Docstring bootstrap plot
Checklist for the pandas documentation sprint (ignore this if you are doing
an unrelated PR):

- [X] PR title is "DOC: update the <your-function-or-method> docstring"
- [X] The validation script passes: `scripts/validate_docstrings.py <your-function-or-method>`
- [x] The PEP8 style check passes: `git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff`
- [x] The html version looks good: `python doc/make.py --single <your-function-or-method>`
- [x] It has been proofread on language by another sprint participant

Please include the output of the validation script below between the "```" ticks:

```
Docstring for "pandas.plotting._misc.bootstrap_plot" correct. :)

```

If the validation script still gives errors, but you think there is a good reason
to deviate in this case (and there are certainly such cases), please state this
explicitly.


Already fixed the wrong new lines Hello @aydevosotros! Thanks for updating the PR.



Cheers ! There are no PEP8 issues in this Pull Request. :beers: 

##### Comment last updated on March 11, 2018 at 17:30 Hours UTC # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/20166?src=pr&el=h1) Report
> :exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (`master@d7bcb22`). [Click here to learn what that means](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/error-reference#section-missing-base-commit).
> The diff coverage is `n/a`.

[![Impacted file tree graph](https://codecov.io/gh/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/20166/graphs/tree.svg?token=eZ4WkYLtcO&src=pr&height=150&width=650)](https://codecov.io/gh/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/20166?src=pr&el=tree)

```diff
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #20166   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?    91.7%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      150           
  Lines             ?    49152           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    45074           
  Misses            ?     4078           
  Partials          ?        0
```

| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| #multiple | `90.08% <ø> (?)` | |
| #single | `41.84% <ø> (?)` | |

| [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/20166?src=pr&el=tree) | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| [pandas/plotting/\_misc.py](https://codecov.io/gh/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/20166/diff?src=pr&el=tree#diff-cGFuZGFzL3Bsb3R0aW5nL19taXNjLnB5) | `38.98% <ø> (ø)` | |

------

[Continue to review full report at Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/20166?src=pr&el=continue).
> **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta)
> `Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data`
> Powered by [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/20166?src=pr&el=footer). Last update [d7bcb22...b2ab30f](https://codecov.io/gh/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/20166?src=pr&el=lastupdated). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments).
 I see a couple warnings locally with `./make.py html --single=pandas.plotting.bootstrap_plot` from the `doc` directory. Can you check that @aydevosotros? along with the extra newline and the `**kwds`.

```
reading sources... [100%] index
/Users/taugspurger/sandbox/pandas-ip/pandas/pandas/plotting/_misc.py:docstring of pandas.plotting.bootstrap_plot:53: WARNING: Explicit markup ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
looking for now-outdated files... none found
pickling environment... done
checking consistency... /Users/taugspurger/sandbox/pandas-ip/pandas/doc/source/generated_single/pandas.plotting.bootstrap_plot.rst:52: WARNING: Citation [R1] is not referenced.
``` Those look good. I think just remove the Notes section and footnote. You can include the wikipedia link in the extended summary. @TomAugspurger I think now fits well. Just so sorry for that much time taken because of my inexperience. Thank you :) Thanks @aydevosotros.