Take the 2-minute tour ×

I am using OpenGL ES 2.0 I have a bunch a quads to be drawn, would love to be able to have to pass only 4 vertices per quad as if I were using GL_QUADS, but basically I just want to know the best way of drawing a bunch of separate quads.

So far what I've found I could do: -GL_TRIANGLES(6 vertices per quad) -Degenerate GL_TRIANGLE_STRIP(6 vertices per quad)

Possibities I've found: -GL_TRIANGLE_STRIPS with a special index value that resets quad strip(this would mean 5 indexes per quad, but I dont think this is possible is OpenGL ES 2.0)

share|improve this question

4 Answers 4

up vote 22 down vote accepted

Just use index buffer and GL_TRIANGLES. In this case you need 4 vertices + 6 indices per quad (6 additional indices may sound large overhead but in reality it is not - once you have constructed your index buffer you don't have to touch it again). See this page for more information (search for glDrawElements)

Simple example code:

GLfloat vertices[] = {-1, -1, 0, // bottom left corner
                      -1,  1, 0, // top left corner
                       1,  1, 0, // top right corner
                       1, -1, 0}; // bottom right corner

GLubyte indices[] = {0,1,2, // first triangle (bottom left - top left - top right)
                     0,2,3}; // second triangle (bottom left - top right - bottom right)

glVertexPointer(3, GL_FLOAT, 0, vertices);
glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, 6, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, indices);

Also, if you are drawing just one quad you need only 4 vertices to draw it with triangle strips (as shown in wikipedia) but I guess you already knew this.

share|improve this answer
The traditional trick for merging multiple triangle strips into a single strip is "degenerate triangles": Repeating the last element of one strip and the first element of the next strip creates 2 triangles with zero area, that thus draw nothing. Consider second quad indices (4, 5, 6, 7). Index buffer for GL_TRIANGLE_STRIP of two quads could be: {0, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7}. The degenerate triangles are 3,3,4 and 3,4,4. Is it worth doing this? No, unless your quads tend to come in pairs (or more) with common edges. If 2nd quad is {3, 2, 4, 5} then strip is {0,1,3,2,5,4}. –  ToolmakerSteve Sep 9 at 5:24
And to make this clear to anyone who comes along and needs to draw a bunch of quads: For the sake of performance, DO NOT copy the above code, and make a glDrawElements call ONCE FOR EACH QUAD. Instead, build up ONE vertices array and ONE indices array that includes ALL the quads you want to draw. Using GL_TRIANGLES, two quads could have indices {0,1,2, 0,2,3, 4,5,6, 4,6,7} or equally good is {0,1,2, 2,3,0, 4,5,6, 6,7,4}. Good class to help this is glText-Android/SpriteBatch –  ToolmakerSteve Sep 9 at 5:37

Using index buffers isn't necessarily faster, as indicated in the Apple docs, "For best performance, your models should be submitted as a single unindexed triangle strip using glDrawArrays".

So, while a GL_TRIANGLE_STRIP will do it in 4 vertices without needing an index buffer, and you can use an index buffer, it's pretty lame to try to "save" repeating 2 vertices. For this reason, I'd suggest you draw 2 separate GL_TRIANGLES and repeat the 2 vertices on the diagonal.

share|improve this answer
Um, no. What that doc says is that your models be submitted as a single INDEXED triangle strip. And the very next sentence is, "To avoid specifying data for the same vertex multiple times in the vertex buffer, use a separate index buffer and draw the triangle strip using the glDrawElements function". Which is exactly what you decided was 'lame'. –  davidf2281 Mar 2 at 13:30
Given that the doc paragraph now refers to glDrawElements rather than glDrawArrays, it has probably been re-written since this answer. Nevertheless, the point the doc was making was that, for performance, supply a single strip (rather than multiple strips, hence multiple gl calls). In this situation, I believe the difference between using indices or not is insignificant; what matters is getting everything into a single vertex array (plus an optional index array), so that you can make a single gl call. –  ToolmakerSteve Sep 9 at 5:06

The big gain on desktop is to move the data into GL_STATIC_DRAW VBOs. Presumably this is true on iPhone's MBX GPU too.

share|improve this answer

Using GL_TRIANGLE_FAN for a quad uses 4 vertices, not 6.

share|improve this answer
Yep, but so does GL_TRIANGLE_STRIP, as other answers have already pointed out. –  Anko Jul 31 at 19:27
@Mr. Blah - You have missed the point of the question, which is how to efficiently do a bunch of quads. One should not make a gl call for each quad, but rather combine a lot of quads into a single array, that can be drawn with a single gl call. GL_TRIANGLE_FAN won't help with this, hence is rarely useful in high-performance rendering. –  ToolmakerSteve Sep 9 at 5:10

Your Answer


