But this is saying that because we couldn't get you for the first murder then we should convict you for the second.  If they had omitted testimony on the first death this appeal wouldn't have even happened.  This is dishonest.  Yes, I think he killed the 2nd wife--but why didn't the state ask for the death penalty?  (That the state didn't ask for death with OJ is a majro reason I think the state doubted he did it but felt they could get a conviction anyways and getting convictions, not convicting the guilty, is the name of the game.