Greenpeace does not have expertise in forecasting asian oil demand.  Financing a project has nothing to do with Greenpeace's resolve.  Greenpeace questioning Kinder Morgan's investment decision based on oil demand is like someone who doesn't like fighting in hockey, telling Sidney Crosby how to play. 

The product will be burned up, whether it comes from Canada or Saudi Arabia.  Therefore, climate-change concerns are irrelevant.  The business that supplies the demand of a legal product should be able to conduct its business under fair and reasonable rules and processes.  Rather, the person who chooses to create the demand for a product that has negative side effects should be the one mainly penalized (i.e. taxed -- as with tobacco and alcohol).  

Greenpeace members support in creating this demand as they too enjoy a great and healthy lifestyle due to fossil fuels, whether they choose to believe it or not.