> Ouch ;-)  Although I'm not ready to give up razor just yet, I'd like to
> see a pyzor check in SA.  I don't think it even needs to be written in
> perl.  SA is actually calling razor-check and razor-report as well as
> dccproc for those checks so it should be nothing more than duplication
> of coding to add pyzor.I don't know from Pyzor, but I've always thought that the way services like
Razor and DCC could be truly useful is if there were a bunch of different
ones. We can assign them scores based on how trustworthy each one is, and
when a message is listed in multiple services you can pretty much trust that
it's spam.--
Michael Moncur  mgm at starlingtech.com  http://www.starlingtech.com/
"Mustard's no good without roast beef." --Chico Marx-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
