Faster method of normalising dictionary, allows user to select columns to ignore
- [ ] Adds new feature and functionality to _normalize() function; ignores user specifed columns and returns the ignored columns in multiple forms (dictionary, tuple, list)
- [ ] closes https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/47852
- [ ] [Tests added and passed](https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/dev/development/contributing_codebase.html#writing-tests) if fixing a bug or adding a new feature
- [ ] All [code checks passed](https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/dev/development/contributing_codebase.html#pre-commit).
- [ ] Added [type annotations](https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/dev/development/contributing_codebase.html#type-hints) to new arguments/methods/functions.
- [ ] Added an entry in the latest `doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rst` file if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.
- [ ] CODE:

Hello @PriestlyAdejo! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for [PEP 8](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008) issues, and found:



There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! :beers: 

##### Comment last updated at 2022-07-25 22:05:08 UTC Why does pre-commit keep on failing? I made sure to revise all the errors I made before... > is this in reference to. specific issue?

No not really... I made it as an addition to pandas_normalize as I was having major problems with the original function when I had json files with uneven columns (due to creating extra data while scraping). I've added an issue in issues. This was an ENH:. Sorry for the errors, it's my first time making a contribution to a community package! 

Issue: #47843  Thanks for creating the issue (https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/47852).

I see that this function has differences than `json_normalize`, but given that the new function is similar to `json_normalize` I would be -1 on including an entirely separate method.

  > Thanks for creating the issue (#47852).
> 
> I see that this function has differences than `json_normalize`, but given that the new function is similar to `json_normalize` I would be -1 on including an entirely separate method.

I agree with you on that I don't think this should replace json_normalize, but I added it as an extra function WITHIN json normalize. This function could be used for whenever a user wants to ignore columns, although they can still choose to use the original json_normalize if they want to. Hello?
 Personally, I still don't believe this functionality would be suitable to include in pandas. It's a lot of additional code to maintain and `json_normalize` is the primary functionality to normalize a record/dict-like structure _to_ a pandas object Thanks for the effort here so far, but I think it's best if discussion occur on the issue you made first to gauge interest before moving with a pull request, so closing. 