uid
stringclasses 122
values | premise
stringclasses 121
values | hypothesis
stringclasses 122
values | chaos_dist
listlengths 3
3
| mnli_labels
listlengths 1
5
| worker_id
stringclasses 48
values | multilabel
listlengths 1
3
| explanation
stringlengths 48
773
| highlight_p
listlengths 0
12
| highlight_h
listlengths 0
9
| dist
listlengths 3
3
| agg_dist
listlengths 3
3
| taxonomy
listlengths 1
3
| within_label_variation
stringclasses 3
values |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29373e
|
After considering comments of the Postal Service and other participants, the Commission found the proposal problematical, and declined to pursue it.
|
The Commission ultimately declined to pursue the proposal.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1
] |
w6
|
[
0
] |
Ultimately would encompass the time period after comments were considered.
|
[] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 58,
"text": "The Commission ultimately declined to pursue the proposal.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.9444444179534912,
0.055555559694767,
0
] |
[
1
] | null |
29373e
|
After considering comments of the Postal Service and other participants, the Commission found the proposal problematical, and declined to pursue it.
|
The Commission ultimately declined to pursue the proposal.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1
] |
w7
|
[
0
] |
Both the context and the statement say that the Commission declined to pursue the proposal.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 126,
"endIndex": 147,
"text": "declined to pursue it",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 26,
"endIndex": 44,
"text": "declined to pursue",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.9444444179534912,
0.055555559694767,
0
] |
[
1
] | null |
29373e
|
After considering comments of the Postal Service and other participants, the Commission found the proposal problematical, and declined to pursue it.
|
The Commission ultimately declined to pursue the proposal.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1
] |
w8
|
[
0
] |
The commission declined to pursue the proposal do the comments and it being problematic.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 126,
"endIndex": 147,
"text": "declined to pursue it",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 26,
"endIndex": 57,
"text": "declined to pursue the proposal",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.9444444179534912,
0.055555559694767,
0
] |
[
1
] | null |
29373e
|
After considering comments of the Postal Service and other participants, the Commission found the proposal problematical, and declined to pursue it.
|
The Commission ultimately declined to pursue the proposal.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1
] |
w9
|
[
0
] |
After some consideration, the Commission ultimately declined to pursue the proposal.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 77,
"endIndex": 148,
"text": "Commission found the proposal problematical, and declined to pursue it.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 58,
"text": "Commission ultimately declined to pursue the proposal.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.9444444179534912,
0.055555559694767,
0
] |
[
1
] | null |
30648c
|
8. Jury Nullification.
|
The jury cannot make a decision contrary to the judge's.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
0,
1,
2
] |
w0
|
[
1
] |
The definition that the statement provides is not actually what the term in the context actually means.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "Jury Nullification.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 9,
"endIndex": 56,
"text": "cannot make a decision contrary to the judge's.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
2,
8
] | null |
30648c
|
8. Jury Nullification.
|
The jury cannot make a decision contrary to the judge's.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
0,
1,
2
] |
w1
|
[
1
] |
Jury nullification means a decision contrary to the judge was returned, which is the opposite of what the statement says when it notes they can't make a decision that is contrary.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "Nullification",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 32,
"endIndex": 40,
"text": "contrary",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
2,
8
] | null |
30648c
|
8. Jury Nullification.
|
The jury cannot make a decision contrary to the judge's.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
0,
1,
2
] |
w13
|
[
2
] |
Without the proper legal knowledge and understanding what nullifies a jury's decision, we cannot know for certain if a jury's verdict can be different from a judge's.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "Jury Nullification",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 16,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "make a decision",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 32,
"endIndex": 55,
"text": "contrary to the judge's",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
2,
8
] | null |
30648c
|
8. Jury Nullification.
|
The jury cannot make a decision contrary to the judge's.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
0,
1,
2
] |
w2
|
[
2
] |
The context only mentions jury nullification without any other information. It is as likely true as false that the jury cannot contradict the judge's decision here, considering we don't know what the judge or jury's decisions actually are.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "Nullification",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "Jury",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 23,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "decision",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 32,
"endIndex": 40,
"text": "contrary",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 48,
"endIndex": 55,
"text": "judge's",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
2,
8
] | null |
30648c
|
8. Jury Nullification.
|
The jury cannot make a decision contrary to the judge's.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
0,
1,
2
] |
w4
|
[
2
] |
The context is only a term and not a full sentence/phrase, and therefore the following statement cannot be inferred to be true or false from it.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "Jury Nullification",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 8,
"text": "The jury",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
2,
8
] | null |
30648c
|
8. Jury Nullification.
|
The jury cannot make a decision contrary to the judge's.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
0,
1,
2
] |
w5
|
[
0
] |
I believe that the statement is explaining what the context means, so therefore it would make the statement true if this is in fact what the statement is doing.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "Jury Nullification.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 20,
"text": "jury cannot make",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
2,
8
] | null |
30648c
|
8. Jury Nullification.
|
The jury cannot make a decision contrary to the judge's.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
0,
1,
2
] |
w6
|
[
1
] |
The context 8 and Jury nullification are not equal or similar to the statement on a jury decision being contrary to a judge. There is no explanation to directly affirm the statement within the context sentence.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "8. Jury Nullification.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
2,
8
] | null |
30648c
|
8. Jury Nullification.
|
The jury cannot make a decision contrary to the judge's.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
0,
1,
2
] |
w7
|
[
2
] |
The context is not a complete sentence and does not indicate whether or not the statement could be true.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "Jury Nullification",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 15,
"text": "jury cannot",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
2,
8
] | null |
30648c
|
8. Jury Nullification.
|
The jury cannot make a decision contrary to the judge's.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
0,
1,
2
] |
w8
|
[
2
] |
It's either true or false because the context does not talk about whether a jury can or cannot make a decision contrary to the judge's.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "Jury Nullification",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 31,
"text": "jury cannot make a decision",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
2,
8
] | null |
30648c
|
8. Jury Nullification.
|
The jury cannot make a decision contrary to the judge's.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
0,
1,
2
] |
w9
|
[
2,
1
] |
Jury Nullification occurs when a jury finds a defendant not guilty despite being clearly guilty. The judge may agree with the jury though. This is likely false, but could also be neither true or false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "Jury Nullification",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 56,
"text": "jury cannot make a decision contrary to the judge's.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0.5,
0.5
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
2,
8
] | null |
32078e
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are not talking about individual holders of wealth.
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are talking about collective holders of wealth
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
2,
0,
0
] |
w13
|
[
0,
2
] |
Bush and Bradley could be talking about any of a number of aspects of wealth, not just who holds the wealth. It's also possible they are discussing who holds wealth besides individuals.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 54,
"endIndex": 82,
"text": "individual holders of wealth",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 50,
"endIndex": 78,
"text": "collective holders of wealth",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1
] | null |
32078e
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are not talking about individual holders of wealth.
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are talking about collective holders of wealth
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
2,
0,
0
] |
w16
|
[
2
] |
Since according to the context, they are not talking about individual holders of wealth, there is a possibility that they are talking about collective holders of wealth.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 54,
"endIndex": 82,
"text": "individual holders of wealth",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 50,
"endIndex": 78,
"text": "collective holders of wealth",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1
] | null |
32078e
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are not talking about individual holders of wealth.
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are talking about collective holders of wealth
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
2,
0,
0
] |
w2
|
[
1
] |
The context and statement are identical except the word "not" changing the meaning to the opposite making it false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 36,
"endIndex": 39,
"text": "not",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 32,
"endIndex": 35,
"text": "are",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 32,
"endIndex": 35,
"text": "are",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1
] | null |
32078e
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are not talking about individual holders of wealth.
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are talking about collective holders of wealth
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
2,
0,
0
] |
w25
|
[
2
] |
Complementary ideas. If they are not talking about the individual, they probably are talking about the collective.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 36,
"endIndex": 39,
"text": "not",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 54,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "individual holders",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 32,
"endIndex": 35,
"text": "are",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 50,
"endIndex": 60,
"text": "collective",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1
] | null |
32078e
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are not talking about individual holders of wealth.
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are talking about collective holders of wealth
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
2,
0,
0
] |
w30
|
[
0,
2
] |
If they are talking about holders of wealth, but aren't talking about individual holders, then the holders must be collective. But then, they could also be talking about something other than holders of wealth.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 36,
"endIndex": 39,
"text": "not",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 54,
"endIndex": 82,
"text": "individual holders of wealth",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 50,
"endIndex": 78,
"text": "collective holders of wealth",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1
] | null |
32078e
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are not talking about individual holders of wealth.
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are talking about collective holders of wealth
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
2,
0,
0
] |
w39
|
[
2
] |
Just because they are not talking about something specific, doesn't necessarily mean they are talking about a another specific thing.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 54,
"endIndex": 64,
"text": "individual",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 32,
"endIndex": 47,
"text": "are not talking",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 50,
"endIndex": 60,
"text": "collective",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 32,
"endIndex": 43,
"text": "are talking",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1
] | null |
32078e
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are not talking about individual holders of wealth.
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are talking about collective holders of wealth
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
2,
0,
0
] |
w4
|
[
1
] |
Since the context indicates that the two individuals aren't talking about the topic mentioned in the statement, the statement must be false as it claims they are talking about the topic.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 32,
"endIndex": 47,
"text": "are not talking",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 32,
"endIndex": 43,
"text": "are talking",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1
] | null |
32078e
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are not talking about individual holders of wealth.
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are talking about collective holders of wealth
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
2,
0,
0
] |
w40
|
[
2
] |
In one case, they could not be talking at all in which case the statement is not true, in the other case, they are talking but just not about individual holders of wealth but may be talking about collective holders of wealth.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 36,
"endIndex": 47,
"text": "not talking",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 54,
"endIndex": 64,
"text": "individual",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 32,
"endIndex": 43,
"text": "are talking",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 50,
"endIndex": 60,
"text": "collective",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1
] | null |
32078e
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are not talking about individual holders of wealth.
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are talking about collective holders of wealth
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
2,
0,
0
] |
w7
|
[
2
] |
The context states that they are not talking about individual holders of wealth, but it does not specify what they are talking about. The could possibly be talking about collective holders of wealth, but they may not be.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 36,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "not talking about individual holders",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 36,
"endIndex": 68,
"text": "talking about collective holders",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1
] | null |
32078e
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are not talking about individual holders of wealth.
|
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are talking about collective holders of wealth
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
2,
0,
0
] |
w8
|
[
0
] |
George W. Bush and Bill Bradley are not talking about individual holders of wealth but instead about collective holders of wealth.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 54,
"endIndex": 64,
"text": "individual",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 50,
"endIndex": 60,
"text": "collective",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
1
] | null |
32572c
|
I guess he thought you'd turned up your toes.
|
He knew that you'd turned up your toes.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w0
|
[
0,
2
] |
The context is simply a guess to a third party's inner thought. The statement implies that the thought has been confirmed.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 18,
"text": "I guess he thought",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "He knew",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.3333333432674408,
0.6333333253860474,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
7
] | null |
32572c
|
I guess he thought you'd turned up your toes.
|
He knew that you'd turned up your toes.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w1
|
[
0
] |
While the statement says "knew," which implies certainty, the context says "thought", which implies a suggestive. However, given the context it is safe to assume that a level of certainty about turning up their toes is accurate and it's more likely to be true than false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 11,
"endIndex": 18,
"text": "thought",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 40,
"endIndex": 44,
"text": "toes",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 34,
"endIndex": 38,
"text": "toes",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "knew",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.3333333432674408,
0.6333333253860474,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
7
] | null |
32572c
|
I guess he thought you'd turned up your toes.
|
He knew that you'd turned up your toes.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w2
|
[
2
] |
It is not possible to confirm that he indeed "knew" like the statement says since the context is a "guess"about a "thought", not a confident declaration.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 10,
"text": "he",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 11,
"endIndex": 18,
"text": "thought",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 2,
"text": "He",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "knew",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.3333333432674408,
0.6333333253860474,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
7
] | null |
32572c
|
I guess he thought you'd turned up your toes.
|
He knew that you'd turned up your toes.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w3
|
[
0,
2,
1
] |
Context is surrounding a guess. Statement is certain. The context does come from 1st party without knowing exactly what "he" is thinking or knows. It could be true.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 18,
"text": "he thought",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "He knew",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.3333333432674408,
0.3333333432674408,
0.3333333432674408
] |
[
0.3333333432674408,
0.6333333253860474,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
7
] | null |
32572c
|
I guess he thought you'd turned up your toes.
|
He knew that you'd turned up your toes.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w4
|
[
0,
2
] |
Just because someone is making a guess at something, it doesn't necessarily make it true. The guess could be just a hunch, in which case either false or true are equally likely lacking any other information, or it could be an educated guess, which would make the statement more likely to be true.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "I guess",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "He knew",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.3333333432674408,
0.6333333253860474,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
7
] | null |
32572c
|
I guess he thought you'd turned up your toes.
|
He knew that you'd turned up your toes.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w5
|
[
2
] |
There is no way of knowing if the individual turned up their toes or not, so the statement can either be true or false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 18,
"text": "he thought",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 12,
"text": "knew that",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.3333333432674408,
0.6333333253860474,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
7
] | null |
32572c
|
I guess he thought you'd turned up your toes.
|
He knew that you'd turned up your toes.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w6
|
[
2
] |
I guess he thought and he knew indicate varying degrees of assurance. Also I guess he thought is one parties opinion of another's thoughts and he knew is more direct.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 45,
"text": "I guess he thought you'd turned up your toes.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.3333333432674408,
0.6333333253860474,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
7
] | null |
32572c
|
I guess he thought you'd turned up your toes.
|
He knew that you'd turned up your toes.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w7
|
[
2
] |
He thought you'd turn up your toes, but he did not necessarily know for sure.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 18,
"text": "he thought",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "He knew",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.3333333432674408,
0.6333333253860474,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
7
] | null |
32572c
|
I guess he thought you'd turned up your toes.
|
He knew that you'd turned up your toes.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w8
|
[
0
] |
He thought and knew that you'd turned up your toes.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 18,
"text": "he thought",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "He knew",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.3333333432674408,
0.6333333253860474,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
7
] | null |
32572c
|
I guess he thought you'd turned up your toes.
|
He knew that you'd turned up your toes.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w9
|
[
2
] |
This is mostly guesswork. He could have known, and maybe he didn't. This is also a guess, so either could be true
|
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 18,
"text": "he thought",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "knew",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.3333333432674408,
0.6333333253860474,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
7
] | null |
35422n
|
Marina del Rey is another, where you can also charter a yacht.
|
Yacht charters are not only possible at Marina del Rey.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
1,
0,
2
] |
w1
|
[
0
] |
The context notes that Marina del Rey is another, presumably place, where yachts can be chartered, which implies that yacht charters can also be found elsewhere as noted in the statement.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 14,
"text": "Marina del Rey",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 18,
"endIndex": 25,
"text": "another",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 41,
"endIndex": 45,
"text": "also",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 40,
"endIndex": 54,
"text": "Marina del Rey",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 36,
"text": "not only possible",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.75,
0.10000000149011612,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
9,
4
] | null |
35422n
|
Marina del Rey is another, where you can also charter a yacht.
|
Yacht charters are not only possible at Marina del Rey.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
1,
0,
2
] |
w15
|
[
1
] |
The context does not suggest any other thing that can be done at Marina del Rey other than charter a yacht, therefore the statement cxould be false. However, the statement affirms the context's point of being able to charter a yatch at Marina Del Rey.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 46,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "charter",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 6,
"endIndex": 36,
"text": "charters are not only possible",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.75,
0.10000000149011612,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
9,
4
] | null |
35422n
|
Marina del Rey is another, where you can also charter a yacht.
|
Yacht charters are not only possible at Marina del Rey.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
1,
0,
2
] |
w16
|
[
0
] |
In the context it is stated that Marina del Rey is another place to charter a yacht, while the statement says that they are 'not only possible' there, which makes it a true statement.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 25,
"text": "Marina del Rey is another",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 46,
"endIndex": 61,
"text": "charter a yacht",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 14,
"text": "Yacht charters",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 54,
"text": "not only possible at Marina del Rey",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.75,
0.10000000149011612,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
9,
4
] | null |
35422n
|
Marina del Rey is another, where you can also charter a yacht.
|
Yacht charters are not only possible at Marina del Rey.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
1,
0,
2
] |
w2
|
[
0
] |
By saying Marina del Rey is "another" place to charter yachts, the context then must be true that there are indeed other options besides Marina del Rey.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 15,
"endIndex": 17,
"text": "is",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 18,
"endIndex": 25,
"text": "another",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 41,
"endIndex": 45,
"text": "also",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 22,
"text": "not",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 23,
"endIndex": 27,
"text": "only",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 28,
"endIndex": 36,
"text": "possible",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 37,
"endIndex": 39,
"text": "at",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.75,
0.10000000149011612,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
9,
4
] | null |
35422n
|
Marina del Rey is another, where you can also charter a yacht.
|
Yacht charters are not only possible at Marina del Rey.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
1,
0,
2
] |
w30
|
[
0,
2
] |
The comma after "another" implies that the sentence is mainly categorizing Marina del Ray as something else, but in addition to that, it is a place where you can charter a yacht. While you can probably charter yachts in other places, this isn't necessarily true.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 18,
"endIndex": 25,
"text": "another",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 41,
"endIndex": 45,
"text": "also",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 54,
"text": "not only possible at Marina del Rey",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.75,
0.10000000149011612,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
9,
4
] | null |
35422n
|
Marina del Rey is another, where you can also charter a yacht.
|
Yacht charters are not only possible at Marina del Rey.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
1,
0,
2
] |
w31
|
[
0
] |
The context implies that Marina del Rey is just one place where yacht charters are available. The statement reaffirms that sentiment by stating that they are not only possible at the location, implying there are other places where one can charter yachts.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 41,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "also charter",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 36,
"text": "not only possible",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.75,
0.10000000149011612,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
9,
4
] | null |
35422n
|
Marina del Rey is another, where you can also charter a yacht.
|
Yacht charters are not only possible at Marina del Rey.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
1,
0,
2
] |
w4
|
[
0
] |
The statement includes the marina as an option where yacht channeling is available, implying there are other existing options. Hence the statement that other places can charter yachts is most likely to be true
|
[
{
"startIndex": 33,
"endIndex": 61,
"text": "you can also charter a yacht",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 36,
"text": "Yacht charters are not only possible",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.75,
0.10000000149011612,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
9,
4
] | null |
35422n
|
Marina del Rey is another, where you can also charter a yacht.
|
Yacht charters are not only possible at Marina del Rey.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
1,
0,
2
] |
w7
|
[
2,
1
] |
The context states that it is possible to charter yachts at Marina del Rey, but does not limit this location to all possible locations to charter a yacht. The statement that Marina del Rey is the only possible location to charter a yacht is possibly true, but is not stated in the context.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 18,
"endIndex": 26,
"text": "another,",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 23,
"endIndex": 36,
"text": "only possible",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0.5,
0.5
] |
[
0.75,
0.10000000149011612,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
9,
4
] | null |
35422n
|
Marina del Rey is another, where you can also charter a yacht.
|
Yacht charters are not only possible at Marina del Rey.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
1,
0,
2
] |
w8
|
[
0
] |
There are several places where yacht charters are possible such as at Marina del Rey.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 25,
"text": "Marina del Rey is another",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 54,
"text": "not only possible at Marina del Rey",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.75,
0.10000000149011612,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
9,
4
] | null |
35422n
|
Marina del Rey is another, where you can also charter a yacht.
|
Yacht charters are not only possible at Marina del Rey.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
2,
1,
1,
0,
2
] |
w9
|
[
0
] |
As the context says, It 'is another, where one can also charter a yacht. I'm assuming it is being called another place to charter a yacht, or it is another coastal region, where one can charter a yacht. Either way, it is common knowledge that there are many places to charter a yacht. It may be the case that it is another place within a country or area where one can charter a yacht. The context doesn't give much information on this but I think the statement is likely to be true.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 37,
"endIndex": 61,
"text": "can also charter a yacht",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 54,
"text": "not only possible at Marina del Rey",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.75,
0.10000000149011612,
0.15000000596046448
] |
[
9,
4
] | null |
38100e
|
no no but you know i was just thinking of getting one those for the yard because they they are really nice and um up here we have uh we have quite a few mosquitoes at nighttime
|
I was considering getting one of those for my home.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
0,
1
] |
w0
|
[
0
] |
The statement is just a shortened version of the context, in which a person is considering purchasing a product. The context provides more information on what the product is for and why they are considering it while the statement simply portrays their intention,
|
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "i was just thinking of getting one",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 73,
"endIndex": 106,
"text": "because they they are really nice",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 133,
"endIndex": 163,
"text": "we have quite a few mosquitoes",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 17,
"text": "I was considering",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0.05000000074505806,
0.10000000149011612
] |
[
7
] | null |
38100e
|
no no but you know i was just thinking of getting one those for the yard because they they are really nice and um up here we have uh we have quite a few mosquitoes at nighttime
|
I was considering getting one of those for my home.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
0,
1
] |
w1
|
[
0
] |
The context notes they are thinking about getting one for the yard which is consistent with the statement that they are thinking about getting one for the yard. Thus the statement is most likely true.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 42,
"endIndex": 49,
"text": "getting",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 68,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "yard",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 46,
"endIndex": 50,
"text": "home",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 18,
"endIndex": 25,
"text": "getting",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0.05000000074505806,
0.10000000149011612
] |
[
7
] | null |
38100e
|
no no but you know i was just thinking of getting one those for the yard because they they are really nice and um up here we have uh we have quite a few mosquitoes at nighttime
|
I was considering getting one of those for my home.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
0,
1
] |
w16
|
[
1
] |
The statement is a short version of the context while the context is just a 'verbatim' version of what someone said.
E.g. Context: i was just thinking of getting one those for the yard because they they are really nice
Statement: I was considering getting one of those for my home.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "i was just thinking of getting one those for the yard",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 50,
"text": "I was considering getting one of those for my home",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0.05000000074505806,
0.10000000149011612
] |
[
7
] | null |
38100e
|
no no but you know i was just thinking of getting one those for the yard because they they are really nice and um up here we have uh we have quite a few mosquitoes at nighttime
|
I was considering getting one of those for my home.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
0,
1
] |
w2
|
[
0,
2
] |
Although the item is not specifically mentioned, it is likely the "one of those" in the context and statement mean the same thing. There is also the difference between "yard" and "home" but I think most people would agree a yard is part of a home.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 50,
"endIndex": 53,
"text": "one",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 54,
"endIndex": 59,
"text": "those",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 68,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "yard",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 26,
"endIndex": 29,
"text": "one",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 30,
"endIndex": 32,
"text": "of",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 33,
"endIndex": 38,
"text": "those",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 46,
"endIndex": 50,
"text": "home",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0.05000000074505806,
0.10000000149011612
] |
[
7
] | null |
38100e
|
no no but you know i was just thinking of getting one those for the yard because they they are really nice and um up here we have uh we have quite a few mosquitoes at nighttime
|
I was considering getting one of those for my home.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
0,
1
] |
w4
|
[
0
] |
It's unlikely the person would be getting the item for someone else's yard, and far more likely than not if you have a yard you have a home.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 60,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "for the yard",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 39,
"endIndex": 50,
"text": "for my home",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0.05000000074505806,
0.10000000149011612
] |
[
7
] | null |
38100e
|
no no but you know i was just thinking of getting one those for the yard because they they are really nice and um up here we have uh we have quite a few mosquitoes at nighttime
|
I was considering getting one of those for my home.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
0,
1
] |
w5
|
[
0
] |
Though the statement does not say what the person is considering getting, both the context and the statement are speaking of possibly purchasing items for the home.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 50,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "one those for the yard",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 18,
"endIndex": 38,
"text": "getting one of those",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0.05000000074505806,
0.10000000149011612
] |
[
7
] | null |
38100e
|
no no but you know i was just thinking of getting one those for the yard because they they are really nice and um up here we have uh we have quite a few mosquitoes at nighttime
|
I was considering getting one of those for my home.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
0,
1
] |
w6
|
[
0
] |
Both the context and statement refer to getting " one of those", and a yard can be considered part of a home.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 59,
"text": "i was just thinking of getting one those",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 50,
"text": "I was considering getting one of those for my home",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0.05000000074505806,
0.10000000149011612
] |
[
7
] | null |
38100e
|
no no but you know i was just thinking of getting one those for the yard because they they are really nice and um up here we have uh we have quite a few mosquitoes at nighttime
|
I was considering getting one of those for my home.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
0,
1
] |
w7
|
[
0
] |
They were thinking of getting one for their yard, so it is likely the yard of their home.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 60,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "for the yard",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 39,
"endIndex": 50,
"text": "for my home",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0.05000000074505806,
0.10000000149011612
] |
[
7
] | null |
38100e
|
no no but you know i was just thinking of getting one those for the yard because they they are really nice and um up here we have uh we have quite a few mosquitoes at nighttime
|
I was considering getting one of those for my home.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
0,
1
] |
w8
|
[
0
] |
The person is considering getting one of those for their home.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 42,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "getting one those for the yard",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 6,
"endIndex": 50,
"text": "considering getting one of those for my home",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0.05000000074505806,
0.10000000149011612
] |
[
7
] | null |
38100e
|
no no but you know i was just thinking of getting one those for the yard because they they are really nice and um up here we have uh we have quite a few mosquitoes at nighttime
|
I was considering getting one of those for my home.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
2,
0,
1
] |
w9
|
[
0
] |
The person was likely looking for a solution for their home
|
[
{
"startIndex": 30,
"endIndex": 72,
"text": "thinking of getting one those for the yard",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 6,
"endIndex": 51,
"text": "considering getting one of those for my home.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.8500000238418579,
0.05000000074505806,
0.10000000149011612
] |
[
7
] | null |
43599e
|
It was stated that auditors frequently leave the profession early in their careers to join clients, and that over half of CPAs are not practicing public accounting.
|
Most CPAs are in private accounting.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
2,
0
] |
w0
|
[
0,
2
] |
The first part of the context reveals that auditors frequently leave their profession altogether, while the second part only states that over half are not practicing specifically public accounting. It makes sense to assume that those who have not altogether left the profession and are not practicing publicly. are now practicing privately.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 28,
"endIndex": 44,
"text": "frequently leave",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 109,
"endIndex": 118,
"text": "over half",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 146,
"endIndex": 164,
"text": "public accounting.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 17,
"endIndex": 36,
"text": "private accounting.",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 9,
"text": "Most CPAs",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
7
] | null |
43599e
|
It was stated that auditors frequently leave the profession early in their careers to join clients, and that over half of CPAs are not practicing public accounting.
|
Most CPAs are in private accounting.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
2,
0
] |
w1
|
[
0
] |
Because the context notes that over half of CPAs are not in public accounting, it can be presumed that they are in private accounting as stated in the statement.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 109,
"endIndex": 118,
"text": "over half",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 146,
"endIndex": 152,
"text": "public",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 17,
"endIndex": 24,
"text": "private",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 4,
"text": "Most",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
7
] | null |
43599e
|
It was stated that auditors frequently leave the profession early in their careers to join clients, and that over half of CPAs are not practicing public accounting.
|
Most CPAs are in private accounting.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
2,
0
] |
w19
|
[
0
] |
The context says over half not practicing public accounting. Since private is the main alternative to public, the statement that "most" are in private is likely to be true.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 109,
"endIndex": 126,
"text": "over half of CPAs",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 131,
"endIndex": 152,
"text": "not practicing public",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 9,
"text": "Most CPAs",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 17,
"endIndex": 24,
"text": "private",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
7
] | null |
43599e
|
It was stated that auditors frequently leave the profession early in their careers to join clients, and that over half of CPAs are not practicing public accounting.
|
Most CPAs are in private accounting.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
2,
0
] |
w2
|
[
0,
2
] |
The context states that "over half of CPAs" are not involved in public accounting, which to assume the context is correct would indeed make most CPAs involved in private accounting true. However there could be more forms of accounting besides public and private that the context does not mention, making the "most" in the statement true or false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 109,
"endIndex": 113,
"text": "over",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 131,
"endIndex": 134,
"text": "not",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 135,
"endIndex": 145,
"text": "practicing",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 146,
"endIndex": 152,
"text": "public",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 114,
"endIndex": 118,
"text": "half",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 4,
"text": "Most",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 17,
"endIndex": 24,
"text": "private",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
7
] | null |
43599e
|
It was stated that auditors frequently leave the profession early in their careers to join clients, and that over half of CPAs are not practicing public accounting.
|
Most CPAs are in private accounting.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
2,
0
] |
w4
|
[
0
] |
Since public and private accounting account for the entirety of possible accounting professions, if over half of CSA's are not in public accounting that would therefore mean most of them are in private accounting.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 131,
"endIndex": 163,
"text": "not practicing public accounting",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 17,
"endIndex": 35,
"text": "private accounting",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
7
] | null |
43599e
|
It was stated that auditors frequently leave the profession early in their careers to join clients, and that over half of CPAs are not practicing public accounting.
|
Most CPAs are in private accounting.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
2,
0
] |
w5
|
[
1
] |
The context describes how most CPAs are not practicing private accounting, not that they are, as the statement says, making the statement false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 131,
"endIndex": 163,
"text": "not practicing public accounting",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 10,
"endIndex": 16,
"text": "are in",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
7
] | null |
43599e
|
It was stated that auditors frequently leave the profession early in their careers to join clients, and that over half of CPAs are not practicing public accounting.
|
Most CPAs are in private accounting.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
2,
0
] |
w6
|
[
0
] |
The context amount of more than half can be considered equal to most in the statement.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 109,
"endIndex": 164,
"text": "over half of CPAs are not practicing public accounting.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 36,
"text": "Most CPAs are in private accounting.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
7
] | null |
43599e
|
It was stated that auditors frequently leave the profession early in their careers to join clients, and that over half of CPAs are not practicing public accounting.
|
Most CPAs are in private accounting.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
2,
0
] |
w7
|
[
2
] |
If CPAs are not practicing public accounting, it does not necessarily mean that they are practicing private accounting, although they could be.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 131,
"endIndex": 164,
"text": "not practicing public accounting.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 14,
"endIndex": 36,
"text": "in private accounting.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
7
] | null |
43599e
|
It was stated that auditors frequently leave the profession early in their careers to join clients, and that over half of CPAs are not practicing public accounting.
|
Most CPAs are in private accounting.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
2,
0
] |
w8
|
[
0
] |
Most CPA's are in private accounting and not practicing public accounting.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 122,
"endIndex": 163,
"text": "CPAs are not practicing public accounting",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 5,
"endIndex": 35,
"text": "CPAs are in private accounting",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
7
] | null |
43599e
|
It was stated that auditors frequently leave the profession early in their careers to join clients, and that over half of CPAs are not practicing public accounting.
|
Most CPAs are in private accounting.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
2,
0
] |
w9
|
[
1
] |
Most CPAs are not in private accounting so this is likely to be false
|
[
{
"startIndex": 109,
"endIndex": 164,
"text": "over half of CPAs are not practicing public accounting.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 36,
"text": "Most CPAs are in private accounting.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.6000000238418579,
0.20000000298023224,
0.20000000298023224
] |
[
7
] | null |
44957c
|
Postal Service data to define the relationship between costs and cost drivers.
|
Postal Service data is used to define the relationship between cost and inflation.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
2,
0
] |
w1
|
[
2
] |
The context indicates the study looks at costs and drivers of cost, which could include inflation as indicated in the statement, but the drivers in the context aren't specifically identified so it is not known for certain if inflation was looked at. Thus, it could be true or false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 70,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "drivers",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 55,
"endIndex": 60,
"text": "costs",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 72,
"endIndex": 81,
"text": "inflation",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 63,
"endIndex": 67,
"text": "cost",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
7
] | null |
44957c
|
Postal Service data to define the relationship between costs and cost drivers.
|
Postal Service data is used to define the relationship between cost and inflation.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
2,
0
] |
w13
|
[
0
] |
Inflation is one component of whether costs go up or down.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 65,
"endIndex": 78,
"text": "cost drivers.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 72,
"endIndex": 81,
"text": "inflation",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
7
] | null |
44957c
|
Postal Service data to define the relationship between costs and cost drivers.
|
Postal Service data is used to define the relationship between cost and inflation.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
2,
0
] |
w14
|
[
2
] |
We are not given enough context to know whether there is data between cost and inflation.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 55,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "costs and cost drivers",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 63,
"endIndex": 81,
"text": "cost and inflation",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
7
] | null |
44957c
|
Postal Service data to define the relationship between costs and cost drivers.
|
Postal Service data is used to define the relationship between cost and inflation.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
2,
0
] |
w16
|
[
1
] |
The Postal Service data according to the context, is used to define costs-cost drivers, not cost-inflation as it is stated in the statement.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 19,
"text": "Postal Service data",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 47,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "between costs and cost drivers",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 19,
"text": "Postal Service data",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 55,
"endIndex": 81,
"text": "between cost and inflation",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
7
] | null |
44957c
|
Postal Service data to define the relationship between costs and cost drivers.
|
Postal Service data is used to define the relationship between cost and inflation.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
2,
0
] |
w2
|
[
2
] |
The context mentions "cost drivers" while the statement uses the word "inflation" which can be considered a cost driver, but is not clear that is exactly the cost driver being mentioned here.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 65,
"endIndex": 69,
"text": "cost",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 70,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "drivers",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 72,
"endIndex": 81,
"text": "inflation",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
7
] | null |
44957c
|
Postal Service data to define the relationship between costs and cost drivers.
|
Postal Service data is used to define the relationship between cost and inflation.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
2,
0
] |
w4
|
[
1
] |
Inflation is only a subset of cost drivers, so the answer is likely false since many other factors are also considered,
|
[
{
"startIndex": 65,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "cost drivers",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 72,
"endIndex": 81,
"text": "inflation",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
7
] | null |
44957c
|
Postal Service data to define the relationship between costs and cost drivers.
|
Postal Service data is used to define the relationship between cost and inflation.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
2,
0
] |
w5
|
[
2
] |
Postal service data is being said that it is used to collect different things in both the context and the statement, therefore it can be true or false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 15,
"endIndex": 19,
"text": "data",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 55,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "costs and cost drivers",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 15,
"endIndex": 19,
"text": "data",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 63,
"endIndex": 81,
"text": "cost and inflation",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
7
] | null |
44957c
|
Postal Service data to define the relationship between costs and cost drivers.
|
Postal Service data is used to define the relationship between cost and inflation.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
2,
0
] |
w7
|
[
2,
1
] |
The Postal Service data is being used to define the relationship between costs and cost drivers, not necessarily inflation.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 55,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "costs and cost drivers",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 63,
"endIndex": 81,
"text": "cost and inflation",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0.5,
0.5
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
7
] | null |
44957c
|
Postal Service data to define the relationship between costs and cost drivers.
|
Postal Service data is used to define the relationship between cost and inflation.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
2,
0
] |
w8
|
[
1
] |
The Postal Service data is used to define the relationship between costs and cost drivers.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 47,
"endIndex": 77,
"text": "between costs and cost drivers",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 42,
"endIndex": 81,
"text": "relationship between cost and inflation",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
7
] | null |
44957c
|
Postal Service data to define the relationship between costs and cost drivers.
|
Postal Service data is used to define the relationship between cost and inflation.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
2,
1,
2,
0
] |
w9
|
[
2
] |
It isn't obvious or confirmed that postal service data can be used to define the relationship between cost and inflation. This could or could not be the case.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 46,
"text": "Postal Service data to define the relationship",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 81,
"text": "Postal Service data is used to define the relationship between cost and inflation",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.10000000149011612,
0.550000011920929,
0.3499999940395355
] |
[
7
] | null |
47404c
|
do you really romance
|
Are you just friends?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
1,
2,
0
] |
w0
|
[
2
] |
The way that the context and the statement are both worded does not provide enough information to make a clear judgement. One is an uncomplete statement while the other is a question.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 6,
"text": "do you",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 14,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "romance",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 13,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "friends?",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.4333333373069763,
0.5333333015441895,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
8,
7
] | null |
47404c
|
do you really romance
|
Are you just friends?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
1,
2,
0
] |
w1
|
[
2
] |
There is no answer provided as to whether they are just friends or are involved in romance, so the statement inquiring that they are just friends could be true or false dependent on the replied information provided, which is known.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 14,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "romance",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 13,
"endIndex": 20,
"text": "friends",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.4333333373069763,
0.5333333015441895,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
8,
7
] | null |
47404c
|
do you really romance
|
Are you just friends?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
1,
2,
0
] |
w11
|
[
2
] |
The context and statement are responding and are about different things. The context asks do you really romance while the statement asks are you just friends.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "do you really romance",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 20,
"text": "Are you just friends",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.4333333373069763,
0.5333333015441895,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
8,
7
] | null |
47404c
|
do you really romance
|
Are you just friends?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
1,
2,
0
] |
w19
|
[
0
] |
The statement is asking if two individuals are just friends, seeming to imply that they might be more than friends. The context mentions romance, so it seems the statement is likely to be true / the status of the relationship is questionable.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 14,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "romance",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 20,
"text": "just friends",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.4333333373069763,
0.5333333015441895,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
8,
7
] | null |
47404c
|
do you really romance
|
Are you just friends?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
1,
2,
0
] |
w2
|
[
2
] |
Both the statement and context are questions, "Do you" and "Are you" have the same intent, while "just friends" would mean a non-romantic relationship, and "really romance" would mean the opposite, but neither are implied since they are a question.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 2,
"text": "do",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 3,
"endIndex": 6,
"text": "you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 3,
"text": "Are",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 7,
"text": "you",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.4333333373069763,
0.5333333015441895,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
8,
7
] | null |
47404c
|
do you really romance
|
Are you just friends?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
1,
2,
0
] |
w4
|
[
0
] |
Both the context and the statement seem to be asking the same question, albeit from different angles. If someone *wasn't* just friends with someone else, it implies that there's a romantic connection. Therefore they're essentially asking the same thing as the context.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 14,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "romance",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 20,
"text": "just friends",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.4333333373069763,
0.5333333015441895,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
8,
7
] | null |
47404c
|
do you really romance
|
Are you just friends?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
1,
2,
0
] |
w5
|
[
0,
2,
1
] |
The context does not make sense. However the statement asking someone if they are just friends, does.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 14,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "romance",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 20,
"text": "just friends",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.3333333432674408,
0.3333333432674408,
0.3333333432674408
] |
[
0.4333333373069763,
0.5333333015441895,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
8,
7
] | null |
47404c
|
do you really romance
|
Are you just friends?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
1,
2,
0
] |
w6
|
[
0
] |
The question of really romance or just being friends seems to be asking the same thing, are the parties being questioned really friends or involved romantically.
|
[] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "Are you just friends?",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.4333333373069763,
0.5333333015441895,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
8,
7
] | null |
47404c
|
do you really romance
|
Are you just friends?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
1,
2,
0
] |
w8
|
[
0
] |
Asking if you are just friends could be implied as asking if you are in a romance.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "do you really romance",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "Are you just friends?",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.4333333373069763,
0.5333333015441895,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
8,
7
] | null |
47404c
|
do you really romance
|
Are you just friends?
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
0,
1,
1,
2,
0
] |
w9
|
[
2
] |
This could be either true or false because people can be both friends and lovers. They could also be just friends.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "do you really romance",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 21,
"text": "Are you just friends?",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
1,
0
] |
[
0.4333333373069763,
0.5333333015441895,
0.03333333134651184
] |
[
8,
7
] | null |
48454e
|
These revelations were embarrassing to Clinton's opponents, wrote the Washington Post . The Sun-Times quoted Rahm Emanuel, Stephanopoulos' successor, on the From Day One I always thought this was politically motivated and had politics written all over it; after five years, it is nice to have the truth catch up with the president's political opponents.
|
Clinton's supporters were embarrassed by the news.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w1
|
[
1
] |
The context notes the news was embarrassing to Clinton's opponents while the statement notes the supporters were embarrassed by the news. If the opponents were embarrassed, it is highly unlikely that the supporters were likewise embarrassed as proposed by the statement.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 23,
"endIndex": 35,
"text": "embarrassing",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 49,
"endIndex": 58,
"text": "opponents",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 10,
"endIndex": 20,
"text": "supporters",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 26,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "embarrassed",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.05000000074505806,
0.75
] |
[
1
] |
coref
|
48454e
|
These revelations were embarrassing to Clinton's opponents, wrote the Washington Post . The Sun-Times quoted Rahm Emanuel, Stephanopoulos' successor, on the From Day One I always thought this was politically motivated and had politics written all over it; after five years, it is nice to have the truth catch up with the president's political opponents.
|
Clinton's supporters were embarrassed by the news.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w5
|
[
1
] |
The context explains why Clinton's opponents were embarrassed, but his supporters being embarrassed, making the statement false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 6,
"endIndex": 35,
"text": "revelations were embarrassing",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 39,
"endIndex": 58,
"text": "Clinton's opponents",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 10,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "supporters were embarrassed",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.05000000074505806,
0.75
] |
[
1
] |
coref
|
48454e
|
These revelations were embarrassing to Clinton's opponents, wrote the Washington Post . The Sun-Times quoted Rahm Emanuel, Stephanopoulos' successor, on the From Day One I always thought this was politically motivated and had politics written all over it; after five years, it is nice to have the truth catch up with the president's political opponents.
|
Clinton's supporters were embarrassed by the news.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w0
|
[
1
] |
The context writes that it would be embarrassing to Clinton's "opponents" while the statement tries to claim that Clinton's "supporters" would be embarrassed. They are two different groups of people.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 23,
"endIndex": 58,
"text": "embarrassing to Clinton's opponents",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 20,
"text": "Clinton's supporters",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.05000000074505806,
0.75
] |
[
1
] | null |
48454e
|
These revelations were embarrassing to Clinton's opponents, wrote the Washington Post . The Sun-Times quoted Rahm Emanuel, Stephanopoulos' successor, on the From Day One I always thought this was politically motivated and had politics written all over it; after five years, it is nice to have the truth catch up with the president's political opponents.
|
Clinton's supporters were embarrassed by the news.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w16
|
[
1
] |
The statement says that Clinton's supporters were embarrassed, but according to the context the revelations were embarrassing actually to Clinton's opponents.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 58,
"text": "These revelations were embarrassing to Clinton's opponents",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 49,
"text": "Clinton's supporters were embarrassed by the news",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.05000000074505806,
0.75
] |
[
1
] | null |
48454e
|
These revelations were embarrassing to Clinton's opponents, wrote the Washington Post . The Sun-Times quoted Rahm Emanuel, Stephanopoulos' successor, on the From Day One I always thought this was politically motivated and had politics written all over it; after five years, it is nice to have the truth catch up with the president's political opponents.
|
Clinton's supporters were embarrassed by the news.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w2
|
[
2,
1
] |
Although there is a possibility Clinton's supporters were also embarrassed by a certain news piece, since the context only stated that his opponents' were embarrassed it's more likely that the supporters of a politician feel the opposite.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 23,
"endIndex": 35,
"text": "embarrassing",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 36,
"endIndex": 38,
"text": "to",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 39,
"endIndex": 48,
"text": "Clinton's",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 49,
"endIndex": 58,
"text": "opponents",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 9,
"text": "Clinton's",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 10,
"endIndex": 20,
"text": "supporters",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 26,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "embarrassed",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 45,
"endIndex": 49,
"text": "news",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0.5,
0.5
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.05000000074505806,
0.75
] |
[
1
] | null |
48454e
|
These revelations were embarrassing to Clinton's opponents, wrote the Washington Post . The Sun-Times quoted Rahm Emanuel, Stephanopoulos' successor, on the From Day One I always thought this was politically motivated and had politics written all over it; after five years, it is nice to have the truth catch up with the president's political opponents.
|
Clinton's supporters were embarrassed by the news.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w4
|
[
0
] |
Since the context states Clinton's opponents were embarrassed, it's likely that Clinton's supporters were happy with the news, not embarrassed as well.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 39,
"endIndex": 58,
"text": "Clinton's opponents",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 20,
"text": "Clinton's supporters",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.05000000074505806,
0.75
] |
[
1
] | null |
48454e
|
These revelations were embarrassing to Clinton's opponents, wrote the Washington Post . The Sun-Times quoted Rahm Emanuel, Stephanopoulos' successor, on the From Day One I always thought this was politically motivated and had politics written all over it; after five years, it is nice to have the truth catch up with the president's political opponents.
|
Clinton's supporters were embarrassed by the news.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w6
|
[
1
] |
The context states embarrassing to Clinton's opponents which is the opposite of the statement supporters were embarrassed.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 58,
"text": "These revelations were embarrassing to Clinton's opponents",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.05000000074505806,
0.75
] |
[
1
] | null |
48454e
|
These revelations were embarrassing to Clinton's opponents, wrote the Washington Post . The Sun-Times quoted Rahm Emanuel, Stephanopoulos' successor, on the From Day One I always thought this was politically motivated and had politics written all over it; after five years, it is nice to have the truth catch up with the president's political opponents.
|
Clinton's supporters were embarrassed by the news.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w7
|
[
1
] |
The news was embarrassing to Clinton's opponents, not to his supporters.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 23,
"endIndex": 59,
"text": "embarrassing to Clinton's opponents,",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 10,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "supporters were embarrassed",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.05000000074505806,
0.75
] |
[
1
] | null |
48454e
|
These revelations were embarrassing to Clinton's opponents, wrote the Washington Post . The Sun-Times quoted Rahm Emanuel, Stephanopoulos' successor, on the From Day One I always thought this was politically motivated and had politics written all over it; after five years, it is nice to have the truth catch up with the president's political opponents.
|
Clinton's supporters were embarrassed by the news.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w8
|
[
1
] |
The news was embarrassing to Clinton's opponents and not to his supporters.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 58,
"text": "These revelations were embarrassing to Clinton's opponents",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 49,
"text": "Clinton's supporters were embarrassed by the news",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.05000000074505806,
0.75
] |
[
1
] | null |
48454e
|
These revelations were embarrassing to Clinton's opponents, wrote the Washington Post . The Sun-Times quoted Rahm Emanuel, Stephanopoulos' successor, on the From Day One I always thought this was politically motivated and had politics written all over it; after five years, it is nice to have the truth catch up with the president's political opponents.
|
Clinton's supporters were embarrassed by the news.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1,
2,
1,
0,
2
] |
w9
|
[
0
] |
We are not sure whether Clinton's supporters were embarrassed by the news, but if her opponents were embarrassed, it is likely that her supporters were not embarassed too.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 6,
"endIndex": 59,
"text": "revelations were embarrassing to Clinton's opponents,",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 50,
"text": "Clinton's supporters were embarrassed by the news.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.20000000298023224,
0.05000000074505806,
0.75
] |
[
1
] | null |
51021e
|
The same year, the University of Hawaii campus at Manoa became the site of the Center for Cultural and Technical Interchange Between East and West (popularly known as the East West Center), a unique and venerated resource for advanced Pacific Rim studies.
|
The University of Hawaii became known as the site for advanced studies.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1
] |
w0
|
[
1
] |
The University of Hawaii has become a site for a specific type of advanced studies, so the statement's generalized usage of the phrase "advanced studies" is false.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 226,
"endIndex": 254,
"text": "advanced Pacific Rim studies",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 54,
"endIndex": 71,
"text": "advanced studies.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.5652173757553101,
0.3478260934352875,
0.08695652335882187
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
51021e
|
The same year, the University of Hawaii campus at Manoa became the site of the Center for Cultural and Technical Interchange Between East and West (popularly known as the East West Center), a unique and venerated resource for advanced Pacific Rim studies.
|
The University of Hawaii became known as the site for advanced studies.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1
] |
w1
|
[
0
] |
The University of Hawaii campus became known for advanced studies in Pacific Rim studies, thus the statement is true that the University became known for advanced studies because the context notes its reputation in this specific area.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 226,
"endIndex": 254,
"text": "advanced Pacific Rim studies",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 39,
"text": "University of Hawaii",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 24,
"text": "University of Hawaii",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 54,
"endIndex": 70,
"text": "advanced studies",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.5652173757553101,
0.3478260934352875,
0.08695652335882187
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
51021e
|
The same year, the University of Hawaii campus at Manoa became the site of the Center for Cultural and Technical Interchange Between East and West (popularly known as the East West Center), a unique and venerated resource for advanced Pacific Rim studies.
|
The University of Hawaii became known as the site for advanced studies.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1
] |
w10
|
[
1
] |
The East West Center is known for advanced studies. While this is located at the University of Hawaii Manoa, this does not mean that the school is known for that.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 171,
"endIndex": 254,
"text": "East West Center), a unique and venerated resource for advanced Pacific Rim studies",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 24,
"text": "University of Hawaii",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0,
0,
1
] |
[
0.5652173757553101,
0.3478260934352875,
0.08695652335882187
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
51021e
|
The same year, the University of Hawaii campus at Manoa became the site of the Center for Cultural and Technical Interchange Between East and West (popularly known as the East West Center), a unique and venerated resource for advanced Pacific Rim studies.
|
The University of Hawaii became known as the site for advanced studies.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1
] |
w12
|
[
0,
2
] |
It says the center is for "advanced Pacific Rim" studies, but just because that's what the center is for doesn't mean that it will get any notice. It seems likely to be true, but maybe it's only used by a niche of people.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 226,
"endIndex": 254,
"text": "advanced Pacific Rim studies",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 25,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "became known",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 45,
"endIndex": 70,
"text": "site for advanced studies",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
0.5,
0.5,
0
] |
[
0.5652173757553101,
0.3478260934352875,
0.08695652335882187
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
51021e
|
The same year, the University of Hawaii campus at Manoa became the site of the Center for Cultural and Technical Interchange Between East and West (popularly known as the East West Center), a unique and venerated resource for advanced Pacific Rim studies.
|
The University of Hawaii became known as the site for advanced studies.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1
] |
w13
|
[
0
] |
The reputation of the whole university is based upon the collective works of all its campuses, not just one particular location, thus the University of Hawaii as a whole received credit for the success of one branch.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 19,
"endIndex": 55,
"text": "University of Hawaii campus at Manoa",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 24,
"text": "University of Hawaii",
"type": "highlight"
},
{
"startIndex": 25,
"endIndex": 37,
"text": "became known",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.5652173757553101,
0.3478260934352875,
0.08695652335882187
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
51021e
|
The same year, the University of Hawaii campus at Manoa became the site of the Center for Cultural and Technical Interchange Between East and West (popularly known as the East West Center), a unique and venerated resource for advanced Pacific Rim studies.
|
The University of Hawaii became known as the site for advanced studies.
|
[
0,
0,
0
] |
[
1
] |
w14
|
[
0
] |
The statement is describing what happened in the specific description given in the context.
|
[
{
"startIndex": 226,
"endIndex": 255,
"text": "advanced Pacific Rim studies.",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
{
"startIndex": 54,
"endIndex": 70,
"text": "advanced studies",
"type": "highlight"
}
] |
[
1,
0,
0
] |
[
0.5652173757553101,
0.3478260934352875,
0.08695652335882187
] |
[
2,
1
] | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.