[Guido]
> There seem to be two "drivers" for the classifier now: Neale Pickett's
> hammie.py, and the original GBayes.py.  According to the README.txt,
> GBayes.py hasn't been kept up to date.It seemed that way to me when I ripped the classifier out of it -- I don't
think anyone has touched it after.> Is there anything in there that isn't covered by hammie.py?Someone else will have to answer that (I don't use GBayes or hammie, at
least not yet).> About the only useful feature of GBayes.py that hammie.py doesn't (yet)
> copy is -u, which calculates spamness for an entire mailbox.  This
> feature can easily be copied into hammie.py.That's been done now, right?> (GBayes.py also has a large collection of tokenizers; but timtoken.py
> rules, so I'm not sure how interesting that is now.)Those tokenizers are truly trivial to rewrite from scratch if they're
interesting.  The tiny spam/ham collections in GBayes are also worthless
now.  The "self test" feature didn't do anything except print its results;
Tester.py since became doctest'ed and verifies that some basic machinery
actually delivers what it's supposed to deliver.> Therefore I propose to nuke GBayes.py, after adding a -u feature.+1 here.> Anyone against?