A reasoned examination of Prof. Peterson and his views could be useful. Unfortunately, the Globe has published a smear, not an article, starting with the lead, which highlights the fact that Peterson's private lectures are 'subscribed to' by people paying a fee to see them, which makes him an "exploiter" of audiences.  She should look at Mother Teresa as a better example of an exploiter. Also, "the wrong sort" read him so he must be the wrong sort. There are five stand-alone fabrications in the first paragraph alone. Dr. Peterson does come across as 'militant'; however, he knows the difference between "asking for special accommodation" and "requiring by law that one change the English language." Also, the difference between critiquing a policy (as bullying) and "railing against anti-discrimination policy." The fact that only Peterson himself is cited in defence of himself, while every PC warrior at U of T is cited in attack, speaks to the purpose of this article.