1-if you look at Romeros voluminous diaries when he was Archbishop, he mentions OD a couple of times. He does not mention Escriva once. Hardly some one that was an ardent follower of OD.
2-the Crux statement "For almost 15 years Romero had a spiritual director/confessor from the Opus Dei - first the Rev. Juan Aznar and later the Rev. Fernando Saenz, who would replace Romero as Archbishop of San Salvador after his death." It does not say he had an OD SD while Archbishop.
3-Most troubling is indeed his meeting with OD the day before he died. Rev Saenz was close to the military. Did OD warn Romero, try to protect him or did they do nothing. They must have know his life was in immediate danger.
So sorry, I don't buy this revisionist history. OD is notorious with changing facts overtime to suite its needs.