Statistical analysis shows that the consequences of Jordon, in its first 6 months, have not been that dramatic:
*) There has been an increase of 12% in the rate of 11(b) stays. There has also been an increase in the rate of 11(b) applications. Overall, 25 more cases were stayed under 11(b) in the six months after Jordon than in the six months after, across Canada.
*) Judges in all cases stayed under Jordon observed that those cases also would have been stayed under the pre-Jordon law (morin)
*) It should be expected that over time, these transitional will prove transitional and lower and the questions referred to in the article will be worked out.

More than half of the people incarcerated in Canada are awaiting trial, and have not been found guilty of any crime. This is extremely expensive for the public, and people have a right to trial within a reasonable time.

I appologize i see no public domain link to J. Patrick, Schulich school of law "6 months after jordon: stat overveiw