This opinion is not based on a full set of facts to support that this is a “campfire round of Kumbya”.   Most of the expansion of the monument is on O&C lands.  A federal solicitor's opinion, on an earlier monument designation, stated the Antiquities Act cannot be used to designate O&C Lands as a monument.  On this fact alone the designation will be subject to litigation.   Where have these reported “scientific studies” been published and subject to review by the public?  Where is the disclosure that comes with NEPA on the full implications of such a designation?  The BLM has completed two major land use plans on this area neither which concluded that expansion was warranted. The BLM lands in Klamath County and Jackson County would no longer be able to be managed for sustainable timber production. The BLM office in Klamath Falls would likely be closed and those rural jobs would be lost.  Revenues generated from the O&C lands are shared across all 18 O&C Counties.  This is not Kumbya!