Responsibility for Mr. Ho's violence can be determined as follows. After he was arrested and sent to the state hospital for treatment, he should have been prosecuted once his condition stabilized. At that point, he would have either (a) been found not guilty by reason of mental illness, returned to the hospital, and upon release placed on conditions of close supervision with authority to rehospitalize him if he became non-compliant or a danger. Alternatively, at trial he may have (b) plead guilty and been released by the court on standard probation or (c) simply set free.

SA could track down what happened simply by the public record of the outcome of his criminal case. This will show who, if anyone, was responsible for Ho's supervision and then explore if there was any negligence or btreakdown in "the system". Also, was he ever prosecuted for the assault on patients (not "inmates" please)? If not, why?
SA used to have reporters who investigated instead of blindly flailing around. Sad.