1a. Why is the Globe & Mail obliged to report facts?
1b. If so, who is the judge of what is, or is not, a fact?
---
2a. Why shouldn't the Globe & Mail present its political views?
2b. If not, whose political views should it present?
---
In case you're wondering, the answer to the "b" section of each question is...Serafim Sarovskii! Me! I'm the judge! My political views are the only ones which the G&M should present! Me, me, me!!!

LOL

(Yeah. That was sarcasm.)