clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Open Gameday Thread, 3/9

New, comments

From Sports Illustrated (and pointed out by King Kaufman):

It's hard to imagine that Bonds' presence could do more for a new club than his absence has done for his old one.
I wonder what it would take to validate the Bonds-hurts-his-team theory? If the Giants win just as many games as last year, does that mean the loss of production was made up for by increased chemistry?