uid
stringclasses 122
values | premise
stringclasses 121
values | hypothesis
stringclasses 122
values | chaos_dist
listlengths 3
3
| mnli_labels
listlengths 1
5
| worker_id
stringclasses 48
values | multilabel
listlengths 1
3
| explanation
stringlengths 48
773
| highlight_p
listlengths 0
12
| highlight_h
listlengths 0
9
| dist
listlengths 3
3
| agg_dist
listlengths 3
3
| taxonomy
listlengths 1
3
| within_label_variation
stringclasses 3
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
137083n
|
It was always a part of me.
|
Even though it is not true anymore, back then it was a portion of me.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
0,
2,
0
] |
w1
|
[
1
] |
The context notes it's "always" a part, while the statement notes that it was "back then" a part, referencing the past and that it is now longer a part. Thus, the statement is not congruent with the context and likely to be false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 7,
"endIndex": 13,
"text": "always",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 36,
"endIndex": 45,
"text": "back then",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
4
] | null |
137083n
|
It was always a part of me.
|
Even though it is not true anymore, back then it was a portion of me.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
0,
2,
0
] |
w11
|
[
0,
2
] |
The statement could be accurate with the context since it says it was a portion of me and in the context it says it was always a part of me.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 16,
"endIndex": 26,
"text": "part of me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 55,
"endIndex": 68,
"text": "portion of me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
4
] | null |
137083n
|
It was always a part of me.
|
Even though it is not true anymore, back then it was a portion of me.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
0,
2,
0
] |
w2
|
[
2
] |
The thing being described in the context as being "always a part" of the person does not have an expiration mentioned. So for the statement to say "it is not true anymore" cannot be confirmed by the context.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 7,
"endIndex": 13,
"text": "always",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 16,
"endIndex": 20,
"text": "part",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 21,
"endIndex": 23,
"text": "of",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 24,
"endIndex": 26,
"text": "me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 18,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "not",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 22,
"endIndex": 26,
"text": "true",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 27,
"endIndex": 34,
"text": "anymore",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 49,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "was",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 55,
"endIndex": 62,
"text": "portion",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 63,
"endIndex": 65,
"text": "of",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 66,
"endIndex": 68,
"text": "me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
4
] | null |
137083n
|
It was always a part of me.
|
Even though it is not true anymore, back then it was a portion of me.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
0,
2,
0
] |
w4
|
[
2
] |
The context claims "it" was a part of the speaker in the past. Therefore, the second part of the statement is definitely true. However, since you can't infer whether it's still part of the speaker or not, the statement as a whole is just as likely to be either true or false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 13,
"text": "was always",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 46,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "it was",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 18,
"endIndex": 34,
"text": "not true anymore",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
4
] | null |
137083n
|
It was always a part of me.
|
Even though it is not true anymore, back then it was a portion of me.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
0,
2,
0
] |
w5
|
[
0
] |
The statement is simply reiterated what the context had stated before, making the statement most likely true.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 16,
"endIndex": 26,
"text": "part of me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 55,
"endIndex": 68,
"text": "portion of me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
4
] | null |
137083n
|
It was always a part of me.
|
Even though it is not true anymore, back then it was a portion of me.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
0,
2,
0
] |
w6
|
[
0
] |
The "was a part of me" in the context seems similar or equal to the statement "was a portion of me"
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 27,
"text": "It was always a part of me.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 49,
"endIndex": 68,
"text": "was a portion of me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
4
] | null |
137083n
|
It was always a part of me.
|
Even though it is not true anymore, back then it was a portion of me.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
0,
2,
0
] |
w7
|
[
0,
2
] |
If it was a part of me in the past, it is likely true that it was always part of me in the past.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 13,
"text": "was always",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 36,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "back then it was",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
4
] | null |
137083n
|
It was always a part of me.
|
Even though it is not true anymore, back then it was a portion of me.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
0,
2,
0
] |
w8
|
[
1
] |
It was always a part of that person and it's still true.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 7,
"endIndex": 26,
"text": "always a part of me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 5,
"endIndex": 34,
"text": "though it is not true anymore",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
4
] | null |
137083n
|
It was always a part of me.
|
Even though it is not true anymore, back then it was a portion of me.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
0,
2,
0
] |
w9
|
[
0
] |
This is likely true because the experience or entity was involved at some point with the person in question. The statement is true to the context.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 7,
"endIndex": 27,
"text": "always a part of me.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 36,
"endIndex": 69,
"text": "back then it was a portion of me.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
4
] | null |
138210c
|
At that event, legal services personnel, court personnel, and other technology experts saw demonstrations by four companies on their products, and assessed their utility for preparing pro se documents.
|
Legal services personnel heard product descriptions.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
0,
1,
2
] |
w1
|
[
0
] |
The context notes that legal serves personnel saw demonstrations by companies on their products, so it is likely that they heard product descriptions as part of these demonstrations.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 15,
"endIndex": 39,
"text": "legal services personnel",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 91,
"endIndex": 105,
"text": "demonstrations",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 133,
"endIndex": 141,
"text": "products",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 24,
"text": "Legal services personnel",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 39,
"endIndex": 51,
"text": "descriptions",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 31,
"endIndex": 38,
"text": "product",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
2
] | null |
138210c
|
At that event, legal services personnel, court personnel, and other technology experts saw demonstrations by four companies on their products, and assessed their utility for preparing pro se documents.
|
Legal services personnel heard product descriptions.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
0,
1,
2
] |
w16
|
[
0
] |
The legal services personell is mentioned in the context as seeing the demonstrations.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 15,
"endIndex": 39,
"text": "legal services personnel",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 133,
"endIndex": 141,
"text": "products",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 24,
"text": "Legal services personnel",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 31,
"endIndex": 38,
"text": "product",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
2
] | null |
138210c
|
At that event, legal services personnel, court personnel, and other technology experts saw demonstrations by four companies on their products, and assessed their utility for preparing pro se documents.
|
Legal services personnel heard product descriptions.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
0,
1,
2
] |
w19
|
[
0,
1
] |
The context says the personnel saw demonstrations of the products, so the statement that the personnel heard product descriptions is likely to be true or false, since demonstrations likely would or would not have also described the product. A demonstration is not the same as a description.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 87,
"endIndex": 105,
"text": "saw demonstrations",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 25,
"endIndex": 51,
"text": "heard product descriptions",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0,
0.5
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
2
] | null |
138210c
|
At that event, legal services personnel, court personnel, and other technology experts saw demonstrations by four companies on their products, and assessed their utility for preparing pro se documents.
|
Legal services personnel heard product descriptions.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
0,
1,
2
] |
w2
|
[
0
] |
It is very likely that within demonstrations on a company's products, the people in attendance (legal services personnel) heard product descriptions as well since that's how products are marketed.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 15,
"endIndex": 20,
"text": "legal",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 21,
"endIndex": 29,
"text": "services",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 30,
"endIndex": 39,
"text": "personnel",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 87,
"endIndex": 90,
"text": "saw",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 91,
"endIndex": 105,
"text": "demonstrations",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 133,
"endIndex": 141,
"text": "products",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 5,
"text": "Legal",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 6,
"endIndex": 14,
"text": "services",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 15,
"endIndex": 24,
"text": "personnel",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 25,
"endIndex": 30,
"text": "heard",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 31,
"endIndex": 38,
"text": "product",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 39,
"endIndex": 51,
"text": "descriptions",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
2
] | null |
138210c
|
At that event, legal services personnel, court personnel, and other technology experts saw demonstrations by four companies on their products, and assessed their utility for preparing pro se documents.
|
Legal services personnel heard product descriptions.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
0,
1,
2
] |
w25
|
[
1
] |
The context states that a few groups saw demonstrations, while the statement claims that they heard descriptions.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 15,
"endIndex": 39,
"text": "legal services personnel",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 87,
"endIndex": 105,
"text": "saw demonstrations",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 25,
"endIndex": 30,
"text": "heard",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 39,
"endIndex": 51,
"text": "descriptions",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
2
] | null |
138210c
|
At that event, legal services personnel, court personnel, and other technology experts saw demonstrations by four companies on their products, and assessed their utility for preparing pro se documents.
|
Legal services personnel heard product descriptions.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
0,
1,
2
] |
w30
|
[
0
] |
It is unlikely that companies would simply demonstrate their products without talking about them as well.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 87,
"endIndex": 105,
"text": "saw demonstrations",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 124,
"endIndex": 141,
"text": "on their products",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 25,
"endIndex": 51,
"text": "heard product descriptions",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
2
] | null |
138210c
|
At that event, legal services personnel, court personnel, and other technology experts saw demonstrations by four companies on their products, and assessed their utility for preparing pro se documents.
|
Legal services personnel heard product descriptions.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
0,
1,
2
] |
w4
|
[
0
] |
Since a product demonstration by a company should normally include a description of the product, it follows that the people attending those demonstrations probably heard the descriptions.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 87,
"endIndex": 141,
"text": "saw demonstrations by four companies on their products",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 25,
"endIndex": 51,
"text": "heard product descriptions",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
2
] | null |
138210c
|
At that event, legal services personnel, court personnel, and other technology experts saw demonstrations by four companies on their products, and assessed their utility for preparing pro se documents.
|
Legal services personnel heard product descriptions.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
0,
1,
2
] |
w7
|
[
0
] |
The context states that legal services personnel saw product demonstrations. The statement that legal services personnel heard product demonstrations is most likely true, because whether they were seeing the demonstration live or in a video, there most likely would have also been sound.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 15,
"endIndex": 39,
"text": "legal services personnel",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 87,
"endIndex": 90,
"text": "saw",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 25,
"endIndex": 30,
"text": "heard",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
2
] | null |
138210c
|
At that event, legal services personnel, court personnel, and other technology experts saw demonstrations by four companies on their products, and assessed their utility for preparing pro se documents.
|
Legal services personnel heard product descriptions.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
0,
1,
2
] |
w8
|
[
0
] |
The legal services personnel saw demonstrations of products so it could be the same as hearing product descriptions.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 91,
"endIndex": 141,
"text": "demonstrations by four companies on their products",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 31,
"endIndex": 51,
"text": "product descriptions",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
2
] | null |
138210c
|
At that event, legal services personnel, court personnel, and other technology experts saw demonstrations by four companies on their products, and assessed their utility for preparing pro se documents.
|
Legal services personnel heard product descriptions.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
0,
1,
2
] |
w9
|
[
0
] |
The legal services personnel were amongst those who saw the presentations by the four companies. Presentations count as product descriptions. One would think presenting something is describing it.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 87,
"endIndex": 141,
"text": "saw demonstrations by four companies on their products",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "Legal services personnel heard product descriptions.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
2
] | null |
138317e
|
did you see it
|
Can you see it?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
0,
2,
2
] |
w1
|
[
2,
1
] |
The context asks if someone did see something, which implies past tense. The statement asks if someone can see something, which implies present tense. Thus, they are likely to be in conflict. However, because the statements lack additional context, it is hard to know for certain.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 3,
"text": "did",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 3,
"text": "Can",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0.5,
0.5
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
0,
5
] | null |
138317e
|
did you see it
|
Can you see it?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
0,
2,
2
] |
w15
|
[
1
] |
The context refers to a past event by using the verb "did", however, the stsement refers to a present event by using the verb "can"
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 3,
"text": "did",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
0,
5
] | null |
138317e
|
did you see it
|
Can you see it?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
0,
2,
2
] |
w16
|
[
2
] |
This context and statements are hard to compare because they are different ways to ask a question, but in different times (present and past)
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 3,
"text": "did",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 3,
"text": "Can",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
0,
5
] | null |
138317e
|
did you see it
|
Can you see it?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
0,
2,
2
] |
w19
|
[
0
] |
The context statement is missing a question mark, but still seems to be asking if a person saw something. The statement is asking someone if they can see something. This likely to be true because "did you" and "can you" tend to be used interchangeably especially in asking questions about something visual.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "did you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "Can you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
0,
5
] | null |
138317e
|
did you see it
|
Can you see it?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
0,
2,
2
] |
w2
|
[
2
] |
The statement and context are two questions, although one is asking about something being seen, and the context is more so about the ability of seeing whatever it was.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 3,
"text": "did",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 3,
"text": "Can",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
0,
5
] | null |
138317e
|
did you see it
|
Can you see it?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
0,
2,
2
] |
w30
|
[
2,
1
] |
The past tense of "did" suggests that being able to see it was in the past, and therefore not possible now, but it could mean that it is possible to be seen and they want to know if it in fact was seen.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 3,
"text": "did",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 3,
"text": "Can",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0.5,
0.5
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
0,
5
] | null |
138317e
|
did you see it
|
Can you see it?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
0,
2,
2
] |
w4
|
[
2
] |
As the statement merely rephrases the context into a question with entirely different meaning, you cannot infer anything from it.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 3,
"text": "did",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 3,
"text": "Can",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
0,
5
] | null |
138317e
|
did you see it
|
Can you see it?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
0,
2,
2
] |
w7
|
[
2
] |
The context asks whether or not someone saw something, but does not specify whether or not someone was able to see it. Therefore, the statement "can you see it" could either be true or false, because it is not answered in the context.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "did you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "Can you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
0,
5
] | null |
138317e
|
did you see it
|
Can you see it?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
0,
2,
2
] |
w8
|
[
2
] |
Both questions are very similar while one is asking in past tense and the other is in present tense so it could be true or false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 3,
"text": "did",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 3,
"text": "Can",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
0,
5
] | null |
138317e
|
did you see it
|
Can you see it?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
0,
2,
2
] |
w9
|
[
0
] |
The difference here is tenses. One is present and one is past-tense. The context appears to be a question, only without a question mark. Likely, the same is meant by these two.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 14,
"text": "did you see it",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 15,
"text": "Can you see it?",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
0,
5
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w0
|
[
0,
2
] |
The person in the context has made the correlation that as soon as this person has been caught, they will be next. It is reasonable to think they would want to help them get away to buy themselves some more time. However, it is not proven anywhere in the context, so it is purely speculation.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 13,
"text": "I'll help you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w1
|
[
2
] |
The context notes that they'll come for people, but it doesn't indicate whether the speaker will help that person get away before they're caught. Thus, the statement could be true, if they did desire to help them, or false, if they didn't desire to do such.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 24,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "get you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 14,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "get away",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w10
|
[
2
] |
This has too many variables. The person may want to help the other get away so they can be found quicker. Then again, if thsis person getting away would impede something, it would be a totally different concept.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 24,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "get you",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 41,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "come for me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 5,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "help you get away",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w12
|
[
2
] |
The person probably will want to help you. If they fear they are the next in line for something bad to happen they want to protect themselves and helping you get away might prevent a bad outcome to them. However, they might not help you get away because that means they're the only one left and they might be attacked.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "as soon as they get you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 5,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "help you get away",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w13
|
[
0,
2
] |
The speaker is not obligated to help the other person get away but it is in their best interest to do so.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "as soon as they get you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 13,
"text": "I'll help you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w14
|
[
1
] |
The speaker will not be there to help the other get away.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 24,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "get you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 13,
"text": "I'll help you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w16
|
[
1
] |
The statement states that someone will help another person get away, but in the context, the same person says that as soon as they get you, they'll come for the same person that supposedly would help someone else get away.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 2,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "think as soon as they get you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "I'll help you get away",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w19
|
[
0,
2
] |
The context makes it seem like the main character wants to avoid getting caught and believes that "they" will look for him after they get "you." So it is likely to be true that the main character wants to help "you" so save him/herself. But it could be false because the main character may not help "you" get away because he/she could decide to run or do any number of other things instead.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "they get you",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 33,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "they'll come for me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 13,
"text": "I'll help you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w2
|
[
0,
2
] |
The context is about the people being chased or tracked down in someway by using the words "Get you" and "come for me", the statement is more so about the actions of one individual so the first person does not get caught. It is equally likely or unlikely to be true, depending on what kind of person it is which isn't established in the context.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 23,
"text": "they",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 24,
"endIndex": 27,
"text": "get",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 28,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "you",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 41,
"endIndex": 45,
"text": "come",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 46,
"endIndex": 49,
"text": "for",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 50,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 4,
"text": "I'll",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 5,
"endIndex": 9,
"text": "help",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 10,
"endIndex": 13,
"text": "you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w20
|
[
2,
1
] |
If the person is already taken, it'd be very unlikely that they're able to help the other person get away.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 24,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "get you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 14,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "get away",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0.5,
0.5
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w21
|
[
1
] |
If the speaker of the second sentence is taken first, then they cannot help them get away when whomever comes for them.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 41,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "come for me",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "they get you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "I'll help you get away",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w22
|
[
2
] |
If the speaker from the context is the same as in the statement, it is most likely true. If the speaker from the statement is replying to the speaker in the context, it is most likely false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 1,
"text": "I",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 24,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "get you",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 50,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 14,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "get away",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 4,
"text": "I'll",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w24
|
[
2
] |
The Context specifies that some people are moving against both the speaker and the listener, which doesn't give enough information to make the Statement true as it affirms that the speaker will help the listener.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "they get you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 13,
"text": "I'll help you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w26
|
[
2
] |
The statement is confusing, since it doesn't refer to who is being came after, and who is helping.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "they get you",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 33,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "they'll come for me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 10,
"endIndex": 13,
"text": "you",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 4,
"text": "I'll",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w3
|
[
1
] |
The context's end result is these two people (you and I) being together. It does not state anything about escape. The statement focuses on this escape but it isn't mentioned in context.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 41,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "come for me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 5,
"endIndex": 13,
"text": "help you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w35
|
[
0,
1
] |
If both "you" and "me" want to be captured, then the statement is likely false because if they will rescue you from a drowning boat, and as soon as they get you, then will rescue me too, "me" will be interested in not letting "you" leave because it may affect "me"'s chances of being rescued. If both "you" and "me" do not want to be captured, then the statement is likely true because if one robber gets captured, the police might be likely to also capture "me", so "me" has a vested interested in helping both "you" and "me" get away.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "they get you",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 33,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "they'll come for me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "I'll help you get away",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0,
0.5
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w37
|
[
2
] |
It is possible the person means they'll help the other get away so they'll avoid getting caught themselves, but it's unclear if that's what they mean.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "as soon as they get you, they'll come for me",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 1,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "'ll help you get away",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w4
|
[
0
] |
The context states that the speaker fears they'll be the next target. Therefore, it makes sense that they'd be willing to help the current target get away, to avoid being targetted next.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 33,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "they'll come for me.",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 18,
"text": "as soon as",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 13,
"text": "I'll help you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w5
|
[
1
] |
The statement is most likely false. This is because the context describes that if they get the person speaking the statement first, then the person speaking in the context is done for. therfore, the person speaking the statement would be unable to help the person speaking in the context get away.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "they get you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 13,
"text": "I'll help you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w6
|
[
1
] |
There is no mention of getting away or the need for help in the context. The order of the context also indicates that the action will happen to you before me.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w7
|
[
2,
1
] |
The context says that someone is going to be gotten by someone else, so the statement that I will help you get away could possibly be true, but not likely.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "they get you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 10,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "you get away",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0.5,
0.5
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w8
|
[
1
] |
The person won't be able to help the other one get away since they will for them first.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 11,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "soon as they get you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 5,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "help you get away",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
138500n
|
I think as soon as they get you, they'll come for me.
|
I'll help you get away.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2
] |
w9
|
[
2,
1
] |
Could be either true or false, but most unlikely. It's more likely to be false because if they get the one they'll go for the other. Mayhaps if the one doe not gets caught, then the next won't get caught too.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "they get you, they'll come for me.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 5,
"endIndex": 23,
"text": "help you get away.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0.5,
0.5
] |
[
0.15217390656471252,
0.45652174949645996,
0.3913043439388275
] |
[
2
] | null |
140704e
|
I think this report shows that we have had an inordinately productive and successful year.
|
The report shows that we need to be productive to have a successful year
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
2,
0
] |
w1
|
[
2
] |
The context notes that they had a productive and successful year but it doesn't indicate that it notes that productivity is a necessary component of the successful year as put forth in the statement. The presence of productivity in relation to success could be true or false but it is uncertain based on info provided.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 59,
"endIndex": 69,
"text": "productive",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 34,
"endIndex": 42,
"text": "have had",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 25,
"endIndex": 29,
"text": "need",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 36,
"endIndex": 46,
"text": "productive",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.15000000596046448,
0.550000011920929,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
3,
4
] | null |
140704e
|
I think this report shows that we have had an inordinately productive and successful year.
|
The report shows that we need to be productive to have a successful year
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
2,
0
] |
w16
|
[
0,
2
] |
Being productive and having a successful year are probably correlated, but we are unsure about that, even though I'm leaning toward yes.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 59,
"endIndex": 89,
"text": "productive and successful year",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 36,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "productive to have a successful year",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.15000000596046448,
0.550000011920929,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
3,
4
] | null |
140704e
|
I think this report shows that we have had an inordinately productive and successful year.
|
The report shows that we need to be productive to have a successful year
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
2,
0
] |
w18
|
[
2
] |
Being productive can lead to great success but correlation doesn't always mean causation.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 46,
"endIndex": 89,
"text": "inordinately productive and successful year",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 25,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "need to be productive to have a successful year",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.15000000596046448,
0.550000011920929,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
3,
4
] | null |
140704e
|
I think this report shows that we have had an inordinately productive and successful year.
|
The report shows that we need to be productive to have a successful year
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
2,
0
] |
w2
|
[
2
] |
Though both high production and success are mentioned in both the context and the statement, there is no direct correlation between the two in the statement. The report measures the production and success, it does not prove that production equals success.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 31,
"endIndex": 33,
"text": "we",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 39,
"endIndex": 42,
"text": "had",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 59,
"endIndex": 69,
"text": "productive",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 70,
"endIndex": 73,
"text": "and",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 74,
"endIndex": 84,
"text": "successful",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 85,
"endIndex": 89,
"text": "year",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 25,
"endIndex": 29,
"text": "need",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 30,
"endIndex": 32,
"text": "to",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 33,
"endIndex": 35,
"text": "be",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 36,
"endIndex": 46,
"text": "productive",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 47,
"endIndex": 49,
"text": "to",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 50,
"endIndex": 54,
"text": "have",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 57,
"endIndex": 67,
"text": "successful",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 68,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "year",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.15000000596046448,
0.550000011920929,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
3,
4
] | null |
140704e
|
I think this report shows that we have had an inordinately productive and successful year.
|
The report shows that we need to be productive to have a successful year
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
2,
0
] |
w4
|
[
1
] |
The report in the context was in reference to a previous year. Therefore it doesn't seemingly have anything to say about what this year or next needs to be like.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 31,
"endIndex": 42,
"text": "we have had",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 22,
"endIndex": 32,
"text": "we need to",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.15000000596046448,
0.550000011920929,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
3,
4
] | null |
140704e
|
I think this report shows that we have had an inordinately productive and successful year.
|
The report shows that we need to be productive to have a successful year
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
2,
0
] |
w5
|
[
1
] |
The statement is most likely false because according to the context, data shows it has been a productive year.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 59,
"endIndex": 90,
"text": "productive and successful year.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 22,
"endIndex": 46,
"text": "we need to be productive",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.15000000596046448,
0.550000011920929,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
3,
4
] | null |
140704e
|
I think this report shows that we have had an inordinately productive and successful year.
|
The report shows that we need to be productive to have a successful year
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
2,
0
] |
w6
|
[
0
] |
The successful year seems directly related to the productivity in the first part of the sentence.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 59,
"endIndex": 69,
"text": "productive",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 74,
"endIndex": 84,
"text": "successful",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "The report shows that we need to be productive to have a successful year",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.15000000596046448,
0.550000011920929,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
3,
4
] | null |
140704e
|
I think this report shows that we have had an inordinately productive and successful year.
|
The report shows that we need to be productive to have a successful year
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
2,
0
] |
w7
|
[
2
] |
The report shows that the year has been productive and successful, but does not say that it was successful because it was productive, although this could possibly be true.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 59,
"endIndex": 90,
"text": "productive and successful year.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 25,
"endIndex": 46,
"text": "need to be productive",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.15000000596046448,
0.550000011920929,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
3,
4
] | null |
140704e
|
I think this report shows that we have had an inordinately productive and successful year.
|
The report shows that we need to be productive to have a successful year
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
2,
0
] |
w8
|
[
1
] |
The report shows that they were productive and had a successful year.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 59,
"endIndex": 89,
"text": "productive and successful year",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 25,
"endIndex": 46,
"text": "need to be productive",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.15000000596046448,
0.550000011920929,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
3,
4
] | null |
140704e
|
I think this report shows that we have had an inordinately productive and successful year.
|
The report shows that we need to be productive to have a successful year
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
2,
0
] |
w9
|
[
2
] |
This is most likely to be false because the report shows that they are already having a successful year. The statement says that they should be more productive and have a more successful year, which may be true, but unlikely
|
[
{
"startIndex": 13,
"endIndex": 89,
"text": "report shows that we have had an inordinately productive and successful year",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 22,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "we need to be productive to have a successful year",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.15000000596046448,
0.550000011920929,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
3,
4
] | null |
143789c
|
What a brilliantly innocuous metaphor, devised by a master manipulator to obscure his manipulations.
|
The simile was created by the manipulator.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
2,
1,
0
] |
w39
|
[
0
] |
Something devised by someone implies that it was created by them.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 39,
"endIndex": 46,
"text": "devised",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 59,
"endIndex": 70,
"text": "manipulator",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 15,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "created",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 30,
"endIndex": 42,
"text": "manipulator.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.30000001192092896,
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
1,
7,
4
] |
QUD
|
143789c
|
What a brilliantly innocuous metaphor, devised by a master manipulator to obscure his manipulations.
|
The simile was created by the manipulator.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
2,
1,
0
] |
w4
|
[
0
] |
As all metaphors are a subset of similes, the statement must be true.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 29,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "metaphor",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 10,
"text": "simile",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.30000001192092896,
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
1,
7,
4
] |
QUD
|
143789c
|
What a brilliantly innocuous metaphor, devised by a master manipulator to obscure his manipulations.
|
The simile was created by the manipulator.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
2,
1,
0
] |
w1
|
[
1
] |
The context notes that a metaphor was created by the manipulator and the statement notes that the manipulator created a simile. A simile and metaphor are not the same thing.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 29,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "metaphor",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 59,
"endIndex": 70,
"text": "manipulator",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 10,
"text": "simile",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 30,
"endIndex": 41,
"text": "manipulator",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.30000001192092896,
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
1,
7,
4
] | null |
143789c
|
What a brilliantly innocuous metaphor, devised by a master manipulator to obscure his manipulations.
|
The simile was created by the manipulator.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
2,
1,
0
] |
w19
|
[
0
] |
The context says that a master minipulator devised a metaphor. The statement says a simile was created by the manipulator. This is likely to be true because similes and metaphors are both figures of speech that are used to make a comparison between two things that are not alike. The difference is that similes make the comparison by saying that something is like something else but metaphors make the comparison by saying that something is something else. So all metaphors are similes.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 29,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "metaphor",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 39,
"endIndex": 70,
"text": "devised by a master manipulator",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 10,
"text": "simile",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 15,
"endIndex": 41,
"text": "created by the manipulator",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.30000001192092896,
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
1,
7,
4
] | null |
143789c
|
What a brilliantly innocuous metaphor, devised by a master manipulator to obscure his manipulations.
|
The simile was created by the manipulator.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
2,
1,
0
] |
w2
|
[
1
] |
The context describes a metaphor, while the statement mentions a simile, which is a different type of speech.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 29,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "metaphor",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 10,
"text": "simile",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.30000001192092896,
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
1,
7,
4
] | null |
143789c
|
What a brilliantly innocuous metaphor, devised by a master manipulator to obscure his manipulations.
|
The simile was created by the manipulator.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
2,
1,
0
] |
w28
|
[
2
] |
The context discusses a metaphor created by a manipulator, yet the statement discusses a simile. The manipulator could create both similes and metaphors, or only metaphors.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 29,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "metaphor",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 39,
"endIndex": 46,
"text": "devised",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 59,
"endIndex": 70,
"text": "manipulator",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 10,
"text": "simile",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 15,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "created",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 30,
"endIndex": 41,
"text": "manipulator",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.30000001192092896,
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
1,
7,
4
] | null |
143789c
|
What a brilliantly innocuous metaphor, devised by a master manipulator to obscure his manipulations.
|
The simile was created by the manipulator.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
2,
1,
0
] |
w30
|
[
2
] |
A metaphor is not the same as a simile, which the manipulator definitely created, but they could have created a simile too.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 29,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "metaphor",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 10,
"text": "simile",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.30000001192092896,
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
1,
7,
4
] | null |
143789c
|
What a brilliantly innocuous metaphor, devised by a master manipulator to obscure his manipulations.
|
The simile was created by the manipulator.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
2,
1,
0
] |
w40
|
[
2
] |
The context is purely that there is a metaphor that was devised by a manipulator. So saying that manipulator created a separate simile could be true if the manipulator did both the simile and metaphor or false if they didn't do the simile.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 29,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "metaphor",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 52,
"endIndex": 70,
"text": "master manipulator",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 10,
"text": "simile",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 26,
"endIndex": 41,
"text": "the manipulator",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.30000001192092896,
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
1,
7,
4
] | null |
143789c
|
What a brilliantly innocuous metaphor, devised by a master manipulator to obscure his manipulations.
|
The simile was created by the manipulator.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
2,
1,
0
] |
w7
|
[
2
] |
The context states that a metaphor was created by a manipulator, but does not mention a simile. The statement that the simile was created by the manipulator could be true or false since it is not mentioned in the context, but it is possible.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 29,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "metaphor",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 59,
"endIndex": 70,
"text": "manipulator",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 10,
"text": "simile",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.30000001192092896,
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
1,
7,
4
] | null |
143789c
|
What a brilliantly innocuous metaphor, devised by a master manipulator to obscure his manipulations.
|
The simile was created by the manipulator.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
2,
1,
0
] |
w8
|
[
1
] |
In the context it does not say that the simile was created by a manipulator.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 29,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "metaphor",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 52,
"endIndex": 70,
"text": "master manipulator",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 41,
"text": "simile was created by the manipulator",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.30000001192092896,
0.4000000059604645,
0.30000001192092896
] |
[
1,
7,
4
] | null |
14442e
|
i'd say they appraised it it's gone up you now maybe like five percent
|
If I were to have it appraised, it would have gone up.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
2,
0,
0
] |
w0
|
[
0
] |
The statement is a generalized version of the context. Both claims agree that appraisals indicate a growth.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 25,
"text": "they appraised it",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 26,
"endIndex": 38,
"text": "it's gone up",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 13,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "have it appraised,",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 46,
"endIndex": 54,
"text": "gone up.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.699999988079071,
0.10000000149011612,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1,
3
] | null |
14442e
|
i'd say they appraised it it's gone up you now maybe like five percent
|
If I were to have it appraised, it would have gone up.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
2,
0,
0
] |
w1
|
[
0
] |
The context notes that the appraised item has gone up while the statement implies a current appraisal would show the value would go up. While not exactly matching, the two are congruent and thus the statement is more likely true than false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 13,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "appraised",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 31,
"endIndex": 38,
"text": "gone up",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 46,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "gone up",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 21,
"endIndex": 30,
"text": "appraised",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.699999988079071,
0.10000000149011612,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1,
3
] | null |
14442e
|
i'd say they appraised it it's gone up you now maybe like five percent
|
If I were to have it appraised, it would have gone up.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
2,
0,
0
] |
w13
|
[
0
] |
The speaker in the statement has not yet had an appraisal done but given the economic environment of rising values, he expects an appraisal to show the value of his property to be higher than it was.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 47,
"endIndex": 70,
"text": "maybe like five percent",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 31,
"endIndex": 38,
"text": "gone up",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "If I were to have it appraised, it would have gone up",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.699999988079071,
0.10000000149011612,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1,
3
] | null |
14442e
|
i'd say they appraised it it's gone up you now maybe like five percent
|
If I were to have it appraised, it would have gone up.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
2,
0,
0
] |
w16
|
[
0
] |
Both the context and statement say the same thing in differents words. [i'd say they appraised it it's gone up = If I were to have it appraised, it would have gone up.]
|
[
{
"startIndex": 1,
"endIndex": 38,
"text": "'d say they appraised it it's gone up",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 30,
"text": "If I were to have it appraised",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 46,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "gone up",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.699999988079071,
0.10000000149011612,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1,
3
] | null |
14442e
|
i'd say they appraised it it's gone up you now maybe like five percent
|
If I were to have it appraised, it would have gone up.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
2,
0,
0
] |
w2
|
[
0
] |
Both the context and statement are speculating that if an item is appraised then the value is likely to have "gone up." The five percent mentioned in the context does not matter since the statement is more vague.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 31,
"endIndex": 35,
"text": "gone",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 36,
"endIndex": 38,
"text": "up",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 13,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "appraised",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 46,
"endIndex": 50,
"text": "gone",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 51,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "up",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 21,
"endIndex": 30,
"text": "appraised",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.699999988079071,
0.10000000149011612,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1,
3
] | null |
14442e
|
i'd say they appraised it it's gone up you now maybe like five percent
|
If I were to have it appraised, it would have gone up.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
2,
0,
0
] |
w4
|
[
1
] |
Since it already increased in value on appraisal, it's likely it's valued at its true worth now. It's unlikely it'd increase in value again with a second appraisal.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 26,
"endIndex": 38,
"text": "it's gone up",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 13,
"endIndex": 30,
"text": "have it appraised",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.699999988079071,
0.10000000149011612,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1,
3
] | null |
14442e
|
i'd say they appraised it it's gone up you now maybe like five percent
|
If I were to have it appraised, it would have gone up.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
2,
0,
0
] |
w5
|
[
0
] |
The person speaking of appraisal assumes the item has gone up in value in both the context and the statement, making the statement most likely true.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 13,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "appraised",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 58,
"endIndex": 70,
"text": "five percent",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 46,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "gone up",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 21,
"endIndex": 30,
"text": "appraised",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.699999988079071,
0.10000000149011612,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1,
3
] | null |
14442e
|
i'd say they appraised it it's gone up you now maybe like five percent
|
If I were to have it appraised, it would have gone up.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
2,
0,
0
] |
w7
|
[
2
] |
Someone else appraised it and it went up, but this does not say anything about whether or not it would have gone up if I had apprasied it.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 25,
"text": "they appraised it",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 34,
"text": "If I were to have it appraised, it",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.699999988079071,
0.10000000149011612,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1,
3
] | null |
14442e
|
i'd say they appraised it it's gone up you now maybe like five percent
|
If I were to have it appraised, it would have gone up.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
2,
0,
0
] |
w8
|
[
1
] |
It was appraised and it has gone up by five precent.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 13,
"endIndex": 70,
"text": "appraised it it's gone up you now maybe like five percent",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 21,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "appraised, it would have gone up",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.699999988079071,
0.10000000149011612,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1,
3
] | null |
14442e
|
i'd say they appraised it it's gone up you now maybe like five percent
|
If I were to have it appraised, it would have gone up.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
1,
2,
0,
0
] |
w9
|
[
0
] |
I would think a product being appraised would increase its cost
|
[
{
"startIndex": 13,
"endIndex": 70,
"text": "appraised it it's gone up you now maybe like five percent",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 13,
"endIndex": 54,
"text": "have it appraised, it would have gone up.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.699999988079071,
0.10000000149011612,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1,
3
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w0
|
[
1
] |
They didn't need to stand the pain any longer as their mouth returned back to normal
|
[
{
"startIndex": 35,
"endIndex": 78,
"text": "my mouth has returned to its familiar self.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 17,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "they could no longer stand the pain.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w1
|
[
1
] |
The context implies the pain went away after three days while the statement implies that the pain was still strong after three days. Thus, the statements conflict and the statement is likely to be false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 64,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "familiar",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 56,
"text": "returned",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w10
|
[
2
] |
The context never said there was pain, so this is something that can go either way.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 20,
"endIndex": 34,
"text": "using the gel,",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 38,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "mouth has returned to its familiar self",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w12
|
[
1
] |
It would not be a familiar state for a mouth to feel in pain. The context implies a positive outcome from the gel, not a negative one, therefore this is most likely false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 38,
"endIndex": 43,
"text": "mouth",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 64,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "familiar self",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w13
|
[
2,
1
] |
We do not know if the "three days" occurred at the same time. The gel use might've happened because of the three days of pain.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 6,
"endIndex": 33,
"text": "three days of using the gel",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "After three days they could no longer stand the pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0.5,
0.5
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w14
|
[
1
] |
The context says nothing about pain and only talks about the benefit.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 78,
"text": "returned to its familiar self.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 28,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "no longer stand the pain.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w15
|
[
1
] |
The context is most likely to be false because it refers to something not being able to withstand pain, whereas the context refers to the person's mouth being restored.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "returned to its familiar self",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 38,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "stand the pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w16
|
[
1
] |
The statement is most likely to be false because the context states that after three days of using the gel, the mouth feels normal again. Which may mean that prior to this, the person felt pain, but not right now.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 33,
"text": "After three days of using the gel",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "returned to its familiar self",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 16,
"text": "After three days",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 38,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "stand the pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w19
|
[
1
] |
The context says the gel "has returned mouth" to familiar. "Returned" implies normal, and normal would not include pain. So the statement is likely to be false. After three days, the pain should be gone.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "returned to its familiar self",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 44,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "the pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w2
|
[
2,
1
] |
The context explains the person's mouth has returned to normal after using a gel, where as in the statement the person mentions the pain persisting and no mention of gel. Unless the person is always in pain, it is false., but if these are different time frames, it could be true or false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 64,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "familiar",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 73,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "self",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 30,
"endIndex": 33,
"text": "gel",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 6,
"endIndex": 11,
"text": "three",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 12,
"endIndex": 16,
"text": "days",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 38,
"endIndex": 43,
"text": "stand",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 44,
"endIndex": 47,
"text": "the",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0.5,
0.5
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w21
|
[
2,
1
] |
By "familiar self," the speaker might mean that their mouth is always in pain, or is not in pain. If the former the statement could be true, but it's most likely the latter in which case it would be false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "returned to its familiar self",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 6,
"endIndex": 16,
"text": "three days",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 6,
"endIndex": 16,
"text": "three days",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0.5,
0.5
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w22
|
[
1
] |
If the mouth has returned to its normal self, I assume it is not in pain.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 56,
"text": "returned",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 64,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "familiar self",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w23
|
[
2
] |
In the context, the writer is referring to their mouth feeling like it's familiar self. This would be either that their mouth is feeling worse or better since it doesn't specify. The statement simply says that after three days they couldn't stand the pain. It doesn't specify that the unbearable pain was before or after using the gel. Therefore, the statement may or may not be true.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 64,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "familiar self",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 28,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "no longer stand the pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w26
|
[
1
] |
The context and statements are contradictory. The context implies the gel helped, whereas the statement implies the gel made things worse.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 6,
"endIndex": 16,
"text": "three days",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 30,
"endIndex": 33,
"text": "gel",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 64,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "familiar self",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 56,
"text": "returned",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 6,
"endIndex": 16,
"text": "three days",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w3
|
[
2
] |
The statement refers to "they". Assuming "they" is referring to the teeth or mouth area/bacteria, it could make sense they could no longer stand the pain and got rid of all the bacteria.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 35,
"endIndex": 43,
"text": "my mouth",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 17,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "they could no longer stand the pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w33
|
[
1
] |
The context suggests that the gel helped relieve mouth pain by returning it to its familiar self while the statement says that the person is experiencing pain
|
[
{
"startIndex": 38,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "mouth has returned to its familiar self",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 22,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "could no longer stand the pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w34
|
[
1
] |
Both of the sentences are stating opposite outcomes. One is stating that the gel has helped, while the other one is stating that the pain increased after 3 days.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 6,
"endIndex": 33,
"text": "three days of using the gel",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "returned to its familiar self",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 16,
"text": "After three days",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 22,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "could no longer stand the pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
14545c
|
After three days of using the gel, my mouth has returned to its familiar self.
|
After three days they could no longer stand the pain.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0
] |
w36
|
[
1
] |
After 3 days, if your mouth returned to it's familiar self, there is no way you would have pain after three days. It's a contradiction.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 16,
"text": "After three days",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 38,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "mouth has returned to its familiar self",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 16,
"text": "After three days",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 52,
"text": "pain",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0,
0.2199999988079071,
0.7799999713897705
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.