I am doing no such thing. I'm saying that your "we know God created everything to appear old" is an absurd conclusion. I'm not debating with you, I'm debating that the vague claims made in the Bible do not stand up to observation. You claim they are more accurate than our observations, or contain special answers about what we observe. You fail to prove this, and retreat to name-calling and special pleading. 

"We know it's this way because of the bible, you're swine and an idiot because you don't accept my special pleading."

In Genesis it's widely known that a "day" could be interpreted to mean "an age". Again, we're just going back to debating dates here. Your own religion can't even agree on the dates. Either things are old, or they were made to appear old. Which is it? Which is more consistent with observation?

Do you think that night and day existed before there was the sun? That's also what's in your special "more accurate than observation" book says.