Perhaps the Denver Post could do a piece on how this development will affect economics for Vestas's US wind energy business on a localized level?  Also, what impact it could have on heavily subsidized initiatives like  solar panel  and electric vehicle manufacturing.   Closer to home-- what impact will it have on Boulder County and SF Bay Area activism jobs related to government funded research of carbon emissions/global warming?  My interpretation is that this will be good for the western US gas and coal industries, manufacturing, and agriculture. Also, good for household consumers-as long as they're not households which are dependent on activism for their weekly paycheck.  Some people work for a living, while others vote for their living.