You stated that BC had placed into effect, "strict regulations to dampen demand".

I replied that BC in fact, has gone out of their way not to dampen demand, and listed some of the (factual) reasons why.

Your civil response is to accuse me of an "insane personal bias", rather than  countering  the veracity of the points I made?

Regardless of whether or not you believe the runup in RE price, and Vancouver's trajectory as the least unaffordable city in North America to purchase is a benefit or not, a civil response goes a lot further in presenting your argument.