CI: ax.rowNum and ax.colNum attributes deprecated in Matplotlib 3.2
https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/32442/checks?check_run_id=485569958
@WillAyd not sure about this. should we just be silencing the deprecation warnings instead. `The rowNum attribute was deprecated in Matplotlib 3.2 and will be removed two minor releases later. Use ax.get_subplotspec().rowspan.start instead.` On a phone so haven’t looked deeply but does swapping out the attribute access for what the message says not work? > On a phone so haven’t looked deeply but does swapping out the attribute access for what the message says not work?

it doesn't work on older versions. hopefully latest commit fixes but is more complex (may not be relevant).

The alternative is silence the warnings and fix at a later date when the attributes have been deprecated. > The alternative is silence the warnings and fix at a later date when the attributes have been deprecated.

assuming our minimum supported version has 'SubplotSpec' object has attribute 'rowspan' by then. hmm, appears new matplotlib related errors on Linux py37_locale. right. fixed warnings in web and docs, but for some reason have two new test failures. have skipped so we can get to ci to green, raise an issue, and resolve independently @WillAyd I'm not happy with this but I think ok to merge. I think silencing the warnings may be a better approach, but sphinx is not my forte, so I leave that for others to investigate. @simonjayhawkins how about just capping matplotlib for now to get CI green then can come back to this at a deeper level (?) > There is a typo.

nice catch. Thanks @datapythonista > And probably worth adding a test

ok as a follow-up if this is green? > ok as a follow-up if this is green?

Sure, the docs are being our tests already. Just thought that would be good to see this warning failing the tests. But happy to see the CI fixed asap. > But happy to see the CI fixed asap.

yeah, if this fails, will go with @WillAyd suggestion, https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/32444#issuecomment-594967595