Doomed Planet

Ocean Vents And Faulty Climate Models

ocean heatOcean currents are driven by tides, by wind and by variations in water density caused by variations in salinity and temperature. Their paths are also controlled by the earth’ s rotation in the same way that winds in the atmosphere rotate about low pressure systems. These circular current paths are called gyres.

The Gulf Stream, the Kurashio (Japan) and the Aghulas (South Africa) are well known ocean currents. The flow of ocean currents are measured in Sverdrups, one Sverdrup (Sv) being a million cubic meters of water passing a fixed point in one second. The flow of the Amazon is about 0.5 Sv. The biggest ocean current, the Antarctic Circumpolar Current has a flow of 100 Sv where it runs through Drake Passage between South America and Antarctica. The flow of the ACC is equal to that of two hundred Amazons.

Ocean currents determine local climate. Deserts, such as the Atacama Desert of Peru tend to be flanked by cold currents. Offshore currents flowing towards the equator are generally colder and give rise to less evaporation and less precipitation, whereas warm, pole-ward currents lead to enhanced evaporation and higher rainfall. On the other hand pole-ward currents are generally poor in life-supporting nutrients compared with equator-ward currents. The Labrador current flows between Greenland and Canada and carries nutrient southward to nourish the cod fishery of the Grand Banks of the North Western Atlantic.

It is commonly assumed by oceanographers that world ocean currents have remained fundamentally unchanged since the last ice-age termination 11,000 years ago. Historical and archaeological evidence indicates that this was not the case.

Greenland and Easter Island

The Vikings, more correctly the Norse, were a sea-faring people who raided, traded and often farmed European coasts and river systems from Greenland to the Black Sea. We know from their middens that they ate fish. We also know that, for them, fish was a low status food; meat was high status food.

The Norse settlements in Greenland (980 AD to 1435 AD) were an exception. The middens of these settlements contain the bones of aquatic mammals but no fish bones. Since these people were culturally identical to Norse in other parts of Europe it seems likely that, unlike today, there were no fish available to them. This suggests in turn, that ocean circulation was different at that time.

A similar puzzle concerns the consumption of porpoise by the inhabitants of Easter Island. According to Jared Diamond in his book Collapse:

Comparison of early garbage deposits with late prehistoric ones or conditions on modern Easter Island reveals big changes in … initially bountiful food sources. Porpoises and deep ocean fish like tuna, virtually disappeared from the islander’s diet.

According to J. Loret in  Easter Island. Scientific exploration into the world’s environmental problems in microcosm:

Throughout Polynesia archaeologists have found that 90% of middens consist of fish or shellfish. On Easter Island however, from the period of 900 – 1300 A.D. one third of the bones were of porpoises. Yet nowhere in Polynesia do the bones of porpoises account for more than one percent. These marine mammals had to be hunted faroffshore indicating that their craft had to be sufficiently seaworthy and constructed from large trees.

Both authors are reaffirming the accepted narrative that Easter Islanders destroyed their own livelihood by cutting down all the big trees from which they constructed their canoes.

Maps of the present day distribution of the four major species of porpoise indicate that there are no porpoise within thousands of kilometres of Easter Island. It seems unlikely that early Easter Islanders could have travelled so far to hunt these animals; there must have been porpoise closer to the island. Today the ocean around Easter Island is very poor in nutrients. There is no marine ecosystem sufficiently large to support a top predator such as porpoise; there is insufficient nutrient available to generate such an ecosystem.

Once again this implies that ocean circulation between 900 and 1300 AD differed from that of the present day. These events both occurred at a time of warm weather in Europe known as the Mediaeval Warm Period and suggest that changes in ocean circulation accompanied and perhaps even caused  the MWP.

Finally, consider the Maya, a civilisation which flourished on the Yucatan peninsula of present day Mexico from about 400 to 900 AD. Oxygen isotope ratios and sulphur abundances in lake sediments from Yucatan suggest that the cause of the Mayan Collapse was sustained drought.

The Mayan drought immediately preceded the Mediaeval Warm Period.

Subaqueous Volcanism

But what caused these changes? A promising candidate is subaqueous volcanism.

Subaqueous volcanism refers to volcanic activity beneath the surface of the ocean, as distinct from sub-aerial volcanism, which refers to volcanic activity on land. It is believed that subaqueous volcanism accounts for eighty-five percent of all volcanic activity, sub-aerial five percent so that volcanic activity is more than five times more common under the sea than on land. The rapid formation of steam when water flash-boils on contact with hot magma is the reason for the explosive power of sub-aerial volcanoes. The large pressure at the bottom of the ocean prevents water from boiling and forming steam. As a consequence ocean floor volcanoes are much less likely to be explosive than are those on land: 5% compared with 80%.

Instead, subaqueous volcanism takes the form of hydrothermal vents (HTVs). These were first discovered in 1977. Also known as “black smokers”, they are found on mid-ocean ridges and above volcanic hotspots at depths of two to three kilometres. They are formed when seawater penetrates the ocean floor and comes into contact with hot magma. The heated water then exits through vents as black plumes which rise 100m or so above the ocean floor. The vents are often surrounded by strange life forms — life forms which utilise the free energy of the chemicals in the plume and are not dependent on sunlight and photosynthesis.

Instead of boiling, the circulating seawater becomes “supercritical” when it is heated above 374°C at high pressure. Supercritical water is neither a true liquid nor a true gas and contains nascent oxygen and hydrogen ions. It is a hot oxidising acid and highly corrosive. It is so corrosive that it tears rocks apart chemically. As a result HTV plumes contains heavy metals and hydrogen sulphide which combine as the plume cools and precipitate onto the ocean floor as metal sulphides. These precipitated metal sulphides make very rich ores. The Mount Isa ore body is comprised of sea floor sulphides created in this way. Some mining companies such as Nautilus Minerals intend mining HTV sulphides directly from the ocean floor.

Known HTVs release 17 terawatts of power into the ocean as heat, about the same as global human usage of energy. Each year they pump into the ocean 500 tonnes of Arsenic, 1500 tonnes of lead, 50,000 tonnes of copperm 140,000 tonnes of zinc and many other metals. They have been doing this since the dawn of time. These metals are rapidly precipitated as sulphides, which explains why their concentrations have not built up in sea water. In fact, HTVs may have the net effect of actually cleansing sea water of dissolved metals by this sulphide precipitation reaction.


Volcanism on land is intermittent, random and explosive. Although subaqueous volcanism is less likely to be explosive there is no reason to assume that it is not similarly intermittent and random. Major sub-aerial volcanic events of the magnitude of Krakatoa are once-in-a-century events. It is likely then that subaqueous events of the similar energy to Krakatoa occur four or five times per century.

Detailed examination of HTVs is expensive. It requires the deployment of remotely operated vehicles from specially equipped research vessels. Only a small fraction of the 50,000 km of mid-ocean ridges has been explored and even then sites of interest are only visited occasionally. The long term variability of HTV fields remains almost a closed book. In the absence of observations the best we can do is to assume that subaqueous volcanism varies over time in a similar way to subaerial volcanism. We can expect that, from time to time, subaqueous volcanic events will occur which gives rise to plumes much larger than those routinely observed. In fact remnants of such plumes, called “megaplumes”, have been observed as anomalous chemical signatures high in the water column. Small patches of high sea surface temperature indicative of megaplumes have been recorded by satellites.

There is an aspect of megaplume formation which has hitherto been ignored. HTV plumes which typically have an exit temperature of 360°C are rapidly cooled by the entrainment of surrounding sea water until they lose buoyancy and spread horizontally much like chimney smoke on a frosty night. However plume dynamics indicates that for a large plume the temperature of the plume interior could remain sufficiently elevated for the water to boil as the hydrostatic pressure decreases with decreasing depth. Indeed one HTV field, the Lucky Strike field near the Azores, is sufficiently shallow at 1700m depth for effluent to be close to boiling point as it exits the vents.

Once boiling commences, plume dynamics alters radically. The formation of steam bubbles greatly increases the buoyancy of the plume causing vertical acceleration of the effluent stream leading to increased further boiling and so on. In effect, the plume becomes a geyser.

Using buoyancy calculations alone and neglecting heat losses, one litre of vent effluent at 360°C, when it boils in a megaplume, will create sufficient buoyancy to lift 30 tonnes of cold sea water to the surface. A sufficiently powerful HTV field can conceivably generate enough buoyancy to turn an entire ocean basin upside down.

The most powerful HTV field so far discovered is the TAG field on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. The power output of the TAG field is around 6 GW. It lies at 26°N, the same latitude as the Yucatan Peninsula, one-time home of the Mayan Civilisation.  We can speculate that the TAG Field is the remnant of a major subaqueous event with a megaplume which transported large volumes of cool deep ocean water into the tropical mixed layer so cooling the sea surface. This led to decreased ocean evaporation and drought in Yucatan.


In addition to changing the surface temperature, a megaplume changes the surface composition of the ocean. Most of the ocean surface, the mixed layer, contains very little nutrient, particularly the deep ocean well away from land. Most of the nutrient and hence most of the plankton and other living organisms are found on continental shelves where nutrient is continually replenished by river run-off from the land. In many parts of the deep ocean, nutrients such as nitrate, phosphorus and silicate are in plentiful supply at depths of 1000m or so but support no life there because essential sunlight cannot penetrate to this depth. This is true of the South Atlantic and North Pacific for example. In some places deep ocean water is forced to the to the surface. When this deep water contains sufficient nutrient, plankton blooms and a marine ecosystems form. Fifty percent of the world’s commercial fish come from such nutrient-rich “upwellings”.

Ocean upwellings are caused by the deflection of ocean currents by ridges, seamounts and coastlines. However a megaplume from an HTV field can have a similar effect. Easter Island lies close to the southern edge of the North Pacific nutrient mass and also on the North Pacific Rise, the world’s fastest spreading mid-ocean ridge and one of the most active. It is likely that a megaplume from an HTV field on the East Pacific Rise supported a mid-ocean marine ecosystem during the period in which Easter Islanders dined on porpoise.

Carbon Dioxide Flux

In The Voyage of the Beagle Darwin opens his chapter of on the Galapagos Islands with the following remark:

Considering that these islands are placed directly under the equator, the climate is far from being excessively hot … this seems chiefly caused by the singularly low temperature of the surrounding water, brought here by the great southern Polar current.

In fact three ocean currents converge near the Galapagos, the current to which Darwin referred, now known as the Humboldt Current, its Northern Hemisphere mirror image, the California Current and the Cromwell Current also known as the Equatorial Counter Current. The first two currents cause deep, nutrient-rich, cold water to come to the surface with the result that the waters around the Galapagos are relatively cool and well-endowed with marine life. The presence of iron in the upwelled water suggests that HTVs above the Galapagos’ volcanic hot-spot contribute to this upwelling.

The last-named current, the Cromwell Current, contributes very little because it is shallow (from 40m to 200m in depth) and poor in nutrients such as nitrate and phosphate. In fact the Cromwell Current has the effect of diluting the nutrient upwelling brought about by the other two currents and the HTV field.

Although poor in nutrients, the Cromwell Current is rich in dissolved inorganic carbon with the result that, when this current comes to the surface near the Galapagos, excess carbon is released into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. A simple calculation shows that three gigatonnes of carbon dioxide are outgassed per year, i.e. equal to about half the calculated human contribution per annum.

The outgassing of CO2 by ocean currents and upwellings depends on the available nutrient and the final temperature achieved by the initially cold, upwelled water.  Like most gases, CO2 is much more soluble in cold water than in warm water. This is something we experience when we fail to return an open bottle of soft drink to the refrigerator on a hot day. By contrast, in temperate and polar regions the upwelling of nutrients generally leads to the net absorption of CO2 from the atmosphere due to photosynthesis by phytoplankton. The atmospheric carbon taken up by the biomass is ultimately returned to the deep ocean in the form of faecal and skeletal material.


THE TOTAL power expended in volcanic heating of the ocean is well in excess of the power dissipated by wind stress and tidal friction. There is growing evidence for the existence of volcanically generated megaplumes both from satellite imagery and from direct observation. Although the physical detail remains to be explored there is growing evidence that megaplumes are, at times, responsible for variations in climate, ocean productivity and ocean export of CO2.

There is a vast amount of CO2 stored in the ocean: 38,000 gigatonnes compared with 380 gigatonnes generated by human activity since the beginning of the industrial revolution. It is doubtful whether mankind’s modest one percent contribution has made very much difference. Nevertheless oceanographers seem quite reluctant to acknowledge the role of subaqueous volcanism in influencing ocean circulation, ocean ecology, climate variation and CO2 flux. Why should this be so?

One possible explanation is that oceanography and climate science have come to be heavily dependent on numerical fluid dynamic modelling. “Ocean-atmosphere general circulation models” or OAGCMs have become the preferred means of investigating ocean circulation. The ocean-atmosphere model is tuned to settle down, after “spin-up”, to a steady state where it remains until deliberately perturbed by some external factor such as changing the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide. According to these models the ocean in its natural state is a sort of machine, a conveyor belt steadily carrying heat, salt and dissolved gases around the planet’s oceans in the same unvarying manner until it is disturbed by humankind.

Volcanic activity does not fit this neat picture. Volcanic behaviour is random, i.e. it is “stochastic” meaning “governed by the laws of probability”. For fluid dynamic modellers stochastic behaviour is the spectre at the feast. They do not want to deal with it because their models cannot handle it. We cannot predict the future behaviour of subaqueous volcanoes so we cannot predict future behaviour of the ocean-atmosphere system when this extra random forcing is included.

To some extent, chaos theory is called in as a substitute, but modellers are very reticent about describing and locating (in phase space) the strange attractors of chaos theory which supposedly give their models a stochastic character. They prefer to avoid stochastic descriptions of the real world in favour of the more precise but unrealistic determinism of the Navier-Stokes equations of fluid dynamics.

This explains the reluctance of oceanographers to acknowledge subaqueous volcanism as a forcing of ocean circulation.  Unlike tidal forcing, wind stress and thermohaline forcing, volcanism constitutes a major, external, random forcing which cannot be generated from within the model. It has therefore been ignored.

John Reid PhD is a retired physicist

Journal References

Baker, E. T. and C. R. German (2004), On the Global Distribution of Hydrothermal Vent

Fields, Mid-Ocean Ridges: Hydrothermal Interactions between Lithosphere and Oceans,

Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol 148, edited by C. R. German et al, 246-266, AGU,

Washington, D. C.

Baker, E. T., J.W. Lavelle, R.A. Feely, G.J. Massoth, S.L. Walker and J.E. Lupton (1989)

Episodic venting of hydrothermal fluids from the Juan de Fuca Ridge. J. Geophys. Res.

94(B7), 9237-9250.

Dahl-Jensen, D., K. Mosegaard, N. Gundestrup, G. D. Clow, S. J. Johnsen, A. W. Hansen,  and N. Balling (1998). “Past Temperatures Directly from the Greenland Ice Sheet”. Science, 282, 5387, pp 268-271.

Deligne, N. I., S. G. Coles and R. S. J. Sparks (2010), Recurrence rates of large explosive volcanic eruptions. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B06203, doi:10.1029/2009JB006554, 2010

Elderfield, H. and A. Schultz (1996), Mid-Ocean RidgeHydrothermal Heat Fluxes and

the Chemical Composition of the Ocean, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 24, 191-244.

Hansen, J. (2014) Quote “So far we have burned about 380 GtC (gigatons of carbon)”. Congressional Testimony by James Hansen 13 March 2014.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Third Assessment Report (2001), Section 3.2, Figure 3.1.

McAvaney, B.J, C.Covey, S. Joussaume, V. Kattsov, A. Kitoh, W. Ogana, A.J. Pittman,

A.J.Weaver, R.A. Wood, and Z.-C. Zhao (2001), Model evaluation in Climate Change

2001: The Scientific Basis, edited by J. T. Houghton et al., Cambridge University Press, 471-524.

Morton, B. R., Sir G. Taylor and J. S. Turner (1956).Turbulent gravitational convection

from maintained and instantaneous sources, Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 234, 1-23.

Munk, W. (1997), Once again: once again—tidal friction Progress In Oceanography 40,


Pyle, D. M.(1995), Mass and Energy Budgets of Explosive Volcanic Eruptions Geophys. Res. Letters, 22, 563-566.

Tivey, M. K. (2007), Generation of Sea Floor Hydrothermal Vent Fluids and Associated Mineral Deposits. Oceanography, 20, 1 pp 50-65.

White, J. D. L., J. L. Smellie and D. A. Clague (2003), Introduction: A Deductive Outline and Topical Overview of

Subaqueous Explosive Volcanism. Explosive Subaqueous Volcanism, Geophysical Monograph 140,  American Geophysical Union, 10.1029/140GM01

Wunsch, C. (1998), The work done by wind on the oceanic general circulation, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 28, 2332-2340.

Web References


Lucky Strike

Viking Diet


Satellite Images

O’Malley, R. T., M. J. Behrenfeld, T. K. Westberry, A. J. Milligan, D. C. Reese and Kimberly H. Halsey (2013), “Improbability Mapping:  A Metric for Satellite detection of Submarine Volcanic Eruptions”

“Argo Data Confirms El Niño/La Niña Caused By Underwater Volcanoes”



  • [email protected]


    A very interesting article. I am highly sceptical of the present IPCC view that man made CO2 is the source of all evil and from your article you make a good case that the HTV’s may well play a part.

    You state that sub aqueous and sub aerial consists of 85% and 5% of all volcanic activity respectively and therefore the former is 5X more likely under the sea compared to on land. Ignoring the ice covered regions for the moment I thought that the ratio of sea to land was roughly 70:30 so per km2 of surface area I thought that the ratio would be more like 7X.

    Maybe you have taken into account the Arctic/Antarctic regions but could you comment please?

    I have BSc(Hons) in Fluid mechanics and have been involved in both stochastic and deterministic modelling plus orbit mechanics, control theory and solid body dynamics( I was variously in the power generation, mining/refining, space and telecommunications industries). I retired as a CTO in 2007.



    • jimmaths

      Is there an issue about undersea vulcanism being very different from that on land because the earth’s plate is much thinner there?

Post a comment