


The guy who pulled over to “help” her is a serial killer. Director Kim Jee-woon tells a terrible tale of murder and the revenge that follows. Only those who enjoy horror to the extreme are going to be able to stomach this South Korean new movie release that premiered at the Sundance Film Festival.

It’s too bad because, besides the gore, there is a lot good about this upcoming movie. If “I Saw the Devil” could pull in a slightly larger audience, the box office would really do well.

In a horrow movie news clip from “I Saw the Devil” a young woman calls her fiance to tell him that she’s stranded in her car and that it’s romantic to be talking to him while it’s snowing.

What the fiance then hears is blood curdling.

Its nearly impossible to tell whose who on the Internet. Thats not to say I couldnt be fooled. I feel relatively safe providing my credit card information despite the horror stories of fraud and theft. I only buy from reputable merchants, those that are well known and publicized.





The Lost Boys and Batman Forever director Joel Schumacher… Val Kilmer opens up about why he walked away from playing… Hey, you guys!

Share this article



Corey said that Joel continued to try and help as things began to spiral out of control for the Stand By Me star. The Goonies cast Josh Brolin, Corey Feldman,… Corey Feldman claims he’s being threatened and harassed…

Compared to rival studios, Universal has been active in releasing movies during the pandemic, largely because of a deal it forged with AMC Theatres.

Typically, movies play on the big screen for 75 to 90 days before they move to digital rental services. But under Universal and AMC’s new agreement, the studio can put new films on premium video-on-demand within 17 days of their theatrical debuts. In return, AMC, which is the biggest cinema chain in the world, promises not to boycott Universal’s movies and also gets a cut of the digital profits.

Compared to many of the poor American Horror films that hit theaters, the Last Exorcism is a decent project amongst many of its peers.

Director Daniel Stamm uses a documentary style approach that works rather well, and Patrick Fabian and Ashley Bell give worthy performances, keeping the film afloat.

Why did the Beatles generate more income in one year than Albert Einstein did throughout his long career?

Rarity or

But, on second reflection, how many scientists like Einstein were there?

The reflexive answer is:

How many bands like the Beatles were there?

Then let’s try this:

Music and football and films are more accessible to laymen than physics. Very little effort is required in order to master the rules of sports, for instance.

Yet, surely the Internet is as accessible as baseball.

Because they are secretly hated by the multitudes. Mass appeal translates to media exposure and the creation of marketable personal brands (think Beckham, or Tiger Woods). This pent-up resentment translates into anti-intellectualism, Luddism, and ostentatious displays of proud ignorance. Hence the mass appeal of entertainment – and its disproportionate revenues.

Consumers perceive entertainment and entertainers as “good”, “human”, “like us”. We feel that there is no reason, in principle, why we can’t become instant to the real and daunting thing. Science is invariably presented in pop culture as evil, or, at the very least, dangerous (recall genetically-modified foods, cloning, nuclear weapons, toxic waste, and global warming). Why did none of the scientists involved in its creation become a multi-billionaire?

Consequently, science has an austere, distant, inhuman, and relentless image.

Egghead intellectuals and scientists are treated as aliens. They are not loved – they are feared.

The penury of the intellect is guaranteed by the anti-capitalistic ethos of science. The uncompromising pursuit of truth provokes paranoia in the uninitiated. Underpaying them is one way of reducing them to size and controlling their potentially pernicious or subversive activities. The fruits of science belong to the community, not to the scholar who labored to yield them. Firms and universities own patents and benefit from them financially – but these benefits rarely accrue to individual researchers.

Additionally, modern technology has rendered a . Books, other texts, and scholarly papers are non-rivalrous (can be consumed numerous time without diminishing or altering) and non-exclusive. It is a self-interested corporate sham, of course.

People resent the elitism  and the arcane nature of modern science. After all, what is the difference between the first copy of a treatise and the millionth one? Not only do scientists and intellectuals subsist on low wages – they cannot even augment their income by selling books or other forms of intellectual property.

Attempts to reverse these developments (for example, by extending copyright laws or litigating against pirates) usually come to naught.

Thus impoverished and lacking in future prospects, their numbers are in steep decline.

One is hard pressed to find even a mention of the sciences, literature, or philosophy anywhere but on dedicated channels and “supplements”. Scientific knowledge and discoveries must be instantly and selflessly shared with colleagues and the world at large. The concept of “original” or “one time phenomenon” vanishes with reproducibility. Literacy has plummeted even in the industrial and rich West. The media’s attention is equally divided between sports, politics, music, and films. The Demise of the Work Ethic Intellectually challenging programming is shunned by both the print and the electronic media as a matter of policy. We are descending into a dark age of diminishing innovation and pulp “culture”.

In the horror movie that our world had become, economic development policy is decided by Bob Geldof, the US Presidency is entrusted to the B-movies actor Ronald Reagan , our reading tastes are dictated by Oprah, and California’s future is steered by Arnold Schwarzenegger.


Leave a Reply