uid
stringclasses
122 values
premise
stringclasses
121 values
hypothesis
stringclasses
122 values
chaos_dist
listlengths
3
3
mnli_labels
listlengths
1
5
worker_id
stringclasses
48 values
multilabel
listlengths
1
3
explanation
stringlengths
48
773
highlight_p
listlengths
0
12
highlight_h
listlengths
0
9
dist
listlengths
3
3
agg_dist
listlengths
3
3
taxonomy
listlengths
1
3
within_label_variation
stringclasses
3 values
10164e
findings, the Administrator has determined that an environmental impact statement need not be prepared.
The Administrator believes a environmental impact statement should not be prepared.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 1, 0, 2 ]
w0
[ 0, 2 ]
The context says "need not" while the statement says "should not" but they both pretty much imply the same thing.
[ { "startIndex": 82, "endIndex": 90, "text": "need not", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 60, "endIndex": 70, "text": "should not", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224, 0 ]
[ 4, 7 ]
null
10164e
findings, the Administrator has determined that an environmental impact statement need not be prepared.
The Administrator believes a environmental impact statement should not be prepared.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 1, 0, 2 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
Both the context and statement support the same claim that the Administrator identified that an environmental impact statement is not needed.
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 27, "text": "Administrator", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 87, "endIndex": 102, "text": "not be prepared", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 72, "endIndex": 81, "text": "statement", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 17, "text": "Administrator", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 67, "endIndex": 82, "text": "not be prepared", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 50, "endIndex": 59, "text": "statement", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224, 0 ]
[ 4, 7 ]
null
10164e
findings, the Administrator has determined that an environmental impact statement need not be prepared.
The Administrator believes a environmental impact statement should not be prepared.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 1, 0, 2 ]
w2
[ 0 ]
Both the context and the statement come to the same conclusion, the only difference is the word "determined" and "believes" which is more of a ruling vs a belief, but either way it is true how the administration feels.
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 31, "text": "has", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 32, "endIndex": 42, "text": "determined", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 82, "endIndex": 86, "text": "need", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 87, "endIndex": 90, "text": "not", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 26, "text": "believes", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 60, "endIndex": 66, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 67, "endIndex": 70, "text": "not", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224, 0 ]
[ 4, 7 ]
null
10164e
findings, the Administrator has determined that an environmental impact statement need not be prepared.
The Administrator believes a environmental impact statement should not be prepared.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 1, 0, 2 ]
w3
[ 0, 2 ]
Context includes that the statement doesn't have to be prepared or there isn't a need for it to be prepared. Statement says it should not be prepared but offers no explanation or doesn't address the same sentiment of need like context does.
[ { "startIndex": 82, "endIndex": 103, "text": "need not be prepared.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 60, "endIndex": 82, "text": "should not be prepared", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224, 0 ]
[ 4, 7 ]
null
10164e
findings, the Administrator has determined that an environmental impact statement need not be prepared.
The Administrator believes a environmental impact statement should not be prepared.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 1, 0, 2 ]
w4
[ 0 ]
An administrator, if they want to do their job well, wants to do it efficiently as possible. Odds are if they feel something doesn't need to be prepared, they also feel it shouldn't be.
[ { "startIndex": 82, "endIndex": 90, "text": "need not", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 27, "text": "Administrator", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 17, "text": "Administrator", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 60, "endIndex": 70, "text": "should not", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224, 0 ]
[ 4, 7 ]
null
10164e
findings, the Administrator has determined that an environmental impact statement need not be prepared.
The Administrator believes a environmental impact statement should not be prepared.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 1, 0, 2 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
The statement clearly describes that the administrator does not believe preparation needs to be done, as does the context.
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 27, "text": "the Administrator", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 17, "text": "Administrator", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224, 0 ]
[ 4, 7 ]
null
10164e
findings, the Administrator has determined that an environmental impact statement need not be prepared.
The Administrator believes a environmental impact statement should not be prepared.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 1, 0, 2 ]
w6
[ 0 ]
Need not be prepared in the context and should not be prepared in the statement are equivalent.
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 103, "text": "the Administrator has determined that an environmental impact statement need not be prepared.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 82, "text": "The Administrator believes a environmental impact statement should not be prepared", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224, 0 ]
[ 4, 7 ]
null
10164e
findings, the Administrator has determined that an environmental impact statement need not be prepared.
The Administrator believes a environmental impact statement should not be prepared.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 1, 0, 2 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
The environmental impact does not necessarily need to be prepared, but this does not mean it shouldn't be prepared.
[ { "startIndex": 82, "endIndex": 102, "text": "need not be prepared", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 60, "endIndex": 83, "text": "should not be prepared.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224, 0 ]
[ 4, 7 ]
null
10164e
findings, the Administrator has determined that an environmental impact statement need not be prepared.
The Administrator believes a environmental impact statement should not be prepared.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 1, 0, 2 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
The administrator believes an environmental impact study does not need to be prepared.
[ { "startIndex": 82, "endIndex": 102, "text": "need not be prepared", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 60, "endIndex": 82, "text": "should not be prepared", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224, 0 ]
[ 4, 7 ]
null
10164e
findings, the Administrator has determined that an environmental impact statement need not be prepared.
The Administrator believes a environmental impact statement should not be prepared.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 1, 0, 2 ]
w9
[ 0 ]
The Administrator has determined that the statement id not necessary.
[ { "startIndex": 82, "endIndex": 103, "text": "need not be prepared.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 60, "endIndex": 83, "text": "should not be prepared.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224, 0 ]
[ 4, 7 ]
null
101940e
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
A few invisible planes are all it takes to fix certain issues.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 2, 1 ]
w7
[ 2, 1 ]
The invisible planes can take care of the issues, but this does not mean that they are the only thing that can help.
[ { "startIndex": 107, "endIndex": 139, "text": "a few invisible planes can't fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 39, "text": "all it takes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.5, 0.3499999940395355, 0.15000000596046448 ]
[ 4, 1 ]
QUD
101940e
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
A few invisible planes are all it takes to fix certain issues.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 2, 1 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
Invisible planes may solve some problems but I'm not sure they are all it takes to fix certain issues. Could be true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 102, "endIndex": 140, "text": "that a few invisible planes can't fix.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 61, "text": "all it takes to fix certain issues", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.3499999940395355, 0.15000000596046448 ]
[ 4, 1 ]
QUD
101940e
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
A few invisible planes are all it takes to fix certain issues.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 2, 1 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
Both the context and statement indicate that a few invisible planes can fix a number of different issues.
[ { "startIndex": 113, "endIndex": 129, "text": "invisible planes", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 136, "endIndex": 139, "text": "fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 22, "text": "invisible planes", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 43, "endIndex": 46, "text": "fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.3499999940395355, 0.15000000596046448 ]
[ 4, 1 ]
null
101940e
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
A few invisible planes are all it takes to fix certain issues.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 2, 1 ]
w10
[ 2 ]
I read this context as being sarcastic. That would make it false. If read as serious context, then it would be true
[ { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 44, "text": "there's nothing", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 107, "endIndex": 139, "text": "a few invisible planes can't fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 61, "text": "invisible planes are all it takes to fix certain issues", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.3499999940395355, 0.15000000596046448 ]
[ 4, 1 ]
null
101940e
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
A few invisible planes are all it takes to fix certain issues.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 2, 1 ]
w11
[ 0 ]
The context and phrase are saying the same thing just in a different form of words.
[ { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 44, "text": "there's nothing", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 102, "endIndex": 139, "text": "that a few invisible planes can't fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 2, "endIndex": 46, "text": "few invisible planes are all it takes to fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.3499999940395355, 0.15000000596046448 ]
[ 4, 1 ]
null
101940e
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
A few invisible planes are all it takes to fix certain issues.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 2, 1 ]
w2
[ 0, 2 ]
The statement reasserts the idea in the context, that invisible planes have issue-fixing abilities, although without mentioning that is a view held by a certain group of people. The word "certain" could pertain to the specific issues mentioned in the context.
[ { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 36, "text": "there's", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 44, "text": "nothing", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 113, "endIndex": 122, "text": "invisible", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 123, "endIndex": 129, "text": "planes", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 130, "endIndex": 135, "text": "can't", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 136, "endIndex": 139, "text": "fix", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 4, "text": "They", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 15, "text": "invisible", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 22, "text": "planes", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 30, "text": "all", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 31, "endIndex": 33, "text": "it", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 34, "endIndex": 39, "text": "takes", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 43, "endIndex": 46, "text": "fix", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 47, "endIndex": 54, "text": "certain", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 61, "text": "issues", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.3499999940395355, 0.15000000596046448 ]
[ 4, 1 ]
null
101940e
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
A few invisible planes are all it takes to fix certain issues.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 2, 1 ]
w4
[ 0, 1 ]
If the view those in the context are encouraging is in fact true, then the statement is likely true. If they're trying to manipulate the facts to their own ends, like if they were Lockheed Martin or something than it could just as easily be false.
[ { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 44, "text": "there's nothing", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 102, "endIndex": 139, "text": "that a few invisible planes can't fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 2, "endIndex": 22, "text": "few invisible planes", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 43, "endIndex": 61, "text": "fix certain issues", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0, 0.5 ]
[ 0.5, 0.3499999940395355, 0.15000000596046448 ]
[ 4, 1 ]
null
101940e
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
A few invisible planes are all it takes to fix certain issues.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 2, 1 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
The statement reiterates what the context is explaining. In warfare, invisible planes can fix man issues.
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 23, "text": "encourage the view", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 109, "endIndex": 129, "text": "few invisible planes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 2, "endIndex": 22, "text": "few invisible planes", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 46, "text": "to fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.3499999940395355, 0.15000000596046448 ]
[ 4, 1 ]
null
101940e
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
A few invisible planes are all it takes to fix certain issues.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 2, 1 ]
w6
[ 2, 1 ]
The context is unclear because "They are encouraging the view" does not make the following part of the context true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 23, "text": "They encourage the view", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.5, 0.3499999940395355, 0.15000000596046448 ]
[ 4, 1 ]
null
101940e
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
A few invisible planes are all it takes to fix certain issues.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 2, 1 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
It's true that a few invisible planes can fix certain issues.
[ { "startIndex": 109, "endIndex": 139, "text": "few invisible planes can't fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 61, "text": "to fix certain issues", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.3499999940395355, 0.15000000596046448 ]
[ 4, 1 ]
null
101940n
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
Iraqi chemical weapons and Serbian atrocities can be easily fixed with a few invisible planes.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 1, 2 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
Both the context and statement explicitly identify that invisible plans can fix issues such as weapons programs and atrocities, so they are consistent and the statement is likely to be true.
[ { "startIndex": 62, "endIndex": 69, "text": "weapons", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 90, "endIndex": 100, "text": "atrocities", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 113, "endIndex": 129, "text": "invisible planes", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 136, "endIndex": 139, "text": "fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 35, "endIndex": 45, "text": "atrocities", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 60, "endIndex": 65, "text": "fixed", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 77, "endIndex": 93, "text": "invisible planes", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 22, "text": "weapons", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.4000000059604645, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
101940n
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
Iraqi chemical weapons and Serbian atrocities can be easily fixed with a few invisible planes.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 1, 2 ]
w12
[ 2 ]
It says they encourage the view, which sounds like an opinion, not a fact. It can't be factually determined from the context whether or not the planes would actually fix the issues.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 23, "text": "They encourage the view", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 102, "endIndex": 139, "text": "that a few invisible planes can't fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 53, "endIndex": 93, "text": "easily fixed with a few invisible planes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.4000000059604645, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
101940n
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
Iraqi chemical weapons and Serbian atrocities can be easily fixed with a few invisible planes.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 1, 2 ]
w13
[ 2, 1 ]
Planes by themselves are not able to fix chemical weapons or correct any atrocities being committed.
[ { "startIndex": 102, "endIndex": 139, "text": "that a few invisible planes can't fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 46, "endIndex": 93, "text": "can be easily fixed with a few invisible planes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.5, 0.4000000059604645, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
101940n
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
Iraqi chemical weapons and Serbian atrocities can be easily fixed with a few invisible planes.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 1, 2 ]
w14
[ 0 ]
It seems the statement just restates what the context is saying about Serbian atrocities and Iraqi germ weapons.
[ { "startIndex": 107, "endIndex": 139, "text": "a few invisible planes can't fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 53, "endIndex": 93, "text": "easily fixed with a few invisible planes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.4000000059604645, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
101940n
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
Iraqi chemical weapons and Serbian atrocities can be easily fixed with a few invisible planes.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 1, 2 ]
w2
[ 0, 2 ]
The statement and context both agree a few invisible planes can fix things like Iraqi germ weapons or Serbian atrocities, the only difference is the statement uses the word "easily" which may or may not be true.
[ { "startIndex": 109, "endIndex": 112, "text": "few", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 113, "endIndex": 122, "text": "invisible", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 123, "endIndex": 129, "text": "planes", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 130, "endIndex": 135, "text": "can't", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 136, "endIndex": 139, "text": "fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 53, "endIndex": 59, "text": "easily", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 60, "endIndex": 65, "text": "fixed", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 73, "endIndex": 76, "text": "few", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 77, "endIndex": 86, "text": "invisible", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 87, "endIndex": 93, "text": "planes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.4000000059604645, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
101940n
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
Iraqi chemical weapons and Serbian atrocities can be easily fixed with a few invisible planes.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 1, 2 ]
w4
[ 0, 1 ]
The truth of the statement depends entirely on who is doing the encouraging. If it's an impartial party, likely the statement is true. If it's some company like Boeing or whatever, likely it's propaganda to sell some new planes so it would be mroe likely to be false.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 14, "text": "They encourage", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 46, "endIndex": 49, "text": "can", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0, 0.5 ]
[ 0.5, 0.4000000059604645, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
101940n
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
Iraqi chemical weapons and Serbian atrocities can be easily fixed with a few invisible planes.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 1, 2 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
The statement is reiterating what the context is describing, that invisible planes can fix issues during warfare. Therefore the statement is most likely true.
[ { "startIndex": 113, "endIndex": 129, "text": "invisible planes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 73, "endIndex": 94, "text": "few invisible planes.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.4000000059604645, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
101940n
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
Iraqi chemical weapons and Serbian atrocities can be easily fixed with a few invisible planes.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 1, 2 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
The context says that invisible planes can solve the issue, but it does not mention whether or not this will be easy.
[ { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 44, "text": "there's nothing", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 113, "endIndex": 140, "text": "invisible planes can't fix.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 53, "endIndex": 65, "text": "easily fixed", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.4000000059604645, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
101940n
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
Iraqi chemical weapons and Serbian atrocities can be easily fixed with a few invisible planes.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 1, 2 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
A few invisible planes can fix Iraqi chemicals weapons and Serbian atrocities.
[ { "startIndex": 107, "endIndex": 139, "text": "a few invisible planes can't fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 71, "endIndex": 93, "text": "a few invisible planes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.4000000059604645, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
101940n
They encourage the view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix.
Iraqi chemical weapons and Serbian atrocities can be easily fixed with a few invisible planes.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 1, 2 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
Invisible planes could solve the problem, just how easily is what we are not sure about.
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 139, "text": "view that there's nothing--from Iraqi germ weapons programs to Serbian atrocities--that a few invisible planes can't fix", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 46, "endIndex": 94, "text": "can be easily fixed with a few invisible planes.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.4000000059604645, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
103482e
Although it is a significant part of the poverty population, Asians historically have not been able to participate in the services and programs available to the poor, he said.
Asians are usually not poor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w1
[ 1 ]
The context notes that Asians are typically a significant part of the poverty population whereas the statement notes that Asians are not usually poor. These two statements seem to contradict one another. Thus, the statement is most likely false.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 33, "text": "significant part", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 41, "endIndex": 48, "text": "poverty", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 61, "endIndex": 67, "text": "Asians", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 6, "text": "Asians", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 27, "text": "not poor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 7 ]
null
103482e
Although it is a significant part of the poverty population, Asians historically have not been able to participate in the services and programs available to the poor, he said.
Asians are usually not poor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w11
[ 1 ]
In the sentence, it says asians are a significant part of the poverty population.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 59, "text": "significant part of the poverty population", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 61, "endIndex": 67, "text": "Asians", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 27, "text": "usually not poor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 7 ]
null
103482e
Although it is a significant part of the poverty population, Asians historically have not been able to participate in the services and programs available to the poor, he said.
Asians are usually not poor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w15
[ 1 ]
The context refers to Asia being a significant part of the poverty population, however the Statement claims asians as not being poor.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 59, "text": "significant part of the poverty population", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 27, "text": "not poor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 7 ]
null
103482e
Although it is a significant part of the poverty population, Asians historically have not been able to participate in the services and programs available to the poor, he said.
Asians are usually not poor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w16
[ 1 ]
The context explicitly say that Asians are a significant part of the poverty population, which makes the statement not true.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 67, "text": "significant part of the poverty population, Asians", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 135, "endIndex": 165, "text": "programs available to the poor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 27, "text": "Asians are usually not poor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 7 ]
null
103482e
Although it is a significant part of the poverty population, Asians historically have not been able to participate in the services and programs available to the poor, he said.
Asians are usually not poor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w2
[ 2, 1 ]
In the context the term "significant part" makes it seem like Asians take up a large percentage of the poor population, but the statement contradicts that by using the opposite phrase "usually not". Depending on their definitions of usually and significant, it could possibly be a bit true.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 28, "text": "significant", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 33, "text": "part", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 61, "endIndex": 67, "text": "Asians", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 157, "endIndex": 160, "text": "the", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 161, "endIndex": 165, "text": "poor", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 49, "endIndex": 59, "text": "population", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 6, "text": "Asians", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 18, "text": "usually", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 22, "text": "not", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 23, "endIndex": 27, "text": "poor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 7 ]
null
103482e
Although it is a significant part of the poverty population, Asians historically have not been able to participate in the services and programs available to the poor, he said.
Asians are usually not poor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w4
[ 2, 1 ]
The context says Asians make a significant part of the poverty population, which would imply that the statement itself is false if the term significant referred to the overall number. However, since there are more Asians than any other demographic, it could just as likely be that they are usually not poor but just make up a significant portion due to them making up a significant portion of the overall population.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 59, "text": "significant part of the poverty population", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 27, "text": "usually not poor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 7 ]
null
103482e
Although it is a significant part of the poverty population, Asians historically have not been able to participate in the services and programs available to the poor, he said.
Asians are usually not poor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w5
[ 1 ]
The statement declares that Asians are usually not poor. However, the context states that poverty among the Asian community is a significant issue.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 59, "text": "significant part of the poverty population", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 22, "text": "usually not", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 7 ]
null
103482e
Although it is a significant part of the poverty population, Asians historically have not been able to participate in the services and programs available to the poor, he said.
Asians are usually not poor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w7
[ 2, 1 ]
The context does not mention how often Asians tend to be poor, but it does state that Asians make up a significant part of the poverty population. It may or may not be true that Asians do not tend to be poor, but this is likely not true since they make up such a significant part of that population.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 60, "text": "significant part of the poverty population,", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 27, "text": "usually not poor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 7 ]
null
103482e
Although it is a significant part of the poverty population, Asians historically have not been able to participate in the services and programs available to the poor, he said.
Asians are usually not poor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
Some Asian population are in poverty as stated in the context.
[ { "startIndex": 41, "endIndex": 59, "text": "poverty population", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 27, "text": "usually not poor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 7 ]
null
103482e
Although it is a significant part of the poverty population, Asians historically have not been able to participate in the services and programs available to the poor, he said.
Asians are usually not poor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w9
[ 1 ]
Not having access to services for the poor does not mean that a person or group of people is not poor. This could either be true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 81, "endIndex": 165, "text": "have not been able to participate in the services and programs available to the poor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 28, "text": "Asians are usually not poor.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 7 ]
null
103863c
for a change i i got i get sick of winter just looking everything so dead i hate that
I'm so sick of summer.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 2 ]
w18
[ 1 ]
The speaker hates winter because the foliage is dead, therefore he likely loves summer when everything is alive.
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 41, "text": "sick of winter", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 85, "text": "everything so dead i hate that", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 21, "text": "sick of summer", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 1, 2 ]
coref
103863c
for a change i i got i get sick of winter just looking everything so dead i hate that
I'm so sick of summer.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 2 ]
w5
[ 1 ]
The context is stating how one is sick of winter, not summer, as the statement describes.
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 41, "text": "sick of winter", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 21, "text": "sick of summer", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 1, 2 ]
coref
103863c
for a change i i got i get sick of winter just looking everything so dead i hate that
I'm so sick of summer.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 2 ]
w1
[ 2, 1 ]
The context notes the person is sick of winter but does not indicate how they feel about summer. The statement thus could be true or could be false since we don't know how they feel about that season. However, it is likely to be false since the reason they dislike winter is everything looks so dead and during summer everything looks alive.
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 31, "text": "sick", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 35, "endIndex": 41, "text": "winter", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 69, "endIndex": 73, "text": "dead", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 21, "text": "summer", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 11, "text": "sick", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 1, 2 ]
null
103863c
for a change i i got i get sick of winter just looking everything so dead i hate that
I'm so sick of summer.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 2 ]
w16
[ 2, 1 ]
The context states that the person gets sick of winter, while the statement says that the person is sick of summer; the person might be sick of both seasons but it's probably not the case.
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 41, "text": "i get sick of winter", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 21, "text": "I'm so sick of summer", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 1, 2 ]
null
103863c
for a change i i got i get sick of winter just looking everything so dead i hate that
I'm so sick of summer.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 2 ]
w17
[ 2 ]
Being sick of winter does not necessarily mean being sick of summer. Someone can be sick of winter but love summer, but someone can also be sick of winter and summer.
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 41, "text": "sick of winter", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 21, "text": "sick of summer", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 1, 2 ]
null
103863c
for a change i i got i get sick of winter just looking everything so dead i hate that
I'm so sick of summer.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 2 ]
w2
[ 1 ]
The statement and context mention opposite seasons, summer and winter, yet sharing the same feeling making the context not true.
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 31, "text": "sick", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 32, "endIndex": 34, "text": "of", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 35, "endIndex": 41, "text": "winter", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 11, "text": "sick", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 14, "text": "of", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 21, "text": "summer", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 1, 2 ]
null
103863c
for a change i i got i get sick of winter just looking everything so dead i hate that
I'm so sick of summer.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 2 ]
w4
[ 2, 1 ]
You cannot infer someone's attitude about a certain season just by stating their opinion on an entirely different season. However, since they don't like things looking dead you could make the case that since summertime has a lot of greenery they might not hate summer.
[ { "startIndex": 35, "endIndex": 73, "text": "winter just looking everything so dead", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 21, "text": "sick of summer", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 1, 2 ]
null
103863c
for a change i i got i get sick of winter just looking everything so dead i hate that
I'm so sick of summer.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 2 ]
w7
[ 1 ]
The statement is that someone is sick of winter, not that they are sick of summer.
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 41, "text": "sick of winter", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 21, "text": "sick of summer", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 1, 2 ]
null
103863c
for a change i i got i get sick of winter just looking everything so dead i hate that
I'm so sick of summer.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 2 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
The person is sick of winter and not sick of summer.
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 41, "text": "sick of winter", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 21, "text": "sick of summer", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 1, 2 ]
null
103863c
for a change i i got i get sick of winter just looking everything so dead i hate that
I'm so sick of summer.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 2 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
The context mentions being sick of winter while the statement mentions being sick of summer. These could both be true because the same person may still complain of summer's heat.
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 41, "text": "sick of winter", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 22, "text": "I'm so sick of summer.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 1, 2 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w0
[ 1 ]
The statement falsely implies that the consultants are involved in the conflict themselves when the statement was just merely describing the professional opinion of the management consultant.
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 36, "text": "describe", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 23, "endIndex": 27, "text": "have", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 48, "endIndex": 74, "text": "at the center of conflict.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w1
[ 2 ]
The context notes that bad interactions with other workers are negative behaviors, but it does not note that personality differences or clashes are at the cause of those bad interactions. So, the statement could be true or false as it is not known whether personality clashes are considered.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 27, "text": "consultants", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 63, "text": "dysfunctional interactions", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Consultants", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 47, "text": "personality clashes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w10
[ 2 ]
Since some consultants believe that dysfunction reduces value, they may try to avoid these behaviors. There is no way to tell whether this is successful or not.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 27, "text": "Some management consultants", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 89, "text": "dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Consultants", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 22, "text": "most often", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 47, "text": "personality clashes", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 73, "text": "center of conflict", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w12
[ 2 ]
Dysfunctional interactions with fellow workers would most likely be defined as personality clashes, and a personality clash is a type of conflict. However, it says that some consultants have this, not all it's very possible other consultants have other sources of conflict.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 4, "text": "Some", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 89, "text": "dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 22, "text": "most often", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 47, "text": "personality clashes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w13
[ 2 ]
We do not know if the statement is talking about the clashes of consultants in their own personal lives or if it's referring to a general reason that applies to the whole population.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 36, "text": "Some management consultants describe", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 27, "text": "Consultants most often have", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w14
[ 2 ]
Just because they describe dysfunctional behavior doesn't mean it personality clashes are the problem.
[ { "startIndex": 93, "endIndex": 119, "text": "value-subtracting behavior", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 47, "text": "personality clashes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w16
[ 2 ]
Even though the context and statement are semi-related, we can't be completely sure if the statement is completely true. For example, '... management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers...' and 'Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.' but we don't know if they happen often or not.
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 89, "text": "management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 73, "text": "Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w17
[ 2 ]
Dysfunctional interactions or value-subtracting behavior with one's fellow workers do not necessarily mean that these clashes are at the center of the conflict. These personality clashes could or could not be at the center of conflict, depending on whether or not the workers have other conflicts.
[ { "startIndex": 93, "endIndex": 119, "text": "value-subtracting behavior", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 73, "text": "center of conflict", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w19
[ 2 ]
The context explains that personal clashes among colleagues are value subtracting, but the statement that consultants have such clashes "often" could be true or not -- we don't know if or when/if these clashes happen from the context statement so the it could ultimately be either true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 4, "text": "Some", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 89, "text": "dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 22, "text": "most often", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w2
[ 2 ]
The context mentions "management consultants" where as the statement only mentions "consultants" already making this not as specific therefore equally true or false. The term "dysfunctional interaction" is not identical to "personality clashes" either, though it can be true, it is not stated accurately.
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 15, "text": "management", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 27, "text": "consultants", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 50, "text": "dysfunctional", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 51, "endIndex": 63, "text": "interactions", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Consultants", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 39, "text": "personality", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 47, "text": "clashes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w20
[ 2 ]
When there are dysfunctional interactions between coworkers, it does not always equate to personality clashes. The dysfunctional interactions could be based on many different factors besides personalities clashing.
[ { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 63, "text": "dysfunctional interactions", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 47, "text": "personality clashes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w21
[ 2 ]
While the same population (consultants) is being referenced, it's not necessarily true or false that dysfunctional interactions are related to personality clashes or are made to be the center of conflict.
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 27, "text": "management consultants", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 63, "text": "dysfunctional interactions", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Consultants", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 73, "text": "personality clashes at the center of conflict", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w22
[ 1 ]
I'm not entirely sure what is meant by the center of conflict, but there is no reason to assume consultants have personality clashes.
[ { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 63, "text": "dysfunctional interactions", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 73, "text": "center of conflict", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 47, "text": "personality clashes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w3
[ 0, 2, 1 ]
The statement is vague and does not describe clearly the situation. The context just states dysfunctional interactions as a way to diminish the quality of a relationship while the statement specifically states the dysfucntionality comes from personality clashes. Context does not state where this separation lies.
[ { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 63, "text": "dysfunctional interactions", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 47, "text": "most often have personality clashes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.3333333432674408, 0.3333333432674408, 0.3333333432674408 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w4
[ 0 ]
Since according to the context consultants do have dysfunctional interactions with colleagues at times, and a conflict is usually a cause for discordant behavior, it makes sense that consultants would frequently have their clashes in times of conflict.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 63, "text": "consultants describe dysfunctional interactions", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Consultants", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 73, "text": "personality clashes at the center of conflict", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w5
[ 2 ]
Dysfunctional interactions as described in the context can mean many things, including personality clashes, but is not always the case. This makes the statement perhaps true, and perhaps false.
[ { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 63, "text": "dysfunctional interactions", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 47, "text": "personality clashes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w6
[ 1 ]
The context refers to descriptions made by consultants. The statement refers to the personality or behavior of the consultants.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 120, "text": "Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
Dysfunctional interactions with coworkers being a value-detracting behavior does not mean that it happens often or that it is often at the center of conflict.
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 63, "text": "describe dysfunctional interactions", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 47, "text": "often have personality clashes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w8
[ 2 ]
Consultants do have difficult interactions with fellow workers but it's not clear if its based on personality clashes.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 63, "text": "consultants describe dysfunctional interactions", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 47, "text": "personality clashes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
104837n
Some management consultants describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior.
Consultants most often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
This statement can be either true or false because the statement is not wrong, but it does not exactly go along with the context. Personalities do not always entirely affect clashes in conflict.
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 119, "text": "describe dysfunctional interactions with one's fellow workers as value-subtracting behavior", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 74, "text": "often have personality clashes at the center of conflict.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.06666667014360428, 0.7666666507720947, 0.1666666716337204 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
105191n
The Washington Post called it the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken.
It has been called by the Washington Post as the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken, said the CNN.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 1 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
Both the context and statement share the fact that the Washington Post called it a six-month game of political chicken. Thus, the statement matches the context and is likely to be true.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 19, "text": "Washington Post", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 51, "endIndex": 86, "text": "six-month game of political chicken", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 66, "endIndex": 101, "text": "six-month game of political chicken", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 26, "endIndex": 41, "text": "Washington Post", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
105191n
The Washington Post called it the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken.
It has been called by the Washington Post as the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken, said the CNN.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 1 ]
w12
[ 2 ]
If CNN is reporting accurately they would have said this, as it's consistent with what the Washington Post actually said. However, it's not clear whether CNN reported anything at all, or if they were truthful in their reporting, so it could be false.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 26, "text": "Washington Post called", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 41, "text": "called by the Washington Post", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 103, "endIndex": 115, "text": "said the CNN", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
105191n
The Washington Post called it the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken.
It has been called by the Washington Post as the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken, said the CNN.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 1 ]
w13
[ 0 ]
CNN read the Washington Post article in question and decided to include it in a news report of their own. Both organizations are reliable news sources.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 29, "text": "The Washington Post called it", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 103, "endIndex": 115, "text": "said the CNN", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 41, "text": "It has been called by the Washington Post", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
105191n
The Washington Post called it the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken.
It has been called by the Washington Post as the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken, said the CNN.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 1 ]
w2
[ 2 ]
The context and statement are identical with the exception of the added part in the statement "said the CNN". Nothing about CNN is mentioned in the context, therefore it is as likely true as false that CNN reported on the Washington Post article.
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 29, "text": "it", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 69, "endIndex": 78, "text": "political", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 79, "endIndex": 86, "text": "chicken", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 2, "text": "It", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 84, "endIndex": 93, "text": "political", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 103, "endIndex": 107, "text": "said", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 108, "endIndex": 111, "text": "the", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 115, "text": "CNN", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 94, "endIndex": 101, "text": "chicken", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
105191n
The Washington Post called it the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken.
It has been called by the Washington Post as the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken, said the CNN.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 1 ]
w4
[ 2 ]
While everything bar the organization reporting in the statement is true, as it's copied nearly word for word from the context, there is no indication of what organization would be doing the quoting based on the context. Could be Fox, CNN, MSNBC, BBC etc
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 19, "text": "The Washington Post", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 26, "endIndex": 41, "text": "Washington Post", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 115, "text": "CNN", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 103, "endIndex": 107, "text": "said", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
105191n
The Washington Post called it the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken.
It has been called by the Washington Post as the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken, said the CNN.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 1 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
The statement is agreeing with the context, as if to summarize what the context is describing, making the statement true.
[ { "startIndex": 34, "endIndex": 65, "text": "culmination of a six-month game", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 49, "endIndex": 75, "text": "culmination of a six-month", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
105191n
The Washington Post called it the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken.
It has been called by the Washington Post as the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken, said the CNN.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 1 ]
w6
[ 0 ]
Both the context and statement refer to it being called a six month game of chicken, with CNN quoting the Washington Post.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 87, "text": "The Washington Post called it the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
105191n
The Washington Post called it the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken.
It has been called by the Washington Post as the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken, said the CNN.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 1 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
The quote is from the Washington Post, and it is unknown whether or not CNN also used this quote.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 19, "text": "Washington Post", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 103, "endIndex": 116, "text": "said the CNN.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
105191n
The Washington Post called it the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken.
It has been called by the Washington Post as the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken, said the CNN.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 1 ]
w8
[ 0, 2 ]
It has been called by the Washington Post as a six-month game of political chicken but it doesn't say that CNN said this.
[ { "startIndex": 51, "endIndex": 86, "text": "six-month game of political chicken", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 66, "endIndex": 115, "text": "six-month game of political chicken, said the CNN", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
105191n
The Washington Post called it the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken.
It has been called by the Washington Post as the culmination of a six-month game of political chicken, said the CNN.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 1 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
We are not sure who made the report about what the Post said. It may or may not have been CNN.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 26, "text": "Washington Post called", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 103, "endIndex": 116, "text": "said the CNN.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
107152n
because i don't want to my mother was also a domineering type of personality because she had to take over the things that my dad fell short in
My mother had to work hard to take care of the family.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 1, 1 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
The context notes that the mother was always working to do things that the dad failed to do. This is coherent with the statement that the mother had to take over responsibility for taking care of the family because the dad failed to do the things he was supposed to be doing.
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 33, "text": "mother", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 96, "endIndex": 100, "text": "take", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 129, "endIndex": 139, "text": "fell short", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 9, "text": "mother", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 34, "text": "take", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 26, "text": "work hard", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.4000000059604645, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 7 ]
null
107152n
because i don't want to my mother was also a domineering type of personality because she had to take over the things that my dad fell short in
My mother had to work hard to take care of the family.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 1, 1 ]
w15
[ 2 ]
UNlike the statement, the context doesn't state what things the father fell short of which the mother had to take over. It also didn't state that the mother had to work hard.
[ { "startIndex": 96, "endIndex": 142, "text": "take over the things that my dad fell short in", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 53, "text": "work hard to take care of the family", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.4000000059604645, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 7 ]
null
107152n
because i don't want to my mother was also a domineering type of personality because she had to take over the things that my dad fell short in
My mother had to work hard to take care of the family.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 1, 1 ]
w16
[ 0, 2 ]
This statement can be true or false but is most likely to be true because the statement adds to what the context says, for example, "taking over the things that my dad fell short in" might be interpreted that his mother also had to work.
[ { "startIndex": 24, "endIndex": 56, "text": "my mother was also a domineering", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 96, "endIndex": 139, "text": "take over the things that my dad fell short", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 53, "text": "My mother had to work hard to take care of the family", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.4000000059604645, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 7 ]
null
107152n
because i don't want to my mother was also a domineering type of personality because she had to take over the things that my dad fell short in
My mother had to work hard to take care of the family.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 1, 1 ]
w17
[ 2 ]
Having a domineering type of personality and taking over things does not necessarily mean working hard. The mother could take over simple tasks that the dad fell short in but still not necessarily work hard to take care of the family.
[ { "startIndex": 45, "endIndex": 56, "text": "domineering", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 96, "endIndex": 116, "text": "take over the things", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 26, "text": "work hard", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.4000000059604645, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 7 ]
null
107152n
because i don't want to my mother was also a domineering type of personality because she had to take over the things that my dad fell short in
My mother had to work hard to take care of the family.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 1, 1 ]
w18
[ 2 ]
Her mother might have taken over things that her father failed to do that were social or emotional and did not entail working hard for financial gain.
[ { "startIndex": 89, "endIndex": 142, "text": "had to take over the things that my dad fell short in", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 22, "endIndex": 53, "text": "hard to take care of the family", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 21, "text": "had to work", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.4000000059604645, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 7 ]
null
107152n
because i don't want to my mother was also a domineering type of personality because she had to take over the things that my dad fell short in
My mother had to work hard to take care of the family.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 1, 1 ]
w4
[ 0, 1 ]
A domineering personality compensating for the failures of their spouse would imply the mother is taking over familial duties since it's not like they can take over the father's job or something. Taking on the role of both mother in father is inherently hard work, so it follows they were likely hardworking.
[ { "startIndex": 96, "endIndex": 105, "text": "take over", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 122, "endIndex": 128, "text": "my dad", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 26, "text": "work hard", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 53, "text": "take care of the family", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0, 0.5 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.4000000059604645, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 7 ]
null
107152n
because i don't want to my mother was also a domineering type of personality because she had to take over the things that my dad fell short in
My mother had to work hard to take care of the family.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 1, 1 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
It is most likely true that the mother worked hard to take care of the family because the father "fell short." However, the context states she also had a domineering personality which could have also been a reason why she worked so hard, out of a need for a control.
[ { "startIndex": 85, "endIndex": 109, "text": "she had to take over the", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 26, "text": "had to work hard", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.4000000059604645, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 7 ]
null
107152n
because i don't want to my mother was also a domineering type of personality because she had to take over the things that my dad fell short in
My mother had to work hard to take care of the family.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 1, 1 ]
w7
[ 0, 2 ]
Because the mother had to take over jobs that the father didn't do, it is likely that the mother worked hard, but it is not necessarily true that this meant she worked hard.
[ { "startIndex": 89, "endIndex": 116, "text": "had to take over the things", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 26, "text": "had to work hard", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.4000000059604645, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 7 ]
null
107152n
because i don't want to my mother was also a domineering type of personality because she had to take over the things that my dad fell short in
My mother had to work hard to take care of the family.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 1, 1 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
The mother had to work had because the dad fell short in.
[ { "startIndex": 85, "endIndex": 116, "text": "she had to take over the things", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 26, "text": "mother had to work hard", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.4000000059604645, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 7 ]
null
107152n
because i don't want to my mother was also a domineering type of personality because she had to take over the things that my dad fell short in
My mother had to work hard to take care of the family.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 1, 1 ]
w9
[ 0 ]
This is most likely true because her mother had to take on some of her father's duties. Handling the work of two parents is hard work for sure.
[ { "startIndex": 85, "endIndex": 142, "text": "she had to take over the things that my dad fell short in", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 54, "text": "mother had to work hard to take care of the family.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.4000000059604645, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 7 ]
null
108083c
Do you want to see historic sights and tour museums and art galleries?
You wouldn't like to visit historic places, museums, and art galleries, would you?
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 1 ]
w1
[ 2 ]
The context is a general question without like or dislike implied, while the statement implies dislike. It could be true or false but is dependent on information unknown and not presented in the context.
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 11, "text": "want", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 17, "text": "wouldn't like", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 5 ]
null
108083c
Do you want to see historic sights and tour museums and art galleries?
You wouldn't like to visit historic places, museums, and art galleries, would you?
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 1 ]
w14
[ 2 ]
The same question is asked, just expecting a negative response.
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 34, "text": "historic sights", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 39, "endIndex": 51, "text": "tour museums", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 56, "endIndex": 69, "text": "art galleries", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 42, "text": "historic places", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 51, "text": "museums", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 57, "endIndex": 70, "text": "art galleries", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 5 ]
null
108083c
Do you want to see historic sights and tour museums and art galleries?
You wouldn't like to visit historic places, museums, and art galleries, would you?
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 1 ]
w16
[ 0 ]
The context and the statement say basically the same thing, but one asks in a positive way and the other in a negative way.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Do you want to see", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 69, "endIndex": 70, "text": "?", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 26, "text": "You wouldn't like to visit", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 72, "endIndex": 82, "text": "would you?", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 5 ]
null
108083c
Do you want to see historic sights and tour museums and art galleries?
You wouldn't like to visit historic places, museums, and art galleries, would you?
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 1 ]
w22
[ 0 ]
The heart of both of these questions seems to match.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Do you want", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 72, "endIndex": 81, "text": "would you", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 5 ]
null
108083c
Do you want to see historic sights and tour museums and art galleries?
You wouldn't like to visit historic places, museums, and art galleries, would you?
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 1 ]
w4
[ 0 ]
The statement is just a paraphrase of the context, albiet asked from a different angle, so it's likely true.
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 34, "text": "sights", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 51, "text": "museums", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 56, "endIndex": 69, "text": "art galleries", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 6, "text": "Do you", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 36, "endIndex": 42, "text": "places", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 51, "text": "museums", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 57, "endIndex": 70, "text": "art galleries", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 72, "endIndex": 81, "text": "would you", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 17, "text": "You wouldn't like", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 5 ]
null
108083c
Do you want to see historic sights and tour museums and art galleries?
You wouldn't like to visit historic places, museums, and art galleries, would you?
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 1 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
The statement is asking an individual the same exact question, however with a bit more doubt behind it. Therefore the statement is a true statement.
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 11, "text": "want", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 12, "text": "wouldn't", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 5 ]
null
108083c
Do you want to see historic sights and tour museums and art galleries?
You wouldn't like to visit historic places, museums, and art galleries, would you?
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 1 ]
w6
[ 0 ]
You wouldn't ,would you? Is the almost equal and passive form of asking do you want to, as in the context.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 70, "text": "Do you want to see historic sights and tour museums and art galleries?", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 5 ]
null
108083c
Do you want to see historic sights and tour museums and art galleries?
You wouldn't like to visit historic places, museums, and art galleries, would you?
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 1 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
The context is asking if someone would like to do these things, and there is no indication of whether or not they do.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 6, "text": "Do you", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 12, "text": "You wouldn't", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 5 ]
null
108083c
Do you want to see historic sights and tour museums and art galleries?
You wouldn't like to visit historic places, museums, and art galleries, would you?
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 1 ]
w8
[ 2 ]
Both are asking the same question of whether or not you want to see historic sights and tour museums and art galleries.
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 69, "text": "want to see historic sights and tour museums and art galleries", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 70, "text": "wouldn't like to visit historic places, museums, and art galleries", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 5 ]
null
108083c
Do you want to see historic sights and tour museums and art galleries?
You wouldn't like to visit historic places, museums, and art galleries, would you?
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 1 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
These two are questions that technically ask the same thing. 'Would you' and 'would you not' are in essense the same but they could be understood in different ways.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Do you want to see", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 20, "text": "You wouldn't like to", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 5 ]
null