Yeah, its very clear you understood my thought development. It very clear you did not simply adopt an epistemology in which the question of God's nature as Truth is assumed as self-evident, and thus from that perspective all other epistemologies are absurd, and anyone who might not concur is just foolish.

What's funny here, LifeOfTheLay, is that I actually happen to fully accept your principle pronouncements  in your 2nd through 4th paras. But I also grasp that our shared convictions about God as Truth is not self-evident to all rational human beings, whom I am obliged by my faith to respect as alter-Christi. And I also grasp that our agreement about the ultimate One Eternal Truth does not mean we should expect what one generation sees as clear truth should not evolve through a progressive series of truths towards that One Truth. 

The writing is on the wall: A fundamental tenet of the universe is evolution, and human thought is not an exception, even when it comes to  revelation.