





According to the 







always a back door.


Comments     Threshold


RE: More pleasing fantasies for the truly insecure
By SkullOne on 10/28/2010 10:13:22 AM , Rating: 3
I love how the iSheep spin it already. Attack vector across all platforms or it's technology being dumped because it's crap.

My favorite right now is it's a worthless virus because it requires user interaction. If that's the case then most of the malware infecting Windows right now is worthless because most of it is moving towards some form of social engineering in order to get users to bypass security measures like UAC.

Honestly Tony you need to take a deep sniff of the shit your shoveling so that you pass out. This is only the beginning. Windows users don't want Macs exploited and trashed. We don't care if you want to use a Mac. We just want people like you to shut your damn mouth, drop the "holier then thou" attitude and stop trying to convince the world that your exploit free (when that's far from the truth) because Steve Jobs says so.

RE: More pleasing fantasies for the truly insecure
By Tony Swash on 10/28/10, Rating: -1
By inighthawki on 10/28/2010 10:24:48 AM , Rating: 3
Considering there are images showing of attempts at infection, you cannot honestly believe there is not a SINGLE PERSON dumb enough to hit OK, or even by accident? We don't need a specific example to assume something like this to have occurred already. Rule of thumb, if there is a virus/trojan/etc of any kind, at least one person is dumb enough to fall for its trap.This holds true on any platform, not just OSX.

By inighthawki on 10/28/2010 6:27:52 PM , Rating: 3
I take it you're not very skilled in logic then? No offense but when someone says "I have yet to see an infection, therefore there isn't one", a statement such as "absence of proof is not proof of absence" is a completely valid counter-argument, and is 100% true. I do not have to provide (or take the time/waste my time to find) a direct counter-example, when I can just show the flaw in his logic. I'll wait till he makes a single valid point before I have to give an actually counter-example.

By littlebitstrouds on 10/29/2010 2:53:45 PM , Rating: 1
What confuses me, is if you're so sure of your own arguments, why not take the short time to destroy the very premise and give the counter-example? Seems like an easy task isn't it?

