Speaking as a unionized faculty member, I will say that there are some elements of truth to the union's position; that being said, I can attest that the union executive sets the agenda and cares not one iota for perspectives that deviate from that agenda. Their method is to make the system so frustrating that many members end up not getting involved because it's far too frustrating and end up deciding to focus on their work (e.g., teaching, research). This leaves the executive with full reign to do what they please with minimal opposition. As well, cancelling union membership doesn't do anything because Canadian law states that dues must still be paid. Changing this law is one step that can be taken to help ensure that the union executive is accountable to its membership. A second step would removing tax credits for union dues; it's a double standard to talk about "corporate welfare" yet expect society to cover my union dues when most Canadians aren't unionized.