The original issue was Trump's critique of Khan.

Obviously, any official who does not vigorously condemn Islamic radicalism, be it in Manchester or London or Oxford should be criticized.

You are quite right to point out that a civilized society must "balance individual rights with terrorist prevention."

I gave 10 examples in my last posts of exactly how Khan has failed to get this balance right and directed you to the FT article which shows that Khuram should have been in preventive detention.  If a radical Islamist openly displays supports for Daesh then he/she deserves to be held under the Prevention of Terrorism Act and given a hearing to see if he/she should be jailed and/or deported.

Khan's complacency policy has utterly failed to advocate such common sense preventative measures and  atrocities have been a consequence of Khan's policy.

You are correct about cuts impairing the government's ability to prevent terrorism.

Extremism must be dealt with effectively and fairly.