You're overly sensitive. I'm not spewing hate - I genuinely want to know what your policy response would be in the wake of the following assertion "People with pre-existing conditions (not disabled, they do qualify now if factually disabled for SSDI/Medicare and that is factual) are not sustainable for insurance companies nor the companies customers." If people with pre-existing conditions can neither expect nor rely on insurance, then what's the alternative? Moreover, you claim the a pre-existing condition is not an employment block, whereas at least one other poster here beside me has told you that they have personal knowledge of it sometimes indeed operating as an employment block. I also see that you suggest single-payer, but only on the state level. Why would that be better than on the federal level? Wouldn't that be less sustainable than on the federal level?