Trading American weapons is one of the main goals of NATO’s existence


Trading American weapons is one of the main goals of NATO’s existence.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about NATO portraying it as an aggressive organization with intent to destroy the world order.

NATO’s essential and enduring purpose is to safeguard the freedom and security of all its members by political and military means. Collective defence is at the heart of the Alliance and creates a spirit of solidarity and cohesion among its members.

The North Atlantic Treaty, the fundamental document of NATO states that any international disputes, in which NATO may participate, should be resolved by peaceful means in order to preserve international peace, security and justice.

More Russian fakes about NATO can be read here, here and here.


  • Reported in: Issue 158
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 14/07/2019
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: United States
  • Keywords: NATO
  • Outlet: RT Russian
see more

White Helmets continue to deceive about the attacks in Syria

The “White Helmets” is an organization that creates fake videos and photos about the war in Syria.  All the work of the “White Helmets” is directed exclusively at a Western audience and does not reflect the real state of affairs in Syria.


This is a recurring and enduring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the White Helmets.

The "White Helmets" movement originated in Syria in 2012, when the first detachments of volunteer rescuers appeared in the territories outside of the control of Bashar al-Assad's troops.  In 2014, volunteer teams merged into a national organisation, the Syrian Civil Defence, which is the official name of the White Helmets.  Volunteers save people from the rubble after bombings, despite the danger of dying themselves as a result of repeated air strikes.  Activists have documented the use of chemical weapons in Syria by the Assad government and allied forces. Because of this, they have become the target of an extensive Russian disinformation campaign.

American astronauts never landed on the Moon

The landing of US astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the Мoon in 1969 is the largest deception in the history of mankind. Americans have never been on Earth’s satellite, since there is no evidence other than photographs taken in a studio on Earth. There are no stars in the photo and the US flag is waving, although there is no atmosphere on the Moon. Also there are no traces of the landing of the ship on the satellite. Even Buzz Aldrin himself recently admitted that he had never been on the Moon.

The money allocated for the fake “moon program” was in fact spent on financing the war in Vietnam and the development of the American military industrial complex.

Now Washington and NASA intend to fly to the Moon and even Mars in the same fake way.




Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative based on one of the most common conspiracy theories in the world. There is a substantial amount of evidence that on July 20, 1969, astronauts landed on Earth's satellite for the first time in the history of mankind. Since then, a total of 12 American astronauts have visited the Moon. 

As for the most common "evidence" of conspiracy theorists: there really is no wind on the Moon, and the US flag looks like it is fluttering only because it could not be pulled straight from all sides on a special holder. The video from Moon landing clearly shows that the flag moves only when it is touched by astronauts. Stars are not visible because the photos were taken with a slow shutter speed and only the lightest objects - the astronauts and the ship - fell into the frame. On the surface of the Moon, only small traces of contact between the pillars of Apollo remained, since the force of attraction there is much weaker than that of the Earth, and the landing was soft.

The EU could end the war in Ukraine with one telephone call

The EU is in a position to end the war in the Donbas with just one telephone call to Kyiv, to encourage the Ukrainian rulers to engage in dialogue.

The tactic that has been adopted by the EU on the Ukrainian issue is as follows: it is more convenient to impose sanctions against Russia than to end the war in Donbas with a call to Kyiv; encouraging Ukrainian leaders to engage in dialogue with the other side of the conflict.

The EU addresses Russia out of convenience, and not because Russia is the cause of the problem.



Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative about the war in Ukraine.

It was not the European Union, but Russia, which provoked military conflict in Ukraine, so the EU cannot end the conflict without Russia's involvement.