Who:  I don't think anyone is suggesting Ms. Shurtz's actions were not protected free expression under the First Amendment.  If so, IMO, they need to re-read the Constitution and applicable case law.  

The real issue, again IMO, is what can, and should, the Law School and the University do about it? 

 Obviously, some of Ms Shurtz's "colleagues" and some University students answer that question with "A LOT" and "A LOT."  They suggest her academic career (that's an outstanding career, BTW) be terminated and she be "banished" from the University.  That is the most severe punishment I can imagine for a University professor.  

Ironically, I'd guess most of these individuals (as do I) oppose harsh, punitive measures for no-violent offenses and reject the contention that incarceration is an effective deterrent to crime.  Yet, they scream for Ms. Shurtz to receive the harshest, most punitive sanction possible for her actions.  

At this juncture, I feel University faculty  (continued)