Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet
Aspect
stringclasses
7 values
Index
stringlengths
1
3
Question
stringlengths
58
284
P
stringlengths
16
167
I
stringlengths
3
163
C
sequencelengths
1
7
O
stringlengths
77
4.71k
S
stringclasses
4 values
Dataset
stringclasses
3 values
Management of epilepsy in dementia
1
Should patients with dementia and 1 or more seizures after diagnosis be treated with either levetiracetam/lamotrigine or carbamazepine/phenytoin/valproate?
Patients with dementia and 1 or more seizures of undertermined origin after the diagnosis of dementia
Treatment with either levetiracetam or lamotrigin
[ "Treatment with either carbamazepine, phenytoin, valproate" ]
{"Treatment with either carbamazepine, phenytoin, valproate": "1. Serious adverse events\n2. Global cognitive function\n3. ADL\n4. Number of seizures"}
For the present research question and PICO question, we will include RCTs only since it was the opinion of the Task Force, that these types of studies were the only relevant to address these questions.
2020 EAN Dementia
Management of vascular risk factors in dementia
2a
Should patients with dementia (without previous stroke) and atrial fibrillation and indication for treatment with anti-coagulants be treated with anti-coagulants?
Patients with dementia and atrial fibrillation and indication for treatment with anti-coagulants and no previous stroke or TCI
Treatment with NOACs or warfarin
[ "No treatment with NOACs or warfarin" ]
{"No treatment with NOACs or warfarin": "1. Major hemoragic events \n2. Global cognitive function\n3. Mortality\n4. Ischemic vascular event"}
Both observational and RCTs will be included in the analysis.
2020 EAN Dementia
Management of vascular risk factors in dementia
2b
Does systematical management of vascular risk factors in patients with dementia slow the progression of dementia?
Patients with dementia
Systematic management of vascular risk factors (Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus type 2)
[ "Usual care" ]
{"Usual care": "1. Institutionalisation\n2. Global cognitive function\n3. Mortality\n4. ADL"}
Both observational and RCTs will be included in the analysis.
2020 EAN Dementia
Effects of systematic medical follow-up in dementia
3
Should home-living (non-institutionalised) patients with dementia be offered systematic medical follow-up in a memory clinic setting?
Home-living (non-institutionalised) patients with dementia
Planned structured follow-up in the form of consultations offered in a medical dementia specialist team.
[ "Usual care" ]
{"Usual care": "1. Institutionalisation\n2. Caregiver burden\n3. Acute hospital admissions\n4. ADL "}
For the present research question and PICO question, we will include RCTs only since it was the opinion of the Task Force, that these types of studies were the only relevant to address these questions.
2020 EAN Dementia
Treatment with anti-psychotics in dementia
4a
Should patients with dementia and agitation/aggressive behaviour be treated with atypical anti-psychotics compared to no pharmacological treatment?
Patients with dementia and agitation/aggressive behavior
Treatment with aripripazole, zoleptil, olanzapine, quetiapin, risperidone or clozapine
[ " No pharmacological treatment " ]
{" No pharmacological treatment ": "1. Mortality \n2. Agitation/Aggression \n3. Global cognitive function.\n4. Serious adverse events \n5. Caregiver burden"}
We include only RCTs, both on effects of treatment as well as on discontinuation of treatment, since these types of studies are prevalent, and will provide rich data to address this issue.
2020 EAN Dementia
Treatment with anti-psychotics in dementia
4b
Should patients with dementia and agitation/aggressive behaviour be treated with atypical anti-psychotics compared to haloperidol?
Patients with dementia and agitation/aggressive behavior
Treatment with aripripazole, zoleptil, olanzapine, quetiapin, risperidone or clozapine
[ "Haloperidol" ]
{"Haloperidol": "1. Mortality \n2. Agitation/Aggression \n3. Global cognitive function.\n4. Serious adverse events \n5. Caregiver burden"}
We include only RCTs, both on effects of treatment as well as on discontinuation of treatment, since these types of studies are prevalent, and will provide rich data to address this issue.
2020 EAN Dementia
Treatment with anti-psychotics in dementia
4c
Should treatment with antipsychotics be routinely discontinued?
Patients dementia who are currently being treated with anti-psychotics
Discontinuation of antipsychotics
[ "Continuation of treatment" ]
{"Continuation of treatment": "1. Mortality \n2. Neuropsychiatric symptoms\n3. Global cognitive function.\n4. Serious adverse events "}
We include only RCTs, both on effects of treatment as well as on discontinuation of treatment, since these types of studies are prevalent, and will provide rich data to address this issue.
2020 EAN Dementia
Assessment and treatment of pain in dementia
5a
In patients with dementia, should opioids be discontinued?
Patients with dementia who are treated with opioids
Discontinuation of opioid treatment
[ "Continuation of opioid treatment" ]
{"Continuation of opioid treatment": "1. Psychotropic treatment\n2. Global cognitive function\n3. Mortality\n4. Pain\n5. Neuropsychiatric symptoms"}
For the present research questions, both observational studies and RCTs will be included.
2020 EAN Dementia
Assessment and treatment of pain in dementia
5b
Should behavioral symptoms in patients with dementia be treated with mild analgesics?
Patients with dementia and behavioral symptoms
Treatment with mild analgesics (paracetamol)
[ " No treatment with analgesics " ]
{" No treatment with analgesics ": "1. Psychotropic treatment\n2. Global cognitive function\n3. Agitation/aggression\n4. Neuropsychiatric symptoms "}
For the present research questions, both observational studies and RCTs will be included.
2020 EAN Dementia
null
1a
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and low disease activity receive MTX monotherapy or an alternative csDMARD monotherapy?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and low disease activity
MTX monotherapy
[ "HCQ", "SSZ", "LEF" ]
{"SSZ": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Pain (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS 0-100 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)"], "LEF": ["Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
1b
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed and low disease activity receive MTX monotherapy or an alternative csDMARD monotherapy?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA and low disease activity
MTX monotherapy
[ "HCQ", "SSZ", "LEF" ]
{"LEF": ["Disease activity (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
2a
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and moderate to high disease activity receive MTX monotherapy or an alternative csDMARD monotherapy?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and moderate to high disease activity
MTX monotherapy
[ "HCQ", "SSZ", "LEF" ]
{"SSZ": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Pain (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS 0-100 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)"], "LEF": ["Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
2b
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA and moderate to high disease activity receive MTX monotherapy or an alternative csDMARD monotherapy?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA and moderate to high disease activity
MTX monotherapy
[ "HCQ", "SSZ", "LEF" ]
{"SSZ": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Pain (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS 0-100 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)"], "LEF": ["Disease activity (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
3a
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and low disease activity receive csDMARD monotherapy or csDMARD combination (double or triple) therapy?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and low disease activity
csDMARD monotherapy
[ "csDMARD double combination therapy", "csDMARD triple combination therapy" ]
{"csDMARD double combination therapy": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS 44 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.2 based on the EULAR criteria)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22 )", "Pain (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS 0-100 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)"], "csDMARD triple combination therapy": ["Disease activity (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: DAS 44 (Lower values --> benefit)", "Remission (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: DAS 44 <1.6)", "Disability (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values --> benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 3 months)", "Withdrawal due to Adverse events (follow up: 3 months)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
3b
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA and low disease activity receive csDMARD monotherapy or csDMARD combination (double or triple) therapy?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA and low disease activity
csDMARD monotherapy
[ "csDMARD double combination therapy", "csDMARD triple combination therapy" ]
{"csDMARD triple combination therapy": ["Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: DAS 28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR 70)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
4a
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and moderate to high disease activity receive csDMARD monotherapy or combination (double or triple) therapy?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA who have moderate to high disease activity
csDMARD monotherapy
[ "csDMARD double combination therapy", "csDMARD triple combination therapy" ]
{"csDMARD double combination therapy": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS 44 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.2 based on the EULAR criteria)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Pain (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS 0-100 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to Adverse events (follow up: 1 year)"], "csDMARD triple combination therapy": ["Disease activity (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: DAS 44 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.2)", "Remission (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: DAS 44 < 1.6)", "Disability (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 3 months)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 3 months)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
4b
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA and moderate to high disease activity receive csDMARD monotherapy or combination (double or triple) therapy?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA who have moderate to high disease activity
csDMARD monotherapy
[ "csDMARD double combination therapy", "csDMARD triple combination therapy" ]
{"csDMARD double combination therapy": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS 44 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.2 based on the EULAR criteria)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Pain (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS 0-100 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)"], "csDMARD triple combination therapy": ["Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: DAS 28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR 70)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
5a
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and moderate to high disease activity receive MTX monotherapy or boDMARD monotherapy or tsDMARD monotherapy?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and moderate to high disease activity
MTX monotherapy
[ "TNF Inhibitor", "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
{"TNF Inhibitor": ["Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 20 )", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Remission (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: DAS28-ESR <2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6)", "Disability (follow up: range 1 year to 2 years; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Fatigue (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: FACIT-F (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 15.9)", "Pain (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: VAS 0-100 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Quality of life (follow up: range 1 year to 2 years; assessed with: SF-36 PCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 4.4)", "Quality of life (follow up: range 1 year to 2 years; assessed with: SF-36 MCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 3.1)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 2 years)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (2 years)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 2 years)", "Death (follow up: 2 years)", "Malignancy (follow up: 2 years)", "Malignancy (from SRs on harms)", "Cardiovascular disease (from SRs on harms)", "Death (from SRs on harms)"], "Abatacept": ["Remission (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28 - CRP < 2.6)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ - DI ≥ 0.3)", "Serious adverse events (1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Death (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (from SR of harms) ABA vs MTX"], "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values –> benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Remission (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR <2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values –> benefit) (MCID 4.6)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Quality of life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 PCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 4.4)", "Quality of life (1 year) (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 MCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 3.1)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Death (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (follow up: 1 year)", "Myocardial infarction (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (from SRs of harms)", "Serious adverse events (from SRs of harms)"], "JAK Inhibitor": ["Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Remission (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: DAS28-ESR < 2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6)", "Disability (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 2 years)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 2 years)", "Death (follow up: 2 years)", "Malignancy (follow up: 2 years)", "Malignancy (from SRs on harms)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
5b
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA and moderate to high disease activity receive MTX monotherapy or boDMARD monotherapy or tsDMARD monotherapy?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA and moderate to high disease activity
MTX monotherapy
[ "TNF Inhibitor", "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
{"TNF Inhibitor": ["Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 20 )", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Remission (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: DAS28-ESR <2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6)", "Disability (follow up: range 1 year to 2 years; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Fatigue (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: FACIT-F (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 15.9)", "Pain (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: VAS 0-100 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Quality of life (follow up: range 1 year to 2 years; assessed with: SF-36 PCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 4.4)", "Quality of life (follow up: range 1 year to 2 years; assessed with: SF-36 MCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 3.1)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 2 years)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (2 years)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 2 years)", "Death (follow up: 2 years)", "Malignancy (follow up: 2 years)", "Malignancy (from SRs on harms)", "Cardiovascular disease (from SRs on harms)", "Death (from SRs on harms)"], "Abatacept": ["Remission (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-CRP < 2.6)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (≥ 0.3)", "Serious adverse events (1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Death (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (from SR of harms) ABA vs MTX"], "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values –> benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Remission (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR <2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values –> benefit) (MCID 4.6)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Quality of life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 PCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 4.4)", "Quality of life (1 year) (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 MCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 3.1)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Death (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (follow up: 1 year)", "Myocardial infarction (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (from SRs of harms)", "Serious adverse events (from SRs of harms)"], "JAK Inhibitor": ["Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Remission (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: DAS28-ESR < 2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6)", "Disability (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 2 years)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 2 years)", "Death (follow up: 2 years)", "Malignancy (follow up: 2 years)", "Malignancy (from SRs on harms)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
6a
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and moderate to high disease activity receive MTX monotherapy or boDMARD with MTX or tsDMARD with MTX?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and moderate to high disease activity
MTX monotherapy
[ "TNF Inhibitor + MTX", "Abatacept+ MTX", "Rituximab+ MTX", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor+ MTX", "JAK Inhibitor + MTX" ]
{"TNF Inhibitor + MTX": ["Disease activity (follow up: range 6 months to 1 year; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months; assessed with: DAS28 or DAS44 (Lower values -> benefit) (values>0.2 are considered clinically important)", "Remission (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months; assessed with: DAS28<2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6)", "Fatigue (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS fatigue (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.12 to -0.82))", "Pain (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS pain (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Disability (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Quality of Life (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months; assessed with: SF-36 PCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 4.4)", "Quality of Life (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months; assessed with: SF-36 MCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 3.1)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months)", "Death (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months)", "Malignancy (from SRs on harms)"], "Abatacept + MTX": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28 CRP (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.02))", "Remission (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR remission <2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6))", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22))", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 PCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 4.4))", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 MCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 3.1))", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (follow up: 1 year)", "Death (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (from SRs on harms)"], "Rituximab + MTX": ["Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: DAS28 ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Remission (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: DAS28-ESR remission <2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6)", "Pain (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS pain (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Fatigue (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: FACIT-F (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 15.9)", "Disability (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 PCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 4.4)", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 MCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 3.1)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 2 years)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 2 years)", "Malignancy (follow up: 2 years)", "Death (follow up: 2 years)", "Malignancy (from SRs on harms)"], "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor + MTX": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17))", "Remission (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR remission <2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6))", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22))", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 PCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 4.4))", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 MCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 3.1))", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (follow up: 1 year)", "Myocardial infarction (follow up: 1 year)", "Death (follow up: 1 year)", "Serious adverse events (from SRs on harms)", "Malignancy (from SRs on harms)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
6b
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA and moderate to high disease activity receive MTX monotherapy or boDMARD with MTX or tsDMARD with MTX?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA and moderate to high disease activity
MTX monotherapy
[ "TNF Inhibitor + MTX", "Abatacept+ MTX", "Rituximab+ MTX", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor+ MTX", "JAK Inhibitor + MTX" ]
{"TNF Inhibitor + MTX": ["Disease activity (follow up: range 6 months to 2 years; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: range 6 months to 2 years; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: range 6 months to 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR/CRP)", "Remission (follow up: range 6 months to 2 years; assessed with: DAS28-ESR remission <2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: range 6 months to 1 year; assessed with: mTSS)", "Fatigue (follow up: range 1 year to 2 years; assessed with: VAS-F or FACIT-F)", "Pain (follow up: range 1 year to 2 years; assessed with: VAS pain (0-100))", "Disability (follow up: range 6 months to 24 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI)", "Quality of life (follow up: range 1 year to 2 years; assessed with: SF-36 PCS)", "Quality of life (follow up: range 1 year to 2 years; assessed with: SF-36 MCS)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: range 1 year to 2 years)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: range 6 months to 2 years)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: range 6 months to 2 years)", "Cardiovascular disease (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (follow up: range 1 year to 2 years)", "Death (follow up: range 6 months to 2 years)", "Malignancy (from SRs on harms)"], "Abatacept + MTX": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28 CRP (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.02)", "Remission (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR remission <2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 PCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 4.4)", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 MCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 3.1)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (follow up: 1 year)", "Death (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (from SRs on harms)"], "Rituximab + MTX": ["Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: DAS28 ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17))", "Remission (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: DAS28-ESR remission <2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6))", "Pain (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS pain (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9))", "Fatigue (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: FACIT-F (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 15.9))", "Disability (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22))", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 PCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 4.4))", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 MCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 3.1))", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 2 years)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 2 years)", "Malignancy (follow up: 2 years)", "Death (follow up: 2 years)", "Malignancy (from SRs on harms)"], "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor + MTX": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR)", "Remission (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR <2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: mTSS)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI)", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 PCS)", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 MCS)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (follow up: 1 year)", "Myocardial infarction (follow up: 1 year)", "Death (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (from SRs on harms)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
7a
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and moderate to high disease activity receive mono- or combination csDMARDs and short-term (< 3 months) GCs or mono or combination csDMARDs alone?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and moderate to high disease activity
Mono or combination csDMARDs with short-term (< 3 months) GCs
[ "Mono or combination csDMARDs alone (i.e., without short-term GCs)" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
7b
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA and moderate to high disease activity receive mono- or combination csDMARDs and short-term (< 3 months) GCs or mono or combination csDMARDs alone?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA and moderate to high disease activity
Mono or combination csDMARDs with short-term (< 3 months) GCs
[ "Mono or combination csDMARDs alone (i.e., without short-term GCs)" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
8a
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and moderate to high disease activity, receive long-term (≥ 3 months) low dose (≤ 10mg per day) GCs and mono- or combination csDMARDs or mono or combination csDMARDs alone?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs naïve RA and moderate to high disease activity
Mono or combination csDMARDs with long-term (≥ 3 months) low dose (≤ 10mg per day) GCs
[ "Mono or combination csDMARDs alone (i.e. without long-term GCs)" ]
{"mono or combination csDMARDs alone (i.e. without long-term GCs)": ["Disease activity (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: DAS28-ESR)", "Remission (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: DAS28-ESR<2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: Sharp/van der Heijde score)", "Disability (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: HAQ Swedish version)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 2 years)", "Death (follow up: 2 years)", "Death (age-adjusted) (follow up: 10 years)", "Composite Cardiovascular events (age-adjusted) (follow up: 10 years)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
8b
Should patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA and moderate to high disease activity, receive long-term (≥ 3 months) low dose (≤ 10mg per day) GCs and mono- or combination csDMARDs or mono or combination csDMARDs alone?
Patients with MTX-naïve and non-MTX csDMARDs exposed RA and moderate to high disease activity
Mono or combination csDMARDs with long-term (≥ 3 months) low dose (≤ 10mg per day) GCs
[ "Mono or combination csDMARDs alone (i.e. without long-term GCs)" ]
{"mono or combination csDMARDs alone (i.e. without long-term GCs)": ["Disability (follow up: 2 years; assessed with: HAQ)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
9
Should patients with RA initiating MTX receive oral MTX or subcutaneous (SC) MTX?
Patients with RA initiating MTX
Oral MTX
[ "SC MTX" ]
{"SC MTX": ["Disease Activity (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: ACR 20)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
10
Should patients with RA initiating MTX receive MTX at 15mg or more per week (includes up-titrating to 15mg over the first month) or less than 15mg per week as the initial dose?
Patients with RA initiating MTX
MTX < 15mg per week
[ "MTX 15mg per week", "MTX 20 mg per week", "MTX 25mg per week" ]
{"MTX 15mg per week": ["Disease Activity (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: DAS 28-ESR)", "Disability (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 3 months)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 3 months)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
11
Should patients with RA initiating oral MTX receive MTX as a single or split dose (over < 24 hours)?
Patients with RA initiating oral MTX
MTX single dose
[ "MTX split dose" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
12a
Should patients with RA who have not been previously treated with boDMARD and tsDAMRD receive T2T strategies or usual care?
Patients with RA who have not been previously treated with boDMARD and tsDAMRD
T2T strategy
[ "Usual care" ]
{"usual care": ["Remission (follow up: range 6 months to 1.5 years; assessed with: DAS 44 <1.4 and DAS28 ESR <2.6)", "Disease activity (follow up: range 6 months to 1.5 years; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: range 6 months to 1.5 years; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: range 6 months to 1.5 years; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: range 6 months to 1.5 years; assessed with: DAS 44/DAS28 ESR)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: range 1 years to 1.5 years; assessed with: modified Sharp score)", "Disability (follow up: range 1.5 years to 2 years; assessed with: HAQ-DI)", "Quality of life (follow up: 1.5 years; assessed with: SF-12 PCS)", "Quality of life (follow up: 1.5 years; assessed with: SF-12 MCS)", "Pain (follow up: range 1.5 years to 2 years; assessed with: VAS 0-100)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: range 1.5 years to 2 years)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: range 6 months to 1.5 years)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 6 months)", "Cardiovascular disease (follow up: 2 years)", "Death (follow up: mean 1.5 years)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
12b
Should patients with RA who have had an inadequate response to 1 or more bDMARD or tsDAMRD receive T2T strategies or usual care?
Patients with RA who have had an inadequate response to 1 or more bDMARD or tsDAMRD
T2T strategy
[ "Usual care" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
13
In patients with RA receiving T2T, should the treatment goal be low disease activity or remission?
Patients with RA
Treat to low disease activity
[ "Treat to remission" ]
{"treat to remission": ["DAS remission (follow up: 1 year; assessed with DAS44 ≤ 1.6)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with DAS-44 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.2)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
14
In patients with RA planning to receive T2T, should the interval for treatment escalation be 3 months versus less than 3 months after the last DMARD change?
Patients with RA planning to receive T2T
Escalate treatment 3 months or later after the last DMARD change
[ "Escalate treatment less than 3 months after the last DMARD change" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
15
Should patients with RA not tolerating MTX, on folic acid 1 mg/day, increase the dose of folic acid?
Patients with RA not tolerating MTX on 1mg of folic acid
Increase dose of folic acid to > 1mg per day
[ "Remain on folic acid 1 mg per day" ]
{"Remain on folic acid 1 mg per day": ["Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Disability (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI or modified HAQ (Lower values – > benefit) (values>0.2 are considered clinically significant)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
16
Should patients with RA not tolerating oral MTX receive a split dose (over < 24 hours) or subcutaneous (SC) MTX?
Patients with RA not tolerating oral MTX
Split oral MTX
[ "SC MTX" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
17a
Should patients with RA not tolerating MTX, switch to alternative mono or combination csDMARDs, to a boDMARD, or to a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA not tolerating MTX monotherapy (either oral or SC)
Switch to non-MTX mono or combination csDMARDs
[ "Switch to TNF Inhibitor", "Switch to Abatacept", "Switch to Rituximab", "Switch to IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "Switch to JAK Inhibitor", "Continue same management" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
17b
Should patients with RA on maximally tolerated dose of MTX monotherapy who are NOT at target, switch to alternative mono or combination csDMARDs, to a boDMARD, or to a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA on maximally tolerated dose of MTX monotherapy (either oral or SC) who are not at target
Switch to non-MTX mono or combination csDMARDs
[ "Switch to TNF Inhibitor", "Switch to Abatacept", "Switch to Rituximab", "Switch to IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "Switch to JAK Inhibitor", "Continue same management" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
18
Should patients with RA on oral MTX monotherapy 15 mg per week who are NOT at target increase the dose of oral MTX or switch to SC MTX?
Patients with RA on oral MTX monotherapy 15 mg per week who are not at target
Increase the dose of oral MTX
[ "Switch to SC MTX" ]
{"Switch to SC MTX": ["Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disability (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: HAQ)", "Pain (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: VAS 0-10)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
19
Should patients with RA on maximally tolerated dose of MTX monotherapy who are NOT at target add SSZ and HCQ, add LEF, add a boDMARD, or add a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA on maximally tolerated dose of MTX monotherapy (either oral or SC) who are not at target
Add SSZ and HCQ
[ "Add LEF", "Add TNF Inhibitor", "Add Abatacept", "Add Rituximab", "Add IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "Add JAK Inhibitor", "Continue same management" ]
{"add TNF Inhibitor": ["Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Remission (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: DAS28-CRP < 2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6)", "Disability (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Malignancy (from SRs of harms)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
20
Should patients with RA on maximally tolerated dose of LEF monotherapy who are NOT at target, and have previously failed MTX (due to an inadequate response or adverse events), add SSZ and HCQ, or add a boDMARD, or add tsDMARD?
Patients with RA on maximally tolerated dose of LEF monotherapy who are not at target, and have previously failed MTX (due to an inadequate response or adverse events)
Add SSZ and HCQ
[ "Add TNF Inhibitor", "Add Abatacept", "Add Rituximab", "Add IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "Add JAK Inhibitor" ]
{"add TNF Inhibitor": ["Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: ACR70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR)", "Remission (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: DAS28-CRP < 2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: mTSS)", "Disability (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI)", "Malignancy (from SRs of harms)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
21a
Should patients with RA on DMARD(s) who are NOT at target switch to another DMARD versus add a 2nd DMARD?
Patients with RA on non-biologic DMARD(s) who are not at target
Switch to another DMARD
[ "Add another DMARD" ]
{"Add another DMARD": ["Disease activity (follow up: range 4 months to 2 years; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: range 4 months to 2 years; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: range 4 months to 2 years; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: range 4 months to 2 years; assessed with: DAS28 or DAS44 (lower values --> benefit) (values>0.2 are considered clinically important)", "Remission (follow up: range 4 months to 1 year; assessed with: DAS remission < 2.6 )", "Flare (follow up: 1 months)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6)", "Pain (follow up: range 4 months to 12 months; assessed with: VAS pain (0-100) (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Disability (follow up: range 4 months to 2 years; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Fatigue (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: FACIT-F (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 15.9)", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 MCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 3.1)", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: SF-36 PCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 4.4)", "Quality of Life (follow up: range 4 months to 2 years; assessed with: RAQol or EQ-5D VAS (lower values --> benefit) (values>0.2 are considered clinically important)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: range 4 months to 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: range 3 months to 2 years)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: range 3 months to 2 years)", "Malignancy (follow up: range 4 months to 2 years)", "Death (follow up: range 4 months to 2 years)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
21b
Should patients with RA on DMARD(s) who are NOT at target and who are being switched to a second DMARD, have short-term GCs (≤ 3 months) added, long-term GCs (> 3 months) added versus no GCs added?
Patients with RA on DMARD(s) who are not at target and who are being switched to a second DMARD
Add short-term GCs (≤ 3 months)
[ "Add long-term GCs (> 3 months)", "No GCs added" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
21c
Should patients with RA on DMARD(s) who are NOT at target and whom a second DMARD is being added, have short-term GCs (≤ 3 months) added, long-term GCs (> 3 months) added versus no GCs added?
Patients with RA on DMARD(s) who are not at target and whom a second DMARD is being added
Add short-term GCs (≤ 3 months)
[ "Add long-term GCs (> 3 months)", "No GCs added" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
23
Should patients with RA on DMARD(s) requiring GCs to remain at target, add a 2nd DMARD or switch to another DMARD to enable tapering off of GCs?
Patients with RA on DMARD(s) requiring GCs to remain at target
No change to management
[ "Switch to another DMARD", "Add a 2nd DMARD" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
24
Should patients with RA on their first TNF Inhibitor who are NOT at target, switch to a 2nd TNF Inhibitor or switch to a boDMARD targeting a different molecule or to a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA on their first TNF Inhibitor who are not at target
Switch to a 2nd TNF Inhibitor
[ "Switch to Abatacept", "Switch to Rituximab", "Switch to IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "Switch to JAK Inhibitor", "Continue same management" ]
{"Switch to Abatacept": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Remission (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR <2.6)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (MCID -1.17))", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (MCID -0.22))", "Quality of life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: RAQol (MCID 2))", "Pain (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS 0-100 (MCID -11.9))", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (follow up: 1 year)", "Cardiovascular disease (follow up: 1 year)", "Death (follow up: 1 year)"], "Switch to Rituximab": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28 ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Remission (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR <2.6)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Quality of life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: RAQol (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 2)", "Pain (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS 0-100 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Death (follow up: 1 year)", "CVD (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (follow up: 1 year)"], "Switch to IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor": ["Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: DAS 28-ESR)", "Low disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR <3.2)", "Pain (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: VAS 100)", "Disability (follow up: 6 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 6 months)"], "Continue same management": ["Disease activity (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR)", "Remission (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR <2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: Sharp/ van der Heijde)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 4 months)", "Serious adverse events (from SR of harms)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 4 months)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
25
Should patients with RA on their 2nd TNF Inhibitor who are NOT at target, switch to a 3rd TNF Inhibitor or switch to a boDMARD targeting a different molecule or to a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA on their 2nd TNF Inhibitor who are not at target
Switching to a 3rd TNF Inhibitor
[ "Switch to Abatacept", "Switch to Rituximab", "Switch to IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "Switch to JAK Inhibitor", "Continue same management" ]
{"Switch to Abatacept": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Remission (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR <2.6)", "Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Quality of life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: RAQol (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 2)", "Pain (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS 0-100 (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Death (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (follow up: 1 year)", "Cardiovascular disease (follow up: 1 year)", "Serious adverse events (from SR of harms)"], "Switch to Rituximab": ["Disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with DAS 28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Low disease activity (follow up: 6 months; assessed with DAS28 ≤ 3.2)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22 )", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)"], "Continue same management": ["Disease activity (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Remission (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR <2.6)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 4 months; assessed with: Sharp/ van der Heijde (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 4 months)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 4 months)", "Serious adverse events (from SR of harms)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
26
Should patients with RA on their first IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor who are NOT at target, switch to a 2nd IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor or switch to a boDMARD targeting a different molecule or to a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA on their first IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor who are not at target
Switch to a 2nd IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor
[ "Switch to Abatacept", "Switch to Rituximab", "Switch to TNF Inhibitor", "Switch to JAK Inhibitor", "Continue same management" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
27
Should patients with RA on their first JAK Inhibitor who are NOT at target, switch to a 2nd JAK Inhibitor or switch to a boDMARD?
Patients with RA on their first JAK Inhibitor who are not at target
Switch to a 2nd JAK Inhibitor
[ "Switch to Abatacept", "Switch to Rituximab", "Switch to TNF Inhibitor", "Switch to IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "Continue same management" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
28
Should patients with RA on DMARDs who are NOT at target receive IA corticosteroids alone or add/switch DMARDs or IA corticosteroids and add/switch DMARD(s)?
Patients with RA on DMARDs who are not at target
IA steroids
[ "Add/Switch DMARD(s)", "IA steroids and add/switch DMARD(s)" ]
{"add/Switch DMARD(s)": ["Disease activity (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR)", "Disability (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
52
Should patients with RA on DMARDs who are in low disease activity gradually taper off DMARDs, abruptly withdraw DMARDs, or continue DMARDS at the same doses?
Patients with RA on DMARDs who are in low disease activity
Taper off DMARDs (as long as the patient remains on at least one DMARD)
[ "Abruptly withdraw DMARDs (as long as the patient remains on at least one DMARD)", "Continue DMARDs at same doses" ]
{"Abruptly withdraw DMARDs (as long as the patient remains on at least one DMARD)": ["Disease activity (follow up: range 9 months to 12 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR)", "Flare (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: range 9 months to 12 months; assessed with: mTSS)", "Fatigue (follow up: range 9 months to 12 months; assessed with: FACIT-F)", "Quality of Life (follow up: 9 months; assessed with: SF-36 PCS)", "Quality of Life (follow up: 9 months; assessed with: SF-36 MCS)", "Disability (follow up: 12 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI)", "Pain (follow up: 12 months; assessed with: VAS Pain)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 12 months)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: range 9 months to 12 months)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: range 9 months to 12 months)", "Malignancy (follow up: range 9 months to 12 months)", "Death (follow up: 12 months)"], "Continue DMARDs at same doses": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR)", "Flare (follow up: range 11 months to 18 months)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: mTSS)", "Fatigue (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: FACIT-F)", "Pain (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS pain (0-100))", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (follow up: 1 year)", "Death (follow up: 1 year)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
53
Should patients with RA on DMARDs who are in remission gradually taper off DMARDs, abruptly withdraw DMARDs, or continue DMARDS at the same doses?
Patients with RA on DMARDs in remission
Taper off DMARDs (as long as the patient remains on at least one DMARD)
[ "Abruptly withdraw DMARDs (as long as the patient remains on at least one DMARD)", "Continue DMARDs at same doses" ]
{"Abruptly withdraw DMARDs (as long as the patient remains on at least one DMARD)": ["Disease activity (follow up: 9 months; assessed with: ACR 20)", "Disease activity (follow up: 9 months; assessed with: ACR 50)", "Disease activity (follow up: 9 months; assessed with: ACR 70)", "Disease activity (follow up: 9 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Remission (follow up: 9 months; assessed with: DAS28ESR < 2.6)", "Flare (follow up: 12 months)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 9 months; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6)", "Quality of Life (follow up: 9 months; assessed with: SF-36 PCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 4.4)", "Quality of Life (follow up: 9 months; assessed with: SF-36 MCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 3.1)", "Fatigue (follow up: 9 months; assessed with: FACIT-F (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 15.9)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 9 months)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 9 months)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
54a
Should patients with RA on two or more DMARDs who are at target for less than six months withdraw DMARDs or continue DMARDs?
Patients with RA on two or more DMARDs at target for less than six months
Withdraw one DMARD (or more than one DMARD as long as the patient remains on at least one DMARD)
[ "Continue current therapy" ]
{"Continue current therapy": ["Disease activity (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Remission (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: DAS28-ESR <2.6)", "Flare (follow up: range 7 months to 12 months)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: mTSS (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID 4.6)", "Fatigue (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: FACIT-F (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 15.9)", "Pain (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: VAS pain (0-100) (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Disability (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Quality of Life (follow up: 1 year; assessed with: EuroQol-5 (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 0.1)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 1 year)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Malignancy (follow up: 1 year)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
54b
Should patients with RA on two or more DMARDs who are at target for six months and longer withdraw DMARDs or continue DMARDs?
Patients with RA on two or more DMARDs at target for six months and longer
Withdraw one DMARD (or more than one DMARD as long as the patient remains on at least one DMARD)
[ "Continue current therapy" ]
{"Continue current therapy": ["Disease activity (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Flare (follow up: range 11 months to 18 months)", "Disability (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
55
Should patients with RA on DMARDs and low dose GCs (≤ 10mg per day) who are at target taper off or continue low dose GCs?
Patients with RA on DMARDs and low dose GCs (≤ 10mg per day) who are at target
Taper off low dose GCs
[ "Continue low dose GCs" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
56
Should patients with RA on DMARD monotherapy who are in remission gradually taper off DMARD, abruptly withdraw DMARD, or continue DMARD at the same dose?
Patients with RA on DMARD monotherapy who are in remission
Taper off DMARD
[ "Abruptly withdraw DMARD", "Continue DMARD at same dose" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
57
Should patients with RA on DMARD monotherapy who are in low disease activity gradually taper off DMARD, abruptly withdraw DMARD, or continue DMARD at the same dose?
Patients with RA on DMARD monotherapy who are in low disease activity
Taper off DMARD
[ "Abruptly withdraw DMARD", "Continue DMARD at same dose" ]
{"Abruptly withdraw DMARD": ["Relapse (follow up: 1 year; assessed with DAS28 CRP>2.7 )"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
58
Should patients with RA on triple therapy (MTX + SSZ + HCQ) who are at target withdraw (taper off or abruptly stop) MTX or withdraw (taper off or abruptly stop) alternative csDMARDs?
Patients with RA on triple therapy who are at target
Withdraw (taper off or abruptly stop) MTX
[ "Withdraw (taper off or abruptly stop) alternative csDMARDs", "Continue same management" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
59
Should patients with RA on MTX + boDMARD or MTX + tsDMARD who are at target withdraw (taper off or abruptly stop) MTX or withdraw (taper off or abruptly stop) the boDMARD or the tsDMARD?
Patients with RA on MTX + boDMARD or MTX + tsDMARD who are at target
Withdraw (taper off or abruptly stop) MTX
[ "Withdraw (taper off or abruptly stop) the boDMARD or the tsDMARD", "Continue same management" ]
{"Continue same management": ["Disease activity (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Disability (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Quality of life (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: SF-36 PCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 4.4)", "Quality of life (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: SF-36 MCS (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 3.1)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: 3 months)", "Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (follow up: 3 months)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 3 months)", "Death (follow up: 3 months)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
60
Should patients with RA on DMARD monotherapy who are at target lower the dose or increase the interval between doses or continue the DMARD at the same dose?
Patients with RA on DMARD monotherapy in remission
Continue DMARD at the same dose
[ "Lower the dose of the DMARD", "Increase the interval between DMARD doses" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
61
Should patients with RA on MTX + boDMARD or tsDMARD who are at target continue MTX at the same dose or lower the dose of MTX? (boDMARD or tsDMARD continued at same dose)
Patients with RA on MTX + boDMARD or tsDMARD who are at target
Continue MTX at the same dose
[ "Lower the dose of MTX" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
62
Should patients with RA on MTX + boDMARD or tsDMARD who are at target continue the boDMARD or tsDMARD at the same dose or lower the dose or increase the interval between doses of the boDMARD or tsDMARD (MTX continued at same dose)?
Patients with RA on MTX + boDMARD or tsDMARD who are at target
Continue the same dose of the boDMARD or tsDMARD
[ "Lower the dose of the boDMARD or tsDMARD", "Increase the interval between the doses of the boDMARD or tsDMARD" ]
{"lower the dose of the boDMARD or tsDMARD": ["Disease activity (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Flare (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months)", "Radiographic progression (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months; assessed with: Larsen/Sharp (Lower values – > benefit) (values > 0.2 are considered clinically important)", "Fatigue (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months; assessed with: FACIT-F (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 15.9)", "Pain (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months; assessed with: VAS pain (0-100) (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -11.9)", "Disability (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)", "Quality of Life (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months; assessed with: EQ-5D (Higher values – > benefit) (MCID 0.1)", "Withdrawal due to adverse events (follow up: 1 year)", "Serious adverse events (follow up: range 6 months to 12 months)", "Cardiovascular disease (follow up: 6 months)", "Malignancy (follow up: 1 year)", "Death (follow up: 1 year)"], "increase the interval between the doses of the boDMARD or tsDMARD": ["Disease activity (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: DAS28-ESR (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -1.17)", "Flare (follow up: 18 months)", "Disability (follow up: 3 months; assessed with: HAQ-DI (Lower values – > benefit) (MCID -0.22)"]}
null
2021 ACR RA
null
63
Should patients with RA on MTX + boDMARD or tsDMARD who are at target lower the dose of MTX or lower the dose or increase the interval between doses of the boDMARD or tsDMARD?
Patients with RA on MTX + boDMARD or tsDMARD who are at target
Lower the dose of MTX
[ "Lower the dose of the boDMARD or tsDMARD", "Increase the interval between doses of boDMARD or tsDMARD" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
64
Should patients with RA with (progressive) subcutaneous nodules, who are NOT at target and are not on MTX, start MTX or alternative DMARDs?
Patients with RA and (progressive) subcutaneous nodules, who are not at target, are not on MTX
Start MTX
[ "Start alternative csDMARD mono or combination therapy", "Start TNF Inhibitor", "Start Abatacept", "Start Rituximab", "Start IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "Start JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
65
Should patients with RA with (progressive) subcutaneous nodules, who are at target and are on MTX, continue MTX or switch to alternative DMARD(s)?
Patients with RA and (progressive) subcutaneous nodules who are at target and are on MTX
Continue MTX
[ "Switch to alternative csDMARD mono or combination therapy", "Switch to TNF Inhibitor", "Switch to Abatacept", "Switch to Rituximab", "Switch to IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "Switch to JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
66
Should patients with RA who have persistent hypogammaglobulinemia after RTX treatment continue RTX or switch to csDMARD mono or combination therapy or to a boDMARD targeting a different molecule or to a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA who have persistent hypogammaglobulinemia after RTX treatment
Continue RTX
[ "Switch to csDMARD mono or combination therapy", "Switch to TNF Inhibitor", "Switch to Abatacept", "Switch to IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "Switch to JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
67
Should patients with RA who have clinical parenchymal lung disease receive MTX or alternative DMARD(s) for treatment of joint disease?
Patients with RA and parenchymal lung disease
MTX
[ "Alternative csDMARD mono or combination therapy", "TNF Inhibitor", "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
70
Should patients with RA with CHF NYHA class III or IV with inadequate response to csDMARDs add a TNF Inhibitor or a boDMARD targeting a different molecule or a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with CHF class III or IV with inadequate response to csDMARDs
Add TNF Inhibitor
[ "Add Abatacept", "Add Rituximab", "Add IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "Add JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
71
Should patients with RA who are at target on a TNF Inhibitor and who develop CHF continue the TNF Inhibitor or switch to a boDMARD targeting a different molecule or to a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA who are at target on TNF Inhibitor and who develop CHF
Continue TNF Inhibitor
[ "Switch to Abatacept", "Switch to Rituximab", "Switch to IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "Switch to JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
72
Should patients with RA with an inadequate response to csDMARDs, who have had non-melanoma skin cancer, receive a TNF Inhibitor or a boDMARD targeting a different molecule or a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs, who have had non-melanoma skin cancer
TNF Inhibitor
[ "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
73
Should patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs, who have had melanoma, receive a TNF Inhibitor or a boDMARD targeting a different molecule or a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs, who have had melanoma
TNF Inhibitor
[ "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
74
Should patients with DMARD-naïve RA with a previously treated lymphoproliferative disorder, who have low disease activity, receive csDMARDs or RTX?
Patients with DMARD-naïve RA with a previously treated lymphoproliferative disorder, who have low disease activity
csDMARDs
[ "RTX" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
75
Should patients with DMARD-naïve RA who have moderate to high disease activity and a previously treated lymphoproliferative disorder receive csDMARDs or RTX?
Patients with DMARD-naïve RA with a previously treated lymphoproliferative disorder who have moderate to high disease activity
csDMARDs
[ "RTX" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
76
Should patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs and a previously treated lymphoproliferative disorder receive RTX or a boDMARD targeting a different molecule or a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs and a previously treated lymphoproliferative disorder
RTX
[ "Abatacept", "TNF Inhibitor", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
77
Should patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs and a previously treated lymphoproliferative disorder, who are NOT eligible for RTX, receive a boDMARD targeting a different molecule or a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs and a previously treated lymphoproliferative disorder, and who are NOT eligible for RTX
JAK Inhibitor
[ "Abatacept", "TNF Inhibitor", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
78
Should patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARD monotherapy and a remote history (≥ 5 years) of solid organ cancer and no known residual disease receive triple therapy (MTX or LEF + SSZ + HCQ) or a boDMARD or tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARD monotherapy and a remote history of solid organ cancer
Triple therapy (MTX or LEF + SSZ + HCQ)
[ "TNF Inhibitor", "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
79
Should patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARD monotherapy with recently treated (< 5 years) solid organ cancer receive triple therapy (MTX or LEF + SSZ + HCQ) or a boDMARD or tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARD monotherapy and recently treated (< 5 years) solid organ cancer
Triple therapy
[ "TNF Inhibitor", "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
80
Should patients with RA in low disease activity or remission, who are on DMARD(s) and are being treated with a check-point Inhibitor for cancer, stop or continue DMARDs?
Patients with RA in low disease activity or remission on DMARD(s), receiving a check-point Inhibitor for cancer
Stop DMARDs
[ "Continue DMARDs" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
81
Should patients with RA with moderate to high disease activity, who are being treated with a check-point Inhibitor for cancer, receive GCs or DMARDs?
Patients with RA with moderate to high disease activity receiving a check-point Inhibitor for cancer
GCs
[ "csDMARDs", "TNF Inhibitor", "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
82
Should patients with RA and low or very low risk of reactivation of Hepatitis B, who are initiating RTX, undergo frequent monitoring or start prophylactic anti-viral therapy?
Patients with RA and low or very low risk of reactivation of Hepatitis B, who are initiating RTX
Frequent monitoring
[ "Prophylactic anti-viral therapy" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
83
Should patients with RA and low or very low risk of reactivation of Hepatitis B, who are initiating boDMARD or tsDMARD other than RTX, undergo frequent monitoring or start prophylactic anti-viral therapy?
Patients with RA and low or very low risk of reactivation of Hepatitis B, who are initiating boDMARD or tsDMARD other than RTX
Frequent monitoring
[ "Prophylactic anti-viral therapy" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
84
Should patients with RA and moderate to very high risk of reactivation of Hepatitis B, who are initiating boDMARD or tsDMARDs, undergo frequent monitoring or start prophylactic anti-viral therapy?
Patients with RA and moderate to very high risk of reactivation of Hepatitis B, who are initiating boDMARD or tsDMARDs
Frequent monitoring
[ "Prophylactic anti-viral therapy" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
85
Should patients with DMARD-naïve RA and chronic untreated Hepatitis C receive MTX or alternative DMARDs?
Patients with DMARD-naïve RA and chronic untreated Hepatitis C
MTX
[ "Alternative csDMARD mono or combination therapy", "TNF Inhibitor", "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
86
Should patients with RA with an inadequate response to csDMARDs, and who have chronic untreated Hepatitis C, receive a TNF Inhibitor or a boDMARD targeting a different molecule or a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs, and who have chronic untreated Hepatitis
TNF Inhibitor
[ "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
87
Should patients with RA and NAFLD or NASH receive MTX or alternative DMARDs?
patients with DMARD-naïve RA and NAFLD or NASH
MTX
[ "Alternative DMARDs", "TNF Inhibitor", "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
88
Should patients with RA with inadequate response to MTX and/or LEF, who have moderate to high disease activity and a prior serious infection within 3 years, add HCQ and SSZ or a boDMARD or tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with inadequate response to MTX and/or LEF, moderate to high disease activity, and a prior serious infection within 3 years
Add SSZ and HCQ
[ "Add TNF Inhibitor", "Add Abatacept", "Add Rituximab", "Add IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "Add JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
89
Should patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs, who have moderate to high disease activity and a prior serious infection within 3 years, receive abatacept or a boDMARD targeting a different molecule or a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs, moderate to high disease activity, and a prior serious infection within 3 years
Abatacept
[ "TNF Inhibitor", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
90
Should patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs, who have moderate to high disease activity and a prior serious infection within 3 years, receive low dose GCs (≤ 10mg per day) or a boDMARD or tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs, moderate to high disease activity, and a prior serious infection within 3 years
Low dose GCs (≤ 10mg/day)
[ "TNF Inhibitor", "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
91
Should patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs, who have moderate to high disease activity and a prior serious infection within 3 years, on low dose GCs (≤ 10mg per day), receive GCs 11-20mg per day or a boDMARD or tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs, moderate to high disease activity, a prior serious infection within 3 years, and on low dose GCs (≤10mg per day)
GCs 11-20mg per day
[ "TNF Inhibitor", "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
92
Should patients with RA with inadequate response to MTX and/or LEF, who have moderate to high disease activity and are on treatment for MAC, add HCQ and SSZ or a boDMARD or tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with inadequate response to MTX and/or LEF, moderate to high disease activity, on treatment for MAC
Add SSZ and HCQ
[ "TNF Inhibitor", "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
93
Should patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs, who have moderate to high disease activity and are on treatment for MAC, receive a TNF Inhibitor or a boDMARD targeting a different molecule or a tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs, moderate to high disease activity, on treatment for MAC
TNF Inhibitor
[ "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
null
94
Should patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs, who have moderate to high disease activity and are on treatment for MAC, receive low dose GCs (≤ 10mg per day) or a boDMARD or tsDMARD?
Patients with RA with inadequate response to csDMARDs, moderate to high disease activity, on treatment for MAC
GCs ≤ 10mg per day
[ "TNF Inhibitor", "Abatacept", "Rituximab", "IL-6 Receptor Inhibitor", "JAK Inhibitor" ]
null
null
2021 ACR RA
Evaluation of CKD
a1
What is the diagnostic and prognostic benefit and safety of kidney biopsy among people with CKD?
Adults and/or children with suspected or diagnosed CKD
Native kidney biopsy
[ "Clinical or standard diagnosis or prognosis for studies evaluating diagnostic or prognostic benefit; No comparator for studies evaluating safety" ]
{"Clinical or standard diagnosis or prognosis for studies evaluating diagnostic or prognostic benefit; No comparator for studies evaluating safety": ["Mortality", "Perirenal hematoma", "Retroperitoneal hemorrhage"]}
null
2024 KDIGO CKD
Evaluation of CKD
a2
What is the diagnostic accuracy of Estimated GFR (eGFR) based on measurements of cystatin C, creatinine, or their combination compared to mGFR among people with and without CKD?
Adults and/or children with or without CKD
Estimated GFR (eGFR) based on measurements of cystatin C (eGFRcys); creatinine (eGFRcr); cystatin C and creatinine (eGFRcr-cys)
[ "Measured GFR (mGFR; using urinary or plasma clearance of exogenous filtration marker)" ]
{"Measured GFR (mGFR; using urinary or plasma clearance of exogenous filtration marker)": ["Measurement bias (eGFR - mGFR) for cystatin C-based equations", "Measurement bias (eGFR - mGFR) for creatinine + cystatin-based equations", "Measurement bias (eGFR - mGFR) for creatinine-based equations", "P30 for cystatin C-based equations", "P30 for creatinine + cystatin C-based equations", "P30 for creatinine-based equations"]}
null
2024 KDIGO CKD
Delaying CKD progression and managing its complications
b1
What is the effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) compared with placebo, usual care, or an active comparator among people with CKD in terms of mortality, progression of CKD, complications of CKD, and adverse events?
Adults and/or children with CKD; subgroup of people (1) with type 2 diabetes (T2D), (2) without T2D, (3) with heart failure, and (4) without albuminuria
SGLT2i (canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, ertugliflozin, ipragliflozin, luseogliflozin, remogliflozin, sotagliflozin, tofogliflozin)
[ "Active comparator (e.g., another glucose-lowering agent), placebo, or usual care" ]
{"Active comparator (e.g., another glucose-lowering agent), placebo, or usual care": ["Kidney failure", "All-cause hospitalizations"]}
null
2024 KDIGO CKD
Delaying CKD progression and managing its complications
b2
What is the effect of uric acid–lowering therapy compared with placebo, usual care, or an active comparator among people with CKD and hyperuricemia in terms of mortality, progression of CKD, complications of CKD, and adverse events?
Adults and/or children with CKD and asymptomatic hyperuricemia
Uric acid-lowering therapy (ULT; allopurinol, benzbromarone, febuxostat, oxipurinol, pegloticase, probenecid, topiroxostat, rasburicase, sulfinpyrazone, lesinurad)
[ "Active comparator (e.g., another uric acid–lowering therapy), placebo, or usual care" ]
{"Active comparator (e.g., another uric acid–lowering therapy), placebo, or usual care": ["Progression of CKD to kidney failure (follow-up: range 3 months to 12 months)", "Cutaneous reactions and hypersensitivity (follow-up: mean 3 months)", "Hepatotoxicity (follow-up: range 3 months to 12 months)"]}
null
2024 KDIGO CKD
Delaying CKD progression and managing its complications
b3
What is the effect of uric acid–lowering therapy compared with placebo, usual care, or an active comparator among people with CKD and hyperuricemia in terms of mortality, progression of CKD, complications of CKD, and adverse events?
Adults and/or children with CKD and hyperuricemia with subgroups for symptomatic and asymptomatic hyperuricemia
Uric acid-lowering therapy (ULT; allopurinol, benzbromarone, febuxostat, oxipurinol, pegloticase, probenecid, opiroxostat, rasburicase, sulfinpyrazone, lesinurad)
[ "Active comparator (e.g., another uric acid–lowering therapy), placebo, or usual care" ]
{"Active comparator (e.g., another uric acid–lowering therapy), placebo, or usual care": ["Progression of CKD to kidney failure (follow-up: range 12 months to 84 months)", "Cutaneous reactions and hypersensitivity (follow-up: range 3 months to 41 months)", "Hepatotoxicity (follow-up: range 3 months to 25 months)"]}
null
2024 KDIGO CKD
Delaying CKD progression and managing its complications
b4
What is the effect of aspirin compared with placebo in terms of the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and safety among people with CKD?
Adults and/or children with CKD at risk for CVD (i.e., people must not have established CVD)
Aspirin
[ "Placebo" ]
{"Placebo": ["Cardiovascular mortality (follow-up: range 3.8 years to 5.4 years)", "Composite cardiovascular events (follow-up: range 3.8 years to 5.4 years)", "Myocardial infarction (follow-up: range 3.8 years to 5.4 years)", "Stroke (follow-up: range 3.8 years to 5.4 years)", "Major bleeding (follow-up: range 3.8 years to 5.4 years)", "Minor bleeding (follow-up: range 3.8 years to 5.4 years)"]}
null
2024 KDIGO CKD
Delaying CKD progression and managing its complications
b5
What are the effects of angiography or coronary revascularization compared with medical treatment among people with CKD and ischemic heart disease in terms of mortality, CVD events, kidney failure, and acute kidney injury (AKI)?
Adults and/or children with CKD and ischemic heart disease
Angiography or coronary revascularization
[ "Medical treatment" ]
{"Medical treatment": ["All-cause mortality (follow-up: range 2 years to 10 years)", "Cardiovascular mortality (follow-up: range 4.6 years to 5.6 years)", "Composite cardiovascular events (follow-up: range 2 years to 10 years) ", "Myocardial infarction (follow-up: range 2 years to 10 years)", "Heart failure (follow-up: range 3 years to 5.6 years)", "Acute kidney injury (follow-up: range 3 years to 5.6 years)"]}
null
2024 KDIGO CKD
Delaying CKD progression and managing its complications
b6
What are the effects of non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (also known as direct-acting oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) with or without warfarin compared with placebo or warfarin alone among people with CKD and atrial fibrillation in terms of stroke and bleeding risks?
Adults and/or children with CKD and atrial fibrillation
NOAC/DOAC (dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) with warfarin and NOAC/DOAC alone
[ "Warfarin, placebo" ]
{"Warfarin, placebo": ["Any stroke (follow-up: range 1.9 years to 2.8 years)", "Ischemic stroke (follow-up: range 1.8 years to 2.8 years)", "Hemorrhagic stroke (follow-up: range 1.9 years to 2.8 years)"]}
null
2024 KDIGO CKD
Delaying CKD progression and managing its complications
b7
What are the effects of non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (also known as direct-acting oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) with or without warfarin compared with placebo or warfarin alone among people with CKD and atrial fibrillation in terms of stroke and bleeding risks?
Adults and/or children with CKD and atrial fibrillation
NOAC/DOAC (dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) with warfarin and NOAC/DOAC alone
[ "Warfarin, placebo" ]
{"Warfarin, placebo": ["Intracranial hemorrhage (follow-up: range 1.9 years to 2.8 years)", "Major bleeding (factor Xa inhibitors) (follow-up: range 6 months to 2.8 years)", "Major bleeding (factor IIa inhibitors) (follow-up: median 1.8 years)", "Clinically-relevant non-major bleeding (follow-up: range 1.9 years to 2.5 years)"]}
null
2024 KDIGO CKD

Q2CRBench-3

Q2CRBench-3 is a benchmark dataset designed to evaluate the performance of LLM in generating clinical recommendations. It is derived from the development records of three authoritative clinical guidelines: the 2020 EAN guideline for dementia, the 2021 ACR guideline for rheumatoid arthritis, and the 2024 KDIGO guideline for chronic kidney disease.

Clinical Questions Search Strategies Screened Records Evidence Profiles
2020 EAN Dementia
2021 ACR RA
2024 KDIGO CKD

Table 1.Coverage of Data Components in Q2CRBench-3.

Due to copyright restrictions, we are unable to provide the screened records from the 2020 EAN Dementia and 2021 ACR RA datasets directly. However, you can reproduce them by applying the corresponding search strategies. We separate evidence profiles into Outcome and Paper two parts, you can assess its raw data version in Quicker Repository if necessary.

More details can be find:

Downloads last month
192