"I don't think the Supreme Court was "perverting" the Constitution but was recognizing the fundamental equality of people to participate in the society and the "common good" created by that society."  So you're a Constitutional scholar now?  The "fundamental equality of people to participate in the society and the 'common good'" has never been thought to include what until recently was thought to be perversion, the marriage of two people of the same sex.  There is simply no right under the Constitution to do that which is so fundamentally opposed to the founding laws of the Republic, which regarded such acts as "crimes against nature."  Cue the laugh" faces from the ignorati.