For 1. and 2. I will pass since it's a matter of opinion.
On 3. The word appears in the subject article and I questioned why it was included.
"Moss and Baden articulate enough background on a key element within the narrative — papyrologym— that the reader feels comfortable about conversations about the study of ancient manuscripts."
I didn't bother to include another typo in the piece:
"Predictability, Hobby Lobby — with a net worth exceeding $4 billion"