IMO-Steps / imo_proofs /imo_1984_p6.lean
roozbeh-yz's picture
Upload 42 files
1c3ffd8 verified
import Mathlib
set_option linter.unusedVariables.analyzeTactics true
open Nat
lemma mylemma_sub_sq
(a b : β„•)
(hβ‚€: b < a) :
((a - b) ^ 2 = a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 - 2 * a * b) := by
have h₁: b^2 ≀ a * b := by
rw [pow_two]
refine Nat.mul_le_mul_right ?_ ?_
exact Nat.le_of_lt hβ‚€
have hβ‚‚: a * b ≀ a ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two]
refine Nat.mul_le_mul_left ?_ ?_
exact Nat.le_of_lt hβ‚€
repeat rw [pow_two]
repeat rw [Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib]
repeat rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib a b a]
rw [Nat.sub_right_comm]
repeat rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib a b b]
ring_nf
have h₃: a ^ 2 - (a * b - b ^ 2) = a ^ 2 - a * b + b ^ 2 := by
refine tsub_tsub_assoc ?h₁ h₁
exact hβ‚‚
rw [h₃]
rw [← Nat.sub_add_comm hβ‚‚]
. rw [← Nat.sub_add_eq, ← mul_two]
lemma mylemma_k_le_m_alt
(a b c d k m : β„•)
(hβ‚‚ : a < b ∧ b < c ∧ c < d)
(h₃ : a * d = b * c)
(hβ‚„ : a + d = 2 ^ k)
(hβ‚… : b + c = 2 ^ m)
(hkm : k ≀ m) :
False := by
have h₆: (a + d) ^ 2 ≀ (b + c) ^ 2 := by
refine Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left ?_ 2
rw [hβ‚„,hβ‚…]
exact pow_le_pow_rightβ‚€ (by norm_num) hkm
rw [add_sq, add_sq, mul_assoc, h₃, mul_assoc] at h₆
have h₇: (d - a) ^ 2 ≀ (c - b) ^ 2 := by
have hda: a < d := by
refine lt_trans hβ‚‚.1 ?_
exact lt_trans hβ‚‚.2.1 hβ‚‚.2.2
rw [mylemma_sub_sq d a hda]
rw [mylemma_sub_sq c b hβ‚‚.2.1]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
rw [mul_comm d a, mul_comm c b]
rw [h₃]
refine Nat.sub_le_sub_right ?_ (2 * (b * c))
linarith
have hβ‚ˆ: (c - b) ^ 2 < (d - a) ^ 2 := by
refine Nat.pow_lt_pow_left ?_ (by norm_num)
have hβ‚ˆβ‚€: c - a < d - a := by
have gβ‚€: c - a + a < d - a + a := by
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel ?_]
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel ?_]
. exact hβ‚‚.2.2
. linarith
. linarith
exact Nat.lt_of_add_lt_add_right gβ‚€
refine lt_trans ?_ hβ‚ˆβ‚€
refine Nat.sub_lt_sub_left ?_ hβ‚‚.1
exact lt_trans hβ‚‚.1 hβ‚‚.2.1
have h₉: (d - a) ^ 2 β‰  (d - a) ^ 2 := by
refine Nat.ne_of_lt ?_
exact lt_of_le_of_lt h₇ hβ‚ˆ
refine false_of_ne h₉
lemma mylemma_k_le_m
(a b c d k m : β„•)
(hβ‚‚ : a < b ∧ b < c ∧ c < d)
(h₃ : a * d = b * c)
(hβ‚„ : a + d = 2 ^ k)
(hβ‚… : b + c = 2 ^ m) :
(m < k) := by
have h₆: (c - b) ^ 2 < (d - a) ^ 2 := by
refine Nat.pow_lt_pow_left ?_ (by norm_num)
have hβ‚ˆβ‚€: c - a < d - a := by
have gβ‚€: c - a + a < d - a + a := by
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel ?_]
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel ?_]
. exact hβ‚‚.2.2
. linarith
. linarith
exact Nat.lt_of_add_lt_add_right gβ‚€
refine lt_trans ?_ hβ‚ˆβ‚€
refine Nat.sub_lt_sub_left ?_ hβ‚‚.1
exact lt_trans hβ‚‚.1 hβ‚‚.2.1
have h₇: (b + c) ^ 2 < (a + d) ^ 2 := by
rw [add_sq b c, add_sq a d]
have hda: a < d := by
refine lt_trans hβ‚‚.1 ?_
exact lt_trans hβ‚‚.2.1 hβ‚‚.2.2
rw [mylemma_sub_sq d a hda] at h₆
rw [mylemma_sub_sq c b hβ‚‚.2.1] at h₆
rw [mul_assoc 2 b c, ← h₃, ← mul_assoc]
rw [mul_assoc 2 c b, mul_comm c b, ← h₃, ← mul_assoc] at h₆
rw [add_assoc, add_comm _ (c ^ 2), ← add_assoc]
rw [add_assoc (a ^ 2), add_comm _ (d ^ 2), ← add_assoc]
rw [mul_assoc 2 d a, mul_comm d a, ← mul_assoc] at h₆
rw [add_comm (d ^ 2) (a ^ 2)] at h₆
rw [add_comm (c ^ 2) (b ^ 2)] at h₆
have gβ‚€: 2 * a * d ≀ 4 * a * d := by
ring_nf
exact Nat.mul_le_mul_left (a * d) (by norm_num)
have g₁: 2 * a * d = 4 * a * d - 2 * a * d := by
ring_nf
rw [← Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib]
norm_num
have gβ‚‚: 2 * a * d ≀ b ^ 2 + c ^ 2 := by
rw [mul_assoc, h₃, ← mul_assoc]
exact two_mul_le_add_sq b c
have g₃: 2 * a * d ≀ a ^ 2 + d ^ 2 := by
exact two_mul_le_add_sq a d
rw [g₁, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc (gβ‚€) (b ^ 2 + c ^ 2)]
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc (gβ‚€) (a ^ 2 + d ^ 2)]
rw [Nat.sub_add_comm gβ‚‚, Nat.sub_add_comm g₃]
exact (Nat.add_lt_add_iff_right).mpr h₆
have h2 : 1 < 2 := by norm_num
refine (Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right h2).mp ?_
rw [← hβ‚„, ← hβ‚…]
exact (Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_left (by norm_num) ).mp h₇
lemma mylemma_h8
(a b c d k m : β„•)
(hβ‚€ : 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∧ 0 < c ∧ 0 < d)
(h₁ : Odd a ∧ Odd b ∧ Odd c ∧ Odd d)
(hβ‚‚ : a < b ∧ b < c ∧ c < d)
(hβ‚… : b + c = 2 ^ m)
(hkm : m < k)
(h₆ : b * 2 ^ m - a * 2 ^ k = (b - a) * (b + a))
(h₇ : 2 ^ m ∣ (b - a) * (b + a)) :
(b + a = 2 ^ (m - 1)) := by
have h₇₁: βˆƒ y z, y ∣ b - a ∧ z ∣ b + a ∧ y * z = 2 ^ m := by
exact Nat.dvd_mul.mp h₇
let ⟨p, q, hpd⟩ := h₇₁
cases' hpd with hpd hqd
cases' hqd with hqd hpq
have hm1: 1 ≀ m := by
by_contra! hc
interval_cases m
linarith
have hβ‚ˆβ‚€: b - a < 2 ^ (m - 1) := by
have gβ‚€: b < (b + c) / 2 := by
refine (Nat.lt_div_iff_mul_lt' ?_ b).mpr ?_
. refine even_iff_two_dvd.mp ?_
exact Odd.add_odd h₁.2.1 h₁.2.2.1
. linarith
have g₁: (b + c) / 2 = 2 ^ (m-1) := by
rw [hβ‚…]
rw [← Nat.pow_sub_mul_pow 2 hm1]
simp
rw [← g₁]
refine lt_trans ?_ gβ‚€
exact Nat.sub_lt hβ‚€.2.1 hβ‚€.1
have hp: p = 2 := by
have hpβ‚€: 2 * b < 2 ^ m := by
rw [← hβ‚…, two_mul]
exact Nat.add_lt_add_left hβ‚‚.2.1 b
have hp₁: b + a < 2 ^ (m) := by
have gβ‚€: b + a < b + b := by
exact Nat.add_lt_add_left hβ‚‚.1 b
refine Nat.lt_trans gβ‚€ ?_
rw [← two_mul]
exact hpβ‚€
have hpβ‚‚: q < 2 ^ m := by
refine Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_of_dvd ?_ hqd) hp₁
exact Nat.add_pos_right b hβ‚€.1
have hp₃: 1 < p := by
rw [← hpq] at hpβ‚‚
exact one_lt_of_lt_mul_left hpβ‚‚
have h2prime: Nat.Prime 2 := by exact prime_two
have hpβ‚…: βˆ€ i j:β„• , 2 ^ i ∣ (b - a) ∧ 2 ^ j ∣ (b + a) β†’ (i < 2 ∨ j < 2) := by
by_contra! hc
let ⟨i, j, hi⟩ := hc
have hti: 2 ^ 2 ∣ 2 ^ i := by exact Nat.pow_dvd_pow 2 hi.2.1
have htj: 2 ^ 2 ∣ 2 ^ j := by exact Nat.pow_dvd_pow 2 hi.2.2
norm_num at hti htj
have hiβ‚„: 4 ∣ b - a := by exact Nat.dvd_trans hti hi.1.1
have hiβ‚…: 4 ∣ b + a := by exact Nat.dvd_trans htj hi.1.2
have hi₆: 4 ∣ (b - a) + (b + a) := by exact Nat.dvd_add hiβ‚„ hiβ‚…
have hi₇: 2 ∣ b := by
have gβ‚€: 0 < 2 := by norm_num
refine Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left gβ‚€ ?_
rw [← Nat.add_sub_cancel (2 * b) a, Nat.two_mul b]
rw [add_assoc, Nat.sub_add_comm (le_of_lt hβ‚‚.1)]
exact hi₆
have hiβ‚ˆ: Even b := by
exact even_iff_two_dvd.mpr hi₇
apply Nat.not_odd_iff_even.mpr hiβ‚ˆ
exact h₁.2.1
have hp₆: βˆ€ i j:β„• , i + j = m ∧ 2 ^ i ∣ (b - a) ∧ 2 ^ j ∣ (b + a) β†’ (Β¬ j < 2) := by
by_contra! hc
let ⟨i, j, hi⟩ := hc
have hiβ‚€: m - 1 ≀ i := by
rw [← hi.1.1]
simp
exact Nat.le_pred_of_lt hi.2
have hi₁: 2 ^ (m - 1) ≀ 2 ^ i := by exact Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by norm_num) hiβ‚€
have hiβ‚‚: 2 ^ i < 2 ^ (m - 1) := by
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hβ‚ˆβ‚€
refine Nat.le_of_dvd ?_ hi.1.2.1
exact Nat.sub_pos_of_lt hβ‚‚.1
linarith [hi₁, hiβ‚‚]
have hiβ‚€: βˆƒ i ≀ m, p = 2 ^ i := by
have gβ‚€: p ∣ 2 ^ m := by
rw [← hpq]
exact Nat.dvd_mul_right p q
exact (Nat.dvd_prime_pow h2prime).mp gβ‚€
let ⟨i, hp⟩ := hiβ‚€
cases' hp with him hp
let j:β„• := m - i
have hjβ‚€: j = m - i := by linarith
have hj₁: i + j = m := by
rw [add_comm, ← Nat.sub_add_cancel him]
have hq: q = 2 ^ j := by
rw [hp] at hpq
rw [hjβ‚€, ← Nat.pow_div him (by norm_num)]
refine Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_right ?_ hpq
refine Nat.ne_of_gt ?_
rw [← hp]
linarith [hp₃]
rw [hp] at hpd
rw [hq] at hqd
have hj₃: Β¬ j < 2 := by
exact hp₆ i j {left:= hj₁ , right:= { left := hpd , right:= hqd} }
have hiβ‚‚: i < 2 := by
have gβ‚€: i < 2 ∨ j < 2 := by
exact hpβ‚… i j { left := hpd , right:= hqd }
omega
have hi₃: 0 < i := by
rw [hp] at hp₃
refine Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero ?_
exact (Nat.one_lt_two_pow_iff).mp hp₃
have hiβ‚„: i = 1 := by
interval_cases i
rfl
rw [hiβ‚„] at hp
exact hp
have hq: q = 2 ^ (m - 1) := by
rw [hp, ← Nat.pow_sub_mul_pow 2 hm1, pow_one, mul_comm] at hpq
exact Nat.mul_right_cancel (by norm_num) hpq
rw [hq] at hqd
have hβ‚ˆβ‚‚: βˆƒ c, (b + a) = c * 2 ^ (m - 1) := by
exact exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd hqd
let ⟨f, hf⟩ := hβ‚ˆβ‚‚
have hfeq1: f = 1 := by
have hfβ‚€: f * 2 ^ (m - 1) < 2 * 2 ^ (m - 1) := by
rw [← hf, ← Nat.pow_succ', ← Nat.succ_sub hm1]
rw [Nat.succ_sub_one, ← hβ‚…]
refine Nat.add_lt_add_left ?_ b
exact lt_trans hβ‚‚.1 hβ‚‚.2.1
have hf₁: f < 2 := by
exact Nat.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right hfβ‚€
interval_cases f
. simp at hf
exfalso
linarith [hf]
. linarith
rw [hfeq1, one_mul] at hf
exact hf
theorem imo_1984_p6
(a b c d k m : β„•)
(hβ‚€ : 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∧ 0 < c ∧ 0 < d)
(h₁ : Odd a ∧ Odd b ∧ Odd c ∧ Odd d)
(hβ‚‚ : a < b ∧ b < c ∧ c < d)
(h₃ : a * d = b * c)
(hβ‚„ : a + d = (2:β„•)^k)
(hβ‚… : b + c = 2^m) :
a = 1 := by
by_cases hkm: k ≀ m
. exfalso
apply Nat.not_lt_of_le at hkm
rw [← not_true_eq_false]
refine (not_congr ?_).mp hkm
refine iff_true_intro ?_
exact mylemma_k_le_m a b c d k m hβ‚‚ h₃ hβ‚„ hβ‚…
. push_neg at hkm
have h₆: b * 2 ^ m - a * 2 ^ k = (b - a) * (b + a) := by
have h₆₀: c = 2 ^ m - b := by exact (tsub_eq_of_eq_add_rev (id hβ‚….symm)).symm
have h₆₁: d = 2 ^ k - a := by exact (tsub_eq_of_eq_add_rev (id hβ‚„.symm)).symm
rw [h₆₀, h₆₁] at h₃
repeat rw [Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, ← pow_two] at h₃
have h₆₂: b * 2 ^ m - a * 2 ^ k = b ^ 2 - a ^ 2 := by
symm at h₃
refine Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add ?_
rw [add_comm, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc]
. rw [Nat.sub_add_comm]
. refine Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq ?_ h₃
rw [pow_two]
refine le_of_lt ?_
refine mul_lt_mul' (by linarith) ?_ (le_of_lt hβ‚€.2.1) hβ‚€.2.1
linarith
. rw [pow_two]
refine le_of_lt ?_
refine mul_lt_mul' (by linarith) ?_ (le_of_lt hβ‚€.1) hβ‚€.1
linarith
. refine le_of_lt ?_
rw [pow_two, pow_two]
exact mul_lt_mul hβ‚‚.1 (le_of_lt hβ‚‚.1) hβ‚€.1 (le_of_lt hβ‚€.2.1)
rw [Nat.sq_sub_sq b a] at h₆₂
linarith
have h₇: 2 ^ m ∣ (b - a) * (b + a) := by
have h₇₀: k = (k - m) + m := by exact (Nat.sub_add_cancel (le_of_lt hkm)).symm
rw [h₇₀, pow_add] at h₆
have h₇₁: (b - a * 2 ^ (k - m)) * (2 ^ m) = (b - a) * (b + a) := by
rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib]
rw [mul_assoc a _ _]
exact h₆
exact Dvd.intro_left (b - a * 2 ^ (k - m)) h₇₁
have hβ‚ˆ: b + a = 2 ^ (m - 1) := by
exact mylemma_h8 a b c d k m hβ‚€ h₁ hβ‚‚ hβ‚… hkm h₆ h₇
have h₉: a = 2 ^ (2 * m - 2) / 2 ^ k := by
have ga: 1 ≀ a := by exact Nat.succ_le_of_lt hβ‚€.1
have gb: 3 ≀ b := by
by_contra! hc
interval_cases b
. linarith
. linarith [ga, hβ‚‚.1]
. have gβ‚€: Β¬ Odd 2 := by decide
exact gβ‚€ h₁.2.1
have gm: 3 ≀ m := by
have gmβ‚€: 2 ^ 2 ≀ 2 ^ (m - 1) := by
norm_num
rw [← hβ‚ˆ]
linarith
have gm₁: 2 ≀ m - 1 := by
exact (Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right (by norm_num)).mp gmβ‚€
omega
have gβ‚€: a < 2 ^ (m - 2) := by
have gβ‚€β‚€: a + a < b + a := by simp [hβ‚‚.1]
rw [hβ‚ˆ, ← mul_two a] at gβ‚€β‚€
have g₀₁: m - 1 = Nat.succ (m - 2) := by
rw [← Nat.succ_sub ?_]
. rw [succ_eq_add_one]
omega
. linarith
rw [g₀₁, Nat.pow_succ 2 _] at gβ‚€β‚€
exact Nat.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right gβ‚€β‚€
have h₉₀: b = 2 ^ (m - 1) - a := by
symm
exact Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add hβ‚ˆ.symm
rw [hβ‚ˆ, h₉₀] at h₆
repeat rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib] at h₆
repeat rw [← Nat.pow_add] at h₆
have hm1: 1 ≀ m := by
linarith
repeat rw [← Nat.sub_add_comm hm1] at h₆
repeat rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc hm1] at h₆
ring_nf at h₆
rw [← Nat.sub_add_eq _ 1 1] at h₆
norm_num at h₆
rw [← Nat.sub_add_eq _ (a * 2 ^ (m - 1)) (a * 2 ^ (m - 1))] at h₆
rw [← two_mul (a * 2 ^ (m - 1))] at h₆
rw [mul_comm 2 _] at h₆
rw [mul_assoc a (2 ^ (m - 1)) 2] at h₆
rw [← Nat.pow_succ, succ_eq_add_one] at h₆
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel hm1] at h₆
rw [← Nat.sub_add_eq ] at h₆
have h₉₁: 2 ^ (m * 2 - 1) = 2 ^ (m * 2 - 2) - a * 2 ^ m + (a * 2 ^ m + a * 2 ^ k) := by
refine Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq ?_ h₆
by_contra! hc
have g₁: 2 ^ (m * 2 - 1) - (a * 2 ^ m + a * 2 ^ k) = 0 := by
exact Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le (le_of_lt hc)
rw [g₁] at h₆
have gβ‚‚: 2 ^ (m * 2 - 2) ≀ a * 2 ^ m := by exact Nat.le_of_sub_eq_zero h₆.symm
have g₃: 2 ^ (m - 2) ≀ a := by
rw [mul_two, Nat.add_sub_assoc (by linarith) m] at gβ‚‚
rw [Nat.pow_add, mul_comm] at gβ‚‚
refine Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_right gβ‚‚ ?_
exact Nat.two_pow_pos m
linarith [gβ‚€, g₃]
rw [← Nat.add_assoc] at h₉₁
have h₉₂: a * 2 ^ k = 2 * 2 ^ (2 * m - 2) - 2 ^ (2 * m - 2) := by
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel ?_] at h₉₁
. rw [add_comm] at h₉₁
symm
rw [← Nat.pow_succ', succ_eq_add_one]
rw [← Nat.sub_add_comm ?_]
. refine Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add ?_
rw [mul_comm 2 m, ← h₉₁]
exact rfl
. linarith [hm1]
. refine le_of_lt ?_
rw [mul_two, Nat.add_sub_assoc, Nat.pow_add, mul_comm (2 ^ m) _]
refine (Nat.mul_lt_mul_right (by linarith)).mpr gβ‚€
linarith
nth_rewrite 2 [← Nat.one_mul (2 ^ (2 * m - 2))] at h₉₂
rw [← Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib 2 1 (2 ^ (2 * m - 2))] at h₉₂
norm_num at h₉₂
refine Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_left ?_ h₉₂
exact Ne.symm (NeZero.ne' (2 ^ k))
by_cases hk2m: k ≀ 2 * m - 2
. rw [Nat.pow_div hk2m (by norm_num)] at h₉
rw [Nat.sub_right_comm (2*m) 2 k] at h₉
by_contra! hc
cases' (lt_or_gt_of_ne hc) with hcβ‚€ hc₁
. interval_cases a
linarith
. have hcβ‚‚: Β¬ Odd a := by
refine (not_odd_iff_even).mpr ?_
have hc₃: 1 ≀ 2 * m - k - 2 := by
by_contra! hcβ‚„
interval_cases (2 * m - k - 2)
simp at h₉
rw [h₉] at hc₁
contradiction
have hcβ‚„: 2 * m - k - 2 = succ (2 * m - k - 3) := by
rw [succ_eq_add_one]
exact Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hc₃ rfl
rw [h₉, hcβ‚„, Nat.pow_succ']
exact even_two_mul (2 ^ (2 * m - k - 3))
exact hcβ‚‚ h₁.1
. push_neg at hk2m
exfalso
have ha: a = 0 := by
rw [h₉]
refine (Nat.div_eq_zero_iff).mpr ?_
right
exact Nat.pow_lt_pow_right (by norm_num) hk2m
linarith [ha, hβ‚€.1]