In the Mishneh Torah, Laws of Kings 11:1 (or 11:2 in some editions), Rambam brings verses to prove that the Torah "testifies to [the Messiah]", namely Deuteronomy 30:3-5:

‮וְשָׁב יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ אֶת-שְׁבוּתְךָ וְרִחֲמֶךָ וְשָׁב וְקִבֶּצְךָ מִכָּל-הָעַמִּים אֲשֶׁר הֱפִיצְךָ יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ שָׁמָּה: אִם-יִהְיֶה נִדַּחֲךָ בִּקְצֵה הַשָּׁמָיִם מִשָּׁם יְקַבֶּצְךָ יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ וּמִשָּׁם יִקָּחֶךָ: וֶהֱבִיאֲךָ יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ אֶל-הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר-יָרְשׁוּ אֲבֹתֶיךָ וִירִשְׁתָּהּ וְהֵיטִבְךָ וְהִרְבְּךָ מֵאֲבֹתֶיךָ:

that then the LORD thy God will turn thy captivity, and have compassion upon thee, and will return and gather thee from all the peoples, whither the LORD thy God hath scattered thee. If any of thine that are dispersed be in the uttermost parts of heaven, from thence will the LORD thy God gather thee, and from thence will He fetch thee. And the LORD thy God will bring thee into the land which thy fathers possessed, and thou shalt possess it; and He will do thee good, and multiply thee above thy fathers.

To me, these verses speak about an eschatalogical "Messianic era", but not a Messiah per se. The classical commentaries "on the page" (ie. in my mikraot gedolot) agree, and not a one mentions the Messiah (excepting Ramban, but see there).

While it is possible to read that Rambam does not mean "testifies to [the Messiah]" but in fact "testifies to [the Messianic era]", this does not seem to be the simplest read. Indeed, the Chabad translation, for example, supplies "[Mashiach]".

In support of Rambam's idea that these verses testify to the Messiah as person, we have Targum Pseudo-Jonathan to Deut 30:4b (my translation):

‮... מתמן יכנוש יתכון מימרא די"י אלהכון על ידוי דאליהו כהנא רבא ומתמן יקרב יתכון על ידוי דמלכא משיחא.

... The Lord your God will gather you from there by means of Elijah the Kohen HaGadol (?) and bring you close by means of the King Messiah.

Question: Am I understanding Rambam correctly? If so, how does Rambam (and Targum Pseudo-Jonathan) read the verses to support this interpretation? Can this idea be found in other commentaries, or better yet, in the gemara or midrash?

  • I think the 'proof' in the rambam from the cities of refuge from supports your read of 'messianic era' – Double AA Mar 2 '16 at 1:47
  • who else will do all this if not the messiah? – ray Mar 2 '16 at 12:42
  • 2
    @ray "The LORD thy God"...? – magicker72 Mar 2 '16 at 14:37
  • @ray The messiah's great-grandson? – Double AA Mar 2 '16 at 17:18
  • The Rambam uses the ambiguous term בו which could mean to him or to it. He probably means both - a king who will do what he just described. – Yishai Mar 3 '16 at 0:11

The Daas Zekenim (earlier, in Devarim 30:2) quotes the Talmud in Yomah 86b in which Rabbi Yonathan says that teshuvah is important because it brings about the Geula and then connect this to Yeshayah 59:20 which mentions the expression "ובא לציון גואל". I'm not sure if this answer your question but made an interesting conection with very close pesukim you quote.


The Lubavitcher Rebbe (Likkutei Sichos vol. 34 p. 114) says that this verse indeed only indicates a redemption, not necessarily through a human King. That is why the Rambam adds the subsequent verses as evidence for a King specifically

  • I'm not sure I understand the paragraph spanning 114-115. If the point is to prove that מי שאינו מאמין בו. . כופר. . בתורה ובמשה רבינו ש­הרי התורה by showing that it is מפורש in the Torah that משיח will come, and the בלעם verses are not sufficiently מפורש, why are דברים ל,ג־ה chosen, when the Rebbe just explained that these verses are not about משיח? – magicker72 Mar 3 '16 at 0:28

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .