Will the judge be issuing the basis of his decision? The transfer is codified in law; so is the judge saying the distribution is an appropriation? I get the impression from the lawsuit that the governments half goes to the legislature for further appropriation, but not the half that goes to us. Even though Walker veto of 1/2 of the distribution going to residents I don't understand how this requires an appropriation, or spending by the legislature. This may be crunch time and I agree but the Morse's decision seems more like a personal decision than one supported by statute. One way or the other the supreme court is required to justify it's decision based on the law and not personal opinion and the pressure of low oil prices.