No, No You got me wrong. I am a strong proponent of  the Global warming argument, particularly anthropogenic  component.  You would be preaching to the converted with me on that score.  But I do support nuclear. What I find difficult is for someone who is trying to advocate the good causes that Greenpeace does, to then contaminate the thrust by delving into other non environmental issues where there is a diversity of opinion and where the risk of getting on the wrong side of people is much greater..    My point is that like trust, years of credibility can be completely broken by a small error.   If you want to convert people to your cause then minimise opportunity to offend. Greenpeace does not appear to be sensitive to this.