"I have brilliantly articulated how we, as Canadians, no longer have freedom of speech Ad nauseam."

Well, that's partly right.

No, my "comeback" is the Supreme Court of Canada.  Every now and again, I ask you for the statement in case law that you rely on . . . and you haven't answered yet.  I don't blame you.  Someone who thinks the Charter governs the Globe's handling of its comments section doesn't know much.  Or who thinks that a chief justice said that "political discourse should never, ever, be censored."

The closest to 'brilliantly articulating' the law was when you wrote that when I asked you to name even one case "You are trying to bait me so you can get me banned."  (November 13, 2016)  Lol.

ps, your comment about "Star Chamber tribunals where they have a 100% conviction rate" is right up there, too.