The Eichmann line was not appropriate in this case. 

If you say "Obergefell, like Roe v Wade, was based on a 'privacy' right fashioned out of the 'penumbra' to the Constitution - aka out of thin air" then saying that you disapprove of the right to privacy is a simple restatement of what YOU said. Certainly, no one who approved of the right to privacy would have written that. Don't you understand what you, yourself, write?