How come you didn't have the stones to reveal your political leanings in your column. Here you admit to adhering to Dunleavy style conservatism...which means you're the same kind of  conservative extremist ideologue as Dunleavy. Of course, just like Dunleavy, your can't name any specific cuts you want to see. You just refer to them in vague generalities. 

Your column, infested as it is with those vague generalities, is therefore completely lacking in value.