Well, even you must admit that a long list of footnotes  --  citing generations-old studies that have now been discredited  --  is not what anyone would call interesting.

You could juice it up by providing a little precis, or even just a quote, for each citation.  But oh dear, that would mean you'd have to read those studies yourself, Randy. 

Maybe you could ask the people who write your talking points to flesh out those endless, "dazzle 'em with detail" citations with some actual content.  

Even simple rubes like us do get wise to your strategy after we've been on the receiving end of your "Rapid Response Team" thuggery more than once.  It's that trusty old formula  --  "If you can't baffle 'em with BS, dazzle 'em with detail."