As much as I enjoyed reading this article, and the original essay, perhaps it would be best if the comments section was disabled for essays on church architecture. The comments seem to be a devolution from the tone of the two articles. That is a shame, for designs for houses of worship are very important for the communities forming them, and as "the art we live in" remain in our communities and our consciousness for decades and decades. While reading Mr. Feuerherd's piece, it occurred that something more than a column and less than a book would be nice to illustrate America's late 20th century church heritage. But I've reconsidered that thought, and think such efforts be left to magazines by and for architects, pastors, and other ecclesiastical designers.