Newsreader60 below is correct in one respect. The article posing the proposition of the traditionalists: "Secular - bad; sacred - good" is misleading. The error, the "mis-lead" is to elevate ideological to sacred'ness, to identify cult with church.  OUR sacred, our specific articulation of God is fundamentally rooted in the secular: Incarnation.  As if to ensure that we limited humans were sufficiently armed to defend ourselves from hierarchical elitism, God went further: "God so loved the world....". The death,  entombment and resurrection are fundamentally secular as is/are the "render unto Caesar", on and on.
We are called to permeate - as Jesus in us, as God in creation  - the secular.  To retreat, to castigate, to exclude the secular in embracing a formulaic creed that reinforces exclusion, builds walls from the real of intelligent perception and evolving consciousness of the real is the ultimate of ideology; it  is inhuman, cult, un-Christ, even to the point of being "anti-".