The Post called this one wrong. Street cops are held to a very high level of accountability for decisions made in the heat of the moment, often under very trying circumstances.  These 2 guys are alleged to have committed actions that were the opposite of that-they were not "heat of the moment on the street" actions, but rather conscious (perhaps not so well) thought out decisions made in an administrative setting.  Accountability starts at the top for any organization that it is right that these alleged actions receive a thorough, transparent and unbiased airing.  It also needs to be asked, regarding the accountability from the top down portion of the questioning, if these guys are actually "the top" or whether they are a notch or 2 down.