"Trump says Obama ‘colluded’ on Russia, but gives no evidence"

It's easy to see the bias of the MSM, and the narrative they're promoting. When a few officials in the US alleged that the Russians interfered with the election, they gave no evidence either. Yet the media ignored that. Over six months later, there's still no evidence. Nevertheless the MSM narrative that the Russians did something extraordinary is now a 'fact' accepted by many. However, when Trump offers a narrative that the MSM doesn't like, it emphasizes that he offers no evidence.

Whatever side you're on, surely you see the problem?