You missed (so mysteriously for such a scrupulous person such as yourself!) this from your OWN link:

"the total new spending under the bill would be between $50 billion and $100 billion each year"

If EXISTING premiums, copays, employer subsidies, etc. are re-labelled as "taxes" then there isn't much money to come up with since there isn't much NEW spending beyond what is already spent -- just the peace of mind that money isn't the center of health care for an individual patient. 

Yes, for wingnuts, making EXISTING spending into government spending is a cause for a heart attack. But for sober-minded people focused on problem solution, it's a dull as reviewing school budgets. 

And let's be clear, this $50-100B ignores that not providing health care isn't itself free - the costs just show up elsewhere, off the balance sheet: bankruptcies, charity, crime, etc.

Sorry, California isn't panicked.  But nice try, snowflake.