I don't think posting inaccurate, frankly wacky information while totally misreading what someone who disagrees with your point of view writes, is at all conducive to bringing people together. 
This statement is simply inane:"California would not be the decider because California as an entity would be irrelevant to the election." The people who live in California would in effect decide the election, absent the EC, that was Neklason's point.
Careful, or you might be confused with that you decry.