Katherine, so, you realize of course, that the Mayor requested the attorney come to a city council meeting, give his opinion and encouraged the council, citizens and and "reporter" to ask him any questions, right? I assume you wouldn't make comments without being informed. Certainly when you say it is incumbent upon citizens to be informed you know that there was 100% open dialog, the city didn't ask for further opinion of the attorney, but yet the "reporter" decided to spend tax payer money (thankfully the attorney later waived the cost) on something that he was in attendance for. Perhaps he should have been listening as to what was going on at the time instead of costing us tax payers money.