Energy security

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A U.S. Navy F/A-18 Super Hornet displaying an "Energy Security" logo.



Energy security threats[edit]

The modern world relies on a vast energy supply to fuel everything from transportation to communication, to security and health delivery systems. Perhaps most alarmingly, peak oil expert Mike Ruppert has claimed that for every calorie of food produced in the industrial world, ten calories of oil and gas energy are invested in the forms of fertilizer, pesticide, packaging, transportation, and running farm equipment.[2] Energy plays an important role in the national security of any given country as a fuel to power the economic engine.[3] Some sectors rely on energy more heavily than others; for example, the Department of Defense relies on petroleum for approximately 77% of its energy needs.[4] Threats to energy security include the political instability of several energy producing countries, the manipulation of energy supplies, the competition over energy sources, attacks on supply infrastructure, as well as accidents, natural disasters, rising terrorism, and dominant countries reliance to the foreign oil supply.[5]

Foreign oil supplies are vulnerable to unnatural disruptions from in-state conflict, exporters’ interests, and non-state actors targeting the supply and transportation of oil resources. The political and economic instability caused by war or other factors such as strike action can also prevent the proper functioning of the energy industry in a supplier country. For example, the nationalization of oil in Venezuela has triggered strikes and protests in which Venezuela’s oil production rates have yet to recover.[6] Exporters may have political or economic incentive to limit their foreign sales or cause disruptions in the supply chain. Since Venezuela’s nationalization of oil, anti-American Hugo Chávez threatened to cut off supplies to the United States more than once.[7] The 1973 oil embargo against the U.S. is a historical example in which oil supplies were cut off to the US due to US support of Israel during the Yom Kippur War. This has been done to apply pressure during economic negotiations—such as during the Russia-Belarus energy dispute. Terrorist attacks targeting oil facilities, pipelines, tankers, refineries, and oil fields are so common they are referred to as “industry risks”.[8] Infrastructure for producing the resource is extremely vulnerable to sabotage.[6] One of the worst risks to oil transportation is the exposure of the five ocean chokepoints, like the Iranian controlled Strait of Hormuz. Anthony H. Cordesman, a scholar at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington warns, “It may take only one asymmetric or conventional attack on a Ghawar Saudi oil field or tankers in the Strait of Hormuz to throw the market into a spiral."[9]

According to an article by the RAND Corporation, oil export revenues are used to finance terrorist groups, like Hamas and Hizballah. Former CIA director, Jim Woosley reports, “Except for our own Civil War, this [the war on terror] is the only war that we have fought where we are paying for both sides. We pay Saudi Arabia $160 billion for its oil, and $3 or $4 billion of that goes to the Wahhabis, who teach children to hate. We are paying for these terrorists with our SUVs.”[10]

New threats to energy security have emerged in the form of the increased world competition for energy resources due to the increased pace of industrialization in countries such as India and China. Although still a minority concern, the possibility of price rises resulting from the peaking of world oil production is also starting to attract the attention of at least the French government.[11] Increased competition over energy resources may also lead to the formation of security compacts to enable an equitable distribution of oil and gas between major powers. However, this may happen at the expense of less developed economies. The Group of Five, precursors to the G8, first met in 1975 to coordinate economic and energy policies in the wake of the 1973 Arab oil embargo, a rise in inflation and a global economic slowdown.[12] NATO leaders meeting in Bucharest in April 2008 may discuss the possibility of using the military alliance "as an instrument of energy security." One of the possibilities include placing troops in the Caucasus region to police oil and gas pipelines.[13][dated info]

Long term security[edit]


The impact of the 1973 oil crisis and the emergence of the OPEC cartel was a particular milestone that prompted some countries to increase their energy security. Japan, almost totally dependent on imported oil, steadily introduced the use of natural gas, nuclear power, high-speed mass transit systems, and implemented energy conservation measures.[14] The United Kingdom began exploiting North Sea oil and gas reserves, and became a net exporter of energy into the 2000s.[citation needed]

In other countries energy security has historically been a lower priority. The United States, for example, has continued to increase its dependency on imported oil[14] although, following the oil price increases since 2003, the development of biofuels has been suggested as a means of addressing this.[15]

Increasing energy security is also one of the reasons behind a block on the development of natural gas imports in Sweden. Greater investment in native renewable energy technologies and energy conservation is envisaged instead. India is carrying out a major hunt for domestic oil to decrease its dependency on OPEC, while Iceland is well advanced in its plans to become energy-independent by 2050 through deploying 100% renewable energy.[citation needed]

Short term security[edit]


Petroleum or otherwise known as "crude oil" has become the resource most used by countries all around the world including Russia, China and the United States of America. With all the oil wells located around the world energy security has become a main issue to ensure the safety of the petroleum that is being harvested. In the middle east oil fields become main targets for sabotage because of how heavily countries rely on oil. Many countries hold strategic petroleum reserves as a buffer against the economic and political impacts of an energy crisis. All 28 members of the International Energy Agency hold a minimum of 90 days of their oil imports, for example.[16][17]

The value of such reserves was demonstrated by the relative lack of disruption caused by the 2007 Russia-Belarus energy dispute, when Russia indirectly cut exports to several countries in the European Union.[citation needed]

Due to the theories in peak oil and need to curb demand, the United States military and Department of Defense had made significant cuts, and have been making a number of attempts to come up with more efficient ways to use oil.[18]

Natural gas[edit]

Compared to petroleum, reliance on imported natural gas creates significant short term vulnerabilities. Many European countries saw an immediate drop in supply when Russian gas supplies were halted during the Russia-Ukraine gas dispute in 2006.[citation needed]

Natural gas has been a viable source of energy in the world. Consisting of mostly methane, natural gas is produced using two methods: biogenic and thermogenic. Biogenic gas comes from methanogenic organisms located in marshes and landfills, whereas thermogenic gas comes from the anaerobic decay of organic matter deep under the Earth's surface. Russia is the current leading country in production of natural gas.[citation needed]

One of the biggest problems currently facing natural gas providers is the ability to store and transport it. With its low density, it is difficult to build enough pipelines in North America[clarification needed] to transport sufficient natural gas to match demand. These pipelines are reaching near capacity and even at full capacity do not produce the amount of gas needed.[citation needed]

Nuclear power[edit]


Uranium for nuclear power is mined and enriched in diverse and "stable" countries. These include Canada (23% of the world's total in 2007), Australia (21%), Kazakhstan (16%) and more than 10 other countries. Uranium is mined and fuel is manufactured significantly in advance of need. Nuclear fuel is considered by some to be a relatively reliable power source, being more common in the Earth's crust than tin, mercury or silver,[19] though a debate over the timing of peak uranium does exist.

Nuclear power is a sustainable energy source that reduces carbon emissions.[20] Although a very viable resource, nuclear power can be a controversial solution because of the danger that people associate with it. Another big factor in the debate with nuclear power is that many people or companies simply do not want any energy solution near to them.

Currently, nuclear power provides 13% of the world's total electricity.[21] The most notable use of nuclear power within the United States is in US Navy aircraft carriers, cruisers, and submarines, which have been exclusively nuclear-powered for several decades. These classes of ship provide the core of the Navy's power, and as such are the single most noteworthy application of nuclear power in that country.

Renewable energy[edit]


As the resources that have been so crucial to survival in the world to this day start declining in numbers, countries will begin to realize that the need for renewable fuel sources will be as vital as ever. With the production of new types of energy including, solar, geothermal, hydro-electric, biofuel and wind power. With the amount of sun that hits the world in one hour there is enough energy to power the world for one year. With the addition of solar panels all around the world a little less pressure is taken off the need to produce more oil.

Geothermal can potentially lead to other sources of fuel, if companies would take the heat from the inner core of the earth to heat up water sources we could essentially use the steam creating from the heated water to power machines, this option is one of the cleanest and efficient options. Hydro-electric which has been incorporated into many of the dams around the world produces a lot of energy and is very easy to produce the energy as the dams control the water that is allowed through seams which power turbines located inside of the dam. Biofuels have been researched using many different sources including ethanol and algae, these options are substantially cleaner than the consumption of petroleum. "Most LCA results for perennial and ligno-cellulosic crops conclude that biofuels can supplement anthropogenic energy demands and mitigate GHG emissions to the atmosphere."[23][citation needed]

See also[edit]

By area


  1. ^ International Energy Agency (2012). "Energy Technology Perspectives 2012". 
  2. ^ Michael Ruppert (2009). Collapse (in English). Event occurs at 27:50. "There are ten calories of hydrocarbon energy in every calorie of food consumed in the industrialized world." 
  3. ^ "Emerald: Article Request - Sino-Indian cooperation in the search for overseas petroleum resources: Prospects and implications for India". Retrieved 2010-06-01. 
  4. ^ Parthemore, C. (2010). "Fueling the Force: Preparing the Department of Defense for a Post-Petroleum Era". Center for New American Security. 
  6. ^ a b Global Issues. CQ Researchers. 2009. 
  7. ^ Global Issues. CQ Researcher. 2009. 
  8. ^ Luft, G; Korin, A. (2003). "Terrors Next Target". Journal of International Security Affairs. 
  9. ^ Cordesman, A. (2006). "Global Oil Security". Center for Strategic and International Studies. 
  10. ^ Crane, K. "Imported Oil and U.S. National Security". RAND Corporation. 
  11. ^ Porter, Adam (2005the -06-10). "'Peak oil' enters mainstream debate". BBC News. Retrieved 2010-06-01. 
  12. ^ Panoptic World: "Globocops of Energy Security" Mathew Maavak, originally published in The Korea Herald on July 18, 2006
  13. ^ "Climate change may spark conflict with Russia, EU told" Guardian, March 10, 2008
  14. ^ a b Oil Crisis, US Senator Bob Bennett, September 27, 2000[dead link]
  15. ^ CNN: Oil majors question Bush biofuel plan, February 15, 2007[dead link]
  16. ^
  17. ^ Margaret Baker. "Reauthorization of the Energy Policy & Conservation Act". Retrieved 2010-06-01. 
  18. ^ "Energy Security as National Security: Defining Problems Ahead of Solutions". 
  19. ^ "Cameco Uranium". 
  20. ^ U.S. Energy Legislation May Be 'Renaissance' for Nuclear Power.
  22. ^ "Contribution of renewables to Energy Security" (PDF). Retrieved 2010-06-01. 
  23. ^ Davis, Sarah (2008). "Life-cycle analysis and the ecology of biofuels". Cell Press. Retrieved 3 October 2012. 

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]

Additional sources[edit]