That was exactly my immediate reaction as well. "The results don't seem to make sense." A Nanos poll again?

Soooooo much depends on how carefully/neutrally the pollsters' questions are phrased, especially if phones are involved and people have little chance to mull-over the question.  Nuance and clarity and simplicity are crucial.  The very best writers are required. With no agenda. It's too bad that there is no parallel to the classic double-blind scientific experiment protocol, where neither the subject (Pat Public) nor the experimenter (Dr. Nik) have a clue about what is expected.

So I looked through this news story to discover just *exactly* what question was asked. No luck. Not even a link. Not on their website. That speaks volumes. Bush League.