Dataset Viewer
url
stringlengths 57
101
| date_str
stringdate 2023-04-03 00:00:00
2025-06-30 00:00:00
| title
stringlengths 0
212
⌀ | speaker
stringlengths 0
249
| data
stringlengths 0
1.26M
| chamber
stringclasses 6
values | country
stringclasses 3
values |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Gabriel Ste-Marie
|
I would first ask for the consent of the House to share my time with my friend, the one and only member for Abitibi--Temiscamingue .
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Gabriel Ste-Marie
|
during the first part of my speech, in March, I spoke in favour of this bill. It is a good bill. It is a step toward transparency that will help fight tax evasion and fraud. The bill is respectful of the provinces. In fact, Quebec's registry has been in place for almost a month. However, the tax cheats who were exposed in the Paradise papers did not create their shell companies in Canada; they created them in tax havens. The bill does nothing to address that. The work has only just begun. Cracking down on fraudsters who use tax havens requires a global registry--not just a registry of the real company owners, but also a registry of real beneficial owners of trusts. I am thinking, for example, of the real beneficial owners of the Isle of Man trusts that KPMG Canada created for Canadian tax evaders, the ones who were granted amnesty by the Canada Revenue Agency. It sounds like a huge undertaking, but it is not. In fact, this registry already exists to a large extent, and it is maintained, for one, in Luxembourg by a consortium of financial institutions. Even tax cheats like their banks to know they have assets somewhere; it is good for their credit. This registry is available to financial institutions, but not to governments that want to go after fraud. I think we can all agree that there is something wrong with that. Transparency, public registries and so on are excellent tools against fraud, but they do nothing against profiteers, against those who take advantage of all the loopholes in the Income Tax Act to use tax havens legally. Those individuals do not need to hide their income. All they need is a good accountant to make sure their income is not taxable, even when it is declared. The United States forced Canada's hand by imposing its idea of endorsing a 15% minimum global tax rate at the G20. The latest budget introduces Joe Biden's minimum global tax rate. Using tax havens will become less attractive, but the government is doing the bare minimum to fight tax havens. Income repatriated from tax havens that have information exchange agreements with Canada remains tax-free. This has to stop. Yes, we will support Bill C-42 , but it does not go far enough. A registry is good, but tax fairness is better.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Kevin Lamoureux
|
a part of dealing with the issue is bringing in legislation, but there are also budgetary measures that the government has taken in the last few years. We have beefed up the resources for CRA: A few budgets back it was close to half a billion dollars, and several hundred million dollars followed that. I am wondering if my colleague could provide his thoughts. Yes, the legislation is really important, but along with that legislation one has to establish, as we have, the financial resources, in good part, to be able to deal with the issue at hand.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Gabriel Ste-Marie
|
I have a simple answer: Yes, but all that is not enough. I want to talk about the example I gave at the end of my speech. In committee we looked at the issue of who really profited from the Isle of Man trusts created by KPMG for Canadian tax cheats. We worked for a long time on that issue. In the United States, when the same thing was done, there were investigations, criminal prosecutions and even jail time. The IRS, the Canada Revenue Agency counterpart, put a stop to it. Here, there have been no criminal prosecutions and no jail time. Even though we have laws, even though we have the funding, we do not have the will. The minister refuses to use her discretionary authority to make the CRA do more. We must change the way things are done by this government and the CRA, because we can see that our laws and funding are still not enough.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Jean-Denis Garon
|
allow me to return to the KPMG issue and the tax fraud scheme for which it faced criminal charges in the United States but was cleared of wrongdoing by the Canada Revenue Agency. At the time, we reminded the Minister of National Revenue that she had the power, by law, to launch an investigation that would have been led by a Tax Court of Canada judge. The minister still insists that the CRA is independent and that she cannot launch an investigation. Clearly, she is unfamiliar with the law. Despite all these lofty legislative initiatives, I wonder what my colleague thinks about the message this is sending about Canadian leadership in fighting international tax fraud.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Gabriel Ste-Marie
|
I thank my colleague and friend from Mirabel for the question. The minister came to committee and told us that she did not want to get involved in this, that she considered the Canada Revenue Agency to be independent. However, Mr. Lareau, a global tax expert, came to committee and told us that the minister was the only person in the country who had the power to launch an investigation. She has the power but is choosing not to use it, while the government is choosing to leave her in her position. It is not good enough, and it is unacceptable. We are seeing some progress being made worldwide under the leadership of the United States. The Biden administration is saying enough is enough. The wealthy need to pay a minimum of 15%. Now the G20, the OECD and other groups of rich countries are following suit. From day one, Canada has systematically been lagging behind others. It also does the minimum and maintains this system of impunity. The message being sent to KPMG and potential beneficial owners is that there will be no consequences if they try; at best, they will pay less taxes, at worst, they will have to pay it back. The message that is being sent is unacceptable.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Brad Vis
|
we know that the federal registry is not enough to fight money laundering because most small and medium-sized businesses in Canada are regulated by the individual provinces and territories. Does my Bloc Quebecois colleague think that the Government of Quebec could enter into an agreement with the federal government to improve the federal level's capacity to fight money laundering while respecting Quebec's jurisdictions?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Gabriel Ste-Marie
|
I thank my hon. colleague for his question, which he asked in excellent French. I really appreciate that. In my opinion, what we are seeing in this bill is a possible harmonization with the provinces. It seems to be respectful of the rights of the provinces. For example, Quebec has had its own registry for a month now. This will require collaboration and information sharing, as with all countries around the world, but things seem to be on the right track. Obviously, we must always do more to fight against money laundering, and our job is to remain vigilant to ensure that everything works well and that we can do more.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Sebastien Lemire
|
I rise today to speak to a bill that is of crucial importance to the Quebec and Canadian economies, specifically, Bill C-42, an act to amend the Canada Business Corporations Act and to make consequential and related amendments to other acts. Bill C-42 was introduced in the House of Commons to modernize the Canada Business Corporations Act and make it more competitive and adapted to the current needs of businesses. The amendments to the act seek to enhance the transparency, responsibility and sustainability of Canadian businesses while ensuring their competitiveness on the international stage. The bill has several important provisions. First, it introduces an obligation for corporations to declare their real economic interests to enhance transparency and fight money laundering and terrorist financing. This provision will also help prevent corporations from hiding their true ownership behind opaque structures and improve the public's confidence in the integrity of the corporate system. The bill also brings in a new corporate social and environmental responsibility strategy. Corporations will be held accountable for social, environmental and governance factors in their decisions and their trade action. The purpose of this provision is to encourage businesses to adopt a long-term vision and make a positive contribution to society in addition to generating profits. My colleague from Joliette , who is also our finance critic, had questions the last time this bill was introduced. His question was the following: If business A belongs to company B, which belongs to corporation C, can we find out who the beneficial owner is? What happens when a business is in another, less co-operative country where information is not automatically shared, like in a tax haven? Will Bill C-42 allow us to identify the true owner? This question needs to be answered. Countless reports and investigations on multinational corporate activities indicate that organizational charts and operational structures are not always clear. The takeover of national security sensitive sectors or sectors that might jeopardize our supply chains is a real concern for our party. The example we are talking about here of a company that is owned by a chain of other companies can create a situation where it is difficult to identify the real owner, particularly if one or more of the companies are located in countries that do not have automatic information-sharing agreements. For example, I am thinking of two places in particular from a case I was looking at recently, where, at the centre of the company's complex structure were shell companies located in Labuan, a territory of Malaysia, and the British Virgin Islands, two places where strict laws and secrecy prevent the public and foreign courts from accessing information about the real owners of these companies. The two shell corporations were involved in transactions in France, Brazil and the United States. How are those countries managing this issue right now? Does the existing legislation provide tools for better monitoring and more flexibility in dealing with the challenges of the ongoing technological transition? I hope so. Although the new provisions of the bill improve the transparency of Canadian companies, they do not necessarily make it possible for Canadian authorities to identify the real owners of Canadian companies owned by entities located in uncooperative countries or tax havens. In such cases, Canadian authorities may have to rely on other methods to identify beneficial owners, such as requesting information from foreign authorities, using agreements for mutual legal assistance or relying on other sources of information such as media reports or leaked documents. It is therefore important that the teams monitoring and conducting assessments are well equipped. In February 2020, the Quebec government announced its intention to create a registry of beneficial owners of companies. Bill 78, an act to modernize legislative provisions respecting legal auditing, was introduced in the Quebec National Assembly in June 2020 and passed in December of the same year. Bill 78 contains provisions to create a registry of beneficial owners and make it public. We could take a closer look at the challenges of setting up such a registry and determine where the various provinces stand on this issue. How will the registry work? I look forward to hearing from officials on this issue. It is important to note that Canada has a number of information exchange agreements with other countries, including tax information exchange agreements that would allow Canadian authorities to access information from foreign companies operating in Canada. These agreements have made it easier for Canadian authorities to identify beneficial owners, even in cases where companies are owned by entities located in uncooperative jurisdictions or tax havens. I would really like to have a chance to hear the opinions of experts, as well as some recommendations for conditions that could be considered for the next round of negotiations with certain countries. The bill also includes amendments to strengthen shareholders' rights. It gives shareholders the right to vote on executive compensation and management succession plans. This provision will ensure greater transparency and accountability to shareholders, while increasing board members' accountability. We are pleased that some of our recommendations caught the attention of the department and have been included in Bill C-42 . Finally, the bill introduces amendments to facilitate access to capital for Canadian corporations. It simplifies the process for issuing shares and eliminates some existing restrictions, making it easier and more efficient for companies to raise capital. In short, the act to amend the Canada Business Corporations Act and to make consequential and related amendments to other acts is a crucial bill for the future of our economy in Quebec and in Canada. The proposed amendments aim to strengthen the transparency, accountability and sustainability of Canadian companies, while enhancing their ability to compete internationally. As a member of Parliament, I am certain that this legislation is necessary to protect the interests of Quebeckers and Canadians and to ensure long-term economic growth. In conclusion, I would like to draw a comparison related to my duties as critic for sport, a field in which good governance has been raised as an issue. Governance and accountability are key factors in sport. Governance refers to the way sport organizations are managed and led, while accountability refers to the way actors involved in sport are held accountable for their actions. In terms of governance, sport organizations must be managed transparently, effectively and fairly. Decisions must be democratic, and all stakeholders must have a say in the decision-making process. Governance structures must also be accountable to their members and to stakeholders. Accountability in sports has to do with how those involved are held responsible for their actions. That can include the responsibility of athletes when it comes to fair play and following the rules and the responsibility of coaches and the heads of sports organizations when it comes to keeping players safe and promoting a healthy sports environment. In the end, good governance and accountability are essential to ensuring the integrity and durability of sports. Sports organizations must be transparent in how they operate, accountable to their stakeholders and held responsible for their actions in order to maintain the trust and respect of fans and sports communities. It is unfortunate that the funding was established without a full understanding of what sports organizations would have to do to demonstrate real change. Obviously, I am thinking here of the government restoring funding to Hockey Canada. We need to ensure that the intentions of Bill C-42 live up to expectations, particularly those that will be expressed before the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology. I therefore call on all members of the House to support this important bill and to work together to pass it as quickly as possible.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Kevin Lamoureux
|
creating a public, searchable corporate registry would ensure a much higher sense of accountability, and the government over the last number of years has expressed its interest in ensuring that everyone is paying their fair share when it comes to taxes and that there is more transparency. However, it is also important to recognize, as I did in the previous question I asked the member's colleague, that there have been significant amounts of financial resources allocated to the CRA. That money is there to support the idea of looking at who the people are who are paying taxes. I am wondering if my colleague could provide his thoughts. It is great that Ottawa is doing it and the Province of Quebec is moving forward on it, but it is really important that we see consistency from coast to coast, with other provinces and territories also providing similar legislation.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Sebastien Lemire
|
everyone must collaborate, but the federal government must show leadership and set an example on the international stage. It must send the message that it will no longer tolerate tax havens and fraudulent actions. For me, that is a problem. Let us take the Panama papers, for example. Quebec showed leadership. It recouped more money than the federal government, so yes, collaboration is important. I have looked at Quebec laws. The co-operative financial sector, Desjardins for example, is governed by Quebec's laws, and I find that it is much more effective in fighting these types of situations. There are things to think about, of course, but the federal government must be able to set the example and put an end to tax fraud.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Brad Vis
|
I know that the Bloc Quebecois will be supporting this bill. I would like to know if they are open to accepting some amendments to protect the privacy of small and medium-sized businesses and individuals, in certain cases, and to create more rules so that this work is not left to the civil servants after the bill is passed. Is the Bloc Quebecois open to protecting confidentiality in some cases?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Sebastien Lemire
|
I cannot help but think of a debate that my colleague raised in the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology. The question was whether we were entitled to know the details of an $8-billion to $13-billion federal investment in a Volkswagen project. That element of transparency was at the heart of our discussions. I can also draw a parallel with sport. Confidentiality agreements keep athletes silent and force them to keep quiet when they are victims. Confidentiality is a very delicate issue. It is always arbitrary. I think we need to be able to really reflect on that. I am counting on my colleague to bring experts on this issue to committee so that we can come to an agreement and come up with the best possible amendments to this legislation, to make it as robust as possible.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Alistair MacGregor
|
my colleague very clearly outlined the problems and what more needs to be done, especially by Canada and the international community, about the sheer amount of wealth we lose out on every year to tax evasion and dirty money funnelling through the system. One of the parts in the bill to ensure compliance is a $5,000 penalty for corporations and up to $200,000 for individuals. I respect the fact that the legislation is trying to uncover the identity of the individual, but what does the member think about the paltry $5,000 fine for corporations? We know there are lots of avenues open to people to hide their wealth in corporate structures. Does he think that this particular financial penalty may need to be looked at and perhaps stiffened to ensure better compliance with the legislation?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Sebastien Lemire
|
I think harsh penalties are needed. We must not give criminals a chance in life. Like my colleague, I am a progressive person who believes in sharing the wealth. It is pretty rich for the federal government to claim that it cannot provide decent health transfers because it does not have the money. We know where that money is. At the end of day, it means that our seniors, people aged 65 and older, cannot increase their income, and it means that our emergency rooms are overflowing. That is because our money is sitting in tax havens. Firm action is needed.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Daniel Blaikie
|
I am happy to rise today and speak to Bill C-42 . There is a lot of talk in this place about government gatekeepers, and rightly so. There are a lot of important decisions made within government that have an impact on Canadians' lives, and Parliament is a place to hold the decision-makers to account and to press for better decisions. Elections are the place to press for better decision-makers. This is the place to press for better decisions. I think the case that the New Democrats have been trying to make throughout this Parliament and many others is that there is not just the problem of government gatekeeping; there are actually a lot of private sector gatekeepers. Too often, the leader of the Conservative Party and this government are either ignoring them or working with them behind the scenes to try to create more room for their power and their influence, which is not regularly held to account by a democratically elected Parliament, and to allow their power to flourish. If we look at our economy, there are a lot of ways in which they are able to do that, including a lot of rules around commercial secrecy and other ways. There are people who own significant chunks of our economy, whether that is our land, our real estate, our manufacturing or our resources, and we do not actually have a good way of knowing who those people are. That creates a lot of problems for Canadians, who feel the pinch of that power acting in the economy, through unjustified price hikes, for example, the likes of which we have seen a lot of in the last few years in Canada. A significant contributor to inflation has been outsized price increases in a number of industries. There are also people who are hiding behind corporation numbers and making important land-use policy decisions because of the power of their own ownership. Yes, municipalities have a role to play in zoning but we also know that ownership matters a lot and people can choose to do a lot of things with their property. In some cases that has a real impact on communities, and we do not even know who is doing the work. That is why something like a public beneficial ownership registry is so important, because it will actually allow us to put names to the people who have an important controlling stake in certain parts of our local economies and our national economy. That is important for any number of reasons. One is that we know that Canada is known internationally as a place where a lot of money gets laundered. I think it is a sad fact about Canada's reputation and Canada's actions in the world that we have allowed ourselves to be a place that people look to in order to launder the proceeds of crime. That is something that has been going on for a long time. In fact, the Canadian banking industry had an important role to play in setting up tax havens in other places. Canadian bankers could go to places like the Bahamas or the Caicos Islands, where it was advantageous to say, "Oh, we are not like those Americans; we are allied with the Brits." They could do that and get their hands into the local economy there and set up a banking infrastructure that would serve their interests and the interests of their clients, when it suited them better to say, "Oh, well, one cannot bank directly with the Americans but one can bank with us and we are buddy-buddy with them." They did that too, and they actually helped create the international infrastructure of tax havens that is now costing Canadians anywhere from $30 billion to $40 billion a year in lost taxable income because they are pushing it out of the country. As I say often, it has been hard even to know who some of the beneficiaries of these things are. When it comes to money laundering, if we want to get serious about taking action, it is important to be able to identify the beneficiaries of various corporate holdings. A public beneficial ownership registry would help with that. When it comes to Russia's completely unwarranted and illegal invasion of Ukraine, we saw Canada come out of the gate quickly with a lot of strong words about sanctions, but the follow-up, in terms of enforcement, has been rather pathetic. There is no evidence of Canada actually doing a lot of meaningful work to follow up on those sanctions and to make Russia hurt. One of the reasons why that is the case, and I think there is more that the government can do under the existing rules, is that it needs tools like a public beneficial ownership registry in order to be able to effect that work well. That will help identify the natural persons behind the corporate persons and make it easier for us to pursue those folks in the appropriate way. I talked a bit about tax havens already, and I have talked about the problem of money laundering. The fact of the matter is that when we talk about the people at the top, who make the most money, we are not just talking about salaries. Usually the wealthiest do not make most of their money through an annual salary. They make most of their money in rent off various kinds of assets, whether real estate assets or other kinds of assets. They get dividends; that is a form of rent on the capital that they invest in companies. That is how they make their money. If we accept the findings of the Parliamentary Budget Officer, from a year and a half or two years ago, about wealth distribution in Canada, this follows a trend for a lot of western countries. The Parliamentary Budget Officer says that now 40% of Canadians are sharing 1% of Canada's wealth, and 1% of Canadians own and control 40% of Canada's wealth. If members think that is completely out of whack, I agree completely. That is part of what is driving many of the problems that most Canadians, who are not in that top 1%, are experiencing. Those are the folks who are really struggling with inflation. Those are the folks who cannot find a home. Those are the folks who do not know how they are going to get to work because they cannot afford the car they have. That is not just a function of the carbon tax, which the Conservatives would have people believe. What is wrong with accepting that narrative is that it does not appreciate the problem, so it does not offer a real solution. Cutting the carbon tax is not going to fix those structural deficits. It is not the carbon tax that has led to massive wealth inequality, and it is not the way we are going to solve it. One way we might solve it is by having a tax, not just on high income, but on high wealth. In order to do that, we need to be able to track the wealth of the 1% that owns and controls 40% of Canada's wealth. The way to do that is through a public beneficial ownership registry, which would make it easier to identify the real people, who are far fewer than the many corporate personas across the economy. If we could trace it back, we would find that it is a much smaller number of people who are behind and who are the recipients of so much of Canada's wealth and resources. A public beneficial ownership registry is important in that respect. Partly because of the conflict and the illegal war in Ukraine, many of our international partners are moving forward quickly on public beneficial ownership registries. This legislation is important because it keeps Canada well within the international norm, which, on this issue, is moving in the right direction. This is not something Canada should be falling behind on, so I am pleased with the bill. Folks at Publish What You Pay Canada have done some excellent work, first of all, suggesting what a public beneficial ownership registry should look like, and then following up and providing useful feedback on the legislation. The good news is that they are largely satisfied, and I think a lot of folks who follow this kind of issue feel that this is pretty good legislation. There has been discussion in the debate so far in the House about how so-called stacked ownership structures or different corporate ownership structures could be used to evade the public beneficial ownership registry. I think that is an important thing for us to look at in committee. New Democrats are certainly open to discussions about how to improve the legislation, but I feel it is important that we do keep this moving at a good pace so that we keep up not only with our international partners, who have accepted the wisdom of having this kind of registration, but also with many provinces within Canada, which have seen the wisdom of that and have been acting in their own jurisdictions to implement a public beneficial ownership registry. One of the good components of the design of this federal registry is that it is meant to be a registry that can be compatible with provincial efforts and allow provinces to onboard at different times as they have their own debates and pass their own legislation in their provincial legislatures. I understand the government is working on this. I commend it for that effort; I think that is a good thing. The hope is that we will eventually have a registry in every province and territory that will contribute seamlessly to the public beneficial ownership registry of Canada, and that is a very good thing. With all those reasons for having a public beneficial ownership registry in mind, and some optimism about the course that this bill has taken and the good work done so far, I am very much looking forward to voting in favour of this at second reading and sending it to committee, so that we can enhance the bill where possible and ensure that Canada quickly joins the ranks of countries across the world that have public beneficial ownership registries.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Kevin Lamoureux
|
I appreciate a number of the comments the member has made. The issue of tax fairness is really important to Canadians. It is one of the reasons why one of the very first actions this government took upon being elected back in 2015 was to establish an increase in the tax on Canada's wealthiest 1%. We see that as a very strong positive. At the same time, we enhanced the tax break for Canada's middle class and those aspiring to be a part of it. Through the years, we have been able to invest a great deal of money, in the hundreds of millions of dollars, to ensure the CRA has the financial resources to reinforce the issue of tax fairness and go after individuals who are trying to avoid paying taxes. What are the member's thoughts with respect to other provincial legislatures across the country and the important role they play in passing legislation of a similar nature?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Daniel Blaikie
|
as I was saying in my concluding remarks, it is very important that the provinces be on board. Many provinces are showing leadership already. I think it is one of the virtues of the way the government is proceeding on this that provinces will be able to onboard and provide information out of their own registries into the federal registry. I understand there has been a lot of discussion between the federal government and the provinces. What I would say with respect to the tax fairness points that my colleague raised is simply this. As Canadians, we look around at other jurisdictions and see revelations like the Panama papers and others. We hear the government talk about investing in recovering some of those funds, but the record is that Canada has not and other jurisdictions have. When we hear about the resources given to the CRA, they seem to be spent more on chasing the poor to recover CERB funds, which they were encouraged to get by this very government, while the big tax cheats are getting away with it, either through tax havens or through the Canada wage subsidy program, from which the government has not even deigned to try to recover a dime.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Ms. Marilyn Gladu
|
I wonder if the member opposite has given any consideration to the kind of amendments he would want to see made to this bill in order to improve it.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Daniel Blaikie
|
one thing that has emerged from debate in the House is that the question of stacked ownership structures is something we need to look at. I will not prejudge the outcome of that study by already thinking I know the answer to that, but I certainly think this is something the committee should be looking into. I hope that, in its wisdom, the committee will find some recommendations that make sense and can improve the bill in that regard.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Jean-Denis Garon
|
in the past, it has been common for the government to pass imperfect but still useful legislation and then tell us that it has done everything it can, it has taken action and there is nothing left to do. This was true in the case of the whistle-blower legislation, which was passed 17 years ago. It is full of flaws, but for 17 years, we have been told that the job is done, even though there is no protection. I have a question for the member for Elmwood--Transcona. Once we pass the bill that is before us today, will the job be done? What are the next major steps for the government if it really wants to get tough on tax evasion, especially internationally?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Daniel Blaikie
|
the short answer is no. The work will not end with the passage of this bill. I would say it is not a matter of resources, because the Canada Revenue Agency has a lot of resources, but rather a matter of resource allocation. The agency is heavily focused right now on recovering CERB overpayments from Canadians who are already experiencing financial hardship. When it comes to the high rollers with deep pockets, however, the agency leaves them alone. It really is a resource allocation issue. The Agency needs to focus on these high rollers. It has to stop chasing after people who do not have the means to repay the CERB--that is not a wise investment. It should be chasing down people who have the money to pay back what they owe.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Alistair MacGregor
|
I really appreciated my colleague's remarks regarding the Conservatives' crusade against carbon pricing, because he is right. If we were to get rid of carbon pricing tomorrow, it would do nothing to change the structural deficit that exists in our economy and the fact that we have a system today where 40% of Canadians control 1% of the wealth, and 1% of Canadians control 40% of the wealth. There has been a massive hoovering of wealth from a large group of Canadians to a very small group. That is why we need a beneficial registry; we need to see who is benefiting from these obscene amounts of wealth. Over the decades that this has been occurring, what has that structural deficit led to? What could Canada of today have been had we tackled these problems several decades ago? What does that mean to people's overall health, their well-being and their ability to access services? This is the structural problem that is fundamental to our policy direction today.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Daniel Blaikie
|
one of the big watershed moments was in the mid-1990s when the federal government decided to cut services massively and pushed the burden of spending down onto provinces. Many of them then pushed it down onto municipalities, and ultimately it has landed on the shoulders of Canadians because we do not have the same level of funding of social infrastructure that we had over 30 years ago in Canada. If we look at the corporate tax rate, in the year 2000 the corporate tax rate was 28% and today it is 15%. If we look at the percentage of government revenue that is paid by large corporations, that is down in proportion. Conservatives and Liberals both said that they were going to cut corporate taxes and that it was going to allow business owners to invest in their businesses, it was going to raise productivity and it was going to generate a lot more economic activity than would holding the corporate tax rate where it was to be able to fund social services. However, a common complaint of Conservatives these days if we listen to them at committee, as well as private sector economists and a lot of people in the business sector, is that Canadian business investment is pathetic compared to our peers and our productivity is not keeping pace, because that money was never invested back into their businesses. It was shunted out into tax havens or paid out in dividends, which, frankly, are not taxed enough, and all sorts of other things. Therefore, the promise of the big tax cuts for the fat cats never came home to roost. This is why we should change what we are doing instead of doing the same thing and hoping for different results.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Mike Morrice
|
we have heard from many across the country that one of the ways to address the $30 billion in corporate tax loopholes from last year alone is to put in place a minimum tax on reported profits; that is, the profits that some of the largest corporations in the country report to their shareholders. Canadians For Tax Fairness estimates that this could recoup $11 billion of that $30 billion every year. The governing party chose not to do that in budget 2023. Could my colleague from Elmwood--Transcona share more about that?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Mr. Daniel Blaikie
|
we absolutely need to be engaging in the enterprise of trying to ensure that this tax revenue is not lost, to go out of the country or to go to people who already own and control 40% of Canada's wealth as part of that small 1%. I have a private member's bill requiring that if people want to benefit from the tax advantages of these tax treaties that Liberal and Conservative governments have put in place over the years, they have to have some economic substance to their business. Right now, what counts as a business is just a business number and a small mailbox somewhere in Barbados. Requiring that business to actually have something like a manufacturing facility or a desk and a computer with somebody hired to do some work seems like a pretty bare-minimum requirement for any legitimate business. There is what my colleague suggested, and then there are some other ideas about how we can ensure that people are not just paying a lawyer somewhere else to set up a fake company in order to get massive tax benefits.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Ms. Marilyn Gladu
|
I will be splitting my time with the member for Calgary Centre . It is a pleasure to rise today and speak to Bill C-42 , an act to amend the Canada Business Corporations Act and to make consequential and related amendments to other acts. Bill C-42 amends the CBSA to require Corporations Canada to make public certain information regarding those with significant control or ownership of federally regulated private corporations in Canada, creating a national registry of these individuals. In this case, "significant control" is defined as someone owning or controlling at least 25% of the corporation's shares. The bill will also better protect whistle-blowers, add new offences and give Corporations Canada additional inquiry, data validation and information-sharing powers. The government has stated that its goal with this bill is to protect Canadians against money laundering and terrorist financing, deter tax evasion and avoidance, and ensure that Canada is an attractive country in which to conduct business. The bill's title, while literal, does not speak to the good the bill would do to combat money laundering and criminal financial activity in our country. Because of this, the Conservatives support the bill in principle, with important amendments recognizing the sheer need for action on money laundering in Canada. I will talk about the amendments later. First of all, I need to outline just how serious financial crime is in Canada and, thus, speak to the need for this bill. Money laundering in Canada is so well known in the world that criminals call it "snow-washing". While it is a problem throughout the country, the worst of the issue is concentrated in British Columbia, especially in the Vancouver area. As stated in the Cullen commission's final report on the issue of money laundering in British Columbia, money laundering has, as its origin, crime that destroys communities. This includes drug trafficking, human trafficking and fraud. Such crimes victimize the most vulnerable members of society. Money laundering is also an affront to law-abiding citizens, who earn their money honestly and pay their fair share of the costs of living in a community. There can be few things more destructive to a community's sense of well-being than a governing regime that fails to resist those whose opportunities are unfairly gained at the expense of others. Under the Liberal government, and going back into certain governments in the 1990s, Canada became a haven for money laundering. Specifically, in the nineties, the British Columbia provincial NDP government changed regulations that governed casinos. Five-dollar bets became $500 bets at baccarat tables and private gambling salons, and the bets only grew from there. The Cullen commission report indicates a stunning growth in cash transactions in B.C. casinos; first flagged by investigators in 2008, transactions continued unabated until at least 2014, when casinos accepted more than $1.2 billion in cash transactions. Many of the transactions matched the indicators for criminal funds, where bricks or even duffle bags of cash were delivered to casinos. The commission indicated that these criminal transactions involved loan sharks delivering bundles of $20 bills, which had been packaged in a way that was consistent with the proceeds of drug trafficking, to high-profile foreign gamblers. These gamblers had travelled primarily to Canada to play baccarat in secluded areas of the casino. These high rollers often paid back the loan sharks the funds they gambled via transactions in their country of origin. In this evolution, B.C. gambling, real estate and luxury items became favourite tools of criminals to launder illicit foreign funds. It is ironic that it is the Liberal government strengthening money-laundering bills. I am glad to see it, but if we look at the history even since I was elected, there was Joe Peschisolido, who was accused of money laundering. Then we had Raj Grewal, who asked questions about money laundering to FINTRAC at committee just before being arrested and charged with fraud. We also have another backbencher who is flipping real estate, even though we know that real estate is one of the key ways in which money laundering is happening. As I said, it is ironic that they are bringing this forward, but I certainly agree that we need to do something to rein in out-of-control money laundering. The commission also found that, in B.C.'s economy, casinos, real estate dealings, banks and law offices face big money-laundering risks and that the failures of the federal RCMP and FINTRAC allowed money laundering to grow. The report indicated that FINTRAC's reporting regime is essentially wasteful and that the RCMP's lack of attention has allowed for the unchecked growth of money laundering since at least 2012. The report states: One of the primary criticisms of the federal regime is the ineffectiveness of FINTRAC.... While...there is a statutory threshold that must be met before FINTRAC can disclose information to law enforcement, the number of disclosures to law enforcement is [allegedly] not commensurate with the volume of reports that FINTRAC receives, nor with the scale of money laundering activity in British Columbia. That is according to Cullen and his team. He suggests: Law enforcement bodies in British Columbia cannot rely on FINTRAC to produce timely, useful intelligence about money laundering activity that they can put into action. It is true that FINTRAC receives an enormous volume of reports from public and private sector reporting entities, but it produces only a modest number of intelligence packages that actually go to law enforcement. For example, in 2019 to 2020, the Cullen commission found that FINTRAC received over 31 million individual reports. In that same year, it disclosed only 2,057 intelligence reports to law enforcement agencies across Canada and only 355 to law enforcement agencies in B.C. Global News reporter Sam Cooper has been investigating dirty money in B.C. for years. He found that, as of 2016, fully half of the luxury properties in Vancouver were owned through suspicious circumstances. The Prime Minister has known about this for years. The global money-laundering watchdog warned the Prime Minister in 2016 that Canada was a safe haven for money laundering, particularly in our real estate market, and that a registry was needed to help identify and deter this activity. In fact, the watchdog gave the Liberal government a failing grade in five key areas because dirty money was able to slip into our businesses and real estate market undetected, with no questions asked. That was 2016, and it is now 2023; the legislation is pretty late in coming. The Panama papers data leak in 2016 exposed that international criminals have long exploited the gaps in Canada's corporation beneficial ownership regulatory scheme to engage in corrupt conduct through federally, provincially and territorially administered corporations. Canada is generally perceived as having weak laws to combat money laundering and the proceeds of crime. As a result, in 2018, B.C. launched the expert panel on money laundering in real estate. The panel estimated that in B.C. alone, more than $7 billion of dirty money was laundered in 2018 and between $800 million and $5.3 billion was laundered through the real estate market, raising housing prices by an estimated 5% on already wildly expensive properties. The Cullen commission report demonstrates that money laundering within real estate often involves the use of loans, mortgages and, in some cases, lawyers' trust accounts in the legal system. It can also involve cash. The report provides this example: A criminal might take out a mortgage with the purchase of a property and repay the mortgage with the proceeds of crime. If the cash deposited for each payment is under $10,000, it will not trigger the requirements for a large-transaction report to FINTRAC. Over time, criminals may accumulate multiple properties or higher-value real estate using this strategy. The properties can then be sold, often at a significant profit in the Vancouver real estate market, with the criminal property owner receiving clean funds from the purchaser to complete the money-laundering process. Law-abiding Canadians across the country have been suffering as a result of this issue. Since the Trudeau government was elected, the price of a home in Canada has--
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
The Assistant Deputy Speaker
|
I would remind members not to use the first or last names of MPs in the House. The hon. member for Sarnia--Lambton.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Canada Business Corporations Act
|
Ms. Marilyn Gladu
|
I apologize. The price of a home under the Liberals has doubled, and many Canadians have entirely given up on the dream of home ownership. Most young people now believe that owning a home is unachievable. Even if the money-laundering problem is adequately combatted by the passing of this bill, it is years too late. Therefore, it is not enough to stop the snow-washing in our housing market that is escalating costs for Canadians. I have concerns about the bill; not only does it exclude real estate in the scope, even though we know that this is a major place for money laundering to happen, but it also covers only federally regulated businesses. Many business owners are provincially regulated, so if the provinces do not come on board, then there are many ways that this could slip through the cracks. In terms of amendments, Conservatives would like to see amendments to protect privacy rights in the registry. We also want the registry to achieve the government's stated goal and have the capacity to do so. Will the bill give law enforcement enough necessary tools to capably combat money laundering and terrorist financing? Conservatives have some recommendations. The new and existing penalties for violating reporting requirements under the CBCA should be strengthened, corporations should be held accountable as individuals, and if the act is violated, there needs to be clarification on who can and cannot be exempted from the regulations. This bill is a critical update to our laws, and I look forward to seeing it at committee, where we can make amendments to improve the bill and eliminate money laundering in Canada.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Mr. Mike Morrice
|
today marks the National Day of Mourning for workers killed, injured or made ill by workplace conditions and hazards. In 2021, over 1,000 workplace deaths were reported in Canada, with 18 of them being young people from communities across the country. We must put health and safety at the forefront of all jobs to prevent further work-related injuries and loss of life. To start, we know a unionized job is a safer job. Collective bargaining and the right to strike are fundamental rights. These rights are central to our democracy and have resulted in improved working conditions for all workers. I would encourage all my colleagues to read and press for the recommendations of the Canadian Labour Congress to ensure every worker in Canada is safe. While we pause today to honour and remember each life tragically cut short, let us also continue to push for better.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Mr. Chad Collins
|
I rise today to pay tribute to Jim Howlett, who, after a brief battle with cancer, passed away on April 9 of this year. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family: his wife Carol; their children and partners, Jessi and Keith, Katie and Vlad, and Aaron and Stephanie; their grandchild, Evan; and his close family friend, and honorary mother, Lydia Cartlidge. Jim dedicated nearly 30 years of his life serving as a volunteer on local boards and committees, including 17 years at the Hamilton Conservation Authority, and up until the time of his passing, as a board member of the Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority. He was an environmental pioneer, advocating for a clean airshed, clean soil in Hamilton's industrial lands and clean water in Hamilton harbour. He pushed all levels of government to make the environment a priority in his neighbourhood, and much of the progress we have witnessed in and around Hamilton harbour can be attributed to Jim's efforts. Most important to me, Jim Howlett was my friend, and I am going to miss our conversations about all things Hamilton. His passing is an incredible loss for the beach community, the city of Hamilton and our country. He will be sorely missed.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Mr. Joel Godin
|
as the member for Portneuf--Jacques-Cartier, I have the pleasure of regularly meeting with the seniors in my riding. Every time I meet with them, I can only admire how strongly they feel about being community builders. I would like to thank our presidents: Lynda Lavoie-Leclerc from Cap-Sante; Jacqueline Gignac from Deschambault-Grondines; Micheline Cote from Donnacona; Ghislaine Lepage-Alain from Lac-Beauport; Micheline Bernier from Neuville; Yves Laroche from Pont-Rouge; Sylvie Lefebvre from Portneuf; Robert Julien from Saint-Alban; Carole Dolbec from Saint-Augustin-de-Desmaures; Martine Germain from Saint-Basile-de-Portneuf; Michel Despres from Sainte-Brigitte-de-Laval; Etienne Dusablon from Saint-Casimir; France Laprise from Sainte-Catherine-de-la-Jacques-Cartier; Gaetane Martel from Sainte-Christine-d'Auvergne; Raymond Groleau from Saint-Gilbert; Denyse Julien from Saint-Leonard-de-Portneuf; Louise Barette from Saint-Marc-des-Carrieres; Yvon Marcotte from Saint-Raymond; Marie-France Delisle from Saint-Ubalde; Shirley Kiley from Shannon; Gaetane St-Laurent from Stoneham; and Edith Boivin, who will be meeting with me this Saturday in Riviere-a-Pierre. I simply want to give them my thanks.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Mr. Chandra Arya
|
because we are a major energy producer, the global shift to net zero presents both a challenge and an opportunity for Canada. More than $100 trillion in private capital is projected to be spent between now and 2050 to build the global clean economy. We must capitalize on Canada's competitive advantages, including our skilled and diverse workforce, abundant supplies of critical minerals and metals, clean energy, and the technologies needed to power the global clean economy. We also have uranium and are developing small modular nuclear reactors. We must attract investment for extraction, processing and recycling of the critical minerals essential for clean technology supply chains. We must take a team Canada approach and work collaboratively with provinces and indigenous communities to fast-track projects' implementation and realize our full potential.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Mr. Blake Desjarlais
|
for over 40 years, unions, families and communities have observed the National Day of Mourning to recognize all of those who have tragically lost their lives on the job, such as my dad, who left us when I was just 12 years old. He was killed on a work site in northern Alberta, where his employer recklessly failed to supply a safe work environment. To all those families like my own, I see them, I am with them, and together we will ensure that no more lives are lost. In particular, I want to recognize the many single parents who were left shocked by the sudden workplace death of their partners and were forced to parent alone, like my mom did. To her and so many like her, I thank them for always being there for us. Finally, I want to thank all of those who have shown kindness to the families who have lost their loved ones. It is because of their support that so many of us are able to stand to continue to fight for workers' justice today. It is the deepest of solidarity, and I will never forget that support. To anyone who has time to spend with families and victims of workplace deaths at gatherings across Canada today, I thank them. It means the world to us.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Ms. Emmanuella Lambropoulos
|
April is Autism Month and I am rising at the end of this month to speak on behalf of Canadians on the autism spectrum because this community wants to be heard and deserves to be heard. Before I became an MP, I was a teacher. Before that, I was a special education teacher for people with specific needs and I helped autistic students integrate into "neurotypical" classrooms. This is a community that needs to be given some additional tools to thrive. Currently, there is a lack of support. Additional funding is required to provide students with autism special education teachers, child care workers and behaviour analysts, to name a few. When it comes to autism, early intervention is key. Families of children with autism need access to therapies that have been proven to significantly improve outcomes, such as speech language pathology, occupational therapy and applied behavioural analysis, which are too expensive for the average family to afford. These kids deserve that early intervention, and together, I know we can do better to make Canada a more inclusive place for all.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Ms. Marilyn Gladu
|
The Charter of Freedoms and Rights Is now in a whole bunch of fights From Religion to Speech Libs extended their reach And the courtrooms are full of their plights Let us start with the censorship bills C-11 and 18 are the pills That restrict what we see And take down if they don't agree Against all Canadians' wills And then let's go on to the guns That sports shooters will use just for fun They'll put in a ban While the crooks to a man Will keep theirs while charges are none. The privacy rights of us all Will be toast if their bill doesn't fall C-27 won't aid Our European trade If it doesn't comply with their call And this is the end of my rhyme Because I've just run out of time Or for sure there'd be more I could say on this score Our rights I'll protect, they're sublime.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Mr. John Aldag
|
following a three-year break due to COVID, I am excited the Cloverdale Rodeo will once again be taking place from May 19 to 22. Established in 1888, this agricultural fair and exhibition is Canada's second-largest rodeo event. The Cloverdale Rodeo and Country Fair was created to encourage the development of agricultural resources in the Fraser Valley of B.C. There will also be a variety of food vendors and a parade of over 1,000 participants, myself included. From marching bands to skateboarders, dance groups and clowns, there will be something for everyone to enjoy. Live musicians will play on stage as the surrounding community comes together to share in sport, art, song and dance. I encourage both British Columbians and those outside the province to come experience our western hospitality. Join me in getting back to country and agriculture at the Cloverdale Rodeo this upcoming May long weekend.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Ms. Anita Vandenbeld
|
I would like to bring to the attention of this House the situation of just one of many political prisoners in Iran, Mojahed Kourkour, who has been unjustly sentenced to death by the Iranian regime. He was wrongfully convicted for the murder of a nine-year-old boy, despite the boy's parents having testified it was in fact state security officers who killed their son. Both parents were present when their son was shot, and the father was left paralyzed during the same incident. Mojahed has been subject to severe torture in prison and was only recently allowed to call his family after several months. The Iranian regime continues to harass and imprison women's rights activists who are protesting the killing of Jina Mahsa Amini and fighting for women, life and freedom. This is unacceptable. I call on Iran to stop the imminent execution of Mojahed Kourkour, release all political prisoners and stop the executions.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Mr. Bernard Genereux
|
last Saturday was the seventh edition of the spaghetti dinner fundraiser in Montmagny. This charity event, organized by Enfants d'coeur, finally made a comeback after a forced three-year break. The evening was a resounding success. In total, 1,356 tickets were sold and over $17,000 was raised. The proceeds from the dinner will go towards supporting the foundation's primary mission, which is to support projects that encourage youth to adopt healthy lifestyle habits by participating in sports. I want to sincerely congratulate and thank Francis Frechette and Frederic Ouelle, the founders of Enfants d'coeur, two men with big hearts. Thanks to their dedication and involvement, hundreds of young people will have the chance to grow up healthy. I also want to thank all the volunteers who made sure that the event went smoothly and the partners who gave everyone the opportunity to enjoy a delicious dinner in good company. I am extremely proud of my riding's vitality and community spirit. Long live Enfants d'coeur.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Mr. Gary Anandasangaree
|
last week, I called one of my favourite Canada summer jobs employers, Kajanan "KJ" Chandrasekaram of Bliss Stations, to inform him that his budding company has been approved for the program. I was devastated to learn from his brother of the untimely passing of KJ on April 18 at the young age of 26. In 2018, KJ founded Bliss Stations, a dessert company based in Scarborough--Rouge Park. His passion and determination turned Bliss Stations into a burgeoning force at major events in Scarborough and beyond. He persisted during the COVID-19 pandemic and came out stronger. KJ sought to expand his business this summer by providing 12 young people with their first summer jobs. I am heartbroken by the loss of KJ because of his infectious spirit of entrepreneurship, determination and sheer hard work. A life of promise was cut short, but I am told that his family will continue to build his dream. I ask members to join me in extending our condolences to KJ's family, friends and his team at Bliss Stations.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Mr. Tom Kmiec
|
last weekend, I joined Rabbi Reuben Poupko for the Sabbath at Beth Israel Beth Aaron synagogue in Cote St. Luc in Montreal. I was saddened to learn there of the loss of a great local leader, Debbie Sonberg Ajzenkopf, who passed away recently. What a rabbi is to the Torah, so was Debbie to everything in that synagogue. She knew who liked to sit where, who was ill, who was doing better, who was getting along with whom, and who was not getting along with whom. Debbie was literally the keeper of everything, of all the knowledge in the synagogue. From the tales of those there, I mean everything. She was also a committed and passionate Jew, absolutely devoted to her faith and to her synagogue. Debbie embodied the prophet Isaiah's teachings, that each of us should give what we have decided in our heart to give, not reluctantly and under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver. Debbie was a cheerful giver of her time, and of her love for Judaism and Yahweh. Baruch dayan ha'emet .
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Mr. Chris Lewis
|
in 1984, April 28 was established as the National Day of Mourning in Canada to remember and honour those who have died, been injured or suffered illness in the workplace. The Day of Mourning, also known as Workers' Memorial Day, is officially recognized in about 100 countries worldwide. Today, on the National Day of Mourning, we remember and honour those who have lost their lives or been injured on the job. Every year, too many workers are injured or killed while simply trying to earn a living for themselves and their families. We must do everything in our power to ensure that every worker returns home safe at the end of the day. This is the day to take a moment to reflect on the importance of workplace safety and commit ourselves to creating safer working environments for everyone. It is with great respect and also great sorrow that we remember those who have given their lives or their health to go to work. We realize that more must be done to protect them.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Mrs. Marie-France Lalonde
|
on April 10, I attended the 15th awards gala of the Regroupement affaires femmes, where three women from Orleans were recognized for their leadership. I want to congratulate Lydia Marie Philippe, who received a "young leader" award; Hortense Mvuemba, who received the "community engagement" award; and Sabine Daniel, who was named "icon of the year". It was also a pleasure to host an iftar reception with leaders of the Muslim community of Orleans on April 18, where we gathered to break fast. I would like to take this opportunity to wish Eid Mubarak to all, which was celebrated on April 21. I was also very proud to join current and former students, staff members and teachers on April 20 to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the Beatrice-Desloges Catholic secondary school in Orleans and congratulate all the staff and employees for their devotion to education in French over the past 25 years. Congratulations to them.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Ms. Laurel Collins
|
today I want to bring the House's attention back to the horrible events that continue to unfold in Iran. Since the death of Mahsa Amini, the oppression from the Iranian regime has been relentless, and we must not look away. Today, I am announcing that I am politically sponsoring Samaneh Asghari. She is a children's rights activist and industrial engineering student who has been unjustly sentenced to 18 years in prison. We, as members of Parliament, must continue to show the Iranian regime that we are watching, that we are looking at these individual cases. We need to push our Canadian government to do more. Samaneh deserves her freedom. Iranians deserve their freedom, and they deserve to live in dignity with their human rights upheld. No one should ever be unjustly imprisoned, tortured, sexually assaulted or worse, murdered, for speaking out. Today, and until she is released, I will use my public platform to call for justice and freedom for Samaneh and for all Iranians. Women, life, freedom.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Mr. Rene Villemure
|
on February 21, ethics commissioner Mario Dion had to step down for health reasons after 43 years of public service, including the past five as Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner. Mr. Dion elevated the role and today I want to thank him for his excellent work. Throughout his tenure, Mr. Dion helped safeguard public trust, despite the many violations by government members that he had to contend with. He said, "I firmly believe that educating regulatees and the public about the importance of avoiding conflicts of interest serves to help restore Canadians' trust". His successor faces an immense challenge. Mr. Dion can leave with his head held high. The Office of the Commissioner is a credible and trusted institution. I will close by saying that this strategic position urgently needs to be filled by someone everyone can agree on, because without a commissioner, there can be no investigations, and that is just unacceptable. I want to thank Mr. Dion.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Mr. Gerald Soroka
|
the first vacation the Prime Minister went on was to a billionaire's private island. He claimed he was a close personal friend. Was this not also his first ethics violation? In 2021, on the first-ever National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, he and his family jetted off to Tofino for a surfing vacation. This year, before going on vacation to a luxurious Jamaican resort, he received approval from the Ethics Commissioner. That luxurious Jamaican estate belonged to the wealthy Green family, which has made big donations to the Trudeau Foundation. The Prime Minister stated that Peter Green was a close personal friend. Wait. Was the billionaire not also a close personal friend? I guess it is different this time. After all, they are both rich donors to the Trudeau Foundation. I am sure all Canadians agree that they cannot wait until the Prime Minister takes a permanent vacation from politics.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
National Day of Mourning
|
Mr. Darrell Samson
|
last week was National Volunteer Week and I want to take this opportunity to thank all the volunteers for the hard work, dedication, commitment and difference they make in our communities. Too often we underestimate the hard work, long hours and free time the 24 million Canadian volunteers give to our communities. The work of many organizations and associations would not be possible without the generous contributions of volunteers. I want to highlight some of them in my riding: the Sackville Rivers Association, Hope for Wildlife, VETS Canada, Freedom Kitchen & Closet, Sackawa, Cheema and the Orenda Canoe Club. They all play an important role in Sackville--Preston--Chezzetcook. Our communities would not be the same without them. Let us be grateful now and throughout the year for the hard work of our volunteers. I thank them very much.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Ms. Melissa Lantsman
|
while inflation, interest rates and housing prices spiralled out of control, the Prime Minister took a vacation. While Canadians from coast to coast commemorated the first truth and reconciliation day, the Prime Minister took a vacation. While our airports and passport office line-ups were out of control, the Prime Minister took a vacation. Now, while we face the largest public sector strike in Canadian history, the Prime Minister; and I will let members figure out the next line. We know that the Prime Minister is not used to hard work, but can he at least pretend like he is trying?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Randy Boissonnault
|
let us look at the facts. Canada's inflation rate has either remained flat or decreased, now nine months in a row. At the same time, our economy has added, and wait for it, 865,000 full-time jobs with 35,000 in March alone. While the Conservatives lack the confidence to invest in our country, Canadians know that the investments we are making are going to put this country on a solid path to prosperity for generations to come.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Ms. Melissa Lantsman
|
there they go again, telling Canadians that they have never had it so good. Do they really think that hard-working Canadians are that stupid? We have the highest inflation rate in 40 years. We have the highest interest rates in a generation. We have the most expensive housing on record. That is not an answer. Young people cannot buy homes, single mothers cannot buy food and workers cannot buy gas. The Prime Minister is not working and neither is his government. Does anyone over there really think Canadians will not notice?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Randy Boissonnault
|
I know the Conservatives do not like the facts. It is a problem when one is a Conservative and the truth gets in the way of a good story. The reality is that we have had unemployment levels at 5%. We had 865,000 jobs created since the worst time of the pandemic. Our recovery is at 126%, which is faster than the United States. We have the fastest-growing economy in the G7. When it comes to that former government's record on poverty, we will take no lessons from the Conservatives. Over 700,000 people have been lifted out of poverty since we formed government.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Ms. Melissa Lantsman
|
the Liberals have made this mess and now they are trying to tell Canadians that they are going to be the ones who clean it up. All we hear from them is more spending, more taxes and more government: the very things that got us into this mess in the first place. Crime is out of control in our biggest cities. There is a 32% increase. Young people cannot buy homes because the price has doubled under the Liberals' watch and groceries face double-digit inflation. The house is on fire and the Liberals are showing up with a flamethrower. Anybody who thinks this will work is indulging in pure madness. Will the Liberals come to their senses and get out of the way?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Karina Gould
|
Actually, Madam Speaker, when the country was on fire, so to speak, because we were experiencing the biggest health and economic challenge in a generation because of the COVID pandemic, our government came with a fire extinguisher. We were there to support millions of Canadians, whether through the Canada emergency response benefit, whether through the Canada emergency business account or whether was through the Canada emergency wage subsidy. What about the millions of vaccines that we provided to Canadians and the additional support we provided to provinces and territories to get us through the pandemic?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Gerard Deltell
|
while the Prime Minister is living large in New York with his jet-setting lifestyle, Canadians are being impacted by the ongoing public service strike. In my riding, Ms. Hamel, a mother with a three-year-old, was planning a trip. Unfortunately, she did not receive the passport she needed in time, by a matter of hours. She wrote, "I cried, I asked to stay and wait, but I was thrown out without any empathy. They just kept a three-year-old from going on a family vacation". That is the reality for Canadians. When is the Prime Minister going to personally step up to the plate and resolve the current conflict? When is he going to sit down at the table and get to work?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Karina Gould
|
I thank my colleague for that question. Unfortunately, by law, passports are not considered essential. I am being honest with Canadians in telling them that passport applications cannot be processed during the strike. However, we understand that this has an impact on the lives of Canadians. That is precisely why we are at the bargaining table with the union. We want to resolve this strike quickly because it is having a real impact on Canadians.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Gerard Deltell
|
that is precisely why it is time that the Prime Minister assumed his responsibilities as head of the government. The government has been negotiating for 10 days and has nothing to show for it. It is time to change tactics, otherwise another 10 days will pass without any results. Ms. Hamel is disgusted, discouraged, angry and sad. She wrote to me about her poor child who was so eager to go on a beach vacation. For Ms. Hamel and for the thousands of Canadians who are currently suffering as a result of the strike, when will the Prime Minister sit down at the table and act like a prime minister?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Greg Fergus
|
we are at the bargaining table with the Public Service Alliance of Canada. I can say that our goal is to resume normal operations as soon as possible. The government is committed to negotiating an agreement that is reasonable for public servants and fair for Canadians. I can say that the negotiators are still talking. The government is at the table, and we are negotiating in good faith.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Ms. Christine Normandin
|
in Quebec, French is declining as the language spoken at work. French is declining as the language spoken at home. The proportion of people whose first official language learned is French is declining. In short, French is declining across Quebec. However, the Liberals' official languages action plan invests hundreds of millions of dollars in promoting English in Quebec. The entire portion available for Quebec focuses on English. Can the Liberals explain how providing huge amounts of funding for English in Quebec will slow the decline of French?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Pablo Rodriguez
|
I will ask the Bloc Quebecois to be more open-minded. It is quite possible to defend French, and defend it vigorously, without attacking, offending, intimidating and criticizing the anglophone community. Whether we are anglophone or francophone, we are all Quebeckers.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Ms. Christine Normandin
|
I do not need lessons from anyone when it comes to being open-minded. We heard a real gem from the Minister of Official Languages yesterday. She said her action plan does not provide funding for English, it provides funding for the vitality of Quebec's English-speaking community. That changes everything. Nearly 30% of people mainly use English at work in Montreal. Meanwhile, the use of French as a main language has dropped by 13% in the communications sector and by 11% in the finance sector. In short, the vitality of the English language seems to be doing just fine. Why are the Liberals investing in English when we keep reminding them that French is the language that is at risk?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Pablo Rodriguez
|
we are investing in many ways to strengthen French. We are investing in our official languages plan and we are investing in culture, more specifically in television production, literature and elsewhere. That being said, I repeat that the Bloc Quebecois should be a bit more open-minded and stop trying to pit anglophones and francophones against each other. I would like them to understand something once and for all: Whether anglophone or francophone, we are all Quebeckers.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Alexandre Boulerice
|
we are all aware of the Prime Minister 's irrepressible and nearly pathological desire to rub elbows with the rich and famous, but now is not the time for champagne and selfies with Hollywood actors. This is day 10 of the biggest strike in Canada's history. Some 150,000 people, mostly women, are in the streets standing up for their working conditions and their purchasing power. Is the Prime Minister so out of touch that he does not understand that these workers are fighting just to avoid getting poorer?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Greg Fergus
|
as I just said, we are still at the bargaining table. The Canadian government is negotiating in good faith. The unions are also still at the table. I know full well that this is important. We recognize that it is important for public servants to provide services. We need to give them a salary that is fair, but also find a solution that is fair for Canadians.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Blake Desjarlais
|
today, as we mark the National Day of Mourning, we remember all those killed or injured on the job. It has been over 20 years since the Westray act was passed. It provides a legal framework for workplace health and safety, and it imposes serious penalties on unsafe workplaces. However, the Liberals have refused to properly educate law enforcement or take steps to enforce it. It is shameful for all workers who continue to be put in dangerous situations. Why does the government continue to ignore workers who deserve protections on the job? Will it enforce the Westray act?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Terry Sheehan
|
I wish to pass on my sympathies to the member. I heard his S. O. 31 about his father's passing while on the job. One worker's death is too many workers' deaths. Workers have the right to refuse unsafe work if they feel their life, health or safety is at risk. Employers have the duty and responsibility to protect the health and safety of workers. They are encouraged to seek guidance from the appropriate channels, including the Public Health Agency of Canada, industry associations and the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. They must do this. Protecting lives and preventing illness are a top priority.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. John Williamson
|
it takes a special kind of incompetence to ramp up federal spending on the public service by over 50% and end up with the largest public service sector strike in Canadian history. The Liberals are spending $22 billion more on employees and wages but taxpayers are receiving fewer services, in some cases no services, from government workers. When will the Liberal government get its employees back to work and protect Canadian taxpayers from more debt and high taxes?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Greg Fergus
|
first of all, it is really important to state that both parties are at the negotiating table. The federal government is negotiating in good faith. I know that my receding hairline might give an indication that I am a little bit long in the tooth, but I have a bit of a memory and I do remember when those on the other side of the aisle were in government. What did they do every time workers tried to have a collective agreement? They legislated them back to work. We believe in having a negotiated settlement that is fair for workers and reasonable for Canadians.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. John Williamson
|
the largest public strike is happening not because of the Conservatives. We delivered on our promises. We did not have a general strike of federal workers while we were balancing the books and cutting taxes for families and businesses. We were able to manage the federal government and keep delivering services to Canadians. The Liberals had two years to come to an agreement with the public service. Now 150,000 workers are out on strike. Again, when will the Prime Minister and the government get back to work?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Karina Gould
|
the only thing the Conservatives did when they were in government was that they balanced the books on the backs of Canadians. They did nothing when it came to helping Canadians get out of poverty. In contrast, what we have done is help lift 450,000 children and a total of 2.7 million Canadians out of poverty. At the height of the COVID crisis, do members know what we did? We were there for every single Canadian, whether through wage supports or through services.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Scot Davidson
|
the Liberals could not organize a birthday party. We have seen it time and time again with inflation, passports, airports, cost of living and housing. Now there is the largest public service strike in history, despite increasing spending on the bureaucracy by $21 billion. There is no planning ahead. There is no leadership and no respect for taxpayers. Canadians just want their government back to work. Why is it that the Liberal government never knows where the puck is going?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
The Assistant Deputy Speaker
|
I am going to get the hon. minister to restart his answer and hopefully there will not be any interruptions this time. The hon. minister.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Randy Boissonnault
|
we should roll the clip back to when President Biden was in the House and the Conservatives would not stand up when he talked about a gender-balanced cabinet. The Conservatives would not stand up when he talked about union rights. The Conservatives do not believe in collective bargaining; we do. We are going to get a deal that is fair for Canadians, a deal that is fair for the federal public servants. Why do they not like the fact that we have more public servants? I cannot say, but the public servants helped us get through the pandemic. The Conservatives do not like it; Canadians do. We are going to get a good deal.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Scot Davidson
|
Canadians are getting their lunch eaten and being told it is good for them. Under the Liberals, everything is broken. Canadians are being denied basic government services once again, because of the largest public service strike in history. It is said that Nero played the fiddle while Rome burned. The Prime Minister is now doing the same, but, knowing him, he is playing dress-up. When will he fix the mess that he made?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Adam van Koeverden
|
Canadians deserve elected representatives who come to Ottawa with solutions, not just cheap shots and slogans. Triple-triple is a coffee order at Tim Hortons, not a policy solution. It is not a valuable contribution to the debate in the House. However, budget 2023 invests in solutions like dental care for uninsured families, investments in mental health and more doctors and nurses to reduce wait times and make sure that Canadians can get the procedures and the surgeries that they need. When will the Conservatives propose some solutions instead of just these childish slogans? We need some solutions, everyone. That is what Canadians need.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Joel Godin
|
we will propose solutions when we form government. In Portneuf--Jacques-Cartier, schools in Shannon and Valcartier are closed and parents are having to take time off work because traffic is being disrupted. Canadian citizens have unanswered questions about their tax returns. There are delays in issuing passports to young people who have invested all their savings in their year-end trip, and families will lose thousands of dollars without those passports. The government is solely responsible for this strike. Where is the Prime Minister when it is time to negotiate, find a solution and get the country out of this crisis?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Greg Fergus
|
as I have said many times, we are still at the bargaining table with the union. We are there to negotiate in good faith. I am confident that when the parties are there and decide to negotiate in good faith, we will come to a solution. There are certainly situations where we want to avoid doing what the Conservatives do: Whenever there is a problem, they always blame the public servants.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Joel Godin
|
I think my colleague has missed the point of what we have been saying for the last 10 days. The bureaucracy has increased by 50% in terms of costs paid by Canadian taxpayers, who are receiving fewer services. Now 155,000 Canadian public service workers are on strike. It is the largest strike in Canadian history. This government's inaction over the past two years is what created this dispute. When will the Prime Minister come back and fix this problem?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Karina Gould
|
the point my hon. colleague has missed is that this increased spending was to serve Canadians during the pandemic. I know the Conservatives have forgotten that there was a pandemic that sent big shock waves through the economy and the health care system, but our government was there for Canadians during the pandemic. We made sure they received income supports, and we were there for Canadian organizations. We will continue to respect the bargaining process with the union.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Rene Villemure
|
at this point, the ties between the Prime Minister and the Trudeau Foundation are clear. His family, his friends and his staff are involved, as we heard in committee this morning. The ties between the Chinese government and the foundation are also clear after a $140,000 donation was made. The Trudeau Foundation is a collection of Liberal Party friends, and that is why it is of interest to China. All Quebeckers understand this. One question remains: Who can trust anyone from the foundation to investigate Beijing's attempts to get close to Liberal circles?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Kevin Lamoureux
|
where I agree with the member is that it is very clear. The Prime Minister has had no direct or indirect contact with the Trudeau Foundation for over 10 years now. That is well established and is very clear.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Rene Villemure
|
Ottawa must clamp down. This was the warning given last week by Raphael Glucksmann, chair of the special committee on foreign interference in Europe, who stated that what made it possible for these repeated attacks to take place was first and foremost the absence of sanctions, adding that there were no sanctions in the European Union. That is why the Bloc Quebecois is calling for three things: first, an independent public inquiry; second, an independent and permanent investigative body; and, third, a criminal law on foreign interference to equip police services. No one will settle for an already-discredited report by the Trudeau Foundation. When will the Prime Minister realize that?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Dominic LeBlanc
|
my colleague from the Bloc Quebecois knows full well that our government strengthened legislation to deal with foreign interference in our democratic institutions. He knows full well that we have taken several measures--which were definitely not in place when we formed the government in 2015--to strengthen our institutions and to counter foreign interference, which had already been a factor for 10 years. The good news is that we are continually working to strengthen our measures. We look forward to reading Mr. Johnston's recommendations on this issue.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Michael Barrett
|
by using the Trudeau Foundation, a Beijing influence operation was successful. For $140,000, Beijing had access to the Prime Minister and to the man the Prime Minister picked to investigate and report on foreign interference in our elections. What did that report say? It said there was nothing to see. Is $140,000 the cost to influence our democracy under the Liberals?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Kevin Lamoureux
|
let us talk about bending the truth. The reality is very simple: At the end of the day, the Prime Minister has had no direct or indirect contact with the foundation for over 10 years now. The member knows that.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Michael Barrett
|
the Liberals are unreal. They are the only ones who think that "arm's-length" means literally holding a meeting at arm's length from the Prime Minister 's desk. They allowed Beijing to directly interfere in our elections and gave direct access to the Prime Minister and the person who is supposed to investigate interference in our elections. It is unbelievable. It is frankly not credible. Conservatives have called for hearings to occur on this, and we have invited, because he asked in the newspapers, Mr. Alexandre Trudeau to appear at committee to answer questions. The Prime Minister 's brother is going to answer questions. The board that is falling apart is answering questions. When will the Liberals finally give Canadians answers?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Kevin Lamoureux
|
again, the member is very much aware that standing committees get the opportunity to call the witnesses they choose to call, and we respect that.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Michael Cooper
|
Trudeau Foundation donors paid for the Prime Minister 's luxurious $80,000 Caribbean vacation. The Prime Minister's brother signed off on a $140,000 Beijing bribe to the foundation to buy his influence, and the foundation held a meeting with five deputy ministers in none other than the Prime Minister's own office. The Prime Minister claims he has nothing to do with the Trudeau Foundation. Is it really so?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Kevin Lamoureux
|
yes, it really is. I do not know how much clearer I can be on this issue. The Prime Minister has very much indicated that there has been no direct or indirect contact with the Trudeau Foundation. The member knows that, and it has not taken place for over 10 years now.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Michael Cooper
|
there is more. The Prime Minister appointed the former president of the Trudeau Foundation to whitewash Beijing's interference in the 2021 election. It was interference to help him get re-elected. Convenient appointments, paid vacations, meetings in his office and Beijing bribes all connect the Prime Minister to the Trudeau Foundation. When will the Prime Minister and the government stop insulting the intelligence of Canadians and admit that the Prime Minister is closely connected to the foundation that bears his family name?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Kevin Lamoureux
|
I would like to tell the member that tinfoil hats are on sale on Amazon. I have been very clear on the issue. The Prime Minister has not had direct or indirect contact with the foundation for well over 10 years.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Ms. Leah Gazan
|
while the Prime Minister is schmoozing with billionaires and bankers and taking selfies with Hollywood stars, 155,000 civil servant workers are on day 10 of their strike. In Winnipeg, 9,000 workers are on the streets, waiting on the Prime Minister to deliver a fair wage to keep up with inflation. The Prime Minister's lack of attention is, quite frankly, disrespectful. When will the Prime Minister get to the negotiation table to deliver the fair deal that workers deserve?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Hon. Greg Fergus
|
let me make this perfectly clear: The negotiators for the federal government are at the table, and they are negotiating in good faith. The negotiators for the unions are at the table, and they are negotiating. The best deal to happen is at the negotiating table, and if they work together, I am confident they will come to an agreement.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Ms. Bonita Zarrillo
|
migrant workers in the care economy are essential. They deserve respect and they deserve to stay here if they choose to. They take care of our aging parents, grandparents and loved ones. The Liberals must grant permanent residency for migrant workers and their families so that they have the same protections and rights as any Canadian worker. When will the Minister of Immigration grant permanent residency for migrant workers in Canada?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mrs. Marie-France Lalonde
|
I want to thank the member for her question and for her advocacy for caregivers in our country. As a former social worker, I know caregivers' hardship. I have also worked with caregivers in many of my roles before entering politics. We have announced that we are reducing work requirements from 24 months to 12 months to help reduce the barriers in getting PR. We sincerely value the sacrifice of our caregivers. We will always try to help people.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Ms. Viviane Lapointe
|
today is the National Day of Mourning when we remember those who have died on the job and commit to safer and more respectful workplaces for all. A safe workplace is a fundamental right of every Canadian worker. One death in the workplace is one too many. Can the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Labour tell us what our government is doing to help ensure workplaces are safe for Canada's workers on this National Day of Mourning?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Terry Sheehan
|
I thank the member for Sudbury for continuing to support workers. Every worker in Canada has the right to a safe and healthy workplace and the right to return home safely at the end of their workday. On the National Day of Mourning, we pay tribute to all workers who have lost their lives, been injured or fallen ill at work. As we pause to reflect, we also see April 28 as a call to continued action. As we honour the memory of those lives lost, we are rededicating ourselves to creating and fostering workplaces where all workers can do their best work knowing that they are physically and mentally safe. One accident or one death on the job is one too many.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mrs. Rachael Thomas
|
we know that, for years, Beijing has attempted to exert undue influence in Canada, but this is the very first government and the very first Prime Minister that have willingly offered Beijing cash for access. This is the first government that has gone that far, and $140,000 is all that it takes. It might as well be 30 pieces of silver. Why does the Prime Minister believe that our democracy is up for sale?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Kevin Lamoureux
|
it is somewhat unfortunate that the Conservatives want to continue with partisan attacks and character assassinations when there are so many different issues that Canadians are facing today. One of the budget announcements that I am very proud of and feel that Canadians are glad to see is the grocery rebate. That is putting money in the pockets of Canadians, and somewhere to the tune of 11 million people will benefit from it. I think the Conservatives need to get in touch with what Canadians are concerned about.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Mr. Jeremy Patzer
|
they say that if someone does not learn from history, they are doomed to repeat it. We would think that the Liberals would learn a lesson or two with their many failed firearms policies, but here we are. Rather than focusing on the violent criminals who are causing havoc in our streets, they would rather implement a buyback program from our law-abiding retailers. Why will the Prime Minister not get back to work and focus on criminals, rather than lawful citizens?
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/187/HAN187-E.XML
|
2023-04-28
|
Government Priorities
|
Ms. Pam Damoff
|
combatting crime is a complex issue. Rather than offering solutions, the party opposite wants to come up with catchy slogans and obstruct the policies we are putting forward. We need to be dealing with mental health. We are providing options when it comes to housing. We are very proud of Bill C-21 and the things that are being put in there to get a handgun freeze and additional penalties on organized crime. We are taking an overall approach to dealing with crime, and I am proud of what we are doing.
|
HOUSE OF COMMONS
|
CA
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
Congressional Data from the our ICML 2025 paper "Private federated learning using preference-optimized synthetic data"
- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16438
- This dataset contains speeches extracted from government institutions of the US, UK and Canada.
- Each speech is a single partition and contains metadata such as speaker name, date, country, and the source URL.
- This dataset is intended to evaluate federated learning algorithms. If using one speech as a client, then there are 134k clients for date range 2023-04-01 to 2024-08-31; If using one speaker as a client, then there are 1k clients for the same period. Since there are more speeches that are later added, there will be more clients as we increase the date range.
- Github: https://github.com/hazylavender/fl_llm_benchmark_dataset
Dataset Details
The raw dataset is a list of dictionaries object like below
{
"url": "https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/335/HAN335-E.XML",
"date_str": "2024-06-19",
"title": "Prime Minister's Award for Excellence in Early Childhood Education",
"speaker": "Mr. Mike Kelloway",
"data": "it is a privilege to rise in the House today to recognize a constituent of mine who has received the Prime Minister's Award for Teaching Excellence….",
"chamber": "HOUSE OF COMMONS",
"country": "CA"
},
Uses
To use this dataset, use any libraries of your liking, for example
from mlcroissant import Dataset
ds = Dataset(jsonld="https://huggingface.co/api/datasets/hazylavender/CongressionalDataset/croissant")
records = ds.records("default")
To filter on dates (or any other fields), you can do
import itertools
import pandas as pd
df = (
pd.DataFrame(list(itertools.filterfalse(lambda x: x['default/date_str'].decode() < '2024-01-01', records)))
)
Dataset statistics
(cutoff 2024-08-31)
- Date range 2023-04-01 to 2024-08-31
- Number of speeches: 134k
- Token distribution
- Number of speeches grouped by countries
- Number of unique speakers grouped by countries
Data sources and license information
US
- Source: https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record
- License: https://www.loc.gov/collections/publications-of-the-law-library-of-congress/about-this-collection/rights-and-access/#:~:text=Publications%20of%20the%20Law%20Library%20of%20Congress%20are%20works%20of,free%20to%20use%20and%20reuse.
- API: https://api.govinfo.gov/docs/
Canada
- Source: https://www.ourcommons.ca/documentviewer/en/44-1/house/sitting-340/hansard
- License: https://www.ourcommons.ca/en/open-data
- API: https://api.openparliament.ca
UK
- Source: https://hansard.parliament.uk/
- License: https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/
- API: https://www.theyworkforyou.com/
Citation
If you found our datasets useful for your work, please consider citing our paper:
@misc{hou2025privatefederatedlearningusing,
title={Private Federated Learning using Preference-Optimized Synthetic Data},
author={Charlie Hou and Mei-Yu Wang and Yige Zhu and Daniel Lazar and Giulia Fanti},
year={2025},
eprint={2504.16438},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.LG},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16438},
}
- Downloads last month
- 287