JC12345 writes:  "Ambrose is saying that the police should be neutral in their questioning, neither assuming guilt nor innocence but keeping in mind the possibility of both."

No.  Once again, the comment by Ambrose that got us into this thread was "the police should rightly question the complainant as if the accused were innocent." 

I called him on it; he then modified his original statement, to which I said: "I'm not sure we're so far apart" . . . adding " I don 't see the presumption of innocence in sexual assault cases being in any risk."

And then you got into it to stir the pot with foolish misreadings and accusations.  Your decision to bow out now shows, finally, a glimmer of common sense.  I've been harsh because it's far from the first time you've done this.