"If you dislike this paper, why read it?" Such logical fallacies are typical of leftist thinking. This logic maintains that if one disagrees, the dissenter should be silenced. The left is so wrapped up in itself that a difference of opinion is irrelevant, and for persons like Rowman, their solution is to tell the opposition what and who to read. I read the DP because, fallacies and all, it is such an easy target. It is a caricature of the left, so predictable, repeatedly promoting its political bias.