DEP: update python-calamine to 0.3.2
- [x] closes https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/61186
- [ ] [Tests added and passed](https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/dev/development/contributing_codebase.html#writing-tests) if fixing a bug or adding a new feature
- [ ] All [code checks passed](https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/dev/development/contributing_codebase.html#pre-commit).
- [ ] Added [type annotations](https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/dev/development/contributing_codebase.html#type-hints) to new arguments/methods/functions.
- [ ] Added an entry in the latest `doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rst` file if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.

This PR updates the calamine engine dependency to version `0.3.2`, which includes the upstream fix for leading-zero truncation in VLOOKUP-derived Excel cells.

It'd be good to either link an existing issue, or to write a description, so we can understand why we should merge this. @datapythonista Thanks for the reminder! I’ve now added the issue link for clarity. Since this is my first PR involving a package version bump, I wanted to ask:
1. Does the pandas community support this upgrade to calamine >= 0.3.2? If it’s not aligned with project goals, I’m happy to close the PR.
2. If the upgrade is approved, would you like me to add a unit test covering the original issue scenario?

Thanks!  Thanks for the context. This looks reasonable. In general we support dependencies that are two years old. Given there is a bug, I guess it can make sense to require a version that is newer than that. @mroeschke @rhshadrach do you have an opinion on whether it's more important to be compatible with older versions one of the libraries to read Excel, or to prevent a bug it has? > Given there is a bug, I guess it can make sense to require a version that is newer than [2 years].
> ...
> do you have an opinion on whether it's more important to be compatible with older versions one of the libraries to read Excel, or to prevent a bug it has?

Every optional dependency has bugfixes on just about every release, I think a bugfix would only justify bumping the minimum version if it is of an serious nature. Security issues as well. I do not think this is the case here. Let's close this then. I assume many users create a fresh environment and they'll get a new version anyway. For the people who has environments with the old dependency, hopefully they can find information that leads them to upgrading the buggy version. 