text
stringlengths 0
4.54k
| labels
sequence | encoded_labels
sequence |
|---|---|---|
No. This ignores census results, historical use, and, most important, the colloquial language. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
What minute. Please at least be so kind enought to just post the email addy. Not everyone feels like clicking around. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
If we are talking about resuming negotiations, then it is the UK who is refusing, since it won't negotiate under previous terms, i.e. it won't sit at the table one on one without the presence of the FI Government (or something along those lines; I'm not sure about the exact official British invitation).
If you ignore those negotiations of the decades before the War, then it falls to a matter of perspective (point of view):
the UK refuses to negotiate without the presence of the FI Government (or refuses to negotiate and redirects negotiations to the FI Government; again I'm not sure); or
Argentina refuses to negotiate with UK if the FI Government is involved in any way, or refuses to negotiate with the FI Government as the sole negotiation partner.
In this last case, who is ""refusing"" to negotiate is a matter of where the editor is standing. (t) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
AH my God
What a scary pair of eyes, have you ever heard of visine. ohhh get some, and fast!!!!!!!!!!76.175.6.45 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
August 2006 (UTC)
Keep. 03:46, 27 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Please see [ related discussion]. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Edit request on 17 March 2013
218.214.78.112 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Quarter Horses are registered by the American Quarter Horse Association, or related organizations in other countries. The Wikipedia Article American quarter horse describes what they look like and has more info | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Well it's been moved now, and so I'll focus on human testing whilst considering ways to improve the List of bow tie wearers, the world needs to know who wore the bow. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
December 2005 (UTC)
The above is a mixture of lies and personal attacks. 10:47, 5 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
" | decline = I can only assume that means you are a blocked editor trying to evade your block. The editor who uses the pseudonym """" " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Gimbutas looniness again
""such as the glaringly obvious fact that many scholars accept the basic parameters of an an overall ""Pontic-Caspian steppe"" origin theory without swallowing every last detail of what Gimbutas came up with in the later part of her life.""
So 4% Kurgan Theory = 100% Kurgan Theory? Nice math! Not ironic at all. Me obtuse? Okay. Sure, boss. I mean, are you really rooting for a neopagan revisionist tale?? Are you a Wiccan or just undiagnosable? To reiterate just in case you lost attention: ′′′Pontic-Caspian homeland => within reason; Kurgan => petty modern gender politics.′′′ Anyways, I know you're just trololollin' on WP but when you're ready to learn linguistics and archaeology for real, I will be more than happy to help you out, you hilarious neopagan. Until this intellectual drought of yours passes, I still rather enjoy this dialogue for more immature reasons, I admit. 50.72.139.25 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
We should go with the english common usage, for those article titles. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Hi, you and your ban of propaganda pawns will be blocking me soon, before I move on to important things in life. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"WP:TITLE says, ""If an article title has been stable for a long time, and there is no good reason to change it, it should not be changed. If it has never been stable, or unstable for a long time, and no consensus can be reached on what the title should be, default to the title used by the first major contributor after the article ceased to be a stub."" In this case, that would be New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
That was no mistakes, because 17N wanted to get rid of NATO and the U.S. too, but I guess some editor missed the connection ... (t, c) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
yeahbitch
Stop defending neo-Nazis, you fu | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Love waves
I noticed the section explaining love waves describes them as being both faster than Reyleigh waves, but slowest as well. I for one don't know which statement is true. I would like to see someone who does know the answer to edit the article, then delete this portion of the discussion. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Memorable Gaffes by country section
An utterly non-encyclopedic section that is really just a coatrack way to list non-notable or non-context events. No sourcing or anything helpful to back up that these are more ""memorable"", if anything it is just what happens to be more recent. If anything, it needs to be trimmed only to gaffes that have their own page. (let's chat) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Why do you not think I deserve an apology here?76.119.75.131 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
There's an article Tractive force which explains the principle.
The class 66 (and GM locos in general) have anti wheelspin control, maybe it doesn't work ? ) , they (66) are less powerful on paper, (but only a few percent), so probably less powerful in practice as well - (with or without wheelspin control).87.102.67.84 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Ron,
One more trim. Let me know what you think, need to leave for a few hours. I'll check in later.
cl | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Editing under a new name does not remove your conflict of interest, nor does it address your clear intention to promote a product on Wikipedia. If the company is notable, you will need to provide a clear and credible assertion of notability, backed up by reference to major independent sources. (talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
At this time, Orangemarlin is not under any sanctions, he has simply been notified of the pseudoscience case. Thanks for the comments though, I'll keep them in mind going forward. onka | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Truth be told I am dumbfounded, too. I think the motto warrants a paragraph of explanation. Otherwise I'm afraid we'll keep having people ""fixing"" it. 17:36, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
There's also information from facts & figures that I've founded:
Stormforce 10 was the first water ride in the UK to have a backwards drop.
The owner and chairman, George Bryan went to Disneyland and went on the Pirates of the Caribbean ride and took an idea from it to create Pirate Adventure which opened in Pirate Cove in 1990. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Speedy deletion request declined
Hi Joe, I have declined your speedy deletion request for 203d RED HORSE Squadron. The article has a few sentences of prose, so it is not eligible for A3. Feel free to PROD it or nominate it at AfD. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Please note (to any administrator) that Zackaback can be unblocked as soon as he starts communicating. · (talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
AfD Nomination: Whistle Sports
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that Whistle Sports meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.
Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whistle Sports. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.
Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the ""articles for deletion"" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Thanks, Jiang, for working on this. We need to clean this up and make the text tighter, but maybe later.... – 10:56, 2005 Mar 14 (UTC) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
n.b. Yep, there exist reliable sources for /bin/true. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I never made a single bad edit under this account yet you ban me, I would like to appeal this unworthy ban. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Why is it absurd? What is absurd is complaining about something and then asking someone else to remove it. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
This is not right at all. This is NOT FLOOR HOCKEY this is a prejudice variation of floor hockey. This artice needs to be split VERY BADLY. WHAT A DISAPOINTMENT. FIX IT! this artice should be called 'floorball, some lousy forign version of floor hockey'. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
This is such an obvious merge. The man's only notability derives from this seigenthaler nonsense. His bio-blurb could easily fit inside that article. Someday this will be merged. Until then, I am taking this off my watchlist. War | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Just click on it and it will tell you how to use it. | talk2me''' " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I have no idea how to put tables in Inkscape. I'd just get 12 squares in a row and make sure the grid is on. // ]] " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Weird Tits
This article is full of LULZ. WTF, m8? | [
"toxic",
"profane"
] | [
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
's inability to understand | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
yes, it's an article about him and that was a fact about him you cant remove it because you dont like it
while you're at it you may as well remove the WHOLE article about the word Fuck because its kind of a ""rude word"" too..." | [
"toxic",
"profane"
] | [
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
K is radioactive
from potassium page:
""Naturally occurring potassium is composed of three isotopes, one of which, 40K, is radioactive. Traces (0.012%) of this isotope are found in all potassium...""
So there's no need to make a distinction... K 40 or otherwise.
Please refrain from editing things you don't understand." | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
You work those articles, Bitch!
Write 'em, clean 'em up, format 'em, ref 'em. Do it, Bitch, NOW!
Yeah, you like dat, dontcha faggy jew boy?
All the Worst, 72.76.1.33 | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I laugh that you find cold hard stats deceiving, and that the rural counties of Maryland are desolate and therefore uninmportant. Wikipedia is not a place to espouse your agenda and its often illogical biases. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
" What are you talking about? What you did is the fill-in-the-blank question: Gusuku ... often refers to castles or fortresses in ______ that feature stone walls. And your answer is ""the Ryukyu Islands."" That's wrong in the sense that we wouldn't say, ""We speak Germanic"" when we actually speak English. Castles or fortresses that feature stone walls are typical of Okinawa. Applying the term to other island groups is highly problematic to say the least. Narratives about gusuku are truly chaotic. No wonder you don't understand the situation correctly. No one can define the meaning of gusuku, which reminds me of family resemblance. What's why I avoided the ""A is B"" definition and used ""A often refers to B"" in the article. Explaining many conflicting theories as I did in the article is confusing. So I present just one hypothesis which I personally support: The word gusuku originally meant stone walls that, say, partitioned agricultural fields. In other words, the word gusuku was not associated with castles. This meaning survives in Yaeyama. There has been a long tradition of mountain cult. At first, the word gusuku was not associated with mountain cult. In Amami, medieval mountain fortifications, that are typical of mainland Japan, were constructed, probably in response to Ryūkyū's repeated invasions. At this stage, the word gusuku was not associated with these mountain fortifications. In Okinawa, some sacred mountains were later fortified with stone walls. One consequence of the fusion of mountain cult and fortification was the association of the word gusuku with mountain cult and/or fortification. The association of gusuku with stonework was weakened, but anyway Okinawa's castles and fortresses had stone walls. Ryūkyū finally conquered Amami and introduced the noro ritual system to Amami. The new meanings of gusuku (1. related to mountain cult, 2. fortification) were also introduced to Amami. Most of the former medieval mountain fortifications were abandoned, but some were transformed into sacred places and given the name of | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
gusuku even though they lacked stone walls. Some people of Amami might have interpreted the word gusuku as fortifications regardless of whether they had stone walls. Others reinterpreted the word as a sacred place regardless of whether it had stone walls. For this reason, some gusuku are on sand dunes, on cliff edges, and in caves. Archaeologists of Okinawa Prefecture re-used the word gusuku as a technical term (yet another meaning). This was the source of confusion. They referred to Okinawa's castles and fortresses that feature stone walls as gusuku. They met fierce oppositions from folklorists because their use of gusuku was not grounded in people's actual usages. Some archaeologists of Okinawa Prefecture attempted to extend the gusuku-as-fortifications framework to Amami, Miyako and Yaeyama, regardless of whether local people referred to the target as gusuku (The remains of human settlements of Yaeyama are not called gusuku by local people either). They met fierce oppositions not only from folklorists but also from fellow archaeologists. It is convenient to consider a dichotomy between inductive and deductive reasoning. Linguists, folklorists and ethnologists base their arguments on people's actual usages and try to infer a generalized conclusion from them. By contrast, archaeologists often define a term, independently of people's actual usages, and apply it to those which meet the definition. Due to lack of written materials, archaeologists need to name archaeological findings by themselves. So they naturally clash with scholars from other disciplines. It is important to note that the gusuku-as-fortifications framework (that's what the lead sentence says) is no longer supported in the archaeology of the Amami Islands. The renaming of so-called ""Uragami Gusuku"" was a symbolic event. A gusuku is a gusuku only because people refer to it as such. It's not because the referent meets some definition. In Amami, gusuku (as a technical term) is dead, long live gusuku (as to people's actual usages)! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I note that people on here just got Wikid77 blocked for three months because he allegedly communicated behind closed doors, called ""canvassing."" Why isn't re-writing a whole article just with a group of people who all agree with each other, with no clear notice to the public what is going on or where this draft is located, or how they can participate, even worse? This sure looks worse to me, like some sort of Tag Team situation, even if it isn't exactly canvassing. I don't see why it is okay for a group to plan to remove a whole article behind closed doors, while what he did is so egregious you wanted him blocked for three months. In my opinion, this attempted re-write behind closed doors violates Wikipedia policy on openness. That is all I am going to say for now at this level. Have a nice day. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Ok then. Well I havent found any new reviews yet. Just the ones that are already there. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"::::::::::::::I would suggest that it's not necessarily an ""anti-vax"" site as suggested, and it does cite sources within the body if was read. Nonetheless, it raises interesting points (such as efficacy being related to age and to a particular strain)and does present the other side of the argument. With respect to purported anti-vax statements on websites, this is against the standard of practice in most Canadian provinces and the CCO has fined members up to 25K for those shenanigans. Nonetheless, we should not pick one example and make attributions, for I can go to MD websites and show them endorsing questionable methods such as homeopathy. We need to be careful with giving fringe POVs too much weight here which seems to be an increasing concern.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Report
I thought it fair to let you know that I have reported your attacks on me here. . | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
(www.ebenefits.va.gov) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Thank you for the assistance, really helps ) But in regards to the pages, you may be able to help me with a couple of questions. I know the songs by Kylie that I made have not charted, won an award, or have been covered by any artists as stated by WP:NSONGS, there are a selection of songs I found on Wikipedia by really famous artists that kinda sits on the same boat as these articles. For example, articles Superpower (song), Rocket (Beyoncé song) and Rocket (Beyoncé song) by American singer Beyonce are well cover just like my articles but have not charted, won an award or have been covered by a variety of artists as stated by the criteria (maybe the music video significance allows it on the site?), alongside Who Am I Living For? by American singer Katy Perry. Also, some articles have charted like Double Rainbow (song) and Choose Your Battles by Perry or Carmen (Lana Del Rey song) and Money Power Glory by American singer Lana Del Rey are only provided by some of the albums information, reviews and sources rather than independent sources about the song itself, etc. Some of the articles I made, like ""Too Far"" and ""I Don't Need Anyone"" feature info about being released promotionally through radio airplay and proposals of being an official single. Also, the WP:NSONGS does say that those three criterias do not have to been needed but are afromented to. I'm not trying to make excuses, that is not my intention, but maybe you can help me out on this factor so I can have a clearer idea and mind on what I can do and cannot do with song/album articles. That would be much appreciated ) (talk · contribs} " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Listen, I really don't care what wikipedia's policies are, Troll metal does not exist and whether or not people think it does is irrelevant. It does not, hence, it should not be listed. The only people who care about keeping it are people who want to role-play bureaucrats on their favorite online encyclopedia.
Break a rule; keep your sanity. It is a fair trade, I think. If you want to defend a paragraph that you know doesn't belong in there, then why defend it because the community of unqualified teenyboppers said it should be? It makes me wonder if you take pills....
This POV thing is nonsense. It isn't about what people want to think, it is about what is real. Troll metal does not exist, hence it doesn't belong. Screw the morons who think otherwise. They make my nappy hair soggy with sweat from anger and frustration. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
So depending on whether a candidate was a more right or left winging secessionist, such a 2012 candidate could away enough votes to sway an election to the opponent of someone support by the COI editor. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Result of the GAR
Boston and Lowell Railroad
result:Delist 3-0
Warned 5 weeks ago by me regarding lack of inline citations. Delist.
delist
Delist, all three of these articles have not improved since they were notified of their status.
Delist No inline references.
This is the consensus to delist. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Category:Wikipedians who use userboxes for statistical reasons
maybe you like Category:Wikipedians who use userboxes for statistical reasons, I use the template now. I am not a big fan of user boxes, but if it helps in statistics it's good. So I will maybe deploy more in the future. (Talk)
Thanks, but no, thanks. ""Statistical reasons"" sounds as a great reason for userboxes, but it is fundamentally flawed. Unless all Wikipedians are mandated to use userboxes for ""statistical reasons"" (an unlikely event), the statistics gathered this way is bound to be mostly, erm, useless. Plus, I am not that excited about a possibility of adding (yet another) bright yellow userbox to my already too bright userpage )— • (yo?); " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Volt marketing
How about blow the current redundant para away, first of all. I think the Volt has been an interesting marketing exercise, but have not read any analysis of it /as such/ in a RS. So just lose the whole section for the time being. I wonder if anyone has done that for prius, which must rank as one of the most successful automotive marketing exercises for a long time. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
About misrepresentation, Ernst and fighting: I remember that incident I think, but missed that two editors had been banned. Wow - who were they? talk|contribs| | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Actually I think what you mean to say is this: Clostridium difficile infection can cause pseudomembraneous colitis which can lead, in extreme cases, to toxic megacolon. The C. diff infection often comes about as a result of taking a broad-spectrum antibiotic (such as Clinamycin) which destroys the normal gut flora, enabling C. diff, if present or introduced, to completely take over. Normally the beneficial species of microorganisms in the gut flora can overcome C. diff. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
But stop this rubbish about Arabic and apartheid . Keep factual and accurate and it will be much easier for you to be taken serious. / -Chess | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Sorry, I wasn't aware but it appears that I was blocked sometime in the last 24 hours. All that would appear to prove is that was somewhat myopic when it comes to the big picture. A prominent part of that big picture, aside from the obvious cluelessness of Auslondonder, is the notice at the top of this very page. I also mentioned somewhere in that palaver that I was doped on morphine and was going to bed. The block came after that, I think, because I certainly didn't see it. D'oh. - | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Hello again. Someone has found a better angled shot for the article. Assuming that one won't be soon deleted (fair assumption?), mine isn't needed. (talk) 21:00, October 3, 2014 (UTC) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
hello
im not sure of the proper way to address you here on wikipedia but i dont appreciate your accusations. i am not abusing multiple accounts. i have one account. i realize that i was, mistakenly editing the liddell article and i fixed that. my addition to the article is legit and can be backed by numerous sources. please do not erase it again. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Your question at the Help desk | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Ok, sorry, they were not spamming. (talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
You suggest a rewrite. Please elaborate. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
":::::You seem to work on hearsay, not on original sourses. Where Hansen did predict that? In his 1985 Nature paper he gives quite conservative predictions. Last year discoveries about increased ice sheet melting made some researchers increase the predictions from 0.3 to 1.0 m per century (see for example the Science Magazine 2006 Science Breakthough #3). I believe the ""several feet"" prediction you write about was also supposed to happen in a century or two. Don't be so hasty. It will come in due time.
Also your claims that satellites do not see global warming is simply rehashing old arguments that have been already refuted (Wentz and Schabel 1998 who ""discovered that the original satellite data, published in 1995, was not adjusted for the natural decay of spacecraft altitude caused by atmospheric drag"" and all debate that followed: for example the Science papers on the subject). I would not agree that the Hockey Stick has been recognized as fraud. It is Mann (the main ""fraudster""), not von Storch (the sceptic), after all, who is given the priviledge to write the newest review paper on the subject (Michael E. Mann, 2007, Climate Over the Past Two Millennia).
Enough for now. Do you have any sources of your own to match these?
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
why on earth would I want to edit your page? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I'll move it to his talk page, hope you don't mind. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
High gravity as a substitute for high speed relatistic time dilation effect
From the article:
Using time dilation under the Theory of General Relativity, for instance:
Residing inside of a hollow, high-mass object;
Are you sure this is accurate? I was under the impression that according to the shell theorem, the net gravity inside a hollow, symmetrical sphere was zero. If the hollow object isn't symmetrical, there could be some gravity inside, but in that case it would be no different from (and probably less efficient than) standing on the outside of a high-mass object. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
REDIRECT Talk:TRS-80 Model 100 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
", but I strongly agree with Doktorbuk that it is better ""to make the project better than reopen all the endless discussion for just one word""" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Do not remove deletion tags from any page as you did for Electric head (band) unless you are an administrator, it is considered vandalism and if you persist you may be banned from editing. Cheers | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
OK I read this which explains all. Pythagoras learned all his philosophy from the Egyptians. Much of Aristotle's work was not written by him, but by the Egyptians &c.; I'm not sure this view is sufficiently notable enough to include in Wikipedia, although it all sounds very plausible and may be true. The problem is we are bound to verifiability, not truth. Sorry. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
REDIRECT Talk:USCG Treasury-class cutter | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Retirement
We'll miss you when you hang up your spikes at the end of the year. Al Desmond 8/16/2010 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
FG9
Discussion on LocoNotes about a heavy fuel B-A1A EMD locomotive called the ""FG9"". It was never built. Don Strack started the topic as he has correspondence between EMD and Union Pacific Superintendent of Motive Power Mr. Neuhart. SSW9389 SSW9389 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"::: I think I got all the notes, just adding about Relay then over to you again... Thanks, ty.007
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I thought the message was from someone else, your talkpage history says you copied that message from another page which explains my thought. Indeed itr is time for bed, goodnight, | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Said from someone who had some very offensive userboxes on their page till a few days ago. The point in referring to the ads is to reaffirm its historical accuracy which Haymaker ridiculously called into question. WO Please leave me a wb if you reply " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Well done, you helped a LOT by deleting teams, wow, that is so professional and such a phenomenal contribution to this problem. By the way, thanks for asking what is happening, at least! Cheers! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Re: Personal attacks
I have removed the following statement from Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/Karmafist:
""but i would support electing Karmafist as most abusive, mendacious, hypocritical, and unfit admin in the WP project.""
I feel that this statement constitutes a personal attack, and therefore have removed it. If you disagree with this action, please discuss either on user talk or on the talk page of the Arbcom vote. (TALK • CONTRIBS)
thanks for informing me. i reworded it to indicate more of what Karmafist has done rather than simply what he is. i believe this information is important for people to read lest Karma do to them what he has done to me. when an abusive and unfit admin (of whom two of the present ArbCommissioners have voted to desysop him) tries to increase his power by running for ArbCom, there is certainly increased danger of abuse and harrassment to legit editors of WP. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
So, Necrothesp, let's get this straight. You wrote an article on a woman whose crowning achievement seems to be that she ran a pottery company for something a bit over a year before World War II, with her husband, and yet you doubt the notability of a woman who has curated at least nine exhibitions over a period of 20 years at one of Australia's most important art galleries and continues to do so? Should I remind you that four years later your article only has one reference, no notes and no external links?
It's not that I dislike the disambiguation page. I'm all for it, and would certainly agree with adding a reference to a disambiguation page on this one, once the move has been made. But it seems entirely sensible to me to have a page for the only entry that's currently for someone unambiguously called Julie Robinson at the address http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Robinson and have the disambiguation page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Robinson_(disambiguation). If someone else more notable comes along with a claim to that exact address, I'd happily support her taking this page, too. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
thrash metal and speed metal there | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
April 2008
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Richard Wagner. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. † " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I was thinking the same thing. The ""criticism"" section is more of an ""attacking the critics"" section. This whole screed is way beyond NPOV. 206.124.6.222 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Close connection
Yes, since I'm a Wikipedia user, I didn't like to see Webconverger article get out of date with the current release version. I've refrained from making substantial edits to the text and I've made no attempt to hide myself which seems commonplace on other articles. I've declared I work for Webconverger on my user page.
Notability
IT media have covered Webconverger several times and there is non-exhaustive list here: http://webconverger.org/press | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Mister adijapan, administrator of ROMANIA, what is the error if i add at section NATIVE name near the others native name, one and the most importan for us. ????? ( ) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Advice
Hallo, I see you've added several articles to Wikipedia about Lifestyle brands etc. A few points:
Please learn how to add Categories - see the changes I've made to your articles
Please check where your links are going: I've fixed a link to Patagonia which was intended for Patagonia (clothing), but you've got links to disambiguation pages in your Icon brand article.
Please do not add blog sites as External links - see WP:ELNO
You can make a link to Icon brand from the words ""Icon brands"" by adding an ""s"" at the end of the link: [[Icon brand]]s. Much neater than repeating the whole thing in a piped link.
The See Also section should not include articles which are already linked within the article.
Please don't use informal language like ""it's"" for ""it is"": this is an encyclopedia. (It's quite OK on talk pages).
There is a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia, but it is an interesting journey. Happy Editing. D " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"::Unlikely, not in main body, but such info could be justified in making up a section called Influences in modern culture or something. disc.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"|decline=Unfortunately, I see no indication that you intend to stop inserting misinformation into Wikipedia, and from the wording of your request I get the impression you know what you are doing is wrong. — " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
You exactly know this if you have read what is written above.
""contradicts""? how can it contradict the claim when it recognises that there were criticism, wherever it came from?
On top, I'm completely against the insertion of Suny, who's neither an historian nor a philologist, who's not a specialist on Moses, and whose paper is not on Moses. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Gotcha. ) I didn't realize it was a GA. That said, even with featured articles, there is still room for improvement. I won't fight you about it though. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I have been blocked
Some ochlarchist/unscientifical administrator has blocked my account. This is a severe blow to libertarian research on wikipedia! Unblock me this instant we will be forced to try you at the International Anarchist Tribunal and you will be issued a brown card and be removed from the anarchist movement. The information I am adding is based on reliable independent third party sources, easily verifiable, and 100% according to Wikipedia's principle about verification. It confirms that the Northern sections of IFA-IAF exists 100%. This is no joke. The so called ""anorg-warning you are linking to is totally unreliable and 100% a hoax, and is 100% rejected and turned down by IIFOR at http://www.anarchy.no/anorgwarning.html . If my account is blocked, it is an attack on the truth and verification
~ Anna Quist" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
The world does not recognize Israel's position on Jerusalem, by a majority of 193 to 1. The majority of states recognize The State of Palestine by a majority of 130 to 63. If you want a debate about WP:Undue, you'd lose on that score alone, since, as I noted, the current opening line gives undue weight to a fringe position. Still, we're here not to quarrel, but to find a sensible arrangement for an inadequate lead. I'm happy to withdraw my qualifiers if the current majority prefers the text as Evansh2008 and Tiamut tailored it, by the way. Since the SoP is a state occupied by Israel, arguments of the kind you are adducing do not apply. We do not underwrite power arrangements here, we simply state what the best sources agree is the case, which here, is that Jerusalem is not wholly in Israel, is occupied, and the occupied Palestinian part is more or less left to its own resources in managing the mess in its quarter. Since the article deals with all of the city, there's no way of equivocating over this, and trying to maintain NPOV while relegating the Palestinian fact to a footnote. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Please obtain a Wikipedia User ID
It would greatly help the discussions here, and even help the pro-Chabad writers, if they would simply register at the top of the page as regular Wikipedia contributors, with their own nicks of course. It would facilitate communications and make life easier as we edit our way through life on this Wikipedia project. Thank you and yasher koach. 09:05, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Radiopeople for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
'I am nobodies sock-puppet. this is tripe. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Can you check this guy...
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"::You're welcome—I also posted on the article's talk page to try to clear things up. 1217
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Subsets and Splits