Description:    Well I just loaded,        and this is crazy,    but here's my address,        172.31.0.10/artisinal_assembly_0331fb4526b5ffee34f6ab66899bac0bRunning objdump on the binary showed minimal obfuscation, as well as a `main` function that seemed to do nothing more than call a bunch of functions:    0000000000400506 <main>:      400506:   55                      push   %rbp      400507:   48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp      40050a:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      40050f:   e8 63 01 00 00          callq  400677 <initialize_dx>      400514:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      400519:   e8 61 01 00 00          callq  40067f <import_input>      40051e:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      400523:   e8 6c 01 00 00          callq  400694 <a_good_start>      400528:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      40052d:   e8 31 01 00 00          callq  400663 <word_realignment>      400532:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      400537:   e8 71 00 00 00          callq  4005ad <source_cx>      40053c:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      400541:   e8 5f 01 00 00          callq  4006a5 <todo_unit_tests>      400546:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      40054b:   e8 4d 01 00 00          callq  40069d <largerify>      400550:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      400555:   e8 33 01 00 00          callq  40068d <timing_offset>      40055a:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      40055f:   e8 5f 00 00 00          callq  4005c3 <finalize_xc>      400564:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      400569:   e8 4d 00 00 00          callq  4005bb <almost_there>      40056e:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      400573:   e8 61 00 00 00          callq  4005d9 <todo_reexamine>      400578:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      40057d:   e8 79 00 00 00          callq  4005fb <reticulate_splines>      400582:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      400587:   e8 42 00 00 00          callq  4005ce <timing_loop>      40058c:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      400591:   e8 65 00 00 00          callq  4005fb <reticulate_splines>      400596:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax      40059b:   e8 3f 00 00 00          callq  4005df <export_results>      4005a0:   5d                      pop    %rbp      4005a1:   c3                      retqIgnoring `mov %0x0,%eax`, we notice that function calls appear out of order from the function definitions, as well as `important_initialization`, which wasn't called at all:    00000000004005a2 <important_initialization>:    00000000004005ad <source_cx>:    00000000004005bb <almost_there>:    00000000004005c3 <finalize_xc>:    00000000004005ce <timing_loop>:    00000000004005d9 <todo_reexamine>:    00000000004005df <export_results>:    00000000004005fb <reticulate_splines>:    0000000000400663 <word_realignment>:    0000000000400677 <initialize_dx>:    000000000040067f <import_input>:    000000000040068d <timing_offset>:    0000000000400694 <a_good_start>:    000000000040069d <largerify>:    00000000004006a5 <todo_unit_tests>:Stepping through the instructions reveals nothing, as the program just builds the string "The answer is 42" and prints it.Initially we thought that execution order was important, and that maybe we needed to call all the functions in the order defined in the binary, but it didn't seem like there was enough code, nor available static strings, to produce anythinge else. Additionally, the NOPs spread through the program strongly suggested that the function offsets were important.By taking the least significant byte of each instruction argument in `main` we get:    89 63 61 6c 31 71 5f 4d 33 5f 4d 61 79 42 65 3fwhich can be converted back from hex to get:    $ echo -n '89 63 61 6c 31 71 5f 4d 33 5f 4d 61 79 42 65 3f' | xxd -r    cal1q_M3_MayBe?Answer:    cal1q_M3_MayBe?