[1) Why isn't the Navy reporting presence/absence of PFOA and PFOS?]

Seriously?

From the article above:

"Test results show that three of 27 groundwater monitoring wells at the Navy’s Outlying Field Coupeville have levels of two perfluorinated chemicals above the Environmental Protection Agency’s lifetime health advisory level...The Navy received results from 112 samples of properties near OLF Coupeville and seven results were above the health advisory...The Navy received 99 results from wells near the Ault Field base on North Whidbey. Two sample results were above the advisory level, the Navy reported."

[2) Why isn't it testing for or why isn't it releasing results of testing for indicators that the source of the pollution is its firefighting foam]

Again, seriously?

From the article:

"The two substances, PFOA and PFOS, are found in firefighting foam"