I can't speak for others, that is their business, I speak for myself. Would some be inconsistent? Maybe. I'm not so sure. 

I have been saying I disagree with the motion, because it sacrifices freedom of speech, a crucial value of liberal democracy, for useless reasons, and even counterproductive ones (see article above). A government motion condemning preaching of hate and fear in mosques would have zero effect on those preaching it, no matter how much better it makes those who make it feel.

But you keep changing the argument. Now it isn't matter of whether one should condemn "hate and fear", but condemning the PREACHING of it, two different things. 

And then there is the definition of what counts as "preaching hate and fear", or "Islamophobia". Judging by what gets deleted here, that is pretty broad.

But remember Bissonnette didn't act during Trump's election or right after, but the day after Trudeau's tweet and announcement of an emergency debate on the ban in Parliament...