

Re: HTML and XHTML techniques

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 13:30:05 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101021328510.27842-100000@tux.w3.org>
You mean that we should consider different editors for different parts of

Well, that would be easier on the individuals. My point was more that it is
helpful to have actual names, rather than just things that we could ask
people to do (a call for volunteers, dressed up a little <grin/>)



On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Sean B. Palmer wrote:

  > it needs to have a named person who is responsible for it.

  I think there will be a series of named people, probably because I still
  believe in multiple parts. For example, you don't seriously want one
  editor/document about HTML tables, HTML for CSS, and HTML m12n do you? That
  is a lot of burden... (X)HTML isn't the technology that it was only a
  couple of years ago: it's more interoperable now, and as such has many
  different facets.

  Kindest Regards,
  Sean B. Palmer
     - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.

until 6 January 2001 at:
Received on Tuesday, 2 January 2001 13:30:08 GMT
