« Previous Post | Show Tracker Home | Next Post »

'American Idol' Banter: Who are they really?













-- Ann Powers

Photo courtesy of Fox

Comments () | Archives (54)

The comments to this entry are closed.

This show has jumped the shark.

I was watching last night, and suddenly realized that I no longer cared.

Not that I ever thought this show was ever good, or the contestants, or the judges.

Who are they really? WHO CARES?

For an entertainment reporter, Ann Powers doesn't seem to know much about entertainment. For one thing, Switchfoot wasn't a Christian band turned secular that had a hit or two. Their lyrics are overtly Christian as are their live shows, and their sales and hits have been consistent for well over a decade now.

Secondly, to compare what Syesha has to offer to Amy Winehouse and her ilk is a stretch at best. Syesha is the archetype of every community theatre performer who believes themselves to be three shades more talented than they actually are. If she didn't believe it were so, she wouldn't have the audacity to attempt the biggest songs with the biggest notes with a straight face (not with that voice). She wouldn't talk back to the judges with more industry experience than summer dinner theatre reviews. Love them or hate them, artists like Winehouse or Duffy work because they remind us of all the great parts of Motown, Doo-wop and early Pop Rock while staying firmly planted in today's soundscape and culture. Can Powers really believe Syesha's "Fever" rendition truly contained anything fresh or commercially viable?

The problem with too many American Idol ex-patriots is that they believe the judges when they are told they are talented, original artists, who are destined for superstardom. I wonder what Blake Lewis thought when his album full of the same tired beat-boxing (that was already old when Timberlake filled 'NSync 'No Strings Attached' tour costume changes with it onstage) that the judges made over to no end was released...and tanked. They're not all Kelly Clarksons and Carrie Underwoods. Syesha's certainly not. I just don't see a place for her (or David Cook, whose success thusfar makes me wonder if people have forgotten so soon about the terrible mass error in judgment that was Creed's success) in the modern music machine beyond next summer's AI tour.

The LA Times may want to consider hiring reporters with their finger slightly more firmly placed on the pulse of pop culture.

Ann, Thank you so much for what you said about Syesha! You said beautifully what I was struggling to articulate last night in the debate going on in my own living room. You are right on! Syesha is very commercially viable, her retro style is wonderful. It's such a pleasure to see her on her feet in her stilettos, working that smokey jazz milieu. Did you notice she sounded just like Randy Crawford on a couple of her runs last night. I like her more and more every week. Bravo, Syesha!!

I think David Cook has, at present, the best chance at a pop career, Syesha has the best stage presence and would do well in a show or review. David Archuleta is so far superior as a vocalist that I would question the integrity or hearing of anyone who wouldn't agree to this evident fact.

Everyone seems to want the 2 Davids to win. I personally think it should be between David A and Syesha. She usually hits her notes and David Cook misses his and is hard to understand as he doesn't articulate well.

All three will probably get a contract so in the end they all will win.

tjayswift has written the most cogent comment here. "Because, if it was solely about vocal talent, then the competition was over weeks ago. Despite his young age, Archuleta's by FAR the most talented and versatile. And that's a fact. If you don't see that clearly, you either a) don't know a whole lot about music and/or vocal performance, or b) are having trouble seeing past the personality and entertainment part of the equation."
And of course, tjay is right on the money. If singing was the entire criteria of AI then Archie would get the gold ring. But since this is a popularity contest, and since Archie's real talent is not appreciated for what it is, pure and beautiful tonalities that he is able to convey with or without instrumental accompaniment, he is likely to lose to that one trick pony, David Cook. Sayesha has great stage presence and deserves a shot as a Vegas act or Broadway musical star, but she lacks the vocal power to command any long term public affection. Cook is simply a rock and roll screamer, and as such will probably win next week because in this country, true to Goebbels' dictum, screamers win.

There are a lot of pompus people posting here. All three contestants are talented and don't deserve to be ridiculed. The fact that they can endure the stress that must come from being on this show and still peform is a credit in itself. Brooke was very talented but could't take the pressure. So part of AI is to get the future winner ready for the demands that will be made on them. I'm glad it's the two Davids, but I hope Cook wins. I would like David A to be in a more protective enviroment for a time, perhaps touring with Miley Cyrus and other young artists. He seems like a very nice perosn and I would hate for him to become jaded by being thrust into an adult enviroment when he isn't quite emotionally ready for it. Cook has received good reviews from the AI vocal coaches and other professional voice trainers, so those who say he can't sing are only showing their bias towards David A. David A fans think by knocking David C, that makes David A better. It doesn't. David A is a true talent, but so is David C in a different way. They both can be talented at the same time.

The problem with AI is its format. How can you "count the votes" when the contestants don't use the same ballot? In other words, how can David Å lose when his songs are always a ballad, but David C's and Macardo's ballots are ballads, show tunes, rock 'n roll etc?

The answer to the gordian knot AI presents is to have one song for all contestants every week. Then and only then will the apple v oranges blood fued stop.

If AI was a piano playing contest—David A would play chop sticks over and over again, even when he was playing Gershwin's Rhapsody in Blue or Jerry Lee Lewis's Great Balls of Fire.

This is the most insightful analysis of this program (or any other like it) that I've ever read.

To the person who said... "Chris Daughtry didn't win American Idol, and he has the best selling album out of all the seasons." uh, you're wrong! Carrie Underwood and Kelly Clarkson had much better selling albums than Daughtry. Even William Hung's album did better!

David Cook is anything but the definition of a bartender. He is a college graduate with a Bachelor Degree in Graphic Arts Technology-Management, who has been beating the pavement to realize his dream. Moved to Tulsa after college and worked in a club to make ends meet while he tried to make his way in the music business. That is what you call perserverance and he is the most deserving, humble person you could ever meet.

I have been a big fan of idol but------last year I was so shocked at the total disreguard of Melina Doolittle.She had all of the judges and celebs speechless and yet BYE BYE!!!I still crave her singing. And this year David A presents with almost the same talent and he has been blown away personality wise for being too nice.Now his father is foremost in the news to discouirage voters.You might as well go back to Murray. I personally think we need a few Legends to begin their carreer. sometimes we need to listen to beautiful soft music and escape the hard rock fo awhile. David A is just too "nice" of a role model or boring as previosly stated. Sad isn't it?

Ann, you seem like somone strong who can take care of herself, but I wanted to say that every time I've read your analyses, I am so glad to have found someone knowledgeable and articulate to read. You're not just an American Idol fan (if you even are); you're a music critic, and I appreciate all you have to say and the time and thought you put into it. You're a talented writer, which I'm sure you already know. I find it sad and funny--and irritating when I read the comments. Most people just use this--the way they do everywhere else with an AI comment section--to talk about their favorite and bash the others. Not nearly enough people take the time to respond to you; and when they do, all too often it's bash YOU for having your own opinions and a forum for expressing them. I don't agree with you all the time, but I found myself agreeing with everything you've written in this article. Even when I don't agree, though, I'm still enjoying myself, reading you. Just wanted to let you know!

« | 1 2 3


Recommended on Facebook

In Case You Missed It...


Tweets and retweets from L.A. Times staff writers.




Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists:

In Case You Missed It...