Nice try at revisionist history.

Funny how the right NEVER cites any proof from the Walkerton Inquiry.

Guess this is why:
Chapter 13, section 13.7.1, pgs 464-5.



 In  addition,  I concluded in the Part 1 report of this Inquiry that budget cuts at the MOE
had both a direct effect and an indirect effect on the events in Walkerton. The
direct effect was the failure to enact a regulation mandating testing laboratories
to follow a notification protocol at the time of the privatization of laboratory
testing services. The indirect effect was that budget cuts made it less likely that
approvals or inspections programs would have led to the discovery of problems
at Walkerton.

DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS.

Despicable and disgusting.