This article is a mess. You start out with a sob story about Finney going on about not knowing why she got a no cause eviction. Then you jump around for a way on other bits before jumping back to Finney and quoting the building owner "says the tenants' departure was necessary to clean up the mold", then jumping around and mentioning about owner refiling the eviction.
What is going on? Is Finney getting a no clause eviction or not? Do we not know the clause or is it the mold?