There's no "merit" in providing excellent customer service, huh?  That's certainly news to literally everyone but you.

You rail against the value judgments that underpin our notions of society and professionalism and say there's nothing that makes non-homeless people more "deserving," yet in the same breath you turn around and fall right back on your own value judgments to make your point (I think you have one, it's a little unclear).  

So we have two competing sets of values here, and which do you think is going to win?  Spoiler alert: not yours!

It's nice that you "graduated physics," but redefining "merit" as "agreements" to explain economics doesn't make you particularly insightful about the current state of affairs, nor any less of another self-proclaimed rebel shouting into the void.

All that being said, I do like the departitioned housing idea.