The judge's ruling leaves me very unease, but so does how the feminist activists twisting of the facts.  As reported in the National Post: "“I think we should be concerned when a trial judge in a sexual assault case refers to a complainant as ‘a drunk’,” said Elaine Craig, an associate professor of law at Dalhousie University."  The judge did not call the complainant a drunk. He said "a drunk can consent", which is a general statement, not specifically directed at the complainant.  One would think someone  who is an associate profess of law would know the difference, but when leftist-feminist ideology is in play facts are ignored or twisted.