SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Model
Paper
•
2502.02737
•
Published
•
110
BigScience Data
non-profit
AI & ML interests
None defined yet.
Recent Activity
View all activity
bigscience-data's activity
craffel
authored
a
paper
about 19 hours ago
loubnabnl
authored
a
paper
about 19 hours ago
guipenedo
authored
a
paper
about 19 hours ago
thomwolf
authored
a
paper
about 19 hours ago
lvwerra
authored
a
paper
about 22 hours ago
albertvillanova
posted
an
update
3 days ago
Post
2357
🚀 Introducing
@huggingface
Open Deep-Research💥
In just 24 hours, we built an open-source agent that:
✅ Autonomously browse the web
✅ Search, scroll & extract info
✅ Download & manipulate files
✅ Run calculations on data
55% on GAIA validation set! Help us improve it!💡
https://huggingface.co/blog/open-deep-research
In just 24 hours, we built an open-source agent that:
✅ Autonomously browse the web
✅ Search, scroll & extract info
✅ Download & manipulate files
✅ Run calculations on data
55% on GAIA validation set! Help us improve it!💡
https://huggingface.co/blog/open-deep-research
- 2 replies
Post
315
From ancient medical ethics to modern AI challenges, the journey of consent represents one of humanity's most fascinating ethical evolutions. In my latest blog post, I explore how we've moved from medical paternalism to a new frontier where AI capabilities force us to rethink consent.
The "consent gap" in AI is real: while we can approve initial data use, AI systems can generate countless unforeseen applications of our personal information. It's like signing a blank check without knowing all possible amounts that could be filled in.
Should we reimagine consent for the AI age? Perhaps we need dynamic consent systems that evolve alongside AI capabilities, similar to how healthcare transformed from physician-centered authority to patient autonomy.
Curious to hear your thoughts: how can we balance technological innovation with meaningful user sovereignty over digital identity?
Read more: https://huggingface.co/blog/giadap/evolution-of-consent
The "consent gap" in AI is real: while we can approve initial data use, AI systems can generate countless unforeseen applications of our personal information. It's like signing a blank check without knowing all possible amounts that could be filled in.
Should we reimagine consent for the AI age? Perhaps we need dynamic consent systems that evolve alongside AI capabilities, similar to how healthcare transformed from physician-centered authority to patient autonomy.
Curious to hear your thoughts: how can we balance technological innovation with meaningful user sovereignty over digital identity?
Read more: https://huggingface.co/blog/giadap/evolution-of-consent
Muennighoff
authored
a
paper
4 days ago
stellaathena
authored
a
paper
9 days ago
Adding `safetensors` variant of this model
#2 opened 12 days ago
by
SFconvertbot
lvwerra
authored
a
paper
22 days ago
guipenedo
authored
a
paper
22 days ago
Pclanglais
authored
a
paper
22 days ago
stellaathena
authored
a
paper
22 days ago
thomwolf
authored
a
paper
22 days ago
Post
3018
💫...And we're live!💫 Seasonal newsletter from ethicsy folks at Hugging Face, exploring the ethics of "AI Agents"
https://huggingface.co/blog/ethics-soc-7
Our analyses found:
- There's a spectrum of "agent"-ness
- *Safety* is a key issue, leading to many other value-based concerns
Read for details & what to do next!
With @evijit , @giadap , and @sasha
https://huggingface.co/blog/ethics-soc-7
Our analyses found:
- There's a spectrum of "agent"-ness
- *Safety* is a key issue, leading to many other value-based concerns
Read for details & what to do next!
With @evijit , @giadap , and @sasha
Post
2188
🤗👤 💻 Speaking of AI agents ...
...Is easier with the right words ;)
My colleagues @meg @evijit @sasha and @giadap just published a wonderful blog post outlining some of the main relevant notions with their signature blend of value-informed and risk-benefits contrasting approach. Go have a read!
https://huggingface.co/blog/ethics-soc-7
...Is easier with the right words ;)
My colleagues @meg @evijit @sasha and @giadap just published a wonderful blog post outlining some of the main relevant notions with their signature blend of value-informed and risk-benefits contrasting approach. Go have a read!
https://huggingface.co/blog/ethics-soc-7
albertvillanova
posted
an
update
about 1 month ago
Post
2037
Discover all the improvements in the new version of Lighteval: https://huggingface.co/docs/lighteval/
lhoestq
authored
a
paper
about 2 months ago
Post
2224
🇪🇺 Policy Thoughts in the EU AI Act Implementation 🇪🇺
There is a lot to like in the first draft of the EU GPAI Code of Practice, especially as regards transparency requirements. The Systemic Risks part, on the other hand, is concerning for both smaller developers and for external stakeholders.
I wrote more on this topic ahead of the next draft. TLDR: more attention to immediate large-scale risks and to collaborative solutions supported by evidence can help everyone - as long as developers disclose sufficient information about their design choices and deployment contexts.
Full blog here, based on our submitted response with @frimelle and @brunatrevelin :
https://huggingface.co/blog/yjernite/eu-draft-cop-risks#on-the-proposed-taxonomy-of-systemic-risks
There is a lot to like in the first draft of the EU GPAI Code of Practice, especially as regards transparency requirements. The Systemic Risks part, on the other hand, is concerning for both smaller developers and for external stakeholders.
I wrote more on this topic ahead of the next draft. TLDR: more attention to immediate large-scale risks and to collaborative solutions supported by evidence can help everyone - as long as developers disclose sufficient information about their design choices and deployment contexts.
Full blog here, based on our submitted response with @frimelle and @brunatrevelin :
https://huggingface.co/blog/yjernite/eu-draft-cop-risks#on-the-proposed-taxonomy-of-systemic-risks
- 2 replies