At places of employment, committees are formed,  are given instruction by management/city council/ fed or prov legislatures to go away and study something and bring back recommendations. Sometimes the recommendations are approved and sometimes they aren't. Management/city council/Governments ALWAYS reserve the right to reject amy report or recommendations they want if they decide it is best not to proceed in thst direction.
I don't agree with Mondef taunting the committee members, implying they did a poor job. But unfortunately taunting is part of QP. Doesn't make dense to taunt her own collegues though. But it's not particularly editorial worthy.
Personally I am ginr either way, change  ir or leave it, but probably prefer leaving it, and will care less if this promise is shelved.
For me, and I suspect many others, what matters in the end are results for a few key promises important to me (this isn't one of them) and no expectation that all promises be equally weighted or even kept.