Edit This Page


FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.17 beta
This feature is currently in a beta state, meaning:

  • The version names contain beta (e.g. v2beta3).

EndpointSlices provide a simple way to track network endpoints within a Kubernetes cluster. They offer a more scalable and extensible alternative to Endpoints.

EndpointSlice resources

In Kubernetes, an EndpointSlice contains references to a set of network endpoints. The EndpointSlice controller automatically creates EndpointSlices for a Kubernetes Service when a selectorAllows users to filter a list of resources based on labels. is specified. These EndpointSlices will include references to any Pods that match the Service selector. EndpointSlices group network endpoints together by unique Service and Port combinations.

As an example, here’s a sample EndpointSlice resource for the example Kubernetes Service.

kind: EndpointSlice
  name: example-abc
  labels: example
addressType: IPv4
  - name: http
    protocol: TCP
    port: 80
  - addresses:
      - ""
      ready: true
    hostname: pod-1
    topology: node-1 us-west2-a

By default, EndpointSlices managed by the EndpointSlice controller will have no more than 100 endpoints each. Below this scale, EndpointSlices should map 1:1 with Endpoints and Services and have similar performance.

EndpointSlices can act as the source of truth for kube-proxy when it comes to how to route internal traffic. When enabled, they should provide a performance improvement for services with large numbers of endpoints.

Address Types

EndpointSlices support three address types:

  • IPv4
  • IPv6
  • FQDN (Fully Qualified Domain Name)


Each endpoint within an EndpointSlice can contain relevant topology information. This is used to indicate where an endpoint is, containing information about the corresponding Node, zone, and region. When the values are available, the following Topology labels will be set by the EndpointSlice controller:

  • - The name of the Node this endpoint is on.
  • - The zone this endpoint is in.
  • - The region this endpoint is in.

The values of these labels are derived from resources associated with each endpoint in a slice. The hostname label represents the value of the NodeName field on the corresponding Pod. The zone and region labels represent the value of the labels with the same names on the corresponding Node.


By default, EndpointSlices are created and managed by the EndpointSlice controller. There are a variety of other use cases for EndpointSlices, such as service mesh implementations, that could result in other entities or controllers managing additional sets of EndpointSlices. To ensure that multiple entities can manage EndpointSlices without interfering with each other, a label is used to indicate the entity managing an EndpointSlice. The EndpointSlice controller sets as the value for this label on all EndpointSlices it manages. Other entities managing EndpointSlices should also set a unique value for this label.


In most use cases, EndpointSlices will be owned by the Service that it tracks endpoints for. This is indicated by an owner reference on each EndpointSlice as well as a label that enables simple lookups of all EndpointSlices belonging to a Service.

EndpointSlice Controller

The EndpointSlice controller watches Services and Pods to ensure corresponding EndpointSlices are up to date. The controller will manage EndpointSlices for every Service with a selector specified. These will represent the IPs of Pods matching the Service selector.

Size of EndpointSlices

By default, EndpointSlices are limited to a size of 100 endpoints each. You can configure this with the --max-endpoints-per-slice kube-controller-managerControl Plane component that runs controller processes. flag up to a maximum of 1000.

Distribution of EndpointSlices

Each EndpointSlice has a set of ports that applies to all endpoints within the resource. When named ports are used for a Service, Pods may end up with different target port numbers for the same named port, requiring different EndpointSlices. This is similar to the logic behind how subsets are grouped with Endpoints.

The controller tries to fill EndpointSlices as full as possible, but does not actively rebalance them. The logic of the controller is fairly straightforward:

  1. Iterate through existing EndpointSlices, remove endpoints that are no longer desired and update matching endpoints that have changed.
  2. Iterate through EndpointSlices that have been modified in the first step and fill them up with any new endpoints needed.
  3. If there’s still new endpoints left to add, try to fit them into a previously unchanged slice and/or create new ones.

Importantly, the third step prioritizes limiting EndpointSlice updates over a perfectly full distribution of EndpointSlices. As an example, if there are 10 new endpoints to add and 2 EndpointSlices with room for 5 more endpoints each, this approach will create a new EndpointSlice instead of filling up the 2 existing EndpointSlices. In other words, a single EndpointSlice creation is preferrable to multiple EndpointSlice updates.

With kube-proxy running on each Node and watching EndpointSlices, every change to an EndpointSlice becomes relatively expensive since it will be transmitted to every Node in the cluster. This approach is intended to limit the number of changes that need to be sent to every Node, even if it may result with multiple EndpointSlices that are not full.

In practice, this less than ideal distribution should be rare. Most changes processed by the EndpointSlice controller will be small enough to fit in an existing EndpointSlice, and if not, a new EndpointSlice is likely going to be necessary soon anyway. Rolling updates of Deployments also provide a natural repacking of EndpointSlices with all pods and their corresponding endpoints getting replaced.


The Endpoints API has provided a simple and straightforward way of tracking network endpoints in Kubernetes. Unfortunately as Kubernetes clusters and Services have gotten larger, limitations of that API became more visible. Most notably, those included challenges with scaling to larger numbers of network endpoints.

Since all network endpoints for a Service were stored in a single Endpoints resource, those resources could get quite large. That affected the performance of Kubernetes components (notably the master control plane) and resulted in significant amounts of network traffic and processing when Endpoints changed. EndpointSlices help you mitigate those issues as well as provide an extensible platform for additional features such as topological routing.

What's next