annotations
listlengths 1
1
| meta
dict | id
stringlengths 32
32
| data
dict |
|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ZG0W72NY",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 48,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 37,
"text": "Indu Kakkar"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "TG1VXT8Y",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 84,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 71,
"text": "Supreme Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "W2579KJJ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 144,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 134,
"text": "27-12-1989"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/653184"
} | 4d6221a439264d11b8319172aef766c0 | {
"text": "During the pendency of the suit, one Indu Kakkar, appellant before the Supreme Court, got a registered sale deed from the allottee on 27-12-1989 of his rights in respect of the plot in question and got herself impleaded as second plaintiff in the suit."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ZUC37ZKN",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 98,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 82,
"text": "Narmada Tribunal"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1938608/"
} | 460dc52a354441e0945fa8c54a7763c7 | {
"text": "There is also no planning for community resettlement even though the Award of the Narmada Tribunal made detailed provision regarding rehabilitation of the oustees which required that there should be village wise community rehabilitation."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/147948079/"
} | 3bc3b53c1e244b6ebcb9d396a4ebb3a8 | {
"text": "Such delay was, even otherwise, expected because the job was herculean one."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "OI7ROHKG",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 84,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 74,
"text": "section 59"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "TCB6XB3E",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 116,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 92,
"text": "Transfer of Property Act"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/245101/"
} | c9a56ffbcad547baaf804533c2d13f4e | {
"text": "The mortgage is a document required to be attested by two attestors under section 59 of the Transfer of Property Act and in this case it is attested by two attestors."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "HP058AUO",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 124,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 115,
"text": "K.K. Sood"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "QIPNTDOA",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 147,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 141,
"text": "R. Roy"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "HTUGEWMI",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 204,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 166,
"text": "Hotel 'My Inn' at 901, Chandiwali Lane"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3ZFGXH39",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 215,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 206,
"text": "Paharganj"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "OIRIW4AT",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 226,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 217,
"text": "New Delhi"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/156225466/"
} | 33755e00207a42d0abdbefe1daffbeb8 | {
"text": "One or two subordinate staff was also included in the team and all the members of the team, so constituted by PW8 K.K. Sood, alongwith PW4 R. Roy, himself, reached Hotel 'My Inn' at 901, Chandiwali Lane, Paharganj, New Delhi."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "7YQYFJY2",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 128,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 113,
"text": "28th June, 1979"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "G0W86WLR",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 184,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 145,
"text": "First Additional District Judge, Indore"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "4IB6DSKI",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 223,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 188,
"text": "Civil First Appeal No. 37-A of 1978"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "Z440NNE1",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 295,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 280,
"text": "28th July, 1977"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "H03OIGQZ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 348,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 304,
"text": "Court of Third Civil Judge, Class II, Indore"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "VN96DOTQ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 377,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 352,
"text": "Civil Suit No. 8A of 1972"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1547786"
} | 2b5afb034fc245f4a6d6eb3ba3ea4a32 | {
"text": "This is an appeal arising out of a suit for ejectment by the defendant against the judgment and decree dated the 28th June, 1979 of the Court of First Additional District Judge, Indore in Civil First Appeal No. 37-A of 1978, whereby it has confirmed the judgment and decree dated 28th July, 1977, of the Court of Third Civil Judge, Class II, Indore in Civil Suit No. 8A of 1972."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ZNB82XR3",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 79,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 0,
"text": "S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9876 /2012 Gajendra Singh Rathore Vs. RSRTC and Ors"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/108926297"
} | 146c8031cb164001b0dfcab66e4b854e | {
"text": "S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9876 /2012 Gajendra Singh Rathore Vs. RSRTC and Ors."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "5CNEQRLL",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 15,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 6,
"text": "30-8-1968"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JVUN7L6R",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 61,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 33,
"text": "Hakim Mohd. Shaukat Ali Khan"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "Z6D494TO",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 122,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 94,
"text": "Wakf Commissioner, Rajasthan"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "UAKMI80M",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 341,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 315,
"text": "Wakf Committee Dharamshala"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1481916"
} | 627930177e684565b05dfe2136822620 | {
"text": "3. On 30-8-1968 respondent No. 4 Hakim Mohd. Shaukat Ali Khan presented an application to the Wakf Commissioner, Rajasthan, respondent No. 2, saying that the said building was wakf property, that its sale was invalid, that it was fit to be cancelled and that its possession should be recovered and entrusted to the Wakf Committee Dharamshala."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "AM30T8P8",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 86,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 77,
"text": "Section 7"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "XKDB7YPB",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 149,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 90,
"text": "Indian Singly duplicate for each Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/26904083"
} | 77e3c93b1f3d46b3a2b03395ccad3826 | {
"text": "(1) (2) Policy of Insurance- If drawn If drawn in 47. A.- Sea-Insurance [see Section 7 of Indian Singly duplicate for each Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899)] - part [ (1) for or upon voyage - [Five paise]."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "CVJI1WDH",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 13,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 5,
"text": "Digamber"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "IZOAHFBC",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 141,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 135,
"text": "Maroti"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "land&property_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/845834/"
} | e70413dd6005486cbd4d6e22f5c9cacb | {
"text": "PW.9 Digamber who was a witness of inquest turned hostile, but in his cross-examination he stated that he went to the house of accused Maroti at about 9.00 a.m. and had seen the body of the deceased with a piece of cloth tied around her mouth."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "GAPAOUAW",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 77,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 64,
"text": "Jamuna Prasad"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JM62RFFJ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 116,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 112,
"text": "Pana"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1701866"
} | 790dc9ab9d7c478daf39551684774d50 | {
"text": "Thus so far as the point of interest of the minor is concerned, Jamuna Prasad has an adverse interest, not Smt. Pana."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "6L17JOU4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 137,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 131,
"text": "Ranjit"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "W10CP74X",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 149,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 139,
"text": "State Bank"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "0Q9ABFYO",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 165,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 151,
"text": "Syndicate Bank"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DDL60QIU",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 250,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 244,
"text": "Ramzan"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "Z8L297IV",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 263,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 254,
"text": "Thangaraj"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1454156"
} | 09e711f351d74c7ebfb4d2761149ff88 | {
"text": "The true position would appear from the deposition of PW11 that the notes marked Q418 to 436 were part of the notes recovered from Ranjit, State Bank, Syndicate Bank and the Municipality with which neither the accused persons nor the witnesses Ramzan or Thangaraj had anything to do."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "X9WO8AOA",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 22,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 0,
"text": "Sriyuths P. Sadashivan"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "V1CKXHKA",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 33,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 24,
"text": "Mariyappa"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "RH1KW15N",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 50,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 35,
"text": "K.R. Srinivasan"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "W128Q94T",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 59,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 52,
"text": "Charian"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "PTFA4KQ3",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 80,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 69,
"text": "Sadamba Rao"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DD2IKKUX",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 166,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 135,
"text": "Javahar Bharati Education Trust"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "UWW8PJJQ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 180,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 171,
"text": "Bangalore"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "SMKY31BO",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 209,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 196,
"text": "P. Sadashivan"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/191510"
} | cbe3c867b4b9497c8c6539cf22eeb3b7 | {
"text": "Sriyuths P. Sadashivan, Mariyappa, K.R. Srinivasan, Charian and Smt. Sadamba Rao were the Trustees of an Educational Society known as 'Javahar Bharati Education Trust' in Bangalore, of which, Sri P. Sadashivan was the founder-trustee."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "LKUO3I26",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 81,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 70,
"text": "section 363"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "0SRYG39F",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 85,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 82,
"text": "IPC"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/18498179"
} | e54fd344d6d34ed395612339a40c12be | {
"text": "The punishment and order of sentence with regard to the offence under section 363 IPC i.e., RI for a period of 5 years with a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default, SI for six months, shall remain."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "5JND2BYM",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 53,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 46,
"text": "Perayya"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ULOGFE1Z",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 77,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 64,
"text": "Anantaramayya"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "OUTGDZ09",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 98,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 91,
"text": "Pulliah"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "O205TNC9",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 108,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 101,
"text": "Sivayya"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/302365"
} | 677f0bd153cf4c438c0d0959cad72960 | {
"text": "The assenting persons are examined as P.W. 7 (Perayya), P.W. 3 (Anantaramayya) and P.W. 2 (Pulliah), Sivayya, the other consenting party having died between the date of the adoption and the trial of the suit."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "X5OFTIIK",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 9,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 0,
"text": "Section 9"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1327939"
} | 17d7acc1949b476d8fd5a4494b352884 | {
"text": "Section 9 was not enacted to curb the spirit of adventure among Indians or make them a nation of Koopaman- dookas."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "XN934Q2E",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 19,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 3,
"text": "23 February 1968"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "T590FJ5N",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 49,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 40,
"text": "section 6"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/689330/"
} | aa064032a3b34907ada61c1bfe7b4641 | {
"text": "On 23 February 1968, notification under section 6 was published in the Gazette."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "65XQRKX1",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 48,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 31,
"text": "9th November 2013"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "TO4AXB5F",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 112,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 93,
"text": "13 th November 2013"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/154473448"
} | ab4a332238a14fe0ad4c26e54fde15a3 | {
"text": "The petitioner was arrested on 9th November 2013 and was remanded to the police custody upto 13 th November 2013."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "M9XZT2P5",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 55,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 46,
"text": "31.7.2008"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2WGI63H4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 127,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 122,
"text": "Meera"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "N2X5UQUF",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 165,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 153,
"text": "Charan Singh"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/41067986"
} | 85aa16fab7114cbdbfe7d3f4f1e4638e | {
"text": "When the matter was taken up for arguments on 31.7.2008, the aforesaid facts were taken note of which points out that Ms. Meera was not abducted by Shri Charan Singh."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "QSFPANW3",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 60,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 3,
"text": "State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Madan Lal, 1999 (2) FAC 214"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/65303790/"
} | ec05a9cc80a74ea3ab861e6acd166589 | {
"text": "In State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Madan Lal, 1999 (2) FAC 214, it was held \"admittedly there is presumption in law that a communication sent by post on the correct address of the addressee is presumed to have been received by him if it is not received back by the sender.\" \n\n71."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2F54CCPM",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 127,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 110,
"text": "Section 32(1)(ii)"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/114050172"
} | 7b713264026b4f80958980ba89ffa1b2 | {
"text": "(c) the AO further noticed that the assessee Company claimed depreciation to the tune of Rs.14,17,500/- under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Act."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "QLUOPT7S",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 25,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 13,
"text": "Vinay Cement"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JR1MDL81",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 65,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 52,
"text": "Supreme Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "VRP10ODP",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 77,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 69,
"text": "7.3.2007"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/39629770"
} | 232e291f6bbb4a1ba459617bbaf70853 | {
"text": "The order in Vinay Cement (supra) was passed by the Supreme Court on 7.3.2007 wherein it observed as follows:- \"Delay condoned."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/85861"
} | a1fdc8501c3c494082237386ee3d01e7 | {
"text": "On an evening in April, 1984, when he visited her house uninvited, she protested to him strongly and told him that all that was unbecoming of a senior member of the Faculty."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "GFVWXMFB",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 105,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 84,
"text": "Madras Act XV of 1946"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1895596"
} | fdf9fcc0f7104443adc85896230c3627 | {
"text": "The point for discussion is really Issue No. 1 in the suit which runs thus: \n \"Does Madras Act XV of 1946 apply to the property leased to 1st defendant and is he entitled to claim the benefit of its provisions?\""
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "6UFPLW1E",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 51,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 38,
"text": "11 June, 2013"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "LU3BI5PB",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 116,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 103,
"text": "17 June, 2013"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/58639737"
} | 8d135a30d3bb4028834749d95c324346 | {
"text": "(11) The impugned order was passed on 11 June, 2013 and copy thereof was received by the petitioner on 17 June, 2013."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "W27QFX01",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 149,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 137,
"text": "Schedule-III"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "E10AU699",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 171,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 157,
"text": "Wealth Tax Act"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/19071498"
} | bed738a8689c4479b0336e85a4457d0a | {
"text": "However, reference need not be made to the Valuation Officer when the value of the asset is determinable as per the formula laid down in Schedule-III of the Wealth Tax Act."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "GLNL7624",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 70,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 60,
"text": "Schedule-I"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1362862"
} | 3be6f50e6816405e904d9a0b601fa688 | {
"text": "It was contended that though some of the castes included in Schedule-I of the Act may lack in political wisdom and may be inadequately represented in the political field, but they cannot be clubbed with the dominant castes, such as, Yadavas, Kurmis and Koeris, who are dominating in the political field."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/826529"
} | b17b9299a0a94484943845fb3619304d | {
"text": "It was also laid down that where a quasi-judicial Tribunal records findings based on no legal evidence and the findings are his mere ipse dixit or based on conjectures and surmises, the enquiry suffers from the additional infirmity of non-application of mind and stands vitiated."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "NTQU3KK1",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 14,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 0,
"text": "Harwinder Kaur"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "6VIV4ZH1",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 121,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 110,
"text": "Avtar Singh"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "4TVKF7SM",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 210,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 199,
"text": "Sucha Singh"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2JQTDACU",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 230,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 219,
"text": "Sucha Singh"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/45198249"
} | 87a7f37dfbd44666987ae997505f2e53 | {
"text": "Harwinder Kaur wife of the accused raised a lalkara saying that who were they to stop him and on that lalkara Avtar Singh (appellant) gave a blow with his 'kahi' (spade) which hit on the forehead of Sucha Singh and he (Sucha Singh) fell down."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "L6GQC32O",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 61,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 45,
"text": "25th March, 1953"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DBLWI8TO",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 89,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 70,
"text": "Calcutta High Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "WPVI5TRZ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 134,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 105,
"text": "Original Order No. 54 of 1953"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1300646/"
} | 41bbce01579f49ec920e26b44d6831f2 | {
"text": "Appeal from the Judgment and Order dated the 25th March, 1953, of the Calcutta High Court in Appeal from Original Order No. 54 of 1953."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "J9YNRY21",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 82,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 62,
"text": "sections 397 and 402"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "HS2EA467",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 115,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 90,
"text": "Act (Companies Act, 1956)"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "FTSAD5MB",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 141,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 130,
"text": "section 210"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "U3FDFSHV",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 170,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 149,
"text": "English Companies Act"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/805226"
} | 9630f6015aa24e3893118cc7362c7086 | {
"text": "We may remind ourselves, here, that the elements comprised in sections 397 and 402 of the Act (Companies Act, 1956), are found in section 210 of the English Companies Act."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/40375535"
} | 9ca5849670424404994607b37048b363 | {
"text": "They have further submitted that before holding the examination qualifying marks were also not fixed by the High Court."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1543088"
} | 040341f1f030487dbba4794f378fd294 | {
"text": "The photographs produced at Exhs. 47 and 48 of past and when compared with the photographs after the injuries, produced at Exhs. 50 and 51, it becomes quite evident that not only she has sustained disfigurement of face, but the whole integrity of the face is violently shattered."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "QGHZ94PT",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 40,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 26,
"text": "Hanuman Prasad"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "K63HDJHA",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 51,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 42,
"text": "Parmanand"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "MH9IUCZ1",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 64,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 53,
"text": "Jelhu Singh"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ARAAJD0P",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 78,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 66,
"text": "Sanjay Kumar"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DFYXZO8P",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 103,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 83,
"text": "Gaurav Kumar @ Ganga"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1995920"
} | 4723eadf237948e88b650adea38acf91 | {
"text": "Since accused respondents Hanuman Prasad, Parmanand, Jelhu Singh, Sanjay Kumar and Gaurav Kumar @ Ganga are on bail, therefore, they shall surrender before the trial court immediately and in case they do not surrender before the trial court, the trial court shall take necessary steps for arresting them and sending them to jail to serve out the remaining period of sentence. \n\n2."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "YM175QCK",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 22,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 12,
"text": "18.03.2014"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "F66LXUJ4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 66,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 52,
"text": "I.A.No.1500/14"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "W5VLQ9XE",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 189,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 182,
"text": "Prakash"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "X7V1WJ0R",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 241,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 233,
"text": "Sikandar"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/166504428"
} | 7a3e5846a752473b8122a09ba4c636a1 | {
"text": "Order dated 18.03.2014 read as under :-\n\n \"Heard on I.A.No.1500/14, an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail. \n\n Learned counsel submits that the main eye-witness Prakash has not been deposed against the appellant Sikandar."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "VPQFURY3",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 124,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 106,
"text": "Annamalai Chettiar"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "QNL4OJO5",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 143,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 129,
"text": "Ramdev Chokani"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3LAWJZUM",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 181,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 166,
"text": "5th April, 1937"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "land&property_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/259610/"
} | d8f213759049431d8e645ef29fd5e574 | {
"text": "The Official Assignee having acquired knowledge about the telephonic conversation that had passed between Annamalai Chettiar and Ramdev Chokani on the evening of the 5th April, 1937, came to the conclusion that the insolvent had been a victim of a fraud perpetrated by the defendants and dismissed their claim."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ZIJH1T8X",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 13,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 5,
"text": "Madanlal"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "70RFFCLL",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 56,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 42,
"text": "CBI, New Delhi"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/144689/"
} | 85f948a205b4468bb406494ac4a9b5cb | {
"text": "Shri Madanlal, PW 85, Senior Inspector of CBI, New Delhi was the Investigating Officer of this case."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "NP1V3XNT",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 36,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 17,
"text": "Government of India"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/99072131/"
} | da6b3ae12be04966a2824bb843f8f38c | {
"text": "Respondent No.1, Government of India (GOI), took a policy decision in the year 1992 to offer some of its discovered oil fields for development on a joint venture basis."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "QPU66IND",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 15,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 4,
"text": "Sahera Banu"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "4NX1SJ8L",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 43,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 37,
"text": "Zahira"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DS8GIT81",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 100,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 67,
"text": "Criminal Revision No. 583 of 2003"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/105430/"
} | eee86210e4d542469beda972803a251b | {
"text": "One Sahera Banu (sister of appellant-Zahira) filed the afore-noted Criminal Revision No. 583 of 2003 before the High Court questioning the legality of the judgment returning a verdict of acquittal."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2OVCW1JZ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 56,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 27,
"text": "Ramjibhai Nathubhai Chaudhari"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1675727"
} | 3573081dd7b0456a91ea76d8e8a20bc7 | {
"text": "Meanwhile, opponent No. 2, Ramjibhai Nathubhai Chaudhari, who was driving a tractor No. GJM 9774 to which a trailer, No. GTE 9669 was attached, came there."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "IHVLSBXX",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 70,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 62,
"text": "Majumdar"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DQ5TQNNY",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 123,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 102,
"text": "Art. 235, Article 235"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "PRY1BZ5X",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 165,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 157,
"text": "Art. 236"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1739668"
} | c87f26be5f8e43f4b1e7797dd48c7c4e | {
"text": "We shall take lip first the second question, as argued by Mr. Majumdar about the true construction of Art. 235, Article 235 and the interpretation clause in Art. 236 run as under: -\n \"235. -"
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "5A2MNOD7",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 64,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 54,
"text": "Mohd. Aqil"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DT0ZTIX4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 92,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 82,
"text": "19.09.2012"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/82529102/"
} | 44e40976500840899942c618586a1412 | {
"text": "prosecution has failed to prove sale of contraband by Mohd. Aqil to any person on 19.09.2012 or prior thereto."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "U3SKYFL5",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 59,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 49,
"text": "Section 80"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3RL24LXI",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 67,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 60,
"text": "C P. C."
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/162361"
} | d67be025ffa345589e3d8104105adc15 | {
"text": "It is true that the plea of want of notice under Section 80 C P. C. was raised by the appellant."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/59931489"
} | f61183264d8e490eb90aa5d8dc1f987f | {
"text": "Since the version of PW-6 has been dis-believed, even if the arrest time is taken as 10:30 AM, this would in no manner advance the version of the appellant."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "QM9N5HAT",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 11,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 6,
"text": "Ullal"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "0AANX8W8",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 69,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 56,
"text": "Supreme Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "9Z7YUUHE",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 131,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 73,
"text": "Bhopalsugar Industries Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Bhopal"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1000631"
} | dbf06ce7409b4e778e25fc6b30a4e0f4 | {
"text": " \nMr. Ullal also strongly relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Bhopalsugar Industries Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Bhopal ."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1120373/"
} | 871215205e9d4b26ae8dcfcec1b4dc88 | {
"text": "It was further held that the effect of the acquittal of the three co-accused is that they did not co-jointly and with the appellant commit the murder."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "civil_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1862564"
} | 4a20ee5f932c48c8aa9f9faa7168669b | {
"text": "He is therefore, entitled to his salaries for the months of October, November and December, 1954 and for ten days in January 1955. \n\n11."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "52H87939",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 53,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 37,
"text": "Order XVI, R, 1,"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3TWLWMLS",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 62,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 54,
"text": "C. P. C."
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "BPMY9021",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 114,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 67,
"text": "Order XVI, Section 1(i) (including the proviso)"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "RV6EQ5Y6",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 124,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 116,
"text": "C. P. C."
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "LMB27EMJ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 135,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 126,
"text": "Rajasthan"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/909053"
} | e6415c98e2594d4985be3215654281c0 | {
"text": "There cannot be any controversy that Order XVI, R, 1, C. P. C. and Order XVI, Section 1(i) (including the proviso), C. P. C. (Rajasthan) cover the same field."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "7PT3I0D6",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 26,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 16,
"text": "16/07/2012"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "EQT6YAJM",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 135,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 122,
"text": "CS No. 162/13"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/65879221/"
} | 9c66d99d574d490988c9c2a3649ceccb | {
"text": "e) Notice dated 16/07/2012 was issued to the defendant to vacate and hand over the actual, vacant and peaceful possession CS No. 162/13."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "YBZQDHVN",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 59,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 3,
"text": "Juvvi Subbaramaiah and Co. v. Commissioner of Income-tax"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "VTTAAUUV",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 90,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 65,
"text": "Andhra Pradesh High Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "5OTH84RW",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 367,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 357,
"text": "Section 19"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3H9J3B33",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 415,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 375,
"text": "Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1948147"
} | 04638a85dc42441bb3e3422be0b71088 | {
"text": "In Juvvi Subbaramaiah and Co. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, the Andhra Pradesh High Court considered a similar question and held : \n\" As already stated, the two transactions in question are only a part of a larger activity of the assessee, and the other transactions were found to be admittedly in the nature of tejimandi contracts, prohibited outright by Section 19 of the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "financial_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/7540881/"
} | a6be725ea43f4a05a16e2d10827e3279 | {
"text": "The relevant para reads as under: \" 15 ... if the complainant is able to prove that the drawer of the cheque knew about the notice and deliberately evaded service and got a false endorsement made only to defeat the process of law, the Court shall presume service of the notice."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "KVQXQ2QL",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 26,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 18,
"text": "2.8.2011"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "898E37A0",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 52,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 38,
"text": "Ram Dass Sadhu"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/74775971"
} | 27fa2a243e9e46f09128cf4717db3918 | {
"text": "Date of Decision: 2.8.2011 Ram Dass Sadhu and another."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "MBXKAFF0",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 9,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 4,
"text": "Chari"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ZN54XIKI",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 92,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 83,
"text": "section 6"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "QL87KQ63",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 119,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 100,
"text": "General Clauses Act"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DZPEJPJF",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 159,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 145,
"text": "article 13 (1)"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "AYO5KH7X",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 179,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 167,
"text": "Constitution"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/656658/"
} | 5c3e6516d808486ca4e319a8d478799c | {
"text": "Mr. Chari contended that the High Court was in error in applying the provisions of section 6 of the General Clauses Act to the interpretation of article 13 (1) of the Constitution inasmuch as the provisions of this article were not analogous to repeal and did not amount to a repeal of the existing law."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "1XQHYT5I",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 20,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 17,
"text": "DLC"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "6MH8JO12",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 73,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 70,
"text": "SMC"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/43967494"
} | 78488cf585c94ede89b4a1c7dc307faf | {
"text": "The complainant, DLC, has named the managing partner and a partner of SMC as witnesses, they were earlier arraigned as A-2 and A-3 in DLC's complaint 45/2011."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "VJGEGDJ7",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 30,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 20,
"text": "Article 14"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "1205XKD3",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 102,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 88,
"text": "22nd May, 1953"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1908113/"
} | 6a190a811ab14b32b71ae3d6c5190f85 | {
"text": "The objection under Article 14 was decided against the appellants by judgment dated the 22nd May, 1953."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "BEP3VZ64",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 69,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 59,
"text": "Hari Chand"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "4Z5QC8O0",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 116,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 106,
"text": "S.K. Singh"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "9P8823T3",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 156,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 140,
"text": "Cross River Mall"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/98627779/"
} | 656088d9c4274c9ead1558924ebf1876 | {
"text": "A call was made by complainant at about 10 a.m. to accused Hari Chand who told that he along with accused S.K. Singh was coming in front of Cross River Mall."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "W7PR7RYK",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 19,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 0,
"text": "Sanat alias Bhontra"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "9TB90M84",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 108,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 103,
"text": "Nemai"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "9F02JC1J",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 129,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 124,
"text": "Netai"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "S2YU2RK8",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 158,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 153,
"text": "Kamal"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "VONC28A5",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 246,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 241,
"text": "Sanat"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/907312"
} | 2774046c3fcd4dda9f6500c6318e32ba | {
"text": "Sanat alias Bhontra, P. W. 5 who was one of the persons who had gathered there on hearing the cries of Nemai caught hold of Netai after the stabbing and Kamal who also had gone back to his house came out armed with an iron rod and struck at Sanat."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "4DMBRWHY",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 12,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 5,
"text": "Babulal"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "Z15UGPP4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 79,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 69,
"text": "Chhitarlal"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "RGX5LKSW",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 95,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 85,
"text": "Shrawanlal"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "NLOPTOU1",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 105,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 97,
"text": "Mahaveer"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "YIW11VE8",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 117,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 110,
"text": "Jagdish"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/144371192"
} | 6fe4c0c7d98c4f14b04a385bebaa59d9 | {
"text": "PW-3 Babulal stated that when incident took place he was at field of Chhitarlal and, Shrawanlal, Mahaveer and Jagdish were with him."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "civil_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1899067"
} | 4640534f41aa43c786abb833d7000f88 | {
"text": "The power can also be exercised on account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record or for any other sufficient reason."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JDH9KBBN",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 17,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 4,
"text": "Supreme Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ZQYQVGDK",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 223,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 211,
"text": "O. 41, R. 27"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "BOWCU4DQ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 235,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 225,
"text": "Civil P.C."
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/625055"
} | b469c394f58a45318d81ac817883ca07 | {
"text": "The Supreme Court also observed in that case as follows : \n \"The discretion to receive and admit additional evidence is not an arbitrary one, but is a judicial one circumscribed by the limitations specified in O. 41, R. 27, Civil P.C."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "GA2B5A3E",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 203,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 196,
"text": "Rule 50"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1371839/"
} | f765d0a3e90c4a8fb8e8f9e4cfb000f9 | {
"text": "Indigenous manufacturers of High Security Plates can manufacture and supply registration plates on their own strength by complying with all standards and in conformity with all norms laid down in Rule 50 without entering into collaboration with any foreign partner."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/408373/"
} | 3f6459285cd34fb493f85d6e6fa017e2 | {
"text": "Inasmuch as the first defendant has not disputed the correctness of the sale deed executed by the second defendant in favour of Defendant Nos.3 to 5, the sale of the Doctor's Lane house in favour of the said defendants is good and valid."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "Z2CIETAT",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 31,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 19,
"text": "Chintamanrao"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "1WDTU2KW",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 102,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 94,
"text": "Kantilal"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1217564/"
} | 7587a025904043e69277cd5a3fda9608 | {
"text": "The 1st Appellant, Chintamanrao, is the Managing-Partner of the firm while the 2nd appellant, Kantilal, is its active Manager."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JIRZMSU0",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 39,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 25,
"text": "42nd amendment"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "MZQE7215",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 62,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 44,
"text": "Constitution Bench"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ASH1RXE1",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 164,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 152,
"text": "Constitution"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1347915/"
} | 3f4f6a7c100f4bfc96fd848c4a71cdaf | {
"text": "Explaining the effect of 42nd amendment the Constitution Bench at page 755 observed that \"All that has happened after the Forty-second Amendment of the Constitution is to advance the point of time at which the representation of the employee against the enquiry officer's report would be considered."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "PRG8E0XQ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 163,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 150,
"text": "Section 21(1)"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/206621"
} | 7fe86cac4d5040de9dea5b66d9f1bf5e | {
"text": "He can call for the record of a proceeding pending before an assessing authority and pass such order in respect thereof as he thinks fit according to Section 21(1) of the Act."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "T29V365Y",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 13,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 4,
"text": "Gursahani"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "I571CIMJ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 174,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 117,
"text": "Maharashtra Country Liquor (Second Amendment) Rules, 1981"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ZEK1OBXK",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 210,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 198,
"text": "Constitution"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1677796"
} | cafc937eaef04a6fb4334c2c743d23e7 | {
"text": "Mr. Gursahani, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, urged the following contentions before us :---\n(i) Maharashtra Country Liquor (Second Amendment) Rules, 1981 are ultra vires of the Constitution."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "8H1HHYNT",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 18,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 12,
"text": "Punjab"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JRHACH8J",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 34,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 20,
"text": "(2005) 6 SCC 1"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/176121529"
} | ecb4b6aa22a44f70a1969f474b04c504 | {
"text": "v. State of Punjab: (2005) 6 SCC 1 wherein the Court observed as under:-"
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "U0E2F9ZQ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 8,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 3,
"text": "India"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "YJABY7YW",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 100,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 82,
"text": "Central Government"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "B3MQ0DYP",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 274,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 267,
"text": "Part II"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2AFFXF78",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 390,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 385,
"text": "India"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "HOU98TGT",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 416,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 410,
"text": "Part I"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "1XN39AEZ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 439,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 424,
"text": "Arbitration Act"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/194012216"
} | 5ee97344bd8a40aea2ba1cefdc0e9cb3 | {
"text": "In India, therefore, the said reciprocity clause/ provisions/ Notification by the Central Government is mandatory and therefore, in view of the admitted position prior to the date of agreement between the parties and the arbitral award in question, the provisions of Part II, as sought to be contended, are not applicable and therefore the arbitral award is executable/ enforceable in India as contemplated in Part I of the Arbitration Act."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1902076"
} | 4f3d552eae0943d5a198a6d8ad4bcfc0 | {
"text": "In other words, the case of the respondents was that at the time of the accident Respondent No. 2 had taken the vehicle-\"on a frolic of his own.\""
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "92PGFKBO",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 163,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 155,
"text": "9-1-2013"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2Y4JND7S",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 256,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 247,
"text": "27-9-2012"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/188398170/"
} | 532663ea0af84d54b6a28a753009a583 | {
"text": "Otherwise also, when defendant in his cross examination himself specifically stated that no compromise had taken place with plaintiff on any date prior to 9-1-2013, then the reliance placed by counsel for defendant upon Ex. PW1/D-1 which is dated 27-9-2012 to show that compromise had taken place between parties vide this document is not acceptable."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "RQEIV6H1",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 121,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 118,
"text": "DDA"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ADHVCYA7",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 139,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 130,
"text": "Tej Singh"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JXW7VP5C",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 148,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 141,
"text": "Manohar"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "QFQV68ST",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 153,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 150,
"text": "Lal"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "PGD3KAHX",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 254,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 243,
"text": "Beadon Pura"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "F4NT87KN",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 266,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 256,
"text": "Karol Bagh"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "LBF0XWJU",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 277,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 268,
"text": "New Delhi"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/89840592/"
} | e1eaf498a5b946ffb74398eed39a08af | {
"text": "One more document which was filed on record by the petitioners was the copy of the mutation certificate issued by the DDA showing Tej Singh, Manohar, Lal and the petitioners herein to be 1/6th shareholders of the property bearing no. 2956/41, Beadon Pura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/46495"
} | 70774e20218a47f88a920abdd795a343 | {
"text": "The applicant No. 4 offered to execute a fresh lease deed at a monthly rent of Rs. 2/- per square feet of the total area Subject to the condition that an additional area of 250 sq. feet will be provided for the residence of the Branch Manager and the residence in occupation of the Branch Manager will be released."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/122317069"
} | 133f6daee4ef4cdd8fe1b29420695b8f | {
"text": "In paragraph 7 the witness has further clarified that he has named only those whom he had seen during the day on the bank of the canal but were not seen by him during the night."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "I6HS3T2G",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 214,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 160,
"text": "Murlidhar Meghraj Loya etc. v. \n\n\tState of Maharashtra"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/744830/"
} | 3ee7992985bd4dafa7ab49b82145ce1c | {
"text": "ACCOMPLICE:\n\tWhether a pointer an accomplice [See Representation of the People Act.] ...... 525 ACCUSED PLEADED GUILTY If lesser sentence could be awarded. \n\n Murlidhar Meghraj Loya etc. v. \n\n\tState of Maharashtra etc. .. 1 \tADMISSIONS:\n\tadmissibility in evidence"
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "WMV3IGZF",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 64,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 34,
"text": "Writ Petition No. 1977 of 1973"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1611996/"
} | 6a74d01a181d41f2b04e4ec7d7649250 | {
"text": "JUDGMENT:\nORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition No. 1977 of 1973."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "LC8PC2ER",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 27,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 18,
"text": "M. Mridul"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3A7UU6CX",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 60,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 42,
"text": "Surendra Pal Singh"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2JCFYHW2",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 99,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 64,
"text": "D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 29/79"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "LRT66YMK",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 124,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 113,
"text": "N.N. Mathur"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "IW9FRBOY",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 224,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 189,
"text": "D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 28/79"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/127092"
} | bdc442b6a6ad4251ab7927feeb93fbb9 | {
"text": "We have heard Mr. M. Mridul for appellant Surendra Pal Singh in D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 29/79 and also Mr. N.N. Mathur appearing for non-petitioners No. 1 to 5, who are appellants in D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 28/79."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "X01S6JRL",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 44,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 16,
"text": "Annexures A and B and Rule 7"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/451438"
} | a4294358eaa44fb4a9f6fec94d5cd63d | {
"text": "In pursuance of Annexures A and B and Rule 7 of the Rules, the post of Assistant Registrar is not made of seniority alone and it involves comparative assessment of the officers appeared at the interview."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3Z65QNP0",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 121,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 51,
"text": "Narain Swedeshi Weaving Mills v. Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax(2)"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/648722/"
} | d0a2f8ccffa94681976bd89301edef1a | {
"text": "We do not think that the judgment of this Court in Narain Swedeshi Weaving Mills v. Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax(2) lays down any general proposition that the High Court hearing a reference is entitled to amend or reframe a question and call for a supplementary statement so as to enable a party to lead evidence which has not been led before the Tribunal or the departmental authorities."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/695234"
} | fd1fd3044b684a1eb31ef4873af40cd8 | {
"text": "A complaint was recieved by the Board that unfair means was used by the examinees at large scales at the said centre in answering the question papers of Intermediate Examination of 1973."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "GFPHLPJ1",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 27,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 15,
"text": "Sathiyamohan"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "YVQJJ5ZK",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 158,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 147,
"text": "Section 420"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "WN4G30TM",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 165,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 159,
"text": "I.P.C."
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DU01TZCE",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 278,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 266,
"text": "Saudi Arabia"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "YVIAION9",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 349,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 343,
"text": "Mumbai"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/975832"
} | 99f8778db1b44ff1b5cbcb10dbcf47d9 | {
"text": "Per contra, Mr.Sathiyamohan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank contended that the writ petitioner was prosecuted for offence under Section 420 I.P.C., as he cheated 16 persons by representing to them that he will arrange for securing jobs to them in Saudi Arabia and he had received Rs.1.40 lakhs in all, took those persons to Mumbai and left them stranded there and the petitioner absconded from the place."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/319805"
} | f4fbd3abe0a14d53b2d36344706e856a | {
"text": "The learned Public Prosecutor points out that in this case also, a bail application was pending on behalf of the detenu on the date when the order was passed, which was clear from ground No.(xxx) of the grounds of detention and, therefore, the detaining authority in this case could not be said to have been wrong in describing the detenu as a “remand-prisoner” though inappropriately."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "8BVEQZYN",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 24,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 11,
"text": "Ashok Khurana"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "AA5BTBAH",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 105,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 96,
"text": "24-9-2001"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "NV2GSS5X",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 135,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 117,
"text": "Narinderjeet Singh"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/698632"
} | bf633a8d57a44de8b9f9a97d3b286f0e | {
"text": "Though Dr. Ashok Khurana PW6 claimed that about three months prior to the statement in court on 24-9-2001 petitioner Narinderjeet Singh approached him for consultation."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "I49YERZ8",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 29,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 3,
"text": "MG Brothers Lorry Services"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/370955"
} | 7de3d1b1a35944b8b0833d6941e28228 | {
"text": "2. MG Brothers Lorry Services, \n Rep. by its Partners,\n YMCA Buildings, 2nd Floor,\n NSC Bose Road, Chennai-600 001."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "HA0JRBWC",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 45,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 21,
"text": "complaint no.125 of 1998"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ZNRUVBTG",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 70,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 53,
"text": "Women Cell, Delhi"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1643829/"
} | 0955fad5c7a34bc382fb29eec183d479 | {
"text": "The respondent filed complaint no.125 of 1998 in the Women Cell, Delhi in September 1997 against the appellant's lawyer and friend alleging criminal intimidation."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/142761873"
} | a67794672338410e8045e6d92d7475d1 | {
"text": "(ii) Loss of earnings (and other gains) which the injured would have made had he not been injured, comprising:\n 11/30 FA 169 of 2009.doc (a) Loss of earning during the period of treatment; (b) Loss of future earnings on account of permanent disability."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "GB84G4PW",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 21,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 8,
"text": "Supreme Court"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/673012/"
} | ac9ab014525a4c43aa7d98e208284fbb | {
"text": "(2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or write, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, qua warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "6E6A2CBY",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 8,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 0,
"text": "Pata Ram"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "CWZTR87V",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 61,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 49,
"text": "Nissan Jonga"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "EVZU3PIB",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 134,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 124,
"text": "Hassan Ali"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1618690"
} | 5366e94171a34520a38a512c5dafe806 | {
"text": "Pata Ram with other passengers was travelling in Nissan Jonga No. RRQ 7577, which was driven by defendant-respondent No. 4, Hassan Ali."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/588005"
} | 7b7703f9915b46bea0bf6bcf4292f8b6 | {
"text": "The person, who had been previously retrenched, raised the dispute seeking re-engagement and faulting the appointment afforded to a fresh hand."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "1VHQTCXS",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 187,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 155,
"text": "M/s. Indamer and Co. (P) Limited"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "RIE3JC6Z",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 204,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 196,
"text": "Brinnand"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "V7HOTMRQ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 285,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 260,
"text": "Civil Aviation Department"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "VS94FKYS",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 301,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 287,
"text": "Govt. of India"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1806843"
} | 6b25b13826fc4c6daca5c6ca9226226b | {
"text": "The prosecution case further is that in the absence of an operating licence, the ownership of the two aircrafts also could not be changed from the name of M/s. Indamer and Co. (P) Limited to Capt Brinnand's name in the certificate of registration, kept in the Civil Aviation Department, Govt. of India."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3RTG5GZU",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 68,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 55,
"text": "Supreme Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "53OO2LLR",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 126,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 101,
"text": "proviso to Section 23D(1)"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "PSFBT0QW",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 249,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 239,
"text": "Section 28"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1604406"
} | ba187298bf0340e288e9fd2537b26177 | {
"text": "The above - quoted observations make it clear that the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that the proviso to Section 23D(1) furnished the criterion or the guideline for exercise of discretion conferred on the Director of Enforcement by Section 28."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "KV7F38WB",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 54,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 44,
"text": "Section 14"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "9OBU4ICF",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 84,
"labels": [
"JUDGE"
],
"start": 77,
"text": "Maclean"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/296296"
} | 49c5eeb2666e4e48812704c5c85207bb | {
"text": "It was contended before the High Court that Section 14 covered the case, but Maclean C. J. expressly observed that they felt grave doubt whether the case fell within that section."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "K8SPF1OT",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 95,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 22,
"text": "Mahesh Mehto and others vs. Shri Shankar Kumar Mehto (1999)(4) Crimes 461"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "FM6S5CT6",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 260,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 246,
"text": "Section 397(2)"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "6FDL75OF",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 271,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 264,
"text": "Cr.P.C."
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1948814"
} | 7057bd6d3541408fa0147c817b450d02 | {
"text": "Except in the case of Mahesh Mehto and others vs. Shri Shankar Kumar Mehto (1999)(4) Crimes 461, in all other cases, it has been held:\nthat grant or refusal of bail constitutes an interlocutory order and no revision lies against such order under Section 397(2) of Cr.P.C. \n (Emphasis supplied) \n11."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "CCU9OTXJ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 21,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 6,
"text": "sub-section (7)"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "YOF1Y6K9",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 32,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 29,
"text": "RTA"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/906427"
} | 0fe1ead21b9a4df5946dccc2647daa29 | {
"text": "Under sub-section (7) if the RTA refuses any application for grant of a permit, the reasons for refusal have to be communicated to the applicant."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/895706/"
} | 4197d044d5c3490db1a90af479abf538 | {
"text": "It was submitted that the High Court was right in coming to this conclusion."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "U4IJDZ8N",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 28,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 0,
"text": "First Appeal No. 430 of 1959"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1607349"
} | 72c84e327ffe42718fe28b384fd4bbef | {
"text": "First Appeal No. 430 of 1959, it clearly amounts to confirmation of the finding of the Court below, so far these plaintiff-respondents are concerned, and now that finding cannot be modified by this appeal."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "5GXWI4DH",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 130,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 114,
"text": "MLC No.334149/12"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/81945540/"
} | 29e7e6bb90ca40f8b67d4714be794e38 | {
"text": "It was stated that after the accident the police reached at the spot and took the injured to Trauma Center, where MLC No.334149/12 of the injured was prepared."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "XF98ZDGS",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 29,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 19,
"text": "23.07.1987"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/165733481"
} | 93748e3f75354f0e9679dfd8fa2643d6 | {
"text": "The Circular dated 23.07.1987 provided for a six tier structure to be maintained in the Corporation for the Land Development, Agro Chemicals, and the Finance and Accounts Departments."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "FL3OESGE",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 108,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 97,
"text": "Article 226"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "237KGYXL",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 137,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 116,
"text": "Constitution of India"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/510946"
} | 8c50ca128fa94c1bb3177487e8ef1ae6 | {
"text": "All the 39 workmen challenged their order of termination by filing separate writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "CQFJALLM",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 159,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 149,
"text": "Apex Court"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/905998"
} | 65cc4bbf991a41aa8db87ef0301afee8 | {
"text": "While deprecating the practice by giving admission to the students in the respective educational institutions on the strength of interim orders, the Apex Court observed as under:\n "
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "WVTAY3DA",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 185,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 172,
"text": "Abhishek Goel"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "BQTA8UJ6",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 215,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 201,
"text": "Pursharth Goel"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/15219160"
} | fc9bab01c8304fb3b937100333eff61c | {
"text": "All this prima facie shows that petitioner No.1 and his family comprising himself and his wife need one room with attached bathroom, the two sons of petitioner No.1 namely Abhishek Goel (24 years) and Pursharth Goel (19 years) need at least one room each."
} |
Subsets and Splits