There's a sad irony in any to & fro charges of bad faith as Amoris was so very much an exhortation admonishing all not to judge.

The Correctio presupposed conceptions of the human will and related notions like "voluntary" and "full consent" and "full knowledge" that correspond to standard dictionary definitions. Colloquial understandings of these realities are woefully deficient anthropologically and terribly superficial psychologically. 

The Correctio also ignored the dynamical realities of developmental psychology and formative spirituality, as well as indispensable theological distinctions between justification & sanctification, secular & religious conversions, the law of graduality & gradualness of law.

Without employing such distinctions and while using unnuanced conceptions of human moral decision-making & action, what gets lost are any robust notions regarding subjective exculpability, e.g. invincible ignorance, force of habit, poor formation. 

All that remains: GUILTY!!!