Most of why justice seems blind is that very very few people know the law, let alone know when it is being broken. To argue a human rights case without any knowledge of the laws is where most of the public is. The value of our freedoms is in the way they are defended, not about popular vote, whether or not there are mitigating factors. Vigilantes are illegal. Why? Because people react with emotion instead of rational thought, waiting until both sides being heard BEFORE judgement. Can anyone quote Khadre's lawyers arguments?