If it was against the law then why did they "let him off" with a warning about being inappropriate and not wrong ? I don't advocate taking these kinds of pictures and don't do it myself, but nobody here, including Motley Fool has made a case that the guy broke the law. And in my, psychologically damaged, mind he may have acted rudely and cruely, but did not break the law. And, again, if the woman is so bothered by people looking at or taking pictures of he bare flesh then she can cover it up. AND she didn't seem to have an issue with it until she was denied a promotion, unless I am reading the story incorrectly.