Looking at the NASA sea level graphs, there is something interesting. Why did NASA cut off the ground data plot in 2000 then switched to satellite data, with NO overlay, comparing the two methods of measurement? In science, when one adds a new measurement method, one ALWAYS compares the old with the new.

The lack there of raises a RED FLAG as to why NOT!

Current land based data, with 100+ years accumulation shows no significant deviation from a linear trend line.

This one item raises some questions of why this data, along with other data, was presented this way?

Unfortunately, to many answers, leave an uneasy feeling about honesty, or latest buzz word, transparency,  in presenting information.