Datasets:

mwitiderrick

/

legal

like 0

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YVUEAIC6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 53, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 34, "text": "O. P. No 33 of 1966" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1229358" }

{ "text": "The 3rd respondent Sarpanch filed O. P. No 33 of 1966 on the file of the Principal Munsif-Magistrate's Court." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/159740132" }

{ "text": "The driver had the competence to drive such a vehicle, tractor with a trailer carrying goods being of light motor vehicle category transport vehicle which is the question involved in the instant case." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "XULTUX0K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 120, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 115, "text": "India" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "A5W6HV3F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 171, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 154, "text": "sub-clause (viii)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XGDRNIJN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 212, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 207, "text": "India" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "W7VY3J05", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 292, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 287, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/799078" }

{ "text": "It was held that it was not necessary that the person or corporation rendering services should be situated outside India and it was sufficient to attract sub-clause (viii) that services are rendered outside India even if the person or corporation performing such services is situated in India." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/994246/" }

{ "text": "On this reasoning also we hold that the order of the CIT (Appeals) is correct." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "7HVXUERE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 162, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 151, "text": "28-03- 1990" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/88660185" }

{ "text": "Long after a period of six years, you have chosen to issue a notice calling upon to pay the outstanding dues even though you have recalled the loan on 28-03- 1990 itself." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "41OW3P3I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 61, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 53, "text": "1.7.1990" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0JBGEDQU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 88, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 78, "text": "Tamil Nadu" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1507897" }

{ "text": "6.It is the case of the petitioners that on or after 1.7.1990 in the State of Tamil Nadu, no new permit can be granted to any private operators which may overlap on the notified route." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/95069444" }

{ "text": "The amount in deposit to be transmitted to the Tribunal." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/781710" }

{ "text": "A plain reading of the provisions reproduced above shows that the same vests the court with the power to direct rectification, the exercise of which power is discretionary with the court as is apparent from the word \"may\" used in the section." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NRVNT3KD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 193, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 182, "text": "section 307" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NSAVWLRQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 197, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 194, "text": "IPC" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/89581176/" }

{ "text": "On the other hand, Ld. defence counsel has further <span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_27\">SC No.13/2011 State Vs. Sandeep Chaudhary Page 27 of 36</span> argued that no offence under section 307 IPC is made out as the bullet allegedly fired by the accused did not cause any injury to anybody." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ATW7Z1JX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 66, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 55, "text": "Section 313" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4AJEPLIU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 74, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 67, "text": "Cr.P.C." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1934278" }

{ "text": "Thereafter, statements of the accused appellants under Section 313 Cr.P.C. were recorded." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "I5BZHPVC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 37, "text": "Khalarka" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QVUY77GU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 95, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 78, "text": "Rawat Tej Singhji" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5WFFBMOU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 115, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 99, "text": "Thikana Rawatsar" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/62724" }

{ "text": "It may be mentioned that the village Khalarka formed part of the Jagir of one Rawat Tej Singhji of Thikana Rawatsar." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "WJ3GW8CO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 108, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 96, "text": "Minaxi Patel" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/395404" }

{ "text": "Identification of this accused by some prosecution witnesses and especially prosecution witness Minaxi Patel may have an important effect on the totality of the evidence." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QRREUSMG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 46, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 31, "text": "section 156 (3)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "85P97LYA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 54, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 47, "text": "Cr.P.C." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PWQ11HF9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 102, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 87, "text": "Jagannath Yadav" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UYMVV4FV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 125, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 115, "text": "K.L. Yadav" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "I13BJ2OV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 137, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 129, "text": "8.9.2014" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "D5J4PVJW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 151, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 142, "text": "15.9.2014" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "05YIDORP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 256, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 248, "text": "5.8.2015" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/117700307" }

{ "text": "An application was moved under section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. by the father of the petitioner Jagannath Yadav and wife of K.L. Yadav on 8.9.2014 and 15.9.2014 respectively against the complainant and other accused persons in respect to the incident dated 5.8.2015." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "9BCDECKT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 11, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "1.3.2014" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1676849/" }

{ "text": "On 1.3.2014 it was stated that the legal offer of settlement filed on behalf of the Insurance Company was not acceptable to the LRs of the deceased." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "0P6B9UTK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 108, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 98, "text": "Section 10" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/34441316" }

{ "text": "This argument cannot be accepted, because it ignores the first condition for the applicability of Section 10 to the effect that the person contravening the order must be a company itself." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "9A325QBY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 77, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 53, "text": "Shriram Investments Ltd." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/26904083" }

{ "text": "\n\n A few writ petitions came up for consideration in Shriram Investments Ltd. (supra)." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1943657" }

{ "text": "She has given her specimen signature against her name." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "VKR1F25K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 28, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 8, "text": "Government of Punjab" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "U7HQWXPL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 99, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 79, "text": "Articles 315 and 316" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BLF9A2HT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 128, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 107, "text": "Constitution of India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/765272" }

{ "text": "(h) The Government of Punjab has constituted a Public Service Commission under Articles 315 and 316 of the Constitution of India which consists of Chairman with at least 7 members." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "JZ6JP9R9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 10, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 1, "text": "Section 1" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1279970" }

{ "text": "\nSection 1 states that the Lokayukta is not to hold any other office." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/25377156/" }

{ "text": "If there was no information available with the investigating agency prior to 4.15 AM on the intervening night, they had no occasion whatsoever to stay back in the office throughout night." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/547310" }

{ "text": "But this is not inflexible and there may be sections in the Act where the meaning may have to be departed from on account of the subject or context in which the word has been used and that will be giving effect to the opening sentence in the or context." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/7255" }

{ "text": "The intention of the Act was to cover, as far as possible, the entire field." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/70946855" }

{ "text": "\n\n 7. Where a criminal proceeding is manifestly attended with mala fide and/or where the proceeding is maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the accused and with a view to spite him due 47 Criminal Application No.258.13 (APL) to private and personal grudge." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "O8TNMCI2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 58, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 51, "text": "Singhvi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6ZMF81Q6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 147, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 136, "text": "Article 226" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5U1QY69I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 176, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 155, "text": "Constitution of India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/157235995" }

{ "text": "We are also unable to accept the submission of Mr. Singhvi that the review petition filed by the petitioner itself was a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and, therefore, direction given in the review petition should be treated as if given in a writ petition." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "3F292Z75", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 48, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 32, "text": "Nandu @ Nand Lal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9I4YGUO4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 92, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 82, "text": "Gita Nagar" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/987256" }

{ "text": "On his disclosure the appellant Nandu @ Nand Lal was apprehended from his room in Gita Nagar." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZJA7TVX0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 118, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 86, "text": "Punjab Kashmir Finance Pvt. Ltd." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CCOMR0JF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 173, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 154, "text": "ITA No.5(Asr)/2001," } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0IJVJGAT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 227, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 206, "text": "ITA No.5(Asr)/2001 of" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/46970483/" }

{ "text": "Since the facts in the present grounds are identical to the facts in the case of M/s. Punjab Kashmir Finance Pvt. Ltd. for the assessment year 1997-97 in ITA No.5(Asr)/2001, our order in the said appeal in ITA No.5(Asr)/2001 of even date shall be identically applicable to the facts in the present grounds and accordingly grounds No.1 to 5 of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EIAHX3LW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 69, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 52, "text": "1st December 1951" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/453175" }

{ "text": "In June 1951 he became the Vice-Principal; and from 1st December 1951 he was appointed the Principal." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/16780618/" }

{ "text": "4. Of the 8 witnesses sought to be examined by the prosecution to substantiate its case against the accused persons ,all of them were examined." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "SO438QN3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 113, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 103, "text": "IIT, Powai" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/991728" }

{ "text": "As per the statement of these witnesses, five accused who had fired bullet shots had proceeded towards IIT, Powai from the Padmavati road in an auto rickshaw." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/676408" }

{ "text": "We find that neither the ITO nor the CIT(A) nor the Tribunal has examined the matter by applying the functional test." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EXPVBETT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 92, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 87, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/799078" }

{ "text": "Secondly, even if any services were performed, such services are not performed outside India." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "2LIR3R6A", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 32, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 4, "text": "High Court of Andhra Pradesh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/510946" }

{ "text": "The High Court of Andhra Pradesh also rejected the plea of the Banks." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "618B16RL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 25, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 9, "text": "I.A.No.3501/2014" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/12840019" }

{ "text": "Heard on I.A.No.3501/2014, an application for urgent hearing." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YD760C0K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 150, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 132, "text": "D.V. Chandrashekar" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/852742" }

{ "text": "The owner insured who had also valid licence did not know that nor it has been established that he consented to its being driven by D.V. Chandrashekar, a person not holding a driving licence or a permanent driving licence and who was only holding a learner's licence." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/928859" }

{ "text": "It has been submitted that para 6 of the 1987 Directions provides the mode of investment which is necessarily linked up with the rate of interest mandatorily and compulsorily required to be paid by every residuary non-banking company by para 5 of the 1987 Directions." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LOUG0EFY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 33, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 22, "text": "Mohd. Rafiq" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ORRNC199", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 199, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 187, "text": "Mohd. Rashid" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/44562882" }

{ "text": "Since the complainant Mohd. Rafiq claims to be innocent, whereas the police, after carrying out investigation, has concluded he alongwith his co-accused is guilty of committing murder of Mohd. Rashid, investigation on the counter version given by the complainant would be a re- investigation and not only a further investigation by the police." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "MJ2A3A6L", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 140, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 134, "text": "Pennan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "37K6NHZB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 153, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 146, "text": "Vellian" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "A0LD31H6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 167, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 158, "text": "Anaikutti" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/855025" }

{ "text": "The next incidental question which arises for consideration is whether there has been a severance in status and a division as between Pennan III, Vellian and Anaikutti." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/52055607" }

{ "text": "Thus, the submission that the entire examination should be set aside also merits no consideration." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "4JY1MIJX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 38, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 24, "text": "Chiman Bhuriya" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "S2XBXOG9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 275, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 270, "text": "Kalji" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/176975066" }

{ "text": "He has also denied that Chiman Bhuriya took them near his house and one stone was seized from there in their presence, or that he also showed one toilet and thereafter, he took them the panchas and the police near Sukhi Canal and showed the place by stating that he and Kalji had thrown the dead-body in that canal by bringing it in a bundle." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "J4UYWHCJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 110, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 71, "text": "CC NO: 378/12 Mohd Afsar v/s Mohd Afroz" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "O2U5D8Q0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 136, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 126, "text": "04.03.2014" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "financial_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/34483639/" }

{ "text": "\nCounsel has further submitted that accused got the matter referred to CC NO: 378/12 Mohd Afsar v/s Mohd Afroz Judgment dated 04.03.2014 8 of 17 ­9­ mediation center but there also he tried to buy time." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "D17XCWF9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 70, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 57, "text": "Karnail Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4TFN7YCC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 118, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 106, "text": "Pritam Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "R1YNUHA6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 172, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 160, "text": "Sarwan Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YRZLYS8M", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 235, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 223, "text": "Sarwan Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/187346893" }

{ "text": "The Will was also witnessed by another attesting witness Karnail Singh, who, as per the statement of DW-1 Pritam Singh, also signed the Will in the presence of Sarwan Singh and that of the scribe and even the photograph of Sarwan Singh was pasted on the Will and scribe also made entry of the Will in his register." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/65345734/" }

{ "text": "\n ➔ It was also agreed that if he or his legal heirs refuses to execute sale deed/transfer documents of the tenanted premises in favour of the tenant, the advance amount of Rs. E. No. 468/06/03 Tulsi Dass v Ashok Kumar Kainth 9 of 21 two lacs would be returned to the tenant with interest @ 24% per annum." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "6XNCEI10", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 14, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 3, "text": "W.P. 907/86" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1IMUVGM8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 44, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 33, "text": "W.A. 669/86" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ICWZQ4S1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 176, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 164, "text": "Shyam Sunder" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1435631" }

{ "text": "In W.P. 907/86 (corresponding to W.A. 669/86) 2 petitioners working as Section Officers etc. (Cat. 5 of Divn. I) claimed equal salary with that of their junior Sri Shyam Sunder." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "5Q7OYNH7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 15, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 0, "text": "M. F. A. 337/78" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WA62IWCR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 67, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 51, "text": "Calicut Tribunal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AS2VOK83", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 99, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 71, "text": "O. A. Nos. 176/74 and 211/74" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "S0VFBQ8K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 191, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 182, "text": "O. A. 176" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8O01XJBG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 224, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 215, "text": "O. A. 211" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "REVZ78T9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 284, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 259, "text": "Section 2 (f) (1) (i) (C)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TSF30B3D", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 303, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 292, "text": "Vesting Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/253563" }

{ "text": "M. F. A. 337/78 is against the common order of the Calicut Tribunal in O. A. Nos. 176/74 and 211/74, holding that the teak plantations involved in the two applications (894 acres in O. A. 176 and 343.95 hectares in O. A. 211) are eligible for exemption under Section 2 (f) (1) (i) (C) of the Vesting Act." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/32466115" }

{ "text": "Similarly the party No.1 will be entitled to construct the first floor on the main building and construction on the garrage." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "6ETAKPW1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 17, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 0, "text": "HC Devinder Kumar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QSSK1YZ0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 87, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 77, "text": "Section 41" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NSVPMDJZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 95, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 88, "text": "Cr.P.C." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/177807969" }

{ "text": "HC Devinder Kumar deposed that he had prepared the kalandra Ex.PW-23/A under Section 41 Cr.P.C. \n\n34." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YPN4RPH2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 33, "text": "Faiyaz Ahmad" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PEH3I1TA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 61, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 50, "text": "Neyaz Ahmad" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "D2LAMDWD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 82, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 72, "text": "Aurangabad" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/198425636" }

{ "text": "(l) It has come in evidence that Faiyaz Ahmad and Neyaz Ahmad reside at Aurangabad but they have not been examined by the plaintiff in support of his case although the plaintiff claims his title through them." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "MZWE1R1Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 146, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 121, "text": "A.P. Productivity Council" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QXXKMQ5U", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 219, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 187, "text": "Girijan Co-operative Corporation" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/200837" }

{ "text": "It has been argued on behalf of the appellant before us that when he accepted to conduct the course for four days in the A.P. Productivity Council for the benefit of the employees of the Girijan Co-operative Corporation, he was engaged in occasional work of a scientific or cultural character." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "FKAGSTWY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 25, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 18, "text": "Bhojraj" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "93MTD7AS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 64, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 47, "text": "Rajendra Padmakar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3D3DMB0K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 87, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 74, "text": "Ganesh Dhakde" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "VWF7BJEJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 125, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 109, "text": "Subhash Padmakar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LSESO00I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 181, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 174, "text": "Bhojraj" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/56162384" }

{ "text": "It is stated that Bhojraj went to the house of Rajendra Padmakar whereas, Ganesh Dhakde went to the house of Subhash Padmakar five minutes after the departure of the witness Bhojraj." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "B3O3NCL8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 25, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 12, "text": "Explanation-I" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TMLOF91P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 103, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 82, "text": "Regulation No.67 (10)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1580486" }

{ "text": "In my view, Explanation-I is not a mere explanation added to explain or elaborate Regulation No.67 (10), but it is an independent provision." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "V31J4JC5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 38, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 33, "text": "Alrav" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2EU3I8FO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 67, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 62, "text": "Laxmi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/21076707" }

{ "text": "He has deposed that they all saw Alrav in a pool of blood and Laxmi had also sustained injuries." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "5HKVNCJ5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 30, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 16, "text": "N.V.N Krishnan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "H3M9O6KL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 93, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 74, "text": "CBI, ACB, New Delhi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RJXSGLR5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 245, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 231, "text": "06/11 26 of 95" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AW4JY1LX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 323, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 307, "text": "Anil Kumar Saini" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/140333014/" }

{ "text": "Witness DW9 Sh. N.V.N Krishnan who was posted as Inspector of Police with CBI, ACB, New Delhi in January 2009 had identified his signatures on the seizure memo Ex.DW9/A vide which he had seized document related to this case during 06/11 26 of 95 a search conducted at the office premise of accused no.1 Sh. Anil Kumar Saini." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LE0XFGVA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 46, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 26, "text": "Allahabad High Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MEX7VME9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 101, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 96, "text": "Katju" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "IRHW4DEY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 128, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 111, "text": "Poonam Srivastava" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BZ6VLI4H", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 188, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 172, "text": "January 27, 2004" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AA18J0S6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 245, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 201, "text": "Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. State of U.P." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CXRCRHTN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 300, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 262, "text": "Moser Baer India Ltd. v. State of U.P." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "L9GUVDGJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 321, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 317, "text": "U.P." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BPTYBMNT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 391, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 381, "text": "apex court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1526351" }

{ "text": "Writ petitions before the Allahabad High Court were heard and allowed by the Division Bench (M. Katju and Mrs. Poonam Srivastava, JJ.) vide common judgment and order dated January 27, 2004 reported in Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. State of U.P. (connected with Moser Baer India Ltd. v. State of U.P.). \n\n4. State of U.P., being aggrieved, filed special leave petitions before the apex court." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YR0XROJD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 128, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 101, "text": "District and Sessions Judge" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/963190" }

{ "text": "Here, ad interim order of attachment was passed by the Vacation Judge who was sitting in vacation as District and Sessions Judge." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1K5TXR1Q", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 108, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 92, "text": "Assam High Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XUMSC6JH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 223, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 131, "text": "Bholanath Thakur and another Vs. Sarvananda Kotoky and others, reported in AIR 1966 Assam 41" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/166242807" }

{ "text": "To buttress his contentions, the Counsel for the appellants has relied upon the judgment of Assam High Court passed in the case of Bholanath Thakur and another Vs. Sarvananda Kotoky and others, reported in AIR 1966 Assam 41." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/471823" }

{ "text": "There can be an escape from assessment only when there is an assessment." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HU6N5B91", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 136, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 88, "text": "Manager of Bank of India, Hanumanthanagar Branch" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4XAMIY2S", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 147, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 138, "text": "Bengaluru" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "744MM25A", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 274, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 242, "text": "Nandh Product Promoters Pvt.Ltd." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/8433981/" }

{ "text": "The brief facts of the case of the prosecution are that:-\n (i) The accused No.1 was the Manager of Bank of India, Hanumanthanagar Branch, Bengaluru during the period from May-1999 to July-2001 and accused Nos.2 to 5 were the Directors of M/s.Nandh Product Promoters Pvt.Ltd." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "N864SLHQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 121, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 108, "text": "Supreme Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/170125" }

{ "text": "There has since been quite a number of important decisions of this Court, other High Courts and the Hon'ble Supreme Court." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QCG94TVT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 10, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 4, "text": "Constn" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AIQCN2LB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 107, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 102, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1954589" }

{ "text": "The Constn. conceives of an impeachment of the President of India, Comptroller and Auditor General of India." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "RY9DI7NN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 33, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 17, "text": "Section 5.4.1(3)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/140333014/" }

{ "text": "One may refer to Section 5.4.1(3) here." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1930802" }

{ "text": "I must also note that the legislature does have experience in enacting provisions conceding the powers for confiscation to specified non-judicial authorities who are to exercise quasi judicial functions." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "PM3DPTYJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 145, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 129, "text": "January 31, 1992" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/928859" }

{ "text": "However, the petitioner-company again started investing the deposits in the manner prescribed by the 1987 Directions on and from January 31, 1992." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/528295" }

{ "text": "In this factual scenario, it would be in the interest of justice to set aside the judgment of the learned Additional District Judge and remand both the suits to the learned trial court for trial." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "E19X9EM9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 231, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 224, "text": "s 4 (1)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YTVEBH5Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 248, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 239, "text": "L. A. Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/102133044/" }

{ "text": "It was also denied that compensation assessed by LAC in respect of the land acquired is either inadequate or that it does not represent the true market LAC-07/13 Page:-4/14 value of the land as on the date of notification U/s 4 (1) of the L. A. Act." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "U8U669ME", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 15, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 5, "text": "Vimla Jain" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "K9ESE1I6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 59, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 29, "text": "Criminal Revision No. 463/1999" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4EB8QTAH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 70, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 60, "text": "11/04/2014" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/23880587" }

{ "text": "(Smt.Vimla Jain) Judge manju Criminal Revision No. 463/1999 11/04/2014 None for the applicant." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "CBPUZ0CS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 40, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 36, "text": "Bhat" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "22IWSNZF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 84, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 75, "text": "Section 7" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/155199616/" }

{ "text": "On merits it has been argued by Mr. Bhat that the essential ingredients of Section 7 of the Act have not established inasmuch as no official work was pending with the accused-appellant and the allotment work was done by the Manager and, hence, he could not have shown any official favour." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "4LNR5WDW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 11, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 0, "text": "Section 100" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/189012866" }

{ "text": "Section 100 deals with administrative powers of Zilla Parishad." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "4VANDV7O", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 28, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 16, "text": "Aruna Chadha" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NUTKCNNT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 97, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 87, "text": "25.07.2013" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LJ28XMZ7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 159, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 122, "text": "Crl.M.A. No.14966/2013 and 14965/2013" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UP82QHDR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 189, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 167, "text": "Crl.Rev.P. No.305/2013" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/142262670" }

{ "text": "The co-accused, Aruna Chadha moved an application seeking clarification of order dated 25.07.2013 passed by this Court in Crl.M.A. No.14966/2013 and 14965/2013 and in Crl.Rev.P. No.305/2013." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "56NROYN3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 24, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 4, "text": "Rajasthan High Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZV45W6O4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 67, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 28, "text": "Bhuramal and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/557776/" }

{ "text": "The Rajasthan High Court in Bhuramal and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan took a similar view." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZKS27CID", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 17, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 4, "text": "Supreme Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/106341234" }

{ "text": "The Supreme Court mentioned some of the factors which are required to be considered in deciding whether the language of a particular enactment is to be understood as indicative of the retrospective operation of the Act and held that normally a statute is to be interpreted, as far as possible, not to defeat vested rights." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "07QW7FT4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 174, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 152, "text": "Article 22(1) or 22(2)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4SK3IN53", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 194, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 182, "text": "Constitution" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QX5RK6IR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 208, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 198, "text": "Section 50" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "O3F784SF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 223, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 216, "text": "Cr. P.C" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/357430" }

{ "text": "The question posed was that since presently there is a valid order remanding them to judicial custody, even if there was a prior infringement either of Article 22(1) or 22(2) of the Constitution or Section 50 of the Cr. P.C, the said illegality stood cured and in any case has become irrelevant." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YC019LN3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 43, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 32, "text": "Inder Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "52PWV7UV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 85, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 75, "text": "28.09.2013" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SZFAFQYV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 137, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 124, "text": "Darshan Kumar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "449IFOIK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 257, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 244, "text": "Darshan Kumar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5QXMCE0X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 342, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 328, "text": "Rajouri Garden" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/108301472/" }

{ "text": "It was further argued that RW-1 Inder Singh in his cross examination dated 28.09.2013 while admitting that respondent no. 1 Darshan Kumar is a tenant in the suit premises in his individual capacity went further in stating that respondent no. 1 Darshan Kumar is not residing in the tenancy premises since long and is residing at Rajouri Garden, BLK-189 (MIG) Flat." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HRPWEV1I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 177, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 168, "text": "New Delhi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/181290679/" }

{ "text": "In the name of availability of the commercial premises, the petitioners have got only the first floor and second floor of the property bearing no.3/13B, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi, which is entirely in occupation of the tenants." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "G0O4NYIT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 108, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 99, "text": "18-4-2006" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QDQV6J2B", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 148, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 119, "text": "Right to Information Act 2005" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "T5OEHVXU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 228, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 208, "text": "Bapatla Municipality" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1030167" }

{ "text": "It is further averred that the 1st petitioner-Association also submitted another application dated 18-4-2006 under the Right to Information Act 2005 to the Public Information Officer-cum-Municipal Manager of Bapatla Municipality seeking for copies of (i) documents submitted by the 9th respondent at the time of the nomination in the month of September 2005 and (ii) Caste certificate filed by the 9th respondent at the time of filing of nomination." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/176121529" }

{ "text": "Consequently, both options (3) and (4) are correct." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "G3TMR6RJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 67, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 44, "text": "Ordinance XXVII of 1949" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QVWZM0KA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 120, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 105, "text": "items 62 and 63" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "16UFZL6R", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 164, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 153, "text": "section 188" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5ROXILNM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 189, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 166, "text": "Criminal Procedure Code" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1786180/" }

{ "text": "If so, that jurisdiction,\"as restored under Ordinance XXVII of 1949 by the amendment thereby of the said items 62 and 63 thus bringing it into line with section 188, Criminal Procedure Code, with the requisite adaptations." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "V37PPIVK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 126, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 115, "text": "Section 304" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "64SWPPG4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 133, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 130, "text": "IPC" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/109801351" }

{ "text": "Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in view of the facts and circumstances of the case no offence under Section 304 of IPC is made out against the applicant, as the deceased is trained lineman and he should have taken due precaution and care before restoring the power supply." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1166491" }

{ "text": "The contractor was being repeatedly asked to furnish security deposit in terms of the contract." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "RVGDERTU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 59, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 27, "text": "Kerala High Court (1964 KLT 298)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FTQL4VSL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 181, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 171, "text": "Art. 15(4)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "VYOX7743", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 201, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 189, "text": "Constitution" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1720792/" }

{ "text": "An earlier decision of the Kerala High Court (1964 KLT 298) gave rise to a Commission appointed to recommend which sections of the people required special treatment under Art. 15(4) of the Constitution, having regard to their social and educational conditions." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "3D1RRP6K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 206, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 192, "text": "Indian society" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1362862" }

{ "text": "It further held that if caste is taken as themselves as the sole basis for determination of social backwardness of a group of citizens, the test may break down in relation to many sections of Indian society, like Muslims, Christians and Jains." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1020783" }

{ "text": "The material common facts relevant for the purpose of disposing of these revision applications are as follows:" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "FYVSPLRU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 29, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 21, "text": "Lundgren" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DTYOCUI0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 41, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 34, "text": "Rollven" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/158533" }

{ "text": "The appellants, M/s. Lundgren and Rollven, have to show that it passed to them and passed, too, before the beginning of the voyage." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "AYKPU7PN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 12, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 4, "text": "PS MALIK" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "KB3YL7B3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 63, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 38, "text": "Karkardooma Courts, Delhi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/70504714/" }

{ "text": "Dr. PS MALIK Addl. Sessions Judge N/E Karkardooma Courts, Delhi" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "GXGMF2ZQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 101, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 94, "text": "Siemens" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1420147" }

{ "text": "In his order of provisional assessment the ITO set out his grounds for rejecting the claim of Siemens." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q3HS9FWF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 42, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 31, "text": "Section 154" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FD6LIDQC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 125, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 107, "text": "September 16, 1958" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1982605" }

{ "text": "That was again rectified under Section 154 and assessment was completed on a total income of Rs. 12,705 on September 16, 1958." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "C7GRE9RL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 31, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 22, "text": "Jakir Ali" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/160913574/" }

{ "text": "Whereas, the RW 1 Sh. Jakir Ali in his affidavit Ex. RW 1/1, filed in the year 2013, stated that the respondent was inducted as a tenant ten years ago i.e., 2003." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "18B0IJ0A", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 54, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 4, "text": "Circle Inspector of Police, Kundara police station" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GUJ56VYJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 78, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 58, "text": "Crime No.108 of 1999" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MGVVWPN0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 100, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 82, "text": "Anchalamood police" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "N42AS2Z2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 136, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 101, "text": "Crl.Appeal No.1585/05 & R.C.No.1/05" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/277207" }

{ "text": "The Circle Inspector of Police, Kundara police station in Crime No.108 of 1999 of Anchalamood police Crl.Appeal No.1585/05 & R.C.No.1/05." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QG2HU5ZR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 89, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 60, "text": "M. C. Mehta v. Union of India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1130897" }

{ "text": "It would also be subject to the same limitations as held in M. C. Mehta v. Union of India.' \n \n\n 11." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "T1EKTIPL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 40, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 35, "text": "Gupta" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TKFWBQWX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 53, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 42, "text": "Tulzapurkar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NK31V76M", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 64, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 55, "text": "Fazal Ali" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "12587C55", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 71, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 66, "text": "Desai" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DFBPUML4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 82, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 76, "text": "Pathak" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DHKPO5V4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 190, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 182, "text": "Bhagwati" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1830927/" }

{ "text": "The other learned Judges - namely, Gupta, Tulzapurkar, Fazal Ali, Desai and Pathak, JJ - who were parties to the above judgment have all agreed in general with the view expressed by Bhagwati, J. on the question of locus standi." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "E2KVC2XN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 19, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "November 1, 1950" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "KN60VYJX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 25, "text": "K. P. Banerjee" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "53510ASM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 111, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 91, "text": "Dimakuchi Tea Estate" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/156482219/" }

{ "text": "On November 1, 1950, Dr. K. P. Banerjee was appointed the Assistant Medical Officer of the Dimakuchi Tea Estate, whose management is the respondent in this appeal." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1779844/" }

{ "text": "These particulars supplied by the election-petitioner were in the nature of his supplemental pleading." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1333455" }

{ "text": "To cover up that, totally false allegations are being raised against the accused persons, it is contended." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1983056" }

{ "text": "In view of the decision cited (supra), I have also awarded a sum of Rs. 15,000/- towards loss of consortium to the first claimant and a further sum of Rs. 15,000/- towards loss to the estate to the claimants apart from granting interest at 12 per cent per annum." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "G1L61120", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 27, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 16, "text": "Munni Lal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "I1INK43L", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 169, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 160, "text": "Munni Lal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2L3U74CL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 206, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 178, "text": "USO International Pvt. Ltd." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/116619499/" }

{ "text": "The workman Munni Lal directly filed the claim petition against the management raising the industrial dispute of ID No. 340/11 Munni Lal Vs. M/s USO International Pvt. Ltd. Page No. 1 out of 28 his illegal termination.\n\n2" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "XWZUSUIJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 251, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 240, "text": "section 155" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/598195" }

{ "text": "The petitioners who have transferred the shares through respondent No. 2 and thereafter it is respondent No. 2 who has set them up, their conduct is not bona fide, therefore, in equity they are not entitled to invoke the jurisdiction under section 155 of the Act and the court will not be justified in exercising jurisdiction in their favour." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "89TLS69F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 106, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 93, "text": "Rajendrasingh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "88T2TY1L", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 169, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 156, "text": "Rajendrasingh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1438033" }

{ "text": "The Claims Tribunal held that the accident occurred due to negligence of non-applicant No. 1 Rajendrasingh and compensation was payable to the claimants by Rajendrasingh and the Insurance Company with which the vehicle was insured." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QAGNMO4I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 61, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 55, "text": "Shinde" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SCOEN4WS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 77, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 69, "text": "Deshmukh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4149J2FZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 140, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 111, "text": "sub-Section (2) of section 16" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9WY2NFMM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 167, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 148, "text": "Amendment Act, 2002" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GA2989ZS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 207, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 197, "text": "Apex Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AX50J0SP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 247, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 224, "text": "State Bank of Hyderabad" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XDYZ92YJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 264, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 252, "text": "Sumesh Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/786712" }

{ "text": "Learned counsel further submits that the view taken by Shinde J. and Deshmukh J. does not notice provisions of sub-Section (2) of section 16 of the Amendment Act, 2002 so also the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of State Bank of Hyderabad and Sumesh Singh (supra) and will therefore have to be held as per incuriam." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "9LK79H88", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 59, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 40, "text": "[1952] S. C. R. 583" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1514049/" }

{ "text": "As already indicated, the statutory (1) [1952] S. C. R. 583." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "financial_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/186263843/" }

{ "text": "Firstly, that he has not received any legal demand notice from the complainant and Secondly that the blank signed cheque in question Ex. CW1/2 has been issued by him as security to the complainant at the time of taking of the loan and not in discharge of his loan liability as alleged by the complainant." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "PGU2BIYO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 194, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 158, "text": "M.P. Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/472537" }

{ "text": "This is more when the provision is discriminatory as it creates a discrimination between the petitioner University and the other University created under the M.P. Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973." }