There is not much. 

However, as I commented on the AgriSA article, interestingly the reporter and editors feels no need here to comment on the discussion or provide an alternative take from a critic of "socialism".  No framing here of the panel as a bunch of 70-s era socialist & communist fossils, revisionist history or the legacy of the system they want to rehabilitate...In fact they are just "leftist reinventing socialism for SA". The bulk of the article is on their opinions - great - of course in the AgriSA case a significant proportion of the article rather deal with context and criticism...Fair enough, not all journalism should follow the same template and perhaps not much needs to be added when "socialist" speak in 2017. 

As an aside, in the AgriSA article Ruth Hall is introduced as from the "Institute of Poverty and Land Studies at the University of the Western Cape"; not from PLAAS (same thing) - that hosted this platform. Hmm...see how this stuff works...