Some one from the other side will write up another opinion piece. submit it, and the ADN will put it up if it's coherent. and it likely will be.  Allocation squabble - there are at least 2 sides, and more likely 3 or 4.  
But he makes a strong point about Turner.  If some/any members of the BoG are clearly [some] industry interest, then there's going to have to be seat designations by party interest for each seat on the Board - to order to insure balance.  Maybe a resident hunter member, a trapper, a couple for the various non-consumptive and non- users, at least 1-2 with solid research background in the science to keep everybody in touch with the need for fact-based reality . . . . .