Your accusations are groundless. The scholarly consensus exists outside my opinion and yours. Fact.

You have no idea what "subset of New Testament criticism" I'm familiar with, and I would never say that the scope of my reading defines the discipline. That would be stupid. Neither am I oblivious to the field of apologetics. However, they have different hermeneutics entirely.

What's this "school" you referred to again? You're certainly given to evasion.