I'm the last person to defend a Radical Islamic Terrorist; However, when the crux of the allegation that this dude wants to do us harm is gleaned from uncontroverted testimony from one federal agent, and after five years of stagnancy, it's time to ____ or get off the pot. The fact that a judge is actually having to make ex-parte evidentiary determinations, on one hand evaluating the Government's evidence, and on the other hand ruling on a Habeas Corpus Petition filed by the defendant in the same case, is abhorrent. It seems as the Government wants to employ some strategy where they are acknowledging that other evidence exists, but they won't reveal it. This is a 6th Amendment nightmare. Ineffective assistance of counsel, but only because counsel can't or won't get the evidence that they shouldn't have to ask for in the first place? So you keep someone locked up, based on allegations, but you won't detail what's really behind the allegations? Ridiculous...