I believe that there are many places in the world where patriarchy and misogyny are dominant themes, and those areas are also disproportionately identified as high conflict zones.  What is much less clear is whether the patriarchal/misogynistic themes are primary or secondary attributes of the problems observed. 

For example, it may be that a particularly inflammatory book (which shall remain nameless to appease the PC censors) prescribes conduct that is the actual primary issue, and the patriarchal piece is a secondary requisite factor vital to service of the reproduction rate that feeds goals associated with that primary issue.

Consequently, attention focused on the gender dynamic may be missing the real issue, and taking us down paths that allow the real issue to hide and grow unabated.