The city's own numbers don't add up. After correcting errors and omissions as best as I could, my spreadsheet emulation shows deficit in 2018 increasing to almost $650 million, of course mostly from the new 'stress' contingency. But thats $548 million, so it's still short. And there are some unidentified items that had to be isolated/exposed. So how solid a plan is that? Only SA would call a deficit plan solid. I like to see capex coverage ratios 1.3x to 1.5x including the reserves, but this isn't even 1x. It should at least be 1x to break even.