[rust] Fix and test dylib support

Rust dylibs are handled pretty much exactly like rlibs. Like rlibs,
they embed Rust metadata which is used by the compiler when building
dependencies. This is a bit awkward to express in GN given that they
have a shared_library target type, whereas rlibs have their own target

Bug: fuchsia:59286
Change-Id: I300163bae8327bc9328c785a4b9033511bfbdebc
Reviewed-on: https://gn-review.googlesource.com/c/gn/+/10800
Commit-Queue: Tyler Mandry <tmandry@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Hosek <phosek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Brittain <bwb@google.com>
8 files changed
tree: 9b5f9bf99876cf1d59b44818fc741090097a22a6
  1. build/
  2. docs/
  3. examples/
  4. infra/
  5. misc/
  6. src/
  7. tools/
  8. .clang-format
  9. .editorconfig
  10. .gitignore
  11. .style.yapf
  14. OWNERS
  15. README.md



Related resources:

What GN is for

GN is currently used as the build system for Chromium, Fuchsia, and related projects. Some strengths of GN are:

  • It is designed for large projects and large teams. It scales efficiently to many thousands of build files and tens of thousands of source files.

  • It has a readable, clean syntax. Once a build is set-up, it is generally easy for people with no backround in GN to make basic edits to the build.

  • It is designed for multi-platform projects. It can cleanly express many complicated build variants across different platforms. A single build invocation can target multiple platforms.

  • It supports multiple parallel output directories, each with their own configuration. This allows a developer to maintain builds targeting debug, release, or different platforms in parallel without forced rebuilds when switching.

  • It has a focus on correctness. GN checks for the correct dependencies, inputs, and outputs to the extent possible, and has a number of tools to allow developers to ensure the build evolves as desired (for example, gn check, testonly, assert_no_deps).

  • It has comprehensive build-in help available from the command-line.

Although small projects successfully use GN, the focus on large projects has some disadvanages:

  • GN has the goal of being minimally expressive. Although it can be quite flexible, a design goal is to direct members of a large team (who may not have much knowledge about the build) down an easy-to-understand, well-lit path. This isn't necessarily the correct trade-off for smaller projects.

  • The minimal build configuration is relatively heavyweight. There are several files required and the exact way all compilers are linkers are run must be specified in the configuration (see “Examples” below). There is no default compiler configuration.

  • It is not easily composable. GN is designed to compile a single large project with relatively uniform settings and rules. Projects like Chromium do bring together multiple repositories from multiple teams, but the projects must agree on some conventions in the build files to allow this to work.

  • GN is designed with the expectation that the developers building a project want to compile an identical configuration. So while builds can integrate with the user‘s environment like the CXX and CFLAGS variables if they want, this is not the default and most project’s builds do not do this. The result is that many GN projects do not integrate well with other systems like ebuild.

  • There is no simple release scheme (see “Versioning and distribution” below). Projects are expected to manage the version of GN they require. Getting an appropriate GN binary can be a hurdle for new contributors to a project. Since it is relatively uncommon, it can be more difficult to find information and examples.

GN can generate Ninja build files for C, C++, Rust, Objective C, and Swift source on most popular platforms. Other languages can be compiled using the general “action” rules which are executed by Python or another scripting language (Google does this to compile Java and Go). But because this is not as clean, generally GN is only used when the bulk of the build is in one of the main built-in languages.

Getting a binary

You can download the latest version of GN binary for Linux, macOS and Windows from Google's build infrastructure (see “Versioning and distribution” below for how this is expected to work).

Alternatively, you can build GN from source with a C++17 compiler:

git clone https://gn.googlesource.com/gn
cd gn
python build/gen.py
ninja -C out
# To run tests:






cd examples/simple_build
ninja -C out

For a maximal configuration see the Chromium setup:

and the Fuchsia setup:

Reporting bugs


Sending patches


Register at https://gn-review.googlesource.com.

... edit code ...
ninja -C out && out/gn_unittests

Then, to upload a change for review:

git commit
git push origin HEAD:refs/for/main


When revising a change, use:

git commit --amend
git push origin HEAD:refs/for/main





Versioning and distribution

Most open-source projects are designed to use the developer‘s computer’s current toolchain such as compiler, linker, and build tool. But the large centrally controlled projects that GN is designed for typically want a more hermetic environment. They will ensure that developers are using a specific compatible toolchain that is versioned with the code

As a result, GN expects that the project choose the appropriate version of GN that will work with each version of the project. There is no “current stable version” of GN that is expected to work for all projects.

As a result, the GN developers to not maintain any packages in any of the various packaging systems (Debian, RedHat, HomeBrew, etc.). Some of these systems to have GN packages, but they are maintained by third parties and you should use at your own risk. Instead, we recommend you refer your checkout tooling to download binaries for a specific hash from Google's build infrastructure or compile your own.

GN does not guarantee the backwards-compatibility of new versions and has no branches or versioning scheme beyond the sequence of commits to the main git branch (which is expected to be stable).

In practice, however, GN is very backwards-compatible. The core functionality has been stable for many years and there is enough GN code at Google alone to make non-backwards-compatible changes very difficult, even if they were desirable.

There have been discussions about adding a versioning scheme with some guarantees about backwards-compatibility, but nothing has yet been implemented.