Mr Vegter, you cannot criticise someone's poor referencing, and then cite a 2003 study in 2017. Like most of your articles, you have again painted a picture short on facts and long on science-less anthropocentrism. You criticise climate science without discussion of a single element thereof. You call scientists fearmongers; with the type of language you use, what are you? Industrial populist? Metaphors of science as dogma are absurd, and a significant contributor to social inaction on environmental issues of concern. I'll pay more attention to your ranting when you write something considered, balanced, and cognisant of scientific fact and consensus (not a 147-year-old newspaper clipping).