Another initiative that will most likely hinder the chances of making significant and necessary changes to Title 16 that would give better directions to both environment and development concerns. This is on a normal track with the lower court. It knows that the final decision will eventually end up in the State Supreme court so why not rule in the petitioners favor. This is a constitutional question therefore the court of appeals jurisdiction. Chances are the high court will rule against. If not, the legislature will wrestle with it and do nothing because it is an election year. So we have a strong conservative push for Governor and by most Alaskans to get the economy rolling. An initiative for complicating resource development will not be popular with those recently laid off. A no vote will damage any real changes. Didn't Trump win the election handedly and do we not have Republican dominance in the congressional delegation and in the elected in Juneau? Naïve Woods, youth has its...