There's no point in debating on-topic points, which I have been doing all along, if a person cannot debate in a meaningful, honest, and valid manner.    I think lack of fairness speaks eloquently, myself.  

The customer stood up for his own need to get to work on time, something that I believe United now recognizes he had both an ethical and possibly legal right to do.   The airline has now changed its policy completely and will no longer remove seated passengers for reasons not related to FAA safety.  They have also changed their processes so their employees, if they need a seat on a flight, will be have confirmed seats before seating passengers.  I have no doubt they will settle out of court for a lot, and they should have to.

If Dr. Dao was 'wrong,' he still won this fight in the long term, and he should have.  Of course the security personnel were also in the wrong.  But capitalism requires such wrongdoing, and state violence and capitalism are Siamese twins.