everyone,I'm the systems admin for the Electronic Frontier Foundation and I'm using razor running under spam assassin there and one my own personal server. Generally it works fine with near 0 false positives - except - that almost all the false positives I've seen are on messages that originated at EFF.So - I am wondering why RAZOR is catching EFF email and how is this happening. Below is an example of what I'm talking about.---------------------------------Envelope-to: pcn@virtualrecordings.com X-Sender: robin@mail.eff.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 To: eff-ip@eff.org From: Robin Gross Subject: [E-IP] HP backs off DMCA threat - CNET.com Sender: eff-ip-admin@eff.org X-BeenThere: eff-ip@eff.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Intelectual Property List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 10:15:12 -0700 Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 10:15:12 -0700 tests=MAILTO_LINK,RAZOR_CHECK version=2.40 2002/07/29 16:25:10 jmason Exp $) SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ---------------------- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. SPAM: SPAM: Content analysis details: (7.1 hits, 5 required) SPAM: MAILTO_LINK (0.1 points) BODY: Includes a URL link to send an email SPAM: RAZOR_CHECK (7.0 points) Listed in Razor, see http://razor.sourceforge.net/ SPAM: SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results --------------------- X-Spam: [SPAM] - Spam Assassinhttp://news.com.com/2100-1023-947740.htmlDocument: HP backs off DMCA threatBy CNET News.com Staff August 1, 2002, 6:10 PM PTHewlett-Packard Thursday abandoned legal threats it made against security analysts who publicized flaws in the company's software.In a statement released late Thursday, HP said it would not use the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), a controversial copyright law, to pursue a loosely-organized team of researchers who demonstrated a bug in the company's Tru64 Unix operating system.The following is the company's statement:1) HP is committed to protecting our customer's security environments.2) We have verified that there is a security vulnerability with Tru64 UNIX, the details of which were brought to our attention July 18. The problem has now been isolated and HP has been preparing a fix, which will be available within the next 48 hours.3) We won't comment on the specifics of our discussions with SnoSoft. However, we take our customers' security requirements very seriously and have a strong track record following industry-standard security practices.4) Where and how the DMCA should be applied is a matter of great controversy. The reported letter to SnoSoft was not consistent or indicative of HP's policy. We can say emphatically that HP will not use the DMCA to stifle research or impede the flow of information that would benefit our customers and improve their system security.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Robin D. Gross - Cyberspace Attorney @ Law - Intellectual Property Director - Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression (CAFE) Electronic Frontier Foundation 454 Shotwell Street, San Francisco, CA 94110 e: robin@eff.org w: http://www.eff.org p: 415.863.5459 f: 415.436.9993 http://www.eff.org/cafe http://www.eff.org/IP/Open_licenses ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users