ds_i
stringlengths 829
14.8k
| ds_o
stringlengths 2
10
| prompt
stringlengths 2.37k
16.3k
|
|---|---|---|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 . properties . we conduct our primary operations at the owned and leased facilities described below . location operations conducted approximate square feet expiration new haven , connecticut corporate headquarters and executive , sales , research and development offices 514000 .
|location|operations conducted|approximatesquare feet|leaseexpirationdates|
|new haven connecticut|corporate headquarters and executive sales research and development offices|514000|2030|
|dublin ireland|global supply chain distribution and administration offices|215000|owned|
|lexington massachusetts|research and development offices|81000|2019|
|bogart georgia|commercial research and development manufacturing|70000|2024|
|smithfield rhode island|commercial research and development manufacturing|67000|owned|
|zurich switzerland|regional executive and sales offices|69000|2025|
we believe that our administrative office space is adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future . we also believe that our research and development facilities and our manufacturing facility , together with third party manufacturing facilities , will be adequate for our on-going activities . in addition to the locations above , we also lease space in other u.s . locations and in foreign countries to support our operations as a global organization . as of december 31 , 2015 , we also leased approximately 254000 square feet in cheshire , connecticut , which was the previous location of our corporate headquarters and executive , sales , research and development offices . in december 2015 , we entered into an early termination of this lease and will occupy this space through may 2016 . in april 2014 , we purchased a fill/finish facility in athlone , ireland . following refurbishment of the facility , and after successful completion of the appropriate validation processes and regulatory approvals , the facility will become our first company-owned fill/finish and packaging facility for our commercial and clinical products . in may 2015 , we announced plans to construct a new biologics manufacturing facility on our existing property in dublin ireland , which is expected to be completed by 2020 . item 3 . legal proceedings . in may 2015 , we received a subpoena in connection with an investigation by the enforcement division of the sec requesting information related to our grant-making activities and compliance with the fcpa in various countries . the sec also seeks information related to alexion 2019s recalls of specific lots of soliris and related securities disclosures . in addition , in october 2015 , alexion received a request from the doj for the voluntary production of documents and other information pertaining to alexion's compliance with the fcpa . alexion is cooperating with these investigations . at this time , alexion is unable to predict the duration , scope or outcome of these investigations . given the ongoing nature of these investigations , management does not currently believe a loss related to these matters is probable or that the potential magnitude of such loss or range of loss , if any , can be reasonably estimated . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: how many square feet are leased by alexion pharmaceuticals , inc? | 734000.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 . properties . we conduct our primary operations at the owned and leased facilities described below . location operations conducted approximate square feet expiration new haven , connecticut corporate headquarters and executive , sales , research and development offices 514000 .
|location|operations conducted|approximatesquare feet|leaseexpirationdates|
|new haven connecticut|corporate headquarters and executive sales research and development offices|514000|2030|
|dublin ireland|global supply chain distribution and administration offices|215000|owned|
|lexington massachusetts|research and development offices|81000|2019|
|bogart georgia|commercial research and development manufacturing|70000|2024|
|smithfield rhode island|commercial research and development manufacturing|67000|owned|
|zurich switzerland|regional executive and sales offices|69000|2025|
we believe that our administrative office space is adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future . we also believe that our research and development facilities and our manufacturing facility , together with third party manufacturing facilities , will be adequate for our on-going activities . in addition to the locations above , we also lease space in other u.s . locations and in foreign countries to support our operations as a global organization . as of december 31 , 2015 , we also leased approximately 254000 square feet in cheshire , connecticut , which was the previous location of our corporate headquarters and executive , sales , research and development offices . in december 2015 , we entered into an early termination of this lease and will occupy this space through may 2016 . in april 2014 , we purchased a fill/finish facility in athlone , ireland . following refurbishment of the facility , and after successful completion of the appropriate validation processes and regulatory approvals , the facility will become our first company-owned fill/finish and packaging facility for our commercial and clinical products . in may 2015 , we announced plans to construct a new biologics manufacturing facility on our existing property in dublin ireland , which is expected to be completed by 2020 . item 3 . legal proceedings . in may 2015 , we received a subpoena in connection with an investigation by the enforcement division of the sec requesting information related to our grant-making activities and compliance with the fcpa in various countries . the sec also seeks information related to alexion 2019s recalls of specific lots of soliris and related securities disclosures . in addition , in october 2015 , alexion received a request from the doj for the voluntary production of documents and other information pertaining to alexion's compliance with the fcpa . alexion is cooperating with these investigations . at this time , alexion is unable to predict the duration , scope or outcome of these investigations . given the ongoing nature of these investigations , management does not currently believe a loss related to these matters is probable or that the potential magnitude of such loss or range of loss , if any , can be reasonably estimated . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: how many square feet are leased by alexion pharmaceuticals , inc? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175 securities borrowed and securities lent are recorded at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . securities borrowed consist primarily of government and equity securities . jpmorgan chase moni- tors the market value of the securities borrowed and lent on a daily basis and calls for additional collateral when appropriate . fees received or paid in connection with securities borrowed and lent are recorded in interest income or interest expense . the following table details the components of collateralized financings. .
|december 31 ( in millions )|2008|2007|
|securities purchased under resale agreements ( a )|$ 200265|$ 169305|
|securities borrowed ( b )|124000|84184|
|securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c )|$ 174456|$ 126098|
|securities loaned|6077|10922|
( a ) includes resale agreements of $ 20.8 billion and $ 19.1 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . ( b ) includes securities borrowed of $ 3.4 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 . ( c ) includes repurchase agreements of $ 3.0 billion and $ 5.8 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . jpmorgan chase pledges certain financial instruments it owns to col- lateralize repurchase agreements and other securities financings . pledged securities that can be sold or repledged by the secured party are identified as financial instruments owned ( pledged to various parties ) on the consolidated balance sheets . at december 31 , 2008 , the firm received securities as collateral that could be repledged , delivered or otherwise used with a fair value of approximately $ 511.9 billion . this collateral was generally obtained under resale or securities borrowing agreements . of these securities , approximately $ 456.6 billion were repledged , delivered or otherwise used , generally as collateral under repurchase agreements , securities lending agreements or to cover short sales . note 14 2013 loans the accounting for a loan may differ based upon whether it is origi- nated or purchased and as to whether the loan is used in an invest- ing or trading strategy . for purchased loans held-for-investment , the accounting also differs depending on whether a loan is credit- impaired at the date of acquisition . purchased loans with evidence of credit deterioration since the origination date and for which it is probable , at acquisition , that all contractually required payments receivable will not be collected are considered to be credit-impaired . the measurement framework for loans in the consolidated financial statements is one of the following : 2022 at the principal amount outstanding , net of the allowance for loan losses , unearned income and any net deferred loan fees or costs , for loans held for investment ( other than purchased credit- impaired loans ) ; 2022 at the lower of cost or fair value , with valuation changes record- ed in noninterest revenue , for loans that are classified as held- for-sale ; or 2022 at fair value , with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest revenue , for loans classified as trading assets or risk managed on a fair value basis ; 2022 purchased credit-impaired loans held for investment are account- ed for under sop 03-3 and initially measured at fair value , which includes estimated future credit losses . accordingly , an allowance for loan losses related to these loans is not recorded at the acquisition date . see note 5 on pages 156 2013158 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s elections of fair value accounting under sfas 159 . see note 6 on pages 158 2013160 of this annual report for further information on loans carried at fair value and classified as trading assets . for loans held for investment , other than purchased credit-impaired loans , interest income is recognized using the interest method or on a basis approximating a level rate of return over the term of the loan . loans within the held-for-investment portfolio that management decides to sell are transferred to the held-for-sale portfolio . transfers to held-for-sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value on the date of transfer . credit-related losses are charged off to the allowance for loan losses and losses due to changes in interest rates , or exchange rates , are recognized in noninterest revenue . loans within the held-for-sale portfolio that management decides to retain are transferred to the held-for-investment portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value . these loans are subsequently assessed for impairment based on the firm 2019s allowance methodology . for a fur- ther discussion of the methodologies used in establishing the firm 2019s allowance for loan losses , see note 15 on pages 178 2013180 of this annual report . nonaccrual loans are those on which the accrual of interest is dis- continued . loans ( other than certain consumer and purchased credit- impaired loans discussed below ) are placed on nonaccrual status immediately if , in the opinion of management , full payment of princi- pal or interest is in doubt , or when principal or interest is 90 days or more past due and collateral , if any , is insufficient to cover principal and interest . loans are charged off to the allowance for loan losses when it is highly certain that a loss has been realized . interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against interest income . in addition , the amortiza- tion of net deferred loan fees is suspended . interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent it is received in cash . however , where there is doubt regarding the ultimate col- lectibility of loan principal , all cash thereafter received is applied to reduce the carrying value of such loans ( i.e. , the cost recovery method ) . loans are restored to accrual status only when future pay- ments of interest and principal are reasonably assured . consumer loans , other than purchased credit-impaired loans , are generally charged to the allowance for loan losses upon reaching specified stages of delinquency , in accordance with the federal financial institutions examination council policy . for example , credit card loans are charged off by the end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days past due or within 60 days from receiv- ing notification of the filing of bankruptcy , whichever is earlier . residential mortgage products are generally charged off to net real- izable value at no later than 180 days past due . other consumer .
Question: what was the ratio of the securities borrowed to the securities loaned in 2008 | 20.40481 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175 securities borrowed and securities lent are recorded at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . securities borrowed consist primarily of government and equity securities . jpmorgan chase moni- tors the market value of the securities borrowed and lent on a daily basis and calls for additional collateral when appropriate . fees received or paid in connection with securities borrowed and lent are recorded in interest income or interest expense . the following table details the components of collateralized financings. .
|december 31 ( in millions )|2008|2007|
|securities purchased under resale agreements ( a )|$ 200265|$ 169305|
|securities borrowed ( b )|124000|84184|
|securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c )|$ 174456|$ 126098|
|securities loaned|6077|10922|
( a ) includes resale agreements of $ 20.8 billion and $ 19.1 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . ( b ) includes securities borrowed of $ 3.4 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 . ( c ) includes repurchase agreements of $ 3.0 billion and $ 5.8 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . jpmorgan chase pledges certain financial instruments it owns to col- lateralize repurchase agreements and other securities financings . pledged securities that can be sold or repledged by the secured party are identified as financial instruments owned ( pledged to various parties ) on the consolidated balance sheets . at december 31 , 2008 , the firm received securities as collateral that could be repledged , delivered or otherwise used with a fair value of approximately $ 511.9 billion . this collateral was generally obtained under resale or securities borrowing agreements . of these securities , approximately $ 456.6 billion were repledged , delivered or otherwise used , generally as collateral under repurchase agreements , securities lending agreements or to cover short sales . note 14 2013 loans the accounting for a loan may differ based upon whether it is origi- nated or purchased and as to whether the loan is used in an invest- ing or trading strategy . for purchased loans held-for-investment , the accounting also differs depending on whether a loan is credit- impaired at the date of acquisition . purchased loans with evidence of credit deterioration since the origination date and for which it is probable , at acquisition , that all contractually required payments receivable will not be collected are considered to be credit-impaired . the measurement framework for loans in the consolidated financial statements is one of the following : 2022 at the principal amount outstanding , net of the allowance for loan losses , unearned income and any net deferred loan fees or costs , for loans held for investment ( other than purchased credit- impaired loans ) ; 2022 at the lower of cost or fair value , with valuation changes record- ed in noninterest revenue , for loans that are classified as held- for-sale ; or 2022 at fair value , with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest revenue , for loans classified as trading assets or risk managed on a fair value basis ; 2022 purchased credit-impaired loans held for investment are account- ed for under sop 03-3 and initially measured at fair value , which includes estimated future credit losses . accordingly , an allowance for loan losses related to these loans is not recorded at the acquisition date . see note 5 on pages 156 2013158 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s elections of fair value accounting under sfas 159 . see note 6 on pages 158 2013160 of this annual report for further information on loans carried at fair value and classified as trading assets . for loans held for investment , other than purchased credit-impaired loans , interest income is recognized using the interest method or on a basis approximating a level rate of return over the term of the loan . loans within the held-for-investment portfolio that management decides to sell are transferred to the held-for-sale portfolio . transfers to held-for-sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value on the date of transfer . credit-related losses are charged off to the allowance for loan losses and losses due to changes in interest rates , or exchange rates , are recognized in noninterest revenue . loans within the held-for-sale portfolio that management decides to retain are transferred to the held-for-investment portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value . these loans are subsequently assessed for impairment based on the firm 2019s allowance methodology . for a fur- ther discussion of the methodologies used in establishing the firm 2019s allowance for loan losses , see note 15 on pages 178 2013180 of this annual report . nonaccrual loans are those on which the accrual of interest is dis- continued . loans ( other than certain consumer and purchased credit- impaired loans discussed below ) are placed on nonaccrual status immediately if , in the opinion of management , full payment of princi- pal or interest is in doubt , or when principal or interest is 90 days or more past due and collateral , if any , is insufficient to cover principal and interest . loans are charged off to the allowance for loan losses when it is highly certain that a loss has been realized . interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against interest income . in addition , the amortiza- tion of net deferred loan fees is suspended . interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent it is received in cash . however , where there is doubt regarding the ultimate col- lectibility of loan principal , all cash thereafter received is applied to reduce the carrying value of such loans ( i.e. , the cost recovery method ) . loans are restored to accrual status only when future pay- ments of interest and principal are reasonably assured . consumer loans , other than purchased credit-impaired loans , are generally charged to the allowance for loan losses upon reaching specified stages of delinquency , in accordance with the federal financial institutions examination council policy . for example , credit card loans are charged off by the end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days past due or within 60 days from receiv- ing notification of the filing of bankruptcy , whichever is earlier . residential mortgage products are generally charged off to net real- izable value at no later than 180 days past due . other consumer .
Question: what was the ratio of the securities borrowed to the securities loaned in 2008 |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. .
|balance sheet data|december 31 , 2014|december 31 , 2013|
|cash cash equivalents and marketable securities|$ 1667.2|$ 1642.1|
|short-term borrowings|$ 107.2|$ 179.1|
|current portion of long-term debt|2.1|353.6|
|long-term debt|1623.5|1129.8|
|total debt|$ 1732.8|$ 1662.5|
liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .
Question: what was the average of short-term borrowings in 2013-2014? | 143.15 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. .
|balance sheet data|december 31 , 2014|december 31 , 2013|
|cash cash equivalents and marketable securities|$ 1667.2|$ 1642.1|
|short-term borrowings|$ 107.2|$ 179.1|
|current portion of long-term debt|2.1|353.6|
|long-term debt|1623.5|1129.8|
|total debt|$ 1732.8|$ 1662.5|
liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .
Question: what was the average of short-term borrowings in 2013-2014? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 75.0 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 72.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on september 12 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase up to approximately 348 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on september 27 , 2012 and december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 279 and 2 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 63.5 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.8 million ) . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation .
||preliminary purchase price allocation|
|current assets|$ 8763|
|non-current assets|2332|
|property and equipment|26711|
|intangible assets ( 1 )|21079|
|other non-current liabilities|-1349 ( 1349 )|
|fair value of net assets acquired|$ 57536|
|goodwill ( 2 )|5998|
( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 10.7 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 10.4 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on november 16 , 2012 , the company entered into an agreement to purchase up to 198 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 188 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 64.2 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.9 million ) . .
Question: for acquired customer-related and network location intangibles , what is the expected annual amortization expenses , in millions? | 7.385 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 75.0 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 72.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on september 12 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase up to approximately 348 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on september 27 , 2012 and december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 279 and 2 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 63.5 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.8 million ) . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation .
||preliminary purchase price allocation|
|current assets|$ 8763|
|non-current assets|2332|
|property and equipment|26711|
|intangible assets ( 1 )|21079|
|other non-current liabilities|-1349 ( 1349 )|
|fair value of net assets acquired|$ 57536|
|goodwill ( 2 )|5998|
( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 10.7 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 10.4 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on november 16 , 2012 , the company entered into an agreement to purchase up to 198 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 188 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 64.2 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.9 million ) . .
Question: for acquired customer-related and network location intangibles , what is the expected annual amortization expenses , in millions? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , is as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2012|2011|2010|
|beginning balance|$ 1375|$ 943|$ 971|
|increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year|340|49|61|
|decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year|-107 ( 107 )|-39 ( 39 )|-224 ( 224 )|
|increases related to tax positions taken during the current year|467|425|240|
|decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities|-3 ( 3 )|0|-102 ( 102 )|
|decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations|-10 ( 10 )|-3 ( 3 )|-3 ( 3 )|
|ending balance|$ 2062|$ 1375|$ 943|
the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 401 million and $ 261 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2012 and 2011 of $ 140 million and $ 14 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1989 and 2002 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company believes it is reasonably possible that tax audit resolutions could reduce its unrecognized tax benefits by between $ 120 million and $ 170 million in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . dividend and stock repurchase program in 2012 , the board of directors of the company approved a dividend policy pursuant to which it plans to make , subject to subsequent declaration , quarterly dividends of $ 2.65 per share . on july 24 , 2012 , the board of directors declared a dividend of $ 2.65 per share to shareholders of record as of the close of business on august 13 , 2012 . the company paid $ 2.5 billion in conjunction with this dividend on august 16 , 2012 . no dividends were declared in the first three quarters of 2012 or in 2011 and 2010. .
Question: what was the aggregate change in the ending balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties between 2012 and 2011? | 687.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , is as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2012|2011|2010|
|beginning balance|$ 1375|$ 943|$ 971|
|increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year|340|49|61|
|decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year|-107 ( 107 )|-39 ( 39 )|-224 ( 224 )|
|increases related to tax positions taken during the current year|467|425|240|
|decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities|-3 ( 3 )|0|-102 ( 102 )|
|decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations|-10 ( 10 )|-3 ( 3 )|-3 ( 3 )|
|ending balance|$ 2062|$ 1375|$ 943|
the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 401 million and $ 261 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2012 and 2011 of $ 140 million and $ 14 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1989 and 2002 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company believes it is reasonably possible that tax audit resolutions could reduce its unrecognized tax benefits by between $ 120 million and $ 170 million in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . dividend and stock repurchase program in 2012 , the board of directors of the company approved a dividend policy pursuant to which it plans to make , subject to subsequent declaration , quarterly dividends of $ 2.65 per share . on july 24 , 2012 , the board of directors declared a dividend of $ 2.65 per share to shareholders of record as of the close of business on august 13 , 2012 . the company paid $ 2.5 billion in conjunction with this dividend on august 16 , 2012 . no dividends were declared in the first three quarters of 2012 or in 2011 and 2010. .
Question: what was the aggregate change in the ending balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties between 2012 and 2011? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 7 . derivative instruments effective january 1 , 2001 , aes adopted sfas no . 133 , 2018 2018accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 2019 2019 which , as amended , establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities . the adoption of sfas no . 133 on january 1 , 2001 , resulted in a cumulative reduction to income of less than $ 1 million , net of deferred income tax effects , and a cumulative reduction of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders 2019 equity of $ 93 million , net of deferred income tax effects . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , the impact of changes in derivative fair value primarily related to derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment was a charge of $ 36 million , after income taxes . this amount includes a charge of $ 6 million , after income taxes , related to the ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying as cash flow and fair value hedges for the year ended december 31 , 2001 . there was no net effect on results of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , of derivative and non-derivative instruments that have been designated and qualified as hedging net investments in foreign operations . approximately $ 35 million of other comprehensive loss related to derivative instruments as of december 31 , 2001 is expected to be recognized as a reduction to earnings over the next twelve months . a portion of this amount is expected to be offset by the effects of hedge accounting . the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivative transactions will be reclassified into earnings as interest expense is recognized for hedges of interest rate risk , as foreign currency transaction and translation gains and losses are recognized for hedges of foreign currency exposure and as electric and gas sales and purchases are recognized for hedges of forecasted electric and gas transactions . amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of tax , during the year-ended december 31 , 2001 , were as follows ( in millions ) : .
|transition adjustment on january 1 2001|$ -93 ( 93 )|
|reclassification to earnings|-32 ( 32 )|
|change in fair value|4|
|balance december 31 2001|$ -121 ( 121 )|
aes utilizes derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk , foreign exchange risk and commodity price risk . the company utilizes interest rate swap , cap and floor agreements to hedge interest rate risk on floating rate debt . the majority of aes 2019s interest rate derivatives are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges . currency forward and swap agreements are utilized to hedge foreign exchange risk which is a result of aes or one of its subsidiaries entering into monetary obligations in currencies other than its own functional currency . the majority of aes 2019s foreign currency derivatives are designated and qualify as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges . certain derivative instruments and other non-derivative instruments are designated and qualify as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation . the company utilizes electric and gas derivative instruments , including swaps , options , forwards and futures , to hedge the risk related to electricity and gas sales and purchases . the majority of aes 2019s electric and gas derivatives are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges . the maximum length of time over which aes is hedging its exposure to variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions , excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest , is three years . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , a charge of $ 4 million , after income taxes , was recorded for two cash flow hedges that were discontinued because it is probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur . a portion of this charge has been classified as discontinued operations . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , no fair value hedges were de-recognized or discontinued. .
Question: for 2001 what was the net change in aoci in millions?\\n | 28.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 7 . derivative instruments effective january 1 , 2001 , aes adopted sfas no . 133 , 2018 2018accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 2019 2019 which , as amended , establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities . the adoption of sfas no . 133 on january 1 , 2001 , resulted in a cumulative reduction to income of less than $ 1 million , net of deferred income tax effects , and a cumulative reduction of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders 2019 equity of $ 93 million , net of deferred income tax effects . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , the impact of changes in derivative fair value primarily related to derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment was a charge of $ 36 million , after income taxes . this amount includes a charge of $ 6 million , after income taxes , related to the ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying as cash flow and fair value hedges for the year ended december 31 , 2001 . there was no net effect on results of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , of derivative and non-derivative instruments that have been designated and qualified as hedging net investments in foreign operations . approximately $ 35 million of other comprehensive loss related to derivative instruments as of december 31 , 2001 is expected to be recognized as a reduction to earnings over the next twelve months . a portion of this amount is expected to be offset by the effects of hedge accounting . the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivative transactions will be reclassified into earnings as interest expense is recognized for hedges of interest rate risk , as foreign currency transaction and translation gains and losses are recognized for hedges of foreign currency exposure and as electric and gas sales and purchases are recognized for hedges of forecasted electric and gas transactions . amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of tax , during the year-ended december 31 , 2001 , were as follows ( in millions ) : .
|transition adjustment on january 1 2001|$ -93 ( 93 )|
|reclassification to earnings|-32 ( 32 )|
|change in fair value|4|
|balance december 31 2001|$ -121 ( 121 )|
aes utilizes derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk , foreign exchange risk and commodity price risk . the company utilizes interest rate swap , cap and floor agreements to hedge interest rate risk on floating rate debt . the majority of aes 2019s interest rate derivatives are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges . currency forward and swap agreements are utilized to hedge foreign exchange risk which is a result of aes or one of its subsidiaries entering into monetary obligations in currencies other than its own functional currency . the majority of aes 2019s foreign currency derivatives are designated and qualify as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges . certain derivative instruments and other non-derivative instruments are designated and qualify as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation . the company utilizes electric and gas derivative instruments , including swaps , options , forwards and futures , to hedge the risk related to electricity and gas sales and purchases . the majority of aes 2019s electric and gas derivatives are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges . the maximum length of time over which aes is hedging its exposure to variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions , excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest , is three years . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , a charge of $ 4 million , after income taxes , was recorded for two cash flow hedges that were discontinued because it is probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur . a portion of this charge has been classified as discontinued operations . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , no fair value hedges were de-recognized or discontinued. .
Question: for 2001 what was the net change in aoci in millions?\\n |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: we participate in a medicare health support pilot program through green ribbon health , or grh , a joint- venture company with pfizer health solutions inc . grh is designed to support medicare beneficiaries living with diabetes and/or congestive heart failure in central florida . grh uses disease management initiatives including evidence-based clinical guidelines , personal self-directed change strategies , and personal nurses to help participants navigate the health system . revenues under the contract with cms , which expires october 31 , 2008 unless terminated earlier , are subject to refund unless a savings target is met . to date , all revenues have been deferred until reliable estimates are determinable . our products marketed to commercial segment employers and members smart plans and other consumer products over the last several years , we have developed and offered various commercial products designed to provide options and choices to employers that are annually facing substantial premium increases driven by double-digit medical cost inflation . these smart plans , discussed more fully below , and other consumer offerings , which can be offered on either a fully-insured or aso basis , provided coverage to approximately 564700 members at december 31 , 2007 , representing approximately 16.4% ( 16.4 % ) of our total commercial medical membership as detailed below . smart plans and other consumer membership other commercial membership commercial medical membership .
||smart plans and other consumer membership|other commercial membership|commercial medical membership|
|fully-insured|327900|1480700|1808600|
|aso|236800|1406200|1643000|
|total commercial medical|564700|2886900|3451600|
these products are often offered to employer groups as 201cbundles 201d , where the subscribers are offered various hmo and ppo options , with various employer contribution strategies as determined by the employer . paramount to our product strategy , we have developed a group of innovative consumer products , styled as 201csmart 201d products , that we believe will be a long-term solution for employers . we believe this new generation of products provides more ( 1 ) choices for the individual consumer , ( 2 ) transparency of provider costs , and ( 3 ) benefit designs that engage consumers in the costs and effectiveness of health care choices . innovative tools and technology are available to assist consumers with these decisions , including the trade-offs between higher premiums and point-of-service costs at the time consumers choose their plans , and to suggest ways in which the consumers can maximize their individual benefits at the point they use their plans . we believe that when consumers can make informed choices about the cost and effectiveness of their health care , a sustainable long term solution for employers can be realized . smart products , which accounted for approximately 55% ( 55 % ) of enrollment in all of our consumer-choice plans as of december 31 , 2007 , are only sold to employers who use humana as their sole health insurance carrier . some employers have selected other types of consumer-choice products , such as , ( 1 ) a product with a high deductible , ( 2 ) a catastrophic coverage plan , or ( 3 ) ones that offer a spending account option in conjunction with more traditional medical coverage or as a stand alone plan . unlike our smart products , these products , while valuable in helping employers deal with near-term cost increases by shifting costs to employees , are not considered by us to be long-term comprehensive solutions to the employers 2019 cost dilemma , although we view them as an important interim step . our commercial hmo products provide prepaid health insurance coverage to our members through a network of independent primary care physicians , specialty physicians , and other health care providers who .
Question: considering the smart plans and other consumer membership , what is the percentage of the fully insured among the total commercial medical plans? | 0.58066 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: we participate in a medicare health support pilot program through green ribbon health , or grh , a joint- venture company with pfizer health solutions inc . grh is designed to support medicare beneficiaries living with diabetes and/or congestive heart failure in central florida . grh uses disease management initiatives including evidence-based clinical guidelines , personal self-directed change strategies , and personal nurses to help participants navigate the health system . revenues under the contract with cms , which expires october 31 , 2008 unless terminated earlier , are subject to refund unless a savings target is met . to date , all revenues have been deferred until reliable estimates are determinable . our products marketed to commercial segment employers and members smart plans and other consumer products over the last several years , we have developed and offered various commercial products designed to provide options and choices to employers that are annually facing substantial premium increases driven by double-digit medical cost inflation . these smart plans , discussed more fully below , and other consumer offerings , which can be offered on either a fully-insured or aso basis , provided coverage to approximately 564700 members at december 31 , 2007 , representing approximately 16.4% ( 16.4 % ) of our total commercial medical membership as detailed below . smart plans and other consumer membership other commercial membership commercial medical membership .
||smart plans and other consumer membership|other commercial membership|commercial medical membership|
|fully-insured|327900|1480700|1808600|
|aso|236800|1406200|1643000|
|total commercial medical|564700|2886900|3451600|
these products are often offered to employer groups as 201cbundles 201d , where the subscribers are offered various hmo and ppo options , with various employer contribution strategies as determined by the employer . paramount to our product strategy , we have developed a group of innovative consumer products , styled as 201csmart 201d products , that we believe will be a long-term solution for employers . we believe this new generation of products provides more ( 1 ) choices for the individual consumer , ( 2 ) transparency of provider costs , and ( 3 ) benefit designs that engage consumers in the costs and effectiveness of health care choices . innovative tools and technology are available to assist consumers with these decisions , including the trade-offs between higher premiums and point-of-service costs at the time consumers choose their plans , and to suggest ways in which the consumers can maximize their individual benefits at the point they use their plans . we believe that when consumers can make informed choices about the cost and effectiveness of their health care , a sustainable long term solution for employers can be realized . smart products , which accounted for approximately 55% ( 55 % ) of enrollment in all of our consumer-choice plans as of december 31 , 2007 , are only sold to employers who use humana as their sole health insurance carrier . some employers have selected other types of consumer-choice products , such as , ( 1 ) a product with a high deductible , ( 2 ) a catastrophic coverage plan , or ( 3 ) ones that offer a spending account option in conjunction with more traditional medical coverage or as a stand alone plan . unlike our smart products , these products , while valuable in helping employers deal with near-term cost increases by shifting costs to employees , are not considered by us to be long-term comprehensive solutions to the employers 2019 cost dilemma , although we view them as an important interim step . our commercial hmo products provide prepaid health insurance coverage to our members through a network of independent primary care physicians , specialty physicians , and other health care providers who .
Question: considering the smart plans and other consumer membership , what is the percentage of the fully insured among the total commercial medical plans? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy gulf states louisiana , l.l.c . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 12.3 million primarily due to lower interest expense and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 37.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher taxes other than income taxes . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2010 net revenue|$ 933.6|
|retail electric price|-20.1 ( 20.1 )|
|volume/weather|-5.2 ( 5.2 )|
|fuel recovery|14.8|
|transmission revenue|12.4|
|other|-2.1 ( 2.1 )|
|2011 net revenue|$ 933.4|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in credits passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing . see 201cmanagement 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2013 hurricane gustav and hurricane ike 201d and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the act 55 storm cost financing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to less favorable weather on the residential sector as well as the unbilled sales period . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of 62 gwh , or 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) , in billed electricity usage , primarily due to increased consumption by an industrial customer as a result of the customer 2019s cogeneration outage and the addition of a new production unit by the industrial customer . the fuel recovery variance resulted primarily from an adjustment to deferred fuel costs in 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of fuel recovery. .
Question: what as the percent of the net revenue from transmission in 2011 | 0.01328 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy gulf states louisiana , l.l.c . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 12.3 million primarily due to lower interest expense and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 37.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher taxes other than income taxes . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2010 net revenue|$ 933.6|
|retail electric price|-20.1 ( 20.1 )|
|volume/weather|-5.2 ( 5.2 )|
|fuel recovery|14.8|
|transmission revenue|12.4|
|other|-2.1 ( 2.1 )|
|2011 net revenue|$ 933.4|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in credits passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing . see 201cmanagement 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2013 hurricane gustav and hurricane ike 201d and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the act 55 storm cost financing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to less favorable weather on the residential sector as well as the unbilled sales period . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of 62 gwh , or 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) , in billed electricity usage , primarily due to increased consumption by an industrial customer as a result of the customer 2019s cogeneration outage and the addition of a new production unit by the industrial customer . the fuel recovery variance resulted primarily from an adjustment to deferred fuel costs in 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of fuel recovery. .
Question: what as the percent of the net revenue from transmission in 2011 |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: amount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions of dollars total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 .
|other commercial commitmentsmillions of dollars|total|amount of commitment expiration per period 2010|amount of commitment expiration per period 2011|amount of commitment expiration per period 2012|amount of commitment expiration per period 2013|amount of commitment expiration per period 2014|amount of commitment expiration per period after 2014|
|credit facilities [a]|$ 1900|$ -|$ -|$ 1900|$ -|$ -|$ -|
|sale of receivables [b]|600|600|-|-|-|-|-|
|guarantees [c]|416|29|76|24|8|214|65|
|standby letters of credit [d]|22|22|-|-|-|-|-|
|total commercial commitments|$ 2938|$ 651|$ 76|$ 1924|$ 8|$ 214|$ 65|
[a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2009 . [b] $ 400 million of the sale of receivables program was utilized at december 31 , 2009 . [c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . [d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2009 . off-balance sheet arrangements sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc . ( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility . upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors . the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 600 million and $ 700 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 400 million and $ 584 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . during 2009 , upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables . the value of the undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements . the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively . this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements . the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution . if default or dilution ratios increase one percent , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would not change as of december 31 , 2009 . should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility . the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability , as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities . the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility . the costs of the sale of receivables program are included in other income and were $ 9 million , $ 23 million , and $ 35 million for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively . the costs include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability . the decrease in the 2009 costs was primarily attributable to lower commercial paper rates and a decrease in the outstanding interest held by investors. .
Question: using the value of the undivided interest held by investors and retained by upri at december 31 , 2009 as a proxy for ar balance , what was the average receivable turnover in 2009?\\n\\n[14] : at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively . | 11.18314 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: amount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions of dollars total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 .
|other commercial commitmentsmillions of dollars|total|amount of commitment expiration per period 2010|amount of commitment expiration per period 2011|amount of commitment expiration per period 2012|amount of commitment expiration per period 2013|amount of commitment expiration per period 2014|amount of commitment expiration per period after 2014|
|credit facilities [a]|$ 1900|$ -|$ -|$ 1900|$ -|$ -|$ -|
|sale of receivables [b]|600|600|-|-|-|-|-|
|guarantees [c]|416|29|76|24|8|214|65|
|standby letters of credit [d]|22|22|-|-|-|-|-|
|total commercial commitments|$ 2938|$ 651|$ 76|$ 1924|$ 8|$ 214|$ 65|
[a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2009 . [b] $ 400 million of the sale of receivables program was utilized at december 31 , 2009 . [c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . [d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2009 . off-balance sheet arrangements sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc . ( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility . upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors . the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 600 million and $ 700 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 400 million and $ 584 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . during 2009 , upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables . the value of the undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements . the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively . this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements . the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution . if default or dilution ratios increase one percent , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would not change as of december 31 , 2009 . should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility . the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability , as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities . the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility . the costs of the sale of receivables program are included in other income and were $ 9 million , $ 23 million , and $ 35 million for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively . the costs include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability . the decrease in the 2009 costs was primarily attributable to lower commercial paper rates and a decrease in the outstanding interest held by investors. .
Question: using the value of the undivided interest held by investors and retained by upri at december 31 , 2009 as a proxy for ar balance , what was the average receivable turnover in 2009?\\n\\n[14] : at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively . |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2006 net revenue|$ 466.1|
|base revenue|7.9|
|volume/weather|4.5|
|transmission revenue|4.1|
|transmission equalization|4.0|
|reserve equalization|3.8|
|attala costs|-10.2 ( 10.2 )|
|other|6.7|
|2007 net revenue|$ 486.9|
the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .
Question: what percent of the change in revenue was due to volume/weather? | 0.21635 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2006 net revenue|$ 466.1|
|base revenue|7.9|
|volume/weather|4.5|
|transmission revenue|4.1|
|transmission equalization|4.0|
|reserve equalization|3.8|
|attala costs|-10.2 ( 10.2 )|
|other|6.7|
|2007 net revenue|$ 486.9|
the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .
Question: what percent of the change in revenue was due to volume/weather? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) december 30 , 2006 , december 31 , 2005 and january 1 , 2005 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 8 . inventories , net inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market , cost being determined using the last-in , first-out ( "lifo" ) method for approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of inventories at both december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . under the lifo method , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most currently purchased inventories while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs relating to prices paid in prior years . the company 2019s costs to acquire inventory have been generally decreasing in recent years as a result of its significant growth . accordingly , the cost to replace inventory is less than the lifo balances carried for similar product . as a result of the lifo method and the ability to obtain lower product costs , the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 9978 for fiscal year ended 2006 , an increase in cost of sales of $ 526 for fiscal year ended 2005 and a reduction to cost of sales of $ 11212 for fiscal year ended 2004 . the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , which consist of the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries and are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . core values are included as part of our merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . additionally , these products are not subject to the frequent cost changes like our other merchandise inventory , thus , there is no material difference from applying either the lifo or fifo valuation methods . the company capitalizes certain purchasing and warehousing costs into inventory . purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , were $ 95576 and $ 92833 , respectively . inventories consist of the following : december 30 , december 31 , 2006 2005 .
||december 30 2006|december 31 2005|
|inventories at fifo net|$ 1380573|$ 1294310|
|adjustments to state inventories at lifo|82767|72789|
|inventories at lifo net|$ 1463340|$ 1367099|
replacement cost approximated fifo cost at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company uses a cycle counting program in all distribution centers , parts delivered quickly warehouses , or pdqs , local area warehouses , or laws , and retail stores to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory . the company establishes reserves for estimated shrink based on historical accuracy and effectiveness of the cycle counting program . the company also establishes reserves for potentially excess and obsolete inventories based on current inventory levels and the historical analysis of product sales and current market conditions . the nature of the company 2019s inventory is such that the risk of obsolescence is minimal and excess inventory has historically been returned to the company 2019s vendors for credit . the company provides reserves when less than full credit is expected from a vendor or when liquidating product will result in retail prices below recorded costs . the company 2019s reserves against inventory for these matters were $ 31376 and $ 22825 at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively . 9 . property and equipment : property and equipment are stated at cost , less accumulated depreciation . expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged directly to expense when incurred ; major improvements are capitalized . when items are sold or retired , the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts , with any gain or loss reflected in the consolidated statements of operations . depreciation of land improvements , buildings , furniture , fixtures and equipment , and vehicles is provided over the estimated useful lives , which range from 2 to 40 years , of the respective assets using the straight-line method. .
Question: what is the percentage increase in inventories due to the adoption of lifo in 2005? | 0.05624 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) december 30 , 2006 , december 31 , 2005 and january 1 , 2005 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 8 . inventories , net inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market , cost being determined using the last-in , first-out ( "lifo" ) method for approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of inventories at both december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . under the lifo method , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most currently purchased inventories while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs relating to prices paid in prior years . the company 2019s costs to acquire inventory have been generally decreasing in recent years as a result of its significant growth . accordingly , the cost to replace inventory is less than the lifo balances carried for similar product . as a result of the lifo method and the ability to obtain lower product costs , the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 9978 for fiscal year ended 2006 , an increase in cost of sales of $ 526 for fiscal year ended 2005 and a reduction to cost of sales of $ 11212 for fiscal year ended 2004 . the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , which consist of the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries and are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . core values are included as part of our merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . additionally , these products are not subject to the frequent cost changes like our other merchandise inventory , thus , there is no material difference from applying either the lifo or fifo valuation methods . the company capitalizes certain purchasing and warehousing costs into inventory . purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , were $ 95576 and $ 92833 , respectively . inventories consist of the following : december 30 , december 31 , 2006 2005 .
||december 30 2006|december 31 2005|
|inventories at fifo net|$ 1380573|$ 1294310|
|adjustments to state inventories at lifo|82767|72789|
|inventories at lifo net|$ 1463340|$ 1367099|
replacement cost approximated fifo cost at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company uses a cycle counting program in all distribution centers , parts delivered quickly warehouses , or pdqs , local area warehouses , or laws , and retail stores to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory . the company establishes reserves for estimated shrink based on historical accuracy and effectiveness of the cycle counting program . the company also establishes reserves for potentially excess and obsolete inventories based on current inventory levels and the historical analysis of product sales and current market conditions . the nature of the company 2019s inventory is such that the risk of obsolescence is minimal and excess inventory has historically been returned to the company 2019s vendors for credit . the company provides reserves when less than full credit is expected from a vendor or when liquidating product will result in retail prices below recorded costs . the company 2019s reserves against inventory for these matters were $ 31376 and $ 22825 at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively . 9 . property and equipment : property and equipment are stated at cost , less accumulated depreciation . expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged directly to expense when incurred ; major improvements are capitalized . when items are sold or retired , the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts , with any gain or loss reflected in the consolidated statements of operations . depreciation of land improvements , buildings , furniture , fixtures and equipment , and vehicles is provided over the estimated useful lives , which range from 2 to 40 years , of the respective assets using the straight-line method. .
Question: what is the percentage increase in inventories due to the adoption of lifo in 2005? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2017 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .
|period|total numberof sharespurchased|averageprice paidper share|total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )|total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms|approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )|
|october 2017|515762|$ 77.15|292145|223617|$ 1.6 billion|
|november 2017|2186889|$ 81.21|216415|1970474|$ 1.4 billion|
|december 2017|2330263|$ 87.76|798|2329465|$ 1.2 billion|
|total|5032914|$ 83.83|509358|4523556|$ 1.2 billion|
( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2017 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2016 program ) with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 1.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2016 program . on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date. .
Question: for the fourth quarter of 2017 what was the percent of the total number of shares purchased in november | 0.43452 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2017 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .
|period|total numberof sharespurchased|averageprice paidper share|total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )|total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms|approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )|
|october 2017|515762|$ 77.15|292145|223617|$ 1.6 billion|
|november 2017|2186889|$ 81.21|216415|1970474|$ 1.4 billion|
|december 2017|2330263|$ 87.76|798|2329465|$ 1.2 billion|
|total|5032914|$ 83.83|509358|4523556|$ 1.2 billion|
( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2017 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2016 program ) with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 1.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2016 program . on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date. .
Question: for the fourth quarter of 2017 what was the percent of the total number of shares purchased in november |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: to determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant- date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , options for 12337000 and 13397000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 106.08 and $ 118.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 37 million , $ 4 million and $ 5 million . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 118 million , $ 41 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 41 million , $ 14 million and $ 5 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 29192854 at december 31 , 2012 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 30537674 shares at december 31 , 2012 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2012 , we issued approximately 1.7 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 include 25620 , 27090 and 29040 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2012 , we incorporated several risk-related performance changes to certain incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics relative to our peers , the final payout amount will be subject to a negative adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement . however , the p&cc has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances . these awards have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . additionally , performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2012 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options , with generally the same terms and conditions as the 2011 awards of the same . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 60.68 , $ 63.25 and $ 54.59 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 130 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair .
|shares in thousands december 31 2011|nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 830|weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 61.68|nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2512|weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 54.87|
|granted|465|60.70|1534|60.67|
|vested|-100 ( 100 )|64.21|-831 ( 831 )|45.47|
|forfeited|-76 ( 76 )|60.27|-154 ( 154 )|60.51|
|december 31 2012|1119|$ 61.14|3061|$ 60.04|
in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2012 , there was $ 86 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 55 million , $ 52 million and $ 39 million , respectively . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 203 .
Question: what was the average weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 and 2011? | 61.965 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: to determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant- date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , options for 12337000 and 13397000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 106.08 and $ 118.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 37 million , $ 4 million and $ 5 million . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 118 million , $ 41 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 41 million , $ 14 million and $ 5 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 29192854 at december 31 , 2012 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 30537674 shares at december 31 , 2012 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2012 , we issued approximately 1.7 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 include 25620 , 27090 and 29040 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2012 , we incorporated several risk-related performance changes to certain incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics relative to our peers , the final payout amount will be subject to a negative adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement . however , the p&cc has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances . these awards have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . additionally , performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2012 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options , with generally the same terms and conditions as the 2011 awards of the same . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 60.68 , $ 63.25 and $ 54.59 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 130 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair .
|shares in thousands december 31 2011|nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 830|weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 61.68|nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2512|weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 54.87|
|granted|465|60.70|1534|60.67|
|vested|-100 ( 100 )|64.21|-831 ( 831 )|45.47|
|forfeited|-76 ( 76 )|60.27|-154 ( 154 )|60.51|
|december 31 2012|1119|$ 61.14|3061|$ 60.04|
in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2012 , there was $ 86 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 55 million , $ 52 million and $ 39 million , respectively . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 203 .
Question: what was the average weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 and 2011? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( "s&p 500 retail index" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( "s&p 500" ) . .
|company/index|december 31 , 2010|december 31 , 2011|december 31 , 2012|december 31 , 2013|december 31 , 2014|december 31 , 2015|
|o'reilly automotive inc .|$ 100|$ 132|$ 148|$ 213|$ 319|$ 419|
|s&p 500 retail index|100|103|128|185|203|252|
|s&p 500|$ 100|$ 100|$ 113|$ 147|$ 164|$ 163|
.
Question: what is the roi of an investment in the o'reilly automotive inc . from 2010 to 2011? | 0.32 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( "s&p 500 retail index" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( "s&p 500" ) . .
|company/index|december 31 , 2010|december 31 , 2011|december 31 , 2012|december 31 , 2013|december 31 , 2014|december 31 , 2015|
|o'reilly automotive inc .|$ 100|$ 132|$ 148|$ 213|$ 319|$ 419|
|s&p 500 retail index|100|103|128|185|203|252|
|s&p 500|$ 100|$ 100|$ 113|$ 147|$ 164|$ 163|
.
Question: what is the roi of an investment in the o'reilly automotive inc . from 2010 to 2011? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , entergy new orleans has $ 53.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . the planned capital investment estimate for entergy new orleans reflects capital required to support existing business . the estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints , environmental compliance , market volatility , economic trends , changes in project plans , and the ability to access capital . management provides more information on long-term debt and preferred stock maturities in notes 5 and 6 and to the financial statements . as an indirect , wholly-owned subsidiary of entergy corporation , entergy new orleans pays dividends from its earnings at a percentage determined monthly . entergy new orleans 2019s long-term debt indentures contain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends or other distributions on its common and preferred stock . sources of capital entergy new orleans 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; and debt and preferred stock issuances . entergy new orleans may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .
|2011|2010|2009|2008|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 9074|$ 21820|$ 66149|$ 60093|
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through october 2013 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 100 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through july 2012 . entergy louisiana 2019s ninemile point unit 6 self-build project in june 2011 , entergy louisiana filed with the lpsc an application seeking certification that the public necessity and convenience would be served by entergy louisiana 2019s construction of a combined-cycle gas turbine generating facility ( ninemile 6 ) at its existing ninemile point electric generating station . ninemile 6 will be a nominally-sized 550 mw unit that is estimated to cost approximately $ 721 million to construct , excluding interconnection and transmission upgrades . entergy gulf states louisiana joined in the application , seeking certification of its purchase under a life-of-unit power purchase agreement of up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the capacity and energy generated by ninemile 6 . the ninemile 6 capacity and energy is proposed to be allocated 55% ( 55 % ) to entergy louisiana , 25% ( 25 % ) to entergy gulf states louisiana , and 20% ( 20 % ) to entergy new orleans . in february 2012 the city council passed a resolution authorizing entergy new orleans to purchase 20% ( 20 % ) of the ninemile 6 energy and capacity . if approvals are obtained from the lpsc and other permitting agencies , ninemile 6 construction is .
Question: by what amount did the receivables from the money pool differ between 2010 and 2011? | -12746.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , entergy new orleans has $ 53.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . the planned capital investment estimate for entergy new orleans reflects capital required to support existing business . the estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints , environmental compliance , market volatility , economic trends , changes in project plans , and the ability to access capital . management provides more information on long-term debt and preferred stock maturities in notes 5 and 6 and to the financial statements . as an indirect , wholly-owned subsidiary of entergy corporation , entergy new orleans pays dividends from its earnings at a percentage determined monthly . entergy new orleans 2019s long-term debt indentures contain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends or other distributions on its common and preferred stock . sources of capital entergy new orleans 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; and debt and preferred stock issuances . entergy new orleans may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .
|2011|2010|2009|2008|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 9074|$ 21820|$ 66149|$ 60093|
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through october 2013 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 100 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through july 2012 . entergy louisiana 2019s ninemile point unit 6 self-build project in june 2011 , entergy louisiana filed with the lpsc an application seeking certification that the public necessity and convenience would be served by entergy louisiana 2019s construction of a combined-cycle gas turbine generating facility ( ninemile 6 ) at its existing ninemile point electric generating station . ninemile 6 will be a nominally-sized 550 mw unit that is estimated to cost approximately $ 721 million to construct , excluding interconnection and transmission upgrades . entergy gulf states louisiana joined in the application , seeking certification of its purchase under a life-of-unit power purchase agreement of up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the capacity and energy generated by ninemile 6 . the ninemile 6 capacity and energy is proposed to be allocated 55% ( 55 % ) to entergy louisiana , 25% ( 25 % ) to entergy gulf states louisiana , and 20% ( 20 % ) to entergy new orleans . in february 2012 the city council passed a resolution authorizing entergy new orleans to purchase 20% ( 20 % ) of the ninemile 6 energy and capacity . if approvals are obtained from the lpsc and other permitting agencies , ninemile 6 construction is .
Question: by what amount did the receivables from the money pool differ between 2010 and 2011? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: augusta , georgia mill and $ 2 million of costs associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging .
|in millions|2015|2014|2013|
|sales|$ 2940|$ 3403|$ 3435|
|operating profit ( loss )|-25 ( 25 )|178|161|
north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2014 and $ 2.0 billion in 2013 . operating profits were $ 81 million ( $ 91 million excluding the cost associated with the planned conversion of our riegelwood mill to 100% ( 100 % ) pulp production , net of proceeds from the sale of the carolina coated bristols brand , and sheet plant closure costs ) in 2015 compared with $ 92 million ( $ 100 million excluding sheet plant closure costs ) in 2014 and $ 63 million ( $ 110 million excluding paper machine shutdown costs and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2013 . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2015 were lower than in 2014 reflecting weaker market demand . the business took about 77000 tons of market-related downtime in 2015 compared with about 41000 tons in 2014 . average sales price realizations increased modestly year over year as competitive pressures in the current year only partially offset the impact of sales price increases implemented in 2014 . input costs decreased for energy and chemicals , but wood costs increased . planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 10 million lower in 2015 . operating costs were higher , mainly due to inflation and overhead costs . foodservice sales volumes increased in 2015 compared with 2014 reflecting strong market demand . average sales margins increased due to lower resin costs and a more favorable mix . operating costs and distribution costs were both higher . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2016 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to be slightly lower than in the fourth quarter of 2015 due to our exit from the coated bristols market . average sales price realizations are expected to be flat , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix . input costs are expected to be higher for wood , chemicals and energy . planned maintenance downtime costs should be $ 4 million higher with a planned maintenance outage scheduled at our augusta mill in the first quarter . foodservice sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower . average sales margins are expected to improve due to a more favorable mix . operating costs are expected to decrease . european consumer packaging net sales in 2015 were $ 319 million compared with $ 365 million in 2014 and $ 380 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were $ 87 million compared with $ 91 million in 2014 and $ 100 million in 2013 . sales volumes in 2015 compared with 2014 increased in europe , but decreased in russia . average sales margins improved in russia due to slightly higher average sales price realizations and a more favorable mix . in europe average sales margins decreased reflecting lower average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix . input costs were lower in europe , primarily for wood and energy , but were higher in russia , primarily for wood . looking forward to the first quarter of 2016 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be stable . average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly higher in both russia and europe . input costs are expected to be flat , while operating costs are expected to increase . asian consumer packaging the company sold its 55% ( 55 % ) equity share in the ip-sun jv in october 2015 . net sales and operating profits presented below include results through september 30 , 2015 . net sales were $ 682 million in 2015 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2014 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were a loss of $ 193 million ( a loss of $ 19 million excluding goodwill and other asset impairment costs ) compared with losses of $ 5 million in 2014 and $ 2 million in 2013 . sales volumes and average sales price realizations were lower in 2015 due to over-supplied market conditions and competitive pressures . average sales margins were also negatively impacted by a less favorable mix . input costs and freight costs were lower and operating costs also decreased . on october 13 , 2015 , the company finalized the sale of its 55% ( 55 % ) interest in ip asia coated paperboard ( ip- sun jv ) business , within the company's consumer packaging segment , to its chinese coated board joint venture partner , shandong sun holding group co. , ltd . for rmb 149 million ( approximately usd $ 23 million ) . during the third quarter of 2015 , a determination was made that the current book value of the asset group exceeded its estimated fair value of $ 23 million , which was the agreed upon selling price . the 2015 loss includes the net pre-tax impairment charge of $ 174 million ( $ 113 million after taxes ) . a pre-tax charge of $ 186 million was recorded during the third quarter in the company's consumer packaging segment to write down the long-lived assets of this business to their estimated fair value . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , upon the sale and corresponding deconsolidation of ip-sun jv from the company's consolidated balance sheet , final adjustments were made resulting in a reduction of the impairment of $ 12 million . the amount of pre-tax losses related to noncontrolling interest of the ip-sun jv included in the company's consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 19 million , $ 12 million and $ 8 million , respectively . the amount of pre-tax losses related to the ip-sun jv included in the company's .
Question: what percentage of consumer packaging sales where from north american consumer packaging in 2015? | 0.64626 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: augusta , georgia mill and $ 2 million of costs associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging .
|in millions|2015|2014|2013|
|sales|$ 2940|$ 3403|$ 3435|
|operating profit ( loss )|-25 ( 25 )|178|161|
north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2014 and $ 2.0 billion in 2013 . operating profits were $ 81 million ( $ 91 million excluding the cost associated with the planned conversion of our riegelwood mill to 100% ( 100 % ) pulp production , net of proceeds from the sale of the carolina coated bristols brand , and sheet plant closure costs ) in 2015 compared with $ 92 million ( $ 100 million excluding sheet plant closure costs ) in 2014 and $ 63 million ( $ 110 million excluding paper machine shutdown costs and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2013 . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2015 were lower than in 2014 reflecting weaker market demand . the business took about 77000 tons of market-related downtime in 2015 compared with about 41000 tons in 2014 . average sales price realizations increased modestly year over year as competitive pressures in the current year only partially offset the impact of sales price increases implemented in 2014 . input costs decreased for energy and chemicals , but wood costs increased . planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 10 million lower in 2015 . operating costs were higher , mainly due to inflation and overhead costs . foodservice sales volumes increased in 2015 compared with 2014 reflecting strong market demand . average sales margins increased due to lower resin costs and a more favorable mix . operating costs and distribution costs were both higher . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2016 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to be slightly lower than in the fourth quarter of 2015 due to our exit from the coated bristols market . average sales price realizations are expected to be flat , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix . input costs are expected to be higher for wood , chemicals and energy . planned maintenance downtime costs should be $ 4 million higher with a planned maintenance outage scheduled at our augusta mill in the first quarter . foodservice sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower . average sales margins are expected to improve due to a more favorable mix . operating costs are expected to decrease . european consumer packaging net sales in 2015 were $ 319 million compared with $ 365 million in 2014 and $ 380 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were $ 87 million compared with $ 91 million in 2014 and $ 100 million in 2013 . sales volumes in 2015 compared with 2014 increased in europe , but decreased in russia . average sales margins improved in russia due to slightly higher average sales price realizations and a more favorable mix . in europe average sales margins decreased reflecting lower average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix . input costs were lower in europe , primarily for wood and energy , but were higher in russia , primarily for wood . looking forward to the first quarter of 2016 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be stable . average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly higher in both russia and europe . input costs are expected to be flat , while operating costs are expected to increase . asian consumer packaging the company sold its 55% ( 55 % ) equity share in the ip-sun jv in october 2015 . net sales and operating profits presented below include results through september 30 , 2015 . net sales were $ 682 million in 2015 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2014 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were a loss of $ 193 million ( a loss of $ 19 million excluding goodwill and other asset impairment costs ) compared with losses of $ 5 million in 2014 and $ 2 million in 2013 . sales volumes and average sales price realizations were lower in 2015 due to over-supplied market conditions and competitive pressures . average sales margins were also negatively impacted by a less favorable mix . input costs and freight costs were lower and operating costs also decreased . on october 13 , 2015 , the company finalized the sale of its 55% ( 55 % ) interest in ip asia coated paperboard ( ip- sun jv ) business , within the company's consumer packaging segment , to its chinese coated board joint venture partner , shandong sun holding group co. , ltd . for rmb 149 million ( approximately usd $ 23 million ) . during the third quarter of 2015 , a determination was made that the current book value of the asset group exceeded its estimated fair value of $ 23 million , which was the agreed upon selling price . the 2015 loss includes the net pre-tax impairment charge of $ 174 million ( $ 113 million after taxes ) . a pre-tax charge of $ 186 million was recorded during the third quarter in the company's consumer packaging segment to write down the long-lived assets of this business to their estimated fair value . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , upon the sale and corresponding deconsolidation of ip-sun jv from the company's consolidated balance sheet , final adjustments were made resulting in a reduction of the impairment of $ 12 million . the amount of pre-tax losses related to noncontrolling interest of the ip-sun jv included in the company's consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 19 million , $ 12 million and $ 8 million , respectively . the amount of pre-tax losses related to the ip-sun jv included in the company's .
Question: what percentage of consumer packaging sales where from north american consumer packaging in 2015? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 30 , 2011 through october 30 , 2016 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 30 , 2011 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/30/11 in stock or 10/31/11 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .
||10/30/2011|10/28/2012|10/27/2013|10/26/2014|10/25/2015|10/30/2016|
|applied materials|100.00|86.93|148.68|179.96|143.74|255.27|
|s&p 500 index|100.00|115.21|146.52|171.82|180.75|188.90|
|rdg semiconductor composite index|100.00|96.65|127.68|160.86|154.90|191.65|
dividends during each of fiscal 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what is the total return if 1000000 is invested in applied materials in 2011 and sold in 2012? | -130700.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 30 , 2011 through october 30 , 2016 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 30 , 2011 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/30/11 in stock or 10/31/11 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .
||10/30/2011|10/28/2012|10/27/2013|10/26/2014|10/25/2015|10/30/2016|
|applied materials|100.00|86.93|148.68|179.96|143.74|255.27|
|s&p 500 index|100.00|115.21|146.52|171.82|180.75|188.90|
|rdg semiconductor composite index|100.00|96.65|127.68|160.86|154.90|191.65|
dividends during each of fiscal 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what is the total return if 1000000 is invested in applied materials in 2011 and sold in 2012? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: .
||2012|2011|
|balance at january 1|$ 102|$ 107|
|accruals for warranties issued during the year|42|28|
|accruals related to pre-existing warranties|16|8|
|settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year|-38 ( 38 )|-38 ( 38 )|
|other net ( including currency translation )|-4 ( 4 )|-3 ( 3 )|
|balance at december 31|$ 118|$ 102|
investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .
Question: what was the percent of the change in the accruals for warranties issued from 2011 to 2012 | 0.5 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: .
||2012|2011|
|balance at january 1|$ 102|$ 107|
|accruals for warranties issued during the year|42|28|
|accruals related to pre-existing warranties|16|8|
|settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year|-38 ( 38 )|-38 ( 38 )|
|other net ( including currency translation )|-4 ( 4 )|-3 ( 3 )|
|balance at december 31|$ 118|$ 102|
investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .
Question: what was the percent of the change in the accruals for warranties issued from 2011 to 2012 |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company is a registered life insurance company that maintains separate account assets , representing segregated funds held for purposes of funding individual and group pension contracts , and equal and offsetting separate account liabilities . at decem - ber 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the level 3 separate account assets were approximately $ 4 and $ 12 , respectively . the changes in level 3 assets primarily relate to purchases , sales and gains/ ( losses ) . the net investment income and net gains and losses attributable to separate account assets accrue directly to the contract owner and are not reported as non-operating income ( expense ) on the consolidated statements of income . level 3 assets , which includes equity method investments or consolidated investments of real estate funds , private equity funds and funds of private equity funds are valued based upon valuations received from internal as well as third party fund managers . fair valuations at the underlying funds are based on a combination of methods which may include third-party independent appraisals and discounted cash flow techniques . direct investments in private equity companies held by funds of private equity funds are valued based on an assessment of each under - lying investment , incorporating evaluation of additional significant third party financing , changes in valuations of comparable peer companies and the business environment of the companies , among other factors . see note 2 for further detail on the fair value policies by the underlying funds . changes in level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended december 31 , 2008 .
||investments|other assets|
|december 31 2007|$ 1240|$ 2014|
|realized and unrealized gains / ( losses ) net|-409 ( 409 )|-16 ( 16 )|
|purchases sales other settlements and issuances net|11|2|
|net transfers in and/or out of level 3|-29 ( 29 )|78|
|december 31 2008|$ 813|$ 64|
|total net ( losses ) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or ( losses ) relating to assets stillheld at the reporting date|$ -366 ( 366 )|$ -17 ( 17 )|
total net ( losses ) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or ( losses ) relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 366 ) $ ( 17 ) realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded for level 3 assets are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) on the consolidated statements of income . non-controlling interest expense is recorded for consoli- dated investments to reflect the portion of gains and losses not attributable to the company . the company transfers assets in and/or out of level 3 as significant inputs , including performance attributes , used for the fair value measurement become observable . 6 . variable interest entities in the normal course of business , the company is the manager of various types of sponsored investment vehicles , including collateralized debt obligations and sponsored investment funds , that may be considered vies . the company receives management fees or other incen- tive related fees for its services and may from time to time own equity or debt securities or enter into derivatives with the vehicles , each of which are considered variable inter- ests . the company engages in these variable interests principally to address client needs through the launch of such investment vehicles . the vies are primarily financed via capital contributed by equity and debt holders . the company 2019s involvement in financing the operations of the vies is limited to its equity interests , unfunded capital commitments for certain sponsored investment funds and its capital support agreements for two enhanced cash funds . the primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that absorbs a majority of the entity 2019s expected losses , receives a major - ity of the entity 2019s expected residual returns or both as a result of holding variable interests . in order to determine whether the company is the primary beneficiary of a vie , management must make significant estimates and assumptions of probable future cash flows and assign probabilities to different cash flow scenarios . assumptions made in such analyses include , but are not limited to , market prices of securities , market interest rates , poten- tial credit defaults on individual securities or default rates on a portfolio of securities , gain realization , liquidity or marketability of certain securities , discount rates and the probability of certain other outcomes . vies in which blackrock is the primary beneficiary at december 31 , 2008 , the company was the primary beneficiary of three vies , which resulted in consolidation of three sponsored investment funds ( including two cash management funds and one private equity fund of funds ) . creditors of the vies do not have recourse to the credit of the company . during 2008 , the company determined it became the primary beneficiary of two enhanced cash management funds as a result of concluding that under various cash 177528_txt_59_96:layout 1 3/26/09 10:32 pm page 73 .
Question: what percent did the realized and unrealized losses effect the assets as of 2008? | 0.3347 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company is a registered life insurance company that maintains separate account assets , representing segregated funds held for purposes of funding individual and group pension contracts , and equal and offsetting separate account liabilities . at decem - ber 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the level 3 separate account assets were approximately $ 4 and $ 12 , respectively . the changes in level 3 assets primarily relate to purchases , sales and gains/ ( losses ) . the net investment income and net gains and losses attributable to separate account assets accrue directly to the contract owner and are not reported as non-operating income ( expense ) on the consolidated statements of income . level 3 assets , which includes equity method investments or consolidated investments of real estate funds , private equity funds and funds of private equity funds are valued based upon valuations received from internal as well as third party fund managers . fair valuations at the underlying funds are based on a combination of methods which may include third-party independent appraisals and discounted cash flow techniques . direct investments in private equity companies held by funds of private equity funds are valued based on an assessment of each under - lying investment , incorporating evaluation of additional significant third party financing , changes in valuations of comparable peer companies and the business environment of the companies , among other factors . see note 2 for further detail on the fair value policies by the underlying funds . changes in level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended december 31 , 2008 .
||investments|other assets|
|december 31 2007|$ 1240|$ 2014|
|realized and unrealized gains / ( losses ) net|-409 ( 409 )|-16 ( 16 )|
|purchases sales other settlements and issuances net|11|2|
|net transfers in and/or out of level 3|-29 ( 29 )|78|
|december 31 2008|$ 813|$ 64|
|total net ( losses ) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or ( losses ) relating to assets stillheld at the reporting date|$ -366 ( 366 )|$ -17 ( 17 )|
total net ( losses ) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or ( losses ) relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 366 ) $ ( 17 ) realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded for level 3 assets are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) on the consolidated statements of income . non-controlling interest expense is recorded for consoli- dated investments to reflect the portion of gains and losses not attributable to the company . the company transfers assets in and/or out of level 3 as significant inputs , including performance attributes , used for the fair value measurement become observable . 6 . variable interest entities in the normal course of business , the company is the manager of various types of sponsored investment vehicles , including collateralized debt obligations and sponsored investment funds , that may be considered vies . the company receives management fees or other incen- tive related fees for its services and may from time to time own equity or debt securities or enter into derivatives with the vehicles , each of which are considered variable inter- ests . the company engages in these variable interests principally to address client needs through the launch of such investment vehicles . the vies are primarily financed via capital contributed by equity and debt holders . the company 2019s involvement in financing the operations of the vies is limited to its equity interests , unfunded capital commitments for certain sponsored investment funds and its capital support agreements for two enhanced cash funds . the primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that absorbs a majority of the entity 2019s expected losses , receives a major - ity of the entity 2019s expected residual returns or both as a result of holding variable interests . in order to determine whether the company is the primary beneficiary of a vie , management must make significant estimates and assumptions of probable future cash flows and assign probabilities to different cash flow scenarios . assumptions made in such analyses include , but are not limited to , market prices of securities , market interest rates , poten- tial credit defaults on individual securities or default rates on a portfolio of securities , gain realization , liquidity or marketability of certain securities , discount rates and the probability of certain other outcomes . vies in which blackrock is the primary beneficiary at december 31 , 2008 , the company was the primary beneficiary of three vies , which resulted in consolidation of three sponsored investment funds ( including two cash management funds and one private equity fund of funds ) . creditors of the vies do not have recourse to the credit of the company . during 2008 , the company determined it became the primary beneficiary of two enhanced cash management funds as a result of concluding that under various cash 177528_txt_59_96:layout 1 3/26/09 10:32 pm page 73 .
Question: what percent did the realized and unrealized losses effect the assets as of 2008? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2015 equity aum totaled $ 2.424 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 52.8 billion . net inflows included $ 78.4 billion and $ 4.2 billion into ishares and active products , respectively . ishares net inflows were driven by the core series and flows into broad developed market equity exposures , and active net inflows reflected demand for international equities . ishares and active net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 29.8 billion . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s . markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2015 at $ 1.422 trillion , increasing $ 28.7 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from december 31 , 2014 . the increase in aum reflected $ 76.9 billion in net inflows , partially offset by $ 48.2 billion in net market depreciation and foreign exchange movements . in 2015 , active net inflows of $ 35.9 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield strategies . flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income strategies funds , with net inflows of $ 7.0 billion and $ 3.7 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.7 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 3.5 billion . fixed income ishares net inflows of $ 50.3 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and high yield bond funds . active and ishares net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 9.3 billion . multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2015 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , 2014 net inflows ( outflows ) acquisition ( 1 ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2015 asset allocation and balanced $ 183032 $ 12926 $ 2014 $ ( 6731 ) $ ( 3391 ) $ 185836 .
|( in millions )|december 312014|net inflows ( outflows )|acquisition ( 1 )|market change|fx impact|december 312015|
|asset allocation and balanced|$ 183032|$ 12926|$ 2014|$ -6731 ( 6731 )|$ -3391 ( 3391 )|$ 185836|
|target date/risk|128611|218|2014|-1308 ( 1308 )|-1857 ( 1857 )|125664|
|fiduciary|66194|3985|2014|627|-6373 ( 6373 )|64433|
|futureadvisor|2014|38|366|-1 ( 1 )|2014|403|
|multi-asset|$ 377837|$ 17167|$ 366|$ -7413 ( 7413 )|$ -11621 ( 11621 )|$ 376336|
( 1 ) amounts represent $ 366 million of aum acquired in the futureadvisor acquisition in october 2015 . the futureadvisor acquisition amount does not include aum that was held in ishares holdings . multi-asset class net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 17.4 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 7.3 billion to institutional multi-asset class net new business in 2015 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net outflows of $ 1.3 billion were primarily due to a large single-client transition out of mutual funds into a series of ishares across asset classes . notwithstanding this transition , retail flows reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 4.6 billion in 2015 . the company 2019s multi-asset class strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 49% ( 49 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 12.9 billion . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites. .
Question: what percent of the muilti asset value is from the asset allocation and balanced section? | 0.4938 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2015 equity aum totaled $ 2.424 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 52.8 billion . net inflows included $ 78.4 billion and $ 4.2 billion into ishares and active products , respectively . ishares net inflows were driven by the core series and flows into broad developed market equity exposures , and active net inflows reflected demand for international equities . ishares and active net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 29.8 billion . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s . markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2015 at $ 1.422 trillion , increasing $ 28.7 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from december 31 , 2014 . the increase in aum reflected $ 76.9 billion in net inflows , partially offset by $ 48.2 billion in net market depreciation and foreign exchange movements . in 2015 , active net inflows of $ 35.9 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield strategies . flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income strategies funds , with net inflows of $ 7.0 billion and $ 3.7 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.7 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 3.5 billion . fixed income ishares net inflows of $ 50.3 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and high yield bond funds . active and ishares net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 9.3 billion . multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2015 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , 2014 net inflows ( outflows ) acquisition ( 1 ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2015 asset allocation and balanced $ 183032 $ 12926 $ 2014 $ ( 6731 ) $ ( 3391 ) $ 185836 .
|( in millions )|december 312014|net inflows ( outflows )|acquisition ( 1 )|market change|fx impact|december 312015|
|asset allocation and balanced|$ 183032|$ 12926|$ 2014|$ -6731 ( 6731 )|$ -3391 ( 3391 )|$ 185836|
|target date/risk|128611|218|2014|-1308 ( 1308 )|-1857 ( 1857 )|125664|
|fiduciary|66194|3985|2014|627|-6373 ( 6373 )|64433|
|futureadvisor|2014|38|366|-1 ( 1 )|2014|403|
|multi-asset|$ 377837|$ 17167|$ 366|$ -7413 ( 7413 )|$ -11621 ( 11621 )|$ 376336|
( 1 ) amounts represent $ 366 million of aum acquired in the futureadvisor acquisition in october 2015 . the futureadvisor acquisition amount does not include aum that was held in ishares holdings . multi-asset class net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 17.4 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 7.3 billion to institutional multi-asset class net new business in 2015 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net outflows of $ 1.3 billion were primarily due to a large single-client transition out of mutual funds into a series of ishares across asset classes . notwithstanding this transition , retail flows reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 4.6 billion in 2015 . the company 2019s multi-asset class strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 49% ( 49 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 12.9 billion . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites. .
Question: what percent of the muilti asset value is from the asset allocation and balanced section? |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 15