I do not know how to interpret your accusation that I am hiding a motive, so I will simply give you this: My experience with +Chaput is as I described it and consistent with what I have read, tough I am accustomed to seeing him outside Philadelphia in liturgies where he has less involvement in planning. In things that he controls he has always opted for simpler. Given the opportunity to sing or chant, he speaks. Given the choice to use a little of the Latin we were to preserve, he uses English. You and I do disagree on things. What you call "garbled"" I call "vastly improved" in most respects. I have no use for Pontifical Mass from the Throne in the EF, but find most NO masses bland, lacking mystery and the ability to inspire. The Eastern Churches are much better at liturgy as far as I am concerned.