I've been attempting to relieve you of your bias for about three or four posts now, with little success. So certainly I'm willing to explain it to you explicitly.

You stated that none of Camp's expert interlocutors had come to his post-tribunal defence. Why did you make that false statement. Because you were attempting to impugn Camp; you were trying to make the point that there was no sympathy for him within the legal community. 

There's but one example of your bias, I could point to others throughout our exchange. Worse, you have a closed mind on the issue. When I pointed out your mistake, you stubbornly stuck to your claim that no one had come to his defence. Only now, finally, are you willing to admit that yes, Cossman did come to his defence. But even there you won't allow that she has reservations about the tribunal's conclusion, even though she states that reservation explicitly. 

Robin Camp openly and abundantly admitted his errors. His mind is open to correction. Is yours?