"Actually, Clinton got the most votes."

I understand this, but it isn't the whole story.  We did not hold a national popular election.  Instead we held 50 state popular elections (and a handful or so of district popular elections) for picking "winner-take-all" electors.  

If we had held a national popular election the vote totals would have been different.  The campaigns would have been conducted differently, advertising would have been different, candidates would have visited more states, etc.  

Voters in deep blue or red states that didn't bother to vote (whether blue or red) because under the electoral system they would not have affected the outcome, may decide to vote.  Voters in those same states that went 3rd party or traded votes with voters in battleground states might vote differently.  

I suspect Clinton would have won a national popular election, but it is unknowable at this point because we did not hold a national popular election.