uid
stringclasses
122 values
premise
stringclasses
121 values
hypothesis
stringclasses
122 values
chaos_dist
listlengths
3
3
mnli_labels
listlengths
1
5
worker_id
stringclasses
48 values
multilabel
listlengths
1
3
explanation
stringlengths
48
773
highlight_p
listlengths
0
12
highlight_h
listlengths
0
9
dist
listlengths
3
3
agg_dist
listlengths
3
3
taxonomy
listlengths
1
3
within_label_variation
stringclasses
3 values
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w0
[ 2, 1 ]
The context claims that the qualifiers include ALL recipients of healthcare with the condition that they are competent to give informed consent. So those who are on welfare but are not competent would not qualify. The statement is a little too generalized to be able to count it as completely false.
[ { "startIndex": 62, "endIndex": 87, "text": "all recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 151, "endIndex": 193, "text": "who are competent to give informed consent", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 41, "text": "on welfare will not qualify", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w1
[ 1 ]
The context notes that women on welfare could qualify, while the statement says that women who are on welfare will not qualify, which is contradictory.
[ { "startIndex": 42, "endIndex": 47, "text": "women", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 48, "endIndex": 53, "text": "could", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 159, "endIndex": 168, "text": "competent", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "Women", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 33, "text": "not", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 34, "endIndex": 41, "text": "qualify", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w10
[ 1 ]
The context said women on welfare and other public aassistance may qualify.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 26, "text": "qualifying", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 42, "endIndex": 47, "text": "women", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 48, "endIndex": 87, "text": "could include all recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 24, "text": "welfare", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 41, "text": "not qualify", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "Women", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w11
[ 1 ]
The context says that it could include all recipients of welfare but the statement says the opposite.
[ { "startIndex": 48, "endIndex": 76, "text": "could include all recipients", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 77, "endIndex": 87, "text": "of welfare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 57, "text": "on welfare will not qualify for the implant", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w12
[ 1 ]
It says that everyone on welfare that can give informed consent can qualify. There is nothing about being on welfare that would make it difficult for a person to give informed consent.
[ { "startIndex": 62, "endIndex": 87, "text": "all recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 159, "endIndex": 193, "text": "competent to give informed consent", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 26, "text": "qualifying", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 41, "text": "will not qualify", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 24, "text": "welfare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w13
[ 2, 1 ]
Qualification for the procedure is based on competency to make a decision, not on whether or not you get welfare.
[ { "startIndex": 159, "endIndex": 193, "text": "competent to give informed consent", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 41, "text": "on welfare will not qualify", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w14
[ 1 ]
The context states that many on welfare can qualify for the implant.
[ { "startIndex": 62, "endIndex": 87, "text": "all recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 24, "text": "Women who are on welfare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w16
[ 0, 2 ]
The context states that woman and teenagers on welfare 'could' be included, while the statement mentions that women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant, which is most likely to be true but we can't be 100% sure.
[ { "startIndex": 42, "endIndex": 87, "text": "women could include all recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 201, "endIndex": 218, "text": "implant procedure", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 57, "text": "Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w18
[ 2 ]
The context states that women on welfare "could" be included in the category of those who qualify to receive the implant, but does not state that they are included in this category, therefore the statement can be either true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 48, "endIndex": 87, "text": "could include all recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 41, "text": "who are on welfare will not qualify", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w19
[ 1 ]
The context says qualifying women include recipients of welfare. The statement "on welfare" is more informal way of saying "recipients of welfare" so the saying those "welfare" will not qualify is likely to be false based on context.
[ { "startIndex": 62, "endIndex": 87, "text": "all recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 61, "text": "category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 24, "text": "on welfare", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 41, "text": "not qualify", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w2
[ 1 ]
The term "qualifying" and "include" indicate in the context that women on welfare are able to, which is the exact opposite in the statement but using the term "not qualify"
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 26, "text": "qualifying", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 42, "endIndex": 47, "text": "women", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 62, "endIndex": 65, "text": "all", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 66, "endIndex": 76, "text": "recipients", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 77, "endIndex": 79, "text": "of", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 80, "endIndex": 87, "text": "welfare", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 61, "text": "include", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "Women", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 16, "text": "on", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 24, "text": "welfare", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 33, "text": "not", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 34, "endIndex": 41, "text": "qualify", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w20
[ 2, 1 ]
The statement mentions qualifying teens and women able to receive the implant could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance. The statement makes it known that women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant. However, it MIGHT be true since the statement does not mention other public assistance, only welfare.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 26, "text": "qualifying", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 91, "endIndex": 114, "text": "other public assistance", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 41, "text": "not qualify", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 24, "text": "welfare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w22
[ 1 ]
The context suggests a wide range of people will qualify for the implant.
[ { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 87, "text": "include all recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 41, "text": "not qualify", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w23
[ 1 ]
The context specifically states that some women and daughters can qualify for the implant even though they are on welfare. Since this is true, then we must assume that being on welfare or other assistance does not exclude or disqualify them just on that basis. Therefore the statement is false.
[ { "startIndex": 48, "endIndex": 114, "text": "could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 57, "text": "welfare will not qualify for the implant", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w24
[ 1 ]
The qualification described in Context includes women and specifies the possibility of welfare recipients with the modal verb "could include", which opens the possibility for this demography that, according to Statement, cannot qualify.
[ { "startIndex": 48, "endIndex": 87, "text": "could include all recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 42, "endIndex": 47, "text": "women", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "Women", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 41, "text": "on welfare will not qualify", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w25
[ 2, 1 ]
Women who are on welfare were listed as a qualifying category, but some women on welfare may not qualify for other reasons.
[ { "startIndex": 48, "endIndex": 87, "text": "could include all recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 33, "text": "will not", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w26
[ 1 ]
The statement contradicts the context by saying women who are on welfare do not qualify, but the context says qualifying women could be on welfare.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 47, "text": "qualifying teen-agers and women", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 66, "endIndex": 87, "text": "recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 201, "endIndex": 218, "text": "implant procedure", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "Women", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 24, "text": "welfare", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 41, "text": "not qualify", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 50, "endIndex": 57, "text": "implant", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w27
[ 1 ]
The context states that qualifying individuals "include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance" where the statement contradicts it by stating that Women receiving welfare will NOT qualify.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 26, "text": "qualifying", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 42, "endIndex": 47, "text": "women", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 61, "text": "include", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 62, "endIndex": 87, "text": "all recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 24, "text": "on welfare", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 41, "text": "not qualify", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "Women", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w3
[ 2 ]
Context explains consent of the implant procedure but not the actual implant. Statement moves forward to discuss who is qualified to receive the implant.
[ { "startIndex": 172, "endIndex": 193, "text": "give informed consent", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 34, "endIndex": 58, "text": "qualify for the implant.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w4
[ 1 ]
The statement is most likely to be false since the context states at least some subset of women on welfare *could* be included, whereas the statement states all members of the set women on welfare are not included.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 26, "text": "qualifying", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 42, "endIndex": 47, "text": "women", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 48, "endIndex": 87, "text": "could include all recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "Women", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 41, "text": "on welfare will not qualify", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w5
[ 0, 2 ]
The context states that implant procedure applicants "could include" individuals on welfare, whereas the statement states clearly that individuals on welfare will not qualify. Because the context does not state definitely, but the statement does, then both sentences could be perceived as true. However, the contradictory nature also makes me feel that they could be either both true, or false.
[ { "startIndex": 48, "endIndex": 61, "text": "could include", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 66, "endIndex": 87, "text": "recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 41, "text": "welfare will not qualify", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w6
[ 2, 1 ]
The context says the category could include all women welfare recipients. The statement says will not. It is not clear whether could will become will not.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 87, "text": "The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w7
[ 1 ]
The context states that women qualifying for the implant procedure include those who receive welfare or other public assistance. Therefore, the statement that women on welfare will not qualify is contradictory to the context.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 26, "text": "qualifying", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 42, "endIndex": 47, "text": "women", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 66, "endIndex": 87, "text": "recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 61, "text": "include", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 41, "text": "will not qualify", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
Women on welfare are indeed qualified for the implant so the statement is false.
[ { "startIndex": 42, "endIndex": 87, "text": "women could include all recipients of welfare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 41, "text": "Women who are on welfare will not qualify", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108847c
The category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include all recipients of welfare or other public assistance (including daughters of recipients) who are competent to give informed consent to the implant procedure.
Women who are on welfare will not qualify for the implant.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
Either outcome could take place because it says the women on welfare will 'not' qualify whereas the context says, 'could'. This could be either true or false
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 61, "text": "category of qualifying teen-agers and women could include", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 41, "text": "will not qualify", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.03999999910593033, 0.25999999046325684, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 0 ]
null
108934c
Blue says Blumenthal claimed Clinton had told him that Lewinsky had made unwanted sexual advances.
Clinton told Blumenthal that he was the one harassing Lewinsky.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 2, 1 ]
w1
[ 1 ]
The context and the statement are in conflict. The former states that Lewinsky had made the unwanted advances while the latter indicates that Clinton had made the unwanted moves.
[ { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 63, "text": "Lewinsky", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 73, "endIndex": 81, "text": "unwanted", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 31, "endIndex": 32, "text": " ", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 53, "text": "harassing", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.25, 0.15000000596046448, 0.6000000238418579 ]
[ 4 ]
null
108934c
Blue says Blumenthal claimed Clinton had told him that Lewinsky had made unwanted sexual advances.
Clinton told Blumenthal that he was the one harassing Lewinsky.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 2, 1 ]
w10
[ 1 ]
Lewinsky is the one that was making unwanted advances according to the context, so the statement would likely be false.
[ { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 97, "text": "Lewinsky had made unwanted sexual advances", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 62, "text": "he was the one harassing Lewinsky", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.25, 0.15000000596046448, 0.6000000238418579 ]
[ 4 ]
null
108934c
Blue says Blumenthal claimed Clinton had told him that Lewinsky had made unwanted sexual advances.
Clinton told Blumenthal that he was the one harassing Lewinsky.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 2, 1 ]
w11
[ 0 ]
The context says that blumenthal said clinton told him about lewinsky which is the exact same thing as the statement.
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 63, "text": "Blumenthal claimed Clinton had told him that Lewinsky", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 28, "text": "Clinton told Blumenthal that", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.25, 0.15000000596046448, 0.6000000238418579 ]
[ 4 ]
null
108934c
Blue says Blumenthal claimed Clinton had told him that Lewinsky had made unwanted sexual advances.
Clinton told Blumenthal that he was the one harassing Lewinsky.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 2, 1 ]
w20
[ 2, 1 ]
There seems to be hearsay, or even lying, occurring by one or more parties within this context/statement. Regarding context, Blue mentions a claim made by Blumenthal, told to him by Clinton, that Lewinsky made unwanted sexual advances toward Clinton. But Clinton told Blumenthal he was the one responsible for sexually harassing Lewinsky. It's possible the sexual advances were later reciprocated by one another but the initiation began with one of them and that truth is only really known by Clinton and Lewinsky, not Blue or Blumenthal, despite what they claim to have heard.
[ { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 63, "text": "Lewinsky", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 7, "text": "Clinton", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.25, 0.15000000596046448, 0.6000000238418579 ]
[ 4 ]
null
108934c
Blue says Blumenthal claimed Clinton had told him that Lewinsky had made unwanted sexual advances.
Clinton told Blumenthal that he was the one harassing Lewinsky.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 2, 1 ]
w4
[ 0, 1 ]
Unless Bluementhal was lying, the context makes it clear that Clinton claimed Lewinksy was making the advances, not the other way around. If Bluementhal was lying to Blue for some reason, however, the statement could be true.
[ { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 72, "text": "Lewinsky had made", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 43, "text": "he was the one", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0, 0.5 ]
[ 0.25, 0.15000000596046448, 0.6000000238418579 ]
[ 4 ]
null
108934c
Blue says Blumenthal claimed Clinton had told him that Lewinsky had made unwanted sexual advances.
Clinton told Blumenthal that he was the one harassing Lewinsky.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 2, 1 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
The statement is most likely true, due to the fact that the context reads that Blumenthal claimed the same fact.
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 28, "text": "Blumenthal claimed", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 23, "text": "told Blumenthal", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.25, 0.15000000596046448, 0.6000000238418579 ]
[ 4 ]
null
108934c
Blue says Blumenthal claimed Clinton had told him that Lewinsky had made unwanted sexual advances.
Clinton told Blumenthal that he was the one harassing Lewinsky.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 2, 1 ]
w6
[ 1 ]
The context claims Lewinsky made advances and the statement claims the opposite, he (Clinton) made advances.
[ { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 98, "text": "Clinton had told him that Lewinsky had made unwanted sexual advances.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.25, 0.15000000596046448, 0.6000000238418579 ]
[ 4 ]
null
108934c
Blue says Blumenthal claimed Clinton had told him that Lewinsky had made unwanted sexual advances.
Clinton told Blumenthal that he was the one harassing Lewinsky.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 2, 1 ]
w7
[ 1 ]
The context states that Clinton claimed he was the one approaching Monica, and the statement says the opposite, that Monica approached him.
[ { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 97, "text": "Lewinsky had made unwanted sexual advances", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 62, "text": "he was the one harassing Lewinsky", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.25, 0.15000000596046448, 0.6000000238418579 ]
[ 4 ]
null
108934c
Blue says Blumenthal claimed Clinton had told him that Lewinsky had made unwanted sexual advances.
Clinton told Blumenthal that he was the one harassing Lewinsky.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 2, 1 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
Clinton told Blumenthal that Lewinsky was making unwanted sexual advances.
[ { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 97, "text": "Lewinsky had made unwanted sexual advances", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 62, "text": "he was the one harassing Lewinsky", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.25, 0.15000000596046448, 0.6000000238418579 ]
[ 4 ]
null
108934c
Blue says Blumenthal claimed Clinton had told him that Lewinsky had made unwanted sexual advances.
Clinton told Blumenthal that he was the one harassing Lewinsky.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 2, 1 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
We are not quite sure what Clinton may have said to Blumenthal.
[ { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 49, "text": "Clinton had told him", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 23, "text": "Clinton told Blumenthal", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.25, 0.15000000596046448, 0.6000000238418579 ]
[ 4 ]
null
112701n
It has a full program of events, including lectures.
There might be some lectures in the very full docket of events.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 0 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
The full program includes lectures, so it is correct that that there will be some lectures scattered amidst the docket of events.
[ { "startIndex": 33, "endIndex": 51, "text": "including lectures", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 31, "text": "program of events", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 28, "text": "lectures", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 46, "endIndex": 62, "text": "docket of events", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8333333134651184, 0.03333333134651184, 0.13333332538604736 ]
[ 0 ]
null
112701n
It has a full program of events, including lectures.
There might be some lectures in the very full docket of events.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 0 ]
w19
[ 1 ]
We know that the program of events includes lectures, so the statement that there might be some lectures as part of the event is false -- there will be lectures, not might be lectures.
[ { "startIndex": 33, "endIndex": 42, "text": "including", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 43, "endIndex": 51, "text": "lectures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 11, "text": "might", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 28, "text": "lectures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.8333333134651184, 0.03333333134651184, 0.13333332538604736 ]
[ 0 ]
null
112701n
It has a full program of events, including lectures.
There might be some lectures in the very full docket of events.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 0 ]
w2
[ 0 ]
The word including confirms that there is indeed, not just might, lectures during the full program.
[ { "startIndex": 33, "endIndex": 42, "text": "including", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 11, "text": "might", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 14, "text": "be", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 19, "text": "some", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8333333134651184, 0.03333333134651184, 0.13333332538604736 ]
[ 0 ]
null
112701n
It has a full program of events, including lectures.
There might be some lectures in the very full docket of events.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 0 ]
w28
[ 0 ]
The context states it is certain that there are lectures in the program of events. If the context is true, then the statement would also be true.
[ { "startIndex": 33, "endIndex": 51, "text": "including lectures", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 31, "text": "events", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 28, "text": "lectures", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 56, "endIndex": 62, "text": "events", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8333333134651184, 0.03333333134651184, 0.13333332538604736 ]
[ 0 ]
null
112701n
It has a full program of events, including lectures.
There might be some lectures in the very full docket of events.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 0 ]
w29
[ 0, 2, 1 ]
The first statement definitely states that there will be lectures but the second statement is uncertain if there will be lectures on not.
[ { "startIndex": 33, "endIndex": 42, "text": "including", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 11, "text": "might", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.3333333432674408, 0.3333333432674408, 0.3333333432674408 ]
[ 0.8333333134651184, 0.03333333134651184, 0.13333332538604736 ]
[ 0 ]
null
112701n
It has a full program of events, including lectures.
There might be some lectures in the very full docket of events.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 0 ]
w30
[ 0 ]
The full program of events includes lectures, therefore there are some lectures in the docket of events.
[ { "startIndex": 33, "endIndex": 51, "text": "including lectures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 28, "text": "some lectures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8333333134651184, 0.03333333134651184, 0.13333332538604736 ]
[ 0 ]
null
112701n
It has a full program of events, including lectures.
There might be some lectures in the very full docket of events.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 0 ]
w31
[ 0 ]
The context implies certainty that lectures will be included in the events. The statement implies that lectures might be included in the events. Therefore, the statement is likely true because there is a possibility of lectures at the event.
[ { "startIndex": 33, "endIndex": 42, "text": "including", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 14, "text": "might be", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8333333134651184, 0.03333333134651184, 0.13333332538604736 ]
[ 0 ]
null
112701n
It has a full program of events, including lectures.
There might be some lectures in the very full docket of events.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 0 ]
w4
[ 0 ]
As the context states the events include lectures, it follows that there must be some lectures on the docket of events. Also, full program is just another way of stating very full docket.
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 31, "text": "full program of events", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 33, "endIndex": 51, "text": "including lectures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 28, "text": "might be some lectures", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 36, "endIndex": 62, "text": "very full docket of events", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8333333134651184, 0.03333333134651184, 0.13333332538604736 ]
[ 0 ]
null
112701n
It has a full program of events, including lectures.
There might be some lectures in the very full docket of events.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 0 ]
w7
[ 0 ]
The context states that the full program includes lectures, so the statement that there might be some lectures in the docket would logically follow as true.
[ { "startIndex": 33, "endIndex": 51, "text": "including lectures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 28, "text": "might be some lectures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8333333134651184, 0.03333333134651184, 0.13333332538604736 ]
[ 0 ]
null
112701n
It has a full program of events, including lectures.
There might be some lectures in the very full docket of events.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 1, 0 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
There will be lectures in the full program of events.
[ { "startIndex": 33, "endIndex": 51, "text": "including lectures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 28, "text": "some lectures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8333333134651184, 0.03333333134651184, 0.13333332538604736 ]
[ 0 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w0
[ 0, 2 ]
The statement is missing the intention of the context. They are not only hoping for a consensus, but they are also hoping for a consensus that will provide good benefits for their country.
[ { "startIndex": 63, "endIndex": 123, "text": "one that will provide the country with significant benefits.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 66, "text": "a consensus.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
Both the context and statement present information that they hope that common interests will lead to a consensus, thus the information matches and the statement is supported as true.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 32, "text": "common interests", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 38, "endIndex": 42, "text": "lead", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 51, "endIndex": 60, "text": "consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 37, "text": "common interests", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 43, "endIndex": 47, "text": "lead", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 56, "endIndex": 65, "text": "consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w10
[ 0 ]
Since the writer said they had hope for common interests, this is a statement that is more likely to be true.
[ { "startIndex": 2, "endIndex": 6, "text": "hope", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 32, "text": "common interests", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 38, "endIndex": 60, "text": "lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 11, "text": "hoped", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 37, "text": "common interests", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 56, "endIndex": 65, "text": "consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w12
[ 0 ]
The "I" in the context states that they hope common interests will lead to consensus. The statement says it is hoped the same thing. At least one person hopes this, so it seems to be true.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 6, "text": "I hope", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 60, "text": "common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "it is hoped", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 37, "text": "common interests", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 43, "endIndex": 65, "text": "lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w13
[ 0 ]
The desire for consensus could be for any topic, not necessarily for the country as stated in the context.
[ { "startIndex": 85, "endIndex": 96, "text": "the country", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 65, "text": "common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w14
[ 0 ]
Both are talking about the same thing and come to the same conclusion.
[ { "startIndex": 51, "endIndex": 60, "text": "consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 56, "endIndex": 66, "text": "consensus.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w16
[ 0 ]
Both the context and the statement serve the same purpose, written in a different form.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 60, "text": "I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 65, "text": "it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w18
[ 0 ]
The context tells us that the individual is hoping that common interest will lead to a consensus, which means that there is hope that having the same interests will lead everyone reach agreements unanimously.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 60, "text": "common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 2, "endIndex": 6, "text": "hope", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 55, "text": "hoped that the common interests will lead us to a", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 56, "endIndex": 65, "text": "consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w19
[ 0 ]
The statement is a passively phrased version "it is hoped" of the context statement "I hope" but it still likely to be likely to be true because even the passive version is another way of saying the same thing.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 6, "text": "I hope", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "it is hoped", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w2
[ 0 ]
Despite the statement not being in first person like the context, the sentiment is identical. "It is hoped" and "I hope" and "the" and "our" do not change the likeliness of the context being any less true.
[ { "startIndex": 2, "endIndex": 6, "text": "hope", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 22, "text": "common", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 23, "endIndex": 32, "text": "interests", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 33, "endIndex": 37, "text": "will", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 38, "endIndex": 42, "text": "lead", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 51, "endIndex": 60, "text": "consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 11, "text": "hoped", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 27, "text": "common", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 37, "text": "interests", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 38, "endIndex": 42, "text": "will", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 43, "endIndex": 47, "text": "lead", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 56, "endIndex": 65, "text": "consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w21
[ 0 ]
Statement two repeats statement one in different words; there's hope from all parties that common interests will lead to consensus.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 60, "text": "common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 65, "text": "common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w22
[ 0 ]
If one individual hopes for an outcome, then that outcome has been hoped for.
[ { "startIndex": 2, "endIndex": 6, "text": "hope", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 11, "text": "hoped", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w26
[ 0 ]
The statement and context align, both address common interests leading too a consensus.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 32, "text": "common interests", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 51, "endIndex": 60, "text": "consensus", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "I hope that", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 56, "endIndex": 65, "text": "consensus", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "it is hoped", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w27
[ 0 ]
While the context gives further information specificying the consensus as benefiting the country, the statement both agree that the consensus is hoped for.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 32, "text": "common interests", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 38, "endIndex": 60, "text": "lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 77, "endIndex": 122, "text": "provide the country with significant benefits", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 2, "endIndex": 6, "text": "hope", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 11, "text": "hoped", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 37, "text": "common interests", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 43, "endIndex": 65, "text": "lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w28
[ 0 ]
The first part of the context and the entire statement mean the same thing. The latter part of the context, "one that will provide the country with significant benefits," simply gives additional information. Without this information, the context and statement almost say the same thing word-for-word.
[ { "startIndex": 51, "endIndex": 60, "text": "consensus", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 32, "text": "common interests", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 56, "endIndex": 65, "text": "consensus", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 37, "text": "common interests", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w32
[ 0 ]
The phrase 'common interests will lead us to a consensus' appears in both context and statement.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 60, "text": "our common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 65, "text": "common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w33
[ 0 ]
the statement is affirming the context's specific hope that common interests will lead to a consensus by saying "it is hoped"
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 60, "text": "I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 65, "text": "it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w34
[ 2 ]
Common interests may or may not lead to a consensus.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 32, "text": "common interests", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 77, "endIndex": 122, "text": "provide the country with significant benefits", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 65, "text": "common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w4
[ 0 ]
Since the context states that an individual hopes for what is contained in the statement, it therefore follows that the statement that an individual hopes so must be true.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "I hope that", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "it is hoped", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
The statement is summing up exactly what the context reads, therefore the statement is most likely true.
[ { "startIndex": 51, "endIndex": 60, "text": "consensus", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 102, "endIndex": 122, "text": "significant benefits", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 56, "endIndex": 65, "text": "consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w6
[ 0 ]
The I hope in the context refers to the it is hoped in the statement.
[]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 66, "text": "it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w7
[ 0 ]
Hoping that our common interests lead us to consensus is the same as saying the common interests.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 32, "text": "our common interests", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 37, "text": "the common interests", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
It is hoped that the common interested will lead us to a consensus.
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 60, "text": "common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 65, "text": "common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113060e
I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus - one that will provide the country with significant benefits.
it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w9
[ 0 ]
There is a hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 60, "text": "I hope that our common interests will lead us to a consensus", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 66, "text": "it is hoped that the common interests will lead us to a consensus.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.9375, 0.0625, 0 ]
[ 2 ]
null
113585n
we only have to get up for you know for the daytime feedings
We have to get up early to prepare the daytime feedings.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w0
[ 2 ]
The context is worded too confusingly to understand what it means. It is not written in complete proper English sentences, so there is no way to know for sure what it means.
[ { "startIndex": 23, "endIndex": 39, "text": "for you know for", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 23, "text": "get up early", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
113585n
we only have to get up for you know for the daytime feedings
We have to get up early to prepare the daytime feedings.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
The use of language is a bit inconsistent and the use of the word "known" in the context doesn't make sense. However, based on the surrounding language, it is presumed that both the context and the statement intended to reference getting up early for the feedings.
[ { "startIndex": 31, "endIndex": 35, "text": "know", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 60, "text": "daytime feedings", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 23, "text": "early", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 39, "endIndex": 55, "text": "daytime feedings", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
113585n
we only have to get up for you know for the daytime feedings
We have to get up early to prepare the daytime feedings.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w13
[ 2 ]
Daytime feedings do not necessarily have to be prepared early in the day so they may or may not have to get up early.
[ { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 60, "text": "daytime feedings", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 55, "text": "get up early to prepare the daytime feedings", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
113585n
we only have to get up for you know for the daytime feedings
We have to get up early to prepare the daytime feedings.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w2
[ 0, 2 ]
The context and the statement are identical with the exception of the phrase "for you know" and "prepare" which do not contradict each other. There is a slight chance the context is describing eating the feeding rather than preparing it, but it seems unlikely. The statement mentions "early" however, where the context does not give a time of day.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 2, "text": "we", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 19, "text": "get", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 22, "text": "up", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 52, "endIndex": 60, "text": "feedings", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 2, "text": "We", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 14, "text": "get", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 17, "text": "up", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 23, "text": "early", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 47, "endIndex": 55, "text": "feedings", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
113585n
we only have to get up for you know for the daytime feedings
We have to get up early to prepare the daytime feedings.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w4
[ 0, 1 ]
The truth of the statement depends on whether they're getting up to be fed or to do the feeding. If it's the former, the statement is false. If it's the latter, the statement is true.
[ { "startIndex": 52, "endIndex": 60, "text": "feedings", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 51, "text": "daytime", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 34, "text": "prepare", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 39, "endIndex": 55, "text": "daytime feedings", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0, 0.5 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
113585n
we only have to get up for you know for the daytime feedings
We have to get up early to prepare the daytime feedings.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w5
[ 2 ]
The context does not state when they have to get up, only that they have to get up for daytime feedings. Therefore, the statement can either be true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 22, "text": "have to get up", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 23, "text": "get up early", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
113585n
we only have to get up for you know for the daytime feedings
We have to get up early to prepare the daytime feedings.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w6
[ 2 ]
The context does not qualify daytime as early. It is unclear whether daytime and early are equal.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 60, "text": "we only have to get up for you know for the daytime feedings", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 39, "endIndex": 55, "text": "daytime feedings", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
113585n
we only have to get up for you know for the daytime feedings
We have to get up early to prepare the daytime feedings.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
We have to get up for the daytime feedings, but not necessarily early.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 22, "text": "have to get up", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 23, "text": "have to get up early", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
113585n
we only have to get up for you know for the daytime feedings
We have to get up early to prepare the daytime feedings.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
They have to get up early to prepare for the daytime feedings.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 22, "text": "have to get up", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 34, "text": "get up early to prepare", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
113585n
we only have to get up for you know for the daytime feedings
We have to get up early to prepare the daytime feedings.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 1 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
Could either be true or false. They may have to prepare the daytime feedings earlier.
[ { "startIndex": 36, "endIndex": 60, "text": "for the daytime feedings", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 56, "text": "prepare the daytime feedings.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421, 0.05000000074505806 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
114316e
There's a dramatic difference between someone like Michael Dell and someone like Al Dunlap.
There is a vast destination between the two individuals.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 2, 0, 1 ]
w0
[ 0 ]
They have taken the phrase "dramatic difference" from the context and used words with similar meaning for the statement. They have also replaced the specific names for a more generalized term. Ultimately the statement and the context are conveying the same information.
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 29, "text": "dramatic difference", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 51, "endIndex": 91, "text": "Michael Dell and someone like Al Dunlap.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 27, "text": "vast destination", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 56, "text": "two individuals.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.18333333730697632, 0.5833333134651184, 0.23333333432674408 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
114316e
There's a dramatic difference between someone like Michael Dell and someone like Al Dunlap.
There is a vast destination between the two individuals.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 2, 0, 1 ]
w1
[ 1 ]
It is unclear in this situation what is meant because the statement uses "destination" and "difference" is used in the context. These are different things and do not relate one to the other.
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 29, "text": "difference", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 27, "text": "destination", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.18333333730697632, 0.5833333134651184, 0.23333333432674408 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
114316e
There's a dramatic difference between someone like Michael Dell and someone like Al Dunlap.
There is a vast destination between the two individuals.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 2, 0, 1 ]
w2
[ 2 ]
The term "difference" in the context and "destination" in the statement do not express the same thing. One is about differences in people, one is about distance.
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 29, "text": "difference", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 30, "endIndex": 37, "text": "between", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 27, "text": "destination", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 35, "text": "between", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.18333333730697632, 0.5833333134651184, 0.23333333432674408 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
114316e
There's a dramatic difference between someone like Michael Dell and someone like Al Dunlap.
There is a vast destination between the two individuals.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 2, 0, 1 ]
w3
[ 2 ]
Destination used in the statement does not make sense. Destination refers to an ending while the context is referring to the journey or gap between these two people.
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 29, "text": "difference", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 27, "text": "destination", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.18333333730697632, 0.5833333134651184, 0.23333333432674408 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
114316e
There's a dramatic difference between someone like Michael Dell and someone like Al Dunlap.
There is a vast destination between the two individuals.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 2, 0, 1 ]
w4
[ 2 ]
The statement is nonsensical, and therefore can neither be true nor false based on the context.
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 29, "text": "dramatic difference", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 27, "text": "vast destination", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.18333333730697632, 0.5833333134651184, 0.23333333432674408 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
114316e
There's a dramatic difference between someone like Michael Dell and someone like Al Dunlap.
There is a vast destination between the two individuals.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 2, 0, 1 ]
w5
[ 0, 2, 1 ]
The context makes sense that the two individuals are very different, however, the statement makes no sense. "Vast destination"? I'm assuming this is supposed to be reiterating the same thing, but it does not translate at all.
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 37, "text": "dramatic difference between", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 35, "text": "vast destination between", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.3333333432674408, 0.3333333432674408, 0.3333333432674408 ]
[ 0.18333333730697632, 0.5833333134651184, 0.23333333432674408 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
114316e
There's a dramatic difference between someone like Michael Dell and someone like Al Dunlap.
There is a vast destination between the two individuals.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 2, 0, 1 ]
w6
[ 0, 2 ]
The statement is likely to be true if dramatic difference is equal or similar to vast destination between the two, but vast destination between the two seems unclear.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 90, "text": "There's a dramatic difference between someone like Michael Dell and someone like Al Dunlap", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.18333333730697632, 0.5833333134651184, 0.23333333432674408 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
114316e
There's a dramatic difference between someone like Michael Dell and someone like Al Dunlap.
There is a vast destination between the two individuals.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 2, 0, 1 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
There is a difference in these individuals, but there is no statement about a destination that involves them both.
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 37, "text": "dramatic difference between", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 27, "text": "destination", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.18333333730697632, 0.5833333134651184, 0.23333333432674408 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
114316e
There's a dramatic difference between someone like Michael Dell and someone like Al Dunlap.
There is a vast destination between the two individuals.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 2, 0, 1 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
There is a vast difference between the two individuals and not a vast destination.
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 29, "text": "dramatic difference", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 27, "text": "vast destination", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.18333333730697632, 0.5833333134651184, 0.23333333432674408 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
114316e
There's a dramatic difference between someone like Michael Dell and someone like Al Dunlap.
There is a vast destination between the two individuals.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 2, 0, 1 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
This depends on who the individuals are. Could be true or false. I'm assuming 'destination is the wrong word used.
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 91, "text": "difference between someone like Michael Dell and someone like Al Dunlap.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.18333333730697632, 0.5833333134651184, 0.23333333432674408 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
115139n
But in fact Haveman and Wolfe's statistical analysis is designed to rule out this and similar alternative theories, leaving us to conclude that the moves themselves are harmful.
We concluded that moves of the government are harmful.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 0 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
The statistical analysis in the context concludes that the moves are harmful, and the statement also concludes that the moves are harmful. Thus, both statements are congruent and the statement is likely to be true.
[ { "startIndex": 169, "endIndex": 176, "text": "harmful", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 148, "endIndex": 153, "text": "moves", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 46, "endIndex": 53, "text": "harmful", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 23, "text": "moves", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
115139n
But in fact Haveman and Wolfe's statistical analysis is designed to rule out this and similar alternative theories, leaving us to conclude that the moves themselves are harmful.
We concluded that moves of the government are harmful.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 0 ]
w11
[ 2 ]
The context doesn't really mention the government but it could be the government.
[ { "startIndex": 148, "endIndex": 176, "text": "moves themselves are harmful", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 53, "text": "moves of the government are harmful", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
115139n
But in fact Haveman and Wolfe's statistical analysis is designed to rule out this and similar alternative theories, leaving us to conclude that the moves themselves are harmful.
We concluded that moves of the government are harmful.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 0 ]
w18
[ 2 ]
Given little information in the context as to what the statistical analysis is actually pertaining to, we cannot conclude that it at all relates to the government and thereby the government's moves are bad.
[ { "startIndex": 32, "endIndex": 177, "text": "statistical analysis is designed to rule out this and similar alternative theories, leaving us to conclude that the moves themselves are harmful.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 31, "endIndex": 53, "text": "government are harmful", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
115139n
But in fact Haveman and Wolfe's statistical analysis is designed to rule out this and similar alternative theories, leaving us to conclude that the moves themselves are harmful.
We concluded that moves of the government are harmful.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 0 ]
w2
[ 2 ]
Without more knowledge of the theories being ruled out in the context, it is unclear whether to tell if government is involved in these moves at all, like mentioned in the statement.
[ { "startIndex": 94, "endIndex": 105, "text": "alternative", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 106, "endIndex": 114, "text": "theories", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 144, "endIndex": 147, "text": "the", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 148, "endIndex": 153, "text": "moves", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 86, "endIndex": 93, "text": "similar", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 23, "text": "moves", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 31, "endIndex": 41, "text": "government", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
115139n
But in fact Haveman and Wolfe's statistical analysis is designed to rule out this and similar alternative theories, leaving us to conclude that the moves themselves are harmful.
We concluded that moves of the government are harmful.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 0 ]
w4
[ 0, 2 ]
The context gives no indication of whether it's a government or some other institution being studied/theorized about. Therefore you can't really say whether this is true or false, altho given the fact that statistical analysis is needed in the first place it implies there's a lot of data to look at, and government institutions are usually big, so it could possibly be true as well.
[ { "startIndex": 32, "endIndex": 52, "text": "statistical analysis", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 41, "text": "the government", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
115139n
But in fact Haveman and Wolfe's statistical analysis is designed to rule out this and similar alternative theories, leaving us to conclude that the moves themselves are harmful.
We concluded that moves of the government are harmful.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 0 ]
w5
[ 2 ]
It is difficult to say if the statement is true or false because it says the "government's moves" whereas in the context there is no mention of the government, just "moves".
[ { "startIndex": 148, "endIndex": 164, "text": "moves themselves", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 41, "text": "moves of the government", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
115139n
But in fact Haveman and Wolfe's statistical analysis is designed to rule out this and similar alternative theories, leaving us to conclude that the moves themselves are harmful.
We concluded that moves of the government are harmful.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 0 ]
w6
[ 2 ]
The context does not mention the government specifically and the statement conclusions relate to the government.
[ { "startIndex": 144, "endIndex": 177, "text": "the moves themselves are harmful.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
115139n
But in fact Haveman and Wolfe's statistical analysis is designed to rule out this and similar alternative theories, leaving us to conclude that the moves themselves are harmful.
We concluded that moves of the government are harmful.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 0 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
The context states that the moves are harmful, but not that the moves are from the government. It may possibly be true that it is the government's moves.
[ { "startIndex": 144, "endIndex": 164, "text": "the moves themselves", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 41, "text": "moves of the government", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
115139n
But in fact Haveman and Wolfe's statistical analysis is designed to rule out this and similar alternative theories, leaving us to conclude that the moves themselves are harmful.
We concluded that moves of the government are harmful.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 0 ]
w8
[ 2 ]
Moves themselves are harmful but it was not stated whether it was moves of the government so it could be true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 148, "endIndex": 164, "text": "moves themselves", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 41, "text": "moves of the government", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
115139n
But in fact Haveman and Wolfe's statistical analysis is designed to rule out this and similar alternative theories, leaving us to conclude that the moves themselves are harmful.
We concluded that moves of the government are harmful.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 2, 0 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
There is no information about whose moves are being concluded upon. This could either be true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 130, "endIndex": 176, "text": "conclude that the moves themselves are harmful", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 54, "text": "We concluded that moves of the government are harmful.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
11618n
Enlarging the village was not desirable and most knew that Severn only desired wealth and a seat on the council of elders.
Severn only cared about being a millionaire.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 0, 1, 0, 2 ]
w4
[ 0, 1 ]
Severn is indicated in the context to desire prestige/power as well as wealth. Therefore the statement is false, unless most of the villagers were misled and he truly only desired to be wealthy, in which case the statement would be true.
[ { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 53, "text": "most knew", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 90, "endIndex": 96, "text": "a seat", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 11, "text": "only", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 33, "endIndex": 44, "text": "millionaire", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0, 0.5 ]
[ 0.44999998807907104, 0.25, 0.30000001192092896 ]
[ 4, 7 ]
prob