If it`s a common carrier gasline under FERC rules and I think this one is, it will have "distance sensitive" rates for delivering the gas along the route.. Customers will pay more tariff if they are on the long end of the pipe, and less if they are close to the short end of the pipe.   Trucks will certainly find more work delivering to storage areas and transferring DOT LNG stands (or gas-liquids products) to accessible towns (road and river),.. that will certainly happen.  
I was referring to distance-sensitive rates, sir.  You can` charge buyers at the near end of the gasline the higher cost charged at the far end. Obviously because it cost more to ship the LNG to Nikiski, or to Japan on an LNG carrier.., than it does to Deadhorse or Fairbanks. If it`s not economical it won`t go. That`s always been evident. And that remains to be seen.  I think it would be the best investment the state ever made in itself, other than owning the oil under state land and creating the permanent fund.