Your comment confuses two separate thing.

1. Is there evidence for a historical Jesus?
2. Is there evidence that this historical Jesus was the Messiah?

If you deny 1, then you are simply not credible. (And you slipped into that, I am afraid)
If there is validity in your comment, it is is rather about 2. 

But since you shot your credibility about 1. guess what ... You'll find lots in this thread will not listen to what is credible in your challenge to point 2.