Daniel DiNardo should never have become a cardinal.  That hat was intended for Atlanta. Wilton Gregory's health cost him the red hat.  Daniel DiNardo has no business being Archbishop of G-Houston.  He is an outsider that was placed there because of his crony connection to Cardinal Wuerl. They are both native and priest of Pittsburgh. He is no pastor. It makes sense that he would also publicly question and criticize Pope Francis who understands what it means to be a pastor.   Daniel DiNardo is a careerist that now realizes he is no longer going anyhere in this pontificate. He does not understand SE Texas. He inherited a vibrant progressive diocese and he has done everything in his power to nothing short of reversing liturgy to Pre-Vatican II practices.  Under his watch it is a nightmare in the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston.  Daniel DiNardo is not one of the good guys that wears a red hat.