BUG : Add Deprecation FutureWarning for parse function call in read_excel
- [ ] closes #50953 (Replace xxxx with the GitHub issue number)
- [ ] [Tests added and passed](https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/dev/development/contributing_codebase.html#writing-tests) if fixing a bug or adding a new feature
- [ ] All [code checks passed](https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/dev/development/contributing_codebase.html#pre-commit).
- [ ] Added [type annotations](https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/dev/development/contributing_codebase.html#type-hints) to new arguments/methods/functions.
- [ ] Added an entry in the latest `doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rst` file if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.

@rhshadrach @simonjayhawkins  - Closed this by mistake was merging the latest main to my branch. Will resolve mentioned comments and will create a new PR. Why not just reopen? > Why not just reopen?

Okay sorry wasn't aware about it. Reopening now. This pull request is stale because it has been open for thirty days with no activity. Please [update](https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/development/contributing.html#updating-your-pull-request) and respond to this comment if you're still interested in working on this. I'd like to make sure there isn't a better way of deprecating specifying arguments by position as recommended in https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/51437#pullrequestreview-1302390009. cc @mroeschke @phofl  > I'd like to make sure there isn't a better way of deprecating specifying arguments by position as recommended in [#51437 (review)](https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/51437#pullrequestreview-1302390009). cc @mroeschke @phofl

I think you can use in `deprecate_nonkeyword_arguments` in pandas/util/_decorators.py Thanks for the pull request, but it appears to have gone stale. If interested in continuing, please merge in the main branch, address any review comments and/or failing tests, and we can reopen.