But that's exactly the point myself and the article has made which you keep ignoring.
Me forming an opinion and expressing that opinion is in no way PART of any legal system, civilized or otherwise.
My opinions and the legal system are two entirely distinct things with absolutely nothing connecting them - even when they are considering the same issue.

There is absolutely no sane reason why the essential restrictions placed upon the legal system should apply to my personal opinions - because it's not part of that restricted system, it has no power or influence over it, it has no connection to it whatsoever.

> This all you propose should be done by the public.
Nobody proposed that or anything that even vaguely resembles that. We're arguing that personal opinions are not part of the legal system and not bound by it's constraints. Somehow you keep interpreting that as "personal opinions should REPLACE the legal system".
You're arguing a point nobody believes.