James Green, You referenced the precautionary principle in your previous comment that was removed because it did not meet civility standards.  As I mentioned, the precautionary principle is that if an action or policy has a suspected risk of causing harm to the public, or to the environment, in the absence of scientific consensus (that the action or policy is not harmful), the burden of proof that it is not harmful falls on those taking that action.  Therefore, the burden is on the GMO food producers to prove that GMO foods are not harmful to humans.  Or do you no longer subscribe to the precautionary principle?