No.  John does not get to post his comments that are at once untrue, wrong and sanctimonious without comment.  If his nasty comments can somehow be considered "civil", there is a problem here.

There is nothing uncivil about my response..
So - repost:

More spin and interpretation from John.
Any disagreement with his stated position is deemed unacceptable.
John values diversity - except, it seems, if you disagree with him. So misrepresentation of the truth, spin, personal attack is okay if it is done in agreement with his beliefs and agenda.
So we are able then to post pithy comments like John's twisted one above with no substantiation or dialogue in order to quash disagreement.
Tell me...since you have made the very same comment ad nauseum - where exactly has EFC, me, or any other poster here EVER said that a gay person does not deserve love and dignity in accord with his humanity?
Knock it off, John. You only damage your claim to liberalism when you descend to the levels you do.