"Compromise" means different things to either side of a dispute. The word means nothing in itself. I prefer to go back to the fundamentals of our State Constitution for the answers:
1. The dividend is not a constitutional right. And it is not an entitlement, in fact the IRS taxes us on it as "income".
2. The dividend is not and was never intended as a means of social welfare. In fact it is a very inefficient and ineffective way to assist those less fortunate.
3. You cannot tax income to pay for "dividends". It does not meet the test of a "public purpose" under Article 9 Section 6. It is also unconstitutional as a "dedicated fund" for State income.
The only compromise available is to follow the Senate Plan to either reduce the Dividend or reduce Spending. I would go a step further in the interest of leveling the playing field for future budget debates: End the Dividend after this year - with a $2500 Last Dividend.  A 1% income tax, $100 capped school tax starting in 2018.