implemented additionally functionality of formatters_col in to_latex
Not sure what I should do for the whatsnew entry, bit confused about versioning. 

- [ x ] closes #26278
- [ x] tests added / passed
- [ x] passes `black pandas`
- [ x] passes `git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff`
- [ ] whatsnew entry

Hello @wlgranados! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for [PEP 8](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008) issues, and found:





There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! :beers: 

##### Comment last updated at 2020-10-06 01:25:04 UTC i am not sure the proposed api is in line how we format for example
i’m to_csv is there a reason you are diverging? > i am not sure the proposed api is in line how we format for example
> i’m to_csv is there a reason you are diverging?

No particular reason, just wasn't paying attention, I believe I have addressed this issue with the latest commit.  @wlgranados do you have time to merge in master and to address the review comments?  @mroeschke yes, I have some time.
I believe I addressed some comments on my local branch, just forgot to mention it here. 
I'll update this shortly.  @wlgranados is this still active? Can you address latest comments? @WillAyd @mroeschke  Yeah still active, I found that the test case I included was incorrect. There is an issue with the lambda function generation inside the list comprehension, so attempting to fix that currently. Also I read in the original thread that it might be possible to use the formatters variable instead, I think this should address the api usage comments then what I had before.  @WillAyd @mroeschke this should be code complete, so any comments would be appreciated  Looks pretty good. Just needs a whatsnew entry for 1.2.0 @wlgranados looks like some merge conflicts have piled up and there are some outstanding CI failures - can you take a look and try to get things green? Closing in favor of #37552