<p dir="auto">When trying out Atom 1.0, I was totally digging it until I went to the command line and tried:</p>
<div class="snippet-clipboard-content notranslate position-relative overflow-auto" data-snippet-clipboard-copy-content="ls | atom"><pre class="notranslate"><code class="notranslate">ls | atom
</code></pre></div>
<p dir="auto">And I got a blank document.  After some searching I found this <a href="https://discuss.atom.io/t/it-would-be-nice-to-be-able-to-pipe-standard-out-to-atom-and-have-it-open-in-an-unsaved-document/4781" rel="nofollow">discussion thread</a>.  Seems that a lot of folks would like this and for me, it is part of my daily workflow.</p>
<p dir="auto">I searched the issues and pull requests here and couldn't find an issue for this, but please close if this topic has already come and gone.</p>
<p dir="auto">Cheers and thanks!</p>
<p dir="auto">support/4aa96dda9fd511e3961e21f79eba7c86</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">It'd be nice if piping input into atom were possible.<br>
<code class="notranslate">git diff | atom</code><br>
Right now this seems to open a second instance of Atom that immediately closes. The data goes nowhere.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">This probably belongs in the feature-request arena, but also seems like something to keep track of here. Personally, I think this would be great to have. 🍩</p>
<p dir="auto">Other reports:</p>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>support/e9fab3a2a94a11e39ef7d68ca2b55878</li>
<li>support/ddc261f2a5df11e39bf33f35dc393db2</li>
</ul>