I have said this before but.... how many domestic assaults occur in this city without making the newspaper? Probably a lot.  It becomes news because he is a teacher.  I get that.  But I would suggest that out of fairness we make sure we that mention the employers of all suspects arrested for domestic assault or mention none of them.

What set me off about this several years ago was a news story that appeared in the RG that a crazy person was harassing someone in our city. The police got involved and the harasser was arrested.  It was discovered that the perpetrator had taught briefly at the U of O 14 years prior to the crime.  The headline in the RG? "Former U of O Professor Arrested For Harassment." 

Unless the crime happens at the workplace or involves employees at the workplace the suspect's employer is not relevant to the charge.  It may become relevant after trial or plea bargain and action may need to be taken.  But why before?

Stop this practice or apply it fairly.