BG" I don't propose that I "get to decide who speaks for the will of the people."  I simply propose that those who assert they speak for the "will of the people" are both presumptuous and arrogant.  There is no monolithic "will of the people."  We are a diverse, divided people with very different opinions are most every topic imaginable.  I challenge Trump supporters who parrot his claim that he has a "mandate."  Nothing could be further from the truth.  He is a "minority" President; elected with the smallest percentage of votes of any President in my 74 year lifetime.  He also has the lowest approval rating of any "modern day" incoming President.  He is President.  He does have a GOP controlled Congress.  But he's a long, long ways from having a "mandate" which, so he claims, represents the "will of the people."  

BTW: To oppose a stated position in civil terms without resorting to ad hominem attacks is not "being a troll."  Thanks, Gary Crum