13 urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:C9EFD5EBE90952A590B82C7119603A4E urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ED34F394-2E4C-49D6-8300-0DC18F233E6C Zoosystematics and Evolution ZSE 1435-1935 1860-0743 Pensoft Publishers 10.3897/zse.95.38259 38259 Research Article Gastropoda Stylommatophora Taxonomy Brazil Taxonomic revision of the genus Hyperaulax Pilsbry, 1897 (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora, Odontostomidae) Salvador Rodrigo B. 1 Cavallari Daniel C. 2 Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. 169 Tory Street, 6011, Wellington, New Zealand Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa Wellington New Zealand Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo. Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-900, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil

Corresponding author: Rodrigo B. Salvador (salvador.rodrigo.b@gmail.com)

Academic editor: Frank Köhler

2019 11 09 2019 95 2 453 463 D49EC3D9F8BA54B4AFED827B67E83634 EE9B3C6B-D4AE-4508-BF0E-5CCEEB7F12EA 15 07 2019 27 08 2019 Rodrigo Brincalepe Salvador, Daniel C. Cavallari This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. http://zoobank.org/EE9B3C6B-D4AE-4508-BF0E-5CCEEB7F12EA

The genus Hyperaulax Pilsbry, 1897 comprises two living species endemic to the oceanic Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, off north-eastern Brazil. They are currently allocated in two subgenera, Hyperaulax s. str. and Bonnanius Jousseaume, 1900, belonging to the family Odontostomidae. Herein we present a taxonomic revision of these species, assessing their familiar allocation within Orthalicoidea, offering updated diagnoses and descriptions, figuring the type materials and further relevant specimens, and providing barcoding DNA sequences. We conclude that Bonnanius is a junior synonym of Hyperaulax, which is classified in Odontostomidae. The genus contains two valid species, H. ridleyi and H. ramagei, both endemic to Fernando de Noronha.

Bonnanius endemic species Fernando de Noronha island speciation Orthalicoidea Pulmonata European Community Research Infrastructure Action, Malacological Society of London, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Bruce Fraser Hazelwood Fund, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa

The genus Hyperaulax Pilsbry, 1897 had a unique composition. It comprised two living species endemic to the oceanic Fernando de Noronha Archipelago off Brazil, H. ridleyi (Smith, 1890) and H. ramagei (Smith, 1890), and eight species from Tampa Silex beds (Oligocene) of Florida, USA: H. americanus (Heilprin, 1887), H. ballistae (Dall, 1915), H. floridanus (Conrad, 1846), H. heilprinianus (Dall, 1890), H. remolinus (Dall, 1915), H. stearnsii (Dall, 1890), H. tampae (Dall, 1915), and H. tortilla (Dall, 1915). Suspecting this could not reflect an actual relationship, the fossil species previously assigned to Hyperaulax were revised by Auffenberg et al. (2015). Those authors concluded that the fossils bore only a superficial similarity to Hyperaulax and erected the new genus Tocobaga Auffenberg et al., 2015 to house the North American fossil species, which they classified in the Bulimulidae rather than in Odontostomidae. Auffenberg et al. (2015) considered most of the fossil forms to be synonymous and recognized only three valid species: Tocobaga americanus, T. floridanus and T. wakullae Mansfield, 1937 (previously considered a subspecies of T. americanus).

The two Recent species are also not without problems, as two names are currently considered synonymous with H. ramagei; moreover, this species is included in the subgenus Bonnanius Jousseaume, 1900, which can sometimes be recognized as a valid genus (e.g., Simone 2006). The peculiar morphological features of Hyperaulax also present some challenges, as it is reminiscent of several lineages of Orthalicoidea. The genus is usually placed in Odontostomidae, but it also bears resemblance to insular Bulimulidae from the Galapagos; furthermore, Hyperaulax had also been assigned to the extinct family Grangerellidae by Henderson (1935), although this author suggested this based on Oligocene material from Florida (now in Tocobaga), not the Recent Brazilian species (for a full discussion see Auffenberg et al. 2015).

Therefore, herein we conducted a taxonomic review of the two Recent species of Hyperaulax, assessing their familiar allocation within Orthalicoidea and the validity of the subgenus Bonnanius and of the two species synonymized with H. ramagei. Furthermore, an updated diagnosis and description, alongside images of the type and additional materials, is provided here for each species.


Fernando de Noronha is an archipelago located ca 350 km off northeastern Brazil (3°50'–3°52'S, 32°24'–32°28'W) originating from extinct volcanic structures estimated to be 1.8–12.4 Ma old. It comprises the main island of Fernando de Noronha (17 km²) and over 20 smaller islands and rocks (Fig. 1). The local climate is dry tropical with a mean annual rainfall of 1,300 mm and a mean annual temperature of 25.4 °C. It has strong oceanic influence, with two well-defined seasons: dry from August to January and rainy from February to July (Fávaro et al. 2006; Marques et al. 2007). The vegetation on the islands has close affinities with the Atlantic Rainforest, though only 5% of the original cover remains (Claudino-Sales 2019). Even so, the islands are rich in endemic species of plants and animals but have a low overall diversity compared to the mainland, which is especially true for terrestrial snails, of which there are three known endemic species (Lopes and Alvarenga 1955). The entire area totals 112.7 km² including land and sea; it was designated as an environmental protection area by the Brazil in 1989 and became a World Heritage Site in 2001. Nevertheless, the islands are populated and suffer the negative impacts of overtourism and pollution (Claudino-Sales 2019).

10.3897/zse.95.38259.figure1 EC0FD376529C54A2B830FB7CBB0816EA

Map showing the location of Fernando de Noronha, Brazil.


All the type specimens were analyzed and the main museum collections worldwide that could contain material of Hyperaulax were visited or contacted for loans or photographs and information of their specimens. The type materials are illustrated herein, alongside additional specimens to thoroughly show conchological variation. Shell measurements were taken with a digital caliper. SEM images of the protoconchs were obtained at the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart (SMNS; Stuttgart, Germany).

The material studied in the present work is housed in the following collections: ANSP, Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University (Philadelphia, USA); MNHN, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (Paris, France); MNZ, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (Wellington, New Zealand); MZSP, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo (São Paulo, Brazil); NHMUK, Natural History Museum (London, UK); USNM, Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History (Washington, DC, USA); ZSM, Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science (Berlin, Germany); ZSM, Zoologische Staatssammlung München (Munich, Germany).

The following abbreviations are used herein for shell dimensions: H, shell height (parallel to coiling axis); D, greatest shell width (perpendicular to H); h, aperture height (maximum length parallel to aperture plane); d, aperture width (maximum width parallel to aperture plane); W, number of whorls of shell (approximated to closest quarter); w = number of whorls of protoconch (approximated to closest quarter).

Two adult specimens of H. ridleyi from lot MZSP 89940 had a fraction of their foot clipped for molecular study. No specimen of H. ramagei with preserved soft parts is known. Given our suspected systematic affinity of Hyperaulax, we also sequenced a specimen of Tomigerus corrugatus Ihering, 1905 (lot MZSP 43077). DNA extraction was carried out with QIAGEN DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit, standard protocol. We targeted the barcoding fragment of the mitochondrial COI gene (primers LCO and HCO of Folmer et al. 1994), with circa 650 bp. The PCR protocol was set as: (1) initial denaturation at 96 °C (2 minutes); (2) denaturation at 94 °C (30 seconds); (3) annealing at 48 °C (1 minute); (4) extension at 72 °C (2 minutes); (5) repeat steps (2) to (4) 34 times, for a total of 35 cycles; (6) final extension at 72 °C (5 minutes). PCR products were quantified via agarose gel electrophoresis, cleaned with ExoSAP-IT™ (Affymetrix Inc.), and Sanger sequenced. The sequences were assembled and quality-checked in Geneious Prime (version 2019.0.3, Biomatters Ltd), and uploaded to NCBI GenBank under the accession numbers MN175954 and MN175955 (H. ridleyi) and MN175956 (T. corrugatus).

Additional orthalicoid COI sequences were obtained from GenBank, originating from the work of Breure and Romero (2012; see Appendix 1 for accession numbers). We excluded some species from those authors’ dataset, namely those with uncertain identification, incomplete sequences, and the basal-most taxa (e.g., Bothriembryontidae, Megaspiridae), which could bring too much noise to the analysis. We used one Planorbidae as outgroup (sequence from GenBank, see Appendix 1). A total of 35 species were used from that work; sequences were 654 bp long, with the exception of the outgroup, with 669 bp due to an indel.

All sequences were aligned in Geneious Prime with the MUSCLE plugin (Edgar 2004; default settings, accuracy-optimized) and further proofed manually. A tree was built in Geneious Prime by Bayesian Inference (MrBayes plugin; Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001; Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003); settings: HKY85 substitution model, 200,000 burn-in length, 1,100,000 iterations.

Systematics Superfamily <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Orthalicoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Family <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Odontostomidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Pilsbry & Vanatta, 1898 Animalia Stylommatophora Odontostomidae 2CBB29F8B0E85E078960A46EADBEA25D Hyperaulax Pilsbry, 1897 Bulimulus (Hyperaulax) Pilsbry 1897a: 10; Pilsbry 1897b: 82. Bonnanius Jousseaume 1900: 39; Schileyko 1999: 337. Hyperaulax : Pilsbry 1901: 102; Wenz 1923: 729; Thiele 1931: 660; Henderson 1935: 145; Morretes 1949: 153; Oliveira et al. 1981: 350; Parkinson et al. 1987: 29; Schileyko 1999: 320; Salgado and Coelho 2003: 165; Simone 2006: 178; Salvador 2019: 87. Hyperaulax (Bonnanius) : Pilsbry 1901: 103; Thiele 1931: 661; Morretes 1949: 153; Zilch 1960: 505; Breure 1974: 52; Oliveira et al. 1981: 350. Hyperaulax (Hyperaulax) : Thiele 1931: 661; Morretes 1949: 153; Zilch 1960: 505; Breure 1974: 109. Tomigerus (Bonnanius) : Parodiz 1962: 453. Bonnarius [sic]: Simone 2006: 178. Type species.

Bulimus (Bulimulus) ridleyi Smith, 1890, by original designation.

Included species.

Hyperaulax ridleyi (Smith, 1890) and H. ramagei (Smith, 1890).


Shell bulimoid. Protoconch sculptured by sinuous axial riblets, which can anastomose and fade on abapical region. Umbilicus surrounded by a periumbilical spiral angulation.


Shell small to medium-sized, bulimoid, with ca 4–5 convex whorls; ground color cream, ochre or brown, with 1–4 lighter-colored spiral bands on lateral portion of whorls; periumbilical region completely or marginally discolored, whitish; apex (especially protoconch) usually of lighter color. Suture well-marked. Protoconch sculptured by numerous fine sinuous axial riblets, transition unclear. Teleoconch overall smooth except for axial growth lines. Aperture ovoid; peristome white, reflected, thickened, and continuous, with 0–4 apertural teeth. Umbilicus perforate, well marked.


After Auffenberg et al. (2015) removed all fossil taxa from Hyperaulax, the genus was left only with two living species, Hyperaulax ridleyi (Fig. 2) and H. ramagei (Figs 3, 4), with the latter classified in the subgenus or full genus Bonnanius. Both species are known only from Fernando de Noronha Archipelago off north-eastern Brazil.

10.3897/zse.95.38259.figure2 455FFD254F2F53B597B467B804312319

Hyperaulax ridleyi. A–E. Lectotype, NHMUK 1888.6.27.106. F–I. Paralectotypes #1 to #4 (in order), NHMUK 1888.6.27.107-110. J. Extreme form, large and with thick callus, NHMUK 1888.6.27.88-94. K. Weathered specimen, ZMS unnumbered (ex Heimburg colln.). L. Protoconch detail (same specimen from K).

10.3897/zse.95.38259.figure3 1F45671426045B47BC6E0C55BE0EA0E0

Hyperaulax ramagei. A–E. Lectotype, NHMUK 1988.6.24.163. F–J. Paralectotypes #1 to #5 (in order), including large forms in apparent sub-fossil state, NHMUK 1988.6.24.164-170. K. Specimen without the white spiral bands, NHMUK 1902.10.16.4.

10.3897/zse.95.38259.figure4 694A593412695B0F9CC84617F05F8DBE

Hyperaulax ramagei. A–C. Syntype of Bonnanius bouvieri, MNHN-IM-2000-28020 (MNHN). D. Reproduction of “Turbine #44” of Buonanni (1861), the holotype of Bonnanius bonnanius. E. Protoconch detail, NHMUK 1902.10.16.4.


The genus Bonnanius is considered here synonymous with Hyperaulax as there are no diagnostic characters allowing its clear separation other than its larger shell size. The presence of teeth in the aperture of H. ramagei (previously classified in Bonnanius) could be used as a diagnostic genus-level character; however, it is well known that odontostomid genera show great inter- and intraspecific variation in the presence and strength of apertural teeth. Moreover, some specimens of H. ridleyi do show a palatal tooth (Fig. 2A) similar in position and length to that of H. ramagei. Furthermore, for a genus with only two species, keeping them separated into two distinct subgenera is excessively zealous taxonomy. As for the other conchological characters, Bonnanius share all of them with Hyperaulax, as discussed below.

The protoconch sculpture has always been deemed a good character to define genera in Orthalicoidea and has more recently received large support from molecular studies (Breure and Romero 2012). The protoconchs of Hyperaulax and Bonnanius are very similar and indicate a close affinity between the two forms: same number of whorls (ca 1¾); same sculpture pattern (sinuous axial riblets, more clearly separate on adapical area of whorl, but anastomosing on abapical area and sometimes fading into scattered dots). There are also some differences on the protoconch, but nothing that would suggest two distinct genera (many genera of Orthalicoidea bear some minor differences in their protoconchs, which helps with species diagnosis; e.g., Salvador and Cavallari 2013; Salvador and Simone 2016). The main difference is that the protoconch of H. ramagei is more flattened and rounded, which makes the riblets a little more spaced; this can be attributed to its shell being larger and wider overall. Furthermore, the protoconch of H. ridleyi has a raised ridge on its middle region. Finally, the protoconch sculpture of museum specimens of H. ramagei is often faded or eroded, which has led to claims of a smooth protoconch in the literature (e.g., Parodiz 1962; Abbott 1989).

Other conchological characters are very similar in both H. ridleyi and H. ramagei: the roughly pentagonal shape of the aperture and its positioning in relation to the body whorl, the long palatal tooth (absent in most H. ridleyi specimens), the shape of the umbilicus and the periumbilical spiral angulation, the unsculptured teleoconch (except for growth striations), and the periostracum color (brown with at least one white spiral band).

The classification of Hyperaulax in Odontostomidae has been well supported in the literature, with just a few different classification schemes. For instance, Schileyko (1999) argued in favor of Bulimulidae because H. ridleyi has no teeth; however, not all odontostomids actually have teeth and some specimens of H. ridleyi do show a faint palatal tooth, as discussed above and already remarked by Pilsbry (1901). Moreover, H. ridleyi has the typical channel-like structure on the junction of the parietal and palatal regions of the peristome. Schileyko (1999), however, maintained Bonnanius (and hence H. ramagei) in Odontostomidae.

In any event, there are other conchological characters favoring an allocation within Odontostomidae, such as the elevated embryonic whorls (Auffenberg et al. 2015) and the protoconch sculpture (wavy riblets, similar to Plagiodontes Doering, 1876; Pizá and Cazzaniga 2016). The overall shell shape of Hyperaulax is very similar to Tomigerus Spix, 1827 and Biotocus Salgado & Leme, 1990, but with a different position of the aperture in relation to the body whorl and a different structure of the umbilical region; also, the protoconch of Tomigerus is smooth. The periostracum color is also similar to what is seen in Tomigerus (e.g., T. clausus Spix, 1827, T. matthewsi Salgado & Leme, 1991, and T. rochai Ihering, 1905), but a striped pattern can also be found in species of Moricandia Pilsbry & Vanatta, 1898 and even Anostoma Waldheim, 1807. The dentition of Hyperaulax (mainly of H. ramagei) is similar to that of Burringtonia Parodiz, 1944 and also Anctus angiostomus (Wagner, 1827). Finally, the channel-like structure on the junction of the parietal and palatal regions of the peristome is virtually identical to what is observed in some species of Cyclodontina Beck, 1837, Spixia Pilsbry & Vanata, 1898, and Anostoma Waldheim, 1807.

Our analysis of interspecific affinities using the barcoding region of the COI marker has grouped Hyperaulax (H. ridleyi only) with Tomigerus, as expected by our morphological analysis, with a posterior probability of 0.997. However, these two species were grouped with Simpulopsis Beck, 1837 (family Simpulopsidae) in our Bayesian tree, instead of being grouped with other odontostomids. This is likely due to the fact that COI alone is not sufficient to solve family-level relationships among stylommatophoran snails (Breure and Romero 2012), despite being sufficient to capture the relationship of close species-level taxa. Based on morphological data, we retain Hyperaulax (and Tomigerus) in the family Odontostomidae.

It is curious that another orthalicoid lineage, from the other side of South America, evolved an uncannily similar shell shape to Hyperaulax: Naesiotus wolfi (Reibisch, 1892), from the Galapagos (lectotype ZSM 47.950, paralectotype NHMUK 1894.6.8.7). Furthermore, N. wolfi is within the size range of Hyperaulax, and has a similar color pattern to H. ridleyi, including the median white spiral band. The protoconch, naturally, is different (Naesiotus Albers, 1850 has very fine and well-defined axial striae), alongside other more general shell features: higher spire, different proportion of body whorl to spire, and a larger number of whorls (ca 6½). In any event, this is a remarkable case of convergent evolution on islands and deserves further investigation.

Animalia Stylommatophora Odontostomidae BC12D4D252AE5CAC9FD27DB8CC16FB0F Hyperaulax ridleyi (Smith, 1890) Fig. 2 Bulimus (Bulimulus) Ridleyi E.A. Smith 1890: 501, pl. 30, fig. 9; Dall 1896: 415. Bulimulus (Hyperaulax) ridleyi : Pilsbry 1897a: 10; Pilsbry 1897b: 82, pl. 14, figs 11–13. Buliminus ridleyi : Möllendorff 1901: 126. Hyperaulax ridleyi : Pilsbry 1901: 103; Ihering 1923: 191; Wenz 1923: 729; Schileyko 1999: 321, fig. 396; Salgado and Coelho 2003: 165; Simone 2006: 178, fig. 637; Breure and Ablett 2012: 36, figs 20C, D, 20ii; Salvador 2019: 87. Hyperaulax (Hyperaulax) ridleyi : Thiele 1931: 661; Morretes 1949: 153; Zilch 1960: 505, fig. 1771; Breure 1974: 51; Breure and Schouten 1985: 4. Hyperaulax (s. str.) ridleyi : Lopes and Alvarenga 1955: 181. Bulimus (Bulimulus) ridleyi : Oliveira and Oliveira 1984: 19. Type locality.

Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, Fernando de Noronha Island and Rata Island. Original (Smith 1890: 501): “Living under bark of Mango-trees in the garden and on north side of island; also at base of the Peak, north side, under stones, and on Rat Island.”


Known only from Fernando de Noronha Archipelago.

Type material.

Lectotype NHMUK 1888.6.27.106 (designation by Breure and Ablett 2012). Paralectotypes: NHMUK 1888.6.27.107-110, 4 shells.

Material examined.

Types. BRAZIL: Fernando de Noronha: ANSP 71271, 7 shells, H.H. Smith leg., 1896; MNZ 205835, 4 shells, ex Suter coll. 5637; ANSP 81426, 1 shell; ANSP 100530, 4 shells, H.v. Ihering leg., 1910; ANSP 220399, 2 shells, ex B.R. Bales coll., J.S. Schwengel leg., 1958; MNZ 205835,4 shells, ex Suter coll. 5637; MZSP 501, 14 shells, 1900; MZSP 7752, 20 shells. MZSP 30134, 10 shells, dunes of Praia das Caieiras, E.F. Nonato leg., 25/vii/1955; MZSP 30135, 8 shells, de Fiore leg., 1983; MZSP 31064, 1 shell, Praia do Meio, L.R.L. Simone & Souza leg. 22/vii/1999; MZSP 31305, 30 specimens, between Baía dos Porcos and Baía do Sancho, L.R.L. Simone leg., 21/vii/1999; MZSP 31676, 14 shells, Praia das Caieiras, L.R.L. Simone et al. leg., 23/vii/1999; MZSP 31681, 15 specimens, mangrove on Praia do Sudeste, C.M. Martins leg., 20/vii/1999; MZSP 31686, 50 specimens, Praia do Meio, C.M. Martins leg., 17–23/vii/1999; MZSP 48824, 1 shell, Praia do Porto, 3°50'05"S, 32°24'04"W, L.R.L. Simone leg., 30/iv/2005; MZSP 48990, 9 shells, Praia das Caieiras, 3°50'19"S, 32°24'00"W, L.R.L. Simone leg., 3/v/2006; MZSP 49001, 11 shells, mangroove on Praia do Sudeste, 3°51'58"S, 32°25'35"W, L.R.L. Simone leg., 4/v/1005; MZSP 49089, 39 shells, in front of Morro Dois Irmãos and Cacimba do Padre, L.R.L. Simone leg., 3/v/2005; MZSP 86542, 13 shells; Praia do Porto, 3°50'11"S, 32°24'04"W, L.R.L. Simone et al. leg., 28/x/2007; MZSP 89929, >50 shells, 3°50'00"S, 32°24'05"W, L.R.L. Simone & C.M. Cunha leg., iii/2009; MZSP 89933, 17 shells, L.R.L. Simone & C.M. Cunha leg., 11/iii/2009; MZSP 89939, 2 specimens; 3°50'21"S, 32°24'10"W, L.R.L. Simone & C.M. Cunha leg., 12/iii/2009; MZSP 89940, 5 specimens, Mirante, L.R.L. Simone & C.M. Cunha leg., 11/iii/2009; MZSP 89993, 1 shell, Praia do Sudeste, 3°52'06"S, 32°25'32"W, L.R.L. Simone & C.M. Cunha leg., 9/iii/2009; MZSP 97854, 3 shells, ex J. Vaz coll., A. Nüssenbaum leg., viii/1973; MZSP 97878, 3 shells, ex J. Vaz coll., Praia das Caieiras, C. Bardelli leg., vi/1994; MZSP 119089, 23 shells, Cacimba do Padre, 3°50'36"S, 32°25'14"W, L.R.L. Simone et al. leg., 8/v/2013; MZSP 119090, 29 shells, Cacimba do Padre, 3°50'36"S, 32°25'14"W, L.R.L. Simone et al. leg., 7/v/2013; NHMUK 1888.6.27.88-94, 7 shells; NHMUK 1888.6.27.95-100, 6 shells, Rata Island; NHMUK 1888.6.27.101-105, 5 shells; NHMUK 20170270, 4 shells, H.E.J. Biggs coll., H. Fiedrick leg.; USNM 134849, 1 shell, H.A. Pilsbry leg.; USNM 214401, 1 shell, H.A. Pilsbry leg.; USNM 307580, 2 shells, Henderson coll., H. Clapp leg.; USNM 518214, 3 shells, W. Williamson leg.; ZSM no nr., 2 shells, Blume coll. 4003; ZSM no nr., 4 shells, H.H. Smith coll.


The shell is smaller overall and has a more elongated and slender profile. The protoconch has a more raised ridge and its sculpture consists largely of more anastomosed riblets. Typically, there is no apertural dentition.


Shell small, bulimoid, slender; spire tall; W ~ 4¾–5. Shell color ochre to brown; body whorl sometimes darker than rest; fine white spiral band on middle portion of whorl; periumbilical spiral angulation discolored, whitish; peristome white. Protoconch (w ~1¾) rounded, with raised ridge that becomes a faint subsutural ridge on teleoconch; sculptured by fine sinuous axial riblets, which sometimes anastomose (especially on abapical area of whorl); transition to teleoconch unclear. Teleoconch smooth (except for growth lines). Suture well marked, but not deep. Aperture ovoid, elongated. Peristome reflected and slightly thickened; presence of small channel-like structure on division between parietal and palatal regions of aperture; parietal callus might be present in older specimens. Apertural teeth usually absent, but faint elongated tooth on middle portion of palatal region may be present (Fig. 2A). Umbilicus narrow, deep, surrounded by a periumbilical spiral angulation.


Lectotype: H = 11.4 mm, D = 5.9 mm, h = 4.8 mm, d = 3.0, W = 5¼, w = 1¾. Paralectotype #1: H = 9.5 mm, D = 5.3 mm, h = 4.4 mm, d = 3.0 mm, W = 4½, w = 1½. Paralectotype #2: H = 9.1 mm, D = 5.3 mm, h = 4.3 mm, d = 2.9 mm, W = 4½, w = 1¾. Paralectotype #3: H = 8.9 mm, D = 5.2 mm, h = 4.3 mm, d = 2.9 mm, W = 4½, w = 1¾. Paralectotype #4: H = 8.9 mm, D = 5.2 mm, h = 4.2 mm, d = 2.8 mm, W = 4½, w = 1¾. Average (n = 63, except for w, where n = 10): H = 10.2 ± 1.00 mm (min = 7.8 mm, max = 12.7 mm), D = 5.7 ± 0.51 mm, h = 4.9 ± 0.45 mm, d = 3.5 ± 0.34 mm, W = 4¾ to 5 (min = 4¼, max = 5½), w = 1¾ (occasionally 1½).


Other than showing a reasonable variation in shell size, the species displays little conchological variation (Fig. 2). Rare specimens, however, do deviate from the typical form, for instance by having broader shells with shorter spires (Fig. 2F–I) or by having a palatal tooth (Fig. 2A, lectotype). The color might vary from more ochre tones to more reddish-brown ones, but the single white spiral band on the mid-section of the whorl is always present. Hyperaulax ridelyi can be easily distinguished from its only congener, H. ramagei, by its smaller shell (with a single spiral white band) and more elongated and slender shell profile. Moreover, its protoconch has a more raised ridge and the riblets of its sculpture are much more anastomosed. Finally, H. ridleyi typically bears no apertural dentition (although a weak palatal tooth might be present; Fig. 2A).

Unfortunately, not much can be found in the literature about this species’ habitat or habits, but the museum labels point to a variety of collection locales, albeit more usually referring to dead shells only. In any event, this species has been reported alive from forested areas, mangrove, beaches, dunes, and gardens.

Animalia Stylommatophora Odontostomidae 21FEDBE1B9185FEAA947DBE4386F201C Hyperaulax ramagei (Smith, 1890) Figs 3 , 4 “Turbine, in cui la prima voluta è (…)” Buonanni 1681: 185, fig. Turbine #44. Bulimus (Tomigerus) Ramagei E.A. Smith 1890: 500, pl. 30, fig. 8. Bulimus (Tomigerus?) Ramagei: Dall 1896: 415. Bonnanius bouvieri Jousseaume 1900: 39, pl. 1, fig. 19. Bonnanius bonnanius Jousseaume 1900: 41. Hyperaulax (Bonnanius) ramagei : Pilsbry 1901: 103, pl. 11, figs 60–62; Thiele 1931: 611; Morretes 1949: 153; Lopes and Alvarenga 1955: 181; Zilch 1960: 505, fig. 1772; Breure 1974: 52; Breure 1975: 1158; Oliveira et al. 1981: 350; Parkinson et al. 1987: 29; Abbott 1989: 106, text fig. Tomigerus (Bonnanius) ramagei : Parodiz 1962: 453. Bulimus (Tomigerus) ramagei : Oliveira and Oliveira 1984: 19. Bonnanius ramagei : Schileyko 1999: 339, fig. 419; Breure and Ablett 2012: 34, figs 20A, B, 20i. Hyperaulax ramagei : Salgado and Coelho 2003: 165; Salvador 2019: 87. Bonnarius [sic] ramagei: Simone 2006: 178, fig. 638. Type locality.

Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, Fernando de Noronha Island, Ponta do Tabaco. Original (Smith 1890: 500): “imbedded in sandy mud on a raised reef at Tobacco Point (G.A. Ramage leg.)”.


Known only from Fernando de Noronha Archipelago.

Type material.

Lectotype NHMUK 1888.6.27.163 (designation by Breure and Ablett 2012). Paralectotypes: NHMUK 1888.6.27.164–170, 7 shells.

Material examined.

Types. BRAZIL: Fernando de Noronha: ANSP 100531, 4 shells, H.v. Ihering leg., 1910; MNZ 205835, 4 shells, ex Suter coll. 5637; MNHN-IM-2000-28020 syntype of Bonnanius bouvieri, Jousseaume coll.; MNZ 205822, 5 shells, ex Suter coll. 5639; MZSP 7738, 14 shells; MZSP 97933, 3 shells, ex J. Vaz coll., A. Nüssenbaum leg., viii/1973; NHMUK 1902.10.16.4, 1 shell; MZSP 131996, 3 shells, Ponta das Caracas, 3°52'28"S, 32°25'24"W, F. Schunck leg., 27/ix/2013; NHMUK 20170271, 13 shells, from sand on north end of island, 16/vi/1887; USNM 518215, >30 shells, W. Williamson leg.; USNM 709805, >30 shells, dunes in Porto Santo Antônio, L. Storrs et al. leg., vii–viii/1973; USNM 709806, >30 shells, Porto Santo Antônio, L. Storrs et al. leg.; ZSM 7861, 1 shell, 1940; ZSM no nr., 3 shells.


The shell is larger overall and has a broader profile. The riblets on the second part of the protoconch are more defined. The peristome is strongly thickened and displays marked apertural teeth.


Shell medium-sized, bulimoid, rounded; W ~ 4½. Shell color chestnut brown; spire apex light brown to cream-colored; up to four equidistant white spiral bands might be present on lateral portion of whorls (but entirely brown morphs also occur); periumbilical region usually discolored, whitish; peristome and apertural teeth white. Protoconch (w ~1¾) rounded; first ½ whorl presenting undefined anastomosing sculpture; remainder sculptured by fine sinuous axial usually well-defined riblets (but sometimes anastomosed in some areas) that become less pronounced towards teleoconch; transition to teleoconch unclear (but sometimes with thickening of the last riblet). Teleoconch smooth (except for growth lines, which become more marked towards aperture). Suture well-marked, but not deep. Aperture roughly ovoid, but angulate. Peristome reflected and strongly thickened; some older specimens show continuous thickening of the peristome; parietal callus might be present in older specimens. Apertural teeth present: two knob-like parietal teeth positioned slightly towards the interior of shell (not always present); long palatal tooth in the middle portion of palatal region (its surface goes from smooth to serrated, with up to three distinct points); columellar tooth elongated, with smooth surface. Both columellar and palatal tooth produce a marked depression on outer wall of shell. Umbilicus slit-like.


Lectotype: H = 17.3 mm, D = 12.3 mm, h = 8.8 mm, d = 6.6, W = 4, w = 2. Paralectotype #1: H = 22.3, D = 15.6 mm, h = 10.9 mm, d = 7.7 mm, W = 4¾. Paralectotype #2: H = 23.5 mm, D = 16.0 mm, h = 11.2 mm, d = 8.7 mm, W = 5. Paralectotype #3: H = 19.5 mm, D = 14.6 mm, h = 10 mm, d = 7.2 mm, W = 4½, w = 1¾. Paralectotype #4: H = 19.6 mm, D = 13.7 mm, h = 8.8 mm, d = 6.7 mm, W = 4½. Paralectotype #5: H = 20.3 mm, D = 13.2 mm, h = 9.8 mm, d = 7.4 mm, W = 4¾, w = 1¾. Syntype of Bonnanius bouvieri: H = 22.5 mm, D = 15.4 mm (Breure, 1975). Average (n = 34, except for w, where n = 10): H = 17.9 ± 1.56 mm (min = 16.1 mm, max = 22.0 mm), D = 12.9 ± 0.96 mm, h = 9.7 ± 0.71 mm, d = 7.6 ± 0.63 mm, W = 4½ (min = 4¼, max = 5), w = 1¾ (occasionally 2).


The names H. bouvieri and H. bonnanius were synonymized with H. ramagei by Pilsbry (1901); this decision is followed here. The syntype of H. bouvieri (Fig. 4A–C) is indistinguishable from H. ramagei, but the discussion regarding H. bonnanius is slightly more colorful and it is worthwhile to recapitulate it here. Its original description (Jousseaume 1900) was based upon the work of the Jesuit scholar Filippo Buonanni (1638–1723), who compiled the first conchology manual (Buonanni 1681) and is thus considered the Father of Conchology (Leonhard 2007). As Pilsbry (1901) argued, Buonanni’s (1681) description of his Turbine #44 and its illustration (allowing for some distortion in the drawing) are vastly consistent with H. ramagei. Despite later authors such as Linnaeus having relied on Buonanni’s work, this particular species was overlooked until Jousseaume (1900) published it as Bonnanius Bonnanius, misspelling the Jesuit’s name and likely without knowing the work of Smith (1890).

The shell features of H. ramagei display some morphological variation: (1) shell size, from some rather small specimens to very large ones (Hmin = 16 mm and Hmax = 22 mm); (2) shell color can go from entirely brown to marked with four white spiral bands; (3) aperture size, relative to remainder of the shell; (4) shell shape, with some specimens having a much shorter spire (Fig. 3A–C, lectotype); (5) two parietal teeth might be absent (Fig. 3I); (6) the surface of the palatal tooth goes from nearly smooth (Fig. 3I, J) to serrated (Fig. 3F, G), with up to three distinct points (Fig. 3A), reminiscent of the carnassial tooth of Carnivora (apparently this is not related to the age of the individual or to the freshness of the specimen when collected). The syntype of H. bouvieri show a four-pronged palatal tooth, which is also unusually large, and a three-pronged parietal tooth (Fig. 4A–C); this could be seen as morphological variation, but, as this specimen bears a mark of breakage near the aperture and further growth (Fig. 4C), it could be simply post-trauma anomalous growth. For a comparison with its single congener, H. ridleyi, see the Discussion section of that species.

Some of the specimens available (including some paralectotypes) appear to be of a sub-fossil state, as already noted by Smith (1890). These appear to be larger than the fresh specimens, but this could be due to collection bias towards larger specimens; at present, there is not enough sub-fossil material for a statistically meaningful assessment.


Hyperaulax is here classified in the Odontostomidae and presently contains two species, H. ridleyi and H. ramagei, both endemic to Fernando de Noronha Archipelago. This genus seems to be more closely related to Tomigerus than to other odontostomids.

According to recent collection events on Fernando de Noronha, H. ramagei cannot be found alive in spite of meaningful search efforts (L.R.L. Simone personal communication). In fact, museum specimens of H. ramagei still bearing the periostracum typically date back to the first half of the 20th century. It is a troubling possibility that presently this species has a much-reduced range or is altogether extinct. Future collection efforts should focus on this species to properly define its status according to current guidelines for conservation (IUCN 2012).

Finally, another curious aspect of the fauna of Fernando de Noronha deserving further study is Amphisbaena ridleyi Boulenger, 1890, an amphisbaenid (worm lizard) endemic to the archipelago that possesses adaptations for a durophagous diet including a large proportion of land snails (Pregill 1984). In the original report, the author could not indicate which species of terrestrial gastropods were part of the lizard’s diet and a study involving this species and possible defensive adaptations of the snails would be very welcome.


We are very grateful to Luiz R.L. Simone (MZSP), Jon Ablett (NHMUK), and Enrico Schwabe (ZSM) for granting access to the material under their care; to Ellen Wildner (ANSP) and Lisa Comer and Ellen Strong (USNM) for photos and information about the material housed in the collections under their care; to Barbara M. Tomotani (MNZ) for help with lab work; to Christina G. Martin (SMNS) for the SEM images; and to Bram Breure and Frank Köhler for the helpful comments on the manuscript. RBS received support from: SYNTHESYS Project (proposal GB-TAF-6613), financed by the European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP7 Integrating Activities Programme; Malacological Society of London (Early Career Research Grant 2017); Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart (SEM imaging); Bruce Fraser Hazelwood fund and MNZ.

References AbbottRT (1989) Compendium of land shells.American Malacologists, Melbourne, 240 pp. AuffenbergKSlapcinskyJPortellRW (2015) A revision of the fossil taxa assigned to Hyperaulax (Gastropoda: Odontostomidae), with the description of a new genus (Gastropoda: Bulimulidae).The Nautilus129(2): 5462. BreureASH (1974) Catalogue of Bulimulidae (Gastropoda, Euthyneura), II. Odontostominae.Basteria38(5–6): 109127. BreureASH (1975) Types of Bulimulidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda) in the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle233 [1976]: 11371187. BreureASHAblettJD (2012) Annotated type catalogue of the Bothriembryontidae and Odontostomidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Orthalicoidea) in the Natural History Museum, London.ZooKeys182: 170. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.182.2720 BreureASHRomeroPE (2012) Support and surprises: molecular phylogeny of the land snail superfamily Orthalicoidea using a three-locus gene analysis with a divergence time analysis and ancestral area reconstruction (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora).Archiv für Molluskenkunde141(1): 120. https://doi.org/10.1127/arch.moll/1869-0963/141/001-020 BreureASHSchoutenJR (1985) Notes on and descriptions of Bulimulidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda). III.Zoologische Verhandelingen216: 198. BuonanniF (1681) Ricreatione dell’occhio e della mente. Nell’offeruatione delle Chiocciole, proposta a’ suriosi delle opere della natura.Felice Cefaretti, Rome, 384 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.119125 Claudino-SalesV (2019) Brazilian Atlantic islands: Fernando de Noronha and Atol das Rocas, Brazil. In: Claudino-SalesV (Ed.) Coastal World Heritage Sites.Springer Netherlands, 217223. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1528-5_32 DallWH (1896) Insular land shell faunas, especially as illustrated by the data obtained by Dr. G. Baur in the Galapagos Islands.Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia48: 395460. FávaroDITOliveiraSMBDamattoSRMenorEAMoraesASMazzilliBP (2006) Caracterização química e mineralógica do material inconsolidado do fundo da Lagoa da Viração, Arquipélago de Fernando de Noronha, Pernambuco.Geologia USP5(2): 111. https://doi.org/10.5327/S1519-874X2006000200001 FolmerOBlackMHoehWLutzRVrijenhoekR (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates.Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology3(5): 294299. HuelsenbeckJPRonquistF (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny.Bioinformatics17: 754755. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 HendersonJ (1935) Fossil non-marine Mollusca of North America.Geological Society of North America Special Papers3: 1290. https://doi.org/10.1130/SPE3-p1 IheringH von (1923) Transgression des Meeres während der Ablagerung der Pampas.Archiv für Molluskenkunde55: 183193. IUCN [International Union for Conservation of Nature](2012) IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 3.1, second edition.International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, 32 pp. JousseaumeF (1900) Mollusques terrestres. Clausilia, Rhodea et Bulimus Sud-Americanae.Bulletin de la Société Philomathique de Paris2(1): 544. LeonhardK (2007) Shell collecting. On 17th-century Conchology, curiosity cabinets and still life paintings. In: EnenkelKAESmithMS (Eds) Early modern zoology: the construction of animals in science, literature and the visual arts.Brill, Leiden, 177214. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004131880.i-657.52 LopesHSAlvarengaM (1955) Contribuição ao conhecimento dos moluscos da Ilha Fernando de Noronha – Brasil.Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico6(1–2): 157196. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0373-55241955000100005 MarquesFARibeiroMRBittarSMBTavares-FilhoANLimaJFWF (2007) Caracterização e classificação de Neossolos da Ilha de Fernando de Noronha (PE).Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Solo31(6): 15531562. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832007000600032 MöllendorffO von (1901) Zur Südpolar-Land-Frage.Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft33: 125127. MorretesFL (1949) Ensaio de catálogo dos moluscos do Brasil.Arquivos do Museu Paranaense7: 1216. OliveiraMPOliveiraMHR (1984) Comunicações malacológicas n° 16. Listagem de tipos de GastropodaPulmonata brasileiros depositados em quatro museus europeus.Boletim do Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e de Geociências38: 146. OliveiraMPRezendeGJRCastroGA (1981) Catálogo dos moluscos da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. Sinonímia de família, gênero e espécie.MEC, UFJF, Juiz de Fora, 520 pp. ParkinsonBHemmenJGrohK (1987) Tropical land shells of the world.Christa Hemmen, Wiesbaden, 279 pp. ParodizJJ (1962) New and little-known species of South and Central American land snails (Bulimulidae).Proceedings of the United States National Museum113(3462): 429456. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.113-3462.429 PilsbryHA (1897a) The affinities of Floridian Miocene snails. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 49: 10. PilsbryHA (1897b–1898) Manual of conchology, second series. Pulmonata. Vol. 11. American Bulimulidae: Bulimulus, Neopetraeus, Oxychona and South American Drymaeus. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, 339 pp. PilsbryHA (1901–1902) Manual of conchology, second series. Pulmonata. Vol. 14. Oriental bulimoid Helicidae; Odontostomidae; Cerionidae.Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, 302 pp. PizáJCazzanigaNJ (2016) Plagiodontes parodizi, a new species from Argentina (Gastropoda: Odontostomidae).Journal of Conchology42: 19. PregillG (1984) Durophagous feeding adaptations in an amphisbaenid.Journal of Herpetology18(2): 186191. https://doi.org/10.2307/1563747 RonquistFHuelsenbeckJP (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.Bioinformatics19: 15721574. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 SalgadoNCCoelhoACS (2003) Moluscos terestres do Brasil (gastrópodes operculados ou não, exclusive Veronicellidae, Miladicae e Limacidae). Revista de Biología Tropical 51(Suppl. 3): 149–189. SalvadorRB (2019) Brazilian, Uruguayan and Argentinian land snails in the collection of the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.Tuhinga30: 8298. SalvadorRBCavallariDC (2013) Taxonomic revision of Leiostracus onager and Leiostracus subtuszonatus (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Orthalicidae).Journal of Conchology41: 511518. SalvadorRBSimoneLRL (2016) A new species of Kora from Bahia, Brazil (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Orthalicoidea), with an emended diagnosis of the genus.Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde A, Neue Serie9: 17. https://doi.org/10.18476/sbna.v9.a1 SchileykoAA (1999) Treatise on Recent terrestrial pulmonate molluscs. Part 3. Partulidae, Aillyidae, Bulimulidae, Orthalicidae, Megaspiridae, Urocoptidae.Ruthenica, Supplement2: 263436. SimoneLRL (2006) Land and freshwater mollusks of Brazil.EGB/FAPESP, São Paulo, 390 pp. SmithEA (1890) Mollusca.Journal of the Linnean Society of London20: 483503. ThieleJ (1931) Handbuch der systematischen Weichtierkunde. Erster Band, Teil 2.Gustav Fisher Verlag, Jena, 442 pp. WenzW (1923) Gastropoda extramarina tertiaria. II. In: DienerC (Ed.) Fossilium catalogus I: Animalia 18.Junk, Berlin, 353736. ZilchΑ (1959–1960) Euthyneura. In: Schindewolf OH (Ed.) Handbuch der Paläozoologie. 6(2): (1): 1–200 (1959); (2): 201–400 (1959); (3): 401–600 (1960); (4): 601–835 (1960). Borntraeger, Berlin. Appendix 1

Below are listed the COI sequences of other Orthalicoidea species, obtained from the work of Breure and Romero (2012), used to ascertain the classification of the species studied herein. The list is organized by family and species (in alphabetical order), followed by the respective GenBank accession number. Bulimulidae: Bostryx agueroiJF514623 ; Bostryx bilineatusJF514637 ; Bostryx edmundiJF514622 ; Bostryx longispiraJF514624 ; Bostryx strobeliJF514636 ; Bostryx superbusJF514621 ; Bulimulus diaphanusJF514633 ; Bulimulus guadalupensisJF514630 ; Bulimulus hummelinckiJF514629 ; Bulimulus sporadicusJF514632 ; Bulimulus tenuissimusJF514631 ; Drymaeus inusitatusJF514648 ; Drymaeus laticinctusJF514646 ; Drymaeus multifasciatusJF514647 ; Drymaeus serratusJF514649 ; Drymaeus vexillumJF514625 ; Naesiotus quitensisJF514635 ; Naesiotus stenogyroidesJF514650 ; Neopetraeus tessellatusJF514627 ; Rabdotus alternatusJF514638 ; Scutalus chiletensisJF514628 . Odontostomidae: Clessinia cordovana cordovanaJF514618 ; Clessinia cordovana stelzneriJF514617 ; Clessinia pagodaJF514613 ; Cyclodontina guaraniJF514619 ; Plagiodontes multiplicatusJF514620 ; Spixia pervariansJF514614 ; Spixia philippiiJF514612 ; Spixia popanaJF514616 ; Spixia tucumanensisJF514615 . Simpulopsidae: Leiostracus perlucidusJF514640 ; Simpulopsis decussataJF514639 .

The sequence of the outgroup taxon was obtained from GenBank: Planorbis planorbisEF012175 (Planorbidae).