The Wisconsin recount did take place and was completed, and the end result, as I recall, was a net vote gain for Trump of 131 votes. There is absolutely no evidence of any problems with the initial vote count, and Jill Stein did not present any evidence. The recount attempt was ridiculous from the beginning, because it was based on nothing, except a childish unwillingness to accept the election result, and this recount was also clearly politically motivated, since it only focused on three key states Trump won by a smaller margin, and not on the states Clinton won narrowly, such as New Hampshire. Anyway, the concept that these recounts would have changed anything was a fantasy from the beginning, and no serious expert expected any significant change in the results.