Putting aside party titles for a moment, this data, to me shows also an interesting pattern in campaigns. For those non-incumbent candidates that are actually getting out there, and I mean ones like Stanley Chang for the Senate,  Dale Kobayashi, Tiare Lawrence and Jaci Agustin  for the House races, there seems to be money available to them. 

For a lot of the races, though, it seems, more typical, one sided, with the incumbent pretty much having the cash and the competition having no cash. For some of the competition (and in some cases incumbents themselves) I would place their inability to rake in money either on a not having a focused effort or the inability to sell their version of politics and philosophy on the electorate. 

Whether the ability (or inability) to rake in cash is the best and sure sign of elect ability, well, that theory will be proven out, one way or the other, by the end of the readouts on Saturday.