Datasets:

mwitiderrick

/

legal

like 0

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "RH2TW3E1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 11, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 0, "text": "Ashok Kumar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "JW9GG2SH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 29, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 16, "text": "Kewal Krishna" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4D79TLLP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 93, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 80, "text": "Supreme Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/659917" }

{ "text": "Ashok Kumar and Kewal Krishna preferred a petition for Special Leave before the Supreme Court." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/9886500" }

{ "text": "It is clarified that 8% meant for widow and 2% for divorcee would be on the 30% seats meant for women and not on the total posts." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "7LZZ1OPD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 40, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 36, "text": "Saha" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XRV7IEA4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 265, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 261, "text": "Saha" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1949616" }

{ "text": "It is clear that though the surname Saha may have been assumed by members of other trading castes like the Gandhabaniks, there are families amongst the Sunri caste who are economically advanced and form a definite group and whose only insignia are the surname 'Saha' and their dislike for the original occupation of distilling liquor." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UK2BAFM3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 66, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 3, "text": "Sevaka Perumal etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, AIR 1991 (SC) 1463" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3JZ9WCA0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 81, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 68, "text": "Supreme Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/140182780/" }

{ "text": "In Sevaka Perumal etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, AIR 1991 (SC) 1463, Supreme Court held that :-\n \"In a trial for murder it is not an absolute necessity or an essential ingredient to establish corpus delicti." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/414190" }

{ "text": "In the said statement, P.W. 1 clearly stated that he knows A-3 right from the year 1987; while so, when it came to evidence he spoke as if A-3 was a stranger to him." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/842404" }

{ "text": "The learned Advocate-General has given three reasons in support of that contention." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1116196" }

{ "text": "As it was the mistake of the counsel he filed a petition for necessary amendment." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "D1XAF9ER", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 16, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 3, "text": "Vasu Deo Ojha" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1572167" }

{ "text": "In Vasu Deo Ojha's case the Division Bench found the slips on which reliance was placed for the State, to be unacceptable as warrants because the endorsements on the slips bore no date nor stated that detenus concerned were remanded to jail custody." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "AQR83V3P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 79, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 69, "text": "02.12.1997" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "JM18BD1X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 160, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 153, "text": "Suseela" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1168238" }

{ "text": "The crux of the allegations against the appellant/accused is that on 02.12.1997 at 12 mid night, he trespassed into the residential building of deceased Suseela, aged 45 years, the mother of PW1." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1553350" }

{ "text": "The jewels of the petitioner was received by the respondent and pledged in a bank." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "K7WKLYPF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 229, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 173, "text": "Misc. Criminal Application Nos.15677/2014 and 16609/2014" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/137616601" }

{ "text": "It appears that the accused persons got confused with the two paras referred to above and therefore, thought fit to file an application for clarification/modification being Misc. Criminal Application Nos.15677/2014 and 16609/2014." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "5OLS1LKI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 26, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 9, "text": "14 December, 2008" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NG324HFX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 87, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 44, "text": "Institute of Business and Bio-Science, Kota" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZF2KROZJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 127, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 121, "text": "Behrod" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SGP8KQ2R", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 145, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 139, "text": "Jaipur" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OM6BWOCS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 166, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 149, "text": "15 December, 2008" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1948814" }

{ "text": "\nThat on 14 December, 2008, the students of Institute of Business and Bio-Science, Kota, came on tour and after visiting Behrod arrived at Jaipur on 15 December, 2008." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "6040L28L", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 92, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 86, "text": "Madras" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/68876" }

{ "text": "Court was capable of operating on sale transactions concluded outside the province of Madras." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "XDZTGJOX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 102, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 85, "text": "Robort P. Collier" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "KKEH8JBM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 156, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 121, "text": "judicial committee of Privy council" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1086058/" }

{ "text": "In James Dunber Smith v. Her Majesty the Queen, (1877-78)3 App. Case 614, 623 JC Sir Robort P. Collier, speaking for the judicial committee of Privy council, used the phrase `the requirements of substantial justice', while in Arthur John Specman v. Plumstead District Board of Works, (1884-85) 10 App.Case 229, 240, Earl of Selbourne, S.C. preferred the phrase `the substantial requirement of justice'." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1776521" }

{ "text": "It appears to me that there would be no rational basis for classification in putting impleaded parties or their representatives against whom the suit has been dismissed as one class, different from persons who were not unpleaded in the suit." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "TQCBBVQ2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 27, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 24, "text": "CBI" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/166102025/" }

{ "text": "He further deposed that CBI had interrogated him in this case." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NYYKRJTN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 147, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 136, "text": "Section 173" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ULROLAI7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 155, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 148, "text": "Cr.P.C." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "X1GQUDC1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 245, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 233, "text": "Gurdev Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3Y4LSGMI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 263, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 253, "text": "Hari Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "HBQYTLGS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 290, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 268, "text": "Teja @ Tejwinder Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FYMHC0B9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 310, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 298, "text": "Rattan Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/46074810" }

{ "text": "Counsel for the petitioner/complainant contends that an inadvertent mistake, which had occurred during the presentation of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C., wherein through oversight, statements of two eye-witnesses/injured, namely, Gurdev Singh son of Hari Singh and Teja @ Tejwinder Singh son of Rattan Singh, could not be attached with the report, although, both of them were cited as eye witnesses/injured and their medico legal reports were attached with the report." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1JO2G7T6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 89, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 79, "text": "03.12.2014" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "D0QL2LAI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 228, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 196, "text": "Sri.Ram Builders and Contractors" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/192340928/" }

{ "text": "In this regard, the Petitioners have produced Ex.P.28 Salary Certificate dated 03.12.2014, which disclosed that, at the time of accident, the deceased was working as a part time Accountant in M/s Sri.Ram Builders and Contractors and his last drawn salary was Rupees 9,500/- per month." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "JPJ8L4YB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 76, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 58, "text": "Adi Nath Das Gupta" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "Z70YDZ5V", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 125, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 106, "text": "Sarawgi Trading Co." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/279656" }

{ "text": "The plaintiff examined two witnesses, the first being one Adi Nath Das Gupta, as assistant in the firm of Sarawgi Trading Co." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "URP1T7ZS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 90, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 72, "text": "Vinod Kumar Roosia" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1381651/" }

{ "text": "In this connection it is also necessary to refer to the evidence of one Vinod Kumar Roosia PW 11 who was examined to prove the inquest panchnama." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "JJMIKZE4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 167, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 154, "text": "Peer Mohammad" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CYI40O78", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 205, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 196, "text": "Peer Mohd" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/77372393" }

{ "text": "So far as the contributory negligence is concerned, while refuting the contention of appellant respondent, the Tribunal relied upon the statement of PW-2 Peer Mohammad who is an eye witness. PW-2 Peer Mohd., has made statement that accident occurred because of rash and negligent driving of the Bus of the appellant." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YB8ID7CM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 31, "text": "order 9 rule 7" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "HS3RHUW1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 49, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 46, "text": "CPC" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PGMJT9XL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 71, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 60, "text": "Section 151" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BMTFM1R1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 75, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 72, "text": "CPC" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "X3W4RAJ7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 191, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 183, "text": "2.4.2012" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/7015327/" }

{ "text": "An application was filed under order 9 rule 7 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for setting aside the ex­parte order passed against the respondent No.3 which was allowed vide order dated 2.4.2012 of my learned predecessor." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Z8SW08J7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 63, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 54, "text": "31.3.1995" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1189440/" }

{ "text": "------------ Profit & Loss Account for the year ended 31.3.1995 is also relevant which is reproduced hereunder:- ALOK NURSING HOME PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31ST MARCH, 1995 INCOME SCHEDULE AMOUNT(Rs.) AMOUNT(Rs.) ------ -------- ----------- ------------ NURSING HOME CHARGES 3,839,830.00 CONSULTATION CHARGES 304,615.00 OTHER INCOME ------------ RENT RECEIVED 25,000.00 INTEREST ON BANK DEPOSITS 22,172.30 47,172.30 --------- ------------ TOTAL 4,191,617.30 ------------ EXPENDITURE ----------- BANK INTEREST AND CHARGES 82,224.74" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "XGXF0823", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 85, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 12, "text": "Ambika Prasad Mishra v. State of U.P. and Ors., [1980] 3 SCC 719 at 72-23" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/427114/" }

{ "text": "Moreover in Ambika Prasad Mishra v. State of U.P. and Ors., [1980] 3 SCC 719 at 72-23 para 5 &\n6." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DKSDSTW5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 55, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 2, "text": "Vide Karan Singh and Ors. v. Emperor, AIR 1928 All 25" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q7436X27", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 104, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 57, "text": "State v. Fateh Bahadur and Ors. AIR 1958 All. 1" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3ZMOFFBR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 192, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 110, "text": "K. Abdul Rahiman and Ors. Divisional Forest Officer and Anr., AIR 1989 Ker. 1 (FB)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1625909" }

{ "text": "[(Vide Karan Singh and Ors. v. Emperor, AIR 1928 All 25; State v. Fateh Bahadur and Ors. AIR 1958 All. 1; and K. Abdul Rahiman and Ors. Divisional Forest Officer and Anr., AIR 1989 Ker. 1 (FB)]\n \n\n20." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/80201700" }

{ "text": "The Investigating Officer also did not find any blood anywhere." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QBYD6BKG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 14, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 4, "text": "Jethmalani" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "N9VO2T2J", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 110, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 85, "text": "Union Carbide Corporation" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MVYX4O37", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 195, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 178, "text": "W.P. No.3346/2015" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/63084991" }

{ "text": "Mr. Jethmalani, rightly drew analogy from the dictum in Paragraph 101 in the case of Union Carbide Corporation (supra) wherein it is observed that the President cannot be liable W.P. No.3346/2015 to arrest, imprisonment, or detention, while he in the discharge of the duties of his office; and for this purpose his person must be deemed, in civil cases, at least, to possess an official inviolability." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QQX4QAAB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 31, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 28, "text": "CBI" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YYUXS9W8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 35, "text": "04/01/2013" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MS9HICHW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 87, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 77, "text": "27/12/2012" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0IM41UTK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 112, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 95, "text": "Himmat Singh Brar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "R8VDQKJ1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 191, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 157, "text": "Director­Iris Cabs Private Limited" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1JPXJZ9H", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 330, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 321, "text": "New Delhi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/149840195/" }

{ "text": "This case was registered by CBI on 04/01/2013 on the written complaint dated 27/12/2012 of Sh. Himmat Singh Brar, complainant (herein after referred as PW6) Director­Iris Cabs Private Limited that his company had laid claim for Abatement and Cenvat credit in the office of Deputy Commissioner of Service Tax Division­II, New Delhi." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "OFKH38ZB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 56, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 11, "text": "State of Gujarat v. Pratamsing Narsinh Parmar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UO0Q86XV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 146, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 129, "text": "Forest Department" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8VUOID2Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 170, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 163, "text": "Gujarat" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LJRT7H00", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 328, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 305, "text": "Industrial Disputes Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/16293958/" }

{ "text": "In case of State of Gujarat v. Pratamsing Narsinh Parmar, (supra) the question for consideration in that appeal was, whether the Forest Department in the State of Gujarat wherein the respondent was appointed as a 'Clerk' can be held to be \"an industry\" within the meaning of the said expression under the Industrial Disputes Act." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/39434590/" }

{ "text": "Thereafter, he alongwith father and brother of Prosecutirix went to PS Kamla Market and informed the police about the same." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "2M6JZKXQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 11, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "1.9.2006" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "KSU2F32N", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 116, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 81, "text": "Thayarammal Poly Clinic, Coimbatore" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/104822134" }

{ "text": "On 1.9.2006, they have brought P.W.1, an unwed pregnant girl of 16 years old, to Thayarammal Poly Clinic, Coimbatore." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "J8HIMO7N", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 64, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 55, "text": "7-3- 1951" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1332957" }

{ "text": "The objection was dismissed by the Deputy Custodian on 7-3- 1951." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "AGHNXAB2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 98, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 43, "text": "Forensic Science Laboratory, Government of NCT of Delhi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UVVXNPR6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 113, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 100, "text": "Malviya Nagar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "56K2YS4E", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 124, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 115, "text": "New Delhi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1745686" }

{ "text": "The sample marked Ext. `A' was sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Government of NCT of Delhi, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi for Chemical analysis." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "PDYDB5YS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 199, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 161, "text": "Regular Second Appeal No. 2805 of 2009" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1483790" }

{ "text": "What is meant by it is explained further by widening the ambit of the section by use of the word 'shall' and the expression \"all suits of a civil nature\" unless Regular Second Appeal No. 2805 of 2009 [13] \"expressly or impliedly barred\". \n\n 28." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "TXRZJACU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 80, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 58, "text": "Supreme Court of India" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MAEE2SPU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 172, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 167, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/108020097" }

{ "text": "That the aforesaid observations are 'law declared' by the Supreme Court of India, and are binding 20 Cri.Appeal 972-12 on all Courts Tribunals within the Territory of India, cannot be doubted for a moment." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "3V5BJPQE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 43, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 38, "text": "Kiran" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4AIZ4K63", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 68, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 63, "text": "Lalit" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "K1JZOGHZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 94, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 88, "text": "Ranglo" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MEYEC12Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 131, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 126, "text": "Ashok" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1386846" }

{ "text": "She has stated that the accused No. 2-Kiran, the accused No. 3-Lalit, the accused No. 4-Ranglo (Ramesh) and the accused No. 5-Ashok and two unknown persons were giving" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "7PHSKXKJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 207, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 196, "text": "Article 265" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WCQZ121O", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 227, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 215, "text": "Constitution" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1920671" }

{ "text": "All these cases are clearly distinguishable, and the only rule that emerges from these decisions is that no tax can be levied without the authority of law, the very principle which is embodied in Article 265 of the Constitution." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "31Y6TURY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 11, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 1, "text": "R.K. GAUBA" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UTHL4Q27", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 62, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 13, "text": "District & Sessions Judge (South) Saket/New Delhi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/100643817/" }

{ "text": "(R.K. GAUBA) District & Sessions Judge (South) Saket/New Delhi." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1565002" }

{ "text": "In the present case, if there was no impediment in law the High Court could therefore, though allowing the appeal of the State by dismissing the plaintiff's suits against it, give the plaintiff a decree against any or all the other defendants who were parties to the appeal as respondents." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1248834" }

{ "text": "But it is a judgment giving effect to the right of the petitioners to annual cash bonus under the Settlement by issuing a writ of mandamus directing the" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "E8BFK5XS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 60, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 40, "text": "Sections 302 and 201" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZLOVVFG9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 64, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 61, "text": "IPC" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/184587709" }

{ "text": "They were charged for the offence under Sections 302 and 201 IPC." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "M0AX70TZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 14, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 3, "text": "Section 200" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YNGV2DDR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 22, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 15, "text": "Cr.P.C." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/193526216" }

{ "text": "\n\n Section 200 Cr.P.C. reads as under :\n200. Examination of complainant." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HQFONT15", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 67, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 3, "text": "All India Films Corporations V. Raja Gian Nath (1969 (3) SCC 79)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NHK8V99W", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 112, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 99, "text": "Supreme Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/55409615/" }

{ "text": "In All India Films Corporations V. Raja Gian Nath (1969 (3) SCC 79) relied upon supra, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has opined about how rights of mortgagees are extinguished." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "GJT2L1TN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 11, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 0, "text": "Chapter XII" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/78244" }

{ "text": "Chapter XII provides the <span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_12\">Crl.R.P.No.3953/2007 13</span> procedure for information in investigation of the offence by the police." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "F97J14RM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 41, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 9, "text": "ARUN KUMAR AGARWAL v. RADHA ARUN" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2NO4WJXU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 85, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 47, "text": "Division Bench of Karnataka High Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/73223469" }

{ "text": "\n\n16. In ARUN KUMAR AGARWAL v. RADHA ARUN 4, a Division Bench of Karnataka High Court observed similarly under similar circumstances as follows: \"Where such adulterer is named in the petition and evidence is let in to show that the spouse had intercourse with such person, the Court will have to record a finding that the spouse had a voluntary sexual intercourse with such named person." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "SA364S0E", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 74, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 65, "text": "16.8.2005" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/139706240" }

{ "text": "Objections were filed by the employer and rejoinder was filed on 16.8.2005 (annexure no.25) by the Federation." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "4V88SSI0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 60, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 51, "text": "17.4.1969" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FL2HFU4E", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 74, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 65, "text": "19.5.1970" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LRCKMXMW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 206, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 195, "text": "section 122" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6GBKH7R7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 243, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 214, "text": "Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/971610" }

{ "text": "Since the order sought to be implemented are dated 17.4.1969 and 19.5.1970, the execution application which was filed in 1971 was well within three years of the period of limitation expressed in section 122 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HMWO0H9B", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 27, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 5, "text": "Articles 31-A and 31-B" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "T6YJNT34", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 47, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 35, "text": "Constitution" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0N8OIJK0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 69, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 57, "text": "9th Schedule" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/341651" }

{ "text": "That Articles 31-A and 31-B of the Constitution with the 9th Schedule are void." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "52MTYEUC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 176, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 153, "text": "Industrial Disputes Act" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TAIYK8J3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 289, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 276, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "JA1ECQ67", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 303, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 297, "text": "Kamath" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/897613" }

{ "text": "The Tribunal's application of the law or inference from such fact that he still remained a clerk 2nd, therefore, was a workman within the meaning of the Industrial Disputes Act is a manifest error patent on the face of the proceedings and within the doctrine laid down by the Supreme Court in the Kamath decision." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/189285249" }

{ "text": "The Scheme of the Act as well as the Rules provide the safeguards not to levy any excise duty when the factory suspends its production for more than 15 days continuously after adhering to the procedure for availing the abatement from the levy of excise duty." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "D5GA2OWO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 66, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 38, "text": "sub-section (4) of Section4A" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LO8U7XX4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 107, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 97, "text": "14.05.2003" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YADGELEX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 282, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 269, "text": "dt.01.03.2008" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/40668339/" }

{ "text": "We find that though the provisions of sub-section (4) of Section4A was brought into statute from 14.05.2003, how to re-determine the RSP in the case of mis-declared RSP was not \u0013prescribed\u0014 by the Central Government till the issuance of Notification No.13/2008-CE(NT), dt.01.03.2008." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ALNMJQWH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 65, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 55, "text": "Apex Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "J2AB1L1X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 136, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 82, "text": "Bakshish Singh Vs. State of Punjab\" (AIR 1971 SC 2016)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "24GI93TP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 200, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 142, "text": "Kanbi Karsan Jadav Vs. State of Gujarat\" (AIR 1966 SC 821)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/188549797" }

{ "text": "Reliance has been placed on the judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of \"Bakshish Singh Vs. State of Punjab\" (AIR 1971 SC 2016) and \"Kanbi Karsan Jadav Vs. State of Gujarat\" (AIR 1966 SC 821) in which it is held that the accused would have given an information and dead body was discovered on that information then it is not a conclusive proof against the accused." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YA33MICS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 155, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 133, "text": "DINESH KUMAR Committee" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "I3VXPP5C", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 209, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 199, "text": "2015.07.06" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/97997762" }

{ "text": "Applications pending under the Compassionate Appointment Scheme as on the date on which this new Scheme is approved by the Executive DINESH KUMAR Committee of the Central Board will be dealt with in 2015.07.06 11:08" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "0HWRRIGC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 133, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 123, "text": "19.10.2011" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/43836141" }

{ "text": "It was also submitted that further investigation during pendency of the petition and pursuant to the aforesaid order dated 19.10.2011 had served no purpose at all, insofar as it has been conducted under supervision of the same higher officer and has not unearthed any material leading to explaining the whole conspiracy and the role played by individuals other than the persons already accused in the charge-sheet filed, as aforesaid." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "V12DUJUL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 114, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 95, "text": "Safdarjung Hospital" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/25301707/" }

{ "text": "The petitioner after the accident was taken to a private hospital from where he was shifted to Safdarjung Hospital." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "064MBL2W", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 95, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 91, "text": "MACT" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/43566304" }

{ "text": "These appeals are preferred against the judgment and award passed by the learned Member of MACT as stated above." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1M5KWNC6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 209, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 119, "text": "HDFC ERGO General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Lalta Devi & Ors., MAC. APP. 189/2014 decided" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "14JFZQU3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 223, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 213, "text": "12.01.2015" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/199011660" }

{ "text": "As far as addition towards future prospects is concerned, the issue has been examined at great length by this Court in HDFC ERGO General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Lalta Devi & Ors., MAC. APP. 189/2014 decided on 12.01.2015." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "S6GMS9PC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 147, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 132, "text": "Jindal Hospital" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/98972904" }

{ "text": "From the statement of PW-20, it is evident that after getting treatment in civil hospital for two hours, the patient was shifted to Jindal Hospital at 10.30 a.m." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "AHAZ4L1K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 46, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 37, "text": "20.2.2005" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1756335" }

{ "text": "The autopsy of the limbs was done on 20.2.2005" }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1057586" }

{ "text": "The learned Chief Justice further held that the nature of proceedings in contempt were such, as not to bring them within definition of an offence within the meaning of Criminal P. C." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "PB0XKR0R", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 102, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 91, "text": "Section 404" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9ST892H3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 106, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 103, "text": "IPC" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/129567883" }

{ "text": "However, he was rightly convicted and sentenced for commission of offence punishable under Section 404 IPC." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "E5G8OJCI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 72, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 63, "text": "Dharamvir" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "S8KAR2MF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 81, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 77, "text": "Anil" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2KSS642R", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 110, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 97, "text": "Sukhvir Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6WW1MTO5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 129, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 116, "text": "Mahavir Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/158255212/" }

{ "text": "He further deposed that he came to know the name of drivers as Dharamvir and Anil and of cleaner Sukhvir Singh from Mahavir Singh." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "BSQX5TBB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 32, "text": "Section 19(1)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "F3BIH8OX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 75, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 53, "text": "Karnataka Civii Courts" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/57857616" }

{ "text": "The Ltatdguaghev.efnb1oyet:1 in Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civii Courts Aet_ 'statihg\"e:'V_.tt{en the a1t1ount or vaiue of the subject matter of \"._tZ.h€ o:'i.gt'h;9.1 suit or proceeding does not exceed Rupees Ten appeai shat} tie to the District Cotm', Clearly denotes that h ités the value of the subject matter at the origins} preeeectirzg that determines the appeliate fomm." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QFQ46Q3Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 13, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 4, "text": "Sridharan" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/106827301" }

{ "text": "Mr. Sridharan would engage us in a very detailed discussion, but what one finds is that if the legal issue is settled, SRP 77/83 WP2119.16.doc then, the peripheral or secondary matters can always be considered and decided on case to case basis." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "F73CTEGT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 141, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 130, "text": "27.03.2007-" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/62125967/" }

{ "text": "As could be seen from the impugned judgment, the Mahazar, IMV report and seizure of the vehicle was done on the same day i.e., on 27.03.2007- the date on which the complaint was lodged which was about 2 months after the date of the alleged accident." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "XSWYXZJI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 72, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 57, "text": "Kollegala Taluk" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "A2HII2S4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 126, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 102, "text": "Charnarajanagar District" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/117703777" }

{ "text": "S .T.. Road', \\.A|| are' Mlgslim by Caste \" --,and__R/at Kollegala Taluk, _ \"'--'_K0_lle\"gala town, . Charnarajanagar District." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "6W4BV21H", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 32, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 22, "text": "Section 11" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/700266" }

{ "text": "\n It may be said that Section 11 applies when the failure is to use all reasonable dispatch in entering on and proceeding with the reference and not when it is to use all reasonable dispatch in only proceeding with the reference." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "BWG37PWV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 22, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 0, "text": "Ogston ana Tennant Co." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/451537" }

{ "text": "Ogston ana Tennant Co. almost copied these words \"London Candles\" with their labels." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "9KSZ93AH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 19, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 7, "text": "Naveen Malik" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NBR4UPG8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 57, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 50, "text": "Haryana" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "27O0PBVU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 78, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 70, "text": "Abhishek" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GQTTX052", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 177, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 168, "text": "10.5.2003" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1205003" }

{ "text": "\n\n Ms. Naveen Malik, Additional Advocate General, Haryana argued that Abhishek aged about one year and seven months was seen last time in the company of the accused on 10.5.2003." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "83VN1GIY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 10, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 4, "text": "Chagla" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/174403392" }

{ "text": "Mr. Chagla submitted that the plaintiffs had, more than three years prior to the filing of the Originating Summons, disputed the interpretation of the same clauses of which they now seek an interpretation." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "MMSW6PX7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 16, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 0, "text": "RCA No. 132/2011" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YN5WOKZ0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 156, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 145, "text": "Section 340" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AXJ8DWYE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 171, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 164, "text": "Cr.P.C." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/76733538/" }

{ "text": "RCA No. 132/2011 has been filed by Regular Civil Appeals No. 37/2011 & 132/2011 Page No. 2/14 the defendant no. 1 by which his application under Section 340 of the Cr.P.C. was dismissed." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/710325" }

{ "text": "But this is not the only consideration that should weigh with a court in applying the provisions of the Act to prosecutions thereunder." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "CR97FP55", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 110, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 88, "text": "District Judge, Bhopal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BT3PHK82", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 127, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 117, "text": "section 27" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "O2B2U3LN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 157, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 131, "text": "M.P. Public Trust Act 1951" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2VX6VG1Q", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 198, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 188, "text": "02-03-2010" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "E9GSEXBR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 262, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 252, "text": "Section 24" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "D42QIUZG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 291, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 270, "text": "M.P. Public Trust Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/161369376" }

{ "text": "Against this order, records indicate that the petitioner preferred an appeal before the District Judge, Bhopal under section 27 of M.P. Public Trust Act 1951 and the same was dismissed on 02-03-2010 on the ground that the order is not appellable under Section 24 of the M.P. Public Trust Act." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "MSDD8JI7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 80, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 67, "text": "Section 498-A" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "C51FCPBE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 101, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 84, "text": "Indian Penal Code" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9S884QEK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 135, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 129, "text": "Renuka" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1KZCO9B0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 235, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 223, "text": "Laxminarayan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZOZNGGIW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 271, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 265, "text": "Renuka" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/134169359" }

{ "text": "Learned A.P.P. fairly states that though technically no case under Section 498-A of Indian Penal Code is made out; harassment to Renuka is sufficiently established on record by examining these witnesses, as also P.W.11 - Laxminarayan, who happens to be father of Renuka." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DMS6QELR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 78, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 67, "text": "Article 226" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "U2RVTJM1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 107, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 86, "text": "Constitution of India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/637971" }

{ "text": "The appellant thereafter filed a writ petition in this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the decision of the Board of Revenue." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UNOKBAHF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 104, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 98, "text": "Sanyal" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/897613" }

{ "text": "Prima facie, one should have thought it was difficult to believe that not only the designation of Sanyal was changed and he was described as a Junior Grade Assistant but also his emoluments increased to Rs. 575/- per month and yet his work remained exactly the same." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UW0HYT7V", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 84, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 75, "text": "15.2.2001" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SSZMUC99", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 133, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 110, "text": "Dental Council of India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/121951" }

{ "text": "The aforesaid application was finally disposed of by this Hon'ble Court on 15.2.2001 interalia, directing the Dental Council of India to take appropriate action to recognise the degrees of the students." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "A7QF2GH2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 55, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 42, "text": "Supreme Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/902820" }

{ "text": "It is well-settled that a decision of the Supreme Court cannot be ignored on the ground that there the Lordships have not considered the question of public policy." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "MJZLY1KF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 38, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 8, "text": "Indian National Congress (INC)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "39FLFE55", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 90, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 84, "text": "Kerala" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "HQKVZENI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 101, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 92, "text": "Karnataka" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4H3PF8F7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 120, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 106, "text": "Andhra Pradesh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/671144" }

{ "text": "\n\n \"The Indian National Congress (INC) has pioneered reservations for minorities in Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh in Government employment and education on the basis of their social and economic backwardness." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/227285" }

{ "text": "In the present case, however nothing like that has happened: on the contrary, the Magistrate was postponing the inquiry from lime to lime and was awaiting the submission of the final charge-sheet by the police." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/183366665" }

{ "text": "In my view, therefore having sought an interim relief and an order thereon having been passed, the respondent/workman cannot possibly be contended to seek the same relief as an interim relief in the present application." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "R4HWCHWN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 107, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 103, "text": "Pore" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DGGRGQFW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 165, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 160, "text": "Kolad" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QV1M1R17", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 279, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 271, "text": "Dattaram" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "VC71MPVZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 287, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 283, "text": "Roha" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1988488" }

{ "text": "If it can be said that these armed constables had to take their orders from the accused head constable Pore as the official in-charge of the police out-post at Kolad then they might as well be directed by the accused head constable, to give effect to his threat, to take Dattaram to Roha in a hand-cuffed condition." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EGJ1NBNN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 60, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 18, "text": "Leather Industries Development Corporation" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1BFVM6MH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 123, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 102, "text": "W. P. No. 854 of 1979" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1RSO2SVK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 211, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 203, "text": "7-9-1973" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/828663" }

{ "text": "Now coming to the Leather Industries Development Corporation -- which is the Corporation concerned in W. P. No. 854 of 1979 -- it was directed to be created by the Government in G. O. Ms. No. 835, dated 7-9-1973." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/167695969/" }

{ "text": "The plaintiff filed the replication and reiterated the averments made in the plaint." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "4YMXYZ3T", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 143, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 132, "text": "Section 376" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3JC7GDL0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 147, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 144, "text": "IPC" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1321006" }

{ "text": "It was, under these circumstances, that the trial Court awarded R.I. for 3 years, to the accused, for the offence, punishable under Section 376 IPC." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1F1GDLWI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 81, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 69, "text": "Syed Mohamed" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/495790" }

{ "text": "Before the Tribunal, claimant No. 1 was examined as PW 1 besides one Syed Mohamed as PW 2." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "0PJN02NO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 28, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 10, "text": "Hubli Municipality" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "D1RKC4UD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 96, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 75, "text": "Sections 80 and 81(1)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "I1OODLFT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 139, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 104, "text": "Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FBVVRPNP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 153, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 144, "text": "31-3-1939" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1978666" }

{ "text": "There the Hubli Municipality published a now revised assessment-list under Sections 80 and 81(1) of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925, on 31-3-1939." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "4EKQ2WNG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 131, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 124, "text": "Haryana" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/694211" }

{ "text": "The said test was also contemplated to be conducted for the Self Financing Affiliated Colleges of Education in the State of Haryana." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "8CCJ509V", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 136, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 128, "text": "MRTP Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1274953" }

{ "text": "Providing for imposition of a premium which is nothing but a fee, will have to be held to be ultra vires, the provisions of the MRTP Act." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/42647" }

{ "text": "it is no business of the police to continue with the investigation or to start a fresh investigation." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1495649" }

{ "text": "We, therefore, quash Ext. P-2 order to the extent it suspends the results of the petitioner's Pre-Degree examination and debars him from appearing for any examination or conducting studies." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "CIU4QQ4X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 28, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 18, "text": "21.12.2012" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NJWZ40VB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 116, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 33, "text": "New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Patiala ......Appellant(s) Versus Smt. Rajo Devi & ors" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/58119806" }

{ "text": "Date of decision: 21.12.2012 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Patiala ......Appellant(s) Versus Smt. Rajo Devi & ors." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YQ3WKDQ8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 38, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 33, "text": "s 166" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ME4X8CL3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 46, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 39, "text": "M.V Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/85739561/" }

{ "text": "As the petition has been filed U/s 166 M.V Act it was incumbent upon the petitioner to prove that she sustained injuries in an accident caused due to the rash and negligent driving by respondent No.1, the driver of the offending vehicle No.DL­2C­AP­5911. \n\n11." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ANG18DI7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 48, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 38, "text": "Parliament" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/155707572" }

{ "text": "It has been further observed that the Parliament advisedly did not provide for enlargement of time because every elected office has a fixed term, and the election petition challenging the same must be disposed of most expeditiously." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "99EEOO5Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 120, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 102, "text": "Thiruvananthapuram" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1526182" }

{ "text": "\n\n d) The Registry shall forthwith communicate the order to the Superintendent of the Central Prison, Thiruvananthapuram forthwith." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1526351" }

{ "text": "The concept of compensatory taxes was propounded in the case of Automobile Transport , in which compensatory taxes were equated with regulatory taxes." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "F84EJ1Q2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 17, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 4, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "IM91IONH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 72, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 49, "text": "Section 96 (2) (b) (ii)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q16P2GZH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 137, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 113, "text": "Section 149 (2) (a) (ii)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4HSWQDF3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 242, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 165, "text": "Skandia Insurance Company Limited v. Kokilaben Chandravadan ,(1987) 2 SCC 654" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/16174343" }

{ "text": "The Supreme Court observed that the provision of Section 96 (2) (b) (ii) of the Act of 1938 is in parimateria to Section 149 (2) (a) (ii) of the Act and referred to Skandia Insurance Company Limited v. Kokilaben Chandravadan ,(1987) 2 SCC 654 and quoted with approval the following observations:-\n \"12." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "FAFT42D5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 61, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 30, "text": "Cri. Misc. Case No. 737 of 1969" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1572167" }

{ "text": "The third and unreoorted case Cri. Misc. Case No. 737 of 1969." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "K6B3XFP6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 98, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 90, "text": "Kolhapur" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1279818" }

{ "text": "It is not disputed before us by the counsel on both sides that there is only one Court at Kolhapur, viz., the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LJ1D8BD2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 10, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 0, "text": "Section 17" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7TRSB8S3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 34, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 14, "text": "the Registration Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/137083742/" }

{ "text": "Section 17 of the Registration Act clearly provides that any document (other than testamentary instruments) which purports or <span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_22\">CS No. 07/13 Page 22 of 35</span> operates to create, declare, assign, limit or extinguish whether in present or in future any right, title or interest whether vested or contingent of the value of Rs. 100 and upwards to or in immovable property." }