But did Mr. Knight not already change the subject?  Was original subject not the Adventist philosophy of education?  Does his training to teach others or study of history prepare him for such task in philosophy?  Do the two papers presented have anything to do with the philosophy of education?

Everyone has the ability to present.  I respect Mr. Knights opinion and within proper proof and weight to the BIBLE would respect his ideologies.  I and many do not see such proof.  

We do see in his presentation that James White would not accept the position of president of the organization because of appearance of a "worldly kingdom", yet Mr Knight proposes in principle to create such.  We see the proposals of Mrs White to create Unions to help in leadership, but Mr Knights misinterpretation and actual removal of those responsibilities in unionization.  Then we see an anti-organizational paper that describes this organized rebellion in absolute, proving failure in confusion.