Try clearly laying out your own reasoning, instead of simply making unsupported assertions and then telling others who did lay out their reasoning in response to "think about it." 

How exactly would you "tighten up" the process? What "additional vetting", via what exact mechanism, would account for records which were not placed into the the database designed to receive them, nor, apparently, even centralized in any format within the reporting agency?

Not platitudes, not sweeping generalizations, concrete suggestions that can be assessed for practicality.