Karen Spencer, cont...

Given the high level of fluoride pollution from coal burning and other sources  in China, India, and Iran....other than to antifluoridationists, it is obvious that the 61 human studies have no  relevance, whatsoever, to optimally fluoridated water in the US.
.
According to the just released "EPA Six-Year Review 3 of Drinking Water Standards" in the "summary of review outcomes", fluoride is in the category of "Low priority and/or no meaningful opportunity".
.

In view of this categorization, and the lack of any credible support for the claims in the petition, it seems highly unlikely that the EPA will accord this "petition" anything more than an obligatory response and rejection, as is always the result of such junk filed by antifluoridationists.


Steven D. Slott, DDS