Hello editors of the Globe and Mail,

What kind of a game are you trying to play, exactly?

Your headline (ridiculously) claims: "Toronto housing affordability now worse than Vancouver".

Yet within the article we read: "... house prices are higher in Vancouver than in Toronto."

Hello?

The mathematical acrobatics that leads you to your headline would apply equally well to a city of 90% houses and 10% apartments and where, say, overseas money has skyrocketed the price of each house to ten million dollars, all owned by billionaires who pay zero% of their income towards shelter costs annually, and where the remaining 10% of housing (apartments) are rented by local workers, consuming 29 per cent of their annual income toward shelter costs.

That city would, by your mathematical acrobatics, have even BETTER "home affordability" than Vancouver and Toronto!

You would be praising a city with all its houses costing ten million dollars as having good "home affordability"!

Are you kidding me?