Would we like to see a pipeline/LNG facility? Well sure - I'd venture to say most would agree that it would be a great thing IF it penciled out. 
But that's just it. It doesn't pencil out. If the state ends up building it (it won't happen anyway), it would likely cost twice as much to finance and operate the complex and pay the producers than what it would bring in revenue. That's what we call harvesting Alaska's resources NOT to the maximum benefit of the people, but rather the maximum detriment to the people. 
Now take the TAPS pipeline on the other hand couldn't be built fast enough by eight world class oil companies and not a single dime of public money spent to build it. And now 40 years of no taxes, PFD's, infrastructure improvements and a $60 billion nest egg later, the oil and TAPS operation has been a maximum benefit to Alaska as required by the constitution. 
Unfortunately it's not looking the same way with natural gas.