"Lazeelink, I repeat, if you have evidence of false news, show it"

Apparently its all about semantics. Your stance seems to be undisclosed sources are valid until proven otherwise, by claiming "What I don't know YET is the extent of involvement or collaboration between the Trump team and Russians". You've already resigned yourself to the fact that Trump is guilty on all counts. 
You are combining Russian interference with collusion. Security agencies have said there was interference. They've also said it had zero influence on the outcome of the election. It is also known that the Russians are active trying to influence other elections worldwide.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/14/opinion/can-the-kremlin-influence-the-french-election.html
So I ask if you have ANY evidence proving Trump campaign collusion, show it. And if not, what label do you place on unproven accusations? Common sense  dictates everything is in TBD status and if not,  it definitively is ALL about beliefs.