SentenceTransformer based on sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2

This is a sentence-transformers model finetuned from sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2. It maps sentences & paragraphs to a 384-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for semantic textual similarity, semantic search, paraphrase mining, text classification, clustering, and more.

Model Details

Model Description

Model Type: Sentence Transformer
Base model: sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2
Maximum Sequence Length: 350 tokens
Output Dimensionality: 384 dimensions
Similarity Function: Cosine Similarity

Model Sources

Documentation: Sentence Transformers Documentation
Repository: Sentence Transformers on GitHub
Hugging Face: Sentence Transformers on Hugging Face

Full Model Architecture

SentenceTransformer(
  (0): Transformer({'max_seq_length': 350, 'do_lower_case': False}) with Transformer model: BertModel 
  (1): Pooling({'word_embedding_dimension': 384, 'pooling_mode_cls_token': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_tokens': True, 'pooling_mode_max_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_sqrt_len_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_weightedmean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_lasttoken': False, 'include_prompt': True})
  (2): Normalize()
)

Usage

Direct Usage (Sentence Transformers)

First install the Sentence Transformers library:

pip install -U sentence-transformers

Then you can load this model and run inference.

from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer

# Download from the 🤗 Hub
model = SentenceTransformer("zihoo/all-MiniLM-L6-v2-WMGPL")
# Run inference
sentences = [
    'what is mindfulness?',
    'Workplace Mindfulness Mindfulness is also defined as a state (e.g., Bishop et al.,  2004; Good et al., 2016; Lau et al., 2006; Tanay & Bernstein,  2013) of being aware of and attentive to what is taking place  internally and externally at that moment (Good et al., 2016;  Lau et al., 2006; Tanay & Bernstein, 2013). For example, Lau  et al., (2006, p. 1447) described mindfulness as “a mode, or  state-like quality that is maintained only when attention to  experience is intentionally cultivated with an open, nonjudg mental orientation to experience.” More recently, Good et al.,  (2016, p. 117) defined mindfulness as “receptive attention to  and awareness of present events and experience.”',
    'Workplace Mindfulness Brown and Ryan (2003) further propose that, despite their  intertwined nature, distinctions exist between attention and  awareness—the insights gained by sustained awareness can  only be translated into specific actions by paying focused  attention to our behaviors or the tasks at hand (Martin,  1997). Hence, heightened attention to and awareness of  experiences and events should capture two different aspects  of mindfulness. Recent research has also emphasized that  attention and awareness should be distinguished from each  other because attention reflects an ever-changing factor of  consciousness, whereas awareness refers to a specific and  stable state of consciousness (Selart et al., in press). In the  past, attention and awareness have proved important to the  study of mindfulness-promoting practices (Brown & Ryan,  2004), as some of these practices highlight focused attention  whereas others emphasize awareness (Bishop et al., 2004).  Notably, research has yielded empirical support confirming  these distinctions (Feldman et al., 2007).',
]
embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
print(embeddings.shape)
# [3, 384]

# Get the similarity scores for the embeddings
similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings)
print(similarities.shape)
# [3, 3]

Training Details

Training Dataset

Unnamed Dataset

Size: 160,000 training samples
Columns: sentence_0, sentence_1, sentence_2, and label

Approximate statistics based on the first 1000 samples:

	sentence_0	sentence_1	sentence_2	label
type	string	string	string	float
details	min: 5 tokens mean: 9.0 tokens max: 25 tokens	min: 94 tokens mean: 254.31 tokens max: 350 tokens	min: 94 tokens mean: 253.05 tokens max: 350 tokens	min: -9.79 mean: 3.84 max: 20.17

Samples:

sentence_0	sentence_1	sentence_2	label
`why is mindfulness used at work`	Assessing Facets of Doing so, the present endeavor makes three contributions to the literature. First, using the multidimensional scale developed in the present work, we will provide first insights into the differential validities of subfacets of mind fulness for key work outcomes. This will foster a refined understanding of the mechanisms of action inherent to mindfulness and help understand why mindfulness matters for which work outcome (Bishop, Lau, Shapiro, Carlson, Anderson, Carmody, Segal, Abbey, Speca, Velting, & Devins, 2004; Shapiro, Carlson, Astin, & Freedman, 2006). Second, although prominent mindfulness theories and scholarly work on mindfulness in the clinical area suggest that mindfulness consists of multiple subfacets (Baer et al., 2006; Bishop et al., 2004), research on mindfulness in the context of work has almost exclusively operationalized mindfulness by assessing the awareness component (for an exception see Liang et al., 2017). This bears the risk of con...	Assessing Facets of Over the last 7 years, research into mindfulness in the context of work has been gaining momentum and there is a growing body of research pro viding initial evidence on the benefits of mindfulness for core workplace outcomes. Especially health and well-being-related outcomes have been at the center of research attention, but also interpersonal relationships, lead ership and performance outcomes (for reviews and meta-analyses see Eby, Allen, Conley, Williamson, Henderson, & Mancini, 2019; Good, Lyddy, Glomb, Bono, Brown, Duffy, Baer, Brewer, & Lazar, 2016; Mesmer-Magnus, Manapragada, Viswesvaran, & Allen, 2017). Also, practitioners have become increasingly interested in mindfulness and its applications in the context of work. Organizations including Google, AETNA, IBM, or SAP, have started offering mindfulness trainings to their workforce (Hyland, Lee, & Mills, 2015). With the first empirical studies appearing in the scientific IO literature 8 years ago (H...	`-1.3994250297546387`
`who developed mindfulness scales`	MAAS FMI A variety of measures of mindfulness have been constructed such as the MAAS (Brown & Ryan, 2003), the FMI (Buchheld et al., 2001), the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS) (Lau et al., 2006), the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness (KIMS) (Baer, Smith & Allen, 2004), the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (Feldman, Hayes, Kumar, Greeson & Laurenceau, 2007) and the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (Chadwick, Hember, Symes, Peters, Kuipers, & Dagnan, 2008). These scales differ because some measure mindfulness as a unidimensional construct versus a multi-faceted construct (Baer et al., 2006), while others measure mindfulness as a trait-like or state-like construct (Dane, 2011). Some consider only the mental state, whereas others include bodily sensations and experience (Grossman, 2008). Furthermore, some measures (e.g. KIMS) include the reported ability to verbally describe experience (e.g. ‘I am good at finding the words to describe my feelings’), while othe...	`Workplace Mindfulness Mindfulness is widely considered as “paying attention in a par ticular way: on purpose, in the present moment, and nonjudg mentally” (Kabat-Zinn, 1994, p. 4). However, scholars have not reached a consensus on the essential features of mindful ness, with various conceptualizations such as a set of skills, a state, a trait, and a cognitive process. In what follows, we sum marize the prevailing views of mindfulness in the literature.`	`8.103286743164062`
`what measures mindfulness`	Workplace Mindfulness Scholars have developed several measures of mindfulness (Table 1). These measures help us understand the construct of mindfulness, but they are very different in terms of con ceptualization, factor structure, scoring, reliability, and validity. For example, the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI; Buchheld et al., 2001) and Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS; Lau et al., 2006) were developed to measure states of mindfulness. The Mindfulness Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS; Brown & Ryan, 2003), Cognitive and Affec tive Mindfulness Scale—Revised (CAMS-R; Feldman et al., 2007), and Philadelphia Mindfulness Questionnaire (PMQ; Cardaciotto et al., 2008) have been employed to measure mindfulness as a trait. The Five Facet Mindfulness Question naire (FFMQ; Baer et al., 2006), Experiences Questionnaire (EQ; Fresco et al., 2007), and Kentucky Inventory of Mind fulness Skills (KIMS; Baer et al., 2004) seek to measure mindfulness skills. The Southampton Mindfulne...	Workplace Mindfulness Given this background, our conceptualization is expected to be appropriate and valuable in the workplace because compared with the general mindfulness scales, the Work place Mindfulness Scale can measure individual mindfulness in the work context more accurately and relevantly. Practi cally speaking, adopting a skill perspective emphasizing the variability of mindfulness provides useful guidance to employees and organizations, as they aim to improve indi viduals’ mindfulness by implementing interventions. The skill view also assumes a degree of stability for mindful ness—that is, this construct is influenced by contextual fac tors but remains steady over a period of time.	`1.8723740577697754`

Loss: gpl.toolkit.loss.MarginDistillationLoss

Training Hyperparameters

Non-Default Hyperparameters

per_device_train_batch_size: 16
per_device_eval_batch_size: 16
num_train_epochs: 1
max_steps: 10000
multi_dataset_batch_sampler: round_robin

All Hyperparameters

Click to expand

overwrite_output_dir: False
do_predict: False
eval_strategy: no
prediction_loss_only: True
per_device_train_batch_size: 16
per_device_eval_batch_size: 16
per_gpu_train_batch_size: None
per_gpu_eval_batch_size: None
gradient_accumulation_steps: 1
eval_accumulation_steps: None
torch_empty_cache_steps: None
learning_rate: 5e-05
weight_decay: 0.0
adam_beta1: 0.9
adam_beta2: 0.999
adam_epsilon: 1e-08
max_grad_norm: 1
num_train_epochs: 1
max_steps: 10000
lr_scheduler_type: linear
lr_scheduler_kwargs: {}
warmup_ratio: 0.0
warmup_steps: 0
log_level: passive
log_level_replica: warning
log_on_each_node: True
logging_nan_inf_filter: True
save_safetensors: True
save_on_each_node: False
save_only_model: False
restore_callback_states_from_checkpoint: False
no_cuda: False
use_cpu: False
use_mps_device: False
seed: 42
data_seed: None
jit_mode_eval: False
use_ipex: False
bf16: False
fp16: False
fp16_opt_level: O1
half_precision_backend: auto
bf16_full_eval: False
fp16_full_eval: False
tf32: None
local_rank: 0
ddp_backend: None
tpu_num_cores: None
tpu_metrics_debug: False
debug: []
dataloader_drop_last: False
dataloader_num_workers: 0
dataloader_prefetch_factor: None
past_index: -1
disable_tqdm: False
remove_unused_columns: True
label_names: None
load_best_model_at_end: False
ignore_data_skip: False
fsdp: []
fsdp_min_num_params: 0
fsdp_config: {'min_num_params': 0, 'xla': False, 'xla_fsdp_v2': False, 'xla_fsdp_grad_ckpt': False}
fsdp_transformer_layer_cls_to_wrap: None
accelerator_config: {'split_batches': False, 'dispatch_batches': None, 'even_batches': True, 'use_seedable_sampler': True, 'non_blocking': False, 'gradient_accumulation_kwargs': None}
deepspeed: None
label_smoothing_factor: 0.0
optim: adamw_torch
optim_args: None
adafactor: False
group_by_length: False
length_column_name: length
ddp_find_unused_parameters: None
ddp_bucket_cap_mb: None
ddp_broadcast_buffers: False
dataloader_pin_memory: True
dataloader_persistent_workers: False
skip_memory_metrics: True
use_legacy_prediction_loop: False
push_to_hub: False
resume_from_checkpoint: None
hub_model_id: None
hub_strategy: every_save
hub_private_repo: None
hub_always_push: False
gradient_checkpointing: False
gradient_checkpointing_kwargs: None
include_inputs_for_metrics: False
include_for_metrics: []
eval_do_concat_batches: True
fp16_backend: auto
push_to_hub_model_id: None
push_to_hub_organization: None
mp_parameters:
auto_find_batch_size: False
full_determinism: False
torchdynamo: None
ray_scope: last
ddp_timeout: 1800
torch_compile: False
torch_compile_backend: None
torch_compile_mode: None
dispatch_batches: None
split_batches: None
include_tokens_per_second: False
include_num_input_tokens_seen: False
neftune_noise_alpha: None
optim_target_modules: None
batch_eval_metrics: False
eval_on_start: False
use_liger_kernel: False
eval_use_gather_object: False
average_tokens_across_devices: False
prompts: None
batch_sampler: batch_sampler
multi_dataset_batch_sampler: round_robin

Training Logs

Epoch	Step	Training Loss
0.05	500	32.954
0.1	1000	29.8033
0.15	1500	29.0685
0.2	2000	29.799
0.25	2500	28.8365
0.3	3000	28.9655
0.35	3500	29.0616
0.4	4000	29.378
0.45	4500	29.0731
0.5	5000	27.8961
0.55	5500	28.9225
0.6	6000	29.1866
0.65	6500	28.4707
0.7	7000	28.291
0.75	7500	28.4819
0.8	8000	28.5333
0.85	8500	27.9674
0.9	9000	29.8078
0.95	9500	27.0718
1.0	10000	29.6496

Framework Versions

Python: 3.11.11
Sentence Transformers: 3.3.1
Transformers: 4.47.1
PyTorch: 2.5.1+cu124
Accelerate: 1.2.1
Datasets: 3.2.0
Tokenizers: 0.21.0

Citation

BibTeX

Sentence Transformers

@inproceedings{reimers-2019-sentence-bert,
    title = "Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks",
    author = "Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
    month = "11",
    year = "2019",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084",
}

zihoo
/

all-MiniLM-L6-v2-WMGPL