Translate

Friday, August 30, 2013

THIS IS A VERY LENGTHY UPDATE TO "RIGHT TO REFUSE VACCINES, OUR RIGHT TO LIVE", MY BLOG OF April 20, 2013, http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2013/04/right-to-refuse-vaccines-our-right-to.html, AND BEGINS WITH A VERY RECENT ARTICLE BY SAYER JI, FOUNDER OF GREENMEDINFO.COM, WHOSE WEBSITE IS ONE OF THOSE THAT CAME UNDER ASSAULT FROM UNICEF, THE UNITED NATIONS' "CHILDREN'S FUND".THE TEA ROOM IS MOST GRATEFUL FOR MR. JI APPROVING A FULL COPYING OF HIS ARTICLE TO THIS SITE.GREENMEDINFO IS PERHAPS THE MOST EXACTING, IMPECCABLY RESEARCHED AND TRUSTWORTHY WEBSITE ON THE INTERNET TODAY.PEER REVIEWED ARTICLES BACK UP WHAT YOU FIND THERE, AND YOU WILL FIND NO 'CONSPIRACY THEORY', NO 'MODIFIED' TRUTHS THERE, EVER.MR. JI INSISTS ON HONESTY AND INTEGRITY IN REPORTING.

AS YOU WILL SEE, THIS WAS MUCH TOO BIG AN UPDATE TO POST WITHIN MY OLDER BLOG, BUT IT IS AN UPDATE ONLY.

PLEASE, READ MR. JI'S ARTICLE CAREFULLY, AND PLEASE PASS IT ON TO AS MANY AS YOU LOVE OR EVEN CARE FOR.

<<A stunning new report reveals that the United Nations
Children's Fund (UNICEF) has been monitoring independent health sites
and their users in an attempt to identify 'anti-vaccine influencers' and
their effect on lackluster vaccine uptake.

Opening
with the Mark Twain quote: "A lie can travel halfway around the world
while the truth is putting on its shoes," the report lists the following
'anti-vaccine influencers' shaping the online conversation:

UNICEF's
opening reference to the "lie" (misinformation) spread by the
above-mentioned web-based organizations indicates that while the
document purports to be analytical and descriptive, it has proscriptive
and defamatory undertones, and only thinly conceals an agenda to
discredit opposing views and voices.

The report's data-gathering methodology is described as follows:

"Researchers
have selected social media channels, languages and formulated key word
strings for online searches from 1 May till 30 June 2012. Messages from
over 22,300 participants using English, Russian, Romanian and Polish
were monitored by volume (using mentions, views, postings), by channels through which users exchange content, by engagement (how users respond, like, share) and by sentiment analysis to detect positive and negative attitudes."

The authors of the report note 'ethical considerations' in gathering
and analyzing the web usage behavior and data of 22,300 tracked users,
but claim that by not publishing the specific IP data in their report
that their work does not break any laws, even if it may violate 'moral'
codes of those who were subject to uninformed surveillance.

Their main findings are reported:

In all four languages, blogs are the most frequently used channel
followed by Facebook. Twitter is the second largest channel in Russian.

Most of the interactions are taking place in forums. While female
audiences tend to focus on issues such as developmental disabilities,
chemical and toxins, and side effects; men focus on arguments around
conspiracy theories and religious/ethical beliefs. Participants
discussing anti-vaccination sentiments are 56 % female and 44 % male.

During the observed time period, more messages in English are
recorded using key words stemming from conspiracy theories, distrusts
against governments and pharmaceutical industry. Religious and ethical
beliefs, distrust against U.S. and western governments drive the Russian
language discussions.

Anti-vaccination opinion leaders in
the online world show varying characteristics. Some have no college
education while others are in the medical field (such as nurses). Often
they appear well educated in alternative medicine and subscribe to
social channels of homeopaths and alternative medicine advocates.

According to the report: "The study reveals the urgent need to invest
further in analyzing vaccine hesitancy, and immunization partners to
develop joint strategies to tackle with this trend."

The report also makes the following recommendations:

"International
agencies and other partners will need to combine forces and support
governments to reverse this counterproductive trend and develop common
strategies to promote immunization, as one of the most successful and cost-effective health interventions known in the world." [emphasis added]

While
this report appears to have the objectivity and credibility long
associated with world governmental health agencies, UNICEF does little
to conceal its willingness to partner with, and accept money from,
corporations who may have a vested interest in discrediting valid
information about the unintended, adverse health effects of vaccines
and/or their lack of effectiveness, such as

According to the report: "The study reveals the urgent need to invest
further in analyzing vaccine hesitancy, and immunization partners to
develop joint strategies to tackle with this trend."

The report also makes the following recommendations:

"International
agencies and other partners will need to combine forces and support
governments to reverse this counterproductive trend and develop common
strategies to promote immunization, as one of the most successful and cost-effective health interventions known in the world." [emphasis added]

While
this report appears to have the objectivity and credibility long
associated with world governmental health agencies, UNICEF does little
to conceal its willingness to partner with, and accept money from,
corporations who may have a vested interest in discrediting valid
information about the unintended, adverse health effects of vaccines
and/or their lack of effectiveness, such as manufacturers of vaccines
themselves. They openly advertise their willingness
to support national- and multi-national corporation's "cause-marketing
initiatives," a marketing phenomenon widely criticized by public
interest groups, and which in the case of the breast cancer industry has
produced monstrosities such as the Smith and Wesson's Pink Handgun, and KFC's now defunct "Buckets for the Cure."

As
an example of UNICEF's lack of insulation from conflicts of interest,
in June of this year, they partnered with one of the world's largest
vaccine manufacturers, Merck & Co.,
who pledged $500 million "to decrease maternal
mortality, HIV and tuberculosis prevalence in South Africa." President
and CEO of the U.S. Fund for UNICEF Caryl Stern was quoted in a June
2012 Vaccine New Daily article as saying, "Merck is a valued
partner that is helping to bring us closer to a day when ZERO children
die of preventable causes."[1]
Merck, while being considered by UNICEF as a "valuable partner," can
hardly be claimed as a credible source of information on the safety and
effectivencess of its products, as exemplified by the 2011 decision by
the U.S. Justice Department that Merck would be forced to pay $950
million to resolve criminal charges and federal civil claims associated
with the fraudulent marketing of its deadly drug Vioxx. This is only
the tip of the iceberg of Merck's many legal problems. Learn more here

Another
organization UNICEF has partnered with and accepted substantial
financial contributions from is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation,
who has actively supported the online surveillance of so-called
"anti-vaccine" groups, as we documented in an Aug. 29th, 2012, report: "Gates Foundation Funds Surveillance of Anti-Vaccine Groups":

[A]$100K grant was recently disbursed to Seth C. Kalichman, professor at
the Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, for "Establishing an Anti-Vaccine Surveillance and Alert System," which intends to "establish an internet-based global monitoring and rapid alert system for finding, analyzing, and counteracting misinformation communication campaigns regarding vaccines to support global immunization efforts."

The Gates foundation is notorious for focusing its charitable contributions on Global Polio Eradication
initiatives, while neglecting to emphasize with equal fiscal enthusiasm
sustainable solutions to preventing morbidity and mortality associated
with infectious disease vectors, namely, improved nutrition, sanitation
and hygiene.
Ironically, UNICEF's own vaccine-based programs to combat child deaths from disease in West Africa appear to reduce survival relative to areas outside the reach of their programs. According to a 2010 BBC News report,
"Unicef spent $27m (£17m) rolling out vaccinations, vitamin A pills and
bed nets to protect against malaria from 2001 to 2005 in areas of 11
countries. The researchers studied parts of Ghana, Mali and Benin and
said children often survived better outside the UN scheme."
Indeed, the most well-known criticism of UNICEF is that it has done
very little to decrease child mortality (in sub-Saharan Africa it has
actually increased) underscoring why its focus on promoting vaccination,
and now monitoring and perhaps targeting "anti-vaccine" organizations, is profoundly misguided.

Ultimately,
UNICEF's new report is more than an objective analysis of so-called
"anti-vaccine" organizations, but a concerning bit of propaganda aimed
at dissuading the millions who visit alternative health sites daily from
obtaining information that was not underwritten and/or ghostwritten by
the very industries who stand to gain most by hiding the well-known
adverse health effects of their products, and who have managed to
transform many governmental health agencies – and we can see, even
global ones -- into their cheerleading, marketing, liability protection
and now surveillance divisions.

Sayer Ji is an author, researcher, lecturer, and advisory board member of the National Health Federation.
He founded Greenmedinfo.com in 2008 in order to provide the world an
open access, evidence-based resource supporting natural and integrative
modalities. It is widely recognized as the most widely referenced health
resource of its kind.

Disclaimer:
This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or
treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of
GreenMedInfo or its staff.]

<END SAYER JI ARTICLE>

I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO CALL ATTENTION TO TWO OTHER ARTICLES BY MR. JI:
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/has-drug-driven-medicine-become-form-human-sacrifice
"Has Drug-Driven Medicine Become A Form of Human Sacrifice?"
ANDhttp://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/why-law-forbids-medicinal-use-natural-substances"Why The Law Forbids The Medicinal Use of Natural Substances"

NOW PLEASE UNDERSTAND, UNICEF IS NOT THE CONCERNED, ALTRUISTIC ORGANIZATION IT CLAIMS TO BE, NEVER WAS, NEVER WILL BE!HERE'S PROOF...<<While
no one can argue with the fact that UNICEF does work to improve living
conditions for some children in need, their assistance goes to those who
already have families. Those without, not so much.This year, if the
spirit moves you to send holiday cards that will make a difference,
there are many other alternatives to supporting UNICEF, which has lost
its moral compass and has turned orphans into collateral damage in
service of a political agenda.>>[Read more:
http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/red-thread-adoptive-family-forum/2011/dec/5/why-i-wont-buy-unicef-holiday-cards/#ixzz2dQ3N489P
]

PHYSICIANS,
PEDIATRICIANS IN MANY OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE PROTESTED AGAINST UNICEF'S
VACCINATION POLICIES, AND ALSO SAID THAT CHILD MORTALITY RATES IN
VACCINE-PUSHED NATIONS HAVE DRASTICALLY INCREASED, BUT HAVE WE READ
ABOUT THAT IN OUR NEWS?http://www.whale.to/vaccines/bharati.html<<I
think we have to call for a boycott of the entire vaccination procedure
to make the political mandarins to sit up and take notice. It is a
dastardly and heinous act to continue with the vaccination process
without making provision for informed consent, introducing a physicians
warranty of vaccine safety, compensation in case of adverse effects and
without any long term studies on the effects of vaccines, specially when
the so called "misinformation" about vaccine dangers circulating
amongst dissenters, even within the medical community, is turning out to
be a fact rather than rumour. The issue of heavy metals in vaccines is
yet to be resolved. Countries putting the maximum emphasis on vaccines
have the highest rate of infant mortality. We also do not understand
how the voices of Indian doctors are not being heard and instead
"foreign experts" dictate terms in matters of vaccination policy in
India. Who are these "experts" and what influence do they yield to
dictate terms? What are these "experts" doing to ensure compensation and
treatment for the millions of vaccine damaged children? What are they
doing to educate the public about vaccine dangers?"'You cannot take
the "First do no harm" medical oath and push vaccines at the same time.
This is ludicrous. This is madness. This is utter stupidity.'"- Quoted from "Vaccination: Fact of the Matter" by Jagannath Chatterjee,
http://www.whale.to/v/vaccination89.html>>[SEE also: http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/third-world-duped-on-polio-eradication/]

UNICEF DEVOTED TO POPULATION CONTROL/FEWER CHILDRENhttp://www.all.org/article/index/id/MjQyNg<<UNICEF
is, undoubtedly, the most well known and, probably, the most popular UN
agency among Americans. The organization received $282 million from the
United States alone in 2002. What is not well known, however, is
UNICEF's evolution from a life affirming, child saving and Nobel peace
prize-winning foundation to a contraceptive-distributing,
abortion-performing and sterilization-providing partner of some of the
world's most notorious "family planning" organizations.There was
major controversy in the UN - so much so that the organization's
structure was threatened. The World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF
were reluctant to join in the debate. WHO was unsure about the health
effects of the pill and UNICEF did not want to act before WHO.
Controversy within UNICEF itself threatened to split the Executive Board
in the spring of 1966. It was proposed that UNICEF funds would be spent
on providing women with access to family planning in those countries
where the government requested it but that UNICEF would not offer any
advice nor provide supplies or equipment to make them. Opponents argued
"it would be wrong for UNICEF to depart from its original mandate of
saving children in order to engage in activities to prevent them from
being born". The proposal was withdrawn and the issue tabled for a
year.The Population Information Program was the responsibility of
George Washington University Medical Center in Washington, D.C. until
July 1, 1978 and then that of John Hopkins University in Baltimore,
Maryland. These Reports clearly outline UNICEF's involvement with
population control throughout that time frame.>>

UNICEF'S DIRTY TRICKSA
Liberian actor has filed a $25 million lawsuit against UNICEF for
alleged child abuse over his starring role aged 13 in a fundraising film
as a murderous child soldier who tortures his victims.March 28 2013, http://www.africareview.com/News/Unicef+sued+for+child+abuse/-/979180/1733062/-/12n1vqjz/-/index.html<<Mike
James, now 28, says he and other cast members have been “stigmatised as
rebels, killers, cannibals and drug addicts” after being recruited for
the 1997 film Soldier Boy and made to act out eating human body
parts.>>UNICEF MADE MILLIONS OFF THAT "DOCUMENTARY, BUT PAID ITS 'STAR' A MEAGER $300!HE WAS AN ACTOR!

UNICEF-DRILLED WELLS HAVE CREATED ARSENIC POISONING PROBLEMUp to 75 million at risk from tainted water. 75 MILLION!<<The
arsenic crisis in Bangladesh was caused by the sinking of over one
million wells by foreign aid agencies and the Bangladeshi government
from the 1970s. The effort - intended to reduce the incidence of
water-borne disease in the region - has instead put millions of
Bangladeshis at risk of poisoning. "Bangladesh makes the Chernobyl
disaster look like a Sunday-school picnic," says Richard Wilson, a
Harvard University expert on arsenic poisoning.The problem was not
noticed until victims began showing external symptoms of arsenic
poisoning: calluses on the palms and soles of feet, leading to skin
cancers.Most of the wells were sunk by UNICEF, the United Nations
Children's Fund, in the 1970s and 1980s. The Bangladeshi government
considered suing UNICEF..."Most hydrogeologists worth their salt would
have known about it," claims John McArthur, a sedimentologist at
University College London, who points out that reports of chronic
arsenic poisoning started to emerge from neighbouring, and geologically
similar, West Bengal in the mid-1980s. >>http://www.nature.com/news/2001/011011/full/news011011-14.htmlUNICEF CLAIMS IT HAD NO IDEA...ETC, ETC.

UNICEF’s collusion with the Guatemalan government and media in their case against Intercountry Adoptions...THEY WON'T ALLOW ADOPTIONS BY "FOREIGNERS" EVEN THOUGH THIS MEANS CHILDREN LANGUISH AND EVEN DIE IN "ORPHANAGES" AND OTHER FACILITIES, OR GROW UP WITHOUT PARENTS OR A REAL HOME. WHEN NO ONE STEPS UP TO ADOPT WITHIN A NATION WHY NOT ALLOW ADOPTIONS BY OTHERS?http://illicittrafficking.wordpress.com/tag/unicef/

UNDER THE GUISE OF VACCINATING NIGERIANS, UNICEF ADMINISTERED CONTAMINATED VACCINE THAT CAUSES STERILIZATIONMarch
2004: <<The UNICEF campaign to vaccinate Nigeria's youth against
polio was found to be a front for sterilizing the nation. Dr. Haruna
Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist and Dean of the Faculty of
Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, took
samples of the vaccine to labs in India for analysis where evidence was
found of serious contamination. The vaccines contained toxic substances
that have direct effects on the human reproductive system.UNICEF is no friend of children.>>[SOURCES:
"UNICEF Nigerian Polio Vaccine Contaminated with Sterilizing Agents
Scientist Finds", LifeSiteNews.com, Kaduna, Nigeria, March 11, 2004.ANDState
Secret:Thousands Secretly Sterilized, May16, 2005, http://www.nigeriavillagesquare.com/forum/main-square/1280-state-secret-thousands-secretly-sterilized.html ]UNICEF WANTS TO LEGALIZE PROSTITUTIONJune 2003: A
high-ranking official with UNICEF called for the legalization of
prostitution and for UNICEF to make condoms available to "everybody,
everywhere and at all times". Urban Jonsson, UNICEF Eastern and Southern
African Regional Director urged that UNICEF take actions to
"de-criminalize sex-work and facilitate the organization of sex-workers
[since] when sex-workers are organized, they are in a stronger position
to negotiate safer sex with their clients." Mr. Jonsson also stated
"Abstinence is simply not a realistic option for most young people
today."[SOURCE: "Top UNICEF Official Calls for Legalized and Unionized Prostitution", C-Fam/LifeSiteNews.com, New York, June 5, 2003 ]

YEAH, THAT UNICEF!NICE FOLKS, YES?NO!!!SO NOW, THEY ATTACK CREDIBLE, DEDICATED NATURAL HEALTH AND EDUCATIONAL WEBSITES THAT SIMPLY OFFER FACTUAL RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC DATA THAT SHOWS THE REAL DANGERS AND THE TRUTH OF VACCINES?WHY?THERE
IS AMPLE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT PARENTS, OR SINGLE ADULTS, WHO DON'T WANT
VACCINES FOR THEIR CHILDREN OR THEMSELVES ON THE IMPECCABLY DOCUMENTED
GREENMEDINFO.COM WEBSITE. USE THEIR RESEARCH TOOLS AND SEARCH THEIR
ARTICLES, SUPPORT THEM ANY WAY YOU CAN.

ANOTHER PLACE TO TURN TO FOR FACTS IS...http://vactruth.com/2013/08/21/pharmaceutical-spy-tactics/THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE IS A MUST-READ ON THE ABOVE WEBSITE, I SINCERELY HOPE.<<Pharma Collects Data on Your Vaccine ConcernsAccording
to a recent news article, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) hired a text analytic
software company, called Luminoso, to find out what parents were most
concerned about with vaccines.The news article stated information on
two websites were collected, BabyCenter.com and WhattoExpect.com. In
similar NSA-like-fashion, neither the website owners nor parents were
aware of their information being anonymously collected.However, unlike
the NSA, GlaxoSmithKline and others are probably not doing anything
illegal – even though their behavior is still very chilling.[Reported
on:
http://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2013/05/01/glaxo-mined-online-parent-discussion-boards-for-vaccine-worries/]
>>THINK, PLEASE!WHY, WHY DO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES SPEND BILLIONS MORE ON ADS THAN ON RESEARCH?WHY THE HARD-SELL?

Are vaccines safe?Do they actually PREVENT people from contracting the diseases they claim to target?We've explored this before, so see my blog linked at the very beginning of this update,and be advised that the answer to both is, in too many cases, NO.

AND WHO IS COMPLICIT WITH BIG PHARMA AND UNSAFE DRUGS AND VACCINES?WHO APPROVES THESE FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ASSURING US ALL IS WELL?THE FDA, AND ONLY THE FDA CAN SIGN-OFF FOR THE RELEASE OF ANY AND ALL DRUGS HERE!WITHOUT THE FDA, THERE WOULD BE NO DRUGS ON THE MARKET, AND NO VACCINES!The
FDA has the supporting research, much done by nations which now BAN
some of the heavily-pushed 'vaccines', some by their OWN scientists,
research that has been peer-reviewed, that has shown to be
FACTUAL...vaccines can KILL, maim, destroy health, and have, and will
continue to.The lawsuits are too numerous for these attacks on
people's health to be "coincidence", to be 'scientifically unproven', to
be wrong!No, what is WRONG is that the FDA long ago subjugated
itself to the pharmaceutical industry, rolled-over for 'Big Pharma',
and even a presidential candidate saw that.I CAN FIND NO MAINSTREAM COVERAGE OF THIS SO...http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-fda-and-big-pharma-are-in-bed-together/

A
2006 survey of 997 FDA scientists revealed that forty percent feared
"retaliation" for voicing safety concerns over prescription drugs in
public. These are ALL scientists CONNECTED to the FDA!Over one-third
of those SAME scientists didn't even feel comfortable expressing safety
concerns inside the agency with colleagues, behind closed doors!What should this tell us?It
has only been the daring courage of a FEW independent FDA scientists
over the years, taking a stand despite what they have described as
intense intimidation and censorship from the FDA's own top officials,
who have stood up and warned the American public about dangerous
prescription drugs... like Vioxx.<<Merck:With a long list of
deaths to its credit, and more than $5.5 billion in judgments and fines
levied against it, it was five years before Merck made its $30-billion
recall of the painkiller Vioxx. After the drug was withdrawn, and 60,000
had already died, Merck picked up the pieces painlessly by getting a
new drug fast-tracked and on the market.That drug is Gardasil, a
vaccine that so far has been linked to thousands of adverse events and
at least 49 unexplained deaths. It's a situation that the FDA and CDC
have been denying repeatedly, even as the adverse reports mount. [SEE MY BLOG: "PROVEN DANGERS OF HPV/GARDASIL AND HEPATITIS B VACCINES", http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2013/05/proven-dangers-of-hpvgardasil-and.html]Baxter:
Dozens of recalls of products that caused deaths and injuries, at least
11 different guilty pleas to fraud and illegal sales activity, more
than 200 lawsuits – many of them stemming from selling AIDS-tainted
blood to hemophiliacs – and more than $1.3 billion in criminal fines and
civil penalties.REMEMBER BAXTER'S NAME WHEN THE FLU VACCINE HAD THE WHISTLE BLOWN ON IT?"Baxter To Develop Swine Flu Vaccine Despite Bird Flu
Scandal.
The fox has been given the duty of guarding the henhouse."April 27, 2009<<A
U.S. based pharmaceutical company that just weeks ago was involved
in a scandal involving vaccines tainted with deadly avian flu
virus has been chosen to head up efforts to produce a vaccine
for the Mexican swine flu that has seemingly migrated into the
U.S. and Europe.

Baxter confirmed over the weekend that it is working
with the World Health Organization on a potential vaccine to
curb the deadly swine flu virus that is blamed for scores of
deaths in Mexico and has emerged as a threat in the U.S., reports
the Chicago
Tribune.>>WORKING WITH THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION...SISTER AGENCY TO UNICEF!DARLING OF THE FDA!WE KNOW BAXTER HID FACTS BUT LET'S TRUST THEM AGAIN?INSANITY!

BUT ON THEY GO!

Pfizer: In the largest health care fraud settlement
in history, Pfizer was ordered to pay $2.3 billion to resolve criminal
and civil allegations that the company illegally promoted uses of four
of its drugs, including the painkiller Bextra, the antipsychotic Geodon,
the antibiotic Zyvox, and the anti-epileptic Lyrica. In a study
recently released by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMSHA), officials emphasized that people should not
assume there's no risk in prescribed medicines. The truth is, the only
way to avoid all risk, including death, from prescription drugs is to
not take them at all.>>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/10/26/prescription-drugs-number-one-cause-preventable-death-in-us.aspx

Literally
tens of millions of Americans have been harmed by such obvious FDA negligence
over the last decade, and well over one million have been killed by
FDA-approved prescription drugs, some of which were later found to have
been approved based on FRAUDULENT 'scientific' data.The
FDA, like too much of mainstream medicine, or what we erroneously call
'medicine', seems to have abandoned public safety, ethics, and
scientific integrity in favor of MAKING MONEY for shareholders, and
getting more money from our own 'Federal Corporation', WHAT WE CALL our government. We
can sanely and honestly say, given the facts and consumer-won class action
lawsuits before us, that the FDA has become the single greatest threat
to the health and safety of the American people, a greater threat than
any so-called 'terrorist group'! NO 'terrorist organization' has yet
been complicit in the death of a MILLION American citizens, has it?A
shocking 18.4 % of the 997 FDA scientists in the 2006 survey report
that they "...have been asked, for non-scientific reasons, to
inappropriately exclude or alter technical information or their
conclusions in a FDA scientific document."61% of these surveyed
scientists reported that they knew of cases where "Department of Health
and Human Services or FDA political appointees have inappropriately
injected themselves into FDA determinations or actions."Can you imagine that? I can!POLITICIANS
in high places are influencing the FDA, making themselves almost the
same as a criminal gang of thugs, who strong-arm 'legislation', who
interfere with that agency every chance they get. Even when the FDA
has been found negligent, been caught cheating on research results,
their handlers, their pals in political circles have done little but
gently slap their hands with a wink and a nod, and NOTHING GETS
FIXED!If you or I did the SAME things that politicians and Big
Business/Big Pharma are doing to make the FDA their slave agency, we'd
be tried for treason, or for terrorist acts, no doubt about it!Read the entire BUSH2 "Patriot Act" or NDAA of this president's regime if you doubt that. It's IN BOTH! YOU CAN'T "BUY-OUT" A THING LIKE THE FDA, BUT SOME HAVE!53% of surveyed scientists think the FDA sometimes provides INACCURATE information on drugs to the American people! THIS IS JUST INFORMATION "FROM THE HORSES' MOUTHS", AMERICA.

<<Understand
this very clearly, no medical drug in America can be released for
public use until and unless the FDA states it is safe. The FDA is the
agency responsible for every such decision on every drug. The buck stops
there.The revelations of ongoing knowledge to be found at the FDA
website page stagger the mind. Here is yet another implication: what
about all the studies on drugs that are published in prestigious medical
journals, month after month? These studies unequivocally claim the
drugs are safe. What level of fraud must exist for such peer-reviewed
studies to attain the false status of medical fact?

Perhaps this
quote from Marcia Angell, former editor of the New England Journal of
Medicine, will clarify that aspect of the scandal:“It is simply no
longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is
published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or
authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion,
which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor
of The New England Journal of Medicine.”>>(Marcia Angell, MD, The New York Review of Books, January 15, 2009)http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/05/17/hidden-in-plain-view-fda-murder/

Remember how America responded after the attack on the Twin Towers, the Pentagon on 9/11?The
media whipped us into a frenzy after 9/11, made us demand retribution, got us to
agree to a war in TWO nations that had NOTHING to do with the attack on
America then. We were screaming for heads to roll, patriotism became a
good word once again.There were less than 3,000 lives lost on 9/11,
plus the just under 5,000 American military men and women killed in the 'war' that the
Department of Defense ADMITS to. I'm only mentioning American
citizens because so few care to know how many foreign CIVILIANS have
died, or how many of THEIR military members. The point is, we
SCREAMED for those responsible for the initial loss of the 2,996 to be
captured and killed. Though our government swore they'd get those
responsible, they never did, never will. The hijackers were, all but
four, Saudi nationals, we were told, remember? Have we attacked Saudi
Arabia, or any Saudi except for allegedly hunting for Bin Laden? The
other 4 were from Egypt, Lebanon, and 2 from the United Arab Emirates,
we were told, remember? NONE were from Iraq, Iran, or Afghanistan, not a
one.Yes, we screamed for justice over 9/11, but 9/11 is repeated
almost every week by those that die from drug "treatments" and
"vaccines" here in America!WHY, AMERICA, WHY DON'T YOU SCREAM FOR RETRIBUTION FOR A MILLION DEATHS OF YOUR OWN PEOPLE? IF ANOTHER NATION WAS DOING THIS AND IT WAS MADE KNOWN TO US, WE WOULD CALL IT GENOCIDE, AND HAVE!WHY DON'T WE CALL IT THAT ALOUD, JUST CALL IT WHAT IT IS?OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA ALMOST NEVER COVER THE DAILY DEATHS BY PRESCRIPTIONS OR VACCINES!WHY
didn't we read more about little 8-weeks-old "Baby Stacy", a premature
twin who died after she was given NINE (9) vaccines in ONE day? Her twin
sister, Lesly, somehow survived.[SEE: "Christina England Vactruth
Baby Dies After 9 Vaccines in One Day" http://vactruth.com/2012/01/19/baby-dies-after-first-shots/ ]

WHY
didn't Americans read in OUR news what the Australian News reported in
August of 2012, that there had been 2,136 reports of adverse events and
ten (10) deaths reported following injection with CSL’s Fluvax and
Fluvax Junior, the vaccine that replaced Panvax in 2010?[The
Australian News: "10 Deaths linked to the anti flu vaccine"
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/deaths-linked-to-anti-flu-vaccines/story-e6frg8y6-1226441791947
]<<‘Fluvax is used for about half the nation’s estimated 6
million flu vaccinations each year. But the number of reported
side-effects for Fluvax is five times higher than the other three most
popular brands of flu vaccines together.’>>

<< In
February, Linda Morin reported that she was suing Merck, the
manufacturers of Gardasil, along with three doctors, pediatrician
Guylaine Larose, neurologist Amelie Nadeau and her family doctor, Lynne
Nadeau for the sum of $197,000. Ms. Morin stated that she had found her
14 year-old daughter Annabelle dead in the bathtub after she had
received her second Gardasil vaccination. [SEE: Thaddeus Baklinski
LifeSiteNews, " Parents sue after Quebec teen dies following Gardasil
vaccination", http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/parents-sue-after-quebec-teen-dies-following-gardasil-vaccination/
]

When people die by the thousands every week from prescription drugs/vaccines, why doesn't mainstream media cover it?The
discovery of a page, on the FDA’s own website from the year 2000, 13
years ago, proves the FDA is fully aware that the drugs it certifies as
safe have been killing Americans, at the rate of 100,000 per year, and
that they knew of OVER 2 MILLION "adverse drug reactions , ADRs, in that
same one year time frame![SEE:http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/DrugInteractionsLabeling/ucm114848.htm ]Don't these deaths matter?Maybe the stories of these senseless deaths just don't sell enough copies, or garner a big enough audience?Maybe they don't think pain, death, or suffering is valid except in combat, or some sort of disaster?I APPLAUD ONE RENSE.COM AUTHOR WHO ASKED:<<I
have to wonder: Would the people demand reform if the FDA actually
conducted nuclear bombing raids on U.S. cities? Would lawmakers finally
stand up and say the FDA should stop bombing our cities? Or would the
FDA brush off the critics and simply slap a black-box warning label on
the side of the B2 stealth bomber that said, "Warning: This bomb may
kill you," and then continue the bombing runs? Why isn't the FBI
conducting armed raids on the [FDA] agency right now and marching these
criminals away in handcuffs?>>In a June 2010 report in the
Journal of General Internal Medicine, study authors said that in looking
over records that spanned from 1979 to 2006 (the most recent year
available) they found that, of 62 million death certificates, almost a
quarter-million deaths were coded as having occurred IN A HOSPITAL
setting due to medication errors. THOSE ARE JUST HOSPITAL DEATHS!Adverse drug reactions cause injuries or death in 1 of 5 hospital patients. WHY NO WAR ON THIS? WE HAVE A WAR ON EVERYTHING ELSE![SEE:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/06/03/are-hospitals-really-more-deadly-in-july-when-novice-doctors-arrive/#.Uh_9g3_hctI ]

"'Meanwhile, the FDA pursues an agenda of attacking
nutritional supplements, and the latest federal regulations classify
these supplements as “potentially dangerous”—despite the fact that
supplements have a record of safety that is astonishing.'" ~ Jon
Rappoport, candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of
California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize. Worked as an investigative
reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and
health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other
newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe.

I SAW THE QUESTION ASKED OVER AND OVER IN MANY ARTICLES, "WHO HAS EVER DIED FROM A LACK OF VIOXX, OR OTHER DRUG?"PEOPLE DIE FROM DISEASE, DRUGS ONLY TREAT SYMPTOMS OF DISEASE!

I GRADUATED FROM A SMALL-TOWN HIGH SCHOOL IN THE DEEP SOUTH, 78 IN THE SENIOR CLASS.WE WERE ALL GIVEN THOSE FIRST POLIO VACCINES, THEN A FINAL SUGAR CUBE DRENCHED IN THE VIRUS.ONCE I READ ABOUT THE CONTAMINATION OF THOSE EARLY VACCINES WITH CANCER-CAUSING AGENTS, I BEGAN TO INQUIRE OF THE CLASS HISTORIAN ABOUT THE HEALTH OF OUR CLASSMATES. AFTER 15 YEARS FROM THE START OF THAT INQUIRY, WE LEARNED THAT 56 OF US HAD FACED SOME FORM OF CANCER, 5 HAD DIED, MANY OF US HAD MORE THAN ONE TYPE OF CANCER, SOME WERE STILL BATTLING THAT KILLER.YOU TELL ME WHAT THE ODDS OF THAT ARE THAT OVER 3/4ths OF AN ENTIRE CLASS WOULD GET SOME FORM OF CANCER..MY ONLY SON HOVERED BETWEEN LIFE AND DEATH FOR WEEKS FOLLOWING ONE TETANUS VACCINE, AS HAD HIS GREAT-GRANDFATHER AND GREAT-UNCLE.AFTER MORE THAN 20 YEARS OF LOOKING INTO THIS, I WILL NEVER AGREE TO BE VACCINATED FOR ANYTHING EVER AGAIN.WE HAVE THAT RIGHT, YOU HAVE THAT RIGHT...FOR NOW.