Datasets:

---

Ramitha

/

sl-results-40-mistral-self

like 0

"What was the Petitioner's claim regarding his suspension and subsequent demobilization in the Supre(...TRUNCATED)

"In the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010, the Petitioner, Ekanayake Udaya Kumara Eka(...TRUNCATED)

"services were suspended on 06.03.1999 on an incident of shooting, where the Petitioner alleged, tha(...TRUNCATED)

"The Petitioner in the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010 claimed that his services we(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the reason given by the 3rd Respondent in the letter dated April 25, 2009, for demobilizin(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the snippet, the reason given by the 3rd Respondent in the letter dated April (...TRUNCATED)

"What were the grounds for the Petitioner's demobilization and removal from the enrollment list on M(...TRUNCATED)

"The grounds for the Petitioner's demobilization and removal from the enrollment list on March 24, 2(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What was the basis of the Petitioner's Supreme Court application in SC/FR/Application(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nThe basis of the Petitioner's Supreme Court application in SC/FR/Application No 412/2009(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the Petitioner, his suspension and subsequent demobilization were in violation(...TRUNCATED)

"The petitioner claimed that he was falsely implicated in a shooting incident and was suspended. Aft(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: \"The Petitioner alleged that he was falsely implicated in an incident of shooting and was (...TRUNCATED)

"[2.7709121704101562, 0.7668946981430054, 1.0915045738220215, -0.3064374327659607, 2.902823448181152(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.813631296157837, 0.3998943269252777, -0.24464191496372223, 0.3380472660064697, 3.967390775680542(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.8102317452430725, 1.7455753087997437, -0.6149107217788696, -1.30384361743927, 3.9251441955566406(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.712554693222046, -0.6427655816078186, 1.0816714763641357, -0.5215374231338501, 3.892148494720459(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.921628952026367, 0.7925076484680176, 1.010780692100525, -1.017400860786438, 3.456202507019043, -(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.8483364582061768, 1.1144145727157593, 0.11180075258016586, -0.7212181091308594, 2.52215194702148(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.640984535217285, -0.3892313241958618, -0.4788110554218292, -1.3329498767852783, 2.10238623619079(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.1884734630584717, -0.1338784098625183, 0.7105703949928284, -1.0565911531448364, 1.40905654430389(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.022986888885498, -0.47583243250846863, 0.8103837370872498, -0.9370884895324707, 4.85114002227783(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.901972770690918, -0.09254065155982971, 0.8786465525627136, -1.9776852130889893, 0.69575947523117(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.617764472961426, -0.962127685546875, 0.9909602403640747, -0.5914303660392761, 2.7599995136260986(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.049391984939575, -1.6914348602294922, 0.22431696951389313, 0.1962553709745407, 3.581763505935669(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.797466516494751, -1.231181025505066, 1.4768726825714111, -1.4829097986221313, 2.761399507522583,(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2(...TRUNCATED)

"The questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2011 were: (...TRUNCATED)

"IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA SC Appeal No. 44/2011 E.P.A.(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, there is no explicit mention of the questions of law for which leave(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the judgment of the High Court of Ampara in the case of E.P.A. Premasundara vs Seemasahith(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The judgment of the High Court of Ampara in the case of E.P.A. Premasundara vs Seemasahitha(...TRUNCATED)

"In SC Appeal No. 44/2011, the legal issue is whether the respondent's leave to appeal against the j(...TRUNCATED)

"The provided text does not specify the questions of law that were the subject of leave to appeal in(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in SC Appeal No. 44/2011 are:\n\(...TRUNCATED)

"In SC Appeal No. 44/2011, the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted were whether t(...TRUNCATED)

"The provided text does not specify the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in th(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.668245792388916, 1.9506795406341553, -0.2955102026462555, -0.57252037525177, 0.14052772521972656(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.37964072823524475, 4.311244964599609, -1.8652290105819702, -1.7932164669036865, 2.33788776397705(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.5645225644111633, 3.231071710586548, -1.6539479494094849, -1.2607285976409912, 2.01615047454834,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.2248668670654297, 0.158525750041008, -1.1743484735488892, -1.553755760192871, 1.9516850709915161(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.702627420425415, 2.1113440990448, -0.18326938152313232, -0.9967041611671448, 1.5282666683197021,(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.5933823585510254, 1.673380970954895, -0.1882643699645996, -2.7519633769989014, 1.334901213645935(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.15140996873378754, 5.567068576812744, -0.09142845124006271, -3.115417957305908, 0.41295394301414(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.5268735885620117, 2.4654455184936523, -1.1106677055358887, -2.2097396850585938, 2.67357325553894(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.30546894669532776, 2.752509832382202, -0.2080574482679367, -1.1273059844970703, 2.92083573341369(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.5581105351448059, 4.540900230407715, 0.17631025612354279, -3.9271903038024902, -0.0174773018807(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.7432382106781006, 1.7849302291870117, -1.3214088678359985, -2.01318097114563, 2.6102888584136963(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.834442377090454, 1.4034428596496582, -0.42719629406929016, -1.2613567113876343, 2.23671555519104(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.22521710395813, 1.926895260810852, -1.3542574644088745, -0.23595258593559265, 2.491783618927002,(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016(...TRUNCATED)

"In Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016, the Supreme Court addressed the following key legal issues: (...TRUNCATED)

"1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 S.C(...TRUNCATED)

"The key legal issues addressed in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016, as identified from the provid(...TRUNCATED)

"What are the legal grounds for the appeals filed by Nadaraja Rajendra and Thevathasan Sritharan in (...TRUNCATED)

"legal grounds for the appeals filed by Nadaraja Rajendra and Thevathasan Sritharan in Case Number S(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case involving Nadaraja Rajendra and Thevathasan Sritharan, the legal issues addressed inclu(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What legal issues are addressed in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016, as identified (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The provided text does not describe the legal issues addressed in Case Number S.C. Appeal N(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 w(...TRUNCATED)

"In Case Number S.C Appeal No. 8/2016, the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka addressed several legal issues(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The text does not describe the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Numb(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.009406566619873, 0.8218401074409485, -0.5290337800979614, -0.017912402749061584, 1.9936319589614(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.594658613204956, 3.729414224624634, -2.401832342147827, -2.1473731994628906, 1.6878812313079834,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.7117047905921936, 0.8904199004173279, -2.1205685138702393, -1.1297231912612915, 2.75330877304077(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.9473295211791992, 1.9571465253829956, -0.6223475933074951, -1.9342453479766846, 1.91831564903259(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.6608076095581055, 3.7383029460906982, 1.2928028106689453, -1.164339542388916, 1.3710627555847168(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.395291328430176, 0.9384627938270569, -1.1898846626281738, -1.753760814666748, 2.395297050476074,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.358808994293213, 2.0119426250457764, 0.32680609822273254, -1.9476449489593506, 1.927471399307251(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6013180017471313, 2.4561173915863037, -1.6375391483306885, -1.9985610246658325, 1.94203376770019(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.963451623916626, 1.6447993516921997, -2.1428067684173584, -2.687957286834717, 3.5390496253967285(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.603073239326477, 1.2991280555725098, -0.729144811630249, -2.00754714012146, 2.4784979820251465, (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4066717624664307, 1.2288596630096436, -1.48434579372406, -2.151949405670166, 2.1035611629486084,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.6876698732376099, 0.7631193399429321, -1.4424675703048706, -1.9575135707855225, 3.8381996154785(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.907239556312561, -1.2057090997695923, -1.0322376489639282, -2.030205011367798, 2.826215028762817(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Su(...TRUNCATED)

"The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED)

"The Petitioner in this appeal is seeking to set aside the judgment of the High Court of Colombo by (...TRUNCATED)

"The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the basis on which the Ceylinco Insurance applied to the High Court of Colombo to set asid(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the snippet provided, the basis on which Ceylinco Insurance applied to the High Court of C(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 between Trico Marit(...TRUNCATED)

"The issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 between Trico Maritime (Pvt(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What was the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The main issue in the case before the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of(...TRUNCATED)

"The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.876460075378418, 1.755306601524353, 1.045732021331787, -0.6103132963180542, 1.1343841552734375, (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.9400760531425476, 1.3699281215667725, -1.7240854501724243, -1.7852979898452759, 4.3907794952392(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.07330448180437088, 1.5362974405288696, -1.2164126634597778, -1.64785897731781, 2.042574644088745(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.24524998664855957, 0.9959165453910828, -1.1990875005722046, -2.5125691890716553, 2.513327836990(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6225471496582031, 0.12437394261360168, -0.2164638638496399, -0.26517894864082336, 2.166367530822(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.1316256523132324, 1.634177327156067, 1.2162173986434937, -1.5492323637008667, 1.3272680044174194(...TRUNCATED)

"[-1.3312010765075684, -0.7072316408157349, -1.8322938680648804, -2.762238025665283, 5.1553750038146(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.06018621101975441, 1.5810729265213013, 0.45673254132270813, -3.70257568359375, 1.73613321781158(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.22394979000091553, 0.05121967941522598, -0.5461742281913757, -2.6493844985961914, 2.36129140853(...TRUNCATED)

"[-2.1808314323425293, -1.170505404472351, -2.6027424335479736, -2.726127862930298, 4.37331581115722(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.24911077320575714, 2.336111068725586, -0.07313837110996246, -3.188124656677246, 1.84787225723266(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.43827593326568604, 1.6093802452087402, 0.3540533185005188, -2.6718196868896484, 1.28536379337310(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.16200141608715057, -0.22629636526107788, -0.4430082142353058, -3.2032549381256104, 4.14903020858(...TRUNCATED)

"Who were the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/20(...TRUNCATED)

"The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 were D(...TRUNCATED)

"1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA --------------------------(...TRUNCATED)

"The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 were D(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the names of the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. A(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The names of the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. App(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the name of the four judges on the panel for the case S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 in the Democra(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009, the four judges on the panel were Nikawewa, Moragollagama, Paha(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What were the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/200(...TRUNCATED)

"In Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009, the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Sr(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6474357843399048, 0.6964972615242004, 0.7756362557411194, -0.0732327252626419, 3.529158115386963(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.522343635559082, 3.899329423904419, -1.5287988185882568, -2.5361075401306152, 0.7912911772727966(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.463613510131836, 1.9216727018356323, -1.3451460599899292, -1.1060583591461182, 2.211231708526611(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.463613510131836, 1.9216727018356323, -1.3451460599899292, -1.1060583591461182, 2.211231708526611(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.438117742538452, 0.13574109971523285, 0.7225733995437622, -1.425629734992981, 1.9739394187927246(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.3074448108673096, 0.6242135167121887, -0.5967556834220886, -1.8385405540466309, 2.98871302604675(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2809926271438599, 1.2632331848144531, 0.4224119186401367, -0.1157897561788559, 3.290171623229980(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5784657001495361, 2.620143413543701, -1.783281683921814, -0.796110212802887, 2.2101504802703857,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.831965923309326, 1.77842378616333, -1.1379178762435913, -2.380709409713745, 1.0354260206222534, (...TRUNCATED)

"[0.9404081702232361, 2.1268417835235596, -1.9826068878173828, -0.3962988257408142, 1.88248324394226(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5784657001495361, 2.620143413543701, -1.783281683921814, -0.796110212802887, 2.2101504802703857,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.8991451263427734, 1.5071135759353638, -2.2024691104888916, -0.9769462943077087, 1.82613122463226(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4103114604949951, 2.1395246982574463, -1.9035618305206299, -0.8017234206199646, 1.79764318466186(...TRUNCATED)

"What criteria did the Respondents rely on to counter the Petitioner's claim in the case SC APPLICAT(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008, the Respondents relied on the marking scheme annexed to t(...TRUNCATED)

"SPMDC than the 15th Respondent. In particular, he contended that the Petitioner was not awarded any(...TRUNCATED)

"The Respondents in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 countered the Petitioner's claim by relyin(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the criteria used by the Respondents in the case to evaluate the Petitioner's claim of ad(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The criteria used by the respondents to evaluate the petitioner's claim of additional marks(...TRUNCATED)

"What direct relevant experience does the Petitioner possess in the posts claimed to have been held (...TRUNCATED)

"The Petitioner has direct relevant experience in the post of Director of the SPMDC as she held vari(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** How does the marking scheme annexed to the Petitioner's own petition explain how mark(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe marking scheme annexed to the Petitioner's petition explains that marks should be aw(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: According to the snippet, the Respondents relied on the marking scheme annexed to the Petit(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008, the Respondents relied on the criteria of direct relevant(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe Respondents in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 relied on the marking scheme an(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.5148322582244873, 0.45838403701782227, 0.3328988552093506, -0.5556311011314392, 2.11454391479492(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.909816324710846, 3.597468376159668, -1.3542767763137817, 0.023683127015829086, 3.963069200515747(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.106536388397217, 0.9568238854408264, -1.4795995950698853, -2.6058738231658936, 2.680094718933105(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.783497929573059, 0.21440066397190094, -0.5288013815879822, -2.223085403442383, 1.570984601974487(...TRUNCATED)

"[-2.077674388885498, 2.9567487239837646, -2.1110849380493164, -3.093763589859009, 4.337230682373047(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.7562854290008545, 0.4642070233821869, 0.9341692328453064, -2.4130942821502686, 2.873217105865478(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.5764381289482117, 1.4309762716293335, -0.551895260810852, -1.6869189739227295, 3.174824476242065(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.087542772293091, 1.2565019130706787, -0.9957486391067505, -2.130173444747925, 1.317838191986084,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.9021440744400024, 0.647756814956665, -1.6204774379730225, -1.2366691827774048, 5.723635196685791(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.33904507756233215, 0.9373460412025452, -0.797422468662262, -2.702436923980713, 3.23903203010559(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.757672071456909, -0.4548463523387909, -1.0591356754302979, -2.3366661071777344, 2.86423635482788(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.9496558904647827, 1.2246710062026978, -1.3656376600265503, -2.58471941947937, 2.883253335952759,(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.2982242107391357, -0.06339988857507706, -1.098979115486145, -2.1780648231506348, 1.5134117603302(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Distri(...TRUNCATED)

"The defendant-appellant-appellant argued that he had prescriptive title to the land and the right t(...TRUNCATED)

"Learned President’s Counsel for the respondents contended that the respondents, being the plainti(...TRUNCATED)

"The defendant-appellant in the District Court of Negombo case argued that he had prescriptive title(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the basis of the appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the District Cour(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The basis of the appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the District Court(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the appellant's argument regarding his right to the land described as Muthurajawela in Sche(...TRUNCATED)

"The appellant's argument regarding his right to the land described as Muthurajawela in Schedule II (...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What was the main argument of the appellant in the District Court of Negombo case reg(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nThe appellant's main argument in the District Court of Negombo case regarding the land d(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the snippet, the defendant-appellant-appellant's argument in the District Cour(...TRUNCATED)

"The defendant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the District Court of Negombo(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nThe defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Dist(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.5817885398864746, 2.3257224559783936, 0.8880720734596252, -1.3346577882766724, 5.372858047485352(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.6078605651855469, 2.2013778686523438, -2.373924493789673, 0.7517554759979248, 5.83242654800415, (...TRUNCATED)

"[2.017944097518921, 3.5845117568969727, -0.8646590113639832, -1.0038816928863525, 5.497158050537109(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.0000373125076294, 2.2477192878723145, -0.6016330718994141, -1.8143091201782227, 5.00261116027832(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.2997822761535645, 2.141828775405884, -0.4375151991844177, -1.3715449571609497, 2.938973426818847(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.9662405252456665, 0.8106568455696106, 1.6864137649536133, -2.918071985244751, 4.458614826202393,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.8833181858062744, 2.537885904312134, 0.7851998805999756, -1.3877032995224, 4.4937238693237305, -(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.3338623046875, 1.7462536096572876, 0.39458778500556946, -1.6364507675170898, 4.9904656410217285,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.0220410823822021, 3.2430756092071533, -0.3065303564071655, -1.6768826246261597, 4.24164152145385(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.3019605875015259, 2.2621588706970215, -0.0038164742290973663, -1.4480805397033691, 5.29368543624(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.1254220008850098, 2.8762760162353516, -0.33425381779670715, -2.121932029724121, 5.63073205947876(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.877036690711975, 1.5705026388168335, 0.45291784405708313, -0.6566256284713745, 6.025970458984375(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2195475101470947, 2.262916326522827, 0.2755608856678009, -2.1703555583953857, 5.31020450592041, (...TRUNCATED)

"What was the Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the P(...TRUNCATED)

"In Case Number SC Appeal 13/2016, the Supreme Court disagreed with the position taken by the Court (...TRUNCATED)

"She may have acted on cumulative provocation, still for all, it cannot be counted as sudden provoca(...TRUNCATED)

"The Supreme Court did not directly address the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of t(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet and answer, what question would you generate to further clarify the i(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the correct interpretation of section 297 of the Penal Code with regard to the circumstance(...TRUNCATED)

"The correct interpretation of section 297 of the Penal Code with regard to the circumstances of the(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** Whether the Accused-Appellant had the knowledge that her act would definitely lead to(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe Accused-Appellant had no knowledge that her act would definitely lead to the death o(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Pe(...TRUNCATED)

"The Supreme Court held that the Appellant's act of committing the alleged offence cannot be classif(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.975341558456421, 2.9047160148620605, 0.040127720683813095, -0.8074741363525391, 2.81976079940795(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.058722496032715, 3.889874219894409, -0.639028012752533, -1.353960394859314, 0.796196699142456, -(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.7821173667907715, 2.484675884246826, -0.41789790987968445, -2.5172533988952637, 1.07997250556945(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.187333106994629, 2.108949899673462, 0.35743463039398193, -3.4160749912261963, 2.2850115299224854(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.40024995803833, 5.23977518081665, -0.5195099711418152, -2.8835272789001465, 2.0377037525177, -2.(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.708493232727051, 2.4106557369232178, 0.41030460596084595, -2.0199551582336426, 2.214003801345825(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.809812068939209, 1.306496262550354, -0.31914040446281433, -3.8147308826446533, 2.636771917343139(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.115772724151611, 0.7648487091064453, 0.6945191621780396, -2.0680062770843506, 2.5428922176361084(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.065276145935059, 4.01676082611084, -0.7134174704551697, -3.7262940406799316, 2.2951810359954834,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.8026978969573975, 0.5615237355232239, -0.11151031404733658, -1.0777462720870972, 2.5010039806365(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.278257846832275, 1.966468095779419, 1.000391960144043, -2.865586042404175, 2.7215750217437744, -(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.8114964962005615, 1.531463384628296, -0.05161069706082344, -2.3961222171783447, 1.41129362583160(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.8362600803375244, 1.7938573360443115, 0.808657169342041, -2.595609426498413, 3.2299673557281494,(...TRUNCATED)

"In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, what was the main issue in (...TRUNCATED)

"In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, the main issue in the case (...TRUNCATED)

"have fulfilled the requirements of the Circular P3. If not for the restrictions contained in P4B an(...TRUNCATED)

"The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Democratic Sociali(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the legal basis for the court's decision in the SC FR Application 41/2016, and how does it (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe legal basis for the court's decision in SC FR Application 41/2016 is rooted in the C(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the ruling of the Supreme Court in SC FR Application 41/2016 regarding the admission of chi(...TRUNCATED)

"The ruling of the Supreme Court in SC FR Application 41/2016 regarding the admission of children of(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** Whether the Petitioners, who met the requirements of Circular P3 but were denied admi(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe Petitioners, who met the requirements of Circular P3 but were denied admission t(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 was the interpretation of Circular P3 (...TRUNCATED)

"In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, the main issue in the case (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Democra(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.1104570627212524, 3.4724817276000977, -1.0680694580078125, -2.4400599002838135, 2.21065950393676(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.033918436616659164, 1.5617090463638306, -1.0276423692703247, -1.143194317817688, 3.934888839721(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.6340014934539795, 1.9942651987075806, -1.1645104885101318, -1.824273943901062, 3.38872528076171(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.3931145966053009, 1.561724066734314, -1.018689513206482, -2.923835515975952, 3.504472255706787, (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.3274590969085693, 0.7337749600410461, 0.6609054207801819, 0.18582944571971893, 2.538899183273315(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.5779334902763367, 0.39020052552223206, -1.4432188272476196, -1.9281021356582642, 4.7615647315979(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.168062210083008, 0.10201295465230942, -0.30696025490760803, -0.224466934800148, 3.41938400268554(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.09081270545721054, -2.0477044582366943, -0.35697275400161743, -1.5899590253829956, 4.26459693908(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.13079479336738586, -0.0702236220240593, 0.18723386526107788, -0.08135543018579483, 2.97695446014(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.9384669065475464, -1.9674224853515625, 0.018605614081025124, -2.5648794174194336, 3.634778499603(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.41468700766563416, 0.6052225232124329, 1.3493741750717163, -3.171586275100708, 1.15561687946319(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.12145765125751495, 1.4958099126815796, -0.5057035088539124, -1.356189489364624, 3.6987504959106(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6516095399856567, -1.4022867679595947, -0.05951793119311333, -2.9789810180664062, 3.555974960327(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal No(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case SC Appeal No. 85/2004, the Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections: ((...TRUNCATED)

"Counsel for the Petitioners-Respondents (hereinafter referred to as the Respondents) moved to raise(...TRUNCATED)

"The Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections during the hearing of SC Appeal No. 8(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the two preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in SC Appeal No. 85/(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, the two preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the background of the case and what is the proposal for an amicable resolution suggested by(...TRUNCATED)

"In light of the background provided, the proposal for an amicable resolution suggested by the Respo(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What were the two preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents during(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe two preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents during the hear(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in (...TRUNCATED)

"The preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents are that the appeal is time-barred(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal N(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.3160781860351562, -0.36298924684524536, -0.4241160452365875, -1.1069163084030151, 0.947704851627(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4698712825775146, 0.6416577100753784, -1.3529961109161377, 0.6187921762466431, 1.676846027374267(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.357375383377075, -0.14539943635463715, -0.07925627380609512, 1.3838481903076172, 3.1561095714569(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.4222153127193451, -0.7894576787948608, -0.0825706273317337, 0.3590362071990967, 2.22945237159729(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.11126676946878433, 0.4837665259838104, -0.5901758074760437, 0.23303796350955963, 1.725531816482(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.4633116722106934, -0.24009323120117188, -0.1579003632068634, -1.1101969480514526, 1.100507259368(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.8398122787475586, 0.7654860019683838, -0.49861738085746765, -0.8177505731582642, 1.5516117811203(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6282668113708496, -1.1579294204711914, -0.47569024562835693, -0.016756204888224602, 2.7974400520(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.4009101986885071, 1.2297873497009277, -0.7944984436035156, -2.571275234222412, 2.561591863632202(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.16140682995319366, -0.7957728505134583, -0.35924094915390015, 0.43200844526290894, 1.69662296772(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.9759156703948975, -0.45467409491539, -0.33353543281555176, -0.8309109807014465, 2.55620288848876(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.993354320526123, 0.5551925301551819, -0.5120095610618591, 1.8796842098236084, 2.204171657562256,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6610304117202759, -1.1934703588485718, 0.40233859419822693, 0.38816431164741516, 2.2459170818328(...TRUNCATED)