<p>Kubernetes documentation is saying that multi-zone clusters are supported, but not the multi-region ones. At the same time Kubernetes has support for both <code>failure-domain/zone</code> and <code>failure-domain/region</code>.</p>

<p>What are the downsides of having my Kubernetes clusters to be multi-zone and multi-region at the same time? Is it only latency and if so what are the required latency numbers for it to be reliable?</p>

<p>On a plus side I see service discovery and being able to deploy applications across multiple regions without and extra tooling on top of it.</p>

<p>I know there's federation v1 and v2 being worked on but it seems to be adding a lot of complexity and v2 is far from being production ready.</p>

Maklaus
<p>This is speculative, but it's <em>informed</em> speculation, so hopefully that means it'll still be helpful</p>

<p>Let's take two things that kubernetes does and extrapolate them into a multi-region cluster:</p>

<ul>
<li>load balancer membership -- at least on AWS, there is no mechanism for adding members of a different region to a load balancer, meaning <code>type: LoadBalancer</code> could not assign all <code>Pod</code>s to the <code>Service</code></li>
<li>persistent volume attachment -- similarly on AWS, there is no mechanism for attaching EBS volumes across even availability zones, to say nothing of across regions</li>
</ul>

<p>For each of those, one will absolutely be able to find "yes, but!" scenarios to demonstrate a situation where these restrictions won't matter. However, since kubernetes is trying to solve for the general case, in a cloud-agnostic way, that's my strong suspicion why they would recommend against even trying a multi-region cluster -- regardless of whether it happens to work for your situation right now.</p>
