Most of this response seems to be an attempt to disengage from discussing issue while still riding the high horse of righteousness.  I could take personal issue with all the "political views," "bias" and "all liberal such as yourself" baloney but that would be unhelpful.  Let's try to actually move the discussion forward.  Note: if you still want to talk about my person rather than the point I'm going to conclude you have no intention to honestly and civilly discuss it.
There are a couple of points.  The only active one is that you only present the Senate's check on the President's appointment power as authority.  But with that authority comes the duty to use it appropriately.  For example, a cop has the authority to use deadly force but the duty to use it in service and protection of society.  The same is true for the Senate.  And not even holding a hearing for Obama's appointment was a dereliction of duty.
We had touched on Gorsuch's appointment as well but isn't active.
>Continued<