Datasets:

mwitiderrick

/

legal

like 0

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "J26Q0QOG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 57, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 40, "text": "Kerala High Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "M2RYBELN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 82, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 73, "text": "N.T. John" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1539947/" }

{ "text": "He also referred to the judgment of the Kerala High Court in the case of N.T. John (supra) for the contention that once the proceedings under this Chapter are commenced then no assessment be made by way of regular assessment." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NJ7U089G", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 32, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 16, "text": "Cr.A.No.722/2015" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MUUV69S0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 43, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 33, "text": "21.09.2015" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2TRVRCDG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 61, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 50, "text": "Vivek Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4RIO5HS5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 102, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 94, "text": "Kashiram" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YNZ4FIH8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 116, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 107, "text": "Kishanlal" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/166504428" }

{ "text": "Judge Judge ns. Cr.A.No.722/2015 21.09.2015 Shri Vivek Singh, learned Counsel for appellants Kashiram and Kishanlal." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZL17MQUM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 24, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 4, "text": "Income-tax Act, 1961" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "VNMB5U0O", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 55, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 45, "text": "Chapter IX" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1960330/" }

{ "text": "The Income-tax Act, 1961, contains a special Chapter IX which is devoted to the subject of 'Double Taxation Relief\"." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "RI8JLS8D", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 128, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 110, "text": "Central Government" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8QMA4KXT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 225, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 194, "text": "section 269UF and section 269UG" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3WJB2MH8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 253, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 233, "text": "Income-tax Act, 1961" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "V6YIK2VK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 308, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 299, "text": "Bangalore" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZOY0I8ZD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 332, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 319, "text": "N. K. Sangwan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XTDMN62H", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 371, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 366, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/547310" }

{ "text": "It is hereby ordered that the following Chief Commissioners of income-tax shall exercise the functions of the Central Government in their respective charges for the purpose of the provisions of section 269UF and section 269UG of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : ... \n\n5. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore. \n\n (Sd.) N. K. Sangwan, Under Secretary to the Govt. of India.\"" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NXCV3S11", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 30, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 25, "text": "Yadav" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YFO1K0PW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 97, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 89, "text": "Tripathi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/374135" }

{ "text": "The defence of appellant Yadav was that he was not, in any way, connected with appellant Tripathi and has been falsely implicated in this case by interested persons." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "0USHD35M", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 72, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 62, "text": "Manoranjan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ENDYEWW7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 124, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 104, "text": "Sunil Kumar Bhowmick" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1747584" }

{ "text": "The said fact has been established by the evidence of P. W. 6 Manoranjan and that of the doctor P. W. 4 Sunil Kumar Bhowmick who treated him while he was at the nursing home." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "FZ35CMWC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 184, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 165, "text": "Sections 138 to 142" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "VZTIXUK3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 218, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 192, "text": "Negotiable Instruments Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/543749" }

{ "text": "The appellant's case is that the suit was filed with a malafide intention and oblique motive to shield or shelter its Directors from the rigour of the provisions of Sections 138 to 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "AC9UF6PC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 75, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 64, "text": "Section 302" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SKYQ6WS5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 79, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 76, "text": "IPC" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/187242188" }

{ "text": "It ought to have convicted him for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "RXLK2Y0R", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 81, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 60, "text": "Section 198-B (3) (a)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6FG5G1CQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 112, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 89, "text": "Criminal Procedure Code" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DC51W3HQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 131, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 122, "text": "N.G. Kaul" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GK6M16R1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 165, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 149, "text": "U. P. Government" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WJ9XWMM3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 229, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 206, "text": "Sessions Judge, Lucknow" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1390790" }

{ "text": "Sanction to prosecute the two applicants was obtained under Section 198-B (3) (a) of the Criminal Procedure Code from Sri N.G. Kaul, Home Secretary, U. P. Government, and the complaint was filed before the Sessions Judge, Lucknow." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "P7KZ2AVA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 27, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 16, "text": "Maharashtra" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "J71OSKON", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 28, "text": "Section 9-A" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TAY3LLJH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 77, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 57, "text": "Civil Procedure Code" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4LP1KL6F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 138, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 81, "text": "Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1977" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/191732005" }

{ "text": "In the State of Maharashtra Section 9-A was added to the Civil Procedure Code by Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1977." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DVWUXDF3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 124, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 107, "text": "Punjab Government" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6P0X7W8F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 149, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 131, "text": "30th January, 1997" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1423970" }

{ "text": "The above mentioned terms and conditions contained in the brochure have been issued by Notification of the Punjab Government dated 30th January, 1997." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "M39A03IR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 32, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 4, "text": "District Magistrate, Neemuch" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/102625801" }

{ "text": "The District Magistrate, Neemuch, is at liberty to initiate proceedings for confiscation after conclusion of trial by the concerned Magistrate, in case, it is found that offence was committed by the accused and the vehicle in question was used in commission of the crime." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UH3YOYT8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 38, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 29, "text": "Sterndale" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QDBMI3IA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 60, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 50, "text": "Warrington" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "V0FKLMRG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 74, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 66, "text": "Scrutton" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/2177/" }

{ "text": "In the Court of Appeal, Lord Sterndale, M. R. and Warrington and' Scrutton, L. JJ. distinguished the case on the same ground." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "RCY7N91A", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 53, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 15, "text": "Ramesh v. Savita, reported, in 3 MC 74" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6TPZ64UN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 157, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 139, "text": "Rule 13 of Order 9" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QBPAJ7RJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 213, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 203, "text": "Section 24" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "93KYYU4Q", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 239, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 221, "text": "Hindu Marriage Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/771773" }

{ "text": "In the case of Ramesh v. Savita, reported, in 3 MC 74 this Court was dealing with the question as to whether pending the application under Rule 13 of Order 9 the wife could maintain an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Z7FS6STE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 48, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 35, "text": "Sarvate T. B." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "R2R9MXOI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 72, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 56, "text": "1966 M.P.L.J. 26" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "HGDWP6XT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 149, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 137, "text": "Kamla Soni's" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NVF5MLFZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 177, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 155, "text": "A.I.R. 1969 N.S.C. 186" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XURKE162", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 209, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 180, "text": "Civil Appeal No. 2150 of 1966" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AM803EOC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 236, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 216, "text": "26th September, 1969" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1111910" }

{ "text": "It is obvious that the decision in Sarvate T. B.'s case 1966 M.P.L.J. 26 was not brought to the notice of this court while deciding Smt. Kamla Soni's case A.I.R. 1969 N.S.C. 186. (Civil Appeal No. 2150 of 1966 dated 26th September, 1969) or else this court would not have landed itself in such patent contradiction." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "6X83OX5P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 132, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 66, "text": "Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8O3C1H56", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 158, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 136, "text": "CGITA No. 1476 of 2004" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/24824105" }

{ "text": "The attention of this Court was drawn to the issues framed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad in CGITA No. 1476 of 2004 which read as under:\n Whether the reference is maintainable? \n\n Have the second party union got valid cause of action in this case? \n\n " }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "OBVN2KZF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 88, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 77, "text": "Section 161" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "KUXKFTJG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 122, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 96, "text": "Code of Criminal Procedure" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1272441" }

{ "text": "He also stated, in his cross- examination, that he had made statement, under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, that all the accused confessed their guilt, before him, individually." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "XHIVIB70", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 54, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 41, "text": "P.C. Bhandari" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "B677LD6Q", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 252, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 243, "text": "22-3-1970" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/541371" }

{ "text": "On the other hand it is contended by Mr. P.C. Bhandari learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent that there is no reliable evidence on record to show that after the agreement of sale was entered into between the purchaser and the seller on 22-3-1970 any offer was made either by the vendee or the vendor to purchase the suit property." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "J83CUWHU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 144, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 135, "text": "Moradabad" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "EYZEOWX3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 189, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 179, "text": "28-10-1991" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "Z5Z0GT7Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 265, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 241, "text": "District Jail, Moradabad" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "EUOPEBGV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 295, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 286, "text": "Moradabad" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/821011" }

{ "text": "Such contingency however, has so far not arisen, on account of the petitioner himself having obtained even before his acquittal in the Moradabad case, an interim stay order dated 28-10-1991 from this court, prohibiting his transfer from the District Jail, Moradabad to any jail outside Moradabad." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "M6ZZNZE2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 97, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 87, "text": "15.09.2004" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/71853448" }

{ "text": "In that situation he had informed that he would come and stay in his ancestral home on 15.09.2004." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NWMJOGQR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 40, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 33, "text": "Haryana" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "829C4RJV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 144, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 116, "text": "Crl.Appeal No.374-DB of 2002" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/86092706" }

{ "text": "Learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana has submitted, on the other hand, that learned trial court has made a fair Crl.Appeal No.374-DB of 2002 .... \n\n assessment of the evidence coming from both the sides." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/128970763/" }

{ "text": "(since the complainant and her sisters are victim of sexual assault, their identity is withheld and they are referred to as PW1, PW2 and PW3). \n\n2." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1HZHR8W7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 15, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 5, "text": "31.03.2008" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/26398979/" }

{ "text": "On 31.03.2008 adjournment was requested by ld. ARM which was strongly opposed by ld. ARW. " }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "SF432T3O", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 49, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 39, "text": "17.09.2011" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OHXGF7FE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 122, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 84, "text": "Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Panipat" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9EBKJWV9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 172, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 157, "text": "Section 156 (3)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UL4R378W", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 181, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 173, "text": "Cr.P.C.," } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YJATV5K9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 210, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 200, "text": "24.09.2011" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YWZQ12UH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 272, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 245, "text": "Sections 323, 498-A and 506" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "D1UYRMRO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 276, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 273, "text": "IPC" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4HOA2LBD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 330, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 295, "text": "Police Station Chandnibagh, Panipat" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/115311593" }

{ "text": "It is submitted that a complaint dated 17.09.2011 was filed in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Panipat and in terms of the provisions of Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., FIR No. 861 dated 24.09.2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 498-A and 506 IPC was registered at Police Station Chandnibagh, Panipat." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/123218719/" }

{ "text": "It is further stated by respondent side that son of the petitioner is already well settled and is not dependent on the petitioner." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YJ5NB8IA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 88, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 81, "text": "Seervai" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "L5VUDE7E", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 105, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 94, "text": "Article 301" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FSFB7O02", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 149, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 137, "text": "Constitution" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/451134" }

{ "text": "Paras 34, 35, 37 and 38 of the report read as under:\n(34) It is suggested by Mr. Seervai that Article 301 is merely a declaration by the Constitution marks and that it does not constitute any restriction upon the legislative competence of the legislature." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/15219160" }

{ "text": "Perusal of the leave to defend application shows that the number of the family member of the petitioner has not been disputed by the respondent." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/100449682/" }

{ "text": "Whereas, on the other hand, if the time of performance is the essence of contract, any delay will render the contract CS No.194/2014 Hi Tech Polyflex Pvt Limited v New Life Pharmaceuticals Page 15 of 25 voidable at the option of the other party." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Z1DIIX9B", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 29, "text": "Order­XII rule 6" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9R34SVTS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 49, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 46, "text": "CPC" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/50743632/" }

{ "text": "In view of the provisions of Order­XII rule 6 CPC, it is clear that where admissions of the fact have been made either in the pleadings or otherwise , the court can, at any stage of the suit, pronounce the judgment on the basis of the said admissions." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LQ9MNMIW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 12, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 4, "text": "Dhaniram" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9K53HHU8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 57, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 32, "text": "AIR 2011 Chhattisgarh 103" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/6742030" }

{ "text": "Vs. Dhaniram & Anr. reported in AIR 2011 Chhattisgarh 103. \n\n 7." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/12575/" }

{ "text": "Then there are provisions for the payment of royalty to the State and sale of cement at concession rates to local consumers." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "VTO99JAW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 109, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 99, "text": "16.09.1999" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZNRP5L3S", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 147, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 120, "text": "Original Suit No. 5 of 1998" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/26148" }

{ "text": "This appeal arises out of a probate proceeding and is directed against a judgment and decree dated 16.09.1999 passed in Original Suit No. 5 of 1998 by which the application for probate to the Will in question was granted after a contest." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "C9V04A07", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 175, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 165, "text": "s. 561 A." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1152219/" }

{ "text": "The remarks in the present\tcase were not\t of such a character, so\t as to\t call for the\t exercise of\t the extraordinary power of the High Court under s. 561 A." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "3NFBQ7FI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 173, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 163, "text": "12.10.2009" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "financial_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/145002494/" }

{ "text": "When the complainant presented the said cheque for the encashment before his bankers, it came to be dishonoured with a bank endorsement as \"insufficient funds\" on 12.10.2009." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "C1024UL1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 46, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 34, "text": "sub rule (5)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "N3UYGBC8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 202, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 158, "text": "clause (iv) of sub section (2) of Section 21" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/152081498" }

{ "text": "We are conscious of the fact that sub rule (5) is part of the Rule captioned as single 'supervision of prosecution and submission of report' \u0016 referred to in clause (iv) of sub section (2) of Section 21." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "7VE8911A", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 83, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 70, "text": "6th May, 2003" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/106827301" }

{ "text": "There was an addendum to the conveyance and the agreement executed on 6th May, 2003." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/835773" }

{ "text": "About kickbacks, there has undoubtedly been clear evidence and a reference to such evidence has been made by the Tribunal in its order." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1168238" }

{ "text": "Her statement can be reckoned as only an approximate statement." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "OXBBFTG5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 43, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 33, "text": "08.07.2013" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QPKW18Y3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 98, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 74, "text": "Municipal Council, Jaora" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LIGJL0NV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 210, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 197, "text": "Gopal Panchal" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/182954850" }

{ "text": "After the High Court order dated 08.07.2013, the Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council, Jaora has rejected the representation of the petitioners and the said order has been challenged by Shri Gopal Panchal and others by way of writ petition before this Court and the said writ petition is still pending." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1420147" }

{ "text": "He can reject items claimed as exemptions or deductions and arrive at his own determination of income and then proceed to determine the chargeable profits." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "PU396LCS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 95, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 86, "text": "Jagannath" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/127462" }

{ "text": "There is no explanation why as against this, the bus stopped in between and picked up Jagannath (D. W. 1)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "H10I7XCO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 179, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 160, "text": "[1955] 1 S.C.R. 206" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ULO6GDVE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 204, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 187, "text": "[1959] F.C.R. 124" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/660275/" }

{ "text": "between the Governor-General in Council and any province if and in so far as the dispute involves any question (whether of law or fact) on which the exist- (1) [1955] 1 S.C.R. 206. \n\n(2) [1959] F.C.R. 124 ence or extent of a legal right depends." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "26XPUACR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 43, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 31, "text": "Sudesh Kumar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "J913S2FG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 58, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 48, "text": "Vidya Wati" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/170406031" }

{ "text": "Defendants No.2 and 3, namely, Sudesh Kumar and Vidya Wati, also filed their joint written statement controverting the allegations levelled by the plaintiff." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "08I0LE1F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 103, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 29, "text": "T. Arivandandam vs. T.V. Satyapal and another) AIR 1977 Supreme Court 2421" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/460837" }

{ "text": "In the decision reported in (T. Arivandandam vs. T.V. Satyapal and another) AIR 1977 Supreme Court 2421, it was held in para-5 thus:-\n \"5." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/909225" }

{ "text": "This decision also is of no help to us, as the Court did not decide on this point urged by the counsel for the appellant." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/647153" }

{ "text": "He also preferred an appeal against the said order." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/62927312" }

{ "text": "The other documents produced by DW.1 pertains to the entry made In the revenue records as per Exs.D16 to D21 and the receipts for having paid the land revenue as per Exs.D6 to D15. \n\n 15." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/181845991/" }

{ "text": "In view of the above findings and observations, DCP (South East) is directed to look into the above aspect by conducting fair investigation regarding the fact who is /are the real person/persons responsible for preparation and use of fake policy." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HXWLMV8E", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 49, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 43, "text": "Jessel" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RKSHOO29", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 111, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 70, "text": "Lord Abinger v. Ashton, (1873) 17 Eq. 358" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/849068" }

{ "text": "Then, why this blind faith in experts whom Jessel, M. R. described in Lord Abinger v. Ashton, (1873) 17 Eq. 358 at pp. 373-374, as remunerated witnesses available on hire to pledge their oath in favour of the party who has paid them." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EADZOLMN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 84, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 74, "text": "19.10.1983" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1892672" }

{ "text": "The copy of said complaint has sent to the Court of learned Magistrate on 19.10.1983, which was received in the Court at 3-00 PM i.e. after 4 days." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/179903285" }

{ "text": "The procession was less than a kilometer in length." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EDOIFIEM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 105, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 101, "text": "Goya" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3I1QAXZV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 114, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 107, "text": "Salsood" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8K2EQ5W6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 122, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 116, "text": "Birdih" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "S6ZILHUC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 134, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 127, "text": "Bariatu" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1417141" }

{ "text": "So far as the properties in suit are concerned, they are situated in four different villages namely, Goya, Salsood, Birdih and Bariatu." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "MYCPU26T", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 161, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 152, "text": "24-4-1960" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SI5HNM7K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 183, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 173, "text": "Rule 10-A." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/6759/" }

{ "text": "Before proceeding further we will deal with the question whether the Division Bench correctly refused to permit an argument that the impugned notice of 24-4-1960 fell under Rule 10-A." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "3QN27G1U", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 38, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 21, "text": "Syed Abdul Razack" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/709552" }

{ "text": "The first defendant, Syed Abdul Razack got examined himself as D.W.1 and got marked Exs.B.1 to B.20." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/196778613" }

{ "text": "Whereas in the evidence of some of the witnesses, it has come that 61 Cri.Confirmation Case no.3.2013 accused no.1 was holding katta and accused no.2 was holding knife. \n " }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "A6QGO2GP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 57, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 41, "text": "Ajoy Kumar Shome" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "L2IAKDNK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 128, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 119, "text": "Sachindra" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/176124" }

{ "text": "Indeed, to prove her \"gross misconduct\", Ajoy Kumar Shome, assistant librarian of Victoria Institution, is examined as Sachindra's ninth witness." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "0194NAW8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 28, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 16, "text": "Reserve Bank" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CJW5K317", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 192, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 163, "text": "Industrial Disputes Act, 1947" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/149275" }

{ "text": "The judgment in Reserve Bank (supra) was referred to contend that the provisions of the unfair labour practices can be enforced through the machinery contained in Industrial Disputes Act, 1947." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UVA3AV6Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 49, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 32, "text": "Balaram Choudhury" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XI59VYN0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 121, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 112, "text": "Choudhury" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1949616" }

{ "text": "If this be correct, then P.W. 2 Balaram Choudhury cannot be a member of the Sunri caste, having the surname of 'Choudhury', but no suggestion to this effect was made to him." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "4VKJNTWC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 4, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 0, "text": "TBIL" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AN7ZONHW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 100, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 33, "text": "BIFR (Bureau of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, New Delhi)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TNE0Q56F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 123, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 104, "text": "27th November, 1993" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MDAMYVE9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 140, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 130, "text": "Section 15" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FTE8BAO8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 200, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 144, "text": "Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QLSX6RD8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 339, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 283, "text": "Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1761540/" }

{ "text": "TBIL made a reference before the BIFR (Bureau of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, New Delhi) on 27th November, 1993 under Section 15 of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 whereby it was stated that the company has become a sick industrial company under Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/369575" }

{ "text": "It has been already remarked that the unbroken succession of wheat crops returned by the same land is often surprising, but sometimes the soil shows signs of complete exhaustion." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "H7USBCYW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 20, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 7, "text": "Supreme Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/55023227" }

{ "text": "\n\n The Supreme Court observed that the above observations will apply with added vigour to the field of education." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/22563035/" }

{ "text": "PW2 had deposed that suddenly the lights were got on by the driver of the offending vehicle due to which he became stunned and lost Suit No. 334/14 Radha Devi Vs. Guru Enterprises & Ors." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "3SL8ACPG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 21, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 3, "text": "FAFO No.86 of 2010" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/49180458" }

{ "text": "In FAFO No.86 of 2010 considering the notional income to be Rs. 3,000/- per month and deducting 1/3 for funeral expenses, the annual dependency comes to Rs.24,000/-." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "CAYDOI38", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 35, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 28, "text": "Sec. 50" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZHVBAM7T", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 47, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 39, "text": "NDPS Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/86198642/" }

{ "text": "held that non-compliance of Sec. 50 of NDPS Act even in a case where recovery is affected from a trunk, after the investigating agency chooses to give such notice, would be fatal." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1252118" }

{ "text": "So long as, as observed above, no factual investigation is involved, and on the admitted fact as appears in the appeal before the authority, when a prohibition is sought making out total lack of jurisdiction, this Court cannot hesitate to issue such a writ." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "6JNSAOJC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 48, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 37, "text": "section 147" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/82230760" }

{ "text": "Viewed in this light, the proviso to section 147 of the said Act, carves out an exception from the main provisions of section <span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_25\">WP(C) 4074/2007 Page No. 24 of 41</span>\n 147." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "28I7X7RI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 191, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 171, "text": "April 30/May 1, 1964" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1773109" }

{ "text": "It is therefore but just that he should have the whole of January 1964 with a view to finding out a new lessee in place of Cultex guilty of having broken the agreement of April 30/May 1, 1964." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DALBP0SZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 113, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 95, "text": "September 29, 1988" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "90N8CJ4Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 157, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 146, "text": "Mehla Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "W7J8ICFV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 209, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 197, "text": "Surjit Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/93178175" }

{ "text": "The matter of termination of services of petitioner was considered in two parallel meetings on September 29, 1988, one under the Presidentship of Mehla Singh and another under the Presidentship of Surjit Singh." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NUKR072H", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 77, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 59, "text": "Kripashankar Patel" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "IWVMGZUQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 113, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 100, "text": "Shankar Patel" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MK5DM3M1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 200, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 191, "text": "12.6.2012" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "A8R50BWG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 243, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 237, "text": "Nandni" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "397S9YBV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 266, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 257, "text": "18.6.2012" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RMFAIYL0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 310, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 301, "text": "24.6.2012" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/105769111" }

{ "text": "In further averments it is stated that the respondent no.9 Kripashankar Patel (wrongly mentioned as Shankar Patel) was not present on the date of incident as he was on leave for 10 days from 12.6.2012 because of marriage of his daughter Nandni scheduled on 18.6.2012, and he had resumed the duties on 24.6.2012." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "3IZZYERE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 70, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 60, "text": "Apex Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4IHCKFMG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 145, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 74, "text": "Amit Kapoor v. Ramesh Chander and another, reported in (2012) 9 SCC 460" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/43365892" }

{ "text": "She has also placed reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Amit Kapoor v. Ramesh Chander and another, reported in (2012) 9 SCC 460, wherein the Hon'ble" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "FIVHYNJU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 197, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 184, "text": "Balwant Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1865791/" }

{ "text": "As stated above, as many as six witnesses were examined including two officers of the Bank who conducted the preliminary enquiry and had recorded the statements of witnesses including Balwant Singh." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "S91BY7PO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 214, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 183, "text": "M.A.C.A Nos.223 and 243 of 2007" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/183455156" }

{ "text": "We are not adverting to the other unnecessary details as it is very clear now that the claimants are pressing the claim for compensation only against the owner and the insurer of the M.A.C.A Nos.223 and 243 of 2007-B 4 lorry which had collided with the vehicle in which the deceased were travelling." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "0IGP45WA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 82, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 72, "text": "Habib Seth" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WSI4AZDX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 105, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 90, "text": "1968 All LJ 446" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5TLKS64N", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 174, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 158, "text": "Tajammul Hussain" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/759763" }

{ "text": "The Lower Appellate Court had mainly relied on the decision reported in Habib Seth's case 1968 All LJ 446 (supra) and had found on the basis of the same that Tajammul Hussain, the plaintiff, was not entitled to get any decree of possession in the present suit." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "R9YG4UV3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 83, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 14, "text": "State of Uttar Pradesh v. Raj Kishore Bhargava 1992 Suppl. (2) SCC 92" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/627562/" }

{ "text": "Similarly, in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Raj Kishore Bhargava 1992 Suppl. (2) SCC 92, the Chief Engineer who had given adverse entries against the officer in one year was appointed a member of the Screening Committee for deciding about the compulsory retirement of the officer." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "C7G5815W", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 105, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 72, "text": "Section 66/192A & CMVR 138(3)/177" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QZ8GGRS5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 123, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 109, "text": "M.V. Act,1988." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/159000229/" }

{ "text": "In the present challan, the accused was challaned for the violations of Section 66/192A & CMVR 138(3)/177 of M.V. Act,1988." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1306907/" }

{ "text": "Other statutes providing for speedy action to meet emergent situations may well be construed as excluding the principle audi alteram partem." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1516991" }

{ "text": "The circumstances relied on are consistent with the entirely innocent relations of friends with a common interest in sports.\"" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "H9YWDBXM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 10, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 0, "text": "Section 19" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/681436/" }

{ "text": "Section 19 gave power to the State Government to make rules and in the exercise of that power, the State Government made the Rules." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1C9T3Y44", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 10, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 0, "text": "Lila Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "EX56C20B", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 140, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 116, "text": "Gurcharan Singh Sarpanch" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "97Q4UNMS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 160, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 152, "text": "Panjmala" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/45864869" }

{ "text": "Lila Singh (appellant No.3) in his defence stated that he had been falsely involved in this case at the instance of Gurcharan Singh Sarpanch of village Panjmala." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/491331" }

{ "text": "I have already rejected the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner that there has been any serious irregularity or illegality in procedure or failure to observe the principles of natural justice." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "0LSFRJ85", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 55, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 31, "text": "16th day of August, 2014" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "21NLT2PK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 161, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 56, "text": "(SUMEDH KUMAR SETHI) ACJ/ARC/CCJ(West)/16.08.2014 E. No. 63/2013 Hari Shankar Vs Anwar Hussain and Others" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/114703247/" }

{ "text": "Announced in the open Court on 16th day of August, 2014 (SUMEDH KUMAR SETHI) ACJ/ARC/CCJ(West)/16.08.2014 E. No. 63/2013 Hari Shankar Vs Anwar Hussain and Others" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DW0WGV5U", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 41, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 30, "text": "Vijay Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OJR8FDJP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 146, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 135, "text": "Section 313" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6HTIJV7A", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 155, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 148, "text": "Cr.P.C." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/670260" }

{ "text": "It is true that the appellant Vijay Singh has not put forward the plea of the right of private defence in his statement recorded under Section 313, Cr.P.C." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "KQFNR370", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 129, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 102, "text": "section 140 or section 163A" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RUKWOSL1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 334, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 309, "text": "Fatal Accidents Act, 1855" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LYEFQL0J", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 369, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 345, "text": "Motor Vehicles Act, 1988" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/190580/" }

{ "text": "The Claims Tribunal is required to determine the application for payment of compensation either under section 140 or section 163A on the basis of no-fault liability and also on the basis of right to receive the compensation on the principle of fault liability on the basis of Law of Torts, as modified by the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 read with Motor Vehicles Act, 1988." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "3AJMV2NP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 46, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 27, "text": "Article 217 (1)\n(a)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "W2D6AM7C", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 75, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 54, "text": "Constitution of India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/147006/" }

{ "text": "upon the interpretation of Article 217 (1)\n(a) of the Constitution of India." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "VD2XGYBU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 211, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 165, "text": "C. Arunachalam -vs- Commissioner of Income Tax" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/21385" }

{ "text": "The rules of construction applicable to taxation measures which are now well settled, some of which have been succinctly summarised by a Full Bench of this Court in C. Arunachalam -vs- Commissioner of Income Tax has ex-" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "AWZIHYW4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 5, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 0, "text": "Madhu" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "05D61XQY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 34, "text": "Latha" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "B64TJN9Y", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 57, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 52, "text": "Akila" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1438332/" }

{ "text": "Madhu (A.3) was identified by Dr. Latha (PW.1); and Akila (PW.2)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "9J7RNGVE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 8, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 0, "text": "Panditji" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3ZWEE64H", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 44, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 30, "text": "Subhash Sharma" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/92629565" }

{ "text": "Panditji claimed that he knew Subhash Sharma and that he could help them." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YFH9LYP3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 28, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 19, "text": "24-7-1987" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8T8IW5X6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 40, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 29, "text": "J. P. Desai" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OM4YYS27", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 125, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 116, "text": "S.S. Shah" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1200860" }

{ "text": "By the order dated 24-7-1987 J. P. Desai, J. dismissed the said application passing the following order:\n Heard Mr. S.S. Shah for the petitioners." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/812940" }

{ "text": "On account of her disability, she discontinued her studies." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "76XZBPI8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 70, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 49, "text": "Bangesh Chandra Gupta" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/279656" }

{ "text": "The next witness on the defendant's side was one Bangesh Chandra Gupta, the guard of the train 743 Up." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1FEG3H8S", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 24, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 12, "text": "Section 9(6)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/789410" }

{ "text": "Thus, under Section 9(6) of the Code, what is required by the Sessions Court to see the general convenience of the parties and witnesses to hold its sitting at any other place in the Sessions Division than the place notified by the High Court, and that too, with the consent of the prosecution and/or the accused." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "N5HCFST2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 77, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 46, "text": "Civil Revision No. 4025 of 2006" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PJH4ECTJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 93, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 80, "text": "Section 14(6)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "HSTBYU1Q", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 110, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 101, "text": "Delhi Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/188714471" }

{ "text": "14. Protection of tenant against eviction: -\n Civil Revision No. 4025 of 2006 [ Section 14(6) of the Delhi Act restricts the right of a landlord to seek eviction in the event of acquisition of title." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "0K0D4PUV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 43, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 29, "text": "Union of India" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "82Z8Z0GN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 88, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 75, "text": "Roy Chowdhury" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "EWH7JM4Q", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 232, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 218, "text": "Income Tax Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/806017" }

{ "text": "On behalf of the respondent, Union of India, the arguments advanced by Mr. Roy Chowdhury have been mainly adopted and it has further been submitted that this writ petition is incompetent as the Bank for the purpose of Income Tax Act is treated and considered to be a company." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q55TVFK8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 43, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 31, "text": "Anu Malhotra" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/108389166/" }

{ "text": "\n\nAnnounced in the Open Court (Anu Malhotra) today this the 01st day of District & Sessions Judge/ ARCT July, 2014 (West) Delhi ARCT No. 23/2013 Page 21/21" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "8TKGKZB2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 65, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 55, "text": "Apex Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9DUQ2M8B", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 84, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 69, "text": "Jasvinder Saini" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZDES8P4X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 127, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 112, "text": "Prakash Chander" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/72093584" }

{ "text": "In the light of the above noted views expressed by the Apex Court in Jasvinder Saini (4 supra), the judgment in Prakash Chander (2 supra) may not be considered as laying down correct law." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "FDFR9AL2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 85, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 74, "text": "Vivian Bose" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "852TAXYF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 150, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 93, "text": "Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal : (AIR p.429, para 16)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/192064050" }

{ "text": "At this stage, it is relevant to extract the passage from the judgment of Vivian Bose, J. in Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal : (AIR p.429, para 16) \"16." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "BVYRH13E", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 29, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 12, "text": "Madras High Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XZVIC0PP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 124, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 38, "text": "Sumathi Vs. Sengottaiyan and others, C.R.P. (PD) No.1591 of 2009 and M.P. No.1 of 2009" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TKER8Y7H", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 147, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 137, "text": "05.02.2010" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/69940573" }

{ "text": "The Hon'ble Madras High Court in case Sumathi Vs. Sengottaiyan and others, C.R.P. (PD) No.1591 of 2009 and M.P. No.1 of 2009 (decided on 05.02.2010), also took similar view while observing as under:-\n \"11." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "RAO5GK6W", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 58, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 42, "text": "[1965]58 ITR 241" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1671648/" }

{ "text": "v.\tNchanga Consolidated Copper Mines LTD [1965]58 ITR 241; followed" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "O1WIPWT4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 93, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 79, "text": "Chanda Tamboli" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "90YIRJF8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 105, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 98, "text": "Ramsukh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "W2MFJ835", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 154, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 145, "text": "Rajvendra" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1337712" }

{ "text": "The Government has already issued a circular after considering the decision of Chanda Tamboli and Ramsukh (supra) and this Court also in case of Rajvendra and Ors. (supra) has very categorically laid down that the incumbents should be paid the minimum of the pay scale of 3rd Grade Teachers and they should be paid for the summer vacations also." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "O2UB7MWX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 13, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 0, "text": "Varadachariar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CJD6Y5G1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 62, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 52, "text": "Section 37" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "83V0QWTI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 89, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 70, "text": "Indian Contract Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/530826" }

{ "text": "Varadachariar J., as he then was, pointed out \"that Section 37 of the Indian Contract Act which lays down that 'parties to a contract must either perform or offer to perform their respective promises' \" qualifies this statement by the words \"unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of any other law.\"" }