"Disinformation Scientists"

I did not say that.  I said that the PopTech site is a disinformation site.  The papers quoted there, which the site says refute AGW (many of them by legitimate  scientists), do not refute anything.  They are small details that are peripheral to the question.  If you would bother to read the papers instead of believing PopTech's false claim, you would see that the claims made by PopTech are pure propaganda.  The claims made at PopTech  that the 97% has been debunked are lies, backed up by incompetant people or scientists, most of whom have fossil fuel connections.

Climatechange dispatch is another disinformation site.  There can be no refutation of the obvious consensus.  All attempts are based on faulty math.   As I said, no science society or organization in the world disagrees with AGW.  Do a literature review yourself.   Stop lying about it.