Stop the fake debates please

I can already feel the heat of hate I’m going to get for this.

There’s a broken record.

You’re being played.

What strawman?

Not all (crime) are (demographic) is an excuse to dismiss data.
Probability data. It happens to the HBD crowd all the time.
A derailing tactic intended to keep you ignorant and fixated on casting aspersions (ad hom). Bullshit rhetoric. There’s no debate. It’s the statistical equivalent of anecdote and rejects the heinousness of the crime in question. In a civilized, First World society, the acceptable number is zero.

They want you to forget this.

(I also think that traumatizing a person with crime should be an aggravating offence, we already implicitly have this but it’s been forgotten in sentencing for political expedience e.g. aggravating factor for taking a child’s innocence away or raping a celibate/faithful Christian or a virgin, same principle. It could even apply to male rape of a straight man, since there is another layer to the trauma based on the individual’s beliefs and identity. “Hate” crime should be put toward those ends if anything, protecting the in-group against the out-group of the really spiteful (anti-Western) predatory targeting and life ruining. The system we have is broken because it defends the out-group like infantile damsels when they are literally criminals explicitly targeting the in-group of the society they chose to live in. That is “sexual terrorism”.)

I’ll take the one with more data as example.

Muh “not all men are rapists”

– but most rapists are male, it’s just un-PC to collect demographic data (including race) and publish it.

Seriously, try to find rape data by sex and/or sexuality, I did. Couldn’t find anything reliable. Isn’t this suspicious?

We need a data collection charter where such information in the public interest must be collected and published freely, with no distortions. Including the rate of demonstrably false accusations. It viscerally sickens me that a raped man by another man must expressly state he isn’t homosexual to be taken more seriously. Where are the libertarians on that privacy? Consent is never an assumption, property rights begin with the body.

You’re being hoodwinked. So I looked up American data since a lot of you are filthy Americans.

You won’t pay attention unless I’m talking about you.

Best I could find in a moderately long search attempt.

OT but “Attempted rape includes verbal threats of rape.”
How many men plead ignorance on that one?

All this insufficient data (even at collection stage) is intended to keep men and women at one another’s throats. To lower the fertility rate. It is dyscivic.

Sex-based triangulation. You cannot fight the system that oppresses you if you’re busy engaging in an impossible game of one-upmanship.

They also want to deny unPC but true stereotypes by hoping you won’t ask for full datasets.

Your taxes are paying for them already, you should get all the information.

They also are intellectually dishonest to report victim but not criminal.
Revised Oct 2018 data from 2016 (latest).
“The rate of violent victimization against males increased from 2015 to 2016, rising from 15.9 to 19.6 per 1,000 males age 12 or older.
From 2015 to 2016, the rate of aggravated assault against males age 12 or older rose from 2.7 to 4.2 per 1,000.
The rate of violent victimization against persons ages 25 to 34 rose from 21.8 per 1,000 persons to 28.4 per 1,000 from 2015 to 2016, and the rate for females in this age group rose from 24.6 to 33.4 per 1,000.”

>implies women are not persons but O.K.

Who attacked them? A ghost? It is a common incomplete sentence and poor grammar. It’s also scientism.

You need a Punnett square and I see none.

Male, female and male, female. Basic stats again? Otherwise an individual reading cannot know their risk.

“Not all men” really is the fake right equivalent of the fake left’s “not all immigrants”.

-but most terrorists are foreign, culturally and racially, it’s just un-PC to collect demographic data….. again.

See the pattern?

You’re chasing your tails.

Red-pill statistics can make men look really, really bad. Men have a right to know the likes of rape data, in particular, because they need to know they’re at great risk from other men as well.

Naturally it doesn’t list the latter but they take one step forward in two steps back by collecting male victim data…. only to neglect entirely listing the female. Mathematics in need of context. Society is not just one group, you collect all the data or it’s close to useless. They know this, it’s deliberate. This is intended to bait silly MRAs who won’t even notice it doesn’t mention perp details.

They do make another error in saying Male for Male Victim rape and subsuming the female in an age range.
Piss-poor data entry. I notice everything.

Collect ALL the data or no, we cannot debate it. 

It would entirely become a futile argument of ignorance. 

They know this. Mathematically, you have no data.

Conveniently, they don’t have to change and lower the crime rate (toward zero) if you don’t know how badly they’re doing their job.

5% of the latest reported US crime was rape.
That’s absurdly high for such a specific and brutal crime.
(This is what happens when you don’t keep serial offenders off the streets).
1 in 20 criminal acts was rape. You need all the data, America.

If I hadn’t screencapped this, you probably wouldn’t have believed me.

Irony! The dramatic irony!

Statistically you’re more likely to suffer domestic violence than stranger violence. That is horrifying. You were over twice as likely to get raped as burgled (1.99% in 2016). Do the libertarians care about bodily rights? Statistically they should care twice as much as about burglaries. The average citizen is twice as likely to be raped as generally assaulted, do you consider non-sexual assault a real problem?

You call yourself the First World? Greatest nation on Earth? Please, lead by example.

We’re right there with you. Bring back the standards of civil behavior, the etiquette. Update it, sure, but you do need it back again, what little data you have is starkly apparent in this. Perhaps enshrined in law, to make sure everyone is clear.

Not all- is NOT how statistics work.
Using big words doesn’t make it a debate.
You are not sounding intelligent to anyone who uses their brain.

Demand more data and think for yourselves.

Fellow Westerners are not the enemy. It is those who keep you shrouded in ignorance and wasting your time attending a digital circus of vicious fallacies. Oh but the delivery of their lies is so sweet, right?

Not all (blank) – they cant.

They don’t have to be.

It’s a false equivalence.

Rape doesn’t belong in the First World and neither do hostile foreigners.

Hopefully you can see why they won’t let me near a television camera.

You’re only watching the puppets who never raise real points. You can’t settle real issues in a soundbite or cheeky Youtube clip.

“Boys will be boys” is pathological altruism enabling the psychopathic of the male population against everyone else and sexist infantilisation.


Can this become a meme?

Well done for you waking up.

Welcome to the real world.

Ah, Tyler, who are you?

Nobody ever asks, do they?

Let’s get a conversation going about black genocide, then we can talk about white.

Link: The Litmus Test

Alt light: Multiculturalism is killing us.

Alt right: The liberalism that caused this is killing us.

Alt light: Brown people are the problem.

Alt right: We’re all the sodding problem!

Blue pill: when they do it, it’s evil.

Red pill: it’s evil.

Blue pill: we’re defending the West.

Red pill: what can we do, apart from laugh and cry over a meme stash?

Blue pill: we have the truth.

Red pill: we wish we didn’t have this.

Blue pill: we’re helping.

Red pill: stop fucking. Please, just… stop fucking.

Dear people who fuck everything up: stop.

Chew on this:

If it weren’t for the Sexual Revolution, Rotherham and Co. couldn’t be written off as a series of tiffs with boyfriends. SJWs don’t oppose Rotherham at all because they see it as collateral damage of what they caused, it’s a sign of their power. The culture you help them to maintain. They control men by the dick and you let them. You aren’t “showing them” at all! That’s why they laugh at you!

The world we live in is a direct outcome of how we act. Society is the mass effect of individual choices to virtue or vice. Evil leads to evil.

Why do you think they got so upset when Trump voters said they wouldn’t sleep with them any more? The one genuine threat is ignoring them. The original MGTOWs got this.

By limiting his sexuality to one quality woman, a man is stronger.


What is the cost of being an ugly man?

Since this topic is popping up again, I’ll indulge you a piece of new research.
The cost of being an ugly man?
Yes, K.
The thing you won’t be after reading this.
Remember, if you’re offended, that must mean you’re ugly.

My students often interpret this result as saying that women really care about money, but that is not what it says at all$186,000 is a huge difference in income. If women didn’t care about looks and only cared about money, the figure would be much, much lower. This says that despite the impression that on the marriage market women really care about income, the evidence suggest that they also care about looks. They just care about income too.”

They care about not starving in the street after being abandoned. The fact it’s common this abandonment happens in our time is a bountiful supply of evidence that the fear is just.

Sample bias in the gold diggers versus everyone else. The pool wanting looks is all, the pool willing to overlook Darwinian fitness (good genes, high IQ correlates to good looks) for cash is a minority, and would that minority be faithful? Look at adultery stats, no. So really they do get both, just by lying about the looks thing to secure cash first. Most women are too honest to cheat, so they go right for the looks as long as he’s stable and sane.

Sex should not be confused with breeding. Marrying someone doesn’t mean breeding with them nowadays, in the era of the starter marriage. If they ask non-gold diggers about who they would breed with, in either sex, the number would soar because it’s critical to your baby’s health that they possess good genes.

Which sex invests more metabolically, again?

Ignore the lookism at your peril. Women naturally gravitate toward better-looking men (better genetic fitness) during times of hardship, for multi-layered protection. You want women to give you a chance? Fix the economy.

The manopshere won’t tell you things like this (and without twisting the findings) because they want shekels more than your wellbeing.

The Asian Questions

Off the top of my head, as promised,

  • Have you looked at the torture techniques these people practiced up until very, very recently?

feel free to write on these independently or come up with your own.
I’d be curious about a similar list for Whites. I’m fine with criticism.

  • Is nobody going to mention the fetishes?
  • They move to white universities and white-majority territories, why are they always unhappy with their own kind?
  • How many have ruined ancient Western monuments with scratchings and name carvings like a chav?
  • Without instruction, from baby age up, where would they be? Where’s the initiative? The culture must suppress and control them but how deep does this infantilisation go? Plenty of middle-aged men are under their elderly mother’s thumb, since they’re Matriarchal cultures?
  • Serious attitude angle worked in the media to boost the appearance of intelligence, rampant cheating when they measure themselves versus other races do, plenty of credentialism, really studious but never beyond curriculum (will this be on the exam?) Where is the Asian genius?
  • Care for attaining rank not performing role, tend to outsource and ethics are dodgy (type a country and ‘product scandal’, see what comes up, or ‘Country is selling’). China sells human flesh. They do. You can also buy dolphin and tigers.
  • Western manufacturing standards are laughed at. Why does everything break?
  • They don’t produce any classical art, they only copy and recite like a robot. WTF is that? If we LARPed their culture, we’d be professionally lynched. Burn The King & I.
  • Selecting for obedience doesn’t make for leaders, they lack the MAO genes to be useful in a war. If it weren’t for the staunch ingroup preference, they’d have been outbred or competed long before now.
  • If they’re so smart, why can’t they pool their IQ to make a better academic culture from the ground up?
  • Why do they have an aging population when they like math?
  • I don’t think white people understand just how much Chinese people hate them. They’re just good at hiding it most of the time. Fake smiles are common between LA and Japan. When will America realize the trade deals always favour the House? i.e. inferior grade metals.
  • It isn’t a class thing, it’s a race thing. They have long memories, like Muslims going on about the Crusades, but Opium wars. Why do they seem to have eerily gotten over things like Hiroshima instantly and without a shred of malice?
  • Why is social climbing still seen as the white thing to do?
  • Cool Asian Girl has replaced Cool White Girl and nobody is discussing it. The Cultural Marxists encourage this.
  • Have you noticed how they hate white people but steal our names, move into our cultures (even AFRICA) and breed with our men? Asians are the race that invented invasion, distinguish all of this from that.
  • Christianity has failed there but Islam is thriving, why is this?
  • There’s no distinction between men and women that they don’t force e.g. dress. Why is their sexual dimorphism so low? At least Africans look like adults, and it’s strange that mixed black/white children are criticized as ugly when far worse in the looks stakes are Asian combinations, who look alien-like. Nobody is ever allowed to talk about this. A black/white girl is going to be far, far prettier than an Asian/white hybrid mix. They appear to have worse health but it’s hardly studied e.g. the tendency to obesity seems greatest in this group of all groups.
  • It’s a fine line between love and hatred… about as thin as an alimony check.The Chinese judge their own as inferior to mixed half-whites. Is this purely based on appearance?
  • Why are they cut slack? When they do something wrong, people write it off. It must have been a mistake.. No?
  • When the West(ern Industrialization) from the British Revolution falls, they’ll eat each other. What happens when America stops providing its farming exports, including technology to keep the soil fertile?
  • They eat dogs and calls rice cuisine…. they are the most r-selected by population, over HALF the world and invading Africa. Why does Chinese food have such a great reputation when it’s on the level of a kebab?
  • Well, SE English average IQ is around 102. Highest SE Asian score average is 105. That’s WITH cheating in most cases and extra tuition, they’re maxxed out – plus the social science margin of error is 5% ….
    or 5 points. When the white man tries again, how much farther can we soar past them and what will the reaction be?
  • The worst SJWs are asian because collectivism should be a sin. Many evils are done in its name, see Holodomor, I chose a non-Asian example. Will Asians take over SJWism until it becomes synonymous or try to play both sides?
  • Why are the absolute worst divorce rape stories…. Asian ball-buster Tiger Mom? (Abusive)
  • Anime rips off non-Asian culture because they basically don’t have a history e.g. Yu Gi Oh rips off Egyptians so much I’m shocked the SJW say nothing, there are many Arthurian stories and their character have creepily white features. How much are we supposed to take when those shows are basically extended adverts for toys that you pay for? Why isn’t there a study on anime viewership in children reducing IQ? It might not be the internet or screen technology in general.
  • Why haven’t they evolved lactose tolerance and why continue to use famine chopsticks to draw out the process of eating?
  • There’s no Chinese language, for example, there are many, why isn’t there an efficient superior one? None have special properties to explain the world. They don’t want to evolve.
  • They expect the world to cater to them, why the entitlement?
  • The cultures suppresses the emergence of personality disorders in public but Princess Syndrome and Little Emperor are known problems, looming larger than in the West, suggesting that they’re incapable of K-selection and nobody connects narcissism to Asia, why is nobody studying it?
  • What are the values and principles aside from r-selected large families? …Anyone? They seem curiously blank, like a Mah Jongg tile.

I may add to this as inspiration strikes.

If you want a prompt, these redpilling questions can usually be pre-empted by

I just think it’s funny that-