That's an excellent article, thank you. That seems to show that we should be making an effort to tailor restrictions based what we are attempting to accomplish. At least one other poster mentioned that it's a tough call that has pro/con when implementing controls. We acknowledge we could dramatically reduce lethal suicide by having mentally ill people on no buy lists, possible limited time forfeiture of a person firearm that is diagnosed with suicidal thoughts or depression (not all mentally ill is equal), but what about their right to self defense? It's a balance of risk I suppose. Sometimes I feel like no one can rightfully decide for everyone else and it could be ballot measure. Politics is society after all. The courts will be left to decide what is overreaching or in society's interest. The public needs to be as involved as it is but open to reasonable rules. That's the goal. Thanks, I appreciated your input.