"Should it be replaced ?

Not !

It merely presents a false picture of international justice - something to salve our conciences. As does "International Law" ....

As S. Sarovskii posted - the Big Boys have the power to ignore it. A second issue is that would you present your case before a court that includes Third World members and legal concepts ?!

Perhaps only then would/could we admit that "Justice" is a rather ethereal concept and we should not waste time and money pretending otherwise, but "get over it" and concentrate to build a better future for all."
-
-
-
What would you propose as an alternative to a organized system of international justice based on international law?

Another question: Is it possible to build a better future for all without addressing the past? And, a follow-up: If one country can ignore its terrible past, why shouldn't all countries ignore their terrible present--after all, today's present is tomorrow's past.