Talk of sustainable logging, money going to schools, is just a coverup for  standard operating procedure and perspective for short term profit.  The history of abuse to  natural resources because of short term profit motives is enormous,  resulting in the complete or near extinction of  thousands of species.  Environmental lawsuits exist not to thwart jobs, money for schools or sustainable logging, but to prevent ABUSE.  The most cost effective methods almost always result in abuse and exploitation.   Fact is the state is complying with its logging requirement, just not at a rate high enough for the short term perspective.  Why is volume part of the equation?  But why sell the land and remove it from public ownership, why not sell logging rights under environmental guidelines and allow wise sustainable harvests with no clear cutting?  Ah, because no one will buy those rights because the only way most companies will log is with methods yielding highest short term returns.