Datasets:
license: mit
task_categories:
- text-classification
language:
- en
multilinguality:
- monolingual
annotations_creators:
- expert-generated
language_creators:
- found
source_datasets:
- extended
dataset_modality: text
tags:
- gaming
- annotations
- binary
- classification
- labels
- steam
- reviews
- steam-reviews
- BERT
- ROBERTA
- constructiveness
- constructivity
- sentiment-analysis
- nlp
pretty_name: 1.5K Steam Reviews Binary Labeled for Constructiveness
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
thumbnail: >-
https://i.ibb.co/Bnj0gw6/abullard1-steam-review-constructiveness-classifier-logo.png
dataset_size: 332 KB
dataset_info:
features:
- name: id
dtype: int32
- name: game
dtype: string
- name: review
dtype: string
- name: author_playtime_at_review
dtype: int32
- name: voted_up
dtype: bool
- name: votes_up
dtype: int32
- name: votes_funny
dtype: int32
- name: constructive
dtype: int32
1.5K Steam Reviews Binary Labeled for Constructiveness
Dataset Summary
This dataset contains 1,461 Steam reviews from 10 of the most reviewed games. Each game has about the same amount of reviews. Each review is annotated with a binary label indicating whether the review is constructive or not. The dataset is designed to support tasks related to text classification, particularly constructiveness detection tasks in the gaming domain.
The dataset is particularly useful for training models like BERT, and its' derivatives or any other NLP models aimed at classifying text.
Dataset Structure
The dataset contains the following columns:
- id: A unique identifier for each review.
- game: The name of the game being reviewed.
- review: The text of the Steam review.
- author_playtime_at_review: The number of hours the author had played the game at the time of writing the review.
- voted_up: Whether the user marked the review/the game as positive (True) or negative (False).
- votes_up: The number of upvotes the review received from other users.
- votes_funny: The number of "funny" votes the review received from other users.
- constructive: A binary label indicating whether the review was constructive (1) or not (0).
Example Data
id | game | review | author_playtime_at_review | voted_up | votes_up | votes_funny | constructive |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1024 | Team Fortress 2 | shoot enemy | 639 | True | 1 | 0 | 0 |
652 | Grand Theft Auto V | 6 damn years and it's still rocking like its g... | 145 | True | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1244 | Terraria | Great game highly recommend for people who like... | 569 | True | 0 | 0 | 1 |
15 | Among Us | So good. Amazing game of teamwork and betrayal... | 5 | True | 0 | 0 | 1 |
584 | Garry's Mod | Jbmod is trash!!! | 65 | True | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Labeling Criteria
- Constructive (1): Reviews that provide helpful feedback, suggestions for improvement, constructive criticism, or detailed insights into the game.
- Non-constructive (0): Reviews that do not offer useful feedback, do not offer substance, are vague, off-topic, irrelevant, or trolling.
Of course, constructiveness is subjective, when testing the dataset on a finetuned ROBERTA model though, we reached about 80% accuracy.
Notes
Please note, that the dataset is unbalanced. 63.04% of the reviews were labeled as being non-constructive while 36.96% were labeled as being constructive. Please take this into account when utilizing the dataset.
License
This dataset is licensed under the MIT License, allowing open and flexible use of the dataset for both academic and commercial purposes.