I never suggested that that you have not read studies that are pro AGW, or if I did i did not intend to. NASA is a wonderful organization and has great resources. But they also have Hansen, he is a fanatic and was documented altering data to support the conclusion he wanted. As long as he heads the climate studies, it can not be trusted. Glad you l9ove the bible, I do not find it relevant. 

1077 engineers and geoengineers are not adequate for you now, yet you posted   "physicists, ecologists, engineers, public health professionals, economists, and energy analysts." to support your claim. Please pick a side of the fence to be on here. Although I do agree with you on that point to some degree. The oil industry may be lying about AGW, or they may be correct. 

Now, about the birds, what evidence did they offer to the cause of the die-off? They starved to death, but what ties that (evidence wise) to their demise?