You make my point. There are internal inconsistencies in the argument made in the piece that should be explored instead of hit pieces about this or that public enemy. The authors would do better by responding to the criticisms instead of sniping. If for nothing else than to show they do not exhibit the same dualistic thinking. But I have seen no evidence of that yet.

Your snipe at Chaput does nothing really to embellish your view; indeed its kind of petty. I suspect you would be quick to call out others for making that comment about a cleric more to your liking.