Yet you stated your opinion regarding Mr. Brauchler and Medicare-for-all but you are suddenly unwillingly to state your opinion regarding specifics?
It would seem that you support Medicare-for-all but at what level of taxation. Is there no level of taxation at which Medicare-for-all would be burdensome?
If families currently with private employer healthcare were to lose coverage for the same cost in premiums and taxes with Medicare-for-all, what level of coverage loss is acceptable in your opinion? And if those families desired to supplement their Medicare-for-all with additional private insurance (as many in single-payer countries do) that resulted in higher overall costs than currently is that acceptable in your opinion.
Medicare-for-all sounds great but when you consider that rolling Medicaid recipients, private plans and possibly VA into the new system will result costs and coverage changes, the specifics should be stated honestly otherwise the solution is simply faith not facts.