2. 1. Granted, there are two differences but did you read Frank Luke's comment above?

But with Rahab, we see that she married Salmon. Strong's Concordance She married Salmon, the son of Nahshon.

These are the definitions according to Strong's Dictionary of Greek words in the Bible: G4477. Using standard notation for vector magnitude, 200 mA output from the Arduino digital output.

This was the explanation suggested by most of the Christian fathers, and on the whole is the most satisfactory. "Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab" (Matthew 1:5). The same may be said of the acute pagans who wrote against Christianity. Did Naphtali too? In Matt.

(x) Juchasin, fol. 2. And this was doubtless done. They were both descended from David, but in different lines. The conclusion is unavoidable : Rachab refers to the Gentile Rahab. 2. Why thin metal foil does not break like a metal stick?

Sota, fol. How seriously did romantic composers take key characterizations? [3], https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Salmon_(biblical_figure)&oldid=985674731, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 27 October 2020, at 08:16.

23 And the young men that were spies went in, and brought out Rahab, and her father, and her mother, and her brethren, and all that she had; and they brought out all her kindred, and left them without the camp of Israel.'. Reference request: Examples of research on a set with interesting properties which turned out to be the empty set. Who knows how long it took for these events to happen. Read the next few verses: (Joshua 6:23‭-‬25 NIV). Beracot, fol.

But with Rahab, we see that she married Salmon. 23. But though this solution is plausible, and may be true, yet it wants evidence. 71. (u) Targ. And Obed begat Jesse. 25.

Original Word: Ῥαάβ, ἡ That explains the differences with the word choice. 4. There is no story about him, he is only mentioned in genealogies (Ruth 4:20-21; 1 Chronicles 2:11; Matthew 1:4-5; Luke 3:32).

The two Greek names are merely different transliterations of the same name.


As we can see in the Matthew's Genealogy of Jesus beneath, it does not say Rahab the Harlot, but Rachab (apparently another name). 1. Was Rahab the Harlot contemporary with Salmon?

If Joshua can be translated why Is the name of Jesus translated “Jesus” but his name in hebrew was Joshua? Consider the other mentions of women in the Genealogy. Also in the Genealogy of Moses Exodus6: 16 These are the names of the sons of Levi according to their generations: Gershon, Kohath, and Merari, the years of the life of Levi being 137 years. Can differences in the line of Zerubbabel in the genealogies of Jesus in Matthew & Luke be reconciled with each other and with 1 Chronicles 3:17-24? fol.

fol 23. i. When you take the Bible literally, you get the not impossible 366 years from the Exodus to David's birth. It cannot, however, be proved that this was not the design of Luke.

& Zohar in Exod. 1. 278.

8. T. Bab.

Why echo request doesn't show in tcpdump? It undoubtedly requires the Rahab that married Salmon to be a Hebrew; and this is no mere appeal to one simple anti-Canaanite marital prohibition (which would be sufficient), but is grounded in an even larger ethno-nationalist framework barring ALL mongrels from an inheritance in Israel. This solution derives some plausibility from the fact that the promise was made to David, and as Jesus was not the son of Joseph, it was important to show that Mary was also descended from him.

2. By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. fol. Phonetic Spelling: (raw-khawb') indicating that the children of Israel would return to drive out the Amorites. Salmon is mentioned in 1 Chronicles 2:10–11, Ruth 4:20,21, Matthew 1:4–5 and Luke 3:32. Gloss in T. Bab. Occurrences: Matthew 1:5, G4460. Part of Speech: Proper Noun, Indeclinable 10. Paul seems to have researched this and to have calculated the period exactly, to 430 years, in Galatians 3:17.

What was that object? To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

All the others are those who are famous in the Old Testament, so it makes sense that the Rahab of Matthew 1 is the same as Rahab the harlot, who is the only significant Rahab in the Old Testament.

1. But I need a more convincing argument to prove my hypothesis. fol. This would be 440 years after Jericho fell.

Thus the two lines might have been intermingled, According to this solution, which was first proposed by Africanus, Matthan, descended from Solomon, married Estha, of whom was born Jacob. From Abraham to David the two tables are alike. 7.

So we have two differences that supports the teory tat Rhaab the Harlot is not Rhachab present in Matthew, right?

However, Jesse is rightly put among the progenitors of Christ, since the Messiah was to be a rod of his stem, and the branch of his roots, and is called the root of Jesse, Isaiah 11:1 which words are interpreted of the Messiah, by many of the Jewish writers (y); and to this day the Jews pray for him in their synagogues under the name of , "the son of Jesse" (z). So the time from the fall of Joshua to the birth of David is equal to 366 years. Rahab was accepted into the nation of Israel to such an extent that she was able to marry into the royal family of Judah. Basil, T. Bab. This period of 400 years only accommodates 4 generations, as God told Abraham in Genesis 15:16 But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full. 4. There is no evidence that they ever adduced them as containing a contradiction. Tzeror Hammor, fol. Nahshon was one of the Israelite leaders present with Moses[1] during the exodus from Egypt who undertook a "census of all the congregation of the children of Israel"[2] and therefore Salmon would probably have been a contemporary of Joshua and part of the generation of Israelites who entered the promised land.


Say each of these people had their kids when they were about 15. 18 The sons of Kohath: Amram, Izhar, Hebron, and Uzziel, the years of the life of Kohath being 133 years. I totally get that, and it sounds like a good argument. Therefore I need to find out if the two if them were contemporary or not.