Date/Time 28 Dec 2014 10:59:58am
Actually Warrigal, I do keep up with the latest developments in the science, several times a week. I choose to read BOTH sides of the debate, and I can tell you that over the last few years there has been a definite swing away from the idea that humans are capable of causing significant global warming.

As for the "problem" of the lack of Tropospheric heating, are you familiar with this issue? Basically, weather balloons with very sensitive measuring devices have been used for a number of decades to measure conditions at various points in the atmosphere. The "problem" is, these VERY accurate measurements showed little or no heating in the troposphere, wheras the computer models predicted that the heating should be GREATER than at the surface. I have read papers attempting to explain this embarrassment, and they have used very weak arguments. They are STILL clinging to the idea that there MUST have been heating in the troposphere, even though actual measurements show otherwise. To justify this, arguments involving "proxies" such as wind speed are used, but this is really clutching at straws. To make matters worse for such scientists, satellite data has nicely confirmed the weather balloon measurements.

This one issue has been enough to sway MANY scientists from belief in AGW. I encourage you to do more reading on this topic.