You prove nothing with this post really; as realistically there is no "land base" on which the Kingdom can use to operate with, in the first place!  Only time will tell if the UN or the ICI will have any teeth to enforce their rulings against another sovereign country.

As for Pono not saying anything about the composition of the populace, is because of the fallacy of "revisionists" only considering "Hawaiians" to be represented.  Here's a second "small kine lesson:" Hawaiian is an ethnicity which you are equating to be a "nationality" but how can you have a "nationality" when there is no "nation" to establish or keep it flourishing?  Nations rise and fall throughout history, do you see any people claiming to be "Spartan's or Chaldean's?"

here's a question for you then:  "Why go back to a system, that failed, in the end?" Claiming that it was a "constitutional Monarchy" still means it was an "elitist society" with a striated populace?