The story of how Lizzie Borden was accused in 1892 of taking an ax and killing her father and stepmother has been fodder for films, TV shows, a rock musical and a child’s jump rope game. Although Borden was acquitted of the murders, the general thinking is that she got away with murder.

So much notoriety created a challenge for screenwriter Bryce Kass and director Craig William Macneill (“The Boy”) as they took another run at the famous murder case in “Lizzie.”

The simple approach of showing Lizzie’s unhappy home life, the brutality of the murders and the court case would not do. Most of those elements are in this latest tale of murder and mayhem (with a lot less emphasis on the court proceedings) but the focus is more on the systematic development of relationships – both good and bad – that served a purpose in Borden’s life.

Central to what is either emotional manipulation or the first outward expression of love for Lizzie (Chloë Sevigny) that comes through her interaction with Bridget Sullivan (Kristen Stewart), the Irish servant who moves into the Borden home. Bridget and Lizzie bond almost immediately as the house servant is quickly subjected to a brutality that Lizzie either has known firsthand or seen in some variation.

Macneill builds on the kind of situation that would at a minimum make the women feel like kindred spirits. Their relationship goes way beyond in this film. There are clear moments of the physicality the two women share but only glimpses of what is going on in their heads and hearts.

This is another strong performance by Sevigny, who has made a career out of playing damaged characters. In the case of Lizzie, she shows just enough mental and emotional strength to make Lizzie a dominant player in the house but never to the point of ignoring what probably happened because Lizzie is so vulnerable.

Sevigny is always a force on the screen and it takes a strong co-star to keep up with her. Stewart provides the balance with a strength that is far different from Sevigny’s. Much of Stewart’s performance had to be played with more subtlety and finesse because of her status in the household. Her character is not an equal no matter how closely she and Lizzie get. Much of her performance comes through her eyes and body language that at first glance looks passive but on closer examination shows great will and determination.

Had either performance wavered, “Lizzie” would have been little more than another period piece murder mystery where the outcome has been well-documented. That never happens because Sevigny and Stewart are always the primary powers in a scene even if the writing and direction stumble a bit.

Kass has created a story in three acts where the first two acts have some slow spots and the final act wraps up so quickly, it was as if the production was about to run out of money. He also takes a very linear approach with the murder portion instead of at least developing some of the casually mentioned alternate versions a little more.

The decision by Macneill to use mostly ambient light creates some very moody moments. This is dangerous especially in a period story because the tempo of this kind of tale is never going to be very energetic. The use of the distinct lighting style through most of the story means it never becomes a tool for adding emphasis to a scene or drawing attention away from a sequence. It ends up being a flat looking movie until the end when the increase in lighting comes across as gimmicky in regards to the ending.

Even with a few blips, “Lizzie” is a film that while based on an oft told tale comes across with enough originality to make it interesting. Add to that solid performances by Sevigny and Stewart and “Lizzie” shows that even a project based on the familiar can be a cut above the rest.