I think we should be careful about making accusations of guilt-by-association. It's entirely possible to be a member of an organization whose principles don't fully align with your own. I for one would rather judge Bailey based on his own words and actions than those of a church Bailey himself has openly disagreed with. From WWeek's prior article:

*Bailey says he rejects these components of his church. "I worship a God of love, and I believe when two people love each other, it's a reflection of God," he says. "And I believe everybody should have the right to enjoy that love and that marriage."*

*It was the last precept, though, that pushed Bailey from the church for about a year in 2011. ...*

*He returned after numerous conversations with elders led him to believe there was room for his beliefs in the church, he says.*

*"Families can have disagreements," he says. "But at the end of the day, this is family."*

In light of this, I think saying Bailey is "probably a bigot" is unfair.