The Rise of “Gun Sanctuaries” and the End of the Rule of Law

If Democrats are going to refuse to enforce immigration laws, then Republicans are going to refuse to enforce gun restrictions.

It’s very simple: if they don’t have to obey the laws they don’t like, then neither do we.




Reuters describes the sheriffs in these “gun sancturary” jurisdictions as “rogue.” Wonder why Reuters doesn’t use the same language to describe Democrat officials who refuse to enforce immigration laws?

(That was a rhetorical question: we all know why.)

Make no mistake: this is the beginning of the end of the rule of law in this country. Both sides now flat-out refuse to be governed by the other.

As much as it sucks, we have to stick up for ourselves. We can’t let the rule of law be a one-way street in which liberals get to pick and choose which laws they obey while we obey them all–including the ones we don’t like–out of loyalty to the ideal of the Rule of Law. It doesn’t work that way.

Either everyone follows all the laws, or nobody does.

2 thoughts on “The Rise of “Gun Sanctuaries” and the End of the Rule of Law”

  1. There’s a major difference. The laws that the Dems want enforced are illegal since they violate both US Constitution and Divine Law. As such, Americans MUST defy such criminal laws. Indeed, given that the Dems are still alive in office, the People have yet to fulfill their duties to Nation and God.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: