is_offensive
int64 0
1
| text
stringlengths 1
5k
|
|---|---|
1 | @harley_schuder bitch where you goin? |
1 | "
Ryanpostlethwaite
I'm not going to sit here and just blatantly make fun of what you do and who you are. However, I look at your picture(funny how you added a drunken one of yourself in an obvious attempt to impress your readers) and it's quite easy to see that you're an ugly little parasite. As I browse through your insignificant pages on Roger Royle and Harold Gaba (that must have taken hours to make), and I know right then and there that you're a compulsive masturbator. I look at all your Wikipedia buddies and their comments concerning ""speedy deletions"" and ""harassment via Wikipedia"" and I now understand why there are entire hospitals throughout the world that treat internet addictions. So go ahead and suspend or block or whatever it is you people do to naughty Wikipedia users, because I could really careless. You piece of shit." |
0 | "
Fair use rationale for Image:Smurf1.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Smurf1.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 1 != 2 " |
1 | What the fuck is your problem? |
0 | "
While perhaps you are being sarcastic, I think it is quite literally true that ""blocking repeat offenders a 4th, 5th, or 6th time and giving ""second"" and ""third"" chances to others is an acceptable waste of time for many"" as many admins are bored cats playing with mice. All of us here have to decide which activities are an acceptable use of our time and which are not. I tell everyone, ""If editing wikipedia is not fun, you are not doing it right."" Lately editing wikipedia has begun to be less fun for me so I've cut down greatly on the edits I make. Guy seems to have done the same. Frankly, I think it not wise to perform the role of admin with a username whose real life identity is known. Perhaps Guy has come to the same conclusion and is even now editing under an alias. I hope he is. " |
0 | You're edits seem a strange mixture of both fixing and practising vandalism. Is your acount being used by multiple users? Whatever your intentions are, please note that everything you do is logged and looked at. If you want to make constructive edits, you are always welcome to do so. But if you continue to harm other peoples work, you will eventually be blocked for good. Cheers, |
0 | "
I'm tired
Hi, I would not have contacted you (or anyone) on this matter since there is nothing unusual from what I see regularly but because of the recent incident where you served a a judge of sorts, I figured I give you an example.
Things like [
this] and this, an this recent ""notification"" that my contributions are watched (note the date of the article's creation, nd note that it could'n hae been on anyone watchlist) happens a lot in Lithianian topics.
Those are all diffs from just one day (today) and the first one is especially powerful. Now, I do not have and I do not intend to develop a habit of stacking up diffs to attack Piotrus' ""when I have enough"" but It's just a tiny example, what Lithuanian editors have go through. I've already expressed my angst on another page.
Finally there is my question - should I run to AE with that? Should I demand ""sanctions for stalking and offensive speech?
I would not have even brought this up, as I do usually ignore this stuff. But because of the recent incident, I just want to illustrate, what Lithuanian editors have to deal with on a daily basis. Regards. " |
0 | "
Restoring section breaks
Please do not abuse the word ""restoring"", when you are in fact putting in a section break in a random please. The original section break was in an entirely different please than where you put a new section break.
When you call something ""restoring"" when it is clearly not such, people could construe that as vandalism. Thanks. " |
0 | never mind, i checked it and sinebot deleted it. |
1 | After a fight in the club in New Orleans them bitches start jumping |
0 | correct! thank you for pointing that out. |
0 | "
When you say ""sorcery"", does it really mean ""Magic Tricks""? 202.156.9.3 " |
0 | Article Evaluation
Article Evaluation
For this assignment, I was tasked to analyze and comment on the article about Change Management. The first paragraph includes useful and clear overview of the topic, however, it could use a little more information that would broaden the interests of readers. They key points in this article are based on historical occurrences that have contributed to rapid changing events in the workforce and that also created a standard for change management in a way. The information includes sufficient information regarding the history and the context of this topic. It most definitely covers a variety of topics, including the reasons for such change. In addition to that, the article addresses the key issues including globalization and technology that have heavily influenced change management. There is therefore well supported evidence throughout the article and the analysis of certain models proves that the article is referenced and can be proven with contextual information.
The article itself has a clear focus on a topic and also includes detailed scholarly support throughout the text, which can be found in the reference section. The contribution considers a variety of perspectives, however, I think it primarily focuses on today’s rapidly changing world, in reference towards globalization and technology and maybe could focus more than just a few scholars. It takes an appropriate tone in providing points of view in the context of globalization and technology and is supported with appropriate references throughout the page. I think for this article there are sufficient references but more references can always be beneficial and offer more content.
The article represents a neutral point of view but in a way is sort of drawn towards today’s issues in terms of globalization and technology and offers a certain point of view. It does a good job staying with the facts and avoiding opinions. In terms of article length, the only thing I would suggest is a longer intro with a little more information for the reader to have.
Overall, it’s a well written entry with detailed information about change management. I couldn’t find any grammatical errors or any misspellings and the text itself reads well and expresses good ideas. In terms of structure, I would only add more information to the introduction to give the reader more background knowledge. |
0 | How about you let us all know once you have gazed into your crystal ball. |
0 | @idkconstancio I'm trash |
1 | If I don't unwrap a big booty hoe today i'm going rio be outraged. |
0 | the eastern part of the island |
0 | "
Please take the advice you are being given
Please calm down and familiarise yourself with how Wikipedia works. Your repeated shrill invocations of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are frankly risible, makes you look foolish and shows a clear misunderstanding of what Wikipedia is and what it is not. Simply, talk pages of Wikipedia articles are not vehicles for individuals to impart their own unsupported viewpoints. You must understand this. You do not have the ""freedom"" to hijack them for another purpose, to express your own view. Talk pages are there to discuss (supportable) improvements to the article, not for debate on the topic. If you intended to do so at Scots language your proposed improvement was not clear. For instance are we to extrapolate that your contention is that the topic doesn't exist, so neither should the article (in which case nominate for deletion)? Was it something else? All that is clear is your own POV, unsupported by any reliable evidence. The appropriate place for this type of postulation is not here on an article talk page - maybe start your own blog or discuss on chat rooms.
You clearly have either not read or not understood WP:NOTFORUM, which you have been directed to by several editors. Speaking of which, your portrayal of being thwarted by one individual is not accurate, though I'm not sure if this is due to you not having the skills to know this because of your newness as an editor. Numerous people have removed your soapboxing.
Now you are taking the inappropriateness of your posts to a bizarre new level by discussing your perceived martyrdom regarding your inadmissable soapboxing on Scots at Talk:Comparison of Norwegian Bokmål and Standard Danish. How on earth does this have any pertinence to improvement of the article on the comparison of Bokmål and Danish? That is why I am going to remove that section from that talk page.
Please also familiarise yourself with what a minor edit is. Adding or removing content, be it from a an article or a talk page is not a minor edit. Again you probably don't know that because you are new.
I hope you do take time to learn about how Wikipedia works and on that basis, and since you haven't been given a WP:WELCOME, I will post one below as it gives some other useful indications about how to edit here. " |
0 | They can if the issues are buried by partisans who are trying to protect their chosen candidate. Whether or not this runs in the NYT does not decide whether or not it is legitimate. I am not suggesting that the story is true, but rather that there is a controversy surrounding it. That is indisputable fact. It is a shame that Wikipedia is no longer the peoples' place for all information, but rather an archive for issues already completely fleshed out by the antiquated media outlets. Shame. |
0 | A start.
Ok, if someone questions the notability of a particular piece, in my mind they should explain their thoughts.
I am not in support of removing or incorporating this article into another.
Brent has had a well known career for a while, even before One Republic. |
0 | "
Citations needed
The paragraph that begins: ""Academic hackers usually work openly and..."" reads like original research to me, as does the paragraph that appears much later beginning ""Computer security hackers are the opposite..."". Anyone want to volunteer to rewrite these to hew more closely to our content policies (notably, by sourcing them?) " |
1 | thanks, but no thanks. i don't have time like some people who spend all their free time on here. i would rather spend my free time to volunteer in real life instead of wasting it on this useless web site full of errors and communist propagandas. |
1 | Take yourwarning and shake salt on it and shove it up your poop pipe... |
0 | I agree with the SQ (singapore Airlines) thing being incoorect, technically isn't the aircanda inclusion also incorrect. I believe they aren't allowed to offer LHR-US flights. Transatalantic from Heathrow yes, but the article mentions LHR-US flights. |
0 | It's going in the aricle. If Twitter pics of her wedding ring meets the encyclopaedic threshold then so does this. |
0 | "
Dear Mjroots. Your decision came as a shock to me and I really feel disrespected. I have a busy life and all these rules and restrictions you ask me to do are very stressful to me. You should at least bring sound reasons and evidences before banning me. And why indefinitly. It seems to me that you are biased against me. If you see my edits they are usally orientaed towards maintaining the concensus or mediating between different views. I deliberately revert the POV-pushers who break the cionsensus. You better had warned or banned these ""pushers"" very often resembling the Vandalists, who operate with many accounts and sockpoppets. I thought people with sockpoppets should be banned by the rules of Wikipedia. Why didn't you investigate this issue and banned me. This is very amazing. I hope you are gentle enough to respond these questions or lift this unjust ban" |
1 | just like i made you hoes come for me , i can make yall go away 👐✌️ |
0 | The Left Hand
Can anyone point to an article that points to why the tradition of not eating with the left hand has stuck around? I can't imagine the practice of cleaning yourself after the bathroom still is around; if it is, why? I read that there are preferences from Profects that prefer the right hand, but does that condemn the left? I'd like to read the article about the McDonald's campaign that lost sales for big macs due to the image of Ronald McDonald holding the sandwich with both hands. Thanks. |
1 | Green |Red |Desu Desu Desu Desu Desu |Edit this page, and you are a cocksucker ~ Desu |
1 | Fingering N eating the pussy at the same time is good 📋📝 |
0 | "
The harassment, insults, and accusations continue: see the history of this talk page, and this link: where he is still calling me a ""vandal"" and a ""sock"". 193.109.199.35 " |
0 | That's a good suggestion. He seems to be behaving himself at the moment. I'm happy as long as he continues to do so. 86.147.218.231 |
0 | @BigCatCooke deserved victory! Elite8 awaits your Orange army. Sweet16 was no disgrace collegehoops ill be back next time hoosiers |
0 | "::::::::::::You have given overwhelming evidence as to ""why"" the picture is related to homosexuality. You have given no''' evidence as to why it is related to societal attitudes. The picture depicts two people. The image does not relate to societal attitudes in any what at all.
" |
0 | "
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Video. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " |
0 | unsourced biography of a living person which has remained unsourced for years |
0 | The fact that you have indicated you are the author of most of the articles implicitly suggests that you feel you can assert ownership over the pages. I fail to see why it is you refuse to let anyone else provide input - unless it has been vetted and approved of by you. I have emailed Mr. Moon of the ongoing problems. I expect he is going to ask to have the page removed rather than have his career described according to your personal whims. |
0 | "
An entry from appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 3 April, 2007.
" |
1 | Hahaha, fuck you ESA, you worthless pieces of shit. |
1 | "Bleed out hoe!!!" -Alexa |
0 | Why would Kyle Baker, or any gainfully employed, not to mention extremely busy person be doing editting Wikipedia. Which almost leads me to think u have 'fannish' delusions or a lack of touch with deductive abilities. If I were Kyle why would I not supply the necessary credentials for the photo I posted 3 days ago ? Think about that (sigh) |
0 | Tsarinas named Feodorovna
Can some Russian expert explain why the significance of the apparent patronymic Feodorovna which was given to several tsarinas of Russia on their marriage and conversion to Orthodoxy, even though their fathers were not named Feodor. According to the disambiguation pages for Alexandra Feodorovna and Maria Feodorovna, this name was given to TWO tsarinas named Alexandra, most famously the last tsarina whose father's name was Louis, and TWO named Maria, including the second-last tsarina whose father was King Christian IX of Denmark. Why were all four of these tsarinas given the patronymic Feodorovna which seems to imply daughter of Feodor? Who was Feodor?? |
0 | FYI, I have merged the entire contents of this article into semiautomaton. At this time, WP has five distinct articles (e.g. transformation semigroup, transition monoid, state transition system, etc.) all talking about exactly the same thing, all using slightly different notations and language. I'm trying to consolidate/uniformize all of these. If there are objections or comments, please leave them at Talk:Semiautomaton |
1 | Nicca n dis bitch playin games on his phone |
0 | This is not the place for that, take it some-place else. |
0 | Adoption
Hell Suncatcher 13! I wanted to get back to you about adoption. Unfortunately, my work and school schedule does not allow me to spend as much time editing as I would like. I don't think I can really make a commitment to an adoptee. I don't want to go halfway and then quit because of my schedule. I am very sorry to turn you down. If you need any help with questions here and there, I am happy to answer them and should be able to do that in a timely manner. I just don't think I can sign up for a full adoption program. Again, I apologize. I hope to see your edits soon! Cheers! |
0 | This is about you, not about other users. You are very, very fast to apply tu quoque fallacies when you're called on your behaviour. I have advised several editors previously about the recommendations of the above-mentioned essay, and will advise others if I see them engaging in similar behaviour. Please consider the recommendation of Matthew 7:5. |
0 | Cleanup 2008
Is the letter att he bottom really necessary for this article? It looks like a text dump from somewhere, lacks any breaks and is hard to read. While it might be relevent, a link to it would be better. Having it here is not encyclopaedic. 205.157.110.11 |
0 | "
I'd prefer the Broncos image after his career is done, but I like a Dolphins photo currently.►''''''Holla! " |
1 | Wow, what a blatant racist you are. Have you considered therapy? |
1 | my dogs breath smells of contempt
look up order of krill |
0 | I wonder: Do you even read your talk page? You will not turn Shishtavec into an Albanian village by simply deleting all other references to it. |
1 | spring break bitches |
0 | "
Thank you ?
Um... on my talk page, you said ""Thanks for reverting vandalism ''' " |
0 | Hope you don't mind me droppin' by. Was thinkin' you could be interested in this discussion. D - |
0 | Hey this IP belongs to a Public Library in NYC |
0 | "
Date of Establishment?
When was this award established? SECNAVINST 1650.1H gives authorization as ""Navy Department General Order No. 10 of 28 January 1948"". Kerrigan says it was authorized on Jan 22, 1947. The article's infobox currently say's 1946, but gives no source (I believe that's the date of the Army of Occupation Medal's establishment). I'm going to remove the 1946 bit for now. It's possible one date was when the award was created, and a later date is when the details and award criteria were hammered out, but I don't know which is which. " |
0 | "
From your comment, it doesn't look like it. It looks like a standard knee-jerk reaction to something someone doesn't like. However, if that's how things work around here, perhaps there should be a page on how to avoid such problems. btw, what happened to ""first warning"" (and maybe even second)? " |
1 | lmao that bitch saw the camera & looked up at the big screen n then realized💀💀 |
0 | "
Thread at EAR
I was just wondering if your issue got resolved. Let us know either way so that we know whether to archive the thread. Thanks. Adrian M. H. " |
0 | Better quality references
The self-published Vectorsite references need to be replaced with WP:RS ones for the GA review of this article. I'll work on this, but probably need some assistance. Thanks for any help. - |
0 | Daily Closing Values
Does any one know: where can I find daily closing values (and change from the preceding close) of the DJIA going back to 1896? In particular, I am interested to know IF and WHEN the DJIA ever had a daily change of 0.00 points from the preceding day. In other words, were there days in which there was no change at all (0.00 points) between one day and the next? Thanks. ( ) |
0 | Law
| Sir Syed Sultan Ahmed
|-
| Posts and Air
| Sir Mohammad Usman
|-
| Representative at the British War Cabinet and on the Pacific War Council
| Arcot Ramasamy Mudaliar
|-
| Supply
| Sir Homi Mody
|-
| |
1 | Are you suggesting that I should start ass kissing instead? Is that what will get me further? |
0 | From Jihadi streams: Rutba, Anbar Province, Iraq |
0 | "
Symbols and Designs
I noticed that someone has identified by name and possible reference, the symbol on the locker used by Desmond in his underground lair although, I did not see it on his uniform. However, there was also a very unusual design on Desmond's shirt in the ""stadium running"" flashback with Jack, which I've screencapped here:
image:DesmondShirt2.jpg
Can anyone identify what this is, as it was shown repeatedly and clearly in multiple shots while Desmond was holding up Jack's ankle? Is it just me, or does it seem to be reminiscent of the ""Anarcho-punk"" symbol, such as this one: ? There's even what looks like an ""A"", in black, on the right of the design, turned on its side " |
0 | Thankyou. I honestly think that you should soon become an administrator. I would nominate you if i could and if you would like. BTW I think you should archive your talk page pretty soon:) |
0 | cutie in the house
cutie in the house hala |
0 | Voice of The Blank
It was probably not Maddona who voiced The Blank, it does sound an awful lot like Frank Welker, does anyone know for certain who did it? (173.18.28.177 ) |
0 | I can provide proof of detailed involvement with GS Should i need to. Im not challenging his block I want talk page access removed and block extended significantly. |
0 | "
Field hockey
Please stop reverting my edit to field hockey. It is done like that for every multi-sporting event. TalkContributions " |
0 | Again, read George I of Great Britain and George II of Great Britain and you'll see the translation there. As long as they were also Kings of Hannover, a GERMAN state, their names should appear in German too. |
1 | "Get your ass back to Detroit ya fuckin' wigger!" |
1 | Me: My bitch face is on point.
@zzachbarness: That's 24/7.
Thanks |
0 | "
Mariah (October)
S/He is now editing as per a, b and c histories. © ™ (). " |
0 | On a quantum computer it's supposed to be faster and find the global optimum more often. |
0 | As if to make the point, here is a story of a rescue prosecuted by an MH-60G and two MH-53Js during Operation Allied Force. |
0 | "
I'm not sure that your statement on this ""fawning article"" by someone you characterize as a ""conspiracy nut"" is in compliance with WP:NPOV. " |
0 | Morris also cites his own interview with Yirmiya. |
0 | Putin owns the Russian media. Thats all it comes down to. |
0 | Actually, there's no reason why you have to be the bad guy, so I'll block this one. |
1 | Seen Glo eat a twat on stage watching that shit. And get eaten in the middle of a populated concourse, if I ain't mistaken... |
0 | Your adjustment is even worse. I was endeavouring to stop a recurrent fire, and flame-war, not stoke it. Irony is not drama-mongering, quite the opposite. Don't worry, I don't complain formally. But I've taken the hint, permanently. |
0 | The confusion arose because he didn't sign his post.220.253.222.146 |
0 | I wouldn't say its any more ghoulish than listing deaths in the first place. But it is cumbersome. Initiative should always be encouraged, but in this case it was perhaps slightly misplaced. 212.183.134.130 Captain celery |
0 | @simons_lives keep in shape for the ski slopes |
0 | "
request unblock
My IP address is: (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • [ block log])
I need to post on the Request for Arbritation Page." |
0 | , 17 August 2013 (UTC)
No. NPOV, underlies all the arguments that call for following the high quality sources. You're the only one who argues NPOV is irrelevant (that policy is non-negotiable, overrides other policy, and must be followed in every edit). 18:24 |
1 | What they say about Wikipedia is right. It's a mob mentality. I don't give a shit about your rules. I do what is right. What is right is making the edits that correct infactual information. You don't think I'm justified in getting pissed off because some jerk kept reverting 100% VALID EDITS? Seriously wikipedia, you are full of yourself. Etiquette? Secondary. Primary goal is to get articles right and I did that. You are idiots for blocking me but not blocking the editor who kept reverting to infactual information. |
0 | "
—Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs)
The reason why we quote the AMA in the lead is to be able to give an overview of what medical organisations as a general rule, say, and the AMA seems to be the best available source for that, even though it's not perfect. In contrast, if we were to discuss the policy of the AMA, the reader wouldn't have any information at all about other policies. Also, it might come across as rather US-centric. In principle, I guess I'd be willing to go along with it, but I'd have some reluctance, and would find it difficult to defend if anyone were to challenge it in future. Including the words ""stated in 1999"" seems an awful lot simpler... " |
0 | Hello. I am on a public computer where there has been a lot of vandalism by immature kids on my IP address in the past. I would just like to ask that you take this into account, when viewing the addition that I made to Franklin, Wisconsin, Milwaukee County. I, personally, would never vandalize Wikipedia and am just trying to incorporate some information, that is a better depiction of the city, and what it relies around. Thanks! Nick S. |
0 | Support Based on what PatGallacher asserts, I can buy that more people are looking for a three-season TV series than for a just-launched comic strip or a TV episode, which are the only other uses with dedicated articles right now (and none of the other uses appear to be contenders, either). |
0 | I'm Pregnant Charlie Brown! WorstPeanutsSpecialEver |
0 | So far there are 17 tournaments and 7 books AFAIK. I would be much more worried about what will the page look if only the participants are mechanically listed year after year. But at least there´s concensus. It's better to remove all the books than select just some of them. Personally I would keep them. |
0 | "
Nice suggestion about the evolution article! j/k. I think in an article about a controversial topic we should include arguements on both sides of an issue, not based on their silliness/validity, but on their appearance in the debate.
Please understand that gay marriage is a relatively new concept for many of us. I am not opposed to gay marriage. I am actually undecided on whether legally using the label ""marriage"" for gay marriages is a good idea. I am currently leaning towards Marriage privatization, although I'm leary of anything with ""privatization"" in it's name. I can see why everyone might think that I'm some prop 8 troll or something, but I'm not. I was just reading about the topic on here and felt that there were some issues with the article and wanted to contribute. " |
0 | Definition of Web on Internet page
I take issue with the definition of the WWW on the Internet page - a collection of documents? Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that the web is a graphical interface we use to access files on the Internet? Because don't lots of people now say they're going to upload a video to the web, or download a podcast from the web? They don't say they're going to go look at an HTML page with some Ajaxy stuff that allows them to view a video. |
0 | @LanceTHESPOKEN Statement of the Day: Ppl who are even dumber than he is. The ole birds of a feather type of deal. |
0 | " Not my concern...rules are rules.
Hannah Arendt
""In her reporting of the Eichmann trial for The New Yorker, which evolved into Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (1963), she coined the phrase ""the banality of evil"" to describe Eichmann. She raised the question of whether evil is radical or simply a function of banality - the tendency of ordinary people to obey orders and conform to mass opinion without critically thinking about the results of their action or inaction."" (Wikipedia)
The irony of democratic process is that if those who value it do not defend it against the onslaught of fanatics and totalitarians, it will be lostand every step of the way, the eradication of democracy will be accomplished with small, seemingly insignificant actions, justified as within the rules and laws of the democracy being slowly poisoned to death." |
0 | I'm the Daktel troll. Trolling trolls. 69.178.193.40 |
0 | "
Vahe Demirjian, Castro supporters try and erase such things, I am sure this item has been addressed before here and then erase. ""El Jigue"" 3-09-07 " |
Subsets and Splits