Regarding: "He also clarified that the standing committee meeting did not address the March 22 letter because the bishop of the diocese where the incident happened, Bishop Jose Porunnedom of Mananthavady, was not a participant. "It was not proper to discuss the case in his absence," he explained."
- So how convenient was it for Bishop Jose of Manathavady to do a fade?
- That any standing committee would not do its job because a bishop is not in attendance is to say the standing committee is but window dressing.