Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm

On Apr 26, 1:59 pm, "J.D." <degolyer...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 26, 1:41 pm, bmearns <mearn...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

a smaller deck is used, then this sort of vulnerability would fade
much more quickly, right?

Intuitively it seems like that should be the case, though I don't have
a proof either one way or the other.

Yes, unfortunately formal (or even informal) proofs for cryptographic
algorithms are nothing like my strong point. I'll see what sort of
testing I can come up with for it.

Thanks, again.