Iranian Nuclear Issue: US Chooses Threats and Aggression Over Simple Solution to Peace

Back in May I wrote about the coordinated US campaign of cyber-terrorism, commercial sabotage, targeted assassinations, and proxy wars against the Iranian regime. In other words, the list of acts of international aggression the US has more or less openly unleashed against Iran. Well, now the Guardian has reiterated these facts for their audience.

Bush asked Congress to approve $400m for a programme of support for rebel ethnic groups, as well as intelligence gathering and sabotage of the nuclear programme. Part of that effort involved slipping defective parts such as centrifuge components into the black market supply to Iran, designed to blow apart while in operation and in so doing bring down all the centrifuges in the vicinity. The UK, Germany, France and Israel are said to have been involved in similar efforts. Meanwhile, western intelligence agencies stepped up their attempt to infiltrate the programme, seeking to recruit Iranian scientists when they travelled abroad.

Gholam Reza Aghazadeh, the head of Iran’s atomic energy organisation, complained to the press in 2006 about sabotage but vowed that Iran would overcome the challenge by making more of the centrifuges and other components itself.

But it was impossible to make everything at home. The computer systems which run the centrifuge operations in Natanz, supplied by the German engineering firm Siemens, were targeted last year by a computer worm called Stuxnet, reportedly created as a joint venture by US and Israeli intelligence. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad conceded that Stuxnet had caused damage, and last November, Iranian scientists were forced to suspend enrichment to rectify the problem. A few days later, however, the centrifuges were working once more.

The black operations have not been confined to hardware and computer systems. They have also targeted Iran’s scientists. In July 2009, an Iranian nuclear expert called Shahram Amiri vanished while on a pilgrimage to Mecca. A year later, he surfaced in the US claiming he had been abducted by American agents, and in July 2010 he returned to a hero’s welcome in Tehran.

US officials said he had been a willing defector who had been paid $5m for his help, but who had since had a mysterious change of heart. There have since been claims Amiri had been an Iranian double agent all along. The truth is unclear.

Other attempts to remove Iran’s scientists have been blunter and bloodier.

Starting in January 2010, there were a series of attacks in Tehran on Iranian physicists with links to the nuclear programme. The first target was Masoud Ali Mohammadi, a physicist and lecturer at the Imam Hussein university, run by the Revolutionary Guards. He was on his way to work when a bomb fixed to a motorbike parked outside his house exploded and killed him instantly.

In November that year, assassins on motorbikes targeted two Iranian scientists simultaneously as they were stuck in morning traffic. In both cases, the killers drove up alongside their targets’ cars and stuck bombs to the side. Majid Shahriari, a scientist at the atomic energy organisation, who had co-authored a paper on neutron diffusion in a nuclear reactor, was killed.

The other target, Fereidoun Abbasi-Davani, suspected by western officials of being a central figure in experiments on building a nuclear warhead, was only injured. Three months later he was promoted to the leadership of the nuclear programme.

A third scientist, Darioush Rezaeinejad, was killed in an attack in July this year, when gunmen on motorbikes shot him in a street in east Tehran. He was initially described in the Iranian media as a “nuclear scientist”, but the government later denied he had any involvement in the programme.

The only problem with the piece is that is it concluded with a lament about how despite all this above-mentioned effort, Iran is seeking enriching uranium. More accurately, Iran is still enriching uranium because of these acts of naked aggression. Everything the US has done towards Iran, especially the latest circus of threats and aggression, has made it abundantly clear Iran had better get a nuclear deterrent or else face a unilateral attack. The US has the ability to end the Iranian nuclear issue tomorrow, first by ending the aggression and garrisoning of Iran’s surroundings. But there’s an even simpler solution – namely to agree to a nuclear free zone in the Middle East. Iran supports such a move. So does the Arab League. So does the United Nations. America opposes it because Israel has nuclear weapons and won’t get rid of them. Therefore, the instability in the region vis-à-vis the nuclear weapons issue persists.

13 thoughts on “Iranian Nuclear Issue: US Chooses Threats and Aggression Over Simple Solution to Peace”

  1. why does nobody comment that a few nuclear weapons would not serve as deterrent, instead they would make an attack on Iran all the more certain.

  2. Kim Jung Il was in Iran's position. His regime was a threat to world peace and a source of insecurity, threat to America etc, etc. Then his firecracker went boom and he's more 'reasonable' , than ever.

    NOT having a bomb is a virtual guarantee the the Iranian regime will remain in the crosshairs of those who 'bomb for freedom and humanity'.

  3. The "triple standard" is shameful. The West treats NPT regime in 3 different ways: Declared nuclear states are exempt and indeed contrart to the letter of the agreement, they produce more nuclear weapons; Non-signatories who defy international rule and make weapons but are "our friends," countries such as India and Israel, get tacit support and finally the countries that have signed the signed teh agreement and can still drop it, despite being monitored and despite not having any weapons are targes of threats and sanctions. People around the workd see this and do not buy it. Unless the approach changes, this game will continue to our peril.

  4. Glaser—how does agreeing to a nuclear-free zone work if the nations that possess nukes don't agree?

    The simple solution to iran's nuclear program is not to disarm the rest of the world, but to disarm Iran.

  5. What about izrael that still Occupies and Ethnicly Cleanses Palestinians, stealing their land and even money????
    That is a threat to peace and prosperity, not Iran

  6. En la era de la oficina técnica, no hay razón para rechazar todas las tarjetas de crédito. Muchas personas que optan por utilizar una tarjeta de crédito para pagar todas sus necesidades, y luego pagar al final del mes.
    lexus wheels

Comments are closed.