The mother of the girl inexplicably okayed the publishing of the report, even though it had happened years ago and that the perpetrator had served his sentence and had by all accounts rehabilitated himself. The mother of the girl okayed the publishing of this report, even though she knew it would in essence "out" her daughter as a victim of sexual abuse. This is not something to be considered lightly. I would seriously call into question the mother's reasoning for okaying the publishing of this report. Saying that she wanted to give her daughter "a voice" makes no sense as this kind of attention could only cause her to re-live the abuse and face ostracization from her peers once her identity becomes known (as it undoubtedly will, thanks to the ever-vigilant media's blood-lust quest to get all the facts out, regardless of who gets hurt in the process).  What mother would wish to inflict THAT upon their child? The only winner in this sad story is the media. THEY win. Everyone else loses.