You do seem upset, I'll give you that.

Science doesn't have a spokesperson or a conspiracy against God. Science is a method for explaining things. Science can't make claims about God as it's unverifiable. 

Which is a better explanation for why we have seasons? That there is a God of winter, spring, and summer? Or that the earth's axis tilts as it rotates around the sun? Which explanation is harder to vary? Which explanation is simpler?

You can believe that "God created us" whatever that means, or you can have a very detailed and verifiable explanation of how life came to be as we see it. Nobody is claiming they have 100% of the story. The reason Neil DeGrasse Tyson says things like that is because he is comfortable with his ignorance, he is aware of it. Ignorance is where real science happens.

You're the pious one, who claims to have all the answers and gets upset to people who simple are saying "I don't have all the answers, but this is my best guess - what do you think?"