"You want me to comment on your character? Fine" --- Um, I never asked you to do that.
.
" Because you intentionally mischaracterize, distract, present strawman arguments, etc. rather than discuss the issue or topic in the comment you reply to indicates that you are a Republican apologist." --- really? Where can you specifically point to show a) I do that, and b) that these only indicate a "Republican apologist," and not, say, someone who simply offers a straw-man, with no political affiliation, or, say, a "Democrat apologist?"  You do realize that's the textbook example of selection bias, right?
.
"[no one except them wanted ACA before amendments]  -- "Source?"  Are you serious, right now?  0% of Republicans voted for it and all but 39 Democrats voted for it.   You know what 100% of those 39 Democrats had in common?  All of them were in competitive districts in the upcoming midterm election.  You're not really trying to tell us you need a "source" for that, are you?