Wait, do I understand this right?  This kid was on anti-psychotics when he committed the crime.  He's now being held involuntarily in a mental hospital which wants to treat him by putting him back on anti-psychotics.  And the hospital has to rely on the courts to give them the right to put this patient back on the medication he was getting before he was arrested?

I'm all for mental patients' civil rights, but this does seem pretty ridiculous.