Chase, you link a wiki article as evidence that WUWT is not an appropriate evidence source? Dude, WUWT?
News flash, promoting climate change denial is not a bad thing if it is accurate. It's not even a bad thing if it is inaccurate if it asks questions that need to be answered.   
Nother news flash, the governing rules for WIKI are not journalism. They write whatever they want and have their buddies join in the fun. What you offer as evidence that WUWT is not to be trusted is in fact evidence that you stoop to any depth to silence the opposition.