<link href=notaverb.css rel=stylesheet><title>
   Login
  </title><body><h1>"Login" Is Not a Verb</h1> Despite what many people --mostly in the computer field-- think, "login" is not a verb. It's simply not. Whether or not "login" is a word at all may spark a debate in some circles, but assuming it is then it may act as many parts of speech, but not as a verb. <p>I will repeat the important part for clarity: "login" is <i> not </i> a verb. It's simply not.<p>This site is dedicated to educating people about the common misuses of words like "login." It is meant for both non-native speakers who may not know any better, and for native speakers who <i> should </i> know better but don't. It is in no way a substitute for a real education. Poor grammar is an excellent way to make any presentation sound stupid --or program look sloppy-- so if you intend to use this language much then it behooves you to learn it properly.<p>For clarity, I need to point out that this has nothing to do with verbification, or "verbing." It is completely natural for nouns to become verbs and verbs to become nouns; the problem this site addresses is the <i> manner </i> in which that happens for a particular category of word or phrase. This is not an attempt to arrest the evolution of the language, but to correct mistakes. <a name=verbs> </a><h2><a name=verbs> About Verbs </a></h2><a name=conjugation> <h3>Conjugation</h3> </a> It is possible to conjugate verbs. They can change tense and mood. They can change number and person. You will see how even basic conjugation fails for "login." <p><a name=conjugate> </a><h4><a name=conjugate> Verb: "Conjugate" </a></h4> Here are some examples with the verb "conjugate." If you doubt that "conjugate" is a verb (or need to look up what it means), definitions from <a href=http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=conjugate> dictionary.com </a> and <a href=http://webster.com/dictionary/conjugate> Merriam-Webster </a> agree. Note that, as with many verbs, noun forms exist. Here we're using the verb form. <p><div class=right><table border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tbody><tr><th><th colspan=2>Singular<th> <th colspan=2>Plural<tr><th>Person<th>Pronoun<th>Verb<th> <th>Pronoun<th>Verb<tr><td>1 <sup> st </sup><td>I<td>conjugate<th> <td>we<td>conjugate<tr><td>2 <sup> nd </sup><td>you<td>conjugate<th> <td>you [all]<td>conjugate<tr><td>3 <sup> rd </sup><td>he/she/it<td>conjugates<th> <td>they<td>conjugate</table></div><p>Conjgate is a regular verb, so the present tense is simple. Consider the past tense:<p><div class=right><table border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tbody><tr><th><th colspan=2>Singular<th> <th colspan=2>Plural<tr><th>Person<th>Pronoun<th>Verb<th> <th>Pronoun<th>Verb<tr><td>1 <sup> st </sup><td>I<td>conjugated<th> <td>we<td>conjugated<tr><td>2 <sup> nd </sup><td>you<td>conjugated<th> <td>you [all]<td>conjugated<tr><td>3 <sup> rd </sup><td>he/she/it<td>conjugated<th> <td>they<td>conjugated</table></div><p>The past tense is easy to form with a weak verb like "conjugate." This is normal behavior for a verb. English has more complicated verbs, like irregular and strong verbs, but those are generally the oldest verbs in the language. New verbs are regular and weak.<p><h4>Verb: "Login" (?)</h4> As a new verb, "login" should follow the regular, weak model that "conjugate" exemplifies. Unfortunately, it does not: <p><div class=right><table border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tbody><tr><th><th colspan=2>Singular<th> <th colspan=2>Plural<tr><th>Person<th>Pronoun<th>Verb<th> <th>Pronoun<th>Verb<tr><td>1 <sup> st </sup><td>I<td>login<th> <td>we<td>login<tr><td>2 <sup> nd </sup><td>you<td>login<th> <td>you [all]<td>login<tr><td>3 <sup> rd </sup><td>he/she/it<td><span class=wrong> logins </span><th> <td>they<td>login</table></div><p>Notice the problem with the third person singular. However, let's choose to ignore this problem for now. After all, we can't let one little conjugation problem make thousands of programmers and technical writers look like fools. Plowing right ahead, we'll look at the past tense:<p><div class=right><table border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tbody><tr><th><th colspan=2>Singular<th> <th colspan=2>Plural<tr><th>Person<th>Pronoun<th>Verb<th> <th>Pronoun<th>Verb<tr><td>1 <sup> st </sup><td>I<td><span class=wrong> logined </span><th> <td>we<td><span class=wrong> logined </span><tr><td>2 <sup> nd </sup><td>you<td><span class=wrong> logined </span><th> <td>you [all]<td><span class=wrong> logined </span><tr><td>3 <sup> rd </sup><td>he/she/it<td><span class=wrong> logined </span><th> <td>they<td><span class=wrong> logined </span></table></div><p>Unfortunately, not a single one of those sounds right. It seems that "login" can't change tense or conjugate like a normal verb. <a name=strong> </a><h3><a name=strong> A Strong Verb? </a></h3> Many older verbs are strong verbs, meaning they change tense by modifying an internal vowel or diphthong. As you will see, it doesn't behave like a strong verb, either. Compare the above behavior to the strong verb "sing:" <p><div class=right><table border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tbody><tr><th>Present<th> <th>Past<tr><td>I sing<th> <td>I sang<tr><td>I run<th> <td>I ran<tr><td>I meet<th> <td>I met</table></div> See how the strong verb forms its past participle by changing an internal vowel (instead of adding "ed" at the end, for example). "Login" does not do that, so it's not a strong verb. <p><a name=separate> </a><h3><a name=separate> A Separate Verb? </a></h3> Some grammarians will call this a "phrasal" or "two-part" verb, but this is mostly because some grammarians are seeking tenure at their university posts and must publish anything they can to get or keep that coveted teaching spot. Similar motivation has created definitions for "compound verbs" and "stretched verbs" --all different kinds of verbs, supposedly. Essentially, though, a two-part verb must have two parts and login only has one. The following list of login's component parts demonstrates this fact. <ol><li><b> Part 1: </b> login<li><b> Part 2: </b></ol> Having only one part, login cannot be a two-part verb. <a name=behavior> <h3>True Behavior</h3> </a> Someone may make the case that it is irregular. By definition, irregular verbs do not follow rules and have strange conjugations ("I am," "you are," "he is"), but look at how it behaves: <p><div class=right><table border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tbody><tr><th><th colspan=2>Singular<th> <th colspan=2>Plural<tr><th>Person<th>Pronoun<th>Verb<th> <th>Pronoun<th>Verb<tr><td>1 <sup> st </sup><td>I<td>log in<th> <td>we<td>log in<tr><td>2 <sup> nd </sup><td>you<td>log in<th> <td>you [all]<td>log in<tr><td>3 <sup> rd </sup><td>he/she/it<td>logs in<th> <td>they<td>log in</table></div><p>The past tense is also predictable:<p><div class=right><table border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tbody><tr><th><th colspan=2>Singular<th> <th colspan=2>Plural<tr><th>Person<th>Pronoun<th>Verb<th> <th>Pronoun<th>Verb<tr><td>1 <sup> st </sup><td>I<td>logged in<th> <td>we<td>logged in<tr><td>2 <sup> nd </sup><td>you<td>logged in<th> <td>you [all]<td>logged in<tr><td>3 <sup> rd </sup><td>he/she/it<td>logged in<th> <td>they<td>logged in</table></div> It appears the verb is "log," which behaves like a regular weak verb (doubling the final consonant is normal: sag => sagged, dip => dipped) in both American and English. The verb form is not a verb at all, but an idiom of a verb and a preposition, like "break down" or "shake up." In fairness to some grammarians, this kind of idiom sometimes has the name "phrasal verb" or "two-part verb." It's true that most idioms of this kind use strong verbs, since they come from Old Norse influence on the language over a thousand years ago. That makes the "log in" idiom unusual, but far more plausible than pretending that we have an irregular verb "login" with something like "logdin" as a past participle. No other verb in the American language behaves that way. Even in the arcane, deprecated predecessor of American (English), no verb behaves that way. <a name=what> <h2>What is it?</h2> </a> As I indicated earlier, I'm sure you can find purists who will argue "login" is not a word at all. For the sake of discussion, I will assume it is a word because I do not care one way or another. Let's look at some possibilities: <a name=adjective> <h3>Adjective</h3> </a> Adjectives describe nouns. Let's put "login" with some other adjectives ("stupid" and "alabaster") to see how well they play with each other: <div>The cat is stupid. It is a stupid cat. <br> The cat is alabaster. It is an alabaster cat. <br><span class=wrong> The book is login. It is a login book </span> . <br></div> "Login" doesn't work well as an adjective. <a name=adverb> <h3>Adverb</h3> </a> Adverbs are to verbs what adjectives are to nouns. Adverbs describe verbs (or, more accurately, the verb actions). Here are some sentences with adverbs. See if you can tell which does not belong: <div>The car runs smoothly. <br> The car runs quietly. <br> The car runs <span class=wrong> <strike> login </strike> login </span> . <br></div> "Login" doesn't work well as an adverb. <a name=noun> <h3>Noun</h3> </a> Any fourth grader will tell you that a noun is a "person, place, or thing." As such, it is something you can have and something you can modify. Behold as I use my language powers to display ownership of the noun "book" and then modify it: <p><div class=right><table border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tbody><tr><th>Owned<td>I have a book.<tr><td> <td> <tr><th>Modified<td>I have a secret book.</table></div><p>I own the book, then make it a secret book. Truly, that is grand. Now I will do the same for "login."<p><div class=right><table border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tbody><tr><th>Owned<td>I have a login.<tr><td> <td> <tr><th>Modified<td>I have a secret login.</table></div><p>"Login," it seems, works as a noun. <a name=conclusion> </a><h2><a name=conclusion> Conclusion </a></h2> Clearly "login" is not a verb. It's simply not. If it is any part of speech at all, it is a noun. While we did not explore every possible part of speech, we saw with certainty that "login" is not a verb. It's simply not. <p>If you take only one thing away from this page, take that one fact: "login" is not a verb. Educate others. Correct manuals, software, and web pages as you find them. Tell everyone you know that "login" is not a verb. You will make a pedant (me) happy. You will earn the respect of grammar nazis. Most importantly, you will know the truth. <a name=solutions> </a><h3><a name=solutions> Solutions </a></h3> Magnanimousness demands that I offer solutions, or correct forms of some of the common abuses of "login" Here are some suggestions, assuming you prefer to use "login" as a word rather than take a more conservative approach and insist the proper form is "log in" or "log-in." <p><div class=right><table border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tbody><tr><th>Common Misuse<th>Correction<tr><td><span class=\"wrong\"> Can you login? </span><td>Can you log in?<tr><td><span class=\"wrong\"> I tried to login . . . . </span><td>I tried to log in . . . .<tr><td>Enter your name at the login prompt.<td><i> (This is acceptable) </i><tr><td><span class=\"wrong\"> Please login again. </span><td>Please log in again.</table></div><h3>What Next</h3> What you do with this information is, of course, your choice. As I mentioned above, however, the ideal choice is to use this knowledge for good and correct errors. The more correct examples people see, the more people will stop believing the lie that this is a verb. <p>You can also continue your education by learning about <a href=http://notaverb.com/badbad_verbs> other words that are not verbs </a> .<p>For entertainment you can read <a href=voltron_verbs.html> a sarcastic rebuttal </a> to the argument that login really is a verb and the language simply has evolved.<hr><center> © 2006 - 2021 notaverb.com <br> Link, quote, reference, and share freely. Be a grown-up and give credit, though. <p>Thanks to Mark Pettit for the corrections to the "checkout" page. <br> Thanks to Nathanial Jones for the <a href=http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/630/01/> observation of phrasal verbs </a> . <br> Thanks to someone whose email I deleted before I could record his name for his suggestion to add a note on prepositions. <br> Thanks to John Goodman for the correction on "carryout" in the index. <br> Thanks to several people on <a href=http://www.metafilter.com/93147/Clearly-login-is-not-a-verb-Its-simply-not> MetaFilter </a> for observing I need to clarify that the site is not about "verbing," just about correct use of a word/phrase. <br> Thanks to Andrew Dunbar for slowdown and splashdown.</p> </center>