Q:

Term for the opposite of salami publishing

Question
Salami publishing refers to the practice of splitting scientific work into overly small pieces (least publishable units) and publishing a separate paper about each.
I am looking for a term for the opposite practice, i.e., lumping together a lot of or too much scientific work into one paper.

I prefer terms that can be understood (by a suitable audience) without further explanation. Essentially, I want something less cumbersome than opposite of salami publishing.
I have no strong preference regarding the tone of the term. E.g., it can be derogatory (but doesn’t need to be).
I am open to neologisms, but please consider the first point.

Background
This term would be useful for me to talk about the publishing culture in biology (or certain subfields thereof), where new relevant methods often do not get papers on their own, but are only published as the appendix to some paper that is primarily about findings achieved with that method.

A:

I call it "kitchen sink publishing."  I apply the term to papers which contain redundant methods for determining the result.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/everything_but_the_kitchen_sink

A:

Disclaimer: This answer is full of tongue-in-cheek neologisms ;-)
I would like to stay in the context of food and suggest
Gluttony publishing (more derogatory)
or
Banquet publishing (less derogatory).
You could even go as far as labeling the publication itself as banquet as in the following sentence.

He has just written a banquet paper of 40 pages. He could have easily salami sliced it into 5 papers. Doesn't he know that for most grants only the number of publications counts?

A slightly different term would be a buffet paper denoting a paper that is a collection of not necessarily tightly coupled topics where everyone can pick what he likes. It can also refer to a paper that is written to suit everybody.

A:

This depends on what you mean by "opposite". If you treat "salami publishing" as an extreme, then the more ordinary case (by far) is just "publishing". It needs no adjective. 
However, if you mean the opposite extreme, consider the following. Sometimes a field will have a period of intense work with a large number of (possibly) relatively small results. After that period ends or at least the rate of advancement slows, someone may decide to "consolidate" what has been recently learned in a summative paper that will have many references and a new top-level view of the field as it is then known. "Consolidation" and "Unification" are good terms for that sort of publication. Such a publication is a great resource for new researchers in the field (say, new PhD students). 
However, if you require a food metaphor, try paella. Of course it is best savored in Andalusia. And I guess that if you need an explanation about why this is a good metaphor you haven't tried to make (or eat) it. 

