Alright then, let me put forward another question: Can there be liberal systemic issues within the church or are all 'systemic' issues based on conservative clericalism, pre-Vatcian II myopia and distortions and a repressive view  of sexuality? If this is merely a liberal (pro-Vat II, pro sexual revolution, pro-gay agenda, against a perceived conservative-only based problem, then clergy sexual abuse is not going to be solved. I can give you plenty of examples where it was liberal sexual views and clergy sexual activity that became systemic and allowed abuse to occur and continue. If people doubt this as a possibility then I rest my case in regard to the problems that occur when we fail to account for psychological causes, as well as historical shifts in approaches to sexual behaviour. Why is it always the conservative church that is seen to be the main culprit? Both approaches have their errors. If anyone wants to respond to this post, I'd prefer they answer the above one first.