I will go back to my first reply to you.  Perhaps you should read the thread before commenting.  
I did not "insist upon discussing background checks"  I was merely replying to a comment that was not factual.  It was you who replied ... the suggestion would be that it is you who are insisting not me.  
Secondly if you ascribe a motive to someone whom you do not know and then in the same sentence accuse them of making statements about you that may not be true because the do not know you is a bit disingenuous to say the least.  You have not "stuck to the isssue" but rather have tried to conflate and deflect ... the fact of the matter is If you view voter id laws to be an infringement on the right to vote, then you must logically come to the conclusion that if an id is required to purchase a firearm, that is the same infringement, only on a different right.