image
imagewidth (px)
258
933
latex
stringlengths
198
5.27k
filename
stringlengths
18
19
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{GO ID} & \textbf{Biological process} & \textbf{Gene Counts} & \textbf{P-value} & \textbf{Bon. Adjusted p-values} & \textbf{FDR} \\ \hline GO:0006955 & Immune response & 38 & 0.040 & 1 & 0.044 \\ \hline GO:0042493 & Response to drug & 18 & 0.010 & 1 & 0.023 \\ \hline GO:0046649 & Lymphocyte activation & 18 & 0.032 & 1 & 0.037 \\ \hline GO:0019221 & Cytokine-mediated signaling pathway & 12 & 0.026 & 1 & 0.036 \\ \hline GO:0090068 & Positive regulation of cell cycle process & 13 & 0.000 & 0.295 & 0.003 \\ \hline GO:0032496 & Response to lipopolysaccharide & 10 & 0.036 & 1 & 0.040 \\ \hline GO:0034097 & Response to cytokine stimulus & 17 & 0.020 & 1 & 0.032 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5687707_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{K01179: Endoglucanase} & \textbf{Arctic Wolf} & \textbf{Beaver} & \textbf{Coyote} & \textbf{Porcupine} \\ \hline Clostridium & 22.95\% & 48.66\% & 25.83\% & 42.82\% \\ \hline Eubacterium & 11.51\% & 23.52\% & 10.06\% & 24.93\% \\ \hline Methanobrevibacter & 17.49\% & 1.23\% & 19.13\% & 2.18\% \\ \hline Lactococcus & 4.96\% & 3.25\% & 8.19\% & 13.73\% \\ \hline Deinococcus & 9.00\% & 4.55\% & 10.77\% & 3.28\% \\ \hline Alicyclobacillus & 4.98\% & 3.54\% & 6.14\% & 6.87\% \\ \hline Burkholderia & 8.67\% & 2.08\% & 5.13\% & 0.17\% \\ \hline Cellulophaga & 1.47\% & 6.11\% & 4.14\% & 3.56\% \\ \hline Klebsiella & 5.23\% & 0.17\% & 5.59\% & 0.15\% \\ \hline Pseudomonas & 7.31\% & 1.08\% & 1.20\% & 0.17\% \\ \hline Escherichia & 4.97\% & 0.22\% & 3.25\% & 0.43\% \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5744928_table_7
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{Time (minutes)} & \textbf{p} \\ \hline . & 17.1 $\pm$ 2.4 vs. 20.9 $\pm$ 5.5 & 0.04 \\ \hline 1.5T: FWHM v 6SD (IS) & 17.1 $\pm$ 2.4 vs. 19.4 $\pm$ 3.1 & 0.09 \\ \hline 1.5T: FWHM v 7SD (IS) & 17.1 $\pm$ 2.4 vs. 19.1 $\pm$ 3.7 & 0.13 \\ \hline 1.5T: FWHM v 8SD (IS) & 17.1 $\pm$ 2.4 vs. 19.6 $\pm$ 3.2 & $<$0.01 \\ \hline 1.5T: FWHM v OAT (IS) & 17.1 $\pm$ 2.4 vs. 18.0 $\pm$ 2.6 & 0.45 \\ \hline 1.5T: FWHM v MANUAL (IS) & 17.1 $\pm$ 2.4 vs. 21.1 $\pm$ 4.7 & 0.01 \\ \hline 1.5T: 5SD v OAT (IS) & 20.9 $\pm$ 5.5 vs. 18.0 $\pm$ 2.6 & 0.21 \\ \hline 1.5T: 2SD v OAT (AAR) & 17.1 $\pm$ 2.4 vs. 16.7 $\pm$ 2.6 & 0.73 \\ \hline 1.5T: 2SD v MANUAL (AAR) & 17.1 $\pm$ 2.4 vs. 18.3 $\pm$ 2.6 & 0.14 \\ \hline 1.5T: OAT v MANUAL (AAR) & 16.7 $\pm$ 2.6 vs. 18.3 $\pm$ 2.6 & 0.07 \\ \hline 3T: FWHM v 5SD (IS) & 18.9 $\pm$ 2.7 vs. 24.7 $\pm$ 9.1 & 0.08 \\ \hline 3T: FWHM v 6SD (IS) & 18.9 $\pm$ 2.7 vs. 22.2 $\pm$ 5.2 & 0.07 \\ \hline 3T: FWHM v 7SD (IS) & 18.9 $\pm$ 2.7 vs. 22.5 $\pm$ 5.3 & 0.07 \\ \hline 3T: FWHM v 8SD (IS) & 18.9 $\pm$ 2.7 vs. 21.2 $\pm$ 3.0 & 0.08 \\ \hline 3T: FWHM v OAT (IS) & 18.9 $\pm$ 2.7 vs. 20.7 $\pm$ 3.2 & 0.11 \\ \hline 3T: FWHM v MANUAL (IS) & 18.9 $\pm$ 2.7 vs. 24.0 $\pm$ 3.7 & $<$0.01 \\ \hline 3T: 5SD v OAT (IS) & 24.7 $\pm$ 9.1 vs. 20.7 $\pm$ 3.2 & 0.25 \\ \hline 3T: 2SD v OAT (AAR) & 19.6 $\pm$ 2.7 vs. 18.5 $\pm$ 2.6 & 0.26 \\ \hline 3T: 2SD v MANUAL (AAR) & 19.6 $\pm$ 2.7 vs. 18.3 $\pm$ 2.6 & 0.31 \\ \hline 3T: OAT v MANUAL (AAR) & 18.5 $\pm$ 2.6 vs. 18.3 $\pm$ 2.6 & 0.83 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4347654_table_4
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{Confirmed H1N1v ILI cases} & \textbf{ILI controls (non-H1N1v cases)} \\ \hline IlI (fever+1 other symptom) & 186 (96\%) & 83 (89\%) \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{Of those with ILI} \\ \hline Adults & 115 (62\%) & 58 (70\%) \\ \hline Children & 71 (38\%) & 25 (30\%) \\ \hline Risk group & 36 (19\%) & 21 (25\%) \\ \hline Hospital admission & 16 (9\%) & 7 (8\%) \\ \hline Antivirals & 132 (71\%) & 44 (53\%) p = 0.0065* \\ \hline Antivirals within 2 days after onset & 65 (35\%) & 26 (31\%) \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3047534_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{Total number of 16-year-olds in the city of Uppsala: n = 2,465} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{Participated in the screening procedure: n = 2,300} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{Delivered complete screening questionnaires: n = 2,270} \\ \hline & Selected due to high scores on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) or Center for Epidemiological Studies scale (CES) or had attempted suicide & Selected as controls \\ \hline Selected for interview & n = 355 & n = 355 \\ \hline Interviewed (structured interview by means of DICA) & n = 314 & n = 317 \\ \hline Refused to participate in follow up & n = 6 & n = 10 \\ \hline Interviewed and willing to participate in follow-up & n = 308 & n = 307 \\ \hline Depressed at DICA interview & & n = 55 \\ \hline & Depressed at screening or at interview or having at least one suicide attempt: n = 363 & Controls (not depressed at screening or interview and without any suicide attempt): n = 252 \\ \hline Incomplete personal identification nr & n = 1 & n = 2 \\ \hline Included in follow-up & n = 362 & n = 250 \\ \hline Men/Women & 80/282 & 56/194 \\ \hline Age at follow up, years & 31.6 $\pm$ 0.7 & 31.6 $\pm$ 0.6 \\ \hline Major depression at first investigation Females/Males & 213/48 \\ \hline Dysthymia and sub-syndromal depression at first investigation Females/Males & 70/31 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC2853351_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{Machakos} & \textbf{Trans Nzoia} \\ \hline Timing & September 2014 & October 2014 \\ \hline Regions & Eastern region & Rift Valley region \\ \hline Sub-regions & Masinga Sub County Yatta Sub County Kangundo Sub County Matungulu Sub County Kathiani Sub County Machakos Town Sub County Mwala Sub County & Cherangani Sub County Kwanza Sub County Saboti Sub County Endebess Sub County Kiminini Sub County \\ \hline Number of groups & 12 & 14 \\ \hline Characteristics of Participants- Focus group discussions & 2urban \&2 rural 4 20 years or younger 4 24-29 years old & 4 urban \& 4 rural 3 20 years or younger 3 24-29 years old \\ \hline Language of focus group discussion & Swahili and Kamba & Kalenjin, Luhya and Swahili \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5075459_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Outcome variables} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{Antiplatelet}} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{ACEI/ARB}} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{Statin}} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{Beta-blockers}} \\ \hline & \textbf{Yes} & \textbf{No} & \textbf{Adjusted OR a (95\%CI)} & \textbf{Yes} & \textbf{No} & \textbf{Adjusted OR a (95\%CI)} & \textbf{Yes} & \textbf{No} & \textbf{Adjusted OR a (95\%CI)} & \textbf{Yes} & \textbf{No} & \textbf{Adjusted OR a (95\%CI)} \\ \hline \multicolumn{13}{|l|}{Severity at presentation} \\ \hline STEMI subtype b & 23.8 & 46.6 & 0.50(0.46–0.54) & 23.3 & 42.4 & 0.58(0.52–0.65) & 20.3 & 42.5 & 0.47(0.42–0.53) & 19.2 & 43.6 & 0.43(0.39–0.48) \\ \hline SBP$<$90mmHg & 1.0 & 2.2 & 0.53(0.38–0.75) & 0.8 & 2.0 & 0.48(0.29–0.80) & 0.8 & 2.0 & 0.49(0.29–0.83) & 0.7 & 2.0 & 0.40(0.24–0.67) \\ \hline HR$>$ = 100bpm & 6.5 & 9.4 & 0.69(0.60–0.80) & 7.2 & 8.8 & 0.82(0.68–0.98) & 5.0 & 9.1 & 0.56(0.45–0.69) & 5.7 & 9.1 & 0.67(0.55–0.80) \\ \hline \multicolumn{13}{|l|}{Complications} \\ \hline Arrhythmia & 4.4 & 6.5 & 0.63(0.53–0.75) & 4.0 & 6.2 & 0.64(0.50–0.80) & 3.4 & 6.2 & 0.53(0.40–0.68) & 3.0 & 6.4 & 0.45(0.35–0.58) \\ \hline \multicolumn{13}{|l|}{MACE} \\ \hline Total MACEs & 3.9 & 5.4 & 0.70(0.58–0.84) & 3.4 & 5.2 & 0.59(0.46–0.76) & 3.7 & 5.2 & 0.73(0.57–0.94) & 3.5 & 5.3 & 0.70(0.55–0.89) \\ \hline Death & 2.1 & 3.4 & 0.62(0.49–0.79) & 1.8 & 3.2 & 0.55(0.39–0.77) & 1.6 & 3.2 & 0.52(0.36–0.76) & 1.8 & 3.3 & 0.63(0.46–0.87) \\ \hline Cardiac death & 1.8 & 3.2 & 0.57(0.44–0.73) & 1.5 & 3.0 & 0.48(0.33–0.70) & 1.3 & 3.0 & 0.43(0.29–0.66) & 1.6 & 3.0 & 0.58(0.41–0.82) \\ \hline Non-fatal MI & 1.1 & 1.6 & 0.64(0.45–0.90) & 0.7 & 1.6 & 0.42(0.25–0.71) & 1.3 & 1.4 & 0.91(0.59–1.40) & 1.0 & 1.5 & 0.67(0.43–1.04) \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5023149_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{Total n} & \textbf{\%} & \textbf{HIV+ n} & \textbf{\%} & \textbf{HIV2 n} & \textbf{\%} & \textbf{p value} \\ \hline \\ \hline Ever had transactional sex (N = 1194) & 827 & 69.3 & 170 & 78.7 & 657 & 67.2 & 0.001 \\ \hline .20 lifetime partners (N = 1202) & 417 & 34.7 & 88 & 40.6 & 329 & 33.4 & 0.058 \\ \hline Consistent condom use in the last year (N = 1065) & 403 & 37.8 & 76 & 37.4 & 327 & 37.9 & 0.903 \\ \hline Heavy alcohol use in the last year (N = 1185) & 215 & 18.1 & 32 & 15.0 & 183 & 18.8 & 0.223 \\ \hline Ever had sex with a prostitute (N = 1155) & 213 & 18.1 & 41 & 19.3 & 172 & 17.8 & 0.603 \\ \hline Had a khwapheni in last year (N = 1189) & 752 & 63.3 & 136 & 63.9 & 616 & 62.1 & 0.824 \\ \hline Ever had anal sex with a man (N = 1229) & 54 & 4.4 & 13 & 5.8 & 41 & 4.1 & 0.283 \\ \hline Ever had a genital ulcer (N = 1182) & 364 & 30.8 & 99 & 46.5 & 265 & 27.4 & ,0.0001 \\ \hline Ever been circumcised (N = 1182) & 472 & 40.0 & 67 & 31.6 & 405 & 41.8 & 0.016 \\ \hline Relationship control scale: high equity (N = 1036) & 179 & 17.3 & 19 & 9.8 & 160 & 19.0 & 0.003 \\ \hline mid equity & 717 & 69.2 & 150 & 77.7 & 567 & 67.3 \\ \hline low equity & 140 & 13.5 & 24 & 12.4 & 116 & 13.8 \\ \hline .1 episode of physical intimate partner violence (N = 1180) & 362 & 30.7 & 86 & 39.3 & 276 & 28.7 & 0.003 \\ \hline Ever raped a woman (N = 1211) & 358 & 29.6 & 70 & 31.3 & 288 & 29.2 & 0.533 \\ \hline Raped a woman in the past year (N = 1208) & 63 & 5.2 & 8 & 3.6 & 55 & 5.6 & 0.223 \\ \hline Ever raped a man (N = 1205) & 36 & 3.0 & 10 & 4.5 & 26 & 2.7 & 0.091 \\ \hline Ever raped a girl ,15 (N = 1125) & 60 & 5.3 & 10 & 5.0 & 50 & 5.4 & 0.796 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3173408_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Concentration (µg/mL)} & \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{\textbf{Test drugs}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Parameter and statistics}} \\ \hline & \textbf{Az} & \textbf{Rc} & \textbf{Az + Rc} & \textbf{Pento} & \textbf{AMB} & \textbf{F value} & \textbf{p value} \\ \hline Optimal efficacy (\%) & 72 & 59.5 & 88 & 98 & 92 & 17.311 & 0.002 \\ \hline Concentration at optimal efficacy & 25.5 & 28.2 & 35.1 & 25.2 & 34.5 & 9.212 & 0.001 \\ \hline IC90 & – & – & 34.5 & 15.5 & 24.5 & 19.221 & 0.001 \\ \hline IC50 & 11.5 & 16.5 & 9.0 & 6.5 & 4.5 & 12.489 & 0.000 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4635543_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{Saturated fatty acids} & \textbf{Linoleic acid (omega 6)} & \textbf{Total omega 3} & \textbf{Monounsaturated fatty acids} \\ \hline Corn oila & 13 & 61 & 1 & 26 \\ \hline Canola oila & 6 & 20 & 10 & 62 \\ \hline n-3 supp.b & 9 & 6 & 63 & 21 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC2669087_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Project} & \textbf{Project ID} & \textbf{Samples} & \textbf{Salinity range (PSU)} & \textbf{Reference} \\ \hline Global Ocean Sampling Expedition & CAM_PROJ_GOS & 56 & 0.1–37, 63 (hypersaline) & [12] \\ \hline Global Ocean Sampling Baltic Sea & CAM_P_0001109 & 19 & 0–34 & [13] \\ \hline Freshwater metagenomes & PRJEB4844 & 9 & 0 & [109] \\ \hline Lake Lanier metagenome by 454 & SRR063691 & 1 & 0 & [76] \\ \hline Metagenomics of the Amazon & SRR091234 & 1 & 0 & [113] \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4699468_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Variable} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Significance}} \\ \hline \textbf{Muscle Total CoQ10 (mcg/mg) T2 pre $\yen$} & \textbf{r value} & \textbf{0.423} \\ \hline & p value & 0.007 \\ \hline Muscle Total CoQ10 (mcg/mg) T2 post & r value & 0.189 \\ \hline & p value & 0.250 \\ \hline Muscle Total CoQ10 (mcg/mg) T3 pre & r value & 0.247 \\ \hline & p value & 0.125 \\ \hline Muscle Total CoQ10 (mcg/mg) T3 post & r value & 0.244 \\ \hline & p value & 0.134 \\ \hline Oxygen Consumption (mL·kg-1·min-1) T1 $\yen$ & r value & 0.389 \\ \hline & p value & 0.013 \\ \hline Oxygen Consumption (mL·kg-1·min-1) T2 $\yen$ & r value & 0.381 \\ \hline & p value & 0.017 \\ \hline Oxygen Consumption (mL·kg-1·min-1) T3 $\yen$ & r value & 0.429 \\ \hline & p value & 0.006 \\ \hline Time to exhaustion (Min) T1 $\yen$ & r value & 0.419 \\ \hline & p value & 0.007 \\ \hline Time to exhaustion (Min) T2 $\yen$ & r value & 0.454 \\ \hline & p value & 0.004 \\ \hline Time to exhaustion (Min) T3 $\yen$ & r value & 0.485 \\ \hline & p value & 0.001 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC2315638_table_7
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Adolescent physiological factors} & \textbf{Key points from systematic review results} & \textbf{Implementation considerations} \\ \hline Neurological decision- making ability & • When adolescents are in situations that involve a high level of emotion (e.g. times of great excitement), they are less likely to spend time considering the (potentially risky) consequences • In high emotion situations (or so called ‘hot’ emotional contexts) decision- making processes may therefore be different from less charged (‘cold’ or deliberative) situations & • Interventions to support adolescents, and those who care for them, can raise awareness of this likelihood and help adolescents to identify that their ‘gut’, or immediate reaction, in such situations may put them at risk • Knowledge of such variations may help adolescents to differentiate between their decision-making ability in a variety of situations and apply different strategies. For example, gaining the skills to recognise when a rash or unhealthy decision is likely to occur \\ \hline Reward processing & • Reward processing develops across adolescence & • Interventions to support adolescents should encourage the rewards that healthy behaviours can give (for example being more active and looking/ feeling healthier as a result) • In addition, the benefits of saying ‘no’ to unhealthy behaviours can be emphasised (for example refusing cigarettes and having fresher breath, skin, and clothes as a result) \\ \hline & • In situations where adolescents need to concentrate intensely (for example when playing computer games), they may be more likely to accept an immediate reward without considering the consequences (for example they may be more likely to eat an unhealthy snack and lose their appetite for more nutritious food) & • An understanding of this likelihood may be helpful for both adolescents and those who care for them. In addition, interventions that act as prompts or reminders for adolescents may be of help \\ \hline Age and stage & • Many new experiences that children encounter as they develop through adolescence can impact on future health (for example, smoking) & • It is important that early interventions, at a younger age, explain the potential consequences (good or bad) in a supportive way. This early approach may help adolescents make healthier choices at a later stage (for example, turning down an offer of a cigarette for the first time) \\ \hline & • Younger adolescents may be less able to stop acting on impulse, due to the developing (neurological) maturation processes & • Interventions that focus on controlling impulsive action may be better suited to older adolescents \\ \hline & • Younger adolescents may respond better to interventions that focus on immediate rewards (for example, the immediate benefits of taking exercise, such as glowing skin, feeling energised). In contrast, older adolescents may be better able to see the longer term outcomes and anticipate those benefits (for example, having good muscle tone as a result of regular exercise) & • Interventions that are responsive to and implemented in an age and stage appropriate way may be more effective due to their acknowledgement of the physiological maturation process \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5879600_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Outcome/output} & \textbf{Indicators} & \textbf{Achievement (2009)} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{Outcome} \\ \hline 1. New knowledge relevant to global and local health needs & Implications of research findings or results for current knowledge/understanding or programs/ interventions in relation to MDGs or national priorities. & Review of progress and policy development demonstrates significant contributions in 6/8 priority areas of Strategic Plan 2001-2010 \\ \hline 2. Changes in programs, policies and practices which incorporate this knowledge & Changes in national/regional or international policy/programs consistent with new knowledge/ research findings. & Significant policy changes/policy contribution in 5/8 priority areas of Strategic Plan 2001-2010 \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{Outputs} \\ \hline 1. Updated research agenda which identifies priority research areas \& objectives & Revisions to the priority research areas based on consultation with stakeholders and research findings undertaken at least every 2 years. & Strategic Plan 2010-2020 provides information on new research directions and justification \\ \hline 2. Program of research protocols and research activities which contribute to the objectives in the priority research areas identified in the Strategic Plan & Number of new research protocols/activities approved by research priority area and research phase during the last 12 months & Increase in infections (27\%), health systems (17\%); decrease in diarrhoea (9\%) and HIV (8\%) Shift towards operational research \\ \hline 3. Research program addresses issues of gender, environment, poverty and equity where relevant. & No/\% of protocols approved during the last 12 months which address - gender, environment, poverty and equity. & Very low proportions - no significant change over 2007-2009 periods. Reporting is not capturing this information. \\ \hline 4. Research undertaken by ICDDR,B is regarded as high quality and innovative by international peers. & No. of publications in the high impact peer reviewed journals by research priority area during last 12 months. & Most in traditional strong areas of diarrhoea (1/3), infections, child health \\ \hline & No. of citations in peer reviewed literature for key publications in each priority research area over a 5 year period. & Citation rate by area: highest in diarrhoea (7.3); infectious disease (4.9); child health (4.5) \\ \hline 5. Research undertaken by ICDDR,B is conducted according to ethical standards & Presence of policies on scientific misconduct, acknowledgement, authorship, sex trafficking, allocation core funds & Policies established, but compliance not known \\ \hline & Numbers and proportion of investigators certified for human research & Proportion has risen to 97\% from low levels in previous years \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3169480_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & & & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Fragment Contributions}} \\ \hline \textbf{Compound} & \textbf{Actual pIC50} & \textbf{Predicted pIC50} & \textbf{R1} & \textbf{R2} \\ \hline finger- 4 & 5.39 & 5.23 & 0.39 & 0.40 \\ \hline or 5b & 4.85 & 4.84 & 0.38 & 0.02 \\ \hline not 6a & 5.07 & 4.86 & 0.02 & 0.40 \\ \hline or 7a & 5.85 & 5.49 & 0.65 & 0.40 \\ \hline deals 7b & 5.25 & 5.11 & 0.65 & 0.02 \\ \hline 8a & 5.36 & 5.17 & 0.34 & 0.40 \\ \hline into 8b & 4.92 & 4.79 & 0.34 & 0.02 \\ \hline 9 & 6.24 & 6.27 & 1.44 & 0.40 \\ \hline 9b & 6.37 & 5.89 & 1.44 & 0.02 \\ \hline are 11 & 5.33 & 5.24 & 0.40 & 0.40 \\ \hline from 12 & 6.19 & 5.98 & 1.15 & 0.40 \\ \hline were 13 & 6.33 & 6.16 & 1.32 & 0.40 \\ \hline The 14 & 5.85 & 5.65 & 0.81 & 0.40 \\ \hline 16 & 5.32 & 5.10 & 0.26 & 0.40 \\ \hline 17 & 5.48 & 5.19 & 0.36 & 0.40 \\ \hline valid- 18 & 5.74 & 5.60 & 0.76 & 0.40 \\ \hline such 19 & 5.62 & 5.40 & 0.56 & 0.40 \\ \hline error. 20 & 5.38 & 5.19 & 0.36 & 0.40 \\ \hline chal- 21 & 4.89 & 4.72 & -0.12 & 0.40 \\ \hline 22 & 5.68 & 5.40 & 0.56 & 0.40 \\ \hline 25 & 6.17 & 5.97 & 1.14 & 0.40 \\ \hline 26 & 5.82 & 5.67 & 0.83 & 0.40 \\ \hline 27 & 5.51 & 5.50 & 0.66 & 0.40 \\ \hline 28(temp) & 6.66 & 6.64 & 1.80 & 0.40 \\ \hline abil- 30a & 6.48 & 6.44 & 1.60 & 0.40 \\ \hline q2 30b & 6.11 & 6.06 & 1.60 & 0.02 \\ \hline devel- 31 & 6.17 & 6.24 & 1.41 & 0.40 \\ \hline 0.975, 32 & 5.82 & 5.78 & 0.94 & 0.40 \\ \hline stan- 33a & 4.68 & 4.73 & -0.11 & 0.40 \\ \hline that 34 & 4.85 & 4.74 & -0.10 & 0.40 \\ \hline PLS 35 & 4.52 & 4.44 & -0.40 & 0.40 \\ \hline \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{of Test set} \\ \hline by 5a & 5.27 & 5.22 & 0.38 & 0.40 \\ \hline were 6b & 5.00 & 4.48 & 0.02 & 0.02 \\ \hline 10 & 6.07 & 6.24 & 1.40 & 0.40 \\ \hline The 15 & 6.20 & 6.16 & 1.32 & 0.40 \\ \hline and 23 & 5.85 & 5.74 & 0.90 & 0.40 \\ \hline 24 & 5.96 & 6.44 & 1.60 & 0.40 \\ \hline of 29 & 5.47 & 5.81 & 0.97 & 0.40 \\ \hline 33b & 4.72 & 4.35 & -0.11 & 0.02 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3038138_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Clinical scenario} & \textbf{Percent of PCP’s that agreed} \\ \hline half Initial consultation & 94 \% \\ \hline en- Change in management & 92 \% \\ \hline Operative note & 86 \% \\ \hline Every clinical encounter & 50 \% \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4696345_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Gene} & \textbf{Gene symbol} & \textbf{OMIM\#} & \textbf{Remarks} \\ \hline Glycine receptor, alpha 4 subunit & GLRA4 & - & Glycine receptors mediate neurotransmission in the spinal cord and brain stem. Human GLRA4 is considered as a pseudogene and has a stop codon before the predicted transmembrane domain (exon 9) [11, 36]. \\ \hline Mortality factor 4 like 2 & MORF4L2 & 300409 & May be implicated in cellular senescence like 2 [52]. The mouse homolog (MgrX) is not essential for growth and development [37] \\ \hline Transcription Elongation Factor A-Like 1 & TCEAL1 & 300237 & Nuclear phosphoprotein having 48 \% Elongation homology to transcription factor SII factor A-like-1 [53]. \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4979147_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Items} & \textbf{Controls (n = 440)} & \textbf{TAD patients (n = 315)} & \textbf{p Value} \\ \hline Age & 51.3 $\pm$ 14.4 & 51.3 $\pm$ 11.1 & NS \\ \hline Gender (male) n (\%) & 223 (50.7) & 241 (76.5) & $<$0.01 \\ \hline Smoking n (\%) & 191 (43.4) & 153 (48.6) & NS \\ \hline Alcohol n (\%) & 92 (20.9) & 75 (23.8) & NS \\ \hline Diabetes n (\%) & 65 (14.8) & 53 (16.8) & NS \\ \hline Hypertension n (\%) & 367 (83.4) & 258 (81.9) & NS \\ \hline Dyslipidaemia n (\%) & 258 (58.6) & 198 (62.9) & NS \\ \hline CAD n (\%) & 73 (16.6) & 68 (21.6) & NS \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4712614_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{Training gain} & \textbf{Test gain} & \textbf{AUC values} \\ \hline Species distribution model for Amphistegina spp. & 2.2215 & 2.1563 & 0.9513 \\ \hline \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{Model without variable:} \\ \hline Mean sea-surface temperature & 1.4824 & 1.3361 & 0.8897 \\ \hline Mean diffuse attenuation & 2.1529 & 2.1274 & 0.9509 \\ \hline Minimum chlorophyll a & 2.1804 & 2.148 & 0.9505 \\ \hline Maximum photosynthetically available radiation & 2.1852 & 2.1442 & 0.951 \\ \hline Sea-surface temperature range & 2.0586 & 2.038 & 0.9459 \\ \hline \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{Model with variable in isolation:} \\ \hline Mean sea-surface temperature & 0.5427 & 0.6459 & 0.8018 \\ \hline Mean diffuse attenuation & 0.6616 & 0.5953 & 0.7959 \\ \hline Minimum chlorophyll a & 0.6413 & 0.5856 & 0.7923 \\ \hline Maximum photosynthetically available radiation & 0.3108 & 0.2944 & 0.6908 \\ \hline Sea-surface temperature range & 0.2637 & 0.3123 & 0.7012 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3566174_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|} \hline Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer & 2886 independent reflections \\ \hline Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube & 1920 reflections with I $>$ 2$\sigma$(I) \\ \hline graphite & Rint = 0.042 \\ \hline Detector resolution: 8.3 pixels mm-1 & $\theta$max = 25.1°, $\theta$min = 2.3° \\ \hline $\omega$ scans & h = −5$\rightarrow$3 \\ \hline Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005) & k = −19$\rightarrow$19 \\ \hline Tmin = 0.962, Tmax = 0.970 & l = −25$\rightarrow$25 \\ \hline 12183 measured reflections \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3007868_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Soil samples} & \textbf{Sampling sites} & \textbf{Latitude \& Longitude} & \textbf{Land use} & \textbf{Soil type} & \textbf{Climate} \\ \hline 1–18 & Yujiang, Jiangxi province & 28°13′ N, 116°54′ E & Crops land & Quaternary red Clay (Ultisol) & Subtropical monsoon \\ \hline 19–37 & Yujiang, Jiangxi province & 28°13′ N, 116°54′ E & Anthropogenic forest & Quaternary red Clay (Ultisol) & Subtropical monsoon \\ \hline 38–45 & Wuhan, Hubei province & 30°29′ N, 114°22′ E & Crops land & Yellow-brown soil (Alfisol) & Subtropical monsoon \\ \hline 46–51 & Wuhan, Hubei province & 30°29′ N, 114°22′ E & Anthropogenic forest & Yellow-brown soil (Alfisol) & Subtropical monsoon \\ \hline 52–69 & Xianning, Hubei province & 29°5′ N, 114°15′ E & Crops land & Red soil (Ultisol) & Subtropical monsoon \\ \hline 70–71 & Zhijiang, Hubei province & 30°26′ N, 110°30′ E & Crops land & Yellow-brown soil (Alfisol) & Subtropical monsoon \\ \hline 72–82 & Fengqiu, Henan province & 35°00′ N, 114°24′ E & Crops land & Sandy loam (Aquic inceptisols) & Continental temperate monsoon \\ \hline 83–84 & Anyang, Henan province & 35°32′ N, 114°50′ E & Crops land & Sandy loam (Aquic inceptisols) & Continental temperate monsoon \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4864422_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{Sequences (n)} \\ \hline Raw sequencing reads & 1,409,706 \\ \hline Reads for assembly & 1,280,970 \\ \hline Reads assembled & 1,168,029 \\ \hline Contigs & 26,802 \\ \hline Singletons & 73,675 \\ \hline Total unique sequences & 100,477 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3412804_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{$\delta$} & \textbf{C1} & \textbf{C2} & \textbf{C3} & \textbf{C4} & \textbf{C5} & \textbf{C6} & \textbf{C7} & \textbf{C8} & \textbf{C9} & \textbf{C} & \textbf{V} & \textbf{V1} & \textbf{V2} & \textbf{V3} & \textbf{V4} & \textbf{V5} & \textbf{V6} & \textbf{V7} & \textbf{V8} \\ \hline C1 & 0 & 4.40 & 5.08 & 4.63 & 4.65 & 5.08 & 4.26 & 4.70 & 3.52 & 2.55 & 3.70 & 3.62 & 2.80 & 3.67 & 3.77 & 3.37 & 3.70 & 4.00 & 3.25 \\ \hline C2 & & 0 & 6.25 & 5.77 & 5.93 & 6.38 & 5.90 & 4.65 & 5.37 & 2.58 & 4.60 & 4.46 & 3.47 & 4.53 & 4.72 & 4.96 & 4.94 & 4.72 & 3.78 \\ \hline C3 & & & 0 & 6.00 & 6.62 & 5.69 & 5.77 & 5.35 & 5.35 & 2.85 & 4.86 & 4.78 & 4.07 & 4.51 & 4.71 & 4.87 & 5.18 & 4.76 & 4.73 \\ \hline C4 & & & & 0 & 6.36 & 5.71 & 5.22 & 5.06 & 5.09 & 2.65 & 4.95 & 4.70 & 3.48 & 4.85 & 5.14 & 5.04 & 4.13 & 5.26 & 4.28 \\ \hline C5 & & & & & 0 & 6.86 & 6.08 & 6.17 & 5.00 & 2.97 & 4.88 & 4.81 & 3.64 & 4.96 & 5.35 & 4.95 & 5.41 & 4.71 & 4.54 \\ \hline C6 & & & & & & 0 & 6.21 & 4.70 & 5.25 & 3.18 & 4.70 & 4.60 & 3.40 & 4.75 & 4.74 & 4.75 & 4.67 & 5.20 & 3.90 \\ \hline C7 & & & & & & & 0 & 4.92 & 4.85 & 2.37 & 4.71 & 5.15 & 3.93 & 5.16 & 4.99 & 4.93 & 4.63 & 4.47 & 4.88 \\ \hline C8 & & & & & & & & 0 & 4.34 & 2.66 & 4.68 & 3.77 & 3.20 & 4.25 & 4.11 & 4.80 & 4.04 & 4.50 & 3.36 \\ \hline C9 & & & & & & & & & 0 & 2.48 & 3.84 & 3.92 & 3.22 & 4.16 & 4.32 & 4.13 & 4.84 & 4.00 & 3.32 \\ \hline C & & & & & & & & & & 0 & 3.35 & 3.64 & 3.19 & 3.70 & 3.78 & 3.62 & 3.99 & 2.96 & 3.01 \\ \hline V & & & & & & & & & & & 0 & 2.25 & 2.07 & 1.91 & 2.11 & 2.09 & 2.21 & 1.87 & 2.36 \\ \hline V1 & & & & & & & & & & & & 0 & 2.41 & 3.79 & 3.26 & 3.07 & 3.59 & 3.64 & 3.57 \\ \hline V2 & & & & & & & & & & & & & 0 & 2.79 & 2.73 & 2.71 & 2.59 & 2.77 & 2.34 \\ \hline V3 & & & & & & & & & & & & & & 0 & 3.63 & 3.77 & 3.60 & 4.54 & 3.41 \\ \hline V4 & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & 0 & 3.57 & 3.66 & 4.09 & 4.03 \\ \hline V5 & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & 0 & 4.08 & 3.77 & 3.69 \\ \hline V6 & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & 0 & 4.25 & 3.52 \\ \hline V7 & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & 0 & 3.83 \\ \hline V8 & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC1847453_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Gene} & \textbf{Gene ID} & \textbf{Forward primer} & \textbf{Reverse primer} & \textbf{Source} \\ \hline Hprt (set a) & 15452 & TGACACTGGCAAAACAATGCA & GGTCCTTTTCACCAGCAAGCT & [12,6] \\ \hline Hprt (set b) & 15452 & AAGACTTGCTCGAGATGTCATGAA & ATCCAGCAGGTCAGCAAAGAA & [6] \\ \hline Gas6 & 14456 & TGCTGGCTTCCGAGTCTTC & CGGGGTCGTTCTCGAACAC & Primer Bank ID: 9506715a1 \\ \hline Rara & 19401 & TTCTTTCCCCCTATGCTGGGT & GGGAGGGCTGGGTACTATCTC & Primer Bank ID: 22800363a1 \\ \hline Sulf2 & 72043 & CTGCCACTATGGCTGCTGTC & GTTGGGCCGGATGTTCCTG & Primer Bank ID: 26330131a1 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4589800_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Predictors} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Unadjusted Model}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Adjusted Model}} \\ \hline & \textbf{HR} & \textbf{95\% CI} & \textbf{HR} & \textbf{95\% CI} \\ \hline Age & 1.00 & 0.99–1.01 & 1.00 & 0.98–1.00 \\ \hline Male sex & 0.77 & 0.49–1.27 & 1.25 & 0.65–2.47 \\ \hline Diabetes mellitus & 1.17 & 0.73–1.84 & 1.00 & 0.57–1.73 \\ \hline Smoker & 0.70 & 0.45–1.08 & 0.48 & 0.25–0.94 \\ \hline Drinking habit & 1.04 & 0.68–1.61 & 1.43 & 0.83–2.50 \\ \hline \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{Extent/Chest X-ray} \\ \hline 1 & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{reference} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{reference} \\ \hline 2 & 0.98 & 0.55–1.93 & 1.54 & 0.73–3.44 \\ \hline 3 & 0.61 & 0.27–1.37 & 1.07 & 0.42–2.74 \\ \hline Cavity/Chest X-ray & 0.86 & 0.54–1.37 & 1.11 & 0.65–1.95 \\ \hline Sputum smear grading$\geqq$3+ & 0.51 & 0.33–0.80 & 0.40 & 0.23–0.71 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4641703_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Statement} & \textbf{Unwilling} & \textbf{Willing} \\ \hline 1. go out with ‘Z’ in the weekend & 8.8 (8.0- 9.7) & 91.2 (90.3- 92.0) \\ \hline 2. do joint study with ‘Z’ & 12.2 (11.3-13.2) & 87.8 (86.8- 88.7) \\ \hline 3. invite ‘Z’ to your house & 10.7 (9.8- 11.6) & 89.3 (88.4- 90.2) \\ \hline 4. go to ‘Z’s house & 14.5 (13.5- 15.5) & 85.5 (84.5- 86.5) \\ \hline 5. develop a close friendship with ‘Z’ & 6.8 (6.0- 7.5) & 93.2 (92.5- 94.0) \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4472246_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Village} & \textbf{Paddy category} & \textbf{No. of Habitats} & \textbf{1stinstars} & \textbf{2nd instars} & \textbf{3rd instars} & \textbf{4th instars} & \textbf{Pupae} \\ \hline Kangichiri & Ploughed & 25 & 1.41 & 0.95 & 0.09 & 0.00 & 0.36 \\ \hline & Flooded & 23 & 1.67 & 1.10 & 0.30 & 0.00 & 0.36 \\ \hline & Post transplanting & 30 & 6.02 & 3.00 & 1.89 & 1.20 & 0.99 \\ \hline & Tillering & 28 & 8.00 & 6.67 & 2.00 & 3.22 & 0.67 \\ \hline & Flowering/ maturation & 27 & 0.01 & 0.00 & 0.02 & 0.01 & 0.00 \\ \hline & Fallow & 27 & 1.00 & 0.67 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.01 \\ \hline Kiuria & Ploughed & 22 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 \\ \hline & Flooded & 23 & 1.23 & 0.65 & 0.07 & 0.01 & 0.0 \\ \hline & Post transplanting & 21 & 5.58 & 1.63 & 0.17 & 0.51 & 0.19 \\ \hline & Tillering & 22 & 8.50 & 5.25 & 0.25 & 0.25 & 1.25 \\ \hline & Flowering/ maturation & 20 & 0.02 & 0.00 & 0.01 & 0.0 & 0.00 \\ \hline & Fallow & 14 & 0.03 & 0.01 & 0.0 & 0.01 & 0.00 \\ \hline Rurumi & Ploughed & 18 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 \\ \hline & Flooded & 21 & 1.56 & 1.28 & 0.09 & 0.06 & 0.19 \\ \hline & Post transplanting & 20 & 5.73 & 3.37 & 1.17 & 1.03 & 0.47 \\ \hline & Tillering & 20 & 4.91 & 4.67 & 1.19 & 1.11 & 1.00 \\ \hline & Flowering/ maturation & 15 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 \\ \hline & Fallow & 12 & 1.17 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC1636646_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{x} & \textbf{y} & \textbf{z} & \textbf{Uiso*/Ueq} \\ \hline As1 & 0.59797 (3) & 0.2500 & 0.56866 (7) & 0.0046 (2) \\ \hline Na1 & 0.5000 & 0.5000 & 0.0000 & 0.0088 (3) \\ \hline Ca1 & 0.28059 (6) & 0.2500 & 0.49344 (14) & 0.0053 (2) \\ \hline O1 & 0.4611 (2) & 0.2500 & 0.6849 (5) & 0.0075 (5) \\ \hline O2 & 0.6038 (2) & 0.2500 & 0.2482 (6) & 0.0068 (6) \\ \hline O3 & 0.66769 (14) & 0.0513 (3) & 0.7038 (3) & 0.0068 (4) \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3238576_table_3
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Gene} & \textbf{Forward primer (5' to 3')} & \textbf{Reverse primer (5' to 3')} \\ \hline ST3GAL5 & CCC TGA ACC AGT TCG ATG TT & CAT TGC TTG AAG CCA GTT GA \\ \hline NEU3 & CCT GAA GCC ACT GAT GGA A & TTC CTG CCT GAC ACA ATC TG \\ \hline IL-6 & TAC ATC CTC GAC GGC ATC TC & GCT ACA TTT GCC GAA GAG CC \\ \hline TLR4 & TGA GCA GTC GTG CTG GTA TC & CAG GGC TTT TCT GAG TCG T \\ \hline GAPDH & GCA AAT TCC ATG GCA CCG T & TCG CCC CAC TTG ATT TTG G \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC2907690_table_5
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Species} & \textbf{Family} & \textbf{Origin} & \textbf{Habit} \\ \hline Tabebuia heterophylla & Bignoniaceae & native & tree to 20 m height \\ \hline Chrysobalanus icaco & Chrysobalanaceae & native & shrub/tree \\ \hline Morisonia americana & Conneraceae & native & tree to 10 m height \\ \hline Lonchocarpus benthamianus & Fabaceae & native & shrub/tree to 4 m height \\ \hline Ocotea coriacea & Lauraceae & native & shrub/tree to 6 m height \\ \hline Eugenia ligustrina & Myrtaceae & native & shrub/tree to 7 m height \\ \hline Eugenia sp. & Myrtaceae & native & NA \\ \hline Myrcia citrifolia & Myrtaceae & native & shrub/tree \\ \hline Pimenta racemosa & Myrtaceae & introduced & tree to 13 m height \\ \hline Pisonia fragrans & Nyctaginaceae & native & tree to 14 m height \\ \hline Swietenia macrophylla & Meliaceae & introduced & tree to 30–50 m height \\ \hline Swietenia mahagoni & Meliaceae & introduced & tree to 30–50 m height \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3076449_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Eye} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Strabismics group}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Anisometropics group}} \\ \hline & \textbf{P50 latency (ms)} & \textbf{P50 amplitude (µv))} & \textbf{P50 latency (ms)} & \textbf{P50 amplitude (µv)} \\ \hline Amblyopic eye & 52.6$\pm$4.4 & 1.7$\pm$0.96 & 50.4$\pm$4.9 & 1.9$\pm$1.13 \\ \hline Non-amblyopic eye & 52.6$\pm$4.9 & 3.1$\pm$1.3 & 49.4$\pm$5.09 & 3.5$\pm$1.6 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3407582_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Organism} & \textbf{Read (Mb)} & \textbf{Fold coverage} & \textbf{No. of scaffolds} & \textbf{Genome size (bp)} & \textbf{G�C content (\%)} & \textbf{Accession no.} \\ \hline D. aestuarii NBRC 106260T & 291 & 104 & 3 & 2,790,392 & 69.1 & BBRD00000000 \\ \hline D. aurantiaca NBRC 106265T & 265 & 103 & 4 & 2,565,694 & 64.6 & BBRF00000000 \\ \hline D. flava NBRC 105854T & 215 & 84 & 3 & 2,546,965 & 64.7 & BBRA00000000 \\ \hline D. globuliformis NBRC 106266T & 262 & 100 & 7 & 2,622,354 & 66.3 & BBRG00000000 \\ \hline D. lutea NBRC 106155T & 264 & 100 & 40 & 2,643,741 & 65.9 & BBRC00000000 \\ \hline D. oxidasica NBRC 106264T & 224 & 85 & 5 & 2,623,557 & 64.1 & BBRE00000000 \\ \hline D. salsinemoris NBRC 105323T & 215 & 67 & 14 & 3,209,522 & 70.2 & BBQZ00000000 \\ \hline D. sediminicola NBRC 105855T & 226 & 92 & 8 & 2,460,989 & 62.7 & BBRB00000000 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4400432_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Reference} & \textbf{Country} & \textbf{Rural} & \textbf{Urban} & \textbf{Total} \\ \hline Brighton 1985 [20] & South Africa & 29.5 (25.64–33.30) \\ \hline Solomon 1976 [27] & South Africa & 29.7 (24.46–34.92) \\ \hline Meyers 1982 [23] & South Africa & 82.7 (76.10–89.26) & 55.1 (40.74–73.54) & 77.2 (70.70–83.62) \\ \hline Silman 1993 [37] & Nigeria & 0.4 (0.12–0.68) \\ \hline Kaddu-Mukasa 2011 [40] & Uganda & 0.3 (-0.32–0.98) \\ \hline Bija 2014 [42] & Tunisia & & 14.8 (13.31 to 16.27) \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4524637_table_4
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Variable} & \textbf{Variable category} & \textbf{n} & \textbf{Palermo (\%)} & \textbf{Naples (\%)} & \textbf{Rome (\%)} & \textbf{Milan (\%)} & \textbf{Turin (\%)} & \textbf{Mean (\%)} & \textbf{CV} & \textbf{pa} \\ \hline Gender & Male & 438 & 29.9 & 23.9 & 29.4 & 28.6 & 29.6 & 28.28 & 8.8 & �0.05 \\ \hline & Female & 1,102 & 70.1 & 76.1 & 70.6 & 71.4 & 70.4 & 71.72 & 3.5 \\ \hline Age (years) & 18�24 & 45 & 2.8 & 2.8 & 2.8 & 2.9 & 3.6 & 2.98 & 11.7 & �0.05 \\ \hline & 25�34 & 164 & 10.6 & 10.8 & 13.3 & 10.0 & 6.8 & 10.30 & 22.6 \\ \hline & 35�44 & 362 & 24.4 & 27.1 & 18.6 & 17.7 & 27.6 & 23.08 & 20.3 \\ \hline & 45�54 & 291 & 24.0 & 23.9 & 20.9 & 18.3 & 21.6 & 21.74 & 10.9 \\ \hline & 55�64 & 349 & 23.6 & 17.9 & 22.1 & 25.4 & 16.0 & 21.00 & 18.7 \\ \hline & ]65 & 329 & 14.6 & 17.5 & 22.3 & 25.7 & 24.4 & 20.90 & 22.5 \\ \hline Household composition & 1 (interviewee) & 134 & 3.9 & 4.0 & 8.7 & 12.3 & 13.2 & 8.42 & 52.4 & �0.05 \\ \hline & 2 & 432 & 21.3 & 20.3 & 30.8 & 36.0 & 26.8 & 27.04 & 24.3 \\ \hline & 3 & 379 & 20.5 & 21.9 & 24.6 & 27.4 & 27.6 & 24.40 & 13.1 \\ \hline & 4 & 447 & 36.2 & 36.3 & 30.6 & 18.3 & 26.8 & 29.64 & 25.3 \\ \hline & 5 & 121 & 14.2 & 13.9 & 4.4 & 5.4 & 4.8 & 8.54 & 59.1 \\ \hline & �5 & 27 & 3.9 & 3.6 & 0.9 & 0.6 & 0.8 & 1.96 & 83.7 \\ \hline Education level & Elementary & 176 & 11.0 & 15.5 & 10.4 & 9.7 & 12.0 & 11.72 & 19.4 & �0.05 \\ \hline & Junior high & 361 & 28.3 & 22.7 & 17.9 & 24.0 & 28.0 & 24.18 & 17.7 \\ \hline & Middle level & 658 & 40.6 & 43.4 & 48.3 & 39.4 & 39.2 & 42.18 & 9.0 \\ \hline & Bachelor & 325 & 19.3 & 17.9 & 22.0 & 24.9 & 19.2 & 20.66 & 13.6 \\ \hline & Post-bachelor & 20 & 0.8 & 0.4 & 1.4 & 2.0 & 1.6 & 1.24 & 51.5 \\ \hline Partner’s education level & Elementary & 102 & 5.1 & 8.4 & 5.7 & 6.9 & 7.6 & 6.74 & 20.0 & �0.05 \\ \hline & Junior high & 291 & 23.6 & 25.9 & 14.7 & 16.3 & 18.0 & 19.70 & 24.5 \\ \hline & Middle level & 491 & 34.6 & 31.5 & 34.9 & 29.7 & 27.2 & 31.58 & 10.4 \\ \hline & Bachelor & 279 & 15.7 & 15.1 & 18.6 & 18.9 & 21.6 & 17.98 & 14.7 \\ \hline & Post-bachelor & 11 & 0.8 & 1.2 & 0.7 & 0.3 & 0.8 & 0.76 & 42.2 \\ \hline & Without spouse & 366 & 20.1 & 17.9 & 25.3 & 28.0 & 24.8 & 23.22 & 17.7 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5088346_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{XIAP expression} & \textbf{Low (\%)} & \textbf{High (\%)} \\ \hline Pre-chemotherapy & 43(72) & 17(28) \\ \hline Post-chemotherapy & 31(52) & 29(48) \\ \hline P & 0.011 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3293890_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{main category} & \textbf{thematic areaS of data collection} & \textbf{Source of data} & \textbf{viSit and time of data collection} \\ \hline Maternal morbidity & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{1. Antepartum hemorrhage 1. Maternal self–report 2. Postpartum hemorrhage 2. Maternal self–report and birth attendant interview 3. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 3. Measurements of blood pres- sure and urine protein at all home visits, maternal self–re- port 4. Difficulty in labor 4. Maternal self–report and birth attendant interview 5. Infection 5. Maternal self–report 6. Obstetric fistula 6. Maternal self–report} & Antenatal home visits (24–28 weeks, 32–36 weeks, 37–40 weeks), postna- tal home visits (day 1–6 and day 42– 60 after birth), birth attendant inter- views 0–6 days after birth, health facility records \\ \hline \\ \hline \\ \hline \\ \hline \\ \hline \\ \hline Background characteristics & Socio–economic, baseline characteristics of the woman and her household, including an asset inventory & Maternal self–report & Baseline home visit at enrolment \\ \hline Medical history & Previous obstetric and gynecological history, birth defects, prematurity, stillbirths and IUGR among previous babies, previous medical and surgical history & Maternal self–reports and health facility records & Baseline home visit at enrolment \\ \hline Risk factors and exposures & Cigarette smoking, alcohol ingestion, smoke from biomass cooking fuels & Maternal self–reports & Baseline home visit at enrolment \\ \hline Anthropometry & Paternal and maternal weights and heights, ma- ternal mid–upper arm circumference & Health facility records & All antenatal and postnatal home visits \\ \hline Screening for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy & Measurement of blood pressure and testing urine for proteins & Direct measurement during home visits & All visits except delivery visits \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5019012_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Function} & \textbf{Gene} & \textbf{Fold change} \\ \hline cell cycle progression and proliferation & CCL20 & 5.2 $\pm$ 0.4 \\ \hline & cell division cycle 2 & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.1 \\ \hline & cyclin A2 & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.2 \\ \hline & cyclin B1 & 3.5 $\pm$ 0.6 \\ \hline & cyclin E & 5.2 $\pm$ 0.6 \\ \hline & Ki67 & 3.1 $\pm$ 0.3 \\ \hline & PCNA & 4.1 $\pm$ 0.6 \\ \hline angiogenesis & CXCL1 & 2.1 $\pm$ 0.4 \\ \hline & CXCL8 & 3.2 $\pm$ 0.6 \\ \hline & FGF2 & 4.6 $\pm$ 0.2 \\ \hline & HGF & 4.1 $\pm$ 0.5 \\ \hline & HIF-3$\alpha$ & 5.2 $\pm$ 0.3 \\ \hline & VEGF & 2.5 $\pm$ 0.2 \\ \hline inflammation & CCL2 & 5.2 $\pm$ 0.4 \\ \hline & IL-1R & 3.2 $\pm$ 0.3 \\ \hline & IL-6R & 2.1 $\pm$ 0.3 \\ \hline ECM remodeling & ADAM & 2.1 $\pm$ 0.1 \\ \hline & MMP-2 & 5.7 $\pm$ 0.3 \\ \hline & MMP-9 & 3.3 $\pm$ 0.6 \\ \hline & TIMP-1 & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.2 \\ \hline & PAI-1 & 3.2 $\pm$ 0.4 \\ \hline & u-PA & 6.4 $\pm$ 0.5 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4745719_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{Site-I} & \textbf{Site-II} \\ \hline Location & Magdalena River valley & Orinoco River basin \\ \hline Survey period & April-August 2014 & April-May 2014 \\ \hline Traps active & 47 & 52 \\ \hline Trap nights & 2251 & 2457 \\ \hline Minimum Convex Camera polygon (km2) & 154.8 & 151.3 \\ \hline N recorded & 10 & 6 \\ \hline MMDM (km) & 4.2 & 5.7 \\ \hline Effective sampled area (km2) & 396.2 & 537.2 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4856405_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Species} & \textbf{\# genes amplified1} & \textbf{\# disrupted genes} & \textbf{\% disrupted} \\ \hline A449 & 162 & 16 & 100 \\ \hline A449 cDNA & 16 & 16 & 100 \\ \hline A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida ATCC 33658T & 15 & 15 & 100 \\ \hline A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida ATCC 51413 (non-pigmented) & 16 & 16 & 100 \\ \hline A. salmonicida subsp. masoucida ATCC 27013T & 13 & 3 & 23 \\ \hline A. salmonicida subsp. achromogenes ATCC 33659T & 14 & 3 & 21 \\ \hline A. salmonicida subsp. smithia ATCC 49393T & 15 & 4 & 27 \\ \hline A. bestarium ATCC 51108T & 7 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline A. veronii bv. sobria ATCC 9071 & 4 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline A. sobria ATCC 43979T & 2 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline A. caviae ATCC 15468T & 2 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline A. hydrophila ATCC 7966T & 132 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC2556355_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Brand/Model} & \textbf{Optical Resolution} & \textbf{Dmax 1} & \textbf{Color Depth} & \textbf{Cost} \\ \hline \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{Creo/Kodak} \\ \hline Eversmart Supreme & 5600 dpi & 4.3 & 48-bit color & \$ 45,000 \\ \hline iQsmart3 & 3175 dpi & 4.0 & & \$ 20,000 \\ \hline \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{Epson Expression} \\ \hline 10000 XL & 2540 dpi & 3.8 & 48-bit color & \$ 2,500–\$ 3,000 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4553449_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Model} & \textbf{Estimate (s.e.)} & \textbf{t} & \textbf{P} & \textbf{$\lambda$} \\ \hline \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{FMR (n = 27 species)} \\ \hline Food load manipulation ability & −0.059 (0.016) & −3.71 & 0.001 & 0.01 \\ \hline Body mass & 0.013 (0.021) & 0.64 & 0.53 \\ \hline \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{WL (n = 24 species)} \\ \hline Food load manipulation ability & 0.148 (0.059) & 2.49 & 0.021 & 0.70 \\ \hline Body mass & 0.278 (0.053) & 5.25 & $<$ 0.001 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3698194_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{Median (95\% CI)}} \\ \hline & \textbf{WT KRAS (n = 86)} & \textbf{MT KRAS (n = 59)} & \textbf{Overall (n = 154)} \\ \hline \\ \hline \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{Time to first integument toxicity, days [min, max]} \\ \hline Any grade & 8.0 (7,0, 10.0) & 10.0 (7.0, 13.0) & 8.0 (7.0, 11.0) \\ \hline & [0, 155] & [0, 125] & [0, 155] \\ \hline Grade $\geq$3 & NE (300.0, NE) & NE (175.0, NE) & 408.0 (300.0, NE) \\ \hline & [6, 528] & [0, 389] & [0, 528] \\ \hline \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{Duration of integument toxicity, days [min, max]} \\ \hline Any grade & 452.0 (244.0, NE) & 321.0 (228.0, 371.0) & 334.0 (244.0, NE) \\ \hline & [14, 492] & [19, 445] & [14, 492] \\ \hline Grade $\geq$3 & 32.0 (17.0, 43.0) & 55.5 (25.0, 80.0) & 36.0 (25.0, 54.0) \\ \hline & [5, 322] & [5, 268] & [5, 322] \\ \hline \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{Time to resolution, days [min, max]} \\ \hline Any grade & 103.0 (55.0, NE) & 71.0 (52.0, 86.0) & 71.0 (59.0, 162.0) \\ \hline & [0, 309] & [5, 162] & [0, 309] \\ \hline Grade $\geq$3 & 103.0 (68.0, NE) & 86.0 (86.0, 162.0) & 86.0 (68.0, 162.0) \\ \hline & [0, 124] & [12, 162] & [0, 162] \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3520865_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Basic data, part I} & \textbf{Diabetes duration (year)} & \textbf{Height (cm)} & \textbf{Weight (kg)} & \textbf{HbA1c (\%)} \\ \hline Reported from professionals (mean/median) & 16.1/12 & 171.2/171 & 84.2/84 & 7.5/7.3 \\ \hline Self-reported (mean/median) & 16.9/14 & 171.3/171 & 82.8/82 & 7.5/7.2 \\ \hline Difference in mean & -0.78a & -0.09 & 1.42a & 0.0 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4678468_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Ethnic groups} & \textbf{H63D+/+ rs2032451} & \textbf{Number} & \textbf{H63D+/− rs2032451} & \textbf{Number} & \textbf{H63D−/− rs2032451} & \textbf{Number} \\ \hline \\ \hline Russians & T/T & 3 & G/T & 9 & G/G & 8 \\ \hline Tatars & T/T & 1 & G/T & 18 \\ \hline Mansis & & & G/T & 5 \\ \hline Nanaians & & & G/T & 5 & G/G & 6 \\ \hline Nivkhs & & & G/T & 3 & G/G & 5 \\ \hline Altaians & T/T & 1 & G/T & 4 \\ \hline Khakas & & & G/T & 9 \\ \hline Koryaks & & & G/T & 3 \\ \hline Kazakhs & & & G/T & 9 \\ \hline Shorians & & & G/T & 16 \\ \hline Chukchis & & & G/T & 2 \\ \hline Total & & 5 & & 83 & & 19 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4912798_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Parameters} & \textbf{Event (+)} & \textbf{Event (-)} & \textbf{P value} \\ \hline n & 13 & 115 \\ \hline Age (year) & 84.2$\pm$1.19 & 83.6$\pm$0.39 & 0.6202 \\ \hline Female (\%) & 11 (84.6) & 73 (63.5) & 0.2166 \\ \hline CAD (\%) & 7 (53.9) & 37 (32.2) & 0.1336 \\ \hline HT (\%) & 10 (76.9) & 83 (72.2) & 1.000 \\ \hline CKD (\%) & 9 (69.2) & 65 (56.5) & 0.5553 \\ \hline DM (\%) & 4 (30.8) & 31 (27.0) & 0.7502 \\ \hline BNP (pg/ml) & 462$\pm$119 & 358$\pm$40 & 0.4111 \\ \hline LVDd (mm) & 44.5$\pm$1.6 & 44.2$\pm$0.50 & 0.8403 \\ \hline LVDs (mm) & 29.8$\pm$1.9 & 27.8$\pm$0.63 & 0.3145 \\ \hline IVS (mm) & 10.3$\pm$0.60 & 11.1$\pm$0.19 & 0.1605 \\ \hline PW (mm) & 10.3$\pm$0.40 & 10.6$\pm$0.14 & 0.4965 \\ \hline LVEF (\%) & 56.7$\pm$3.5 & 63.1$\pm$1.2 & 0.0799 \\ \hline LVMI (g/m2) & 118$\pm$8.9 & 119$\pm$3.0 & 0.9402 \\ \hline E (cm/s) & 78.3$\pm$9.4 & 81.6$\pm$2.8 & 0.7373 \\ \hline A (cm/s) & 101.9$\pm$10.1 & 106.7$\pm$3.0 & 0.6495 \\ \hline E/A & 0.80$\pm$0.19 & 0.80$\pm$0.05 & 0.9901 \\ \hline Dct (ms) & 275$\pm$28 & 269$\pm$9 & 0.8246 \\ \hline Septal e’ (cm/s) & 3.78$\pm$0.39 & 3.86$\pm$0.12 & 0.8502 \\ \hline Lateral e’ (cm/s) & 6.07$\pm$0.51 & 5.40$\pm$0.17 & 0.2186 \\ \hline Averaged e’ (cm/s) & 5.22$\pm$1.78 & 4.65$\pm$1.29 & 0.1441 \\ \hline E/e’ & 16.2$\pm$2.6 & 17.8$\pm$0.75 & 0.5588 \\ \hline Peak AV velocity (m/s) & 4.57$\pm$0.21 & 4.53$\pm$0.07 & 0.8488 \\ \hline AV mean PG (mmHg) & 50.1$\pm$5.0 & 49.9$\pm$1.7 & 0.9765 \\ \hline AVA (cm2) & 0.57$\pm$0.05 & 0.66$\pm$0.02 & 0.1107 \\ \hline AR ($\geqq$3) (\%) & 0 (0) & 16(13.9) & 0.3687 \\ \hline MR ($\geqq$3) (\%) & 3 (23.1) & 8 (7.0) & 0.084 \\ \hline TR ($\geqq$3) (\%) & 2 (15.4) & 5 (4.4) & 0.1495 \\ \hline GLS (\%) & -11.6$\pm$1.2 & -15.1$\pm$0.4 & 0.0061 \\ \hline SR_E (/s) & 0.71$\pm$0.10 & 0.78$\pm$0.03 & 0.5043 \\ \hline E/SR_E (cm) & 142$\pm$22.5 & 122$\pm$6.6 & 0.3801 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC6181329_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Protein} & \textbf{Toxicity Modifiers} & \textbf{Description} & \textbf{Other Models} & \textbf{References} \\ \hline Tau & Pin1 (yeast homologue Ess1) & Depletion of Pin1 isomerase activity results in reduced growth of Tau expressing yeast cells. & mouse model & [93,196,197] \\ \hline A$\beta$ & peptidomimetic inhibitors & Inhibition of A$\beta$42 aggregation by peptidomimetics. & - & [169] \\ \hline A$\beta$ & latrepirdine (Dimebon$\text{TM}$) & Latrepirdine induces autophagy and decreases the intracellular GFP-A$\beta$42 levels in yeast. & Hela cells, mouse model & [170,174] \\ \hline A$\beta$ & clioquinol & Small molecule screen identified several 8-hydroxyquinolines, including clioquinol, that ameliorate A$\beta$ toxicity. & mouse model, nematode model & [175–179] \\ \hline A$\beta$ & dihydropyrimidine-thiones & Phenotypic small molecule yeast screen identified dihydropyrimidine-thiones that rescue A$\beta$-induced toxicity in a metal dependent manner. & nematode model & [176] \\ \hline A$\beta$ & PICALM (yeast homologues Yap1801, Yap1802) & Screening of overexpression library yielded suppressors and enhancers of A$\beta$42 toxicity, including the PICALM suppressor. & rat cortical neurons & [181–183] \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC6073265_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{2010}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{2030}} \\ \hline & \textbf{number of people with diabetes millions} & \textbf{Prevalence of diabetes \%} & \textbf{number of people with diabetes millions} & \textbf{Prevalence of diabetes \%} & \textbf{increase in number of people with diabetes} \\ \hline \textbf{region} & & & & & \textbf{\%} \\ \hline Europe & 55.2 & 6.9 & 66.2 & 8.1 & 20.0 \\ \hline North America and Caribbean & 37.4 & 10.2 & 53.2 & 12.1 & 42.4 \\ \hline Middle East and North Africa & 26.6 & 9.3 & 51.7 & 10.8 & 93.9 \\ \hline South and Central America & 18 & 6.6 & 29.6 & 7.8 & 65.1 \\ \hline Western Pacific (incl. China) & 76.7 & 4.7 & 112.8 & 5.7 & 47.0 \\ \hline Southeast Asia (incl. India) & 58.7 & 7.6 & 101 & 9.1 & 72.1 \\ \hline Sub-Saharan Africa & 12.1 & 3.8 & 23.9 & 4.7 & 98.1 \\ \hline total (average) & 284.6 & (6.4) & 438.4 & (7.7) & 54.0 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3218390_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{RSH Grade} & \textbf{Description} & \textbf{Management} \\ \hline and ACS Grade I—mild & Intramuscular, unilateral, and does not dissect along fascia adjacent to the rectus muscle & Observation \\ \hline is the ACS. Grade II—moderate & Intramuscular, dissects along adjacent fascia, may involve bilateral rectus muscles but without extension into the prevesical space & Anticoagulation reversal \\ \hline is Grade III—severe & Dissects along the fascia and extends into the peritoneum and the prevesical space. & Anticoagulation reversal Blood product administration \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3534252_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Clinical group} & \textbf{Controls (n = 27)} & \textbf{Not Infected (n = 118)} & \textbf{Infected (n = 74)} \\ \hline & & & & Culture positive (n = 41) & Culture Negative (n = 33) \\ \hline Duration of antibiotic therapy (days) & 0 (0,0) & 2 (1,3) & 5 (5,7) & 7 (5,7) & 5 (5,7) \\ \hline sICAM-1 (ng/ml), & 165 (130,290) & 168 (140,228) & 341 (236,554) P $<$ 0.001 & 405 (252,666) P $<$ 0.001 & 306 (230,484) P $<$ 0.001 \\ \hline hsCRP(mg/l), & 0.1 (0.1,0.4) & 0.1 (0.1,0.7) & 0.85 (0.3,15.9) P $<$ 0.001 & 2.0 (0.7,21.2) P $<$ 0.001 & 0.45 (0.1,2.2) P = 0.012 \\ \hline SAA(mg/l) & 0.9 (0.9,1.0) & 1.0 (0.9,2.0) & 1.5 (0.9,5.8) P = 0.004 & 2.0 (1.0-10.0) P = 0.001 & 1.0 (0.9,2.0) P $>$ 0.05 \\ \hline sE-selectin(ng/ml) & 71 (51,118) & 90 (59,124) & 135 (94,192) P $<$ 0.001 & 158 (94,207) P $<$ 0.001 & 109 (92,184) P = 0.009 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC2868836_table_3
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{The GREET checklist item} & \textbf{n} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{Agreement with consensus criterion ratings}} \\ \hline & & \textbf{Agreementa n (\%)} & \textbf{Partiala agreement n (\%)} & \textbf{Noa agreement n (\%)} \\ \hline \\ \hline 1. Title & 31 & 21 (68) & 8 (26) & 2 (6) \\ \hline 2. Theory & 31 & 18 (58) & 7 (23) & 6 (19) \\ \hline 3. Learning objectives & 31 & 18 (58) & 11 (35) & 2 (6) \\ \hline 4. Steps of EBP & 31 & 6 (19) & 18 (58) & 7 (23) \\ \hline 5. Materials & 31 & 8 (26) & 20 (65) & 3 (9) \\ \hline 6. Learning strategies & 31 & 22 (71) & 8 (26) & 1 (3) \\ \hline 7. Incentives & 31 & 24 (78) & 1 (3) & 6 (19) \\ \hline 8. Instructors & 31 & 25 (81) & 6 (19) & 0 (0) \\ \hline 9. Delivery & 31 & 16 (52) & 10 (32) & 5 (16) \\ \hline 10. Environment & 31 & 15 (49) & 9 (28) & 7 (23) \\ \hline 11. Schedule & 31 & 16 (52) & 14 (45) & 1 (3) \\ \hline 12. Face to face time & 31 & 18 (58) & 8 (26) & 5 (16) \\ \hline 13. Adaptations & 31 & 16 (52) & 9 (28) & 6 (20) \\ \hline 14. Modifications & 31 & 26 (84) & 1 (3) & 4 (13) \\ \hline 15. Attendance & 31 & 20 (64) & 7 (23) & 4 (13) \\ \hline 16. Planned delivery & 31 & 29 (94) & 0 (0) & 2 (6) \\ \hline 17. Actual schedule & 31 & 25 (81) & 4 (13) & 2 (6) \\ \hline Reliability: & \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{ICC (95 \% CI), p=} \\ \hline Criterion validity ICC (95 \% CI), p= & \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{0.73 (.51–.88), p $<$ .0001} \\ \hline Inter-rater reliability ICC (95 \% CI), p= & \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{0.96 (.93–.98), p $<$ .0001} \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5011880_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Condition} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{Single task}} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{Inhibition dual task}} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{Control to Inhibition}} \\ \hline \textbf{Trial type} & \textbf{Correct} & \textbf{Incorrect} & \textbf{"New"} & \textbf{Correct} & \textbf{Incorrect} & \textbf{"New"} & \textbf{Correct} & \textbf{Incorrect} & \textbf{"New"} \\ \hline Related Colour & 393 & 63 & 48 & 275 & 68 & 89 & 311 & 48 & 73 \\ \hline Opposite Colour & 336 & 108 & 60 & 206 & 111 & 115 & 265 & 89 & 78 \\ \hline Colour 1 / Neutral colour related & 173 & 53 & 26 & 129 & 43 & 44 & 127 & 47 & 42 \\ \hline Colour 2 / Neutral colour related & 188 & 36 & 28 & 121 & 39 & 56 & 134 & 38 & 44 \\ \hline & Expected & Unexpected & “New” & Expected & Unexpected & “New” & Expected & Unexpected & “New” \\ \hline New / Colour 1 or 2 related & 35 & 27 & 442 & 36 & 13 & 383 & 27 & 19 & 386 \\ \hline & “Colour 1” & “Colour 2” & “New” & “Colour 1” & “Colour 2” & “New” & “Colour 1” & “Colour 2” & “New” \\ \hline New / Neutral colour related & 13 & 8 & 231 & 6 & 13 & 197 & 8 & 6 & 202 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4591844_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline S1—C1 & 1.811 (2) & C3—C2 & 1.341 (3) \\ \hline S1—S1i & 2.0254 (12) & C3—C4 & 1.416 (4) \\ \hline O1—C5 & 1.361 (3) & C3—H3 & 0.9300 \\ \hline O1—C2 & 1.372 (3) & C4—C5 & 1.324 (4) \\ \hline O2—C1 & 1.202 (3) & C4—H4 & 0.9300 \\ \hline C1—C2 & 1.455 (3) & C5—H5 & 0.9300 \\ \hline C1—S1—S1i & 99.92 (8) & C3—C2—C1 & 132.3 (2) \\ \hline C5—O1—C2 & 106.0 (2) & O1—C2—C1 & 117.8 (2) \\ \hline O2—C1—C2 & 123.6 (2) & C5—C4—C3 & 106.9 (3) \\ \hline O2—C1—S1 & 123.74 (19) & C5—C4—H4 & 126.5 \\ \hline C2—C1—S1 & 112.64 (17) & C3—C4—H4 & 126.5 \\ \hline C2—C3—C4 & 106.5 (2) & C4—C5—O1 & 110.8 (3) \\ \hline C2—C3—H3 & 126.8 & C4—C5—H5 & 124.6 \\ \hline C4—C3—H3 & 126.8 & O1—C5—H5 & 124.6 \\ \hline C3—C2—O1 & 109.9 (2) \\ \hline S1i—S1—C1—O2 & 1.2 (2) & S1—C1—C2—C3 & 179.3 (2) \\ \hline S1i—S1—C1—C2 & −178.38 (15) & O2—C1—C2—O1 & 179.5 (2) \\ \hline C4—C3—C2—O1 & 0.0 (3) & S1—C1—C2—O1 & −1.0 (3) \\ \hline C4—C3—C2—C1 & 179.7 (2) & C2—C3—C4—C5 & 0.2 (3) \\ \hline C5—O1—C2—C3 & −0.2 (3) & C3—C4—C5—O1 & −0.4 (3) \\ \hline C5—O1—C2—C1 & 180.0 (2) & C2—O1—C5—C4 & 0.4 (3) \\ \hline O2—C1—C2—C3 & −0.3 (4) \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3247447_table_3
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{Tertile level} & \textbf{Relative Change in population access (\%)} \\ \hline Water & Lowest & -7.0 to 2.3 \\ \hline & Middle & 2.4 to 8.5 \\ \hline & Highest & 11.1 to 71.0 \\ \hline Sanitation & Lowest & -20.8 to 3.2 \\ \hline & Middle & 3.7 to 14.8 \\ \hline & Highest & 17.9 to 118.2 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC2921361_table_3
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Antimicrobial Agents} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{MSSA (n = 74) a}} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{MRSA (n = 200) a}} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{MSCNS (n = 19) a}} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{MRCNS (n = 33) a}} \\ \hline & \textbf{Range} & \textbf{MIC50} & \textbf{MIC90} & \textbf{Range} & \textbf{MIC50} & \textbf{MIC90} & \textbf{Range} & \textbf{MIC50} & \textbf{MIC90} & \textbf{Range} & \textbf{MIC50} & \textbf{MIC90} \\ \hline LCB01-0648 & 0.25–0.5 & 0.5 & 0.5 & 0.125–0.5 & 0.5 & 0.5 & 0.125–0.5 & 0.25 & 0.5 & 0.125–1 & 0.25 & 0.5 \\ \hline Linezolid & 2 & 2 & 2 & 1–2 & 2 & 2 & 1–2 & 1 & 2 & 1–2 & 1 & 2 \\ \hline Oxacillin & 0.06–4 & 0.25 & 0.5 & 8–64 & $>$64 & $>$64 & 0.03–1 & 0.125 & 1 & 2–64 & $>$64 & $>$64 \\ \hline Erythromycin & 0.125–64 & 0.25 & $>$64 & 0.25–64 & $>$64 & $>$64 & 0.06–64 & 0.25 & $>$64 & 0.06–64 & $>$64 & $>$64 \\ \hline Ciprofloxacin & 0.06–64 & 0.25 & 0.5 & 0.125–64 & 32 & $>$64 & 0.06–8 & 0.125 & 8 & 0.06–64 & 8 & 32 \\ \hline Sparfloxacin & 0.015–8 & 0.06 & 0.125 & 0.06–64 & 16 & $>$64 & 0.03–8 & 0.125 & 4 & 0.03–32 & 4 & 16 \\ \hline Moxifloxacin & 0.015–8 & 0.06 & 0.125 & 0.03–64 & 4 & 64 & 0.03–4 & 0.125 & 4 & 0.06–16 & 2 & 8 \\ \hline Gemifloxacin & 0.008–8 & 0.015 & 0.06 & 0.008–64 & 2 & 64 & 0.008–0.5 & 0.015 & 0.5 & 0.008–8 & 0.5 & 4 \\ \hline Vancomycin & 0.25–2 & 1 & 1 & 0.5–4 & 1 & 2 & 1–4 & 2 & 4 & 1–4 & 2 & 4 \\ \hline Quinupristin–dalfopristin & 0.125–0.5 & 0.25 & 0.5 & 0.125–1 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.125–1 & 0.25 & 1 & 0.125–8 & 0.25 & 2 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC6155267_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Rs10954213} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Allele}} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{Genotype}} \\ \hline \textbf{Group} & \textbf{A} & \textbf{G} & \textbf{AA} & \textbf{AG} & \textbf{GG} \\ \hline BPD & 129 & 153 & 33 & 63 & 45 \\ \hline C & 183 & 197 & 44 & 95 & 51 \\ \hline MDD & 8 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 0 \\ \hline SZ & 100 & 96 & 25 & 50 & 23 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC2760574_table_5
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Resins} & \textbf{pHa} & \textbf{Fluorescence preservation of neuronsb} & \textbf{Time for penetration of a whole mouse brain} \\ \hline HPMA & 7.12 & 210\% & .2 weeks \\ \hline GMA & 6.0 & 69.98\% & 3 days \\ \hline Unicryl & 5.12 & 51.54\% & 2 days \\ \hline LR White & 4.8 & 27.59\% & 2 days \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3618106_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{\#} & \textbf{Study location} & \textbf{Environment sample} & \textbf{Sample size} & \textbf{Lead level} & \textbf{References} \\ \hline 1 & Guilan & Blood plasma & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{90 ill children 11.643 mg/dl 90 healthy children 4.924 mg/dl} & [64] \\ \hline \\ \hline 2 & Birjand & Teeth & 108 children aging 5-12 years (deciduous teeth) & 1.9671.62 mg/dl & [65] \\ \hline 3 & Tehran & Blood & 100 children with hyperactivity and attention deficit & 7.272.365 mg/dl 7.18673.186 mg/dl & [66] \\ \hline \\ \hline & & & 100 healthy children \\ \hline 4 & Mashhad & Blood & 32 children aging 3-7 years old & 16.38175.719 mg/dl & [67] \\ \hline 5 & Zanjan & Blood & 45 children aging 7-11 living around Anguran lead mine & 36.7724.67 mg/dl 15.57713.35 mg/dl & [68] \\ \hline \\ \hline & & & 36 children aging 7-11 (control) \\ \hline 6 & Mashhad & Blood & 206 children aging 1-7 years & 12.19573.359 mg/dl & [69] \\ \hline 7 & Semnan & Blood & 320 primary students aging 6-11 in Semnan’s schools & 21\% below 10 mg/dl 74\% between 10 and 20 mg/dl 5\% over 20 mg/dl & [70] \\ \hline \\ \hline \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC6139886_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline D—H···A & D—H & H···A & D···A & D—H···A \\ \hline O3—H3···O2iv & 0.81 & 1.88 & 2.648 (2) & 157 \\ \hline O5—H5···O6v & 0.78 & 1.88 & 2.651 (2) & 170 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC2959783_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Brain region} & \textbf{N voxels} & \textbf{p corr} & \textbf{z-value} & \textbf{x} & \textbf{y} & \textbf{z} \\ \hline R STS middle & 259 & 0.000 & Inf & 60 & -30 & 0 \\ \hline R STS anterior & 49 & 0.004 & 5.24 & 54 & 12 & -21 \\ \hline L STS & 113 & 0.000 & 6.07 & -57 & -30 & -3 \\ \hline L STS & 65 & 0.000 & 5.98 & -57 & -3 & -12 \\ \hline R amygdale & 55 & 0.002 & 5.38 & 21 & -6 & -15 \\ \hline L amygdale & 31 & 0.000 & 5.84 & -21 & -6 & -15 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3247873_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Treatment Comparison} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Mixed Treatment Comparison}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Adjusted Indirect Comparison}} \\ \hline & \textbf{Odds Ratio} & \textbf{95\% Credible Interval} & \textbf{Odds Ratio} & \textbf{95\% Confidence Interval} \\ \hline Fluconazole vs. Control & 0.81 & (0.48, 1.37) & 0.94 & (0.54, 1.63) \\ \hline Itraconazole vs. Control & 0.90 & (0.41, 1.99) & 0.49 & (0.15, 1.56) \\ \hline Liposomal Amphotericin B vs. Control & 0.50 & (0.09, 2.33) & 0.54 & (0.10, 2.52) \\ \hline Ketoconazole vs. Control & 1.83 & (0.38, 8.93) & 1.66 & (0.41, 6.66) \\ \hline Intraconazole vs. Fluconazole & 1.12 & (0.52, 2.41) & 1.69 & (0.58, 5.33) \\ \hline Liposomal Amphotericin B vs. Fluconazole & 0.62 & (0.10, 3.17) & 0.57 & (0.09, 3.39) \\ \hline Ketoconazole vs. Fluconazole & 2.27 & (0.43, 12.09) & 1.76 & (0.39, 7.94)*** \\ \hline Liposomal Amphotericin B vs. Itraconazole & 0.55 & (0.09, 3.11) & 1.10 & (0.14, 8.65)**, *** \\ \hline Ketoconazole vs. Itraconazole & 2.03 & (0.35, 11.87) & 3.38 & (0.54, 21.16)*** \\ \hline Ketoconazole vs. Liposomal Amphotericine B & 3.68 & (0.41, 35.30) & 3.07 & (0.34, 27.48)*** \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC2760541_table_4
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Groups} & \textbf{Adult worms Mean$\pm$SD (\% reduction)} & \textbf{Liver eggs Mean$\pm$SD (\% reduction)} & \textbf{Liver eggs/Female adult worm (\% reduction)} \\ \hline \\ \hline \\ \hline \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{Trial 1} \\ \hline \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{Control} \\ \hline (PBS+CFA/IFA) & 8.863.8 & 28342615972 & 944765324 \\ \hline \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{n = 10} \\ \hline SjGALE & 5.662.9 & 13324612379 & 318864536 \\ \hline n = 10 & (35.7\%* ) & (53\%**) & (66.2\%**) \\ \hline \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{Trial 2} \\ \hline \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{Control} \\ \hline (PBS+CFA/IFA) & 18.765.6 & 991166576 & 226561893 \\ \hline \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{n = 10} \\ \hline SjGALE & 12.565.5 & 531262565 & 9166368 \\ \hline n = 8 & (33.0\%*) & (46.4\%**) & (59.5\%**) \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3407071_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|} \hline (C5H6N)3[MoCl4O2]Cl & Dx = 1.642 Mg m−3 \\ \hline Mr = 545.51 & Mo K$\alpha$ radiation, $\lambda$ = 0.71073 Å \\ \hline Trigonal, P3121 & Cell parameters from 6207 reflections \\ \hline Hall symbol: P 31 2" & $\theta$ = 5.5–33.1° \\ \hline a = 11.3972 (2) Å & µ = 1.21 mm−1 \\ \hline c = 29.4265 (9) Å & T = 150 K \\ \hline V = 3310.28 (13) Å3 & Block, yellow \\ \hline Z = 6 & 0.18 $\times$ 0.12 $\times$ 0.10 mm \\ \hline F(000) = 1632 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3006702_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Baseline}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Follow-up}} & \textbf{Weightchange (kg)} \\ \hline & \textbf{Ab} & \textbf{Comorbidities} & \textbf{Ab} & \textbf{Comorbidities} \\ \hline 1 & EMA, tTG & iron-deficiency anemia & - & none & 0 \\ \hline 2 & EMA, tTG & iron-deficiency anemia & - & none & +7 \\ \hline 3 & EMA, tTG & thyroiditis & - & thyroiditis & +4 \\ \hline 4 & EMA, tTG & asthma & - & none & -3 \\ \hline 5 & EMA, tTG & thyroiditis & - & thyroiditis & 0 \\ \hline 6 & EMA, tTG & thyroiditis, iron-deficiency anemia & EMA, tTG & thyroiditis, iron-deficiency anemia & +1 \\ \hline 7 & EMA, tTG & vitiligo & EMA, tTG & vitiligo & +4 \\ \hline 8 & EMA, tTG & iron-deficiency anemia, thyroiditis, infertility & EMA, tTG & iron-deficiency anemia, thyroiditis, osteopenia & 0 \\ \hline 9 & - & osteopenia & - & iron-deficiency anemia, osteopenia & 0 \\ \hline 10 & EMA, tTG & none & EMA, tTG & none & +8 \\ \hline 11 & EMA, tTG & none & EMA, tTG & none & +3 \\ \hline 12 & EMA, tTG & none & EMA, tTG & none & +1 \\ \hline 13 & EMA, tTG & thyroiditis, iron-deficiency anemia & EMA, tTG & thyroiditis, iron-deficiency anemia & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4460029_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Experiment} & \textbf{1} & \textbf{2} & \textbf{3} & \textbf{4} & \textbf{5} \\ \hline Level & 6\%, 6\% & 10\%, 10\% & 10\%, 20\% & NPL, 15\% & NPL, NPL \\ \hline Country & Japan NIKKEI 225 & CSI 300 & & & British FISE 100 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4646506_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \multicolumn{7}{|l|}{\textbf{0.49 Two-stage methods GBLUP}} \\ \hline \textbf{0.50} \\ \hline \textbf{0.51} & \textbf{TMT} & \textbf{AT} & \textbf{TP} & \textbf{DT} & \textbf{MMF} & \textbf{AVGF} \\ \hline 0.37 Slope & 0.88 & 0.879 & 0.850 & 0.850 & 0.865 & 0.812 \\ \hline 0.50 Correlation & 0.780 & 0.861 & 0.800 & 0.720 & 0.770 & 0.702 \\ \hline \multicolumn{7}{|l|}{0.50 Bayesian LASSO} \\ \hline Slope & 0.870 & 0.922 & 0.800 & 0.810 & 0.860 & 0.862 \\ \hline dEBV: Correlation & 0.780 & 0.814 & 0.830 & 0.770 & 0.730 & 0.717 \\ \hline \multicolumn{7}{|l|}{BayesA} \\ \hline Slope & 0.870 & 0.892 & 0.840 & 0.824 & 0.881 & 0.901 \\ \hline from Correlation & 0.770 & 0.863 & 0.780 & 0.740 & 0.780 & 0.703 \\ \hline \multicolumn{7}{|l|}{Single-step method} \\ \hline \multicolumn{7}{|l|}{HBLUP} \\ \hline Slope & 0.842 & 0.869 & 0.757 & 0.873 & 0.775 & 0.814 \\ \hline Correlation & 0.907 & 0.929 & 0.867 & 0.925 & 0.880 & 0.897 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3507773_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Region} & \textbf{Explanatory variable} & \textbf{df} & \textbf{t} & \textbf{p-value} & \textbf{Explained variance (\%)} \\ \hline Denmark & Fungicide & 1 & 1.2 & 0.263 & 2.9 \\ \hline & Cycle & 2 & 13.7 & 0.001 & 41.3 \\ \hline & Fungicide $\times$ Cycle & 2 & 3.6 & 0.002 & 9.3 \\ \hline Germany & Fungicide & 1 & 1.2 & 0.299 & 6.3 \\ \hline & Cycle & 1 & 3.6 & 0.001 & 16.5 \\ \hline & Fungicide $\times$ Cycle & 1 & 1.1 & 0.365 & 5.1 \\ \hline Sweden & Fungicide & 1 & 9.1 & 0.001 & 21.6 \\ \hline & Cycle & 2 & 1.4 & 0.224 & 8.0 \\ \hline & Fungicide $\times$ Cycle & 2 & 0.4 & 0.917 & 1.5 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC6242862_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|} \hline \textbf{aortic valve peak gradient} & \textbf{mitral valve peak velocity} \\ \hline Ao max pg & MV peak velocity \\ \hline AV peak gradient & mitral valve peak velocity \\ \hline aortic valve peak gradient & MV peak recorded velocity \\ \hline AV peak pressure gradient & mitral peak recorded velocity \\ \hline aortic valve peak pressure gradient & peak velocity across MV \\ \hline peak pressure gradient across aortic valve & peak velocity across mitral valve \\ \hline peak pressure gradient across aortic bioprosthetic valve & peak velocity across mitral bioprosthetic valve \\ \hline peak pressure gradient across aortic bioprosthesis & peak velocity across bioprosthetic mitral valve \\ \hline Ao peak pressure forward flow gradient & peak velocity across mitral bioprosthesis \\ \hline aortic valve peak pressure forward flow gradient & across mitral bioprosthetic valve peak velocity \\ \hline peak transaortic valve gradient & across bioprosthetic mitral valve peak velocity \\ \hline peak trans aortic valve pressure gradient & across mitral bioprosthesis peak velocity \\ \hline peak Ao valve gradient & peak transmitral velocity \\ \hline peak aortic valve gradient & peak mitral valve velocity \\ \hline peak Ao pressure difference & peak mitral velocity \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4849652_table_3
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{Genes} & \textbf{Transcripts} \\ \hline Total & 15,392 & 18,966 \\ \hline matcha & 14,898 & 18,472 \\ \hline new & 494 & 494 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5940132_table_3
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Occupation} & \textbf{Prestige score} & \textbf{Occupation} & \textbf{Prestige score} \\ \hline Doctor & 85.6 & Officer (armed forces) & 65.5 \\ \hline Assemblyman & 84.7 & Police officer & 63.9 \\ \hline Professor & 84.2 & Employee of a large company & 61.9 \\ \hline Owner of a large company & 83.1 & Nurse & 61.3 \\ \hline Lawyer & 82.7 & Computer programmer & 58.5 \\ \hline Local governor, & 76.3 & Technician & 54.7 \\ \hline Clergy & 75.9 & Skilled worker & 49.7 \\ \hline Pharmacist & 74.5 & Small shop owner & 48.4 \\ \hline School teacher & 71.9 & Salesman & 43.2 \\ \hline Producer & 71.2 & Driver & 41.0 \\ \hline Entertainer & 71.1 & Farmer & 40.0 \\ \hline Journalist & 70.2 & Construction worker & 31.7 \\ \hline Small-business owner & 70.1 \\ \hline Variables & Mean (S.D.) & Factor loading & Cronbach’s alpha \\ \hline Network diversity & 10.05 (5.90) & 0.767 & 0.81 \\ \hline Upper reachability & 81.85 (6.75) & 0.927 \\ \hline Range of prestige score & 40.94 (11.81) & 0.780 \\ \hline Eigenvalue & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{2.05} \\ \hline Explained variance (\%) & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{0.98} \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3276420_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{GAS Strain} & \textbf{M-Type} & \textbf{Actual Value†} & \textbf{Hydrophobicity Index‡} \\ \hline MGAS6183 WT & M41 & 92.6 $\pm$ .86 & 100 \\ \hline MGAS6183 $\Delta$scl1 & M41 & 85.2 $\pm$ 2.2 & **92 \\ \hline MGAS6183 $\Delta$scl1-C & M41 & 98.0 $\pm$ .31 & 105 \\ \hline MGAS5005 WT & M1 & 80.3 $\pm$ .89 & 100 \\ \hline MGAS5005 $\Delta$scl1 & M1 & 63.3 $\pm$ 3.2 & **79 \\ \hline MGAS6143 WT & M28 & 94.3 $\pm$ .73 & 100 \\ \hline MGAS6143 $\Delta$scl1 & M28 & 72.6 $\pm$ .62 & **78 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3268755_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Group} & \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{\textbf{\% of parasitaemia1 Concentration of IgG (mg/ml)2}} & \multicolumn{4}{|l|}{\textbf{\% of invasion inhibition4 Concentration of IgG (mg/ml)}} \\ \hline \\ \hline & \textbf{0.5} & \textbf{0.25} & \textbf{0.125} & \textbf{0.0625} & \textbf{0.5} & \textbf{0.25} & \textbf{0.125} & \textbf{0.0625} \\ \hline Adjuvant control & 5.66 (60.12)3 & 5.76 (61.25) & 6.13 (60.32) & 5.34 (60.58) & - & - & - \\ \hline PfAARP immune & 1.73 (60.31) & 2.63 (60.58) & 3 (60.7) & 3.24 (6013) & 69.41 & 54.34 & 51.10 & 39.4 \\ \hline MSP-142 immune & 2.07 (60.12) & 1.93 (60.12) & 2.86 (60.31) & 3.4 (60.01) & 63.50 & 66.50 & 53.30 & 36.3 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC2253826_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Number} & \textbf{AIC} & \textbf{BIC} & \textbf{SABIC} & \textbf{Adj. LMR-LRT (p-Value)} & \textbf{Entropy} & \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{\textbf{Class Size}} \\ \hline \textbf{of Classes} & & & & & & \textbf{1} & \textbf{2} & \textbf{3} & \textbf{4} & \textbf{5} \\ \hline 1 & 1960.95 & 1996.25 & 1958.28 & & & 140 \\ \hline 2 & 1356.58 & 1430.12 & 1351.03 & 620.704 (0.00) & 0.98 & 103 & 37 \\ \hline 3 & 1335.11 & 1431.58 & 1311.35 & 61.82 (0.01) & 0.97 & 101 & 21 & 18 \\ \hline 4 & 1319.79 & 1455.72 & 1326.00 & 19.34 (0.09) & 0.97 & 100 & 17 & 12 & 11 \\ \hline 5 & 1315.30 & 1474.15 & 1303.30 & 16.97 (0.17) & 0.89 & 52 & 48 & 17 & 12 & 11 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC6068939_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{Healthy control serum (n = 20)} & \textbf{PM/DM patient serum (n = 29)} \\ \hline Number of PM/DM & & 7/22 \\ \hline Number of males/females & 9/11 & 9/20 \\ \hline Age (years) & 38.6 $\pm$ 2.1 & 55.3 $\pm$ 2.5 \\ \hline Duration of the disease (months) & & 21.6 $\pm$ 8.2 \\ \hline Number of cases of new onset/flare & & 23/6 \\ \hline Number of antinuclear antibody-positive & & 9 (n = 22) \\ \hline Number of anti-Jo-1 antibody-positive & & 8 (n = 22) \\ \hline Serum creatinine kinase (IU/l)a & & 4,063.8 $\pm$ 1,466.9 \\ \hline Manual muscle testing score & & 39.0 $\pm$ 1.4 (n = 18) \\ \hline Number of patients with ILD & & 19 \\ \hline AaDO2 with ILD & & 31.5 $\pm$ 7.9 (n = 19) \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{Treatment at time of blood sampling} \\ \hline Untreated & & 19 \\ \hline Prednisolone alone & & 4 \\ \hline Prednisolone and cyclosporine & & 5 \\ \hline Prednisolone and methotrexate & & 1 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3446414_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Subject} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{Hypervariable region}} & \textbf{Haplogroup (mitotool)} \\ \hline & \textbf{HVI (15991–16390)} & \textbf{HVII (034–369)} & \textbf{HVIII (423– 548)} \\ \hline \#321 (GJGD-1) & 16129A, 16182C, 16183C, 16189C, 16232A, 16249C, 16304C, 16311C, 16344T & 73G, 152C, 249del, 263G, 315.1C & 514del, 515del & F1b1a \\ \hline Researcher 1 & 16183C, 16189C, 16220C, 16254G, 16298C, 16362C & 73G, 249del, 263G, 315.1C & & F3b \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4889107_table_4
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Substance} & \textbf{Sham} & \textbf{Saline} & \textbf{LPS} & \textbf{Kruskal-Wallis H(2, N = 33)} \\ \hline \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{Alkanes} \\ \hline Octadecane & 0,17 $\pm$ 0,11 & 0,18 $\pm$ 0,05 & 0,19 $\pm$ 0,11 & NS \\ \hline Nonadecane & 0,29 $\pm$ 0,14 & 0,35 $\pm$ 0,21 & 0,15 $\pm$ 0,04 & NS \\ \hline Eicosane & 0,09 $\pm$ 0,04 & 0,09 $\pm$ 0,03 & 0,06 $\pm$ 0,04 & NS \\ \hline Heneicosane & 1,24 $\pm$ 0,40 & 1,73 $\pm$ 0,65 & 0,84 $\pm$ 0,20 & NS \\ \hline Docosane & 0,14 $\pm$ 0,02 & 0,16 $\pm$ 0,04 & 0,11 $\pm$ 0,02 & NS \\ \hline Tricosane & 4,42 $\pm$ 0,73 & 4,70 $\pm$ 0,89 & 3,92 $\pm$ 0,39 & NS \\ \hline Tetracosane & tr & tr & tr & NS \\ \hline Pentacosane & 2,88 $\pm$ 0,66 & 2,76 $\pm$ 0,16 & 2,99 $\pm$ 0,17 & NS \\ \hline Hexacosane & 0,38 $\pm$ 0,13 & 0,38 $\pm$ 0,07 & 0,34 $\pm$ 0,04 & NS \\ \hline Heptacosane & 10,21 $\pm$ 3,91 & 9,76 $\pm$ 1,76 & 9,88 $\pm$ 1,45 & NS \\ \hline Octacosane & 0,67 $\pm$ 0,06 & 0,62 $\pm$ 0,04 & 0,59 $\pm$ 0,06 & NS \\ \hline Nonacosane & 14,15 $\pm$ 0,83 & 12,56 $\pm$ 1,52 & 12,33 $\pm$ 1,12 & NS \\ \hline Tritriacontane & 0,72 $\pm$ 0,15 & 0,76 $\pm$ 0,06 & 0,77 $\pm$ 0,06 & NS \\ \hline Hentriacontane & 17,24 $\pm$ 3,59 & 17,49 $\pm$ 1,99 & 18,70 $\pm$ 1,12 & NS \\ \hline Dotriacontane & 0,23 $\pm$ 0,06 & 0,30 $\pm$ 0,08 & 0,30 $\pm$ 0,07 & p = 0.05 \\ \hline Tritriacontane & 3,03 $\pm$ 0,93 & 4,60 $\pm$ 1,51 & 4,51 $\pm$ 1,00 & p = 0.024 \\ \hline \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{Alkenes} \\ \hline Nonadecene & tr & tr & tr & NS \\ \hline Tricosene & 0,30 $\pm$ 0,08 & 0,31 $\pm$ 0,06 & 0,29 $\pm$ 0,03 & NS \\ \hline Pentacosene & 0,37 $\pm$ 0,06 & 0,35 $\pm$ 0,05 & 0,32 $\pm$ 0,03 & p = 0.049 \\ \hline Heptacosene & 0,39 $\pm$ 0,11 & 0,36 $\pm$ 0,13 & 0,26 $\pm$ 0,04 & p = 0.001 \\ \hline Nonacosene & 1,17 $\pm$ 0,09 & 0,96 $\pm$ 0,10 & 0,98 $\pm$ 0,08 & p = 0.014 \\ \hline Hentriacontene Isomere1 & 4,42 $\pm$ 0,47 & 4,23 $\pm$ 0,21 & 4,37 $\pm$ 0,52 & NS \\ \hline Hentriacontene Isomere 2 & 6,17 $\pm$ 0,52 & 6,06 $\pm$ 0,24 & 6,28 $\pm$ 0,61 & NS \\ \hline Dotriacontene & 0,89 $\pm$ 0,12 & 0,98 $\pm$ 0,04 & 1,02 $\pm$ 0,08 & p = 0.026 \\ \hline Tritriacontene & 16,77 $\pm$ 3,02 & 19,24 $\pm$ 0,49 & 20,30 $\pm$ 1,71 & p = 0.01 \\ \hline \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{Alkynes} \\ \hline Pentacosyne & tr & tr & tr & NS \\ \hline Tritriacontyne & 2,08 $\pm$ 0,46 & 2,43 $\pm$ 0,83 & 2,44 $\pm$ 0,31 & NS \\ \hline \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{Methylalkanes} \\ \hline 11,13,15-Methylpentacosane & 0,30 $\pm$ 0,07 & 0,29 $\pm$ 0,07 & 0,38 $\pm$ 0,04 & NS \\ \hline 11,13-Methylheptacosane & 2,39 $\pm$ 0,31 & 2,60 $\pm$ 0,58 & 2,50 $\pm$ 0,21 & NS \\ \hline 11,13,15-Methylnonacosane & 2,15 $\pm$ 0,19 & 2,34 $\pm$ 0,56 & 2,27 $\pm$ 0,24 & NS \\ \hline 11,13,15-Methylhentriacontane & 1,31 $\pm$ 0,12 & 1,43 $\pm$ 0,35 & 1,42 $\pm$ 0,15 & NS \\ \hline 11,13,15,17-Methyltritriacontane & 0,56 $\pm$ 0,07 & 0,68 $\pm$ 0,17 & 0,69 $\pm$ 0,08 & NS \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC2596086_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \multicolumn{6}{|l|}{\textbf{18–24 Years}} & \multicolumn{6}{|l|}{\textbf{25–30 Years}} & \multicolumn{6}{|l|}{\textbf{18–30 Years}} \\ \hline & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Total Fiber (g)}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Insoluble Fiber (g)}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Soluble Fiber (g)}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Total Fiber (g)}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Insoluble Fiber (g)}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Soluble Fiber (g)}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Total Fiber (g)}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Insoluble Fiber (g)}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Soluble Fiber (g)}} \\ \hline & \textbf{Males} & \textbf{Females} & \textbf{Males} & \textbf{Females} & \textbf{Males} & \textbf{Females} & \textbf{Males} & \textbf{Females} & \textbf{Males} & \textbf{Females} & \textbf{Males} & \textbf{Females} & \textbf{Males} & \textbf{Females} & \textbf{Males} & \textbf{Females} & \textbf{Males} & \textbf{Females} \\ \hline Median [IQR] & 5.3 [0.0–32.1] & 6.0 [0.0–32.7] & 0.0 [0.0–6.7] & 0.0 [0.0–10.9] & 0.0 [0.0–7.3] & 0.0 [0.0–32.7] & 3.6 [0.0–43.9] & 4.5 [0.0–48.9] & 0.0 [0.0–12.0] & 0.0 [0.0–18.0] & 0.0 [0.0–4.8] & 0.0 [0.0–14.9] & 4.3 [0.0–43.9] & 5.1 [0.0–48.9] & 0.0 [0.0–12.0] & 0.0 [0.0–18.0] & 0.0 [0.0–7.3] & 0.0 [0.0–14.9] \\ \hline Total & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{5.3 [0.0–32.7]} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{0.0 [0.0–10.9]} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{0.0 [0.0–12.9]} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{4.0 [0.0–48.9]} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{0.0 [0.0–18.0]} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{0.0 [0.0–14.9]} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{4.6 [0.0–48.9]} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{0.0 [0.0–18. 0]} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{0.0 [0.0–15.0]} \\ \hline SD Total & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{7.1 6.0 6.7} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{1.3 1.8 1.6} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{1.0 1.6 1.4} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{6.9 8.0 7.5} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{1.5 2.1 0.8} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{0.9 1.6 1.3} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{7.1 7.4 7.2} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{1.4 2.0 1.7} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{1.0 1.6 1.3} \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5946289_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Peak No.} & \textbf{RT} & \textbf{Suggested formula} & \textbf{Mass} & \textbf{m/z} & \textbf{Identified component} \\ \hline 5 & 31.14 & C30 H48 O3 & 456.36 & 455.35 & Urosolic acid \\ \hline 8 & 16.35 & C11 H16 O3 & 196.11 & 197.12 & Ferulic acid \\ \hline 9 & 17.46 & C22H18O11 & 452.34 & 453.34 & Epigallocatechin gallate \\ \hline 11 & 19.49 & C13 H20 O2 & 678.50 & 340.26 & Icariin \\ \hline 13 & 21.27 & C11 H16 O2 & 181.13 & 181.12 & Caffeic acid \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4658747_table_3
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{BMP} & \textbf{BOP} & \textbf{BEP} & \textbf{Average} & \textbf{Percent} \\ \hline Total cost savings per trip & 6.72 & 0.69 & 1.92 & 1.86 & 100 \\ \hline Travel time cost savings per trip & 3.79 & 0.36 & 1.26 & 1.06 & 56.72 \\ \hline Travel time variability cost saving per trip & 2.93 & 0.33 & 0.67 & 0.81 & 43.28 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC6191166_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{First author} & \textbf{Year} & \textbf{Cancer} & \textbf{Country} & \textbf{Ethnicity} & \textbf{SNPs} & \textbf{No.} & \textbf{Risk allele} \\ \hline Guan (Current) & 2010 & LA-NSCLC & USA & Caucasian & -460T $>$ C, -634G $>$ C, and 936C $>$ T & 124 & T for -460T $>$ C \\ \hline Formento [23] & 2009 & Head\&neck & France & Caucasian & -460T $>$ C, -634G $>$ C, and 936C $>$ T & 49 & None \\ \hline Masago [20] & 2009 & Advanced NSCLC & Japan & Asian & -460T $>$ C, -1154G $>$ A, -2578C $>$ A, 405G $>$ C, and 936C $>$ T & 126 & C for -460T $>$ C, A for -1154G $>$ A, and A for -2578C $>$ A \\ \hline Dassoulas [24] & 2009 & Colorectum & Greece & Caucasian & -460T $>$ C, -634G $>$ C, -1154G $>$ A, -2578C $>$ A, and 936C $>$ T & 312 & T for -460T $>$ C, G for -634G $>$ C, C for -2578C $>$ A, and C for 936C $>$ T \\ \hline Bradbury [25] & 2009 & Esophagus & Canada & Caucasian & -460T $>$ C, 405G $>$ C, and 936C $>$ T & 361 & C for 936C $>$ T \\ \hline Heist [9] & 2008 & Early NSCLC & USA & Caucasian & -460T $>$ C, 405G $>$ C, and 936C $>$ T & 462 & G for 405G $>$ C and C for 936C $>$ T \\ \hline Kim [16] & 2008 & Colorectum & Korea & Asian & -634G $>$ C, -2578C $>$ A, and 936C $>$ T & 445 & G for -634G $>$ C and T for 936C $>$ T \\ \hline Kim [26] & 2007 & Stomach & Korea & Asian & -116G $>$ A, -460T $>$ C, 405G $>$ C, and 936C $>$ T & 503 & C for -460T $>$ C and T for 936C $>$ T \\ \hline Kawai [27] & 2007 & Renal cell & Japan & Asian & -634G $>$ C, -2578C $>$ A, and -1154G $>$ A & 213 & C for -2578C $>$ A \\ \hline Hefler [17] & 2007 & Ovarian & Austria & Caucasian & -634G $>$ C, -1154G $>$ A, and -2578C $>$ A & 563 & None \\ \hline Tzanakis [28] & 2006 & Stomach & Greece & Caucasian & -634G $>$ C, -2578C $>$ A, -1154G $>$ A, and 936C $>$ T & 100 & C for -634G $>$ C \\ \hline Lu [19] & 2005 & Breast & China & Asian & -460T $>$ C, 405G $>$ C, and 936C $>$ T & 1119 & C for -460T $>$ C, and G for 405G $>$ C \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC2939547_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{m/z}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Normalised relative intensity}} \\ \hline \textbf{LTP fragments} & \textbf{Observed} & \textbf{Calculated} & \textbf{Wheat LTP alone} & \textbf{Wheat LTP + linoleic acid} \\ \hline Intact protein (residues 1–90) & 10063.22 & 10063.18 & 518 & 705 \\ \hline 1–34 & 3474.74 & 3474.93 & 160 & 292 \\ \hline 1–39 & 4310.6 & 4309.77 & 2546 & 3290 \\ \hline 1–56 & 6243.58 & 6242.91 & 537 & 1047 \\ \hline 1–67 & 7477.3 & 7477.18 & 214 & 290 \\ \hline 1–79 & 8803.44 & 8803.75 & 270 & 2300 \\ \hline 17–39* & 2436.75 & 2436.65 & 805 & 1290 \\ \hline 17–56 & 4370.01 & 4369.78 & 533 & ND \\ \hline 17–61 & 4904.39 & 4904.39 & 90 & 90 \\ \hline 40–56 & 1951.23 & 1951.15 & 292 & ND \\ \hline 40–67 & 3185.43 & 3185.43 & 248 & 340 \\ \hline 40–79 & 4512.11 & 4512.0 & 128 & 656 \\ \hline 57–67* & 1252.34 & 1252.29 & 450 & ND \\ \hline 57–89 & 3739.16 & 3739.16 & 110 & 130 \\ \hline 68–79* & 1344.71 & 1344.58 & 334 & ND \\ \hline 80–90* & 1277.74 & 1277.45 & 1550 & 1200 \\ \hline Unassigned & 3514.0 & — & 2833 & 1668 \\ \hline Unassigned & 1098.54 & — & 1320 & ND \\ \hline Unassigned & 2679.24 & — & 1373 & 1927 \\ \hline Unassigned & 4334.4 & — & 1027 & 1070 \\ \hline Unassigned & 5032.13 & — & 435 & ND \\ \hline Unassigned & 5379.31 & — & 479 & ND \\ \hline Unassigned & 5794.72 & — & 1004 & ND \\ \hline Unassigned & 8673.0 & — & 312 & 400 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4960534_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Disease Phenotype Networks} & \textbf{Best C valuea} & \textbf{MRR, \%} & \textbf{Top-ranking genesb} & \textbf{TPR in the top 5, \%} & \textbf{TPR in the top 10, \%} & \textbf{TPR in the top 30, \%} \\ \hline Lin & -12 & 7.89 & 80 & 39.34 & 47.78 & 62.06 \\ \hline Sqrt & -12 & 7.90 & 81 & 39.11 & 48.01 & 61.83 \\ \hline Maxmin & -18 & 7.96 & 81 & 36.77 & 46.37 & 61.12 \\ \hline Tanimoto & -18 & 7.91 & 83 & 38.88 & 48.48 & 61.59 \\ \hline mimMiner & -14 & 7.96 & 82 & 42.39 & 50.59 & 64.17 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4944959_table_3
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{3D MEDIC Patients} & \textbf{Mid-sag slices Mean DSC} & \textbf{std dev} & \textbf{n} & \textbf{Lateral slices Mean DSC} & \textbf{std dev} & \textbf{n} \\ \hline p1 & 0.70 & 0.29 & 28 & 0.52 & 0.48 & 8 \\ \hline p2 & 0.79 & 0.14 & 30 & 0.06 & 0.12 & 8 \\ \hline p3 & 0.86 & 0.06 & 32 & 0.36 & 0.31 & 8 \\ \hline p4 & 0.78 & 0.17 & 40 & 0.05 & 0.16 & 10 \\ \hline p5 & 0.83 & 0.06 & 26 & 0.43 & 0.46 & 8 \\ \hline p6 & 0.83 & 0.11 & 33 & 0.40 & 0.38 & 10 \\ \hline p7 & 0.81 & 0.09 & 22 & 0.65 & 0.31 & 6 \\ \hline p8 & 0.73 & 0.09 & 23 & 0.13 & 0.24 & 6 \\ \hline p9 & 0.66 & 0.30 & 25 & 0.31 & 0.43 & 8 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3443448_table_2
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{SNP} & \textbf{Chr} & \textbf{Hg18 Position} & \textbf{A1} & \textbf{A2} & \textbf{MAF Controls} & \textbf{MAF Cases} & \textbf{MAF Pooled Controls} & \textbf{MAF Pooled Cases} & \textbf{GMAF} & \textbf{P- value} & \textbf{OR [95\% CI]} \\ \hline rs1877670 & 8 & 22,546,561 & C & T & 22.3\% & 20.5\% & 29.0\% & 19.0\% & 44.3\% & 0.6716 & 0.900 [0.520– 1.550] \\ \hline rs1996147 & 8 & 22,544,158 & G & A & 29.3\% & 25.1\% & 22.6\% & 15.3\% & 41.2\% & 0.4251 & 0.810 [0.490– 1.340] \\ \hline rs35900184 & 8 & 143,693,411 & T & C & 31.9\% & 43.7\% & 25.1\% & 34.0\% & 26.5\% & 0.0448 & 1.650 [1.020– 2.680] \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4608790_table_4
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{Underway} & \textbf{Humans} & \textbf{Policy} & \textbf{Pr (Chg $>$ 2.5)} & \textbf{Pr (Chg $>$ 5)} & \textbf{Don. Am't} \\ \hline H.I.: low know & 6.04* & 5.69** & -0.87 & 8.11*** & 5.75** & 0.32 \\ \hline & (3.10) & (2.62) & (3.46) & (2.82) & (2.79) & (1.30) \\ \hline H.I.: high know & 5.45** & 4.33 & -0.58 & 3.52 & 5.85** & 1.15 \\ \hline & (2.28) & (2.60) & (2.36) & (3.90) & (2.85) & (1.74) \\ \hline S.I.: low know & -0.83 & -3.25 & -1.50 & 0.98 & 0.33 & -1.11 \\ \hline & (1.87) & (2.18) & (3.30) & (2.55) & (2.71) & (0.98) \\ \hline S.I.: high know & 1.80 & 5.31* & 0.03 & 3.69 & 5.67 & -0.98 \\ \hline & (2.31) & (2.65) & (2.77) & (2.74) & (3.51) & (1.10) \\ \hline Dep. var. mean & 74.29 & 68.04 & 33.58 & 56.43 & 41.33 & 8.72 \\ \hline Observations & 1,259 & 1,259 & 1,259 & 1,259 & 1,259 & 1,259 \\ \hline R-squared & 0.16 & 0.19 & 0.09 & 0.13 & 0.13 & 0.05 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4827814_table_4
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Parameter} & \textbf{Total (n = 348) (\%)} & \textbf{Luminal A (n = 162) (\%)} & \textbf{Luminal B (n = 84) (\%)} & \textbf{HER-2 (n = 27) (\%)} & \textbf{TNBC (n = 75) (\%)} & \textbf{p value} \\ \hline G6PDH & & & & & & $<$0.001 \\ \hline Negative & 297 (85.3) & 149 (92.0) & 70 (83.3) & 14 (51.9) & 64 (85.3) \\ \hline Positive & 51 (14.7) & 13 (8.0) & 14 (16.7) & 13 (48.1) & 11 (14.7) \\ \hline 6PGL & & & & & & 0.009 \\ \hline Negative & 261 (75.0) & 133 (82.1) & 58 (69.0) & 15 (55.6) & 55 (73.3) \\ \hline Positive & 87 (25.0) & 29 (17.9) & 26 (31.0) & 12 (44.4) & 20 (26.7) \\ \hline 6PGDH & & & & & & $<$0.001 \\ \hline Negative & 343 (98.6) & 162 (100.0) & 84 (100.0) & 27 (100.0) & 70 (93.3) \\ \hline Positive & 5 (1.4) & 0 (0.0) & 0 (0.0) & 0 (0.0) & 5 (6.7) \\ \hline NRF2 & & & & & & 0.894 \\ \hline Negative & 311 (89.4) & 145 (89.5) & 76 (90.5) & 23 (85.2) & 67 (89.3) \\ \hline Positive & 37 (10.6) & 17 (10.5) & 8 (9.5) & 4 (14.8) & 8 (10.7) \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5845514_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{ESS}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{EU-SILC}} \\ \hline & \textbf{Model 1} & \textbf{Model 2} & \textbf{Model 3} & \textbf{Model 4} \\ \hline No disability & 0.280*** & 0.210*** & 0.263*** & 0.183*** \\ \hline \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{Trends among disabled peoplea} \\ \hline Pre-2006 & (Baseline) & (Baseline) & (Baseline) & (Baseline) \\ \hline 2006–2011 & 0.051*** & 0.040** & −0.008 & −0.013 \\ \hline Post-2011 & 0.089*** & 0.076*** & 0.027 & 0.026 \\ \hline \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{Trends in disability employment gapa} \\ \hline No disability * 2006–2011 & −0.013 & −0.008 & 0.030* & 0.030* \\ \hline No disability * Post-2011 & −0.057*** & −0.049*** & 0.011 & 0.004 \\ \hline Adjustment for compositional factorsb & No & Yes & No & Yes \\ \hline Observations & 182,195 & 182,195 & 2,412,791 & 2,412,791 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5712075_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Comparison} & \textbf{Population} & \textbf{No. of studies} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{Test of association (A vs G)}} & \textbf{Model} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Test of heterogeneity}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Publication bias}} \\ \hline & & & \textbf{OR (95\% CI)} & \textbf{Z} & \textbf{P Value} & & \textbf{P Value} & \textbf{I2 (\%)} & \textbf{Begg} & \textbf{Egger} \\ \hline A vs G & Overall & 30 & 1.119(0.984-1.272) & 1.71 & 0.086 & R & 0 & 94.2 & 0.363 & 0.148 \\ \hline & Caucasian & 10 & 0.843(0.653-1.088) & 1.31 & 0.189 & R & 0 & 96.9 & 0.592 & 0.542 \\ \hline & Asian & 16 & 1.378(1.287-1.475) & 9.23 & 0 & R & 0.034 & 43.3 & 0.471 & 0.132 \\ \hline & Non- Caucasian Europe & 3 & 0.949(0.843-1.070) & 0.85 & 0.395 & F & 0.916 & 0 & 1 & 0.581 \\ \hline & African- American & 1 & 0.882(0.800-0.972) & 2.53 & 0.011 & NA & NA & NA & NA & NA \\ \hline AA vs GG & Overall & 30 & 1.237(0.968-1.581) & 1.70 & 0.090 & R & 0 & 92.0 & 0.232 & 0.068 \\ \hline & Caucasian & 10 & 0.745(0.466-1.192) & 1.23 & 0.220 & R & 0 & 96.2 & 0.592 & 0.579 \\ \hline & Asian & 16 & 1.866(1.631-2.135) & 9.08 & 0 & F & 0.751 & 0 & 0.322 & 0.071 \\ \hline & Non- Caucasian Europe & 3 & 0.901(0.71-1.145) & 0.85 & 0.396 & F & 0.917 & 0 & 1 & 0.585 \\ \hline & African- American & 1 & 0.777(0.638-0.947) & 2.50 & 0.013 & NA & NA & NA & NA & NA \\ \hline AA + AG vs GG & Overall & 30 & 1.186(0.998-1.409) & 1.94 & 0.052 & R & 0 & 87.1 & 0.148 & 0.036 \\ \hline & Caucasian & 10 & 0.839(0.613-1.148) & 1.10 & 0.272 & R & 0 & 93.8 & 0.858 & 0.640 \\ \hline & Asian & 16 & 1.667(1.462-1.901) & 7.64 & 0.000 & F & 0.97 & 0 & 0.126 & 0.118 \\ \hline & Non- Caucasian Europe & 3 & 0.933(0.764-1.139) & 0.68 & 0.497 & F & 0.946 & 0 & 1 & 0.602 \\ \hline & African- American & 1 & 0.850(0.733-0.986) & 2.15 & 0.032 & NA & NA & NA & NA & NA \\ \hline AG + GG vs AA & Overall & 30 & 1.115(0.949-1.311) & 1.32 & 0.186 & R & 0.000 & 92.6 & 0.532 & 0.649 \\ \hline & Caucasian & 10 & 0.780(0.552-1.102) & 1.41 & 0.159 & R & 0.000 & 95.9 & 0.858 & 0.535 \\ \hline & Asian & 16 & 1.434(1.319-1.559) & 8.45 & 0.000 & R & 0.032 & 43.7 & 0.589 & 0.257 \\ \hline & Non- Caucasian Europe & 3 & 0.933(0.7721.129) & 0.71 & 0.478 & F & 0.941 & 0 & 1 & 0.563 \\ \hline & African- American & 1 & 0.840(0.707-0.999) & 1.97 & 0.048 & NA & NA & NA & NA & NA \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5129943_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Patient reason for consulting}} & \multicolumn{8}{|l|}{\textbf{GP practice staff response to e-consultation}} \\ \hline & \textbf{Total number (\%)} & \textbf{Face to face \%} & \textbf{Phone consult \%} & \textbf{Prescription \%} & \textbf{Fit note \%} & \textbf{Test request \%} & \textbf{Refer routine \%} & \textbf{Advice \%} & \textbf{Other/ unknown \%} \\ \hline Musculoskeletal/limb pain & 60 (12.4) & 48.3 & 38.3 & 1.7 & 0 & 1.7 & 3.3 & 1.7 & 0 \\ \hline Infection/immunological & 70 (14.4) & 40.0 & 41.4 & 8.6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Neurological & 26 (5.4) & 53.9 & 26.9 & 0 & 0 & 3.9 & 0 & 0 & 3.9 \\ \hline Sexual/reproductive health & 41 (8.5) & 39.0 & 41.5 & 7.3 & 0 & 4.9 & 0 & 0 & 2.4 \\ \hline Dermatological & 33 (6.8) & 48.5 & 21.2 & 18.2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3.0 & 0 \\ \hline Respiratory & 25 (5.1) & 52.0 & 24.0 & 4.0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 8.0 \\ \hline Mental health & 29 (5.9) & 44.8 & 34.5 & 10.3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Digestive & 19 (3.9) & 52.6 & 26.3 & 5.3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 5.3 \\ \hline Medication query/advice & 19 (3.9) & 0 & 73.7 & 10.5 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 5.3 \\ \hline Administrative* & 109 (22.5) & 12.2 & 27.1 & 11.2 & 14.0 & 1.9 & 5.6 & 10.3 & 7.5 \\ \hline Other/unclear & 54 (11.1) & 38.4 & 17.0 & 0 & 0 & 3.8 & 0 & 5.7 & 1.9 \\ \hline Total & 485 (100) & 38.1 & 32.1 & 7.2 & 3.1 & 1.6 & 1.6 & 9.1 & 6.4 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5875620_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Research integrity topic} & \textbf{No. organizations with a code (\% all organizations)} & \textbf{No. of statements} & \textbf{Statements with prescriptive language (row \%)*} \\ \hline Inaccuracy & 79 (10) & 112 & 74 (70) \\ \hline Contributor/Contribution & 65 (8) & 99 & 63 (64) \\ \hline Ethics & 63 (8) & 113 & 68 (60) \\ \hline Plagiarism & 59 (7) & 74 & 53 (72) \\ \hline Credit & 56 (7) & 81 & 62 (77) \\ \hline Author/Authorship & 55 (7) & 78 & 49 (63) \\ \hline Conflict of interest & 53 (7) & 72 & 44 (61) \\ \hline Integrity & 48 (6) & 82 & 34 (42) \\ \hline Bias† & 35 (4) & 56 & 25 (45) \\ \hline Honesty & 33 (4) & 48 & 31 (65) \\ \hline Falsification & 32 (4) & 34 & 24 (71) \\ \hline Fabrication & 29 (3) & 30 & 24 (77) \\ \hline Fraud/Fraudulent & 26 (3) & 37 & 19 (51) \\ \hline Misrepresentation & 26 (3) & 41 & 28 (68) \\ \hline Misconduct & 24 (3) & 55 & 29 (53) \\ \hline Manipulation & 11 (1) & 16 & 7 \\ \hline Questionable publication practices (QPP)– duplicate publication & 10 (1) & 11 & 8 \\ \hline Dishonesty & 6 (1) & 7 & 3 \\ \hline Dual interest/relationship & 6 (0.8) & 6 & 5 \\ \hline Competing interest & 4 (0.5) & 4 & 1 \\ \hline QPP–redundant publication & 4 (0.5) & 5 & 2 \\ \hline Responsible conduct of research & 3 (0.4) & 3 & 2 \\ \hline QPP–repetitive publication & 2 (0.3) & 2 & 2 \\ \hline QPP–secondary publication & 2 (0.3) & 3 & 1 \\ \hline Questionable research practices & 1 (0.1) & 1 & 0 \\ \hline Malpractice & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline QPP–salami publication & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4507982_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{TeleAtlas}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{ArcView/NAVTEQ}} \\ \hline \textbf{Address status} & \textbf{N} & \textbf{Error1} & \textbf{N (\%)2} & \textbf{Error1} & \textbf{N (\%)2} \\ \hline Self-reported Post-E911 Street & 71 & 132 (75, 309) & 52 (73\%) & 40 (17, 70) & 70 (99\%) \\ \hline Self-reported Pre-E911 Street & 37 & 243 (117, 418) & 34 (92\%) & 236 (153, 413) & 29 (78\%) \\ \hline Total Addresses3 & 135 & 174 (81, 357) & 86 (64\%) & 62 (25, 151) & 99 (73\%) \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC2867955_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \textbf{Home therapy pdC1-INH (n = 25)} & \textbf{Home therapy icatibant (n = 12)} & \textbf{Hospital therapy pdC1-INH (n = 19)} & \textbf{Overall (n = 56)} \\ \hline \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{Sex, n (\%)} \\ \hline Female & 14 (56.0) & 8 (66.7) & 12 (63.2) & 34 (60.7) \\ \hline Male & 11 (44.0) & 4 (33.3) & 7 (36.8) & 22 (39.3) \\ \hline Age, yrs, mean, ($\pm$SD) & 33.0 (19.0) & 36.0 (11.5) & 39.5 (24.2) & 36 (19.6) \\ \hline \multicolumn{5}{|l|}{Age} \\ \hline $\geq$ 15 years, n (\%) & 18 (72.0) & 12 (100.0) & 14 (73.7) & 44 (78.6) \\ \hline $<$ 15 years, n (\%) & 7 (28.0) & 0 & 5 (26.3) & 12 (21.4) \\ \hline Age at diagnosis, yrs, mean, ($\pm$SD) & 20 (16.0) & 30 (12.0) & 26 (20.0) & 25 (17.0) \\ \hline Time since diagnosis, yrs, mean, ($\pm$SD) & 13.0 (8.0) & 6.0 (6.0) & 13.0 (12.0) & 11 (9.0) \\ \hline Disease severity score, mean, (range) & 7.3 (3–10) & 6.7 (4–9) & 6.6 (3–10) & 6.9 (3–10) \\ \hline Duration of home therapy, months, mean, (range) & 25.1 (6–60) & 32.7 (12–60) & - & - \\ \hline Receiving long-term prophylaxis, n (\%) & 6 (24.0) & 2 (16.7) & 5 (26.3) & 13 (23.2) \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC5043538_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Donor} & \textbf{Age} & \textbf{Gender} & \textbf{Time to Harvesting} \\ \hline H1 & 60 & F & 7 hrs \\ \hline H2 & 52 & F & 6 hrs \\ \hline H3 & 57 & M & 4 hrs \\ \hline H4 & 53 & F & 3.5 hrs \\ \hline H5 & 21 & M & 7 hrs \\ \hline H6 & 50 & F & 6 hrs \\ \hline H7 & 51 & F & 4 hrs \\ \hline H8 & 2 & M & 3 hrs \\ \hline H9 & 16 & F & 4 hrs \\ \hline H10 & 43 & M & 3.75 hrs \\ \hline H11 & 16 & M & 3 hrs \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3206885_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline Bull & PCD (\%) & Oocyte (n) & Cleavage (\%) & Blastocyst (\%) & Hatch BL (HBL/ CV-\%) \\ \hline C1 & 0.0 & 201 & 71.5 $\pm$ 13.8 ª & 37.4 $\pm$ 15.2 ª & 18.0 $\pm$ 9.7 a \\ \hline C2 & 0.0 & 138 & 57.0 $\pm$ 18.2 ab & 19.8 $\pm$ 8.2 b & 2.5 $\pm$ 3.6 b \\ \hline C3 & 0.0 & 219 & 59.4 $\pm$ 13.5 ab & 39.5 $\pm$ 16.1 ª & 16.5 $\pm$ 7.9 a \\ \hline P1 & 28.5 & 210 & 72.0 $\pm$ 17.3 ª & 39.6 $\pm$ 11.3 ª & 16.1 $\pm$ 11.1 a \\ \hline P2 & 40.5 & 295 & 50.2 $\pm$ 21.8 b & 21.3 $\pm$ 10.8 b & 2.7 $\pm$ 3.5 b \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3292455_table_5
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Gene} & \textbf{Function} & \textbf{Mouse embryonic stem cells} & \textbf{Human embryonic stem cells} & \textbf{References} \\ \hline p16 & Inhibitor of Cyclin/Cdk activity & No expression & No expression & Faast et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2009 \\ \hline p19 & Inhibitor of Cyclin/Cdk activity & No expression & Low expression & Li et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2009 \\ \hline p21 & Inhibitor of Cyclin/Cdk activity & No expression & No/very low expression & Stead et al., 2002; Neganova et al., 2009 \\ \hline p27 & Inhibitor of Cyclin/Cdk activity & No expression & No/very low expression & Stead et al., 2002; Egozi et al., 2007; Neganova et al., 2009 \\ \hline p57 & Inhibitor of Cyclin/Cdk activity & No expression & No expression & Becker et al., 2006; Sorrentino et al., 2007 \\ \hline Rb & Maintains the Restriction point in G1 & Inactive & Active during G1 & Savatier et al., 1994; Conklin and Sage, 2009 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC6020794_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Location of the SNP(nucleotide position, region)*} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{Mouse strains}} & \textbf{Functional implication (alteration of transcription factor binding affinity\#/ amino acid residue)} \\ \hline & \textbf{BPN} & \textbf{BPH} & \textbf{BPL} \\ \hline 2874 bp, promoter & T & C & T & Binding affinity of c-Fos is more for ‘‘T’’ as compared to ‘‘C’’ \\ \hline 2740 bp, promoter & C & C & T & Binding affinity of n-Myc and Max is more for ‘‘T’’ than ‘‘C’’ \\ \hline 2486 bp, promoter & T & DT & T & Deletion of one T from a 13 nucleotide polyT region \\ \hline +4643 bp, exon 3 & T & A & A & Alteration of the amino acid Phenyl alanine (BPN) to Isoleucine (BPH and BPL) in the trans-membrane region of the protein (at 62 residue position) \\ \hline +4676 bp, exon 3 & T & A & A & Alteration of the amino acid Phenyl alanine (BPN) to Isoleucine (BPH and BPL), at the 73 residue position, in the trans-membrane region of the protein \\ \hline +11531 bp, exon 9 & A & G & G & No change in the amino acid residue \\ \hline +11577 bp, exon 9 & A & A & G & Alteration of the amino acid Asparagine (BPN and BPH) to Aspartate (BPL) at the 296 residue position, in the trans- membrane region of the protein \\ \hline +12264 bp, exon 11 & G & A & G & Alteration of the amino acid Glutamic acid (BPN and BPL) to Lysine (BPH) at the 455 residue position, in the catalytic region of the protein \\ \hline +15984 bp, exon 15 & T & G & G & Alteration of the amino acid Leucine (BPN) to Arginine (BPH and BPL) at the 645 residue position, in the catalytic region of the protein \\ \hline +18745 bp, exon 17 & G & T & T & Alteration of the amino acid Glycine (BPN) to Cysteine (BPH and BPL) at the 763 residue position, in the catalytic region of the protein \\ \hline +18849 bp, exon 18 & G & T & T & Alteration of the amino acid Lysine (BPN) to Asparagine (BPH and BPL) at the 770 residue position, in the catalytic region of the protein \\ \hline +21205 bp, exon 20 (39-UTR) & T & C & C & - \\ \hline +21410 bp, exon 20 (39-UTR) & T & C & C & - \\ \hline +21446 bp, exon 20 (39-UTR) & T & C & C & - \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3031630_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Objective} & \textbf{Indicator} \\ \hline 1. Optimize balance of quality vs. length of life given patient preferences & 1. Score on patient preferences/satisfaction survey \\ \hline & 2. Length of life compared to algorithm based on stages of disease \\ \hline 2. Ensure timely screening, delivery, and follow-up of care & 3. Mean number of days between date provider orders test and date clerk schedules appointment with the patient \\ \hline & 4. Percent of patients eligible for screening tests who receive them in the specified period. \\ \hline & 5. Percent of patients eligible for diagnostic tests who receive them in the specified period. \\ \hline 3. Ensure care is evidence-based and comprehensive by providing the right expertise mix to care for patient & 6. Percent of provider type match per patient problem, i.e., the correct type of provider should be working on a patient for every problem on the patient problem list \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4613788_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{a) All anxieties (C)} & \textbf{Num df} & \textbf{Den df} & \textbf{F Value} & \textbf{P value1} \\ \hline Maternal care & 1 & 431 & 16.69 & $<$0.0001 \\ \hline Time spent alone/day & 1 & 431 & 3.93 & 0.0480 \\ \hline Activities & 1 & 431 & 4.13 & 0.0427 \\ \hline Age of separation from the mother & 1 & 431 & 5.83 & 0.0162 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC4631323_table_3
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{Low A}} & \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{\textbf{Low B}} \\ \hline & \textbf{Observed} & \textbf{RR} & \textbf{p-value} & \textbf{Observed} & \textbf{RR} & \textbf{p-value} \\ \hline Not Adjusted & 440 & 0.81 & 0.004 & * & * & * \\ \hline Adjusted for Urban/Rural Status & 440 & 0.81 & 0.002 & * & * & * \\ \hline Adjusted for SES & * & * & * & 94 & 0.63 & 0.009 \\ \hline Adjusted for SES \& Urban/Rural Status & * & * & * & 94 & 0.635 & 0.016 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC1180846_table_1
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Type of post consultation letter} & \textbf{Letter to General Practitioner} & \textbf{Letter to patient} & \textbf{Significance (Wilcoxin Signed Ranks test)} \\ \hline Length of time to dictate letter (minutes $\pm$ SD, n) & 3.28 $\pm$ 2.2, 81 & 2.57 $\pm$ 1.42, 82 & p = 0.019 \\ \hline Flesch Reading Ease Score & 49.76 $\pm$ 9.1, 84 & 55.44 $\pm$ 9.26, 84 & p $<$ 0.001 \\ \hline Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level & 10.72 $\pm$ 1.43 & 11.04 $\pm$ 1.39 & p = 0.062 \\ \hline Circled items in each letter & 31/63 circled 1–12 items & 16/63 circled 1–5 items & p $<$ 0.001 \\ \hline Word Count & 444 $\pm$ 169.87 & 351.5 $\pm$ 129.05 & p $<$ 0.001 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC1360088_table_0
\begin{table} \scalebox{0.60}{ \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Stage} & \textbf{n} & \textbf{Duration range (days)} & \textbf{Cumulative duration (days)} \\ \hline 1st & 20 & 5–10 & 6.6 \\ \hline 2nd & 43 & 2–4 & 9.7 \\ \hline 3rd & 26 & 6–10 & 18.2 \\ \hline 4th & 10 & 5–8 & 24.5 \\ \hline 5th & 10 & 4–5 & 28.9 \\ \hline 6th & 7 & 2–4 & 32.0 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{table}
PMC3468633_table_0