Actually, you've commented harshly on LSUC's motivations:  "But what does LSUC say ... We don't agree with TWU's religious views on marriage and sexual intimacy. We can't punish TWU for its views, so we will punish you [students] instead.'"

You totally misrepresented what LSUC has really said, and you claim they are acting out of vengeance because they object to a religious belief.

It's not the beliefs they object to -- it's that by making adherence to religious beliefs a condition for enrollment LSUC excludes anybody who doesn't share those beliefs.  LSUC has not challenged LSUC's legal right to do so under the BC HRA.  As I've tried to explain, their position is simply that the only criteria to enter the legal profession should be merit, which is why they banned religion as a criteria in 1839.  They are not excluding lawyers with evangelical beliefs from practicing law in Ontario now either.  They are defending their principle of equality of access to the legal profession.