Learning from the Masters: On Varying Sentence Length


What would you say the goal of writing a novel is?

This could be a long discussion. But I’d argue that one of the primary goals of telling someone a story via printed words is to get them to forget that they’re reading a story at all.

A good book should cast a spell on the reader. They start off reading words on a page, but pretty soon they’re so caught up in the world you’ve created, they forget that it’s a fictional world at all.

Creating such a story takes a certain amount of talent and practice and work. One of the best way to do this is to make your writing tight enough. And one of the best way to do that is:

Varying your sentence length.

I read a writing submission recently that went something like this:

I opened the door. I jumped out of the car. I saw him standing there. He looked angry. I ran up to him. I threw my arms around him. I pulled back to look at him. His expression hadn’t changed.

Do you see why this paragraph doesn’t work? Each sentence is roughly the same length. It’s very staccato–even beats, over and over, more like a poem than prose. It causes you to notice it, which in turn distracts you from the story.

Equally bad is:

I opened the door, jumped out of the car, and saw him standing there with an angry expression on his face. I ran up to him, threw my arms around him, then pulled back so I could look him directly in the face, but his expression hadn’t changed.

Here the sentences are also the same length, just longer. It’s less noticeable than the short sentences, but if this paragraph were to continue in this way, it would get very tedious.

Variety is key. Short sentences followed by long sentences followed by medium sentences. And so on and so forth.

I’m going to quote a passage from one of my favorite books of all time, written by my favorite writer of all time.


Do you see?

Short sentence–very long sentence–short sentence–long sentence with a short sentence embedded via semi-colon–very short sentence–long sentence–medium sentence–

It casts a spell on you. You forget you’re reading words on a page, and instead are sucked into the story.

(Also isn’t Tana French just the greatest writer? I could gush for hours about her work–but I won’t right now).

Of course, this all depends on the purpose of your paragraph or scene–for example, it’s perfectly acceptable to have a passage of dialogue with all short sentences. Same could go for an action scene. And if you’re in description mode, it’s also acceptable to have several longer sentences. However, I’d argue that even in these scenes, adding in some variety in length will make your passage, and thereby your book, flow better.

How do you know if your sentences flow? I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: you need to read, widely and often, in order to become a good writer. I can pick out awkward paragraphs from a mile away because I’ve been reading good books (and bad books) my entire life. It’s like having a fine-tuned musical ear (something I do not have)–maybe not everyone will be able to tell if you’re playing off-key, but those readers (and writers!) who are familiar with what it should sound like, definitely will.

Image found here

3 thoughts on “Learning from the Masters: On Varying Sentence Length

Leave a Reply


WordPress.com Logo


Google photo


Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Connecting to %s