


CFR 49 reads in full:




Sources: Infowars, The Truth About Cars

Comments     Threshold


RE: Hooray for the nanny state
By Reclaimer77 on 4/20/2012 12:20:35 PM , Rating: 1
That's a Fascist Dictatorship. Not "fascism" as an ideology. There isn't one neat singular definition for the application of fascism.

Liberal Progressive Democrats power-consolidating top-down approach to Governing has far more in common with fascism than Democracy or a Republic. Especially this Administration which, as he pointed out, makes sweeping policies by fiat executive orders without ANY checks on power, because he's bypassing Congress. They're even ignoring the Judicial system, another check on Executive power. President Obama's Administration is being held in contempt of court for ignoring rulings on the drilling memorandum. Their response? Ignore it as if it didn't happen.

I don't even know where you guys make the jump.

It's a lot easier to jump when ones head isn't crammed up his own ass. You should try it sometime.

RE: Hooray for the nanny state
By tayb on 4/20/2012 12:19:21 PM , Rating: 1
Fascism does not exist without some sort of totalitarian authority.

Are you counting the 22 Republicans among those Liberal Progressive Democrats? I might partially agree with you on the surface if this requirement was coming from an executive order. It's not. It's coming from elected members of Congress.

RE: Hooray for the nanny state
By Reclaimer77 on 4/20/2012 12:45:16 PM , Rating: 2
Fascism does not exist without some sort of totalitarian authority.

Congress IS that totalitarian authority.

Jesus man wake up. Almost yesterday they passed a law stating that they have the power to require, under punishment of law, American's to buy Government ran health care. Hello? You don't think we're over the edge yet!? If they have the power to force by law that we buy certain products, their power is for all intents and purposes UNLIMITED. Do you understand the ramifications here?

When a President can pass sweeping mandates for an entire nation, without ANY Congressional involvement, that's not totalitarian and unilateral action?

It's coming from elected members of Congress.

To the American public that must abide, what's the difference? Saying "oh well it can be overturned later" is philosophically no different than saying "Well a new dictator can overturn this one's law later"

