We journalists try to shine light on issues of urgent importance and vet facts (truth) from “alternative facts” (lies). You decide what to do with that information. ----Brett Oppegaard.
------
 "alternative facts (lies)" -- abhorrence to Trump made the Opposition Media to compare a photo of Obama inauguration to Trump's. 
What are all journalists supposed to do with information they possess?  
Such as a photo of the Obama inauguration and a photo of Trump's?
Ethics dictate that the Journalist with those two photos should know that in comparing those photos, comparison should be fair and equal - not apples and oranges.

Comparison of a photo w/out a TIME STAMP is apple vs. orange

What would a photo of the Trump inauguration look like at its peak?  

Would there be a huge difference between Obama's and Trump's? 

Comparison w/out a Time stamp is fake, fake journalism.  

Alternative Facts is truth that repudiates fake facts from Opposition Media.