Profits Before Safety: Why Are Legal Exemption Lines Drawn For Big Pharma?


by Catherine J. Frompovich, Activist Post:

There seems to be an enigma, double standard or even a legal faux pas in tort law in the United States. Nowhere is that more readily evident than in the following example, in my opinion.

Back on July 19, 2018, a “Ride the Ducks Branson” Duck Boat tragedy occurred on Table Rock Lake, near the tourist magnet town of Branson, Missouri. Seventeen unfortunate people lost their lives by drowning due to the Duck Boat capsizing and sinking, which apparently occurred due to some sort of negligence(s), either accidental and/or deliberate, as is now being proffered by Missouri Attorney General Josh Hawley in late August, 2018.

Missouri AG Hawley filed a lawsuit August 31st under Missouri’s consumer protection law wherein,

Hawley claims Ripley Entertainment and Branson Duck Vehicles have “been on notice for decades of ongoing safety hazards that posed a present and deadly danger to every person who boarded a duck boat.”

That’s an interesting concept at law, but how come it cannot be applied to a certain segment of commerce and industry regarding a “present and deadly danger to every person who is vaccinated.”

Regardless of the 1986 Vaccine Law Congress gifted the pharmaceutical industry with absolving them of all legal and financial liabilities for their toxic chemical/nanoparticle products deadly dangers [as qualified and quantified in the HRSA “Petitions Filed, Compensated and Dismissed, by Alleged Vaccine, Since the Beginning of VICP, 10/01/1988 through 8/08/2018” (Page 6), 1,270 death petitions were filed along with 18,399 other vaccine health damage petitions indicating an obvious “present and deadly danger to every person” who is proselytized by HHS/CDC/FDA and media memes to believe vaccines are ‘safe’, while DELIBERATELY not told the full spectrum of possible adverse health effects prior to forced vaccination by MDs, RNs, and all those licensed to provide vaccine inoculations.

If the Missouri AG filed legal action against the Duck Boat principals because

…they did not notify passengers of the dangers, the filing states, and falsely assured them ‘that safety was a top priority when in actuality it was their own profits,’

then what’s the difference legally between Duck Boat owners and vaccine makers top priority, when vaccine makers rake in thousands times more the profits Duck Boat owners do/did?

Back in 2016, “the vaccine market is worth close to $24 billion,” whereas by 2020, the worth “will be an estimated $61 billion in projected sales.” [1]

What is it the law, HHS, CDC, and FDA really don’t want to get about protecting health consumers by not doing the following?

a. Mandating totally informed consent regarding vaccines as per vaccine package insertsContraindications, Warnings, Precautions and Adverse Reactions extensive information before inoculation;

b. Honestly reporting vaccines are not safe – even the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that in the Bruesewitz v. Wyeth 2011 decision therefore, legally abiding by states laws providing vaccine exemptions;

c. Reinstating the original intent of the 1986 Vaccine Law at the Vaccine Court for the time being, before Congress is forced by various tactics to rescind it.

We are in the third generation of U.S. children being damaged after receiving vaccines! That is a documented fact from the CDC’s VAERS reporting system, which represents roughly between only one % and 10% of vaccine injuries due to MDs ardent reluctance to follow the law and file the proper VAERS reports!

Furthermore, HRSA “Petitions Filed, Compensated and Dismissed, by Alleged Vaccine, Since the Beginning of VICP, 10/01/1988 through 8/08/2018” has paid out almost $4 Billion [$3,937,771,417.58] in settled claims and attorneys’ fees per Page 10 of that report.

Dr. Mercola points out,

Safety Provisions Not Being Enforced

At the time of the law’s creation in 1986, Congress said they were committed to setting up a fair, expedited, non-adversarial, less traumatic, less expensive no-fault compensation mechanism alternative to civil litigation. But Congress also acknowledged that any legislation providing liability protection must also be equally committed to preventing vaccine harm.

The Act contains strong safety provisions, including first-time mandates for doctors to record and report serious health problems, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths after vaccination and give parents written benefit and risk information before a child is vaccinated.


[Note that medical professionals i.e., MDs, are the prime offenders in vaccine injury cases by not abiding by the 1986 law and, as such, should be prosecuted, as most impartial people would agree.]

However, the overarching problem is current laws reflecting vested interests’ rights vs. human rights, including the U.S. Congress, which acts as corporation lobbyists’ “go fors.”

Diseases always have been a human problem [see Otzi, the Iceman’s mummified corpse (2)] and will continue to be with living organisms. However, humans have evolved over millennia withoutvaccines, pharmaceuticals and modern technological nanoparticles. Now, it’s to the point where, currently, human life is threatened with possible extinction from:

  1. Toxic chemicals and pharmaceuticals, i.e., conventional cancer treatments for one; neurotoxic vaccines another
  2. Weather geoengineering and management: global ecosystems destruction, especially the hydrologic cycle
  3. Genetically modified ‘phood’ and science, man-made ‘life forms’: should we question Morgellons disease?
  4. Electromagnetic frequencies currently billions of times greater than all life forms on Earth ever have experienced before the last 50 years, including the military’s Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) being deployed as a commercialized version called 5G Wi-Fi for faster Internet service
  5. Nuclear fission radiation: either accidents and/or warfare, something the Deep State is clamoring for, or so it seems
  6. Clandestine galactic activity emanating from military involvement in the ionosphere

Undoubtedly, there probably are many more, e.g., those from off-planet ET assets and technologies back engineered [reverse engineering] being applied. Nevertheless, I think readers get the idea humans are an endangered species whether we admit it or not.

Read More @