Spending more money than others in life does not necessarily translate into better results. Plenty of people and institutions throw money at problems that remain unsolved or get worse. Having effective people in place to lead, manage, teach, and work are typically more important than throwing more money at the problem. There appears to be something wrong with the structure and priorities of the school's here that cannot be solved by throwing more money into the mix. How is it that during the Great Depression and afterwards in the 20th Century, teachers were able to teach subjects with less technology (e.g., computers, projectors, smart boards, etc.) and children were learning subjects more thoroughly than todays teachers and children? There was not as much money invested into schools then, as is wasted today on schools and education.