Is this just poor reporting that is intentionally leaving out parts of the story or are there some serious questions regarding this stop? The deputy pulls in behind the vehicle and the vehicle drives toward the deputy. Does that mean the vehicle was backing up towards the deputy or did it drive forward and make a U-turn to drive towards the deputy? How did the hole get in the windshield if the deputy was behind the vehicle? Is it standard procedure for Adams county to pull their weapon on every stop they make? The tag was not known to be stolen at the time of the stop so why was the weapon pulled? This article is just as confusing as the original article Wednesday.