Once again our politicians pile onto the politically correct bandwagon with disregard for the consequences.

If our judges are to be "educated" to adopt a particular context with respect to the testimony of sexual assault victim witnesses, then presumably they can also be "educated" to do likewise with respect to other issues.  Which other issues?  Who will decide which issues and what "education" is required?

Wouldn't it be better to have our judges remain as impartial as possible and leave it to the litigants to introduce whichever context or frame of reference happens to be in vogue at the time?