


















Comments     Threshold


RE: Talk about taking things out of context
By kattanna on 12/20/2010 3:03:03 PM , Rating: 1
Seriously, is your hate for FOX really that blinding to you people? Don't get me wrong, they're biased, but trust me, you guys are really trying to nail them on a technicality here (how the memo was worded). And what's worse is you're pretending to know what they meant, when it's clear, to me and others, that they meant something else.

first off, i have no love or hate for any news source, as that would imply some sort of emotional attachment, of which i have none. I shift through a wide variety of local and foreign firms for news. not caring for them personally, but the quality of their news content.

my view of the fox memo is not based on solely this one incident, but over a long history of them. they have well known, and many more not so well known instances of them exaggerating the truth. which in and of itself most news sites seem to do. but they also have gone to the point of lying and intentionally fabricating news stories. so, IMO, they rate no higher then "weekly world news". actually lower as with the weekly world news can be good for a laugh!

me personally i willnt even click on a web link that goes to any fox news website anymore. so this email is just one more step in their long path of shenanigans.

I am also having to continually correct the news my poor grandmother gets from them, which ranges from worryingly wrong to amusingly wrong.

what worries me is how people could NOT see fox news for what they are, but alas it seems most are content to be entertained, not educated.

By Schrag4 on 12/20/2010 5:39:25 PM , Rating: 2
So...since they're biased and you think they make up news, then you know what they really mean in this memo? Even though it says something else? I'm sorry, but that sounds kind of like Dan Rather saying that the Bush National Guard documents were fake but accurate.

Let's stick to the memo at hand, shall we?

