/tech/ - Technology

Buffer overflow

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Drawing x size canvas

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom

Expand All Images

Blockchan Anonymous 09/20/2019 (Fri) 14:27:28 [Preview] No. 13645
BlockChan: The Uncensorable Image Board

- Blockchan runs on XRP + IPFS
- We are immutable, indestructible, uncensorable
- Host a decentralized federated node in under 5 mins: https://github.com/ndm-inf/BlockChan
- High level recruits wanted!

https://blockchan.link - https://blockchan.ca

Anonymous 09/20/2019 (Fri) 14:30:04 [Preview] No.13646 del
(295.10 KB 600x523 blockchan.png)

sage sage 09/22/2019 (Sun) 21:39:41 [Preview] No.13677 del
(1.69 MB 256x256 blacksun.gif)
Just what the Internet needs: yet another clearnet pol chan.

Anonymous 09/22/2019 (Sun) 22:12:50 [Preview] No.13679 del
I like it but the 4 mg file size limit is really gay.

Anonymous 09/26/2019 (Thu) 15:34:15 [Preview] No.13696 del
And why not? Clearnet is easily accessed by the uninitiated, but this one is decentralized and uncensorable. It's also not only /pol/.

sage sage 09/27/2019 (Fri) 20:36:32 [Preview] No.13701 del
(27.27 KB 343x215 NO_fuck_off.jpg)

Anonymous 09/30/2019 (Mon) 10:59:01 [Preview] No.13704 del
Bad slogan, but /leftycuck/ is also trying to fuck around, so you know what? game on!

Anonymous 10/03/2019 (Thu) 03:40:40 [Preview] No.13729 del
(29.43 KB 426x341 wipe_sweat.jpg)
Unironically, this is the most interesting thing to happen to Image Board technology in like 10+ years. We should be applauding these efforts fags.

Anonymous 10/03/2019 (Thu) 03:47:51 [Preview] No.13730 del
(225.01 KB 390x269 fine.gif)

Anonymous 10/03/2019 (Thu) 07:54:07 [Preview] No.13734 del
> Relying on XRP
> Not even have multiple blockchain support
At least be diverse

Anonymous 10/03/2019 (Thu) 08:43:47 [Preview] No.13735 del
(898.03 KB 1440x607 LojQWQH.png)
>High level recruits wanted!
This negro

Anonymous 10/03/2019 (Thu) 20:38:26 [Preview] No.13739 del
Nah. They blew that. If you want to roll something cool out, you can't slap a fucking swastika on it and expect it to be anything but that.

Anonymous 10/05/2019 (Sat) 10:54:10 [Preview] No.13748 del
imageboards are supposed to be centralized (centralized as in all-in-one-place centralized) and ephemereal

not decentralized and permanent

am i wrong?

Anonymous 10/05/2019 (Sat) 11:02:04 [Preview] No.13749 del
Bost your reasoning.

Anonymous 10/05/2019 (Sat) 11:18:28 [Preview] No.13750 del
text boards and imageboards by inheritance are intended to constantly FIFO varying threads

i'm thinking of organizing a massive "all-in-one" imageboard with no "boards" or topics

Anonymous 10/05/2019 (Sat) 13:53:45 [Preview] No.13752 del
wrong, it is the most "unpopular" or "uncontroversial" (not bumped) that gets deleted or archived (slid).
> no boards
bad design, boards are made for people to stay in topic and organize.

Anonymous 10/05/2019 (Sat) 14:43:27 [Preview] No.13753 del
technically it is FIFO but whatever

>no boards is bad design
1. that is just your opinion
2. so what

Anonymous 10/05/2019 (Sat) 22:51:57 [Preview] No.13755 del

Anonymous 10/07/2019 (Mon) 09:13:42 [Preview] No.13778 del
so to add to this >>13748
perhaps unifying them should be a priority

is there a project out there that's trying to do that? does vichan do that?

Anonymous 10/07/2019 (Mon) 10:18:58 [Preview] No.13780 del
that is what nntpchan tried to do, unify all the fragments into one network. it doesn't work because the islands don't want to give up their control over their users. imageboard admins usually have a huge ego and power complex.

Anonymous 10/10/2019 (Thu) 04:12:12 [Preview] No.13804 del
nntpchan was/is great technology-wise. What killed it for me was that any thread I created or contributed to eventually wound up with "niggers niggers niggers" and "who's behind that post?" and "kys idiot! it's da jooz!" until I gave up. It's the culture of a board that brings and keeps users, not the tech. nntpchan couldn't really be anything else because that was the culture of its creators and maintainers. I think they were even aware of it and tried on various occasions to be more... whatever, fuck i dunno.

Anonymous 10/10/2019 (Thu) 15:33:14 [Preview] No.13805 del
I will say this - like attracts like. And if you can't handle /pol/ you are basically abandoning the core group of which the software is built for.
Assuming you are not a newfag that is. If so I would recommend DuckDuckGo-ing "pol reading list" and do some academic reading first, that is all.

Anonymous 10/11/2019 (Fri) 03:38:11 [Preview] No.13806 del
People are just generally attached to some form of consensus or notion of truth, which polarization occurs from plurality since it is counterintuitive and necessitatively false to assert pluralism as truth, while people who run certain instances have their own notions of truth so they deviate from other instances. This is how the "fediverse" became its own enemy, censoring others within the network by consensus first, by paranoia second. Something made to combat paranoia ends up breeding it. Something made to unify two divergent systems ends up becoming the third divergent system. Fragmentation and the illusion of choice of what's fundamentally flawed is typical of human behavior to secularize and deviate from the original to the point beyond recognition, speciates into its microcosm. A deeper, more fundamental change needs to happen concerning these attempts of reestablishing order from entropy that would resist decay for at least 30 or so years by studying what worked and failed 30 or so years ago in the past.

Anonymous 10/11/2019 (Fri) 07:42:27 [Preview] No.13807 del
pol is a cesspool of racism and hate. The original nntp sure wasn't built for that, and as for being a newfag, I was using nntp when canter and siegel sent their original green card spam. You can ddg that if you don't know what it is.

If nntpchan was designed for the "pol core group" as you say, then yep, that's what they'll get, just like blockchan. In my experience, however, Psi and a few others seemed to want users and they would occasionally try for less kys and nigger nigger nigger to encourage the oc creators and keep them around before drifting back to swastikaville and wondering why nobody who wasn't a seig heiler didn't seem to hang out for very long. Am I wrong?

The key point is that if you slap swastikas on technology then you brand it with that and you cannot later say "Hey, let's try something to bring more varied users in" and expect it to work. A board's content is its best advertisement.

Nobody deleted stuff I posted. It always propagated and settled somewhere. That wasn't the problem. nntpchan failed to establish a consistent thriving user base because it emitted a constant racists-only vibe. For non-haters, that shit eventually wears you out. nntp worked because there was no inherent generalizd bias across the entire thing. nntp was apolitical. It was agnostic.

Anonymous 10/12/2019 (Sat) 15:25:23 [Preview] No.13809 del
I think we have a liberal on the loose. If you can't handle the banter and debate with a level head... I don't think imageboards in general will suit you.

Anonymous 10/14/2019 (Mon) 15:21:00 [Preview] No.13830 del
nntpchan wasn't really designed for /pol/, it just had free speech like most imageboards. the main worry that I remember people having was someone posting CP.

Since there weren't really any long term clearnet nodes it was hard for new users to find. The other thing that seems to help websites get users is a topic. 4chan was founded for anime discussion, for example.

Anonymous 10/14/2019 (Mon) 15:32:11 [Preview] No.13831 del
dose any one have an i2p link to this please

Anonymous 10/14/2019 (Mon) 15:39:13 [Preview] No.13832 del
Sounds to me like we've got a retard on the loose. I'll try to spoonfeed the key "debate" point from post 13807 to you:

nntp protocol just underlying protocol, no inherent bias. That why work 30 year. Brand new foundational tech with swastikas stupid, unnecessary, pointless, and self-defeat.

Hope that helps you with reading comprehension and formulation of a response! It's okay if you got nuthin' but coming up with a name to call me though. I understand. :)

Anonymous 10/14/2019 (Mon) 15:52:30 [Preview] No.13833 del
i dont think he cares

Anonymous 10/16/2019 (Wed) 10:22:30 [Preview] No.13839 del
Here is the thing, brother: It does not matter what technology we are using, what matters is the community of which it fosters.
If you don't want a "Free Speech Platform" please just go back to Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Reddit, there are millions waiting for you.
The reason why people are moving from F.Y.T.R. to Gab, Voat, Bitchute and *chan is because they can tolerate "Free Speech" i.e. /pol/.
The price you pay for avoiding /pol/ is government-corporate spying (see ADL and SPLC), data mining (adverts) and heavy censorship (ala GamerGate).
If you are going to act like a tankie all day and want to de-platform people, someday you yourself will be de-platformed.

Anonymous 10/18/2019 (Fri) 02:23:34 [Preview] No.13842 del
(319.84 KB 255x255 autism9001.gif)
/pol/ is his entire world

Anonymous 10/19/2019 (Sat) 00:05:33 [Preview] No.13843 del
>hate, racism, hitler, swastika, repeat cycle
You have to slow down on TV my brother, the narrative is starting to take control of your mind, please do not go gentle into that good night.

As the brother have said to you, take that reading list on the chin, if you can't handle the most intelligent minds of all time saying to you that race matters and jews are so much of a problem that they devised a surname to handle them, the Jewish Question, well I guess you are a ticking-time-bomb, you just don't know yet. Good luck though.

BTW, I liked BlockChan motives and initiative, at least they have the courage to let it out in the open what they expect instead of just luring people to be disappointed. Every free place will devise into /pol/, you can't debate nature.

Anonymous 10/19/2019 (Sat) 00:35:25 [Preview] No.13844 del

Anonymous 10/19/2019 (Sat) 00:45:57 [Preview] No.13845 del
accidentally hit reply
Christopher Langan is a moron and a fool who can't logically refute Taleb and many others on the utter failure that IQ tests has been in measuring intelligence, which those who give credance to it are those who have everything to lose when people don't care about IQ at its very foundation is a socially based construct held by society as to what values are held in that society. https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2019/10/06/knowledge-culture-logic-and-iq/

betamax Board owner 10/19/2019 (Sat) 01:27:25 [Preview] No.13846 del
This thread is off topic, bitch about it in the containment thread >>13819

Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply