WEB: Moving maintainers to inactive (no answer from them)
I couldn't get an answer from @jreback @topper-123 @alimcmaster1 regarding being active or unactive for some time.

I'll leave this open for few days, in case they see it an can confirm. But in the past we've been moving people to inactive if they didn't seem active for a long time and we couldn't get confirmation from them on whether they want to continue to be active or not.
well i do follow things and in particular not too happy about what is going on

will reserve the right to vote if needed Thanks Jeff for confirming, great news that you are still following the project and interested in voting if needed. Very happy to revert the changes and leaving you as active.

And if you want to share the feedback on why you aren't happy on what's going on, I'm surely very interested to know your opinion. I didn't hear from Terji, so I guess he could be moved to inactive, but I think I prefer to just close this PR, since I'm not sure what the governance says in this case. > I didn't hear from Terji, so I guess he could be moved to inactive, but I think I prefer to just close this PR, since I'm not sure what the governance says in this case.

@datapythonista discussed this at the steering committee meeting. The core team decides its membership, so it really should be a core team decision on how to manage the non-response of any individual.