A second issue is that the university, all of it, now operates with neo-liberal ethics. Processes are rationalized and incentivized. So is political activism. The issues are power and money. Schill had to suspend Shurtz and start an inquiry in order to protect his power. Otherwise he himself could have been scapegoated. He did what a President should do. The agitation and demands that are certain to follow will be for many things, but mostly some form of money and power. Justice in this kind of economy is funding for new appointments or institutes or for specific departments and the power that goes along with that. 

Understand me, I am not judging. All peoples scapegoat. And the neo-liberal sense of justice as a demand for power and money for the wronged, the aggrieved, my department, my students is rational. So is the demand that others be under tighter scrutiny (less power, less competition for funds). 

This is not about truth or "justice" in some older sense. Or forgiveness.