|
|
--- |
|
|
license: cc-by-2.0 |
|
|
pretty_name: structure constants of schubert polynomials, n = 5 |
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
# A Combinatorial Interpretation of Schubert Polynomial Structure Constants |
|
|
|
|
|
Schubert polynomials [1,2,3] are a family of polynomials indexed by permutations of \\(S_n\\). |
|
|
Developed to study the cohomology ring of the flag variety, they have deep connections to |
|
|
algebraic geometry, Lie theory, and representation theory. Despite their geometric origins, |
|
|
Schubert polynomials can be described combinatorially [4,5], making them a well-studied object |
|
|
in algebraic combinatorics. An important open problem in the study of Schubert polynomials |
|
|
is understanding their *structure constants*. |
|
|
|
|
|
When two Schubert polynomials \\(\mathfrak{S}_{\alpha}\\) and \\(\mathfrak{S}_{\beta}\\) |
|
|
(indexed by permutations \\(\alpha \in S_n\\) and \\(\beta \in S_m\\)) are multiplied, |
|
|
their product can be written as a linear combination of Schubert polynomials |
|
|
\\(\mathfrak{S}_{\alpha} \mathfrak{S}_{\beta} = \sum_{\gamma} c^{\gamma}_{\alpha \beta} \mathfrak{S}_{\gamma}\\). |
|
|
where the sum runs over permutations in \\(S_{n+m}\\). The question is whether the |
|
|
\\(c^{\gamma}_{\alpha \beta}\\) (the *structure constants*) have a combinatorial interpretation. |
|
|
To give an example of what we mean by combinatorial interpretation, when Schur polynomials |
|
|
(which are a subset of Schubert polynomials) are multiplied together, |
|
|
the coefficients in the resulting product are equal to the number of semistandard tableaux |
|
|
satisfying certain properties (this is known as the |
|
|
[Littlewood-Richardson rule](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Littlewood%E2%80%93Richardson_rule)). |
|
|
|
|
|
## Example |
|
|
|
|
|
We multiply Schubert polynomials corresponding to permutations of \\(\{1,2,3\}\\), |
|
|
\\(\alpha = 2 1 3\\) and \\(\beta = 1 3 2\\), each written in one line notation. |
|
|
Writing these in terms of indeterminants |
|
|
\\(x_1\\), \\(x_2\\), and \\(x_3\\), we have \\(\mathfrak{S}_{\alpha} = x_1 + x_2\\) |
|
|
and \\(\mathfrak{S}_{\beta} = x_1\\). Multiplying these together we get |
|
|
\\(\mathfrak{S}_{\alpha}\mathfrak{S}_{\beta} = x_1^2 + x_1x_2\\). As |
|
|
\\(\mathfrak{S}_{2 3 1} = x_1x_2\\) and \\(\mathfrak{S}_{3 1 2} = x_1^2\\) we can write |
|
|
\\(\mathfrak{S}_{\alpha}\mathfrak{S}_{\beta} = \mathfrak{S}_{2 3 1} + \mathfrak{S}_{3 1 2}\\). |
|
|
It follows that for these \\(\alpha\\) and \\(\beta\\), \\(c_{\alpha,\beta}^{\gamma} = 1\\) |
|
|
if \\(\gamma = 2 3 1\\) or \\(\gamma = 3 1 2\\) |
|
|
and otherwise \\(c_{\alpha,\beta}^{\gamma} = 0\\). |
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset |
|
|
Each instance in this dataset is a triple of permutations \\((\alpha,\beta,\gamma)\\), |
|
|
labeled by its coefficient \\(c^{\gamma}_{\alpha \beta}\\) in the expansion of the product |
|
|
\\(\mathfrak{S}_{\alpha} \mathfrak{S}_{\beta}\\). We call permutations \\(\alpha\\) and \\(\beta\\) |
|
|
*lower index permutations 1* and *2* respectively. We call \\(\gamma\\) the *upper index |
|
|
permutation*. The datasets are organized so that |
|
|
\\(\alpha\\) and \\(\beta\\) are always drawn from the symmetric group on \\(n\\) elements, |
|
|
but \\(\gamma\\) may belong to a |
|
|
strictly larger symmetric group. Not all possible triples of permutations are included |
|
|
since the vast majority of these would be zero. The dataset consists of an approximately |
|
|
equal number of zero and nonzero coefficients (but they are not balanced between quantities |
|
|
of non-zero coefficients). |
|
|
|
|
|
**Statistics** |
|
|
|
|
|
All structure constants in this case are either 0, 1, or 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|Coefficient | 0 | 1 | 2 | Total number of instances | |
|
|
|---|---|---|-----|---| |
|
|
| Train | 42,810 | 42,603 | 175 | 85,588 | |
|
|
| Test | 10,696 | 10,661 | 39 | 21,396 | |
|
|
|
|
|
## Data generation |
|
|
The Sage notebook within this [directory](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/schubert_polynomial_structure) |
|
|
gives the code used to generate these datasets. |
|
|
The process involves: |
|
|
- For a chosen \\(n\\), compute the products \\(\mathfrak{S}_{\alpha} \mathfrak{S}_{\beta}\\) for \\(\alpha,\beta \in S_n\\). |
|
|
- For each of these pairs, extract and add to the dataset all non-zero structure constants \\(c^{\gamma_1}_{\alpha,\beta}, \dots, c^{\gamma_k}_{\alpha,\beta}\\). |
|
|
- Furthermore, for each \\(c^{\gamma_i}_{\alpha,\beta} \neq 0\\), randomly permute \\(\gamma_i \mapsto \gamma_i'\\) to find \\(c^{\gamma_i'}_{\alpha,\beta} = 0\\) and \\(c^{\gamma_i'}_{\alpha,\beta}\\) is not already in the dataset. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Task |
|
|
|
|
|
**Math question:** Find a combinatorial interpretation of the structure constants \\(c_{\alpha,\beta}^\gamma\\) |
|
|
based on properties of \\(\alpha\\), \\(\beta\\), and \\(\gamma\\). |
|
|
**Narrow ML task:** Train a model that, given three permutations \\(\alpha, \beta, \gamma\\), can |
|
|
predict the associated structure constant \\(c^{\gamma}_{\alpha,\beta}\\). Extract the rules |
|
|
the model uses to make successful predictions. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Small model performance |
|
|
Model and training details can be found in our paper. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Size | Logistic regression | MLP | Transformer | Guessing majority class | |
|
|
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------| |
|
|
| \\(n= 4\\) | \\(88.8\%\\) | \\(93.1\% \pm 2.6\%\\) | \\(94.6\% \pm 1.0\%\\) | \\(52.3\%\\) | |
|
|
| \\(n= 5\\) | \\(90.6\%\\) | \\(97.5\% \pm 0.2\%\\) | \\(96.2\% \pm 1.1\%\\) | \\(49.9\%\\) | |
|
|
| \\(n= 6\\) | \\(89.7\%\\) | \\(99.8\% \pm 0.0\%\\) | \\(91.3\% \pm 8.0\%\\) | \\(50.1\%\\) | |
|
|
|
|
|
The \\(\pm\\) signs indicate 95% confidence intervals from random weight initialization and training. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Further information |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Curated by:** Henry Kvinge |
|
|
- **Funded by:** Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
|
|
- **Language(s) (NLP):** NA |
|
|
- **License:** CC-by-2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
### Dataset Sources |
|
|
|
|
|
Data generation scripts can be found [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/schubert_polynomial_structure). |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Repository:** [ACD Repo](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master) |
|
|
|
|
|
## Citation |
|
|
|
|
|
**BibTeX:** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@article{chau2025machine, |
|
|
title={Machine learning meets algebraic combinatorics: A suite of datasets capturing research-level conjecturing ability in pure mathematics}, |
|
|
author={Chau, Herman and Jenne, Helen and Brown, Davis and He, Jesse and Raugas, Mark and Billey, Sara and Kvinge, Henry}, |
|
|
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06366}, |
|
|
year={2025} |
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**APA:** |
|
|
|
|
|
Chau, H., Jenne, H., Brown, D., He, J., Raugas, M., Billey, S., & Kvinge, H. (2025). Machine learning meets algebraic combinatorics: A suite of datasets capturing research-level conjecturing ability in pure mathematics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06366. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Card Contact |
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Kvinge, [email protected] |
|
|
|
|
|
## References |
|
|
|
|
|
\[1\] Bernstein, IMGI N., Israel M. Gel'fand, and Sergei I. Gel'fand. "Schubert cells and cohomology of the spaces G/P." Russian Mathematical Surveys 28.3 (1973): 1. |
|
|
\[2\] Demazure, Michel. "Désingularisation des variétés de Schubert généralisées." Annales scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure. Vol. 7. No. 1. 1974. |
|
|
\[3\] Lascoux, Alain, and Marcel-Paul Schützenberger. "Structure de Hopf de l’anneau de cohomologie et de l’anneau de Grothendieck d’une variété de drapeaux." CR Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math 295.11 (1982): 629-633. |
|
|
\[4\] Billey, Sara C., William Jockusch, and Richard P. Stanley. "Some combinatorial properties of Schubert polynomials." Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics 2.4 (1993): 345-374. |
|
|
\[5\] Bergeron, Nantel, and Sara Billey. "RC-graphs and Schubert polynomials." Experimental Mathematics 2.4 (1993): 257-269. |