Chevron Left
返回到 AWS Fundamentals: Addressing Security Risk

學生對 亚马逊网络服务系统 提供的 AWS Fundamentals: Addressing Security Risk 的評價和反饋

2,904 個評分











526 - AWS Fundamentals: Addressing Security Risk 的 550 個評論（共 563 個）

創建者 Vincent C


E​xposed you with the needed security topics. Could use some improvement on explanation of the details

創建者 Ferran G P


The content is interesting but I would be interesting to have the opportunity to do some exercises.

創建者 Mazen A K


The girl's accent was not clear to me, I was struggling to understand most of her videos



Overall course was satisfactory. Hands on practice would have been a better experience.

創建者 Avishka A


Content is not the best and lacks visual representations of what is being presented.

創建者 Анисимов А С


The course is dry. The lack of tasks and even quizzes was very frustrating.



the course in itself is good, but the instructors are super annoying.

創建者 annamaria


course not so clear, concepts are not explained in a appropriate way



This course needs more contents in readings section and some lab

創建者 Nicolas B G


The course need virtual labs like google cloud has with qwiklabs

創建者 MD


Too much of technical jargon without appropriate explanation.

創建者 Gabor B


It would be nice to have demos with more meaningful examples.

創建者 Токарь И А


Не настолько легог в восприятии как перый курс из программы

創建者 swapnil a


Nice course but more demo assignment should be added....

創建者 Jorge O G G


Sería mejor si hubiera un parte práctica.

創建者 Sagar L


okay okay

創建者 Michał K


It was very high-level and I learned very little from it. AWS Cloud Technical Essentials course had a great lab to work on,  and this one didn't contain any practical assignment. Instructors tried to be funny, but their sense of humor was childish and very cringe-worthy - not something I would expect out of a technical course. The whole idea of explaining services in "bees on Mars" context was ridiculous and made it harder to understand the topic. Referencing some real-life projects would be much more helpful. Many times the quiz questions were not in line with training materials. I found some typos and outdated information. Also, Hong has a very strong accent, and while I didn't have much problem understanding her, it was still a struggle to listen to her. Even the subtitles were wrong a lot of times when she was speaking (I'm guessing they were autogenerated). If you want to pay specifically for this course, you really should reconsider, as this is a big waste of time and money. The instructors were constantly saying to check out the public AWS training materials and whitepapers to get a better understanding of the topic discussed in the video - and to be honest, without those links you won't learn much... except for cheesy jokes.

創建者 James D


By trying to be funny, the instructors were over-the-top corny which made the course ever so annoying. I couldn't wait to complete this course as it is a part of a specialization I seek. Further, one of the instructors (Hong) was incredibly difficult to understand. While she may be bright, her accent made it very difficult to comprehend what she was sayiing.

創建者 Nick M


The first AWS course in the AWS Fundamentals specialization was really interesting. But the AWS Fundamentals: Addressing Security Risk was terrible. It felt as if the instructors were just reading out the descriptions of these services.

創建者 Kristiyan D


It was hard to undertand some of the speakers without subtitels. The topics in the videos covers really poorly the tests. I found 20% of this course to be actualyl useful.

創建者 Jagruti K


Very short videos but lots of concept. This course seriously needs to be update. There is a lot to grasp but very short explanation in video.

創建者 Gabriele B


I have quite the sensation that this course is just the readed intros of the AWS product for security...



just average ,i didnt like it at all ,the previous course aws cloud native was exceptionally good

創建者 udhav c


the Vietnamese accent is difficult to understand

創建者 Dario M


nice but basic without much generic theory