Are you then part of the problem as a HART Rail consulting Party member?  If you know the background from the very beginning, you must know WHY the rail was advanced during Mufi's administration...was it really to cut down on traffic from the west side or was there another reason that we all don't know about?  

In the beginning, why was not the maintenance of the rail and its facilities taken into consideration and included in its estimated cost?  Was the rail system electrical needs taken into consideration?  Was the cost of rail executive and its "out of this world" lease rent needed in addition to salaries that is expected to be in the multi million of dollars taken into consideration. 

I ask you, Mr. Rail Consulting Party Member, what negative issues were taken onto consideration when rail was born as an idea?  

Please give us a true and unaldulterated answer.  You should know and can answer all of my question as you claim to be "in" from the beginning!