Well as long as he's comfortable who are we to question this?  There are only two former directors of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, Richard Fadden and Ward Elcock, who stated they would have recommended the review by defence and security experts (as per NP).  We have Michael Byers, the Canada Research Chair in Global Politics and International Law at UBC stating “a review by CSIS would have warned that investments by the same Chinese company have raised security concerns in other countries" (as per UBC).  Plus we have Innovation, Science and Economic Development Minister Navdeep Bains, who approved the deal, telling Parliament that it had in fact been the subject of a full security review, while the prime minister went so far as to claim that every foreign takeover is given the same scrutiny. Neither statement being true (as per NP).

So what is it?  Every day we have the government giving different answers to something as serious as national security.  What a gong show.