

70 Pokemon wouldn't be SO bad if 42 of them weren't revealed pre-release.

#11Sloth9230Posted 10/7/2013 1:05:47 PM
Nope, then I would have just been disappointed once I actually owned the game, not before. At least know I know where my money is going.
#12Conflagration(Topic Creator)Posted 10/7/2013 1:07:21 PM
JMartinho posted...
You mean if you didn't spoil it yourself? I've personally seen around 20-25 gen 6 Pokemon so far.

You call looking at CoroCoro or watching Nintendo Directs spoiling myself? Stop being hilarious.
#135ky_4nth3mPosted 10/7/2013 1:08:12 PM
The_Undying_84 posted...
I don't really care about that. The only thing I find bad about it is that it created misleading expectations.

I wouldn't like 70 Pokemon no matter how many of them were shown.

i don't really care about the only 70 new pokemon tragedy nor does it disappoint me in any shape or form but i have to agree that it probably misled ppl into thinking there were more than said total.

i guess they got scared of losing too much by being honest about this from day one.
but yeah, not nice no matter how you look at it.
3DS FC: 1504-6073-5046
#14Vito219Posted 10/7/2013 1:09:25 PM
I made this exact post earlier lol. Tey showed way too many Pokemon/allowed Corocoro and Smash show to many Pokemon. 1 pokemon a week would have been fine. And only prevos, that way evolutions can surprise hose who didnt follow leaks
Black: 0003 2733 6504
SS: 1677 7369 7003
#15Sebas27Posted 10/7/2013 1:10:43 PM
Yeah it honestly makes it feel like GF has something up their sleeve(not thinking about DLC)
#16RyosagiPosted 10/7/2013 1:13:38 PM
Not really. I think about the releases when Japan had the game first and would have known all the pokemon by then.
I like to use exclamation points!! My favorite punctuation and it just shows emotion!!
#17NewbieN00bPosted 10/7/2013 1:14:38 PM
I agree. I find it kinda odd they revealed so many if they only had 70 total...
Give me all teh FE D':
White FC: 4428-2451-8791