The case would never have be brought but for the evidence which is now alleged to have been falsified by Niall Silva and he says it was.  Silva was in CIU for 8 years according to his testimony.   If Silva is telling the truth now, shouldn't his work on other cases be reviewed?  Is Tonaki going to do anything to see if people represented by his office were damaged by other improper conduct by Silva or others?  Passing it off to the "administrator" seems derelict on the part of the public defender.  

https://www.propublica.org/article/thousands-of-potentially-wrongful-convictions-years-of-delayed-action