It is very important that this audit, should it be imposed on the program by the Legislature, be designed to ask the right questions, regardless of what the anti-rail people want.  Because the last thing I think anyone wants is that we are forced to watch a political blood sport on everything and everyone in this state for the sake of really figuring out why the project price tag has gone up. 
So when it is written, by a person who really knows this stuff and not the gaggle of anti railers who are looking to make this into a gladiator episode, that it is "key is for lawmakers to clearly frame the questions they want the audit to answer", we as a community should heed that word. Furthermore, I would say that adults who really know about how these forensic audit questions should be worded be in that room and not just take the side of anti railers.