Does that respect for others' opinions apply equally for those whose expression of their opinions, in the opinion of A-Today editors, moderators and the majority of participants, makes it more "difficult to save the globe from our own human hands," more difficult for those trying to advance the WO agenda, or more difficult for those of the LGBTQ community to find affirmation in SDA congregations?  When I read a recent invitation to a "One Project" gathering, I noticed that at tables for discussions following each sermon, younger people were to be segregated from older attendees. How convenient that must be to keep young, impressional minds from being able to consider alternate, more traditional viewpoints. While I do like the feature of "civil comments," whereby we are notified by e-mail when someone has responded to our comments, the whole set-up smacks of the Emergent Church world view whereby group consensus, rather than proper exegesis of Scripture, determines what is acceptable.