Lets' stop beating around the bush (I'm guilty of this also). Let's quit using the term "non-consumptive user". 

99% of the time when someone says they want a "non-consumptive user" to be placed on the BOG, they really mean an anti-hunter. 

If you're part of that 99%, just say that you want someone who's opposed to hunting to represent you on the BOG; that would be a more honest approach. 

A potential problem with the idea of an anti-hunter on the BOG is that it may not fit into the State constitutional mandates regarding game animal management.