Quite familiar.  The wall is imaginary; the case was wrongly decided.  If you had a decent law professor, he would have asked your class to discuss the merits of the case and whether the Court's decision was a good one or not given the legal arguments made by the parties.

That's the problem with a lot of law schools; the liberals go into teaching and preach that "living document" crap which becomes the basis for SCOTUS expanding its powers beyond those designated to it.