CI: Catch importwarning _SixMetaPathImporter.find_spec
Lets see if this helps somehow

I can't see how this could be related to our s3fs and aiobotocore pins. The following is the version diff from before and after the pin:

```
                 Name_old     Name_new Version_old Version_new
3             aiobotocore  aiobotocore       2.4.0       1.4.2
26                  boto3        boto3     1.24.59    1.17.106
27               botocore     botocore     1.27.59    1.20.106
76                 fsspec       fsspec    2022.7.1    2021.7.0
77                  gcsfs        gcsfs    2022.7.1    2021.7.0
98   google-cloud-storage          NaN       2.5.0         NaN
119              jmespath     jmespath       1.0.1      0.10.0
286                  s3fs         s3fs       0.6.0    2021.7.0
287            s3transfer   s3transfer       0.6.0       0.4.2
```
Yes, definitely. Its a bit hard to find out from which one though. 

Just want to see if this helps. Can add to pyproject.toml afterwards Added to pyproject.toml, lets see if it works. Can not reproduce the warning locally It looks like filterwarnings does not work well together with assert_produces_warning. Could not get tests to pass locally when filtering the warning with pytest and checking for no warning cc @mroeschke 

This is greenish now. Check is ugly though So I did a little debugging, and the warning is coming from botocore(they vendor six), and it looks like the pinning downgraded botocore, cuasing this warning to come back. Yeah but this is necessary, see https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/48272#issue-1352193730 I would be okay with this PR as is as a temporary fix if pinning botocore doesn't work https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/48291#issuecomment-1230610791. (It is really strange behavior that a s3fs code path is being hit when it should have nothing to do with it?)

I would prefer not to pin s3fs higher than our minimum version if possible (and generally not have our dep files have different pins in general). The thing is, this does have to do with it. The way I understand it is s3fs pins aiobotocore which pins down botocore. As I mentioned, pinning aiobotocore in the other PR is pinning down botocore to an old version that vendors an old six doesn't address the warning.

So I would be -1 on this, since this ImportWarning is telling us that pinning aiobotocore was not the right move. S3fs is not pinning aiobotocore, but we have to pin since the old s3fs is not compatible with aiobotocore > 2.0. pinning botocore will most likely cause non solvable environments

i think pinning aiobotocore is the right move here in a sense, not having a higher s3fs minimum requirement is the actual issue. The old s3fs is not compatible with 3.10

can we bump this in the rc? Or do we have to follow a certain version Schema there? > can we bump this in the rc? Or do we have to follow a certain version Schema there?

As mentioned in https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/48291, I would be +1 to simply bumping `s3fs` in the 1.5.0rc. I have been following a "min version that has been released one year prior" rule of thumb for most optional dependencies. Thx, closing in favour of #48299