Hello post writers called "Pension Fund" and "Society",

Can you explain how you managed to somehow disagree with the factual account I provided, of reporting in this newspaper? How is it you folks are disagreeing with facts?

Look, it is a fact that every time, for years and years, that house prices increased in Vancouver, this newspaper downplayed and downplayed any possible role of overseas money. Go back and read the articles. They always list it last, on their list, well after things like a vibrant local job market, or low mortgage interest rates, or whatever. This paper has endlessly peddled the (ridiculous) line that the skyrocketing house prices in Vancouver are somehow (roll eyes) the result of local workers' appetites.

And yet, hello, as soon as there is the tiniest little drop in house prices, well suddenly now this paper attributes that drop fully and completely to the matter of buying pressures from overseas money?

Hello?

Do you not see the glaring incongruence?