You know as well as I do that Burke is unhappy with the changes Pope Francis made in Mitis iudex Dominus Iesus and Mitis et Misericors Iesus.  The rescript issued in Dec. 2015, provides "The laws reforming the aforementioned marriage nullity process abrogate or derogate every law or norm to the contrary hitherto applicable: general, particular, or special, even if approved in specific form (e.g. The MP Qua cura, given by my Predecessor Pius XI in times very much different from the present)."  That really upends Burkes tightly defined world.

The problem is that Burke has so publicly made an issue of changes Pope Francis has made that anyone who attends should keep an open mind on anything Burke says - he has an agenda, he has been very public about it, he is not on the same page with Pope Francis when it comes to marriage annulments.  

Burke has a point of view, but not the only point of view.  Should anyone trust a canon lawyer trained by Burke to represent them?  I wouldn't.