The investigation will determine what happened in the meeting at which the Grand Chancellor (a professed knight) was terminated; that appears to be the crux of the controversy. If he was told, wrongly, that the "Holy See" (which he would reasonably infer is the pope, who occupies that See), wanted him out, then the critical issue is who presented the false information and why. The fact that the Patron of the Order, who serves at the pleasure of the pope and represents him to the Order, was at the meeting puts the focus on him. The fact that the incident is several years old and is only now coming to a head may suggest that +Burke escalated the controversy. I read the circumstantial evidence, as well as Burke's history, as pointing that way, which is why I said that my money is on him when you speculated that somebody jumped the gun. The pope has quite properly initiated an investigation.
As for accusing me personally: I accept and thank you for your apology. Peace.