re : my order is actually future p \ l based . if it wasn ' t in enron n . a . i would put calger way higher . ie - if it was pulp and paper and i knew that we wouldn ' t have the opportunity to trade size , chris would be in the top 3 . maybe 1 . but in this market we need to have the people who can make over 100 mm every year . just thinking . - - - - - original message - - - - - from : kitchen , louise sent : sat 10 / 13 / 2001 11 : 58 am to : lavorato , john cc : subject : re : i didn ' t get a copy of dave ' s email but a few comments and i attach a compromise ordering . i added to your file schoolyard . our differences are : me - don miller , joe deffner , chris foster you - zipper , ermis , aucoin i would put them all ahead of bernie however i have no data points apart from p & l on nothing with frank so i can ' t comment on him . . not huge differences in order , apart from your slant on canadians ! the main issue with yours is calger behind benson and zufferli ( and even maybe dana ) , he ' s a future leader of this organisation . your ordering is very p & l based . are we supposed to cover wes or will causey ? i added to your file schoolyard . speak to you later . louise belden arnold presto shively sturm swerzbin calger davis , dana benson milnthorp zufferli herndon motley davies martin grigsby tycholiz richter black luce allen devries wiggs duran storey arora zipper foster ermis or miller gonzales - - - - - original message - - - - - from : lavorato , john sent : saturday , october 13 , 2001 9 : 56 am to : kitchen , louise subject : i think we have 3 that are on my list and not on yours . we have big differences in order . i ' m very concerned about this process . i ' ll send you dave ' s email and you might understand why . call me or resend me an email . john