Whether "historic education" has ZERO relevance may be debatable.  What is not debatable is that the reporter, who thought it was relevant to include Weaver's educational history (impressive) and Clark's (not impressive, given the fact she didn't graduate from any of the schools listed)  failed to mention Horgan's educational history at all.  (Bachelors degree from Trent U and Masters from Sydney U in Australia).Why is that? I think it is fair to infer it is because he wanted to make Horgan's qualifications look inferior to the others.  Which suggest bias on his part.