User avatar #37 - wiredguy (10/17/2013) [-]
This is extremely exaggerated.

I actually had this program, it was great and I spent a load of time working on lots of proteins, including the one mentioned here which was at the top of the featured list.

It was up there and uncomplete for far longer than ten days.
Plus it isn't as significant as they're making it sound.

Though it is definitely awesome and very impressive. Somewhat of a milestone in the new age of scientific research.
The whole new fad of putting in-silica (computerised) scientific work up onto the net for everyone interested at home to chip in for is ingenious, and has proved to work pretty well so far.
#47 to #37 - 2scared2login (10/18/2013) [-]
You come here say its wronng and provide no evidence. So why believe you?
User avatar #50 to #47 - Leopard (10/18/2013) [-]
OP's article also has no source and was from facebook.. Why should we believe anything?

It's called intuition, you choose to believe what seems more realistic. Aka, believe the less impressive facts.
#74 to #50 - vampyrate (10/18/2013) [-]
Link to the article, now in description

You need to login to view this link
User avatar #75 to #74 - vampyrate (10/18/2013) [-]
Well, it won't let me put it in the description. Boo.
User avatar #46 to #37 - Syncronicity (10/18/2013) [-]
What's the program called if I may ask?
User avatar #106 to #46 - wiredguy (10/18/2013) [-]
 Friends (0)