I get it, and I am open to the idea that the other ordering forces outside current models.  I think that this is a worthy point of inquiry and one POV that should be explored.  To take the leap that the other ordering forces are intelligent in nature (or must be, as some ID proponents claim) is a very very bold leap.  If ID proponents were to change the name and the tone of the rhetoric, I know I for one would be more open accepting that the conversation they are trying to have is a valid one.   I do think that leaving it as 'not currently understood' is the right way to frame it, instead of many ID proponents who proclaim, "not currently understood, and therefore MUST BE intelligent."  It may be intelligent, it may not be.   It is not explored, and we need to keep exploring it, with the understanding that the outcome may result in either outcome being true.