<p>I have two Ubuntu 18.04 bare metal servers. using devstack deployment I have stood up a multi-node (2 nodes) cluster where one server has the controller services and compute, while the second has only compute. In the controller node, I have enabled lbaas v2 with Octavia.</p>

<pre>
# LBaaS
enable_plugin neutron-lbaas https://git.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-lbaas stable/queens
enable_plugin octavia https://git.openstack.org/openstack/octavia stable/queens
enable_service q-lbaasv2 octavia o-cw o-hk o-hm o-api
</pre>

<p>I've created a kubernetes cluster with 1 master and 2 minion nodes. some initial testing was successful. deploying WordPress via Helm created a load balancer and I was able to access the app as expected.</p>

<p>I'm now trying to set up a nginx-ingress controller. when I deploy my nginx-ingress controller LoadBalancer service, I can see the load balancer created in OpenStack. however, attempts to access the ingress controller using the external IP always result in an empty reply. </p>

<p>Using the CLI i can see the load balancer, pools, and members. The member entries indicate there is an error:</p>

<pre>
+---------------------+--------------------------------------+
| Field               | Value                                |
+---------------------+--------------------------------------+
| address             | 10.0.0.9                             |
| admin_state_up      | True                                 |
| created_at          | 2018-09-28T22:15:51                  |
| id                  | 109ad896-5953-4b2b-bbc9-d251d44c3817 |
| name                |                                      |
| operating_status    | ERROR                                |
| project_id          | 12b95a935dc3481688eb840249c9b167     |
| protocol_port       | 31042                                |
| provisioning_status | ACTIVE                               |
| subnet_id           | 1e5efaa0-f95f-44a1-a271-541197f372ab |
| updated_at          | 2018-09-28T22:16:33                  |
| weight              | 1                                    |
| monitor_port        | None                                 |
| monitor_address     | None                                 |
+---------------------+--------------------------------------+
</pre>

<p>However, there is no indication of what the error is. there is no corresponding error in the log that I can find.</p>

<p>Using kubectl port-forward I verified that the nginx ingress controller is up/running and correctly configured. the problem seems to be in the load balancer.</p>

<p>My question is how can I diagnose what the error is? </p>

<p>I found only one troubleshooting guide related to lbaas v2 and it claims I should be able to see q-lbaas- namespaces when I run: <code>ip netns list</code>.  However, there are none defined. </p>

<p>Using helm --dry-run --debug the service yaml is:</p>

<pre><code># Source: nginx-ingress/templates/controller-service.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  labels:
    app: nginx-ingress
    chart: nginx-ingress-0.25.1
    component: "controller"
    heritage: Tiller
    release: oslb2
  name: oslb2-nginx-ingress-controller
spec:
  clusterIP: ""
  externalTrafficPolicy: "Local"
  ports:
    - name: http
      port: 80
      protocol: TCP
      targetPort: http
    - name: https
      port: 443
      protocol: TCP
      targetPort: https
  selector:
    app: nginx-ingress
    component: "controller"
    release: oslb2
  type: "LoadBalancer"
</code></pre>

<p>Interestingly, in comparing to a previous (wordpress) LoadBalancer service that worked, i noticed that the nginx-ingress externalRoutingPolicy is set to <strong>Local</strong>, while wordpress specified Cluster. I changed the values.yaml for the nginx-ingress chart to set externalRoutingPolicy to Cluster and now the load balancer is working.</p>

<p>We'd like to keep the policy at "Local" to preserve source IPs. Any thoughts on why it doesn't work?</p>

jmer
<p>It turns out I was barking up the wrong tree (apologies). There is no issue with the load balancer. </p>

<p>The problem stems from Kubernetes inability to match the minion/worker hostname with its node name. The nodes take the short form of the hostname, e.g.:
<code>k8s-cluster-fj7cs2gokrnz-minion-1</code> while kube-proxy does the look-up based on the fully qualified name: <code>k8s-cluster-fj7cs2gokrnz-minion-1.novalocal</code></p>

<p>i found this in the log for kube-proxy:</p>

<pre><code>Sep 27 23:26:20 k8s-cluster-fj7cs2gokrnz-minion-1.novalocal runc[2205]: W0927 23:26:20.050146       1 server.go:586]
 Failed to retrieve node info: nodes "k8s-cluster-fj7cs2gokrnz-minion-1.novalocal" not found
Sep 27 23:26:20 k8s-cluster-fj7cs2gokrnz-minion-1.novalocal runc[2205]: W0927 23:26:20.050241       1 proxier.go:463] invalid nodeIP, initializing kube-proxy with 127.0.0.1 as nodeIP
</code></pre>

<p>This has the effect of making Kubernetes fail to find "Local" endpoints for LoadBalancer (or other) services. When you specify <code>externalTrafficPolicy: "Local"</code> K8s will drop packets since it i) is restricted to routing only to endpoints local to the node and ii) it believes there are no local endpoints.</p>

<p>other folks who have enountered this issue configure kube-proxy with <code>hostname-override</code> to make the two match up. </p>
