Datasets:

---

danibor

/

human-medium-length-essays-5000

like 0

The author supports the idea of studying Venus in a descriptive way. Have you ever wanted to or at least have learned about the other planets in our solar system? Do you know what Venus is? In my opinion I believe that learning more about another planet like Venus is worth knowing about. i believe this because he's giving us details about our focus, Venus. He explains that Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any other planet in the solar system even though the one planet being close to the sun is Mercury. This is something unique to say about Venus. In conclusion, the author supports the idea of studying Venus despite the dangers of it because he's being descriptive about Venus and explains more details about it. For example; he says," Also notable, Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in the solar system." This is something interesting to learn about Venus and thats how well the author supports the idea of studying Venus.

There is fasinations in venus because of many reasons , such as its similarities to Earth and the myterious dangers behind the planet its self. The passage is biased that travels beyond earth on a another world shold not be guarded by the dangers and doubts it upholds. Risk are just hard challenges. In "The Challenge of Exploring Venus," the author suggestthat studying Venus is a worthy persuit despite the dangers it presents. He states in his writing that " Venus still has some features that are anolgous to those on Earth." Other than Venus being reffered to as Earths twin, and being the closest planet to Eath in situations such as density and size, there is still info wanted to me learned. Based on facts Venus is a very dangerous place to study . but everyone should be able to do want they want and face the challenges they want. The conditions of venus are far more extreme then anythig humans have handled befor , bu the author is passionate , and therefore the author has a case that backs up him opinion on Venus's dangers and exploration on those dangers.

The article 'The Challenge of Exploring Venus" is very convincing. The author had many great points and was also compairing Venus to Earth. Definitly will grab your attention. A really great con of exploring Venus is that it has many common things to Earth. In paragraph 2 it states that Venus is often referred to Earth as a twin. Also it states that Venus is the second planet in our solar system. Another con why Venus is a great topic to explore is that if there was ever a time in a life time that we had to live in another world, Venus is the answer to that problem. In paragraph 5 it states that NASA has particulary compelling ideas for sending humans to study Venus, but it the temperatures would be toasty at sorund 170 degrees Fahrenheit. Not easy conditiond, but survivable for humans. Over alll I think we should continue reaseaching about Venus and exploring Venus, not only because it would help us humans learn more about our solar system, but it could be a new home for our community.

the author is looking for the study of Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers,"A thick atmosphere of most 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets." Venus atmosphere on the planets surfac temperatures average over 800 degrees fahrenheit,and atmosphere pressure is 90 times great than what our planet has but our planet has more humans enater. Venus and Mars ,our other planetary neighbor venus was covered with largely oceans long ago could have supported various forms of life ust like Earth. Today still has some features are anologous to those on earth, sending humans to study Venus NASA'S working on other approaches to studing venus in the 1800's played an important role in the 1940s during worlde war ll. struving to meet challenge presented by venus has value not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet because human will likely lead us into intimidating endearers. Our travels doubts meet the edges so we can say when we et older in life on old can say i been in space to see venus.

In this artical the author suggests that studing venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. The author supports this idea by providing some information about Venus and how similer and different it is compared to Earth. In paragraph one, the author states how Venus is the second planet from our sun. Then in paragraph two, the author tells us that Venus is often referred to as Earth’s “twin." The author also states how Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density, size, and distance. Since Venus is right around the corner, humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land on this cloud-draped world. In paragraph two, it states that each previous mission was unmanned, and for a good reason, because no space craft survived the landing for more than a few hours. The author then stated, that maybe this issue explains why not a single spaceship has landed on Venus for more than three decades. Venus has a thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide that blankets it. The more challenging thing is that Venus has clouds that are highly corrosive sul

That the author did good job at explan the evidences like he saws, "Just as our jet airplanes travel at a higher altitude to fly over many storms, a veicle hovering over venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditition by staying up and ount of their way" That it is imported to study Venus even if it dangers. Venus ounce look like earth, like "Earth-like planet in our solar system. Long age, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth." That it tells us that it you'st to be livible. Venus is a challenging planet to study like it saws, "numerous factors contribute to Venus's reputation as a challenging planet for humans to study, despite its proximity to us." Venus is a challenging to travel to even if it so close. Traveling to Venus isn't imposible like it saws, "Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imaginatin and innovation." It is posible to trave to Venus. Venus is a challenging planet, that we like to study about and learn how it was formed.

Have you ever thought of living onanother planet ? well scientists are studying venus. venus is earths twin. It states that "longe ago , venus was probaly covered with oceans and could have supported various forms of life." This means that venus had similar features of eath long ago. this one reason why we should study venus. Another reason is that veanus has a similar surface. It states that " the planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar featuers such as valleys, mountains, and craters." This means that the author is trying to study venus because it has familiar features. NASA are working on different ways to study venus. It states that " some simlified electronics made electronics ...and have lasted for three weeks in such conditions." this means they are testing electronics to with stand venus's condictions. If electronics could gather the information for us then thiers no reason for us to not study venus. this is why studying venus is a worthy pusuit despite the dangers it presents.

The article "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" mentions may things about all the problems with going to Venus. Then, it is said how those problems could be fixed. These are all to support the authors claim. From examining the risk vs. reward of going to mars for exploring that was used in the text and the simple soutions that have baffled the world for 3+ decades, it's clear that the author got through with the message he was trying to convey. What I've learned fromt the text is that traveling to Venus for a fair amount of time could be a very momentus event in history, but it will be very arduous to reach that goal. There were several dangers listed; temperature, air pressure, lightning, volcanoes, etc. "While Venus is simple to see from the distant but safe vantage point of earth, it has proved a very challenging place to examine more closely". (Paragraph 1) These were also problems that were tackled by the author. He relenquishes all of the huge problems and proves that going to Venus could be worth it.

The author supports the suggestion that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers by providing benifits and solutions to exploring Mars. In the text it states 'Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like plantet in our solar system'. This shows that by studying Venus we may learn that Venus was once like Earth. In the text it also states 'recall that Venus can sometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit'. This shows that Venus is the easiest to get to in terms of speed/time. Finally they provide ways that space agencies are working on solutions to exploring Mars. For this, the text states 'NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray'. These support the authors' suggestion by showing reasons as to why we should study Venus and the fact that agencies already are researching solutions to exploring Venus.

The story "the challenge of exploring Venus" is about a guy who is trying to persuade his readers on why Venus should be explored despite its dangers, Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers because it may well once have been the most earth like planet in our soler system. Venus is a great planet and NASA should explore it because it is earths twin and also because it probably used to have living things or even people, The author tell us that "Venus was probably covered largly with oceans and could have supported various forms of life" he says this which makes us think if Venus really had bodies of ocean and life which also makes NASA think to discover it. In conlusion the author really tries to persuade us by making us wonder and think about how Venuse could be similer to Earth and also makes us think if it did have ife or even bodies of ocean.

the author is right in this passage because in paragraph 8 nassa is trying to shut down all the towers and the author about this story he wishes nassa could go away but that will be inpossonle these differences from nassa are in speed mars and other times to venus because venus is sometimes around the corner cloud drapped world each previous mission is unmanned and for a good reason cause nassa can handle there men unmanned they all survied the landing for more than a few hours. Maybe this issue explains why venus spaceship hasnt touched down in almost 3 decades. So nassa is concerned about venus spaceship. A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets venus. if our sister planet is so inhospitable why are scientists even discussing futher visits to its surface there wasting there time for all the importanty of nassa....the surfce was rockey and couldnt be walled on because of that reason or drove on there was mountains and craters furthermore. the nationL aeronautics and space administration (NASA) has one particularly compelling idea for sending humans to study venus.

The Earth and Venus have somewhat in common which is allowing NASA want to do what they are trying to study for. Venus is the closest planet to the sun. Which will bring some problems to the project. But it won't stop NASA from trying to do what they are soon going to acconplish. The author did a good job explaining and supporting his idea. Venus is alot like the Earth and it can also have some living things. "Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans." Their is a possiblitity that Venus will have some living things. And to find out about all this it takes risk. And thats what NASA is trying to do but carfully and slowly. To conclude the autor did a good job explaining his point and also supporting his idea. Sooner or later NASA or someone else will go to Venus. And the truth will be told.

The author said that " twin venus is the closest planet to earth" that proves that he is saying that the planet is closer to us and could potentally be more dangerous. He also said "Not a single space ship has touched down on venus in more than three decades" this also shows that they are trying to figure out a way to be able to touch the planet without injuring more people. The author said that "no space craft lasted more than a few hours" its really not safe that people are still tring to go on the planet but, some really want to be able to. The author says that "studying venus is a worthy prosuit" and i agree with him because people are going to start to get curious and there needs to be a way by now that we should be able to get on the planet without blowing up in the few minures we are on there. In conclusion i think that we should be able to get on venus and i think we should find more safe ways to be able to do it. Yes i agree with the author

The authour supports this stament well by showing details from the nasa discovery's and showing how it change venus accroding to the acrticle in phargaph 3 it shows how scientist has been exploring venus for such a long time now and how nasa wants to send humans to study more about how venus works. In passge seven it also states that "nasa has been working on studying venuse for such a long time that some of there electronics made of slilcon carbide have been tested in a chamber and have latsed for three weeks in such conditions". scientiste have once said that venus was probably cover largely with oceans and could have suppoted human life now scientist have discover that the temperture around venus is more than 800 degrees which means sending humans to venus we wouldn't be able to survive it and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greter than what we experince on earth. venus also has simlail things comparing to earth it has rocky sediment, mountains and craters.

In the passage "The Challenge if Exploring Venus" the author suggests that the studying of Venus is a worthy pursuit dispite the dangers it presents by explaining the fact that scientist can not of study if that Venus is like Earth because it is studied from a far distance and that they need to get closer and get rock samples. For example the passage states ," More importantly, researchers cannot take samples of rock, gas, or anything else, from a distance. Therefore, scientits seeking to conduct a thorough mission to nderstand Venus would need to get close up and pesonal dispite the risks." This piece of evidence proves that they would have to go through with a mission to Venus to get rock, gas, and other samples for scientists to study to compare Venus to earth. Therfore, in the passage " The Challenge of Eploring Venus" the authors suggestion to study Venus should entirely be accepted with the evidence they provided but also dispite the risks so that we have stand point on how close Venus is to the Earth comparing rocks,gases, and other pieces of evidence.

In this article the author thinks that venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. And he has many reasons for thinking and suggesting it and here the way that he says that it would be worthy of pursuit is by putting facts that would be helpful in the article. Some of the advantages that the article would have is that it is very well informed and it have a lot of evidence that we could use to say that it is a study that is worthy of pursuit. In the articleit says´Venus is the closest planet to earth in terms of density and size and occasionaly the closest in distance to´.This is saying that venus is closer to us and we have more adantage of knowing more about it because more people can go on it since it is closer. It also says that ´Numerous factors contribute to venus reputation as a challenging planet for humans to study despite its proximity to us. which also means that it could also be difficult to pursuit worthy on venus because it could be difficult to study. Thats is why he says we should pursuit worthy to venus but there are also some disadantages I think that either way there are more facts about pursuing it but not all might think the same.

To support the authors details,I'm going to use details from this passage. The author thinks that Venus is worthy to pursuit, despite the dangers. Here is one detail from the passage that supports this. "Often referred to as Earth's "twin,"Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size." But it would be very challegning only because the conditions on Venus are very rough and must be elevated off the ground at most 30 miles above the ground to get a good look. Plus more details from the passage say "A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus. Even more challenging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere. On the planets surface, tempatures average over 800 degrees. Despite all those dangers I think it is very possible to get a better look at the beautiful planet that we live next to! heres a quote to show that nasa doesn't let little things get in the way."Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imgination and innovation.

We should be allowed to study Venus. To begin with Venus and Earth have somethings in common even though Venus may be a some what dangerous planet there are some things that they have in common. Something that the author said was " Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life just like Earth." In other words what the author is trying to say is that Venus maybe once had the same features just like Earth does today. But now it's all dry. There are some features that Venus has and Earth too. Venus has a rocky sediment and has valleys, mountains and crater just like Earth does. Another good reason we should study Venus is that maybe one day the Earth were in right now may dissapper and we would have to move to a different planet. Studying something would be bad we all have to try new things. Even though Venus sounds like a very dangerous planet are could be some benfits to exploring new planets. We could find new and interting things about different planets.

Here is what ive learned from this passage Earth venus and mars are are planetary neighbors. they use spacecrafts to land on venus for clues and what the planet venus is all about. and Scientist havent got any really good and frequent data,and thats because the spacecrafts break for more than a few hours. i really interesting fact is, a spaceship hasnt land on venus for more than 3 decades. Venus is a challenging and a hard planet to learn from because it nhas so many things that messes up our data. On Venus, the reason why we couldent land there and our machines break all the time is that the the temperature on the surface of venus averages around 800 degrees. these conditions are extreamly dangerous. no one ever encountered that on our planet earth long ago ago they believed that venus did have water on its planet and could have been wild life there. studying venus is really cool in my opinion and the dangers of it. one day we will find a solution and be able to land on venus and explore and learn even more about it

In the article "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" the author suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it may present. The author then goes on to tell us all of his facts that back up his claim. I believe the author makes a very good point. In paragraph 4 the author tells us even though Venus's surface had conditions five times more extreme than what we see on Earth, long ago it was covered with large oceans, rocky sediment and craters. If Venus's conditions used to be so similar to Earth then could it possibly have supported life? In paragraph 7 the author goes to tell us that scientists over at NASA have some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating Venus like conditions. If we can somehow develop the technology to last in Venus like conditions wouldn't it be worth it to see what mysteries it holds. We have the technology at our fingertips, all we have to do is put in the time and effort to get to Venus.

In this passage the author supports his/ her idea by explaining that there are so many risks that will be taken if you land on Venus unprepared. The author supports the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers by saying, "A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent cardon dioxide blankets Venus", which means that Venus is covered in a dangerous acid that basically covers the whole entire planet. In the text i chose this quote because it explains one of the many dangers to going to the planet Venus ans why it is very dangerous and risky because lives could be on the line. In summary you should not go to Venus because the author has made a great point about how dangerous it is and he is trying to persaude you not to go but not only that but he is also trying to expalin to you in detail the pro's and con's of going to Venus.

have you ever wondered whats lives beyond earth if we are able to explore beyond this planet we would know whats to come and could prepare for the moment this information gets broken to us. Even though it might be dangerous it might not be such a bad idea to study it more if we learn more about this planet and gather enough information we might be able to make or gather the equipment to even explore this planet and who know what we can find we might find new minerals,materials,or even a different species. It might be a bad idea to explore these planets that we haven't explore yet, but there are probably stuff that are on these planets that can help worldwide problems like cure diseases make better material or better technology, they may be our key to advancing but if we don't try to advance we might be stuck here facing worlwide problems. Last,the author might not have a bad idea but it might be dangerous but its a risk we might have to take exploring these undiscovered planets that might be harmful but these planet might have the needs we are looking for to advance forward, to help us with our problems that are occuring today.

I would say that planning a trip to Venus is a worthy idea and pursuit because scientists can go there and collect samples of rocks and gases. They could be able to see things and stuff they have never seen before. The problem would be that scientists and explorers would probably not be able to return back to Earth to examine the samples because Venus's Surface is over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and they won't be able to survive on the surface for a long period of time. Inseead of using electronics, we can use mechanical computers which are more ridgid and less fragile in extreme weather and environment conditions. These mechanical computers are worthy because they were used in World War II. These mechnical computers were made to withstand the extreme of weather and environmental conditions. . Some examples include the following, " A thick atmosphere of almost 97% carbon dioxide covers Venus". "Even more challenging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere". "On the planet's surface temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet".

The author of this passage seems to support the idea of traveling to Venus but also seems to have his doubts at the same time. In paragraph 4 he says "If our sister planet is so inhospitable, why are scientists even dicussing further visits to its surface" That statement from the passage doesn't seem like it would come from someone who supports the idea. The other reason I personally believe he doesnt really support this is because when you read passages of people supporting ideas, they dont really go into the negative things that could happen. The author of this went well into detil of the hazards and dangers that can occur on venus. In paragraph 5 he says " Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans." He is saying that even after NASA figures out a way to make it to Venus, it would still be extremely difficult but you probably won't die. My conclusion of this passage is that the author does not fully support the topic he is writing about and for many reasons. Yes, Venus may have had a good enviroment that could have sustained human life in the past but it doesn't anymore. I think we should stop trying to explore somewhere that could harm you.

Venus is a planet what belong the System Solar. Venus is the second planet from our sun. Earth, Venus and Mars our other planetry neighbor, orbit the sun at different speeds. Venus is sometimes right around the corner-in space term-humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land ono this cloud-draped word. In the atomosphere of almost 97% carbon dioxide blankets Venus. Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Today go to the univerce is very dangers because not can to breathe and you can not survive. The NASA has one particulary compelling idea for seding humans to study Venus .At thirty-plus miles above the surface, temperatures would still be toasty at around 170 degrees Fahrenheit, but the air pressure would be close to that of sesa level on Earth. NOt can have table or cell phone is a acid or heat capable of melting tin. The people are very corious what investigator everything the System Solar.

In the passage, the author does not support the idea well. The formatting of the essay is incorrect. The supporting details are also extremely unrealistic. In the passage, the author states that the surface temperature is so high, that it can melt a vast amount of metals, therefor it would make sense for humans to not go. Later, they state that scientists are working on a blimp-like vehicle to float thirty miles above Venus's surface. This refutes the the part of the essay in which the author is explaining that scientists would have to go to the surface to collect research samples. Also, the whole idea of exploring Venus is undermined because floating thirty miles above defeats the purpose of exploring Venus, as the author states the atmosphere makes it difficult to view using photography and videography. This would make reasearch extremely difficult because they will not be able to see the planet's surface. The author does not sufficiently support their argument. The evidence used is unrealistic. The author continues to make arguments for their side and then refute them.

The author said that it is a worthy pursuit despite the danger it presents. In paragraph 2 it stares that Each previous mission was unmanned, and for good reason, since no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hour. That in paragraph 6 it sates that most important that reseachers can't take sample of rocks, gas, or anything else from a distance. That scientists are trying to seek something that would get up close and personal despite the risk. In paragraph 6 it also states that Many researchers are working on innovations that would allow our machines to last long enough to contribute meaningfully to our knowledge of Venus. Also in paragraph 7 its states that by comparison, systems that use mechanical parts can be made more resistant to pressure, heat, and other forces. In conclusion that it is pasable to studying Venus by use technology that can stand Venus risk and there are way for scientists to get close to Venus by use types of machine.

Here's why the author thinks Venus is a worthy pursuit because Venus could of once been a Earth like planet. Venus is same size in density, and size as Earth. The planet had rocky sediments, craters, valleys, and mountains. But nobody can visit or get a up close look to venus because it has a thick atmosphere of almost 97% carbon dioxide, highly corrosive clouds of sulfuric acid in its atmosphere. The weather is extremely hot the average temperature is about 800 degrees Fahrenheit. The atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than we are experiencing right now on earth this is stronger than any sea level on earth. If we were to have another pursuit to Venus it would not be efficient because we dont have the right equipment to survive on that kind of journey. No, the author did not evaluate his idea good enough there wasn't enough supporting details to support his claim "Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents".

The author of this essay suggests that they definately know Venus and have done their research on this topic before. There is quite a bit of information in there to handle all at face value, percentages and dates gallore. Either way, I have come to the deduction that the author very much desires for scientests to explore Venus. According to the essay, Venus is often refered to as eaths twin because ofit's similar size, density and occassionally the close distance to earth. Another fact is that They took the time to research Venus' atmosphere, which is 97% carbon dioxide blankets over the planet itself. It goes on to inform us about the weather systems and the environment Vus really holds behind those thick blankerts of gas. Another supporting claim for their research is that they go through the history of what we know about Venus and or speculate it was like. Thhey also talk about what the future could look like if we do intend to explore Venus. IN conclusion, this author is extremely passionate about out 'twin' planet and it is very clear to see that theywish someone would go out there and explore.

They say Venus can sometimes be our nearest option for planetary visit. Its a crucial consideration given the long time frames of spave travel. The value of returnung to Venus seems indisputable, but what are the options for making such a mission both safe and scientifically productive. I think if we can study Venus up close we'll get a better understanding of the planet, like what materials it has and how the weather conditions are. NASA has a compelling idea for sending humans to study Venus. NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray. A blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the rolling Venusian landscape. However, peering at Venus from a ship orbiting or hovering safely far above the planet can provide only limited insight on ground. To meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors. Our travels should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation.

It is vary dangerous to explore it because because of the extream heat and the high pressurebut i think it would be worth it. I think it is a vary interesting planit because i would like to know if there is any other life than what is on earth. I dont think that earth is the only inhabbited planet. In The Challenge of Exploring Venus the author says there are valleys, mountains, and craters. I think it would be nice if they could think of a way to explore venus but i dont know if that will happen because we might not be advanced enough. If we where able to get on the planet with out dieing we might find out that there was life on it or there might still be life on there that had to adapt to the envierment. There are alot more planets out in the univers we shout see how far we can get. We might find other planets with life on them. I dont think we should just focus on this one planet. All they are doing is waisting recources on one planet that they could be using on other panets.

In this story they talk about exploring space they siad that venus is called evening start somethimes . At night you can see it its the brightest one in the sky. Venus is the seound plant from the sun. And it has proved a very challeging place to examine more closely. Venus is referred to as earth too because its the cloest to the planet its about the same size as earth. Sometimes we are close to mars and sometimes to venus thier be some days around the corner. No space ship has touched down in venus more then three decades. On venus temperatures are average of 800 degrees fahrenheit and the atmospheric pressure is 90 more times grater then what we experience in earth. Its has the hottest surface temperature of any plant in our solor system. Venus was covered in largely with oceans and could of had life there. NASA are working on approaches on studying venus . A old project is looking back on an device called mechanical computers those devices where first envisioned in 1800s and they played a role in 1940s during world war 2 .Thier are builed useing gerars and levers. They are striving to meet the challenge.

The author suggest Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the danger it presents and i completly agree with that . But im here to prove why his idea is valuable and correct. The author supported his idea in many ways but one way he really showed me how well it was supported was when the article stated "Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and occasionally the closest in distance too". What the author is trying to prove with this is the danger despite it presents by being really close to earth. Something else that is really important for us to know is the speed and space. Yea it might not be as important but the author wrote it because he thought it was something important to know . What he means with speed and space is that, With speed it means that sometime Venus is closer to Earth but also sometimes Mars is closer and this because the rate of speed going through. In space is the numerous spacecraft to land on this cloud-draped world because of humans.

The author have lots of facts and I think he needs to add his ideas so people can see what he thinks. I think Venus is cool but I didn't know that it was that close to the planet Earth. I also feel like people dont find facts fun because people dont want to know all the fact. And I can see this could happen in like in 2040 or longer and if I would be alive I would not because it would be alote of money to go to a planet and I would miss the planet Earth. Yes the author did support this idea but he could add more of his ideas because I dont really understand if you could live on it because how would you get food, water, pets and have fun on Venus. And people would also be mostlikey dupest and fat because people are not going to go outside to go play and you cant talk to enyone. And if the spacecraft was unmanned and for good reason then I dont think this is not going to happen eny time soon.

Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers. The reason why I say this is because Scientists keep on finding more way to study and to go to Venus. The excerpt explains that scientists are looking into making vehicles hovering over Veuns so that they could avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and out of the way. Many of the researchers are working on the innovations that would allow the machines to last long enough to contribute meaningfully to there knowledge of venus. Scientists are seeking to confuct the mission to understand venus therefore they would need to get up close and personal despite all the risks. The conditions are as far more ectreme than anything humans enconutered on the earth; such as environment would crush even a submarine accustomed to diving to the deepest parts and the scientists are willing to take risks to find more things about Venus. Veuns is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers

The author supports this idea well because they give alot infromation, and deatils about Venus, and how venus is the second planet from our sun. The author suggest to study Venus because is important to know about it and how it's bad or good. Humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land on this cloud-draped world. The mission was unmanned, and for a good reason because no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hour. This why venus could be dangerous because not a single spaceship has touched down on Venus in more than three decades. I choose this evidence because expalins alot about venus, and how spacescraft don't want to go down their because no one survived the landing, and how Venus could be dangerous. First, it talks about how Venus,and Mars our other planetary neighbor, orbit the sun at different speeds. Then it talks about 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus even more challenging are the clous of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere and the planet surface, temparatures avarage over 800 degrees Fahrenheit.

The conditions on venus aren't pretty. The tempertures get up to 800 degress fahrenheit. Humans can barely deal when it's a 100 degrees in Arizona. The carobon dioxide is so strong that we could survive it more than 10 minutes. Venus's surface tempertures are too hot to even walk on. Venus even has very dangerous weather like erruptng volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lighting strikes to proes seekng to land on it's surface. Where could we go if earth was to blow up? Mars. Venus or Mercury, We don't have a for sure answer to that. Exploring Venus isn't a bad idea but very risky. We could see what Venus has that could benefit ot affect Earth. Considering Earth is the closet planet to Earth. NASA could potentially send robots in the spacecraft to see what information they can give. No ones life should have to be put on the line to explore a diffrent planet. I personally think its a great idea. As said in the passage "Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation."

The author explains why studying Venus is an important thing by stating the facts about how it is beneficial to us to study our sister planet. Do to to our current limit in technology and the harsh ecosystem on Venus, it is is extremely hard for us to find out any information about this planet. Many people wonder why scientist still try to find out more information about Venus. The reason is that Venus's ecosystem could have been similar to ours many years ago. Since the planet shows signs of mountains, valleys and craters we can safley assume their was once an ocean on the now uninhabitable planet. Many scientist believe that we can safley hover above Venus's atomsphere to get a better look at it. However other scientist state that they want to go on to the planet to take samples of rock, gas ect. Either way going to Venus will not be happening anytime soon.

In the story the author says it's the brightist planet in space. And every space craft has been a failer that has landed. On it and they have acid clouds and your head can expload. And it's super super hot hoter than the sun even and they have very big storms and lightnign stikes. Even though it's very similer to Earth it's still very diffrent in meany ways. Even not being on the planet and just chillin above it you can still die but its hard to even study it. From above because how dens the planet it. But they are finding ways to go their but it's still very hard to study the planet. I think the way the author puts it is good they talk about how it looks like Earth like it have reveains rocks lakes and more. But they also explain how bad the condions are their. So even though i dont really care about space that much I think it would be cool. Because for all we know Venus could of had life on it at some point in life so their could be bones of some kind or if their still is life that would be very cool thats my conclusion.

The author in the story suggests of the idea of going to venus and studying as ''earth's twin''. That with the author's idea of pursuiting to Venus. Even through with the dangers of it by studying to go there does'nt sound too bad to think of. Venus is the closed planet to earth. That people are looking to traval to Mars well Earth,Venus and Mars are neighbor's there is a diffrentce Mars is not as hot as Venus, is closer to the sun. Venus is some times closer to Earth the Mars is humans have send spacecafts to land on Venus but one thing about the dangers no human shoukd go it would be something to look in too. Going to Venus would be hard knoing that no spacecarfts surviced the landing for more than a few hours. Venus is something that is not a good idea knowing that the average is over 800 degrees is nothing to play with just to go to Venus.

In "The Challenge of Exploring Venus," the author suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents and supports this idea very well by explaing different aspects of Venus that make it highly worth studying. when the author explains why we should explore Venus one of the statements that i was most intrigued by was was when the author stated that "long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life just like earth", the reason i think this is a very good reason on why we should explore venus is because it could help give us a better understanding of our universe, mabye human like creatures lived on venus at one time, maybe there were buildings on venus, the possibilities are endless. This is why i think that the author makes a great claim about exploring venus and why i think we should further explore venus.

Scientists wants to keep on exploring venus even tho it is dangerous. One reason I think they should is because they should get information about things they brealy know about. My second reason is because they might find someuseful things if they keep on studing it. My last reason is because it might not be as dangerous as people make it out to be. These are some reason why scientist should keep studing venus. In addition I do think that the scientist should keep studying venus for some of these reasons. Reason one is because of the information that they can find id they keep looking into it. My second reason is that they might find some useful information if they keep studing the plant. My last reason is because it might not turn out to be a dangerous place as people say it is. In conclusion I do think its a good idea for people to keep studing venus. My first reason was because it could give the scientist more information on the plant. My second reason was they might find some useful information that coild help them. My last reason was venus might not be a dangerous place as people make it out to be. So i think this is why some scientist should study venus more.

The Challenge of Exploring Venus Every planet is different and unique in their own way. Every planet is known for what they are and I'm going to talk about Venus. Venus is our second planet in our solar system, many people agree and disagree that studying Venus is and is not pursuit despite the dangers it presents of the author saying and I agree with the author because it could be dangerous enough if someone would go up in space and not be prepared. Reasons why I think it wouldn't be a good idea because in the text in paragraph six it says that "Many researchers are working on innovations that would allow our machines to last long enough to contribute meaningfully to our knowledge of Venus". In my own words I believe it is not safe because what if it doesn't last long ? I believe that Venus is a good planet but it's not safe studying in Venus. I understand that people may disagree but everyone safety is important first when they go up in space.

the aurthor suggestion was a very convensing and belieavible i say this because we as humans are growing in population and one day we are going to need a place wehre we can fit all our people it may not be soon but if we keep groing like this i have no douts that we will fill this earth the aurthor has make this point clear in the story when he says " astronomers are fascinated by venus because it may well be once have been the most earth like planet in out solar system. long ago," this shows his hope of finding something that we could rely on and this shows why it is worth exploring if we can make life in other planet then it it both benifical for us humans and animals. and some other reason why it is worth exploring venus is because we can obtain another planet to ourself a way bigger thing than a country "the planet itself but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally " this is also why it ais worth exploring venus so we humans can have knowlage and experieance what it is like to be on another planet .

I agree with the author when he suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit. Although I agree even more when he says that is presents danger. There are pros and cons on working with Venus. I agree with him because if him and his scientest discover things dealing with the phisical in venus or just plane facts it could do well for them. Yet, the cons are extreme. In paragraph 2 it states " No space craft survived the landing after a few hours." The space men are going to have to learn new techniques in order to discover and survive. Another detail to go along with that cause is in paragraph 3 where it states " The conditions are far more extreme then anything humans encounter on earth." Theres gonna be a lot of tracks the men are going to face and have to learn to adapt. In paragraph 4, it says that " atronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like thing plamet in our solar system." Maybe this is why the author suggest to look into it becuase it was once like us. Maybe he wants to know how it change so much. Maybe in the near future we can be able to discover why those things happendand why.

In that work we gonna explain, give ideas and talk a little bit about the problems at the study of Venus because that planet is very dangers to survival Though Venus is a "sister" of the Earth Planet is not the same, Venus is not safetly to people live in their because doesn't have the sufficient oxygen to survival. Thoughthe austronomers are fascined with Venus because is the most similar planet to the Earth. But this planet obviusly have a differents to Earth like, the surface on Venus temperatures average over 800 degrees that is crazy and impossible to survival and in venus are present Volcanos eruptions. A idea for the NASA from me to send people to study the planet, is implement a new jetplane more security for thr austronomers for they can survival and can study the planet. And a new uniform most special for the can have the capacity to survival that dangers problems at Venus. With that work we can explain and understand better about the problems with that planet and have ideas to a better study.

The author is very convinceing he didnt just say whats good nor did he say all what is bad. From the text he made the evidce of how Venus has made it difficult to walk on or be near. He siad that the prussure and the heat is even difficult for the bots that scincetist had made. He also siad that NASA is compelling an idea that sends human to study Venus. they are trying to make a blump-like vehicle 30 or so miles above the rollong venusian. It would still be 170 degess fahrenheit. Thought the presuure would only be as sea levels on earth. NASA even may bring old technology called Mechanical Cumputers they were first envisiond in the 1800s and played and important role in the 1940 during World War ll. they are not like the smart phones or cumputers we have. Mechanical Cumputerscan can last in heat even longer. They work with gears and levers. The author did make good points. Which are convinceing and to be honest I wish I would go now just to see what it looks like. He proved that there is more then one way to prove that we can study venus even if we cant see it in person.

the author supports his ideas very well because, he tells why its important to study venus and why it is the worthy pursuit despite the dangers. The author also says ¨venuse is the closest planet to earth in terms of density and size¨.They have aslo sent numerous spacecrafts and have done previouse missions. The pervious missions was unmanned. There has not been a spaceship that has touched venuse and why, the author said that gthe reason that spaceship or has not landed was becuse it would not last mor than just a few hours. The author supports the idea that studying venus is worthy pursuit despit the dangers, because know that i read the story icould see why. Venus might be dangers to go to and explore but by making spacecrafts and more andmakeing experiment it probably would not be so dangerous to send spacecraft or maybe a spaceshit to try it out again.

I don't think that studying Venus i a worthy pursuit because in the article it states that "humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land on this cloud draped world,since no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours"meanong no space craft has survied for more than a couple of hours. The article also states that "numerous factors contribute to venu's reutation as a challenging planet for humans to study"meaning its already a hard planet to study. The plant is also almost 97% carbon dioxide blankets venus. Venus is also a very hot place,in the article it states that "temperatures average over 800 degrees fahrenheit and a atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet". The article also says that "these conditions are far more extreme than anything humans encounter on earth" meaning that the tempertures are way too extreme for us humans. Humans arnt even going to live there so what is the point of pursuing studying venus. i don't think that it is a good idea to study venus because there is far to dangers.

Since the planet Venus is the closest planet to earth's density and size scientist have been trying to explore the posibilites Venus could have. Venus is the second planet from the sun which means it is very hot. Venus is 800 degrees fahrenheit and is 90 times hotter than what we experience of earth. Humans have sent many spacecrafts to Venus, but none have sucessfully made it, the ones that have landed didnt make it longer than a few hours. A spacecraft hasnt touched Venus in more than 3 decades. Venus has an atmoshere of 97 percent carbon dioxcide. Scientists want to explore venus because since it is the closest planet it earth maybe at one time it had life. Venus likely had a great amountof ocean water and could of had many lifeforms. Venus would be our closest option if we visited a planet. Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray. A blimp like vehicle hoverig 30 or so miles above the roiling Venusian landscape would be a good option.

Giving details and information, I think the author explained well the dangers of Venus. He explained the temperatures and how hot it can get there, how it can melt metal things and that it's just not worth living there. But it is worth exploring as in studying it, the rocks and maybe they can find something that could possibly live there. The author supports the idea of studying by saying in paragraph 8 how "Venus has value" and how "Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limilted by dangers and doubts but she be expanded to meet the very edges or imagination and innovation. The author says that it gets over 800 F in Venus, says that it could've been possibly like Earth years ago, where humans can live in. But NASA has to do more studying on rocks and other sediments and onjects on Venus. The author explaines how much carbon dioxide is covering Venus, and I believe carbon dioxide is so good for a planet. The planet isn't very useful to live in since it crushes metalic things, and for example cars, something we need to get around places.

Venus is a planet in space, that is the second planet from the sun and the closest plant to Earth density and size wise. Venus has a "thick atmosphere of almost 97 carbon dioxide" which makes it a very toxic place and top of the "clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in the atmosphere." Other dangerous conditions are such as the temperatures that "average 800 degrees Fahrenheit." The author suggets that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the danger it presents. It is a worthy pursuit because researchers can explore new types of rocks, gas, and etc. Because Venus is such as harsh planet, it makes everything on the planet that much rare. Despite the conditions, when things on the planet are discovered it can make a huge impact on the history of space and scientists. "NASA's possible soultion to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float ablove fray." The author presents an idea that would allow humans to be able to observe the planet despite the dangers it presents.

In this article "The challenge of exploring Venus" talks about Venus and how it might be worthy to pursuit. The first secion is going to be about how well it talks about Venus and earth. Second is about how venus is worth learning about even though it is dangerous. The first paragraph talks about common facts about Venus also leads in with a fun fact, also the first paragraph leads into the second. In the second paragraph it explains what were going to talk about in detail also more facts about Venus. Also says why we don't send a spacecraft into unmanned. In the article it talks about how dangerous it is. In the first paragraph it says "almost 97 percent of carbon dioxide blankets the planet". Also mentions that the highly corrosive sulfuric acid in the atmosphere. Also talks about the condissions it is in, like extreme temperature, gravity is 50 times more, metal would liquidfy, and a submarine would be crushed. In the end we still are not on it yet but we have yet to give up. We might find a way to land on it and also live on Venus with those extreme conditions. We have always found a way and we will on this problem to. So don't give up and keep on finding a way.

The author makes a very good case about going to Venus, but there are many dangers about going there. One example of those dangers is the average tempature of 800 degrees Fahrenheit. Another one of those dangers is the atmospheric pressure. The atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than the ones found here on Eath. The author suggests ways that could make those danger less noticeable. One way the author suggests this is by a project that The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has been working on. The project is a huge blimp like aircraft. It would travel 30 miles up in the atmosphere and have an average tempature of 170 degrees Fahrenheit. This would also make it possiable to have humans in the atmosphere of Venus. So in conclution Venus is a worthy pursit. The author did make a good argument that it is worthy to explore Venus, but i would not like to go to Venus anytime soon. Those are just a couple of ways that the author supports the idea that it is worthy to pursue the idea of exploring Venus.

Studying venus would be really interesting but venus is hard to study because it´s dangerous and it has really high pressure. Venus is sometimes known as earth´s twin because venus is the closest planet to earth in terms of density and size. Scientist have tried to get to get numerous spacecrafts on venus but no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours. Venus is one of the hardest planet to study and research. It´s hard for astrounauts to go to venus because temperature is over 800 degrees Fahrenheit and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what humans experience on our own planet. If NASA sent humans to venus it would be really hard for the astronauts to land because it has hostile conditions on the surface of venus. When the humans would land on venus the air pressure would be close to some of the levels in the sea and the temperature would be toasty. In conclusion, venus has challenging things it presents and it would make it very hard for people in NASA to put human life on a planet that has very high air pressure and temperature that we are not used having on earth.

The author of "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" suggests studying Venus is a hopeful endevor despite the danger it presents, its both terrifying and wonderous how Venus mirrors what Earth would have looked like if it was closer to the sun. Venus is the most unexplored planet in the solar system, less than the Earth's oceans. Venus could give us reason to develop new technology to last longer on its surface: "Some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted for three weeks." We human beings tested silicon carbide electronics in a chamber simulating Venus's surface and it lasted three weeks before it was finally broken down by the chaotic conditions. Venus is a worthy pursuit, a dangerous one, but worthy. If we do not try, then we might as well give up everything we accomplished to an incinerater and just sit on the couch doing nothing and wasting precious time.

The author presents the idea of exploring Venus well. But what about walking on the surface to explore from the space craft? If we could walk on the planet without being harmed by all of the outside forces, then we coulf run more tests. In the passage, the author states,"Each mission to Venus was unmanned because none of the spacecrafts have survived landing." These factors show that with the materials we have, we should be going for a safer planet like the moon or mars. The author also states that the planet atmosphere is 97 percent carbon dioxide with highly corrosive clouds. This shows that most metals we have can be melted by the clouds and the temperature at the surface is too much for a human to handle. Like I said in the intro, If we had the materials to keep a human safe to walk on the planet and take samples. We would have plenty of things to test here on Earth. Venus also has the hottest surface temperature in the solar system. If we could find a way to keep the hot air out and the cool air in, we could do it. In conclusion, scientists should not be looking into trying to land on Venus. There are too many risk factors to take and we don't have the resources.

The Challenge of Exploring Venus article gives multiple reasons for why we should continue i n our research on Venus. Although it could be dangerous the author believes "we should not be limited by dangers and doubts". The author supports his claim with evidence and facts. He starts out in the second paragraph by talking about why we should visit Venus, and his evidence for why we should is that Venus is the closest in size to earth and is often closes in distance to earth. He uses this evidence to show that we are very similar planets in size. The author also goes on to talk about how the features on the crust are very similar. His evidence for this statement is that both crusts have mountains, valleys, and craters. Although the trip to Venus can be dangerous, the author belives we should continue our journey because " we should not be limited by dangers or doubts". When the author makes a statement he is very good about backing it up with data. He uses real facts in almost every one of his statements.

Venus is Earth's sister plant or as other people like to call it, "Earth's twin" Venus is counted as Earth's sister or "twin" planet because of how close in desity and size Venus is to Earth. Scientists have tried and tried to explore Venus with little robots but the little robots only lasted a couple of hours on Venus's surface, Venus is believed to be uch like Earth is now. Scientists believe that Venus used to be covered in oceans, greenlife and other type's of life before Earth. Scientists are worried to physically go on Venus themselves because of the dangers they will facewhen arriving on Venus, Venus's atmosphere is blanketetd in a thick blanket of almost 97%, there are clouds of sulforic acid, tempertures reach to at least 800 and the atmosphere pressure is 90 times greater than Earth's. The author thinks that scientists should get up close and personal despite the danger or "challenges" that they fac from Venus because, we could have insights on Venus, we wouldn't get to sample anything, weshouldn't be limited in exploring just because of the dnagers. We should explore to the very edges of imaginations and innovation.

The author who is talking all about the planet Venus in this story, is explaining its history and some interesting facts also. Venus is usually called the "Evening Star" in paragraph one. Venus is often reffered to as Earth's "twin" on paragraph two. It is also the closest planet to the Earth where 7.6 billion people are today. Each planet orbits the sun in different speeds and when the Earth fully orbits the sun, it is a brand new year! Every time NASA tries to explore Venus with a space prob or something familiar, it would never end up touching the ground of the planet due to a mailfunction with the gravity most of the time. The author explains that Venus is a popular plant and should be mostly known for being so close to the Earth. Even though NASA has accomplished moon landings, might mean we could accomplish landings on Venus or another planet.

The challenge of Exploring Venus In the story the author is talking about have Venuse is Earth sister and how Venuse may have had life form on it. Venuse is a posible living place. NASA need to do more resurch on Venuse but it is hard to do when Venuse has only been bored a few times and its hard to see through a scope. Venuse is known as the "Evening Stars because it is just a dot in the lends. Besides the sun Venuse is one of the brightest pionts in the sky. The planet Venuse my have once been like our own lively. No this planet that we call our sister is just filled with dusty mountains abd vallies. NASA is tring to find out more information about Venuse. Why? Because NASA is truying to find a way to give Venuse back life. NASA is not only trying to give Venuse back life, but also to see weather it is living grounds. In order to make sure Venuse is the right planet to give life to NASA has to find out the presure and the oxigen levels. In conclusion NASA is trying to find ways to make othere planets our home because Earth is falling apart. Venuse is our next step to a new home. NASA is trying to find a way to make Venuse our new home.

The auther supports the idea of study venus more because the chance of find out the history about venus and if it was a earth-like plant that was once home to life. In pargah 4 they say that "venus still has some features that are analogous to those on earth," because of venus includes"familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters." As NASA work on a way to study venus and how to reach it. They have work with "some simplified electronics made slilcon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of venus's surface"that has lasted for 3 weeks. As the auther states his last part by say thet "earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation." To sum it all up is that we should stop because we fail we should learn from it and keep push on.

The author thinks that people should not stop what there doing because something is dangerous and has risks. The author thinks that venus should still be studied so we can find out why its like the way it is and see if anything is on the planet. The author wants people to keep studying despite the dangers and risks. The author talks about how scientist are trying to make things that can make it to venus and say on the planet for a while and come back. They were thinking of making a giant blimp-like spacecraft that could fly 30 miles over venus and they couls study the planet from there. They could also make a simplified electronics that are made of silicon carbide. They are wrking on ays to continue studying venus. I agree with the author, people should not stop studying it because of the dangers and the risks. They should continue to study it so they can find out if there is anything knw about the planet that we dont know. They could figure out what there is on the planet and why the conditions are so harsh.

The author suggests that studing Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents because the author wants to study and know everything about venus. Like how Venus is Earths twin they have the same density and size and occasionally the closet in distance too but the arouth is willing to take risks knowing that a thick atmosphere of almost 97% carbon dioxide blankets Venus and on the planets surface temperatures average over 800 degrees fahreheit, and the atmosphere pressure is 90 times greater then what they experience on earth them conditions are far more extreme than anything humans encounter. Venus has the hottest temperature of any planet its beyond high pressure an heat NASA worked on other approaches to study venus they simplified electronics made of silicon carbide it lasted 3 weeks in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus which are erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lighting strikes. But the challenge presented by Venus has value not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also becaues human curiosty will likely lead us to many equally intimidating endeavors.

Is studying Venus a worthy pursuit despite the dangers. In my opinion if you would like to devote your life to the study of venus and go preform test on Venus then what ever makes you happy. How ever the author is more on the side of why go and waist all of the resources needed to go to Venus. In the begining of this passage the author states " human have sent numerous spacecraft to land on this cloud-draped world. Each previous mission was unmanned, and for good reason," which leads me to beileve that he doesnt understand why they keep trying and waisting resources and money. Then in paragraph four he states " if our sister planet is so inhospitable, why are scientist even disscusing further visits to its surface" which moves me to think that he beileves that Venus is so "inhospitable" that we shouldnt even waist time experimenting to in hopes find our second earth. When reading this I hope you take time to think about the importantce of this article and you have time to think what should we do? Should we go do more test in hopes Venus could be our second earth or just stay here and spend the time and money fixing our earth.

Studying Venus is a worthy persuit despite the dangers because in the article it says that numerous spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours, maybe thiss issue explains why nit a single spaceship has touched down on Venus more than three decades, Numerous factors contribute to Venus's reputation as a challenging planet for humans to studydespite its proximity to us. Also, the temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our planet. Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system, even though Mercury is closer to our sun. Venusian geology and weather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes to probes seeking land on surface. However, peering at Venus from a ship orbiting or hovering safely far above the planet can provide only limited insight on ground conditions because most forms of light cannot penetrate the dense atmosphere,rendering standard forms of photography the dense videography ineffective. Venus is so hot that it can melt metal.

My claim to do studying on Venus is saying no I think spending so much time and money on something that has been tempted to do multiple times and failed is wasteful. Because we have tried on numerous accaions and have got just a few hours with a little bit of information it is not worth it. Researchers know that they only get a super small time to only see a little bit of a huge planet. Knowing that Venus is a whole planet the size of earth and only getting to see just a tiny bit of it is like starting at one side of the United States and then driving only a few hours to see how far you get, If you are trying to go all the way around the world to get back to the same spot but only have a few hours to do so, you don't cover much of anything to have any real say of how the world looks in different areas if you haven't seen it all yet. In conclusion to the challenge of Venus I say it is a time waster and we will not be able to see the whole planet of Venus with only a few hours once every few decades.

the author that evaluates how well the author supports the idea that studying venus is a worth pursuit despite the danger. by saying " nasa is working on other approaches to studying venus for example some simplified electronis made of silicoin carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating". This evidence support my claim because the people are studying for big things like how well studying venus is a worthy persuit. Another claim that evalutes how well the author supports the idea that studying venus is a worth pursuit despite. In paragraph 8 it says" striving to meet the challenge presented by venus has vaule. Not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself. which exsplain that studying venus is a worth pursuit despite. The conclusion I have about " the challenge of exploring venus " was . It seem like if u study it its a good thing . because its very important to nasa it says that in the reading . so maybe if u do it you would be succesful.

The author uses supporting claims very well in his article. Stating how we could use machanical computers to put on venus that can withstand the 800 degrees fahrenheit. Where regular computers would not survive. Or the use of silicone, in the article it states that the silicone was able to withstand 3 weeks of venuses harsh eviorment. Or to use space crafts. With these types of advancements this could help us learn more about venus. And how its features are very similar to earth. Which might have had water or even life forms at one point. Studying venus could help us discover new technology or materials. But it would come with challenges the idea of using a spacecraft to hover around venus orbit, could help us but the dense cloud cover would make it difficult to see. This resherch could help us find new ways to explore space. Which could help us not be limited to what we can achive from going forward in space exploration. From new materials to information to why venus became what it is today. With this information maybe one day we could make it on venuses surface but only time will tell.

Yes studying venus is a worthy pursuit because you never know what we might find just like the author said their could be another form of life. Studying venus might be a very dangerous act but i mean look at who we have as our president. Just walikng down the street is dangerous in some parts. I think it could be a very interesting study. The author said that venus has very high conditions but i mean scientists have found a way to live on mars so i mean cant we do that too. Yes it could be very hot and dangerous but what if we found the creators of life not saying we would ut you never know. I just think it is a good idea t study venus. Everyone has questions about how we got here what made life or even who made life but not one person can answer that because we dont know but if we study venus imagine what we could find. Yes this might be a very dangerous act but it could also be a very useful act too. I think studying venus it a great ideo and i hope people agree. So yes we should study venus and try to find a way over the hurdles of venus and figure some things out.

Venus is just like earth but the venus really hold some lives in earth like some animal and some other thing. Venus is a good planet but on big problem we dont know how the life is over there and we really know if it could hold all lifes. Thats why scientist are gonna send a drone or a spaceship to go check it out the venus life. People think that sound crazy but in reality is not is a good thing cause what if some thing happens to our earth and we have no where to go. Scientist said that the planet venus had live so many years ago and the scientist also think there were living things in that planet. Thats why scientist want to go and see if venus is worth living over there and if it could have a big empact to our lives and also if it could hold lives there with no problem. I think we should give it a shot and see if the planet venus could hold any lives and if its not dangerous to go and make other home like earth and make it better. I think everyone will be happy to see if venus will be our next home planet. It will be wired if we find any lives over there like not human related different spices.

This articall is about the planet Venus a nabor to eath but yet millions of miles away. One may think this planet is not much different from earth but it is very different. Venus is closer to the sun so the suface tepertur is some times over 800 degres Fahrenheit. this is where the problems come in and hanestly makes it harder to bealeve it is posible to explore Venus. In the artical the author sounds very confident about this exploration but the conditions seem to risky and how are they 100% shore about these thiges anyway. In the artical it states "At thirty-plus miles above the surface, teperatures would be around 170 degrees but the air pressure would be close to that of sea level on earth". I mean how can you tell they temperature of a planet that far away and even more know how hot it will be at different altitodes. What it all come down to is the author did not give enough evidance or they did not prove it. They just gave us some numbers that we did nit even know where they came from. And they use the word "about" in the quote in my second paragraph. I don't know about you but we probubly should not be voying peoples lives on the word about.

from "the challenge of exploring venus" the author belives thier are great benifits of venus. In paragraph 2 it says "often referred to as earths twin, venus os the closest plant to earth in terms of denstiy and size, and occasionally the closest in distances too.". venus its almost alike to earth. The aurthor belives it to be. Yes venus is are "sister planet" but what about the dangers of going to venus? Venus has a thick atmosphere of alomst 97% carbon dioxide, even in paragraph 3 it says "Even more challening are the clouds of highly corrocsive sulfuric acid in venus atmosphere". How are we to visit venus when we cant even breath on the surface. the conditions are far more alarming then any human incounter. Yet again still think we should go to venus but why? In paragraph 4 is says "astronomers are fascinated by venus because it may well once have been the most earth_-like plant in our solar system." Even withe the dangers of venus one day we will find a way to land on venus. Venus maybe are new home.

The authors supporting details is pretty well. The author want to study the planet. His supporting detail are pretty good. The text states "Often referred to ss Earth's 'twin,' Venus is the closet planet to earth in terms of density and size, and occasionally the closest in distance to." The deatil really inetsting. A third grader can be really interested and would like to read more. " A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus... On the planet's surface, tempatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater thn what we experianceon our own planet." I usually get lost to half the paragraph by now, but because it's so well written, ijust want to ead more. The authors has really good supporting details. Th reader will know what he would be talking about what he mean. i would think that a lot of student would be interested to study other planets because if thus article is well written.

Traveling to Venus is a dangous task. Even with the right equipment and gear the atmosher of Venus still might not be safe. Scientists have been looking into going to Venus. It has been proven that it is not safe to be on it or near the surface of the plant. A group of scientist from NASA are looking into inhabiting Venus. They are sending ships that nobody is on to collect data, but unfortulnlly that ships only lasted a few hours on the planet. With scientists wanting to send people to Venus to collect data, is a little obsvered in the matter. The atmospher is not safe even if they are not on the suface of the planet. This might take years to compelte, but it will take to much of our time to explore and inhabit planets that we can handle. If there are no more of the planets then we could go to Venus, but we should explore others first to see if they are more suitable for people to live on.

in the passage the author of the paasage "the challenge of exploring venus"belives that its worth the risk for example in paragraph 4 the authoer states scientist are fascinated by venus beacuse its the closes thing to earth. scientist have infered long ago venus was most likely covered in in with various life forms. also scientist have discoverd that rocky like features including valleys mountions an crators therefore they belive it could be livable despite its harsh conditons such as high tempetures naza has been working on other appproches to the studying venus for example some simplified electronices made of slilcon carbide have bee ntested in a chamber simulating the chaos of vensus surface an have lasted 3 weeks in such conditions this is evident that scientist are trying to find ways to explore the surface of venus in concluson this show thee amount of curiosity that scientist think would be worh studying venus despite all the negative aspects of venus

The author supports this idea of ''The Challenge of Exploring Venus '' by stating many facts by In paragraph 3 it states that ''A thick atmosphere of almost 97% carbon dioxide blankets venus. Even more challenging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in venus's atmosphere. On the planet's surface tempatures average over 800 degrees fahrenheit,and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we are accustomed to on earth. such an enviorment would crush even a submarine accustomed to diving to the deepest parts of our oceans and would liquify many metals. Venusian geology and weather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes,powerful earthquakes,and frequent lightning strikes to probes seeking to land on it's surface. The main reason i used the following text was to support my point of view of why we do not go to venus. For example we do not go to venus because of the heat,carbondioxide,and the facors of the planet so in conclusion, i think it is important that we should be smart about this and only hoover above the surface. because of the factors of venus.

The author supports this idea by giving information how its different from today then on the 1940s. The author is telling the reader on "paragrahp 7" to imagine a cell phone or tablet to acid or heat capable of melting tin. Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size with the the author wants to say every planet has is own neighbor but they got thier sapce. The author wants to inform the planet Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system even thought Mercury is closer to our sun. The author claim is why are scientists even discussing further visits to its surface even when Venus still has some features that are analogous to those Earth. NASA has one particularly compelling idea for sending humas to studt Venus. The author is saying on paragraph 8; 'Striving to meet the challenge presented by venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also only because of the human curiosity'. The travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovaton.

why visiting venus is a worthy pursuit despite the danger, the planet might have once had life, to gather info on venus to know it better, to satisfy peoples curiosity. the planet might have had life before due to that it is earth like when it comes to terrian, " Today venus still has some features that are analogous to those on earth. The planet has a surface of rocky sedimrnt and includes familiar features such as valllys, mountains, and craters." to gather info on the palnet, is to understand our history more, " Many researchers are working on inovations that would allow our machines to last long enough to contribute meaningfully to our knowledge of venus." to satisy peoples curiosity is to satisfy the search for meaning, " Striving to meet the challange presented by venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity would likely lead us into many equally intimadating endeavours." the possiblity of venus having life, gathering info on venus to learn about it, and to satisfy our curiosity, is why exploring venus is worth the danger.

When the author talks about Venus he talks about how it is and what it is like and how it works. Venus is different from Earth but it is the same in some way. It is differnt because of the tempurature and the atmosphere and the surface. The tempurature reaches up to 800 degrees fahrenheit and that is unsurvivable for humans. The surface is bad to it is a hot lava and molten like suface and it can melt most metals. Venuses atmosphere is mainly filled with 97 percent of carbon dioxide. The air pressure is really bad it is strong enough it could crush a submarine like its going down to the deepest part of our oceans. NASA is trying to come up with a way to study Venus with a blimp like vehicle that can float 30 miles up away from Venus and its nasty surface and atmosphere. Even though the tempurature will reach only 170 degrees fahrenhite it is still survivable for humans.

Exploring Venus I wounder why Venus called the "Evening star" I think venus sometimes call the evening star because its a bright planet and it shine like a star & its the second planet from our sun. And venus referred to earth's twin because venus is the closest planet to earth. If I was an anstronount I would love to explore venus because it would be fun to be walking on venus. Most people should join venus just to see how it look and how is it. I think NASA as our jet airplanes travel at higher altitude to fly over many storms to go into space and explore many plants. The national aeronautics and space administartion have done a great job when they go into space and discover planets. I think it is very cool to go on other planets venus is sometimes closers to mars. The earth rotated its self and people dont nocited it. The sun is the hottest planet in the solar system it is over 100's degrees. Long ago venus was probaly coverd largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life just like earth. Today, venus still has some features that are analogous to those on earth but venus is one of the best planet in the solar system.

"The Challenge of Exploring Venus," says much about the challenge, and how we might be able to study Venus, but says little comparatively of why we should. The article only talks about why we should study Venus only once in the fourth paragraph out of eight others. Paragraph four mentions how Venus may have been like Earth, "it may well have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system." and how it is the nearest planet to Earth, "Furthermore, recall that Venus can sometimes be out nearest option for a planetary visit,". However, these claims it makes are not enough reason to study Venus, they fall short of balancing out the risk with the reward. When you consider what the paragraph says it becomes obvious that with high risk, ineffective solutions, and lacking reasons for study this article misses the mark and doesn't support the worth of studying Venus as well as it aims to.

Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and accasionally the closest in distance too. the speed between Mars, Venus, and Earth orbit the sun in different speeds. these difference in speed mean that sometimes we are closer to Mars and other times venus A thick atmosphere of almost 97% carbon dioxide blankets venus. even more challenging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmophere. on the planet's surface, tempers average over 800 degrees this showws how dangerous it s trying to study venus specially with the high percentages that this story has about venus. Paragraph 4 the authour asks " if our sister planet is so inhospitable, why are scientist even discussing further visit to its surface?" he states that astronomers are fasinated by planet in our solor system , long ago, Venus was probably covered large;y with oceans and could have supported varous forms of life, just like earth. Today, Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on Earth.

Venus the evening star since its the brightest point of light in the night sky. Humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land on this cloud-draped world and each missiion was unmanned since no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours and nvere touched venus in more than tree decades. The thick atmosphere is almost 97 percent carbon dioxide and the clouds are even more challenging since their is highly corrosive sulfuric acid in venus's atmosphere and on the planet surface temperatures average is over 800 degrees fahrenheit and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than we experience on earth and the environment would crush even a submarine. Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported forms of life and has familiar features suah as valleys, mountains, and craters and In conclusion if we could possibly bulid something to survive venus we could find some amazing things like if it ever ahad water and find maybe remains of past forms of life.

The author starts by giving us examples how Earth and Venus are similar to eah other and giving us information how Venus could be a planet were they used to be life before. He or she was explaning the diffrences how the degrees are diffrent and their higher on Venus but he came to the conclusion that how it could be a livible planet. So on paragrah 5 the author says that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) that they have the idea of sending people to explore it so this menas they are actually serious about this. The author explains how they are some bad stuff before sending people so they are comimg up with ideas how the mission can be complete with no failures so this mens that we have the knowledge but we dont have the right things to complete this mission. On paragraph 8 it blow my mind that hes actually right about how we are curios about anything we cant reach with our hands so we try harder to obtain the impossible, we have a huge universe but we will never be satisfy until we reach a dead end.

The author supports the idea by explaining how it might be risky but worth to what explore and find on venus. through out the most of the story the author keep reclaiming the risk of it all to get there, but has reason why its still worth the visit. In paragraph 4 the author states " that its one of our nearest option for planetary visit, a crucial consideration " then on moving on to paragraph 5 where the author also staes " it would be hard to get there and stay but will be survivable to humans." and finale in paragraph 8 the author finale states " striving to meet the challenge presented by venus has value,not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will liklely lead us into many equally intimdating endevors." this paragraphs show that he is on board with visitng venus, but also states the risks of getting there.

The author tells the reader how Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents because no ones been on the planet and metal would just liquefy so we can't send nothing nor no one up to Venus. But I think that the the author would like to know how it's like up there besides knowinf that it's hot, and maybe would like to know what we could do up there in those types of conditions. Like many other planet most people would say we can't live in those types of conditions but scintist found out we could live on some planets and also grow food on some of those planets. So the author might think that it's worth finding out that if we could at least grow plants there since some plants can suvive and grow in real hot conditions. Another posible reason why the author might would want to see if there is living life on Venus. Lots of people talk about there being more then just people on one planet so there could be some form of life on another. If we could grow food on some plants that could also mean that there's life on that planet too. So even thought it's extremelly hot on Venus doesn't mean that there isn't a form of living life on there.

It is not worthy pursuit while it has the dangers it present. here is "in my opinion" the most dangerous things that venus has to offer. The first danger on the planet is the atmosphere. It says that almost 97 percent of the atmosphere that blankets venus is carbon dioxide. since venus has more carbon dioxide then oxygen, you would die from the lack of oxygen. the second danger on the planet is gravity. we can sustain the gravity on earth, but trying to sustain gravity that is 90 time greater than trying to get on venus would be extremely difficlut. the third danger the planet has to offer is heat. if the tempature is 800 degrees fahrenheit, i would profer to go on a hot, sunny day on earth rather then having a normal day on venus. i don't think that have air conditioners would help the fact that you would be cooked alive on venus. they're my three of the dangers that venus has to offer. if we have to examine venus, i am leaving.

In "The Challenge of Exploring Venus," the author suggests that studying Venus is a worthy persuit despite the dangers it presents. Venus is an interesting planet to learn about. The author states "Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because its Earth-like." However, Venus has a thicker atmosphere than earth. The fahrenheit of Venus is extremely hot. It's possible that any NASA person could visit this planet and understand Venus. Scientists will figure out a way to travel to Venus and get more information than they already have. For example, somebody from NASA could reach the planet and get to know so much such as; what it looks like and the temperature. They would report back to the boss with every piece of information they've received. The temperature could affect the traveler because its possible to have a heat stroke if they are not careful enough. The scientists and NASA are being limited by the dangerous travel to Venus. A life could be lost so they are being doubted. Reseachers are not able to research any minerals from Venus unless the rocks, or what not, are brought back to earth by a traveler. Studying Venus is a worthyy pursuit despite the dangers that might come with.

In "The Challenge of Exploring Venus", the author suggests that studying venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. The author does mention "a thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets venus. There are many challenge's to studying venus. "On the planet's surface temperatures average over 800 degrees fahrenheit. " The author mentions challenges that we face in order to study venus. The author states "Striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors." While they are many challenges that scientists, and that people may face, Venus is worthy of being studied. Nasa's possible solution to thhe hostile conditions on the surface on Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray. They are many ways Venus can be studied, with NASA's solution , we are closer to discovering the many secrets of venus. Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation.

The author supports his ideas by show and telling that NASA is working on other prouches to study Venus. In paragraph 7 telling use about how electronics played an important role in the 1940s. so more ideas of electronics would help the author study even more an get even more info about Venus. Dispite the dangers it presents if they make robots that have the mind set on studying Venus that would change the danger of othes and we will have more info of how humans will be in harm of. i just feel like that humans should have 2 planets and were more then capable of doing that so and the author has a point that our travels on earth and beyond should not be limited by danger and doubts but should be expanded to meet the vey edge of imagination and innovtion. Thats shouldnt be a challenge theres so much value cause this planet will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavor.

The author has great supports about why we should study the planet of Venus. He called it Earth's twin. He stated that Venus is the closest planet to be comapred to Earth. The author states that blimp-like vehicles would help with the study of Venus. The author said Venus is Earth's twin because it's the closest planet to have the same density and size as Earth. The author states that we could use blimp-like vehicles to not get burnt or crushed because if the vehicle gets 30 or so miles above the roiling Venusian landscape everything would change. The temperature would drop from about 800 degress to 170 degress Fahrenheit. The atmospheric pressure would drop from 90 times greater than earths surface to about Earth's sea level if the vehicle were to be 30 miles or so above the surface. All you need to know why we need to study Venus more is all here. Venus is basically Earth's twin so why not study it more. Venus is the closet planet to be compared to Earth with its size and density. Blimp-like vehicles would help with it's flight to 30 miles or so. It would help with the temperature and the atmospheric pressure. Do you have anything to debate about these facts?

In "The Challenge of Exploring Venus," the author makes a strong point to argue that observing venus is worth taking a risk for. He backs up his claim as well, ranging from strives in science, to just the insight itself. The author states many strong reasons for his claim. To start off, one of the reasons the author gives for a observitory visit to Venus is because it, "Can sometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit." This shows that he is trying to back up his original claim with the fact that its perhaps the closest option we have for these visits. Also the author strides to say that it will give more knowlage on Venus if we study it. "Not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet (paragrpah 8)." This also backs up what he is saying because the fact that more can be learned from Venus alone, is a huge reason for some to go observe this planet. In conclusion, the author makes a point to say a observitory visit to Venus would be behnificial and supports his claim very well using facts and explaining what and why some of his reasons should be taken seriously. Therefore, the author did a great job in backing up his claims and explaining them thuroghly.

Well the author is saying that Venus is the most like Earth than any other planet we have seen. Venus has oceans covering a bunch of the planet. The author also explains that there could be various forms of life that could be living on Venus, but we don't have any information because Venus is a super hot planet and when we send something down to land on the planet it melts or gets destroyed just because how hot it is. Since Venus has a possibility of life I think we should keep investigating this extremely hot planet to see what it has to offer. If there is any life on Venus we need to keep exploring the planet to see where the planet leads us and if we don't find any signs of life then I say we move on to another planet and just keep exploring. NASA is saying that they are looking for ways to further investigate the planet and take notes on what they see. So therefore, Venus is the most like Earth and NASA is trying to figure all the ways to find information about the planet and see if there is any life or it's just a dead planet. This author has kind of the same mindset as me and what I think we should do and figure out things.

The studying of Venus is a worthy persuit despite its dangers. Theres is many good thing to come out of this. The author states that Earth was once like our planet. In parragraph 4 lines 4-10 it states that perhappes Venus was like Earth. by being covered in oceans and could support various life forms. Still today it still has some of these fetures like valleys and craters. The text also states that they have a unique way that is safe to humans for them to visit Venus. In parragraph 5 NASA has the idea of having a large blimp like structure aporxpmently 30 or so miles above Venus to test. all though it would be hot it would not be as hot as it would be if they were on the planet so it would be safer. NASA is still challengeing themselfs by figuring out how to collect samples. In conclusion traveleing would be worth the while despite the dangers. Because we could figure out amazing things that we didnt know yet. and could further educate our world about our universe.

This is my deatlis to back the witer on his claim how how studying venus is both worthy and dangerousand to explain how the author backs himself up on his claim. He gives alot of good points but a huge point that stood out to me was wehen he said how venus is sometimes called Earth's twin becuase in distance venus is the closest planet to us in denstity and size so pretty much Venus is a mini Earth. Another thing that the author toched on is that Venus nickname The Evening Star the writter put that piece of info about Venus becuase he is explaing how Venus is one of the brightest points of light in the night sky which makes it simple for anyone to spot even a simple stargazer. The last point of evedince the writter used to suppports his claim is the dangerous part oif hsi calim he said that NASA has been studying how they are goinhg to send humnas to study VEnus but the dangerous part of that mission is the surface conditions.

What the author was suggesting when he was saying venus is dangerous but a worthy pursuit. Was that no spacecraft survived more that a couple of hours on venus. The atmosphere was dangerous to people. It has the hottest surface temperature. The first reason you cant go onto Venus is because no spacecraft lasted more than a couple of hours on Venus. If a spacecraft couldn't survive on Venus there is no way that a human can survive. The second reason that man cannot be on Venus is because the atmosphere is dangerous to humans. The atmosphere is almost 97 percent cardon dioxide. Which is deadly to humans. Its like being trapped in an small airtight box with no holes. The last reason that humans can't be on Venus is because it also has the hottest surface temperature of all the planets. While also having many active volcanoes, earthquakes and more frequent lightning strikes. So in conclusion no human can last very long on Venus, making it interesting but hard to research do to that no spacecraft survived more that a couple of hours on Venus. The atmosphere is dangerous to people. It has the hottest surface temperature.

The author effectively communicate his claim that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth like planet in our solar system. "NASA is working on other approaches to studying Venus. Some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simualting the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted for three weeks in such condition". "By comparsion, systems that use mechanical parts can be made more resistant to pressure, heat, and other forces". These evidence proves how NASA are trying different approaches and they are making different kind of new technology so they can withstand the harsh condition of Venus, and striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors.

I think the author did a great job explaining venus and it's many complications. Venus has been a sister panet to us for a long time but we still have yet to properly explore it because of its harsh conditions. Venus is very hot, on average it is over 800 degrees fahrenheit, so it makes it almost impossible to have anything land on it. The author explains how NASA is planning on approaching the heat. Many people believe that Venus may have used to have been able to support life. Venus was known to have bodies of water at some point in time and has other forms of landscape like valleys, mountains, and craters. If we could just get to Venus to check out whats going on, it could help us in the future, and i'm interested in knowing now if we ever will, i like how much information the author provided in this text

The author explains venus very well. he describes the atmospher on the planet and the tempreratures on the planet as well. it would be very difficulet to land there because it is very hot. i have seen images from the planet and the ground is very valcanic looking and you cant see very well cause of the atmospher. The planet gets very hot during the day and very cold there during the night as well. its kinda neet to look up at night on planet earth and see all the stars and planets out there. I have seen venus a couple of times and the author is right it is very bright. The reason we cant land their the author sates that it has sulfiric asid for the atmospher and the author is right. A prob was sent there and it only lasted a few hours. The author done a good job at studying veuns and its a good idea to pursuit it.