Shame on McGill Principle
I have read the article. This resignation looks like censorship to me. Also the McGill Principle failing to have the back of an employee. The article had a lot of facts in it it. Are most of those refuted? This would have blown over in two days. The resignation made it national news. I believe the FACTS in the article hit too close to home. People were perhaps upset because they knew most of what he said was true?

Shame on McGill Principle.