input
stringlengths 1
10k
| output
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|
` *Go ahead already If you look at the procedures for merger, you really only need to propose a discussion if it is likely to be a controversial move. If there is controversy you want to document that there is a consensus before making the merge. Here we have an article about a song and the article only says ``this is a song on record album ``X.``. Be bold, my friend! ` | The text is not hateful |
`:::::Nothing wrong with the science, its a fairly guessable relationship (nutrition = height = intelligence), but the presentation of it - whether for an encyclopedia or a journal - is poor. Doing a copy edit. :::::There is, as you are probably aware, a (percieved) issue with ownership of the article. I came across it on AN/I for that reason when I posted here first. A bit of chilling out a letting others have a hand might not be out of order on a collaborative encyclopedia? ` | The text is not hateful |
::I agree there is no point to maintaining this as a stand-alone article and would suggest merging and redirecting to container gardening (as potted plants can be grown either indoors or outdoors) and where it merits the slightest of mentions. | The text is not hateful |
` ====USGOV editing this article==== *``The School of the Americas (150.226.95.18), renamed the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation, is not too pleased with their bio on Wikipedia. Is it something wrong about training officers to torture and kill people all over Latin America, including nuns and priests? No problem! The ``Gentlemen and Officers`` from Fort Benning re-wrote the entire article. If you did not know better, you would believe that the page describes the International Institute for the Study of Humanitarian Law.`` Link ` | The text is not hateful |
:Wow, well said and very polite too! This has been a very educational experience, I realize you're quite right about consensus be an invalid basis for this decision. Moreover now that I think about it, it was my original research that made me do it, an obvious no-no. | The text is not hateful |
` == Allegations of racism == The alleged planned boycott against Jackie Robinson is vigorously denied by the interviewees in ``The Spirit of St. Louis: A History Of The St. Louis Cardinals And Browns`` by Peter Golenbock. I am noting this very briefly. As a baseball team in a former slave state, and having the reputation of being full of hillbillies (see: Dizzy Dean, Enos ``Country`` Slaughter, etc.), it was going to be easy for people to convince themselves that the Cards would react badly to Jackie Robinson whether or not there was any further evidence of such.` | The text is not hateful |
:Will do. We should also request a translation of Henrique Medina... | The text is not hateful |
Thanks Tom.. I can see I might have to make a submission to the board of trustees. UkraineToday(|E) Trying to be constructive here and as I have suggested above I of there is any misunderstanding then I offer my apologies and seek like wise from others. But in all sincerity I believe this is a political gang-bang. cur) (last) Akhristov (Talk | contribs) (4,672 bytes) (sock) (undo) (cur) (last) DDima (Talk | contribs) (22 bytes) (, for information see: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Luna_Santin&diff;=prev&oldid;=116459892) Please note I have only one account that I use on Wikipedia and this is it. Fact is they do not want certain information and facts published. Yours in good faith UkraineToday(|E) | The text is not hateful |
` :Also, Torrentspy.com lists that ``no coart order`` was responisble for blocking US users. and that ``it was entirely their desision``. ` | The text is not hateful |
, 5 September 2007 (UTC) :: Copy of Email sent in confidence to Administrator in good faith. It contains No threats of litigation as asserted UkraineToday(|E) 21:59 | The text is not hateful |
` == Controversial Demeanor Image == The photo I have added to the ``Controversial Demeanor`` section is a genuine photograph of Supervisor Daly, is used with proper permission, and is a 100% accurate depiction of the exact ``Controversial Demeanor`` that this section is about. Do not removed this imagine again without discussing on this talk page and showing proper justification for it's removal as well as a consensus from the other wiki editors of this article. ` | The text is not hateful |
` ===Eradication of unusual pathogens by combination pharmacological therapy is paralleled by improvement of signs and symptoms of chronic prostatitis syndrome.=== Magri V, Trinchieri A, Ceriani I, Marras E, Perletti G. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2007 Jun;79(2):93-8. ``Long-term improvement of signs and symptoms of prostatitis indicates that combination therapy is beneficial for symptomatic patients showing evidence of infection by unusual pathogens at the prostatic level. Our data support the hypothesis that organisms other than the traditionally recognized uropathogens may play a role in the onset of prostatitis.`` :: This continues to show why this editor should be banned from making any edits to this page. He says I (and other agreeing editors, by implication) am wrong to exclude bacterial theories for Chronic Pelvic Pain Synbdrome (CPPS), also known ironically as chronic abacterial prostatitis (yes, that's ABACTERIAL or non-bacterial), and then, to prove I am wrong, he cites a study that looks at men with chronic BACTERIAL prostatitis, a wholly different entity. I quote from the study's abstract: ``We performed a comparative analysis of microbiological and clinical responses to combination therapy in 104 symptomatic patients showing evidence of infection by traditional uropathogens (TU) or by unusual pathogens (UP) at the prostatic level.`` These are not CPPS patients, as anyone with a scintilla of medical knowledge would immediately realize. The article already has a very good section covering chronic BACTERIAL prostatitis, so this is simply a ridiculous and wrong-headed attempt to disrupt this page. ` | The text is not hateful |
Rating this article B because it aims to be reasonably comprehensive about the subject covering the major subjects you could think of about a wine (Basics characteristics, History, Geography, Varietals, Taste, Climate, Food paring and the like). Contains a couple of reputable citations though citation format could be fixed (ref numbers.). Tries to keep to an objective tone. 83.195.92.222 | The text is not hateful |
. To claim it does is false, misleading or a lie. They are grossly mistaken. | The text is not hateful |
User_talk:Edgarde|☺]] 23:54, 5 September | The text is not hateful |
as you can see There is no threat of litigation as alleged. The blocking administrator has erred in their assessment | The text is not hateful |
== What about the arcade game? == I saw a crimson skies arcade game, It was a modified pc running in an arcade cabinet with another flying type game. Ive seen licensing and hardware like this with beach head 2000]. May I post about it? | The text is not hateful |
` ==Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view demands both stories side by side== That means both the terror terror story and that what actually happened. This also means there is no need to continue the debate about terror, as it is much more important to get the whole secondary explanation on the page. ===Wikipedia:Cite_sources=== Any material that is challenged and for which no source is provided may be removed by any editor. So we don't need a poll, all we need is to remove a lot of things from the page. It needs to be rewritten having both published versions, the scientific one and the warmongering story. Here are some references: [] Why the 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Won't Go Away makes it clear there are 2 mainstream views that should be displayed side by side attributing as much hardcoded quotations as possible. [] We don't believe that 19 hijackers and a few others in a cave in Afghanistan pulled this off acting alone,`` says Jones. ``We challenge this official conspiracy theory and, by God, we're going to get to the bottom of this. [] Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries. Unless anyone has a good reason not to add those to the page and not to mention this documented information? ===William Rodríguez RICO lawsuit=== In October 2004, Rodríguez filed a civil RICO lawsuit directed against George W. Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld and others, including a total of 100 defendants, together with Ellen Mariani and lawyer Phil Berg. The government filed a motion to dismiss, or at least transfer, the case on grounds of national security. is worthy of it's own paragraph. ===no Osama means no Muslims=== [FBI says]: The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 thus the word Muslim may only be quoted at best. ===The use of the word terrorist=== Similarities between the Reichstag fire and The September 11 Attacks are as striking as those between the Reichstag Fire Decree and the Patriot act there is no need to use the word terrorist to explain the event, I do think a separate paragraph dedicated to the media calling it a Muslim terrorist attack would be appropriate. Wikipedia:Avoid_peacock_terms Let the facts speak for themselves.. ===Wikipedia:No original research=== As long as it's not in a peer review journal kerosene cant melt reinforced steel. ===Structural failure=== In a well-designed system, a localized failure should not cause immediate or even progressive collapse of the entire structure. Which makes this pseudoscience: September_11_attacks#The_attacks: Three buildings in the World Trade Center Complex collapsed due to structural failure on the day of the attack. Because that is not what the structural failure of well designed systems works like in any previous historical event. Here the standards of wikipedia go far beyond those of the mainstream media. The buildings where blown up. ===Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words=== Avoid phrases such as ``some people say`` without sources.. Hiding all the evidence incriminates the Bush administration. Further evidence of anything is just weasel wording. Hijackers, fires, explosions, demolition all perfectly good to describe the story. ( )` | The text is not hateful |
== Your relentless edit warring == Your messages are almost as ridiculous as your editwarring. This wouldn't have started if you didn't keep violently editwarring and pov-pushing your agenda. Let's how long before we see you get blocked again. | The text is hateful |
Yes, but soap boxing is appropriate as you have not addressed any of the content suggestions presented. How can you just ignore the secondary account? It's well documented, there is even an attempt to take the Bush administration to court. There are professors who claim the official story is bunk and they do so in Guardian. The FBI says Osama was NOT INVOLVED. This means the current article is one big lie. And my questions about it go ignored. Every instance of the word Muslim does not belong on the page. I'm terribly upset by all this dishonesty. How do you justify this? By complaining about the format of my writing 100 times? I will then take the soap box, I have every right to. I'm sure you have the best of intentions here Haemo but who is not talking about the article it self here? You or me? This sub topic is where I say the page is weasel wording, and you say I'm soap boxing huh? I'm talking about the article justifying the war on terror here? I'm not sure how I became the subject there. Could you please clarify that leap of logic? And how do you relate it to weasle wording? I beg of you to explain, what part of Osama was NOT INVOLVED is so hard for you to understand? ( ) | The text is not hateful |
by default. The caption says painting | The text is not hateful |
Oi! You! Stop vandalising bovine articles! Get a clue. Eat a chappati. | The text is not hateful |
== Hu1lee == Hi Chaser, Can I ask you to delete the page which redirects to my profile due to Hu1lee's vandalism? Thank you in advance. | The text is not hateful |
I am informed that this user has twice sort to modify the conent of the article by again altering the published statement out of context as to what was quoted. | The text is not hateful |
A tag has been placed on Pintculture, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Pintculture. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. • | The text is not hateful |
` :::I don't think every section does at all. Further, I think the ones that do, do so in such a way so seemingly calculated for minimum sympathy that they are a misrepresentation and thus a disgrace. Take this example: ``One argument is that male circumcision is ethically identical to female genital cutting.`` The source is . Read that page. Nowhere are the words ``ethic`` or ``ethical`` used, nor ``identical`` nor ``equal.`` By presenting this apparent criticism of male circumcision (I believe the site is highly critical of the female form of GC as well, based on its name, ``The Female Genital Cutting Education and Networking Project``), the site is merely presenting facts, albeit in an emotional way; not drawing ethical conclusions. That the WP author interpreted this as ``ethically identical`` is his problem. It's not even clearly ``criticism.`` YOU are drawing the conclusion that it is criticism, based on YOUR ethics and worldview. To those people who believe female circumcision is fine but male circumcision is a moral outrage, is it *advocacy*? Ridiculous. :::The problem isn't not having a criticism section; the problem is that there is no fair and well-presented criticism in the article. This isn't the fault of the sources that present circumcision fairly with respect to female genital cutting (which I *do* believe is mutilation, irrelevant as that is here) it's not their place to advocate, just to present facts. ` | The text is not hateful |
`Re: Tried To Help An Odd Editor And Now Not Sure What To Do == Re your message: Oh, yes, I remember that user name. I saw his request for adminship at various places. I don't think it's really necessary to up the warnings. My suggestion is to nicely offer to help again. If he declines, well, there isn't much you can do then. You can't force him to accept your help. =) (And don't forget that you really are not under any obligation to help). As for the adopting thing, you can nicely point him to the adopter criteria saying something like he might want to read it before he adopts somebody. As for his adoptees, better to leave them alone instead of intervening. I think they will eventually figure things out when he is either unresponsive or unhelpful. He reminds me of another young, eager editor. That didn't turn out too well, but maybe this time it will be different. My main advice would be to be gentle. Being more forceful isn't likely to work. :Oh, one more thing... Like I said, you are not obligated to help. If you don't want to help, yet you don't want to strand him, I'm willing to give helping a shot. ::Replied here: . - :::Re your message: I see that has offered to adopt him. Instead of jumping in the middle, let's see how she does. One person helping out is better than two, I think. It's better to have a single person as contact. I will leave her a note offering to help out if necessary though. ::::Is your email address still with a certain ISP that is five letters long? I noticed you disabled your email on here. :::::Replied here: . - ::::::Re your message: Oh, right, you contacted me first. Back in July you sent me an email. I was going to email you something. I just wanted to make sure that the address you used is still valid. :::::::Replied here: . - ::::::::Re your message: Hopefully it will. If not, well, I'll try again... :::::::::Replied here: . - ::::::::::Re your message: That's too bad. =( I see he took a parting shot at you and another editor, but I suspect what did it was the last two comments left on his Talk page. I think he ``left`` once before though. == ` | The text is not hateful |
` ;Proof that the Chaplain and WHINSEC's claims above are 100% false *150.226.95.18 = *OrgName: USAISC-Fort Benning *OrgID: UFB *Address: ATTN: ATZB-IMT *City: Fort Benning *StateProv: GA *PostalCode: 31905-6204 *Country: US *NetRange: 150.226.0.0 - 150.226.255.255 *NameServer: NS01.ARMY.MIL Link to proof of 150.226.95.18 This is 100% proof! *These edits were June 24 of this year! not ancient history like some of the USGOV PR edits to Wikipedia. How about this edit? 100% self-promotion! *;Latin American Liberators Remembered **``The WHINSEC continues this fine tradition in two ways; several additional classrooms and hallways are named for notable figures from the entire hemisphere's common past, and a Gallery of Liberators in the third floor hallway displays scenes or individuals important in each nation's struggle for independence.`` USMIL edit to WHINSEC #1 and USMIL edit to WHINSEC #2 and USMIL edit to WHINSEC #3. I rest my case. The same USMIL that brought you the Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch 'faery tales' now brings you the same empty denials about their edits to the WHINSEC article. I ask that we consider the USMIL a non reliable source for this article. Just like the Gov of Iran or North Korea. Their claims are considered questioned. Same with USMIL, IMO. What about my other points above, Chaplain? Why is Col. Francisco del Cid Diaz participate in the killings of 16 civilians who is on a State Dept list of Gross Human Rights abusers 'escorting a group of cadets' instead of teaching a class or graduating in 2003 supposed to make anybody feel better? SOAW only claimed he ``attended`` WHINSEC in 2003 anyway. WHINSEC is still welcoming killers and has even become worse in that for the first time in decades they no longer release the names of their attendees so SOAW cant track them and they no longer even try and track them themselve! I will supply a link. WHINSEC is hiding and concealing information even more than SOA did! Thank you for reading. ` | The text is not hateful |
` ::Thats not the point is it? We have 100% proof that they were editting their own article adding PR and 'spin' and now we have a 100% denial from the Chaplain who 100% speaks for the school. He is speaking for the school/institute on Wikipedia and his claim has been proofed 100% false. This was June 24, 2007! Only a few months ago! Not in 2004 or 2004 like many of the other USGOV edits! IMO, WHINSEC and the Chaplain are no longer to be considered 'RS'. Sorry they have been caught in the spider-web of lies. ` | The text is not hateful |
. Metrics. The Board reluctantly acknowledges that WHINSEC cannot and, in the current state of affairs, should not attempt to track the careers of individual former students. 2005 Minutes.DOC Why is that? SOAW can track them, or should I say could track them until 2005 when WHINSEC started hiding all their names, so no one can track them! | The text is not hateful |
`before that date are signed ``William Overgard``, and the change in artist was obvious. Matera once thought he began earlier than that because the audition strips he drew were from a story Overgard drew in` | The text is not hateful |
` :::hmmmmm Some might call this Wikistalking and harrassment! I am sorry if you people want to hide the Gay side of some of your RW heros. Please read the article on Outing. As more and more RWs are shown to enjoy Gay sex, especially people who condemn Gay sex but practice it themselves, like Ted Haggard it will take away some of the bad stigma. Its time for all the RW Gay sex practicers to come out of the closets and admit how much they like Gay sex! (IMO) Theres that old saying ``Try it, you'll like it!`` Thats too true! Why do you think more and more people are trying Gay sex!? Its okay, (IMO) to have a wife and kids and enjoy some Gay sex now and then! (no Meth or poppers though!) ``Try it, you'll like it!`` ` | The text is hateful |
` == Hmmmmm == hmmmmm Some might call this Wikistalking and harrassment! I am sorry if you people want to hide the Gay side of some of your RW heros. Please read the article on Outing. As more and more RWs are shown to enjoy Gay sex, especially people who condemn Gay sex but practice it themselves, like Ted Haggard it will take away some of the bad stigma. Its time for all the RW Gay sex practicers to come out of the closets and admit how much they like Gay sex! (IMO) Theres that old saying ``Try it, you'll like it!`` Thats too true! Why do you think more and more people are trying Gay sex!? Its okay, (IMO) to have a wife and kids and enjoy some Gay sex now and then! (no Meth or poppers though!) ``Try it, you'll like it!`` ` | The text is hateful |
::::Bmedley Sutler, your comments here are totally unnecessary and completely inappropriate. | The text is hateful |
LEAVE ME ALOOONE! IM AN ATHLETE!!! LJHASCGJYGASVCLJG | The text is not hateful |
` :I want an unblock and a RFC. I will not tolerate tag-team harrasmment by the same small RW group who just drove Seven Of Diamond off Wiki, and harras and drive out any leftist with organized team tactics. Dheyward Wikistalked me. Here is what I last wrote but couldn't post on ANI :::Neither of you talk to the troll edit Dheyward made, then when I asked to talk to him about it, he deleted my question on his talk page as 'trolling'. His edit was 100% POINT and trolling and hurt the article, not helped it. He knew the correct info, but would have rather made a POINT troll edit instead! That is WP abuse and an attempe to bait me. ` | The text is not hateful |
I avoided EVERY SINGLE article that they edit after my block to avoid them. Dheyward Wikistalked me then did it again on Mongos page about my request for a LBGT mentor. | The text is not hateful |
` ===My proof=== Dheyward Wikistalks me to an article that he never edited, after my block ends. I was on purpose avoiding every single article that the RW team who I have had all the problems with are editing so as to not get into fights. He makes a troll POINT edit. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Western_Hemisphere_Institute_for_Security_Cooperation&diff;=prev&oldid;=155579719 Link} I advice him not to do that, and he revs my request as trolling. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADHeyward&diff;=155586115&oldid;=155585861 Link} Then he Wikistalks my message asking for a LBGT mentor and talks about his Wikistalking to another on the RW team. Now they all show up and pile on at the ANI. ` | The text is not hateful |
`:::::::You misunderstand. If there are strong allegations from 'RS' that someone has had Gay sex they should be included on Wiki. Just look at the Matt Drudge article and the fights there. For months! The RW team will go to any distance to keep well-proven claims that their RW 'heros' have had Gay sex or are Gay or Bi. There were strong allegations about Larry Craig for 2 years! But not on Wiki where the RW team protect the articles. Thats all. If the alleagtions aren't RS, just from a small blog they shouldndt go in, but when the claims are RS documented they should. They're not. ` | The text is not hateful |
` ::::::::::*Plus, take a look! Have I made any outing edits since my block? How many my edits have had anything,/B> to do with outing? I'd say way less than 10%! Most are with the SOA and USGOV foreign policies in Latin America, plus Big Sur! Maybe my 100% proofs that the USMIL editing WHINSEC and lying,/B> about it has something to do with my block? I hope not. ` | The text is not hateful |
::: Until someone gets the info about all these other investors and posts it, doesn't it make sense to list the investors we do know of? Isn't Bin Laden worth mentioning? Let's not let the limited information on Carlyle's investors stop us from providing the info we do have because we're trying to maintain NPOV, particularly when the information is clearly compelling, relevant to understanding at least one view of Carlyle group, and possibly meaningful. The weasel words and the original research warnings are not necessary, at least for the Controversy section. And, I changed some of the weasel words in the Controversy section, although the meaning remains largely the same how else are we to provide the information, which is pertinent, about how an issue or thing is perceived by people?! | The text is not hateful |
Fuck you Pavel Vozenilek you fag. | The text is hateful |
Luciano Pavarotti]] Operatic tenor *[[ | The text is not hateful |
:Can it not be both? | | The text is not hateful |
Loss of Arctic ice leaves experts stunned | The text is not hateful |
` == DVD Release == Regarding this section of the article: ``This release is notable because, due to marketing issues, it was the first Star Wars film never to be released on VHS in the United States.`` I think that this can be eliminated. First of all, this doesn't really make the release notable. Most films released at the same time were not released on VHS. Also, the fact that it WAS released on VHS in other countries makes it even less notable. It also does not have anything to do with the ``DVD`` release, but rather the ``home video`` release. ` | The text is not hateful |
::::Michael Farrel is a nationalist - he admits that his book is not a neutral work, your comment supposes that it is. | The text is not hateful |
` :This is already covered in the Social Issues section and respective sub-article. · · ` | The text is not hateful |
==TV Show== There are no details in here about their tv show. | The text is not hateful |
==You're a little bitch== You are a sad person who spends her whole life on wikipedia. You have no mates. Despite my edits I do actually have a life outside of wikipedia. I have lots of mates and lots of hobbies such as football and tennis. I'm also very intelligent as I have 9A*s in my GCSEs (all in proper subjects). So how dare YOU patronise me. From the timings of your edits (eg: 10:13, 14:39 etc) clearly all you do all day is edit wikipedia. It's all you have. Nothing else in your sad, pathetic life. (and u say ur a nerd). That's quite unhealthy if you ask me. And yes I do think a little girl is sweet and cute. She's extreemly sweet and adorable. Nobody could possibly fail to think so. I also think rabbits are sweet and cute. It doesn't mean I want to fuck them up the arse. Ask most people whether a)they think rabbits are cute and sweet b)if they fancy them and most people would give an answer of yes to a) and no to b). (except AnemoneProjectors who'd say yes to both). My point is clear you can think something/someone is sweet without fancying them. So how dare you acuse me of being a paedophile. I should sue you for slander (or is it libel...) but seeing as you probably live in a bedsit without a job there doesn't seem much point. At the very least you should be blocked for such a viscous personal attack and stopped from being an admin. By the way, adorableness is not a word you stupid motherfucking little cunt. | The text is hateful |
== Masturbatino == Thank you for deleting that article. I was working on trying to figure out how to make the speedy deletion (nonsense) template when you deleted. Again, thanks buddy! | The text is not hateful |
== UN USEFUL COMENTS == Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Please stop making un useful coments on pages such as Kevin Rudd He is not 147 years old | The text is not hateful |
== Norlen == Is she still VP? | The text is not hateful |
` ::As a protestant, I'm not sure that I fully agree with the quoted section from the article above. Don't protestants believe that Jesus Christ is the mediator between the sinner and God the Father (cf John 14:6, Romans 8:34)? Don't protestants pray to God for the forgiveness of sins (as well as for other matters), or in fact do anything, in the name of Jesus Christ, their mediator (cf Hebrew 13:15, Colossions 3:17, Ephesians 5:20)? ::I'd propose changing the above (I haven't checked if the article has changed since this talk section was started) to ``Protestants believe that apart from Jesus Christ, no intermediary is necessary between a person and God, for that person to be absolved from sins. Protestants believe that if a person acknowledges the Lordship of Jesus Chirst, and believes in their heart that God raised him from the dead, then that person will gain God's pardon. This acknowledgement is usually made first in private, and then in public. Protestants do not belive that each sin needs to be individually confessed to be forgiven.`` ::Please provide comments on this redefinition of the protestant view. ` | The text is not hateful |
Ok. But absolutely refusing to check (or admit) a citation and constantly accusing me of not having any citations is ALSO a form of personal attack. | The text is not hateful |
stub; more info to come. | The text is not hateful |
::The true words of a moron | The text is hateful |
sAs hleo dont talk to me like that | The text is hateful |
== what the fuck did i do i have only edited my page == well? | The text is hateful |
:dont abuse your power | The text is not hateful |
== -_- == 2 iS a thRet, not 1 or 2 i see no prOblem with 1 and 3 wAs truE | The text is not hateful |
:is tat a banana in your packet or are you just happy to see me? | The text is not hateful |
`::My understanding - and I have seen NO photograph which shows it, that it had orange upon the top of the wings inset from the edges as was the pattern used by PAA. Under any circumstances such would be quite visible. If they landed on the reef they could not have sent messages. The reef is shown in photos from Gillespies book and it shows quite distinct differences in depth. (the density of the photo varies with the depth of the water). The chances of the Electra landing in shallow water with the gear down and not flipping over are slim, a conventional gear, know known rudely as a ``tail dragger`` is very prone to nosing over when undue breaking or drag is induced (witness AE flipping her Vega at NAS Norfolk some years before), the chances of it landing on such an uneven surface while exposed are equally slim. .` | The text is not hateful |
` ::::::: I know as I have not been able to find out how many amps the receiver and transmitter drew is what happened on the flight to Hawaii. We know about when the generator went off line and we know when they landed. The rest is deduction. What I cannot tell you is if they were down on an island on their belly, (see Lambrechts opinion of landing chances on Gardener) how long they could operate their radios. Or if their electrical system would have been intact enough to function. I grew up in the age of the vacuum tube and know that it would take a minute or two - to 'warm' up the dynamotor and transmitter to the point where it would achieve full power. This is all assuming they had no serious damage to the airplane. My 'best guess`` (OPINION, don't ask me to put it in the article) is that they probably had at least one hour of operation. The other question is how much ``gain`` they would have gotten from a ``less than optimum`` (to quote the TIGHAR radio guy) length under 1/8 wave, V-type antenna sitting less than six feet off the ground. The answer is probably - but not definitely - not much. We are looking at an actual output from the antenna of perhaps 10-20 watts with a horizontal polarity and bad angle. Perhaps they were heard. Odds are they were not. (I repeat this is OPINION). Still we need to consider these things. My guess is that Earhart (OPINION) could have transmitted and received for at least 1 hour. That she could have done one or the other longer. One must remember that a dynamotor was a pretty inefficient means of turning low DC voltage into high voltage AC for radio communications, thus the receiver alone would have more operational life than the transmitter (once again, we do not know how many minutes the xmitter or receiver were on during the Hawaii flight, but a good guess is that they both ran all the time). That the propagation characteristics of her antenna and the frequencies she was able to operate on severely limited any possible range. I find it far easier to think that reports of a 'weak carrier`` or 'feeble and unintelligible`` communications being hear are far more likely than someone who claimed to hear her 4/5. :::::::The bottom line - in my humble (and we all know how humble I am) - opinion is that given the best of circumstances, they would have had at least one hour of radio time left if they were out of fuel. ` | The text is not hateful |
==Wikipedia== Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia. I do not need permission to post here. Please, talk in English. | The text is not hateful |
I do not need consensus to post. Wikipedia is free, don't you know that? | The text is not hateful |
I do not need consensus to post. Wikipedia is free, don't you know that? | The text is not hateful |
==Not Centre-Left== The ALP clearly does not fall in the category of a centre-left party. Someone tell me one policy of the ALP that is remotely left/socialist. The ALP is a centre party. | The text is not hateful |
== English == Please, can't you write in English? This is an Anglo Wikipedia, so its official language is English. If you cannot write in this language, try to find an school, so you can learn it, ok? Bye. | The text is not hateful |
` == September 2007 == Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jesus, you will be blocked from editing. ` | The text is not hateful |
I am sorry, but I cannot write in you native language here, because it is an Anglo wikipedia, and I respect this fact. Bye. | The text is not hateful |
` The question of head winds. Both the last forecast sent to Earhart and Noonan and their reported conditions agree. It is most likely that they were encountering headwinds as high as 23 knots. It is also certain from her reports that they had climbed considerably above the optimum altitudes early in the flight and thus had to have had considerable additional fuel consumption. I would refer you to Kelly Johnson's instructions prepared for Earhart on the flight profile necessary to achieve optimum range. Given the variables which we cannot know, I would imagine that she had 1-2 hours reserve by the time she reached the vicinity of Howland - but that might be optimistic. I cannot know how much fuel she had. One radio log indicates she stated 1/2 hour (but did that include the remainder of 100 octane?). One thing for certain is that she did state she was ``low on fuel`` and that cannot be reasonably interpreted as meaning she was ``fat.`` This is OPINION, but given the anxiety she seemed to have in her voice and her use of the term 'low on fuel,`` coupled with the forecast and reported (by her) winds, it is probable that they were far less than the optimum 4-5 hours given still air and best altitude operations would have made possible. Mr. Gillespie can dismiss her report of ground speed and winds aloft as well as the far higher than optimum altitude she reported less than half way into the flight with the term ``speculation`` (in a foot note). No one did at the time, nor can I. (OPINION- but) Though this is my Opinion, I CAN document several aspects of it including the airplane designers instructions and how his instructions for an optimum profile differed from her report. Her reports and how they coincided with the last forecast the USN sent her from Hawaii. And thus how if Kelly Johnson was right, True had not incompetently read the information about winds aloft from reporting stations near her path, and she was not lying; then she MUST have had significantly higher fuel consumption than the optimum profile would have produced. How much, that is a question I cannot specifically answer. But for all three to be totally wrong, for there have been still air, for True to have been incompetent in his interpretation of winds aloft reports, and Earhart to have been lying about the ``winds`` she reported and her ``speed`` takes a bit of ``speculation`` I cannot indulge in. Mistakes were made, but I can't imagine everyone made exactly the right combination of mistakes and deceptions to allow the Electra to have achieved it's optimum performance on the flight. Given the time which they apparently (from reports and signal strength) spent searching for Howland Island, it is unlikely that they had a big reserve when the last signal was heard (OPINION). ` | The text is not hateful |
Options when running out of gas. You have two. One is to pick the spot where you want to land, the other is to let Sir Isaac Newton pick it for you. | The text is not hateful |
::I guess I'll try that new browser, that'll take a while on dial-up. | The text is not hateful |
== Andrew Usherwood == Who do you think you are trying to delete my article? Andrew Usherwood is a notable figure. | The text is not hateful |
:Andrew Usherwood is notable, have you never heard the Chaser? | The text is not hateful |
::You have exceeded the three revert rule. | The text is not hateful |
:::You are wiki trolling, please stop. | The text is not hateful |
::::WHY DONT YOU FUCK OFF YOU MANWHORE AND LET US LEAD OUR LIFE. WIKIPEDIA IS FOR EVERYONE, NOT JUST PERVERTED TROLLS LIKE YOU! YOU HAVE NOT ASSUMED GOOD FAITH. YOU ARE GOING TO ROT IN HELL YOU POO SNORTING DEVIANT AND SUCK MANS BALLS. I TOLD YOU TO LOOK UP THE CHASER. YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY A POV WARRIOR AND TROLL. | The text is hateful |
== Message to John == Hello John I want to thank you for your help, today in better English because my daughter is helping me again. We got a letter from sifu Peter Rehse telling that he also has the same problems now living in China. I would like to ask a favor from you if you allow me. Could you please, if you read this, put a message in my pages saying that I am in break and the reasons? I don't know where to get those banners and I don't want people think bad about me because I am having my connection blocked. I can still read the Wikipedia and I also will come back when it becomes possible. Thank you for your kindness, I send you my respects | The text is not hateful |
AND I KNOW I AM A DICKHEAD | The text is hateful |
` |} == September 2007 == Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ` | The text is not hateful |
` == IT'S MY TALK PAGE!!! HOW DARE YOU desacrate my Sancturay !!!!!! I DECLARE jihad !!!!!! == I declare jihad on you ݣ۸ݗۻݓڰڜڬ wiki mod admin or bloodsucker or what ever you are. I am going to report you to the nearest מּigger (That's this → ☻ color numbnut NOT this → ☺ ONE!!!! which you are) because you have breached the Ompwn wiki TOS jihad. ALSO!!!!10101010 since you mentioned that you race or ``color`` to be more precise is better then mine then I also suspect you (like a white ``☺`` man would do to a ``☻``) are a OMFMNLOL10101!!!0 ;0) RACIST MG !!!!!!!! ☺ IS NOT ☺>☻ !!!!!! LOGICAL !!!!!! IT CAN NOT=↑ or ∆∞ =☺ OMG EQUATIONS EVERY WHERE♦♥!!!! ``∫-10324 and 0 [x+4]-[x/5]≠☺≤☻+√∞ /0`` (THAT IS THE EQUATION ONE MUST FIND OUT FIRST WHAT THE √∞ divided by 0!!) Dx/dy= (∞,234934723482)I FOUND IT (Hg) mercury is found in ☻ ∆Mols מּiggers are good at music ♪♫ unlike ☺ and suck at luck ♥◄♣♠♦↨ ☻ CAN NOT DO MATH VERY WELL!!! very true ☻= hating on ۞ ♣♫ ☻מּ☺☺ ۾ݟݣݗݜݭ۬ۻ۵ݡݣ۸ݗۻݓڰڜڬڵچو →↑←↔∂ ok ok that was just a joke text and all please stop being racist I can't help my self for being black. FORGIVE ME!` | The text is hateful |
( I really like this Icon where Can I get it ?) | The text is not hateful |
OMG I JUST FOUND OUT YOUR INDIAN!!!!!! I LIKE CURRYYY AND INDIAN PEOPLE LOLOLOL!!!!!!! THEY FIX MY COMPUTER! LOLOLOLOLOLOL | The text is not hateful |
nan bread is a bitch to make how do you do it? I can make chicken marsala but not the indan breads ( | The text is not hateful |
did you know I love ∞ it's so endless lol. | The text is not hateful |
`Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for . I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: * The five pillars of Wikipedia * How to edit a page * Help pages * Tutorial * How to write a great article * Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. For one thing, if you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! - ` | The text is not hateful |
Then why would you let me edit this page??? I understand the michael bolton page but seriously, you allow me to change the page that you set up to warn me about not editing...rigghhhttt | The text is not hateful |
` Revising estimate. I have been flipping through a number of books to try and determine how much they actually transmitted during that last hour of the flight into Hawaii. It appears they were mostly using the receiver with the DF loop and thus were not 'communicating.`` Therefore I must say that we know the battery could keep the equipment running, but we don't know how fast it would be drained by extensive transmission. ` | The text is not hateful |
` == Museum Ruby == Shouldn't there be some mention of this item within the artifact page? The one argument I got for it not being included was that ``it wasn't an artifact, just a random jewel that was stolen.`` That isn't entirely true though as it wasn't just some jewel that was stolen under a random circumstance. It was stolen under the the assumption that it was a Corona Jewel, which relates it to the artifact quest in much the same way as the Eye of the Sea, as a case of mistaken identity. The Eye of the Sea was also sought after because it was under the assumption that it was a Corona Jewel. The fact that the ruby was already in a museum and not hidden shouldn't change things much either as two of the three Neptune Scrolls were also said to have been in a museum before they were stolen. In addition, the Star of Isis (from what I've heard about it) looks similar to the ruby. While this site doesn't deal with speculative thoughts and its probably just a case of recycling props on the production crew's part, looking at it from an in-universe off-camera perspective it could possibly explain why the ruby was mistaken as a Corona Jewel. ` | The text is not hateful |
` Yes in some ways but as boy not in the picture and barrymore not supping on an E or killing lubbock hard it a leap to go and title section ``SEXUAL PREDATOR`` it should perhaps go ``FAMILY ENTERTAINER``? oh and no I don't hate gays do you think that I hate gays? I don't associate them with drug forcing or recall any sex with the teenager in the article?? I have never had a drug force by a gay ` | The text is not hateful |
can i get unblocked please cuz it's starting to nerve | The text is not hateful |
SHIT CUNT FUCK NIGGER CHINK | The text is hateful |
i found this article on crime in managua its from 2006 wich means its recent facts that need to be used for this section i didnt copyright i changed alot of thw phrases Managua the Epicenter of crime in Nicaragua Managua experienced a rise in violence and crime throughout 1990's. Violent crime in Managua is for various reasons such as political violence, Civil war crime and delinquency. Gangs in Managua are a widespread phenomenon that is growing fast. Currently managua has more than 110 gangs with more than 8,000 members. These gangsare responsible for 50% of all crimes in Nicaragua and 60% of all crimes in Managua. violence and gang warfare is prevalent.These gangs are responsible for theft, mugging, pick-pocketing they also have involvement in the drug trade among other criminal activities.[2] and this is the original one Managua, Nicaragua epicenter of crime in Nicaragua experienced rising levels of violence and criminality throughout 1990s 40% of all crimes in Nicaragua committed in Managua – half of these reported crimes considered violent nature of violence and violent crime shifts from political violence and civil war to crime and delinquency Pandillas – youth gangs – in Managua now a prevalent and widespread phenomenon – growing rapidly currently more than 110 pandillas with approximately 8,000 members concentrated in lower-class barrios – poverty and lack of opportunity drive membership territorially based in specific neighbourhoods defend territory as a source of identity and pride Lower class barrio in Managua Pandillas commit variety of crime, often employing firearms responsible for disproportionate share of criminal activity commit 50% of all crimes in Nicaragua and 60% of all crimes in Managua violence and gang warfare prevalent robbery, mugging, pick-pocketing and involvement in drug trade among other criminal activities and here is the link http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/focus/youth_gun/managua9_e.htm | The text is not hateful |
Added a factoid to the Lao Che portion about the correct spelling of the name that Spielberg might have been unaware of. Source is myself, I hold a degree in Chinese and teach it at the secondary level. | The text is not hateful |
:Stop? I didn't think I'd started! What's the matter? | The text is not hateful |
It is fully my intent to vanish from the Wikipedia. I do not wish to have any further contact with the organization, and I do not wish any material which is on my user page or I have contributed to continue to exist. Have a nice day. | The text is not hateful |
` ::(Sorry I'd already started typing this before Spartaz replied - I may as well post it!) Am I allowed a say in the matter? ) It just seems to me that is the same person as , who I'd encountered before on the Immanuel Velikovsky article. I'd recognise his aggresive editing style anywhere, not to mention his penchant for 'wiki-lawyering'. He seems to have a real bee in his bonnet about deleting ``non-mainstream`` and ``pseudosience`` articles. Anyways, I cast my vote on the deletion of the David Talbott article, if the community majority vote the other way then I'm happy to abide by the decision. I've no interest in fighting about it! ` | The text is not hateful |
` I have repeatedly attempted to communicate with Wikipedia with a simple request. Virtually all attempts have been blocked. I am not appealing for arbitration. My contributions were deemed to be ``original research``, the accusation was made that I had never given a valid citation to support them. I repeatedly posted the citation, even going so far as to quote the text. This was rejected by an editor repeatedly as being without merit despite my requests that said editor at least check the citation. Every time the only reply of the editor was that I had given NO citation. I have no problem if the Wikipedia would rather accept a charge that a citation was never given even if the citation - in fact the total quotation of the source material, as used in the citation - was submitted three times. This is the judgement of Wikipedia. My request is very simple. As I stand accused of ``original research`` for repeating in toto the source material (a short telegram) which was likewise published in toto in what was by every standard a legitimate source for the Wikipedia. And as I stand accused of repeated - and admittedly passionate - pleadings for the editor to check the citation, and stand accused for doing so, then all I want is to terminate my account and removed those contributions to the Wikipedia I have made. If my scholarship is not worthy of the Wikipedia then why would you want to keep it? If my defense of my scholarship by portraying the activities of a person who refused it, despite the fact that it was printed in toto in a legitimate source, as ``original scholarship`` as ``obstreperous,`` then all I can say is that my application of the word is within it's dictionary definition. I am not asking that the block on editing be removed. I am not asking for some ``vindication.'I am asking for no consequence to anyone. I am simply asking the Wikipedia to carryout what it must if my work is without merit because I have never cited any valid references for my edits. If my work is worthless, without merit and ``original research,`` then the Wikipedia by it's own standards MUST remove it. If the Wikipedia will not do this then what can I do but try to enforce the actions and stated standards of Wikipedia by taking you to court. I would rather not see that. Have a nice one! Mark D. Lincoln` | The text is not hateful |
Subsets and Splits