The key metric necessary to make sense of 'unfounded' rates has been persistently omitted by the Globe and Mail.  They have now published around a dozen spin-off pieces and still not bothered to mention it.
.
I doubt even the Globe is so illogical that they can't see the significance of it, and so we must conclude their omission is deliberate.
.
The information they are omitting is the conviction rates than follow the investigations.   If you have a low 'unfounded' rate and a low conviction rate, then accusations are not being given due scrutiny.