It would be helpful if Sophie Minich and Rex Rock Sr. would explain more specifically how the Stand for Salmon initiative would stop resource development beyond simply saying it would prevent Native Corporations from developing their lands. Several weeks ago, Phil Brna, a retired fisheries biologist logically outlined reasons to support the Stand for Salmon initiative. I would like the authors of this op-ed to detail counterpoints to Brna's op-ed, rather than broad brush the initiative as preventing all resource resource development, and being a job killer. Be more specific please.