annotations
listlengths 1
1
| meta
dict | id
stringlengths 32
32
| data
dict |
|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "28EE0FM7",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 22,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 0,
"text": "O.A. No. K-269 of 1988"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "BGW9T3EK",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 51,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 42,
"text": "Ernakulam"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "LRHKGBN9",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 105,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 92,
"text": "April 2, 1990"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "8Q3NQ8UZ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 191,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 182,
"text": "Rule 2544"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DVHJW0DD",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 385,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 375,
"text": "Article 14"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "AQBDCYVT",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 405,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 393,
"text": "Constitution"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/476601/"
} | 976309d41bb349acb1de4f8b94ac0a8f | {
"text": "O.A. No. K-269 of 1988 was allowed by the Ernakulam Bench of the Tribunal by judgment dated April 2, 1990 and the impugned notifications were quashed to the extent the amendments in Rule 2544 were given retrospective effect on the view that the said amendments in the rule in so far as the same were given retrospective effect were unjust, unreasonable and were violative of Article 14 of the Constitution."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "5S0TNU5O",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 15,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 5,
"text": "Section 14"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3P8TQDJ1",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 126,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 121,
"text": "S. 20"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "YYYBFGS5",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 167,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 162,
"text": "S. 14"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1908062"
} | 8c8d65dc66e149ca8b6ffb540aca0e87 | {
"text": "When Section 14 in terms specify the cases in which specific performance cannot be granted, it cannot be understood that S. 20 is a departure from the rigours of S. 14."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "0U3Q39E3",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 70,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 54,
"text": "Brijlal Pannalal"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "N0KDFRNK",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 81,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 74,
"text": "Dhuliya"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "A27SA4NO",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 150,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 134,
"text": "Brijlal Pannalal"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "J87HKKI4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 171,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 154,
"text": "November 15, 1960"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "VDM9JJND",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 235,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 210,
"text": "Dewas Flour and Oil Mills"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1081125"
} | f90270e15aa04d4a826461f83a656f5f | {
"text": "This contract of sale was entered into by it with one Brijlal Pannalal of Dhuliya and it could have waited and delivered the goods to Brijlal Pannalal on November 15, 1960, when it was to get delivery from the Dewas Flour and Oil Mills."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2JEX7E5I",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 46,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 41,
"text": "India"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "7X7OESS0",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 116,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 90,
"text": "Code of Criminal Procedure"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "UPBB5FLS",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 265,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 250,
"text": "ss. 435 and 439"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1546207/"
} | f26cefb1836c4f9f963d42a11c624d13 | {
"text": "A history of the criminal legislation in India would manifestly reveal that so far as the Code of Criminal Procedure is concerned both in the 1898 Code and 1955 Amendment the widest possible powers of, revision had been given to the High Court under ss. 435 and 439 of those, Codes."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "CVLJETU2",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 36,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 31,
"text": "Pappu"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "UALFG9ZC",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 45,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 38,
"text": "Mathayi"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2SJVLZHQ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 56,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 50,
"text": "Joseph"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/976160/"
} | b1a64701968b43e4923f78ebc9834590 | {
"text": "Even if it may be assumed that Pappu, Mathayi and Joseph PWs were afraid to go to the police station in the darkness of the night, there appears to be no justification cogent reason for their not reporting the matter to the police early oil the following morning-."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DXQ5K3YL",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 83,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 63,
"text": "Allahabad High Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3YJX3HOP",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 200,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 197,
"text": "CPC"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/877414/"
} | 9937177effab4dee9487d92a100253b4 | {
"text": "Alternatively, he submitted that rules have been framed by the Allahabad High Court making special provisions relating to the trial of election petitions which would override the provisions of the CPC."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "8SJ19ZAV",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 195,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 188,
"text": "Art. 46"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/599701/"
} | 324fc8c6f8c14c46a5689862e2d7da68 | {
"text": "There can be no doubt that the object of making a special provision for the advancement of the castes or communities, there specified, is to carry out the directive principle enshrined in Art. 46."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "X71SA8L4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 104,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 95,
"text": "29.9.2009"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1565130"
} | 5fc4ec9f1e24466da21d5478e2e6e796 | {
"text": "2.The Executive Engineer, Zone III Certiorarified Mandamus to quash Notice of demolition dated 29.9.2009 issued in its letter No.145 of 2009 Pending with an order of status-quo."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1308094/"
} | 52d9cfea0c1c4b749fe6ba0f5ed3cef2 | {
"text": "The nomination only indicates the hand which is authorised to receive the amount, on the payment of which the insurer gets a valid discharge of its liability under the policy,"
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "BQD1PKPM",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 13,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 9,
"text": "Khan"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "6ON6K6T7",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 48,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 41,
"text": "24.8.87"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "W9YBKMG4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 106,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 100,
"text": "5.9.85"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/198387/"
} | 35a3658a51434b8ab9bb0c5be1f3d862 | {
"text": "Then Mr. Khan filed the Writ petition on 24.8.87 for quashing the two telegrams and the order dated 5.9.85 of the Visitor."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "IGCKTDFQ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 88,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 62,
"text": "M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath97"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "IGY576U7",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 124,
"labels": [
"JUDGE"
],
"start": 109,
"text": "S. Saghir Ahmad"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/92645396"
} | 6559b0d98f3541ffad8d2b4da082fd5f | {
"text": "This doctrine was considered by this Court in its judgment in M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath97 to which one of us (S. Saghir Ahmad, J.) was a party."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "P8DMOQ3I",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 106,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 90,
"text": "18th March, 1948"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2NICWR97",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 177,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 162,
"text": "Vindhya Pradesh"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "9D5RNZO0",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 231,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 216,
"text": "20th July, 1948"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "MUPVGPWY",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 259,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 249,
"text": "Rajpramukh"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "R5W7MAWK",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 294,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 277,
"text": "Dominion of India"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1786180/"
} | 588f16aded134759af6c2b76cf02864d | {
"text": "These basic covenants are as already above shown the inter se integration agreement dated 18th March, 1948, executed by all the rulers of the component States of Vindhya Pradesh and the Instrument of Accession dated 20th July, 1948, executed by the Rajpramukh in favour of the Dominion of India."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1079552"
} | 919cbc1e40fc40e0a04ec3200bacb2d5 | {
"text": "My conclusion therefore is that the misdirection mentioned above has resulted in an erroneous verdict as regards these charges."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "financial_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/158035741/"
} | a002741cd4e04aa0bd06633d20a4d6f5 | {
"text": "Further signature on the cheques in question Ex. CW1/3, Ex. CW1/4 and Ex. CW1/5 has also not been disputed by the accused."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1133583/"
} | 45003e0fc9a347259fc052dfae515f0f | {
"text": "With regard to subscription deposit scheme, assessee has booked an expense of Rs. 17,32,165 in Unit No. I whereas no* expenses under this head are booked in Unit Nos. II and III."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JKK5TDDP",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 42,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 4,
"text": "Division Bench of Allahabad High Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "24Q5DI27",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 102,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 91,
"text": "Section 422"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "YYNJJZMW",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 173,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 148,
"text": "Section 195(1) (b) or (c)"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "Z41IF787",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 296,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 285,
"text": "Section 476"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "8CZC551L",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 357,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 346,
"text": "Section 422"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/122401"
} | b904d6f6802d41a7bf346f586fbb80ca | {
"text": "The Division Bench of Allahabad High Court held that \"it may be true that an offence under Section 422 is not included in the offences mentioned in Section 195(1) (b) or (c) and, therefore, the liquidation officer, acting as a civil or revenue court, could not under the provisions of Section 476 make a complaint for an offence which fell under Section 422."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "8WPT81MI",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 26,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 13,
"text": "Ramesh Sharma"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "1ZNMNFLW",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 59,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 43,
"text": "Raj Singh Sharma"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "XO719FDC",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 115,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 80,
"text": "R.K. Computers & Technical Services"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "O0KCM2BJ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 222,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 217,
"text": "s 138"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "HF6MEB3H",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 256,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 230,
"text": "NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "0WBIETUE",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 324,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 319,
"text": "s 138"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "M4HTXVPE",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 333,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 325,
"text": "N.I. Act"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "financial_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/150587499/"
} | ae9b5afce7854bcfb00a44ab8b7499ec | {
"text": "Versus Sh. Ramesh Sharma, \n S/o Late Sh. Raj Singh Sharma,\n Proprietor of M/s R.K. Computers & Technical Services,\n R/o C140, Sector50, \n Noida (U.P.) ......... Accused.\n\nCOMPLAINT U/s 138 OF THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Offence complained of : U/s 138 N.I. Act Date of commission of offence"
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "WYLZ11TR",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 20,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 6,
"text": "April 28, 1977"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "MZXDZP0B",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 199,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 191,
"text": "Calcutta"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "GNY4ZBL2",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 340,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 315,
"text": "Title Suit No. 16 of 1944"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1118170"
} | 5e0d0eb83d4949019900f1584ccc4284 | {
"text": "2. On April 28, 1977 (?), the present appellant entered into an agreement with the pre-sent respondent to sell the suit property which is a demarcated part of premises No. 2, Andul Raj Road, Calcutta, and which had been allotted to the share of the appellant's father under a partition decree passed on an award in Title Suit No. 16 of 1944."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "8C52CO7G",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 63,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 45,
"text": "Laxminarain Gandhi"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "FW48F6CY",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 135,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 121,
"text": "Section 64 (b)"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1524704"
} | e56174c621aa443fac73fbfedf3e0f0b | {
"text": "As my view is that the contesting respondent Laxminarain Gandhi had a right of appeal in this case within the meaning of Section 64 (b) of the Act and consequently the appellate tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the same, this application has no force and must be dismissed."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "N5KO91UD",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 34,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 23,
"text": "section 146"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "LD4E5I80",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 38,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 35,
"text": "IPC"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/197027170/"
} | 6217876a85584fa080284120fb48a64d | {
"text": "Now the ingredients of section 146 IPC are; \n (i) The accused is a member of as assembly consisting of 5 or more people."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3G48N3LN",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 45,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 32,
"text": "Supreme Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "N3W9LOQI",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 60,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 49,
"text": "Mohar Singh"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3L4TPSAN",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 82,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 68,
"text": "AIR 1955 SC 84"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1496679"
} | 7fd0f155f1df4e5889c3a113b6219f93 | {
"text": "The principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Mohar Singh's case AIR 1955 SC 84 have been consistently followed in subsequent cases referred to above and relied upon by both the parties."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DCG3S6O4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 77,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 70,
"text": "DRC Act"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/18453588/"
} | 496ddde449914b159743f6069e82fcff | {
"text": "17(b) That the suit property is not protected under the provisions of DRC Act."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "HC034WNC",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 35,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 19,
"text": "Delhi High Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "O0RQCQVP",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 72,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 57,
"text": "17th March 1980"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DC7V49MN",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 166,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 153,
"text": "Supreme Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JUCULW4F",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 179,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 170,
"text": "16-4-1981"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/294777"
} | 8652f26e3ba8443d92c511416045420d | {
"text": "It stated that the Delhi High Court's decision was dated 17th March 1980 and the Special Leave Petition filed against the said order was rejected by the Supreme Court on 16-4-1981."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "4SMFFTRI",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 106,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 59,
"text": "Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/13255571/"
} | aa6bea5fac424c4eb405ae609ac74864 | {
"text": "This has to be born in mind that the present case is under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and this act was enacted with the objective that the children of tender age are not abused and their childhood and youth are protected against exploitation and they are given facilities to develop in a healthy manner and in condition of freedom and dignity."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "L4U38K9U",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 133,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 120,
"text": "Supreme Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "V3EX0HOX",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 200,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 137,
"text": "M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India in Writ Petition No.13029 of 1985"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/126677406/"
} | 4b58d56742fd4560b7aa64deb6f5c6b9 | {
"text": "As per prosecution by doing so, the accused has committed the violation of permit condition as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India in Writ Petition No.13029 of 1985."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1705894"
} | 0db2defea1d247bcb1cfe8a8906201b5 | {
"text": "Bad debts Account will be transferred to Profit and Loss Account.\" \n 26."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "HMHP3QIE",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 12,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 0,
"text": "Section 2(1)"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "0DTCO2SG",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 76,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 42,
"text": "Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JB4XLRK6",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 112,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 106,
"text": "Madras"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2GGKM1JW",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 238,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 227,
"text": "Pondicherry"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/812784"
} | a806a7455cce428bb872b1c97cdb8edc | {
"text": "Section 2(1) of the Act provided that the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, as in force in the State of Madras immediately before the commencement of the said Act shall extend to and come into force in the Union Territory of Pondicherry subject to certain modifications and adaptations specified in that section."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "7QF4K605",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 142,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 126,
"text": "Mihirl Kumar Ray"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1487058"
} | 0de16d4264db41ccba4b057b46bc74a4 | {
"text": "The finding of the learned Tribunal Judge is based on sound reasoning and evidence on record particularly that of P.W. 1 Shri Mihirl Kumar Ray according to whom such extension was to be granted as a matter of course, and as such it cannot be said that the same finding is an outcome of any hypothetical conjecture having no relation either to fact or the realities of the situation."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "SN1YGIIX",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 111,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 101,
"text": "Apex Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "6L78QTIX",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 190,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 127,
"text": "Mukund Dewangan Vs. Oriental Insurance Company (2016) 4 SCC 298"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/73096947"
} | 02eebc3bf6764dfbbaf7a81377dc5303 | {
"text": "He also submits that this issue has been referred to the Larger Bench in view of judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Mukund Dewangan Vs. Oriental Insurance Company (2016) 4 SCC 298."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "PWLVHCMA",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 182,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 158,
"text": "Finance Act No.2 of 1991"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/170212823"
} | dfaff2e118024c07b35eaca7e5e22924 | {
"text": "Firstly, we shall examine the question as to whether the show cause notices are beyond the period of limitation as per the amended provisions of the Act vide Finance Act No.2 of 1991."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "G7BYE2RD",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 8,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 3,
"text": "Arivu"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "G3KTEIPR",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 93,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 84,
"text": "Sivarasan"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "C2UR6LU3",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 132,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 125,
"text": "Vijayan"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/194120/"
} | 8a710854b2ef401d8d4dd0aad60a6e07 | {
"text": "e) Arivu (A-18) purchased a 12 volt car battery (MO-209) for the wireless set which Sivarasan was to install in the house of Vijayan (A-12)."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "land&property_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1000149/"
} | 71c08709a33547cf833d9046356d262b | {
"text": "In strict principle, this is an allowance of capital nature but it is now well settled that the allowance of depreciation has to be taken into account in order to ascertain the true profits of a business and, therefore, an assessee is permitted to deduct, in the computation of the business income year after year, the prescribed percentage of the value of the assets used for the purposes of business."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "MW5ZKIB0",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 71,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 46,
"text": "States Reorganisation Act"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "V7EEL191",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 108,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 91,
"text": "1st November 1956"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1930019"
} | f53597736b41456e98e56e0ab55991be | {
"text": "this state of affairs continued till the date States Reorganisation Act came into force on 1st November 1956."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "XG2WPW4E",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 159,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 142,
"text": "Punjab High Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "40GLRNTO",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 185,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 175,
"text": "Dial Chand"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/868147/"
} | d49e93c751a14aa68e1c048067f2d423 | {
"text": "In the third case it would not serve the purpose of the Act if the tenant was held liable to be evicted forthwith as is the view taken by the Punjab High Court in the case of Dial Chand (supra)."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/111540258"
} | fef90b79a72b4d2da67fce60af84b63b | {
"text": "They stated that the relationships between them and the second father were good."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/108605804"
} | 2f34baeb29ad44729afbf05115f503e9 | {
"text": "In the cross-examination of this witness by the learned advocate for the accused, this witness has denied that he had not written the complaint of the complainant as dictated by him."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "S7U5H5DS",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 104,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 90,
"text": "Section 437(3)"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "BWSSZEE4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 119,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 112,
"text": "Cr.P.C."
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/35725592"
} | d4fcb9f87b51491c9c6577760316e955 | {
"text": "It is also directed that the applicant shall abide by all the conditions enumerated under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. \n\n Cc. as per rules."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/296625"
} | 80f54fe130614a4e9d2bf4c37ba243da | {
"text": "It yielded to the pressure tactics of those who according to the Government are out to terrorise the police force and to overawe the elected Governments."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/198827109/"
} | e0422960d59c437184b6fb1ed0936cd6 | {
"text": "The plea in the written statement is one of the denial of conduct alleged, and not of provocation."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "8MIO19JS",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 35,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 22,
"text": "Suryanarayana"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "6MPDIYSX",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 63,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 53,
"text": "Saraswathi"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1632111"
} | 74421b5542f048bb8a1bee9148305595 | {
"text": "Just about that time, Suryanarayana (A-3), father of Saraswathi, came to know that the 1st accused was having a wife alive, and therefore he and P. Ws. 2 and 3 questioned the 1st accused about it."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2GQQ47AI",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 34,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 27,
"text": "Ziegler"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "A5W24F78",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 74,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 38,
"text": "Reference Application No. 48 of 1970"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "FMC4Q5PG",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 178,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 169,
"text": "s. 147(b)"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DWLC3FQ2",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 200,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 186,
"text": "I.T. Act, 1961"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/816231"
} | 4077bb3f7a3e4577abcbc901f3abd151 | {
"text": "Except in the case of Shri Ziegler in Reference Application No. 48 of 1970-71, there is a dispute in regard to the validity of the assessment proceedings reopened under s. 147(b) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as \"the Act\")."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "R3BOWX4G",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 69,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 64,
"text": "SAPPI"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "MYSLF7GM",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 148,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 78,
"text": "Godwana Mill Manufacturing Paper Pulp, Newsprint and Kraft Liner Board"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "Q4JOP8S6",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 181,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 156,
"text": "Saicor Mill Manufacturing"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "EQ8XR8P0",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 244,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 218,
"text": "Staryer Mill Manufacturing"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "MFTWQALQ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 300,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 289,
"text": "Saicor Mill"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "HH3VV1RM",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 397,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 389,
"text": "Zimbabwe"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "J77A9RHO",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 414,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 399,
"text": "10th July, 1992"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "GNYRON81",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 433,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 418,
"text": "11th July, 1992"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1539569/"
} | 5e7f16d8412a41999cbef66550fd5c31 | {
"text": "During the visit the undersigned visited the following mills of SAPPI : \n(a) Godwana Mill Manufacturing Paper Pulp, Newsprint and Kraft Liner Board; \n(b) Saicor Mill Manufacturing dissolving grade pulp; and \n\n(c) Staryer Mill Manufacturing coated, tissue and mechanical paper. \nThe Saicor Mill is the single largest plant in the world for production of dissolving grade pulp. \n(2) Zimbabwe (10th July, 1992 to 11th July, 1992)"
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1634320/"
} | d60f4f7b4f2044a9bdf7b791949fb116 | {
"text": "The court is entitled to ascertain the intention of the legislature to remove the ambiguity by construing the provision of the statute as a whole keeping in view what was the mischief when the statute was enacted and to remove which the legislature enacted the statute."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "OJ7K9KBM",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 137,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 123,
"text": "22nd May. 1962"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "WS5D31LA",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 203,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 191,
"text": "Shyamacharan"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "C5MS38XD",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 276,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 261,
"text": "Order 12 Rule 6"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "IRH5M26A",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 283,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 277,
"text": "C.P.C."
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1321046"
} | b1f73d6066d74fb7b6497f8b82d79321 | {
"text": "embodied an unqualified and, absolute-admission that he was not entitled to remain in occupation of the cinema house after 22nd May. 1962, and that in view of this admission of the defendant Shyamacharan the plaintiff-respondent, was entitled to a decree under Order 12 Rule 6 C.P.C., for possession of the cinema house"
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "O6P33K8E",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 22,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 0,
"text": "Amar Singh Raghuwanshi"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "KZ0Y7DUL",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 64,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 51,
"text": "Dehati Nalish"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ELABQZSR",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 97,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 86,
"text": "Santosh son"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "RW2TIGNZ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 119,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 101,
"text": "Champalal Prajapat"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/188702462"
} | f8d121b2480644bd825a0d0ad150cbe6 | {
"text": "Amar Singh Raghuwanshi, SHO on the spot received a Dehati Nalish from PW1 complainant Santosh son of Champalal Prajapat."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1839402/"
} | d3540d92cb564140b0c417c973aad45c | {
"text": "These provisions shall be applicable to all teachers except those having matric [Untrained] or lower qualification:-"
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "1LYQAT3H",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 35,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 31,
"text": "Hale"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/600200"
} | 61a6eecb55344064abfcc4b4825db954 | {
"text": "In the context of our law, Sir Hale's enunciation has to be interpreted no more than emphasising that where the dead body of the victim in a murder case is not found, other cogent and satisfactory proof of the homicidal death of the victim must be adduced by the prosecution."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "UBY9OGKB",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 77,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 68,
"text": "Ashok Lal"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/549608"
} | ecab8a2175284048a10dfce48db5c3fb | {
"text": "(64). Coming to the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Ashok Lal's case, it was a case in which writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking prayer for regularisation of his services and to increase his salary from Rs. 240/- p.m. to regular pay-scale."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "40DISUDJ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 17,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 4,
"text": "Supreme Court"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/199468"
} | a88a9f4cc25e4355badb9d6c9c3ac643 | {
"text": "The Supreme Court held that, in ordinary parlance, paddy and rice were two different goods and there was also change in the identity of the goods."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "AFA8DUYP",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 71,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 3,
"text": "National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Baljit Kaur and others (2004) 2 SCC 1"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "NWXQIP5C",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 139,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 128,
"text": "Section 147"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JFFGDBCC",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 190,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 154,
"text": "Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1994"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/73873069/"
} | a502a44161e5456fb86ebac1856d7977 | {
"text": "In National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Baljit Kaur and others (2004) 2 SCC 1 upon considering the effect of amendment carried out in Section 147 of the Act by Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1994, it was held:\n\n \"By reason of the 1994 Amendment what was added is \"including the owner of the goods or his authorized representative carried in the vehicle.\""
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "TU4MLT9V",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 128,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 102,
"text": "Fakira v. King Emperor (1)"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/653417/"
} | f1bb75e36e3d4fb4b9b0eb8726e426e6 | {
"text": "Reference in this connection may be made to the deci- sion of their Lordships of the Privy Council in Fakira v. King Emperor (1)."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "IRF62LT0",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 66,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 56,
"text": "17.06.2014"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "NCB04HXK",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 149,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 136,
"text": "Section 14(2)"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/12840019"
} | be504387b9e64e889a5778d1b4946cf4 | {
"text": "From perusal of the communication (AnnexureP/10) dated 17.06.2014, it is evident that the Chancellor has not exercised the power under Section 14(2) of the Act."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "O2AHADWU",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 144,
"labels": [
"JUDGE"
],
"start": 130,
"text": "Mohammad Rafiq"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/134634048"
} | 65c437ee535b47158d8b54e1ccb77975 | {
"text": "In view of above, I do not find any merit in these second appeals, and same are therefore dismissed with no order as to costs. \n\n(Mohammad Rafiq) J. \n\n//Jaiman//"
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3V4ROUYJ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 14,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 4,
"text": "Apex Court"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1652199"
} | a025b32e7a644cb1a02f61b939814ec9 | {
"text": "The Apex Court held that the omission to file an affidavit neither rendered petition invalid nor did it affect the assumption of jurisdiction by the Chairman to initiate proceedings to determine the question of disqualification of the members of the House."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "CWXL8AM1",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 114,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 107,
"text": "Pradeep"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2KUUSGQ4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 148,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 142,
"text": "Dinesh"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/607546"
} | 9e884efcd7f249c59009ea7726c62cdc | {
"text": "Moreover, we are of the opinion that the making of subsequent disclosure statement Ex. PW-1/H by Appellant Pradeep and Ex.PW-1/J of Appellant Dinesh is suspect."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "A4MFYQCY",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 44,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 34,
"text": "Section 30"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "75G8CPDN",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 64,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 52,
"text": "Evidence Act"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/194120/"
} | 568bdebf3ec2438b8187deb1163d2e39 | {
"text": "It is now well settled that under Section 30 of the Evidence Act the confession made by one accused is not substantive evidence against a co-accused."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "land&property_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/197490/"
} | 95c05dfa1c294c3f97d48345829c2ace | {
"text": "whether there is lurking behind\tit no minority at all and in any case, no minority institution."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1051408/"
} | bddede0c75f646c7b71dadad2d52b10b | {
"text": "adverb \"exclusively\" governed\t the word \"use' only and did\t not govern the words \"prepared for use\"."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "FBPK3LRW",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 33,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 25,
"text": "7.9.1991"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DYBLHNUM",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 71,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 57,
"text": "Trichy Santhan"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "KE9IGG3K",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 84,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 75,
"text": "Irumborai"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "US1DHJ0A",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 142,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 133,
"text": "Irumborai"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "GM3KXLQL",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 203,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 191,
"text": "Rajiv Gandhi"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/194120/"
} | b2c54e77e5274a4d8590c9b0112243d9 | {
"text": "e) From the letter dated 7.9.1991 (Exh.P-128) written by Trichy Santhan to Irumborai (A-19) prosecution seeks to draw inference that Irumborai (A-19) had prior knowledge about the killing of Rajiv Gandhi."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "0273301W",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 32,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 16,
"text": "F.A.No.6 of 1993"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JN8R2M8Y",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 85,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 75,
"text": "24/02/1999"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "5CZMRTJK",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 152,
"labels": [
"PETITIONER"
],
"start": 142,
"text": "Jainarayan"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/67543563"
} | fd3454af0ad544b3b9f24674ef5488e1 | {
"text": "4. On appeal in F.A.No.6 of 1993 this Court vide judgment and decree dated 24/02/1999 affirmed the finding of the trial Court that plaintiff, Jainarayan was not the exclusive owner of the suit property."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3I22L7AG",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 126,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 110,
"text": "Section 406/420\""
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "EGS98SJ1",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 151,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 134,
"text": "Indian Penal Code"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "PQ218LQN",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 170,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 167,
"text": "TPC"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "TNRG4JQX",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 224,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 179,
"text": "Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3PN9Z9J2",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 264,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 244,
"text": "Case No. 674 of 1997"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "QWQ21KR1",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 316,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 268,
"text": "Police Station Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1699144/"
} | cb7262ba75244f8592f7632533ee117c | {
"text": "By this application the appellants had sought quashing of the criminal proceedings pending against them under Section 406/420\" of the Indian Penal Code (for short the TPC) in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad and arising out of Case No. 674 of 1997 of Police Station Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "6VTK2FY5",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 42,
"labels": [
"JUDGE"
],
"start": 30,
"text": "Chakravartti"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "A92KC7MX",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 86,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 73,
"text": "Supreme Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "782NAZGE",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 107,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 101,
"text": "Madras"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "QBR18I4B",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 146,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 138,
"text": "Calcutta"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "9H3LVPDV",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 339,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 330,
"text": "Clause 15"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/225888"
} | 5cbe2d908ed94fe8ab80acdbe4aa7613 | {
"text": "From the above point of view, Chakravartti C. J., was inclined, like the Supreme Court, to treat the Madras test as only a variant of the Calcutta test and he summed up his total reaction on this particular question in his own inimitable way and unsurpassable language in the following lines;\n\"Whether or not an appeal lies under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent from any particular order"
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "YI0R80XF",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 99,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 68,
"text": "Foreign Exchange Regulation Act"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1539947/"
} | a7d3d756d16d442ea4a48a31753bedbd | {
"text": "Therefore, it cannot be said that the lady directors were afraid of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act provisions."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "financial_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/183957582/"
} | 9c5e88849b2f4c369cfedd52f1286ea9 | {
"text": "The defendant can provide the non-existence of consideration by raising a probable defence."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "SZSLX3K6",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 97,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 87,
"text": "Section 60"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "W0X5KIUK",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 105,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 101,
"text": "POTA"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "IGINDDK9",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 221,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 217,
"text": "POTA"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "9T9UE4Y8",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 243,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 230,
"text": "State of U.P."
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1410163"
} | 29c7f71ad96c4e12bce7178ec52193fa | {
"text": "As is discernible from the factual depiction the accused filed a review petition under Section 60 of POTA and eventually the review committee found that there was no justification to proceed against the accused under POTA and the State of U.P. was directed to release the accused persons."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "X6B0CXC4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 134,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 120,
"text": "Vishakhapatnam"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "QYL2AS24",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 202,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 179,
"text": "Gromor NPK 14 : 35 : 14"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JRFC1I3L",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 247,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 213,
"text": "Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JPO1NBVP",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 353,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 348,
"text": "India"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "HH39RZUJ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 379,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 371,
"text": "1.3.1969"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/85776"
} | 5d1cd6dc6f9142618177526383ffb54b | {
"text": "The petitioners carry business inter alia as manufacturers of diverse kinds of fertilisers at their factory situated at Vishakhapatnam one of the fertilisers thus manufactured is Gromor NPK 14 : 35 : 14 under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as \"the Act\") excise duty was being imposed on fertilisers manufactured in India with effect from 1.3.1969."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "OWVK7RY4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 25,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 15,
"text": "Apex Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "4GEAHWV5",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 150,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 52,
"text": "OM NARAIN AGARWAL AND OTHERS v. NAGAR PALIKA, SHAHJAHANPUR AND OTHERS reported in AIR 1993 SC 1440"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "J21E5ELM",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 245,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 235,
"text": "Article 14"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "KAGIWRBV",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 265,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 253,
"text": "Constitution"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/185565701"
} | 322617ef15e64b86b5ad61102949dc0d | {
"text": "Relying of the Apex Court's judgment in the case of OM NARAIN AGARWAL AND OTHERS v. NAGAR PALIKA, SHAHJAHANPUR AND OTHERS reported in AIR 1993 SC 1440, the learned Advocate General would contend that the right of equality enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution applies to equals and not to unequals."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "7XX6AKGT",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 39,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 23,
"text": "Crime No. 133/01"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "NWWR3BCB",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 70,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 46,
"text": "Sections 396,302 and 307"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "66L5D10V",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 74,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 71,
"text": "IPC"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1620505"
} | 65c8c51805784e1d86ec92917599fb83 | {
"text": "On which he registered Crime No. 133/01 under Sections 396,302 and 307 IPC."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "K637NBGW",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 122,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 72,
"text": "Department of the Comptroller and\t Auditor-General"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "land&property_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1685522/"
} | 06e80c0d311e42828c495d8b61874c30 | {
"text": "is that while two Departments of the\tGovernment have taken one view the Department of the Comptroller and\t Auditor-General has taken a contrary view,\nwhich is neither warranted nor tenable."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "21IP7DD4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 47,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 26,
"text": "Ramakrishna Sons Ltd."
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "QNI8YYRB",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 60,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 49,
"text": "S. P. Mehta"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "L2LZSUFF",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 80,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 62,
"text": "T. A. Ramachandran"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "4U57FS7Q",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 105,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 90,
"text": "J. Ramachandran"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1208473/"
} | a08fd6bb612e424ebf5aa2019b574f7d | {
"text": "For the Interveners : (1) Ramakrishna Sons Ltd.: S. P. Mehta, T. A. Ramachandran and M/s. J. Ramachandran, (2) M/"
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "tax_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1814618"
} | 914a423ef54647e585e76098c46a5f3c | {
"text": "When a law is impugned as being ultra vires of the legislative competence, what is required to be ascertained is the true character of the legislation."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JJI16QL5",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 82,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 65,
"text": "December 31, 1981"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1962951/"
} | 8adeb4c94f284ff69d4029d25bc56f03 | {
"text": "They were requested to examine the rolls as finally published on December 31, 1981."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/104277901"
} | 521b6430088a4a23a05b03b003828f46 | {
"text": "The object and purpose of prescribing regulations is to ensure that minority institutions do not fall below the standard of excellence expected of an educational institution and that they do not fall outside the mainstream of the nation."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1149827/"
} | b9cbf67247e64ac99584c3b867d26ce5 | {
"text": "(c)The\tplea that penalty should be\tconfined only\tto wailful acts of omission and commission in contravention of the provisions of an enactment cannot be accepted because penal consequences can be visited on acts which are\tcom- mitted\twith or without a guilty mind."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "9EECSZKE",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 48,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 30,
"text": "23rd October, 1982"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "N05EOGAA",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 146,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 138,
"text": "2-4-1984"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "KOIMQLK6",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 188,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 179,
"text": "31-3-1981"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JXYXIC22",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 213,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 205,
"text": "3-4-1984"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/936549/"
} | 18a507746a3b4807a7c473a5603cd8df | {
"text": "We find that the report dated 23rd October, 1982 in terms was requested in respect of assessment year 1980-81 and the second report dated 2-4-1984 in respect of the period ending 31-3-1981 was obtained on 3-4-1984 and submitted before the assessment, in which the cost of construction was worked out at Rs. 11,54,800 as against the book version of Rs. 11,44,554."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ON8L9M1Y",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 29,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 0,
"text": "CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1879 OF 1972"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "QDR8X570",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 62,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 34,
"text": "CIVIL APPEAL NO. 115 of 1974"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "7LKPVP9Y",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 133,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 115,
"text": "29th January, 1973"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "FPZX7A6O",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 157,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 141,
"text": "Delhi High Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "MDSJUN1D",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 180,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 161,
"text": "LPA No. 155 of 1972"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/974148/"
} | f443a79d69844b7a9698407b2c4ce770 | {
"text": "CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1879 OF 1972 AND CIVIL APPEAL NO. 115 of 1974 Appeal by special leave from the Judgment dated the 29th January, 1973 of the Delhi High Court in LPA No. 155 of 1972."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "HLI7KLGS",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 229,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 209,
"text": "Naresh Chand Kakaria"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/20233594/"
} | 95705c6542ab4e4f9166b2fb2b398a9a | {
"text": "The defendant No. 1 had also managed to get mutated the said entire suit property fraudulently in his favour on the basis of the said forged and fabricated WILL and the defendant No. 1 declared his father Sh. Naresh Chand Kakaria as dead while he was alive at that time."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "1CMV3ACS",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 9,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 0,
"text": "Sivarasan"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "7H7C32TU",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 42,
"labels": [
"WITNESS"
],
"start": 22,
"text": "P. Thirumathi Vimala"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2Q24HSMA",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 87,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 78,
"text": "Sri Lanka"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/194120/"
} | ed390af791094701b8c840f82821e028 | {
"text": "Sivarasan had brought P. Thirumathi Vimala (PW62) a letter from her mother in Sri Lanka."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/16879269"
} | 093f271cfbb74d0091f8aa7c7425bf63 | {
"text": "If the literal construction leads to an absurdity, external aids to construction can be resorted to."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1607096/"
} | 30d90275e1c74c919537e49a85702b87 | {
"text": "We do not see any justification for this argument."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1977998/"
} | 74f70df8398c4023b191eef14ea0ef43 | {
"text": "However, the respondent will be at liberty to raise this question in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum, if occasion arises."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/261296"
} | cd9c5b5ddc08459bb477ce0343b5ed3e | {
"text": "The police asked whether he gave cyanide to the accused."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1943946"
} | 6eeef6a53b5a4c0897d683568f46c0fe | {
"text": "They reached at the place of occurrence when they were called by other persons."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ELNCXK8A",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 61,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 55,
"text": "Renuka"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "criminal_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/134169359"
} | 46e37be54fc446f7943ec98e24a62459 | {
"text": "He stated that none of the 4 persons informed him that Renuka was taken to any lady Doctor during night."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "tax_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1300317"
} | 1d6e90cd0a4b4132bddd65b257ed3ee0 | {
"text": "We have to take into account all the features that appertain to the office and thereafter proceed to a conclusion."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "ZOFH25YI",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 10,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 4,
"text": "Luthra"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "17BRYENP",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 121,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 79,
"text": "Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/886452"
} | 3acff6dc717047afa75c30ba1584090e | {
"text": "Mr. Luthra submits that the impugned Act, namely, The Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, is invalid."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2IQMGHD4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 131,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 110,
"text": "Promode Ranjan Sarkar"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "PIDCC86R",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 193,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 171,
"text": "Pramatha Nath Talukdar"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "1OUYQ2QJ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 241,
"labels": [
"ORG"
],
"start": 218,
"text": "N. R. Sarkar & Co. Ltd."
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1271682/"
} | e2af0f3d094c4036a376cb3b9bcedd65 | {
"text": "It was alleged that the meeting was held irregularly without any agenda and a resolution was adopted, despite Promode Ranjan Sarkar's protest, by which the appointment of Pramatha Nath Talukdar as Managing Director of N. R. Sarkar & Co. Ltd. was renewed for seven years."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "land&property_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/127577/"
} | 89a728d7561b477592d3cf6998c961dc | {
"text": "We would therefore proceed to deal with this question first."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "C2CNJ0E0",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 37,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 31,
"text": "Biswas"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DCKFVYMO",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 77,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 50,
"text": "Section 75, sub-section (c)"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "KRYTYQIE",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 108,
"labels": [
"STATUTE"
],
"start": 85,
"text": "Code of Civil Procedure"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "0CFDZFCQ",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 156,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 143,
"text": "Supreme Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "KCLBBCB0",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 195,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 160,
"text": "Padam Sen v. State of Uttar Pradesh"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "YFVMIVGB",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 245,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 232,
"text": "Supreme Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "5NAP8LZW",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 282,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 249,
"text": "Monoharlal Chopra v. Seth Hiralal"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/995277"
} | 3878976d0dc64ea08eedebd18ff31edf | {
"text": "In support of his argument Mr. Biswas referred to Section 75, sub-section (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure and relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Padam Sen v. State of Uttar Pradesh, and the subsequent decision of the Supreme Court in Monoharlal Chopra v. Seth Hiralal, ."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "W7Y7GECP",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 103,
"labels": [
"COURT"
],
"start": 90,
"text": "Supreme Court"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "07CU64NP",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 162,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 107,
"text": "Roshan Singh v. Zile Singh, reported in AIR 1988 SC 881"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1417141"
} | d2d5366ed41c4ac1b146aa3ac5eddca8 | {
"text": "In this connection, the learned counsel has placed strong reliance upon a decision of the Supreme Court in Roshan Singh v. Zile Singh, reported in AIR 1988 SC 881."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "KBGYKHFB",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 75,
"labels": [
"PRECEDENT"
],
"start": 15,
"text": "Harishankar Bagla and Anr. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh(')"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "W8BMH6YV",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 84,
"labels": [
"JUDGE"
],
"start": 77,
"text": "Mahajan"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/513801/"
} | 187b0723c33f4eb89eb84219f290a43c | {
"text": "In the case of Harishankar Bagla and Anr. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh('), Mahajan, C.J. at pages 388-89 of the report said \"The Preamble and the body, of the sections sufficiently formulate the legislative policy and the ambit and character of the Act is such that the details of that policy can only be worked out by delegating them to a subordinate authority within the framework of that policy\"."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/19549137"
} | e6da0dfc22824fe6ac1af740e95b7548 | {
"text": "The owner of the vehicle though appeared before the Court through his counsel did not contest the claim thereafter."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "WWMXGYFC",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 83,
"labels": [
"DATE"
],
"start": 55,
"text": "Sat Nov 07 01:12:31 IST 2015"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "NLOT3K2Q",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 109,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 84,
"text": "C/SCA/14948/2015 JUDGMENT"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "constitution_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/128750591"
} | 8c2c54ee8bd5452f887b8e4900befde6 | {
"text": "It is the power, the HC-NIC Page 33 of 46 Created On Sat Nov 07 01:12:31 IST 2015 C/SCA/14948/2015 JUDGMENT function and duty under the Act of the Registrar, on a request made by the respective committees of the Central Banks or Apex Co-operative Society concerned to conduct elections."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "B7V75YR6",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 72,
"labels": [
"PROVISION"
],
"start": 58,
"text": "section 139(8)"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "industrial&labour_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/680611"
} | 53782084d3d64c19bddc89006c9e1e47 | {
"text": "The applicant should pay the taxes and the interest under section 139(8) in the normal course."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "CBY6ESR2",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 90,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 85,
"text": "Kunal"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "D19IOUMN",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 241,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 234,
"text": "accused"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "FR4J1HC4",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 255,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 249,
"text": "Suresh"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "JOZD76S8",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 273,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 257,
"text": "Bhavarlal Sharma"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "3DLDABJN",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 289,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 275,
"text": "Captain Sharma"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "LUY4HC66",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 305,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 300,
"text": "Kunal"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/65700/"
} | 799303d3fb5648a2ab415b5f6f38e069 | {
"text": "However, on the next day, the complainant levelled allegation that since marriage of Kunal had been fixed with another girl, the appellant and his family members had developed a grudge and had, therefore, hatched a conspiracy with co-accused Umesh, Suresh, Bhavarlal Sharma, Captain Sharma to murder Kunal."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "GYPH3MCL",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 14,
"labels": [
"RESPONDENT"
],
"start": 0,
"text": "Dhanpat Chamar"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "DVHDV8D2",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 91,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 68,
"text": "Government Appeal No. 9"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1820878"
} | 2184a2aa7c6741e7b63223caba3a1255 | {
"text": "Dhanpat Chamar, one of those respondents, is the only respondent in Government Appeal No. 9."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "tax_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1332957"
} | 73914e8601ee4b90a3aa6f0145b0afa2 | {
"text": "This intention could be effectuated by interpreting the words \"or interest\" as suggested above."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "S9OV6P7X",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 64,
"labels": [
"CASE_NUMBER"
],
"start": 46,
"text": "CS No.\n171 of 2001"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "motorvehicles_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/182326092"
} | 2b77bb1ceec84a4dab261b7b6726be99 | {
"text": "An interlocutory application was taken out in CS No.\n171 of 2001 seeking to arrest the decree and the execution proceedings launched in pursuance thereof."
} |
[
{
"result": []
}
] | {
"source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/30608464/"
} | 69850ae2b3304a8e9a891b26e56b5708 | {
"text": "Thus, this dispute regarding the identity of the respondent is not material in such eviction proceedings."
} |
[
{
"result": [
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "Z0NOQQ5S",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 14,
"labels": [
"OTHER_PERSON"
],
"start": 1,
"text": "Ranjit Thakur"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "2Y2357YX",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 212,
"labels": [
"GPE"
],
"start": 207,
"text": "India"
}
},
{
"from_name": "label",
"id": "19QUNNR6",
"to_name": "text",
"type": "labels",
"value": {
"end": 296,
"labels": [
"JUDGE"
],
"start": 288,
"text": "McDowell"
}
}
]
}
] | {
"source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/107483/"
} | c95d429711c74435a2eb5b9516df32ab | {
"text": "(Ranjit Thakur is quoted (1) 'Is the High Court the Guardian of Fundamental Constitutional Rights? \n\n(1993 P.L.. 59). in f.n.p.601). \n\n Brind (HL)(1991) - administrative law - proportionality - debatable in India in cases not involving fundamental freedoms: Tata Cellular (SC) (1994) and McDowell (SC) (1996):"
} |
Subsets and Splits