
"Craig R.Hughes" said:> The GA run on the current corpus is yielding an average (mean) 
> score for false-positives of about 10 points, which is higher 
> than before.  There's some tweaking to be done yet (rule 
> elimination and such), so that will likely fall, but -15 might 
> not be enough of a correction in many situations.  I will set 
> the scores for the Habeas stuff and the Ironport stuff to be 
> sensible given:
> 
> a) estimated likeliness of compliance with Habeas/Bonded sender 
> rules, and
> b) score correction level needed to achieve purposes of those projects.Using the score-ranges stuff and my aggressive anti-FP evaluation code,
BTW, yielded an average FP of 5.7 points, with 0.67% FPs and 96.57%
overall accuracy -- but I notice you went back to the other method.
Just pointing this out ;)--j.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk