You are welcome to your opinion and your interpretation. But it is erroneous, it is based on the false premises that my approach involves "referral to the (refugee committee)" which it does not, and on the premise that my approach involves "a quick examination under oath" which it does not  - it would be a law of Canada in which the fleeing refugee in Canada appears in court with a lawyer to face the law in question, before the judge

Setting that aside, it is kind of bizarre that you feel so sure and certain of how future rulings will go with the Charter. Anyways. enjoy your unfounded self-certainty.