PERF: Allow jitting of groupby agg loop
- [x] tests added / passed
- [x] passes `black pandas`
- [x] passes `git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff`
- [x] whatsnew entry

New performance comparison for 10,000 groups

```
In [1]: In [1]: df_g = pd.DataFrame({'a': range(10**4), 'b': range(10**4), 'c': range(10**4)})

In [2]: In [2]: def f(x):
   ...:    ...:     return np.sum(x) + 1
   ...:

In [3]: df_g.groupby('a').agg(f)
Out[3]:
          b      c
a
0         1      1
1         2      2
2         3      3
3         4      4
4         5      5
...     ...    ...
9995   9996   9996
9996   9997   9997
9997   9998   9998
9998   9999   9999
9999  10000  10000

[10000 rows x 2 columns]

In [4]: %timeit df_g.groupby('a').agg(f)
1.2 s ± 70.9 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)

In [5]: def f(values, index):
   ...:     return np.sum(values) + 1
   ...:

In [6]: df_g.groupby('a').agg(f, engine='numba', engine_kwargs={'parallel': True})
Out[6]:
            b        c
a
0         1.0      1.0
1         2.0      2.0
2         3.0      3.0
3         4.0      4.0
4         5.0      5.0
...       ...      ...
9995   9996.0   9996.0
9996   9997.0   9997.0
9997   9998.0   9998.0
9998   9999.0   9999.0
9999  10000.0  10000.0

In [8]: %timeit df_g.groupby('a').agg(f, engine='numba', engine_kwargs={'parallel': True})
2.07 ms ± 64.3 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
```
Hello @mroeschke! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for [PEP 8](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008) issues, and found:













There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! :beers: 

##### Comment last updated at 2020-08-21 23:15:46 UTC @jreback all green thanks @mroeschke 

as discussed if u can follow up to consolidate 2 clean