Datasets:

ELVISIO

/

incorrect_examples_dataset

like 0

i feel much less generous with this film than others of its ilk. the portrayal of madmen in this century is always done with them being so totally bizarre as to be a different species. their antics are so outrageous as to be totally fictionalized. everyone is napoleon or some other historical figure while or they have a fascination with chickens. they are on the make or beating each other up. it as if the scriptwriter said and what can i make up for them to do and without an sense of what insanity or even mental illness is. watch the wonderful human portrayal in one flew over the cuckoo nest where the illnesses are believable and real. i once worked in a state mental hospital. i do not see any of these guys. these are too smart and calculating to make them come to life.

this movie and i would not call it a film and was basically about nothing and functioned mostly for the popular acts of the time. yeah the war was on full swing (pun intended) and and this movie gave the troops and our audiences a treat. but let have something with a bit more substance. loved seeing a young buddy rich on the drums. the music was good throughout. but one cameo after another gets old fast. i do not even recognize zero mostel. so if youre one from the greatest generation and as they say and you will definitely enjoy this. movie.

now this film isn not going to scare anyone and but it was interesting for two reasons two big reason and a smaller one well and that three reasons and isn not it. the first reason this is interesting is the special effects. i found them to be quite interesting and somewhat spectacular. to see the hair growing on marsha a. hunt and sybil danning was creepy and especially when they were participating in a ménage à trois. of interest and is the fact that this marsha hunt is the famous brown sugar of the rolling stones song and and that she was in the infamous nude scene in the london cast of the rock musical hair. besides the special effects and there were two other points of note in this film and and they were brought out repeatedly during the closing credits. i lost count and but i swear that sybil danning bared those points for us in the closing credits at least a dozen times and maybe many more. theyu were the most outstanding feature of the film.

as soon as it hits a screen and it destroys all intelligent life forms around . but on behalf of its producers i must say it doesn not fall into any known movie category and it deserves a brand new denomination of its own . it a neurological drama . it saddens and depresses every single neuron inside a person brain. it the closest thing one will ever get to a stroke without actually suffering one. it drives you speechless and all you members go numb and your mouth falls open and remains so and and the most strange symptom of all is that you get yourself wishing to go blind and deaf. no small feat for such a sort of a movie. the only word that comes to my mind just having finished my ordeal is outrage .

as a child the first installment (the little mermaid) was my favorite movie. it was filled with great characters and songs and and a fun family film. a week or so again i watched this movie for the first time. i believe that this movie was like most sequels and do not surpass their original. i think that i feel this way possibly because i had high expectations and i have grown up. however and it is not a bad film. it starts when ariel has just given birth to a beautiful child and melody. eric and ariel feel threatened by morgana (eurselas sister) and so they build a large wall around their house which lies on the sea. as melody grows up she begins to wonder outside of the walls where she is forbidden to go. trouble stirs up as morgana tries to take control of the seven seas. i do not want to give away any of the movie so you have to see it to find out. i did like that the voices are the same and again wonderful singing. i think this is a good family film though overall.

what was this about . pre destination and you can not change the future cause it has already been written . i will give it this much. i did want to see what happened next and therefore watched the whole movie. this movie took a concept and made it watchable. if youre looking for a recommendation and see it at matinee prices. no thrills but an interesting concept. they should have left the y2k reference out.

i like the time period and i like the attempt and but watching a movie that looks like i am looking at it through a coke bottle gives me a headache. if i played computer games that were this blurry and out of focus and i would upgrade my computer. could be that this was the look the director was after and but not so it hurts the eyes and you want to leave after 10 minutes. if i hadn not taken someone with me to this film and i was out of there. even though it was a series and not a movie per say and band of brothers accomplished this. they made it look like wwii footage and with just a touch of graininess and but it was still a pleasure to watch. movies need real people and with real sets and and real locations while use cgi when it is appropriate and not for an entire film.

i should love this movie . the acting is very good and barbara stanwyck is great but the the movie has always seemed very trite to me . the movie makes working class people look low and cheap . the fact that the daughter is ashamed of her mother and that the daughter does not rise above it has always made me a bit uneasy . barbara stanwyck as the mother worships the daughter but the daughter forgoes a mothers love to find happiness with her well to do fathers family . i wonder how many others who have seen this film feel this way about it. again the acting was very very good and worth watching . i really do not like the story line . just a personal preference . thank you.

just a regular jason lee movie and there were some parts of the movie that were funny. the undertone of the move is to live life on the edge i guess. these are the types of movies that i think 14 year old girls watch at slumber parties. it was an all right movie. it is kind of one of those movies you have on in the back ground and look up every now and then to when something catches attention. i think that julia stiles and selma blair are a good combination and would like to see them in a movie with a good story and plot. its just kind of a boy meets girl movie. this is that perfect movie they would show on comedy central. i am glad that i do not see this movie in the theater and i would have been angry. but i guess that why i do not see it in the theater.

firstly and there are some good things about this film and but it all cliche slasher stuff combined with a teen movie. in the advertising of this movie and that i have seen and a large emphasis was on the fact that denise richards is in it and but she a poor actress and and not as good looking as people try to make her out to be (not that that has anything to do with the movie). and what with that look she gives everyone. perhaps it part of the character and but like i said and the acting. still and the writing is fine. you know who it is all throughout the movie and and you can almost predict what is about to happen and but not in an irritating way. i think the book it based on is probably good and judging by the plot line and but next time i will read the book to find out rather than watch this.

my brother tom aspect ratio represent 1. 85 represent1sound format represent dolby digitalfollowing an episode of sexual abuse at the hands of a trusted neighbor and young jessica (jenna harrison) forms a relationship with a strange boy (ben whishaw) she meets in the woods. unfortunately and whishaw has secrets of his own and no less troubling and far more dangerous. dour drama and sparked by brave performances by harrison and whishaw and in which two kindred spirits immerse themselves in a mutual love of nature after being traumatized by their experiences in the real world. unfortunately and their friendship unravels as harsh reality begins to intrude and leading to an inevitable tragedy. directed by dom rotheroe and photographed in digital video format and the movie looks ragged in places (too many awkward close ups and sloppy hand held camera moves) and takes a while to find its feet and but the dramatic pay off is quietly rewarding.

this is probably the first entry in the lance oleary or nurse keat detective series while in subsequent oleary films and he was played by much younger actors than guy kibbee. a group of relatives (all played by well known character actors) gathers in an old house (on a rainy nite and of course. ) to speak to a wealthy relative and who goes into a coma. while they wait for him to recover and all sorts of mysterious goings on happen and including a couple of murders. a creepy film while worth seeing.

they should have named this movie . blonde women that needed to get their roots colored. also the main character and geeze and the too tight sweaters. the giggling. thought the guy did a good job though. i keep hoping we will find a good 8 star christmas movie to watch this week. the dart throwing. had to laugh at that too. we have still got 3 more on the dvr to watch and maybe we will get lucky. oh yeah and i figured the guy out pretty quickly and nailed it when he picked up the flowers and then drove out with his cousin. i told my daughter they were on their way to the cemetery. and how stupid was it that the two gals followed them there spying on them. creepy.

the story is similar to et represent an extraterrestrial run around on earth and tries to come back home. while its stay on our planet and it will create friendly ties with humans. but and unlike et which exudes drama and comedy and poetry and this movie is only fun. it is indeed a pure dysney production represent its core audience are children and the movie is more more in the visual than in the message. thus and you will find some funny scenes (the first sighting of the town and a cosmic stray toaster) and the casting is experimented and with special mentions to doc and who rejuvenates in a mac fly character and and to hurley and who seems open to auto derision. ice on the cake represent the main title is scored by danny elfman and and like every other great composer and you recognize his voice before he is even credited.

the story at the outset is interesting represent slavery in the (late) 20th century from west africa to the arab middle east. the problem with it is that it intentionally castigates two of director richard fleisher favorite enemies represent arabs and germans. to make us believe that very arab looking men would be free to roam around and easily catch blacks in west africa is as believable as whites hunting for slaves in roots. obviously both trades are or were run by locals and involve(d) much more sophisticated networks. while arab countries are complicit in today child and sex slave trade and israel is one of the worst violators according to amnesty international. so why only point out arabs and then choose a german as the only european buyer. it obvious bias and hatred of those people by a jewish director. the acting is above average and especially by peter ustinov (suleiman) and kabir bedi (malik). michael caine (dr. linderby) is good as always.

knights was just a beginning of a series and a pilot and one might say. the plot (i really shouldn not call it that and there wasn not any plot) wasn not logical at all and there were many mistakes and like [warning and i am summarizing the plot] representin the beginning of the movie someone said that there was only a couple of those cyborgs (the bad guys) but after the climax and nea found out that there were many many more left of them. and it was told that cyborgs were hard to kill and but after a month training and nea could kill them with a single blow. the movie was just pure kicking. i wasn not surprised at all and when i found out that the leading star was a kick boxer. there was one positive thing in the whole movie represent it really gave a great deal of laughter when watching it and talking about it with my friends. i recommend watching it and if you are in need of laughter.

while watching the film and i am not sure what direstion it was to take. there a reason a writer shouldn not direct his work and even act in it as well and you can not do it all. i felt the story really suffered in this film due to the director wearing so many hats. ms. mcteer is the film. to add to her amazing talents and her portrayal of this woman was why i was engaged. here is a british actress who can do anything. in my view and conflict is what makes drama and a great story. i felt this film do not have that. everything was somewhat easy for the characters and there were no real obstacles preventing the chahracters from getting what they wanted. watch the film for the sweetness and but most of all for ms. mcteer brilliant performance.

et obsession with dannielynn smith is despicable. leave the child alone. with all the constant attention she will most likely grow up psychotic and depressed or worse. think of princess diana and how she longed for privacy. now poor little rich girl ashley olson just wants to be left alone. no wonder greta garbo became a recluse and said i want to be alone. how much does et make off this little girl. does et not have anything better to report on. i bet there lots of people who really do not care what color her birthday cake and balloons were. by the way and i never heard that anna nichole ever won any of those court cases over the will and her inheritance. who is paying for the lifestyle of larry and howard and little dannielynn. could it be et.

of course and flatley is already not exactly the ideal name for a dancer and but i think michael is really pushing the irony envelope with this new title represent feet of flames one really can not resist recommending desenex foot spray to the retiring (and clearly and ailing) flatley. i might add that and much like that cheering london crowd (per review below) and i too am enthusiastic about this being his last live performance. hinting that it may be his last live performance and flatley is cheered on by an enthusiastic london crowd. ~ perry seibert and all movie guide.

first off and the lead and brad dourif is a kook. if youre trying to take this movie seriously and then and i guarantee he going to ruin it for you. if you do not take him too seriously and then he actually kind of fun to watch. as with another reviewer and i loved the scene where lisa (cynthia bain) and dourif are declaring their love for each other in between dodging the jets of flame shooting out of his arm in the car. another great campy scene was watching john landis as a snotty radio show producer getting toasted and flailing around the room. in fact and i found the last 15 minutes of the movie to be a non stop laugh riot i am just not sure if tobe hooper meant it to be that way.

i do not think any movie of van damme will ever beat universal soldier but u never know. this movie was good but not as good as 1st. vd returns a luc and must do battle again. he tries 2 b funny here but its maybe worth a smirk of a chuckle. vd has a kid this time from ally w. and good it showed a pic of them 2. goldberg was cool and he does his famous move forgot what its called cause i do not watch wrestling sucks. vd and goldberg had some good fights. it was the ending like the 1st but just not that good. vd does his best move in his career and like always the helicopter kick. even though and the final ending should have been longer. anyway and it is worth seeing but it will never top the original.

the cowboys could leave you a little sore in the saddle. definitely not one of johns best movies. don not get me wrong and with any john wayne move there is always some good spots. and this one has it fair share. but over all the picture moves slow and just doesn not live up to the aspirations it could have been. bruce dern again does an outstanding job as the villain. roscoe lee brown is another bright spot in the movie. the kids in the movie were average but could have been cast better. this would be a good movie for the eight to fifteen year old movie goers. this would be a good family move to watch with your children. just be aware and there is a couple of scenes that you may want to take a look at before you let the young ones see it. but most kids that i know who have seen the movie like it. maybe it because they get to see kids their age do all the grown up work.

this was a watchable movie and but plot was a little weak and most of the jokes were from some of rodney earlier movies. with that said and it was worth the time to watch. i gave this a 5 out of 10. so basically and its one of those movies that you do not go out of your way to see and but if you find it on the tube and take a chance.

dd films were damn corny and damn stupid and had a plot which seemed wafer thin but those days they was a plot at leastthis film isn not just a comedy but a mix of melodrama and romance everythingevery drama scene is blown out of proportionthe comedy is funny but corny too yet the film keeps you entertained and those days govinda films were loud and crass yet they had some funny moments people enjoyeddavid dhawan does a okay job music is okaygovinda acts well in comedy and drama karisma is decent in parts and annoys in parts kader is as usual gulshan and prem chopra are typecast shakti is hilarious.

serge farnel made a very precise critics of this film in the revue the rwandese night (www. lanuitrwandaise. net)a critics which shows how france was behind all the situation undergone by the united nations in rwanda. the un soldiers were in a dangerous situation while the french soldiers were warmly welcomed by the genocide forces. the day before and ten un soldiers had been killed by the genocide forces. that is why the un soldiers decided to protect their own lives by driving behind the french trucks. by doing so and they gave up the tutsi which is unforgivable of course. but we must keep in mind that the french soldiers organized this situation.

quote represent theurgist represent anyone with an i. q. over 50 would have seen this film what it is and an intelligent well acted prequel to a modern day classic and yes it doesn not have a blockbuster cast or a huge budget but it is still very well done and had me hooked for the full duration. an i. q. over 50 you say. that most mean you have an i. q. lower than 50. its name is carlitos way represent rise to power . meaning it should have something whit the first one to do. all and all its a ok movie if. you change the title and no characters named carlito brigante. p. s do not comment on a movie if you do not know anything about movies. but i guess an i. q. under 50 and and you wont know what the hell i am yelling about. peace out.

a routine mystery or thriller concerning a killer that lurks in the swamps. during the early days of television and this one was shown so often and when dad would say what on tv tonight. and we would tell him strangler of the swamp he would pack us off to the movies. we went to the movies a lot in those days.

despite some moments in heavy rain and an encounter with a drunk as well as an organ grinder with a gypsy and a monkey and and a stay in a sanitarium and this roscoe fatty arbuckle silent comedy short with support from buster keaton and al st. john is only fitfully amusing though there is a quite funny sequence of arbuckle in drag flirting with buster that the ultimate in meet cute scenes especially since it one of the few times we see the great stone face smile and laugh in the movies. also and many scenes seem to have been jump cut edited possibly because of overuse of the film stock. still and if youre an arbuckle or keaton completist and good night and nurse. is certainly worth a look.

yes and marie dresler drinks prune juice that she thinks is poison and she exits running. dresler is good. never my cup of tea but she is a solid performer who surely holds the screen. i watched this for polly moran and whom i have seen elsewhere. here and moran is ok just ok as dressler shrewish friend or foe. too bad she has sunk into nearly total oblivion. the plot is good hearted. bad guys try to rob the townspeople. dressler triumphs and all ends well. i do wonder about the central plot mechanism represent bonds. this came out during the depression so maybe everyone was familiar with bonds and what they can do if used well and if used wrongly. i and however and not of that era and am vaguely familiar with them. theyre like stocks only different and right. it seems odd to build a story about the little man around a somewhat sophisticated monetary entity.

i spent almost two hours watching a movie that i thought and with all the good actors in it and would be worth watching. i couldn not believe it when the movie ended and i had absolutely no idea what had happened. i was mad because i could have used that time doing something else. i tried to figure it all out and but really had no clue. thanks to those who figured it out and have explained it. right or wrong and it better than not knowing anything. who was the lady in the movie with dark hair that we saw a couple of times driving away. how did first lady know that her husband was cheating on her. at the end of the movie kate said she would eventually find out the truth. does this mean that were going to be subjected to end game 2.

during a sleepless night and i was switching through the channels and found this embarrassment of a movie. what were they thinking. if this is life after remote control for kari (wuhrer) salin and no wonder she gone nowhere. and why did david keith take this role. it pathetic. anyway and i turned on the movie near the end and so i do not get much of the plot. but this must have been the best part. this nerdy college kid brings home this dominatrix ish girl. this scene is straight out of the comic books or the cheap porn movies. she calls the mother anal retentive and kisses the father oh and i do not expect tongue. great lines. after this and i had to see how it ended. well and of course and this bitch from hell has a helluva past and so the swat team is upstairs. and yes. they surround her. and yes yes. the kid blows her brains out. ahahhahahaha. this is must see tv. .

this movie is awesome. i watched it the other day with my cousin jay jay. he said it was alright and but i think it rulezzz. i mean and it so cool. ted v. mikels is so brave and smart. he made a movie totally unlike those terrible hollywood films and like the matrix and stop or my mom will shoot. it could have been better and though. i like ninjas and pirates. i also like that big talon that the funny man wears. i think he the coolest guy since that domino pizza claymation guy. not only does this movie look really cool and like those out of focus movies my dad made of my birthday when i turned 6. but it tells a complex tale with dozens of characters that seem to be totally unrelated and but they all meet up in the end. it genius how this web is woven to make everything meet up. i wish ted v. mikels would make a sequel. but it needs more aliens. and a pirate.

i love the 80s slasher flicks and i remember when silent night or deadly night was pulled from our theaters and i was very disappointed and so i was very excited to see some of these on fear. net. you better watch out was what i have come to expect of these types of movies. the quality of the special effects were laughable by today standards and the character development too long and but all in all it was laugh out loud funny. the scenes where he loses it because santa and aka dad and is feeling up his mom and later when the mob is actually shown lighting torches not flashlights as you would in the 80s and but real torches. really tickled my funny bone. however and the scenes where he was checking on the kids in his neighborhood gave me a creepy feeling of a different nature. i also enjoyed trying to figure out who some of these character actors were. it took me awhile to figure out that the main character was the lovable teddy bear on brothers.

gritty and dusty western from director richard brooks and who seems thoroughly engrossed in the genre while keeping all the usual clichés intact. early 1900s horse race attracts a low keyed cowboy (gene hackman) and a suave gambler (james coburn) and a cocky kid (jan michael vincent) and and even a female (a surprisingly game candice bergen). once the preliminaries are out of the way (with the predictable arguments over whether or not a woman should take part) and this becomes a fairly engrossing entry and though one which breaks no new ground (it instead resembles something from gary cooper era). good looking and if overlong piece has macho verve and a fine cast and yet the mechanisms of the plot get tiresome rather quickly. from .

to put it simply and i am not fond of westerns. and having never sat through one from beginning to end and i decided to watch my darling clementine and see it all the way through and no matter how painful it was for me. at first it was excruciating as expected. i found the acting to be laughable and the scenery (your standard dessert and horses and cowboys) boring and the music and its timing teetering on the edge of painful. however and after mentally pep talking myself to struggle on and after the first 20 minutes it began to be quite a bit easier for me to endure. focusing in on the cinematography and and how john ford managed to make even the dullest situations (dull according to me that is) look quite stunning at times and made it a lot more interesting. in conclusion and i can not go so far as to say that i enjoyed the movie by the end of it. however it was made well enough for me to sit all the way through to the very end and and that in itself impresses me.

i understand this movie was made on a very low budget but that is no excuse for the monstrosity that is grendel. deathstalker and the throne of fire and barbarian queen and conquest and the invincible barbarian were all done on shoestring budgets and poor special effects yet they still managed to create cult classics by adding some scantily clad women warriors and a good sense of humor. the primitive costumes and dark castles and beautiful bulgarian landscape gave grendel the potential to be a very good low budget sword and sorcery film and but the makers completely ruined this opportunity by using extremely poor cgi effects and colorless characters. compare this film to beowulf (1999). it may not be citizen kane but it is a good example of how an entertaining low budget sci fi or adventure movie can be made by using credible special effects and appealing characters.

i was one of quite a few extras in this big bomb. i just happened to be in the right place working safety for the race scenes at a. i. r. as it was know as back then. thank goodness my scene in in the first few minutes of the movie and i do not have to sit through the whole thing. it was more of a big party than a movie set but hey and the pay was good. attention to detail was not a strong point for this one and but who was going to know. the funny thing was seeing the cars in the track at the really slow speed and then in the movie speeded up to the what was close to normal speed. a lot of the scenes were changed as they were filmed i suppose to shave cost and time. but every one was having such a good time who cared.

there is no question as to who is in command of the training of cadets in this film represent major chick davis (pat obrien). obrien plays an officer who adheres to military discipline in the creation of a new kind of soldier from his cadets the bombardier. but he is not so rigid as to be unfair or unfriendly. in fact and he even changes his opinion as to the value of women working in the military. he tough when he has to be and yet at other times he is a clear mix of coach and pastor and roles he perfected in other films. his character is the foundation of the action around which everything revolves. obrien seems natural in the role and and plays it in fine fashion. two things help this movie represent obrien performance and the spectacular special effects ending.

this is kind of a weird movie and given that santa claus lives on a cloud in outer space and fights against satan and his minions. but it still kinda fun. it has some genuine laughs. whether all of them were intentional is certainly debatable and though. this movie is not good and but i can say i really enjoyed watching it. i would recommend this movie over santa claus conquers the martians and santa claus with dudley moore and john lithgow and or the santa clause with tim allen.

an interesting idea for a film and both showing the last dragon on earth and showing the struggle he and someone evil have together. when he was younger and einon got stabbed in the heart and so bowen (dennis quaid) took him to the dark lord who gave him half his heart. now grown up einon (david thewlis) is now the selfish and evil king. meanwhile and bowen is using a new friend draco the dragon (voiced by sir sean connery) to get rewards for killing dragons. but because einon has half of draco hear and they both feel the pain in one of them is hurt and or killed. also starring pete postlethwaite as gilbert of glockenspur and jason isaacs as lord felton and julie christie as queen aislinn and john gielgud as king arthur. it was nominated for the oscar for best visual effects. worth watching.

after reading the book and i loved the story. watching the movie i was disappointed that so many changes were made. it is understandable that books and movies differ but it was two different stories and only the names and some of the book story remained. read the book and you will have a better understanding of the movie. the book gives you a better development of the characters. these characters are extremely interesting and make you care about them. the locations were indeed in line with the book descriptions. some characters not included. television has microwaved so many great books and stories and this is a perfect example of that. input from the author doesn not always insure a good movie but it can help sometimes.

it not a terrible movie and really and and glenn and keitel are top notch actors. further and they do an acceptable job with the very weak script. the scenery is lush and the plot has some interesting twists. further and i umderstand why these actors and the crew made the film and they are professionals and they get paid for it. but i do wonder why studios spend the time and money to make a film and then do not release it for theater audiences. even if a film is a box office flop and surely it makes some money. if you are a fan of keitel or glenn and rent the video or catch it on tv and as did i. granted and the movie would not help solve the immigration quandary with mexico and but the experience is far better than 90% of the standard tv fare of today.

i first saw this movie on mst3k. and although i laughed my posterior off at the jokes and i do not particularly think this movie was all that bad. sure it was a little hard to understand it is quite obviously low budget and but it had a very hitchcock like plot and i can honestly say that when i viewed the non mst3k version and i was genuinely entertained. this movie is crying out for a hollywood remake.

the volleyball genre is strangely overlooked by most screenwriters. thankfully and highly acclaimed director nelson mccormick has brought us the second best volleyball movie of all time (rated lower than side out and higher than and well and umm). however and do not let the cover of this movie decieve you. kill shot stars up and coming star koji as a modern day sherlock holmes. using such high tech gadgets as a computer that is less powerful than my gameboy and koji is able to aid fbi agents in the tracking of a man who has not committed any obvious crime. while there are other actors in the movie and including brief cameos by denise richards and a gay negro and and a preposterously ugly and annoying girl and koji carries this movie on his own. any fan of movies such as the matrix or hackers will definitely love kill shot.

the three stooges in a feature length western comedy musical. perhaps rockin in the rockies was meant to combine the stooges comedy short with the western musical and in a matinée while if so and this was a pleasant way to break up a saturday afternoon. jay kirby (as rusty) is a handsome young hero while and and mary beth hughes (as the blonde june) and gladys blake (as the brunette betty) are pretty women. the hoosier hotshots are a harmonious group while their songs are quite tuneful while however and this is the 1940s and not the 1950s and so the film doesn not exactly rock. there are a few laughs while but the stooges brand of humor is more subdued than usual. the talking horse is also underutilized. rockin in the rockies (4/17/45) vernon keays ~ moe howard and larry fine and curly howard and mary beth hughes.

come on. get over with the pakistan bashing guys. bollywood can not only make brilliant movies but can seriously affect a generation of viewers. i am a huge bollywood fan but anti pakistan movies just make me wince too much to enjoy screenplay and cinematography and action sequences everything. i am really happy to see that viewers on both sides of the border are rejecting propaganda and and there are movies like main hoon na out there that have done brilliantly not only because they deserved to because of the quality of its bollywood masala but also because it tries to say represent give peace a chance and shows that there are crazies out there on both sides who do not represent the masses.

you know what kind of movie youre getting into when the serial killer main character is being transported to the electric chair (in what seems to be a bakery truck) and only to have the prison vehicle collide with (and i am not making this up) a genetic engineering tanker truck. the goo which spurts forth melts him and and fuses his dna with the snow and creating our protagonist and the killer snowman. my favorite portion of the movie and however and is an over the shoulder shot of the snowman thrashing some poor schmuck and in which his hands look suspiciously like a couple of white oven potholder gloves. mmmmm and schlock.

i was bored and around 10pm and so i watched this movie. and i could not stop laughing. everything was so ridiculous. the way the kids were acting like they were older than 11 just cracked me up. one of the kids had a ring and that supposedly killed people after 3 or so years. it gave me the impression that he wanted to be a gangster. it pretty hard to take little kids seriously and especially when it has to do with eating worms. they act like everything is such a big deal and like if billy (the main character) doesn not eat the worms then the world will end. this is a good movie for little kids (excluding the fact that a 5 year old says penis) and but not for teens or adults who do not want to waste their time.

the movie was not a waste except for some boring scenes in between. but the women cast gave a pretty good show than the males who were laughable. but krista allen really rocked in the movie . her voice was so seducing and sexy. the scenes in the bed involving krista should have shortened but she made it so watchable and sexier than any one could do. krista really is one of the best in such roles. she also enacted quiet well as the baddie in the last 5 minutes and which is the interesting part of the movie. burt reynolds was not that good and this was not his best as an action star. he could have chosen a better script than this. ireally think he did for money.

story of a man who has unnatural feelings for a pig. starts out with a opening scene that is a terrific example of absurd comedy. a formal orchestra audience is turned into an insane and violent mob by the crazy chantings of it singers. unfortunately it stays absurd the whole time with no general narrative eventually making it just too off putting. even those from the era should be turned off. the cryptic dialogue would make shakespeare seem easy to a third grader. on a technical level it better than you might think with some good cinematography by future great vilmos zsigmond. future stars sally kirkland and frederic forrest can be seen briefly.

anna lives with her family in a new housing estate just outside the city. she has been with her husband sebastiaan for years and they do not talk so much anymore. while on a working visit abroad and a female colleague commits suicide. anna is deeply impressed by her death and even though she hardly knew her. nobody seems to know why she took her own life. for the first time anna realizes that one can be an unknown among your most dearest. anna doesn not mention the incident back home and starts observing her husband and child. guernsey is the story of a woman who suddenly starts looking at her own life. and she wonders how she got so drifted apart from the people closest to her. (this is my translation of the dvd cover text synopsis. i hope you find it useful and as this movie doesn not have an imdb plot summary yet at this date. ).

a group of people are invited to there high school reunion and but after they arrive they discover it to be a scam by an old classmate they played an almost fatal prank on. now and he seeks to get revenge on all those that hurt him by sealing all the exits and cutting off all telephone lines. dark slasher film with an unexceptional premise. bringing it up a notch are a few good performances and some rather creative death scenes and plenty of excitement and scares and some humor and an original ending. unrated for extreme violence and graphic nudity and sexual situations and profanity and drug use.

this scared the hell out of me when i was a teenager. now i find it more amusing than scary and but with some pretty unsettling moments and with a kind of sleazy quality to it that i like. and and come to think of it and the plot is rather disgusting actually. but handled with some kind of taste. if there is a problem with this movie and it is that there are huge gaps where nothing exciting or interesting happens. also and the ending goes on forever and making a potentially tense climax seem silly after a while with barbara bach screaming and screaming. the monster and after it is exposed and isn not very scary either unfortunately. the somewhat drab look of the movie also works against it and making it appear as a tv movie more than something made for theaters. but it is an example of films that are rarely made nowadays so i urge horror fans to watch it and feel a bit nostalgic.

an illegal immigrant resists the social support system causing dire consequences for many. well filmed and acted even though the story is a bit forced and yet the slow pacing really sets off the conclusion. the feeling of being lost in the big city is effectively conveyed. the little person lost in the big society is something to which we can all relate and but i cannot endorse going out of your way to see this movie.

probable reasons why so many people on this site have enjoyed this represent1. they might not have read the book. 2. they might enjoy gore and violence in a film. 3. they might be very young and therefore not understand the violence. 4. people might not understand how somehow more scary and more violent it is compared to the original book. 5. there are sure to be many other reasons not covered here. the only thing i liked about this film is the song bright eyes. if perchance and you happen to be one of those people who has read the book and enjoys calm and peaceful films without violence and are quite old and understand scariness and violence and you are sure not to like this. otherwise you will almost definitely enjoy this. like in the book and a rabbit called fiver in an unsuspecting warren warns of terrible danger to come. only a few rabbits including his brother hazel believe him and they set out on a dangerous journey to find a new place to live.

although this is generally a cheesy jungle adventure movie and it does have some highlights the settings are quite beautiful and and the pacing of the adventure is good. you would not be bored watching it. keith is as breezy as possible playing the eponymous lead and an unabashedly drunk jungle guide shanghai would into escorting rich boy van hoffman and his gorgeous wife shower on a hunting expedition in cannibal country. he never takes things seriously . shower is there as decoration and keith makes extensive use of her she doesn not really have to act much. she not the only female to show off her body and the prurient aspects of the film make it about halfway to a t or a picture. there nothing in this film that would draw specific attention to it and or away from it. produced to be shlock and it succeeds without too much fuss. a good 2 am cable programmer.

this romantic comedy isn not too bad. there are some funny things happening here and there and and there are some rather memorable characters in it. the acting and however and is amateurish (with the exception of the banker). while some scenes are great fun and others are simply embarrassing. in particular and i found the romantic part of the story poor. all in all and i guess it worth seeing if you like football and romantic comedies. it not really a bad movie and and the ending did feel quite good. just do not expect anything out of the ordinary. fair enough if you have an hour and a quarter to kill.

my first opinions on this movie were of course bad. i was expecting a horrible and crappy acting and bad entertainment and ridiculous special effects movie. what i got was actually not that bad. the special effects were absolutely horrible and but i found the movie itself quite interesting and and the script was actually pretty good and decent. the acting wasn not that bad and and overall i had fun watching this movie. it still a pretty bad film and but it not completely worthless like i thought it was going to be and and i am pleased to know that this movie managed to wow me and even when it wasn not that good. overall and it a film that should be avoided and but to me it wasn not as bad as i was expecting it to be.