I am not the one ignorant of reality in this discussion.  I have pointed out that refugees have certain rights and exemptions that are different from other migrants - black letter law.

What you think the majority of Canadians may want is immaterial if it contravenes our supreme law and that has been so since 1982 when the Constitution was patriated and the Charter passed into law.

Since international and domestic law allows refugees claimants to enter Canada by any means necessary and make a claim as Convention refugee and they are entitled to legal representation, why would lawyers be disbarred?  You did read the recent SCOC decision that struck down the amendments to the human smuggling provisions of the IRPA as "overbroad" did you not?  See R. v. Appulonappa, 2015 SCC 59

The is no chance of Canada withdrawing from international conventions and agreements on refugees.

The safe third country agreement is the government exploiting a loophole in the Singh decision.