uid
stringclasses
122 values
premise
stringclasses
121 values
hypothesis
stringclasses
122 values
chaos_dist
listlengths
3
3
mnli_labels
listlengths
1
5
worker_id
stringclasses
48 values
multilabel
listlengths
1
3
explanation
stringlengths
48
773
highlight_p
listlengths
0
12
highlight_h
listlengths
0
9
dist
listlengths
3
3
agg_dist
listlengths
3
3
taxonomy
listlengths
1
3
within_label_variation
stringclasses
3 values
79141n
Isn't a woman's body her most personal property?
Women's bodies belong to themselves, they should decide what to do with it.
[ 0, 76, 24 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w0
[ 0 ]
Although the context is phrased as a question and the statement is not, both are expressing the same sentiment; that a woman's body is their own personal property, and as such they should hold all of the deciding factors for anything regarding it.
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 24, "text": "her", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 47, "text": "personal property", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 36, "text": "belong to themselves,", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 55, "text": "they should decide", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.20000000298023224, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 4, 0 ]
null
79141n
Isn't a woman's body her most personal property?
Women's bodies belong to themselves, they should decide what to do with it.
[ 0, 76, 24 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
The context implies that because a woman's body is her personal property, she should have the right to do what she wants with it. This sentiment is supported likewise by the context since if it i her most personal property, the body belongs to them and they should have the right to decide what to do.
[ { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 38, "text": "personal", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 35, "text": "themselves", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.20000000298023224, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 4, 0 ]
null
79141n
Isn't a woman's body her most personal property?
Women's bodies belong to themselves, they should decide what to do with it.
[ 0, 76, 24 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w13
[ 2 ]
The statement is true when a woman's decision only affects her own body. However, it is not true when it comes to smoking or abortion, for example, when a woman's decision has a direct effect on others. In these examples, smoking would affect nearby people and abortion would kill a baby who is completely separate biologically from its mother.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 20, "text": "woman's body", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 74, "text": "they should decide what to do with it", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.20000000298023224, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 4, 0 ]
null
79141n
Isn't a woman's body her most personal property?
Women's bodies belong to themselves, they should decide what to do with it.
[ 0, 76, 24 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w2
[ 0, 2 ]
The context is a question about women's body autonomy where as the statement is an answer to said question. This is likely true except to people who believe that women don't have the right to decide to do whatever they want with their bodies.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "Isn't", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 41, "text": "they", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 42, "endIndex": 48, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 49, "endIndex": 55, "text": "decide", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.20000000298023224, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 4, 0 ]
null
79141n
Isn't a woman's body her most personal property?
Women's bodies belong to themselves, they should decide what to do with it.
[ 0, 76, 24 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w4
[ 0, 1 ]
The truth of the statement depends entirely on whether you view it as the correct answer to the question posed in the context. Personally true to me, but I can imagine misogynists or extreme social conservatives hold a different view.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 20, "text": "woman's body", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 47, "text": "personal property", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 14, "text": "Women's bodies", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 35, "text": "belong to themselves", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0, 0.5 ]
[ 0.75, 0.20000000298023224, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 4, 0 ]
null
79141n
Isn't a woman's body her most personal property?
Women's bodies belong to themselves, they should decide what to do with it.
[ 0, 76, 24 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
It seems that the statement is answering the context, and the context is asking for reassurance for something they already believe to be true, making the statement true.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 20, "text": "Isn't a woman's body", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 14, "text": "bodies", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.20000000298023224, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 4, 0 ]
null
79141n
Isn't a woman's body her most personal property?
Women's bodies belong to themselves, they should decide what to do with it.
[ 0, 76, 24 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w6
[ 0 ]
The affirmative question, Is not... of the context is stated more directly in the form of a sentence in the statement.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 48, "text": "Isn't a woman's body her most personal property?", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.20000000298023224, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 4, 0 ]
null
79141n
Isn't a woman's body her most personal property?
Women's bodies belong to themselves, they should decide what to do with it.
[ 0, 76, 24 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w7
[ 0, 2 ]
If a woman's body is her most personal property, it may be true that she should be the one to decide what to do with it, but this is not specifically said.
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 47, "text": "her most personal property", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 35, "text": "belong to themselves", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.20000000298023224, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 4, 0 ]
null
79141n
Isn't a woman's body her most personal property?
Women's bodies belong to themselves, they should decide what to do with it.
[ 0, 76, 24 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
Women's bodies belong to themselves and it's their personal property.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 47, "text": "woman's body her most personal property", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 35, "text": "'s bodies belong to themselves", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.20000000298023224, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 4, 0 ]
null
79141n
Isn't a woman's body her most personal property?
Women's bodies belong to themselves, they should decide what to do with it.
[ 0, 76, 24 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w9
[ 0 ]
Women own their own bodies and can do just about anything they want with them.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 47, "text": "woman's body her most personal property", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 35, "text": "Women's bodies belong to themselves", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.20000000298023224, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 4, 0 ]
null
4048n
Improved products and services Initiate actions and manage risks to develop new products and services within or outside the organization.
Managed risks lead to new products
[ 9, 62, 29 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 1 ]
w0
[ 0, 2 ]
Managed risks are not the only factor that lead to new products, but it is one part.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 66, "text": "Improved products and services Initiate actions and manage risks", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Managed risks lead", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2 ]
null
4048n
Improved products and services Initiate actions and manage risks to develop new products and services within or outside the organization.
Managed risks lead to new products
[ 9, 62, 29 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 1 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
Both the context and statement support that managing risks can be helpful in developing new products.
[ { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 66, "text": "manage risks", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 78, "endIndex": 90, "text": "new products", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 22, "endIndex": 34, "text": "new products", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 13, "text": "Managed risks", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2 ]
null
4048n
Improved products and services Initiate actions and manage risks to develop new products and services within or outside the organization.
Managed risks lead to new products
[ 9, 62, 29 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 1 ]
w13
[ 2 ]
It's possible that new products may result from dealing with the risks associated with an idea, but sometimes developers may determine that the concept isn't viable even though they've dealt with risks.
[ { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 103, "text": "manage risks to develop new products and services", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 25, "text": "Managed risks lead to new", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2 ]
null
4048n
Improved products and services Initiate actions and manage risks to develop new products and services within or outside the organization.
Managed risks lead to new products
[ 9, 62, 29 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 1 ]
w16
[ 0 ]
According to the statement managed risks lead to new products, which is kind of what the context is saying in this part: "Improved products and services Initiate actions and manage risks to develop new products "
[ { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 90, "text": "manage risks to develop new products", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 34, "text": "Managed risks lead to new products", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2 ]
null
4048n
Improved products and services Initiate actions and manage risks to develop new products and services within or outside the organization.
Managed risks lead to new products
[ 9, 62, 29 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 1 ]
w4
[ 0 ]
Since the management of risks is stated in the context to be part of the process of developing new products, you can infer that managed risks can lead to new products.
[ { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 66, "text": "manage risks", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 13, "text": "Managed risks", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2 ]
null
4048n
Improved products and services Initiate actions and manage risks to develop new products and services within or outside the organization.
Managed risks lead to new products
[ 9, 62, 29 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 1 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
Manage risks seem to be an inspiration behind new products as described in the context, which would make the statement true.
[ { "startIndex": 67, "endIndex": 90, "text": "to develop new products", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 34, "text": "lead to new products", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2 ]
null
4048n
Improved products and services Initiate actions and manage risks to develop new products and services within or outside the organization.
Managed risks lead to new products
[ 9, 62, 29 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 1 ]
w6
[ 0 ]
"Managed risks" is one of several items listed in the context as a factor in development of new products. The statement refers to the managed risk portion of the context only, making this portion more likely to be true, but not entirely true.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 139, "text": "Improved products and services Initiate actions and manage risks to develop new products and services within or outside the organization.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2 ]
null
4048n
Improved products and services Initiate actions and manage risks to develop new products and services within or outside the organization.
Managed risks lead to new products
[ 9, 62, 29 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 1 ]
w7
[ 0 ]
The context says "manage risks to develop new products", so the statement that managing risks helps develop new products is also true.
[ { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 90, "text": "manage risks to develop new products", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 34, "text": "lead to new products", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2 ]
null
4048n
Improved products and services Initiate actions and manage risks to develop new products and services within or outside the organization.
Managed risks lead to new products
[ 9, 62, 29 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 1 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
Managed risks lead to new products so the statement is true.
[ { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 90, "text": "manage risks to develop new products", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 34, "text": "Managed risks lead to new products", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.75, 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2 ]
null
4048n
Improved products and services Initiate actions and manage risks to develop new products and services within or outside the organization.
Managed risks lead to new products
[ 9, 62, 29 ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 2, 1 ]
w9
[ 1 ]
Managing risks generally may stifle creativity and the invention of new products.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 66, "text": "Improved products and services Initiate actions and manage risks", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 34, "text": "Managed risks lead to new products", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.75, 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2 ]
null
26460n
While it's probably true that democracies are unlikely to go to war unless they're attacked, sometimes they are the first to take the offensive.
Democracies probably won't go to war unless someone attacks them on their soil
[ 3, 66, 31 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 1 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
The context and statement both consistently imply that democracies likely won't got to war unless they are provoked.
[ { "startIndex": 46, "endIndex": 54, "text": "unlikely", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 41, "text": "democracies", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Democracies", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 23, "text": "probably wo", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.699999988079071, 0.30000001192092896, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
26460n
While it's probably true that democracies are unlikely to go to war unless they're attacked, sometimes they are the first to take the offensive.
Democracies probably won't go to war unless someone attacks them on their soil
[ 3, 66, 31 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 1 ]
w13
[ 2 ]
We have no idea what facts or data the speculation about democracies going to war is based upon.
[ { "startIndex": 116, "endIndex": 143, "text": "first to take the offensive", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 36, "text": "Democracies probably won't go to war", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.699999988079071, 0.30000001192092896, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
26460n
While it's probably true that democracies are unlikely to go to war unless they're attacked, sometimes they are the first to take the offensive.
Democracies probably won't go to war unless someone attacks them on their soil
[ 3, 66, 31 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 1 ]
w14
[ 0 ]
The Statement pretty much restates the Context about the probability of going to war.
[ { "startIndex": 42, "endIndex": 54, "text": "are unlikely", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 26, "text": "probably won't", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.699999988079071, 0.30000001192092896, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
26460n
While it's probably true that democracies are unlikely to go to war unless they're attacked, sometimes they are the first to take the offensive.
Democracies probably won't go to war unless someone attacks them on their soil
[ 3, 66, 31 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 1 ]
w2
[ 2 ]
The statement adds an extra part with "on their soil" which is not explicitly mentioned in the context. This could be true or false since the context only mentions being attacked, not where the attack would take place.
[ { "startIndex": 75, "endIndex": 82, "text": "they're", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 83, "endIndex": 91, "text": "attacked", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 68, "endIndex": 74, "text": "unless", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 65, "endIndex": 67, "text": "on", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 68, "endIndex": 73, "text": "their", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 74, "endIndex": 78, "text": "soil", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.699999988079071, 0.30000001192092896, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
26460n
While it's probably true that democracies are unlikely to go to war unless they're attacked, sometimes they are the first to take the offensive.
Democracies probably won't go to war unless someone attacks them on their soil
[ 3, 66, 31 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 1 ]
w4
[ 0 ]
If a nation is being attacked, odds are it's occuring on its soil (there's far more of that than say, foreign military bases or whatever). The context states it's likely true democracies won't go to war unless they're attacked, and since the context is taken as true that means the statement must be so as well.
[ { "startIndex": 46, "endIndex": 54, "text": "unlikely", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 83, "endIndex": 91, "text": "attacked", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 20, "text": "probably", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 52, "endIndex": 59, "text": "attacks", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 74, "endIndex": 78, "text": "soil", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.699999988079071, 0.30000001192092896, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
26460n
While it's probably true that democracies are unlikely to go to war unless they're attacked, sometimes they are the first to take the offensive.
Democracies probably won't go to war unless someone attacks them on their soil
[ 3, 66, 31 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 1 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
The statement is simply stating more bluntly what the context explained beforehand.
[ { "startIndex": 68, "endIndex": 91, "text": "unless they're attacked", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 59, "text": "unless someone attacks", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.699999988079071, 0.30000001192092896, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
26460n
While it's probably true that democracies are unlikely to go to war unless they're attacked, sometimes they are the first to take the offensive.
Democracies probably won't go to war unless someone attacks them on their soil
[ 3, 66, 31 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 1 ]
w6
[ 0 ]
Democracies are unlikely to go to war and democracies probably won't go to war are mostly equivalent, as are attacked and attacked on their own soil.
[ { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 91, "text": "democracies are unlikely to go to war unless they're attacked", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 64, "text": "Democracies probably won't go to war unless someone attacks them", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.699999988079071, 0.30000001192092896, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
26460n
While it's probably true that democracies are unlikely to go to war unless they're attacked, sometimes they are the first to take the offensive.
Democracies probably won't go to war unless someone attacks them on their soil
[ 3, 66, 31 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 1 ]
w7
[ 0 ]
The context states that democracies aren't likely to go to war unless they're attacked, which means the same thing as not going to war unless they're attacked on their own soil.
[ { "startIndex": 68, "endIndex": 92, "text": "unless they're attacked,", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 64, "text": "unless someone attacks them", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.699999988079071, 0.30000001192092896, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
26460n
While it's probably true that democracies are unlikely to go to war unless they're attacked, sometimes they are the first to take the offensive.
Democracies probably won't go to war unless someone attacks them on their soil
[ 3, 66, 31 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 1 ]
w8
[ 2 ]
Democracies are unlikely to go to war unless they are attacked first.
[ { "startIndex": 46, "endIndex": 91, "text": "unlikely to go to war unless they're attacked", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 78, "text": "probably won't go to war unless someone attacks them on their soil", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.699999988079071, 0.30000001192092896, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
26460n
While it's probably true that democracies are unlikely to go to war unless they're attacked, sometimes they are the first to take the offensive.
Democracies probably won't go to war unless someone attacks them on their soil
[ 3, 66, 31 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 1 ]
w9
[ 0 ]
Most of the time democracies won't start a war unless provoked.
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 91, "text": "probably true that democracies are unlikely to go to war unless they're attacked", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 78, "text": "Democracies probably won't go to war unless someone attacks them on their soil", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.699999988079071, 0.30000001192092896, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
80517e
This doesn't look good.
This looks really bad.
[ 3, 65, 32 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w1
[ 0, 2 ]
The context notes that it doesn't look good, but it doesn't specifically state that it looks very bad. It could be something that looks just okay but isn't necessarily bad. Thus, the statement could be true or false. However, it is implied that if it doesn't look good then it probably looks bad. So, the statement is likely true.
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 22, "text": "good", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 12, "text": "doesn't", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 21, "text": "bad", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 10, "text": "looks", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
80517e
This doesn't look good.
This looks really bad.
[ 3, 65, 32 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w16
[ 0, 2 ]
While the context says that something doesn't look good, it does not necessarily mean that is looks really bad, but is the most probable thing.
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 22, "text": "doesn't look good", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 21, "text": "looks really bad", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
80517e
This doesn't look good.
This looks really bad.
[ 3, 65, 32 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w18
[ 2 ]
If it doesn't look good it may look bad or extremely bad, or ugly, or not aesthetically pleasing, or not that bad.
[ { "startIndex": 13, "endIndex": 22, "text": "look good", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 12, "text": "doesn't", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 21, "text": "really bad", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
80517e
This doesn't look good.
This looks really bad.
[ 3, 65, 32 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w19
[ 0 ]
The context says it doesn't look good. When something doesn't look good, it can often look bad, which is the opposite of good. So if it looks bad, the statement is likely to be true.
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 22, "text": "doesn't look good", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 21, "text": "looks really bad", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
80517e
This doesn't look good.
This looks really bad.
[ 3, 65, 32 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w2
[ 0, 2 ]
The phrase "looks really bad" and "doesn't look good" are essentially the same depending on the user's degree of intent. It could vary from identical to the difference between neutral (not good) and the worst thing ever (really bad).
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 12, "text": "doesn't", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 13, "endIndex": 17, "text": "look", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 22, "text": "good", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 10, "text": "looks", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 17, "text": "really", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 21, "text": "bad", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
80517e
This doesn't look good.
This looks really bad.
[ 3, 65, 32 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w4
[ 2 ]
You cannot infer something looks very *anything* just by saying it doesn't look the opposite of that quality.
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 22, "text": "doesn't look good", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 21, "text": "looks really bad", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
80517e
This doesn't look good.
This looks really bad.
[ 3, 65, 32 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
I believe whatever the context and statement are speaking of is true, because both are saying the same thing in different words. It is as if someone is staring at a situation happening, knowing that nothing good could come of it while they are watching, and both the context and the statement could be that individuals internal thoughts.
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 12, "text": "doesn't", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 17, "text": "looks really", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
80517e
This doesn't look good.
This looks really bad.
[ 3, 65, 32 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
The context states that something doesn't look good, but this doesn't necessarily mean that it looks really bad. It is possible that it looks really bad, but this is not stated.
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 23, "text": "doesn't look good.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 22, "text": "looks really bad.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
80517e
This doesn't look good.
This looks really bad.
[ 3, 65, 32 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
Both the statement and context mean the same thing by stating it doesn't look good and it looks really bad.
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 22, "text": "doesn't look good", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 21, "text": "looks really bad", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
80517e
This doesn't look good.
This looks really bad.
[ 3, 65, 32 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w9
[ 0 ]
The context says that something doesn't look good, and the statement says it looks bad. They have similar meaning really.
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 23, "text": "doesn't look good.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 22, "text": "looks really bad.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
43897e
2. Receiving Water Samples
The water samples should be received.
[ 3, 61, 36 ]
[ 1, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w14
[ 0 ]
If you were receiving water samples in the context, then in the statement they should already by received.
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 12, "text": "Receiving", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 37, "text": "should be received.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
prob
43897e
2. Receiving Water Samples
The water samples should be received.
[ 3, 61, 36 ]
[ 1, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w4
[ 0 ]
If there is a procedure dedicated to receiving water samples, as implied by the context than it stands to reason the procedure is expected to be followed.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 1, "text": "2", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 27, "text": "should be", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
prob
43897e
2. Receiving Water Samples
The water samples should be received.
[ 3, 61, 36 ]
[ 1, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w9
[ 0 ]
Likely true because both pertain to the recieving of water.
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Receiving Water", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 36, "text": "water samples should be received", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
prob
43897e
2. Receiving Water Samples
The water samples should be received.
[ 3, 61, 36 ]
[ 1, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w1
[ 2 ]
While the context notes receiving water samples it does not imply that water samples should or should not be received, the former indicated by the statement. Thus, there is not enough information. The statement could be true or false dependent on other outside factors not covered.
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 12, "text": "Receiving", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 24, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 36, "text": "received", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
43897e
2. Receiving Water Samples
The water samples should be received.
[ 3, 61, 36 ]
[ 1, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w12
[ 2 ]
The context is basically a statement of fact that the water samples are going to be received, but it gives no indication of whether that's a desirable thing or should happen.
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 12, "text": "Receiving", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 37, "text": "should be received.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
43897e
2. Receiving Water Samples
The water samples should be received.
[ 3, 61, 36 ]
[ 1, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w13
[ 0, 2 ]
There may be extenuating circumstances where you would not want to receive a water sample, but since this statement falls under a numbered heading it seems likely that the section is about accepting water samples.
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 26, "text": "Receiving Water Samples", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 27, "text": "should be", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
43897e
2. Receiving Water Samples
The water samples should be received.
[ 3, 61, 36 ]
[ 1, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w2
[ 0, 2 ]
The difference between the context and the statement is past and present tense. The context uses the word "receiving" while the statement uses "should be received" as if all of the water samples have already been taken care of, this separates the two from being likely true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 12, "text": "Receiving", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 24, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 27, "text": "be", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 36, "text": "received", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
43897e
2. Receiving Water Samples
The water samples should be received.
[ 3, 61, 36 ]
[ 1, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w5
[ 2 ]
I believe the context is a title for instructions, but the statement does not instruct. Realistically, this makes no sense. So it could be true, or could be false.
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 12, "text": "Receiving", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 36, "text": "should be received", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
43897e
2. Receiving Water Samples
The water samples should be received.
[ 3, 61, 36 ]
[ 1, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
The context mentions receiving water samples, but not whether or not they should be received.
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 26, "text": "Receiving Water Samples", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 36, "text": "should be received", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
43897e
2. Receiving Water Samples
The water samples should be received.
[ 3, 61, 36 ]
[ 1, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w8
[ 0, 2 ]
The water samples could have been received or not, it is not clear.
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 26, "text": "Receiving Water Samples", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 36, "text": "water samples should be received", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
78105n
Their supplies scarce, their harvest meager, and their spirit broken, they abandoned the fort in 1858.
They abandoned their fort after a zombie outbreak.
[ 47, 1, 52 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 2 ]
w1
[ 2 ]
The context provides information on the current circumstances but does not provide information on what caused those circumstances. The statement provides a potential cause for those circumstances but it is not known if it is true or false because there isn't related information in the context. Thus, it could be true or false but is unknown based on available information.
[ { "startIndex": 75, "endIndex": 84, "text": "abandoned", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 14, "text": "abandoned", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
78105n
Their supplies scarce, their harvest meager, and their spirit broken, they abandoned the fort in 1858.
They abandoned their fort after a zombie outbreak.
[ 47, 1, 52 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 2 ]
w13
[ 1 ]
Since zombies aren't real and other realistic reasons were given for the fort abandonment, it's unlikely that zombies had anything to do with this fort.
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 68, "text": "supplies scarce, their harvest meager, and their spirit broken", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 34, "endIndex": 49, "text": "zombie outbreak", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
78105n
Their supplies scarce, their harvest meager, and their spirit broken, they abandoned the fort in 1858.
They abandoned their fort after a zombie outbreak.
[ 47, 1, 52 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 2 ]
w14
[ 1 ]
The reason for abandoning the fort is different in the statement and context.
[ { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 43, "text": "harvest meager", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 68, "text": "spirit broken", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 21, "text": "supplies scarce", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 34, "endIndex": 49, "text": "zombie outbreak", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
78105n
Their supplies scarce, their harvest meager, and their spirit broken, they abandoned the fort in 1858.
They abandoned their fort after a zombie outbreak.
[ 47, 1, 52 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 2 ]
w2
[ 2, 1 ]
The statement explains the reason for abandoning the fort, however the context does not state why, much less because of a "zombie outbreak".
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 14, "text": "supplies", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 21, "text": "scarce", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 36, "text": "harvest", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 43, "text": "meager", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 61, "text": "spirit", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 70, "endIndex": 74, "text": "they", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 75, "endIndex": 84, "text": "abandoned", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 85, "endIndex": 88, "text": "the", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 89, "endIndex": 93, "text": "fort", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 62, "endIndex": 68, "text": "broken", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 26, "endIndex": 31, "text": "after", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 34, "endIndex": 40, "text": "zombie", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 41, "endIndex": 49, "text": "outbreak", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 32, "endIndex": 33, "text": "a", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
78105n
Their supplies scarce, their harvest meager, and their spirit broken, they abandoned the fort in 1858.
They abandoned their fort after a zombie outbreak.
[ 47, 1, 52 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 2 ]
w4
[ 1 ]
There are a great many more plausible reasons for abandoning a fort, like the reasons listed in the context, than due to a zombie outbreak.
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 21, "text": "supplies scarce", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 43, "text": "harvest meager", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 68, "text": "spirit broken", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 34, "endIndex": 49, "text": "zombie outbreak", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
78105n
Their supplies scarce, their harvest meager, and their spirit broken, they abandoned the fort in 1858.
They abandoned their fort after a zombie outbreak.
[ 47, 1, 52 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 2 ]
w5
[ 2 ]
The context states how a port was abandoned, but not the reason why as the statement declares a zombie outbreak. Therefore the statement can either be true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 75, "endIndex": 93, "text": "abandoned the fort", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 25, "text": "abandoned their fort", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
78105n
Their supplies scarce, their harvest meager, and their spirit broken, they abandoned the fort in 1858.
They abandoned their fort after a zombie outbreak.
[ 47, 1, 52 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 2 ]
w6
[ 1 ]
The context does not contain any identifying words related to the subject. The reasons for them leaving the fort are described in the context as scarcity of supplies and a poor harvest. The context does not mention any type of outbreak.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 102, "text": "Their supplies scarce, their harvest meager, and their spirit broken, they abandoned the fort in 1858.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
78105n
Their supplies scarce, their harvest meager, and their spirit broken, they abandoned the fort in 1858.
They abandoned their fort after a zombie outbreak.
[ 47, 1, 52 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 2 ]
w7
[ 1 ]
They abandoned their fort after meager supplies and harvest, not after a zombie outbreak.
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 43, "text": "supplies scarce, their harvest meager", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 34, "endIndex": 49, "text": "zombie outbreak", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
78105n
Their supplies scarce, their harvest meager, and their spirit broken, they abandoned the fort in 1858.
They abandoned their fort after a zombie outbreak.
[ 47, 1, 52 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 2 ]
w8
[ 2 ]
They did abandon their fort but it does not say it was due to zombie outbreak.
[ { "startIndex": 75, "endIndex": 93, "text": "abandoned the fort", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 25, "text": "abandoned their fort", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
78105n
Their supplies scarce, their harvest meager, and their spirit broken, they abandoned the fort in 1858.
They abandoned their fort after a zombie outbreak.
[ 47, 1, 52 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 2 ]
w9
[ 1 ]
Zombies were probably not the reason they left the fort. Their supplies were running low and their harvest was meager.
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 22, "text": "supplies scarce,", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 43, "text": "harvest meager", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 50, "text": "abandoned their fort after a zombie outbreak.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.3499999940395355, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
98721e
that's neat just supervised more or less than anything and security i guess for them
They just supervise people.
[ 8, 32, 60 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w1
[ 2 ]
I'm not sure from the context and statement because the presented information is not coherent so it is difficult to understand what is being presented and how they might related one to another.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 27, "text": "supervised", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 19, "text": "supervise", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.25, 0.3499999940395355, 0.4000000059604645 ]
[ 4, 8 ]
null
98721e
that's neat just supervised more or less than anything and security i guess for them
They just supervise people.
[ 8, 32, 60 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w12
[ 1 ]
The context is pretty confusing. However, saying they are "just supervised more or less" sounds like the people are being supervised, not that they are the ones doing the supervising.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 40, "text": "just supervised more or less", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 4, "text": "They", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 19, "text": "supervise", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.25, 0.3499999940395355, 0.4000000059604645 ]
[ 4, 8 ]
null
98721e
that's neat just supervised more or less than anything and security i guess for them
They just supervise people.
[ 8, 32, 60 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w14
[ 2 ]
The Context is a little unclear. It seems to be taken out of part of a sentence.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 27, "text": "just supervised", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 26, "text": "supervise people", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.25, 0.3499999940395355, 0.4000000059604645 ]
[ 4, 8 ]
null
98721e
that's neat just supervised more or less than anything and security i guess for them
They just supervise people.
[ 8, 32, 60 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w16
[ 2 ]
The statement mentions supervising people, while the context talks about supervising very vaguely, which makes it impossible to know if the statement is true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 27, "text": "just supervised", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 76, "endIndex": 84, "text": "for them", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 26, "text": "They just supervise people", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.25, 0.3499999940395355, 0.4000000059604645 ]
[ 4, 8 ]
null
98721e
that's neat just supervised more or less than anything and security i guess for them
They just supervise people.
[ 8, 32, 60 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w22
[ 0 ]
Supervision seems to be the main activity in both the context and statement.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 27, "text": "supervised", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 59, "endIndex": 67, "text": "security", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 19, "text": "supervise", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.25, 0.3499999940395355, 0.4000000059604645 ]
[ 4, 8 ]
null
98721e
that's neat just supervised more or less than anything and security i guess for them
They just supervise people.
[ 8, 32, 60 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w4
[ 1 ]
The context mentioned they do security for them as well. Therefore they do more than just supervise people.
[ { "startIndex": 59, "endIndex": 67, "text": "security", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 9, "text": "just", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.25, 0.3499999940395355, 0.4000000059604645 ]
[ 4, 8 ]
null
98721e
that's neat just supervised more or less than anything and security i guess for them
They just supervise people.
[ 8, 32, 60 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
The context is describing security and supervision, most likely in a workplace, therefore the statement is most likely true.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 27, "text": "supervised", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 59, "endIndex": 67, "text": "security", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 19, "text": "supervise", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.25, 0.3499999940395355, 0.4000000059604645 ]
[ 4, 8 ]
null
98721e
that's neat just supervised more or less than anything and security i guess for them
They just supervise people.
[ 8, 32, 60 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w7
[ 1 ]
The context says "and security", which sounds like it could include providing security and not just supervision.
[ { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 67, "text": "and security", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 19, "text": "just supervise", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.25, 0.3499999940395355, 0.4000000059604645 ]
[ 4, 8 ]
null
98721e
that's neat just supervised more or less than anything and security i guess for them
They just supervise people.
[ 8, 32, 60 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w8
[ 0, 2 ]
It was supervised and possibly to supervise people so the statement is either true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 40, "text": "just supervised more or less", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 26, "text": "They just supervise people", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.25, 0.3499999940395355, 0.4000000059604645 ]
[ 4, 8 ]
null
98721e
that's neat just supervised more or less than anything and security i guess for them
They just supervise people.
[ 8, 32, 60 ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 ]
w9
[ 1 ]
Apart from supervision, they also provide security services for the company. They do more than just supervise.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 67, "text": "supervised more or less than anything and security", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 19, "text": "just supervise", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.25, 0.3499999940395355, 0.4000000059604645 ]
[ 4, 8 ]
null
47756n
She was quite young, not more than eighteen.
She looked older even though she was only barely eighteen.
[ 32, 6, 62 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 0 ]
w1
[ 2 ]
Both the context and the statement indicate she is eighteen, but the statement presumes she looked older than that. This information is not supported by the context as there is no information about how old she looks. Thus, it could be true or false but it is uncertain with the info provided.
[ { "startIndex": 35, "endIndex": 43, "text": "eighteen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 16, "text": "older", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 49, "endIndex": 57, "text": "eighteen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
47756n
She was quite young, not more than eighteen.
She looked older even though she was only barely eighteen.
[ 32, 6, 62 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 0 ]
w11
[ 2 ]
The context talks about age but the statement talks about physical appearance which can't be confirmed by the context.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 20, "text": "quite young,", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 43, "text": "not more than eighteen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 16, "text": "looked older", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
47756n
She was quite young, not more than eighteen.
She looked older even though she was only barely eighteen.
[ 32, 6, 62 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 0 ]
w16
[ 2 ]
The statement can be true or false because even though they both agree that she is eighteen, we don't know if she looked older or not.
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 43, "text": "not more than eighteen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 57, "text": "only barely eighteen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
47756n
She was quite young, not more than eighteen.
She looked older even though she was only barely eighteen.
[ 32, 6, 62 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 0 ]
w2
[ 2 ]
Although the context and statement both agree the girl was the same age, the context does not mention anything about her looking older, younger, or age appropriate where as the statement does.
[ { "startIndex": 35, "endIndex": 43, "text": "eighteen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 10, "text": "looked", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 16, "text": "older", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 49, "endIndex": 57, "text": "eighteen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
47756n
She was quite young, not more than eighteen.
She looked older even though she was only barely eighteen.
[ 32, 6, 62 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 0 ]
w4
[ 1 ]
If someone looked young, to the point of not being any older than 18, it's unlikely that they simultaneously looked older than being barely eightteen. The statement and the context are basically saying opposite things.
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 43, "text": "not more than eighteen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 16, "text": "She looked older", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 42, "endIndex": 57, "text": "barely eighteen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
47756n
She was quite young, not more than eighteen.
She looked older even though she was only barely eighteen.
[ 32, 6, 62 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 0 ]
w5
[ 2 ]
The context describes her age as does the statement, but does not describe how she looks. Therefore the statement could be true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 19, "text": "quite young", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 16, "text": "looked older", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
47756n
She was quite young, not more than eighteen.
She looked older even though she was only barely eighteen.
[ 32, 6, 62 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 0 ]
w6
[ 0 ]
She was not more than eighteen and she was barely eighteen are the same. She was quite young or looked older are both parenthetical additions her age.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 44, "text": "She was quite young, not more than eighteen.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 58, "text": "she was only barely eighteen.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
47756n
She was quite young, not more than eighteen.
She looked older even though she was only barely eighteen.
[ 32, 6, 62 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 0 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
The context does not state what the person looked like, therefore they could have looked older or younger than eighteen.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 19, "text": "was quite young", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 16, "text": "looked older", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
47756n
She was quite young, not more than eighteen.
She looked older even though she was only barely eighteen.
[ 32, 6, 62 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 0 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
Both the statement and context state that she is eighteen.
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 43, "text": "not more than eighteen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 57, "text": "only barely eighteen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
47756n
She was quite young, not more than eighteen.
She looked older even though she was only barely eighteen.
[ 32, 6, 62 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 0, 0 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
The context does not mention how she looked, so this could be either true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 43, "text": "quite young, not more than eighteen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 57, "text": "looked older even though she was only barely eighteen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 2, 4 ]
null
34043c
The Gaiety Theatre in South King Street is worth visiting for its ornate d??cor.
The Trump Tower is a terrible place to visit for ornate decor.
[ 38, 0, 62 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 2 ]
w0
[ 1 ]
The context and the statement are talking about two entirely different places so we cannot assume that either statement is true.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Gaiety Theatre", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 15, "text": "Trump Tower", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1 ]
null
34043c
The Gaiety Theatre in South King Street is worth visiting for its ornate d??cor.
The Trump Tower is a terrible place to visit for ornate decor.
[ 38, 0, 62 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 2 ]
w1
[ 2 ]
The context and the statement address two different places that are not related. The positives of one do not correlate to the potential negatives of the other. Thus, it could be true or false but it is unknown based on the context.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Gaiety Theatre", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 15, "text": "Trump Tower", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1 ]
null
34043c
The Gaiety Theatre in South King Street is worth visiting for its ornate d??cor.
The Trump Tower is a terrible place to visit for ornate decor.
[ 38, 0, 62 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 2 ]
w13
[ 2 ]
We do not know if the Trump Tower is worth seeing because it does have ornate decor or because it does not have ornate decor.
[ { "startIndex": 43, "endIndex": 79, "text": "worth visiting for its ornate d??cor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 61, "text": "terrible place to visit for ornate decor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1 ]
null
34043c
The Gaiety Theatre in South King Street is worth visiting for its ornate d??cor.
The Trump Tower is a terrible place to visit for ornate decor.
[ 38, 0, 62 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 2 ]
w2
[ 2 ]
The context is discussing the Gaiety Theatre while the statement is describing The Trump Tower. It doesn't matter that the reviews are opposite, since they are different buildings the context can be true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 10, "text": "Gaiety", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Theatre", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 9, "text": "Trump", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 15, "text": "Tower", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1 ]
null
34043c
The Gaiety Theatre in South King Street is worth visiting for its ornate d??cor.
The Trump Tower is a terrible place to visit for ornate decor.
[ 38, 0, 62 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 2 ]
w4
[ 2 ]
There's no connection between one random building presented in the context and another unrelated building presented in the statement. Could equally be true or false, with the context giving no indication of one more than the other.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Gaiety Theatre", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 15, "text": "Trump Tower", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1 ]
null
34043c
The Gaiety Theatre in South King Street is worth visiting for its ornate d??cor.
The Trump Tower is a terrible place to visit for ornate decor.
[ 38, 0, 62 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 2 ]
w5
[ 2 ]
This statement is an opinion that there is no way of knowing based off of the text in the context.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Gaiety Theatre", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 15, "text": "Trump Tower", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1 ]
null
34043c
The Gaiety Theatre in South King Street is worth visiting for its ornate d??cor.
The Trump Tower is a terrible place to visit for ornate decor.
[ 38, 0, 62 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 2 ]
w6
[ 2 ]
The context refers only to the Gaiety Theatre. The context does not provide any information tabout the decor in the Trump Tower.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 80, "text": "The Gaiety Theatre in South King Street is worth visiting for its ornate d??cor.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1 ]
null
34043c
The Gaiety Theatre in South King Street is worth visiting for its ornate d??cor.
The Trump Tower is a terrible place to visit for ornate decor.
[ 38, 0, 62 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 2 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
The Gaiety Theater is a good place to visit, but this does not mean that Trump Tower is a good or bad place to visit.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Gaiety Theatre", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 15, "text": "Trump Tower", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1 ]
null
34043c
The Gaiety Theatre in South King Street is worth visiting for its ornate d??cor.
The Trump Tower is a terrible place to visit for ornate decor.
[ 38, 0, 62 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 2 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
The context does not talk about The Trump Tower so the statement is false.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 18, "text": "The Gaiety Theatre", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 15, "text": "The Trump Tower", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1 ]
null
34043c
The Gaiety Theatre in South King Street is worth visiting for its ornate d??cor.
The Trump Tower is a terrible place to visit for ornate decor.
[ 38, 0, 62 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 2 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
This could be true or false because Trump tower isn't mentioned in the context. also, decor is subject to taste
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 80, "text": "Gaiety Theatre in South King Street is worth visiting for its ornate d??cor.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 62, "text": "Trump Tower is a terrible place to visit for ornate decor.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.800000011920929, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1 ]
null
61285n
We were playing all sorts of sports, and you were not, so shut up and stop twitching,' the microbe's tone of voice changed, it was lower and more resounding.
We have played football, basketball, baseball and soccer and you haven't played anything so shut your mouth.
[ 3, 34, 63 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 1, 1 ]
w1
[ 2 ]
The context notes that they have played all sorts of sports but it doesn't identify the specific sports. Thus, given the information, it is unknown if they played the sports identified in the statement and it could be either true or false base on unknown details.
[ { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 35, "text": "sorts of sports", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 23, "text": "football", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 35, "text": "basketball", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 45, "text": "baseball", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 50, "endIndex": 56, "text": "soccer", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.699999988079071, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
61285n
We were playing all sorts of sports, and you were not, so shut up and stop twitching,' the microbe's tone of voice changed, it was lower and more resounding.
We have played football, basketball, baseball and soccer and you haven't played anything so shut your mouth.
[ 3, 34, 63 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 1, 1 ]
w16
[ 2 ]
The context mentions all sort of sports, but it does not mention any specifics, which means that the statement could either be true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 35, "text": "We were playing all sorts of sports", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 56, "text": "We have played football, basketball, baseball and soccer", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.699999988079071, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
61285n
We were playing all sorts of sports, and you were not, so shut up and stop twitching,' the microbe's tone of voice changed, it was lower and more resounding.
We have played football, basketball, baseball and soccer and you haven't played anything so shut your mouth.
[ 3, 34, 63 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 1, 1 ]
w2
[ 2 ]
The context mentions sports without saying which ones, the statement mentions specific sports that might or might not have been played.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 19, "text": "all", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 25, "text": "sorts", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 26, "endIndex": 28, "text": "of", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 35, "text": "sports", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 23, "text": "football", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 35, "text": "basketball", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 45, "text": "baseball", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 50, "endIndex": 56, "text": "soccer", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.699999988079071, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
61285n
We were playing all sorts of sports, and you were not, so shut up and stop twitching,' the microbe's tone of voice changed, it was lower and more resounding.
We have played football, basketball, baseball and soccer and you haven't played anything so shut your mouth.
[ 3, 34, 63 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 1, 1 ]
w28
[ 0 ]
The sports listed in the statement match the context's description of "all sorts of sports." The speaker also says in both the context and statement that the person they are speaking to did not participate in any of the sports. Based on this information, the statement is most likely to be true.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 35, "text": "all sorts of sports", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 41, "endIndex": 53, "text": "you were not", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 23, "text": "football", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 35, "text": "basketball", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 45, "text": "baseball", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 50, "endIndex": 56, "text": "soccer", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 61, "endIndex": 88, "text": "you haven't played anything", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.699999988079071, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
61285n
We were playing all sorts of sports, and you were not, so shut up and stop twitching,' the microbe's tone of voice changed, it was lower and more resounding.
We have played football, basketball, baseball and soccer and you haven't played anything so shut your mouth.
[ 3, 34, 63 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 1, 1 ]
w29
[ 0, 2 ]
These sentences are saying the same thing because all sorts of sports were played with the exception of one person, in the first statement and in the second statement, specific sports were played with the exception of one person.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 25, "text": "playing all sorts", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 41, "endIndex": 53, "text": "you were not", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 14, "text": "have played", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 61, "endIndex": 72, "text": "you haven't", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.699999988079071, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
61285n
We were playing all sorts of sports, and you were not, so shut up and stop twitching,' the microbe's tone of voice changed, it was lower and more resounding.
We have played football, basketball, baseball and soccer and you haven't played anything so shut your mouth.
[ 3, 34, 63 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 1, 1 ]
w30
[ 2 ]
There are many other sports besides football, basketball, baseball, and soccer that they could have played instead of those.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 35, "text": "all sorts of sports", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 56, "text": "football, basketball, baseball and soccer", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.699999988079071, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
61285n
We were playing all sorts of sports, and you were not, so shut up and stop twitching,' the microbe's tone of voice changed, it was lower and more resounding.
We have played football, basketball, baseball and soccer and you haven't played anything so shut your mouth.
[ 3, 34, 63 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 1, 1 ]
w39
[ 0, 2 ]
"all sorts of sports" includes football, basketball, baseball, and soccer, and both statement and context accuse the other person of not playing anything. however, "all sorts of sports" is an overgeneralization and MAY NOT have included those exact sports, as well.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 35, "text": "all sorts of sports", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 41, "endIndex": 53, "text": "you were not", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 58, "endIndex": 65, "text": "shut up", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 56, "text": "football, basketball, baseball and soccer", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 61, "endIndex": 88, "text": "you haven't played anything", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 92, "endIndex": 107, "text": "shut your mouth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.699999988079071, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
61285n
We were playing all sorts of sports, and you were not, so shut up and stop twitching,' the microbe's tone of voice changed, it was lower and more resounding.
We have played football, basketball, baseball and soccer and you haven't played anything so shut your mouth.
[ 3, 34, 63 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 1, 1 ]
w4
[ 2 ]
The context merely states all sorts of sports, which includes far more types of sports than just the four mentioned in the statement. It could be any of a number of other sports, or it could include the four mentioned. There's no way to infer one or the other.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 35, "text": "all sorts of sports", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 56, "text": "football, basketball, baseball and soccer", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.699999988079071, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
61285n
We were playing all sorts of sports, and you were not, so shut up and stop twitching,' the microbe's tone of voice changed, it was lower and more resounding.
We have played football, basketball, baseball and soccer and you haven't played anything so shut your mouth.
[ 3, 34, 63 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 1, 1 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
The context states that "all sorts of sports" were played, but it does not specify which sports they were. The statement of football, basketball, baseball and soccer being played may or not be true, depending on which sports the original statement was referring to.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 35, "text": "all sorts of sports", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 56, "text": "football, basketball, baseball and soccer", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.699999988079071, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null
61285n
We were playing all sorts of sports, and you were not, so shut up and stop twitching,' the microbe's tone of voice changed, it was lower and more resounding.
We have played football, basketball, baseball and soccer and you haven't played anything so shut your mouth.
[ 3, 34, 63 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 1, 1 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
They stated they played all kinds of sports so it could have been football, basketball, baseball or soccer and it's true that one person did not play.
[ { "startIndex": 41, "endIndex": 53, "text": "you were not", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 61, "endIndex": 88, "text": "you haven't played anything", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.699999988079071, 0 ]
[ 7 ]
null