Your claim is false. Camp did not reject the central tenets of those working with him. Quite the contrary he embraced their instructions and point of view, and they testified to that. The passage you cite is evidence of only one thing: that the tribunal had a far more pejorative view of Camp's frame of mind than even the feminist law professor from the UofT.

There is irony in the ruling though. Across dozens of examples, when presented with a range of possible interpretations of Camp's words, the tribunal consistently chose the most negative one. The term they kept using when condemning Camp's views was "stereotypical." I suggest that their viewpoint is likewise stereotypical, but just in the direction of being rigidly politically correct.

It wasn't a criminal trial and the case against Camp didn't have to proven beyond a reasonable doubt. But in my opinion, neither did the tribunal afford him the reasonable benefit of doubt. If he can appeal the decision, I hope he does.