Religion & Ethics: Content from Across the ABC




Date/Time 18 Mar 2014 2:25:15am
I have written many things on here and try to focus on the main points … I am not going to reply to every little diversion down the track because I need to value my time.

Actually, I think atheism is the least likely path to any reasoned discussion. The tactics of labelling people reply (practice by you and one other here),the false claim to either science or reason and the introduction of new material when you are your arguments have shown to be false presented by the dishonest atheists are simply designed to impose some form of totalitarianism in public discourse. “Dishonest atheists’ because you are trying to hid you discredited positivist views. The distortion of science tuning it into scientism is my best exhibit. Secondly, totalitarianism charge has the way you write to others. That false superiority shown in your rude replies is designed to frighten off your opponents. The abuse that Francis Collins when being appointed head of the US medical research funder in 2008 received had the same desire. Unfortunately for you and some of your fellow followers of scientism forget us Christians have faced more difficult opponents.

Before I go, let me introduce new material like you do. Atheism has only existed since Darwin, if we take Dawkins seriously. In that time atheists have managed to kill more people that all worlds religions put to get during the same period. Pol Pot, Moa, Stalin and the list of Soviet leaders claimed to be atheists.

And finally, where are the atheist aid agencies? Can you name one lead and staffed by atheist. Even the most secular ones are usually staffed by religious believers. All those tax breaks given to churches seem to be justified with all the welfare work they do!