Who the hell is supporting Donald Trump?

March 10, 2016






It’s no longer a blue collar world






Donald Trump as a Strongman





Fear is the Path to the Darkside




Trump protester sucker-punched at North Carolina rally, videos show







Sanders picketline_1






21 thoughts on “Who the hell is supporting Donald Trump?

  1. Your article is spot-on. Even I have family members who would vote for Trump “over any democrat – especially Hillary”. Fear trumps reason (no pun intended), inspires anger and casts rantionale aside. America is in bad shape but has been getting better – no thanks to those like Trump, who as you’ve corerctly pointed out stands to gain immensely from the status quo of pro-corporation. However, in the end, none of this matters. The damage has been done. Even if Trump fails to get the GOP nomination or even if (God forbid) he does and somehow claim the presidency the end result is the same: the face of politics in the US has changed and none for the better. Others will see the sudden popularity Trump has gained through hatred and fear and will use that to their own advantage.

    Republican politics have just become the darkest since Reagan – and will continue to be so for genrations to come.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. “… sudden popularity Trump has gained through hatred and fear”

      All I read there is your hatred, fear and ignorance.
      You don’t seem to have a clue what’s driving GIGANTIC support for Trump, so you label it “fear”. What? Well, it’s a mixture. Fear of further 1-party system stooges and extremely positive reaction to someone who isn’t a pol and who get’s it done. His rallies are a love fest. Only the UberTards are the violent ones, trying to instigate – and block highways as in AZ. Then the masses of Sheep and Presstitutes claim Trump encourages violence. You CANNOT make this sh*t up.

      “Get’s it done” — I know, that hits yer belly button, and right when you were comfortable fondling the lint there. My apologies. Back to sleep now. We won’t wake you up when it’s over.


  2. I hardly know where to begin. OMG. You, like the rednecks you speak of, have just enough information to do damage, and not enough to get to any understanding of what’s really going on.

    Who is going after Trump? Forgetting about the average citizenry for a moment, why would the elite from both the left AND right be going after Trump? Because they are very fearful he is going to upset the status quo, fearful that the people will finally realize that there really is no democracy, just an elite (both Democrat and Republicans) who pass laws that benefit themselves. But the elite love it when we’re fighting. Divide and conquer is their motto and it’s worked very well at keeping the populace in the dark about the real issues.

    If the American people were so racist, how the heck did Obama get elected then? A whole lot of white people voted for his “hope and change”, and it was a very good acting job, wasn’t it? He read a good teleprompter, basically came out of nowhere, and everybody bought it. I too was cheering for him. But it didn’t take long to realize he was not going to change a thing, and he didn’t. How many Wall Street bankers went to jail? Do I hear “none”? I could go on and on and on.

    And you say of Trump: “He wants to ‘bomb the crap’ out of ISIS, unaware that Obama has been quietly doing just that.” Really? Where did you get that information from? The U.S. has been secretly, along with their NATO puppet Erdogan of Turkey and Saudi Arabia, supplying ISIS with money and weaponry. When the U.S. fighter jets go out, they’re coming back with three-quarters of their payload. They’re not trying to bomb ISIS because ISIS is a proxy for the U.S. The U.S. has been trying, unsuccessfully, for years to take out Assad of Syria, just like they did with Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein (a U.S. friend one day, and then weapons of mass destruction that were never found the next). They want a gas pipeline from Qatar to run through Syria and up into Europe, but Syria rejected that idea. You don’t know enough about the subjects you’re talking about.

    Gaddafi, when he came to power in Libya, was faced with a country filled with many tribes, all of whom hated each other. In order to gain some control, he had to be tough. Once he did get control, though, he supplied his people with free medical, free dental, free education, including university. If you couldn’t get the university education you wanted, he sent you overseas to get it. He built a 1,500 mile pipeline in order to pump fresh water from southern Libya to northern Libya. He gave every married couple $50,000.00, no interest, which they had to pay back, but there was no time limit for this. He certainly wasn’t perfect, but he tried to give his people a good life. But he made the mistake of not being a good enough puppet to the U.S. government, and they took him out. They assassinated a sovereign leader – again! How many times does this have to occur?

    Trump is at least saying that he thinks he could solve a lot of problems WITHOUT going to war. Gee, imagine the nerve of him saying that! But also imagine what the military-industrial complex thinks of that idea. Do you think they would like having peace? Why, that would mean their profits would greatly decline. The horror of it all! They must be seriously twisting in their chairs right about now.

    As far as those rednecks wanting a job to support their family – well, that’s terrible, isn’t it? Trump is wondering why Disney, for example, is bringing in foreign workers to replace domestic workers. And to boot, the domestic workers have had to train the foreign workers right up until they get their pink slip and the foreign workers take over their jobs. He’s asking questions, wondering why this is allowed.

    He’s wondering about the upcoming trade agreements, you know, the ones that were agreed to in secret (with no environmental or labor representation) by corporate lawyers, the very agreements we’re promised will provide tons of jobs, but magically they never materialize? How dare he ask those questions, say the elite. They’re a bad deal for the American public, but rarely will you hear a politician speak about this. At least Trump is.

    He’s wondering why China is allowed to have tariffs and our goods are kept out of their markets, yet they’re allowed to export to us whatever they want. Again, the nerve of him!

    Trump doesn’t need to build a wall between Mexico and the United States. Laws are already on the books whereby employers are to be fined heavily for hiring illegals when they should be hiring American citizens. If these laws were enforced, employers would have to hire Americans. If all benefits were cut off from illegals (free medical, education, etc.), they wouldn’t bother coming. There is no need for a wall; only the need to treat your own citizens with dignity and respect. If you then need more workers, well then, fine, invite them in. Does that make Trump a terrible leader? Why, because he actually cares whether American workers have jobs? Yeah, right!

    Trump is also interested in stopping the medical monopolies that keep your health insurance up in the stratosphere. Again, what elite is going to like this? Can you just imagine the insurance and pharmaceutical companies supporting this line of thought? But it would, if done correctly, allow the average citizen to be able to afford health care again, and could go a long way to balancing the budget.

    Everybody is so worried about Trump, but what about Hillary Clinton and her husband, Bill? They have sold the American people out, but they have benefited handsomely, along with Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II, Obama. Dangerous, all of them. Just look at how the Clinton’s have benefited, and they’re by no means alone.


    Sanders might be a good man, but he did go along with bombing Iraq and Libya, and he rarely criticizes Clinton. Trump is the only one who is really asking questions about how the country is run, and he’s not bought and paid for by the elite. This is really what bothers them – he can’t be bought.


    Liked by 2 people

    1. backwardsevolution …. Wow. See, your rebuttal is most admirable. If I cared enough about the UberLibTard race I would’ve done something similar. However it may have helped you to write it, it will do nothing of the kind for the Tards. They are separate and unique. They have PhD’s in Belly Button Lint Fondling.

      The more they ignore, and are protected from, the realities of the world the better it is for their mental state – a permanent “normalcy” equilibrium – which, once disturbed, elicits only transparent bile and blather.

      For they are the most highly educated and the narcissists. Note how often they use the latter noun to lash out and so demonstrate their ignorance, while projecting their own guilt in what they claim against others. It’s quite psychiatric, you know.

      Now, off with you, to spend your efforts more wisely.


      1. As an Anglo Australian , let me comment on the anglosphere, as an outsider let me state the true nature of the retards, of the left,So as above moron he states, that 2×2=4 dosnt equal 4, this applieds to all THINGS= matter mind ect ect genetics, dominance of dark skinned beings, over whites. in an objective sense,he fails to be balanced, This is the reason why the PROGESSIVES only speak of equality,(concept of political , law good intensions .We whites need to be GREATER , than the herd, we need to make beings that have 50 to 100 eye colours,, 50 to 100 hair colours,, in the races,of MEN,not man, So that I reigns supreme over all doctrines of us our them.For as a RIGHT WING BEING, I dont hold to the concept of MANKIND as this moron thinks. for MAN=MIND is not subject to the herd, =KIND, This is the true veiw, of Robert K, the true veiw of Clintons, Dixocratic mind set, the Mexiocrates, LA RAZE, the Negro crates, Femocrates , ect ect …………onward into infinity. As G Orwell, pointed out, only chattering interllectals, are stupid enough to believe in ideas, THAT THE COMMON MAN-MIND REJECTS IN ITS COMMON ,SENSE. Theirs to the common sense of plain Americans, not the veiw of 5 main Corps, that control 90%,of the lie based media, Bill Clinton allowed cross media ownership, now the same media attack TRUMP, and grovel before Clinton,as/ Rorbert K/ states.AS PLATO points out truth in based not what is not stated, as that which is stated, what is not seen, as what is.COMMON MAN MIND IS DISPISED BY SUCH BEINGS, AS ROBERT K


  3. once again you have posted words that put things in perspective for me. the only place we part company is on Hillary Clinton. i think she is smart enough to be a great President. she understands how the game is played. and it is a game with good players and bad ones. the other demo. running are not so wise. they think they can fix it all overnight. Hillary understands it take time to affect changes. or when to give and when to push for that change.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I think there is a fear here that is being missed, and that is the fear that Trump generates not in the public mind but the government mind: how do we handle someone who isn’t one of us? The currently entrenched political regime, most of whom are owned by large corporations and give benefit to only those who give, pay, or contribute the most to their own political careers and personal lifestyles, have no idea what to think or do when it comes to having someone from the outside suddenly step in. Hilary and Bernie, even the other Republican candidates, represent yet more of the same political diatribe and trite sound bites we have been subjected to for the last 40 years, thus the reason congresspersons, governors, and many other members of this entrenched government are so quick to support anyone but Trump: he isn’t one of them, and they don’t want him because it is much easier to have a Democrat or Republican to deal with. Thus their desire, along with the media’s, to highlight his racist and sexism comments (like they are perfect, which is why we still have sex and finance scandals in government…eek), to then call us supporters of racism and sexism if we elect him…which, ironically, is the same thing we heard if we didn’t elect, or vote, for Obama). Just my two cents worth of opinion/idea.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. David … quiet now. Careful. You’re using common sense, logic and observation, not your PhD if you have one. Mustn’t do that.

      The overarching reason for the circus of opposition to Il Duce Trumpolini must necessarily escape all the smarties. That’s the way of things. Didn’t you know that? The shmatas are the last to find out, if ever.


  5. “… his hateful rhetoric reminded of what I had heard in my many years of studying racist groups like the Nazi skinheads and the Ku Klux Klan”

    If all you have is a hammer ……
    And if all you’ve ingested is PC smoothie-blather all your life while becoming expert in hammers ………

    Then it’s no surprise if you have some inflated sense of your importance (and even blog it), have no cognition of the meaning of sudden (who the hell?) events with huge support running counter to the hammer expert, that is – no empathy, and have zero-documentary, strident, unsupported reactions to anything critical.

    That is textbook narcissism.


  6. Blazak ……… It’s quite hopeless. I re-scanned yer blather. EVERY single paragraph is a compilation of ignorance and twisted, false extrapolation. Thereby, it’s an exposition in the heights of sophistry … zero documentation, no actual inquiry, echo chamber amplification.

    I initially subscribed looking for a challenge. Your blog isn’t one. It’s just so pathetic; it’s just depressing. I don’t need that.

    How could anyone be such a simpleton? Easy… look in the LibTard Graduate Depts all over the country and the alumni rolls. The most stunted live in the most elevated towers.


    1. You seem to have a real problem with educated people, typical of a right wing robot, perhaps if you spent less time listening to right wing radio and TV and posting your parroted world view online you might have time to obtain an education and not be so jealous of those that have them.


  7. I do not agree with all of the mud-slinging and character bashing that is going on here. I have always been for a spirited debate, but not when it boils down to personal attacks on someone. What I have always respected about Mr. Blazack is that we cannot have that spirited debate, then agree to disagree while maintaining respect for each other, our opinions and beliefs. I know Mr. Blazack is quite capable of defending himself, but I needed to pipe in here that while I do not agree with his position about Trump, I still hold quite a bit of respect for him as a person. I do not like seeing this kind of personal bashing about anyone, especially someone I have such respect for. Disagree to your hearts content, and give reasonable and objective reasons for it, but leave out the character jabs. Mr. Blazack is a person of high character, and quite honestly, this is his blog, where he is allowed to state his feelings and opinions. We can debate them, but we don’t need the bashing. There is enough of that going on already.


  8. White supremacist skinheads is an oxymoron. True skinheads are not racists plus that picture that you have is a postcard from Manchester from the late 1990s of gay skinheads.


Leave a Reply


WordPress.com Logo


Google photo


Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Connecting to %s