I took a look at ITEP's report. I don't see how they factored in: visitor share, tax credits, military and dependents, increase  in rents if property taxes are tapped for HART. I fear this is a shallow, misleading and incomplete analysis. And, what about increasing income tax rates for the top 10 to 1 percenters? What about increasing tax credits for those under $50k? Where does the 14 to 33 % visitor GET income appear? Wow, knock off 33 % of our GET and attribute it to visitors, makes a big difference. Plus, state school system is taxes off income, not local property taxes, unlike all other states. The gross comparative picture that ITEP attempts to portray is fraught with mis-leading and incomplete analysis. Some of you accountants out there could give us a complete comparison which should be a lot better than just saying, "its regressive", and what might we do to make it less "regressive". We are approaching a $1m average home price, don't stick this turkey onto the homeowner.