





Intel Desktop Processor Roadmap for Dual Core

Clock Speed
Cache Launch
Price @
2.93GHz / 1066MHz 4MB 23-Jul $999
PPXE 955
3.46GHz / 1066MHz 2z2MB Now $999
PPXE 840
3.20GHz / 1066MHz 2x1MB Now $999
2.67GHz / 1066MHz 4MB 23-Jul $530
C2D E6600
2.40GHz / 1066MHz 4MB 23-Jul $316
C2D E6400
2.13GHz / 1066MHz 2MB 23-Jul $224
C2D E6300
1.86GHz / 1066MHz 2MB 23-Jul $183
3.6GHz / 800MHz 2x2MB Now
P4D 950
3.4GHz / 800MHz 2x2MB Now $224 (23-Jul)
P4D 940
3.2GHz / 800MHz 2x2MB Now $183 (23-Jul)
3.0GHz / 800MHz 2x2MB Now
$178 (4-Jun)
P4D 925 (no VT)

3.0GHz / 800MHz 2x2MB Q4'06 $133
P4D 920
2.8MHz / 800MHz 2x2MB Now $178 (4-Jun)


Intel Desktop Processor Roadmap for Dual Core Without VT

Clock Speed
 Price @ Launch
PDP 925
3.0GHz / 800MHz 2z2MB N/A $133 (Q4'06)
PDP 915


Intel Desktop Processor Roadmap for Single Core

Clock Speed
Cache    Price
   Price on
3.6GHz / 800MHz 2MB $401 $183
P4P 651
3.4GHz / 800MHz 2MB $273 $163
P4P 641
3.2GHz / 800MHz 2MB $218 $163
P4P 631
3.0GHz / 800MHz 2MB $178 $163
P4P 541
3.2GHz / 800MHz 1MB $218 $84
P4P 531
3.0GHz / 800MHz 1MB $178 $74
P4P 524
3.06GHz / 533MHz 1MB $143 $69



Comments     Threshold


RE: The truth...
By saratoga on 5/28/2006 10:38:31 PM , Rating: 2

I guess this means you realized you were wrong.

double *sigh* Yonah has everything to do with Conroe. Are you going to tell me that Merom has nothing to do with Conroe either? They are all variants of the core architecture. Intel is working hard to lower their cost. By creating a unified processor, to serve all segments (mobile, desktop, server) IE: Yonah/Merom, Conroe, Woodcrest it makes it much cheaper to produce processors. While I am not familar with the exact manufacturing differences between a Conroe E6300 and a Yonah T2400, they both share pretty much the same core, while the Yonah is optimized to use less power. Hence, why Yonah benchmarks are so important to reconize the power of Conroe.

Yonah is a P3 derivitive. Conroe and Merom are based on NGA. They do not share the same core, you're pretty confused about this whole thing.

As I said above, the Yonah and Conroe processors both share the same core architecture.

And as I said above, please look up what the difference is because you're completely wrong.

RE: The truth...
By PT2006 on 5/28/2006 11:14:39 PM , Rating: 2

It went:
Pentium 3 (P6) -> Banias -> Dothan -> Yonah -> Conroe/Merom/Woodcrest

Dothan and Banias were generally refered to as P6+ because intel did not have an official name for them. Both processors used elements of P6 but also had things like Netburst and ops fusion.

NGA was some term a press guy cooked up that means "Next Generation Architecture." The official "name" for Conroe/Merom/Yonah is "Core"

Yonah is kind of inbetween Core and P6+, but its more like Core than anything else.

