Dataset Viewer
data_source
stringclasses 2
values | prompt
listlengths 1
1
| ability
stringclasses 1
value | reward_model
dict | extra_info
dict | level
stringclasses 2
values | problem_id
stringlengths 20
25
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nLet $ ABP, BCQ, CAR$ be three non-overlapping triangles erected outside of acute triangle $ ABC$. Let $ M$ be the midpoint of segment $ AP$. Given that $ \\angle PAB \\equal{} \\angle CQB \\equal{} 45^\\circ$, $ \\angle ABP \\equal{} \\angle QBC \\equal{} 75^\\circ$, $ \\angle RAC \\equal{} 105^\\circ$, and $ RQ^2 \\equal{} 6CM^2$, compute $ AC^2/AR^2$.\r\n\r\n[i]Zuming Feng.[/i]\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the vertices of the triangles be represented by complex numbers $a, b, c, p, q, r, m$. We can place the triangle $ABC$ in the complex plane by setting $a=0$. Let $u = b-a = b$ and $v = c-a = c$ be the complex numbers representing the vectors $AB$ and $AC$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\frac{2}{3}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 0,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-0-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Let $ ABP, BCQ, CAR$ be three non-overlapping triangles erected outside of acute triangle $ ABC$. Let $ M$ be the midpoint of segment $ AP$. Given that $ \\angle PAB \\equal{} \\angle CQB \\equal{} 45^\\circ$, $ \\angle ABP \\equal{} \\angle QBC \\equal{} 75^\\circ$, $ \\angle RAC \\equal{} 105^\\circ$, and $ RQ^2 \\equal{} 6CM^2$, compute $ AC^2/AR^2$.\r\n\r\n[i]Zuming Feng.[/i]",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\frac{2}{3}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 0,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-0-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nLet $m>1$ be an integer. Find the smallest positive integer $n$, such that for any integers $a_1,a_2,\\ldots ,a_n; b_1,b_2,\\ldots ,b_n$ there exists integers $x_1,x_2,\\ldots ,x_n$ satisfying the following two conditions: \n\ni) There exists $i\\in \\{1,2,\\ldots ,n\\}$ such that $x_i$ and $m$ are coprime\n\nii) $\\sum^n_{i=1} a_ix_i \\equiv \\sum^n_{i=1} b_ix_i \\equiv 0 \\pmod m$\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $\\omega(m)$ denote the number of distinct prime factors of $m$. We will show that the smallest such integer $n$ is $2\\omega(m)+1$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "2\\omega(m) + 1",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 2,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-1-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Let $m>1$ be an integer. Find the smallest positive integer $n$, such that for any integers $a_1,a_2,\\ldots ,a_n; b_1,b_2,\\ldots ,b_n$ there exists integers $x_1,x_2,\\ldots ,x_n$ satisfying the following two conditions: \n\ni) There exists $i\\in \\{1,2,\\ldots ,n\\}$ such that $x_i$ and $m$ are coprime\n\nii) $\\sum^n_{i=1} a_ix_i \\equiv \\sum^n_{i=1} b_ix_i \\equiv 0 \\pmod m$",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "2\\omega(m) + 1",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 2,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-1-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nConvex quadrilateral $ ABCD$ is inscribed in a circle, $ \\angle{A}\\equal{}60^o$, $ BC\\equal{}CD\\equal{}1$, rays $ AB$ and $ DC$ intersect at point $ E$, rays $ BC$ and $ AD$ intersect each other at point $ F$. It is given that the perimeters of triangle $ BCE$ and triangle $ CDF$ are both integers. Find the perimeter of quadrilateral $ ABCD$.\n\nPartial Response:\n**Step 1: Analyze the geometry and angles**\nLet the circle be denoted by $ \\Omega$. Since quadrilateral $ ABCD$ is inscribed in $ \\Omega$, it is a cyclic quadrilateral.\nWe are given $ \\angle{A} = 60^\\circ$. In a cyclic quadrilateral, opposite angles are supplementary, so $ \\angle{BCD} = 180^\\circ - \\angle{A} = 180^\\circ - 60^\\circ = 120^\\circ$.\nWe are given $ BC = CD = 1$. In a circle, equal chords subtend equal angles at the circumference. Thus, $ \\angle{BAC} = \\angle{CAD}$. Since $ \\angle{BAD} = \\angle{A} = 60^\\circ$, we have $ \\angle{BAC} = \\angle{CAD} = 30^\\circ$.\nAlso, angles subtended by the same arc are equal. So, $ \\angle{CBD} = \\angle{CAD} = 30^\\circ$ and $ \\angle{BDC} = \\angle{BAC} = 30^\\circ$.\nIn $ \\triangle BCD$, we have $ \\angle{CBD} = \\angle{BDC} = 30^\\circ$, which confirms it is an isosceles triangle with $ BC=CD=1$. The third angle is $ \\angle{BCD} = 180^\\circ - (30^\\circ + 30^\\circ) = 120^\\circ$, which is consistent with our earlier finding.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\frac{38}{7}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 3,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-2-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Convex quadrilateral $ ABCD$ is inscribed in a circle, $ \\angle{A}\\equal{}60^o$, $ BC\\equal{}CD\\equal{}1$, rays $ AB$ and $ DC$ intersect at point $ E$, rays $ BC$ and $ AD$ intersect each other at point $ F$. It is given that the perimeters of triangle $ BCE$ and triangle $ CDF$ are both integers. Find the perimeter of quadrilateral $ ABCD$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\frac{38}{7}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 3,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-2-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nGiven two integers $m,n$ which are greater than $1$. $r,s$ are two given positive real numbers such that $r<s$. For all $a_{ij}\\ge 0$ which are not all zeroes,find the maximal value of the expression\n\\[f=\\frac{(\\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\\sum_{i=1}^{m}a_{ij}^s)^{\\frac{r}{s}})^{\\frac{1}{r}}}{(\\sum_{i=1}^{m})\\sum_{j=1}^{n}a_{ij}^r)^{\\frac{s}{r}})^{\\frac{1}{s}}}.\\]\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the given expression be denoted by $f$. We can write the numerator $N$ and the denominator $D$ as\n\\[N = \\left(\\sum_{j=1}^{n}\\left(\\sum_{i=1}^{m}a_{ij}^s\\right)^{\\frac{r}{s}}\\right)^{\\frac{1}{r}}, \\quad D = \\left(\\sum_{i=1}^{m}\\left(\\sum_{j=1}^{n}a_{ij}^r\\right)^{\\frac{s}{r}}\\right)^{\\frac{1}{s}}.\\]\nLet $A_j$ be the $j$-th column vector of the matrix $(a_{ij})$, so $A_j = (a_{1j}, a_{2j}, \\dots, a_{mj})^T$.\nLet $B_i$ be the $i$-th row vector, so $B_i = (a_{i1}, a_{i2}, \\dots, a_{in})$.\nUsing the $L_p$-norm notation, $||x||_p = (\\sum_k |x_k|^p)^{1/p}$, we can write\n\\[\\sum_{i=1}^{m}a_{ij}^s = ||A_j||_s^s, \\quad \\sum_{j=1}^{n}a_{ij}^r = ||B_i||_r^r.\\]\nSo the expression becomes\n\\[N = \\left(\\sum_{j=1}^{n}(||A_j||_s^s)^{\\frac{r}{s}}\\right)^{\\frac{1}{r}} = \\left(\\sum_{j=1}^{n}||A_j||_s^r\\right)^{\\frac{1}{r}},\\]\n\\[D = \\left(\\sum_{i=1}^{m}(||B_i||_r^r)^{\\frac{s}{r}}\\right)^{\\frac{1}{s}} = \\left(\\sum_{i=1}^{m}||B_i||_r^s\\right)^{\\frac{1}{s}}.\\]\nLet $S_r = \\sum_{i=1}^{m}\\sum_{j=1}^{n} a_{ij}^r$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\min(m, n)^{\\frac{1}{r} - \\frac{1}{s}}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 4,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-3-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Given two integers $m,n$ which are greater than $1$. $r,s$ are two given positive real numbers such that $r<s$. For all $a_{ij}\\ge 0$ which are not all zeroes,find the maximal value of the expression\n\\[f=\\frac{(\\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\\sum_{i=1}^{m}a_{ij}^s)^{\\frac{r}{s}})^{\\frac{1}{r}}}{(\\sum_{i=1}^{m})\\sum_{j=1}^{n}a_{ij}^r)^{\\frac{s}{r}})^{\\frac{1}{s}}}.\\]",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\min(m, n)^{\\frac{1}{r} - \\frac{1}{s}}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 4,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-3-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nGiven positive integers $n, k$ such that $n\\ge 4k$, find the minimal value $\\lambda=\\lambda(n,k)$ such that for any positive reals $a_1,a_2,\\ldots,a_n$, we have\n\\[ \\sum\\limits_{i=1}^{n} {\\frac{{a}_{i}}{\\sqrt{{a}_{i}^{2}+{a}_{{i}+{1}}^{2}+{\\cdots}{{+}}{a}_{{i}{+}{k}}^{2}}}}\n\\le \\lambda\\]\nWhere $a_{n+i}=a_i,i=1,2,\\ldots,k$\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $S$ be the sum in question:\n\\[ S = \\sum\\limits_{i=1}^{n} {\\frac{{a}_{i}}{\\sqrt{{a}_{i}^{2}+{a}_{{i}+{1}}^{2}+{\\cdots}{{+}}{a}_{{i}{+}{k}}^{2}}}} \\]\nLet $D_i = {a}_{i}^{2}+{a}_{{i}+{1}}^{2}+{\\cdots}{{+}}{a}_{{i}{+}{k}}^{2}$. So the sum is $S = \\sum_{i=1}^n \\frac{a_i}{\\sqrt{D_i}}$.\nThe value $\\lambda(n,k)$ is the maximum possible value of $S$.\n\nStep 1: Find a lower bound for $\\lambda$.\nWe will construct a sequence $(a_i)$ for which the sum $S$ approaches a certain value. This value will be a lower bound for $\\lambda$.\nLet $a_i = x^{i-1}$ for $i=1, 2, \\ldots, n$ for some small positive real number $x$. The indices are cyclic, so $a_{n+j} = a_j = x^{j-1}$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "n - k",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 5,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-4-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Given positive integers $n, k$ such that $n\\ge 4k$, find the minimal value $\\lambda=\\lambda(n,k)$ such that for any positive reals $a_1,a_2,\\ldots,a_n$, we have\n\\[ \\sum\\limits_{i=1}^{n} {\\frac{{a}_{i}}{\\sqrt{{a}_{i}^{2}+{a}_{{i}+{1}}^{2}+{\\cdots}{{+}}{a}_{{i}{+}{k}}^{2}}}}\n\\le \\lambda\\]\nWhere $a_{n+i}=a_i,i=1,2,\\ldots,k$",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "n - k",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 5,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-4-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nLet $P_1P_2\\ldots P_{24}$ be a regular $24$-sided polygon inscribed in a circle $\\omega$ with circumference $24$. Determine the number of ways to choose sets of eight distinct vertices from these $24$ such that none of the arcs has length $3$ or $8$.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the 24 vertices of the regular polygon be represented by the set $V = \\{0, 1, 2, \\ldots, 23\\}$. The circumference of the circle is 24, so the arc length between adjacent vertices is 1. The arc length between two vertices $i$ and $j$ is given by $\\min(|i-j|, 24-|i-j|)$.\n\nThe problem asks for the number of ways to choose a set of 8 distinct vertices from $V$ such that for any two chosen vertices $i$ and $j$, the arc length between them is not 3 or 8.\nThe condition on the arc length means that for any two distinct chosen vertices $i, j \\in S$, we must have:\n$\\min(|i-j|, 24-|i-j|) \\neq 3 \\implies |i-j| \\pmod{24} \\notin \\{3, 21\\}$\n$\\min(|i-j|, 24-|i-j|) \\neq 8 \\implies |i-j| \\pmod{24} \\notin \\{8, 16\\}$\n\nLet's analyze the constraints. We are looking for a subset $S \\subset V$ with $|S|=8$ such that for any two distinct $i, j \\in S$, $i-j \\pmod{24} \\notin \\{3, 21, 8, 16\\}$.\n\nConsider the constraint related to the arc length 8. This forbids any two chosen vertices from having a difference of $\\pm 8 \\pmod{24}$.\nLet's partition the 24 vertices into 8 disjoint sets based on their value modulo 8. However, a more direct partition based on the forbidden differences is more useful.\nLet's partition the set of vertices $V$ into 8 disjoint triangles, where the vertices of each triangle are separated by an arc length of 8. These sets are:\n$U_i = \\{i, i+8, i+16\\}$ for $i = 0, 1, \\ldots, 7$.\nFor any two vertices within a set $U_i$, their difference is a multiple of 8. Specifically, $(i+8)-i=8$, $(i+16)-i=16$, and $(i+16)-(i+8)=8$. These are all forbidden differences.\nTherefore, a valid set of 8 vertices can have at most one vertex from each set $U_i$.\nSince we need to choose exactly 8 vertices, we must choose exactly one vertex from each of the 8 sets $U_0, U_1, \\ldots, U_7$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "258",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 6,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-5-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Let $P_1P_2\\ldots P_{24}$ be a regular $24$-sided polygon inscribed in a circle $\\omega$ with circumference $24$. Determine the number of ways to choose sets of eight distinct vertices from these $24$ such that none of the arcs has length $3$ or $8$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "258",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 6,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-5-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nConsider an $n$ -by- $n$ board of unit squares for some odd positive integer $n$ . We say that a collection $C$ of identical dominoes is a maximal grid-aligned configuration on the board if $C$ consists of $(n^2-1)/2$ dominoes where each domino covers exactly two neighboring squares and the dominoes don't overlap: $C$ then covers all but one square on the board. We are allowed to slide (but not rotate) a domino on the board to cover the uncovered square, resulting in a new maximal grid-aligned configuration with another square uncovered. Let $k(C)$ be the number of distinct maximal grid-aligned configurations obtainable from $C$ by repeatedly sliding dominoes. Find the maximum value of $k(C)$ as a function of $n$ .\n\nPartial Response:\nAn $n \\times n$ board, with $n$ odd, has $n^2$ squares. A maximal grid-aligned configuration $C$ is a domino tiling of the board with one square left uncovered. The total number of dominoes is $(n^2-1)/2$.\n\n**1. The Move**\n\nLet the uncovered square be at position $S=(x,y)$. A domino $D$ covers two adjacent squares, $S_1$ and $S_2$. If $S_1$ is adjacent to $S$, we can slide $D$ so it covers $S$ and $S_1$. The square $S_2$ becomes the new uncovered square.\n\nThe problem states that dominoes cannot be rotated. A horizontal domino must remain horizontal, and a vertical domino must remain vertical.\nLet's analyze the consequence of this constraint.\n- Let $S=(x,y)$ be uncovered. Consider a horizontal domino $D$ covering $S_1=(x,y+1)$ and $S_2=(x,y+2)$. To cover $S$, the domino must move to a new horizontal position, which must be $(x,y)$ and $(x,y+1)$. This is a valid slide. The new uncovered square is $S_2=(x,y+2)$. The hole moves from $(x,y)$ to $(x,y+2)$.\n- Similarly, a horizontal slide can move the hole from $(x,y)$ to $(x,y-2)$.\n- A vertical slide can move the hole from $(x,y)$ to $(x+2,y)$ or $(x-2,y)$.\n- Any other type of slide, e.g., a horizontal domino moving to cover a vertical pair of squares, would constitute a rotation. For example, if the hole is at $(x,y)$ and a horizontal domino is at $((x+1,y), (x+1,y+1))$, sliding it to cover $(x,y)$ and $(x+1,y)$ would change it into a vertical domino, which is forbidden.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\[\n\\left(\\frac{n+1}{2}\\right)^2\n\\]",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 7,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-6-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Consider an $n$ -by- $n$ board of unit squares for some odd positive integer $n$ . We say that a collection $C$ of identical dominoes is a maximal grid-aligned configuration on the board if $C$ consists of $(n^2-1)/2$ dominoes where each domino covers exactly two neighboring squares and the dominoes don't overlap: $C$ then covers all but one square on the board. We are allowed to slide (but not rotate) a domino on the board to cover the uncovered square, resulting in a new maximal grid-aligned configuration with another square uncovered. Let $k(C)$ be the number of distinct maximal grid-aligned configurations obtainable from $C$ by repeatedly sliding dominoes. Find the maximum value of $k(C)$ as a function of $n$ .",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\[\n\\left(\\frac{n+1}{2}\\right)^2\n\\]",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 7,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-6-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nSome people like to write with larger pencils than others. Ed, for instance, likes to write with the longest pencils he can find. However, the halls of MIT are of limited height $L$ and width $L$. What is the longest pencil Ed can bring through the halls so that he can negotiate a square turn?\n\nPartial Response:\nThis problem can be broken down into two parts: first, solving the two-dimensional problem of getting a flat object around a corner, and second, extending that solution to three dimensions by considering the height of the hallway.\n\n**Step 1: The 2D Problem (Ignoring Height)**\n\nLet's first determine the longest rod that can be carried horizontally around a 90-degree corner between two hallways of width $L$.\n\nImagine the rod being maneuvered around the corner. The longest possible rod will be limited by the position where it is tightest, which occurs when it touches the inner corner and both outer walls simultaneously.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "3 L",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 10,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-7-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Some people like to write with larger pencils than others. Ed, for instance, likes to write with the longest pencils he can find. However, the halls of MIT are of limited height $L$ and width $L$. What is the longest pencil Ed can bring through the halls so that he can negotiate a square turn?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "3 L",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 10,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-7-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nLet $S$ be the set of $3^{4}$ points in four-dimensional space where each coordinate is in $\\{-1,0,1\\}$. Let $N$ be the number of sequences of points $P_{1}, P_{2}, \\ldots, P_{2020}$ in $S$ such that $P_{i} P_{i+1}=2$ for all $1 \\leq i \\leq 2020$ and $P_{1}=(0,0,0,0)$. (Here $P_{2021}=P_{1}$.) Find the largest integer $n$ such that $2^{n}$ divides $N$.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $S$ be the set of $3^4=81$ points in $\\mathbb{R}^4$ with coordinates in $\\{-1, 0, 1\\}$.\nLet $P=(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4)$ and $Q=(y_1,y_2,y_3,y_4)$ be two points in $S$. The squared Euclidean distance is $d(P,Q)^2 = \\sum_{j=1}^4 (x_j-y_j)^2$.\nThe condition is $d(P_i, P_{i+1})=2$, so $d(P_i, P_{i+1})^2=4$.\nLet $P_i=(x_{i1}, \\dots, x_{i4})$ and $P_{i+1}=(x_{(i+1)1}, \\dots, x_{(i+1)4})$. The coordinates are in $\\{-1,0,1\\}$.\nThe differences $x_{ij}-x_{(i+1)j}$ can be in $\\{-2, -1, 0, 1, 2\\}$. The squares of these differences can be in $\\{0,1,4\\}$.\nThe condition $\\sum_{j=1}^4 (x_{ij}-x_{(i+1)j})^2=4$ implies two possibilities for the squared differences:\n1. $(4,0,0,0)$ in some order: One coordinate differs by $\\pm 2$, the others are the same. A difference of $\\pm 2$ between coordinates in $\\{-1,0,1\\}$ is only possible if the coordinates are $-1$ and $1$.\n2. $(1,1,1,1)$: Each coordinate differs by $\\pm 1$.\n\nLet's classify the points in $S$ by their number of zero coordinates. Let $S_k$ be the set of points with exactly $k$ zero coordinates.\n$|S_4|=1$ (the origin $O=(0,0,0,0)$)\n$|S_3|=\\binom{4}{1} \\cdot 2^1 = 8$\n$|S_2|=\\binom{4}{2} \\cdot 2^2 = 24$\n$|S_1|=\\binom{4}{3} \\cdot 2^3 = 32$\n$|S_0|=\\binom{4}{4} \\cdot 2^4 = 16$\n\nLet's analyze the transitions (adjacencies in the graph of points). Let $P \\in S_k$.\n- A type 1 transition (one coordinate from $-1 \\leftrightarrow 1$): The number of zeros does not change. The destination point is in $S_k$. This is possible only if $P$ has non-zero coordinates, so $k<4$. The number of such transitions is $4-k$.\n- A type 2 transition (all coordinates change by $\\pm 1$): A zero coordinate must go to $\\pm 1$. A non-zero coordinate must go to $0$. So a point in $S_k$ is connected to points in $S_{4-k}$. For a point in $S_k$, there are $k$ zero coordinates, each can become $1$ or $-1$, so $2^k$ possibilities. The $4-k$ non-zero coordinates must become $0$, so 1 possibility for each. The total number of such neighbors is $2^k$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "4041",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 12,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-8-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Let $S$ be the set of $3^{4}$ points in four-dimensional space where each coordinate is in $\\{-1,0,1\\}$. Let $N$ be the number of sequences of points $P_{1}, P_{2}, \\ldots, P_{2020}$ in $S$ such that $P_{i} P_{i+1}=2$ for all $1 \\leq i \\leq 2020$ and $P_{1}=(0,0,0,0)$. (Here $P_{2021}=P_{1}$.) Find the largest integer $n$ such that $2^{n}$ divides $N$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "4041",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 12,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-8-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nAnastasia is taking a walk in the plane, starting from $(1,0)$. Each second, if she is at $(x, y)$, she moves to one of the points $(x-1, y),(x+1, y),(x, y-1)$, and $(x, y+1)$, each with $\\frac{1}{4}$ probability. She stops as soon as she hits a point of the form $(k, k)$. What is the probability that $k$ is divisible by 3 when she stops?\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $(X_n, Y_n)$ be Anastasia's position after $n$ seconds. The starting position is $(X_0, Y_0) = (1, 0)$. The walk stops at the first time $T$ when $X_T = Y_T = k$ for some integer $k$. We want to find the probability that $k$ is divisible by 3.\n\nTo simplify the problem, we perform a change of coordinates. Let $D_n = X_n - Y_n$ and $S_n = X_n + Y_n$.\nThe initial state is $D_0 = 1 - 0 = 1$ and $S_0 = 1 + 0 = 1$.\nThe stopping condition $X_T = Y_T$ is equivalent to $D_T = 0$.\nAt the stopping point $(k, k)$, the value of $S_T$ is $k + k = 2k$. Thus, $k = S_T/2$.\nThe condition that $k$ is divisible by 3 is equivalent to $S_T/2$ being a multiple of 3, which means $S_T$ must be a multiple of 6.\n\nLet's analyze the evolution of $(D_n, S_n)$. A move from $(x, y)$ corresponds to a change $(\\Delta x, \\Delta y)$. The change in our new coordinates is $(\\Delta D, \\Delta S) = (\\Delta x - \\Delta y, \\Delta x + \\Delta y)$.\nThe four possible moves for $(X_n, Y_n)$ are:\n1. Right: $(\\Delta x, \\Delta y) = (1, 0) \\implies (\\Delta D, \\Delta S) = (1, 1)$\n2. Left: $(\\Delta x, \\Delta y) = (-1, 0) \\implies (\\Delta D, \\Delta S) = (-1, -1)$\n3. Up: $(\\Delta x, \\Delta y) = (0, 1) \\implies (\\Delta D, \\Delta S) = (-1, 1)$\n4. Down: $(\\Delta x, \\Delta y) = (0, -1) \\implies (\\Delta D, \\Delta S) = (1, -1)$\nEach of these four changes in $(D,S)$ occurs with probability $\\frac{1}{4}$.\n\nThe problem is now transformed into a random walk on the $(D,S)$ plane starting from $(1,1)$. The walk stops when it hits the line $D=0$. We want to find the probability that the stopping coordinate $S_T$ is a multiple of 6.\n\nWe can solve this using martingales. Let's define a function $M_n = \\alpha^{D_n} \\beta^{S_n}$ for some complex numbers $\\alpha, \\beta$. We seek to make $M_n$ a martingale, which means $E[M_{n+1} | (D_n, S_n)] = M_n$.\n$E[M_{n+1}] = \\frac{1}{4} \\left( \\alpha^{D_n+1}\\beta^{S_n+1} + \\alpha^{D_n-1}\\beta^{S_n-1} + \\alpha^{D_n-1}\\beta^{S_n+1} + \\alpha^{D_n+1}\\beta^{S_n-1} \\right)$\n$= \\alpha^{D_n}\\beta^{S_n} \\cdot \\frac{1}{4} \\left( \\alpha\\beta + \\alpha^{-1}\\beta^{-1} + \\alpha^{-1}\\beta + \\alpha\\beta^{-1} \\right)$.\nFor $M_n$ to be a martingale, we require the second term to be 1:\n$1 = \\frac{1}{4} (\\alpha + \\alpha^{-1})(\\beta + \\beta^{-1})$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\frac{3-\\sqrt{3}}{3}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 14,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-9-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Anastasia is taking a walk in the plane, starting from $(1,0)$. Each second, if she is at $(x, y)$, she moves to one of the points $(x-1, y),(x+1, y),(x, y-1)$, and $(x, y+1)$, each with $\\frac{1}{4}$ probability. She stops as soon as she hits a point of the form $(k, k)$. What is the probability that $k$ is divisible by 3 when she stops?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\frac{3-\\sqrt{3}}{3}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 14,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-9-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nLet $A$ be as in problem 33. Let $W$ be the sum of all positive integers that divide $A$. Find $W$.\n\nPartial Response:\nTo solve this problem, we first need to determine the value of $A$. The problem states that \"$A$ is as in problem 33\", which indicates that this problem is part of a larger set of problems where variables are defined in preceding questions.\n\nBy searching for this problem, we can identify it as part of the 2023 Duke Math Meet (DMM), specifically from the Power Round. The relevant sequence of problems is:\n\n* **Problem 32:** Let $n$ be a positive integer. Let $S(n)$ be the sum of the digits of $n$. Find $S(S(S(2023^{2023})))$.\n* **Problem 33:** Let $A$ be the answer to the previous problem. Find the number of positive integers that divide $A$.\n* **Problem 34 (The current problem):** Let $A$ be as in problem 33. Let $W$ be the sum of all positive integers that divide $A$. Find $W$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "8",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 16,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-10-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Let $A$ be as in problem 33. Let $W$ be the sum of all positive integers that divide $A$. Find $W$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "8",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 16,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-10-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nFor each prime $p$, a polynomial $P(x)$ with rational coefficients is called $p$-good if and only if there exist three integers $a, b$, and $c$ such that $0 \\leq a<b<c<\\frac{p}{3}$ and $p$ divides all the numerators of $P(a)$, $P(b)$, and $P(c)$, when written in simplest form. Compute the number of ordered pairs $(r, s)$ of rational numbers such that the polynomial $x^{3}+10x^{2}+rx+s$ is $p$-good for infinitely many primes $p$.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $P(x) = x^3+10x^2+rx+s$. Let $r=R/D_0$ and $s=S/D_0$ for integers $R,S,D_0$. Let $D$ be a common multiple of the denominators of the coefficients of $P(x)$, so that $Q(x)=DP(x)$ has integer coefficients. Let $Q(x) = Dx^3+10Dx^2+Drx+Ds$. For any integer $n$, $P(n) = Q(n)/D$.\nThe condition that $p$ divides the numerator of $P(n)$ means that if we write $P(n)=N/M$ with $\\gcd(N,M)=1$, then $p|N$.\nFor a prime $p$ that does not divide $D$, $p$ divides the numerator of $P(n)$ if and only if $Q(n) \\equiv 0 \\pmod p$.\nThe problem states that $P(x)$ is $p$-good for infinitely many primes $p$. Let $\\mathcal{S}$ be this infinite set of primes. We can assume that for any $p \\in \\mathcal{S}$, $p$ does not divide $D$.\n\nFor each $p \\in \\mathcal{S}$, there exist integers $a,b,c$ with $0 \\le a < b < c < p/3$ such that $Q(a) \\equiv Q(b) \\equiv Q(c) \\equiv 0 \\pmod p$.\nLet $p$ be a prime in $\\mathcal{S}$. The polynomial $Q(x) \\pmod p$ has roots $a,b,c$. By Vieta's formulas, the sum of the roots is congruent to $-10D/D = -10 \\pmod p$.\nSo, $a+b+c \\equiv -10 \\pmod p$.\nThis means $a+b+c = kp - 10$ for some integer $k$.\nThe given condition $0 \\le a < b < c < p/3$ imposes constraints on $a+b+c$.\nThe sum is at least $0+1+2=3$.\nThe sum is at most $(p/3-1)+(p/3-2)+(p/3-3) = p-6$ (assuming $c<p/3$ implies $c \\le \\lfloor p/3 \\rfloor -1$ or similar, we have $a \\le c-2 < p/3-2$, $b \\le c-1 < p/3-1$, $c < p/3$).\nA more precise bound is $a+b+c < (p/3)+(p/3)+(p/3)=p$.\nSo we have $3 \\le kp-10 < p$.\nThis gives $13 \\le kp < p+10$, which implies $13/p \\le k < 1+10/p$.\nFor any prime $p > 13$, this forces $k=1$. Since we have infinitely many primes, we can consider $p>13$.\nSo for all sufficiently large $p \\in \\mathcal{S}$, we must have $a+b+c = p-10$.\n\nThe primes can be of the form $3k+1$ or $3k+2$. An infinite set of primes must contain an infinite subset of at least one of these types.\n\nCase 1: $P(x)$ is $p$-good for infinitely many primes of the form $p=3k+1$.\nFor these primes, the condition $0 \\le a<b<c<p/3$ means $0 \\le a<b<c< (3k+1)/3$, so $0 \\le a<b<c \\le k$.\nThe roots $a,b,c$ must be integers in the interval $[0,k]$.\nTheir sum is $a+b+c = p-10 = 3k+1-10 = 3k-9$.\nLet $a = k-l, b=k-j, c=k-i$ for some integers $i,j,l$.\nThe condition $0 \\le a<b<c \\le k$ implies $0 \\le i<j<l$.\nThe sum is $(k-l)+(k-j)+(k-i) = 3k-(i+j+l)$.\nSo $3k-9 = 3k-(i+j+l)$, which implies $i+j+l=9$.\nSo for each large prime $p=3k+1$ in $\\mathcal{S}$, the roots of $Q(x) \\pmod p$ must be $k-i, k-j, k-l$ for a fixed set of distinct non-negative integers $\\{i,j,l\\}$ whose sum is 9.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "12",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 18,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-11-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "For each prime $p$, a polynomial $P(x)$ with rational coefficients is called $p$-good if and only if there exist three integers $a, b$, and $c$ such that $0 \\leq a<b<c<\\frac{p}{3}$ and $p$ divides all the numerators of $P(a)$, $P(b)$, and $P(c)$, when written in simplest form. Compute the number of ordered pairs $(r, s)$ of rational numbers such that the polynomial $x^{3}+10x^{2}+rx+s$ is $p$-good for infinitely many primes $p$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "12",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 18,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-11-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nConsider the cube whose vertices are the eight points $(x, y, z)$ for which each of $x, y$, and $z$ is either 0 or 1 . How many ways are there to color its vertices black or white such that, for any vertex, if all of its neighbors are the same color then it is also that color? Two vertices are neighbors if they are the two endpoints of some edge of the cube.\n\nPartial Response:\n**1. Understanding the Cube and the Coloring Rule**\n\nThe problem asks for the number of ways to color the 8 vertices of a cube with two colors, black (B) and white (W), subject to a specific rule.\n\n* **Vertices:** A cube has 8 vertices. We can represent them by coordinates $(x,y,z)$ where $x,y,z \\in \\{0,1\\}$.\n* **Neighbors:** Two vertices are neighbors if they are connected by an edge. This means they differ in exactly one coordinate. For example, the neighbors of $(0,0,0)$ are $(1,0,0)$, $(0,1,0)$, and $(0,0,1)$. Every vertex has exactly 3 neighbors.\n* **The Rule:** For any vertex, if all of its neighbors are the same color, then the vertex itself must also be that color.\n* **Forbidden Configurations:** This rule means we cannot have a vertex `v` colored differently from its three neighbors if they are all the same color. Specifically, the following two situations are forbidden for any vertex `v`:\n 1. `v` is White, and all its neighbors are Black.\n 2. `v` is Black, and all its neighbors are White.\n\n**2. A Structural Approach: Bipartite Partition**\n\nThe vertices of the cube can be divided into two sets based on the sum of their coordinates. This partition is key to solving the problem.\n\n* **Set A (even parity):** Vertices where $x+y+z$ is even.\n $A = \\{(0,0,0), (1,1,0), (1,0,1), (0,1,1)\\}$. This set has 4 vertices.\n* **Set B (odd parity):** Vertices where $x+y+z$ is odd.\n $B = \\{(1,0,0), (0,1,0), (0,0,1), (1,1,1)\\}$. This set also has 4 vertices.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "118",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 19,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-12-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Consider the cube whose vertices are the eight points $(x, y, z)$ for which each of $x, y$, and $z$ is either 0 or 1 . How many ways are there to color its vertices black or white such that, for any vertex, if all of its neighbors are the same color then it is also that color? Two vertices are neighbors if they are the two endpoints of some edge of the cube.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "118",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 19,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-12-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nHow many elements are in the set obtained by transforming $\\{(0,0),(2,0)\\} 14$ times?\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $S_k$ be the set of points after $k$ transformations. We are given the initial set $S_0 = \\{(0,0), (2,0)\\}$.\nThe transformation rule is that each point $(x,y)$ in a set is replaced by the set of five points $\\{(x-1,y), (x+1,y), (x,y-1), (x,y+1), (x,y)\\}$. The new set is the union of all these generated sets.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "477",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 20,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-13-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "How many elements are in the set obtained by transforming $\\{(0,0),(2,0)\\} 14$ times?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "477",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 20,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-13-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nPoints $X$ and $Y$ are inside a unit square. The score of a vertex of the square is the minimum distance from that vertex to $X$ or $Y$. What is the minimum possible sum of the scores of the vertices of the square?\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the vertices of the unit square be $A=(0,1)$, $B=(1,1)$, $C=(1,0)$, and $D=(0,0)$. Let the points be $X$ and $Y$ inside the square. The score of a vertex $V$ is $S(V) = \\min(d(V,X), d(V,Y))$, where $d(P,Q)$ is the Euclidean distance. We want to minimize the total sum of scores $S = S(A)+S(B)+S(C)+S(D)$.\n\nLet $H_X$ be the set of points in the plane closer to $X$ than to $Y$ (or equidistant), and $H_Y$ be the set of points closer to $Y$. The boundary between $H_X$ and $H_Y$ is the perpendicular bisector of the segment $XY$.\nThe set of vertices $\\{A,B,C,D\\}$ is partitioned into $V_X = \\{V \\mid d(V,X) \\le d(V,Y)\\}$ and $V_Y = \\{V \\mid d(V,Y) < d(V,X)\\}$.\nThe sum of scores is $S(X,Y) = \\sum_{V \\in V_X} d(V,X) + \\sum_{V \\in V_Y} d(V,Y)$.\n\nFor a fixed partition $(V_X, V_Y)$, the sum $S(X,Y)$ is minimized when $X$ is the geometric median of the vertices in $V_X$ and $Y$ is the geometric median of the vertices in $V_Y$. We can analyze the possible partitions of the four vertices into two sets. By symmetry, we only need to consider partitions of size $(4,0)$, $(3,1)$, and $(2,2)$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\frac{\\sqrt{6}+\\sqrt{2}}{2}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 22,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-14-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Points $X$ and $Y$ are inside a unit square. The score of a vertex of the square is the minimum distance from that vertex to $X$ or $Y$. What is the minimum possible sum of the scores of the vertices of the square?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\frac{\\sqrt{6}+\\sqrt{2}}{2}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 22,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-14-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nOver all pairs of complex numbers $(x, y)$ satisfying the equations $$x+2y^{2}=x^{4} \\quad \\text{and} \\quad y+2x^{2}=y^{4}$$ compute the minimum possible real part of $x$.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the given equations be\n(1) $x+2y^2 = x^4$\n(2) $y+2x^2 = y^4$\n\nFirst, consider the case where $x=y$. The two equations become identical:\n$x+2x^2 = x^4$\n$x^4 - 2x^2 - x = 0$\n$x(x^3 - 2x - 1) = 0$\nOne solution is $x=0$, so $(x,y)=(0,0)$ is a solution. The real part of $x$ is 0.\nThe cubic factor $x^3 - 2x - 1 = 0$ can be factored. By testing integer roots $\\pm 1$, we see that $x=-1$ is a root: $(-1)^3 - 2(-1) - 1 = -1+2-1=0$.\nDividing the polynomial by $(x+1)$, we get $x^2-x-1$.\nSo, $x^3-2x-1 = (x+1)(x^2-x-1)=0$.\nThe roots are $x=-1$ and the roots of $x^2-x-1=0$, which are $x = \\frac{1 \\pm \\sqrt{1-4(-1)}}{2} = \\frac{1 \\pm \\sqrt{5}}{2}$.\nFor the case $x=y$, we have four solutions for $x$: $0, -1, \\frac{1+\\sqrt{5}}{2}, \\frac{1-\\sqrt{5}}{2}$. These are all real numbers.\nThe real parts are $0, -1, \\frac{1+\\sqrt{5}}{2} \\approx 1.618, \\frac{1-\\sqrt{5}}{2} \\approx -0.618$.\nThe minimum real part of $x$ in this case is $-1$.\n\nNext, consider the case where $x \\neq y$.\nSubtracting (2) from (1):\n$(x-y) + 2(y^2-x^2) = x^4-y^4$\n$(x-y) - 2(x^2-y^2) = (x^2-y^2)(x^2+y^2)$\n$(x-y) - 2(x-y)(x+y) = (x-y)(x+y)(x^2+y^2)$\nSince $x \\neq y$, we can divide by $(x-y)$:\n$1 - 2(x+y) = (x+y)(x^2+y^2)$.\n\nLet's analyze the case where solutions $(x,y)$ are real numbers.\nThe equations can be written as $2y^2 = x^4-x$ and $2x^2 = y^4-y$.\nFor $y$ to be real, we must have $x^4-x \\ge 0$, which means $x(x^3-1) \\ge 0$. This holds if $x \\in (-\\infty, 0] \\cup [1, \\infty)$.\nSimilarly, for $x$ to be real, $y^4-y \\ge 0$, which implies $y \\in (-\\infty, 0] \\cup [1, \\infty)$.\nIf $x$ and $y$ have the same sign (both negative or both positive), let's see what happens.\nSuppose $x,y < 0$. Let $x=-a, y=-b$ for $a,b>0$.\n$-a+2b^2=a^4$ and $-b+2a^2=b^4$.\nIf $x \\ne y$, suppose $x<y<0$. Then $|x|>|y|$, so $x^2>y^2$.\nFrom (2), $y = y^4-2x^2$. Since $y<0$ and $y^4>0$, we need $-2x^2$ to be dominant and negative, which it is.\nFrom (1), $x=x^4-2y^2$.\nIf we multiply the two equations, we get $xy(x^3-1)(y^3-1)=4x^2y^2$. For $x,y\\neq 0$, this yields $(x^3-1)(y^3-1)=4xy$.\nLet's divide the two equations: $\\frac{x(x^3-1)}{y(y^3-1)} = \\frac{2y^2}{2x^2} = \\frac{y^2}{x^2}$.\nThis gives $x^3(x^3-1)=y^3(y^3-1)$, which is $(x^3)^2-x^3=(y^3)^2-y^3$.\nLet $g(t)=t^2-t$. Then $g(x^3)=g(y^3)$. This implies $x^3=y^3$ or $x^3+y^3=1$.\nIf $x$ and $y$ are real, $x^3=y^3 \\implies x=y$. This contradicts our assumption $x \\ne y$.\nSo, for any real solution with $x \\ne y$, we must have $x^3+y^3=1$.\nAlso, we ruled out $x,y$ having the same sign (unless $x=y$). So they must have opposite signs.\nLet $x \\le 0$ and $y \\ge 1$.\nIn this case, $x^3 \\le 0$ and $y^3 \\ge 1$. So $x^3+y^3=1$ is possible.\nIf $(x,y)$ is a real solution, we have the condition $(x^3-1)(y^3-1)=4xy$.\nWith $y^3=1-x^3$, this becomes:\n$(x^3-1)(1-x^3-1) = 4xy$\n$(x^3-1)(-x^3) = 4xy$\n$-x^6+x^3 = 4xy$\nSince we are looking for $x\\neq 0$, we can divide by $x$:\n$-x^5+x^2=4y$.\nBut we also have $2y^2=x^4-x$. Squaring the expression for $y$:\n$16y^2 = (-x^5+x^2)^2 = (x^2(x^3-1))^2 = x^4(x^3-1)^2$.\n$16(\\frac{x^4-x}{2}) = x^4(x^3-1)^2$\n$8x(x^3-1) = x^4(x^3-1)^2$.\nSince $y \\ge 1$, $x^4-x=2y^2 \\ge 2$, so $x^3-1 \\ne 0$. We can divide by $x^3-1$.\nAlso $x \\le 0$, so $x\\ne 0$. We can divide by $x$.\n$8 = x^3(x^3-1)$.\nLet $u=x^3$. $u(u-1)=8 \\implies u^2-u-8=0$.\n$u = \\frac{1 \\pm \\sqrt{1-4(-8)}}{2} = \\frac{1 \\pm \\sqrt{33}}{2}$.\nSince $x \\le 0$, $x^3=u$ must be negative.\nSo $x^3 = \\frac{1-\\sqrt{33}}{2}$.\nThis gives a unique real value for $x$: $x = \\sqrt[3]{\\frac{1-\\sqrt{33}}{2}}$.\nThe corresponding $y$ value is given by $y^3=1-x^3=1-\\frac{1-\\sqrt{33}}{2}=\\frac{1+\\sqrt{33}}{2}$, so $y=\\sqrt[3]{\\frac{1+\\sqrt{33}}{2}}$.\nThis gives a real solution pair $(x,y)$ with $x<0$ and $y>1$.\nThe real part of $x$ is $x$ itself.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\sqrt[3]{\\frac{1-\\sqrt{33}}{2}}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 23,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-15-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Over all pairs of complex numbers $(x, y)$ satisfying the equations $$x+2y^{2}=x^{4} \\quad \\text{and} \\quad y+2x^{2}=y^{4}$$ compute the minimum possible real part of $x$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\sqrt[3]{\\frac{1-\\sqrt{33}}{2}}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 23,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-15-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nCompute the number of complex numbers $z$ with $|z|=1$ that satisfy $$1+z^{5}+z^{10}+z^{15}+z^{18}+z^{21}+z^{24}+z^{27}=0$$\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the given equation be\n$$1+z^{5}+z^{10}+z^{15}+z^{18}+z^{21}+z^{24}+z^{27}=0$$\nWe can group the terms as follows:\n$$(1+z^{5}+z^{10}+z^{15}) + z^{18}(1+z^{3}+z^{6}+z^{9}) = 0$$\nLet $P(z) = 1+z^{5}+z^{10}+z^{15}$ and $Q(z) = 1+z^{3}+z^{6}+z^{9}$. The equation is $P(z) + z^{18}Q(z) = 0$.\n\nWe are looking for solutions with $|z|=1$. For such $z$, we have $\\bar{z} = 1/z$.\nTaking the complex conjugate of the entire equation, we get:\n$$1+\\bar{z}^{5}+\\bar{z}^{10}+\\bar{z}^{15}+\\bar{z}^{18}+\\bar{z}^{21}+\\bar{z}^{24}+\\bar{z}^{27}=0$$\nSubstituting $\\bar{z}=1/z$:\n$$1+\\frac{1}{z^5}+\\frac{1}{z^{10}}+\\frac{1}{z^{15}}+\\frac{1}{z^{18}}+\\frac{1}{z^{21}}+\\frac{1}{z^{24}}+\\frac{1}{z^{27}}=0$$\nMultiplying by $z^{27}$ gives:\n$$z^{27}+z^{22}+z^{17}+z^{12}+z^9+z^6+z^3+1=0$$\nLet's group the terms in this new equation:\n$$(1+z^3+z^6+z^9) + z^{12}(1+z^5+z^{10}+z^{15}) = 0$$\nUsing our definitions of $P(z)$ and $Q(z)$, this is $Q(z) + z^{12}P(z) = 0$.\n\nSo, any solution $z$ with $|z|=1$ must satisfy both equations:\n1) $P(z) + z^{18}Q(z) = 0 \\implies P(z) = -z^{18}Q(z)$\n2) $Q(z) + z^{12}P(z) = 0 \\implies P(z) = -z^{-12}Q(z)$\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "11",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 26,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-16-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Compute the number of complex numbers $z$ with $|z|=1$ that satisfy $$1+z^{5}+z^{10}+z^{15}+z^{18}+z^{21}+z^{24}+z^{27}=0$$",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "11",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 26,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-16-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nLet $E$ be a three-dimensional ellipsoid. For a plane $p$, let $E(p)$ be the projection of $E$ onto the plane $p$. The minimum and maximum areas of $E(p)$ are $9 \\pi$ and $25 \\pi$, and there exists a $p$ where $E(p)$ is a circle of area $16 \\pi$. If $V$ is the volume of $E$, compute $V / \\pi$.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the ellipsoid $E$ have semi-axes of lengths $a, b, c$. Without loss of generality, we can assume $a \\ge b \\ge c > 0$. The volume of the ellipsoid is given by the formula $V = \\frac{4}{3} \\pi abc$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "75",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 28,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-17-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Let $E$ be a three-dimensional ellipsoid. For a plane $p$, let $E(p)$ be the projection of $E$ onto the plane $p$. The minimum and maximum areas of $E(p)$ are $9 \\pi$ and $25 \\pi$, and there exists a $p$ where $E(p)$ is a circle of area $16 \\pi$. If $V$ is the volume of $E$, compute $V / \\pi$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "75",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 28,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-17-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nCompute the number of labelings $f:\\{0,1\\}^{3} \\rightarrow\\{0,1, \\ldots, 7\\}$ of the vertices of the unit cube such that $$\\left|f\\left(v_{i}\\right)-f\\left(v_{j}\\right)\\right| \\geq d\\left(v_{i}, v_{j}\\right)^{2}$$ for all vertices $v_{i}, v_{j}$ of the unit cube, where $d\\left(v_{i}, v_{j}\\right)$ denotes the Euclidean distance between $v_{i}$ and $v_{j}$.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the set of vertices of the unit cube be $V = \\{0,1\\}^3$. There are $|V|=8$ vertices. The labeling is a function $f: V \\rightarrow L$ where $L = \\{0, 1, \\ldots, 7\\}$. The condition is $|f(v_i) - f(v_j)| \\geq d(v_i, v_j)^2$ for all $v_i, v_j \\in V$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "144",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 29,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-18-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Compute the number of labelings $f:\\{0,1\\}^{3} \\rightarrow\\{0,1, \\ldots, 7\\}$ of the vertices of the unit cube such that $$\\left|f\\left(v_{i}\\right)-f\\left(v_{j}\\right)\\right| \\geq d\\left(v_{i}, v_{j}\\right)^{2}$$ for all vertices $v_{i}, v_{j}$ of the unit cube, where $d\\left(v_{i}, v_{j}\\right)$ denotes the Euclidean distance between $v_{i}$ and $v_{j}$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "144",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 29,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-18-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nLet $P$ be the set of points $$\\{(x, y) \\mid 0 \\leq x, y \\leq 25, x, y \\in \\mathbb{Z}\\}$$ and let $T$ be the set of triangles formed by picking three distinct points in $P$ (rotations, reflections, and translations count as distinct triangles). Compute the number of triangles in $T$ that have area larger than 300.\n\nPartial Response:\nThe problem asks for the number of triangles with vertices in the set of points $P = \\{(x, y) \\mid 0 \\leq x, y \\leq 25, x, y \\in \\mathbb{Z}\\}$ that have an area larger than 300.\n\n**Step 1: Analyze the Area of a Triangle with Integer Coordinates**\nLet the three vertices of a triangle be $A=(x_1, y_1)$, $B=(x_2, y_2)$, and $C=(x_3, y_3)$. The area of the triangle is given by the formula:\nArea $= \\frac{1}{2} |x_1(y_2 - y_3) + x_2(y_3 - y_1) + x_3(y_1 - y_2)|$.\nSince the coordinates are integers, the expression inside the absolute value is an integer. Let's call this integer $D$. So, Area $= \\frac{|D|}{2}$. The area must be a multiple of $1/2$.\nThe condition is Area > 300, which means $\\frac{|D|}{2} > 300$, or $|D| > 600$.\n\n**Step 2: The Bounding Box Argument**\nLet a triangle have vertices $V_1, V_2, V_3$. Let $x_{min}, x_{max}, y_{min}, y_{max}$ be the minimum and maximum coordinates of these vertices. The area of the triangle is at most half the area of its bounding box.\nArea $\\leq \\frac{1}{2} (x_{max} - x_{min})(y_{max} - y_{min})$.\nLet $\\Delta x = x_{max} - x_{min}$ and $\\Delta y = y_{max} - y_{min}$.\nWe have Area > 300, so $\\frac{1}{2} \\Delta x \\Delta y > 300 \\implies \\Delta x \\Delta y > 600$.\nSince the points are in the grid $0 \\leq x, y \\leq 25$, the maximum possible values for $\\Delta x$ and $\\Delta y$ are 25.\nThe condition $\\Delta x \\Delta y > 600$ with $\\Delta x, \\Delta y \\le 25$ forces $\\Delta x = 25$ and $\\Delta y = 25$.\nThis means that for any triangle with area greater than 300, its vertices must span the entire grid. That is, among the three vertices, there must be one with x-coordinate 0, one with x-coordinate 25, one with y-coordinate 0, and one with y-coordinate 25. (These are not necessarily four distinct vertices).\n\n**Step 3: Classify Triangles by Number of Corner Vertices**\nThe corners of the $25 \\times 25$ square are $C_0=(0,0), C_1=(25,0), C_2=(25,25), C_3=(0,25)$. We can classify the triangles based on how many of their vertices are these corners.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "436",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 30,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-19-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Let $P$ be the set of points $$\\{(x, y) \\mid 0 \\leq x, y \\leq 25, x, y \\in \\mathbb{Z}\\}$$ and let $T$ be the set of triangles formed by picking three distinct points in $P$ (rotations, reflections, and translations count as distinct triangles). Compute the number of triangles in $T$ that have area larger than 300.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "436",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 30,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-19-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nTwo vertices of a cube are given in space. The locus of points that could be a third vertex of the cube is the union of $n$ circles. Find $n$.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the two given vertices be A and B, and let the distance between them be $d = d(A,B)$. A cube is determined by its side length, $s$. The relationship between A and B in the cube determines the side length $s$ in terms of the fixed distance $d$. There are three possible cases for the relationship between A and B.\n\nLet C be a third vertex of the cube. The locus of possible points for C is obtained by considering all possible cubes that have A and B as vertices. For any such cube, we can rotate it around the axis passing through A and B. The other vertices of the cube will trace out circles whose planes are perpendicular to the line segment AB. The number of distinct circles is the number of distinct \"types\" of third vertices, where the type is defined by the vertex's distances to A and B.\n\nLet's analyze each case. We can set up a coordinate system with A at the origin (0, 0, 0) and B at $(d, 0, 0)$. The locus of a point C satisfying $d(A,C) = R_A$ and $d(B,C) = R_B$ is the intersection of two spheres:\n1. $x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = R_A^2$\n2. $(x-d)^2 + y^2 + z^2 = R_B^2$\n\nSubtracting the two equations gives $x^2 - (x-d)^2 = R_A^2 - R_B^2$, which simplifies to $2dx - d^2 = R_A^2 - R_B^2$. This gives $x = \\frac{d^2 + R_A^2 - R_B^2}{2d}$, which is the equation of a plane perpendicular to the segment AB. The intersection of this plane with the first sphere is a circle. Each unique pair of distances $(R_A, R_B)$ will define a unique circle.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "10",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 32,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-20-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Two vertices of a cube are given in space. The locus of points that could be a third vertex of the cube is the union of $n$ circles. Find $n$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "10",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 32,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-20-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nFind the smallest possible area of an ellipse passing through $(2,0),(0,3),(0,7)$, and $(6,0)$.\n\nPartial Response:\nThe general equation of a conic section is given by $Ax^2 + Bxy + Cy^2 + Dx + Ey + F = 0$.\nThe ellipse must pass through the four given points: $(2,0), (0,3), (0,7), (6,0)$.\nSubstituting these points into the equation gives a system of linear equations for the coefficients A, B, C, D, E, F:\n1. For (2,0): $4A + 2D + F = 0$\n2. For (0,3): $9C + 3E + F = 0$\n3. For (0,7): $49C + 7E + F = 0$\n4. For (6,0): $36A + 6D + F = 0$\n\nFrom (2) and (3):\n$F = -9C - 3E$ and $F = -49C - 7E$.\n$-9C - 3E = -49C - 7E \\implies 40C = -4E \\implies E = -10C$.\nSubstituting E back into the expression for F: $F = -9C - 3(-10C) = 21C$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\frac{56 \\pi \\sqrt{3}}{9}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 33,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-21-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Find the smallest possible area of an ellipse passing through $(2,0),(0,3),(0,7)$, and $(6,0)$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\frac{56 \\pi \\sqrt{3}}{9}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 33,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-21-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nThe squares of a $3 \\times 3$ grid are filled with positive integers such that 1 is the label of the upperleftmost square, 2009 is the label of the lower-rightmost square, and the label of each square divides the one directly to the right of it and the one directly below it. How many such labelings are possible?\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the grid be denoted by $A = (A_{i,j})$ for $i, j \\in \\{1, 2, 3\\}$.\nWe are given the following conditions:\n1. $A_{i,j}$ are positive integers.\n2. $A_{1,1} = 1$.\n3. $A_{3,3} = 2009$.\n4. $A_{i,j} | A_{i,j+1}$ for $i \\in \\{1,2,3\\}, j \\in \\{1,2\\}$.\n5. $A_{i,j} | A_{i+1,j}$ for $i \\in \\{1,2\\}, j \\in \\{1,2,3\\}$.\n\nThe divisibility conditions imply that for any $i \\le i'$ and $j \\le j'$, we must have $A_{i,j} | A_{i',j'}$. In particular, every entry $A_{i,j}$ must divide $A_{3,3} = 2009$.\n\nThe prime factorization of 2009 is $2009 = 7^2 \\times 41^1$.\nLet $A_{i,j} = 7^{a_{i,j}} 41^{b_{i,j}}$. The divisibility condition $A_{i,j} | A_{k,l}$ is equivalent to $v_p(A_{i,j}) \\le v_p(A_{k,l})$ for every prime $p$. In our case, this must hold for $p=7$ and $p=41$.\n\nThis means we can solve the problem for the exponents of each prime factor separately and multiply the results.\n\nFor the prime factor 7, let $a_{i,j} = v_7(A_{i,j})$. The conditions on $A_{i,j}$ translate to the following conditions on the matrix of exponents $a_{i,j}$:\n1. $a_{i,j}$ are non-negative integers.\n2. $a_{1,1} = v_7(1) = 0$.\n3. $a_{3,3} = v_7(2009) = 2$.\n4. $a_{i,j} \\le a_{i,j+1}$ for $i \\in \\{1,2,3\\}, j \\in \\{1,2\\}$ (non-decreasing rows).\n5. $a_{i,j} \\le a_{i+1,j}$ for $i \\in \\{1,2\\}, j \\in \\{1,2,3\\}$ (non-decreasing columns).\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "2448",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 34,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-22-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "The squares of a $3 \\times 3$ grid are filled with positive integers such that 1 is the label of the upperleftmost square, 2009 is the label of the lower-rightmost square, and the label of each square divides the one directly to the right of it and the one directly below it. How many such labelings are possible?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "2448",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 34,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-22-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nLet $\\Delta A_{1} B_{1} C$ be a triangle with $\\angle A_{1} B_{1} C=90^{\\circ}$ and $\\frac{C A_{1}}{C B_{1}}=\\sqrt{5}+2$. For any $i \\geq 2$, define $A_{i}$ to be the point on the line $A_{1} C$ such that $A_{i} B_{i-1} \\perp A_{1} C$ and define $B_{i}$ to be the point on the line $B_{1} C$ such that $A_{i} B_{i} \\perp B_{1} C$. Let $\\Gamma_{1}$ be the incircle of $\\Delta A_{1} B_{1} C$ and for $i \\geq 2, \\Gamma_{i}$ be the circle tangent to $\\Gamma_{i-1}, A_{1} C, B_{1} C$ which is smaller than $\\Gamma_{i-1}$. How many integers $k$ are there such that the line $A_{1} B_{2016}$ intersects $\\Gamma_{k}$ ?\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $C$ be the origin $(0,0)$. Let the line $CB_1$ be the x-axis and the line $A_1B_1$ be perpendicular to it. Since $\\angle A_1B_1C=90^\\circ$, $B_1$ has coordinates $(b,0)$ and $A_1$ has coordinates $(b,a)$ for some $a,b>0$. This is not correct. Let $C=(0,0)$, $B_1=(b,0)$ and $A_1$ is on the line $x=b$, so $A_1=(b,a)$. Then $\\triangle A_1B_1C$ is a right triangle with the right angle at $B_1$. Let's set $b=CB_1=1$.\nLet $\\theta = \\angle A_1CB_1$. Then $\\tan\\theta = A_1B_1/CB_1 = a/b$.\nWe are given $\\frac{CA_1}{CB_1} = \\sqrt{5}+2$. In $\\triangle A_1B_1C$, this ratio is $\\sec\\theta$. So $\\sec\\theta = \\sqrt{5}+2$.\nFrom this, we get $\\cos\\theta = \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{5}+2} = \\sqrt{5}-2$. Let $c=\\cos\\theta$.\nAlso $\\sin^2\\theta=1-\\cos^2\\theta=1-(\\sqrt{5}-2)^2=1-(9-4\\sqrt{5})=4\\sqrt{5}-8$. Let $s=\\sin\\theta$.\n\nThe points $A_i, B_i$ are constructed such that $\\triangle CA_iB_i$ are all right-angled at $B_i$ and similar to $\\triangle CA_1B_1$.\nThe construction implies $CA_i = CA_{i-1} \\cos^2\\theta$ and $CB_i = CA_i \\cos\\theta$.\nLet's choose a coordinate system where $C=(0,0)$, the line $CB_1$ is the x-axis ($y=0$), and the line $CA_1$ is $y=x\\tan\\theta$.\nWe can set the scale by taking $CB_1=c$. Then $CA_1=1$. $B_1=(c,0)$ and $A_1=(\\cos\\theta, \\sin\\theta)=(c,s)$. The side $A_1B_1$ has length $s$. Triangle sides are $c, s, 1$.\nThe problem states $\\angle A_1B_1C=90^\\circ$. Let's set $C=(0,0)$, $B_1=(1,0)$. Then $A_1=(1,\\tan\\theta)$.\n$CA_1=\\sec\\theta=\\sqrt{5}+2$. This is consistent.\n$A_1=(1, \\tan\\theta)$.\n$B_i$ lies on $CB_1$ (x-axis). $CB_i=CA_1 \\cos^{2i-1}\\theta = \\sec\\theta \\cos^{2i-1}\\theta = \\cos^{2i-2}\\theta$.\nSo $B_{2016}$ has coordinates $(\\cos^{4030}\\theta, 0)$. Let $C_0 = \\cos^{4030}\\theta$.\nThe line $L$ passes through $A_1(1,\\tan\\theta)$ and $B_{2016}(C_0,0)$.\nIts equation is $y-0 = \\frac{\\tan\\theta-0}{1-C_0}(x-C_0)$, which is $(\\tan\\theta)x - (1-C_0)y - C_0\\tan\\theta=0$.\nIn terms of $s,c$: $sx - c(1-C_0)y - sC_0=0$.\n\nThe circles $\\Gamma_k$ are tangent to $y=0$ and $y=x\\tan\\theta$. Their centers $O_k$ lie on the angle bisector of $\\angle A_1CB_1$. Let $r_k$ be the radius of $\\Gamma_k$. The center is $O_k=(r_k\\cot(\\theta/2), r_k)$.\nThe radii form a geometric progression $r_k=r_1 q^{k-1}$ where $q=\\frac{1-\\sin(\\theta/2)}{1+\\sin(\\theta/2)}$.\n$\\sin^2(\\theta/2) = \\frac{1-\\cos\\theta}{2} = \\frac{1-(\\sqrt{5}-2)}{2}=\\frac{3-\\sqrt{5}}{2}$.\n$q = \\frac{1-\\sqrt{\\frac{3-\\sqrt{5}}{2}}}{1+\\sqrt{\\frac{3-\\sqrt{5}}{2}}} = \\frac{1-\\frac{\\sqrt{5}-1}{2}}{1+\\frac{\\sqrt{5}-1}{2}}=\\frac{3-\\sqrt{5}}{1+\\sqrt{5}}=\\frac{(3-\\sqrt{5})(\\sqrt{5}-1)}{4}=\\frac{4\\sqrt{5}-8}{4}=\\sqrt{5}-2=c$.\nSo $r_k=r_1 c^{k-1}$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "4030",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 37,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-23-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Let $\\Delta A_{1} B_{1} C$ be a triangle with $\\angle A_{1} B_{1} C=90^{\\circ}$ and $\\frac{C A_{1}}{C B_{1}}=\\sqrt{5}+2$. For any $i \\geq 2$, define $A_{i}$ to be the point on the line $A_{1} C$ such that $A_{i} B_{i-1} \\perp A_{1} C$ and define $B_{i}$ to be the point on the line $B_{1} C$ such that $A_{i} B_{i} \\perp B_{1} C$. Let $\\Gamma_{1}$ be the incircle of $\\Delta A_{1} B_{1} C$ and for $i \\geq 2, \\Gamma_{i}$ be the circle tangent to $\\Gamma_{i-1}, A_{1} C, B_{1} C$ which is smaller than $\\Gamma_{i-1}$. How many integers $k$ are there such that the line $A_{1} B_{2016}$ intersects $\\Gamma_{k}$ ?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "4030",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 37,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-23-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nLet $p>2$ be a prime number. $\\mathbb{F}_{p}[x]$ is defined as the set of all polynomials in $x$ with coefficients in $\\mathbb{F}_{p}$ (the integers modulo $p$ with usual addition and subtraction), so that two polynomials are equal if and only if the coefficients of $x^{k}$ are equal in $\\mathbb{F}_{p}$ for each nonnegative integer $k$. For example, $(x+2)(2 x+3)=2 x^{2}+2 x+1$ in $\\mathbb{F}_{5}[x]$ because the corresponding coefficients are equal modulo 5 . Let $f, g \\in \\mathbb{F}_{p}[x]$. The pair $(f, g)$ is called compositional if $$f(g(x)) \\equiv x^{p^{2}}-x$$ in $\\mathbb{F}_{p}[x]$. Find, with proof, the number of compositional pairs (in terms of $p$ ).\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $P(x) = x^{p^2}-x$. We are looking for the number of pairs of polynomials $(f, g)$ with coefficients in $\\mathbb{F}_p$ such that $f(g(x)) = P(x)$.\n\nLet $\\deg(f) = d_1$ and $\\deg(g) = d_2$. The degree of $f(g(x))$ is $d_1 d_2$. The degree of $P(x)$ is $p^2$. Thus, $d_1 d_2 = p^2$. Since $p$ is a prime number, the possible pairs of positive integer degrees $(d_1, d_2)$ are $(1, p^2)$, $(p^2, 1)$, and $(p, p)$.\n\nLet's differentiate the equation $f(g(x)) = x^{p^2}-x$ with respect to $x$. Using the chain rule, we get:\n$f'(g(x)) g'(x) = (x^{p^2}-x)'$\nIn $\\mathbb{F}_p[x]$, the derivative of $x^k$ is $kx^{k-1}$. So, $(x^{p^2}-x)' = p^2x^{p^2-1} - 1$. Since the coefficients are in $\\mathbb{F}_p$, $p^2 \\equiv 0 \\pmod{p}$.\nThus, $P'(x) = -1$.\nThe equation becomes $f'(g(x)) g'(x) = -1$.\n\nThe units in the polynomial ring $\\mathbb{F}_p[x]$ are the non-zero constant polynomials. Since the product of the polynomials $f'(g(x))$ and $g'(x)$ is a unit, both must be units themselves.\nLet $g'(x) = c$ for some constant $c \\in \\mathbb{F}_p^*$.\nLet $f'(g(x)) = a'$ for some constant $a' \\in \\mathbb{F}_p^*$.\nFrom $g'(x)=c$, we can deduce the form of $g(x)$. A polynomial has a constant derivative if and only if the coefficients of $x^i$ are zero for all $i>1$ that are not multiples of $p$.\nSo $g(x)$ must be of the form $G(x^p) + cx + d$ for some polynomial $G(y) \\in \\mathbb{F}_p[y]$ and constants $c, d \\in \\mathbb{F}_p$ with $c \\neq 0$.\n\nFrom $f'(g(x))=a'$, since $g(x)$ is not a constant polynomial, its image on the algebraic closure of $\\mathbb{F}_p$ is the entire field. This implies that $f'(y)$ must be the constant $a'$ for all $y$.\nSo $f(y)$ must be of the form $F(y^p) + ay + b$ for some polynomial $F(z) \\in \\mathbb{F}_p[z]$ and constants $a, b \\in \\mathbb{F}_p$ with $a \\neq 0$.\nHere $f'(y) = a$. So $a' = a$.\nThe condition $f'(g(x))g'(x)=-1$ becomes $ac=-1$.\n\nLet's analyze the degrees of $f$ and $g$.\nLet $\\deg(F)=k_1$ and $\\deg(G)=k_2$.\n$d_1 = \\deg(f) = \\deg(F(y^p)+ay+b)$. If $k_1 \\ge 1$, $d_1 = pk_1$. If $F$ is a constant ($k_1=0$), $d_1=1$.\n$d_2 = \\deg(g) = \\deg(G(x^p)+cx+d)$. If $k_2 \\ge 1$, $d_2 = pk_2$. If $G$ is a constant ($k_2=0$), $d_2=1$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "4 p(p-1)",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 38,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-24-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Let $p>2$ be a prime number. $\\mathbb{F}_{p}[x]$ is defined as the set of all polynomials in $x$ with coefficients in $\\mathbb{F}_{p}$ (the integers modulo $p$ with usual addition and subtraction), so that two polynomials are equal if and only if the coefficients of $x^{k}$ are equal in $\\mathbb{F}_{p}$ for each nonnegative integer $k$. For example, $(x+2)(2 x+3)=2 x^{2}+2 x+1$ in $\\mathbb{F}_{5}[x]$ because the corresponding coefficients are equal modulo 5 . Let $f, g \\in \\mathbb{F}_{p}[x]$. The pair $(f, g)$ is called compositional if $$f(g(x)) \\equiv x^{p^{2}}-x$$ in $\\mathbb{F}_{p}[x]$. Find, with proof, the number of compositional pairs (in terms of $p$ ).",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "4 p(p-1)",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 38,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-24-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nIt is known that exactly one of the three (distinguishable) musketeers stole the truffles. Each musketeer makes one statement, in which he either claims that one of the three is guilty, or claims that one of the three is innocent. It is possible for two or more of the musketeers to make the same statement. After hearing their claims, and knowing that exactly one musketeer lied, the inspector is able to deduce who stole the truffles. How many ordered triplets of statements could have been made?\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the three musketeers be A, B, and C. Let S be the musketeer who stole the truffles. S can be A, B, or C.\nEach musketeer makes one statement. A statement can be of the form \"X is guilty\" (G(X)) or \"X is innocent\" (I(X)), where X can be A, B, or C. This gives 6 possible statements.\n\nThe truth value of a statement depends on who the thief S is.\n- G(X) is true if X is the thief (X=S), and false otherwise.\n- I(X) is true if X is not the thief (X!=S), and false otherwise.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "99",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 39,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-25-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "It is known that exactly one of the three (distinguishable) musketeers stole the truffles. Each musketeer makes one statement, in which he either claims that one of the three is guilty, or claims that one of the three is innocent. It is possible for two or more of the musketeers to make the same statement. After hearing their claims, and knowing that exactly one musketeer lied, the inspector is able to deduce who stole the truffles. How many ordered triplets of statements could have been made?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "99",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 39,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-25-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nLet $f(n)$ be the largest prime factor of $n^{2}+1$. Compute the least positive integer $n$ such that $f(f(n))=n$.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $f(n)$ be the largest prime factor of $n^2+1$. We are looking for the least positive integer $n$ such that $f(f(n))=n$.\n\nLet's denote $p = f(n)$. The condition becomes $f(p) = n$.\nThis gives us a pair of equations:\n1. $p = f(n)$, which means $p$ is the largest prime factor of $n^2+1$.\n2. $n = f(p)$, which means $n$ is the largest prime factor of $p^2+1$.\n\nFrom the definition of $f(n)$, its value must be a prime number.\nIn the first equation, $p = f(n)$, so $p$ must be a prime number.\nIn the second equation, $n = f(p)$, so $n$ must be a prime number.\n\nSo, we are looking for the smallest prime number $n$ that satisfies the condition.\nLet's analyze the conditions on the primes $n$ and $p$.\nFrom $n = f(p)$, we know that $n$ is a prime factor of $p^2+1$. This means $p^2+1 \\equiv 0 \\pmod{n}$, or $p^2 \\equiv -1 \\pmod{n}$.\nThis implies that -1 is a quadratic residue modulo $n$. This is only true if $n=2$ or $n \\equiv 1 \\pmod 4$.\n\nSimilarly, from $p = f(n)$, we have $n^2+1 \\equiv 0 \\pmod{p}$, or $n^2 \\equiv -1 \\pmod{p}$.\nThis implies that -1 is a quadratic residue modulo $p$. This is only true if $p=2$ or $p \\equiv 1 \\pmod 4$.\n\nSo, any potential solution $n$ must be a prime number that is either 2 or congruent to 1 modulo 4.\nThe smallest such primes are 2, 5, 13, 17, 29, 37, 41, 53, 61, 73, 89, ...\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "89",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 42,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-26-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Let $f(n)$ be the largest prime factor of $n^{2}+1$. Compute the least positive integer $n$ such that $f(f(n))=n$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "89",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 42,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-26-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nWhat is the maximum number of bishops that can be placed on an $8 \\times 8$ chessboard such that at most three bishops lie on any diagonal?\n\nPartial Response:\nTo solve this problem, we need to find the maximum number of bishops that can be placed on an $8 \\times 8$ chessboard such that no more than three bishops are on any single diagonal.\n\n**1. Understanding Diagonals and Bishop Movement**\n\nA bishop attacks any other piece along the diagonals it occupies. On a chessboard, squares on the same diagonal have either a constant sum of their coordinates $(i+j)$ or a constant difference of their coordinates $(i-j)$. A key property of a chessboard is that any diagonal consists of squares of only one color (either all white or all black).\n\n**2. Decoupling the Problem by Color**\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "38",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 43,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-27-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "What is the maximum number of bishops that can be placed on an $8 \\times 8$ chessboard such that at most three bishops lie on any diagonal?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "38",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 43,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-27-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nManya has a stack of $85=1+4+16+64$ blocks comprised of 4 layers (the $k$ th layer from the top has $4^{k-1}$ blocks). Each block rests on 4 smaller blocks, each with dimensions half those of the larger block. Laura removes blocks one at a time from this stack, removing only blocks that currently have no blocks on top of them. Find the number of ways Laura can remove precisely 5 blocks from Manya's stack (the order in which they are removed matters).\n\nPartial Response:\nHere is a step-by-step solution to the problem:\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "3384",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 44,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-28-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Manya has a stack of $85=1+4+16+64$ blocks comprised of 4 layers (the $k$ th layer from the top has $4^{k-1}$ blocks). Each block rests on 4 smaller blocks, each with dimensions half those of the larger block. Laura removes blocks one at a time from this stack, removing only blocks that currently have no blocks on top of them. Find the number of ways Laura can remove precisely 5 blocks from Manya's stack (the order in which they are removed matters).",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "3384",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 44,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-28-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nFive people take a true-or-false test with five questions. Each person randomly guesses on every question. Given that, for each question, a majority of test-takers answered it correctly, let $p$ be the probability that every person answers exactly three questions correctly. Suppose that $p=\\frac{a}{2^{b}}$ where $a$ is an odd positive integer and $b$ is a nonnegative integer. Compute 100a+b.\n\nPartial Response:\nHere is a step-by-step solution to the problem.\n\n**Step 1: Define the sample space and events**\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "25517",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 45,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-29-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Five people take a true-or-false test with five questions. Each person randomly guesses on every question. Given that, for each question, a majority of test-takers answered it correctly, let $p$ be the probability that every person answers exactly three questions correctly. Suppose that $p=\\frac{a}{2^{b}}$ where $a$ is an odd positive integer and $b$ is a nonnegative integer. Compute 100a+b.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "25517",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 45,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-29-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nFind the number of integers $n$ such that $$ 1+\\left\\lfloor\\frac{100 n}{101}\\right\\rfloor=\\left\\lceil\\frac{99 n}{100}\\right\\rceil $$\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the given equation be\n$$ 1+\\left\\lfloor\\frac{100 n}{101}\\right\\rfloor=\\left\\lceil\\frac{99 n}{100}\\right\\rceil $$\nSince $n$ is an integer, we can use the properties of floor and ceiling functions: $\\lfloor x+k \\rfloor = \\lfloor x \\rfloor + k$ and $\\lceil x+k \\rceil = \\lceil x \\rceil + k$ for any integer $k$.\n\nLet's rewrite the arguments of the functions:\n$\\frac{100n}{101} = \\frac{101n - n}{101} = n - \\frac{n}{101}$\n$\\frac{99n}{100} = \\frac{100n - n}{100} = n - \\frac{n}{100}$\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "10100",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 46,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-30-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Find the number of integers $n$ such that $$ 1+\\left\\lfloor\\frac{100 n}{101}\\right\\rfloor=\\left\\lceil\\frac{99 n}{100}\\right\\rceil $$",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "10100",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 46,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-30-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nFor a continuous and absolutely integrable complex-valued function $f(x)$ on $\\mathbb{R}$, define a function $(S f)(x)$ on $\\mathbb{R}$ by $(S f)(x)=\\int_{-\\infty}^{+\\infty} e^{2 \\pi \\mathrm{i} u x} f(u) \\mathrm{d} u$. Find explicit forms of $S\\left(\\frac{1}{1+x^{2}}\\right)$ and $S\\left(\\frac{1}{\\left(1+x^{2}\\right)^{2}}\\right)$.\n\nPartial Response:\nThis problem requires us to compute two Fourier-type integrals. We will use the method of contour integration and the residue theorem from complex analysis.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "S\\left(\\frac{1}{1+x^{2}}\\right)=\\pi e^{-2 \\pi|x|}, S\\left(\\frac{1}{\\left(1+x^{2}\\right)^{2}}\\right)=\\frac{\\pi}{2}(1+2 \\pi|x|) e^{-2 \\pi|x|}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 49,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-31-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "For a continuous and absolutely integrable complex-valued function $f(x)$ on $\\mathbb{R}$, define a function $(S f)(x)$ on $\\mathbb{R}$ by $(S f)(x)=\\int_{-\\infty}^{+\\infty} e^{2 \\pi \\mathrm{i} u x} f(u) \\mathrm{d} u$. Find explicit forms of $S\\left(\\frac{1}{1+x^{2}}\\right)$ and $S\\left(\\frac{1}{\\left(1+x^{2}\\right)^{2}}\\right)$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "S\\left(\\frac{1}{1+x^{2}}\\right)=\\pi e^{-2 \\pi|x|}, S\\left(\\frac{1}{\\left(1+x^{2}\\right)^{2}}\\right)=\\frac{\\pi}{2}(1+2 \\pi|x|) e^{-2 \\pi|x|}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 49,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-31-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nSome squares of a $n \\times n$ table $(n>2)$ are black, the rest are white. In every white square we write the number of all the black squares having at least one common vertex with it. Find the maximum possible sum of all these numbers.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the set of cells in the $n \\times n$ table be $C$. Each cell can be either black (B) or white (W). Let $S_B$ be the set of black cells and $S_W$ be the set of white cells.\n\nFor each white cell $c \\in S_W$, we write a number $N_c$, which is the number of black cells adjacent to $c$. Two cells are adjacent if they have at least one vertex in common. For a cell $(i,j)$, its adjacent cells are $(i+u, j+v)$ where $u,v \\in \\{-1,0,1\\}$ and are not both zero.\n\nThe problem asks for the maximum possible value of the sum $S = \\sum_{c \\in S_W} N_c$.\n\nLet's analyze the sum $S$. A given pair of cells $(c_1, c_2)$ consists of a white cell $c_1 \\in S_W$ and a black cell $c_2 \\in S_B$. This pair contributes 1 to the sum $S$ if $c_1$ and $c_2$ are adjacent.\nSo, $S$ is the total number of pairs of adjacent cells $(c_W, c_B)$ where $c_W$ is white and $c_B$ is black.\n\nThis sum represents the number of \"edges\" between the set of white cells and the set of black cells in the graph where the vertices are the cells and the edges connect adjacent cells. Let's call this graph the \"king's graph\" on an $n \\times n$ chessboard. The problem is to find the maximum cut of this graph. A \"cut\" is a partition of the vertices into two sets (black and white), and the \"size of the cut\" is the number of edges with one vertex in each set.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "3n^{2}-5n+2",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 50,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-32-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Some squares of a $n \\times n$ table $(n>2)$ are black, the rest are white. In every white square we write the number of all the black squares having at least one common vertex with it. Find the maximum possible sum of all these numbers.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "3n^{2}-5n+2",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 50,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-32-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nCompute the number of nonempty subsets $S \\subseteq\\{-10,-9,-8, \\ldots, 8,9,10\\}$ that satisfy $|S|+\\min (S)$. $\\max (S)=0$.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $S$ be a nonempty subset of $A = \\{-10, -9, \\ldots, 8, 9, 10\\}$.\nLet $m = \\min(S)$ and $M = \\max(S)$. The given condition is $|S| + m \\cdot M = 0$.\nThis can be written as $|S| = -mM$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "335",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 52,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-33-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Compute the number of nonempty subsets $S \\subseteq\\{-10,-9,-8, \\ldots, 8,9,10\\}$ that satisfy $|S|+\\min (S)$. $\\max (S)=0$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "335",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 52,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-33-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nHow many ways are there to place four points in the plane such that the set of pairwise distances between the points consists of exactly 2 elements? (Two configurations are the same if one can be obtained from the other via rotation and scaling.)\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the four points be $P_1, P_2, P_3, P_4$. There are $\\binom{4}{2} = 6$ pairwise distances between these points. The problem states that the set of these distances consists of exactly two distinct values. Let these distances be $a$ and $b$. Since the configurations are considered the same up to scaling, we can set one distance to 1 and the other to $x>0, x \\ne 1$. So the set of distances is $\\{1, x\\}$.\n\nLet $n_1$ be the number of pairs of points with distance 1, and $n_2$ be the number of pairs with distance $x$. We have $n_1 + n_2 = 6$, with $n_1, n_2 \\ge 1$. The pair $(n_1, n_2)$ is a characteristic of the configuration. Due to scaling, a configuration with $(n_1, n_2)$ is equivalent to one with $(n_2, n_1)$ if the ratio of the distances is just inverted. We can analyze the cases based on the values of $n_1$ from 1 to 5.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "6",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 54,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-34-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "How many ways are there to place four points in the plane such that the set of pairwise distances between the points consists of exactly 2 elements? (Two configurations are the same if one can be obtained from the other via rotation and scaling.)",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "6",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 54,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-34-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nConsider a permutation $\\left(a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}, a_{4}, a_{5}\\right)$ of $\\{1,2,3,4,5\\}$. We say the tuple $\\left(a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}, a_{4}, a_{5}\\right)$ is flawless if for all $1 \\leq i<j<k \\leq 5$, the sequence $\\left(a_{i}, a_{j}, a_{k}\\right)$ is not an arithmetic progression (in that order). Find the number of flawless 5-tuples.\n\nPartial Response:\nA permutation $(a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4, a_5)$ of $\\{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\\}$ is flawless if for all $1 \\le i < j < k \\le 5$, the sequence $(a_i, a_j, a_k)$ is not an arithmetic progression (AP).\n\nFirst, let's identify all 3-term arithmetic progressions from the set $\\{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\\}$. A set of three numbers $\\{x, y, z\\}$ can form an AP if, when sorted as $x' < y' < z'$, we have $y' - x' = z' - y'$.\nLet's list the sets of numbers that can form an AP:\n- Common difference $d=1$: $\\{1, 2, 3\\}, \\{2, 3, 4\\}, \\{3, 4, 5\\}$.\n- Common difference $d=2$: $\\{1, 3, 5\\}$.\n- Common difference $d \\ge 3$: No sets are possible as the largest number would exceed 5.\n\nAn important observation is that all of these sets contain the number 3. This means any 3-term AP subsequence must involve the number 3. A permutation is flawless if and only if there is no AP subsequence involving the number 3. This simplifies the problem greatly, as we only need to check for APs containing 3.\n\nLet's analyze the problem by considering the position of the number 3 in the permutation. Let the position of 3 be $j$, i.e., $a_j=3$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "20",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 55,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-35-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Consider a permutation $\\left(a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}, a_{4}, a_{5}\\right)$ of $\\{1,2,3,4,5\\}$. We say the tuple $\\left(a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}, a_{4}, a_{5}\\right)$ is flawless if for all $1 \\leq i<j<k \\leq 5$, the sequence $\\left(a_{i}, a_{j}, a_{k}\\right)$ is not an arithmetic progression (in that order). Find the number of flawless 5-tuples.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "20",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 55,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-35-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nA function $f: \\mathbb{Z} \\rightarrow \\mathbb{Z}$ satisfies: $f(0)=0$ and $$\\left|f\\left((n+1) 2^{k}\\right)-f\\left(n 2^{k}\\right)\\right| \\leq 1$$ for all integers $k \\geq 0$ and $n$. What is the maximum possible value of $f(2019)$?\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the given condition be\n$$|f((n+1) 2^{k})-f\\left(n 2^{k}\\right)| \\leq 1 \\quad (*)$$\nfor all integers $k \\geq 0$ and $n$.\nLet $x, y$ be two integers such that their difference is a power of 2, i.e., $y-x = 2^k$ for some $k \\geq 0$.\nLet $n = x/2^k$. If $n$ is an integer, then $x=n2^k$ and $y=(n+1)2^k$. The condition $(*)$ gives $|f(y)-f(x)| \\leq 1$.\n\nWe want to find the maximum possible value of $f(2019)$. Since $f(0)=0$, this is equivalent to maximizing $f(2019)-f(0)$.\nWe can express $f(2019)-f(0)$ as a telescoping sum. Let's find a path from $z_0=0$ to $z_m=2019$ of the form $z_0, z_1, \\dots, z_m$ such that for each step $i=1, \\dots, m$, the difference $z_i - z_{i-1}$ is of the form $\\pm 2^{k_i}$.\nThen we can write\n$$f(2019) - f(0) = \\sum_{i=1}^m (f(z_i) - f(z_{i-1}))$$\nFor each term in the sum, we want to apply the given condition.\nLet's consider a step $z_i - z_{i-1} = \\epsilon_i 2^{k_i}$ where $\\epsilon_i \\in \\{+1, -1\\}$.\n- If $\\epsilon_i=1$, we have $z_i - z_{i-1} = 2^{k_i}$. For the condition $(*)$ to apply, $z_{i-1}$ must be a multiple of $2^{k_i}$. If it is, let $n=z_{i-1}/2^{k_i}$, then $|f(z_i) - f(z_{i-1})| \\leq 1$.\n- If $\\epsilon_i=-1$, we have $z_{i-1} - z_i = 2^{k_i}$. For the condition $(*)$ to apply, $z_{i}$ must be a multiple of $2^{k_i}$. If it is, let $n=z_{i}/2^{k_i}$, then $|f(z_{i-1}) - f(z_i)| \\leq 1$, which is equivalent to $|f(z_i) - f(z_{i-1})| \\leq 1$.\n\nA path from 0 to 2019 where each step satisfies these divisibility conditions is a \"valid path\".\nFor any such valid path of length $m$, we have:\n$|f(2019)| = |f(2019) - f(0)| = \\left|\\sum_{i=1}^m (f(z_i) - f(z_{i-1}))\\right| \\leq \\sum_{i=1}^m |f(z_i) - f(z_{i-1})| \\leq \\sum_{i=1}^m 1 = m$.\nTo get the tightest upper bound for $|f(2019)|$, we need to find the minimum length $m$ of such a valid path. This minimum length is the shortest path distance from 0 to 2019 in the graph where vertices are integers and edges connect numbers with a difference of $\\pm 2^k$ (respecting the divisibility condition).\n\nLet's find the shortest valid path from 0 to 2019. This is related to the non-adjacent form (NAF) of 2019. The NAF represents an integer as a sum $\\sum c_i 2^i$ with $c_i \\in \\{0, 1, -1\\}$ with the minimum number of non-zero terms.\nThe binary representation of 2019 is $(11111100011)_2$.\nWe can write 2019 using subtractions to reduce the number of terms:\n$2019 = 2048 - 29 = 2048 - (32 - 3) = 2048 - 32 + 3 = 2048 - 32 + 4 - 1$.\nSo, $2019 = 2^{11} - 2^5 + 2^2 - 2^0$.\nThis representation corresponds to a path from 0 to 2019. Let's define the path:\n$z_0 = 0$\n$z_1 = 2^{11} = 2048$\n$z_2 = 2^{11} - 2^5 = 2048 - 32 = 2016$\n$z_3 = 2^{11} - 2^5 + 2^2 = 2016 + 4 = 2020$\n$z_4 = 2^{11} - 2^5 + 2^2 - 2^0 = 2020 - 1 = 2019$\nThe length of this path is $m=4$. Let's check if it's a valid path:\n1. $z_1 - z_0 = 2048 = 2^{11}$. $z_0=0$ is a multiple of $2^{11}$. Valid.\n2. $z_2 - z_1 = -32 = -2^5$. We check $z_1-z_2 = 2^5$. $z_2=2016$ must be a multiple of $2^5=32$. $2016 = 32 \\times 63$. Valid.\n3. $z_3 - z_2 = 4 = 2^2$. $z_2=2016$ must be a multiple of $2^2=4$. $2016 = 4 \\times 504$. Valid.\n4. $z_4 - z_3 = -1 = -2^0$. We check $z_3-z_4 = 2^0$. $z_4=2019$ must be a multiple of $2^0=1$. $2019 = 1 \\times 2019$. Valid.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "4",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 58,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-36-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "A function $f: \\mathbb{Z} \\rightarrow \\mathbb{Z}$ satisfies: $f(0)=0$ and $$\\left|f\\left((n+1) 2^{k}\\right)-f\\left(n 2^{k}\\right)\\right| \\leq 1$$ for all integers $k \\geq 0$ and $n$. What is the maximum possible value of $f(2019)$?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "4",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 58,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-36-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nAlice starts with the number 0. She can apply 100 operations on her number. In each operation, she can either add 1 to her number, or square her number. After applying all operations, her score is the minimum distance from her number to any perfect square. What is the maximum score she can attain?\n\nPartial Response:\nTo solve this problem, we need to find the maximum possible score Alice can attain. The score is the minimum distance from her final number to any perfect square.\n\nLet Alice's final number be `N`. The score is `S = min_{k \\in \\mathbb{Z}} |N - k^2|`.\nTo maximize this score, `N` should be as far as possible from any perfect square. The point furthest from any two consecutive perfect squares, `m^2` and `(m+1)^2`, is roughly in the middle: `N \\approx m^2 + m`.\nIf `N = m^2 + m` or `N = m^2 + m + 1`, the distance to `m^2` is `m` or `m+1`, and the distance to `(m+1)^2 = m^2 + 2m + 1` is `m+1` or `m`. The minimum distance (the score) is `m`.\nSo, a good strategy is to obtain a final number `N` of the form `q^2 + q` or `q^2 + q + 1` for the largest possible integer `q`. The score would then be `q`.\n\nLet's analyze the operations. Alice has 100 operations: add 1 (A) and square (S).\nTo get a large number, squaring is very powerful. However, applying S to 0 or 1 is wasteful (`0^2=0`, `1^2=1`). So we must start with some A operations.\nIt is always better to apply additions before a square, since `(x+1)^2 = x^2 + 2x + 1` is much larger than `x^2+1` for `x>0`.\nThis suggests an optimal strategy is to have blocks of additions followed by a square.\nLet's say Alice applies `n_S` squaring operations. The last operation must be an addition, otherwise the final number is a perfect square and the score is 0.\nSo, the sequence of operations will look like this:\n`k_0` additions -> `S` -> `k_1` additions -> `S` -> ... -> `S` (`n_S` times) -> `k_{n_S}` additions.\n\nThe total number of operations is `n_S + k_0 + k_1 + ... + k_{n_S} = 100`.\nLet's trace the number being generated. Let `M` be the number after the last squaring operation. `M` is a perfect square. Let `M = m^2`.\nThe final number is `N = M + k_{n_S} = m^2 + k_{n_S}`.\nThe score is the minimum distance from `N` to a perfect square. The closest squares are likely `m^2` and `(m+1)^2`.\nThe score is `S = min(N - m^2, (m+1)^2 - N) = min(k_{n_S}, 2m + 1 - k_{n_S})`.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "94",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 59,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-37-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Alice starts with the number 0. She can apply 100 operations on her number. In each operation, she can either add 1 to her number, or square her number. After applying all operations, her score is the minimum distance from her number to any perfect square. What is the maximum score she can attain?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "94",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 59,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-37-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nDorothea has a $3 \\times 4$ grid of dots. She colors each dot red, blue, or dark gray. Compute the number of ways Dorothea can color the grid such that there is no rectangle whose sides are parallel to the grid lines and whose vertices all have the same color.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the grid be represented by a $3 \\times 4$ matrix $A$ where $A_{ij}$ is the color of the dot in row $i$ and column $j$. The three colors are red (R), blue (B), and dark gray (D). A rectangle is formed by choosing two rows $i_1, i_2$ (where $1 \\le i_1 < i_2 \\le 3$) and two columns $j_1, j_2$ (where $1 \\le j_1 < j_2 \\le 4$). Such a rectangle is monochromatic if the four vertices $(i_1, j_1), (i_1, j_2), (i_2, j_1), (i_2, j_2)$ all have the same color. This means $A_{i_1,j_1} = A_{i_2,j_1} = A_{i_1,j_2} = A_{i_2,j_2}$.\n\nLet's analyze the condition for a monochromatic rectangle. For a given pair of rows $(i_1, i_2)$, a monochromatic rectangle is formed with columns $j_1, j_2$ if the colors in those rows are the same and of the same color in both columns. That is, $A_{i_1,j_1} = A_{i_2,j_1} = c$ and $A_{i_1,j_2} = A_{i_2,j_2} = c$ for some color $c$.\n\nLet's define a \"monochromatic pair\" in a column. For a column $j$, a pair of rows $(i_1, i_2)$ is a monochromatic pair of color $c$ if $A_{i_1,j} = A_{i_2,j} = c$. Let's denote this specific event as the tuple $((i_1, i_2), c)$.\nThe set of all possible such monochromatic pairs is $\\mathcal{P}$. There are $\\binom{3}{2}=3$ pairs of rows and 3 colors, so $|\\mathcal{P}| = 3 \\times 3 = 9$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "284688",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 60,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-38-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Dorothea has a $3 \\times 4$ grid of dots. She colors each dot red, blue, or dark gray. Compute the number of ways Dorothea can color the grid such that there is no rectangle whose sides are parallel to the grid lines and whose vertices all have the same color.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "284688",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 60,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-38-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nDavid and Evan are playing a game. Evan thinks of a positive integer $N$ between 1 and 59, inclusive, and David tries to guess it. Each time David makes a guess, Evan will tell him whether the guess is greater than, equal to, or less than $N$. David wants to devise a strategy that will guarantee that he knows $N$ in five guesses. In David's strategy, each guess will be determined only by Evan's responses to any previous guesses (the first guess will always be the same), and David will only guess a number which satisfies each of Evan's responses. How many such strategies are there?\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $S$ be the set of possible values for $N$, so $S = \\{1, 2, \\dots, 59\\}$. David has 5 guesses to determine $N$.\nA strategy for David is a decision tree. Each internal node represents a guess, and the branches from that node represent Evan's possible responses ('<', '=', '>'). The leaves of the tree are the determined values of $N$. The depth of this tree must be at most 5.\n\nLet $f(k)$ be the maximum size of a set of numbers that David can guarantee to identify in $k$ guesses.\nIf David makes a guess $g$ from a set of size $m$, the set is partitioned into three parts: numbers less than $g$, the number $g$ itself, and numbers greater than $g$.\nIf the response is '=', the number is found.\nIf the response is '<' or '>', David has $k-1$ guesses remaining for the smaller or larger set of numbers.\nTo guarantee a win, the size of these new sets must be at most $f(k-1)$.\nLet the set be $\\{1, \\dots, m\\}$ and the guess be $i$. The sizes of the remaining sets are $i-1$ and $m-i$.\nSo, $m = (i-1) + 1 + (m-i) \\le f(k-1) + 1 + f(k-1) = 2f(k-1) + 1$.\nThis gives the recurrence $f(k) = 2f(k-1) + 1$.\nWith 0 guesses, David must already know the number, which implies the set of possibilities has size at most 1. Let's say he knows it if the set has size 1. So, $f(0)=1$.\n$f(1) = 2f(0)+1 = 3$\n$f(2) = 2f(1)+1 = 7$\n$f(3) = 2f(2)+1 = 15$\n$f(4) = 2f(3)+1 = 31$\n$f(5) = 2f(4)+1 = 63$\n\nSince $59 \\le 63 = f(5)$, a strategy is possible. We need to count the number of such strategies.\n\nLet $N(m, k)$ be the number of distinct strategies for a set of $m$ consecutive integers with $k$ guesses.\nA strategy consists of a first guess, say the $i$-th element of the set, followed by sub-strategies for the resulting possibilities.\nFor the first guess $i$ to be valid, the subproblems must be solvable in $k-1$ guesses. This means the sizes of the resulting sets must not exceed $f(k-1)$.\nSo, $i-1 \\le f(k-1)$ and $m-i \\le f(k-1)$.\nThe number of strategies for a guess $i$ is the product of the number of strategies for the subproblems: $N(i-1, k-1) \\times N(m-i, k-1)$.\nThus, the total number of strategies is the sum over all valid first guesses $i$:\n$N(m, k) = \\sum_{i} N(i-1, k-1) \\times N(m-i, k-1)$, where the sum is over all $i$ s.t. $1 \\le i \\le m$, $i-1 \\le f(k-1)$, and $m-i \\le f(k-1)$.\n\nWe need to calculate $N(59, 5)$.\nThe first guess $g_1$ must be an integer $i \\in \\{1, \\dots, 59\\}$.\nThe validity conditions are: $i-1 \\le f(4) = 31 \\implies i \\le 32$, and $59-i \\le f(4) = 31 \\implies i \\ge 28$.\nSo, the first guess $i$ must be in $\\{28, 29, 30, 31, 32\\}$.\n$N(59, 5) = \\sum_{i=28}^{32} N(i-1, 4) N(59-i, 4)$\n$N(59, 5) = N(27,4)N(31,4) + N(28,4)N(30,4) + N(29,4)N(29,4) + N(30,4)N(28,4) + N(31,4)N(27,4)$\n$N(59, 5) = 2N(27,4)N(31,4) + 2N(28,4)N(30,4) + N(29,4)^2$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "36440",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 61,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-39-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "David and Evan are playing a game. Evan thinks of a positive integer $N$ between 1 and 59, inclusive, and David tries to guess it. Each time David makes a guess, Evan will tell him whether the guess is greater than, equal to, or less than $N$. David wants to devise a strategy that will guarantee that he knows $N$ in five guesses. In David's strategy, each guess will be determined only by Evan's responses to any previous guesses (the first guess will always be the same), and David will only guess a number which satisfies each of Evan's responses. How many such strategies are there?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "36440",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 61,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-39-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nWhat is the 3-digit number formed by the $9998^{\\text {th }}$ through $10000^{\\text {th }}$ digits after the decimal point in the decimal expansion of \\frac{1}{998}$ ?\n\nPartial Response:\nTo find the 3-digit number formed by the $9998^{\\text {th }}$ through $10000^{\\text {th }}$ digits after the decimal point in the decimal expansion of $\\frac{1}{998}$, let $x = \\frac{1}{998}$. We denote its decimal expansion as $x = 0.d_1 d_2 d_3 \\dots$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "042",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 62,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-40-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "What is the 3-digit number formed by the $9998^{\\text {th }}$ through $10000^{\\text {th }}$ digits after the decimal point in the decimal expansion of \\frac{1}{998}$ ?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "042",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 62,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-40-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nThere are six empty slots corresponding to the digits of a six-digit number. Claire and William take turns rolling a standard six-sided die, with Claire going first. They alternate with each roll until they have each rolled three times. After a player rolls, they place the number from their die roll into a remaining empty slot of their choice. Claire wins if the resulting six-digit number is divisible by 6, and William wins otherwise. If both players play optimally, compute the probability that Claire wins.\n\nPartial Response:\nTo solve this problem, we need to determine the probability that the final six-digit number is divisible by 6, assuming both Claire and William play optimally. A number is divisible by 6 if and only if it is divisible by both 2 and 3. Let's analyze these two conditions separately.\n\n**Condition 1: Divisibility by 2**\nFor the number to be divisible by 2, its last digit (the digit in the units slot) must be even. The possible die rolls are {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}. The even rolls are {2, 4, 6}, and the odd rolls are {1, 3, 5}. The probability of rolling an even number is 3/6 = 1/2, and the probability of rolling an odd number is 3/6 = 1/2.\n\nClaire wants the last digit to be even, while William wants it to be odd. They will place their rolled numbers into the six empty slots. Let's call the units slot S6. Since placing a digit is a permanent move, the control of S6 is critical.\n\n* **Optimal Strategy for S6:**\n * If it is Claire's turn, S6 is empty, and she rolls an even number, she will place it in S6. This guarantees the number will be even, satisfying one of her winning conditions.\n * If it is William's turn, S6 is empty, and he rolls an odd number, he will place it in S6. This guarantees the number will be odd, making it impossible for Claire to win. William wins immediately.\n * If a player rolls a number with the \"wrong\" parity for them (odd for Claire, even for William) while S6 is empty, they will place it in any other available slot.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\frac{43}{192}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 63,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-41-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "There are six empty slots corresponding to the digits of a six-digit number. Claire and William take turns rolling a standard six-sided die, with Claire going first. They alternate with each roll until they have each rolled three times. After a player rolls, they place the number from their die roll into a remaining empty slot of their choice. Claire wins if the resulting six-digit number is divisible by 6, and William wins otherwise. If both players play optimally, compute the probability that Claire wins.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\frac{43}{192}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 63,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-41-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nAn equiangular hexagon has side lengths $1,1, a, 1,1, a$ in that order. Given that there exists a circle that intersects the hexagon at 12 distinct points, we have $M<a<N$ for some real numbers $M$ and $N$. Determine the minimum possible value of the ratio $\\frac{N}{M}$.\n\nPartial Response:\nAn equiangular hexagon has all interior angles equal to $120^\\circ$. Let the side lengths be $s_1, s_2, s_3, s_4, s_5, s_6$. For an equiangular hexagon, opposite sides are parallel. We are given the side lengths in order as $1, 1, a, 1, 1, a$. So we have $s_1=1, s_2=1, s_3=a, s_4=1, s_5=1, s_6=a$.\n\nA circle intersects the hexagon at 12 distinct points if and only if it intersects each of the 6 side segments at 2 distinct points. This means the circle must not be tangent to any side and must not pass through any vertex.\n\nLet the circle have center $C_0$ and radius $R$. For each side $s_i$, let $L_i$ be the line containing it, and let $d(C_0, L_i)$ be the distance from the center to this line. For each vertex $V_j$, let $d(C_0, V_j)$ be the distance from the center to the vertex. The condition for 12 distinct intersection points is that there exists a center $C_0$ and a radius $R$ such that:\n$$ \\max_{i=1,\\dots,6} d(C_0, L_i) < R < \\min_{j=1,\\dots,6} d(C_0, V_j) $$\nSuch a circle exists if and only if there is a point $C_0$ for which $\\max_{i} d(C_0, L_i) < \\min_{j} d(C_0, V_j)$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\frac{3 \\sqrt{3}+3}{2}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 64,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-42-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "An equiangular hexagon has side lengths $1,1, a, 1,1, a$ in that order. Given that there exists a circle that intersects the hexagon at 12 distinct points, we have $M<a<N$ for some real numbers $M$ and $N$. Determine the minimum possible value of the ratio $\\frac{N}{M}$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "\\frac{3 \\sqrt{3}+3}{2}",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 64,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-42-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nLet $r_{k}$ denote the remainder when $\\binom{127}{k}$ is divided by 8. Compute $r_{1}+2 r_{2}+3 r_{3}+\\cdots+63 r_{63}$.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $r_k$ be the remainder when $\\binom{127}{k}$ is divided by 8. We want to compute $S = \\sum_{k=1}^{63} k r_k$.\n\nTo find $r_k$, we analyze $\\binom{127}{k} \\pmod 8$. Let $n=127=2^7-1$.\nWe consider the generating function for the binomial coefficients $\\binom{n}{k}$:\n$(1+x)^n = \\sum_{k=0}^n \\binom{n}{k} x^k$.\nIn our case, $n=127$, so we are interested in the coefficients of $(1+x)^{127}$ modulo 8.\nWe can write $(1+x)^{127} = \\frac{(1+x)^{128}}{1+x}$.\nLet's analyze $(1+x)^{128} = (1+x)^{2^7}$ modulo 8.\nWe use the property that for $k \\ge 3$, $(1+x)^{2^k} \\equiv (1+x^2)^{2^{k-1}} \\pmod 8$.\nLet's prove this by induction.\nBase case $k=3$:\n$(1+x)^8 = \\sum_{j=0}^8 \\binom{8}{j}x^j = 1+8x+28x^2+56x^3+70x^4+56x^5+28x^6+8x^7+x^8$.\nModulo 8, this becomes $1+4x^2+6x^4+4x^6+x^8$.\n$(1+x^2)^4 = 1+4(x^2)+6(x^2)^2+4(x^2)^3+(x^2)^4 = 1+4x^2+6x^4+4x^6+x^8$.\nSo, $(1+x)^8 \\equiv (1+x^2)^4 \\pmod 8$. The base case holds.\nInductive step: Assume $(1+x)^{2^k} \\equiv (1+x^2)^{2^{k-1}} \\pmod 8$ for $k \\ge 3$.\nThen $(1+x)^{2^{k+1}} = ((1+x)^{2^k})^2 \\equiv ((1+x^2)^{2^{k-1}})^2 \\pmod 8$.\nLet $y=x^2$. The expression is $((1+y)^{2^{k-1}})^2 = (1+y)^{2^k}$.\nBy the inductive hypothesis, since $k \\ge 3$, $k-1 \\ge 2$, we have $(1+y)^{2^k} \\equiv (1+y^2)^{2^{k-1}} \\pmod 8$ is not what we want.\nThe induction proceeds as:\n$(1+x)^{2^{k+1}} = ((1+x)^{2^k})^2 \\equiv ((1+x^2)^{2^{k-1}})^2 \\pmod 8$.\nLet's set $y=x^2$. We have $((1+y)^{2^{k-1}})^2 = (1+y)^{2^k}$.\nThe right hand side of the congruence we want to prove is $(1+x^2)^{2^k}$.\nSo we need to show $(1+y)^{2^k} \\equiv (1+x^2)^{2^k}$. This is not right.\nLet $C_k(x)=(1+x)^{2^k}$. We proved $C_3(x) \\equiv C_2(x^2)\\pmod 8$.\n$C_4(x) = C_3(x)^2 \\equiv (C_2(x^2))^2 = C_3(x^2)\\pmod 8$.\nBy induction, $C_k(x) \\equiv C_{k-1}(x^2) \\pmod 8$ for $k \\ge 3$.\n\nUsing this property repeatedly for $(1+x)^{128} = (1+x)^{2^7}$:\n$(1+x)^{2^7} \\equiv (1+x^2)^{2^6} \\equiv (1+x^4)^{2^5} \\equiv (1+x^8)^{2^4} \\equiv (1+x^{16})^{2^3} \\pmod 8$.\nLet $y=x^{16}$. We have $(1+y)^8 \\equiv 1+4y^2+6y^4+4y^6+y^8 \\pmod 8$.\nSubstituting $y=x^{16}$ back:\n$(1+x)^{128} \\equiv 1+4(x^{16})^2+6(x^{16})^4+4(x^{16})^6+(x^{16})^8 \\pmod 8$\n$(1+x)^{128} \\equiv 1+4x^{32}+6x^{64}+4x^{96}+x^{128} \\pmod 8$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "8096",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 65,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-43-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Let $r_{k}$ denote the remainder when $\\binom{127}{k}$ is divided by 8. Compute $r_{1}+2 r_{2}+3 r_{3}+\\cdots+63 r_{63}$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "8096",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 65,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-43-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nIn acute $\\triangle A B C$ with centroid $G, A B=22$ and $A C=19$. Let $E$ and $F$ be the feet of the altitudes from $B$ and $C$ to $A C$ and $A B$ respectively. Let $G^{\\prime}$ be the reflection of $G$ over $B C$. If $E, F, G$, and $G^{\\prime}$ lie on a circle, compute $B C$.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $a, b, c$ be the lengths of sides $B C, A C, A B$ respectively. We are given $b=A C=19$ and $c=A B=22$. We need to find $a=B C$.\n\nLet $M$ be the midpoint of the side $B C$. $E$ is the foot of the altitude from $B$ to $A C$, so $\\angle B E C=90^{\\circ}$. $F$ is the foot of the altitude from $C$ to $A B$, so $\\angle C F B=90^{\\circ}$. This means that the points $E$ and $F$ lie on the circle with diameter $B C$. Let's call this circle $\\omega$. The center of $\\omega$ is $M$, and its radius is $a/2$. Therefore, we have $M E=M F=a/2$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "13",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 67,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-44-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "In acute $\\triangle A B C$ with centroid $G, A B=22$ and $A C=19$. Let $E$ and $F$ be the feet of the altitudes from $B$ and $C$ to $A C$ and $A B$ respectively. Let $G^{\\prime}$ be the reflection of $G$ over $B C$. If $E, F, G$, and $G^{\\prime}$ lie on a circle, compute $B C$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "13",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 67,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-44-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nEach square in a $3 \\times 10$ grid is colored black or white. Let $N$ be the number of ways this can be done in such a way that no five squares in an 'X' configuration (as shown by the black squares below) are all white or all black. Determine $\\sqrt{N}$.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet the grid squares be denoted by $c_{i,j}$ for $i \\in \\{1,2,3\\}$ and $j \\in \\{1, \\dots, 10\\}$. Each square can be colored black (B) or white (W), which we can represent by 1 and 0, respectively.\n\nAn 'X' configuration is a set of 5 squares centered at some position $(i,j)$. For the $3 \\times 10$ grid, the center of an 'X' must be in the second row, i.e., $i=2$. The corner squares are $(i\\pm1, j\\pm1)$, so the column index $j$ must be in the range $\\{2, \\dots, 9\\}$.\nLet $X_j$ be the 'X' configuration centered at $(2,j)$ for $j \\in \\{2, \\dots, 9\\}$. The squares in $X_j$ are:\n$c_{2,j}$ (center), $c_{1,j-1}$, $c_{1,j+1}$, $c_{3,j-1}$, and $c_{3,j+1}$.\n\nThe problem states that for each of the 8 configurations $X_2, \\dots, X_9$, the 5 squares are not all black and not all white.\nLet $u_j = (c_{1,j}, c_{3,j})$ be the pair of colors in column $j$, rows 1 and 3. There are $2^2=4$ possible states for $u_j$.\nLet $m_j = c_{2,j}$ be the color of the square in the middle row of column $j$. There are 2 states for $m_j$.\n\nThe condition on $X_j$ is that the set of 5 colors $\\{c_{1,j-1}, c_{3,j-1}, c_{2,j}, c_{1,j+1}, c_{3,j+1}\\}$ is not monochromatic. In our notation, this means the colors of $(u_{j-1}, m_j, u_{j+1})$ are not all 0 or all 1.\nThis is a set of 8 conditions, for $j=2, \\dots, 9$:\n$C_j$: The coloring of $(u_{j-1}, m_j, u_{j+1})$ is not monochromatic.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "25636",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 68,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-45-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Each square in a $3 \\times 10$ grid is colored black or white. Let $N$ be the number of ways this can be done in such a way that no five squares in an 'X' configuration (as shown by the black squares below) are all white or all black. Determine $\\sqrt{N}$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "25636",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 68,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-45-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nConsider a $10 \\times 10$ grid of squares. One day, Daniel drops a burrito in the top left square, where a wingless pigeon happens to be looking for food. Every minute, if the pigeon and the burrito are in the same square, the pigeon will eat $10 \\%$ of the burrito's original size and accidentally throw it into a random square (possibly the one it is already in). Otherwise, the pigeon will move to an adjacent square, decreasing the distance between it and the burrito. What is the expected number of minutes before the pigeon has eaten the entire burrito?\n\nPartial Response:\nThis problem asks for the expected total time for a pigeon to eat a whole burrito. Let's break down the process into steps.\n\n**1. The Eating Process**\nThe pigeon eats 10% of the burrito's *original* size each time they are in the same square. To eat the entire burrito (100%), the pigeon must eat from it 10 times. Let's call each of these events a \"meal\".\n\nThe total time is the sum of the time taken for each of the 10 meals and the time the pigeon spends traveling to the burrito between meals.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "71.8",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 69,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-46-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Consider a $10 \\times 10$ grid of squares. One day, Daniel drops a burrito in the top left square, where a wingless pigeon happens to be looking for food. Every minute, if the pigeon and the burrito are in the same square, the pigeon will eat $10 \\%$ of the burrito's original size and accidentally throw it into a random square (possibly the one it is already in). Otherwise, the pigeon will move to an adjacent square, decreasing the distance between it and the burrito. What is the expected number of minutes before the pigeon has eaten the entire burrito?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "71.8",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 69,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-46-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nFind the sum of all positive integers $n$ such that there exists an integer $b$ with $|b| \\neq 4$ such that the base -4 representation of $n$ is the same as the base $b$ representation of $n$.\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $n$ be a positive integer. Let its representation in base $-4$ be $(d_k d_{k-1} \\dots d_1 d_0)_{-4}$. This means $n = \\sum_{i=0}^k d_i (-4)^i$ with digits $d_i \\in \\{0, 1, 2, 3\\}$. For $n$ to be positive, the highest power $k$ must be an even integer. To see this, if $k$ is odd, then\n$n = d_k(-4)^k + \\sum_{i=0}^{k-1} d_i(-4)^i \\le -4^k + 3\\sum_{i=0}^{k-1} 4^i = -4^k + 3\\frac{4^k-1}{4-1} = -4^k + 4^k - 1 = -1$.\nSo $n$ would be negative if $k$ is odd. Thus $k$ must be even.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "1026",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 70,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-47-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Find the sum of all positive integers $n$ such that there exists an integer $b$ with $|b| \\neq 4$ such that the base -4 representation of $n$ is the same as the base $b$ representation of $n$.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "1026",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 70,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-47-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nLet $S$ be a subset with four elements chosen from \\{1,2, \\ldots, 10\\}$. Michael notes that there is a way to label the vertices of a square with elements from $S$ such that no two vertices have the same label, and the labels adjacent to any side of the square differ by at least 4 . How many possibilities are there for the subset $S$ ?\n\nPartial Response:\nLet $S = \\{a, b, c, d\\}$ be a subset of $\\{1, 2, \\ldots, 10\\}$ with four distinct elements. Let's assume $a < b < c < d$.\nFor there to be a valid labeling of a square's vertices with these four numbers, there must exist a permutation $(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4)$ of the elements of $S$ such that the vertices, labeled in order around the square, satisfy the condition $|x_i - x_{i+1}| \\ge 4$ for $i=1,2,3$ and $|x_4 - x_1| \\ge 4$.\n\nThe vertices of a square have two pairs of opposite vertices. Let's denote the labels on one pair of opposite vertices as $P_1 = \\{y_1, y_2\\}$ and on the other pair as $P_2 = \\{z_1, z_2\\}$. The four labels on the square, in cyclic order, will be $(y_1, z_1, y_2, z_2)$ or a similar arrangement. The condition that adjacent labels differ by at least 4 means that every element of $P_1$ must differ by at least 4 from every element of $P_2$.\nThat is, for all $y \\in P_1$ and $z \\in P_2$, we must have $|y - z| \\ge 4$.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "36",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 71,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-48-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "Let $S$ be a subset with four elements chosen from \\{1,2, \\ldots, 10\\}$. Michael notes that there is a way to label the vertices of a square with elements from $S$ such that no two vertices have the same label, and the labels adjacent to any side of the square differ by at least 4 . How many possibilities are there for the subset $S$ ?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "36",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 71,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-48-without-guidance
|
with-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "You are given a problem and a partial solution.\n\nFirst, carefully read the partial response and restate in your own words the key steps, ideas, and progress that have already been made. \nExplicitly analyze what the partial solution has done, what intermediate quantities or insights it has established, and where the reasoning currently stands.\n\nAfter revisiting and summarizing the partial response, continue solving the problem from that point onward. \nMake sure your continuation builds directly on the reasoning you just summarized.\n\nShow your reasoning step-by-step, including:\n1. A brief restatement of the partial solution in your own words.\n2. New reasoning steps that complete the solution.\n3. A final answer using LaTeX-style `\\boxed{{}}` notation.\n\nProblem:\nIn Middle-Earth, nine cities form a 3 by 3 grid. The top left city is the capital of Gondor and the bottom right city is the capital of Mordor. How many ways can the remaining cities be divided among the two nations such that all cities in a country can be reached from its capital via the grid-lines without passing through a city of the other country?\n\nPartial Response:\nTo solve this problem, we need to partition the 9 cities of a 3x3 grid into two sets, one for Gondor (G) and one for Mordor (M), with specific constraints.\n\n1. **Grid and Capitals:**\n The cities form a 3x3 grid. Let's label them by coordinates (row, column) from (1,1) to (3,3).\n * Gondor's capital is at (1,1). So, (1,1) must be in set G.\n * Mordor's capital is at (3,3). So, (3,3) must be in set M.\n\n2. **The Constraint:**\n The crucial constraint is that all cities belonging to a nation must be connected to their capital through a path of cities of the same nation. The connections are along the grid lines (up, down, left, right). This means the set of cities G must form a single connected component, and the set of cities M must also form a single connected component.\n\n3. **Method of Solution:**\n We can solve this by enumerating the possible sizes of Gondor's territory and, for each size, counting the number of ways to form a valid territory. A territory is valid if both the Gondor cities and the Mordor cities form connected components.\n\n Let |G| be the number of cities in Gondor. The total number of cities is 9.\n The problem has a symmetry: for any valid partition of cities (G, M), we can create a \"dual\" partition by swapping the roles of Gondor and Mordor for the 7 non-capital cities and reflecting the grid across its anti-diagonal. If G has `k` cities, the dual partition M' will have `9-k` cities. So, the number of ways for |G| = k is the same as the number of ways for |M| = k, which means |G| = 9-k.\n The total number of ways is the sum of valid configurations for |G| = 1, 2, ..., 8.\n Total Ways = 2 * (Ways for |G|=1, 2, 3, 4). Note that |G| cannot be equal to |M| as the total number of cities is odd.\n\nBegin by summarizing the partial response, then continue with the next steps. \nMake sure your final answer is written as: \\boxed{{your_answer_here}}\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "30",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 73,
"split": "with-guidance"
}
|
easy-with-guidance
|
easy-49-with-guidance
|
without-guidance
|
[
{
"content": "In Middle-Earth, nine cities form a 3 by 3 grid. The top left city is the capital of Gondor and the bottom right city is the capital of Mordor. How many ways can the remaining cities be divided among the two nations such that all cities in a country can be reached from its capital via the grid-lines without passing through a city of the other country?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
math
|
{
"ground_truth": "30",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"index": 73,
"split": "without-guidance"
}
|
easy-without-guidance
|
easy-49-without-guidance
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 18