Pulling words out of their context to form your argument invalidates your argument. I neither know nor care whether your attempt was to deliberately mislead or was made from ignorance, the result is the same. The context of the phrasing contained in the 2nd Amendment is a settled matter and it is far different from the context you have invented for it. The prefatory clause, the one you extracted words from, explains why the existing right of the individual to keep and bear arms in their homes is being protected from infringement by the newly created government of the Union. Additionally, well regulated didn't mean highly restricted in 1791, it meant well trained.