I agree. I'm pretty sure I've had a close view of the compartmentalization of childhood trauma, where the compartmentalization had enabled a state of functional not-remembering that saw the person through to her mid twenties.  Then the compartmentalization broke down in a series of disabling flashbacks. Though the memories, or "memories," remembered  through  flashbacks seemed credible,  without the external corroboration of events and circumstances by other parties, belief would have been a matter of trust, intuition, and solidarity with the suffering person, rather than material certainty. In the event, sadly, the bad stuff did happen. But one oughtn't  generalize from a valid instance to other instances. Nor should we generalize from an invalid instance.  Each case has to be assessed on its merits. It's in the nature of such crimes that they are too often hard to prove.