Here's the problem with that analysis. So far, no credible evidence of collusion with the Russians has been unearthed. That's a direct quote by the people in charge of the investigation. So a Congressman spoke with a Russian official at a cocktail party and forgot to mention it during his vetting for the Cabinet. "Yes, this wine is excellent, have you tried this cheese?" is not collusion, it's conversation. If the Russian official happened to say, "when Mr. Trump becomes president, we hope our two countries can get along", that's not collusion either. It's listening. It's not agreeing to anything. Nobody would have said a word had it been Clinton doing it.

OTOH, she-who-would-be-queen has a lot of evidence stacked against her -- hundreds of classified documents on an unsecured server in violation of State Dept. rules, but also thousands of emails found on the laptop of a sex offender. Anyone else would have been charged, stood trial, and been sentenced to prison by now.