The G&M judged this comment uncivil.  Why?

"I considered commenting on an article this morning, but it's been designated a sensitive topic (is this new?),  I couldn't comment on it because within the last 30 days, I'd been restricted for clicking through others' comments and not catching comments the G&M considered uncivil.

As a paying subscriber (which is why I can use this comment board), I do not expect to have to do the G&Ms job for it - if I submit a comment, the G&M moderator should check to see if I've over-stepped the boundaries. 

The G&M is obviously still doing this, but now I am also expected to judge my fellow commenters. If the G&M doesn't like how I judge them, I'm restricted. There is something creepily Orwellian about this.

I wonder if others feel the way I do? I'd end my subscription, but national publications in Canada are woefully limited, as we all know. But I'm very unhappy about this, and not impressed."