Times have changed considerably since then, jimetjules.  No question that some of the history with respect to QC is shameful.....but on the other hand, the main recommendation of the Durham report -- assimilation -- was rejected.  This is quite unlike most other countries -- look at the French experience in the United States, for example.  I laugh every time I go to "Montpeely-er" Vermont, or hear N'Ahwlins instead of New (Nouvelle) Orléans.

I strongly support French language rights, and recognize that Quebec has a unique culture and history.

But no province deserves a veto.  I think that official bilingualism across Canada is a strong recognition of the rights and contributions of francophones -- in addition to the right to administer a provincial pension scheme and tweak EI for requirements perceived unique to QC.  All these constitute de facto recognition of a distinct society.

A veto goes too far, though.