Clark's article is unquestionably biased in that he's expressed a clear disapproval for the actions of the CPC in this matter.  That is, I agree, inappropriate.

However, regardless of how he said it, much of what he said IS fact:

- this IS a motion, not a bill
- it does NOT discuss Sharia law
- it does NOT discuss changing any laws
- the CPC DID vote in favour of a motion opposing "Islamophobia" a few months ago
- this discussion IS pointless because meaningless motions pass all the time

Also, if you're looking for a news source that does NOT offer any form of editorial viewpoint, good luck with that.  No such site exists.