I am trying to avoid feeding this random collection of words masquerading as a "column".

1. There is a pattern here - We point out how poorly written, or thought out this piece is, and other posters attack those pointing it out, as opposed to being able to defend/indicate why this is actually a worthwhile column. Impossible to do, I know, but still.

2. Canada has a pay for access scandal, a PM having compromised ethics, as well as an out of control budget, and Trump is what this person writes on?

3. I was aware of TS's lack of "qualifications' but the link you provided raised again my level of disdain for the mere existence of this on-going car-wreck of a column.

A recently graduated niece (BA in psych) has a round table of friends who get together every Friday evening and "pre-drink" before heading out. There is more gravitas and wisdom contained there, than anything I have ever come across here. 

If one continues to post, one becomes part of the problem, no?