Nice spin, but it does nothing to alleviate the painful truth that the Dim party didn't have the seats to lose.
If a multi-millionaire loses 100 grand, does it really affect his bottom line? Not so much.
But if that millionaire's wealth is based on investment, that 100 grand could very well be his bread and butter for the next year.
Point is, the Dim party couldn't afford the loss, let alone 1000+ seats in such a short amount of time, coupled with losing both Houses including the WH.
You make the same mistake all libs make, you conflate party with ideology.
PUB does not equate to Conservative, today's Pub party is nothing more than the Dim party of the 80s, yes, that's how far left the both party's moved in the last 3 decades.
Sadly, there's no room left for what needs to be said, but you mentioned "Political analysts".
I am a political advisor/analyst, been at it for decades, and one thing we all have in common? Bias, though the left, carries agenda with theirs.