What was there to engage with when debating Milo? He openly calls himself a provocateur which means he has no intention of debating any ideas as he's there to bait with bigoted, sexist, and racist statements. If you know of any legitimate stand he's taken other than vicious taunts, it will be news to me.

And this op/ed piece is hardly pop psychology. It's more of an intervention. Milo is self-destructive. If the alt-Right didn't see that it was because they were enjoying him spewing hate left, right and centre. But anyone who knows irrationally angry people will tell you, the hate is really self-hate disguised.

Of course, you're free to disagree. But you won't be helping Milo. He's defended the priest who abused him while hinting it's okay to abuse children --as long as the child seems sexual mature. And he hates rules so much that he'd embrace total anarchy if he could. Which is nuts!