Yes...but let's face it.  From all indications, not one machine or vote was tampered with, was it?  

Define interference, JD.  It would appear that the sum total is that Russia facilitated the release of information concerning Clinton's questionable activities. The information that was released was apparently not false information, but true.  Should the electorate in your opinion not be entitled to know what she did, and decide for themselves?  The problem seems to be that Clinton supporters are annoyed information about Mr. Trump was not released...somehow, I think  if some had, many liberals would be cheering.

The fact is Clinton did do some questionable things.  Pointing fingers to try to shift the blame is both pointless and childish, and she (and she and others should realize it).  The fact is there has been foriegn "interference" of elections since elections began - the US has indulged also.  There are degrees of interference - so far, I don't see this as catastrophic.  Do you?