Mike nonsense, cont....

5. Informed consent pertains to treatment rendered to an individual, not to a decision by local officials to approve the level of an existing mineral in water supplies under their jurisdiction.
.
If you believe that drinking a glass of water requires your informed consent, you are certainly  free to first inform yourself, then give or not give consent to yourself prior to “administering” that glass of water to yourself.
.
Seems ridiculous, but you seem to believe the rendering of informed consent to yourself  to be important for some odd reason.  
.
6.  There is no waste involved in water fluoridation, “toxic” or otherwise.
.
7.  The greedy mindset of antifluoridationists is always obvious in their constant, groundless claims that fluoridation proponents are somehow getting paid for correcting their ridiculous nonsense.  This is ironic in the fact that the only ones who are indeed getting paid are the antifluoridationist leaders.
.

Steven D. Slott, DDS