"I'm not the one who made the draft dodging comment."
Hold on.  "Draft dodging?"  Straw man.  I questioned no assertion made about draft dodging but about point dodging, presenting blatant bait and for the purpose of distracting from the point raised about the current administration's conduct.  I wouldn't have spoken if you had limited  your response to address "draft dodging."
"I'm just pointing out that the previous administration didn't do much about the problem"
If a response is not relevant or helpful to the previous comment and has a clear partisan bias it seems at best a distraction.  It is pretty clear that Obama's conduct is not binding on Trump's conduct as Trump's conduct in this case does that which Obama specifically avoided/disclaimied.  There appears to be no relevance to the current administration's actions.  Unless you can present some basis for relevance or helpfulness?  I predict mere repetition of the point as if repetition will make a comment relevant or helpful.