Datasets:

mwitiderrick

/

legal

like 0

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/42889083" }

{ "text": "The levy is only on the event of renting out a Three Star hotel or an auditorium; that too, only when it is rented out specifically for weddings or connected ceremonies." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "VHFP037L", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 10, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 0, "text": "Vishwanath" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/2736219" }

{ "text": "Vishwanath interfered and tried to prevent the accused." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "O2VSG2DT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 15, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 4, "text": "Section 10A" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "C3DAM9KK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 44, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 23, "text": "Central Sales Tax Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1002836" }

{ "text": "17. Section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act mentions \"imposition of penalty in lieu of prosecution\"." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "S9WP2UX6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 12, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "31.8.1979" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1408854" }

{ "text": "On 31.8.1979 a statutory complaint was made to the Chief of Army Staff but that was not considered at all as there was no response from the Chief of Army Staff to the statutory complaint. \n\n23." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "SF8GYU3I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 81, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 60, "text": "Police Station Kanina" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "V7FTUDFN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 124, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 113, "text": "Section 173" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LBL592BN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 151, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 125, "text": "Code of Criminal Procedure" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BLCBY9M0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 159, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 153, "text": "Cr.P.C" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NLOKJG4O", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 230, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 213, "text": "Illaqa Magistrate" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "C31GI1Q0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 322, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 312, "text": "Section 15" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/49049015" }

{ "text": "After completion of investigation, Station House Officer of Police Station Kanina instituted police report under Section 173 Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C-for short) against the appellant, before the learned Illaqa Magistrate to the effect that it appeared that he has committed an offence punishable under Section 15 of the Act." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZWA3LC9K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 32, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 19, "text": "Supreme Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/51913" }

{ "text": "Says, further, the Supreme Court : \"Where the two marks are identical, no further questions arise; for then the infringement is made out.\"" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NUBWBTO6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 297, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 287, "text": "section 52" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "R0DLUCCG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 307, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 301, "text": "TP Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/199046307/" }

{ "text": "27 Respondent have strongly objected to the maintainability of the appeal itself, mainly on the ground that appellants do not have locus standi to file the appeal and further being the purchasers during pendency of the suit, they could not be protected in view of the bar created by the section 52 of TP Act." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1011890" }

{ "text": "The provision for payment of interest was envisaged simultaneously with the scheme of introduction of advance tax." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/270103/" }

{ "text": "The assessee-company under a consistent method followed has been making such provision for bad and doubtful debts each year and to the extent recoveries are made in respect of the provision for bad and doubtful debts in earlier years the same is adjusted against the provision for bad and doubtful debts in the current year under the head \"Provision no longer required written off\"." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "SFQ9ZFUJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 105, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 52, "text": "re Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi', AIR 1920 Bom. 175 (G)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/268632" }

{ "text": "No help is derived from the case reported In -- 'In re Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi', AIR 1920 Bom. 175 (G)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "XMCTFGGV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 122, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 109, "text": "March 6, 1065" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1179096" }

{ "text": "It can neither be said in fairness that the question whether the excise duty was duly levied or not prior to March 6, 1065 is irrelevant question in these appeals, nor can it be said in the face of the mass materials produced by the respondents that they are being taken by surprise, on account of this legal plea." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "AU2QQRYU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 26, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 13, "text": "New Hampshire" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "JDTJS6Z7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 131, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 118, "text": "Section 8 (3)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1032035" }

{ "text": "The State of New Hampshire imposed a tax on the logs of wood and the question was, whether it was in contravention of Section 8 (3)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "X560WMQX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 67, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 0, "text": "State Of Karnataka and Ors. v. N. Madappa and Ors., 1996(9) SCC 284" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "HIPM7CNV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 121, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 72, "text": "State Of Mysore v. Syed Ibrahim, AIR 1967 SC 1424" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/53775" }

{ "text": "State Of Karnataka and Ors. v. N. Madappa and Ors., 1996(9) SCC 284 and State Of Mysore v. Syed Ibrahim, AIR 1967 SC 1424 were relied upon to hold that it is the user of the vehicle which determines the liability to pay tax." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "9M6BI765", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 107, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 94, "text": "Section 14(1)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9JRXETDR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 147, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 115, "text": "West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/898326" }

{ "text": "The Division Bench held as follows : \n \"In my view, similar interpretation should be put upon Section 14(1) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "SRT7NNWR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 66, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 6, "text": "(Prahlad Singh v. Sukhdev Singh) AIR 1987 Supreme Court 1145" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2RHQ1BHB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 113, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 112, "text": "\u0013" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1962442" }

{ "text": "\n\n v) (Prahlad Singh v. Sukhdev Singh) AIR 1987 Supreme Court 1145 wherein in page No.1147, it was held thus:-\n \u0013....That the decision given by a court at an earlier stage of a case is binding at a later stage is well settled, though interlocutory judgments are open for adjudication by an Appellate Authority in an appeal against the final judgment." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "8OU126QF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 43, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 33, "text": "Y. Sultana" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/189249991" }

{ "text": "In the circumstances, when LW11, Y. Sultana, is acting against the interests of the deceased just prior to the date of offence and is under the influence of her father, her non examination by the prosecution is not going to advance the defence any further." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NWCF93SI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 43, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 24, "text": "Durgam Bhasker Babu" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DNAORO5N", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 62, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 48, "text": "Krishna Kumari" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YGUR2D3B", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 109, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 90, "text": "SR Nagar, Hyderabad" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/188756303" }

{ "text": "He met with two persons Durgam Bhasker Babu and Krishna Kumari about three months back at SR Nagar, Hyderabad, due to financial problems they decided to organize brothel house and took the premises on rent for Rs.15,000/- p.m. about one month back." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UXTMDYKN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 63, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 42, "text": "District Jail, Ujjain" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5L17DPIQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 178, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 158, "text": "Central Jail, Indore" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9B621A4I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 224, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 204, "text": "Central Jail, Ujjain" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1835163" }

{ "text": "The respondents have also stated that the District Jail, Ujjain has been converted into a Central Jail and about 515 prisoners who were earlier lodged in the Central Jail, Indore have been shifted to the Central Jail, Ujjain." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HZEYK5ON", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 173, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 163, "text": "Appendix 3" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "79I9NHSK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 238, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 206, "text": "Serial No. 561(21) of Appendix 3" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/676957" }

{ "text": "An electronic item whether it be an assembly or sub-assembly cannot be an electronic component-and as such cannot be imported \"electronic components\" appearing in Appendix 3 have been defined and listed in Serial No. 561(21) of Appendix 3 itself and no other item can be imported as electronic components." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "S7GG9ZS6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 171, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 158, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9SCQKIQB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 341, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 327, "text": "Article 311(2)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/987060" }

{ "text": "It was urged that termination of service upon the abolition of a post leads to the loss of earned benefits to the civil servant, and we are reminded that the Supreme Court has repeatedly laid down that the loss of earned benefits is an important test for deciding whether a civil servant has been removed within the meaning of Article 311(2)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "RRDU19WA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 52, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 36, "text": "21st April. 1969" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TXRK48ZA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 102, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 65, "text": "Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1888060" }

{ "text": "In the ex parte order passed on the 21st April. 1969 the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta has merely found that \"in spite of notice served on the opposite party he has not come to contest the claim of the petitioner.\"" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "4KG66R9O", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 80, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 17, "text": "Shivdeo Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors. AIR 1963 SC 1909" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2EPHKIDZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 123, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 112, "text": "Article 226" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6LIXJHF4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 143, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 131, "text": "Constitution" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/27098883/" }

{ "text": "For instance, in Shivdeo Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors. AIR 1963 SC 1909 on a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by A for cancellation of the order of allotment passed by the Director of Rehabilitation in favour of B, the High Court made an order cancelling the allotment though 'B' was not a party." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "7CXX5SU3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 61, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 49, "text": "Krishna Iyer" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OCN95LJG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 133, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 69, "text": "Akhil Bhartiya Soshit Karamchari Sangh v. Union of India and Ors" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1363234/" }

{ "text": "Reference also may be made to the observation of Krishna Iyer, J. in Akhil Bhartiya Soshit Karamchari Sangh v. Union of India and Ors. where he has said:\n Terminological similarities are an illusory guide and we cannot go by verbal verisimilitude." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QKTXENX1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 31, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 21, "text": "Jithakumar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "VAO0JBQH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 42, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 33, "text": "Sreekumar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "91KD17NS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 52, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 47, "text": "Soman" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OTXSA1XQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 108, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 99, "text": "E.K. Sabu" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "E89X9F4I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 149, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 130, "text": "Fort Police Station" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/539145" }

{ "text": "Accused Nos. 1 to 3 (Jithakumar, Sreekumar and Soman) were police constables working under C.W.23 (E.K. Sabu) Circle Inspector of Fort Police Station who was heading the Crime Squad constituted for apprehending culprits involved in theft cases." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "OF687CHH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 20, "text": "12th December, 1968" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4TDDJE6Q", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 188, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 151, "text": "Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1888060" }

{ "text": "The order dated the 12th December, 1968 stated that the notice on the second party was returned unserved and that there was a direction by the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta for the issue of a fresh notice to be served on the identification by the first party." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "X0HXW99F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 245, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 196, "text": "Rex v. Tabrum : Ex parte Dash [1907] 97 L. T. 551" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6ZNSRLKY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 348, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 247, "text": "O. A. O. K. Latchmanan Chettiar v. Corporation of Madras [1927] ILR 50 Mad 130; AIR 1927 Mad 130 [FB]" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/547310" }

{ "text": "It is well settled that such conduct of the petitioners would disentitled them to any relief at the hands of this court (vide Halsbury's Laws of England, Vol. II, Third Edn., page 140, para 265 : Rex v. Tabrum : Ex parte Dash [1907] 97 L. T. 551, O. A. O. K. Latchmanan Chettiar v. Corporation of Madras [1927] ILR 50 Mad 130; AIR 1927 Mad 130 [FB]." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "BMDB56Y7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 16, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 4, "text": "Sundaraswamy" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XZDUUW7K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 99, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 86, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5QO6BN9Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 138, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 103, "text": "CHUNCHUN JHA v. EBADAT ALI AND ANR." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "O4IDT0OS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 180, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 140, "text": "RAVAL & CO. v. K.G. RAMACHANDRAN AND ORS" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "HA0HT84C", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 214, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 183, "text": "SMT. GANGABAI v. SMT. CHHABUBAI" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RUXLU26L", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 278, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 217, "text": "RAJ KUMAR RAJINDRA SINGH v. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1585972" }

{ "text": "Sri Sundaraswamy, learned Senior Counsel also placed reliance on the Decisions of the Supreme Court in CHUNCHUN JHA v. EBADAT ALI AND ANR., RAVAL & CO. v. K.G. RAMACHANDRAN AND ORS., SMT. GANGABAI v. SMT. CHHABUBAI & RAJ KUMAR RAJINDRA SINGH v. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "8CPIGLF4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 55, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 38, "text": "10th August, 1983" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "K5KI41R5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 80, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 63, "text": "Orissa High Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "JQIW2K53", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 109, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 84, "text": "O. J. C. No. 1239 of 1983" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1619801/" }

{ "text": "From the Judgment and Order dated the 10th August, 1983 of the Orissa High Court in O. J. C. No. 1239 of 1983." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1FC3FSM4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 121, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 112, "text": "KGF Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/133475008/" }

{ "text": "In her Cross- examination, she has admitted that a Criminal Case was filed against her and her father-in-law in KGF Court regarding causing hurt." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZXGYHJIR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 24, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 14, "text": "Apex Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/74754697" }

{ "text": "In that case, Apex Court found the evidence about the recovery of the ornaments and other articles too artificial to be believed." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/608134" }

{ "text": "For the reasons already given, these are all objections fatal to the suit." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EWM7ZNPZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 44, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 38, "text": "Madras" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NSOT086F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 55, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 49, "text": "Nagpur" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "Y0SHFPQZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 135, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 127, "text": "Agarwala" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TUIF9LKB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 186, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 143, "text": "--'Umashankar v. Rex', AIR 1950 All 234 (G)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/211132" }

{ "text": "He followed the rule laid down in the Madras and Nagpur, cases mentioned above and also referred to the decision by my brother Agarwala J., in --'Umashankar v. Rex', AIR 1950 All 234 (G). \n 5." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "VBB2ESDR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 73, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 65, "text": "8-8-1975" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1543088" }

{ "text": "He had joined the Commission as Technical Assistant, Grade I, on 8-8-1975." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "SQE9C6NC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 17, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 0, "text": "Rule 27 of Or. 41" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BCHV4SYM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 48, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 25, "text": "Code of Civil Procedure" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/647017/" }

{ "text": "Rule 27 of Or. 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure prescribes the conditions and limitations in the matter." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "G7WWN1CM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 165, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 140, "text": "CRA No. D-1026-DB of 2011" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MQQMRUMK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 195, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 170, "text": "CRA No. D-1046-DB of 2011" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "HEI3F61N", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 234, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 204, "text": "Murder Reference No. 6 of 2011" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "KVQWHUC8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 249, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 235, "text": "Ravinder Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2BWT71HF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 283, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 255, "text": "P.S. Division No.8, Ludhiana" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9K22JNQT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 304, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 294, "text": "05.09.2008" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RPZWOHZW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 356, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 341, "text": "Guru Nanak Pura" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/194413303" }

{ "text": "The statement of the complainant after it was recorded was signed by him in English and it was attested by Sub Inspector ('SI' - for short) CRA No. D-1026-DB of 2011 and CRA No. D-1046-DB of 2011 and -5- Murder Reference No. 6 of 2011 Ravinder Singh SHO, P.S. Division No.8, Ludhiana (PW-5) on 05.09.2008 in the area of Mini Fountain Chowk, Guru Nanak Pura at 11.00 pm." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EUUTDNFR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 27, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 19, "text": "Rajappan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NZU3B8IB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 133, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 123, "text": "Tamil Nadu" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/177508474" }

{ "text": "The wife of MW-155 Rajappan hctd died on account of a situation caused by the atrocities of some unidentified personnel of Tamil Nadu STF.\"" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "2UC9QCMV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 33, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 26, "text": "Santhan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ABX4RWHJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 72, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 63, "text": "Sivarasan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PF0T00S2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 106, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 94, "text": "Robert Payas" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DQVELYDP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 141, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 136, "text": "Ruben" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/194120/" }

{ "text": "Same day in the afternoon Santhan (A-2) on the instructions of Sivarasan went to the house of Robert Payas (A-9) and gave Rs.4,000/- to Ruben (A6), who was there at that time." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "CZCOFAC5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 89, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 3, "text": "Dr. Mrs. Nirmal T. Shah v. Sharavathi Petro Chemicals (Company Petition No. 38 of 1980" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LOWTXP9H", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 111, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 101, "text": "10-10-1984" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DAZ6N8EF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 130, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 114, "text": "Chandrakantharaj" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/598195" }

{ "text": "In Dr. Mrs. Nirmal T. Shah v. Sharavathi Petro Chemicals (Company Petition No. 38 of 1980 decided on 10-10-1984), Chandrakantharaj Urs J. has held that" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "8YSLK8BA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 133, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 105, "text": "Third Central Pay Commission" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/476601/" }

{ "text": "These instructions were necessitated by the introduction of the revised Scales of pay recommended by the Third Central Pay Commission." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "0DIIXU5W", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 35, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 17, "text": "Deepak alias Deepu" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/12840019" }

{ "text": "Respondent no.2, Deepak alias Deepu is present in person." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "MAUTKEH7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 137, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 126, "text": "section 207" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RHP36YOT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 145, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 138, "text": "Cr.P.C." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/116268721/" }

{ "text": "After completion of the investigation, charge­sheet was filed in the Court of Ld. M.M. who after complying with provisions of section 207 Cr.P.C. committed the case to the Court of Sessions which in turn assigned the case to this Court for trial in accordance with law." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "U01ZN2PZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 65, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 52, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NU1DBY7L", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 123, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 85, "text": "1960-2 Lab LJ 592 : (AIR 1960 SC 1223)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1338497" }

{ "text": "This has indeed been settled by the judgment of the Supreme Court referred to above, 1960-2 Lab LJ 592 : (AIR 1960 SC 1223).,\n \n\n19." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "FDH2UASW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 74, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 69, "text": "Johri" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/681088" }

{ "text": "I shall, however, deal with the matter on merits because it was Shri Johri's next contention that if the accused is otherwise guilty on facts, he should not be permitted to get away on the basis of a mere technicality." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1877922/" }

{ "text": "Classification made under the Rules could not be said to be violative of the right to have equal pay for equal work." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YYBWE64E", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 80, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 54, "text": "Sardarbhai Lavjibhai Karan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LU4LWQ92", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 235, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 209, "text": "Sardarbhai Lavjibhai Karan" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/952858" }

{ "text": "The prosecution admits intervention by B.S.F. P.W. 9 \"Sardarbhai Lavjibhai Karan has also admitted that the police station had been handed over the custody of the accused and the articles by the B.S.F. P.W. 5-Sardarbhai Lavjibhai Karan has also admitted that no accused and articles would be handed over to any agency without proper paperwork." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/94658/" }

{ "text": "This is preferable to posting the amount recovered direct from the cash book to the credit of the bad debts account without making any entry in the debtor's personal account, since it is desirable, for future reference, that this account should contain a full history of the occurrence." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1116196" }

{ "text": "PW 4, a purohit and PW 5 (his wife) also spoke to the appellant's earnings." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/111251226/" }

{ "text": "He also made the video of incident." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NF20TJ7H", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 42, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 13, "text": "Writ Petition No. 789 of 2003" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "IXPJ3BQU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 165, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 105, "text": "CTS Nos. 325, 430, 405, 330, 429, 331, 419, 329, 326 and 425" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GJ4XVJYZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 235, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 228, "text": "Chakala" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SHFA2RAN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 249, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 242, "text": "Andheri" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/157235995" }

{ "text": "In so far as Writ Petition No. 789 of 2003 is concerned, as stated above, the same is in connection with CTS Nos. 325, 430, 405, 330, 429, 331, 419, 329, 326 and 425 totally admeasuring about 4905.03 sq.mtrs. located at village Chakala, Tal. Andheri." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1292427/" }

{ "text": "In the result, the related grounds of appeal are allowed." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "2ZD8DPL4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 29, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 4, "text": "W.P.(C).No. 32721 of 2011" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/24372791" }

{ "text": "___ W.P.(C).No. 32721 of 2011 [S.O.1248 (E), dated 5th November" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NJ60TBCX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 48, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 30, "text": "V. Ramaswami Naidu" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "Z3ETZFG7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 197, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 173, "text": "Agravas Estates, Limited" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "KZ965MZX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 231, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 225, "text": "Ceylon" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1209171" }

{ "text": "The material facts are these: V. Ramaswami Naidu, the Kartha of a Hindu undivided family, held in the names of various members of the family 10,208 shares of Rs. 10 each in Agravas Estates, Limited, a company incorporated in Ceylon." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "OKZ9XVY3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 66, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 45, "text": "Arjun Prasad Chowdary" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "A36SVEB0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 126, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 112, "text": "Arjun Serveher" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/24421014" }

{ "text": "According to him, the name of the accused is Arjun Prasad Chowdary, but PW.21 stated the name of the accused as Arjun Serveher, when the investigating officer questioned him." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "H0PS4WL0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 44, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 30, "text": "Article 246(1)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AIOJ9G5M", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 125, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 108, "text": "Union Legislature" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FS5IQ0JT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 182, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 172, "text": "Parliament" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BGPRBL5H", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 228, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 222, "text": "List I" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LS27IM2Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 315, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 308, "text": "List II" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "K00AHZTN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 339, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 323, "text": "Seventh Schedule" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1376129" }

{ "text": "The non obstante clause under Article 246(1) indicates the predominance or supremacy of the law made by the Union Legislature in the event of an overlap of the law made by Parliament with respect to a matter enumerated in List I and a law made by the State Legislature with respect to a matter enumerated in List II of the Seventh Schedule." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ST0MCP02", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 86, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 56, "text": "Crl.R.PNos 2924 & 3906 of 2009" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/498073" }

{ "text": "I have carefully gone through the elaborate judgment of Crl.R.PNos 2924 & 3906 of 2009 :-16-:\nthe trial court." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/64680058" }

{ "text": "Special provisions as to payment of compensation on structured formula basis." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "747VUECY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 30, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 23, "text": "Cl.4(x)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "W1OWGBOJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 385, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 378, "text": "S 81(2)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4D3ERYTZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 395, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 389, "text": "MV Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/157265714" }

{ "text": "But pursuant to saving Cl.4(x) of reciprocal agreement, such operators were allowed to ply vehicles for the period they hold valid permit stood saved and grant of renewal being a fresh grant; if private operators are allowed to ply vehicle on the subject route thereafter, it would be certainly unauthorized route and such of route permits could not be considered for renewal U/S 81(2) of MV Act." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HZOTZKCU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 77, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 71, "text": "Jowell" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WEMPVJDP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 161, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 155, "text": "Jowell" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1702971/" }

{ "text": "The courts are not experts in policy and public administration \u0016 hence Jowell's point that the courts should not step beyond their institutional capacity (Jowell, 2000)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "TS96PJC8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 29, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 22, "text": "Haryana" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "G1GTR21E", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 138, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 105, "text": "Haryana Public Service Commission" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UX0RE3WR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 321, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 308, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UE0JDI43", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 351, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 340, "text": "Article 317" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/39422048" }

{ "text": "The Advocate General, Haryana, has referred to the past unpleasant events, which have taken place in the Haryana Public Service Commission with the initiation of enquiry against the Chairman and Members of the Commission, which ultimately resulted in their removal by the President after the decision of the Supreme Court as provided under Article 317." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "WDWRHGU0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 230, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 220, "text": "Shamjibhai" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q7Z3VKXV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 286, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 246, "text": "Nareshbhai Geegabhai Ranchhodbhai Dudhat" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/72794899" }

{ "text": "Along with the affidavit a chart has been provided specifying the C.R. number, name of the complainant and the role of the accused. \n\n C.R.No. Name of Role of the accused and status of Complainant the case. \n\n I-26/2014 Shamjibhai Accused No.(1) Nareshbhai Geegabhai Ranchhodbhai Dudhat, Residing at 7, Priyanka Row DCB Police Dabhi." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "3I14NY2G", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 15, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 10, "text": "Mantu" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UTXMXUJ3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 61, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 50, "text": "Section 366" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "596GDJP6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 86, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 69, "text": "Indian Penal Code" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/761965" }

{ "text": "Appellant Mantu was found guilty of the charge of Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/194337423/" }

{ "text": "In the absence of the material evidence, by considering the age and family status of the deceased at the time of accident, this Tribunal feels that, it is just, proper and necessary to consider the notional income of the deceased is of Rupees 6,000/- P.M. at the time of accident." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DOJXJNE0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 87, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 75, "text": "Hazara Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GIVRM1SX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 114, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 105, "text": "22-5-1988" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1214222/" }

{ "text": "The first information report was recorded on the basis of the statement of Hazara Singh PW 7 recorded on 22-5-1988." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "JJ29RYZX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 10, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 0, "text": "Anil Pawar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GM9M6YGS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 93, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 78, "text": "Madhukar Jadhav" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "HKNM5F4L", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 141, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 135, "text": "Dongre" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "R527MTRJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 190, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 182, "text": "Wankhade" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NGSWI3N7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 244, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 229, "text": "Madhukar Jadhav" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/172144821" }

{ "text": "Anil Pawar (Investigating Officer) further stated that the complaint of PW-1- Madhukar Jadhav was recorded in the presence of PSI Shri Dongre in writing by the Police Constable Shri Wankhade as per the information given by PW-1- Madhukar Jadhav." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "2N08W93Q", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 66, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 61, "text": "Mohan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GIQESV8H", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 240, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 97, "text": "M. Swaminathan v. The Chairman and Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd., Madras (W.P. No. 12837 of 1986)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LS3PEMBC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 264, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 246, "text": "22nd December 1986" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/391852" }

{ "text": "Similar argument was raised before one of us sitting singly (Mohan, J.) and it was dealt with in M. Swaminathan v. The Chairman and Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd., Madras (W.P. No. 12837 of 1986), dt. 22nd December 1986." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Z42MPEAV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 3, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 0, "text": "Pal" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/533881/" }

{ "text": "Pal, J. speaking for a 3-Judge Bench, however, opined:\n\"\u0005Presumptions are rules of evidence and do not conflict with the presumption of innocence, because by the latter, all that is meant is that the prosecution is obliged to prove the case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ANN69ILX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 9, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 0, "text": "Mudholkar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "EOSFG44X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 102, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 91, "text": "Clause (ii)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1322686" }

{ "text": "Mudholkar, J. was of the view that the words \"to provide for her maintenance\" occurring in Clause (ii) would apply only when there was a duty to maintain under the general Mahomedan law." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1463760/" }

{ "text": "It is submitted that if the impugned judgment is not rectified or set aside, the interests of more than 250 officers would be adversely affected." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "5EF5YI19", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 29, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 19, "text": "Mahakoshal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6VZNIL0F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 149, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 124, "text": "Madhya Pradesh Government" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "R8QVII2R", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 177, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 159, "text": "31st October, 1956" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1457756/" }

{ "text": "In' respect of the Mahakoshal officers shown from serial No. 59 onwards it is seen that no formal orders were issued by the Madhya Pradesh Government prior to 31st October, 1956 fixing the rank of each officers." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LKYIHGNF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 36, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 5, "text": "Sub-section (9) of Section 80-I" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1133583/" }

{ "text": "Even Sub-section (9) of Section 80-I authorizes the Assessing Officer to make adjustment in profit in case certain expenditure in his opinion has been charged excessively and allow deduction accordingly." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QJK7JSD7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 62, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 53, "text": "Raj Reddi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "11AB8Z2J", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 103, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 90, "text": "T. Bali Reddy" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0V8T2Z69", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 150, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 135, "text": "V. Lakshmi Devi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1116196" }

{ "text": "Both findings are attacked by his learned Counsel Mr Raj Reddi, advocate representing Mr. T. Bali Reddy while, on the other hand, Miss V. Lakshmi Devi, the learned Government Pleader, tried to support the findings." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "2DNKHMQ0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 12, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 2, "text": "22/03/2006" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5CMQRKSW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 29, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 20, "text": "H.K. Sema" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TR391B80", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 59, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 36, "text": "AR. Lakshmanan JUDGMENT" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ODJS4LY8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 95, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 81, "text": "AR. Lakshmanan" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1600644/" }

{ "text": ": 22/03/2006 BENCH:\nH.K. Sema & Dr. AR. Lakshmanan JUDGMENT:\nJ U D G M E N T Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/541177" }

{ "text": "Just as a rate is imposed upon the occupant in respect of the house, so income-tax and super tax are imposed upon individuals in respect of the business." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DVZ27K0D", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 40, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 31, "text": "21.7.2006" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1275434" }

{ "text": "Subsequently, with effect from 21.7.2006, new norms have been introduced, wherein there is no provision for opening the College in temporary premises." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "KWT75NZ9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 291, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 251, "text": "APEAL Nos.991/11, 992/11 331/11 & 854/11" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "15372PH8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 329, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 320, "text": "Section 2" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/26694354" }

{ "text": "It has to be noted here that a proviso to main section also can create a substantive right in favour of class of persons and, in the present case, the proviso has created substantive right in favour of victim which has been defined within the meaning APEAL Nos.991/11, 992/11 331/11 & 854/11 of clause (wa) mentioned in Section 2 of the Amendment Act." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "OIKRACKG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 180, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 161, "text": "Dehra Dun limestone" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NZVVNWLS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 247, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 240, "text": "12-4-43" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8LJMGLHO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 279, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 272, "text": "27-7-43" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1895238" }

{ "text": "The petitioner further pointed out that Government had already passed orders in respect of limestone deposits and had thus made the said rules applicable to the Dehra Dun limestone deposits (vide Government Orders Nos. 1296/UP/XVIII, dated 12-4-43 and 2419/L/XVIII, dated 27-7-43)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q1S6UHTR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 20, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "November 01, 2011" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UMRFXMKK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 29, "text": "Uma Dhawan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "KSIJVXHA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 165, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 150, "text": "Sham Lal Chopra" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "V4J27TGM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 186, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 169, "text": "February 09, 2006" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/130756847" }

{ "text": "On November 01, 2011 witness Uma Dhawan DW-3, was shown the will Ex.DW-1/1 and she deposed that the will Ex.DW-1/1 was the will which was executed by Sham Lal Chopra on February 09, 2006 in her presence." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "PD8I56JV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 110, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 95, "text": "Subhash Chander" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/177219351/" }

{ "text": "Subsequently, he sublet, assigned and parted with possession of the suit shop in favour of Sh. Subhash Chander/defendant no.9 without consent of defendant no.8." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "65Z5DNZ7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 59, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 43, "text": "venkata subbaiah" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1987982" }

{ "text": "The subsequent stay at madras according to venkata subbaiah, should not be regarded as the place where they last resided together." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/175843047" }

{ "text": "Their officiating an Agricultural Supervisors does not land to the accrual in their favour on any right to hold their posts and to be governed in the matter of their seniority by the length of their service as Agricultural Supervisors." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "8TIV65SU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 32, "text": "Harshit" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "H2FAKYB9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 102, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 88, "text": "Sanjeev Narula" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "G8YFJVIN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 254, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 242, "text": "Mukesh Sethi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5O61OUYI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 285, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 271, "text": "Sangeeta Sethi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/51854060" }

{ "text": "Her concern was her younger son Harshit who had already been removed to the hospital by Sanjeev Narula PW-5, who is the <span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_6\">Crl.A. 635/2007 &amp; Death Ref. 2/2007 Page 6 of 59</span> elder brother-in-law of Mukesh Sethi, the husband of Sangeeta Sethi." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "VCXXHO27", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 78, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 69, "text": "11.7.1959" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/130149890" }

{ "text": "The Court determined rate of compensation relying on sale deed dated 11.7.1959, i.e., a document executed after almost three and half years after the date of acquisition notification." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "237KF20D", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 27, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 0, "text": "Writ Petition No. 4007/2005" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2UJSHND5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 62, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 42, "text": "Balaji Baliram Bande" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GWVO5PFU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 100, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 78, "text": "Zilla Parishad, Nanded" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WRS9TSFB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 135, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 122, "text": "Jamb Division" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5Y89HJ8F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 165, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 152, "text": "Mukhed Taluqa" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/124188" }

{ "text": "Writ Petition No. 4007/2005 filed by Shri Balaji Baliram Bande, Member of the Zilla Parishad, Nanded who was elected from Jamb Division constituency of Mukhed Taluqa" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "2WZNXEXQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 101, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 77, "text": "Jayalalitha v. The State" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QGDH7QBG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 184, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 122, "text": "Addl. Superintendent of Police, etc., 1998 (2) L.W. (Crl.) 541" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/43124257" }

{ "text": "In support of his above contention, he relied on a decision of this Court in Jayalalitha v. The State, represented by the Addl. Superintendent of Police, etc., 1998 (2) L.W. (Crl.) 541." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "CPQKF80T", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 189, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 79, "text": "Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Deo Patodi [(2009) 13 SCC 123 : (2009) 5 SCC (Civ) 29 : (2010) 1 SCC (Cri) 963]" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/167563808" }

{ "text": "Further, deducting 1/3rd of the annual income towards personal expenses as per Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Deo Patodi [(2009) 13 SCC 123 : (2009) 5 SCC (Civ) 29 : (2010) 1 SCC (Cri) 963] and applying the appropriate multiplier of 13, keeping in mind the age of the parents of the deceased," }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1274533" }

{ "text": "On 27th February the learned Magistrate passed orders on Jitendra's application and directed it to be \"filed for the present,\" because he thought that in view of the petition of motion filed before the Sessions Judge, it would not be proper for him to make any further order in the matter at that stage." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "WCBRQCJ2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 99, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 14, "text": "Workmen of M/s Firestone Tyre Rubber Company of India (P) Ltd. v. Management & Others" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DI14VKDZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 146, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 137, "text": "sec. 11-A" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "IVFPXAP1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 183, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 154, "text": "Industrial Disputes Act, 1947" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/317971/" }

{ "text": "This court in Workmen of M/s Firestone Tyre Rubber Company of India (P) Ltd. v. Management & Others, held that since the introduction of sec. 11-A in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Industrial tribunal is now equipped with the powers to reappraise the evidence in the domestic enquiry and satisfy itself whether the said evidence relied upon by the employer establishes the misconduct alleged against the workman." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "V5RNIWTP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 79, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 76, "text": "Urs" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/836322" }

{ "text": "That the interpretation put to that effect on this provision by Mr. Justice Urs was correct and called for no interference." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "6H322JV2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 24, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 18, "text": "Mukesh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/38919003" }

{ "text": "In her statement, Mukesh (deceased) stated that she has got two Nanads (sisters-in-law), mother-in-law, father-in-law and her husband." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "BE4UA4PG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 59, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 51, "text": "Beaumont" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3XJ8RL8V", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 166, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 69, "text": "Emperor v. Ningappa Ramappa I.L.R. (1942) Bom. 26 : (A.I.R. (28) 1941 Bom. 408 : 43 Crl.L.J. 167)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/104822134" }

{ "text": "In similar circumstances, the observations made by Beaumont, CJ., in Emperor v. Ningappa Ramappa I.L.R. (1942) Bom. 26 : (A.I.R. (28) 1941 Bom. 408 : 43 Crl.L.J. 167) are very instructive and may be cited in extenso." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "11TQGKUA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 13, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 4, "text": "Labhu Ram" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PYKPLFF3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 88, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 78, "text": "15.03.1922" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1EZGLKOW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 136, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 117, "text": "High Court of Delhi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/20233594/" }

{ "text": "Sh. Labhu Ram was the original allottee as per the perpetual lease deed dated 15.03.1922 as filed before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "65J2GSIM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 64, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 56, "text": "8.6.1986" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1871696/" }

{ "text": "The accusation against the three respondents is that on 8.6.1986 at 2.0() P.M. they along with two others named in the complaint, shot and killed an elephant in compartment No. 13 of Kundurugutu Range Forest and removed the ivory tusks of the elephant." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "F94DVMKY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 42, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 3, "text": "Minister for Information & Broadcasting" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1707158/" }

{ "text": "9. Minister for Information & Broadcasting Discretionary Powers of :\n 1. Selection of DD Serials/other programmes." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "X4TN22CN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 9, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 4, "text": "Kapse" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3P7BKIU2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 71, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 54, "text": "Kerala High Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "W8RAGBKP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 150, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 75, "text": "P. N Ramchandra v. Section V. Annapurni Ammal wife of P. N. Ramchandra Iyer" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1337176" }

{ "text": "Mr. Kapse has drawn my attention to a decision of the Kerala High Court in P. N Ramchandra v. Section V. Annapurni Ammal wife of P. N. Ramchandra Iyer, ." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q0HBA527", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 52, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 38, "text": "Surender Kumar" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/133338386/" }

{ "text": "As per the contents of Ex. PW5/B, PW6 Surender Kumar sustained injury on Right Parietal area and aright Supra Occipital area of his head and there were \"deep penetrating cut on right parietal area and on right supra occipital area Sessions Case No. 6/14 Page no. 27 of 32 of skull\"; and seven stitches were given to him besides other treatment." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LTJ5QI0C", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 95, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 90, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1085347" }

{ "text": "One of the Magazines relied upon by the respondents refers to \"Another Denim Giant Enters India.\"" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "5I700QUF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 110, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 91, "text": "Pepsi Foods Limited" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0CPI9NMX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 151, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 141, "text": "Chandigarh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3EUSUNYU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 198, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 178, "text": "VENKATARAMA REDDI#Dr" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "73ECCCUT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 214, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 200, "text": "AR. LAKSHMANAN" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1702971/" }

{ "text": "104-106 of 2003#2003#Bikau Pandey andS Appeal (civil)#Appeal (civil) 4051 of 1996#1996#M/s Pepsi Foods Limited #Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh #2003-11-25#25622#4051#P. VENKATARAMA REDDI#Dr. AR. LAKSHMANAN" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NW4Z0EDZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 24, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 18, "text": "Chagla" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TI2BQO65", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 62, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 54, "text": "sec. 293" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1031140" }

{ "text": "If argument of Mr.Chagla is accepted the words \"under sec. 293\" would practically render superfluous and meaningless." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "E3Y7VUNS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 44, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 34, "text": "22.12.1981" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0I1T02QZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 69, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 52, "text": "Orissa High Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LWM6M7LL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 113, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 73, "text": "Original Judicature Case No. 412 of 1976" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1885635/" }

{ "text": "From the Judgment and Order dated 22.12.1981 of the Orissa High Court in Original Judicature Case No. 412 of 1976." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HAGD0UEF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 49, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 29, "text": "Simranjit Singh Mann" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/906106/" }

{ "text": "All the\t petitioners except Simranjit Singh Mann filed fresh bail bonds." }