Drobe :: The archives

Intel looks for XScale business buyer

Published: 17th Jun 2006, 23:36:20 | Permalink | Printable

Paperwork proves billions burnt on under-performing products

Newly rebranded Intel logoIntel has all but officially axed its XScale business and put the multi-million dollar division up for sale, claim sources. It's being seen as a huge humiliation for the chip giant, which spent $10 billion on diversifying itself away from its range of PC chips by buying into the XScale and other communications-based ventures.

According to Mercury News, "Intel's XScale business, which includes applications processors for cell phones and chips for BlackBerrys, smart cell phones, handheld computers and portable media players, is up for sale.

"That business generated approximately $250 million in sales last year, according to sources who saw documents on the business."

Intel is now reportedly seeking buyers for the divisions facing closure.

The XScale is an ARM-compatible processor, based on the StrongARM designs, acquired by Intel from Digital in 1997. Rumours of the cuts first surfaced in early last month, putting to bed any hope that the Castle Iyonix range of RISC OS computers will be blessed with a much faster XScale CPU. Current Iyonixes continue to use the 600MHz IOP321, which is known to suffer from a crippled memory bus. An 800MHz relative, the IOP333, later arrived, although Castle were reluctant to upgrade to it as it didn't provide enough of a speed boost to warrant the effort.

• RISC OS 5 developers Castle said at the start of the year that they would be willing to sell off the operating system "if the price is right".


How Intel wasted billions from Mercury News

Previous: Twenty things to get instead of Qercus sub
Next: NetSurf reshuffles email lists



Maybe some company will end up buying the Xscale division and make better use of it then Intel did

 is a RISC OS Userhighlandcattle on 18/6/06 9:51AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Good news, I spotted comments on this elsewhere. Really this actually a better outcome that previous news on Drobe would have suggested.

Of course we seen this all before when Digital Equipment Corporation sold its production facility (making DEC Alpha and StrongARM processors) to Intel (as part of a court settlement Intel *lost* as it happened....). Intel then proceeded to replace (after several years) the StrongARM with xScale and the IOP range (of which Iyonix's 80321 is one).

This is merely history repeating itself - and if Intel's ARM Architectural license is up for grabs too then the purchaser may have *considerably more freedom* to expand and improve on the performance on the xScale chip range. Overall I'd be optimistic.

In the interim Intel will run the division *as is* until the find a buyer - contrary to the news piece above Intel are *trying to sell the division as a going concern* - so again nothing to panic about.

What has RISC OS'es owner Castle got to do with "selling off the operating system if the price is right" got to do with this story ? RO5 is well positioned to be adapted to support *whatever* new chips the new xScale owner decides to produce. In fact this news may make it more likely for faster newer chips to arise - ie., *not* the best time to jump ship I would have thought.

 is a RISC OS UserAMS on 18/6/06 3:56PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

highlandCattle AMS

I think you deserve OBE's for your optimistic attitudes, which I have to say seems to be a Risc OS users trait

Me I am a pessimist, I have doubts Intel will find a buyer. If DEC and Intel cannot make a go of things why should anybody else

 is a RISC OS UserJwoody on 18/6/06 7:46PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

About castle selling off RISC OS, who were they thinking of selling it to? RISC OS ltd probably couldn't afford to buy it, so who else did they have in mind?

 is a RISC OS UserOliverB on 18/6/06 10:44PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

OliverB: Microsoft? Apple? :-p

 is a RISC OS Usersascott on 19/6/06 9:26AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

in reply to sascott:


In reply to OliverB:

How much is RISC OS worth?

 is a RISC OS UserMikeCarter on 19/6/06 9:50AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Jwoody>Thanks for the offer of the OBE .... I am impressed that drobe attracts such influential people ;-).

Take a gander at the machines that use Intel's PXA's and xScale chips and you'll find a vertiable "who's who". The division is making an adequate turnover (250Million pa is not to be sneezed at) and if Intel don't get too greedy I am pretty sure they'll find a buyer.

Intel having an architecture license is a biggy - unlike many other players they're not just restricted to ARM7TDMI or 9 or whatever - they can build *any* and can where they want *add* facilities and change the processor pipeline. Having that freedom to exploit ARM - and having the extensive order book that they have may be enough to garner a sale - I would suspect from one of the more communications oriented companies.

OliverB>I don't believe that Castle would sell it. If they did the next owner may not be as relaxed about RISC OS Limited pottering around and selling the OS in the background. So in the interest of both parties it's probably better that Castle hang onto it.

 is a RISC OS UserAMS on 19/6/06 1:52PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

The reason Intel is selling thei Xscale division is not the lack of profit. But because they are starting their own line of low-powerconsuming processors based on their x86 line. It would be silly to support two competing products. Now wouldn't it

 is a RISC OS Userhighlandcattle on 19/6/06 1:59PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]


250 million turnover sounds quite good but how much of it is profit? Thats the 64 dollar question. Also does not look good if you invested 10billion to get said turnover. I don't think greed will come into it. If Intel want a lot for the business its because they spent 10billion and want as much back as is reasonably possible. Greed would be asking for greater than 10 billion for the business.

Personally I remain pesimistic

 is a RISC OS UserJwoody on 19/6/06 3:10PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

highlandcattle wrote> "they [INTEL] are starting their own line of low-powerconsuming processors based on their x86 line"

Indeed and this potentially represents a threat to *all* ARM based systems. ARM simply have to up the performance (speed) of their processors if they are to stand any chance of holding their market share.

Jwoody>If INTEL are intent on getting rid of a less profitable division then they will. You should factor in that a great many companies have products totally dependant on what are (in effect) INTEL "proprietary" variants of ARM - the companies that use them can't simply "second source" a PXA270 or whatever (as Intel don't allow second source). This means that any organisation that "snaps" up the xScale/Comms/ARM division from Intel will have a somewhat captive audience (the old addage about it being easier to keep an existing customer rather than get a new one applies). And then there's the intellectual property too.

I guess we'll just have to wait and see - particularly as Intel really hasn't officially commented yet.

 is a RISC OS UserAMS on 19/6/06 8:37PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]



I accept your argument about a captive market. One could even argue that Intel need to find a buyer so as not to alienate all those companies. But at the end of the day a buyer has to found, willing to invest a lot of money and with the sums involved be in it for the long term. I remain pesimistic until somebody buys into this, at the moment it looks like shades of the British Motor Industry and things being sold off.

 is a RISC OS UserJwoody on 19/6/06 9:20PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Perhaps ARM themselves could buy it back.

 is a RISC OS Userhighlandcattle on 19/6/06 10:02PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]


"Perhaps ARM themselves could buy it back"

Highly unlikely I think ARM decided a long time ago not to go down the road of manufacturing chips, its far too an expensive game for them costs in the order of billions.

Take a look at [link]

You will see that it costs over 2 billion dollars to build a fab factory, makes a 250 million turnover pale in comparision

 is a RISC OS UserJwoody on 19/6/06 10:16PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

I think this thread is yet another case of people not bothering to read things properly and believing what they want to believe. Firstly the $250 million is turnover, not profit - the XScale division is a loss-making business. Secondly the $10 billion Intel spent was for a whole bunch of companies, not just the XScale division. And lastly, nowhere does it say the XScale division actually fabricates the chips it designs. Can we have a discussion on here actually grounded in reality for a change?

I can't see why the XScale couldn't be profitable either. ARM Ltd has never shown any sign of struggling, even when the rest of the industry was in dire straits and it's not as if their licensing fees are exorbitant.

I would look at Intel's webs***e, but it appears to be down.

 is a RISC OS UserCogs on 20/6/06 2:38AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

What Intel will have is two low power products. One is their own design and the other is licensed from ARM for which they have to pay royalties. It makes economic sense to support your own license free product and sell off the other.

 is a RISC OS Usermripley on 20/6/06 8:23AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

I agree with AMS that this will be a positive outcome for the ARM ecosystem. Intel have vastly undercaptialised on the potential of the StrongARM, letting it stew for years after the DEC engineers left in disgust, and spending more effort on the rebranding as XScale as on the development of the chip. The architecture licence would be a huge advantage to a major ARM supplier such as Samsung or (ex-Motorola) Freescale, and they would fully exploit such an asset accross a range of low power and high performance devices.

Intel will live to regret the decision, as there is no way on earth to make an x86 more efficent than an ARM with the same physical process, as the just front end needed to convert the worlds least efficent instruction set in to something modern processors can actually execute, is bigger than any ARM core.

 is a RISC OS Userdruck on 21/6/06 11:11AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Oh please.

Intel IS using the tricks it learned from dissecting ARM-technology into their own designs. Eventually low-power x86 will surpass ARM-technology with the advantage of a much higher clockrate (which doesn't necesarrily translate into higher preformance gain as witnessed with the SA vs Xscale)

Anyway I believe is ditching their ARM business partly for reasons written by mripley and secondly because they now know enough of ARM to make their own low-power technology to compete with ARM (which is not-to-forget not a native US-company).

In fact there's NOTHING stopping Intel for doing excactly the same thing (IP-retail) that ARM does. Only they have vastly more money at their disposal.

Picture this: Intel buils its own IP for a low-power suposedly-high-performance cpu, ARM sees this and discovers ideas stolen from them. They sue Intel... by the time the US-judge states his verdicts (in favour of ARM perhaps), ARM is bancrupt. Intel buys the entire ARM Ltd. and throw it all in the bin. No-more ARM. No-more foreign competition.

And another US-monopolist gets bigger.

Naaah... this is fishy!

 is a RISC OS Userepdm3be on 23/6/06 1:15PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

epdm3be: there are no inherent tricks in ARM technology for Intel to learn from, the reason why they are small and power effiecient is that they are simple designs that do not need all of the massively power expensive tricks for performance that Intel has to cram in to its chips running the bloated and outdated x86 instruction set. Anything executing x86 instrctions will always take more silicon and use more power than the equivelent clean simple orthoganal ARM ISA - theres no way physical round that.

Intel want to produce lower power x86s so Bill Gates can have his latest whim of running full Windows on a device a bit bigger than todays PDAs, and smaller then his previous latest greatest vision of the tablet PC which sank without trace. These x86s will be more efficent than todays ones, but they will never better the ARM or threaten its core markets, which consist of billions of devices which will never need to run Windows, and hence aren't chained to a power sapping legacy instruction set.

 is a RISC OS Userdruck on 23/6/06 1:46PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Apparently Intel have *just* sold the division that makes PDA chips (presumably including xScale) to an outfit called Marvell (nothing to do with the Fantastic 4 I hope ;).

Details that exist are on [link]

 is a RISC OS UserAMS on 27/6/06 7:30PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Further to above on the Marvell site (I quote)


(reference to link is [link]!468540434?releaseID=581)

The gubbins were sold to Marvell for some 600Million USD.

So as I originally said *nothing to worry about*

 is a RISC OS UserAMS on 27/6/06 7:37PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

This is pretty much what we've been saying [link]

 is a RISC OS Userdruck on 29/6/06 9:23AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Druck>Spot on (and thanks for the link).

Yes our impressions of the situation have been vindicated.

Real pity that the story was portrayed here *twice* by drobe in a rather apocalyptic manner - just gets people worried when the facts actually don't justify such "lurid" commentary.

Still it probably makes for better headlines than "Nothing to see here, move along " :)

 is a RISC OS UserAMS on 29/6/06 7:35PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]


Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Review: A9home v. Koolu
    Clash of the tiniest

  • Random article

  • MathMagical's school software goes 3D
    Drobe's Martin Hansen adds 3D graphics to MathBox
     Discuss this. Published: 11 Feb 2007

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    Page generated in 0.2044 seconds.