Again, thanks.  Let me point out that Kipnis' writing on these topics is not scholarly. This is essentially an opinion piece, initiated by an unhappy personal experience. She is foregrounding everything worrisome and shocking that's happening as institutions grapple, often clumsily, with Title9 related matters, while leaving questions about how and why we got there unasked.  She writes engagingly, and I respect and share her unhappiness with some current legal, psychic and semantic outcomes,  but her critique seems rooted in a nostalgia for her early personal experience  in academia in a distinct (and problematic) historical moment. She's shedding enough light to stoke reactionary outrage, but not enough to actually see the landscape. 

For what it's worth, that's how I'm taking this.