There is no way that this lawsuit can prevail.  As to the accusation that info leading to the attack leaked when Clinton's server was hacked - there is no evidence whatsoever that it was ever hacked.  Further, even if the server were hacked by terrorists, the idea that Clinton sent and received information on the activities of Ambassador Stevens is highly dubious and without proof.  The suit is without legal merit - they can't win, as I think any lawyer would be able to recognize - so what is the purpose of the lawsuit?  Any guesses?  I have one.