As we go to press, a great American city is being destroyed; tens of thousands of its inhabitants are in desperate straits. What happened in New Orleans at the end of August should prompt an urgent reconsideration of homeland security. We have been arguing since 9/11 that a government's commitment to the security of its citizens involves a lot more than protecting them against terrorist attacks. It involves social security, economic security, environmental security, and medical security. Terrorists put everyone at risk, but natural disasters, as we are being taught yet again, target the poorest and most vulnerable of our citizens. And so governments that tolerate (or foster) poverty and vulnerability are complicit in the deaths and injuries that result. It is an old lesson: security is not consistent with radical inequality.


Additional Information

Print ISSN
p. 3
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top
