No doubt some hunters are highly educated, as the people in the article appear to be.  But I don't consider hunters as a whole to be "reasonable" and that certainly is not their primary motivation when they minimize the lives of sentient animals in order to rationalize killing them, as though they have some kind of divine right to do so.  Many hunters enjoy killing animals and look forward to it eagerly.   To get pleasure out of planning to and then  ending the life of an intelligent, innocent creature is not something to be proud of and promote as a sport. Nor is it necessary for most people to hunt to survive. I find it hypocritical in the extreme when the same people who kill innocent animals in cold blood and justify their actions by saying it is for food (when there is a multitude of non-animal food available and it's actually healthier), then  condemn an animal for attacking and/or killing humans who threaten them or that they see as a source of food.