I think you're deliberately missing Dan's point in order to win an argument.  Dan equates the lives of the born with the unborn and correctly points out that if we are to be consistent, then poverty should not be a factor in deciding whether the child's life is terminated.   While true that a fetus is not a legal citizen, it is still a life and killing the baby  should not be allowed any more than killing non-citizen toddlers or newborns.  This is a good reminder that our rights as human beings do not derive from any government.  All humans have a right to life.