NZ criticised in wake of Christchurch terror attack for not recording hate crimes



That's because, unlike many Western countries including the UK and the US, New Zealand's government keeps no comprehensive record of hate crimes, failing to act on requests to do so from local and international agencies spanning more than a decade.

"For many years our view has consistently been that this needs to be prioritised and implemented urgently," said Janet Anderson-Bidois, Chief Legal Adviser at the Human Rights Commission, the independent government agency tasked with protecting human rights.

"It is imperative that we have good data."

An Australian has been charged with murder over the Christchurch shootings and will appear in court again on April 5.


Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has ordered a Royal Commission into the attack.



"When there is a hot spot in global events and when Muslims are involved...we do see the pulse of hate crime coming from certain members of the community," he said.

Joris De Bres, New Zealand's Race Relations Commissioner between 2002 and 2013, said he was alarmed at signs of an uptick in threats against Muslims when he took up the role soon after the 9/11 attacks in the US.



"I listed it every year...I wrote at various points to government about it and it was simply said that it wasn't necessary and it wasn't a priority," De Bres said.



The faces of the victims of the Christchurch terror attack
The faces of the victims of the Christchurch terror attack

"Understanding the scale, extent, and location of hate crimes is essential and is a prerequisite to ensuring adequate resources are available to address the issue," the briefing said.



"We are engaged in ongoing conversations with community leaders and representatives about a range of issues, including how police record allegations of hate crime and crimes of prejudice," said a police spokesperson via email.


"There are hate speech laws in the Human Rights Act, but whether data should be collected is an operational matter for Police," a spokeswoman said by email.

New Zealand has had no previous extremist mass attacks, unlike Australia, but civil society members say an underbelly of racism has always existed and may have been escalating.


Anjum Rahman from the Islamic Women's Council of New Zealand said the group had repeatedly alerted the government over the past five years about the rise of the extreme right and the growing threat Muslim women felt in New Zealand.

"Without the data, without the measurement it's really hard to push for change...I feel like it wasn't taken seriously because it wasn't hard data because we didn't have it," she said, adding she felt "a resistance to creating that data."

One-in-10 New Zealand adults have experienced hate speech online according to a 2018 study by internet safety organisation Netsafe, with people of Asian descent or who identified as 'other' ethnicity most affected.

Since 2002, a law has specified judges should take hostility towards a group of people with a "common characteristic", such as race or religion, into account when sentencing. A Reuters review of sentencing records found 22 such cases since 2002, most with a racial motive.


The Human Rights Commission said it received 417 complaints relating to race in 2018, up from 350 in 2014. Those included 63 complaints of "racial disharmony", which includes hate speech, a 26 per cent jump from four years earlier.

Politician Golriz Ghahraman, a former human rights lawyer who was born in Iran and came to New Zealand as a child refugee, said she had received death threats and xenophobia including being called a "terrorist" and "Jihadist" online.

Before the Christchurch attacks, most of the public had felt safe, she said.   "Minorities didn't, but no one was listening to them."     


Contact Newshub with your story tips: