Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:Don't trust 'em (Score 4, Insightful) 97

by SolarCanine (#44136213) Attached to: QUIC: Google's New Secure UDP-Based Protocol
What exactly can be hidden in an open protocol specification that will compromise your personally sensitive data? By design, a protocol has to be something that people can actually implement to be useful - the payloads you send via that protocol are up to you (based on your choices of which pieces of software to use, etc.)

+ - Microsoft Unvailes New Ipad Challenging Tablet ->

Submitted by SchrodingerZ
Link to Original Source

+ - Yahoo! To! Release! Web! Browser! Tonight!->

Submitted by SolarCanine
SolarCanine writes "It seems that Yahoo! is going to release a web browser this evening at 9pm, according to an article from Launch.co

From TFA:

I am so excited to announce that tonight at 9pm we will launch Yahoo! Axis! Since you are one of my most valued clients I am giving you first notification. Since this is not launching publically until tonight, we ask that you please keep this information confidential until tomorrow.

Yahoo! Axis is a new browser that redefines what it means to search and browse- enabling a seamless search experience on your iPhone, iPad, and even your desktop."

Link to Original Source

+ - Verdict is in: Google does not infringe on any Oracle Patents->

Submitted by
walterbyrd writes "Here's a homework assignment for you, if you are willing. I want you to think about those $6 billion damages headlines. Where did the "information" come from? Was it an accurate tip? Remember all those articles about Google and how they were hopelessly in a mess because they had no patents to use in a counterclaim against Oracle? Where did that come from? Was it an accurate analysis? Was it expert? Think: If someone is being paid by a party to litigation, what is he likely to say? There is a difference between information and propaganda.

Here at Groklaw, we told you that there would never be a $6 billion damages award, and I told you that Google has a phenomenal record in beating back patent infringement claims. And I wrote that the patents looked goofball to me. Just like with SCO against the World, Groklaw called it right.

Think of the smearing that Google has had to endure. I hope you fix that now, if you participated in it unwittingly. What does this verdict mean? It means that Google did nothing wrong with Oracle's patents ever at any time. It was Oracle who was in the wrong. There was no patent infringement. Period."

Link to Original Source


Submitted by
Link to Original Source


Submitted by bonch
Link to Original Source
