Why was Gerber's  nasty personal attack on Dan Bryant  even printed?  What did it have to say of any benefit except to stir up anger?  According to the RG's figures, they print less than half the letters they receive-- so was this one  really better than the majority which failed the cut?  Surely we can be critical without this kind of mud slinging .  I don't think it would have qualified as "Civil" on our own "Civil Comments" postings.
Homelessness is a terribly complex issue.  It shouldn't be simplified  as seen in this letter.  Some folks just need a job, others need  mental health treatment, etc.  I applaud all who work to alleviate any part of  this personal and societal tragedy.