Datasets:

---

Ramitha

/

alqa-results-40-mistral-self

like 0

"What does the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 require(...TRUNCATED)

"The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998, as outlined in t(...TRUNCATED)

"AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose (...TRUNCATED)

"The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 for Beechcraft 30(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the specific action required by the Airworthiness Directive (AD) for Beechcraft 300 Series (...TRUNCATED)

"specific action required by the Airworthiness Directive (AD) to correct an unsafe condition is:\n\n(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What is the purpose of the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe purpose of the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) (...TRUNCATED)

"What specific actions are required to be taken to correct an unsafe condition on Beechcraft 300 Ser(...TRUNCATED)

"In accordance with the Airworthiness Directive issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998, th(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 requires (...TRUNCATED)

"The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 requires that the(...TRUNCATED)

"The provided text describes an Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued for the Beechcraft 300 Series Ae(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.7771510481834412, 2.376387119293213, -2.2221953868865967, -1.4531033039093018, 6.521387100219727(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.945505142211914, 1.7554802894592285, -0.46648108959198, -1.3965058326721191, 8.328594207763672, (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.3124765157699585, 1.183045506477356, 0.3087456524372101, -1.5714020729064941, 6.713678359985352,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6774448156356812, 0.577200174331665, 1.374348521232605, -1.6128212213516235, 6.883903980255127, (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5898182392120361, 0.9850074648857117, -0.8895741105079651, -0.2948039472103119, 4.67230367660522(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.074584722518921, 1.3871748447418213, -1.654208779335022, -1.938354730606079, 5.026557922363281, (...TRUNCATED)

"[0.5415791273117065, 1.730587363243103, 0.2248355746269226, -1.1408195495605469, 5.139828205108643,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.04094227775931358, 0.8656237721443176, 0.5880917310714722, -2.485365390777588, 5.985538005828857(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.7670139074325562, 1.4335237741470337, -0.21719813346862793, 0.1524234414100647, 7.22841215133667(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.9324080944061279, 1.4070249795913696, -1.8816490173339844, -1.7006759643554688, 4.17230176925659(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.6946324706077576, 0.0024464824236929417, -0.3562007546424866, -2.548922538757324, 6.698065280914(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.525338888168335, 0.8577262163162231, 1.0905680656433105, -0.8695388436317444, 8.864389419555664,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.5497230887413025, 0.4382484257221222, 0.22406668961048126, -2.482654571533203, 7.57282018661499,(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the definition of a non-member spouse, splitting agreement, splitting order, and superannua(...TRUNCATED)

"Under the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a non-member spouse is defined as a (...TRUNCATED)

"non‑member spouse means a non‑member spouse within the meaning of Part VIIIB or VIIIC of the Fa(...TRUNCATED)

"According to the provided snippet from the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a \(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the definition of a \"non-member spouse\" in the context of Part VIIIB or VIIIC of the Fami(...TRUNCATED)

"According to the provided snippet from the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a \(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What does the provided snippet define and explain in relation to superannuation benef(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\n**Answer:** The provided snippet defines and explains the following terms in relation to(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the definition of a non-member spouse within the context of the Military Superannuation and(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the snippet provided, a non-member spouse within the context of the Military Superannuatio(...TRUNCATED)

"According to the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a non-member spouse is define(...TRUNCATED)

"A non-member spouse, splitting agreement, splitting order, and superannuation interest according to(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nAccording to the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), the definition of (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4478214979171753, 3.0922350883483887, -0.4322068989276886, -5.381718635559082, 2.997316837310791(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.259676694869995, 4.18271017074585, -2.534651041030884, -5.307722568511963, 3.750795602798462, -1(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.0675411224365234, 3.8901026248931885, -0.9559034109115601, -6.170055866241455, 2.771599054336548(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.03563068434596062, 1.617932677268982, -0.2017049640417099, -6.379060745239258, 3.65509104728698(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.2792677581310272, 1.621024250984192, 0.22989101707935333, -7.945568084716797, 2.4454245567321777(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.7934818267822266, 1.4206342697143555, 0.9828540086746216, -3.7953004837036133, 2.565858602523803(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.6458957195281982, 1.8857526779174805, -1.764037847518921, -4.49971342086792, 3.2750794887542725,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5391813516616821, 2.4828813076019287, -0.7223027348518372, -6.706466197967529, 2.740482091903686(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.3956612348556519, 2.802755832672119, -0.35391488671302795, -7.226399898529053, 2.940315008163452(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.3677254319190979, 2.8029513359069824, -1.4643970727920532, -7.629269123077393, 2.096971750259399(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2639213800430298, 2.2542636394500732, -0.4812609553337097, -7.118178844451904, 2.618113040924072(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.336599349975586, 2.341667652130127, 1.8403854370117188, -7.11154317855835, 3.6490299701690674, -(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.0832459926605225, 3.6077721118927, -0.6439634561538696, -6.240518569946289, 2.4213762283325195, (...TRUNCATED)

"Who were the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1652, the (...TRUNCATED)

"ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA V402 OF 1999 BETWEEN: HOPE DOWNS MA(...TRUNCATED)

"The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron Pty Ltd (...TRUNCATED)

"What were the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iro(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron (...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What is the subject matter of the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Ha(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe subject matter of the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersley Iro(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the outcome of the case between Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd and Hamersley Iron (...TRUNCATED)

"The outcome of the case between Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd and Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd w(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron (...TRUNCATED)

"The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron Pty Ltd (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Ir(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.7829921245574951, 2.275529384613037, 0.7530416250228882, -0.9072563052177429, 5.211573600769043,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.012979304417967796, 2.715606927871704, -2.1397643089294434, -1.6856693029403687, 4.3331789970397(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.0618088245391846, 1.8865300416946411, 0.18176499009132385, -3.2181739807128906, 5.04320716857910(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.3636953830718994, 2.353593587875366, 0.3849940598011017, -3.3414201736450195, 4.645495891571045,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.8964492082595825, 1.9027501344680786, 1.2016246318817139, -0.6239217519760132, 3.219146728515625(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.2899582386016846, 2.3093581199645996, 0.8674067854881287, -2.7530219554901123, 4.204615592956543(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6030985116958618, 2.3099210262298584, 0.413019597530365, -0.7312939763069153, 4.032358169555664,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.0514861345291138, 1.883624792098999, 0.340212881565094, -3.5651001930236816, 3.957981586456299, (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.432769775390625, 1.6208165884017944, 1.0527088642120361, -2.733806848526001, 4.584431171417236, (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6943618059158325, 1.4717966318130493, 0.18044471740722656, -3.2690043449401855, 3.90307664871215(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.287724494934082, 2.577430486679077, 0.02314189448952675, -3.383657693862915, 4.746417999267578, (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2966947555541992, 2.210212469100952, 0.3374600112438202, -3.9394872188568115, 4.991615295410156,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.726158618927002, 1.6586596965789795, 0.011791273951530457, -3.529944896697998, 3.814398765563965(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings according to the decision in Pol(...TRUNCATED)

"In the decision of Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, it was noted that the purpose(...TRUNCATED)

"13His Honour noted in his judgment that there is a specific provision of the Legal Aid Commission A(...TRUNCATED)

"The purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings, as outlined in the decision of Police v(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings, as outlined in the decision of (...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings, as outlined in the decision of (...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What is the purpose of the award of costs in legal proceedings as outlined in the dec(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe purpose of the award of costs in legal proceedings as outlined in the decision of Po(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings, and when is it appropriate to m(...TRUNCATED)

"In accordance with the Legal Aid Commission Act, it is not appropriate for the ALS to apply for cos(...TRUNCATED)

"According to the decision in Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, the purpose behind (...TRUNCATED)

"In accordance with the decision in Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, the purpose b(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings according to the decision in (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4544767141342163, 1.3869469165802002, -0.36969801783561707, -1.0271939039230347, 2.7439286708831(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.1501970291137695, 3.0901384353637695, -2.3992438316345215, -1.4106932878494263, 2.78120660781860(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.3060107231140137, 0.20574966073036194, -0.9036598205566406, -2.283653974533081, 3.87593650817871(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.782839059829712, -0.8500561118125916, -1.8270176649093628, -2.4451284408569336, 2.52106761932373(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.9441698789596558, -0.9711732268333435, -1.8781315088272095, -1.0889307260513306, 2.8543186187744(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.668933868408203, 1.2047005891799927, -0.3596072793006897, -1.910943627357483, 2.683835983276367,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.011448621749878, 0.8023213148117065, -0.6456331014633179, -1.2577179670333862, 2.752682209014892(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.0602643489837646, -0.13128869235515594, 0.4067549407482147, -1.8886213302612305, 3.9896023273468(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6313310861587524, 0.07927075773477554, -1.7260963916778564, -1.505188226699829, 4.16140937805175(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.9183723330497742, -0.7017956972122192, -0.9361197352409363, -1.785125970840454, 3.40590286254882(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.432896375656128, -0.20912069082260132, 0.22097940742969513, -1.9846876859664917, 3.7150497436523(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5960304737091064, 0.19450166821479797, -1.6425392627716064, -1.7737866640090942, 3.5768046379089(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.583612322807312, -0.14665673673152924, -0.763729453086853, -1.966451644897461, 4.251577377319336(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of Moles v The University of Adelaide [2001] FCA 1666, the Court refused the applicants(...TRUNCATED)

"REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 On 25 September 2001, the applicants filed an application and accompanying s(...TRUNCATED)

"The applicants in the case of Moles v The University of Adelaide [2001] FCA 1666 applied for interl(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the reason given by the Court for refusing the applicants' application for interlocutory r(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The Court refused the applicants' application for interlocutory relief on the grounds that (...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What was the purpose of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the c(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v The Univ(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v(...TRUNCATED)

"The outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief was that the Court refused to m(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v (...TRUNCATED)

"The outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief was that the Court refused to m(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the snippet, the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the ca(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.1561109572649002, 2.385449171066284, -0.2965782880783081, -0.939990222454071, 3.535632848739624,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.7876265048980713, 3.858767509460449, -1.6595087051391602, -0.7702944278717041, 3.788103342056274(...TRUNCATED)

"[-1.1378613710403442, 2.0661230087280273, -1.9437060356140137, -2.2453880310058594, 3.5018167495727(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.30537575483322144, 2.690148115158081, -1.1726573705673218, -1.2379990816116333, 3.3699860572814(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.20475263893604279, 2.0190112590789795, -0.7385063171386719, -0.17077581584453583, 2.317654609680(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.373769074678421, 2.058715581893921, -0.15469397604465485, -2.164059638977051, 3.684767723083496,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.7394265532493591, 2.1854255199432373, -1.1712778806686401, 0.5342987775802612, 2.350221633911133(...TRUNCATED)

"[-2.257577419281006, 1.4166558980941772, -0.7740084528923035, -2.3956682682037354, 4.10320901870727(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4475706815719604, 3.218981981277466, -0.6840951442718506, 1.1783833503723145, 2.152763605117798,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.5396661162376404, 1.4004830121994019, -0.8845052719116211, -0.5896294713020325, 2.81268453598022(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.7245692610740662, 0.3018191456794739, -0.49616023898124695, -2.2654213905334473, 3.471293926239(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.073901891708374, 2.318997383117676, -0.8949375152587891, 0.177712082862854, 3.0918755531311035, (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.9656765460968018, 1.3970226049423218, -1.5130457878112793, -1.2196288108825684, 3.1274209022521(...TRUNCATED)

"What are the specifications of the $1 and $2 coins as per the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Dete(...TRUNCATED)

"According to the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Determination 2012 (No. 5) (Cth), the $2 coin is (...TRUNCATED)

"Schedule 1 (section 4) Part 1 Specifications of coins Item Denomination Standard composition Standa(...TRUNCATED)

"The $1 coin has a denomination of 1 dollar, a standard composition of silver with a minimum purity (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The standard composition of the $1 coin is made of not less than 99.9% silver, with a weigh(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What information does the snippet provide about the $1 and $2 coins?\n```\n\n**Answer(...TRUNCATED)

"The snippet describes specifications for two coins, the $1 and $2 coins. The $1 coin has a denomina(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The denomination of the $1 coin is $1, the composition is copper, aluminium, and nickel, an(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Determination 2012 (No. 5) (Cth), the spe(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The $1 coin is made of copper, aluminium, and nickel and has a diameter of 20.62 mm, a thic(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nThe specifications of the $1 and $2 coins as per the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) De(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.764514207839966, 1.3088003396987915, -4.424049377441406, -3.6293931007385254, 2.5875184535980225(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.2207694053649902, 2.294379711151123, -5.947979927062988, -2.592341184616089, 1.5081380605697632,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5341055393218994, 2.1117913722991943, -4.884582996368408, -4.746957302093506, 1.0425810813903809(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.619953989982605, 1.9030590057373047, -5.238643646240234, -4.4133806228637695, 1.6680387258529663(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.2038891315460205, 2.4233317375183105, -3.498840808868408, -3.186082363128662, 2.5523505210876465(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.8166228532791138, 2.1723530292510986, -4.292298316955566, -5.348179340362549, 1.660794734954834,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.9691555500030518, 2.5246100425720215, -1.0148075819015503, -1.459601879119873, 1.131923437118530(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4552063941955566, 2.6157829761505127, -5.483936786651611, -4.154303073883057, 2.390134334564209,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.450300931930542, 1.0363099575042725, -5.260636329650879, -2.6374824047088623, 3.0679194927215576(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.22649884223938, 1.6603950262069702, -7.124120235443115, -3.406519651412964, 2.1080191135406494, (...TRUNCATED)

"[2.4754951000213623, 1.7626956701278687, -4.2493205070495605, -3.1992576122283936, 0.64086747169494(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2895101308822632, 2.416149854660034, -5.2336320877075195, -2.953977346420288, 1.0753276348114014(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.1091651916503906, 2.613332509994507, -3.8156485557556152, -3.080857276916504, 0.2864489555358886(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)

" 4 When the matter was before the magistrate, the appellant apparently argued the decision of the T(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)

"What error of law or failure to follow proper procedure did the appellant fail to argue before the (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The appellant failed to argue before the magistrate that there was an error of law or a fai(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** Why did the appellant fail to raise any issue cognisable by the magistrate in the cas(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe appellant failed to raise any issue cognisable by the magistrate in the case of NABC(...TRUNCATED)

"What legal error or failure to follow proper procedures did the Tribunal make in its decision, and (...TRUNCATED)

"The legal error or failure to follow proper procedures in the Tribunal's decision that led to the a(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The appellant in the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous A(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nIn the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [200(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.8175928592681885, 1.98162841796875, -1.574920892715454, -3.250676393508911, 3.675140380859375, -(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.395930051803589, 4.354271411895752, -1.4522359371185303, -0.5426538586616516, 1.411112904548645,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6809821128845215, 3.3039777278900146, -1.34475576877594, -2.390507459640503, 2.9407687187194824,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.377422571182251, 2.094473361968994, -1.0966988801956177, -1.8947323560714722, 2.910701036453247,(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.423693895339966, 1.1647590398788452, 0.501882016658783, -1.5709441900253296, 2.669212818145752, (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4294593334197998, 2.435706853866577, -0.11355388164520264, -2.302947998046875, 4.038566112518310(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.275362253189087, 2.4036152362823486, -1.5403913259506226, -0.46113893389701843, 3.64620161056518(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.6286147236824036, 2.005693197250366, -1.5108616352081299, -2.6977903842926025, 4.293178558349609(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.1056134700775146, 1.8196085691452026, 0.32681864500045776, -1.7019479274749756, 2.47295427322387(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.1820544004440308, 2.556954860687256, -1.5271915197372437, -1.8574813604354858, 3.825073480606079(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.3806946277618408, 3.173706293106079, -2.0660650730133057, -2.644247531890869, 3.4861974716186523(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.6943674087524414, 3.1707959175109863, -1.9066835641860962, -2.4695796966552734, 2.58771896362304(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.020813465118408, 2.8303470611572266, -0.6921873092651367, -1.9995485544204712, 2.338418960571289(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, was the claim put forward by Mr Reyn(...TRUNCATED)

"No, in the matter of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, the court did not consider the(...TRUNCATED)

"20. For these reasons, it is not necessary to address the further question, to which the parties de(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet from the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, the (...TRUNCATED)

"What is the significance of Mr Reynolds' reliance on the Service Payment in his claim, according to(...TRUNCATED)

"According to the court's decision in Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, Mr Reynolds' r(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** Does Mr Reynolds' claim, as presented in the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nMr Reynolds' claim does not give rise to an abuse of process by reason of duplication of(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the proper scope of the Australian Consumer Law's 'unfair contract terms' provision in rela(...TRUNCATED)

"In relation to the Australian Consumer Law's 'unfair contract terms' provision, the proper scope is(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: No, the claim put forward by Mr Reynolds was not considered an abuse of process due to dupl(...TRUNCATED)

"An abuse of process would occur if the claim in the Expedition List Proceedings was an abuse of pro(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nIn the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, the claim put forward by (...TRUNCATED)

"[0.9288944005966187, 2.3860020637512207, -1.0409729480743408, -1.3097890615463257, 5.95317554473876(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5591530799865723, 3.940739870071411, -2.1867072582244873, -0.12818120419979095, 2.29813241958618(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.130063772201538, 2.436711549758911, -0.8977261781692505, -1.0394757986068726, 3.7538697719573975(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.1389758586883545, 1.8253012895584106, -1.2064540386199951, -0.8086274266242981, 4.65435409545898(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.5843470096588135, 1.4373639822006226, -2.2002410888671875, -1.91474187374115, 2.9257125854492188(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.0557658672332764, 1.7568374872207642, -0.6774689555168152, -1.4664160013198853, 4.65006780624389(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.682863712310791, 2.629746198654175, 0.7557034492492676, -1.4026637077331543, 2.1115949153900146,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2909266948699951, 2.9932591915130615, -2.1909472942352295, -0.03526511415839195, 2.4958190917968(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.8038374185562134, 0.6581685543060303, -2.2170441150665283, -4.292659759521484, 1.641558647155761(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.8535373210906982, 1.9731889963150024, 0.1004544347524643, -0.7729830741882324, 3.866787195205688(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2470647096633911, 1.3515115976333618, -0.26837095618247986, -2.5084333419799805, 4.5653433799743(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.7865426540374756, 1.2952544689178467, -2.65468168258667, -1.5782185792922974, 4.499210357666016,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6219817399978638, 2.1877057552337646, -2.610067844390869, -0.9110325574874878, 2.897185802459717(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWDC (...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWDC 66, the offender was charged with recklessly dama(...TRUNCATED)

"remarks on sentence 1. On 13 March 2019 the offender was arraigned on an Indictment containing the (...TRUNCATED)

"The offender, David Keith Green, was charged with recklessly damaging the Corrective Services cell (...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The charge against David Keith Green as stated in the indictment is recklessly damaging the(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What charge was contained in the indictment against the offender in R v David Keith G(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe charge contained in the indictment against the offender in R v David Keith Green [20(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the maximum penalty for the offense of recklessly damaging the Corrective Services cell com(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the snippet provided, the charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWD(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.9475064277648926, 2.1214864253997803, 1.2055413722991943, -1.3905848264694214, 2.365183353424072(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.940646171569824, 2.6028857231140137, -3.1933791637420654, -3.770922899246216, 1.913164496421814,(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.5033669471740723, 0.4930403530597687, -1.678159475326538, -3.124035120010376, 3.9559643268585205(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.48278284072876, -0.32051780819892883, -1.4598288536071777, -3.1391429901123047, 3.69268321990966(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.469749689102173, 0.3136374056339264, 0.7409698963165283, -2.84710693359375, 3.8947885036468506, (...TRUNCATED)

"[2.9901535511016846, 2.236307144165039, 0.32543474435806274, -1.7935717105865479, 2.558014869689941(...TRUNCATED)

"[5.166297435760498, 1.417555809020996, 1.343966007232666, -1.9688092470169067, 2.7253787517547607, (...TRUNCATED)

"[3.0499207973480225, 0.8989139199256897, -0.30492502450942993, -3.4299001693725586, 3.4814958572387(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.30387866497039795, -0.06759066134691238, -1.9107322692871094, -7.013761520385742, 4.13088130950(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.4072186946868896, 0.5539978742599487, -1.2758365869522095, -3.1194911003112793, 3.52599549293518(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.933396816253662, -0.2516516149044037, -0.3130553662776947, -3.4252214431762695, 3.57470512390136(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5552775859832764, 0.19127054512500763, 0.17458006739616394, -4.5798115730285645, 2.7272927761077(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.4970483779907227, -0.2181563377380371, -1.3325060606002808, -3.438453197479248, 4.08182334899902(...TRUNCATED)

"What evidence was found during the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749, the police investigation revealed that the offender had sig(...TRUNCATED)

"ADDITIONAL CHARGES 20. Further police investigations revealed that the offender had signed a standa(...TRUNCATED)

"During the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749 in New South(...TRUNCATED)

"What additional evidence was found during the police investigation that led to the offender being c(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The additional evidence found during the police investigation that led to the offender bein(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What evidence was used to bring additional charges against the offender in the case R(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe evidence used to bring additional charges against the offender in the case R v Green(...TRUNCATED)

"What additional charges were brought against the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749 ba(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: \"The additional charges brought against the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 74(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: During the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749 in N(...TRUNCATED)

"The evidence found during the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSW(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe evidence found during the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.106066346168518, 1.9090663194656372, -0.6207388639450073, -0.7459192872047424, 3.507499456405639(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.4392905235290527, 3.658480167388916, -1.8497817516326904, -3.7252626419067383, 2.945925951004028(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.2309086322784424, 2.633955478668213, -2.023674726486206, -3.968705177307129, 2.8582701683044434,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.803525686264038, 1.5110925436019897, -1.0561102628707886, -4.472348213195801, 2.630159616470337,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.9357848167419434, 1.7989457845687866, -0.37838953733444214, -2.932664632797241, 3.35589694976806(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.82800030708313, 2.0078768730163574, 0.6808907985687256, -3.0470378398895264, 2.6922597885131836,(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.7829740047454834, 1.3974426984786987, -0.11048813164234161, -4.49594783782959, 3.325801610946655(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.914353370666504, 2.26458740234375, -0.64805668592453, -4.626241683959961, 2.9829115867614746, 3.(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.8655591011047363, 1.152145266532898, -0.6485119462013245, -4.759768486022949, 2.672290563583374,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.728798747062683, 1.7015292644500732, -0.5311078429222107, -4.895111083984375, 2.6200428009033203(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2206575870513916, 1.8613594770431519, -0.879921019077301, -3.698848247528076, 3.050694227218628,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.135510206222534, 2.0346832275390625, -0.4979098439216614, -3.5946013927459717, 2.654001235961914(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6505622863769531, 1.1970243453979492, -1.4104644060134888, -3.7003650665283203, 2.66686439514160(...TRUNCATED)