chosen
stringlengths
62
12.6k
rejected
stringlengths
61
12.6k
Human: what engineering jobs require the most physics and high level math? Assistant: Software Engineer for ANSYS lol
Human: what engineering jobs require the most physics and high level math? Assistant: R&D, simulation, control systems that interact with the real world.
Human: If there were a consumer car that was designed to drive for 1,000,000 miles...what would be different relative to cars we get now? I understand we can buy a car that turns over a million miles. I also understand that diesels like the long haul rigs are meant to just dump miles on miles on miles. I'm more wondering what would be different about something like a Toyota Camry if they designed it to hit 1,000,000 miles with nothing but fluid changes and brakes vs sedans we can get right now. So more specifically; engine and since I live in the rust belt...Rust prevention/negation. Assistant: Replacing rock salt with road pepper should do the trick 👍
Human: If there were a consumer car that was designed to drive for 1,000,000 miles...what would be different relative to cars we get now? I understand we can buy a car that turns over a million miles. I also understand that diesels like the long haul rigs are meant to just dump miles on miles on miles. I'm more wondering what would be different about something like a Toyota Camry if they designed it to hit 1,000,000 miles with nothing but fluid changes and brakes vs sedans we can get right now. So more specifically; engine and since I live in the rust belt...Rust prevention/negation. Assistant: Electric but reasonably powered and batteries would be conservatively managed to maximize range, as well as order of magnitude higher QA process to ensure maximum quality cells are in the vehicles.
Human: I am correct in understanding that it would be practically impossible to get a job if I had a 6-9 year gap after graduation? Would there be literally no options or would there even be a slight chance that I could get hired? Assistant: Jesus OP answer some of these questions so you can at least get a reasonable answer. You gave far to little detail.
Human: I am correct in understanding that it would be practically impossible to get a job if I had a 6-9 year gap after graduation? Would there be literally no options or would there even be a slight chance that I could get hired? Assistant: Consider starting with recruiters. HR likes to shit their pants over what they call “redflags”
Human: Does previous non-engineering work experience matter when looking for an engineering internship? When I apply for internships, will having previous non-engineering related work experience (jobs such as food service or working a student job for your university) help or will possible employers not really care? Assistant: Hiring manager here. Add it as a line, but don’t go into detail. I’d like to know you can hold a job down and be responsible, but I don’t really care what you did at Starbucks. Excluding it makes me question how reliable you’d be, akin to when I got stuck with a VPs privileged kid who never worked a day in his life, who would up rolling in at 10am every day, sleeping in the bathroom, and sneaking out by 2pm when I was in my afternoon meetings.
Human: Does previous non-engineering work experience matter when looking for an engineering internship? When I apply for internships, will having previous non-engineering related work experience (jobs such as food service or working a student job for your university) help or will possible employers not really care? Assistant: If you don't have relevant experience, then show what you have. It'll at least let me as a hiring manager know that this isn't going to be your first time in a workplace or professional setting and I'm going to have to teach you the very basics of professionalism.
Human: Non-American engineers, how often do you have to deal with Imperial Units and how often does it complicate things? Assistant: Norway checking in. Not very often, except for pipes, valves, fitting and other pipe related items, which for some reason is either in inches or some weird metric measurement which is obviously a converted imperial measurement. When I do have to deal with it, it’s allways very annoying. And if we get into the 5000 different types of «tons», I flip my desk...
Human: Non-American engineers, how often do you have to deal with Imperial Units and how often does it complicate things? Assistant: Based in Norway. The company I work for never use Imperial for anything engineering related but we do convert to imperial units after the fact when shipping products to the US. Imperial units for radioactivity is tied directly to laws and regulations so we are pretty much required to use the same units.
Human: What would be a good substitute for sputtering of metal layers Atomic layer deposition sounds like a good idea to deposit layers between 10-200 nm but i was wondering if thermal evaporation would also be a good alternative? Assistant: What about simple electroplating? What metal are you depositing and what are you depositing on? Even if it's non-conductive, there are ways of making it conductive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGmxHLHyUPc
Human: What would be a good substitute for sputtering of metal layers Atomic layer deposition sounds like a good idea to deposit layers between 10-200 nm but i was wondering if thermal evaporation would also be a good alternative? Assistant: What is the use case? Environment? Budget? etc?
Human: Does anybody else wish they were paid hourly? Work in manufacturing (salaried), and just did the math - if I were paid entry-level operator wages (including 1.5x OT for >40 hr/wk), for the hours I worked last year, I would have made a whopping $1,478 less than I did. Unrelated, is anybody hiring WFH data analysts? Assistant: No? I work 40hrs a week, just like my contract states im paid for. If i stay late, i come in late next day. If i work Saturday, I don't come in monday. If you are working more than your contract dictates you be compensated for, you need to stop devaluing our profession. Demand to get paid for the hours you work, or stop working them.
Human: Does anybody else wish they were paid hourly? Work in manufacturing (salaried), and just did the math - if I were paid entry-level operator wages (including 1.5x OT for >40 hr/wk), for the hours I worked last year, I would have made a whopping $1,478 less than I did. Unrelated, is anybody hiring WFH data analysts? Assistant: Yeah, don’t average over 40.
Human: has anyone here earned a PhD that was paid for by their company? how did you go about applying for it? Assistant: Government but they are happy to fund grad degrees. At PhD you need a head science official to sign off classes. Once you're in they have programs that will let you take time off work to focus on the research
Human: has anyone here earned a PhD that was paid for by their company? how did you go about applying for it? Assistant: I had a chap working in my team who got his PhD like this. Basically the research he was doing was relevant to the work and was sponsored by us.
Human: What do you think of engineering/science that is the closest to magic? I'm trying to determine what is the most unexplainable, confusing pheneomons out there that we know of yet are unexplainable in the fields of engineering/science. What is the most shrouded in mysteries waiting to be discovered or realized. Stuff like that. I've read around a bit and I'm thinking along the lines of magnets, radios, electricity, etc. Or space and astronomy. Or Maybe the ocean and what lives under it. AI? Biotechnology? Biochemistry? Psychology or neuroscience? Thereotical mathematics? There's so much! Bonus: What field of study is it under? Trying to determine what to study. Assistant: Q-bits and quantum computing. That's shits nuts.
Human: What do you think of engineering/science that is the closest to magic? I'm trying to determine what is the most unexplainable, confusing pheneomons out there that we know of yet are unexplainable in the fields of engineering/science. What is the most shrouded in mysteries waiting to be discovered or realized. Stuff like that. I've read around a bit and I'm thinking along the lines of magnets, radios, electricity, etc. Or space and astronomy. Or Maybe the ocean and what lives under it. AI? Biotechnology? Biochemistry? Psychology or neuroscience? Thereotical mathematics? There's so much! Bonus: What field of study is it under? Trying to determine what to study. Assistant: Heat Treatment of steel.
Human: What's your least favorite part of your job? Assistant: The physical office environment. Background noise, HVAC settings, chair/desk, lighting, smells, etc. I have no control over it and my home office is better in just about every way.
Human: What's your least favorite part of your job? Assistant: IT. Everything has to get approved by IT and they hold up our projects moving forward because they operate on their own schedule. But god forbid you don’t give them what they want in a timely manner.
Human: Your stories about excellent technical engineers who were "forced" to become leaders? Maybe it was you or maybe someone you work with or someone you promoted as a leader yourself. Do you have any stories about excellent technical engineers who were "forced" to become leaders? As an example, let's say one engineer is an average communicator but excellent technically, the other engineer is an excellent communicator but average technically. Often times, the excellent communicator but average technical engineer asks to become manager or leader, while the average communicator but excellent technical engineer stays silent. You chose the technically excellent but average communicator engineer to become the leader; did that turn out to be a good decision? What were the plusses and minuses? Any interesting stories? Assistant: I don't know if I'd call myself an excellent engineer but I was recently promoted and I'm doing terribly. A few months ago my boss called me into his office and basically told me that I was being promoted to team lead whether I liked it or not. I have absolutely no idea what I'm supposed to do all day. One of the project managers is sort of covering for me but I'm probably going to get let go soon. Almost 15 years as an individual contributor and I've never felt less effective.
Human: Your stories about excellent technical engineers who were "forced" to become leaders? Maybe it was you or maybe someone you work with or someone you promoted as a leader yourself. Do you have any stories about excellent technical engineers who were "forced" to become leaders? As an example, let's say one engineer is an average communicator but excellent technically, the other engineer is an excellent communicator but average technically. Often times, the excellent communicator but average technical engineer asks to become manager or leader, while the average communicator but excellent technical engineer stays silent. You chose the technically excellent but average communicator engineer to become the leader; did that turn out to be a good decision? What were the plusses and minuses? Any interesting stories? Assistant: My department director was a shitty scientist and even worse people manager.
Human: What engineering jobs / industries can an incompetent engineer work in for many years with a low risk of getting fired? I see government jobs high up on list ( hard to get into and even harder to get fired from) but I do not know why this is the case. Competitive companies such Pfizer, google , and ExxonMobil typically want the best of the best , so I could imagine that weak engineers get weeded out relatively quickly. Assistant: Academia
Human: What engineering jobs / industries can an incompetent engineer work in for many years with a low risk of getting fired? I see government jobs high up on list ( hard to get into and even harder to get fired from) but I do not know why this is the case. Competitive companies such Pfizer, google , and ExxonMobil typically want the best of the best , so I could imagine that weak engineers get weeded out relatively quickly. Assistant: Department of transportation, any state
Human: What are the most important transferable skills an Engineering graduate of the future will need? In your opinion what do you think are the most important transferable skills for a new graduate engineer to hold. This can be technical skills or emotional skills? Assistant: Understanding the big picture. My young engineers will spend 8 hours designing a new part but never questioned if a new part was necessary. They rarely think to ask about the business case. Who is the customer? How many are they buying? What's the risk if we build/ship this and something goes wrong?
Human: What are the most important transferable skills an Engineering graduate of the future will need? In your opinion what do you think are the most important transferable skills for a new graduate engineer to hold. This can be technical skills or emotional skills? Assistant: Talk to people
Human: Any general tips or advice for dating an engineer? This seems like an appropriate place to ask :D Serious answers appreciated but Jokes are also welcome :P Assistant: Engineers are people too. #engineerlivesmatter
Human: Any general tips or advice for dating an engineer? This seems like an appropriate place to ask :D Serious answers appreciated but Jokes are also welcome :P Assistant: Grease their joints and charge their batteries frequently.
Human: Do Engineers in the US actually use MatLab on a regular basis? I’m a Biomedical Engineering major in my 3rd year, and I’m getting really sick of having to use MATLab for things that I could do far easier on Excel or Python. I know it’s useful and all, but my university likes to tell us that it’s an industry standard and that engineers use it all the time. Is this true? Assistant: I will get downvoted for this but I think/hope that Matlab is on its way out. Python is increasing in popularity and capability, and open source in general seems like a very natural way for engineers.
Human: Do Engineers in the US actually use MatLab on a regular basis? I’m a Biomedical Engineering major in my 3rd year, and I’m getting really sick of having to use MATLab for things that I could do far easier on Excel or Python. I know it’s useful and all, but my university likes to tell us that it’s an industry standard and that engineers use it all the time. Is this true? Assistant: All Excel here. Some Google Sheets as well.
Human: Engineering has often been potrayed as nerdy. In what I observed, this has changed over the last decade or so. Have you noticed this trend as well both in general and on the workfloor? For example, by seeing a lot more would be business majors entering engineering for the money? Assistant: I don't think this is a fair assessment. I've witnessed a mix, the nerds who know every fact about nothing, the jocks who can't take being wrong, the normal who just like things, it's a mixture. I've even seen all three on one person. What you see in the media is just a stereotype.
Human: Engineering has often been potrayed as nerdy. In what I observed, this has changed over the last decade or so. Have you noticed this trend as well both in general and on the workfloor? For example, by seeing a lot more would be business majors entering engineering for the money? Assistant: Lol @ this thread and my user name
Human: Engineers working full time, how do you motivate yourself to develop your skills during your free time? Hey guys. I'm 4 months into my first job after graduating. It's not something I'm interested in at all but I'd been searching for months and was grateful to get a job related to my degree (ME) even though the offer wasn't great at all. Now the issue is that I want to move to another industry, and that requires me to pick up some new skills, but can't seem to get started at all. My job is 8-5 with about an hour of commuting each way, so by the time I get back home and make something to eat I have a couple of hours before I go to sleep. I tried getting started one night but it seemed like my brain was extremely slow at picking up what I was looking at. I have no idea what to do, so any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Assistant: Play factorio because life’s too short to work on weekends
Human: Engineers working full time, how do you motivate yourself to develop your skills during your free time? Hey guys. I'm 4 months into my first job after graduating. It's not something I'm interested in at all but I'd been searching for months and was grateful to get a job related to my degree (ME) even though the offer wasn't great at all. Now the issue is that I want to move to another industry, and that requires me to pick up some new skills, but can't seem to get started at all. My job is 8-5 with about an hour of commuting each way, so by the time I get back home and make something to eat I have a couple of hours before I go to sleep. I tried getting started one night but it seemed like my brain was extremely slow at picking up what I was looking at. I have no idea what to do, so any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Assistant: I don't, work is work. My free time is my own.
Human: Why is Saudi Arabia's 'The Line' a line? Is there any actual engineering or logistics reason that this megastructure is planned to be so long rather than a broader, shorter design, or even circular? It seems like it would be a logistical nightmare for construction and transportation. Also I can only assume there will be very minimal natural light at the ground floor in the centre of the two walls. Have they mentioned any solutions for this? Assistant: It's really stupid to make it 0.2 km wide and 170 km long. It has an area of 34 km^2. If it is built in a circle then the farthest apart anything could be would be 3.29 km. Instead the farthest distance anything could be is 170 km. Am I missing anything here? Is there something that makes this a good idea? edit. Correction. The farthest apart anything would be is 6.58 km. 3.29 km is the radius of the circle, not the diameter.
Human: Why is Saudi Arabia's 'The Line' a line? Is there any actual engineering or logistics reason that this megastructure is planned to be so long rather than a broader, shorter design, or even circular? It seems like it would be a logistical nightmare for construction and transportation. Also I can only assume there will be very minimal natural light at the ground floor in the centre of the two walls. Have they mentioned any solutions for this? Assistant: It’s 100% not from an engineering standpoint because the external heat load of such a building is going to be huge since it’s got such a huge surface area in an extremely hot and sunny climate
Human: [Energy Management] In winter climates, what is the solution for how to electrify building heating without breaking the bank? Assistant: Insulation.
Human: [Energy Management] In winter climates, what is the solution for how to electrify building heating without breaking the bank? Assistant: Breaking the bank for the heating or the unit? Because by far the best electric heater is a heat pump. The ROI is only a few years as opposed to the cheaper but way less efficient electric resistive heating.
Human: What's the most ferromagnetic powder I can easily buy? I'm looking for powder as strongly attracted to a magnet as possible. I have some black iron oxide, and its' okay, maybe powdered iron would be better. There's NdFeB fro pretty cheap on Alibaba. For some reason I'm finding it difficult to get any numbers on and of these products, do I just have to buy a bunch and test them? Thanks for any advice! Assistant: Keep safe ! Powder can be really dangerous.
Human: What's the most ferromagnetic powder I can easily buy? I'm looking for powder as strongly attracted to a magnet as possible. I have some black iron oxide, and its' okay, maybe powdered iron would be better. There's NdFeB fro pretty cheap on Alibaba. For some reason I'm finding it difficult to get any numbers on and of these products, do I just have to buy a bunch and test them? Thanks for any advice! Assistant: NdFeB powder from China is pretty solid stuff (the only country that make it atm) it’s pretty exothermically reactive with oxygen unless it’s been treated with a phosphating process or some other conversion coating. It’s going to have the strongest magnetic performance though
Human: Is it normal to ask for a raise after my 90 day evaluation? Basically, I'm hella underpaid (65K), especially since I live in San Diego, CA. Granted, I got about 1 year of total engineering experience and I'm just trying to shoot for 80-90 a year. I'm doing Machine Vision Applications Engineering right now with this company. I've done everything they've asked so far so I feel like I got a good chance, just wanted to hear any tips on this subject from my fellow engineer. Assistant: Who told you could get a 15k-25k raise after 90 days?
Human: Is it normal to ask for a raise after my 90 day evaluation? Basically, I'm hella underpaid (65K), especially since I live in San Diego, CA. Granted, I got about 1 year of total engineering experience and I'm just trying to shoot for 80-90 a year. I'm doing Machine Vision Applications Engineering right now with this company. I've done everything they've asked so far so I feel like I got a good chance, just wanted to hear any tips on this subject from my fellow engineer. Assistant: 65K in San Diego as an engineering? Bro where do you work getting paid that low? I'm in San Diego too. My offers on Arizona weren't even 65k. I started at 80 and so did a lot of my friends. Lowest was like 75.
Human: I'm a Math major and my friend is an Engineering major, and he is tormenting me with things like "sin(θ) = θ" and "e is basically pi which is basically 4". What sorts of things could I respond with that would make an engineer cry in the same way? Assistant: "you're an engineer? What kind of train do you drive?"
Human: I'm a Math major and my friend is an Engineering major, and he is tormenting me with things like "sin(θ) = θ" and "e is basically pi which is basically 4". What sorts of things could I respond with that would make an engineer cry in the same way? Assistant: what kind of barbarian rounds pi to *four*? Pi = three, duh
Human: Satcube has an 8 kg non parabolic antenna for satellite internet. I want to bring multi gigabit low latency internet to a <3 kg unit with low rain fade, low power use, backpackers can carry, and is easy to deploy. Based on my new and additional details and questions, what's your feedback? **Background** I want to bring multi gigabit satellite internet access to: * People living in and visiting areas only accessible by air taxi. This includes northern Alaska. * Indigenous people in less developed regions. * Low budget crews traveling to less developed areas to help the less fortunate * Backpackers, long distance travelers over non motor watercraft, mountain climbers, etc. * Scientists and tourists going to the north or south pole. * Disaster hit areas * Areas where electricity access is limited or not there. This is so low budget people described above can: * Provide literacy to remote, less developed areas. * Post and blog using recorded or real time video. This may include natural events of beauty like the aurora. * Have reliable internet even during heavy rainstorms in a forest. * Live over the internet video broadcast in 8K. Use of LongGOP VVC, 60 fps, 10 bits per channel, HLG HDR, and 4:4:4 chroma subsampling will be potential options. I eventually want to up it to 8K/16K with 3D light field support. This is to have true 3D for end viewers without headsets or special glasses. **Ideas** 1. Use satellites 500 km away. 2. If one antenna does not provide enough throughput, allow antenna bonding. It can be configured like a mesh network or use regular connection bonding. 3. Hot swappable power sources. 4. Use either: 1. The Ku band if there's a way to get 2 GHz of spectrum up and down. FDD is a given. 2. 4-4.18 GHz for the downlink and 5.925-6.105 for uplink only if steps are taken to prevent 6GHz WiFi interference. 3. 2.52-2.67 GHz combined with 4-4.18 GHz for downlink and 5.925-6.255 GHz for uplink. Same precautions needed. 5. A QAM level of 256 or higher. A higher level than 256 will be needed if less spectrum is used. 6. OFDM 7. Phased array antennas. 8. Intersatellite communications 9. Service sold on a wholesale basis and/or maybe first party basis. This is to allow creative but useful business models. 10. Network operators can use our gateway stations for their own networks. This is in addition to our own gateway integration. 11. Use either OFDMA or Sparse Code Multiple Access (SCMA) **Questions** 1. I know parabolic antennas for satellite communications get larger with wavelength. Is it the same for flat phased array antennas? 2. Is OFDMA or SCMA better? 3. In theory, which of the three frequency band ideas will strike a balance between antenna size, throughput, reducing power consumption, and resistance to rain fade? 4. If it's better to make small high throughput antennas for already developing Low Earth Orbit projects, what can be done to ensure: 1. The antenna can fit in a backpacking backpack. 2. Has 1+ Gbps throughput up and down. This is for 8K/16K light field video streaming. 3. Resistance to rain fade. 5. What's your advice? Assistant: I think you are crazy. Starlink is the closest but it is only ~100Mb/s, uses several hundred watts and could be used in a RV for example, but is not small enough for backpacking.
Human: Satcube has an 8 kg non parabolic antenna for satellite internet. I want to bring multi gigabit low latency internet to a <3 kg unit with low rain fade, low power use, backpackers can carry, and is easy to deploy. Based on my new and additional details and questions, what's your feedback? **Background** I want to bring multi gigabit satellite internet access to: * People living in and visiting areas only accessible by air taxi. This includes northern Alaska. * Indigenous people in less developed regions. * Low budget crews traveling to less developed areas to help the less fortunate * Backpackers, long distance travelers over non motor watercraft, mountain climbers, etc. * Scientists and tourists going to the north or south pole. * Disaster hit areas * Areas where electricity access is limited or not there. This is so low budget people described above can: * Provide literacy to remote, less developed areas. * Post and blog using recorded or real time video. This may include natural events of beauty like the aurora. * Have reliable internet even during heavy rainstorms in a forest. * Live over the internet video broadcast in 8K. Use of LongGOP VVC, 60 fps, 10 bits per channel, HLG HDR, and 4:4:4 chroma subsampling will be potential options. I eventually want to up it to 8K/16K with 3D light field support. This is to have true 3D for end viewers without headsets or special glasses. **Ideas** 1. Use satellites 500 km away. 2. If one antenna does not provide enough throughput, allow antenna bonding. It can be configured like a mesh network or use regular connection bonding. 3. Hot swappable power sources. 4. Use either: 1. The Ku band if there's a way to get 2 GHz of spectrum up and down. FDD is a given. 2. 4-4.18 GHz for the downlink and 5.925-6.105 for uplink only if steps are taken to prevent 6GHz WiFi interference. 3. 2.52-2.67 GHz combined with 4-4.18 GHz for downlink and 5.925-6.255 GHz for uplink. Same precautions needed. 5. A QAM level of 256 or higher. A higher level than 256 will be needed if less spectrum is used. 6. OFDM 7. Phased array antennas. 8. Intersatellite communications 9. Service sold on a wholesale basis and/or maybe first party basis. This is to allow creative but useful business models. 10. Network operators can use our gateway stations for their own networks. This is in addition to our own gateway integration. 11. Use either OFDMA or Sparse Code Multiple Access (SCMA) **Questions** 1. I know parabolic antennas for satellite communications get larger with wavelength. Is it the same for flat phased array antennas? 2. Is OFDMA or SCMA better? 3. In theory, which of the three frequency band ideas will strike a balance between antenna size, throughput, reducing power consumption, and resistance to rain fade? 4. If it's better to make small high throughput antennas for already developing Low Earth Orbit projects, what can be done to ensure: 1. The antenna can fit in a backpacking backpack. 2. Has 1+ Gbps throughput up and down. This is for 8K/16K light field video streaming. 3. Resistance to rain fade. 5. What's your advice? Assistant: I'm just here to say that I love your specs: a heart/kg unit
Human: hey guys, whats the best CAD Software for models with alot more than 10000 parts? currently using inventor... Assistant: Something that will help get you by if you still need to use inventor is to split your assembly into suitable sub assemblies if you haven't already and "append" them to a navisworks model. Just work on your sub assemblies in INV and visualize the whole assembly in Navisworks alongside it. You will have to manually hit "refresh" to see your changes but it might help you out a bit in the meantime.
Human: hey guys, whats the best CAD Software for models with alot more than 10000 parts? currently using inventor... Assistant: Decent strategy, price out NX and Catia then you should be able to justify hardware upgrades instead.
Human: If the engines in cars waste 70% of energy as heat, why don’t we reclaim that? This may be a stupid question, but couldn’t we use thermoelectric generators to reclaim some of this lost energy? Assistant: Low latent heat is difficult to recover efficiently. It’s why sterling engines aren’t used much.
Human: If the engines in cars waste 70% of energy as heat, why don’t we reclaim that? This may be a stupid question, but couldn’t we use thermoelectric generators to reclaim some of this lost energy? Assistant: I know BMW tried years ago but not sure what happened to the idea as it disappeared without trace. Probably negligible gains compared to the extra weight\cost etc. Edit: Found it: BMW TurboSteamer
Human: What thing you dreamed of inventing as a kid but soon realized it wasn't feasible as an adult? Assistant: Electric cars but not using batteries, but instead using extension cords overhead. Basically a massive network of extension cords to power our vehicles lol
Human: What thing you dreamed of inventing as a kid but soon realized it wasn't feasible as an adult? Assistant: As a kid I thought rust was like, something that formed on a surface… like a mold or fungus. So I wondered why proper didn’t create like… rust removal tape to just peel it right off and have pristine metal underneath
Human: Why Is It Impossible to Get An Engineering Job These Days? Honestly, I am curious if companies are just hiring people with 5+ years of experience for an entry level position that is meant for a new grad because they can get it considering all the people who are laid off due to pandemic. Assistant: No. My company is desperately trying to hire engineers right now
Human: Why Is It Impossible to Get An Engineering Job These Days? Honestly, I am curious if companies are just hiring people with 5+ years of experience for an entry level position that is meant for a new grad because they can get it considering all the people who are laid off due to pandemic. Assistant: What type of engineer are you?
Human: Would you say that too many people are graduating with STEM degrees (more specifically engineering degrees) right now? Even if COVID wasn’t a thing? I feel like I’ve seen that the numbers of people who are graduating stem keep growing and it’s only going to get much bigger with all the big pushes for stem in schools. Assistant: I do construction design/management and we literally cannot find an electrical engineer. They searched for two years before they found me, we just lost a guy about 6 months ago and there are zero mid-level guys out there and we have maybe two entry level candidates who we are asking to come interview, they weren't reaching out to us.
Human: Would you say that too many people are graduating with STEM degrees (more specifically engineering degrees) right now? Even if COVID wasn’t a thing? I feel like I’ve seen that the numbers of people who are graduating stem keep growing and it’s only going to get much bigger with all the big pushes for stem in schools. Assistant: Never too many engineers. Engineers CREATE new technology which creates more jobs for engineers. If we magically tripled the number of engineers in the US we would have a temporary surplus but that would turn into entrepreneurial engineers making more work.
Human: In this article about making F1 engine blocks, the article mentions "filling molds uphill". What does that mean specifically? Is it like filling the mold form an opening on the bottom instead of pouring it from the top? https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/f1/techexplained\_formula1\_engineblocks/ Assistant: You inject from the bottom to control the way liquid flows into the mold. Think about if you're pouring water from the top, it'll splash all over the place and have lots of turbulence (resulting in less consistent properties and worse surface finish). By filling from the bottom, you're basically smoothly pumping liquid uphill, giving a much more consistent cast. In my field we call it countergravity casting.
Human: In this article about making F1 engine blocks, the article mentions "filling molds uphill". What does that mean specifically? Is it like filling the mold form an opening on the bottom instead of pouring it from the top? https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/f1/techexplained\_formula1\_engineblocks/ Assistant: No idea about engine blocks, but solid rocket motors are generally filled bottom to top via a process known as bayonet casting.
Human: What type of engineer solves spontaneous problems like getting a container ship unstuck from a narrow canal? ME major. Still thinking on what kind of engineer I want to be. I really want to be the kind of engineer that is as "hands on" as possible, and would prefer to minimize time spent in front of a computer. I've been thinking about who gets called out to solve problems like the one in the Suez Canal a few weeks ago. What is that job title? It sounds fun as hell so I'd like to look into it if it is even a career I could look into. Assistant: Ocean engineering guys and naval architects would be doing this. And some experienced salvage guys in operations. The major global players are mostly Dutch and Belgian companies, but most have US and other international offices.
Human: What type of engineer solves spontaneous problems like getting a container ship unstuck from a narrow canal? ME major. Still thinking on what kind of engineer I want to be. I really want to be the kind of engineer that is as "hands on" as possible, and would prefer to minimize time spent in front of a computer. I've been thinking about who gets called out to solve problems like the one in the Suez Canal a few weeks ago. What is that job title? It sounds fun as hell so I'd like to look into it if it is even a career I could look into. Assistant: It is called Crisis management.
Human: Is there an official term for a thing which starts to work after you hit it? Assistant: Mechanical agitation (the term is used in the nuclear industry)
Human: Is there an official term for a thing which starts to work after you hit it? Assistant: The Fonzie Smack.
Human: Engineers of Reddit, what's going into your house? Say you are going to build a house. You have a reasonable budget because Engineers live in the real world, but you get to say what that budget is because it's your house. What nonstandard design features will this house have? Assistant: I live in SoCal. In 50 years there will be no water. If I was starting from scratch I would make sure the water capturing from rain was ace, install a grey water system (laundry machine, shower, and dish washer water used for toilet flushing), and make sure the landscaping was both fire resistant and low water use.
Human: Engineers of Reddit, what's going into your house? Say you are going to build a house. You have a reasonable budget because Engineers live in the real world, but you get to say what that budget is because it's your house. What nonstandard design features will this house have? Assistant: In a cold climate, an insulated and drywalled garage is a must have. If you spend alot of time, get a garage heater installed. Air exchanger for the house is a must too in my opinion. No more stank air when it's too cold to open the windows.
Human: Traffic engineers of Reddit, how would you redesign the highways, streets, and other infrastructure of your city? Say that you have the chance to redesign the transportation infrastructure of your city from scratch. Would you re-route highways away from downtown? Add more turn lanes? Have fewer intersections? How would you do it? Assistant: I'm not sure I understand the question. For us, the politics are front and center to our work and the primary constraints we have to work around. If I had my way, I'd slap a grid network of exactly 350m blocks with alternating synchronization of 60 second cycles in every city in the world. But that would require tearing up a lot of land and pissing people off, starting with urban planners. It would also be a terribly boring drive.
Human: Traffic engineers of Reddit, how would you redesign the highways, streets, and other infrastructure of your city? Say that you have the chance to redesign the transportation infrastructure of your city from scratch. Would you re-route highways away from downtown? Add more turn lanes? Have fewer intersections? How would you do it? Assistant: I would have computerized driverless vehicles so intersections can do this: http://vimeo.com/37751380 except maybe sped up 300% as well. The cars would either have smart glass that turns opaque when passing through intersections or would have pants holders for all passengers and interiors that are able to be hosed out, for obvious reasons.
Human: I'm setting up my vehicle for overlanding and I have some ideas for power storage I need some answers to. So basically I don't need much as far as power so I'm wanting to use a power inverter that works on power tool batteries. The trick now is figuring out how to charge the batteries. I'm thinking of putting a small solar set up on the roof rack but I don't know much about solar and what would be required to charge maybe 4 battery packs. I'm also wondering if there's a way to set up a small windmill since I'll be driving a lot. And a third question, could you use a gas motor for RC cars to turn the electric motor from rc cars to create a mini generator? Assistant: Also may want to check out sailboat forums. They've been self reliant for power for years.
Human: I'm setting up my vehicle for overlanding and I have some ideas for power storage I need some answers to. So basically I don't need much as far as power so I'm wanting to use a power inverter that works on power tool batteries. The trick now is figuring out how to charge the batteries. I'm thinking of putting a small solar set up on the roof rack but I don't know much about solar and what would be required to charge maybe 4 battery packs. I'm also wondering if there's a way to set up a small windmill since I'll be driving a lot. And a third question, could you use a gas motor for RC cars to turn the electric motor from rc cars to create a mini generator? Assistant: Buy a jackery. Basically exactly what you're describing. Lithium batteries, solar charging, etc.
Human: Are there Mechanical Engineering Jobs that don't use CAD design (like Solidworks or AutoCAD)? So I have recently taken a course in college called Engineering Graphics where we learned to use Solidoworks and AutoCAD. The teacher was absolutely terrible for the class and my experience here has made me want to avoid ever having to use AutoCAD or Solidworks again, if a career using them is going to be anything like I experienced in school. The teacher was awful at explaining how things worked and gave us very demanding assignments that sometimes we couldn't finish correctly. The tests were what were the worst. We were only given 50 minutes to design these ridiculously hard parts in AutoCAD and Solidworks and I never finished them on time. I spent hours outside of class practicing the concepts and using the software but the class was still a ginormous nightmare. I did better in my math and problem solving classes and enjoyed them more than this class where we were learning a "technical" skill that is apparently "commonplace" in the engineering field. Sorry if this is coming off as ranting, I just need to get this off of my chest after my experience in here. I don't ever plan to touch Solidworks or AutoCAD again, but I would just like to know from fellow mechanical engineers, does your job require this software or anything related and do you know of any ME jobs that don't? Assistant: Been working as a MechEng for 14 years. Haven't touched CAD since college. With that said, I wouldn't rule something out just because you had a bad experience with a poor instructor. Design work can be fun and creative.
Human: Are there Mechanical Engineering Jobs that don't use CAD design (like Solidworks or AutoCAD)? So I have recently taken a course in college called Engineering Graphics where we learned to use Solidoworks and AutoCAD. The teacher was absolutely terrible for the class and my experience here has made me want to avoid ever having to use AutoCAD or Solidworks again, if a career using them is going to be anything like I experienced in school. The teacher was awful at explaining how things worked and gave us very demanding assignments that sometimes we couldn't finish correctly. The tests were what were the worst. We were only given 50 minutes to design these ridiculously hard parts in AutoCAD and Solidworks and I never finished them on time. I spent hours outside of class practicing the concepts and using the software but the class was still a ginormous nightmare. I did better in my math and problem solving classes and enjoyed them more than this class where we were learning a "technical" skill that is apparently "commonplace" in the engineering field. Sorry if this is coming off as ranting, I just need to get this off of my chest after my experience in here. I don't ever plan to touch Solidworks or AutoCAD again, but I would just like to know from fellow mechanical engineers, does your job require this software or anything related and do you know of any ME jobs that don't? Assistant: School is all about learning how to teach yourself. And a bad professor is great at helping you learn that lol Go self study it before you decide you hate it.
Human: What happens to semiconductor fabrication equipment of older process nodes when newer process nodes are developed and how does this affect active products using the older process nodes? For example, the Intel i486 was produced from 1989 to 2007 and used 600 to 1000 nm process. Intel was using around 65 nm in 2007. Do manufacturers make the older products on the newer equipment or just keep the old equipment and assembly lines around? How easy is it to transition production of a product to equipment for a newer node without changing the product? Is a 7 nm node capable of producing 600 nm designs, since it should be easier to construct bigger transistors and most likely have better yields? Assistant: An interesting problem arose that caused automotive manufacturers to run into chip shortages. Lots of chips in cars but cars are designed close to seven years out from day one introduction/production. So they’re using older bigger chips available at time of development and design. Thus as fab plants convert to smaller and smaller chips fewer fabs can build chips, chips designed and used for cars.
Human: What happens to semiconductor fabrication equipment of older process nodes when newer process nodes are developed and how does this affect active products using the older process nodes? For example, the Intel i486 was produced from 1989 to 2007 and used 600 to 1000 nm process. Intel was using around 65 nm in 2007. Do manufacturers make the older products on the newer equipment or just keep the old equipment and assembly lines around? How easy is it to transition production of a product to equipment for a newer node without changing the product? Is a 7 nm node capable of producing 600 nm designs, since it should be easier to construct bigger transistors and most likely have better yields? Assistant: How does machines make something that small? I only know of cnc and etching pcb’s… and I can’t imagine any of that style of manufacturing can get down to nanometers… is there a search word I can use on YouTube to settle my curiosity? Edit: I’ll answer my own question. I searched for integrated circuits and found this https://youtu.be/ThNW0EqOH7U
Human: Any engineers here who work for Elon Musk? What is your experience? I am currently in school for engineering. I would like to one day work on one of Elon Musk's projects ( tunnels, SpaceX, etc...) and am wondering how realistic or idealistic that would be. Assistant: I have a lot of friends there. Work till you burn out, or find a fragile equilibrium. If you like working around 60 hrs/week and want to get into those fields it's not bad, but It's far from my ideal job or first choice for an aerospace company. Designing bolts on a spaceship is no more exciting than designing bolts on a shopping cart.
Human: Any engineers here who work for Elon Musk? What is your experience? I am currently in school for engineering. I would like to one day work on one of Elon Musk's projects ( tunnels, SpaceX, etc...) and am wondering how realistic or idealistic that would be. Assistant: It's a trap!
Human: Is there such a thing as "Optical Engineering" or something like that? I've been really interested in getting more into the technical details of AR displays and what makes them work but I haven't been able to find any specific "engineering field" that covers it. Is it just something like Mechanical engineering with a specialization in optics? Assistant: Usually people wanting to get into optics will get their undergraduate in applied physics with a focus on optics or photonics.
Human: Is there such a thing as "Optical Engineering" or something like that? I've been really interested in getting more into the technical details of AR displays and what makes them work but I haven't been able to find any specific "engineering field" that covers it. Is it just something like Mechanical engineering with a specialization in optics? Assistant: Absolutely yes! I'm a Mechanical Engineer and I worked in AR Optics with several Optical Engineers, happy to answer questions. University of Rochester is by far the top school, because of Kodak legacy (and Corning), and University of Arizona has a lot of expertise on larger systems because they manufacture all the big telescope mirrors for NASA. Edit: https://kguttag.com has the best AR Optics industry analysis
Human: Everybody I work with seems to have at least one patent. Am I just a crappy engineer? How common is it for mechanical engineers to have patents anyway? Assistant: There’s success bias, here. Most don’t have patents, but you hear about the ones who do. It all depends on what you do and what markets you’re in. If you’re in academia, you have publications, but in industry a publication isn’t worth much. It doesn’t make you a bad engineer at all. Quit that negative self talk and get back to kicking ass.
Human: Everybody I work with seems to have at least one patent. Am I just a crappy engineer? How common is it for mechanical engineers to have patents anyway? Assistant: It all depends on what sort of work you do, really.
Human: Settle a debate: better to leave the air conditioning on when you’re out for a few days or off and re-cool the house? HVAC types- I’m in New England and it’s hot but not Portland OR hot. We’ll be out for 2 days and the temps will be in the 90s. We have several mini split systems in the house. When we leave it off for for a few hours the house gets up to the 80s but seems not to go above 83/84 inside. It’s fairly humid so the dehumidifier aspects are one of our concerns. If we do turn on the A/C we leave up pretty high but enough to cool a little. So on or off? Assistant: Since you asked engineers and none actually gave you an engineering answer, here it is. It is more efficient to turn it off. Newton's law of cooling tells us that it takes less energy to cool intially and it gets exponentially harder as the temperature is lowered. Therefore, keeping the house at a lower temp for an extended period of time uses more energy, because cooling the house from 84 down to your vacation setpoint uses very little energy in comparison to holding at that setpoint.
Human: Settle a debate: better to leave the air conditioning on when you’re out for a few days or off and re-cool the house? HVAC types- I’m in New England and it’s hot but not Portland OR hot. We’ll be out for 2 days and the temps will be in the 90s. We have several mini split systems in the house. When we leave it off for for a few hours the house gets up to the 80s but seems not to go above 83/84 inside. It’s fairly humid so the dehumidifier aspects are one of our concerns. If we do turn on the A/C we leave up pretty high but enough to cool a little. So on or off? Assistant: If you care about saving energy (or your carbon footprint) definitely off. The only reason to consider running it is humidity, but that's not a big issue in new England unless you have a basement that's getting damp and you can get a dehumidifier for that.
Human: How has learning engineering changed daily living for you, for instance, the way you cook your food? Assistant: Engineering has made me cook very simple meals because I am so tired by the time I get home from work :(
Human: How has learning engineering changed daily living for you, for instance, the way you cook your food? Assistant: Not to much but I think about some of the physics that uses when cool something or things like that What I cannot unsee is that I'm making a thermodynamic exchange to my cold coco cola and make it hotter while I wait to pay so I always took it with my nails to minimize it is silly but hey it something
Human: Engineers of Reddit, what does the best engineer you know personally do for work, and what makes them the best engineer you know? Mine is the chief engineer of a major fighter jet program. He could do a boundary flow analysis in his head. Assistant: All the best engineers I know are deeply cynical and happy to say a project is completely flawed and fucked from the get-go. And yet they find a way to not be seen as contrary or belligerent, and instead actually respected. For example, they get in early enough to get their way, and they substitute better ideas that are equally or more doable. What they're working on doesn't matter.
Human: Engineers of Reddit, what does the best engineer you know personally do for work, and what makes them the best engineer you know? Mine is the chief engineer of a major fighter jet program. He could do a boundary flow analysis in his head. Assistant: Am I allowed to ask what boundary flow analysis is?
Human: What made you interested in Engineering? Assistant: I worked better with machines than people, was good at math, and wanted a secure job.
Human: What made you interested in Engineering? Assistant: Nothing.
Human: How long did it take for you to shake off the feeling of incompetence? I'm concluding my third year as an undergrad; I have yet to get an internship. I've only had a few interviews for internships this year, one ended up not taking me in because they thought I would be bored pushing paper work (mission assurance), instead sent recommendations to their other branch that ultimately did not want interns, just permanent personal. Another did not take me because they, presumably, got someone more fit for the job (EE for an EE internship). As graduation seems to crawl closer, and me being stuck just taking graduate classes for summer just does not seem very bright for my future. Perhaps, I've been too selective with my choices for internships by sticking strictly to aerospace companies. Anyways, going back to the original question, how long did it take you to feel competent enough to allow a company to entrust you with real tasks that impact real people? It feels like a perpetual chase for knowledge, with every step, more things I have to learn show up. It truly feels like trying to drink a whole ocean with a fire hydrant; the amount already is too much and the rate it comes at is too much itself. Assistant: More than 8 years apparently. I'm pretty sure Imma fake it til I make it til I retire. And I frequently get complimented on being very good at what I do. Conclusion? No one knows what the fuck is going on. The world is run by people just doing their best and hoping they don't screw up.
Human: How long did it take for you to shake off the feeling of incompetence? I'm concluding my third year as an undergrad; I have yet to get an internship. I've only had a few interviews for internships this year, one ended up not taking me in because they thought I would be bored pushing paper work (mission assurance), instead sent recommendations to their other branch that ultimately did not want interns, just permanent personal. Another did not take me because they, presumably, got someone more fit for the job (EE for an EE internship). As graduation seems to crawl closer, and me being stuck just taking graduate classes for summer just does not seem very bright for my future. Perhaps, I've been too selective with my choices for internships by sticking strictly to aerospace companies. Anyways, going back to the original question, how long did it take you to feel competent enough to allow a company to entrust you with real tasks that impact real people? It feels like a perpetual chase for knowledge, with every step, more things I have to learn show up. It truly feels like trying to drink a whole ocean with a fire hydrant; the amount already is too much and the rate it comes at is too much itself. Assistant: If you're feeling confident and competent, then you're also being complacent. Challenge yourself and try harder.
Human: Which Engineering field is oversaturated with engineers and which is actually in shortage and in need for more right now? It would be also nice if it someone can explain why there is an abundance and shortage as well as why people seek such these fields and why not. Assistant: ITT:anecdotes that should be taken with a massive grain of salt.
Human: Which Engineering field is oversaturated with engineers and which is actually in shortage and in need for more right now? It would be also nice if it someone can explain why there is an abundance and shortage as well as why people seek such these fields and why not. Assistant: Not sure if this is all across the world, but a lot of young engineers are going into power industry now, especially with rising renewable energy interests and baby boomer engineers retiring. Pay is decent and the work is pretty simple, so it's a great job for anyone who wants a relaxed, middle class life. I'm talking in utilities specifically.
Human: I'm wondering if I should even pursue being an engineer as my career. If If I am able to get an engineering degree, but I always make mistakes or I can't come up with a correct solution to a problem is it even worth trying to become a future engineer? My concern comes from me always making some kind of mistake or sometimes not even being able to come up with a solution to an engineering problem. Usually, I get by this by working with someone who does know how to do the problem correctly or by going to a professor's office hours. After taking an exam for one of my courses, I'm starting to wonder if I can't solve these hw problems, problems with answers, how will I be able to solve real-world problems without answers correctly once I am an engineer? And to add on to this, if I come out of classes with only a B grade understanding, not a 100% or 90% understanding of the course content, wouldn't that make being an engineer in the real world really hard? I feel like I might not even be able to do my job if I am to be an engineer. Is the solution to just have a growth mindset, and to know when I do actual engineering work I will just relearn and hopefully master what I need for the job? To believe even if I come out of a class with 75-80% understanding, it will be ok in the end? TLDR: Are there any engineers who passed a class with 80-75% understanding of a course's content, are doing work related to that course, and are able to perform their job well? When working does have moments where you cannot solve a problem like an experience of not being able to solve a hw problem in school? Assistant: You're worrying way too much. I graduated with a less than 3.0 GPA. I've got a successful career. Your biggest enemy in the workplace is yourself. Self-doubt is the biggest killer. Also, please read this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impostor_syndrome Every engineer gets this from time to time.
Human: I'm wondering if I should even pursue being an engineer as my career. If If I am able to get an engineering degree, but I always make mistakes or I can't come up with a correct solution to a problem is it even worth trying to become a future engineer? My concern comes from me always making some kind of mistake or sometimes not even being able to come up with a solution to an engineering problem. Usually, I get by this by working with someone who does know how to do the problem correctly or by going to a professor's office hours. After taking an exam for one of my courses, I'm starting to wonder if I can't solve these hw problems, problems with answers, how will I be able to solve real-world problems without answers correctly once I am an engineer? And to add on to this, if I come out of classes with only a B grade understanding, not a 100% or 90% understanding of the course content, wouldn't that make being an engineer in the real world really hard? I feel like I might not even be able to do my job if I am to be an engineer. Is the solution to just have a growth mindset, and to know when I do actual engineering work I will just relearn and hopefully master what I need for the job? To believe even if I come out of a class with 75-80% understanding, it will be ok in the end? TLDR: Are there any engineers who passed a class with 80-75% understanding of a course's content, are doing work related to that course, and are able to perform their job well? When working does have moments where you cannot solve a problem like an experience of not being able to solve a hw problem in school? Assistant: As a relatively new person in engineering job I would say experience beats everything. Most of the time theoretical solutions need a practical grounding. Additionally, you will learn a lot from your experienced colleagues. Be a decent person willing to listen, help, discuss and learn. It helps a lot.
Human: Since its taboo to ask at work... How old are you? What discipline are you in? How much do you make? And what is your 401k balance? I'm honestly just trying to get an idea of where I am, where my peers are, and where I should be. To be first... I'm a civil on the west coast making $115k/year. I am in my mid-30s with 10+ years of experience. My 401k balance is about $150k right now. Assistant: ChemE not using my degree directly. 27, 132k and 15k in 401k. Working 2 years and just got this gig.
Human: Since its taboo to ask at work... How old are you? What discipline are you in? How much do you make? And what is your 401k balance? I'm honestly just trying to get an idea of where I am, where my peers are, and where I should be. To be first... I'm a civil on the west coast making $115k/year. I am in my mid-30s with 10+ years of experience. My 401k balance is about $150k right now. Assistant: Remind me! 2 days
Human: How do I quit my engineering technician role and explain to my future employer? I got my masters degree in engineering management last year and whiles finishing my degree I interned with a Fortune 500 automotive supplier for 14months as mechanical design engineering intern while doing a lot of process engineering stuff too. I have a mechanical engineering undergrad degree and was in talks with my boss to get a full time position at the end of the internship in May. After COVID started, they went on a hiring freeze and were even laying off employees so all the hiring plans fell through. After looking for a job for about 4 months to no avail, my former boss (who I interned under) told me about an engineering technician position that was opened and he thought I could do that and work my way to being a process engineer in like a year and half. He recommended me and I got the job. The compensation is really good for the position and with overtime I make a lot. The issue is I dont really like the job. I like the aspect where I make some CAD designs, or write some VBA codes or PLC logics when needed but most of the time I am working with the maintenance crew to clean stuff or doing a lot of physical activity. Also, I work offshift and don't get to spend quality time with the engineers to learn from them. My fiancee also accepted a PhD admission in a city 4 hours away. Everybody likes me and my work ethic but I want to quit. I want to be an engineer like I went to school for. One of my coworkers made a comment that "if he had a masters degree, he would never do this job". It makes me feel like I have no ambition. I want to quit for an engineering role in the new city my fiancee is moving to. I started applying for process engineering and production engineering roles. I'm also looking at mechanical design engineering roles. I want to eventually get an MBA maybe 6 years from now, so I can go to the more business side of things. I feel like I'll disappoint my former boss who recommended me for the job and my new employer too since I'm now getting the technical side of the job pretty good. Is there any advice on how to approach this? How do I explain being a technician after getting a masters degree to my next employer? Assistant: You might be overthinking this, based on what you said in your post. If you were working for me and said, "My partner just got a great opportunity 4 hours away." My immediate response would be, "Oh, so you need to relocate? No problem, I totally understand." No rational, thinking human being would expect you to do anything else.
Human: How do I quit my engineering technician role and explain to my future employer? I got my masters degree in engineering management last year and whiles finishing my degree I interned with a Fortune 500 automotive supplier for 14months as mechanical design engineering intern while doing a lot of process engineering stuff too. I have a mechanical engineering undergrad degree and was in talks with my boss to get a full time position at the end of the internship in May. After COVID started, they went on a hiring freeze and were even laying off employees so all the hiring plans fell through. After looking for a job for about 4 months to no avail, my former boss (who I interned under) told me about an engineering technician position that was opened and he thought I could do that and work my way to being a process engineer in like a year and half. He recommended me and I got the job. The compensation is really good for the position and with overtime I make a lot. The issue is I dont really like the job. I like the aspect where I make some CAD designs, or write some VBA codes or PLC logics when needed but most of the time I am working with the maintenance crew to clean stuff or doing a lot of physical activity. Also, I work offshift and don't get to spend quality time with the engineers to learn from them. My fiancee also accepted a PhD admission in a city 4 hours away. Everybody likes me and my work ethic but I want to quit. I want to be an engineer like I went to school for. One of my coworkers made a comment that "if he had a masters degree, he would never do this job". It makes me feel like I have no ambition. I want to quit for an engineering role in the new city my fiancee is moving to. I started applying for process engineering and production engineering roles. I'm also looking at mechanical design engineering roles. I want to eventually get an MBA maybe 6 years from now, so I can go to the more business side of things. I feel like I'll disappoint my former boss who recommended me for the job and my new employer too since I'm now getting the technical side of the job pretty good. Is there any advice on how to approach this? How do I explain being a technician after getting a masters degree to my next employer? Assistant: You took a job that was available when times were tough. Not much more to be said about it. Try to emphasize what you learned while you were in that position and how it can make you a better engineer in practice.
Human: For those of you who work for companies that do unlimited PTO, do you feel like you get to take a good amount or is it worse than if you had a set amount of PTO? Assistant: It’s BS. I used to have 4 weeks earned vacation, 4 weeks sick time, 40 hours ‘personal business,‘ and a couple floating holidays. Plus any time worked over a casual 43-ish I got to bank to take as comp time. Now that the company has switched to permissive time off, my boss flips his shit if I try to take more than 4 weeks total in a year, including sick time. He’s a dick, and permissive time off is a scam.
Human: For those of you who work for companies that do unlimited PTO, do you feel like you get to take a good amount or is it worse than if you had a set amount of PTO? Assistant: In Sweden we have a ‘mandatory’ 4 week vacation in Summer and another 10 days to take as we please, plus national holidays, and up to one year paid paternity. Not sure what I’d do with unlimited PTO...
Human: Job offer was $25/hr but I need at least $31/hr to pay my expenses. Is it possible to negotiate to that rate if I have zero experience? (Los Angeles) The job is for a staff geotechnical engineer, entry level. They said the work I would be doing initially would be in the field working basically as a technician. Once I get that foundation then I’d be doing more of their engineering work. My monthly expenses are all bills, no fluff, so I’m not able to cut it down to match their pay rate. I would either need to have the hourly start at $31 or have it get there within 2 months. Their offer letter didn’t specify when a raise might occur or bonuses. The average hourly wage in L.A. for entry level Geotech is $32 on some websites but it vastly varies on other websites. Am I able to use the $32 rate alone for the negotiation process? I know the $25/hr is more than most of their technicians and from another job posting, I know they’re willing to pay a staff engineer with 2 years of experience $39-$48/hour. I know I have to ask for an increase, but I need advice on how to go about that. TIA! Assistant: How is it a "Staff" engineer but entry level? Usually "Staff" means you're above senior. Either way $25/hr is terrible for an engineer and insulting in SoCal.
Human: Job offer was $25/hr but I need at least $31/hr to pay my expenses. Is it possible to negotiate to that rate if I have zero experience? (Los Angeles) The job is for a staff geotechnical engineer, entry level. They said the work I would be doing initially would be in the field working basically as a technician. Once I get that foundation then I’d be doing more of their engineering work. My monthly expenses are all bills, no fluff, so I’m not able to cut it down to match their pay rate. I would either need to have the hourly start at $31 or have it get there within 2 months. Their offer letter didn’t specify when a raise might occur or bonuses. The average hourly wage in L.A. for entry level Geotech is $32 on some websites but it vastly varies on other websites. Am I able to use the $32 rate alone for the negotiation process? I know the $25/hr is more than most of their technicians and from another job posting, I know they’re willing to pay a staff engineer with 2 years of experience $39-$48/hour. I know I have to ask for an increase, but I need advice on how to go about that. TIA! Assistant: You need some numbers to back up your points. Google national average and average at LA.. or and pay at their competitor in LA. Just pick a reliable site and make a good points about why you want to get pay 32/h... im sure there is overtime. Do it after they offered you the job. Maybe talk about cost of living there. Otherwise, go back to job application or take the 25
Human: If you had to make a list of wonders of modern engineering what would you put on? The Apollo program, the channel tunnel and the panama canal all come to mind, but what do you think? Assistant: The ballpoint pen. Being able to produce all components is the litmus test for precision manufacturing. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20201028-history-of-the-ballpoint-pen
Human: If you had to make a list of wonders of modern engineering what would you put on? The Apollo program, the channel tunnel and the panama canal all come to mind, but what do you think? Assistant: MOSFET - no 20th or 21st century without it. Internal combustion engine - the ingenuity and "engineeringness" at their best
Human: Got suckered by a "Project Engineer" position. How screwed am I in terms of working my way back into an actual engineering position? Graduated with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in July of 2020. I accepted a position as a "Mechanical Project Engineer" with an MEP construction company in September of 2020. When I first saw the ad, I didn't really understand what a "Project" Engineer was. I knew nothing about construction when I walked into my first interview. I didn't understand the difference between GC, subcontractors, MEP, Engineer-of-Record, Commissioning Agents, etc. I made this clear to the interviewers. They didn't seem to have a problem with it. I don't want to say they misled me but it's very clear in hindsight that they were speaking construction and I was speaking Engineer, and we didn't actually understand one another despite thinking that we did. Knowing what I know now about construction, Google and the interviews I did gave me the idea that I would be doing what a project engineer at an EOR or Commissioning Agent would do. This is not AT ALL what I've done here over the past year. What I do now is what I imagine a construction manager does. I have not touched a single engineering-related task in the year I've been here. Talks with management have revealed that there are absolutely no plans to have any in-house engineering in the future. I've essentially been getting paid peanuts to be a glorified construction secretary in an industry that I could not give less of a fuck about if you put a gun to my head and tried to force me. Okay, end rant. I'm scheduled to take the Mechanical FE in early November (thank COVID and the birth of my kid for forcing me to kick that can far too far down the road). However I'm concerned that I've been out of school for so long in a totally unrelated-to-engineering position that it's going to make it very difficult for me to secure an actual engineering position that pays decent. I haven't touched solidworks in over a year, and though I'm willing and eager to learn other engineering software on my own, I'm concerned that the subscription prices (being in the several THOUSANDS of dollars) may prevent me from being able to learn on my own. I don't know how much longer my student email will work, and several publishers require additional proof of enrollment beyond just a student ID. Grabbing a single joke class from the community College just to show proof doesn't work, as the CCs in my area require you to pay for a minimum of 6 units, which is not something I can afford right now. How screwed am I? Assistant: Take the FE first & get your EIT. After that, apply to a few Architectural/Engineering consulting firms (A/E firms) & you should be fine. You're not at all screwed, I personally have worked with people that came from contractors into consulting firms & love the engineering work. Shoot me a PM if you want some advice. Good luck!
Human: Got suckered by a "Project Engineer" position. How screwed am I in terms of working my way back into an actual engineering position? Graduated with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in July of 2020. I accepted a position as a "Mechanical Project Engineer" with an MEP construction company in September of 2020. When I first saw the ad, I didn't really understand what a "Project" Engineer was. I knew nothing about construction when I walked into my first interview. I didn't understand the difference between GC, subcontractors, MEP, Engineer-of-Record, Commissioning Agents, etc. I made this clear to the interviewers. They didn't seem to have a problem with it. I don't want to say they misled me but it's very clear in hindsight that they were speaking construction and I was speaking Engineer, and we didn't actually understand one another despite thinking that we did. Knowing what I know now about construction, Google and the interviews I did gave me the idea that I would be doing what a project engineer at an EOR or Commissioning Agent would do. This is not AT ALL what I've done here over the past year. What I do now is what I imagine a construction manager does. I have not touched a single engineering-related task in the year I've been here. Talks with management have revealed that there are absolutely no plans to have any in-house engineering in the future. I've essentially been getting paid peanuts to be a glorified construction secretary in an industry that I could not give less of a fuck about if you put a gun to my head and tried to force me. Okay, end rant. I'm scheduled to take the Mechanical FE in early November (thank COVID and the birth of my kid for forcing me to kick that can far too far down the road). However I'm concerned that I've been out of school for so long in a totally unrelated-to-engineering position that it's going to make it very difficult for me to secure an actual engineering position that pays decent. I haven't touched solidworks in over a year, and though I'm willing and eager to learn other engineering software on my own, I'm concerned that the subscription prices (being in the several THOUSANDS of dollars) may prevent me from being able to learn on my own. I don't know how much longer my student email will work, and several publishers require additional proof of enrollment beyond just a student ID. Grabbing a single joke class from the community College just to show proof doesn't work, as the CCs in my area require you to pay for a minimum of 6 units, which is not something I can afford right now. How screwed am I? Assistant: This sounds like every project engineer position I have seen. It is not a technical role per se, really on in terms of understanding the project. A busy project engineer doesn’t have time to do a mechanical engineers job. It’s okay to spend time in various roles. Often emoloyers won’t hold it against you early in your career. Find out what you like quick and stay with it though.
Human: New job does not provide a work cell like my old one. Is it unethical to setup a google voice line to use for work? So my last job was at a big corporate robotics company in a controls engineer position. They provided an iphone to use exclusively for work. It was nice since I could separate my work contacts easily and it made it easy to focus at work so I could just keep my personal phone in my pocket and my work cell on my desk. The other part I liked was the fact that all my work related items were separated from my personal life. That way I could turn off my phone during business hours or prevent some contacts from finding my Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, etc. So this new place is a big corporate company, but I work at a small branch of it. So since I didn't get a work phone I had to install comp portal which essentially "partitions" part of my phone and has dedicated work apps and such. Now it's somewhat harder to manage work and personal notifications since the cellular network is still personal and connected to my line. For example, if I visit a BMW plant and I'm there two weeks to help setup the new automation I'll give the shift manager my number to keep in contact if something happens. Now after those two weeks are up, occasionally my number or business card gets posted on a wall or shared around and I've had plenty of night shift guys call me at 3 am even when I haven't been at a plant for months. This is one of the few scenarios I'm trying to prevent. Assistant: I'd argue that work to NOT provide you with a phone AND expect you to be reachable via phone...is totally unacceptable/unethical on their part. At that point? Who gives a fuck if it's "normally" ethical. They've already proven themselves to be shitstains. No way do I let the office install software on my personal phone. Period. If they want apps installed, they can provide the phone.
Human: New job does not provide a work cell like my old one. Is it unethical to setup a google voice line to use for work? So my last job was at a big corporate robotics company in a controls engineer position. They provided an iphone to use exclusively for work. It was nice since I could separate my work contacts easily and it made it easy to focus at work so I could just keep my personal phone in my pocket and my work cell on my desk. The other part I liked was the fact that all my work related items were separated from my personal life. That way I could turn off my phone during business hours or prevent some contacts from finding my Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, etc. So this new place is a big corporate company, but I work at a small branch of it. So since I didn't get a work phone I had to install comp portal which essentially "partitions" part of my phone and has dedicated work apps and such. Now it's somewhat harder to manage work and personal notifications since the cellular network is still personal and connected to my line. For example, if I visit a BMW plant and I'm there two weeks to help setup the new automation I'll give the shift manager my number to keep in contact if something happens. Now after those two weeks are up, occasionally my number or business card gets posted on a wall or shared around and I've had plenty of night shift guys call me at 3 am even when I haven't been at a plant for months. This is one of the few scenarios I'm trying to prevent. Assistant: I cannot see any reason that would be unethical
Human: Could a sufficiently talented electrical/computer engineer completely design an entire smartphone by themselves? I heard that the specialization of Engineering disciplines means that there is "not a single person" who completely knows how a smartphone works. This seems dubious to me and I would like to know if it would be possible for an experienced electrical engineer to design a smartphone on their own. I know that Steve Wozniak built his own computer from basic electrical components when he was a kid, but then again, I imagine modern technologies like touchscreens, LCD, and WiFi increase the amount of technical knowledge needed to design a phone/computer. Assistant: highy unlikely. you could hack something together, but it will be like something from 1980 when you are done
Human: Could a sufficiently talented electrical/computer engineer completely design an entire smartphone by themselves? I heard that the specialization of Engineering disciplines means that there is "not a single person" who completely knows how a smartphone works. This seems dubious to me and I would like to know if it would be possible for an experienced electrical engineer to design a smartphone on their own. I know that Steve Wozniak built his own computer from basic electrical components when he was a kid, but then again, I imagine modern technologies like touchscreens, LCD, and WiFi increase the amount of technical knowledge needed to design a phone/computer. Assistant: Short answer, yes. But like other people have pointed out, it depends on what your starting point is. I remember hearing in college that a senior design project team made a cell phone. This was around 2007 so smart phones weren’t really main stream yet. but all in all it’s totally doable
Human: Hi all, I've been studying computer science on my own and am currently studying how a computer works from the ground up. The course I'm taking starts with a NAND gate, but I'm wondering what comes before that! The course mentions that everything lower level falls under the realm of electrical engineering, and should be seen as a black box. I gues it really goes into physical electronics at this point. The thing is, I understand software, I understand Hardware, but I still find it very hard to imagine the interface. Could someone please give me a brief explanation on what's happening in this black box? I don't need to understand it to detail, of course, but it would be nice if I could understand the missing link. Assistant: Whoa slow down. Don’t skip ahead so much. First you’ll need to read up on The Big Bang to understand where the elements originated, how the space dust coalesced into this planet, the dawn of mankind, Fire, The Wheel, Mathematics, Science and the Age of Enlightenment, typewriters, World War II and the development of analog encryption, Alan Touring’s decryption machine, vacuum tubes, punchcards, and a few other topics before you get to modern computers.
Human: Hi all, I've been studying computer science on my own and am currently studying how a computer works from the ground up. The course I'm taking starts with a NAND gate, but I'm wondering what comes before that! The course mentions that everything lower level falls under the realm of electrical engineering, and should be seen as a black box. I gues it really goes into physical electronics at this point. The thing is, I understand software, I understand Hardware, but I still find it very hard to imagine the interface. Could someone please give me a brief explanation on what's happening in this black box? I don't need to understand it to detail, of course, but it would be nice if I could understand the missing link. Assistant: https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/digital/chpt-3/ttl-nand-and-gates/ It is also good to look into flip flops and how they are constructed, then shift registers and state machines and how you can create them using tools like karnaugh maps . Basic state machines such are the unsung heros of computing fundamentals.
Human: I'm a 29 year old Accountant. Is it too late to go back to undergrad for Engineering? So I am 29, work in Accounting. Entry level. I LOVE where I work. Charity research hospital for children, but I am certain that I have chose the wrong career path. I find it really hard to get engaged in my field. My hobbies include building rock crawlers and teaching myself things to do and acquiring new hobbies, mountain biking, and hiking/outdoors. I built a Toyota rock crawler after a year or so of research and learning how to weld. No automotive prior experience. I am far too outgoing for accounting. I need more interaction with people and I need to not be in a box under fluorescent lights all day every day. I have been looking at an Engineering Technology degree, it seems like there would be a good bit of application and interaction with others and some field work that is possible. Just asking if I am too old to start all over again from the very bottom, as I am barely up from the bottom of my field. Will I be older than the HS grads in my classes? How will the job search be as an older guy? I will have to do all night classes as I work full time so It might take a little longer to get a degree. Also I am open to info on other areas of engineering as well. Consider me a complete newbie, or an unformed piece of clay. I really appreciate your time in reading this post and thank you in advance for any replies. Assistant: I'm finishing up as a 30+ year old veteran. Don't let any dull your shine, scooter
Human: I'm a 29 year old Accountant. Is it too late to go back to undergrad for Engineering? So I am 29, work in Accounting. Entry level. I LOVE where I work. Charity research hospital for children, but I am certain that I have chose the wrong career path. I find it really hard to get engaged in my field. My hobbies include building rock crawlers and teaching myself things to do and acquiring new hobbies, mountain biking, and hiking/outdoors. I built a Toyota rock crawler after a year or so of research and learning how to weld. No automotive prior experience. I am far too outgoing for accounting. I need more interaction with people and I need to not be in a box under fluorescent lights all day every day. I have been looking at an Engineering Technology degree, it seems like there would be a good bit of application and interaction with others and some field work that is possible. Just asking if I am too old to start all over again from the very bottom, as I am barely up from the bottom of my field. Will I be older than the HS grads in my classes? How will the job search be as an older guy? I will have to do all night classes as I work full time so It might take a little longer to get a degree. Also I am open to info on other areas of engineering as well. Consider me a complete newbie, or an unformed piece of clay. I really appreciate your time in reading this post and thank you in advance for any replies. Assistant: My boyfriend went to community college at the age of 28, transferred to a top engineering university, got a BS and MS, and received a life-changing offer with a big company in Silicon Valley. He starts work just before his 34th birthday. He was a bartender when we met.
Human: I think I understand general principle behind piston powering a wheel - but how do you ensure there is no accidental direction change? Hello I can imagine every step in piston causing wheel to spin, except this certain element. When piston is fully retracted/extended, it would be in straight line through the wheel axis, right? What stops it from getting stuck or swapping direction of push? My apology if it seems silly, I just can't sleep rn cuz I started thinking about this *edit* Poland here, but don't think it matters Assistant: Inertia of the flywheel keeping the crank turning the “right” way, firing order on multi cylinder engines, etc. But many old single cylinder tractors did not have a reverse gear and instead slowed the engine rpm down, and reversed its rotation to actually reverse the tractor. So in short, nothing, and lots of things.
Human: I think I understand general principle behind piston powering a wheel - but how do you ensure there is no accidental direction change? Hello I can imagine every step in piston causing wheel to spin, except this certain element. When piston is fully retracted/extended, it would be in straight line through the wheel axis, right? What stops it from getting stuck or swapping direction of push? My apology if it seems silly, I just can't sleep rn cuz I started thinking about this *edit* Poland here, but don't think it matters Assistant: Momentum if the system wanting to move in that direction. Some might also have directionally features, but in a simple form that could go in both directions, it's momentum
Human: Do you think it's possible to become a mechanical engineer in the aerospace industry after working as a mechanical engineer in the marine industry? Hello, I'm currently a Mechanical engineering graduate who's long term career goal is to end up in the aerospace industry but is open to various industries that would give me the opportunity to sharpen the skills required to work as a mechanical engineer in the aerospace industry. I'm asking this question since where I live has a lot of opportunity with the marine industry and some even have tried to recruit me personally. I'm tempted by the marine industry but also worried that it will make it difficult for me to move into the aerospace industry as it may not provide suitable transferable skills. Assistant: I've done both and switched from both, you'll do fine. A Marine environment is challenging in a lot of way that a space environment is not. If you want to learn about aerospace, take a few classes once you get working and see if you like it. You can also work with some friends and online community to help with their aerospace projects to get your feet wet. Good luck!
Human: Do you think it's possible to become a mechanical engineer in the aerospace industry after working as a mechanical engineer in the marine industry? Hello, I'm currently a Mechanical engineering graduate who's long term career goal is to end up in the aerospace industry but is open to various industries that would give me the opportunity to sharpen the skills required to work as a mechanical engineer in the aerospace industry. I'm asking this question since where I live has a lot of opportunity with the marine industry and some even have tried to recruit me personally. I'm tempted by the marine industry but also worried that it will make it difficult for me to move into the aerospace industry as it may not provide suitable transferable skills. Assistant: I started in the marine industry and transitioned to the aerospace industry and then transitioned back to submarines. It depends on how flexible you are and your willingness to take salary adjustments and learn new skills.
Human: I'm a mechanical engineer, and I'm going to be tackling an undergrad computer science degree. What are some programming projects that would help you guys out (that are reasonably done by one person)? Title. My experience is in pressure vessels and heat exchangers, so mechanical design stuff is more within my realm of expertise. I'm looking for a something I can use as a senior design project, but make it useful to engineers. Problem is, I suck at ideas. Any suggestion? Assistant: I have a degree in mechanical engineering but have worked in software for the past handful of years. I would recommend something in controls engineering. You could model and control the flow through a heat exchanger.
Human: I'm a mechanical engineer, and I'm going to be tackling an undergrad computer science degree. What are some programming projects that would help you guys out (that are reasonably done by one person)? Title. My experience is in pressure vessels and heat exchangers, so mechanical design stuff is more within my realm of expertise. I'm looking for a something I can use as a senior design project, but make it useful to engineers. Problem is, I suck at ideas. Any suggestion? Assistant: Do you have a budget?
Human: How many hours do you actually work in your full-time 40 hour work week? Curious to see what people have to say! Assistant: 38.5 because I work in Germany. Anything I work over than that I get as overtime which can be put towards future time off. Legally I’m capped at 50 hours a week. It’s pretty nice out here!
Human: How many hours do you actually work in your full-time 40 hour work week? Curious to see what people have to say! Assistant: So what I'm getting is it wildly varies.
Human: WFH/Office How much actual productive time? With the new working from home compared to office based work, are you working more efficiently? Do you still need to put in 40+ hours? Assistant: Way less productive working from home. The number of video meetings that have replaced speaking with someone for 15mins is insane, and all the distractions of being at home on top of that. Only got a couple useful hours a day, much happier now that I'm back at work.
Human: WFH/Office How much actual productive time? With the new working from home compared to office based work, are you working more efficiently? Do you still need to put in 40+ hours? Assistant: I don't have a good comparison pre/post-COVID-19 (my work schedule hasn't changed), but I started working 50-75% of the week from home last October and it's a huge upgrade from sitting in a cubicle for 40 hours a week. Not planning on going back to an all-day office job ever, but realistically if things don't pan out that's probably not something I can control.
Human: Engineers who work at recycling facilities: What do I put in the recycling that messes up your process? I've never been sure about how clean recycling needs to be or how the processing is done, what can I do to make the process run as cleanly as possible? Assistant: PLEASE PLEASE make sure puncture steel cans - especially oil filters, they hold water and cause explosions when charged into an EAF (I'm going to call that a recycling facility).
Human: Engineers who work at recycling facilities: What do I put in the recycling that messes up your process? I've never been sure about how clean recycling needs to be or how the processing is done, what can I do to make the process run as cleanly as possible? Assistant: Babies.
Human: Would you say Tinkering around and Opening up things like Mechanical Pencils, Pens, Toy Cars etc. is a good thing to do with your extra time if you aspire to become a Mechanical Engineer? I'll be going to University next year and I aspire to become a Mechanical Engineer, I want to be a step ahead of the competition and not only be a better Mechanical Engineering Student but also a better Mechanical Engineer. So I wanted to know if there are somethings I could do to become more comfortable with doing future homework assignments an Ideal candidate for a Mechanical Engineering job position. Do you reccomend messing around in SolidWorks, adopting a hobby of seeing how mechanical watches work or something of the like? Assistant: Why ask? If it interests you just do it man
Human: Would you say Tinkering around and Opening up things like Mechanical Pencils, Pens, Toy Cars etc. is a good thing to do with your extra time if you aspire to become a Mechanical Engineer? I'll be going to University next year and I aspire to become a Mechanical Engineer, I want to be a step ahead of the competition and not only be a better Mechanical Engineering Student but also a better Mechanical Engineer. So I wanted to know if there are somethings I could do to become more comfortable with doing future homework assignments an Ideal candidate for a Mechanical Engineering job position. Do you reccomend messing around in SolidWorks, adopting a hobby of seeing how mechanical watches work or something of the like? Assistant: All of your suggestions are perfect. I'd recommend getting to grips with things like calculus, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics and try to find some mechanical engineering physics too (things like stress and strain and behavioral properties of materials). Although mostly just sit down with some good documentaries about engineering. Getting an idea of what the end product of your studies are can help motivate you! I personally like engineering connections quite a lot
Human: If I have a lower GPA than the required GPA on a job post, should I even bother applying to the position? I've heard that it shows you "can't follow instruction" if you do so. Just wondering if I should ignore this and be applying to everything under the sun to land a job. Assistant: If you do not apply, then you'll *never* get the job. If you do apply, then you *might* get the job. Choose which outcome you prefer, then check the antecedent activity.
Human: If I have a lower GPA than the required GPA on a job post, should I even bother applying to the position? I've heard that it shows you "can't follow instruction" if you do so. Just wondering if I should ignore this and be applying to everything under the sun to land a job. Assistant: It isn't always this way for recent college graduates, but it is a common rule of thumb that if you meet half of the qualifications (Recommended and Required) of a position, you are probably in pretty good shape, and submitting an application can't hurt. The best way to find a job is to apply to lots of places in your defined scope, at least from what I've seen work.
Human: What are some career hacks you have used/discovered ? What are some career hacks, could be for any experience level. Assistant: It's really simple, and only works if you're a people person. But I've found having a big jar of candy on your desk helps you get into people's good graces. People tend to stop by and spill all their secrets. And they begin to associate you with a dopamine hit. Top tip, find out and include some of the CEOs / eng manager / anyone who could be useful's favourites.
Human: What are some career hacks you have used/discovered ? What are some career hacks, could be for any experience level. Assistant: - if you are paperless, print out project stuff and tack it to the walls. Also leave paper on your desk. Just reposition every now and then. Nobody looks at what it is but being paperless looks like lazy for some reason
Human: How do you deal with passive-aggressive maintenance personnel? I work at a chemical plant and am a new Process Engineer. I have made some mistakes (mis-diagnosed a heat exchanger being blocked) and I see some of passive-aggressiveness from maintenance who had to open up the exchanger and found nothing substantial. We did find some issues with the heat exchanger but for now it looks like I was wrong. I feel that my credibility (which wasn't much because I am new) is mostly gone. Is this how it works in plants, I'm not allowed to make mistakes or are maintenance personnel always gonna hate you? Also, it's not like I got a lot of push-back when I initially suggested cleaning the heat exchangers. Everyone kind of got it done and when I would ask if it was a good suggestion maintenance guys would say "I don't know" and wouldn't really answer my questions. It's almost like they were waiting to see if I would fail or not, and now that I have failed they're acting like they saw it coming a mile away... Don't get me wrong, it is my fault and I should have been better prepared. But does maintenance always act like this? Assistant: Personally, I'd double down and own it and start busting their balls by mentioning the heat exchanger as a suggestion everytime there's any issue with anything in the plant from here in out. "Coffee machine isn't working? Shit, we better pull the staff together to pull apart the heat exchanger again."
Human: How do you deal with passive-aggressive maintenance personnel? I work at a chemical plant and am a new Process Engineer. I have made some mistakes (mis-diagnosed a heat exchanger being blocked) and I see some of passive-aggressiveness from maintenance who had to open up the exchanger and found nothing substantial. We did find some issues with the heat exchanger but for now it looks like I was wrong. I feel that my credibility (which wasn't much because I am new) is mostly gone. Is this how it works in plants, I'm not allowed to make mistakes or are maintenance personnel always gonna hate you? Also, it's not like I got a lot of push-back when I initially suggested cleaning the heat exchangers. Everyone kind of got it done and when I would ask if it was a good suggestion maintenance guys would say "I don't know" and wouldn't really answer my questions. It's almost like they were waiting to see if I would fail or not, and now that I have failed they're acting like they saw it coming a mile away... Don't get me wrong, it is my fault and I should have been better prepared. But does maintenance always act like this? Assistant: Did they get paid to do the work? Push back a little. If you work at plants you need to push back or you will get run over.
Human: Leveraging Offers for a Salary Raise - Is this okay? Hi Reddit. I had previously posted on this subreddit in regards to salary vs years experience and got great feedback. I thought Id give it a shot again and ask for all of your experiences/ advice again. I have been working at a large engineering consulting firm in the greater Toronto region for 6 years. I have progressively worked my way up to the role of project manager on large scale municipal infrastructure projects. I currently have 5 direct reports, and manage and direct the work of a team of 10 members. I am very happy with my job, but very unhappy with my pay. I currently make $75,000; market value based on OPSE salary surveys for someone in my role is $100k. When I have complained about my salary, I have been told by my superiors that I am gaining valuable experience which will be worth it in the long run and have sort of felt brushed off. Furthermore, I have been given the option on company shares and have been told that this shows commitment on the part of my current firm and that "there is a plan for me, be patient". A month ago I decided to test the market and have just received an offer of $100k from another consulting firm. I am in an odd spot because I love my current job and I genuinely do enjoy all of the learning opportunities and prefer not to leave. I have also been told that my salary review at my current job will be completed in the next few weeks, with a raise coming in June. Based on past experience, I am not expecting a jump of 25k that it will take to get me to market value as this would represent a 33% raise. In the last few 6 years the largest raise I have received is 13%. In this scenario, if I were to present the offer I have to my current employer do I risk compromising my reputation by forcing their hand? I am confident they will match the offer once presented as counter-offers were presented to two of my colleges in lower standing, when they received offers from competitors (both left for other reasons). Furthermore, would it be unethical of me to do this to the company that has presented the offer? I am conflicted because I do not want to ruin my reputation or burn any bridges. I just want to ensure I am paid fairly, and not let an opportunity for this to happen expire. Assistant: Be honest with them and you won't burn any bridges. Don't give an ultimatum but say something like you initially just wanted to see what the market salary but quickly turned into an offer. Then tell them that the market salary for your role is significantly different enough that you can no longer financially ignore the deficit and it will eat at you if you say there and continue to be underpaid. Then bring up the salary that was offered as proof of market value.
Human: Leveraging Offers for a Salary Raise - Is this okay? Hi Reddit. I had previously posted on this subreddit in regards to salary vs years experience and got great feedback. I thought Id give it a shot again and ask for all of your experiences/ advice again. I have been working at a large engineering consulting firm in the greater Toronto region for 6 years. I have progressively worked my way up to the role of project manager on large scale municipal infrastructure projects. I currently have 5 direct reports, and manage and direct the work of a team of 10 members. I am very happy with my job, but very unhappy with my pay. I currently make $75,000; market value based on OPSE salary surveys for someone in my role is $100k. When I have complained about my salary, I have been told by my superiors that I am gaining valuable experience which will be worth it in the long run and have sort of felt brushed off. Furthermore, I have been given the option on company shares and have been told that this shows commitment on the part of my current firm and that "there is a plan for me, be patient". A month ago I decided to test the market and have just received an offer of $100k from another consulting firm. I am in an odd spot because I love my current job and I genuinely do enjoy all of the learning opportunities and prefer not to leave. I have also been told that my salary review at my current job will be completed in the next few weeks, with a raise coming in June. Based on past experience, I am not expecting a jump of 25k that it will take to get me to market value as this would represent a 33% raise. In the last few 6 years the largest raise I have received is 13%. In this scenario, if I were to present the offer I have to my current employer do I risk compromising my reputation by forcing their hand? I am confident they will match the offer once presented as counter-offers were presented to two of my colleges in lower standing, when they received offers from competitors (both left for other reasons). Furthermore, would it be unethical of me to do this to the company that has presented the offer? I am conflicted because I do not want to ruin my reputation or burn any bridges. I just want to ensure I am paid fairly, and not let an opportunity for this to happen expire. Assistant: does experience pay your bills?
Human: Engineers, do you have time to thoroughly understand the formulas and methods you use? Seems like a common trope that in engineering, fundamental understanding is sacrificed in favour of practical application. I do further maths and physics for my A Levels, and I honestly sank way more time into deriving the formulas, understanding the fundamental ideas behind calculus, visually deriving various geometric/trigonometric theorems etc. I just can't stand using formulas without a more rigorous understanding of what they actually represent. So naturally I wanted to do physics. I want to be able to really understand what drives all the formulas we use. I wanted to understand the world. At the same time, I also place importance on practical application, on degree employability and future prospects. I want to understand the formulas, but I want to apply them as well. So I'm curious, how much additional time would it take for an engineer to grasp the fundamental physics behind the equations and methods taught in an engineering course? Is the gulf between engineering and physics large enough that an engineer would be better off expanding their knowledge in a specialty area of engineering rather than sinking time trying to grasp unnecessary derivations of their equations? How much time would it take for me to graduate as an engineer, while also having the fundamental understanding of a physicist? Assistant: IMO it’s more important to understand formulae than actually doing them. You can always program something to do the math, but you need to instinctively know if it’s even close.
Human: Engineers, do you have time to thoroughly understand the formulas and methods you use? Seems like a common trope that in engineering, fundamental understanding is sacrificed in favour of practical application. I do further maths and physics for my A Levels, and I honestly sank way more time into deriving the formulas, understanding the fundamental ideas behind calculus, visually deriving various geometric/trigonometric theorems etc. I just can't stand using formulas without a more rigorous understanding of what they actually represent. So naturally I wanted to do physics. I want to be able to really understand what drives all the formulas we use. I wanted to understand the world. At the same time, I also place importance on practical application, on degree employability and future prospects. I want to understand the formulas, but I want to apply them as well. So I'm curious, how much additional time would it take for an engineer to grasp the fundamental physics behind the equations and methods taught in an engineering course? Is the gulf between engineering and physics large enough that an engineer would be better off expanding their knowledge in a specialty area of engineering rather than sinking time trying to grasp unnecessary derivations of their equations? How much time would it take for me to graduate as an engineer, while also having the fundamental understanding of a physicist? Assistant: Answering the headline, there are no equations, formulae or methods I use that I don't understand, although some of the maths stuff I understand only from about cruising altitude. For instance the nitty gritty of the numerical solvers I use are neither interesting nor understood by me. I have a tuning guide for them, but they are a black box. But at uni I understood almost all of it.
Human: I can't seem to land a job after getting my BS in Aerospace, where should I go from here? I live in the Midwest. In May I graduated from U of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, which has a really good Aerospace Engineering program. During my undergrad, I tried for the first three years to land an internship for the summer, but I could never get any companies to reply. I did probably fifty of these each year and didn't get a single email or call back aside from rejections. After graduating, I'm having a similar problem. Since then, I've completed several hundred job applications, and had even done a couple my senior year before graduating. I've gotten a handful of interviews, around one per month, but they ended up either being crappy offers that were way too low and/or not really in my field, or not giving me an offer at all. My grades were good, at just under a 3.5 gpa when I finished. It feels like I can't get a job due to never having had an internship or co-op, and I could never get an internship because I never had a prior internship. I'm living with my parents so I'm not in desperate need of a job immediately, but I also don't want to stay there any longer than I have to. U of I has some decent graduate level degrees (1-year MEng, 2-year MS, and 2.5-year MS with thesis) and my SO thinks I should pursue one of those, which could make it a lot easier to get employed. I'm extremely hesitant to go back to school however because I barely had enough motivation to finish my senior year. I also always thought it would be a lot smarter to wait and see if I could get a masters degree paid for by an employer while I'm working there, as that seems to be fairly commonplace now. I'm at a point now where I just don't know what to do and am losing all motivation to continue. Should I keep applying to jobs and hope that something good actually comes through? Should I take a less-than-ideal position outside aerospace just to get some amount of experience under my belt? Should I go back to school? Thanks in advance. Assistant: My first job out of school was a contract job with no benefits. I made $20 an hour. Guess what? It was a great opportunity. I had no internship experience and had been looking for an engineering job for almost 2 years. 9 years later I make more than double what my first salary was. The opportunities that job gave me in my career are almost priceless. You are unemployed with no relevant job experience. No engineering job offer is below you.
Human: I can't seem to land a job after getting my BS in Aerospace, where should I go from here? I live in the Midwest. In May I graduated from U of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, which has a really good Aerospace Engineering program. During my undergrad, I tried for the first three years to land an internship for the summer, but I could never get any companies to reply. I did probably fifty of these each year and didn't get a single email or call back aside from rejections. After graduating, I'm having a similar problem. Since then, I've completed several hundred job applications, and had even done a couple my senior year before graduating. I've gotten a handful of interviews, around one per month, but they ended up either being crappy offers that were way too low and/or not really in my field, or not giving me an offer at all. My grades were good, at just under a 3.5 gpa when I finished. It feels like I can't get a job due to never having had an internship or co-op, and I could never get an internship because I never had a prior internship. I'm living with my parents so I'm not in desperate need of a job immediately, but I also don't want to stay there any longer than I have to. U of I has some decent graduate level degrees (1-year MEng, 2-year MS, and 2.5-year MS with thesis) and my SO thinks I should pursue one of those, which could make it a lot easier to get employed. I'm extremely hesitant to go back to school however because I barely had enough motivation to finish my senior year. I also always thought it would be a lot smarter to wait and see if I could get a masters degree paid for by an employer while I'm working there, as that seems to be fairly commonplace now. I'm at a point now where I just don't know what to do and am losing all motivation to continue. Should I keep applying to jobs and hope that something good actually comes through? Should I take a less-than-ideal position outside aerospace just to get some amount of experience under my belt? Should I go back to school? Thanks in advance. Assistant: Geographically speaking, where are you applying because I might be wrong, but the mid west isn't exactly known for its aerospace industry? People with specialized degrees constantly forget that you have to typically go where the work is. Also as others have said, if you aren't getting interviews at all, it's because your resume sucks.
Human: I'm curious about digital display(monitors, TVs, phones, etc) engineering. What type of degree does it involve and what would the work look like? Assistant: I work for a company that develops assorted films that are used in making TVs, and other display devices. Most of my colleagues have chemical engineering backgrounds.
Human: I'm curious about digital display(monitors, TVs, phones, etc) engineering. What type of degree does it involve and what would the work look like? Assistant: Electronic engineering, maybe specialising in RF.
Human: I'm a senior graduating this May and I'm looking for jobs. I have applied to a bunch of jobs at a company that never came to my school for our career fair. Any advice on how to get myself out there more since I was unable to speak with recruiters at my career fair? Assistant: I learned one thing that may help. If you go to google maps and view where you live, simply type your job function, i.e. software engineering. This will show you lots of companies in your general area. Simply, email them and ask them if they have openings and just ask if you could visit and explore with your resume at hand. Good luck!
Human: I'm a senior graduating this May and I'm looking for jobs. I have applied to a bunch of jobs at a company that never came to my school for our career fair. Any advice on how to get myself out there more since I was unable to speak with recruiters at my career fair? Assistant: This book helped me learn how to sell myself. It works, read it.
Human: Just got my first job as a design engineer (automotive and aerospace). What are some must have books that I would use for life. So I just got my first job after graduation working as a design engineer. We produce a range of products for the automotve and aerospace industries... dies, tools, moulds, checking fixtures etc. What are some books (or 'the' book) that I would find myself using very often, the sort of books that would be used as references for the rest of my career? I'm talking dense, greatly presented and covering a wide scope of engineering knowledge and guidance kinda books. Assistant: Not specific to your role, but general for anyone just entering the engineering workforce: Unwritten Laws of Engineering
Human: Just got my first job as a design engineer (automotive and aerospace). What are some must have books that I would use for life. So I just got my first job after graduation working as a design engineer. We produce a range of products for the automotve and aerospace industries... dies, tools, moulds, checking fixtures etc. What are some books (or 'the' book) that I would find myself using very often, the sort of books that would be used as references for the rest of my career? I'm talking dense, greatly presented and covering a wide scope of engineering knowledge and guidance kinda books. Assistant: Some suggestions from my shelf: * Engineer in training reference manual * machinery's handbook * the art of electronics If you go to ebay and search for "engineering handbook" you can find excellent deals on all sorts of specialty handbooks.
Human: What’s one industry related to your major that you refuse to work in and why? Assistant: Idk why everyone is hating on defense, not all defense spending is weaponry. I work in the defense sector and I work on satellites which I find fascinating.
Human: What’s one industry related to your major that you refuse to work in and why? Assistant: Anything that is designed to kill people.
Human: What is (are) your favorite example(s) of ridiculously overengineering? It's always interesting/funny to see extreme complexity pop up in the strangest of places. Assistant: The Emeco 1006 Naval Chair. Some additional information on the 77 steps it took to make it
Human: What is (are) your favorite example(s) of ridiculously overengineering? It's always interesting/funny to see extreme complexity pop up in the strangest of places. Assistant: I always thought the term over engineered was funny because in reality most people can cludge a functioning system, it takes an engineer to make a functioning system for half the cost (less material, less parts, etc).
Human: Is it too early to get offers from Technician jobs as a new grad? I’ve chosen a city to really double-down in with my job search, and I have been getting denied from entry-level engineering jobs there. So, I’ve started applying to Engineering Technician jobs that typically require High School+4yrs or Associates+2yr. I like the hands-on aspect of it and I think it’s a great way to start my career (often at the same pay). Anyways, I’ve been getting denied with no explanation at those jobs too. I don’t think my resume is the problem, because I tailor it to each job description and I have 1yr of research/manufacturing experience on top of my B.S. in Aerospace Engineering. I had a phone interview with a recruiter for a space industry test technician role, and everything went great right up until the end of the call when he asked when I could start and I said I needed to attend graduation in early May (my grad date was on my resume) and he told me “well normally this position hires pretty quickly, 2 months is a long time…” I’ve gotten denied for a dozen tech roles in the past week or so, so I’m just wondering, since engineering typically has some of the longest on boarding times, are the technical roles usually really quick to onboard? None of the job listings mention a start date. I’m just baffled that a recruiter was surprised that I was applying to a position with the intention of starting two months from now… Because it even seems like I’m kinda late in the game at this point. Assistant: I'm not interested in hiring someone who wants to be an engineer into a tech role; will probably have to find a new tech within one year.
Human: Is it too early to get offers from Technician jobs as a new grad? I’ve chosen a city to really double-down in with my job search, and I have been getting denied from entry-level engineering jobs there. So, I’ve started applying to Engineering Technician jobs that typically require High School+4yrs or Associates+2yr. I like the hands-on aspect of it and I think it’s a great way to start my career (often at the same pay). Anyways, I’ve been getting denied with no explanation at those jobs too. I don’t think my resume is the problem, because I tailor it to each job description and I have 1yr of research/manufacturing experience on top of my B.S. in Aerospace Engineering. I had a phone interview with a recruiter for a space industry test technician role, and everything went great right up until the end of the call when he asked when I could start and I said I needed to attend graduation in early May (my grad date was on my resume) and he told me “well normally this position hires pretty quickly, 2 months is a long time…” I’ve gotten denied for a dozen tech roles in the past week or so, so I’m just wondering, since engineering typically has some of the longest on boarding times, are the technical roles usually really quick to onboard? None of the job listings mention a start date. I’m just baffled that a recruiter was surprised that I was applying to a position with the intention of starting two months from now… Because it even seems like I’m kinda late in the game at this point. Assistant: Yeah i did it when I first graduated. It's a great way to get your foot in the door as well as learn what the company is really like.
Human: Is there a reason to get a PhD if you don't want to teach? I'm about to start my final undergrad year as a mechanical engineering student. I'm not super sure what I want to do yet in terms of career and I'm thinking about grad school. I was thinking of just getting a masters but one of my previous professors keeps trying to convince me to go for a PhD. He even said he would take me as a student in a heartbeat. I know I don't want to teach (I would not make a good professor), so I don't see a reason to go for a PhD. Can anyone, specifically engineers who have gone to grad school, give any advice or share your thoughts? Or for engineers who did not go to grad school, how did you know what specialty/industry to go into? Assistant: If you're not sure, I personally would recommend working full time for a bit to see what you really like and get to know yourself more in a professional context. Then, you can specialize with a Master's or PhD if you want, but the key is understanding yourself better, and working full time really helped me understand myself before getting my Master's. Also, you can get your company to completely pay for it, so that's cool.
Human: Is there a reason to get a PhD if you don't want to teach? I'm about to start my final undergrad year as a mechanical engineering student. I'm not super sure what I want to do yet in terms of career and I'm thinking about grad school. I was thinking of just getting a masters but one of my previous professors keeps trying to convince me to go for a PhD. He even said he would take me as a student in a heartbeat. I know I don't want to teach (I would not make a good professor), so I don't see a reason to go for a PhD. Can anyone, specifically engineers who have gone to grad school, give any advice or share your thoughts? Or for engineers who did not go to grad school, how did you know what specialty/industry to go into? Assistant: US Federal government likes PhDs and grad degrees in general.
Human: Engineers that work in government (state or federal), what is your work-life balance like? Are you forced to work overtime often? I'm a ChemE graduate from a UC in California, and am currently looking for jobs. Recently through my experience and research I've been realizing that most engineering jobs seem to have pretty terrible work-life balance, and routinely require 60+ hr weeks, and I don't want that kind of life for myself. A couple of people I know who work in government (not engineering) paint a much different work environment - since there is no profit to chase there is no need for constant overtime. Has this been true in your experience, or do engineers working for the government also work long hours? Assistant: Sensational work life balance cannot recommended enough
Human: Engineers that work in government (state or federal), what is your work-life balance like? Are you forced to work overtime often? I'm a ChemE graduate from a UC in California, and am currently looking for jobs. Recently through my experience and research I've been realizing that most engineering jobs seem to have pretty terrible work-life balance, and routinely require 60+ hr weeks, and I don't want that kind of life for myself. A couple of people I know who work in government (not engineering) paint a much different work environment - since there is no profit to chase there is no need for constant overtime. Has this been true in your experience, or do engineers working for the government also work long hours? Assistant: Government Space industry. Pay is great but 45+ hour weeks expected
Human: Why can't California build a high speed rail in the ocean? While California was debating building a high speed rail, it seemed like right of way was the biggest problem driving up costs. Since underwater tunnels exist already and are seemingly well understood, why can't we just build a high speed rail that's a mile or so out in the ocean, and only comes inland to get/offload people? Assistant: I don’t understand why it wasn’t run right up the middle of I-5. All the way through the valley the N and S lanes of I-5 are separated by like a hundred yards of empty dirt. Caltrains already owns it, and Construction couldn’t be easier. Pull truck off freeway, build section of track. Repeat. Why on gods green earth did they decide to Ram it through a bunch of farms and get caught up in eminent domain lawsuits?!
Human: Why can't California build a high speed rail in the ocean? While California was debating building a high speed rail, it seemed like right of way was the biggest problem driving up costs. Since underwater tunnels exist already and are seemingly well understood, why can't we just build a high speed rail that's a mile or so out in the ocean, and only comes inland to get/offload people? Assistant: Tom’s Workers did it.
Human: What are some challenging science/engineering-related hobbies/projects I could take up? Hi engineers/students. I'm currently an mechanical engineering/ material science student in australia and was wondering what hobbies/projects I could take up that would fuel my passion for engineering. My interest is thermodynamics at the moment although that doesnt mean i'm not interested in other areas of engineering including electrical and computer engineering. Some ideas I had were arduino boards and building combustion powered potato launcher (I know that sounds funny). My budget is a few hundred AUD (which is equal to USD at the moment). So what are some hobbies or projects you have or have had? PS. If it helps reveal more about me - I love ironman (the marvel superhero). Assistant: If you like thermo, there's plenty of things you could. You could create cycle generators that would replicate cycles such as a Stirling cycle or also a Brayton cycle. It's not necessarily that difficult either.
Human: What are some challenging science/engineering-related hobbies/projects I could take up? Hi engineers/students. I'm currently an mechanical engineering/ material science student in australia and was wondering what hobbies/projects I could take up that would fuel my passion for engineering. My interest is thermodynamics at the moment although that doesnt mean i'm not interested in other areas of engineering including electrical and computer engineering. Some ideas I had were arduino boards and building combustion powered potato launcher (I know that sounds funny). My budget is a few hundred AUD (which is equal to USD at the moment). So what are some hobbies or projects you have or have had? PS. If it helps reveal more about me - I love ironman (the marvel superhero). Assistant: Potato guns are a boat load of fun. Even compressed air ones. Throw all your thermo knowledge at a potato and see how far it goes.
Human: Would we save power if in a house rather than each electronic device having a 220v AC to 12v DC (or similar) we had a single converter and DC power points around the house? Most smaller electronic run on about 12v DC, and each has their own power brick. I know that energy is lost when converting, so would a 1 big converter rather than multiple small ones be better? Assistant: No. Solar power inverters are very effecient (95-98%). Not to mention high current DC is much harder to do things like switch, since it doesnt cross 0v.
Human: Would we save power if in a house rather than each electronic device having a 220v AC to 12v DC (or similar) we had a single converter and DC power points around the house? Most smaller electronic run on about 12v DC, and each has their own power brick. I know that energy is lost when converting, so would a 1 big converter rather than multiple small ones be better? Assistant: There is a US company called Voltek that is making products to do just that (whole home 12v power distribution for charging, etc.). I have no idea how well it works, but I saw it on one of Matt Risinger's YouTube videos.
Human: In the engineering or software field, what expertise is the highest sought after or in-demand? I see a lot of the same "what area of engineering makes the most money" questions, which seems mainly dependent on location and sometimes doesn't factor in total comp. So I was thinking maybe a better way to frame the question is what engineering/technical skill has the highest demand with the lowest "supply"? Assistant: Whatever skill that old guy who mainly worked by himself and is going to retire in a year or two without having documented anything to trained a successor has.
Human: In the engineering or software field, what expertise is the highest sought after or in-demand? I see a lot of the same "what area of engineering makes the most money" questions, which seems mainly dependent on location and sometimes doesn't factor in total comp. So I was thinking maybe a better way to frame the question is what engineering/technical skill has the highest demand with the lowest "supply"? Assistant: In the EE world if you like the math and sheer black magic buffoonery: RF engineering. Everything is wireless now and everything needs to be able to talk to other devices. Also it takes a special person to understand the wizardry of electromagnetics
Human: How do I show I want a job that isn't the same field as my degree? I recently graduated with a Bachelor's in Environmental Engineering, but with the current job market I am having a hard time finding a job that does environmental engineering work. I've been applying to civil engineering jobs, and I'm often faced with a question that I don't have a good answer for: why are you applying for a civil engineering job if you don't have a civil engineering degree? Truthfully I just want a job to get my foot in the door, but I am also interested in certain civil engineering work. I was wondering if any other ENVE degree earners ended up in a CIVE job, and what they said to that question if they were asked it. Assistant: Apply for the job you want
Human: How do I show I want a job that isn't the same field as my degree? I recently graduated with a Bachelor's in Environmental Engineering, but with the current job market I am having a hard time finding a job that does environmental engineering work. I've been applying to civil engineering jobs, and I'm often faced with a question that I don't have a good answer for: why are you applying for a civil engineering job if you don't have a civil engineering degree? Truthfully I just want a job to get my foot in the door, but I am also interested in certain civil engineering work. I was wondering if any other ENVE degree earners ended up in a CIVE job, and what they said to that question if they were asked it. Assistant: If you tell them something along the lines of ‘I realized the world of EnvE was all about compliance and moving problems around rather than actually solving anything, and I want to be part of a solutions-based approach’ it should hit home. No offense to Environmental Engineers of course, that’s just a phrase that I had a lot of luck with when I was doing the same move (from Environmental Remediation to Geotechnical), although a little later in my career.
Human: My Name Was Removed From A Project That I Led And Another ME Will Be Submitting Under Their Name. Why Would That Be? Hi! I am an ME, and I work in power. I was put on a project and have led it for months. Right when I was about to submit the project, my Boss calls me in says that a new ME is joining our team and he would be the one submitting the project under his name. My Boss gave me no real explanations for why this is He stated "This has happened to me before" & "If he has any questions about the project he needs to come to you" Why would they do this to me? Assistant: The best thing to do is ask your boss directly. The confidence to directly address anyone in your company, whether it be a supervisor or more senior engineer, is a great thing to have, and practice makes perfect. By asking, you are making it clear that it's something that's been on your mind, and you can also make it clear that you're bothered by it. Besides, if you did the work, ethically you should get the credit. Good luck whatever you end up doing in the situation!
Human: My Name Was Removed From A Project That I Led And Another ME Will Be Submitting Under Their Name. Why Would That Be? Hi! I am an ME, and I work in power. I was put on a project and have led it for months. Right when I was about to submit the project, my Boss calls me in says that a new ME is joining our team and he would be the one submitting the project under his name. My Boss gave me no real explanations for why this is He stated "This has happened to me before" & "If he has any questions about the project he needs to come to you" Why would they do this to me? Assistant: Is the new ME a licensed PE? Is his stamp required on something? Are you at a consulting firm? (Edited to correct my misunderstanding of the person in question)
Human: Would you rather work at a big company or a small one (less than 50 employees)/ I know this varies widely on the situation and company. I am 2 years post-graduation with a bachelors, working in electrical engineering as a test engineer at a big company (99% of people reading this are using a product from them). I really like it here. But I am a temp worker and my contract ends in 2 months with unfortunately no budgeting for a direct hire. They'd love to have me back, and so would I, but I would have to do a 90 day break in service where I'm unemployed doing nothing So anyway, a recruiter approached me for a test lead engineer position for a small company. Still have a lot of the interview process to go, but I'm wondering if its worth pursuing. Do you guys see pros and cons to company size? I've only worked at a big company so I don't know the other side. Its not exactly a startup. It is a 30 year old company with 50 employees according to glassdoor. The position seems very interesting to me. But the pay seems a bit on the lower side at 90-100k. Other interviews I've gotten have a salary of around 110k. Another thing I'm worried about is that a small company may not have obvious room for growth within the company compared to a big one. I don't want to get stuck. I don't know what software they use except for "its similar to Python". If its such a specific language, that might not be good for my future career because no one will want to hire someone who has only worked with Latin recently. There are only 4 reviews on glassdoor (all positive). I don't really know what to think of it. I know its such a general question but any insight on big vs. small company (not a startup) would be very appreciated Assistant: There's benefits to both small <100 and large multinationals. The worst I've worked for are the ones in the middle, with 200-500 employees. All of the bureaucracy of a large company, but none of the benefits like the international aspect, the variety of departments you can move between, and also the upper and middle management have massive egos.
Human: Would you rather work at a big company or a small one (less than 50 employees)/ I know this varies widely on the situation and company. I am 2 years post-graduation with a bachelors, working in electrical engineering as a test engineer at a big company (99% of people reading this are using a product from them). I really like it here. But I am a temp worker and my contract ends in 2 months with unfortunately no budgeting for a direct hire. They'd love to have me back, and so would I, but I would have to do a 90 day break in service where I'm unemployed doing nothing So anyway, a recruiter approached me for a test lead engineer position for a small company. Still have a lot of the interview process to go, but I'm wondering if its worth pursuing. Do you guys see pros and cons to company size? I've only worked at a big company so I don't know the other side. Its not exactly a startup. It is a 30 year old company with 50 employees according to glassdoor. The position seems very interesting to me. But the pay seems a bit on the lower side at 90-100k. Other interviews I've gotten have a salary of around 110k. Another thing I'm worried about is that a small company may not have obvious room for growth within the company compared to a big one. I don't want to get stuck. I don't know what software they use except for "its similar to Python". If its such a specific language, that might not be good for my future career because no one will want to hire someone who has only worked with Latin recently. There are only 4 reviews on glassdoor (all positive). I don't really know what to think of it. I know its such a general question but any insight on big vs. small company (not a startup) would be very appreciated Assistant: Copies with 50-75 employees are the sweet spot, with the highest employee workplace satisfaction. Go for it.
Human: Fresh grad with a six sigma black belt I just had another fresh grad applicationcome across my desk for a Senior Quality Engineer. He has an MSI Six Sigma Black Belt. This certification is recognized by the six sigma council. It doesn’t appear he has any projects for six sigma. I’m strictly familiar with the ASQ. Is anyone familiar with any of these course and test only black belts? Are these individuals competent as an ASQ black belt? Assistant: > Six Sigma Into the compost heap you go
Human: Fresh grad with a six sigma black belt I just had another fresh grad applicationcome across my desk for a Senior Quality Engineer. He has an MSI Six Sigma Black Belt. This certification is recognized by the six sigma council. It doesn’t appear he has any projects for six sigma. I’m strictly familiar with the ASQ. Is anyone familiar with any of these course and test only black belts? Are these individuals competent as an ASQ black belt? Assistant: Considering you need to complete 2 real world projects and have significant savings on each (upwards of $40,000) to earn a black belt, if he/she says they don't have project experience, that's a red flag.
Human: Does anybody know how/if a sphere can be rotated off axis, fixed in place on a flat surface? Hi guys, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to ask, but I'm trying to find out if anybody has found a way to make a sphere rotate off a 90 degree axis and stay in one place? I have attached a diagram here: https://i.imgur.com/bwp1ZBN.jpg of what I mean. Obviously sphere A is easy as it can just spin in place on a single point, only issue would be stability, however sphere B would only work if it could roll along the surface since its axis is not 90 degrees. I'm wondering if anyone before has looked at this before, how its possible to make it rotate like this but stay in a single place. I'm currently trying using magnets and nesting one sphere inside another, as I feel the friction from the rotation would be to hard to combat unless I had some ultra smooth/lubricated surfaces. Assistant: I'm thinking set between two rollers is the way to go here
Human: Does anybody know how/if a sphere can be rotated off axis, fixed in place on a flat surface? Hi guys, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to ask, but I'm trying to find out if anybody has found a way to make a sphere rotate off a 90 degree axis and stay in one place? I have attached a diagram here: https://i.imgur.com/bwp1ZBN.jpg of what I mean. Obviously sphere A is easy as it can just spin in place on a single point, only issue would be stability, however sphere B would only work if it could roll along the surface since its axis is not 90 degrees. I'm wondering if anyone before has looked at this before, how its possible to make it rotate like this but stay in a single place. I'm currently trying using magnets and nesting one sphere inside another, as I feel the friction from the rotation would be to hard to combat unless I had some ultra smooth/lubricated surfaces. Assistant: If you don't want to use a bearing you could control it by actuating either the table the ball sits on or the ball in some way. However that will probably take more time than you have allocated for the project :)
Human: Team leader too soon and I'm freaking out, help! I'm a physicist, but I work for a tech company and this seems to be the place to ask. I'm 35 with an M.Sc and 3 years "experience" being a lab engineer at a university. I've been working at my company for about nine months and my team leader is leaving for personal (happy) reasons. A few months ago I was asked how I would feel about replacing her. I said I don't think I have the required experience with the company's technology, but that I wouldn't decline such an opportunity despite the challenges. When the actual offer came along I accepted. Possible mistake number 1. Since she started handing over the role to me, I have been flooded by a torrent of information, interfaces, responsibilities and meetings. The sheer volume of "top of your head" knowledge required for the position is mindboggling to me. I keep getting asked if I understand things, and I answer that it's still new to me and I need to get used to it. To which she would reply that it's important that I familiarize myself with this stuff. I answered OK. Possible mistake number 2. Mistake number 3 came soon enough, I still have my responsibilities as a team member, and because of some unexpected stress from my personal life I dropped the ball on it. I promised to give a presentation on some data that I hadn't even analyzed and only realized last minute that I would never make it. I told my team leader and my boss two days prior to the date, and they managed to move it, but the disappointment was apparent. They also told me that things MUST be done on time for the new date. Since then I've been staying at work late, coming in sick,and working from home to meet the new deadline. My main concern is that I'm just not cut out for this type of work and that I'm too far into the handover process to pull out. My life has been miserable the past few weeks, I dream about work at night and wake up at random hours from the stress. I came to this job with an M.Sc and 3 years of experience, but my experience has been working at a university, where management and deadlines are more abstract concepts than actual deliveries. I feel like I broke the trust my bosses had in me, and that I'm doomed to be stressed out constantly or suffer the humiliation of pulling out of a role before I even started actually performing. What should I do? Assistant: You say your a team leader, but I didn’t hear anything about your team? You need to shift your mindset from personal success to the teams success. You also need to deep dive into the background of your work/product/program etc.
Human: Team leader too soon and I'm freaking out, help! I'm a physicist, but I work for a tech company and this seems to be the place to ask. I'm 35 with an M.Sc and 3 years "experience" being a lab engineer at a university. I've been working at my company for about nine months and my team leader is leaving for personal (happy) reasons. A few months ago I was asked how I would feel about replacing her. I said I don't think I have the required experience with the company's technology, but that I wouldn't decline such an opportunity despite the challenges. When the actual offer came along I accepted. Possible mistake number 1. Since she started handing over the role to me, I have been flooded by a torrent of information, interfaces, responsibilities and meetings. The sheer volume of "top of your head" knowledge required for the position is mindboggling to me. I keep getting asked if I understand things, and I answer that it's still new to me and I need to get used to it. To which she would reply that it's important that I familiarize myself with this stuff. I answered OK. Possible mistake number 2. Mistake number 3 came soon enough, I still have my responsibilities as a team member, and because of some unexpected stress from my personal life I dropped the ball on it. I promised to give a presentation on some data that I hadn't even analyzed and only realized last minute that I would never make it. I told my team leader and my boss two days prior to the date, and they managed to move it, but the disappointment was apparent. They also told me that things MUST be done on time for the new date. Since then I've been staying at work late, coming in sick,and working from home to meet the new deadline. My main concern is that I'm just not cut out for this type of work and that I'm too far into the handover process to pull out. My life has been miserable the past few weeks, I dream about work at night and wake up at random hours from the stress. I came to this job with an M.Sc and 3 years of experience, but my experience has been working at a university, where management and deadlines are more abstract concepts than actual deliveries. I feel like I broke the trust my bosses had in me, and that I'm doomed to be stressed out constantly or suffer the humiliation of pulling out of a role before I even started actually performing. What should I do? Assistant: If you are the team leader now, then who are your subordinates and team members?
Human: Mass shouldn't affect the top speed of an object, so why does rider weight affect the top speed of a motorcycle? This has been weirding me out forever, especially since I've experienced it myself. I lost some weight and my bike's top speed leapfrogged from barely being able to crack 90mph to comfortably keeping a GPS indicated 97mph. And if you look on forums for smaller <125cc motorcycles and scooters, this is a pretty common occurence, where on the same bike, a 150lb rider can top out at 60-65mph easy, but a 250lb rider struggles to reach 55mph. Assistant: Rolling resistance and usually a heavier rider is bigger and has more drag.
Human: Mass shouldn't affect the top speed of an object, so why does rider weight affect the top speed of a motorcycle? This has been weirding me out forever, especially since I've experienced it myself. I lost some weight and my bike's top speed leapfrogged from barely being able to crack 90mph to comfortably keeping a GPS indicated 97mph. And if you look on forums for smaller <125cc motorcycles and scooters, this is a pretty common occurence, where on the same bike, a 150lb rider can top out at 60-65mph easy, but a 250lb rider struggles to reach 55mph. Assistant: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/rolling-friction-resistance-d_1303.html
Human: How old were you when you completed graduated from Engineering school? Assistant: Electrical Engineering here. Started at 39. I'll finish this year at 45. It's been a long and grueling road. Anyone can do it, if they are willing to forgo life for 6.5 years in my case. Wife, 2 kids, a mortgage, and a full time job I put in overtime at pretty much each week. I applied to John Hopkins today to start a graduate program in Spring. My one advice to everyone thinking about becoming an engineer.....do it. Buckle down and just do it. You can do it.
Human: How old were you when you completed graduated from Engineering school? Assistant: 38
Human: Why do small commercial airliners (Gulfstreams, CRJ-900, MD90) almost exclusively mount their engines on the rear fusalage, but larger airliners (737 and larger) hang their engines under their wings? I know one of the reasons is preventing FOD ingestion on smaller aircraft, but the engines on the 737 also sit incredibly low to the ground. I also know that wing-mounted engines are better for NVH. My question is why there aren't larger aircraft with fuse-mounted engines and more small aircraft with under-wing engines (with the exception of the BAE 146)? Assistant: Another reason engine-on-wing is used is that the weight of the engine out on the wing helps to counteract the moment where the wing attaches to the fuselage. You can potentially reduce the size of your structural members as a result. As other posts have said, you don't have enough clearance on some of the smaller aircraft to do this, and the shorter wing means that the benefit from it isn't as great in the first place.
Human: Why do small commercial airliners (Gulfstreams, CRJ-900, MD90) almost exclusively mount their engines on the rear fusalage, but larger airliners (737 and larger) hang their engines under their wings? I know one of the reasons is preventing FOD ingestion on smaller aircraft, but the engines on the 737 also sit incredibly low to the ground. I also know that wing-mounted engines are better for NVH. My question is why there aren't larger aircraft with fuse-mounted engines and more small aircraft with under-wing engines (with the exception of the BAE 146)? Assistant: I'm just here to point out the DC-10. Cheers!
Human: How do you organize your notes? About a decade into my career and I still haven't quite figured out how to optimize/organize my notes. I use OneNote and have tried a few different ways to take notes, but still unclear on which one I prefer. One method is chronological, where I create a tab for each week in the year, typically taking any highlighted content/open action items from the past weeks into the new week. I prefer this method as it keeps consistency and ensures I capture all notes relevant from the past couple weeks. This re-read of old notes into the new week also helps reinforce what is currently important. I do however rely on having to use the search bar for certain topics as I don't recall exact weeks that meetings or decisions were made. Another method is to have different sections/tabs dedicated towards specific projects, recurring meetings, ad-hoc tasks and to keep a chronological log within. This seems to be the classic way of taking notes per specific topics. But eventually I do feel overwhelmed by how many tabs for all the different subjects I have to keep track. Maybe archiving really old tabs can help. So any kind of method or hierarchal structure that works best for you? How often do you go back through your notes to review or consolidate? Do you keep different higher-level, action-item, or to-do lists? Assistant: I email the shit out of myself. My inbox becomes a to-do list where every email that sits in my inbox is an action item for me and if there's no action items then it goes into the proper project folder. Items that require a time delay reminder I put into my calendar (so I can email future-self) and long term monitor items stay in a central email that I update daily and resend to myself.
Human: How do you organize your notes? About a decade into my career and I still haven't quite figured out how to optimize/organize my notes. I use OneNote and have tried a few different ways to take notes, but still unclear on which one I prefer. One method is chronological, where I create a tab for each week in the year, typically taking any highlighted content/open action items from the past weeks into the new week. I prefer this method as it keeps consistency and ensures I capture all notes relevant from the past couple weeks. This re-read of old notes into the new week also helps reinforce what is currently important. I do however rely on having to use the search bar for certain topics as I don't recall exact weeks that meetings or decisions were made. Another method is to have different sections/tabs dedicated towards specific projects, recurring meetings, ad-hoc tasks and to keep a chronological log within. This seems to be the classic way of taking notes per specific topics. But eventually I do feel overwhelmed by how many tabs for all the different subjects I have to keep track. Maybe archiving really old tabs can help. So any kind of method or hierarchal structure that works best for you? How often do you go back through your notes to review or consolidate? Do you keep different higher-level, action-item, or to-do lists? Assistant: Saving this for later...
Human: What is the most interesting or fun field of engineering you would recommend some high schoolers to look into? Assistant: Nothing. Don't go into it for fun or you will drop out of your sophomore year of college SO fast.
Human: What is the most interesting or fun field of engineering you would recommend some high schoolers to look into? Assistant: I love computer engineering (closely related to EE). At the moment, the state of consumer FPGA tools reminds me of software in the 80s and 90s, when your wits and determination could lead to you creating something awesome. The big (and very positive) difference is that with the state of hardware and software now, you can do and create truly profound things without needing to spend much.
Human: Is anyone / does anyone know CEOs/CTOs/VPs/etc that still do engineering work? Or is it all finance/business at that point? I see a fair number of CEOs/CTOs/etc that are engineers, and there's sort of a recent rally against the "MBA-zation of America" and I guess investors are looking more for more and more technical founders/teams. For the field that I want to go into, it's the norm to have a PhD, but most of the private companies in this field have a CEO founder who got a PhD... my question is if these people even need the PhD at that point, and if you want to found/lead a company, does it make any sense to do a PhD? Is this only really common at start up environments? Does anyone here have a "higher up" position and still do engineering work, and if so, could you describe it? I understand if it's not being the proverbial "CAD monkey" but for people in "VP of Engineering" or "VP of design" kind of roles at private companies, are you doing work that you enjoy, and is it based around engineering or just management? Assistant: I’m at the 3rd of 4 engineering titles at my company (after that is Project Manager) and I’m already in a more “team lead” and review role instead of actual engineering so there’s no way VPs are doing any real engineering work.
Human: Is anyone / does anyone know CEOs/CTOs/VPs/etc that still do engineering work? Or is it all finance/business at that point? I see a fair number of CEOs/CTOs/etc that are engineers, and there's sort of a recent rally against the "MBA-zation of America" and I guess investors are looking more for more and more technical founders/teams. For the field that I want to go into, it's the norm to have a PhD, but most of the private companies in this field have a CEO founder who got a PhD... my question is if these people even need the PhD at that point, and if you want to found/lead a company, does it make any sense to do a PhD? Is this only really common at start up environments? Does anyone here have a "higher up" position and still do engineering work, and if so, could you describe it? I understand if it's not being the proverbial "CAD monkey" but for people in "VP of Engineering" or "VP of design" kind of roles at private companies, are you doing work that you enjoy, and is it based around engineering or just management? Assistant: Tory Bruno? He seems like he still dabbles in the deets.
Human: Where would I be able to find old technical drawings of a Nazi jet engine? This is a bit of an odd question however, I have been searching for a while to try to find the technical drawings for the V1 flying bomb engine . The engine specifically is an Argus 014, a very simple pulse jet design that worked extremely well for the Axis powers and I would love to recreate an exact replica. I feel like I’ve searched everywhere on the internet and found nothing. I have also searched the British archives online as I believe the British liberated the factories where the engines were being made but that didn’t turn up much either. Would anyone have any ideas where to look next? Thanks!! Assistant: NASA...jk I’m kidding I’m kidding.
Human: Where would I be able to find old technical drawings of a Nazi jet engine? This is a bit of an odd question however, I have been searching for a while to try to find the technical drawings for the V1 flying bomb engine . The engine specifically is an Argus 014, a very simple pulse jet design that worked extremely well for the Axis powers and I would love to recreate an exact replica. I feel like I’ve searched everywhere on the internet and found nothing. I have also searched the British archives online as I believe the British liberated the factories where the engines were being made but that didn’t turn up much either. Would anyone have any ideas where to look next? Thanks!! Assistant: Didn’t it use a detonation engine
Human: Do engineers consider people who write software actual engineers? By engineers I mean engineers in the traditional sense, usually designing mechanical systems and such by applying physics, math, etc. You can decide what software means * If I use HTML and CSS would you consider me a software engineer? * What if I know at least one programming language pretty well, am I software engineer then? * Or do you judge according to profession? * Do you judge by complexity of the work? e.g. you're a software engineer if you help build an OS and not if you just do web development, etc. * Do I need a university degree to be called a software engineer? Assistant: If you design software you're a software engineer. As far as I know, software engineer isn't a protected title
Human: Do engineers consider people who write software actual engineers? By engineers I mean engineers in the traditional sense, usually designing mechanical systems and such by applying physics, math, etc. You can decide what software means * If I use HTML and CSS would you consider me a software engineer? * What if I know at least one programming language pretty well, am I software engineer then? * Or do you judge according to profession? * Do you judge by complexity of the work? e.g. you're a software engineer if you help build an OS and not if you just do web development, etc. * Do I need a university degree to be called a software engineer? Assistant: Difference between software engineering and computer⁰ science: SE can use GOTOS. CS has to use COMEFROMs.
Human: As a high school student planning on further studies in engineering, was wondering what would be the average day job in whatever is your engineering field. Thanks in advance Assistant: Hey, mods....Can we just get a huge long list of 'typical day from X engineer in Y field at Z part of process' submitted by users? I know I've personally put info into these type of threads several times. Maybe we could make it part of a FAQ on the side and have a humongous banner at the top that's like: HEY, YOU WANT TO BE AN ENGINEER?! THAT'S NEAT! WE DO LOTS OF DIFFERENT THINGS! READ ABOUT THEM OVER THERE --->>> Thoughts?
Human: As a high school student planning on further studies in engineering, was wondering what would be the average day job in whatever is your engineering field. Thanks in advance Assistant: Check out this link for more info : http://www.reddit.com/r/AskEngineers/search?q=average+day&restrict_sr=on
Human: Got an offer to buy 500 of a project I made, should I accept? A few months ago I created a small electrical project and posted about it on my website. Last week, I got a call from a large company who really liked it, and wants to buy a version of it to hand out at a trade show. They want around 500. The design is just a single-sided PCB with 19 parts, and I have experience with small-batch assembly. However, I have no experience with this kind of "contracting". I am currently unemployed so I want to jump on the offer, but I figured I would ask for advice first. Has anyone else done something like this? Assistant: My $.02 would be to make sure that you have the right business structure. Forming an LLC is easy, and protects your personal assets from liability.
Human: Got an offer to buy 500 of a project I made, should I accept? A few months ago I created a small electrical project and posted about it on my website. Last week, I got a call from a large company who really liked it, and wants to buy a version of it to hand out at a trade show. They want around 500. The design is just a single-sided PCB with 19 parts, and I have experience with small-batch assembly. However, I have no experience with this kind of "contracting". I am currently unemployed so I want to jump on the offer, but I figured I would ask for advice first. Has anyone else done something like this? Assistant: why would you make that by hand instead of going on alibaba and paying a PCBA factory to do it for you?
Human: What are best materials for part of hose used within roller pump? Here is picture of such pump: https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/3-s2.0-B9780128024089000053-f05-04-9780128024089.jpg I see multiple problems here: changing pressure, repeated compression, repeated deformation, constant contact with liquid. I'd like to build one, but I don't want it to break after few days. Any advice on best material? Assistant: "Best" is really going to depend on the application. It's hardly worth discussing unless you can describe your use case in detail. What flow and pressure? What's the fluid? Why peristaltic and not any other pump type? > I see multiple problems here: changing pressure, repeated compression, repeated deformation, constant contact with liquid. Valid concerns. The tubing is considered a wear item and needs to be replaced regularly. It won't last forever. How long will depend on the application.
Human: What are best materials for part of hose used within roller pump? Here is picture of such pump: https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/3-s2.0-B9780128024089000053-f05-04-9780128024089.jpg I see multiple problems here: changing pressure, repeated compression, repeated deformation, constant contact with liquid. I'd like to build one, but I don't want it to break after few days. Any advice on best material? Assistant: Depends on the process fluid.
Human: Is there any material or substance that changes color depending on the pressure applied to it? Independently of temperature, etc (no thermochromism), and what it would be called. Assistant: https://www.mcmaster.com/content/pressure-sensitive-film
Human: Is there any material or substance that changes color depending on the pressure applied to it? Independently of temperature, etc (no thermochromism), and what it would be called. Assistant: Pressure-sensitive paint. It's used in wind tunnels to determine pressure over surfaces using an oxygen permeable coating.
Human: If the EU is so focused on Euro emissions standards, why is there not more focus on truck design? So this is gonna sound like a bit of guesswork, and it is. However as a truck driver, I full on believe that I can *feel* the extra resistance when driving a Cabover truck versus a bonneted truck. Plus from my experience, our Bonnet trucks got better economy over our new Cabovers at work. The old bonnet trucks did around 650km from 400l of Diesel, these were running Mack Engines designed in the 70's, so an economy of 61.54l/100km at 55 tonnes The new trucks are a tad heavier, I've not had one past 60 tonnes, however we get down to 350km from 400l of Diesel, which comes to 114.29l/100km on some runs. The new heavy transporter (low loader) can get, on a good day, 200l/100km and if terrain is bad, even less, but that's in excess of 100 tonnes. However then you go across to companies that make bonnet trucks, so for example the drag co-efficient of a Tesla Semi is 0.35, most Bonnet trucks get around 0.5 and most Cabovers get as high as 0.9 So it makes me think if anyone knows how to reduce aerodynamic drag, it would be Tesla, so they clearly picked a bonnet truck for a reason. Now, to me, even with the DPF and DEF and all the other emissions gear, the fact that our new trucks that are Euro 5 are chewing damn near double the fuel of our old trucks at a similar weight makes me wonder, is this Euro 5 Emissions stuff actually achieving anything? Would Manufacturers possibly see better gains from making more aerodynamic bonnet trucks? I get that you might have to knock maybe 2-4 pallet spaces off a trailer to get the overall length to be the same, to remain under dimension limits, however if you're spending half the money on fuel, surely those savings could stack up over 1,000,000kms? For reference, our Cabovers will chew 1,142,900 litres of fuel, the old truck would chew 615,400 litres, so a saving of 527,500 litres over the life of the truck, or at current Australian prices of $1.19/l that's around $627,725 AUD per truck, so a fleet of trucks us a massive fuel saving So looking at a cost of $2.05/km on average to operate a truck in Australia, and an average 45ft trailer so for 26 pallets that's around $0.07884615/pallet/km So freight of 1,500km as an average would be $118.27/pallet per trip So if your average trip is 1,500km then you would get 666 trips out of your truck per million kilometres. So that's $78,767.82 earned by that truck per pallet space, so removing 2 pallet spaces would lose $157,535.64 over the lifetime of the truck, 4 spaces would lose $315,071.28 so even losing 4 whole pallet spaces to run a bonnet truck to a Cabover would still net you a saving over the life of the truck of around $312,654 if the fuel savings I've observed hold true. So yeah, it's got me wondering why Euro Emissions aren't calling for more efficient truck shapes, and instead seem to focus on engines and exhaust emissions? Is there a practical reason why Cabovers are still preferred by European truck Manufacturers and why a lot of the trucks coming out now to Euro emissions standards, even from companies like Kenworth are pushing Cabovers, with the bonnet trucks being more focused on the heavy lifting (Like the T909 being aimed at Road Train work and the Mack Titan being targeted at Heavy Haulage) where economy and emissions aren't as much of a concern? Assistant: You also have to consider that Europe is a lot more densely populated than the US or Australia, and that many cities are much older. This results in trucks often having to navigate congested, tight, low-speed city streets. That enormously favors cargo density over aerodynamics.
Human: If the EU is so focused on Euro emissions standards, why is there not more focus on truck design? So this is gonna sound like a bit of guesswork, and it is. However as a truck driver, I full on believe that I can *feel* the extra resistance when driving a Cabover truck versus a bonneted truck. Plus from my experience, our Bonnet trucks got better economy over our new Cabovers at work. The old bonnet trucks did around 650km from 400l of Diesel, these were running Mack Engines designed in the 70's, so an economy of 61.54l/100km at 55 tonnes The new trucks are a tad heavier, I've not had one past 60 tonnes, however we get down to 350km from 400l of Diesel, which comes to 114.29l/100km on some runs. The new heavy transporter (low loader) can get, on a good day, 200l/100km and if terrain is bad, even less, but that's in excess of 100 tonnes. However then you go across to companies that make bonnet trucks, so for example the drag co-efficient of a Tesla Semi is 0.35, most Bonnet trucks get around 0.5 and most Cabovers get as high as 0.9 So it makes me think if anyone knows how to reduce aerodynamic drag, it would be Tesla, so they clearly picked a bonnet truck for a reason. Now, to me, even with the DPF and DEF and all the other emissions gear, the fact that our new trucks that are Euro 5 are chewing damn near double the fuel of our old trucks at a similar weight makes me wonder, is this Euro 5 Emissions stuff actually achieving anything? Would Manufacturers possibly see better gains from making more aerodynamic bonnet trucks? I get that you might have to knock maybe 2-4 pallet spaces off a trailer to get the overall length to be the same, to remain under dimension limits, however if you're spending half the money on fuel, surely those savings could stack up over 1,000,000kms? For reference, our Cabovers will chew 1,142,900 litres of fuel, the old truck would chew 615,400 litres, so a saving of 527,500 litres over the life of the truck, or at current Australian prices of $1.19/l that's around $627,725 AUD per truck, so a fleet of trucks us a massive fuel saving So looking at a cost of $2.05/km on average to operate a truck in Australia, and an average 45ft trailer so for 26 pallets that's around $0.07884615/pallet/km So freight of 1,500km as an average would be $118.27/pallet per trip So if your average trip is 1,500km then you would get 666 trips out of your truck per million kilometres. So that's $78,767.82 earned by that truck per pallet space, so removing 2 pallet spaces would lose $157,535.64 over the lifetime of the truck, 4 spaces would lose $315,071.28 so even losing 4 whole pallet spaces to run a bonnet truck to a Cabover would still net you a saving over the life of the truck of around $312,654 if the fuel savings I've observed hold true. So yeah, it's got me wondering why Euro Emissions aren't calling for more efficient truck shapes, and instead seem to focus on engines and exhaust emissions? Is there a practical reason why Cabovers are still preferred by European truck Manufacturers and why a lot of the trucks coming out now to Euro emissions standards, even from companies like Kenworth are pushing Cabovers, with the bonnet trucks being more focused on the heavy lifting (Like the T909 being aimed at Road Train work and the Mack Titan being targeted at Heavy Haulage) where economy and emissions aren't as much of a concern? Assistant: We have an experimental electric truck track near us between Frankfurt and Darmstadt. There has also been a study on automation using platooning) where trucks essentially move as a convoy with fuel economy due to coordinated movement and reduced wind resistance for the following trucks. The EU project was SARTRE. The idea is that trucks would still be driven from the load point and the destination but highways could be negotiated as a dynamic road train.