This is a crucial contribution, drawing the clear distinction between public opinion and legal findings. When I trained as a journalist many years ago we had to be exceedingly cautious about potentially influencing any court decision - but as this article makes clear, the end of the jury system means that the courts are assumed to be capable of shutting out the noise of public discourse. The tired argument that the likes of Zuma and the Guptas have not been convicted of any crimes does NOT mean they are innocent.