Datasets:

mwitiderrick

/

legal

like 0

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1903603/" }

{ "text": "For the purpose of brevity, the various petitions, orders, rules, etc. shall be referred to as follows:-\n (1) Air India as \"A.I.\"" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1RX1SMKO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 60, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 50, "text": "Parliament" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/254611/" }

{ "text": "To carry the matter further : Suppose the Federal Parliament were to, lay a tax on the owners of motor cars, and carts, and guns, and dogs and sheep." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "4PCUU9SL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 68, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 58, "text": "Tamil Nadu" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QG1IP5E6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 145, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 131, "text": "Andhra Pradesh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/128816471" }

{ "text": "As is apparent from the above, the brands discontinued in Tamil Nadu by the first petitioner and the others, have been approved in Andhra Pradesh at the existing prices (1999-2000)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "BLSRZR9Y", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 16, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "March 1, 1960" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "S4T3WF3G", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 106, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 93, "text": "March 1, 1960" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1476635/" }

{ "text": "On March 1, 1960, the Governor issued a notification containing Order No. GAD 7 ORR 60 dated March 1, 1960, ordering \"that for direct recruitment to appointments and posts in the services of the State, reservation for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes shall be 15% and 3%." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "FSXPKA70", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 59, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 46, "text": "Bharat Bhusan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UXKZIQT8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 146, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 132, "text": "Bharat Bhushan" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/804595" }

{ "text": "In his cross-examination on behalf of accused Bharat Bhusan nothing of consequence has come out and statement that he had gone with Bharat Bhushan to the cinema House has not been shaken." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "W741BGMR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 117, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 4, "text": "UTTAR PRADESH ABSORPTION OF RETRENCHED EMPLOYEES OF GOVERNMENT OR PUBLIC CORPORATIONS IN GOVERNMENT SERVICE RULES" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1826703" }

{ "text": "THE UTTAR PRADESH ABSORPTION OF RETRENCHED EMPLOYEES OF GOVERNMENT OR PUBLIC CORPORATIONS IN GOVERNMENT SERVICE RULES." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "E096F68K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 19, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 0, "text": "Satya Narayan Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/920550" }

{ "text": "Satya Narayan Singh was not granted any permit." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "8ESLZ547", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 93, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 76, "text": "\"(2007) 2 SCC 170" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "56I3MAS4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 146, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 108, "text": "Ramdas & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DGMU0BYI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 183, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 170, "text": "Supreme Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/13255571/" }

{ "text": "On the other hand, the Ld.Addl.PP has relied upon the judgment reported as, \"(2007) 2 SCC 170\", titled as, \"Ramdas & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra,\", wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been pleased to hold as under:­ xxxxx \"24. ..........." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "JUO66FLB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 15, "text": "State of Punjab v. Balbirsingh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6MSYGI1W", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 65, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 52, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LUA4OQ1P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 94, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 84, "text": "Section 43" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8RB0QP9A", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 198, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 188, "text": "Section 42" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8NLQCHQS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 214, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 206, "text": "NDPS Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1885670" }

{ "text": "In the case of State of Punjab v. Balbirsingh , the Supreme Court has observed that Section 43 which deals with the power of seizure and arrest in public places is slightly different from Section 42 of the NDPS Act in certain respects." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "MUQAR3ZI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 16, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 4, "text": "Moopil Nayar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "VAMKQG70", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 106, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 89, "text": "Kavalappara State" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1431786/" }

{ "text": "The Moopil Nayar or senior member of this family for the time being was the ruler of the Kavalappara State." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NF3O2T2J", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 24, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 4, "text": "Kamal Kant Khandewal" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/120659930/" }

{ "text": "Sh. Kamal Kant Khandewal, handwriting expert was also examined as R4W3 and relied upon photo enlargements Ex. R4W3/1 to R4W3/9 and their CD Ex. R4W3/10, his report Ex. R4W3/11." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/159485/" }

{ "text": "In order that a deduction may be claimed under its provisions it must be proved first that there was an expenditure, secondly, that the expenditure was not in the nature of a capital expenditure- I am leaving aside the personal expenses-and, thirdly, that it was laid out or expended wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the assessee's business-I am leaving out profession or vocation. \"" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QBGZHKWL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 13, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "24.09.2008" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "JKBQM1LL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 42, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 25, "text": "Amit Kumar Saxena" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UGGREFW2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 73, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 55, "text": "P.S. Malviya Nagar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CJN3TIC4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 142, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 132, "text": "18.09.2008" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8ODQTWNG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 177, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 172, "text": "Noida" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/50170976/" }

{ "text": "On 24.09.2008, informant Amit Kumar Saxena went to the P.S. Malviya Nagar and gave a written complaint (Ex.PW1/A) to police that on 18.09.2008, he left for Saket Mall from Noida at about 6:00 p.m and reached at Saket Mall at about 6:45 p.m." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/159739443/" }

{ "text": "He has also argued that the findings of the said court as well as the reports submitted before the Ld. Trial Court by the Protection Officer, clearly indicate that the appellants were in 'domestic­relationship' with the respondent and the respondent was residing in a \"shared household\" with them, during the relevant period." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "FZXN0Q04", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 49, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 38, "text": "Nehru Place" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MQUNBYAU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 140, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 128, "text": "Abid @ Guddu" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ACBMIOJR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 169, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 156, "text": "PS Govindpuri" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "N8QTA9OP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 210, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 203, "text": "Kalkaji" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/101231420/" }

{ "text": "At about 6:00 pm they were present at Nehru Place bus terminal, a secret informer met him and informed him that a person namely Abid @ Guddu who is a BC of PS Govindpuri will came at near Shamshan Ghat, Kalkaji to meet some person at around 7:00 pm on motorcycle bearing no. 2496 alongwith illegal arms with him." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "7DIID20W", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 22, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 12, "text": "Chaturvedi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "68BJTRLY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 127, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 105, "text": "(1)(1952) 1 L.L.J. 195" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8Y5EYMFW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 139, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 131, "text": "cl. 5(a)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/790887/" }

{ "text": "Mr. Justice Chaturvedi, before whom this application came up for hearing held that the application under (1)(1952) 1 L.L.J. 195. \n\ncl. 5(a) was maintainable and the Appellate Tribunal had erred in holding otherwise." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1309120" }

{ "text": "All these witnesses were included in the list of 36 witnesses mentioned above." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EX5ENICB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 44, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 34, "text": "Tamil Nadu" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/87094770" }

{ "text": "It is stated that in the State of Tamil Nadu when 88 omni buses are paying tax on floor area basis and while so, the writ petitioners, who provided seats below 36, cannot make grievance on levy of tax on floor area basis." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "0K3N1Y40", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 66, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 55, "text": "Mohd. Yunus" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/992008" }

{ "text": "The third objection of the objector is that the bid of Mohd. Yunus of a sum of Rs. 1,05,000/- was accepted and he was asked to deposit 25% of the amount of bid." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/132242000/" }

{ "text": "As discussed above a suit can be withdrawn with or without permission of court." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "M3P0MD76", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 82, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 69, "text": "Sukhdev Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "G40HDMRO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 101, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 87, "text": "Mahender Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "55M1QQYH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 130, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 105, "text": "Police Station Hari Nagar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3QWVPA63", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 180, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 170, "text": "N.M. Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6DKUO3G4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 198, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 195, "text": "CBI" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/110570632/" }

{ "text": "PW14 also admitted to have got registered criminal cases against ASI Sukhdev Singh, HC Mahender Singh of Police Station Hari Nagar prior to May 2007 and at that time Sh. N.M. Singh was the SP of CBI." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "FMV90XZZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 51, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 27, "text": "United States of America" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WLRXTLL1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 178, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 165, "text": "United States" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1548739" }

{ "text": "Under the Constituition of United States of America Amendment 14, no State can make of enforce law which abridges the privileges or immunities of the citizen of the United States." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1362188" }

{ "text": "The section salesmen, propagandists, local travelling salesmen, local salesmen and drivers did not belong to the depot establishment." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/62704485" }

{ "text": "Ordinarily, one would not make such a demand to a person whom he knows is not in a position to meet it." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "T68M8JQS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 12, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 0, "text": "Farooq Hasan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WJ570KVY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 29, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 22, "text": "Kanaram" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "F8EV1FTP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 38, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 31, "text": "Hanuman" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "75CJSQEM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 59, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 40, "text": "Bhanwar alias Bhura" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "S95FJLJA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 67, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 61, "text": "Jeewan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AJD7678Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 76, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 69, "text": "Gopiram" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YKD8WXJX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 87, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 78, "text": "Ratna Ram" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "HNFXI9FQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 96, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 89, "text": "Chhitar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1AFMSXCD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 103, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 98, "text": "Phula" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9EOX2IZJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 113, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 108, "text": "Mohan" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1382858" }

{ "text": "Farooq Hasan, J. \n\n1. Kanaram, Hanuman, Bhanwar alias Bhura, Jeewan, Gopiram, Ratna Ram, Chhitar, Phula and Mohan, all the appellants in this appeal are aggrieved against the judgment dated 23rd April." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LOC4PGFB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 91, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 78, "text": "Supreme Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/55383273" }

{ "text": "In the facts of the case before it, by applying the aforesaid principles, the Supreme Court held that quashing of charge in the criminal proceedings at that stage was not just and proper." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "262I5WCC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 73, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 0, "text": "[1960] 2 SCR 311, The General Manager,\nSouthern Railway v. Rangachari" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1903603/" }

{ "text": "[1960] 2 SCR 311, The General Manager,\nSouthern Railway v. Rangachari" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "OLJKF7XN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 38, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 19, "text": "Laljibhai Joitabhai" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1675727" }

{ "text": "Opponent No. 1A/4, Laljibhai Joitabhai, was party to the original petition also as opponent No. 1." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "N2N4I26P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 79, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 60, "text": "Calcutta High Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/728461" }

{ "text": "This Court, with utmost respect to the learned Judge of the Calcutta High Court, cannot accept and follow the said judgment." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "P3F513F6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 34, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 13, "text": "Santi Ranjan Somaddar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "I3Q0GY2W", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 80, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 72, "text": "1-2-1947" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/734191" }

{ "text": "Respondent 1 Santi Ranjan Somaddar was employed by the petitioner since 1-2-1947 as an assistant bill clerk." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "RTUWX7Q1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 78, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 75, "text": "KGF" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/133475008/" }

{ "text": "On the other hand, it is stated in that document that he was a resident of KGF at the relevant point of time." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NRWMGQHV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 72, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 48, "text": "Government of Puducherry" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TJS5IM0K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 184, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 139, "text": "Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "77SP83C3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 212, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 192, "text": "17th September, 2007" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/654318" }

{ "text": "All these writ petitions have been filed by the Government of Puducherry and its Subordinate Officials challenging the common order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, dated 17th September, 2007, in various original applications filed by different applicants." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EX572ZFQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 10, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 5, "text": "Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/17090381" }

{ "text": "Shri Singh was referring to us in the above context the evidence of PW3, the Investigating Officer." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "T3Y5S1QL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 67, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 49, "text": "Articles 14 and 16" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TU0I1G9A", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 96, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 75, "text": "Constitution of India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1713632" }

{ "text": "To permit any such action would be a negation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "WDLW6GYO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 21, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 5, "text": "Patna High Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AA5NQTVX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 43, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 22, "text": "CWJC No.17151 of 2014" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WO1O7S8Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 58, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 48, "text": "19-04-2017" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PVLWN7FD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 183, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 171, "text": "Section 3(2)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QWOF6TL2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 204, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 191, "text": "Entry Tax Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/29666387" }

{ "text": "Even Patna High Court CWJC No.17151 of 2014 dt. 19-04-2017 though, we find no case made out for allowing the prayer made by the petitioner for declaring second proviso of Section 3(2) of the Entry Tax Act to be ultra vires; nor do we find any case made out for holding that recovery and imposition of entry tax on the petitioner by the impugned order is illegal." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "26JUKF1X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 79, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 12, "text": "CT. A. CT. Chidambaram v. CT. A. CT. Subranianian, AIR 1953 Mad 492" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OPDUE0OF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 192, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 174, "text": "Venkata Rama Aiyar" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/502770" }

{ "text": "The case of CT. A. CT. Chidambaram v. CT. A. CT. Subranianian, AIR 1953 Mad 492 was also referred to by learned Counsel and reliance was placed on the principle laid down by Venkata Rama Aiyar, J., as he then was, at page 497, paragraph 12 of 'the report." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/151828753" }

{ "text": "However, he has not adverted to his statement given on oath as DW1." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UJNW0PDL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 24, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 0, "text": "Sections 260-A and 268-A" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "G87OCCWY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 237, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 224, "text": "Section 268-A" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/262753" }

{ "text": "Sections 260-A and 268-A of the 1961 Act will now have to be interpreted by reading the two harmoniously, so as to give effect to the aforesaid two provisions keeping in mind the objects and the reasons on the basis whereof Section 268-A was inserted into the 1961 Act." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "MEISF94J", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 226, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 205, "text": "section 2 clause (15)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZX9KXV9A", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 353, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 318, "text": "Tax Reference Nos. 10 to 14 of 1975" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1859206/" }

{ "text": "Now before we proceed to consider the true meaning and connotation of the words \"not involving the carrying on of any activity for profit\" occurring at the end of the definition of \"charitable purpose\" in section 2 clause (15), it will be convenient to dispose of a short contention raised on behalf of the Revenue in Tax Reference Nos. 10 to 14 of 1975." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/85776" }

{ "text": "The section makes it clear that excise is levied only on the amount representing the manufacturing cost plus the manufacturing profit and excludes post-manufacturing cost and the profit arising from that post-manufacturing operation, namely selling profit." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "62FCY9XJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 12, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 0, "text": "Pirthi Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/534409" }

{ "text": "Pirthi Singh, Deputy Superintendent of Police, also reached there." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Y7M2FPFR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 117, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 88, "text": "Vidya Varidhi Thirtha Swamiar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9PJLW60N", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 208, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 194, "text": "18 April, 1970" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6K9X87XG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 310, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 289, "text": "Moodanidambur village" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1583107/" }

{ "text": "By that resolution the Municipal Council considered the appeal filed by the. respondent Vidya Varidhi Thirtha Swamiar against the proceedings of the Chief Officer of the Municipal Council dated 18 April, 1970 refusing licence for exhibiting cinematograph films in the building situated in Moodanidambur village." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "OQ98UY2D", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 47, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 18, "text": "Writ Petition No. 621 of 1970" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1J85YHW8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 102, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 77, "text": "Writ Petn No. 619 of 1970" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZSI002SC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 119, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 104, "text": "D. N. Chanchala" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7Y96RKKD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 154, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 141, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UKBJ0KUA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 196, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 186, "text": "Rule 4 (h)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1285748" }

{ "text": "The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 621 of 1970 which was decided along with Writ Petn No. 619 of 1970 (D. N. Chanchala's case supra) by the Supreme Court had challenged the validity of Rule 4 (h) of the rules for selection of candidates for admission." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "RIS2WWTU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 33, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 28, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/13048856" }

{ "text": "There is greater danger, in India, of increase in violent crimes if capital punishment is abandoned, particularly, in respect of professional criminals.\"" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "C49280FP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 93, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 84, "text": "Section 5" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "86SI2CER", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 253, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 227, "text": "Civil Procedure Code, 1908" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1453582" }

{ "text": "As far as the issues framed are concerned, it was contended that though in terms of Section 5 of the Act, the 1st respondent is to dispose of Ext. P1 in accordance with the procedure as applicable while trying a suit under the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, issues were not framed with notice to the parties." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "FR9SUXBY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 13, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 0, "text": "Section 20(2)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/283051" }

{ "text": "Section 20(2) does not provide for a claim in anticipation of a breach of the statutory provisions, under which the employer is bound to pay the minimum wages, if the contract rate of wages was lower." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "A5WAQ0P6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 14, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 4, "text": "Madras Act" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PL9M3G2Y", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 49, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 38, "text": "Pondicherry" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "VKX1J7YG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 118, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 95, "text": "Pondicherry Legislature" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SMOBHQ6Y", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 151, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 140, "text": "Pondicherry" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "L4WP81QO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 248, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 230, "text": "9th November, 1966" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/679175/" }

{ "text": "The Madras Act, which was extended to Pondicherry, was as it stood on let April, 1966, and the Pondicherry Legislature made it effective in Pondicherry by passing the retrospective Amending, Act, which Act itself as. published On 9th November, 1966." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "I2YR4CZR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 16, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 0, "text": "R. M. Hajarnavis" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2560BN9W", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 33, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 21, "text": "G. C. Mathur" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8YCY3LJM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 80, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 59, "text": "C. A. No. 132 of 1955" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/506242/" }

{ "text": "R. M. Hajarnavis and G. C. Mathur, for Intervener No. 2 in C. A. No. 132 of 1955." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "CX7FU6RB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 43, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 15, "text": "Suit No. 625/12 Page No.7/11" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/137271740/" }

{ "text": "On calculation Suit No. 625/12 Page No.7/11 on that basis, the amount of compensation would come to Rs. 3,56,400/- and after addition of a sum of Rs. 30,000/- and Rs. 15,000/- the total amount would be Rs. 4,01,400/-." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "0HT9A5UI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 35, "text": "Article 21" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "F2PGW1BT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 65, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 53, "text": "Constitution" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6VFLGD95", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 146, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 134, "text": "A.R. Antulay" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/16358663" }

{ "text": "(2) The propositions emerging from Article 21 of the Constitution and expounding the right to speedy trial laid down as guidelines in A.R. Antulay case5 adequately take care of right to speedy trial." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "024AXVE1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 118, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 99, "text": "Calcutta High Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "IVD5P6E4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 204, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 189, "text": "Bajaj Auto Ltd." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "KJ7N4E4O", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 256, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 241, "text": "Bajaj Auto Ltd." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DBBTV7PQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 318, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 290, "text": "Balarampur Chinni Mills Ltd." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/25308/" }

{ "text": "Surely, it could not have been the intention to convey that the Tribunal erroneously relied on the Calcutta High Court judgment while deciding the case of RIL, because what the Tribunal in Bajaj Auto Ltd. actually said was that the facts of Bajaj Auto Ltd. were different from the facts in Balarampur Chinni Mills Ltd. (supra)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q3PI19NJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 7, "text": "National Human Rights Commission" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/41067986" }

{ "text": "3) The National Human Rights Commission undertook a comprehensive review of the existing Act and made recommendations for comprehensive amendments therein vide its Annual Report 2001-2002." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "U98QSDJN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 47, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 38, "text": "Section 9" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "VD585RFW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 90, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 72, "text": "Central Government" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GHBOBPZJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 180, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 107, "text": "National Highways Fee (Determination of Rules and Collection) Rules, 2008" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/23318419" }

{ "text": "In exercise of the power conferred by Section 9 of the Act of 1956, the Central Government promulgated The National Highways Fee (Determination of Rules and Collection) Rules, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules of 2008)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "T5LPATLH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 14, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 5, "text": "S.K. Jain" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9XH974LR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 142, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 124, "text": "Roda Ram Lal Chand" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GQU2M46H", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 157, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 146, "text": "Baba Bakala" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PICTS364", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 178, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 161, "text": "Amritsar District" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6G25V49D", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 202, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 183, "text": "September 2,1, 1963" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "G77YTZ8U", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 242, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 232, "text": "Dasti Bahi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/733543/" }

{ "text": "Shri S.K. Jain, Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, P.W. 6, has stated that he inspected the business premises of M/s. Roda Ram Lal Chand at Baba Bakala in Amritsar District, on September 2,1, 1963 and from those premises, the Dasti Bahi, ex. P.Y., was taken into possession by him." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ADIYZ443", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 23, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 20, "text": "KEB" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7BXTQQ7N", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 52, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 43, "text": "27-2-1999" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XWI8J3ES", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 83, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 80, "text": "KEB" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "580UZ1MO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 101, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 87, "text": "Bangalore City" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/726642" }

{ "text": "The Chairman of the KEB sent a reply dated 27-2-1999 explaining the position of KEB: \n\"Bangalore City, for a large part is served by overhead lines extending over 13,574 kms." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1422161" }

{ "text": "I do not think it is necessary to apportion the blame between the Accountant-General and the State Government in the matter of preparation of accounts for the purpose of these cases." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "88IRG096", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 93, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 83, "text": "24.12.2005" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/112217108" }

{ "text": "Since MCrC was filed in 2004 itself and ex-parte judgment and decree was passed on 24.12.2005, the argument that the appellants were aware about the judgment and decree in 2004 is devoid of substance." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YTOPL92O", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 64, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 56, "text": "Bijwasan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SFAPNNHN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 75, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 66, "text": "New Delhi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1411829/" }

{ "text": "It has its registered office at 530/1, 3 and 4, Village Bijwasan, New Delhi." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZXK1K34G", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 60, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 45, "text": "State of Punjab" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1378937" }

{ "text": "Though the learned counsel appearing for the State of Punjab stated that there had been an enquiry, we fail to understand as to how there can be an enquiry without regestering a criminal case." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "AIQIVVUH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 32, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8GCMU682", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 121, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 75, "text": "Zolba vs. Keshao and others, 2008 AIR SCW 2739" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8QNXW2IJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 146, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 133, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XVPZ6JQK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 212, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 198, "text": "Order 8 Rule 1" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1429369" }

{ "text": "A similar view was taken by the Supreme Court in a very recent judgment in Zolba vs. Keshao and others, 2008 AIR SCW 2739, where the Supreme Court held as under :-\n \" The use of the word `shall' in Order 8 Rule 1 by itself is not conclusive to determine whether the provision is mandatory or directory." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "V92ILHSG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 36, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 20, "text": "NAROTTAM KAUSHAL" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QHTIJUS4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 107, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 38, "text": "SPECIAL JUDGE (PC Act)­05, (ACB), (CENTRAL), TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TGS7OHOC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 137, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 108, "text": "Corruption Case No. : 33/2008" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CMYNXUL3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 198, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 156, "text": "Case Identification No. : 02401R0465682008" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0GI673OQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 249, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 233, "text": "Section : 7/8/13" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "W5MZ3K8S", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 287, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 253, "text": "Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UBO8E4PU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 293, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 290, "text": "420" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "X0C7QZG6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 297, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 294, "text": "IPC" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UAVBWVDW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 303, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 298, "text": "STATE" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "T5NL4QLU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 321, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 311, "text": "Om Prakash" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/171461762/" }

{ "text": "IN THE COURT OF SH. NAROTTAM KAUSHAL, SPECIAL JUDGE (PC Act)­05, (ACB), (CENTRAL), TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI Corruption Case No. : 33/2008 FIR No. : 71/2006 Case Identification No. : 02401R0465682008 PS : Anti Corruption Branch Under Section : 7/8/13 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 & 420 IPC STATE Versus Om Prakash S/o Late Shri Bhagat Ram R/o Village & Post Office Mundhela Khurd, Delhi ­110073." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "2VELXKRJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 28, "text": "section 100" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MF3YFKGU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 67, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 47, "text": "Civil Procedure Code" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1664566/" }

{ "text": "When this appeal was heard, section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code after its amendment of 1976 was in force." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LVW3111C", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 88, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 79, "text": "19.5.2003" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QT2NBRFR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 201, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 187, "text": "Harpreet Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FH36ZVZ4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 249, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 234, "text": "Kanwaljit Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/90646729" }

{ "text": "As has already been discussed above, the accused were not identified initially 19.5.2003 when the incident had occurred inasmuch as a search for the accused was made at various places by Harpreet Singh Inspector/SHO (PW17) and by ASI Kanwaljit Singh (PW14)." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/965502/" }

{ "text": "That takes us to the impugned seniority list of 1974." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "IV7R94E1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 56, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 49, "text": "Madaiah" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8FBYKLME", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 68, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 60, "text": "MM Hills" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/177508474" }

{ "text": "12. MW-136 Papa son of Detainecijbr 8 days Hegde Madaiah in MM Hills." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ACISRWFQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 92, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 76, "text": "Amigo Industries" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GBLML2GC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 146, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 130, "text": "Amigo Industries" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/67170784" }

{ "text": "This witness has deposed that the respondent was conducting business of M/s Amigo Industries and was looking after affairs of M/s Amigo Industries and was also interacting with customers and clients." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QQCRM4IN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 49, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 33, "text": "Sundaram Finance" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OL5YCA64", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 103, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 94, "text": "Section 9" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0S6TO1QT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 220, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 210, "text": "Section 11" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/116018390/" }

{ "text": "In fact a Bench of this Court in Sundaram Finance case (supra) while considering the scope of Section 9 of the Act has approached the problem from this perspective and incidental observation has been made that Section 11 does not require the Court to pass a judicial order appointing arbitrator." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "9IK4C5YI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 85, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 55, "text": "Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 1979" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/388259/" }

{ "text": "[1077G]\n\n\n\nJUDGMENT:\n CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 1979." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "OBO32B6M", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 14, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 4, "text": "Apex Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "I9UKRGZP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 502, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 420, "text": "Union of India v. Jai Narayan Singh, 1995 Supp. (4) 672" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OP4VMF1V", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 742, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 707, "text": "State of H.P. v. Suresh Kumar Verma" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/116619499/" }

{ "text": "the Apex Court has observed: \n\n \"3. It is now well settled legal position that the Irrigation Department and Tele­\n communication Department are not an `Industry' \n within the meaning of definition under the Industrial Disputes Act as held in Union of India v. Jai Narayan Singh, 1995 Supp. (4) 672 and in \n State of H.P. v. Suresh Kumar Verma, JT 1996(2)\n \n 455." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1908199" }

{ "text": "I again told him that as per our office order I was to give water only for one hour for a particular area and if he wants supply for any further time more he may go to our office and obtain order to that effect." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "MRJAUSVA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 17, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 4, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NF7G6KYS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 61, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 52, "text": "Section 6" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "F3GT2H0R", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 84, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 65, "text": "General Clauses Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/319991" }

{ "text": "The Supreme Court held that the new Act applies and Section 6 of General Clauses Act is not attracted." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "PDBSRUSY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 6, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 0, "text": "YOGESH" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "V2QLN0YG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 24, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 13, "text": "MAHADEVAPPA" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "EF89GG77", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 60, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 49, "text": "BASAVAKRUPA" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3EYMGNMR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 117, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 92, "text": "NANJANGUD MYSORE DISTRICT" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4U2ZNM6J", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 195, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 186, "text": "BANGALORE" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/145145324" }

{ "text": "YOGESH S/O C MAHADEVAPPA, AGE: 36 YEARS NO.6531, BASAVAKRUPA, 16TH CROSS NAGESHWARAN LAYOUT,NANJANGUD MYSORE DISTRICT WORKING AS MOTOR VEHICLES INSPECTOR AT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE AT BANGALORE WEST 7." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "494QM1TL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 141, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 37, "text": "Appeal Nos. 801 of 1993, 798 of 1993, 800 of 1993, 797 of 1993, 794 of 1993, 796 of 1993 and 795 of 1993" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/731262" }

{ "text": "As a result of the above discussion, Appeal Nos. 801 of 1993, 798 of 1993, 800 of 1993, 797 of 1993, 794 of 1993, 796 of 1993 and 795 of 1993 are allowed and the awards passed against the insurance company are set aside." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "PQ9A3CCY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 238, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 227, "text": "GITA MITTAL" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "F6OTGXWK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 265, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 247, "text": "September 29, 2009" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/97850168" }

{ "text": "Needless to say in case of any difficulty in respect of any of the directions, it is open to any person or party concerned to make appropriate application for consideration. \n\n This matter is disposed of in the above terms. \n\n GITA MITTAL (JUDGE) September 29, 2009 kr" }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/146706738/" }

{ "text": "From bare perusal of documents Ex.DW1/A and DW4/A to Ex.DW4/D, in the light of aforesaid judgment, it appears to be just a guideline to the State mentioned therein to set up administrative machinery to work out the details contained therein in order to implement the Scheme." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HPWV9NK9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 76, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 61, "text": "Hari Prasad Sah" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/50908" }

{ "text": "It was argued on behalf of the petitioners in this case that Hari Prasad Sah, respondent No. 3, was not discharged by the petitioners but he left the job of his own accord." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "N4WS6KIZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 13, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "06.12.2003" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AP9QPHJD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 59, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 41, "text": "P.S Rajender Nagar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "KUV8JVIY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 77, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 67, "text": "J.K. Gupta" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "I7TWHX1P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 144, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 134, "text": "R.K. Gupta" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9EW3NNYF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 202, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 196, "text": "Rohini" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UDCI0CQ0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 209, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 204, "text": "Delhi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "H7SM280X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 278, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 256, "text": "Sir Ganga Ram hospital" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TWUQ2I82", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 292, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 282, "text": "05.12.2003" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/195329907/" }

{ "text": "On 06.12.2003, a complaint was lodged at P.S Rajender Nagar by Sh. J.K. Gupta, brother of deceased to the effect that his brother Dr. R.K. Gupta r/o Apartment no. 89, Priya Apartments, Sector­14, Rohini, Delhi left his house at 10.00 am for his work place Sir Ganga Ram hospital on 05.12.2003." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1337712" }

{ "text": "Therefore, simply because the service Rules have not been amended, that would not be enough to say that the concept of graded promotion is still in existence." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "42SHZQ91", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 86, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 52, "text": "Crl.A.Nos. 786, 795, 919, 926/2001" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DFF39IQM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 135, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 130, "text": "Manoj" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QHPC8TUC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 160, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 157, "text": "FSL" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1739225" }

{ "text": "Further, it was submitted that the prosecution case Crl.A.Nos. 786, 795, 919, 926/2001 Page 15 about use of a dagger, for killing Manoj, is falsified by the FSL report, which revealed that the blood stain on the dagger did not show any reaction, on its testing. \n\n25." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NNPGXTIP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 29, "text": "14.08.2008" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "KF2WTY3J", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 264, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 254, "text": "29.08.2008" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "financial_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/10354745/" }

{ "text": "Legal notice of demand dated 14.08.2008 is Ex. CW1/L, Registered post receipt and UPC certificate vide which the aforesaid notice was sent is Ex. CW1/M and Ex. CW1/N respectively, the returned AD Card is Ex. CW1/O and the reply sent by the accused dated 29.08.2008 is Ex. CW1/P. CW-1" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "PYB09UPN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 76, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 16, "text": "R. v. Australian Stevedoring Industry Board (1952)88 CLR 100" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AL2IEE1Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 104, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 81, "text": "High Court of Australia" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/912566" }

{ "text": "In another case R. v. Australian Stevedoring Industry Board (1952)88 CLR 100 the High Court of Australia was called upon to review the conduct of a Board empowered to cancel the registration of an employer of dock labour if \"satisfied\" that he was unfit to be registered or had so acted as to interfere with the proper performance of stevedoring work." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "B21VS3BR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 33, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 21, "text": "Subhash Jain" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "P4W7Q97N", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 237, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 222, "text": "S.R.Vishwakarma" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1943946" }

{ "text": "20) According to Dr. Subhash Jain (PW4), deceased told to him that she got burnt while cooking food which he recorded in her pre M.L.C. Report Ex. P/4, whereas according to dying declaration Ex. P/8 recorded before him by S.R.Vishwakarma (DW1), deceased told that she got burnt while preparing tea on the stove and spreading of kerosene from the cane." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Y07KPKZQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 33, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 8, "text": "Government of Maharashtra" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "718HT0NF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 102, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 87, "text": "State of Bombay" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/851902/" }

{ "text": "But the Government of Maharashtra issued two. resolutions after the bifurcation of the State of Bombay." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "3IB8XDYL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 124, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 96, "text": "Crl.Appeals.2137 & 2223/2005" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/533925" }

{ "text": "Moreover, all the circumstances should be complete and there should be no gap left in the chain Crl.Appeals.2137 & 2223/2005. 24 of evidence." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QYJ6F3O8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 38, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 7, "text": "HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/64680058" }

{ "text": "* HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI MAC App. No.368 of 2005" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "T4MA4DBD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 119, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 106, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q5R2FV3P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 141, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 127, "text": "Devendra Surti" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BOPZG0CR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 183, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 149, "text": "[1969] 34 FJR 376 ; AIR 1969 SC 63" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/198581" }

{ "text": "Incidentally we may advert to the content of the expression \"professional activity\" as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Dr. Devendra Surti's case [1969] 34 FJR 376 ; AIR 1969 SC 63." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "OMGEA897", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 31, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 12, "text": "High Court of Delhi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7BE6HPJB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 62, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 51, "text": "MACA 682/05" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZAC4V32U", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 79, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 70, "text": "13.1.2010" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CE3QS16X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 107, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 80, "text": "Union of India Vs. Nanisiri" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/137271740/" }

{ "text": "The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in its judgment in MACA 682/05 dated 13.1.2010 Union of India Vs. Nanisiri have laid certain guidelines which are as under regarding depositing of award amount." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "J226LSV0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 4, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 0, "text": "Devi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QYXW73KW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 23, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 14, "text": "Ram Kumar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2M8LAHF5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 50, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 33, "text": "Shri Kashi Prasad" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6N1FIPRM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 72, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 55, "text": "Mohalla Brahampur" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WCETMVHF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 82, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 73, "text": "Ghaziabad" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MKW9PVZX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 86, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 84, "text": "UP" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/33695171/" }

{ "text": "Devi W/o Shri Ram Kumar D/o Late Shri Kashi Prasad R/o Mohalla Brahampur Ghaziabad, UP." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1383250" }

{ "text": "Eventually, the suit has been instituted for the recovery of the outstanding dues under the Bills of Exchange together with interest. \n\n3." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/986468/" }

{ "text": "He strongly recommended to the Chief Minister against interfering with the said reservation." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Y825ANOI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 61, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 38, "text": "Kedia Distilleries Ltd." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "L3WYWDPG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 108, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 72, "text": "Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Company Ltd." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1IL619K2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 137, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 119, "text": "Prakash Industries" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OYSX1A0J", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 173, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 146, "text": "Carews Pharmaceuticals Ltd." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "H3TR816X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 213, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 184, "text": "Seethapur Plywoods Industries" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "O1FMB8EV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 256, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 222, "text": "Patheja Forgings & Auto Parts Ltd." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/238906/" }

{ "text": "Straight lease transactions :\n(1) M/s Kedia Distilleries Ltd. \n\n(2) M/s Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Company Ltd. \n\n(3) M/s Prakash Industries (4) M/s Carews Pharmaceuticals Ltd. \n\n(5) M/s Seethapur Plywoods Industries (6) M/s Patheja Forgings & Auto Parts Ltd. \n\nIII." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EH6LX03X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 85, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 68, "text": "Harekrishna Konar" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/133860" }

{ "text": "It is, therefore, difficult to imagine how the election petitioner, Harekrishna Konar, could call the Returning Officer as his own witness." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "IJJ6K3IX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 44, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 39, "text": "Tunga" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "IVUKKK43", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 75, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 68, "text": "Sitaram" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "P54677VX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 86, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 77, "text": "Shivkumar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "E4BZYBMQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 101, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 88, "text": "Rameshchandra" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WEEA9KIN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 114, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 106, "text": "Mohanlal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "90RZG4SO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 144, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 130, "text": "Mahaveer Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1HV9A29D", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 174, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 161, "text": "Sureshchandra" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1SEWSI2C", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 196, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 176, "text": "Madansingh Rajnarain" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7IEE178X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 212, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 201, "text": "Radheyshyam" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1386454" }

{ "text": "The Dy. S.P. then proceeded to village Tunga along with complainant Sitaram, Shivkumar, Rameshchandra and Mohanlal, Sub-Inspector Mahaveer Singh, Head Constable Sureshchandra, Madansingh Rajnarain and Radheyshyam Constables" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1R5OQKDB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 46, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 33, "text": "Chandrashekar" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "financial_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/109070216/" }

{ "text": "Now during evidence P.W.1 namely Chandrashekar who is Manager of the complainant company has filed his affidavit as chief-examination in which he once again restated the facts alleged in the complaint as discussed above." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1072474/" }

{ "text": "The prohibition relating to the use of a statement made to a police officer during the course of an investigation could not be set at naught by\t the police officer not himself recording the statement of a person\t but having\tit in the form of a communication addressed by a person concerned to the police officer." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZBQH5N5O", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 21, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 15, "text": "Shobha" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RBYA1XSZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 165, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 133, "text": "Tirumala hospital, Kamakshipalya" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3SQR710N", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 176, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 167, "text": "Bangalore" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/4963664/" }

{ "text": "10) Petitioner Shobha was hale and healthy and she was aged about 24 years and she was working as tailor at Prajawal garments behind Tirumala hospital, Kamakshipalya, Bangalore and she was drawing salary of Rs.6,500 per month and due to the accidental injuries, she is unable to attend her duty and she is not getting her income." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "BF4IB3VB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 76, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 50, "text": "(1) (1867) L.R. 2 C.P. 651" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XS7U1GIU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 151, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 128, "text": "Beni Ram v. Kundan Lall" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MXLKH731", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 198, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 163, "text": "Narayan Das Khettry v. Jatindranath" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1425329/" }

{ "text": "The statement of the law was quoted with approval (1) (1867) L.R. 2 C.P. 651. \n\n(2) (1866) 6W.R. 228. \n\nby the Privy Council in Beni Ram v. Kundan Lall (1) and in Narayan Das Khettry v. Jatindranath (2)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "PWIJ7WL5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 80, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 33, "text": "S.B.Criminal Misc.Bail Application No.1106/2011" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MNDESSL1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 175, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 166, "text": "18.2.2011" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/91721247" }

{ "text": "Thereafter, the respondent filed S.B.Criminal Misc.Bail Application No.1106/2011 before this Court and the same was allowed by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 18.2.2011." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "TPRZO7JK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 52, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 42, "text": "12.12.1996" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ECIEE5CG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 118, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 100, "text": "State of Meghalaya" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZT2SLM98", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 151, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 143, "text": "8.1.1997" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1725193/" }

{ "text": "In terms of the order of this Court dated 12.12.1996, an Expert Committee was in fact formed by the State of Meghalaya vide notification dated 8.1.1997 with the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests as its Chairman." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LE1D4BL4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 50, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 32, "text": "Gujarat High Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "JRJOWDIC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 84, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 77, "text": "Bradbum" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2LCD5M34", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 152, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 140, "text": "Bramwell, B." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "56B7HZ4E", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 244, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 228, "text": "Patna High Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CBURGUOY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 293, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 248, "text": "Union of India v, Supriya Ghosh, AIR 1973 Pat" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/934048" }

{ "text": "He further pointed out that the Gujarat High Court placed strong reliance on Bradbum's case, presumably because the text of the judgment of Bramwell, B., in the reprint did not contain a passage which has been reproduced by the Patna High Court in Union of India v, Supriya Ghosh, AIR 1973 Pat 129 at page 136." }