The title of this article claims "local values", but the content of the article only discusses (and rather selectively so) "Japanese values"? Do you think this type of cultural appropriation of the word "local" is fair to the original "locals"? I would suggest that this article is an excellent example of the passive aggressive racist attitudes that permeate Hawaii; in this instance aimed specifically at a "haole", while simultaneously silencing and misappropriating the ethos of the indigneous culture. Unless, ofcourse, you mean to equate "enryo" with "aloha", or instead perhaps "enryo" is used in contrast to the "maha'oi" behavior which you allege that Chelsea displayed? Would you care to clarify?