One missing reference to Intensive Management in this debate is habitat improvement. I understand such is a feature or directive of IM that is mostly absent. Carrying capacity of habitat has major influence on ungulate populations which crash when diminished habitat cannot sustain the numbers.  There should be major attention paid to this ignored  element of Intensive Management. The emphasis on killing wolves and bears instead in an endless multimillion dollar slaughter gets top billing. Also wish to point out that Alaska's spectacular wildlife legacy wildlife must not, and ultimately, will not be the exclusive property of the bullet huggers and their sponsoring Safari Clubs International, the Alaska Outdoor Council, the NRA, and the obedient present mindset of the ADFG/Alaska Board of Trappers' and Hunters' (AKA Game) lapdog.  From Alaska's growing dramatic demographic change will emerge a culture that respects and demands Alaska's unique living wildlife gift be manage accordingly.