I find it very hard to take seriously a priest who demands a “sign” from Jesus, while prescribing for Jesus a highly specific form of such sign, which sign is to be interpreted as meaning that Jesus desires said priest to pen a challenge to the Pope. I cannot help feel this is unsound both theologically and psychologically. In particular, and in light of the previous publication of several dubia by four retired or soon to retire cardinals, and the reaction to that by Pope Francis, this whole episode seems to be a rather egregious act of self-aggrandizement.