You assume there is a  bias, or a certain level of corruption in pursuit of the scientists personal agenda. Well sir, I am scientist. And I will let let you that the collection of accurate, and unbiased data is the crucible of my profession. In this regard, the process of scrutiny and fact checking can be exhausting. But you suggest people are manipulating information to pursue an agenda. Do you have a reference that you would like to offer the community to support these claims or are they made from personal experience? If your judgment is made from the former, then what is your profession? Do you cheat your clients to your personal gain?  Are you corrupt in your business dealings? I ask because it is the only conclusion I can draw from which you base your opinion.