Datasets:

mwitiderrick

/

legal

like 0

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QCQN6I3X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 24, "text": "19th April 1995" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "Z4V6DINS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 89, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 45, "text": "High Commission of the Republic of Singapore" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9OJNMF6U", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 161, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 112, "text": "Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WU1JYDOA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 225, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 213, "text": "Rajan Pillai" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "999W8620", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 297, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 277, "text": "(C) No. 1894 of 1998" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1524596" }

{ "text": "On the same date, i.e., 19th April 1995, the High Commission of the Republic of Singapore made a request to the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India to assist it in securing the provisional arrest of Rajan Pillai for the <span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_5\">W.P. (C) No. 1894 of 1998 Page 5 of 48</span> purposes of extradition." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "K67DR03S", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 29, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 25, "text": "Anup" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RIRCF2QQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 41, "text": "Ravi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3CTTCULV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 83, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 68, "text": "11st June, 2006" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/45545433" }

{ "text": "The statements of P.W. 3 Anup and P.W. 9 Ravi have been recorded on 11st June, 2006 i.e. two days after the incident." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "41VO1L1V", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 29, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 24, "text": "S.320" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SI55SW67", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 37, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 30, "text": "Cr.P.C." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RLPSGAB6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 110, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 54, "text": "DASAN Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER, (2014) 12 SCC 666" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LG211Q7Q", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 122, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 112, "text": "Apex Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0RLSTMCF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 160, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 149, "text": "Section 320" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2YRABJVH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 191, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 168, "text": "Criminal Procedure Code" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2P7BPZ6J", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 255, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 245, "text": "Penal Code" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/74276283" }

{ "text": "With regard to scope of S.320 Cr.P.C., in the case of DASAN Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER, (2014) 12 SCC 666, Apex Court has held as follows:\n \"7. Section 320 of the Criminal Procedure Code (the Code) pertains to offences punishable under the Penal Code only." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "8XTENI1V", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 37, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 25, "text": "Saudan Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/174702009" }

{ "text": "\n\n PW-8 is Sub Inspector Saudan Singh, who is I.O. in this case." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "VA1ZUJWA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 179, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 162, "text": "Balakrishna Ayyar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OTQVPRHZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 217, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 187, "text": "W. P. Nos. 291 and 292 of 1957" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/528276" }

{ "text": "We do not think it necessary to examine several other decisions which have been cited, and we would merely add that some of these have been examined in detail by Balakrishna Ayyar, J. in W. P. Nos. 291 and 292 of 1957 (Mad)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DR4R97B1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 76, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 66, "text": "Apex Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DM34O62I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 253, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 250, "text": "CBI" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/87119829" }

{ "text": "Under this circumstance, in paragraph No.9, the division bench of Apex Court has held that;\n\"In the present case, admittedly, no notice was issued by the Vth Metropolitan Magistrate to the appellant before accepting the final report submitted by the CBI and deciding not to take cognizance and drop the proceedings." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "V2NKFA3Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 43, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 23, "text": "Muthalamarappan Mala" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/568991" }

{ "text": "Therefore, necessarily Muthalamarappan Mala could not be such an extensive Mala." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "FPQM8ZJY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 52, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 44, "text": "Sholapur" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4STW3TZI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 73, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 56, "text": "December 12, 1957" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1904898" }

{ "text": "The parties to the petition were married at Sholapur on December 12, 1957." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/826619/" }

{ "text": "We have already considered the facts relating to bogus purchase invoices in respect of oil cakes shown as purchased by the assessee from 33 bogus suppliers." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/175148378/" }

{ "text": "The documents being registered should have been proved through the concerned Sub <span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_5\">Result: Application dismissed Page 5 of 17</span> Chander Kant v Laxmi Chand Ex.No.75/2010/03 Registrar/other government official/executor and not in the manner as sought to be proved" }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/439349" }

{ "text": "If he had paid the fine amount, the same will be refunded to him." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "JYG8UVI7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 31, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 24, "text": "s 3/181" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RKZTDX9B", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 38, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 32, "text": "MV Act" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PDJJH5RL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 97, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 85, "text": "Abid @ Guddu" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/101231420/" }

{ "text": "In respect of offence u/s 3/181 MV Act, during the course of final argument, accused Abid @ Guddu admitted before this court that he FIR No. 196/2011, State Vs. Abid Guddu was driving the motorcycle without having any driving licence, as alleged by the IO/PW7 in his chief examination." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "VJY52UMM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 97, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 79, "text": "26th January, 1950" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZPENA8Q4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 202, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 183, "text": "U. P. Sales Tax Act" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2KHUPJVP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 313, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 288, "text": "Clause (2) of Article 286" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TMK8TYE1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 333, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 321, "text": "Constitution" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7ZMRD61P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 372, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 363, "text": "31-3-1951" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/33208" }

{ "text": "It was contended by learned counsel that an order was made by the President on 26th January, 1950, by which the President directed that the tax on sale or purchase of goods under the U. P. Sales Tax Act shall, notwithstanding that such imposition of tax was contrary to the provisions of Clause (2) of Article 286 of the Constitution, continue to be levied until 31-3-1951." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "T0OM9QZ5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 151, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 136, "text": "Section 221 (5)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "T7Z1LMY3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 176, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 153, "text": "Criminal Procedure Code" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/630620" }

{ "text": "For all that each accused knew, the separate blows he dealt were alleged in the charge to he the fatal ones, because that is implied by Section 221 (5), Criminal Procedure Code, But the fact was that although the deceased had 22 items of injuries, only 3 on the head were grievous and the remaining 10 were simple i.e., did not even endanger life." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/37779983" }

{ "text": "and was chased by the public, but he escaped." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QVW37AO3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 77, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 64, "text": "West Pakistan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NPMDX2G2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 145, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 132, "text": "West Pakistan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GMZ8KQAL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 182, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 177, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/754106" }

{ "text": "The object was to verify claims of these displaced persons from West Pakistan in respect of their properties left behind by them in West Pakistan at the time of their return to India." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "OKJM8WD8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 80, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 73, "text": "Jagalia" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "VM8IXY61", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 112, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 107, "text": "Ditia" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BCHFE7KC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 143, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 136, "text": "Shabhai" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/663776" }

{ "text": "The oral evidence on this point I consists of the deposition of claimant Jagalia, Ex, 38, that of claimant Ditia, Ex. 39 and the driver Shabhai, Ex. 44." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "BV52PSCQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 29, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 19, "text": "Section 22" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/877600" }

{ "text": "If it is not, then Section 22 was no bar to the maintainability of the suit." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/472537" }

{ "text": "The said Yogas arc not merely thcorization in the metaphysical spheres but have a tremendous bearing in the pragmatic world." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/782784" }

{ "text": "Accordingly, we reverse the order of the Tribunal in both the cases on this point." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UL720HIV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 109, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 70, "text": "STATE BANK OF INDIA, Saket Court Branch" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4RZMF25C", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 120, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 111, "text": "New Delhi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/118540148/" }

{ "text": "Rs. 10 lacs for a period of 6 years Deposition of awarded amount with STATE BANK OF INDIA, Saket Court Branch, New Delhi." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DA5F9VOW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 104, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 100, "text": "Gaya" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "S1HGXPBY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 114, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 108, "text": "Ranchi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/274947" }

{ "text": "In such an event also there was no occasion for the plaintiffs to rebook the said consignments from Gaya to Ranchi under fresh consignments notes." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/178996163" }

{ "text": "Where a defendant denies an allegation of fact in the plaint, he must not do so evasively, but answer the point of substance." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "66FSDU81", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 89, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 15, "text": "State of Rajasthan v. S. Chawla, (1959) Supp 1 SCR 904 = (AIR 1959 SC 544)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/280498" }

{ "text": "As was said in State of Rajasthan v. S. Chawla, (1959) Supp 1 SCR 904 = (AIR 1959 SC 544) the entries in the lists must be regarded as enumeratio simplex of broad categories." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "2TCONED0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 92, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 83, "text": "Parke, B." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "REKLKWI5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 114, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 96, "text": "(1834) 149 ER 1044" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1979835" }

{ "text": "However, it is always necessary to remember in that connection the observations of Parke, B. in (1834) 149 ER 1044 already referred to which not only define what a privileged occasion is but also the principle on which it is based." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/146286858" }

{ "text": "Merely because the stone slab was not plastered, the evidence regarding recovery cannot be doubted." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EHWW6Z36", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 42, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 27, "text": "Himatgiri Gosai" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2VJV8C4K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 90, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 81, "text": "Laljibhai" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1675727" }

{ "text": "The Investigating Officer, Himatgiri Gosai, was examined and police statement of Laljibhai was duly proved through his evidence." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/134169359" }

{ "text": "The court mentions that accordingly it recorded first answer given by the witness." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/115472234" }

{ "text": "It has been submitted that the those witnesses were none else but accomplices and were induced by Navy by continuously placing the orders on them despite discovery of story of so-called illegal gratifications allegedly paid by them to the petitioner." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1386444/" }

{ "text": "Apart from the compensation for acquisition of the said premises, the assessee received a sum of Rs. 2 lakhs from the State on account of mesne profits for the use and occupation of the said premises by the erstwhile tenant." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "88VZ4UDU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 20, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 6, "text": "Section 173(8)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GBL7JXXT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 90, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 58, "text": "Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/102520965" }

{ "text": "\n\n21. Section 173(8) is a new provision introduced by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as „Code‟), which was not there in the earlier Code." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "R7LJJNSV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 36, "text": "28.4.2014" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "O3U8LIK0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 110, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 100, "text": "11.01.2013" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OZKF6PO6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 131, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 114, "text": "MACA NO. 792/2006" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RUESE0D5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 191, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 142, "text": "Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd v. Ranjit Pandey & Ors" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/181035804/" }

{ "text": "The petitioner was also examined on 28.4.2014 in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court on 11.01.2013 in MACA NO. 792/2006 titled as Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd v. Ranjit Pandey & Ors." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/374625" }

{ "text": "The plaintiff has to allege and prove that all the terms of the contract are not contained in the promissory note." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1431977" }

{ "text": "What the notification has in view is not a hospital who pampers those in high places but one who gives free treatment to those who find it difficult to survive let alone afford the luxury of being treated in a private hospital." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/192064050" }

{ "text": "The trial Court ordered the petition and directed the 3rd defendant to pay the stamp duty and penalty on Ex.B38, and challenging the said order, a revision was filed in this Court." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "GR2B4G5D", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 43, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 20, "text": "Rajesh Kumar Srivastava" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/86652900" }

{ "text": "However, when P.W.2 Rajesh Kumar Srivastava was examined in court, he has not stated a word about receipt of any secret information by him." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ED0EV8Z9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 59, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 39, "text": "Civil Procedure Code" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WTD7MYNC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 89, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 65, "text": "Transfer of Property Act" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TAJLZ0OC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 107, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 95, "text": "Contract Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1316598" }

{ "text": "There is no reason to suppose that the Civil Procedure Code, the Transfer of Property Act, the Contract Act are excluded from this overriding effect given to these laws." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1283461" }

{ "text": "The Returning Officer could not have been unaware of the fact that the respondent was getting a second application for recount written and he was duty bound to enable him to complete it and present it." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "AK50S62Q", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 103, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 95, "text": "1.4.1994" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GN1A3YGL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 141, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 133, "text": "1.4.1996" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "X1RG96RZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 256, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 169, "text": "Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation (Amendment) Act, 1998 (Tamil Nadu Act No.27 of 1998)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZO8OTSJZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 282, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 274, "text": "1.7.1998" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/87094770" }

{ "text": "The tax in respect of contract carriages (omni buses) increased to Rs.1,000/- with effect from 1.4.1994; Rs.1,500/- with effect from 1.4.1996 and again to Rs.2,000/- by Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation (Amendment) Act, 1998 (Tamil Nadu Act No.27 of 1998) with effect from 1.7.1998." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "0CZKR6MU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 57, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 28, "text": "Sub-section (1) of Section 10" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZOV2WVI4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 74, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 65, "text": "Nayar Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1717203" }

{ "text": "By reason of the proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Nayar Act, the father is not the guardian of his minor children in respect of their tarwad property." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "SOQ3W03O", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 50, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 29, "text": "M.Cr.C. No.10417/2010" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "EQ2UJHGO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 67, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 55, "text": "Satish Lodhi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9EP236YU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 109, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 99, "text": "26.11.2010" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7WPTVFJA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 162, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 152, "text": "31.12.2010" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TCUWOXGJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 194, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 170, "text": "Sessions Judge, Jabalpur" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/59094780" }

{ "text": "\n\n ii. The bail application (M.Cr.C. No.10417/2010) of Satish Lodhi was dismissed by this Court on 26.11.2010, copy thereof was sent by the Registry on 31.12.2010 to the Sessions Judge, Jabalpur." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YEJWI1IO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 67, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 56, "text": "Section 302" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7U4XE4WL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 92, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 75, "text": "Indian Penal Code" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "F864XUQT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 112, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 102, "text": "Bhup Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WO2KHOG0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 144, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 133, "text": "Section 302" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "F0D3HYQS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 165, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 155, "text": "Section 34" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SPZX06OO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 190, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 173, "text": "Indian Penal Code" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4MFR2G49", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 208, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 200, "text": "Omeshwar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "T6AFMAUM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 221, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 213, "text": "Mahender" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1794162" }

{ "text": "After the case was received by commitment, charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, against Bhup Singh, accused, and under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, against Omeshwar and Mahender, accused, was framed, to which they pleaded not guilty, and claimed judicial trial." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "AK9R7Y6W", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 0, "text": "Criminal Appeal Nos. 803, 863 and 871 of 2001" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "Y2Q9S5OF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 197, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 186, "text": "Section 302" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "T8AFZ5FK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 230, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 208, "text": "Section 34 and Sec.148" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NW2ONB98", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 234, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 231, "text": "IPC" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/495653" }

{ "text": "Criminal Appeal Nos. 803, 863 and 871 of 2001 are by A-1, A-3, A-4, A-5, A-7, A-8, A-9, A-11, A-12, A-13, A-14, A-15, A-18, A-20, A-21, A-22 and A-40, challenging their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 and Sec.148 IPC, and the sentence of life imprisonment." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "BN70SOSD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 225, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 174, "text": "sub-section (5) or sub-section (7) of section 251-A" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "79E9WLY1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 233, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 226, "text": "Cr.P.C." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/315840" }

{ "text": "All the same we are unable also to subscribe to the proposition that there is no trial until the accused pleads guilty or when the Magistrate proceeds to take evidence under sub-section (5) or sub-section (7) of section 251-A Cr.P.C." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "O1UOCQ4K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 19, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 9, "text": "Ram Charan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GZF479E8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 56, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 47, "text": "Jagat Pal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "18S9PGP7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 114, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 106, "text": "Mahendra" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "78O2X99X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 121, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 116, "text": "Kamla" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "C0N0TFAB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 145, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 123, "text": "Raju alias Raj Bahadur" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q6W8H3AZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 154, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 147, "text": "Balwant" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8IMVQRO1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 229, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 198, "text": "sections 364, 302/149, 201, 342" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UJAYR5KI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 233, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 230, "text": "IPC" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/189056190" }

{ "text": "Trial of Ram Charan was separated and trial of Jagat Pal abated due to his death during trial. \n4.Accused Mahendra, Kamla, Raju alias Raj Bahadur, Balwant were charged for offences punishable under sections 364, 302/149, 201, 342 IPC." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QYQ502Z6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 46, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 29, "text": "Section 14(1) (e)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "J06E8UGZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 51, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 47, "text": "DRCA" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/95261959" }

{ "text": "The finding by this Court on Section 14(1) (e) DRCA was that the accommodation available with the landlord was more than sufficient for his needs and that he did not bonafide require the tenanted premises." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/294777" }

{ "text": "Annexures-O and P were produced to show that such premises was leased and rent was paid." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/306609" }

{ "text": "If that be so, it must follow that the definition of 'political sufferer' not only makes the children of such sufferers distinguishable from the rest but such a classification has a reasonable nexus with the object of the rules which can be nothing else than a fair and just distribution of seats.\" \n 17." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "FQYCGQVG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 52, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 26, "text": "March 27 and June 12, 1967" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/140181" }

{ "text": "\n\n3. The circulars, dated March 27 and June 12, 1967, and the cabinet decisions upon which they are based are unlawful" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Z7SJ5PEH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 68, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 15, "text": "H. M. Kashiparekh & Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1960] 39 ITR 706" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NIEFQHWL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 113, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 74, "text": "Division Bench of the Bombay High Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1470457" }

{ "text": "In the case of H. M. Kashiparekh & Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1960] 39 ITR 706, the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court held that it is the real income of the assessee that is liable to tax because income-tax is a tax on income." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1042780" }

{ "text": "it bad as it did not disclose all the questions & answers put & received must also fail." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "56AZKK2M", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 102, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 97, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "financial_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/51319766/" }

{ "text": "The case of the complainant as per the complaint is that complainant is a law abiding citizen of India working with M/S AVON TRIP." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/826619/" }

{ "text": "Even the word \"bearer\" on the cheques was not crossed out." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "P0CQ5XKU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 113, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 65, "text": "R. C. Mitter & Sons' case [1959] 36 ITR 194 (SC)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/902820" }

{ "text": "New heads of public policy cannot be made out as already held in R. C. Mitter & Sons' case [1959] 36 ITR 194 (SC). \n" }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1463610" }

{ "text": "Further, Ex.X.7, D.W.1 categorically stated that earlier they intended to enter into agreement, but later they have entered into agreement with fifth respondent." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "A3M9A3WV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 70, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 63, "text": "Raj Pal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "M6OR3IIJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 88, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 77, "text": ".Ram Kishan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XFRSGL5P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 109, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 101, "text": "Desh Raj" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/167472907/" }

{ "text": "On the other hand, defendant no.1 examined himself as DW-1, Sh.Raj Pal s/o.Sh.Ram Kishan as DW-2, Sh.Desh Raj s/o." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "XX9PAW3S", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 26, "text": "CWP No.4405 of 1998" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "V8D5E98F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 123, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 54, "text": "Manju Jain & another Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority & others" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZX734OPT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 146, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 136, "text": "02.04.1998" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "V1PCMFSD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 188, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 176, "text": "Aruna Luthra" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/66086285" }

{ "text": "Another Division Bench in CWP No.4405 of 1998 titled \"Manju Jain & another Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority & others\" decided on 02.04.1998 has followed the judgment in Aruna Luthra's case (supra) to return a finding that there is no provision in the Regulations to levy penal interest, thus, the levy of interest at the rate of 18% p.a. was set aside." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "GBKLZPPF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 11, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 2, "text": "Ram Yadav" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UN0CQJOY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 34, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 20, "text": "Jai Kant Yadav" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "77QAYBFQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 56, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 40, "text": "Village Mangooda" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NKOSFBEP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 75, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 58, "text": "P.S. Dhanshyampur" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "F0I4VLV3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 94, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 86, "text": "Darbanga" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "USUQAZJ8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 101, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 96, "text": "Bihar" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/142423512/" }

{ "text": ". Ram Yadav S/o Sh. Jai Kant Yadav, R/o Village Mangooda, P.S. Dhanshyampur, District Darbanga, Bihar is the complainant in the present case." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "RTVVZOXU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 22, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 15, "text": "England" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/140181" }

{ "text": "By the laws of England, every invasion of private property be it ever so minute, is a trespass." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "25EM6RFA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 216, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 207, "text": "17.6.2011" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RWS1PU34", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 282, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 258, "text": "Andhra Bank, Preet Vihar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OW2AMYHN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 293, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 284, "text": "New Delhi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7J2XD7YL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 383, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 364, "text": "Naresh Kumar Bansal" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "financial_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/44760901/" }

{ "text": "It is the case of the complainant that upon her persistence, the accused persons, in partial discharge of their admitted debts and liability towards the complainant, issued a cheque bearing no. 402041 dated 17.6.2011 for an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/­ drawn on Andhra Bank, Preet Vihar, New Delhi - 110002 in favour of Complainant\"Fashion Link\" signed by accused Sh. Naresh Kumar Bansal." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "NBZ6084I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 41, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 24, "text": "Mysore High Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YF3P4ED5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 61, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 45, "text": "A. Manjundappa's" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "43DKIOFU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 86, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 68, "text": "AIR 1965 Mysore 73" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/626610" }

{ "text": "The single Judge of the Mysore High Court in A. Manjundappa's case (AIR 1965 Mysore 73) (cited supra) held as under :\n \"3." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/4202832/" }

{ "text": "CONCLUSION 16) It is well settled that leave to defend is granted to the tenant in case any triable issue is raised by him, which can be adjudicated by consideration of additional evidence." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "TNU3EU65", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 31, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 17, "text": "Thiru.Iyyappan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TC35N4QM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 43, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 36, "text": "Palani," } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5YNUK53K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 62, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 44, "text": "Didndigul District" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ODJLHROX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 103, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 93, "text": "04.09.1997" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QVHTM08Q", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 158, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 145, "text": "Thiru.Karimal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "P7A6QHI3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 171, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 163, "text": "Kandavel" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "N7G6F5NI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 180, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 173, "text": "Ganesan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BN3A1K3F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 193, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 186, "text": "Sangili" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GLG1ODN5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 203, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 198, "text": "Velan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GDZJKNEL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 218, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 209, "text": "Subramani" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/61661408" }

{ "text": "The Transporter, Thiru.Iyyappan, of Palani, Didndigul District has also given a statement on 04.09.1997, endorsing that the vehicle was hired to Thiru.Karimal S/o.Kandavel, Ganesan, S/o.Sangili and Velan S/o. Subramani for the purpose of transporting sandalwood." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "VPNO8I5M", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 56, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 50, "text": "Indore" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1563013" }

{ "text": "7. Was the cess payable by the first defendant in Indore as a part of the freight and, if so, whether it remained to be -recovered due to mistake?" }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/137271740/" }

{ "text": "However, if any other bank agrees to provide the special scheme for victims of the road accident on the above terms, the deposit be permitted to be made in that Bank subject to the convenience of the victim/legal representative of the victim of the road accident\". \n\n 32." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "VBC47H71", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 27, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 12, "text": "IA No.7385/2015" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SI6FZ74C", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 91, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 86, "text": "Manju" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TK4U1512", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 107, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 101, "text": "Sameer" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/166504428" }

{ "text": "\n\n Heard on IA No.7385/2015, an application for deleting the name of respondents No.2 Manju and No.3 Sameer." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "MBIMZKHL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 77, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 57, "text": "Saurabh Medical Hall" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "V1UIBN0F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 161, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 144, "text": "Sunil Kumar Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/24627712" }

{ "text": "Adjacent west of the room/shop of the informant there is Saurabh Medical Hall, in front whereof also there is open space where the dead body of Sunil Kumar Singh the brother of the informant smeared with blood was found lying flat on the back with head of the deceased on the southern side." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "87VMKYUJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 22, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 3, "text": "Spl.C.C.No.134/1999" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YZH6PHS6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 130, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 120, "text": "09.01.1995" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SLGMY60B", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 144, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 134, "text": "24.08.1995" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/94351147" }

{ "text": "In Spl.C.C.No.134/1999, the accused is alleged to have misappropriated a sum of Rs.1,01,379/- during the period between 09.01.1995 to 24.08.1995" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UV83VJ9F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 198, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 188, "text": "Apex court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1237771" }

{ "text": "Elaborate and detailed arguments are advanced by both sides by inviting our attention to the pleadings, the orders impugned, the order in revision, the legal provisions and the rulings of Apex court and this High Court on the subject." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/199816290/" }

{ "text": "\n\n 20.Complainant has also filed written arguments wherein he has reiterated and reasserted the facts of the case." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "0BGJSR3H", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 64, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 61, "text": "AAC" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UH50G0FJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 113, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 97, "text": "7th August, 1963" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "VZD20HC1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 175, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 156, "text": "27th December, 1965" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SWQY4KAQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 285, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 278, "text": "Rule 48" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2818Z4FC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 316, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 293, "text": "Indian I.T. Rules, 1922" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZS0IY2C4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 334, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 327, "text": "Rule 40" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "EYCZCTBR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 358, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 342, "text": "I.T. Rules, 1962" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/887779" }

{ "text": "With regard to the second point, it was contended before the AAC that as the return was filed on 7th August, 1963, and the assessment was completed only on 27th December, 1965, the ITO should have exercised his discretion to reduce or waive the interest under the provisions of Rule 48 of the Indian I.T. Rules, 1922, or under Rule 40 of the I.T. Rules, 1962." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "WCRUACXM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 51, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 38, "text": "P.R.No.312/03" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UXJUPCDO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 67, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 58, "text": "Rule 3(b)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4MDESLQO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 148, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 75, "text": "Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MFLMFJAN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 214, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 207, "text": "Madurai" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/826529" }

{ "text": "Departmental action has been taken in P.R.No.312/03 under Rule 3(b) of the Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955 by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Madurai Range, Madurai, framing three charges against the petitioner and the other police constables." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "O1DSQK5L", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 77, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 54, "text": "Code of Civil Procedure" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1331931" }

{ "text": "In this case it has been held that the essence of the Code of Civil Procedure is to be exhaustive, so far as it goes." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/86196896" }

{ "text": "It seems that it was sent to his old address." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "787E52Q0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 82, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 76, "text": "I.T.C." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XFOD6W5C", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 231, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 220, "text": "Article 226" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QGAIM021", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 251, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 239, "text": "Constitution" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/654070" }

{ "text": "It is not at all possible to accept the argument that the time spent by the I.T.C. In the departmental proceedings should not be taken into account for the purpose of explaining the delay in approaching this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EEIHTFTS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 69, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 39, "text": "Clause (4) of Condition No. 25" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FWNTAH9I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 199, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 189, "text": "Clause (5)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/704732" }

{ "text": "The terms for renewal are contained in Clause (4) of Condition No. 25 of the Tender Notice and the petitioner does not challenge his liability to get a renewal on the terms as contained in Clause (5)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UR286QQU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 30, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 25, "text": "India" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1VW4BWVS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 65, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 54, "text": "March, 1947" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YF37LO4G", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 79, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 71, "text": "Pakistan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "P6SWQWAI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 196, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 191, "text": "India" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CS8JP20L", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 209, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 201, "text": "Pakistan" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1332957" }

{ "text": "They had admittedly left India after the first day of March, 1947, for Pakistan and it appears from the counter-affidavits that they had left on account of the setting up of the dominions of India and Pakistan." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1QNWUJMG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 55, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 39, "text": "M.B. Mandarvalia" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BEIFOKDY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 92, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 82, "text": "Chhotu Lal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "C8ER7EKM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 140, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 122, "text": "Subhash Singh Dabi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GQG3M1Q9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 162, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 151, "text": "Riyaj Anwar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "X6M7A545", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 185, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 173, "text": "Sanjay Kumar" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1542192" }

{ "text": "Non-applicant produced witnesses NAW 1 M.B. Mandarvalia and other witnesses NAW 2 Chhotu Lal, owner of the vehicle, NAW 3 Subhash Singh Dabi and NAW 4 Riyaj Anwar and NAW 5 Sanjay Kumar." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1362862" }

{ "text": "No doubt, civil and criminal jurisdiction is conferred on the Gram Katchahry, but the Gram Katchahry can sentence an accused to (i) simple imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months; (ii) fine not exceeding Rs. 1000/-, and in default of payment of fine, simple imprisonment not exceeding 15 days." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "JP0KALE3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 58, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 36, "text": "13th of November, 1980" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1992696" }

{ "text": "The company was incorporated on the 13th of November, 1980." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EWXAQBJU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 93, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 3, "text": "1994 MPU681 (M. P. Motor Yan Karadhan Adhiniyam) Naveen Raghunath Karnik v. State of M. P." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7UM7ED5L", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 148, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 138, "text": "Section 20" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MQA33549", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 245, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 232, "text": "Section 16(4)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/845565" }

{ "text": "In 1994 MPU681 (M. P. Motor Yan Karadhan Adhiniyam) Naveen Raghunath Karnik v. State of M. P., the Division Bench of this Court held that Section 20 of the Adhiniyam contains an efficacious and alternative remedy on unsuccess Under Section 16(4) and aggrieved person has to pursue that course." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "M7B65HW9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 69, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 59, "text": "Om Prakash" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "N0ZBA6YG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 85, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 77, "text": "Koja Ram" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8J9EVMLM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 171, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 165, "text": "Hariar" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/800307" }

{ "text": "He also stated that on the date of incident at about 10-11 Om Prakash son of Koja Ram approached to him and informed that the persons of Muslim community of Village Hariar had surrounded their hut." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "W228M09U", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 256, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 245, "text": "Article 137" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UI36N2ZR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 294, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 280, "text": "Limitation Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1807168" }

{ "text": "Once such a provision was made, there is no doubt that an application before the Court has to be made within 3 years after the expiry of 90 days from the date of the application and if any application is made beyond the time so fixed in view of Article 137 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, it is liable to be rejected in limine." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1934278" }

{ "text": "Therefore, motive behind the crime is relevant factor for which evidence may be adduced." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "KHP67CCM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 38, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 20, "text": "M.V.C.No.6640/2013" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2TG2TFT5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 95, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 90, "text": "Priya" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/4963664/" }

{ "text": "\n\n 50) ISSUE No2 in M.V.C.No.6640/2013: PW3 has stated in her evidence that, her daughter Priya sustained fracture of both bones of left hand, abrasion over forehead and blunt injury over right side cheek." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "BH8PWZE9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 31, "text": "Susamma Thomas" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/167563808" }

{ "text": "Paras 8 and 9 of the report in Susamma Thomas (Mrs.) (supra) are extracted hereunder:-\n \"8." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "2UQRCXIC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 54, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 37, "text": "Ramachandran Nair" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1JQQPPJZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 97, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 87, "text": "11.01.1999" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RQF4HQ5N", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 162, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 145, "text": "Naxalite Varghese" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FOIDZ3W8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 242, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 233, "text": "Lakshmana" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/55383273" }

{ "text": "In the said writ petition, Constable Ramachandran Nair filed a counter affidavit dated 11.01.1999 in which he made a confession that he had shot Naxalite Varghese on the instruction of the then Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP), Lakshmana." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UUFHNU03", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 97, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 84, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RC63ZXR9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 113, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 101, "text": "Sahney Steel" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/25308/" }

{ "text": "The above observations of the Tribunal made on the basis of the observations of the Supreme Court in Sahney Steel also how that the Tribunal was alive to the distinction between the character of the subsidy given with the object of promoting industrial growth in a particular area and the subsidy given conditional upon the commencement of production and after actual commencement of production." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "372EBD0A", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 66, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 3, "text": "Mohta Trading Co. v. Commissioner of Sales Tax [1976] 38 STC 11" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1177000" }

{ "text": "In Mohta Trading Co. v. Commissioner of Sales Tax [1976] 38 STC 11, the assessee was a dealer in cotton sewing thread." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ICB86CYW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 47, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 37, "text": "20/01/2003" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "T12W3B9Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 108, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 89, "text": "High Court of Delhi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GUJP4YPG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 191, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 172, "text": "High Court of Delhi" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "HMFGVSO9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 208, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 195, "text": "CM(M)527/1999" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/195187205/" }

{ "text": "\n\n Ex. PW1/D1 is the statement dated 20/01/2003 of the plaintiff recorded before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and Ex.PW1/D2 is the certified copy of the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in CM(M)527/1999." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1943822" }

{ "text": "When the bazar-day permits were proposed to be cancelled in the draft scheme, it cannot be argued that the scheme did not intend exclusive operation by the Corporation on the routes covered by the bazar-day permits." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "XFZQVPKG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 108, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 95, "text": "Section 52(3)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1E9W3A2B", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 143, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 116, "text": "Bills of Exchange Act, 1882" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1383250" }

{ "text": "The third defence that there was no notice of dishonour is again answered by the provisions of Section 52(3) of the Bills of Exchange Act, 1882 to which a reference has already been made." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/803950" }

{ "text": "It was held that once an award has been made a party cannot raise more disputes which he/ it could and ought to have been raised." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "J0I5ZW1O", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 12, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "12-4-1991" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RQXMEFJ3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 70, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 58, "text": "T. V. Ramana" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1293958" }

{ "text": "On 12-4-1991 the counsel for the 2nd respondent i.e., Sri T. V. Ramana endorsed on the said complaint petition\" and the complaint was \"dismissed since not pressed\" by the learned Magistrate." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/980589" }

{ "text": "Plaintiff being the highest bidder, his bid was accepted and he deposited an amount of Rupees 2,949/-." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UH3G5XJH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 132, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 128, "text": "U.K." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/387896" }

{ "text": "It is, therefore, clear that if this Court decrees the suit, the decree can be executed under the reciprocal arrangement in the U.K." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/707845" }

{ "text": "I fail to appreciate how the Customs authorities can bypass the orders passed by the Tribunal dealing with the identical issues." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "P9U49HCP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 256, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 244, "text": "E. B. Powell" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "322UT8LT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 279, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 262, "text": "Indian Trusts Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1211408" }

{ "text": " \n This section is based on the principle of construc-tive trust, which has been defined in the standard English and American Text Books and is an extension of the principle that a trustee shall not be allowed to make profit out of the trust (E. B. Powell, The Indian Trusts Act, p. 388). \n 31." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "J711GH47", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 380, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 356, "text": "Manmohan Singh Chaudhary" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/39422048" }

{ "text": "The fourth ground which has vehemently been argued by counsel for the petitioner is that the age of retirement of Chairman has been fixed at 72 years with the sole intention and object of accommodating respondent No.6 at the behest of respondent No.5 and the same would fall foul to the observations made by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Manmohan Singh Chaudhary (supra)." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/907416" }

{ "text": "To sum up, the basis of every levy is the controlling factor." }