Another mind-numbing "shallow Hal" article by the old one who can't analyze beyond the obvious. It's not the upfront salary that's a killer but what the UH athletic program get back in return for their investment in a head coach. I don't think anyone argues that Shoji was a "bargain" even though he was the highest paid volleyball coach in the league. Likewise few would argue that Jones was a "bargain" even though his total compensation package was in excess of a million. Chow, at less than half of McMackin's pay was a far worse deal when looking at cost/wins and total revenue loss for the football program and 10,000 season tickets lost. Likewise, Arnold was a huge economic loss with his high salary and the NCAA debacle.  Heck, McMackin looks like a deal compared to the two Mormons. Rolo and Ganot are "victims" of the two as they came in at the bottom of the pay scale. The regents, to argue for salary accountability now, are hypocrites, just like Ferd.