"Harper's fiscal performance was even worse than Mulroney's"

Given how you have zero understanding of even the most basic economics,  your maths is pretty shaky, and you contradict yourself constantly, do explain how you reached that conclusion.

One turned a structural primary deficit in to structural surplus, whilst the other faced the worst Financial crisis in 3 generations, and returned the economy to both Primary and Consolidates surpluses. What is not to like about either?