the whole global warming thing is full of incomplete data, over-emphasized data, ignored data. Inconsistencies should be their watchword.
A decade or 15 years ago I went to an exhibit at Bishop Museum about global warming (or "climate change" if you like nowadays). They had a long roll of paper showing all the climate change since.. forever ago - a mighty long time. They got this from dated ice core samples. I pointed out to the (doctor? (of letters)) attending to that section of the exhibit that the warm/cold cycles going way back before the industial age and before civilization, showed a practical identical cycle of swings; how could this be man-made?
He got all defensive about the RATE of uptick is worse now (i squinted hard at the graph paper... oh yeah! that little imperceptible squiggle one hair high than a million years ago? THAT one?!) - he got all huffy and went to talk to someone else.
Global warming is BS.
Well it's changing, sure, but that we did it or we can stop it, uh No