>Anyway I'm making good progress and my implementation works reasonably
>well.  It now seems blindingly clear that we want a tightly-integrated
>implementation of Naive Bayes spam/nonspam classification.  There are
>still some things about how to do this right inside SA that I still am
>figuring out.
>
>DanThis is very good news! Will this allow for individual spam word file
preferences when spamassassin is running on a mailserver for multiple
users? This would be an outstanding addition if it can be done. Thanks
much for a great project.-- 
Regards,Eric Mings Ph.D.-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
