Adam Schwemley wrote: "The only benefit to them is the same as it will be for the whole community, access to the airport, especially in emergencies."

.

Really? Should we believe that because the fish is canned PeterPan Seafoods (Maruha Nichiro) would derive no cost savings from a road? What about, for example, the cost of moving equipment and personal in and out? FWIW looking at the PeterPan website it seems that a significant amount of the product from King Cove is frozen - not canned.  I see no reason why we should destroy critical wildlife habitat and then pay for a road, "to boot," that would primarily benefit a foreign owned fish processing plant.  Worth noting too that in addition to Japanese ownership PeterPan Seafoods' corporate offices are in Seattle - not in Alaska, so once again we allow Alaska's bounty (profits) to be shipped outside.